23.04.2021 Views

Blue Chip Issue 79

This 79th issue of Blue Chip focuses on the art, science and business of investment. Blue Chip is the financial planner’s chaperone to everything investment and this edition is a smorgasboard of the choices, decisions, lessons and associations that relate to it.

This 79th issue of Blue Chip focuses on the art, science and business of investment. Blue Chip is the financial planner’s chaperone to everything investment and this edition is a smorgasboard of the choices, decisions, lessons and associations that relate to it.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOUTIQUES<br />

Why we like boutiques<br />

Independent, owner-managed companies tend to have their own<br />

money invested alongside clients and, essentially, “eat their own<br />

cooking”. Boutique businesses are often characterised by multigenerational<br />

management teams and succession plans. When we<br />

see this, it signals a commitment to, and focus on, long-term returns<br />

over short-term profits. In fact, alignment of interest is one of the<br />

most important factors in our assessment. To this end, we applaud<br />

when fund management businesses are willing to close funds to<br />

manage capacity and protect the interests of existing clients.<br />

Boutique businesses are<br />

often characterised by multigenerational<br />

management<br />

teams and succession plans.<br />

Another positive knock-on effect of this ownership structure<br />

is the ability to attract and retain some of the best talent in the<br />

industry, because the incentive system allows talented employees<br />

to directly own the results of their investment performance.<br />

Smaller, boutique investment managers do not have the<br />

benefit of a big, established brand or distribution networks to rely<br />

on during more challenging periods. This further distils their focus<br />

on delivering superior investment performance consistently and<br />

results that speak for themselves.<br />

Importantly, the absence of corporate red tape and smaller<br />

assets under management allow for nimbleness and flexibility<br />

in internal decision-making as well as from an implementation<br />

perspective. This often means these boutiques can react faster and<br />

with more clarity than their larger incumbents.<br />

Although having these characteristics does not guarantee that<br />

an asset manager will be successful, research does show that these<br />

factors characterise managers who have generated good returns<br />

for clients over the long term – and the performance of our Best<br />

of Breed fund managers across our range of funds over the last<br />

decade and a half certainly reflects this.<br />

The other side of the coin<br />

However, there is a downside to being smaller and for some<br />

asset management companies, the challenges have become<br />

insurmountable. Profit margins in asset management have been<br />

and will continue to be under pressure. This is happening globally,<br />

and it is generally a good thing because the consumer ends up<br />

with a better outcome, but there can be severe consequences for<br />

some companies.<br />

One of the big consequences, and we’ve seen it through various<br />

cycles, is that, as margin pressure grows, there is an increase in the<br />

level of assets that management companies need to sustain their<br />

businesses. For certain companies that don’t get to scale, this is a<br />

challenge, and we’ve seen a number of smaller asset managers<br />

either combine or not survive in this environment.<br />

We’ve also seen some companies struggle through periods<br />

of under-performance and without the distribution network or<br />

brand to fall back on, they cannot survive the consequent loss of<br />

assets, even if the weaker performance period has been relatively<br />

short-term.<br />

Team size can also be a double-edged sword for multi-asset<br />

managers who function with small, focused teams, as they may<br />

not always have the breadth of expertise to cover all asset classes.<br />

The sweet spot<br />

The key is to find the sweet spot for boutique businesses – the<br />

balance between being small enough to remain agile, but big<br />

enough to be sufficiently resourced and survive market shocks<br />

and surprises.<br />

We want flexibility. We want owner-managed firms. We want<br />

managers to be able to implement their views. But we don’t want<br />

them to be worrying about<br />

whether they can survive, and<br />

this is an important focus for us<br />

when we assess potential fund<br />

managers as partners.<br />

We believe the benefits of<br />

independent, well-managed<br />

boutique asset management<br />

firms outweigh the negatives<br />

and there will always be a<br />

place for boutiques who can<br />

demonstrably add value and<br />

have an edge that is sustainable.<br />

However, the reality is that asset<br />

managers of all sizes are going<br />

to need to demonstrate how<br />

they add value, or they are<br />

going to be under pressure in<br />

turbulent environments. <br />

Nic Andrew, Head of<br />

Nedgroup Investments<br />

www.bluechipdigital.co.za<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!