Current Year Is ViciouslyTheAnti-MasculinityWe live in an age of inversion. Masculinity isbad. The nuclear family is bad. Monogamy isbad. Lifting weights reinforces masculinity,and it is, therefore, bad. Eating healthily andexercises leads to 'thin privilege' and, again,it is bad. Things have gotten so out of control- and the only resistance to these falsenotions of progress have been sassy quipsdecrying the double standards of our politicoculturaloverlords. What king was everfiguratively deposed by having his hypocrisypointed out?Nevertheless, we can list the myriad failuresof the traditionally-minded at length to noavail; we should, instead, examine theconsequences of our spiteful anti-maleculture.It's no secret that the most ferocious maleexponents of progress lack masculinity atevery turn - why would a masculine mandenigrate his own masculinity?Consequently, various memes encapsulatingthe soyboy/consoomer trope have poppedup around social media, often going viral andcrossing several internet subcultures beyondthe political sphere. One could argue that thisis because the soyboy/consoomer is a*metapolitical* archetype that ticks all thecertain lifestyle boxes amounting to the samepolitical outcome. A lot of their beliefs couldbe traced back to their low testosteronelevels worsened by their lifestyle saturatedby unhealthy processed food, a sedentaryvitamin-D-deprived existence, andphytoestrogenic beverages (SoyPAs). Due totheir midwittery, they have the intellectualcapacity to rationalize their lack ofmasculinity using progressive narratives andpernicious academic materials - all couched intrendy, meaningless buzzwords - withoutever having to address their physical andmental inadequacies. If everyone is sohecking cute 'n valid, then there's no need forself-improvement. Self-improvement itself isinherently anti-egalitarian and wouldcontradict much of their worldview - werethey to embark upon any character-buildingendeavors. The consoomerism of many ofthese individuals is a cheap way to fill thevoid, so to speak. In the past, I have spokenabout how the raison d'etre of many hasbecome a series of fleeting dopamine hits ofdiminishing marginal returns - kinda likechasing the dragon. Dopamine receptors gobrrrrr; daily life is brimming with variousactivities that warm the various centers ofthe brain they believe occupy the role of thesoul; activities such as virtue signaling onsocial media, supporting the prestigeideology sponsored by every single majorwell-monied institution, getting high off thesecond-hand fumes of power, consoomingfrom their favorite ethnic food place,cracking open a cold craft beer - all to beuploaded on social media in abjectdesperation for wider validation from theirpeers. Moreover, the increased androgyny ofboth sexes through narrative, poor nutrition,xenoestrogens, and other factors has drivena wedge into modern relationships. Nowmore than ever have relationships becomesimultaneously toxic, distant, and vicariousgiven the recent meteoric rise of platformssuch as OnlyFans. The men - or 'Simps' - whodonate to these women crave the humanconnection that porn fails to offer. Theincreased atomization brought to us by thecurrent global situation has been almost likea cycle of tren ace for societal decline.Relationships are temporary; hypergamy,phony self-empowerment pseudophilosophies,the Pareto principle and appshave rearranged the dating scene making itimpossible for a lot of men to compete withtheir Chad counterparts. OnlyFans et alserve as a proxy for the relationships theseless fortunate men crave. Slack-jawedmodern morality simply emboldens theseself-destroying patterns; but if we attempt toarrive at the root cause of this socialepidemic, the lack of strong male figures hasinflated a moral vacuum that has wroughtuntold spiritual havoc on both sexes underthe age of 35. In Clowning of America, I talkabout the inter-generational disconnectbetween today's Millennials and theirgrandparents - who were patient zero forMAN'S WORLD
8