31.03.2021 Views

Retail CBDC Operational Considerations

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Retail</strong> Central Bank<br />

Digital Currency<br />

<strong>Operational</strong> <strong>Considerations</strong><br />

MARCH 31, 2021<br />

John Kiff<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 1


A retail <strong>CBDC</strong> is a widely accessible digital<br />

representation of a sovereign currency that is<br />

issued by, and a liability of, a jurisdiction’s<br />

central bank or monetary authority.<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 2


Where Do <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>CBDC</strong> Fit in the Money Matrix<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 3


Jurisdictions Where <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>CBDC</strong> Is Being Explored (as of March 17, 2021)<br />

Where central banks have launched or piloted (or soon will)<br />

Bahamas (fully launched) Eastern Caribbean (03/31/21 pilot launch) Uruguay (pilot completed)<br />

China (pilot launched)<br />

Ecuador (pilot done & project discontinued)<br />

Where central banks have done proofs of concepts (or soon will)<br />

Jamaica (see also here and here)<br />

Sweden (proof of concept started)<br />

Korea (proof of concept started)<br />

Ukraine (proof of concept done)<br />

Where central banks are in advanced stages of research and development<br />

Canada Japan United States<br />

Euro Area<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Where central banks are still in the exploratory stages<br />

Australia India Norway<br />

Brazil Indonesia Philippines<br />

Chile Israel Russia<br />

Curaçao en Sint Maarten Kenya South Africa<br />

Denmark Kuwait Switzerland<br />

Eswatini Madagascar Thailand<br />

Finland Malaysia Trinidad and Tobago<br />

Ghana Mauritius Tunisia<br />

Hong Kong SAR Morocco Turkey (update)<br />

Iceland<br />

New Zealand<br />

Where central banks have explored or are exploring issuing retail <strong>CBDC</strong><br />

(according to reputable news sources)<br />

Bahrain Iran Pakistan<br />

Egypt Kazakhstan Palestine<br />

Haiti Lebanon Rwanda<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 4


Central Bank Motivations for Issuing <strong>CBDC</strong><br />

Emerging Market & Developing<br />

Economies<br />

Financial digitalization and<br />

inclusion<br />

Reducing physical cash costs and<br />

risks<br />

Reducing dollarization<br />

Advanced Economies<br />

Enhancing payment system competition<br />

In face of declining cash usage<br />

Distributing stimulus payments<br />

Improving monetary policy effectiveness: targeted policy, accessing granular<br />

real-time payments data, breaking through lower zero bound on policy rates<br />

Attempting to derail global stablecoin adoption<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 5


Risks of Issuing <strong>CBDC</strong><br />

• <strong>CBDC</strong> could affect financial stability and banking intermediation if it<br />

competes with bank deposits.<br />

• Banks could also increase their reliance on wholesale funding, with<br />

implications for funding cost and stability, and market discipline.<br />

• Several suggestions have been put forward to control potential banking<br />

sector disintermediation, including holding/transaction limits, variable<br />

interest rates/fees, and restricted conversion modalities.<br />

• <strong>CBDC</strong> may increase bank run risks by offering a readily available, safe,<br />

and liquid alternative to deposits, depending on the <strong>CBDC</strong>’s design.<br />

• <strong>CBDC</strong> could affect the transmission of monetary policy.<br />

• <strong>CBDC</strong> of reserve currency countries available across borders could<br />

increase currency substitution (“dollarization”).<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 6


Analysis and identification of all<br />

risks (macroeconomic, monetary<br />

policy, financial stability, cyber).<br />

<strong>CBDC</strong> Decision-Making Process Flow<br />

Clarifying objectives provides a framework for balancing pros and cons of <strong>CBDC</strong><br />

issuance and guiding design options. The decision-making process starts with<br />

understanding thoroughly the problem to be solved and the full array of solutions.<br />

Foundational capacity assessment to determine if appropriate legal, regulatory/<br />

supervisory frameworks in place, CB’s governance, organization and risk management<br />

up to challenge of managing <strong>CBDC</strong>? If not, capacity building may be in order.<br />

Identification of user and payment ecosystem preferences/requirements including<br />

via surveys and focus groups will drive design choices, and feasibility of <strong>CBDC</strong>.<br />

Key design choices include operating model, degree of anonymity/privacy, availability/<br />

limitations, renumeration, and platform (centralized v decentralized database)<br />

Technology solution assessment vs<br />

design, risks and adoption criteria via PoCs.<br />

Public acceptance, impacts and use cases<br />

assessment with pilots.<br />

Issue <strong>CBDC</strong>?<br />

If PoC reveals gaps, further research<br />

on technology and design required.<br />

If pilots reveal gaps, further research on<br />

use cases, design and impact.<br />

Exit/postpone <strong>CBDC</strong> project at least temporarily.<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 7


To <strong>CBDC</strong> or Not To <strong>CBDC</strong><br />

Objective: Support financial<br />

digitization & inclusion and/or<br />

reduce cash usage<br />

Is digital infrastructure robust<br />

& widely available? If not<br />

upgrade and/or expand.<br />

Regulatory and policy levers<br />

are unable to incentivize<br />

private PSPs to step up?<br />

Objective: Enhance payment<br />

system competition / reduce<br />

monopoly distortions<br />

Are platforms contestable &<br />

interoperable? If not, develop<br />

and encourage contestability<br />

& interoperability<br />

Regulatory and policy levers<br />

are unable to increase<br />

competition/ reduce monopoly<br />

distortions?<br />

Consider issuing <strong>CBDC</strong><br />

Objective: Offset declining<br />

usage of cash, loss of<br />

monetary sovereignty.<br />

Policy levers cannot offset<br />

declining use of cash or<br />

central bank money? If yes,<br />

put them in place.<br />

Objective: Enhance monetary policy effectiveness? If yes, consider interest-bearing <strong>CBDC</strong> and making<br />

cash more costly to hold.<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 8


<strong>CBDC</strong> Business Model <strong>Considerations</strong><br />

Are there enough willing PSPs to run a<br />

whole <strong>CBDC</strong> ecosystem?<br />

Yes<br />

Consider two-tier or synthetic <strong>CBDC</strong><br />

No<br />

Does CB have capacity to (or want to) run a<br />

<strong>CBDC</strong> ecosystem by itself?<br />

Yes<br />

Consider a single-tier <strong>CBDC</strong>?<br />

Incentives<br />

A <strong>CBDC</strong> ecosystem should create economic incentives for all participants to participate in ways that<br />

serve central bank interests. In the case of a two-tier <strong>CBDC</strong> or s<strong>CBDC</strong> ecosystem, there should be a<br />

cost-effective business model for such PSPs with enough revenues from interest spreads, fees, and<br />

cross-subsidization, as well as controllable fixed and variable costs. Also, economic incentives for<br />

users and merchants should leave room for enough users to reach critical mass and incentivize<br />

network buildup while promoting PSP market competition. For example, regulations that encourage<br />

interoperability of competing payment systems to encourage new entrants and reduce concentration<br />

risk should take care not to adversely impact network build-up.<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 9


Design <strong>Considerations</strong><br />

• Availability and limitations: Decisions have to be made about who can<br />

hold <strong>CBDC</strong>, limits on holding/transaction size, offline availability and<br />

convertibility limits.<br />

• Privacy and transparency: Financial integrity, privacy and transparency<br />

requirements need to be balanced.<br />

• Interest-bearing: <strong>CBDC</strong> could be remunerated to modulate demand or<br />

enhance monetary policy transmission. Even if not interest bearing at first,<br />

capacity should be incorporated into design.<br />

• Programmability: Point-of-sale tax payments, integration with physical<br />

devices or IoT applications, or automate distribution of economic relief<br />

based on specific demographic or other characteristics.<br />

• Ledger (de)centralization: If a decentralized platform is chosen, decisions<br />

have to made as to whether ledger maintenance is permissioned or public.<br />

• Cross border functionality and inter-operability?<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 10


Cyber Risk Management Workflow<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 11


INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 12


Discussion and Questions?<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 13


References<br />

Adrian, T., and T. Mancini-Griffoli. 2019a. “The Rise of Digital Money,” IMF Fintech Note 19/01.<br />

----. 2019b. “Central Bank Digital Currencies: 4 Questions and Answers,” International Monetary Fund Blog,<br />

December 12.<br />

Auer, R. and R. Boehme. 2020. “The Technology of <strong>Retail</strong> Central Bank Digital Currency,” Bank for International<br />

Settlements Quarterly Review, March.<br />

Bank of England. 2020. “Central Bank Digital Currency: Opportunities, Challenges and Design,” Discussion Paper,<br />

March.<br />

Bindseil, U. 2020. “Tiered <strong>CBDC</strong> and the Financial System,” European Central Bank Working Paper No. 2351,<br />

January.<br />

Bossu, W., M. Itatani, C. Margulis, A. Rossi, H. Weenink and A. Yoshinaga. 2020. “Legal Aspects of Central Bank<br />

Digital Currency: Central Bank and Monetary Law <strong>Considerations</strong>,” IMF Working Paper No. 20/254.<br />

European Central Bank. 2019. “Exploring Anonymity in Central Bank Digital Currencies,” ECB In Focus, December.<br />

Kiff, J., J. Alwazir, S. Davidovic, A. Farias, A. Khan, T. Khiaonarong, M. Malaika, H.K. Monroe, N. Sugimoto, H.<br />

Tourpe, and P. Zhou. 2020. “A Survey of Research on <strong>Retail</strong> Central Bank Digital Currency,” IMF Working Paper No.<br />

20/104.<br />

Mancini-Griffoli, T., M.S. Martinez Peria, I. Agur, A. Ari, J. Kiff, A. Popescu, and C. Rochon. 2018. “Casting Light on<br />

Central Bank Digital Currency,” IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/18/08.<br />

Shah, D., R. Arora, H. Du, S. Darbha, J. Miedema, and C. Minwalla. 2020. “Technology Approach for a <strong>CBDC</strong>,” Bank<br />

of Canada Staff Analytical Note 2020-6.<br />

Sveriges Riksbank. 2020. Economic Review: Second Special Issue on the E-Krona.<br />

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!