30.05.2021 Views

Chemistry

10th A Carla Luna Keiry Matute Valeria Zúniga Valeria Lobo

10th A
Carla Luna
Keiry Matute
Valeria Zúniga
Valeria Lobo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.



Researchers in various

biomedical fields have taken

center stage in efforts to

understand how the SARS-CoV-2

virus functions and spreads and

how to prevent and treat the

disease, with a vaccine being a

major goal. Environmental

chemistry researchers are also

playing a crucial—but sometimes

overlooked—role in handling the

COVID-19 pandemic and other

possible future disease outbreaks.

A new paper published in the

journal Environmental Chemistry

Letters explores some of the ways

in which the environmental

chemistry field is crucial to

studying, treating and preventing

disease outbreaks. Lead author of

the paper, Virender Sharma, PhD,

professor in the Department of

Environmental and Occupational

Public Health at the Texas A&M

School of Public Health, describes

how environmental factors such

as pollution and climate change

could affect disease outbreaks

and how environmental chemistry

is a crucial part of understanding

how pandemics like COVID-19

occur and evolve. For example,

climate change can increase risks

of food-borne and water-borne

illnesses and air pollution can

dramatically affect the immune

system.

Sharma and colleagues

described several areas where

environmental chemists can

improve knowledge of disease

outbreaks. COVID-19 is thought

to be spread through

aerosolized droplets, though

there is some uncertainty about

the survival of those droplets on

different

surfaces.

Environmental chemistry deals

extensively with the fate of

airborne particles such as

aerosols, particulate matter

and dust, so the field is wellsuited

to studying factors

involved in virus transmission.

Virus survival on solid surfaces is

another crucial issue, and

environmental chemist are

acquainted with driving factors

of this such as material

composition and pore size. The

researchers note that future

research on how different

materials and environmental

factors affect virus survival will

be important.

The research areas and

directions for further study

that Sharma and

colleagues identify in their

paper show how

environmental chemistry

can play a unique and

valuable role in countering

disease outbreaks now and

in the future. Additionally,

increased collaboration

between environmental

chemists and researchers in

various biomedical fields will

be helpful in understanding,

preventing and treating

disease outbreaks. As the

current

pandemic

continues, researchers in

these fields will have more

opportunities to further

explore many different

aspects of the disease. With

a better understanding of

how viruses interact with the

environment, the world’s

scientific and medical

experts have a greater

chance of handling COVID-

19 and preventing or

mitigating

future

pandemics.




Chemistry can guarantee a

specific attitude in criticism,

forma mentis, with its

epistemological characteristics

that are highly dependent on

conceptual, theoretical and

experimental diversity. For these

reasons, chemistry can support

and act as a “glue” in the group

of disciplines that have made up

the fundamental historical group

to combat Covid-19. But chemists

can contribute to facing specific

aspects of a pandemic, for

instance, the correlation with

pollution and particularly with the

particulate matter as a vehicle of

the virus in the air. More about it

other than viruses it does not

seem easily understood why real

regulations about PM consider

only the weight and the size of

the particulate without any

scientific interest toward its

nature, to correlate to hygiene

and safety limits.

Another important aspect of

chemistry concerns scientific

data, their meaning, but above

all, how they are obtained and

how they must be

communicated

Chemistry is a predominantly an

inductive science, and then the

scientific method is synonymous

with an experimental method.

For this reason, it is essential that

communication and data

sharing must proceed

successfully, but this latter

condition presupposes easy

accessibility to magazines,

journals and research results.

This is why the chemical

community has always

defended “Open Science

criteria”. But beyond the

technical and scientific

contributions that chemistry

can provide, it is necessary to

re-emphasize one of its unique

characteristics that perhaps

could act as a catalyst in the

team’s work: chemistry works

positively if and only if it can

cultivate, by working alone or in

a team, the concept of diversity

and scientific doubt.

Many in the chemistry

community are making their

contribution to the global fight

against coronavirus by staying

safely at home. Many of those

will be able to work from home.

And many others – often those

designated as key workers by

governments – are going into

their labs, offices and other

workplaces to carry on

essential work.

Chemistry-based research

institutions and companies of

all sizes are refocusing their

efforts towards discovering

more about the virus,

developing improved testing

technologies, and eventually

creating a vaccine. Many

offer services or devices that

already use cutting-edge

chemical science to

measure smaller samples, or

achieve higher throughput.

Chemistry is essential at

every step of our response to

the virus. Beyond research,

technicians are providing

the specialist skills needed to

run tests, maintain

equipment and manage

laboratory supplies -

including the donations of

chemicals for hand san and

safety equipment that are

going straight to doctors and

nurses on the front lines.



In the wake of the novel coronavirus pandemic, chemists have

focused on searching for drugs to treat COVID-19. One group

identified the antiviral drug “Remdesivir” as a viable medicine to treat

COVID-19 in a research study published in late January. The drug was

originally developed in response to the 2014 Ebola pandemic.

In the wake of the novel coronavirus pandemic, Texas A&M University

chemist Wenshe Ray Liu and his research team have focused their lab

solely on searching for drugs to treat COVID-19.

The Liu group was the first to identify the antiviral drug remdesivir as a

viable medicine to treat COVID-19 in a research study published in late January. The drug was

originally developed in response to the 2014 Ebola pandemic. As a chemical biologist

specializing in medicinal chemistry, Liu's primary research target is cancer. But the lockdown

of Wuhan and the first two diagnosed cases in the U.S. prompted him to refocus his lab on

coronavirus.

"The motivation that drove us was the rush against time to find alternative medicines that might

be put in use to fight against the virus when it spread to the U.S," Liu said.

The researchers are working to develop drugs that can prevent SARS-CoV-2 -- the virus that

causes COVID-19 -- and other coronaviruses from replicating once inside human cells. They're

also exploring how to counteract the effect of the viruses in human plasma.

Liu said his group has made significant progress in a

very short time toward their ultimate goal: to push a

COVID-19 drug candidate to preclinical trials and

clinical testing before the pandemic subsides.

"There is sufficient scientific knowledge for this group

of viruses, and we will be able to find cures," he said.

Remdesivir is being tested in at least five large-scale

clinical trials around the world and also has been

delivered to some patients, including the first known

U.S. case confirmed Jan. 21 in Washington. That

patient recovered after compassionate use of

remdesivir.

While Liu said he remains convinced it's the right treatment, he cautioned that success

shouldn't be viewed as a one-shot approach, given such a swift-moving target as COVID-19.


"Remdesivir is still the best and probably the only option to target the virus directly in patients,"

he said.

With the U.S. clinical trial set to finish this week, Liu is optimistic that the final results released

next week will speak for themselves. However, with remdesivir poised to be the only approved

drug to treat COVID-19, its large-scale use will occur, and some drug-resistant virus strains will

evolve.

"At this stage, the scientific community

needs to prepare for the worst and work to

bring other treatment options to the

forefront," he said, adding that while there

have been positive results from tests of

hydroxychloroquine, additional options

are needed. When it comes to viral

mutations and reports that multiple strains

of the virus exist, Liu deferred to clinicians,

but acknowledged that it has become

more virulent.

"The infectivity of the original strain shown in Wuhan was not as high as what we have observed

for the current strain in the U.S.," he said.

Liu is joined in his work by several additional collaborators in the Department of Chemistry and

across the Texas A&M campus, including Distinguished Professor of Chemistry and 2017

National Academy of Sciences member Marcetta Y. Darensbourg, Texas A&M Provost and

Executive Vice President Carol A. Fierke, who is an X-ray crystallography expert, and noted

Texas A&M biochemist Thomas Meek.

Their research is supported by Liu's Texas A&M Presidential Impact Fellow funds through the

Texas A&M Drug Discovery Laboratory, as well as indirectly through the National Institutes of

Health, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of

Texas, and Welch Foundation funding initially provided

for his group's underlying cancer-related research.

Alongside Liu and his faculty colleagues are dozens of

students and postdoctoral researchers who are fully

engaged in the effort, including Tyler Lalonde, Trae

Hampton, Xinyu Ma, Yuying Ma, Erol Vatansever, Jared

Morse, Shiqing Xu, Chia-Chuan Cho, Peng-Hsun Chen,

Yugendar Reddy and Kaci



At the start of 2020, U.S. chemistry faced

headwinds including a global manufacturing

slowdown, protectionist trade policies and

uncertainty about the upcoming U.S. elections. As

the business effects of the pandemic took hold,

chemical production fell. Motor vehicle

production plummeted along with supply chain

output. Housing showed strong gains due to

shifting patterns of remote work and record-low

interest rates. Most other end-use segments

declined, partially offset by demand for

chemistries used to make items used in the response to the pandemic.

“The post-pandemic outlook is for broad-based growth in chemicals supported by solid

fundamentals,” said Martha Moore, senior director of policy analysis and economics at ACC

and co-author of the Outlook. “Growing customer demand, stabilizing export markets, and a

competitive edge linked to domestic supplies of shale gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) are

among the factors pointing to continued gains in U.S. chemistry.”

During 2020, performance among chemical

sectors was mixed. Plastic resins was the only

segment to post positive growth, due to its role in

COVID-related solutions. Other basic chemical

segments declined, especially synthetic rubber –

a key ingredient in tire manufacturing. Specialty

chemicals saw demand falter across nearly all

functional and market segments. ACC expects a

fairly significant rebound in 2021.

“American chemistry is playing a vital role in the global fight against COVID-19, providing

inputs for personal protective equipment, disinfection and sanitation products, medical

supplies and equipment, protective barriers, and plastic packaging, among others,” said

Kevin Swift, ACC chief economist and Outlook co-author. In March, the U.S. Department of

Homeland Security identified the chemical sector and its workers as ‘Essential Critical

Infrastructure.’

Total chemical production volume excluding pharmaceuticals fell by 3.6 percent in 2020 and

is expected to grow by 3.9 percent in 2021 and 2.7 percent in 2022. Basic chemicals

production fell 1.3 percent in 2020 and is projected to grow by 5.0 percent in 2021 and 3.2

percent in 2022.


U.S. GDP tumbled 3.8 percent during 2020, down from a 2.3

percent gain in 2019. As the global economy recovers from

the pandemic-induced recession, U.S. growth is expected to

rebound 3.7 percent in 2021 and 3.2 percent in 2022, led by

stronger consumer spending. Industrial production fell 6.9

percent in 2020, with declines occurring in nearly every

sector. Industrial production is expected to rise 3.7 percent in

2021 and 3.5 percent in 2022. Growth is anticipated for nearly

all industries, with the largest gains occurring in motor

vehicles, aerospace, appliances, iron and steel, petroleum refining, and plastic and rubber

products.

U.S. chemicals trade will be notably lower in 2020, and it will be a year or two before total

trade flows return to pre-COVID levels. Total chemicals trade is projected to shrink 7 percent

to $220.8 billion in 2020, then recover to $240 billion in 2021. Exports will fall 9 percent to $124.0

billion in 2020 before expanding to $134.5 billion in 2021. Imports will fall 5 percent to 96.8 billion

in 2020, then recover to $105.5 billion in 2021. The chemicals trade outlook is linked to the shape

of the manufacturing recovery, trade policy, and the course of COVID-19. Potential changes

in global supply chains could affect international trade levels longer-term.


Major contributions to health care have been made by chemistry. The

development of new drugs involves chemical analysis and synthesis of

new compounds. Many recent television programs advertise the large

number of new drugs produced by chemists.

The development of a new drug for any disease is long and

complicated. The chemistry of the disease must be studied, as well as

how the drug affects the human body. A drug may work well in animals,

but not in humans. Out of one hundred drugs that offer the possibility of

treating disease, only a small handful actually turn out to be both safe

and effective.

Chemistry contributes to the preparation and use of

materials for surgery (sutures, artificial skin, and sterile

materials). The sutures used in many surgeries today

do not have to be removed, because they simply

dissolve in the body after a period of time.

Replacement blood vessels for heart and other types

of surgery are often made of chemicals that do not

react with the tissues, so they will not be rejected by

the body. As another example, artificial skin can be

used to replace human skin for burn patients.

Clinical laboratory testing uses a wide variety of

chemical techniques and instrumentation for analysis.

Clinical laboratory testing allows us to answer

commonly asked questions such as "is your cholesterol

high?" and "do you have diabetes?" Some laboratory

tests use simple techniques. Other processes involve

complex equipment and computer analysis data, in

order to perform measurements on large numbers of

patient samples.


Laboratory testing has come to the local drug store

or grocery store because of developments in

chemistry. You can test your blood glucose using a

simple portable device that runs a chemical test on

the blood sample and tells you how much glucose is

present, allowing a diabetic patient to regulate how

much insulin to administer (chemistry is also used to

produce the insulin and the disposable syringe that

administers the drug).

1.1 Disease

Numerous challenges to human health still

remain. Deadly infectious diseases

including malaria, cholera and tuberculosis

may have been largely conquered in highincome

regions of the world, but remain a

major threat in poorer regions such as

Africa.8 Even in richer nations infectious

disease remains a constant threat, as the

swine flu pandemic in 2009 and the

dramatic increase of antibiotic resistance

has made clear.6

Infectious diseases are still the main cause

of death in many developing countries, because of a lack of readily available and

inexpensive drugs and vaccines treatments. Poverty and a lack of access to modern drugs

mean that infectious diseases that are rare or under control in high-income countries (such as

diarrheal illness, TB and human immunology virus/ acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

(HIV/AIDS) are still major causes of death.8

In high-income countries, some infectious diseases remain a challenge due to the rise of

antibiotic resistance in many bacterial pathogens and the emergence of new strains of

viruses.9 Modern health systems are struggling to cope with the demand for novel and more

effective antibiotics, as pathogens develop resistance to existing treatments. There is an

urgent need for new drugs to fight multi-resistant infectious agents as our present antibiotics

become ineffective due to global misuse in medicine and the food industry.





The periodic table is a tabular

array of the chemical elements

organized by atomic number, from

the element with the lowest

atomic number, hydrogen, to the

element with the highest atomic

number, oganesson. The atomic

number of an element is the

number of protons in the nucleus of

an atom of that element.

Hydrogen has 1 proton, and

oganesson has 118.

All matter in the universe is composed of several

chemical elements. These chemical building blocks are

also the basis for all living organisms on Earth. While living

organisms contain several different elements, some

elements are found in greater abundance in living

organisms. These elements are oxygen, carbon,

hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus.

To summarize, the periodic table is important because it

is organized to provide a great deal of information about

elements and how they relate to one another in one

easy-to-use reference.

The table can be used to predict the properties of

elements, even those that have not yet been

discovered.

Columns (groups) and rows (periods) indicate elements

that share similar characteristics.

The table makes trends in element properties apparent

and easy to understand.

The table provides important information used to

balance chemical equations.


Meyer's periodic table, published

in "Die modernen Theorien der

Chemie",

1864

Newlands's law of octaves

1866

Mendeleev's first Attempt at a

system of elements

1869


Mendeleev's Natural system of the

elements 1870

Mendeleev's periodic table

1871

Dimitri Mendeleev

1873


Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!