03.03.2021 Views

From Frontiero to the Air Force: Citizenship and Equal Protection in U.S. Reproduction Jurisprudence

Olivia Siemens '21

Olivia Siemens '21

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

disqualified women from claiming the right to seek gainful employment while simultaneously

reaffirming this same right for men.​ 5​ In reserving a different set of rights for each gender, the

Court in essence created two distinct and unequal classes of citizenship, each entitled to a

different range of constitutional liberties. Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment defines

citizenship and its corresponding rights as follows:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction

thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No

State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or

immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person

of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person

within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​ 6

In ​Bradwell​, however, the Court explicitly refused to acknowledge that women were entitled,

under either the Privileges and Immunities or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth

Amendment “to engage in any and every profession, occupation, or employment in civil life.”​ 7

While the decision referred to women as “citizens,” it outright rejected the notion that female

citizenship conferred upon women the same rights as male citizenship did men. Men, the more

“rational” and “civic-minded” sex, could claim full republican citizenship, including the right to

earn a living and contribute to the economic prosperity of the nation. Women, on the other hand,

were deemed “[unfit] for many of the occupations of civil life” and thus confined to a separate

“domestic sphere” of citizenship.​ 8​ The Court’s implication here is self-evident: women enjoyed

only those rights deemed appropriate to the nature and abilities of the female sex. Bound to

respect the whims of political representatives they did not elect—and lacking both procedural

and substantive constitutional remedies—women in the early republic were subject to a

government of men, not of laws.

Republican Citizenship: Representation and Equality

The passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, which barred states from denying a

person’s right to vote based on her sex, carried with it the prospect that American women might,

for the first time, enjoy the same citizenship stature as their male counterparts. Once granted the

5

Ibid.

6

U.S. Const. amend. XIV, §1.

7

​Bradwell​, 83 U.S. 130.

8

Ibid​.

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!