18.03.2021 Views

ECA Review 2021-03-18

ECA Review 2021-03-18

ECA Review 2021-03-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 March 18'21 HANNA/CORONATION/STETTLER, AB. Eca REVIEW

OPINION

The opinions expressed are not necessarily

the opinions of this newspaper.

R

R

R

R

R

Published by

Coronation

Review

Limited

Subscriptions:

$52.50 in Canada; $98.70 in US;

$183.75 Overseas.

EDITORIAL

Highly charged

emotional affair

Brenda Schimke

ECA Review

The province believes it should get

refunded billions of dollars of federal

taxes collected from Albertans

because those dollars were never

returned to the provincial government

in equal proportion through equalization

payments.

Does it then follow that Calgarians,

the wealthiest and largest contributors

to provincial tax revenues, should also

demand a refund whenever more

money is spent on, say, Edmonton hospitals

than theirs?

Kenney is going to use a fall referendum

on

equalization to

argue, ‘those

who pay the

most taxes,

should get an

equivalent

return’.

Equalization

payments are

messy and easily

misunderstood.

Former Prime

Minister Harper,

with Jason

Kenney as a

senior federal

minister, didn’t

eliminate equalization

payments

when they had a majority in Ottawa

because they couldn’t. Equalization

payments are enshrined in the

Constitution. The federal government

is mandated to ensure reasonable provincial

parity in health, education and

social services.

Another important fact, it’s individual

Albertans and corporations

who finance the federal budget, yes,

even equalization payments, not the

Alberta government. Over the last 40

years, on average, Albertans have, and

still do, make the most money and, in

turn, pay the most federal taxes.

Similar to Calgarian taxpayers versus

the rest of us.

Some will even go to the polls

believing the Alberta government

writes a big fat cheque every year to

the federal government to dole out ‘our

money’ to other provinces.

So why is Premier Kenney having a

referendum on equalization when it is

a constitutionally-mandated federal

program, and its Canadian taxpayers

that foot the bill, not provincial

governments?

Former Governor General David

Johnston in his book, “Trust, Twenty

Ways to Build a Better Country”,

argues party platforms, election contests

and elected legislatures, albeit

lengthy processes, provide the best filtering

to reach wise decisions, whereas

referenda undermine the complex

interplay of a democracy.

“Referenda are polarizing devices

and are used to not only divide regions

and peoples, but divide families—often

irrevocably”, wrote Johnson. “They

usually focus on a single issue and

they are invariably emotional

affairs—extremely so, which tends to

cloud or distort our individual and collective

thinking.”

Alberta has major troubles. We’ve

spent 40 years subsidizing low tax

rates with resource revenues and

spending like drunken sailors through

each boom, making the bust times

unsustainable.

We want the

solutions to be

easy—privatize

Referenda are

the civil service

and cut someone

polarizing devices and are else’s job—but

unfortunately

used to not only divide our hole is too big

for ‘bust’ policies

regions and peoples, but of the past.

Revenue must

divide families—often

also be on the

table—our own

irrevocably.

revenue, not the

federal government’s

revenue.

- Former Governor General

DAVID JOHNSON

Instead of an

emotional, nonsensical,

non-binding referendum

on equalization, we need an

Alberta government willing to

acknowledge past mistakes made by

successive provincial governments.

We all enjoyed the ride—addicted to

petroleum dollars, ultra-low taxes and

the highest standard of living in

Canada.

We wanted for little, but planned

poorly for the future. Unfortunately,

the future has arrived.

Albertans, including myself, were

like millionaire lottery winners. We

didn’t invest our windfall wisely, we

didn’t plan for our money to run out,

we kept spending as our cash was

depleting (Alberta has run a deficit

budget every year but one since 2008)

and now broke, we’re claiming Ottawa

stole our money.

Offering up a federal responsibility

(equalization) in a provincial referendum

won’t bring financial stability

to Alberta. It will, however, distract

Albertans from the UCP government’s

lackluster performance in handling

Alberta’s revenue problems and its

multi-billion-dollar investment bungles

last year.

But the referendum is money in the

bank for those who want to rile

Albertans into an even higher state of

emotional rage against Ottawa and

further the advancement of their ultimate

goal of separation.

72 pt

East Central Alberta

EVIEW

60 pt

48 pt

36 pt

Website ECAreview.com

Office Hours Mon. - Fri. 9 am - 5 pm

R

30 pt

4921 - Victoria Avenue

Tel. (403) 578-4111

R

24 pt

Mail: Box 70, Coronation, AB Canada, T0C 1C0

LETTERS POLICY • Letters to the Editor are

welcomed • Must be signed and a phone number

included so the writer’s identity can be verified.

• ECA Review reserves the right to edit letters for

legal considerations, taste and brevity. Letters

and columns submitted are not necessarily the

opinion of this newspaper.

MEMBER OF:

MAIL BAG

Goes with the flow!

Dear Editor,

Just a comment on editorial titled

“People corrupt power’, March 4, 2021,

pg. 6, calling Joe Biden a “God fearing

man of humility”?

If he truly feared God he would not

be pro-abortion?

I believe he is Roman Catholic and

his position is totally against his

Church’s teachings!

JOYCE WEBSTER

Publisher/Editor

publisher@ECAreview.com

YVONNE THULIEN

Marketing/Digital 403-575-9474

digital@ECAreview.com

Strange to call Trump “amoral, corrupted”

when he is pro-life!

It’s really hard to know where Joe

Biden stands on anything. He goes

“with the flow”.

There are no perfect men or politicians.

If we wait for that, we would

have no one in office!

Margaret Lane

Big Valley, Alta.

Proper research required

to go total ‘Green’

Dear Editor,

“Green” will not go far without the

help of proper research and the help of

what we have now as far as oil and gas

(O&G), nuclear, solar, wind, hydro...

DEF (diesel exhaust fluid) for diesel

trucks: a fluid used to prevent soot and

gasses entering the atmosphere and at

the same time drive up the costs one

engine repairs and pollute landfills

with non-recyclable plastic containers

is turning out to be a DUD!

OR ...

Mining open pits for non-renewable

lithium used in batteries for electric

vehicles that require hydrocarbons

(from oil and gas) for greased bearings

and rubber tires, plastic (O&G) and

metal panels (mining required for raw

materials)!

Plus batteries developed to this day

still do not have the capabilities for

long term storage of electrical power.

By the charging aspect ratio to get the

electric vehicle (EV) charged to use as

an everyday unit costs more per litre of

gas then an ICE (internal combustion

engine)!

Then there is the cost of revamping a

home electrical service that most

homes in a town/city block cannot

handle!

When you purchase an EV from a

dealer, the charger given takes days to

charge. A super charger, which makes

a.car usable daily, almost requires a 70

to 100 amp breaker which by the way

not only adds to double the house

power, it exponentially adds demand to

the block power grid, then exponentially

adds to the whole power grid

which by the way, would crash most

power plants we already have.

What about end of life wind turbine

props that have mass graves in

Wyoming because there is no recycle

plan in place for a unit that also uses

steel (O&G mined and produced) and

grease for bearing (O&G) product.

I am for GREEN without question.

My yard has solar, my neighbours

have turbines....however this last cold

snap in Alberta, they were useless!

Solar in Alberta in the cold and the

now closed solar farm in southern

Alberta below -25°C were crap.

Some so called experts say that solar

charges better in the cold, are telling a

half truth....it takes energy to keep the

batteries at a certain temperature and

snow and cloud cover are blockers.

Turbines ice up so O&G kept my

place warm, as it did with every

Albertan who used natural gas, diesel

or coal to heat their home and used

their ICE units to drive to work and

feed livestock while using natural gas/

coal fired power to light their homes!

Stop the fear mongering and do all

100 per cent of the research to the bitter

end . . . not stop at a point to say ‘this

looks okay’ and invent a cart that goes

in front a horse...

There is a long ways to go yet!

Adam Badzioch

Hanna, Alta.

BRENDA SCHIMKE

Editorial Writer

JUDY WALGENBACH

Marketing 403-740-2492

marketing@ECAreview.com

TERRI HUXLEY

Reporter 587-321-0030

news1@ECAreview.com

NIAOMI DYCK

Circulation

STU SALKELD

LJI Reporter 403-741-2615

reporter@ECAreview.com

LISA MYERS-SORTLAND

Graphic Artist

R

18 pt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!