Angelus News | July 16, 2021 | Vol. 6 No. 14

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Acts of contrition If Pope Francis repeats his predecessor’s apology to indigenous Canadians for abuses at residential schools, will it stick this time? BY JOHN L. ALLEN JR. ROME — At one level, the current press for Pope Francis to apologize for the abuse of indigenous persons at Church-run residential schools in Canada might seem a bit gratuitous, given that another pope already did issue such an apology more than a decade ago. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, who became the first pope in history to apologize for the clerical sexual abuse crisis during a meeting with victims in the United States in 2008, issued the “mea culpa” to indigenous Canadians in 2009. Pope Benedict met representatives of the First Nations, groups of Canada’s indigenous population, in the Vatican in late April 2009, roughly a year after his trip to the U.S. Though the session itself was private, the Vatican issued a statement afterward indicating the pontiff had delivered the hoped-for apology. “Given the sufferings that some indigenous children experienced in the Canadian residential school system, the Holy Father expressed his sorrow at the anguish caused by the deplorable conduct of some members of the Phil Fontaine, leader of Canada’s Assembly of First Nations, at the Vatican in 2009. Fontaine was one of the native leaders who met then with Pope Benedict XVI about the legacy of Indian residential schools, many of which were run by Catholic dioceses and orders. | MANUELA DE MEO/CNS, CATHOLIC PRESS PHOTO church and he offered his sympathy and prayerful solidarity,” the Vatican said. Members of the First Nations groups at the time called the apology historic. “Today, to listen to the Holy Father explain his profound sorrow and 18 • ANGELUS • July 16, 2021
sadness and to express that there was no room for this sort of abuse to take place in the residential schools, that is an emotional barrier that now has been lifted for many people,” said Chief Edward John of the Tlazten First Nations. Phil Fontaine, national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, also said he appreciated the apology. “I think His Holiness understands the pain that was endured by so many, and I heard him say that it caused him great anguish,” said Fontaine. “I also heard His Holiness say that the abuse of the nature that was inflicted on us has no place in the Church; it’s intolerable.” “What I heard,” Fontaine added, “it gives me comfort.” It was also praised by the prelate who represented the Canadian bishops in the session, Archbishop Gérard Pettipas of the Archdiocese of Grouard-McLennan. “It was important to hear from the one person who does speak for the Catholic Church around the world, to hear him say ‘I am sorry. I feel for what you people have suffered. We hope that we can turn the page and move toward a better future together,’ ” he said. It was well known a decade ago that more than 150,000 native Canadian children had been compelled to attend these residential schools from the mid-19th century through the 1970s, that for most of that time the schools had been run by the Catholic Church, and that physical and sexual abuse had been rampant. Thus Pope Benedict was issuing a blanket apology for the whole sorry story, while unambiguously recognizing the Church’s role in it. Given that history, how does one explain the recent press by indigenous Canadians for more apologies, including one from the pope, which they now hope will come in a Dec. 17-20 audience with Pope Francis announced this week by the Canadian bishops? Equally, how do we explain the public demand for an apology by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who claimed the Church has been “silent” and “not stepping up”? Surely someone in the Canadian government, or the country’s bishops’ conference, could gently point out that his claims of silence aren’t quite right? For one thing, 12 years ago is a long time, and it’s possible that not only the emotional impact of Pope Benedict’s apology has faded but the very memory of it in some quarters. The fact that Pope Benedict’s papacy generally had a reduced public and media profile may play some role. For another, we didn’t know in 2009 that the suffering of native children for more than a century included not merely physical and sexual abuse, but also deaths amid neglect and obscurity. That reality was brought home by the recent Kamloops discovery earlier this year, when the remains of some 250 children, unceremoniously placed in what amounts to a mass grave, were found on the grounds of what had been the country’s single largest residential school. Since that discovery was made in late May, the finding of remains on the grounds of other residential schools has also been reported. The past 12 years have also, of course, witnessed the further unraveling of the Catholic Church’s public standing due to further revelations of various sorts of abuse, combined with the sometimes anemic and unconvincing efforts of Church authorities to come to terms with that past. All of that makes Pope Francis’ mid-December session with members of three different Canadian indigenous groups — First Nations, the Metis, and the Inuit — which will include elders and Knowledge Keepers, residential school survivors, and youth from across the country, especially fraught. No doubt Pope Francis will deliver the desired apology, as Pope Benedict did before him. In this case, the session will stretch over a full three days, with the pontiff meeting each Protesters take part in a group of indigenous individually march from the Ontario provincial legislature before bringing in Toronto on June 6, everyone together after the remains of 215 at the end, and children were found on it strains credulity that the Vat- the grounds of the Kamloops Indian Residential ican would have School in May. | CHRIS agreed to such a HELGREN/CNS, REUTERS format without believing the pope will deliver. Will the apology stick this time? Perhaps, in all likelihood, it depends in part on how many more gruesome revelations the future holds, and therefore how much previous apologies fade from memory in the harsh light of new truths. John L. Allen Jr. is the editor of Crux. July 16, 2021 • ANGELUS • 19
Page 1 and 2: THE GOAL IS LOVE Behind the scenes
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS Pope Watch................
Page 5 and 6: NEW WORLD OF FAITH ARCHBISHOP JOS
Page 7 and 8: NATION ■ Texas: Suspected embezzl
Page 9 and 10: IN OTHER WORDS... V An objective ta
Page 11 and 12: July 16, 2021 • ANGELUS • 9
Page 13 and 14: y chatter and other sorts of distra
Page 15 and 16: In frustration, he went to talk to
Page 17 and 18: with men in prison, incarcerated ju
Page 19: The honorees of this year’s St. J
Page 23 and 24: Abortion may dominate the news cycl
Page 26 and 27: SHUTTERSTOCK When Silicon Thoughts
Page 28 and 29: AD REM ROBERT BRENNAN Like a thief
Page 30 and 31: INSIDE THE PAGES KRIS MCGREGOR Bet
Page 32 and 33: DESIRE LINES HEATHER KING The glob
Page 34 and 35: LETTER AND SPIRIT SCOTT HAHN Scott

Angelus News | July 16, 2021 | Vol. 6 No. 14

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?