26.11.2020 Views

Ministers and Senators Behaving Badly Series 4

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

If you can't convince them, then confuse them …<br />

Government senate leader Mathias Cormann initially took Labor’s<br />

questions on notice <strong>and</strong> then tabled a one-page response, which said: “I<br />

can confirm that the performance requirements for the prime minister’s<br />

contract were fully satisfied.”<br />

Opposition senate leader Penny Wong dem<strong>and</strong>ed: “So why was he sacked<br />

– unanimously sacked?”<br />

Asked in parliament on Wednesday about the NZ audit findings, Cormann<br />

said: “The Labor Party are clearly getting more <strong>and</strong> more desperate. They<br />

can see that Prime Minister Morrison is somebody who gets results.”<br />

The NZ Office of Tourism <strong>and</strong> Sport was established in July 1998 <strong>and</strong><br />

Morrison was appointed as its inaugural director.<br />

As head of the office, he reported directly to the then NZ tourism minister<br />

Murray McCully. Morrison’s office was supposed to collaborate with the<br />

Tourism Board, a separate <strong>and</strong> independent government entity.<br />

The NZ auditor-general’s report said Morrison commissioned a review of<br />

the NZ Tourism Board’s operations without informing its board members<br />

fully or allowing them input.<br />

He then used the report, which asserted the board was operating “in a<br />

tactical rather than a strategic way” – a description the board disputed – to<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> its chairperson be sacked.<br />

“We were surprised by the vehemence <strong>and</strong> timing of this advice,” the NZ<br />

auditor-general said.<br />

The report criticised Morrison’s review process <strong>and</strong> described how he had<br />

presented alternative grounds for sacking the chairperson – over what the<br />

board described as a technicality – when legal advice cast doubt on his<br />

original judgement.<br />

The report found that a month into the job, Morrison told the minister he<br />

had “serious misgivings about the board”, with which McCully was already<br />

clashing.<br />

The picture that emerges is of a power struggle between Morrison’s office<br />

<strong>and</strong> the board, <strong>and</strong> between the board <strong>and</strong> the minister, in which Morrison<br />

sided with the minister.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!