- Page 1 and 2: Assessment of Ecosystemsand Ecosyst
- Page 3 and 4: Assessment of Ecosystemsand Ecosyst
- Page 5 and 6: 1. Introduction 21.1. Objectives of
- Page 7 and 8: The complexity of today’s environ
- Page 9: The 2013 EC report on “GDP and be
- Page 13 and 14: 2.1. Policy analysis methodologyA p
- Page 15 and 16: Policy sectorAgricultureand RuralDe
- Page 17 and 18: Table 4. Evaluation cycle of MAES r
- Page 19 and 20: geographical, abiotic and biotic fe
- Page 21 and 22: PolicysectorClimateChange -Mitigati
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 3. Template to assess the in
- Page 25 and 26: Po li cysec torMa rineFo res tryBio
- Page 27 and 28: Po li cysec torAgri cultureandRural
- Page 29 and 30: Po li cysec torRe gio nalDe ve lopm
- Page 31 and 32: Table no. 9 (a) below shows the lev
- Page 33 and 34: Policysec torCli mateChange -Miti g
- Page 35 and 36: Policysec torRegio nalDe ve lopment
- Page 37 and 38: PolicysectorMarineForestryBio di ve
- Page 39 and 40: PolicysectorAgri cultureandRuralDev
- Page 41 and 42: achieve Good Ecosystems Governance
- Page 43 and 44: PolicysectorBiodiversityClimateChan
- Page 45 and 46: Environment according to Government
- Page 47 and 48: PolicyrelevanceCross-cuttingissuesP
- Page 49 and 50: With respect to policy making, give
- Page 51 and 52: to establish a functional Policy-Sc
- Page 53 and 54: 3.1. Mapping of ecosystemsIn this c
- Page 55 and 56: Nature Information System) classifi
- Page 57 and 58: The EU member states, together with
- Page 59 and 60: Correspondence between habitats/eco
- Page 61 and 62:
Figure 6. Extract from databases on
- Page 63 and 64:
In this context, the mapping of the
- Page 65 and 66:
• Analysis of SPOT multispectral
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 12. The parameters used to d
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 14. Ecosystems national leve
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 15. The EUNIS tree used for
- Page 73 and 74:
The solution to the identification
- Page 75 and 76:
Indicator Supply - Surface drinking
- Page 77 and 78:
Indicator Supply - Surface drinking
- Page 79 and 80:
Indicator3. Evaluation -Quantity of
- Page 81 and 82:
IndicatorDigital Elevation Model2.
- Page 83 and 84:
Indicator5. ValueThe cost of water
- Page 85 and 86:
IndicatorMean consumedquantity per
- Page 87 and 88:
Materials - Material fibers coming
- Page 89 and 90:
IndicatorQuantity of wood volumeext
- Page 91 and 92:
Indicator4. BenefitNumber of people
- Page 93 and 94:
Regulating and maintenance services
- Page 95 and 96:
Indicator3. Evaluation -Map of eros
- Page 97 and 98:
IndicatorGreenhouse gas emissions2.
- Page 99 and 100:
Cultural servicesThe physical use o
- Page 101 and 102:
Indicator4. BenefitNumber of people
- Page 103 and 104:
IndicatorThe national trend is to m
- Page 105 and 106:
Indicator2. Functional -Mean biomas
- Page 107 and 108:
IndicatorOverall edible roots produ
- Page 109 and 110:
Indicator5. ValueValue of the veget
- Page 111 and 112:
IndicatorPoultry livestock is gener
- Page 113 and 114:
Indicator3. Evaluation -Quantity of
- Page 115 and 116:
IndicatorBenefit resulting from the
- Page 117 and 118:
Indicator2. Functional -Potential c
- Page 119 and 120:
Indicator2. Functional -Number of p
- Page 121 and 122:
Indicator5. ValueValue of education
- Page 123 and 124:
IndicatorQuantity of percolated wat
- Page 125 and 126:
Regulating and maintenance services
- Page 127 and 128:
Indicator3. Evaluation -Report of a
- Page 129 and 130:
IndicatorMeteorological data(precip
- Page 131 and 132:
IndicatorGlobal climate regulation
- Page 133 and 134:
Indicator3. Evaluation -Green infra
- Page 135 and 136:
Agricultural ecosystemsEUNIS Code N
- Page 137 and 138:
Aquatic ecosystemsEUNIS Code Number
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 20. Conclusion assessment ma
- Page 141 and 142:
Figure 22. Assessment map of soil l
- Page 143 and 144:
states, with the assistance of the
- Page 145 and 146:
However, we can assume that instead
- Page 147 and 148:
good information, the neoclassical
- Page 149 and 150:
both information deficit and power
- Page 151 and 152:
In Production Function methods, eco
- Page 153 and 154:
value of e.g. willingness to pay pe
- Page 155 and 156:
In forests belonging to the first f
- Page 157 and 158:
Status and trends of selected ES ge
- Page 159 and 160:
there are geographical differences
- Page 161 and 162:
higher efficiency of forest ecosyst
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 28. Trends in Romanian GHG i
- Page 165 and 166:
Based on these estimates, values of
- Page 167 and 168:
Indicators of nature based tourism
- Page 169 and 170:
Figure 30. Arraivals at mountain re
- Page 171 and 172:
arrivals, data of average stay from
- Page 173 and 174:
the double, i.e. 100% larger than t
- Page 175 and 176:
3.9. Summary of resultsThe Main res
- Page 177 and 178:
The development of the DSS componen
- Page 179 and 180:
Considering the stage of implementa
- Page 181 and 182:
Ecosystems layerDegradation statusB
- Page 183 and 184:
Scenario based analysisTo run a “
- Page 185 and 186:
To stimulate the transition towards
- Page 187 and 188:
EEA Grants 2009-2014Assessment of E
- Page 189 and 190:
Assessment: The analysis and review
- Page 191 and 192:
Appendix 1The functional zoning sys
- Page 193 and 194:
No. Group/Subgroup/Category Functio
- Page 195 and 196:
Arias-Arévalo, P., E. Gómez-Bagge
- Page 197 and 198:
Marie Roué, Jennifer Rubis, Maria
- Page 199 and 200:
Luyssaert, Sebastiaan, E. Detlef Sc
- Page 201 and 202:
Stancioiu, P. T., I. V. Abrudan, an
- Page 203 and 204:
EEA Grants 2009-2014Assessment of E