NuBlock Design Report by Erin Hunt and Yaxuan Liu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Interface Design: Interigating Material Perceptions
NuBlock
Professor: Sawako Kajima
Students: Erin Hunt and Yaxuan Liu
Objective
Our project NuBlock brings a modern and aesthetic update to an
architectural and structural elementary unit—brick. With its innovative
water-soluble formwork, this project can create lighter concrete bricks
through a gradient of variable porosities with intricate geometries and
infinite customizability. Thanks to its customizability, NuBlock’s porosity
can directly relate to its location’s structural need. In areas where greater
structural stiffness is required the block is denser and vice versa. The goal is
to minimize the quantity of material necessary through formal optimization
while maintaining its structural performance and decreasing the embodied
carbon latent in concrete fabrication.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
3
Module: Block
We chose to investigate bricks and masonry blocks because of their:
1. Inherent scale to a person
2. Ease for transportation
3. They are very versatile and can be used to approximate intricate
geometries
Scale Ease of Transport Versatility
(Left) https://mindfulstoic.net/mindful-walking/
(Middle) https://lectura.press/en/picture/brick-handling-with-hyster/44962
(Right) https://sydneyuncovered.com/the-goods-line/
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
5
Formwork Material: Polyvinyl Alcohol
Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) is a biodegradable, water-soluble polymer that is
used in 3D printing as a support structure for a second 3D print material.
When exposed to water it will dissolve. This material is what is used to hold
the detergent in pods and are the composition of glue sticks.
PVA Formwork
For this project PVA was used as a primary print material for use as
concrete formwork. As formwork, it has allowed for the creation of concrete
components with hollow parts, undercuts, as well as other scenarios in
which removing or breaking the formwork would be impossible without
breaking the cast. Typically, casting complex forms in concrete requires
large and multipart formwork but, with PVA, a single mold can be used as
shown in the diagram on this slide. The PVA formwork at left would dissolve
leaving the intricate block at right.
Rockite Cast
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
7
Brick Design Logic
The brick was based off hexagonal sphere packing. The cell size determined the density of the
spheres which allowed for varying porosities. The angle of the sphere array can be changed to allow
for varying direction of porosity that can augment the view or the lighting. The spheres were used
to remove material from a block. An exterior boundary remained on four sides to make the module
more legible once populated on a structure.
Creation of a Hexagonal Grid
Separation of Points
Moving one set of Points in the Z
Axis Distance
Use the Obtained Points as the
Spheres’ Centroids
Linear Array of Spheres
Rotating Spheres about the YZ
Plane and Creating Block Bounds
for the Interior and Exterior
Differencing the Spheres from the
Interior Bounds
Differencing the Spheres from the
Exterior Bounds
Inputs
Hex Cell Size
Length (X Axis)
Width (Y Axis)
Input
Z Axis Move Distance
Input
Sphere Radius
Input
Array Count
Input
Angle
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
9
Case Studies
Two case studies were investigated using very different structures to
showcase NuBlock’s versatility. These two studies were a staircase core and
a shell structure.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
11
1
6
2
Brick Types
7
Ten brick types were designed with a gradient porosity. The depth of the
bricks range from eight to twelve centimeters from the most porous to the
least porous.
3
8
4
9
5
10
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
13
Corner Block
A corner block was designed to aid in turning the corner without losing
porosity.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
15
Mapping Method
In order to map NuBlocks according to the stiffness map from finite element
analysis and optimization, a grid was populated onto the surface and used
to sample the UV tangents (and/or contour line tangents), and stiffness map
brightness, which are used to determine the block orientation and type. The
selected bricks are mapped onto the surface so that their centroids are at
the corresponding grid points.
Brightness: 0.98
Type 10 NuBlock
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
17
9 meters
3 meters
1 meters
3D Model
Structure FEA Analysis
The staircase core case study started with a finite element analysis in
Millipede, a plugin for McNeel’s Grasshopper, of the structure. The
3D model at left was translated into a shell model to be analyzed and
optimized. The staircase wraps about the three-by-three-meter masonry
core which is nine meters tall. The model on the right shows the model that
was input into Millipede. The structural load is represented in pink. The stair
is loaded with five-thousand newtons per square meter with a safety factor
of three while the roof load is two-thousand newtons per square meter and
a safety factor of five. The blue denotes the support structure.
Shell Model
FEA Model
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
19
FEA Result (Stiffness)
FEA Optimization
The diagrams at right denote the stiffness map from the FEA optimization.
The white areas are where the most structural stiffness is desired while the
least is required in the black areas. The rightmost diagram is an unrolled
stiffness map of the three-by-three-meter masonry core.
3 meters
9 meters
12 meters
UnRolled FEA
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
21
Brick Mapping
The renders at right show the blocks mapped onto the structure according
to the FEA optimization result. Solid blocks were placed in areas where the
floating stair is mounted.
Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
23
Concrete Block
Steel Plate
Steel Support
Timber Cladding
Section
Staircase Design Standard Tread
A stair was designed to be subtle and complement the block, with the
intention of not taking away focus from the porous concrete blocks. The
stair’s steel support assembly was designed using Finite Element Analysis.
This analysis allowed for the development of a rectangular extrusion steel
support. This support would be cast into the concrete blocks. The steel
support would be clad with a steel plate and timber.
Timber Cladding
Steel Plate
Steel Support
Isometric
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
25
Timber Cladding
Steel Plate
Staircase Design Corner
The corner landing follows the same structural and material logic as the
standard treads.
Steel Support
Concrete Block
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
27
Isometric
Plan
Elevations
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
29
Close-Up Speculative Rendering
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
31
View at the Staircase Base
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
33
View at the Second Level
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
35
Blocks can be removed in areas where the blocks are most porous to allow for openings
View at the Second Level
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
37
View looking upward from the courtyard
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
39
Statistics
The structure was only 30.73% the volume of this structure with traditional blocks.
Staircase Core
Type Volume (cm 3 ) Quanity Type Total (cm 3 )
1 356.99 610 217,764.92
2 384.27 190 73,010.76
3 480.49 253 121,563.16
4 487.27 231 112,558.70
5 537.29 372
199,873.20
6 463.41 357
165,438.11
7 525.60 388
203,693.94
8 577.48 351
202,693.94
9 715.67 435
311315.83
10 809.52 1412
1,143,037.53
Corner 934.23 344
321,373.72
Total 3,318,564.24
Original Total 2,000 5,400
10,800,000
Percentage 30.73%
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
41
Shell Structure
Shell Model
The shell model analyzed and optimized a Catalan vault with its self-weight.
The geometry was generated through the draping of a chamfered square
which created the most efficient structure. Each anchor is one and one-half
meter in length. The openings are six and one-quarter meters wide and
three meters tall. The structures height is four meters.
4 meters
3 meters
6.25 meters
1.5 meters
FEA Model
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
43
FEA Optimization
FEA Result Isometric (Stiffness)
The diagrams at right denote the stiffness map from the FEA optimization.
The white areas are where the most structural stiffness is desired while the
least is required in the black areas.
FEA Result Plan (Stiffness)
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
45
Brick Mapping
Brick Mapping Isometric
After trying a variety of different patterns of packing, this one was chosen as
it highlights the geometry the best and approximates the stiffness map well.
Brick Mapping Plan
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
47
Rendering of Block Mapping
Isometric
These are renderings of the block mapping results.
Plan
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
49
Close-up render of the mapped blocks. The structure is denser closer to the support and becomes more porous as it approaches the center.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
51
The pavilion site was a park. It provides a space for visitors to stop and rest. The shadows cast by the trees and the pavilion interact well with one another.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
53
The lighting pattern on the underside of the shell shows the structural density.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
55
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
57
Statistics
The structure was only 23.48% the volume of this structure with traditional blocks.
Catalan Vault
Type Volume (cm 3 ) Quanity Type Total (cm 3 )
1 356.99 1066 380,553.12
2 384.27 503 193,286.38
3 480.49 515 247,450.70
4 487.27 326 158,849.08
5 537.29 271
145,606.55
6 463.41 208
96,389.71
7 525.60 158
83,045.44
8 577.48 129
74,494.36
9 715.67 96
68,704.18
10 809.52 260
210,474.33
Total 1,658,853.86
Original Total 2,000 3,532
7,064,000
Percentage 23.48%
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
59
Fabrication Block One
PVA Formwork
A small test block was created which measured twelve centimeters (length)
by six centimeters (width) by six centimeters (height). The project was
bound to a Lulzbot Mini 2 desktop Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D
printer. Its build volume is sixteen centimeters (X) by sixteen centimeters (Y)
by eighteen (Z) centimeters.
Rockite Cast
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
61
Dissolution Block One 11:00 AM 12:00 AM
Prior material research has shown that using heated water to dissolve the
Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) expediates the process. Therefore, a crockpot at low
heat was used to degrade the formwork. The dissolution process took three
hours.
1:00 PM 2:00 PM
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
63
Fabrication Issues Block One
As a result of the inability to integrate support material into the formwork
there were five locations where the printer could not accommodate the
material bridging this created holes and a marred surface finish on the
backside of the block.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
65
New Fabrication Method
A new fabrication method was developed for the second fabrication
test. This method, allowed for the creation of multiple parts that could
be held together with wooden dowels. This new strategy eliminated the
material bridging and need for support structures as a result of where the
components were cut. This allowed for the blocks volume to increase since
the entire block was not being printed at once. The volume of the second
block was 20 centimeter (length) x 10 centimeter (width) x 10 centimeter
(height).
x6
x2
x2
x3
x2
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
67
New Fabrication Method
A new fabrication method was developed for the second fabrication
test. This method, allowed for the creation of multiple parts that could
be held together with wooden dowels. This new strategy eliminated the
material bridging and need for support structures as a result of where the
components were cut. This allowed for the blocks volume to increase since
the entire block was not being printed at once. The volume of the second
block was 20 centimeter (length) x 10 centimeter (width) x 10 centimeter
(height).
PVA Formwork Held with Wooden Dowels
PVA and PLA formworks in Working in Conjunction
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
69
Dissolution of Block Two
The block in vertical orientation in the crockpot allowed for one end of the
PVA to dissolve first as the other end mainly stayed intact. A tall pot was
used to retain heat within the crockpot. As the PVA dissolved the dowels
were carefully removed. The dowels were saved and used once more for the
fabrication of the next block. Once the PVA at one end was dissolved the
other end was submerged.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
71
Resulting Rockite Cast
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
73
Fabrication Issues Block Two
The thinner portions of block had a few cracks, but it is unclear if this is a
result of the Rockite pour or if these areas of the block are too thin.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
75
x2
x4
x2
x2
Rendering of the Formwork and its Components
Fabrication of Block Three
Another fabrication test was conducted. The thinnest element of this block
as well as the external boundary was five millimeter. As a result of the
increased material thickness, the final block had no cracks.
PVA Formwork Held with Wooden Dowels
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
77
Resulting Rockite Cast
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
79
In this image the two final fabricated blocks were stacked to show the possible variation in porosity.
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
81
NuBlock | Hunt + Liu
83