06.11.2020 Views

MEDISCOPE | ISSUE 1 | 04 NOVEMBER 2020

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MEDISCOPE | ISSUE 1 | 04 NOVEMBER 2020

- MENTAL HEALTH

- EPILEPSY

- CANCER

- ETHICS

- MOVEMBER

- BMAT

Logo Design: Sethujah Gangatharan

Photo credits: https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2020/02/09/16/23/coronavirus-4833754_1280.jpg


Dear All,

WELCOME!

One of the main things that these last few months have emphasised, is the

importance of healthcare. Since the outbreak of Covid-19, medicine has been

at the forefront of our world, helping to keep society up and running. The

current situation is inevitable, especially since our knowledge on this disease

is limited.

WELCOME

Covid-19 has caused a lot of us to change and reflect on our lifestyle and way

of thinking, especially in regards to our health. We’ve adapted to wearing face

masks in places like school and incorporated more frequent hand washing to

stay safe. As well as cleanliness, these unprecedented times have forced us to

incorporate thinking about our impact on public health and the NHS. Since we

are trying to minimise the transmission of the virus, staff, parents and

students of various year groups cannot meet up in real life to discuss

medicine. We felt that a more safe way to confer about healthcare and

connect us all as a community, was by starting a journal where articles

written by students themselves are featured; and this is why we created

Mediscope. We want to make people more aware about current affairs, spark

debates about medical issues and discuss medicine’s everyday impact more.

This first issue includes topics about the main themes in November, i.e. mental

health, epilepsy and cancer. To get you debating we have decided to

incorporate articles about medical ethics as well. For aspiring healthcare

professionals, we have included tips about the BMAT along with a section 3

essay competition which year 10s and above can take part in. Don’t worry –

there are other quizzes and puzzles for all students, parents and staff to take

part in too!

- Sethujah Gangatharan

A special thanks to my co-editor Amy Booth (12S) - we both hope you enjoy

reading the journal and we’re sure it will give you an insight into something

new!

1

We would also like to say thank you to Dr Navneet Singh Kandhari for reviewing

the journal and to Mr Blount, Ms Harvey & Mr Bournat for all their help and

support!


CONTENTS

Mental Health:

- The impact of Covid-19 on mental health

by Sethujah Gangatharan 12S ......................................................................... 3

- Advice for coping with stress during exam season

by Zhiyun Xia 10F .................................................................................................. 4

- The effects of COPD on mental health

by Atharvaa Pangare 12N ................................................................................. 5

Epilepsy:

- Epilepsy in our pets

by Alice Edwards 12N ......................................................................................... 6

Cancer:

- Movember

by Amy Booth 12S ................................................................................................. 7

- What is Peto’s paradox and can we resolve it?

by Oscar Houghton-Boyle 12S ........................................................................ 8

Ethics:

- 'The physician should not treat the disease but the patient who is

suffering from it'

by Tanya Singh 13.2 ............................................................................................. 9

- How should patients with both Alzheimer's and cancer be treated?

by Amy Booth 12S ................................................................................................ 11

- The case of Steve Biko

by Sethujah Gangatharan 12S ........................................................................ 12

CONTENTS

Other:

- November's Recommendations ................................................................... 13

- Medical Dates in November ........................................................................... 14

- Quiz .......................................................................................................................... 15

- Puzzles ................................................................................................................... 16

- Photography Competition ............................................................................... 17

- BMAT ....................................................................................................................... 18

2


MENTAL HEALTH AND COVID-19

3

THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON MENTAL

HEALTH

By Sethujah Gangatharan 12S

SARS-CoV-2 is an infectious disease caused by a

virus that is part of the family of Coronoviridae

1

viruses. It is more commonly known as ‘Covid-19’

and those infected with it tend to experience

respiratory problems. Most of the population

infected don’t need treatment and recover with mild

symptoms but the older population or those with

underlying medical problems tend to develop more

serious illnesses as a consequence of it. One of the

main ways in which Covid-19 has affected people, is

by impacting their mental health.

For some people it has led to neurological

complications like delirium, i.e. mental confusion

and emotional disruption, agitation (a state of

2

anxiety) and stroke. A stroke is a life-threatening

condition in which blood supply to a part of the brain

is cut off. This can cause long lasting physical

problems such as paralysis and psychological

problems such as depression and anxiety.

However, those that haven’t tested positive for the

virus have also be affected mentally. For example,

lockdown and self-isolation has meant that people

cannot leave their houses for social interaction –

this restriction has had a greater negative impact for

those living alone. Bereavement and the fear due to

loss of income are also factors that have triggered

mental health conditions and worsened existing

ones.

3

Korean MERS-CoV was the outbreak of Middle East

Respiratory syndrome in South Korea in 2015. This

virus was also a part of the Coronovirdae viruses.

Tests done at the time showed that those

undergoing dialysis as part of their treatment in

4

isolation had increased levels of ccf-gDNA

(circulating cell-free genomic DNA) and ccf-mtDNA

(circulating cell-free mitochondria DNA). Parameters

for stress include ccf-gDNA and ccf-mtDNA and this

suggests that isolation caused high levels of stress.

It was also confirmed that these levels of ccf-gDNA

and cc-mtDNA increased for medical staff and

unfortunately, they then went on to show PTSD

symptoms as well. Another time in which healthcare

workers showed severe PTSD symptoms was during

the 2003 SARS-CoV outbreak in Singapore.

Healthcare workers are dealing with high risks of

contamination whilst having inadequate PPE, and

this itself has led to anxiety. The previous cases of

coronavirus in 2003 and 2015 suggest that this

pandemic could have a long-lasting effect on

healthcare workers’ well-being and perhaps could

cause PTSD. Mental health problems affect factors

like the capacity to make decisions and be attentive

in emergency situations. Due to a domino effect, this

could affect how well patients are treated and delay

the fight against Covid-19.

In order to improve the mental wellbeing of staff

and patients, mental health services should be

5

readily available. A survey carried out by the World

Health Organisation revealed that most countries’

mental, neurological and substance use services

(MNS) have not been readily available due to

reasons like the facilities being used as quarantine

or treatment facilities. A rise in the misuse of

substances like alcohol has clearly portrayed the

negative impacts that the closure of MNS has had.

6

NHS England has recently stated that it will invest

an extra £15 million to care for the mental health of

healthcare workers like doctors, nurses, paramedics

and therapists. The NHS National Mental Health

Director Claire Murdoch has said,

“Frontline workers are the backbone of the NHS,

from porters and cleaners to nurses, doctors and

therapists, and this funding will ensure they are

properly supported while they continue to care for

the thousands of patients who rely on the NHS.”

The money invested will be spent on things like:

Specialist bereavement support

An app for BAME (Black and Minority Ethnic)

colleagues which will hopefully help manage

anxiety & stress

And benefits like free car parking and free tea

and coffee in specific hospitals

Good mental health is fundamental for a good

physical health and vice versa. Covid-19 has had

many psychosocial consequences on healthcare

workers and the public so hopefully, the mental

health services provided by NHS England will help to

better improve the mental health of everyone.


ADVICE FOR COPING WITH STRESS

DURING EXAM SEASON

Mental health problems are one of the most

prevalent issues we are facing in the 21st century in

the UK. The rate of young people in the UK being

diagnosed with mental illness have risen rapidly,

with an estimated 10% of children between 5-16

years bearing the burden of a clinically diagnosable

1

mental disorder. One of the main causes of

deteriorating mental health amongst young people

are exams, which add stress and anxiety - an

already delicate balancing act in itself - to the

already precarious tower of school work, homework

and our daily worries. In 2015, ChildLine and the

NSPCC reported that over the past 5 years, the

number of students who raised concerns about

exam stress increased by 200%.

Although it is likely that anyone preparing for and

taking exams will experience some stress and

anxiety, scientific research has suggested that more

than 17% of GCSE students fall into the category of

being ‘highly test anxious’ ever since the new GCSE

system was put in place in 2018. This demonstrates

that while some individuals, such as former

Education Secretary Michael Gove, believe that

putting an emphasis on exams is a positive, many

recent studies actually show that exams are having

a detrimental effect on students’ mental, emotional

and even physical wellbeing as being healthy is not

just about how you look, it's also how you feel.

In response to a growing awareness of exam stress,

many articles have been published giving tips and

advice on how to manage and cope with exam

stress:

https://www.studentminds.org.uk/examstress.

html

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/stressanxiety-depression/coping-with-exam-stress/

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/stressanxiety-depression/coping-with-exam-stress/

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2017/apr/7-tipshelp-you-cope-exam-stress

https://youngminds.org.uk/find-help/feelingsand-symptoms/exam-stress/

By Zhiyun Xia 10F

and more - I have summarised them all for you into

five (long) sentences:

1. Be honest and open up to the people you trust, you

will feel more relaxed letting all your stress out to

your friends and family.

2.Eat a balanced diet as well as sticking to your

sleeping schedule, exercising regularly and trying to

drink plenty of water to help you feel more

energised for longer, as this all helps more oxygen

flow to your brain and helps enlarges your

hippocampus, the part of the brain that all

information must enter/exit through

3.You have probably heard this one before; while

revising, take regular breaks and do not try to cram

revision the day before as none of that will go into

your brain anyways, why stress yourself out to no

avail?

4.Don't be too hard on yourself, think positively,

such as saying ' I can' instead of 'I can't' and try to

place yourself into a friends shoes, what would they

tell you?

5.Do not compare yourself to others, you will not

feel your best and motivated all the time, it may

sound cliché but it is okay not to be okay!

These tips will also help you in your daily routine as

well as becoming more organised and pro-active!

4

MENTAL HEATH AND STRESS


MENTAL HEALTH AND COPD

5

THE EFFECTS OF COPD ON MENTAL

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease describes a

group of lung conditions that make breathing

increasingly difficult. It develops over many years

and some people may not even be aware they have

1

it. Main symptoms include: increasing

breathlessness, productive chesty cough, frequent

chest infections and persistent wheezing. Less

common symptoms of COPD include weight loss,

tiredness, oedema, and in extreme cases, lung

cancer. COPD is one of the most common diseases in

middle-aged and old people, and has become the

third leading cause of death globally. Depression

2

and Anxiety are progressively becoming common in

patients with COPD. This is often linked to the poor

physical function, worse quality of life, increased

mortality, and damaged health status that patients

with COPD have to cope with.

There is currently no cure for COPD but there are

treatments available that can slow its progression

and control the symptoms. Approximately 85 to 90

percent of COPD cases are caused by smoking , so

after diagnosis patients are strongly advised to stop

3

smoking. Although any damage already done

cannot be reversed, it can prevent further damage.

When patients quit smoking, the withdrawal

symptoms have an extremely negative impact on

their mental health. These symptoms are caused by

nicotine receptors in the brain which are increased

due to previous nicotine use. These symptoms

include headaches, difficulty sleeping, increased

appetite and weight gain and can create a domino

effect leading to depression. Steroid inhalers are

also commonly prescribed; steroid medicines may

aggravate depression and other severe forms of

mental health, such as psychosis, may be triggered.

A study executed in the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi

Medical University, Guizhou, China in June 2020

observed previously diagnosed COPD patients

admitted with acute exacerbations, patients with

anxiety or depression and healthy volunteers.

Patients were assessed using the Hamilton

depression rating scale, and baseline data and

clinical measurements - complete blood count test,

spirometry and arterial blood gas analysis was

collected to assess patients on the COPD evaluation

test. The independent variable was the COPD

evaluation test score, and as this score increased

HEALTH

By Atharvaa Pangare 12N

(higher scores denoting a more severe impact of

COPD on a patient’s life) the frequency of the patient

having AECOPD (Acute Exacerbations of COPD), as

well as a higher score on the Hamilton scale

increased. RDW (red cell distribution width) was

associated with AECOPD patients with depression

and/or anxiety. Red cell distribution width is a

parameter that measures variation in red blood cell

size or red blood cell volume. A normal RDW is

4

11.6% to 14.6% - a higher RDW means that the red

blood cells vary a lot in size. In 2016, researchers

from the Intermountain Medical Centre Heart

Institute found that patients with a RDW higher than

12.9% had an increased risk for depression. A study

in 2013 found that the higher the RDW, the greater

the risk for patients. The study looked at 43,226

patients and studied them for around 5.3 years -

examining their RDW levels at the time of diagnosis

and comparing them to a follow-up diagnosis of

depression. The results suggested that physicians

should be more aware and attentive in screening for

depression in COPD patients and treating it

accordingly. Dr May concluded by saying “Additional

studies will be needed to determine if the

association is causal, wherein depression is a result

of abnormal red cell size, anaemia or some other

co-morbidity.”

Despite the increasingly high frequency of mental

disorders in COPD patients, the evidence about the

optimal treatment is insufficient. Future studies

should focus on how pulmonary rehabilitation can

be improved to help mental health alongside

physical while determining the best treatment for

specific COPD groups – depending on factors such

as sex, severity of COPD, frequency of exacerbations

and severity of mental health problems.


EPILEPSY IN OUR PETS

By Alice Edwards 12N

As well as being crowned the most common neurological

issue found in felines and canines, epilepsy is known for

its crippling side-effects in a huge abundance of species.

This condition is characterized by seizures, which are the

manifestation of uncontrolled and hyper-synchronous

electrical signals of the brain normally resulting in sharp

and rapid muscle contractions, often alongside the loss of

consciousness. But what else do we know?

The large number of breakthroughs in the last century

have brought with them a deeper understanding of human

and animal medicine which has exposed the truth about

many conditions, including epilepsy. We are now able to

distinguish between different types of seizures 1 in our

pets: generalized seizure, i.e. the loss of consciousness,

involuntary repetitive movements, defecation and

salvation; and partial seizures - when more specific areas

of the brain are responsible, appearing as muscle tremors

or hallucinations. Although this is undeniably a harrowing

list of symptoms for worried owners, it is important to be

reassured that although disorientating, seizures do not

directly cause your pets any pain.

Next, it is important to confront the causes of epilepsy. Of

course, being such a diverse condition characterized only

by its seizures, it is not surprising that there are multiple

causes. The first of which is the most common, called

idiopathic epilepsy. This diagnosis dictates that the

condition has been passed down from parent to offspring

although it is still difficult to identify the exact

2

characteristic that is inherited and responsible. It may also

be defined as poly-genic if many gene mutations are

involved. Other causes include a variety of different

underlying health conditions such as brain tumours, liver

disease or kidney disease. Due to scientists’ limited

understanding in this field it’s impossible to breed animals

that will not be at any risk of epilepsy because those

previously born from generations of healthy litters have

still tested positive. Yet, we can identify those who are

most at risk, labelling them as breeds with higher

‘familial’ risk of this condition.

Despite the extent of extreme and periodic symptoms, the

prognosis for epilepsy in animals is a good one. However,

it is important to recognise, and act accordingly, to the

progressiveness of this disease. Although it is possible for

vets to prescribe many human drugs to animals, it is

important to recognize the side effects that may

accompany their use in different species, typically due to

an animal’s higher metabolic rate. The two drugs most

commonly used to treat epilepsy are Phenobarbital and

Imepitoin. In addition to these, potassium bromide may be

prescribed to help control seizures in canines. These are

known under the title of AEDs (anti-epileptic drugs).

Besides staying on top of medication, an owner needs to

keep a high level of vigilance around their animal,

recording their seizures and educating themselves about

when the intervention of medical help is necessary, for

example if the animal is seizing for more than 2 minutes.

It is important to recognise that it is possible an animal

4

can slip into Status epilepticus (SE) at any time. This

medical term is defined as continuous seizure activity that

lasts longer than 5 minutes or alternatively, one discrete

seizure which does not lead to the regaining of a full level

of consciousness during the recovery process. This is

considered to be a medical emergency, especially in small

animals, requiring immediate medical treatment from

professionals. The initial 30 minutes of SE is called the

compensatory phase in which the animal seeks to fulfil

their bodies increased oxygen demand. One way to do this

is by increasing blood supply to the cerebral regulatory

mechanisms. The activated sympathetic nervous system

can result in a rise in body temperature, salivation and

bronchial secretions (all of which an owner should be on

alert for). If aid is not offered within these 30 minutes, the

animal will slip into the decompensatory phase which

results in decreasing blood flow to the brain, ultimately

leading to neuronal cell death. After another 60 minutes, a

build up of intracranial pressure (pressure around the

brain) can lead to organ failures, with the patient's death

often following.

EPILEPSY

The next issue that this condition brings is the difficulty

for diagnosis in veterinary practice. Known as ‘diagnosis

of exclusion’, this process is a long one which entails an

immense amount of examinations and tests. To simplify

this, vets often divide the tests into two parts. Firstly,

they exclude any diseases that may have seizures as a

side effect and then they look in the brain itself to identify

any problems . Some of the tests that may be performed

3

include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and

cerebrospinal fluid analysis. This second procedure,

known as a 'lumbar puncture' in humans, warrants the

insertion of a long needle into the animal’s spine to gain

access to cerebrospinal fluid found in the subarachnoid

space.

A medics first action when faced with this situation should

be to stop the seizure as promptly as possible to limit any

further damage. This is normally through the use of a drug

called Intravenous diazepam (DZ).These are lipid soluble

and therefore can penetrate the CNS very quickly 5 which is

vital to limit the consequences of the ongoing seizure.

Once the seizure has finished a vets duty is to look into the

potential damage that it has caused and to deal with them

appropriately. This may include checking their airways,

blood pressure ECG’s and preferably blood gas values if

accessible.

Owners also need to be aware of the personal risk that

may occur if they attempt to restrain their seizing animal.

If these guidelines are adhered to, epilepsy should have

little interference with an animal's life-span or lifestyle.

6


MOVEMBER

By Amy Booth 12S

MOVEMBER

Movember is a an event that takes place in November every year.

Men around the world grow moustaches to raise awareness and

fundraise for men’s health; specifically suicide prevention, prostate

cancer and testicular cancer. Another way to get involved in

Movember is by running or walking 60km over November for the 60

men who we lose to suicide every hour or by raising awareness your

own way.

SUICIDE IS THE SINGLE MOST COMMON CAUSE OF

DEATH IN MEN UNDER 35.

1 IN 8 MEN WILL GET PROSTATE CANCER AT SOME

POINT IN THEIR LIVES

A MAN WILL DIE FROM PROSTATE CANCER EVERY

HOUR - OVER 10,000 MEN DIE OF THE DISEASE EACH

YEAR IN THE UK

To find out more about Movember and take part in fundraising,

please visit:

https://prostatecanceruk.org/about-us/movember

https://uk.movember.com/?home

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/24/movember

7


WHAT IS PETO’S PARADOX AND CAN WE

RESOLVE IT?

By Oscar Houghton-Boyle 12S

1

“Why don’t all whales have cancer?” At first this

may seem like a simple question but when looking

at research into cancer within multiple species we

find that the principles behind it remain unanswered

or confirmed to this day. Without observing other

organisms, one might expect that the probability of

developing cancer (ignoring carcinogenic

environments) would be dependent on the number

of cells that could possibly turn cancerous and the

organism’s total lifetime cell divisions. This

statement is true within humans, a longer life

allows more time to accumulate genetic damage or

2

mutations that cause cancer, but using this

principle an adult blue whale weighing on average

100 tonnes should be 1000 times more likely to

develop cancer than a human. However, observation

and evidence suggests this is not the case and even

research suggests there is no correlation between

body mass (and therefore number of cells) and

length of life affecting rates of cancer across

different species at all. Even domesticated animals

such as in zoos which usually live longer do not

show an increase in cancer cases compared to wild

members of the same species. Evidence shows that

humans and mice share a similar probability of

developing cancer despite us living on average 50

times longer and having 1000 times more cells than

mice.

3This observation is known as Peto’s Paradox.

Peto’s paradox simply put is the lack of a logical

correlation between the number of cell divisions and

probability of cancer but our question of ‘why’

remains unanswered. Despite being unable to

conclude the reason why large organisms are so

resistant to cancer many useful theories and studies

have arisen. In this article I am going to discuss the

two of the leading theories: evolution and genetics,

and hypertumors.

The fact that there is correlation between body

mass and cancer within species (in fact a 3-4 mm

increase in leg length above the average in

4

humans increases the risk of non-smoking

“related cancer by 80%) but not across species,

leads some researchers to believe that oncogenic

or tumour suppressor mechanisms are positively

selected above a given threshold in body mass.

This form of natural selection means that species

that have evolved to be larger have had to evolve

protection from the environment and the

increased risk of cancer that smaller species

simply did not need. Attributes such as a greater

redundancy of tumour suppressor genes, slower

cell turn over and more efficient immune systems

were positively selected and members of larger

species that did not have genetic mutations that

lead to greater numbers of mechanisms such as

these simply died off.

The second leading theory is the strange concept of

hypertumors, the term comes from organisms

known as hyperparasites (the parasites that live on

parasites). Ultimately, this is what hypertumors are.

Tumour cells contain certain advantageous

characteristics such as the ability to direct blood

vessels to the tumour giving it a constant supply of

bodily resources and therefore starve the body of

nutrients, space and energy which is sometimes

fatal. However due to the unstable nature of

cancerous cells there is another way in which Peto’s

paradox can be resolved. Cancer cells can mutate

multiple times even to the extent that they become

cancerous to the original tumours and also steal

nutrients and energy from the tumours blood supply

so both the tumours then compete with each other

for the body’s resources and never ever grow big

enough for the large organism to notice.

This resolves the paradox as it suggests that larger

organisms may be more susceptible to cancer; this

nature of tumour cells means that they can never

reach a fatal mass. Despite our question being

officially unresolved, research is happening

continuously and hopefully understanding why

some animals are less affected by cancer could one

day lead to effective treatments in humans.

8

CANCER AND ETHICS


“THE PHYSICIAN SHOULD NOT TREAT

THE DISEASE BUT THE PATIENT WHO IS

SUFFERING FROM IT”

By Tanya Singh 13.2

ETHICS

9

Despite the long-established tradition of the

Hippocratic Oath, where physicians swear upon the

healing gods to ‘not treat the fever chart’ ‘but a sick

1

human being’, a biomedical focus towards

treatment has prevailed throughout much of

2

history. The focus is restricted to measurable and

methodical processes where the sole aim lies in the

correction of biological abnormalities; it does not

acknowledge the patient’s complex individuality as

well as the fact that not all diseases can be

biologically treated. The truth is that diseases have

the capability to reshape the patient, posing a

plethora of interdisciplinary challenges that can

cause an accelerated deterioration in their quality of

life. Given this and the revolutionised understanding

of disease, it seems almost inadequate for sound

clinical care to be defined purely by the treatment of

disease.

From the concept’s origin, in the late 1980s, patientcentred

care has evolved to become a central goal

for optimal medical practice. 3 It involves the

physician being respectful and responsive to

individual patient priorities rather than exercising

the cookie-cutter approach of disease

standardisation. No two patients are ever the same

4

and so given their unique and somewhat

unpredictable manifestations of disease, it seems

impossible for the physician to treat disease

uniformly. An example of this involves an

adolescent who had previously experienced a single,

transient episode of diplopia and upon investigation

was found to have multiple sclerosis. The most

common medication given to ease this disease’s

symptoms is methylprednisolone but given the case

at hand, may do more harm than good; alongside

being given intravenously and its associated risks,

this corticosteroid can, paradoxically, cause the

patient to experience rare yet severe side effects.

These include potentially life-threatening

anaphylaxis with Kounis syndrome, i.e acute

coronary syndromes caused by allergic reactions. ,

osteoporosis and stunted growth - which could be

detrimental to the young patient's functioning and

development, especially as they mature into

adulthood. Given this, the route of treatment

appears to be groundless. Physicians should,

therefore, treat by evaluating whether their

patient’s quality of life is being compromised by the

illness as well as assessing the treatment’s benefits

to the patient’s current condition versus its risks.

This allows for the amelioration or preservation of

individual patient lifestyles, whereby (as suggested

by Dr Roger Neighbour) the right patient receives

the right treatment at the right time.

At a time when medical information is as easily

accessible as never before, it comes as no surprise

that many patients use online platforms as a source

of clinical advice and direction. The information,

which may at times be largely unregulated, can

cause patients to conceptualise certain beliefs and

preconceptions relating to their disease. Based on

the specific patient's understanding, these may

range from being idealistic desires to more

predictive notions and can influence the

development, course and prognosis of the illness

through either placebo or nocebo effects. Thus, the

physician should address the patient holistically by

focusing on the role of patient perspective. They

should help in modifying subjective perceptions to

better fit the reality of the patient’s condition, which

could, if not clarified, be at odds with clinical

evidence and interfere with the therapeutic capacity

of treatment. If treated only in view of biological

disease, patients may also develop a false

understanding of their disease, causing them to feel

detached from their treatment plan which could

potentially lead to inappropriate self-care. Instead, a

clarified understanding allows for a heuristic

approach towards treatment whereby the patient is

equipped with the knowledge and skills to adopt an

appropriate level of self-responsibility in relation to

their health. By listening, explaining and making the

patient part of the planning of their treatment, the

physician can provide beneficent patient-orientated

care whilst still respecting the patient’s autonomy,

5

obeying the core principles of medical ethics.

Moreover, through holistic patient management,

physicians can better fathom the reason for each

consultation. These can range from being less

pathological such as the want for being heard to

more biomedical, like pain relief. Through

establishing the reason, doctors can understand and

address individual patient needs and expectations

more accurately - the first NHS constitution in


England stated that ‘NHS services must reflect the

needs and preferences of patients’. This highlights

the physician’s responsibility as a doctor to treat

individual patients by understanding what is

important to them. For example, the symptom of

knee pain appears more significant for an athlete

compared to those in less physically demanding

professions. As a result, this would potentially

generate higher management expectations from the

athlete to suit their higher functional needs and

livelihoods. The physician should, therefore,

formulate treatment plans more aligned to helping

individual patients in restoring their individual

functionalities. Doing so promotes a shared

understanding where patients' needs, expectations

and interests are well addressed through mutually

agreed solutions, leading to better patient

satisfaction and outcome than if the physician was

to only treat the objective disease.

A substantial amount of a patient’s experience with

disease occurs outside of the medical setting.

Alongside biological problems, diseases can induce

wider psychological and social issues where

patients tend to seek explanations and emotional

support; it is not exclusively one of these problems

but rather their interaction which causes the state

of ill-health. An example of distress caused by

disease includes the social and psychological effects

of immobility in a disabled patient. In such scenarios,

the physician must treat the patient through the

means of supportive discussion and the developing

care networks in order to implement strategies to

mitigate both the somatic and mental distress of the

patient. It would be unethical to leave the patient

anxious about their condition if the physician was to

dismiss consequential issues as not being part of

the presentation of the disease - it could lead to a

lack of engagement and therefore an impaired

patient-physician relation only exacerbating the

patient’s psychosocial manifestations. As a result,

physicians should tailor consultations to treat each

patient’s varying degree of clinical, social and

physiological problems, much similar to the triaxial

6

Calgary-Cambridge model of consultation.

Elevated CRP results and incidental pulmonary

nodule detection are both examples of objective

indications of more sinister pathology including

cancer. Often at the early stages of this progressive

disease, the patient remains asymptomatic with no

decline in life quality and so, the physician should

need to treat the biological determinants of disease

rather than the patient’s unchanged wellbeing.

However, despite the apparent focus on disease,

patients will present with a wide variability of host

responses meaning that treatment still needs to be

customised to individuals to maximise its benefits.

For example, pharmacodynamics and

pharmacogenomics will differ between patients.

7

Polymorphic diversity in genes coding for

metabolising enzymes results in varied drug

metabolism; the same drug under the same dose,

could lead to overdose toxicity in some, whilst in

others, it could lack efficacy. An example of one such

anti-cancer drug includes docetaxel where ethnic

variability in its response has been suggested -

Asian patients have shown to have increased

toxicities and response rates. Such differences in

drug disposition mean that physicians should

acknowledge their patient’s unique genetic (and

environmental) make-up, allowing for precision in

treatment which overcomes many challenges

presented in conventional medicine, namely

treatment non-responses and increased disease

and resource costs.

The dynamism in technology has meant that

artificial intelligence and digital-style guidelines

have become an increasingly familiar part of the

current and futuristic vision for medicine. Although

they seem promising in building a more productive

and structured healthcare system, such

mechanisms process individual patients, reducing

them to algorithmic decisions and binary numbers.

Perhaps the proliferation of these systems is

leading to a more disease-centered approach to

8

treatment, where patient rights are in pursuit of

more efficient medical practices rather than the best

possible ones. On the whole, the systems are rigid,

insensitive to patient priorities and lack necessary

human bedside manners and altruism.

ETHICS

The triaxial Calgary-Cambridge model of consultation

Yet despite the need to treat the patient as a human

being and not a diagnosis, at times a more diseasecentred

approach may seem to be more appropriate.

Contrary to machines, physicians should take into

account patient fears, desires and circumstances,

applying the humane art of medical science. This

promotes a patient-centered approach towards

treatment which inculcates self-belief, positivity

and empowerment in patients which, enhanced by

the physician’s medical expertise and digital

advances is the best possible prescription for the

best possible patient outcomes. Thus, the physician

should not treat the disease but the patient who is

suffering from it as this has and will continue to

define sound clinical care.

10


ETHICS, ALZHEIMER’S AND CANCER

HOW SHOULD PATIENTS WITH BOTH

ALZHEIMER’S AND CANCER BE TREATED?

Alzheimer’s is a degenerative brain disease that is the

most common type of dementia. It is caused by cell

damage that leads to complex brain changes. There is

1

no cure or prevention or way to slow Alzheimer’s; as

it advances, symptoms get more severe and include

disorientation, difficulty planning or making

decisions, personality and behaviour changes,

confusion and eventually lead to speaking,

swallowing and walking difficulties. Alzheimer’s

disease is most common in people over the age of 65

as your risk of developing the disease increases with

age. The disease affects around 1 in 14 people over

2

the age of 65 and 1 in 6 people over the age of 80.

There are many studies that show that cancer

patients are less likely to get Alzheimer’s and

patients with Alzheimer’s disease are less likely to

3

develop cancer, however it is not uncommon to see

4

patients develop both. But when they strike together

it can be difficult for patients with memory and

decision-making problems to fully understand and

decide about their cancer treatment, it can also be a

difficult call for doctors to make about whether an

Alzheimer’s patient is fully understanding the risks

and benefits of a treatment.

Consent is a legal requirement for medical treatment,

and for consent to be valid the patient giving the

consent must have capacity. For someone to have

capacity they must be able to understand all the

information they are given and be able to make an

informed decision. However, for someone with

5

Alzheimer’s, their capacity can be affected, so they

cannot give valid consent so how can they choose

whether to revive cancer treatment or not?

One way to solve this ethical issue is for the patient

to have planned ahead when they could still

understand information and make decisions. The

Mental Capacity Act provides steps that people with

Alzheimer’s can follow to have control over decision

6

making in the future. Advanced care planning means

that the patient can write down how and where they

would like to be treated if they become unwell so

7

their wishes can still be carried out. For example,

they may wish to be cared in a hospice instead of at

home, a decision that would have been otherwise

unknown unless they planned ahead. Another

important aspect of care to plan is writing down what

treatments they do not want to have.

11

By Amy Booth 12S

This is called an advance decision to refuse treatment

(ADRT) in England and Wales and it means that

legally everyone knows what treatments they want

to refuse if their capacity becomes affected. As well,

writing down whether they want to donate their body

to medical research or teaching means that their

wishes can still be carried out. Another way to plan

ahead is by legally appointing someone to make

decisions on their behalf by a power of attorney. This

means a family member, friend or just someone they

trust can give consent for treatment and medication

when they are no longer able to make decisions for

themselves.

If patients do not get a chance to plan ahead or simply

don’t, health professionals can still give treatment if

they think it is in the persons best interests. But they

must try to get advice about what the person would

want through their family members or friends. Many

people with Alzheimer’s will also have carers, a

family member or a personal welfare deputy

appointed by the court, and those carers can help

make decisions about their treatment. It can still be

8

difficult for family members, carers or doctors to

make decisions for someone else so talking to

dementia specialists and other people that know the

patient well will help to make a decision that is as

close to what the patient would have wanted as

possible.

Even though there are still questions about

Alzheimer’s patients autonomy such as, what if they

might have changed their mind about treatment?, or

what if they are offered a new treatment after their

capacity becomes affected?, how can other people

truly know what the person would have wanted?, as

mentioned above there are ways that make sure they

are treated as close to what they would have wanted

as possible. But a decision will never be what the

patient wants unless it comes from the patient

themselves.


THE CASE OF STEVE BIKO

By Sethujah Gangatharan 12S

Imagine being killed for the colour of your skin. It’s

2020, so in fact, we don’t need to imagine that. With

the Black Lives Matter movement, 2020 has clearly

highlighted the racism and discrimination that has

been going on for decades. Hundreds and thousands

of innocent black people have died fighting for

equality and justice, and one of these people is Steve

1

Biko.

naked, chained up and unconscious across the

whole of the country. Since Tucker didn’t provide a

medical report, when Biko arrived there, he was

given no treatment and unfortunately died a few

hours later. The South African government covered

up the real cause of Biko’s death and claimed that he

was a ‘dangerous terrorist whose death was of little

4

concern to him and left him cold’.

In 1966, Steve Biko began studying medicine at the

University of Natal where he joined the National

2

Union of South African Students (NUSAS). The main

aim of this union was to end apartheid, i.e. racial

segregation, however this union was mainly

dominated by white liberals rather than the black

students. In Biko’s opinion, they failed to understand

the discrimination that the black people

experienced, and this is why he set up the black

consciousness movement. In Biko’s own words, this

movement was

‘for the black man to elevate his own position by

positively looking at those value systems that make

him distinctively a man in society’.

The government falsely blamed him of hating white

people and being a sexist but all that Biko was trying

3

to do was fight for equality. Despite the numerous

banning orders that were placed on him to try and

restrict his activities, Biko remained politically

active. On the 18th of August, he was arrested at a

roadblock and was then incarcerated in a South

African Prison. 25 days later, on the 12th of

September 1977, he died at just the age of 30. Five

days before he died, two doctors - Benjamin Tucker

and Ivor Lang - were called into examine Biko.

However, since these two doctors were so blinded

by society's racist views, they didn't examine him in

a fair manner - they didn’t even take a history or

carry out simple tests to check Biko’s mental state.

His numerous face and chest injuries were looked

past, along with his slurred speech and lack of

muscle control. Although the other examinations

that were carried out revealed things like blood in

the cerebrospinal fluid, Lang falsely wrote in his

notes that there was 'no change in condition'.

A few days later, Biko was found collapsed and

frothing at the mouth and this was when Tucker

suggested that he should be sent to hospital. The

police objected to him being admitted to a local

hospital and thus sent him to a prison hospital 750

miles away with no supervision. He was driven

Although many doctors were appalled by the fact

that the Medical and Dental had dismissed Biko’s

case and forgiven the two doctors for their

malpractice, only a small group of them (Frances

Ames, Edward Barker, Trefor Jenkins, Leslie

Robertson, and Phillip Tobias) were willing to take

this case to supreme court. Eventually, after a long

six years, Tucker was found guilty of improper and

disgraceful conduct, and his licence to practice

medicine was removed.

'I have come to realise that a medical practitioner’s

primary consideration is the wellbeing of his patient,

and that a medical practitioner cannot subordinate

his patient’s interest to extraneous considerations.'

This part of Tucker’s confession has highlighted that

a doctor’s commitment to their patient shouldn’t

change depending on the patient’s ethnic group. The

patient could be a prisoner or a princess and they

should still be treated the same. Lang and Tucker let

the irrational thoughts and views of a bigoted

society shape them as doctors, and this is why they

failed as doctors. Patients must be able to trust and

confide in a doctor and in order for them to be able

to do this, the doctor must be honest and unbiased.

The case of Biko is one of the many cases that has

5

shaped the GMC guidelines into what it is today. The

current guidelines state rules like:

'You must treat patients fairly and with respect

whatever their life choices and beliefs'

Biko's affair has emphasised the importance of

equality within healthcare. His case reminds doctors

of the qualities and values they should hold and

reinforces the fact that to be successful healthcare

professionals, they must abide by the Hippocratic

oath.

12

ETHICS


NOVEMBER’S RECOMMENDATIONS

Book of the Month:

RECOMMENDATIONS

When Breath Becomes Air by Paul Kalanithi

When Breath Becomes Air’ is a worldwide bestseller written by Paul

Kalanithi. His story is about his life and how he transitions from being a

doctor to a patient within a matter of days. He was an incredibly

hardworking person, pursuing neurosurgery as his medical speciality.

During his time at Yale, he met his wife Lucy, who he then married three

years later. In May 2013, he was diagnosed with stage-4 non-small-cell

EGFR-positive lung cancer, which was unfortunately inoperable. His story

explores the struggles of a cancer patient; the immense emotional toll it

had on his relationships; and the difficult decisions he had to make

throughout his journey. He also talks about the happiness his newborn

daughter brought into his world, and the meaning of life while in the face

of death.

I would recommend this book to anyone – even if you are not particularly into medicine. It made me

realise that time never stops for anyone. Paul Kalanithi was diagnosed with cancer even though he

did not smoke or take part in activities that are usually associated with it. Despite his story being

upsetting, he demonstrates how to seek out the positives in a turmoil of negatives. His patience and

acceptance of his situation helped me to realise that you cannot always control every aspect of your

life, hence why you should embrace every moment you live through. I thoroughly enjoyed this book

and I hope you will too!

By Keerthika Raguraj 12S

Podcasts of the Month:

You, Me & the Big C - BBC Radio 5:

This podcast is about life with, treatment of and other topics relating to the topic of cancer.

Inside Health - BBC Radio 4:

This is a series that demystifies health issues, separating fact from fiction and bringing clarity to

conflicting health advice.

No Such Thing As A Fish:

In this podcast, the writers of the game show 'QI', discuss the best facts that they have learnt each

week.

Documentary of the Month:

The Diagnosis Detectives - BBC iPlayer

Michael Mosley challenges 12 of the UK’s leading medical experts to diagnose patients whose

debilitating symptoms have baffled other doctors. Each expert specialises in a different field and

has their own ideas about what might be wrong. By combining their knowledge and using cuttingedge

technology to test their theories, they try to give these patients the answers they desperately

need.

13


NOVEMBER MEDICAL DATES

November is:

Movember - Men’s Health Awareness Month

Mouth Cancer Action Month

Lung Cancer Awareness Month

.

National Stomach Cancer Awareness Month

Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month

Medical Weeks in November:

National Pathology Week - 2nd-8th

Alcohol Awareness Week - 16th-22nd

World Antimicrobial Awareness Week - 18th-

24th

Medical Days in November:

National Stress Awareness Day (NSAD) - 4th

World Radiography Day - 8th

World Diabetes Day - 14th

Prematurity Awareness Day - 17th

World Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

(COPD) Awareness Day - 21st

KEY MEDICAL DATES

14


QUIZ

To check you’ve been reading so far...

1) How could Coronavirus impact doctors' mental health in the future?

2) What is one tip about how to cope with exam stress?

A Compare yourself to others

B Eat a balanced diet

C Get 3 hours of sleep a night

D Cram!

3) What causes smoking withdrawal symptoms?

4) What are the two types of seizures in pets?

QUIZ

5) What is Peto’s Paradox?

6) What does patient centred care involve?

7) How did Biko's case shape the GMC?

8) Which act provides steps that people with Alzheimer’s can follow to

have control over decision among in the future?

9) What is the name of the broken bone in this photo?

10) What is the name of this muscle?

15

ANSWERS TO THE QUIZ WILL BE FEATURED IN THE NEXT JOURNAL


WORDSEARCH - CANCER

Benign

Biopsy

Cancer

Cells

Chemotherapy

Diagnostic Imaging

Kidney

Lymphoma

Macmillan

Malignant

Melanoma

Movember

Mutation

Oncology

Radiationtherapy

Tumour

PUZZLES

A biopsy is a small procedure in which a small sample of tissue is

taken from the body. This process can be used to detect cancer in

the body. The image on the left shows a duodenal biopsy.

16


PHOTOGRAPHY COMPETITION

PHOTOGRAPHY COMPETITION

This month's photography competition winners are:

Chioma Okeke

17

7S

Notable mentions:

Lola Houghton-Boyle

12S

These two photos

show Newton's

cradle, a device

that demonstrates

conservation of

momentum and

energy using a

series of swinging

spheres!

Tanvi Ambat

12N


BMAT

By Sethujah Gangatharan 12S

The BioMedical Admissions Test (BMAT) is the test that a small number of medical schools use to assess and

select prospective medical students.

The universities that require the BMAT for undergraduate entries are:

Brighton and Sussex Medical School,

Lancaster University

Imperial College London

University College London

University of Cambridge

University of Oxford: A100 Medicine

University of Leeds (required for dentistry as well)

The BMAT is split into three sections and each section tests a range of skills:

Section 1: 32 multiple choice questions in 60 minutes - this can be split into:

Relevant Section - tests the ability to understand arguments and select the most useful information in

a text

Finding Procedures - tests problem solving abilities using basic mathematical skills (no calculator

allowed!)

Identifying similarity - tests ability to analyse and interpret data

Section 2: 27 multiple choice questions in 30 minutes

Tests the ability to apply GCSE level scientific and mathematical knowledge, i.e. biology, chemistry,

physics and maths

Section 3: 1 essay question in 30 minutes

Tests the ability to develop ideas and communicate them in writing

Three essay questions, usually there is one on healthcare, one on science more broadly and one that

doesn't relate to medicine at all (for example, this can be about nature or politics)

Tips for the BMAT:

Read various articles: Section 1 tests the ability to identify relevent information from texts. By reading

various newspaper articles and journals, you can boost your skills for this section!

Read the BMAT specification: Don't assume that you know all the information needed for section 2 of the

BMAT - although the section is based on GCSE knowledge, the depth in which you may have covered the

topics could be different so reading the BMAT specification could help!

Normalise debating about various topics: Section 3 tests the ability to argue from various viewpoints so by

talking about current affairs, healthcare issues and politics, you will train yourself to naturally think from

both sides of an argument.

BMAT

ESSAY COMPETITION

This month's competition is a BMAT Section 3 essay competition which students in years 10 and above can take

part in. The question is:

'Treating the condition is the most important goal in medicine. Discuss what this statement means and explain

an argument in support of and in opposition to this statement.'

All essays will be read by Gayathri Thivyaa Gangatharan - a 3rd year Imperial College London medical student

and Newstead alumni! The winner of the competition will not only have their essay featured in the next issue of

the journal, but will also receive the opportunity to have a 30 minute 1 to 1 Q&A with her! We look forward to

receiving your essays!

Note: The essays should be maximum 1 side of A4 (font 11) and should be sent to nwsgmedicjournal@gmail.com

with 'BMAT essay competition' and your name and form as the subject.

18


WE HOPE YOU ENJOYED

READING OUR JOURNAL!

THANK YOU TO EVERYONE

THAT CONTRIBUTED TO IT -

DON'T FORGET TO KEEP

SENDING IN PHOTOS AND

ARTICLES!

For any queries and suggestions, you can contact us via email:

nwsgmedicjournal@gmail.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!