Prince George Dangerous Goods Routes - Greater Vancouver Section

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Selection of Risk According to: • Opus’ objective assessment • Input from stakeholders and the public (preliminary results presented in consultation process) Criteria Access control Route Risk Rating Low Moderate High Extreme 25 50 75 100 All intersections along route are signalized / few issues with sight distances / few private access points Few unsignalized intersections along route / some issues with sight distances that are correctable / some private access points Some unsignalized intersections along route / some issues with sight distances that are difficult to correct / many private access points (low volume) Many unsignalized intersections along route / many sight distance issues and most are difficult to correct / many private access points (high volume) Weighting Factor 3
Results The higher the total risk score, the lower the desirability Min Score 500 Max Score 2000
Page 1 and 2: 2009 ITE Quad Conference Prince Geo
Page 3 and 4: SR1 Project Tasks • Literature re
Page 5 and 6: Literature Review Legislation • F
Page 7 and 8: Prince George Public Consultation M
Page 9 and 10: Evaluation Methodology Framework
Page 11 and 12: Ideal Characteristics for a Dangero
Page 13: Criteria Access control Population
Page 17 and 18: Recommended DGR Network - Short Ter
Page 19 and 20: Risk Reduction Measures - Legislati
Page 21 and 22: Conclusions • DG routes generally

Prince George Dangerous Goods Routes - Greater Vancouver Section

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?