24.11.2020 Views

Dr Paris Tavakoli, Longitudinal course of IBDs on 12 months of follow up, JGENCA July 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feature article

Part one:

Longitudinal course of

inflammatory bowel disease —

12-month follow-up of disease phase

activity and factors contributing to its

manifestation and severity

Paris Tavakoli

E. Paris858@gmail.com

Supervisors

Professor Michael Grimm

Associate Professor Ute Volmer-Conna

Abstract

Existing data points to possible links between factors such

as psychological state, autonomic influences, microbiome

composition and immune modulation with inflammatory

bowel disease (IBD) symptom manifestation and severity

over time (Andrews, 2014). These factors, however, have

never been assessed longitudinally, and simultaneously,

in a cohort of IBD patients. A broader conceptual and

longitudinal framework of neuropsychological integration,

neurovisceral incorporation, core microbiome analysis and

immune reactivation assessment can be useful to document

and characterise the possible temporal relationship between

these factors.

UNSW, together with St Vincent Hospital and St

George hospital, conducted the “Longitudinal course of

inflammatory bowel disease — LIMBO” study in 2016, which

is a novel investigation and the first to document whether

IBD neuropsychiatric morbidity is mainly associated with

local or systemic measure of immune activation. This study

also brings a distinct and plausible insight into the temporal

sequences of sub-clinical events as potential ground for

neuropsychiatric disturbances and disease severity in IBD.

Keywords and abbreviations

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), interleukin (IL), tumour

necrosis factor α (TNF-α), autonomic nervous system (ANS).

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel diseases and factors contributing in its

symptoms severity

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are characterised

by chronic inflammation of the GI tract and comprise two

idiopathic gastrointestinal disorders that share similarities:

ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Despite

intense research efforts, the disease aetiology is still

unknown. It appears, however, that both genetic and

environmental factors are involved in IBD, affecting the

interaction between the intestinal mucosa and luminal

bacteria, with a breakdown in the regulatory constraints of

mucosal immune responses to enteric bacteria — in other

words, an immune (inflammatory) response that is too easily

triggered and/or needlessly prolonged. Both UC and CD are

chronic disorders of a remitting and relapsing kind. Just as

the cause of the first onset of IBD is unknown, what leads to

remission and relapse is also uncertain (Xavier & Podolsky,

2007).

The incidence of IBDs is about 8 per 100,000 per year,

although this varies across different ethnic groups

(Molodecky et al., 2012). In developed countries, up to 360

in every 100,000 individuals have IBD (Knowles & Mikocka-

Walus, 2015). The highest reported prevalence values for

IBD were in Europe and North America. Australia has one of

the highest prevalence rates worldwide. Estimates suggest

more than 61,000 Australians have IBD — approximately

28,000 have CD and 33,000 have UC (Gastroenterological

Society of Australia — GESA, 2013). The peak of the disease

is in adolescents and young adults, with a second peak in

middle age.

UC is characterised by chronic inflammation of the large

intestine, with abnormal activation of the immune system

and affects the innermost layer of the colon and rectum

(Podolsky, 1991). Crohn’s disease can affect any level of the

intestinal tract from the mouth to the anus and across all

layers of the bowel wall, but mostly affects the lower small

intestine (Ileum) and colon. The most common symptoms

of IBD include diarrhoea, rectal bleeding and abdominal

pain (Baumgart & Sandborn, 2007). The symptoms are

10

| J.GENCA | Vol 27 No 3 | July 2017


due to intestinal damage resulting from the exaggerated

inflammatory response. Complications from these immunemediated

diseases include anaemia, malnutrition, bowel

obstruction, fistula, infection and an increased risk of colon

cancer. Extraintestinal manifestations may also develop,

such as joint problems (arthralgia, arthritis, and ankylosing

spondylitis), rashes and skin conditions (erythema nodosum),

chronic liver disease (primary sclerosing cholangitis) and

eye conditions (such as uveitis).

There is an accumulating body of research exploring

potential factors thought to contribute to the aetiology and

pathophysiology of IBD. These include genetics, microbiome,

dietary, environmental and psychosocial factors.

The genetics of IBD highlight considerable heterogeneity

between, and within, UC and CD, with some genes

common to both and some separate. More than 200 gene

polymorphisms have been identified that are associated with

IBD (Liu et al., 2015). Many of these genes increase the risk

of the development of disease by only a very small amount.

One-third of loci described confer susceptibility to both CD

and UC (Lees et al., 2011). In twin studies of CD and UC, a

strong familial aggregation has been observed (Brant, 2011).

Recent population-based sibling risk is 26-fold greater for

CD and 9-fold greater for UC (Bengtson, 2009). Many risk

alleles are associated with host responses to bacteria,

innate and adaptive immunity, autophagy, phagocytosis and

mucosal barrier function (Xavier & Podolsky, 2007).

It is well documented that any chronic disease is associated

with a greater burden of psychological stress, depression

and anxiety (Knowles & Mikocka-Walus, 2015). IBD follows

the same model of neuropsychiatric co-morbidities, which

are more prevalent with active disease when the disease

is difficult to control (Mikocka-Walus et al., 2007). It could

be projected that illness leads to psychological problems

through a unidirectional effect on patients’ wellbeing and

quality of life. A bidirectional interplay, however, between

disease factors including inflammatory activities in the

body (systemically) and/or in the gut (locally), and the

brain is more likely. Psychological state can influence

patients’ behaviour and their perception of disease. The

role of stress — conceptualised both as an environmental/

psychosocial challenge, as well as an internal stressor such

as an evolving illness, has been substantially investigated

in the course of IBD. It has been shown that stress can

aggravate physiological, psychological and environmental

vulnerabilities, leading to emotional distress and potentially

the onset of mental and physical disorders (Knowles &

Mikocka-Walus, 2015).

In the middle of the nineteenth century, the discovery of

the “enteric nervous system — ENS” was considered a

scientific breakthrough in understanding the interaction

between the nervous system and the digestive system

(Furness, 2006). Even before that, though, and for centuries,

psychologists and physiologists had recognised the

significance of interactions between the brain and the body,

here the digestive system. Early investigators have reported

top-down (brain to gastrointestinal function) modulation,

as well as bottom-up signalling via visceral afferents to the

brain and the gastrointestinal regulatory control by emotion/

stress. The sympathetic innervations in the gastrointestinal

tract modulate GI function and its immune regulation by

their close proximity to immune cells such as dendritic cells,

B-lymphocytes and mast cells (Lyte, Vulchanova & Brown,

2011). The parasympathetic innervations of the GI tract

(vagal and sacral parasympathetic divisions) are thought

to have an anti-inflammatory modulatory role (Knowles

& Mikocka-Walus, 2015). Extensive modification in the

autonomic nervous system and its dysfunction (perhaps

related to stress, anxiety and depression), alters autonomic

output to the gut and is likely to affect brain-gut signalling,

gut function and its immune regulation (Knowles & Mikocka-

Walus, 2015).

There is no cure for IBD, so the aim of treatment is to control

the symptoms, to maintain mucosal integrity and promote

healing. A recent breakthrough in controlling the disease has

been achieved using biologic therapies that target specific

components of the immune system, for example, by using

anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) to suppress the

exaggerated immune response. The aim is to keep patients

in remission and asymptomatic, with a primary aim of

reducing inflammation during relapse and a secondary aim

of prolonging the time spent in remission (Shanahan, 2000).

Intestinal microbiome

Immediately after birth, environmentally exposed surfaces

such as skin, respiratory tract, mouth, vagina and gut are

introduced to and colonised by foreign microorganisms

(Ley, Peterson & Gordon, 2006). A large and dynamic

community of different bacteria is considered a natural

inhabitant of the human gut with well-documented effects

on human physiology and pathology arising from the

interaction between resident bacteria and the mucosal

immune system. However, the nature of this mutualisation

is not very well understood. The human intestine’s immune

system coexists and interacts with more than 400 different

species of bacteria (mostly in the large intestine), almost 10 14

bacteria/g faeces or 10 times more than the number of body

cells (Turnbaugh et al., 2007). This microbiota portfolio can

be affected by factors such as genetics, birth route, diet,

hygiene, psychological distress, infections and medications,

including antibiotics. The gut microflora are important in

inducing tolerance towards this natural habitat and they

are thought to out-compete pathogens. Important roles of

intestinal microorganisms in the colon’s physiology include

their influence on epithelial cell differentiation (Guarner &

Melagelada, 2003).

Gut-bacteria metabolism accounts for the conversion of

many substances into metabolites. These metabolites can

be absorbed and used by the host for processes such

as vitamin synthesis (Guarner & Melagelada, 2003), and

absorption of calcium, magnesium and iron (Miyazawa,

Iwabuchi & Yoshida, 1996). In the large intestine, anaerobic

bacteria ferment undigested carbohydrates to short-chain

www.genca.org | 11


Feature article

fatty acids (SCFAs) including butyrate and acetate as well

as gases (such as hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane,

and hydrogen sulphate — Flint et al., 2012). Butyrate and

acetate as well as other SCFAs are negatively charged

radicals (anions) in the colon and are a major source of

energy for colonocytes. Butyrate is mainly consumed by

colonic epithelial cells and acetate presented systemically

(Flint et al., 2012). The role of these SCFAs and their signal

to gut receptors, their influence on appetite control and

food intake (Sleeth et al., 2010) as well as their anti-cancer

(especially for butyrate) and anti-inflammatory properties

(Hamer et al., 2008), have been an extremely rapidly growing

area of research. There are several factors that control the

prevalence of bacteria in different parts of the GI tract;

such as pH, peristalsis, redox potential, bacterial adhesion,

bacterial cooperation, mucin secretion, nutrient availability,

diet, and bacterial antagonism (Hao & Lee, 2004). The

increasing promotion of probiotics and prebiotics to assist

human health shows recognition of a role for microbial flora

in the prevention/control of disease processes (Shanahan,

2000), although data supporting their role in health are scant

(Shanahan, 2000).

It has long been proposed that gut bacteria play an

important role in the pathogenesis of IBD through their direct

interaction with the intestinal mucosa. There is convincing

evidence from animal studies showing the involvement

of the enteric bacteria in the pathogenesis of IBD. Also it

has been observed that UC and CD closely mimic defined

intestinal infections, and occur in areas with the highest

luminal bacterial concentrations (Farrell & La Mont, 2002).

Older studies have convincingly shown that diversion of

faecal stream induces inflammatory remission and can

prevent recurrence of CD, while Infusion of intestinal

contents to the excluded ileal segments reactivates mucosal

lesions (Thompson-Chagoyan et al., 2005; D’Haens et al.,

1998). Animal model studies on mice, rats and guinea pigs

have shown increasing evidence that antigens derived from

communal bacteria regulate the immune response. The

absence of the normal flora in these studies is correlated

with non-appearance of the intestinal inflammation (Taurog

et al., 1994). Transgenic mice missing the T cell receptors

(TCRa) spontaneously develop colitis in response to normal

intestine microbiota (Mombaerts et al., 1993).

Immune reactivation and IBD

The make-up of the intestinal epithelium includes four cell

families that arise from pluripotent stem cell progenitors

(Yen & Wright, 2006). These cells are: absorptive enterocytes

(IECs); goblet cells that create and secrete mucus;

enteroendocrine cells that produce and secrete hormones;

and Paneth cells that release antimicrobial peptides or

lectins (Yen & Wright, 2006). Beneath the IECs, the lamina

propria is the home of stromal cells, T cells, dendritic cells,

macrophages, B cells (IgA producing plasma cells), and

intraepithelial lymphocytes. Dendritic cells of lamina propria

are capable to establish tight junction like structures with

epithelial cells, to have direct bacterial uptake from the

intestinal lumen (Rescigno et al., 2001). They are positioned

to reach out in the lumen and sample the luminal contents as

an important surveillance strategy (Niess, 2005). Activated

dendritic cells then can migrate to lymph nodes where they

can activate T cells.

The epithelial cells contain, and are coated with pattern

recognition receptors (PRRs, including Toll-like receptors

(TLR) and nucleotide-binding oligomerisation domainlike

receptors (NOD like receptors), which are the key

component of the innate immune system in the intestine

and can recognise common repetitive patterns preset

on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, viruses,

parasites, and fungi (Furrie et al., 2005). These receptors

are sensitive to pathogen associate-molecular patterns

(PAMPs), such as bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS —

Lotz et al., 2006), Gram-positive and mycobacterial PAMPs

(Takeuchi et al., 1999) bacterial lipopeptide (Aliprantis

et al., 1999), lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and peptidoglycan

(PGN — Schwandner et al., 1999), double-stranded viral

RNA and bacterial DNA (Hemmi et al., 2000), and reactive

oxygen species (ROS) induced by commensals (Kumar et

al., 2007). IECs’ Toll-like receptors (TLR 1-9) are expressed

in the small intestine and colon (Otte, Cario & Podolsky,

2004; Cario & Podolsky, 2000). Signalling from TLRs leads

to epithelial cell proliferation, safeguarding of the IECs tight

junctions, release of IgA and expression of antimicrobial

peptides, regulation of pro-inflammatory cascades through

signalling the lamina propria’s immune cells (Khan et al.,

2006), and production of inflammatory cytokines, in case

any products of the bacteria permeate the epithelial layer

and are sensed by these receptors (Lee, Gonzales-Navajas

& Raz, 2008). Nucleotide oligomerisation domain (Nod1 and

Nod2) are additional pattern recognition receptors that are

intracellular, and are required for defense against invasive

enteric pathogens (Abreu, Masayuki & Moshe, 2005).

Immune cells of the adaptive immune system are differentiated

in Peyers patches of the small intestine, lymphoid follicles

of the colon, or mesenteric lymph nodes. IBD is generally

believed to be driven by an increased population of effector

T cells and increased titres of pro-inflammatory cytokines

(such as TNF-α, IL-6, INF-γ). The balance between proinflammatory

and immunosuppressive forces can determine

the progression of inflammation (Teitelbaum & Walker, 2002).

The Regulatory T cells (Tregs) regulate the level and function

of the proinflammatory cytokines derived from effector

T cells, to direct the immune responses (Thompson &

Powie, 2004). Tregs widely proliferate in an antigen-specific

manner and can respond to both self and foreign peptides.

Cytokines released by Tregs are very important to limit an

uncontrolled immune response at environmentally exposed

surfaces such as the gut. These special T cells play a key role

in the maintenance of self-tolerance, therefore preventing

autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (Thompson &

Powie, 2004). Regulatory T-cell deficiency results in an

effector T-cell response and IBD. This response is driven

by reactivity against microbial antigens. Tregs suppress

inflammation through diverse mechanisms, including release

of inhibitory cytokines such as IL-10 and transforming

12

| J.GENCA | Vol 27 No 3 | July 2017


growth factor – β, and IL-35 (Vignali, Collison & Workman,

2008). IL-10 deficient mice develop spontaneous colitis

through IL-23 and TH-17 pathways. Genetically determined

deficiency of IL-10 activity could lead to severe early-onset

forms of IBD in humans.

Recently a new population of T cells known as T Helper

17 (TH-17) cells, which are responsible for production

and release of a specific proinflammatory cytokine (IL-17),

have been addressed in pathogenesis of human colitis

(Kobayashi et al., 2008). IL-23 is the cytokines that regulate

the maintenance and function of TH-17 immune cells. In

animal studies (mice), it has been shown that IL-6, TGF-β,

IL-1β, IL-23 and ATP that derives from commensal bacteria,

(such as segmented filamentous bacteria) are required for

TH-17 cells differentiation. Recent studies have directed

toward the intestinal immune modulation by the microbiota,

as it has been shown that germ-free animals have TH-17

cell development impairment and reduced level of IL-17

production in the colon (Ivanov et al., 2008) and Tregs in

these animals are not as effective as in conventionally

colonised animals (Ishikawa et al., 2008).

The human immune system plays a critical role in the

recognition, response and adaptation to countless self

and foreign molecules; so its integrity is very important in

maintaining and recovering health. The basic development

of human immune system function depends on its

interaction with the human microbiome (Macpherson &

Harris, 2004). The first line for mucosal defence is to prevent

the diffusion of foreign antigens from pathogenic bacteria

that penetrate the mucosal barrier. In all mammals, the

intestinal lumen is colonised by communities of bacteria that

result in biofilm production — the proteolytic cleavage of the

outer coating of mucus, which creates a barrier to infection.

Any challenge that alters the microbiota composition and

suppresses their regrowth can disturb the barrier, allowing

infection and disease to occur (Stecher et al., 2007). The

thickness of this mucus layer of the epithelium is correlated

to bacterial content of the intestine. It is thinner in the

proximal small intestine (containing 10 3 –10 5 organisms per

gram) and is thicker in the distal small and large intestine

(containing 10 10 –10 12 organisms per gram). Previous

studies have shown that both humans and mice normally

tolerate autologous microbiota and the breakdown of this

tolerance is associated with chronic intestinal inflammation

(Duchman et al., 1995). It is likely that potential pathological

responses to the component of intestinal flora, which are

restrained by immunoregulatory controls, do occur. When

this immune constraint is breached, it modulates the

inflammatory response (Garside, Mowat & Khoruts, 1999).

In addition, it is possible that alteration in the composition

of gut microbiota (dysbiosis), disturbs the interaction

between the immune system and microbiome and ultimately

leads to immune response alteration and may motivate

inflammatory disorders (Round & Mazmanian, 2009). IBD

patients respond to antibiotic therapy, faecal diversion and

have higher titres of antibodies against commensal bacteria,

compared to healthy individuals (Tannock, 2002). Clinically

and endoscopically, the distribution of the inflammatory

lesions of IBD is more pronounced in the areas of gut with

higher concentration of bacteria.

Conclusion

IBDs are chronic gastrointestinal inflammatory disorders.

The onset of disease is in adolescents and young adults

with the second peak in middle age (Andrews, 2014).

There are multiple genetic, environmental, psychological,

immune and microbiota factors contributing to the

manifestation and disease severity. The aetiology of IBDs

is not very well understood. Prevalence of IBD in Australia

is more than 61,000 cases diagnosed (Gastroenterology

Society of Australia, 2014). The national total hospital cost

of IBD in Australia is more than $100m per annum (PWC

Australia, March 2013). To characterise the risk factors

and vulnerabilities in remission and individual differences

and their interdependence, it is important to demonstrate

a longitudinal assessment of biological and psychological

factors and their temporal trajectory, including in relapse.

To be continued in the next GENCA Journal

References

Abreu, M. T., Masayuki, F., & Moshe, A. (2005). TLR signaling in

the gut in health and disease. The Journal of Immunology, 174(8),

4453–4460.

Aliprantis, A. O., Yang, R.-B., Mark, M. R., Suggett, S., Devaux, B.,

Radolf, J. D., Klimpel, G. R., Godowski, P., & Zychlinsky, A. (1999).

Cell activation and apoptosis by bacterial lipoproteins through tolllike

receptor-2. Science, 285(5428), 736–739.

Andrews, J. M. (2014). IBD What is it and does psyche have

anything to do with it? Psychological Aspects of Inflammatory

Bowel Disease: A biopsychosocial approach.

Baumgart, D. C., & Sandborn, W. J. (2007). Inflammatory bowel

disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies.

The Lancet, 369(9573), 1641–1657.

Bengtson, M.-B., Solberg, C., Aamodt, G., Sauar, J., Jahnsen, J.,

Moum, B., Lygren, I., Vatn, M. H., & IBSEN study group. (2009).

Familial aggregation in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in a

Norwegian population-based cohort followed for ten years. Journal

of Crohn’s and Colitis, 3(2), 92–99.

Brant, S. R. (2011). Update on the heritability of inflammatory

bowel disease: the importance of twin studies. Inflammatory Bowel

Diseases, 17(1), 1–5.

Carol, M., Borruel, N., Antolin, M., Llopis, M., Casellas, F., Guarner,

F., & Malagelada, J.-R. (2006). Modulation of apoptosis in intestinal

lymphocytes by a probiotic bacteria in Crohn’s disease. Journal of

Leukocyte Biology, 79(5), 917–922.

Cario, E., & Podolsky, D. K. (2000). Differential alteration in intestinal

epithelial cell expression of toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and TLR4 in

inflammatory bowel disease. Infection and immunity, 68(12), 7010–

7017.

D’Haens, G. R., Geboes, K., Peeters, M., Baert, F., Penninckx, F.,

& Rutgeerts, P. (1998). Early lesions of recurrent Crohn’s disease

caused by infusion of intestinal contents in excluded ileum.

Gastroenterology, 114(2), 262–267.

www.genca.org | 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!