Design Yearbook 2016
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>2016</strong><br />
School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape<br />
Newcastle University
Contents<br />
Welcome 3<br />
BA (Hons) Architecture 4<br />
Charrette<br />
Stage 1<br />
Stage 2<br />
Stage 3<br />
BA Dissertation<br />
Fieldwork and Site Visits<br />
4<br />
BA Architecture & Urban Planning (AUP) 80<br />
Stage 1<br />
Stage 2<br />
Stage 3<br />
MArch 90<br />
Stage 5 - Semester 1<br />
Thinking-Through-Making Week<br />
Stage 5 - Semester 2<br />
Stage 6<br />
MArch Dissertation<br />
Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology - Zeynep Kezer<br />
Linked Research<br />
90<br />
Research in Architecture 164<br />
Mountains & Megastructures<br />
A Mountain Near Thebes - Andrew Ballantyne<br />
Taught Masters Programmes<br />
PhD / PhD by Creative Practice<br />
Architecture Research Collaborative<br />
164
Welcome<br />
Professor Graham Farmer – Director of Architecture<br />
Welcome to this <strong>Yearbook</strong> which is a wonderful record of the hard work and achievements of staff<br />
and students during the past 12 months. The School has seen a number of positive changes this year<br />
and we have integrated new full and part-time colleagues, introduced numerous new teaching and<br />
research initiatives and integrated a wide range of new design projects and studios, each of which have<br />
delivered some outstanding work at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels.<br />
I would like to take the opportunity to thank those colleagues who have taken up new teaching<br />
management roles this year; Sam Austin and Zeynep Kezer as BA and MArch Programme Directors<br />
respectively, and the new Stage coordination teams; Ed Wainwright and Claire Harper in Stage 2,<br />
Matthew Margetts, Matt Ozga-Lawn and Josep-Maria García-Fuentes in Stage 3, James Craig and<br />
Steve Parnell in Stage 5 and Adam Sharr in Stage 6. Each of them has brought innovation but also<br />
a concern for continuity to their new roles and this is represented by the work in this book which<br />
once again conveys the diversity, sense of invention, energy, enthusiasm and relevance that continue<br />
to characterise and define our teaching and research. This year we will also graduate the first cohort<br />
of students from our cross-disciplinary undergraduate degree programme in Architecture and Urban<br />
Planning (AUP) and a selection of their work is included in this book for the first time. Establishing<br />
a new programme has brought substantial challenges and has required a real commitment on behalf<br />
of staff to get to this point. I would particularly like to thank Armelle Tardiveau and Daniel Mallo for<br />
their invaluable contribution in this respect and also to wish the first graduates from the programme<br />
all the best as they move into the next stages of their education or future careers.<br />
The Architecture Research Collaborative continues to go from strength to strength under the<br />
Directorship of Katie Lloyd-Thomas and Martyn Dade-Robertson and this year has seen a number of<br />
exciting developments in the context of architectural research in the School. One highlight of this year<br />
was the Mountains and Megastructures event which brought together staff and students to exhibit<br />
and present a diverse range of creative practice, historical, cultural and geographic research into large,<br />
landscape-scale artifices – mountainous, real, fictitious and otherwise. The active participation of<br />
our students in this event is evidence of our ongoing commitment to developing and supporting<br />
a research-based culture within our taught programmes and this in turn helps to support design<br />
outputs of the very highest quality. During the past year the work of our students has been recognised<br />
in numerous competitions and particular mention goes to Assia Stefanova and Rob Arthur who<br />
were placed first and runner-up in the RIBA Hadrian Medal for Part 2 with Randi Karangizi also<br />
runner-up at Part 1. Stage 5 students Becky Wise, Katie Fisher and Noor Jan-Mohamed were also<br />
awarded first place in the North Pennines Community Observatory design competition which is<br />
now being built at Allenheads. Our success in design competitions has also been mirrored by the<br />
Newcastle University Architecture Society (NUAS) who were this year recognised by the Student’s<br />
Union as the University’s Best Departmental Society. I would like to take the opportunity to thank<br />
NUAS President Regen-James Gregg and all of his excellent team, who have made an invaluable<br />
contribution to the wider life of the School and who have been so important in helping to maintain<br />
the sense of identity and community that so defines the character of our School.<br />
Fifty years ago the School of Architecture moved into what we know as our current home – a<br />
newly refurbished Architecture Building and a brand new Building Science wing. Those building<br />
developments brought the staff and students of Architecture together for the first time in many years<br />
because for most of the 1960s the School had to function in scattered accommodation in various<br />
buildings on campus and for a while even in temporary huts.<br />
We are now undergoing the first major redevelopment of our estate since 1966 and during the next<br />
academic year we will move into our new workshop facilities and studio accommodation which<br />
will extend the existing Building Science wing and provide us with significantly enhanced facilities.<br />
The new building will certainly help support our pedagogical and research ambitions well into the<br />
future but it is also interesting to look back at the thoughts of our predecessors as they moved into<br />
their new home fifty years ago. In his speech to mark the opening of the new School of Architecture,<br />
Professor Jack Napper, (then Head of School) took the opportunity to outline the character of the<br />
architectural programmes at Newcastle, describing design pedagogy as a continual and uncertain<br />
experiment and suggesting that an ideal specification for a programme in Architecture would be one<br />
that could educate in the best and widest sense, that could develop the ability in students to apply<br />
their developing knowledge to new situations, and could propagate a strong sense of human values.<br />
As we reflect on another year of positive change and look forward to the next stage in our evolution<br />
it is reassuring to know that the educational values held by those who came before us are still both<br />
recognisable and relevant today.<br />
3
BA (Hons) Architecture<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Newcastle’s RIBA Part I accredited BA programme fosters an inclusive, research-led approach to<br />
architecture. Alongside a thorough grounding in all the skills required to become an imaginative,<br />
culturally informed, socially aware and technically competent design professional, it offers<br />
opportunities to engage in developments at the forefront of current research, from computation and<br />
material science to architectural history and theory. Emphasising collaboration as well as independent<br />
critical enquiry, we encourage students to draw on diverse methods and fields of knowledge, to follow<br />
their own interests and to develop their own design approach.<br />
We believe that to produce good architecture requires more than rounded abilities and knowledge;<br />
it requires judgements about what we value in the buildings and cities we inhabit, what to prioritise<br />
in the spaces and structures we propose and what contribution architecture can make. The course<br />
doesn’t claim to offer simple – or correct – responses to these challenges. Our diverse community<br />
of researchers and practitioners, each with their own interests and expertise, introduce students to<br />
a range of issues, ideas, traditions and techniques in architectural design and scholarship. We help<br />
students develop fine grained skills in interpreting spaces and texts, critical thinking to understand<br />
the implications of design decisions, and spatial and material imagination to stretch the boundaries of<br />
what architecture can achieve. Rather than teach a single way of working, we give students the tools<br />
to discover what kind of architect they want to be.<br />
A lively design studio is central to this learning process and to the life of the School. <strong>Design</strong><br />
projects, taught by a mix of in-house tutors and practitioners from across the UK, account for<br />
half of all module credits. We promote design as thinking-through-making, an integrated process<br />
of researching and testing ideas in sketchbook, computer, workshop and on site, of responding to<br />
diverse issues and requirements all at once – spatial, material, functional, social, economic etc. This<br />
approach is reinforced by collaborative projects involving artists and engineers, and at the beginning<br />
of each year by week-long design charrettes where students from all stages of all design programmes<br />
work together to respond to diverse design challenges, through installations around the School and<br />
beyond. Lectures, seminars and assignments in other modules examine the theoretical, historical,<br />
cultural, practical and professional dimensions of architecture, and support students to embed these<br />
concerns in studio work.<br />
Stages 1 and 2 are structured to guide students through increasingly challenging scales, kinds and<br />
contexts of design projects, a breadth of related constructional and environmental principles and<br />
varied themes in architectural history and theory. Briefs invite experimentation with different<br />
architectural ideas and representational skills, first through projects set in Newcastle, then<br />
incorporating study trips to regional towns and cities. As work increases in depth and complexity<br />
– from room to house, community to city, simple enclosure to multi-storey building – students<br />
have more opportunities to develop and focus their own interests. A dissertation – an in-depth<br />
original study into any architecturally related topic – sets the scene for a year-long Stage 3 final<br />
design project. With a choice of diverse thematic studios, each with its own expert contributors and<br />
international study trip, students acquire specialist skills and knowledge, allowing them to craft their<br />
own distinctive portfolio.<br />
5
Charrette<br />
The academic year kicks off in style with a long, School-wide, intensive workshop known as Charrette Week. It is an extremely creative, explorative<br />
and thought-provoking week, allowing all years and courses to come together to experiment with a wide range of studio themes, which are delivered by<br />
guest artists, engineers and architects. This year’s broad theme of Spectacle/Material/Resistance, generated some fantastic outcomes for the exhibition<br />
at the end of the week, including an indoor beach, a baroque fashion show, mesmerising optical illusions, an immersive theatre production and allencompassing<br />
inflatable structures.<br />
Charrette 1: A Hole in One Week<br />
Holly Hendry<br />
Charrette 2: Aural Dynamics<br />
Gillian Peskett and Joseph Finlay<br />
Charrette 3: Framing Newcastle<br />
Yatwan Hui, Andrea Fox and Liz Leech<br />
Charrette 4: From Precarity to Permanence<br />
Charlotte Gregory and Julia Heslop<br />
Charrette 5: Illusion of Architecture<br />
Jennie Webb and Matt Lawes<br />
Charrette 6: Inflate!<br />
Michael Simpson and Cara Lund<br />
Charrette 7: Migratory Hides<br />
Matt Rowe<br />
Charrette 8: Nu Baroque<br />
Tom Randle and Matt Charlton<br />
Charrette 9: Play! Summer is Not Over<br />
Amara Roca Inglesias and Nicholas Henninger<br />
Charrette 10: Site Specfic Theatre<br />
Hanna Benihoud and Hannah Pierce<br />
Charrette 11: Spectacle, Ruin Value and the Ruination of Spectacle<br />
Gareth Hudson and Nathan Hudson<br />
Charrette 12: Tracing Echoes<br />
Andrew Walker and Kyveli Anastassiadi<br />
Charrette 13: Wonder & Success<br />
Hazel McGregor<br />
6
Stage 1<br />
Stage 1 is a varied introduction to architecture, characterised by numerous workshops, visits and hands-on<br />
activities, and students respond to it with great energy. For the first semester Stage 1 architecture students<br />
share their modules with students who are on the BA in Architecture and Urban Planning.<br />
In the first week of term students take part in a number of intense design charrettes with all students<br />
from across the School. First year begins with a number of skill-building exercises involving measuring,<br />
observation and photography in buildings in and around Newcastle, as well as life and object drawing.<br />
Their first design project explores the domestic interiors of Pieter de Hooch through model-making<br />
and drawing. Students are then asked to design a small community reading room on a suburban site<br />
in Newcastle, where site analysis skills and the ability to design at different scales are developed. Theory,<br />
history and technology are taught through lectures, seminars and group work, and are also integrated into<br />
the design teaching.<br />
In semester two, students start by studying a series of 20th and 21st century row house precedents before<br />
designing their own house for an artist on an inner-city site, where scale, function, materiality and<br />
construction of space are developed. A final semester two project focusses on unbuilt and lost architecture<br />
and asks students to convey architectural ideas through the use of digital media, before students bring<br />
together the great range of work they have undertaken for the portfolio. Finally, there is a whole-year<br />
history trip to Fountains Abbey in Yorkshire.<br />
Year Coordinator<br />
Martin Beattie<br />
Project Leaders<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
Carlos Calderon<br />
Jennie Webb<br />
Kati Blom<br />
Martin Beattie<br />
Contributors<br />
Alex Borrell<br />
Becky Wise<br />
Cath Keay<br />
Charlotte Powell<br />
Chloe Gill<br />
Chris Beale<br />
Chris Elias<br />
Claire Harper<br />
Damien Wootten<br />
David Davies<br />
Di Leitch<br />
Elizabeth Gray<br />
Ewan Thomson<br />
Georgina Robinson<br />
Greg Murrell<br />
Henna Asikainen<br />
James Harrington<br />
James Longfield<br />
James Perry<br />
Jamie Morton<br />
Jennie Webb<br />
Joanna Hinchcliffe<br />
Joe Dent<br />
Justin Moorton<br />
Kati Blom<br />
Katie Fisher<br />
Katie Lloyd-Thomas<br />
Keri Townsend<br />
Kevin Vong<br />
Laurence Ashley<br />
Louise Squires<br />
Malcolm Pritchard<br />
Mariya Lapteva<br />
Martin Beattie<br />
Matt Charlton<br />
Matt Wilcox<br />
Michael Chapman<br />
Mike Veitch<br />
Nedelina Atasanova<br />
Nik Ward<br />
Nikoletta Karastashi<br />
Nita Kidd<br />
Olga Gogoleva<br />
Patrick McMahon<br />
Peter St Julien<br />
Richard McDonald<br />
Rumen Dimov<br />
Ruth Sidey<br />
Sana Al-Naimi<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Smajo Beso<br />
Sneha Solanki<br />
Sophia Banou<br />
Stephen Brookes<br />
Steve Tomlinson<br />
Tara Stewart<br />
Tony Watson<br />
Tracey Tofield<br />
Vili-Valtteri Welroos<br />
Wallace Ho<br />
William Tavernor<br />
Xi Chen<br />
Students<br />
Aaron Swaffer<br />
Abigail May Smart<br />
Aleksandra Iachinskaia<br />
Alesia Berahavaya<br />
Alysia Lara Arnold<br />
Amna Ahmad I M Fakhro<br />
Anna Christian Moroney<br />
Arran James Noble<br />
Bahram Yaradanguliyev<br />
Benedict Thornton Wigmore<br />
Boris Larico Villagomez<br />
Brandon Athol Few<br />
Calum James Luke<br />
Charlie William Donaldson<br />
Cheng Wan Mak<br />
Ching Wah Hong<br />
Chloe McSweeney<br />
Chou Ee Ng<br />
Ciara Catherine McClelland<br />
Cooper Taylor<br />
Danielle Helena Berg<br />
Darcy Eleanor Arnold-Jones<br />
David Michael Gray<br />
David Richard Osorno G?z<br />
Dianne Kwene Aku Odede<br />
Dominica Ruby Bates<br />
Dora Mary Frances Farrelly<br />
Eleanor Waugh<br />
Elliot Matthew Dolphin<br />
Elliott James Crowe<br />
Eloise Aliza Coleman<br />
Emily Catherine Child<br />
Emily Reta Spencer<br />
Emma Elizabeth Kemp<br />
Emma Imogen Moxon<br />
Ethan John Archer<br />
Euan McGregor<br />
Eve Kindon<br />
Faith Mary Hamilton<br />
Finlay William Lohoar Self<br />
Fope Foluwa Olaleye<br />
Freya Jane Emerson<br />
Gemma Louise Duma<br />
Grace Charlotte Ward<br />
Hannah Emily McAvoy<br />
Harry Cameron Tindale<br />
Harry Robert Henderson<br />
Hattie Florence Reeve<br />
Hazel Ruth Cozens<br />
Helena Genevieve Taylor<br />
Henri Robert Cooney<br />
Henry James Cahill<br />
Ho Sze Jose Cheng<br />
Ibadullah Shigiwol<br />
Ioana Buzoianu<br />
Irvano Irvian<br />
Jack Adam Collins<br />
Jack Oscar Sweet<br />
Jake Andrew Holding<br />
Jake Williams-Deoraj<br />
James Gillis<br />
James Edward Bacon<br />
James Edward Knapp<br />
Jamie Schwarz<br />
Jay Antony Hallsworth<br />
Jemima Alice Smith<br />
Jerome Sripetchvandee<br />
Jhon Sebastian Cortes<br />
Joanne Lois May Cain<br />
Joel Pacini<br />
Jonathan Pilosof<br />
Jordan Middleton<br />
Jordan Paige Ince<br />
Jose Diogo Marques Figueira<br />
Joseph Henry Noah Elbourn<br />
Joshua Willem Jago Knight<br />
Junyi Chen<br />
Ka Chun Rico Chow<br />
Kai Lok Cheng<br />
Katie Ann Campbell<br />
Katrina Barritt-Cunningham<br />
Katy Rose Barnes<br />
Kieran Harrison<br />
Kieron Thomas Dawson<br />
Kiran Kaur Basi<br />
Kotryna Navickaite<br />
Levente Mate Borenich<br />
Liam Kieran Rogers<br />
Liam Michael Marcel Davi<br />
Lilian Winifred Davies<br />
Louis Windsor Page-Laycock<br />
Luc James Askew-Vajra<br />
Malgorzata Nicoll Szarnecka<br />
Man Cheong Gabriel Leung<br />
Mathilda Louise Durkin<br />
Matilda Marie Barratt<br />
Matthew Edward Harrison<br />
Matthew Oliver Ward<br />
Michalakis Georgiou<br />
Monica Said<br />
Myeongjin Suh<br />
Nadia Beatriss Young<br />
Nancy Margaret Marrs<br />
Nicholas James Morrison<br />
Nicholas Juan Tatang<br />
Nitichot Setachanadana<br />
Nophill Damaniya<br />
Olga Barkova<br />
Pablo Larrea Wheldon<br />
Phoebe Shepherd<br />
Polina Morova<br />
Qian Wang<br />
Rachael Helena Burleigh<br />
Rachel Spencer<br />
Rachel Marie Cummings<br />
Rebecca Charlotte Glancey<br />
Rebecca Jean Maw<br />
Reece Oliver Jay<br />
Robert Walker Ashworth<br />
Rowena Saffron Covarr<br />
Rufus Giles Wilkinson<br />
Sam Henry Carroll<br />
Samuel George Brooke<br />
Samuel James Hawkins<br />
Samuel Joseph Robinson<br />
Seyoung Han<br />
Simone Pausha Pearce<br />
Siriwardhanalage De Saram<br />
Siroun Elise Button<br />
Sophie Ogilvie-Graham<br />
Steven Gary Lennox<br />
Susanna Emily Jane Smith<br />
Tanya Naresh Haldipur<br />
Tian Hong Kevin Wong<br />
Tian Yee Lim<br />
Toghrul Mammadov<br />
Weihao Wang<br />
Wiktoria Sypnicka<br />
Wing Yung Janet Tam<br />
Yuan Xue<br />
Yuen Sum Tiffany Liu<br />
Yuze Tian<br />
8
Architectural Representation<br />
Kati Blom<br />
In the first three weeks of the first year, students undertake different analogical exercises such as life drawing, drawing in various places in the city and<br />
photographing and constructing multi-view drawings based on measurements. These exercises prepare them for the design projects.<br />
10 City Drawing Photos courtesy of Damien Wootten and Sneha Solanki
11
Beyond the Frame<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
The project focusses on orderly domestic interiors depicted by Pieter de Hooch in Holland during the mid to late seventeenth century. We begin by<br />
observing, drawing and modelling the fragment of the house in the painting, before designing a new room beyond it.<br />
12<br />
Top - Xi Lin<br />
Bottom - Rachael Cummings
Top left to bottom right - Chou Ee Ng , Kotryna Navickaite, Joseph Elbourn, Chou Ee Ng, Jack Sweet, Jose Figueira, Nikshith Reddy, Xi Lin Ng, Jose Figueira<br />
13
Heaton Reading Room<br />
Jennie Webb<br />
Students were asked to design a small community reading room in the vibrant and culturally diverse suburb of Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne. The<br />
local area currently lacks library facilities of its own and so through the creation of a reading room, comes the opportunity to foster a love for reading,<br />
writing, storytelling and community mindfulness. The design for the reading room, run by a specially formed literary cooperative, needed to address<br />
the relatively tight urban site conditions and be multifunctional; capable of hosting reading and writing groups, book clubs and childrens’ storytelling<br />
sessions.<br />
14<br />
Top - Rebecca Glancey
RENDER<br />
Top - Bahram Yaradanguliyev<br />
Bottom - Choue Ee Ng<br />
15
Row House Typologies and Living<br />
Martin Beattie<br />
Students are asked to design a modest 3-bedroom row house and studio for an artist and their family. The site, in the Ouseburn Valley, is an area close<br />
to Newcastle city centre with a rich industrial past.<br />
16 Jose Figueira
Top left to bottom right - Joseph Elbourn, Henry Cahill, Phoebe Shepherd, Jonathan Pilosof,<br />
17
Unbuilt Architecture<br />
Carlos Calderon<br />
Unbuilt Architecture is designed to introduce the use of digital media within the creative architectural design process. Digital communication tools<br />
are used to re-analyse and re-interpret three unbuilt and lost works of architecture: Cedric Price, Fun Palace; Louis Khan, US Consulate in Luanda;<br />
and John Dobson, Royal Arcade.<br />
18
19
Stage 2<br />
Economy forms the basis of our architectural investigations and design explorations in Stage 2 this year.<br />
How architecture is produced by, and productive of, the economies within which we live has been explored<br />
through analysis of urban environments and the imagination of their futures; the design of collective<br />
housing and communal spaces; projects crossing the boundaries between art, architecture and engineering;<br />
and the design of spatial experience.<br />
With projects set in Edinburgh’s historic port, Leith, and the Northumberland border town of Berwickupon-Tweed,<br />
and in the fictional realms of film, projects have moved between the scale of the dwelling to<br />
the scale of space; from the digital to the material and practices of making: always asking the question of<br />
architectures’ role and relation to the economies it is embedded in.<br />
A year of transition, Stage 2 seeks to encourage a growing sense of criticality towards design decisions, a<br />
developing autonomy of thought and action, and an understanding of architectures’ position in times of<br />
social, cultural and economic flux.<br />
Year Coordinators<br />
Ed Wainwright<br />
Claire Harper<br />
Jennie Webb<br />
Project Tutors<br />
Jamie Anderson<br />
Amy Butt<br />
Dan Kerr<br />
Nita Kidd<br />
Luke Rigg<br />
Christos Kakalis<br />
Gillian Peskett<br />
Hazel Cowie<br />
David McKenna<br />
Yasser Megahed<br />
Claire Harper<br />
Ed Wainwright<br />
Fine Art Tutors<br />
Alexia Mellor<br />
Holly Hendry<br />
Isabelle Southwood<br />
Gareth Hudson<br />
Julia Heslop<br />
Rosie Morris<br />
Isabel Lima<br />
Peter Sharp<br />
Contributors<br />
Adam Sharr<br />
Amara Roca Iglesias<br />
Amy Linford<br />
Andrew Ballantyne<br />
Carlos Calderon<br />
Corbin Wood<br />
Emily-Jane Harper<br />
Ewan Thomson<br />
Greta Varpucianskyte<br />
Hannah Pierce<br />
Imogen Holden<br />
Iona Howell<br />
James Longfield<br />
James Perry<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />
Kieran Connolly<br />
Lam Nguyen Tran<br />
Martin Beattie<br />
Martyn Dade Robertson<br />
Matt Lawes<br />
Matthew Margetts<br />
Patrick Devlin<br />
Peter Kellett<br />
Prue Chiles<br />
Richard Murphy<br />
Richard Talbot<br />
Rob Paton<br />
Rumen Dimov<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Sam Clark<br />
Sarah Tulloch<br />
Seva Karetnikov<br />
Simon Hacker<br />
Steve Dudek<br />
Tim Pitman<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
Students<br />
Aadil Abdul Rashid Toorawa<br />
Agatha Savage<br />
Aishath Rasheed<br />
Alena Pavlenko<br />
Alexander McCulloch<br />
Alexander Mackay<br />
Alexander Gardner<br />
Alice Reeves<br />
Alice Simpkins-Woods<br />
Amber Farrow<br />
Ameeta Ladwa<br />
Andreas Haliman<br />
Angus Campbell Brown<br />
Anna Vershinina<br />
April Glasby<br />
Ashleigh Usher<br />
Assem Nurymbayeva<br />
Benjamin Taylor<br />
Boram Kwon<br />
Chao Shen<br />
Charlotte Goodfellow<br />
Charlotte Armstrong<br />
Chi-Yao Lin<br />
Ciaran Horscraft<br />
Claudia Bannatyne<br />
Connor O’Neill<br />
Daniel Barrett<br />
Daniel Francis Hill<br />
David Stuart Jones<br />
Eliza Hague<br />
Elizabeth Rose Ridland<br />
Elle-May Simmonds<br />
Emily Georgina O’Hara<br />
Emma Kate Burles<br />
Esme Hallam<br />
Farrah Noelle Colilles<br />
Gabrielle Faith Beaumont<br />
George Oliver<br />
Grace de Rome<br />
Hannah Ysia Hiscock<br />
Hao Zhuang<br />
Harrison Jack Avery<br />
Hector Adam Laird<br />
Henry Orlando Valori<br />
Ho Yin Chung<br />
Huey Ee Yong<br />
Isabel Mills Lyle<br />
Jack David Ranby<br />
Jacob Alexander Smith<br />
James Kennedy<br />
Jennifer Betts<br />
Ji Chuen Ng<br />
Joe Thomas Dolby<br />
John Knight<br />
John Joseph O’Brien<br />
Jonathon McDonald<br />
Joseph William Firth Smith<br />
Juan Felipe Lopez Arbelaez<br />
Ka Chun Tsang<br />
Kate Francis Byrne<br />
Kate Helena Stephenson<br />
Katherina Weiwei Bruh<br />
Katherine Isabel Rhodes<br />
Katherine Mitchell<br />
Katie Hannah Longmore<br />
Laura Jane Cushnie<br />
Lawrence Loc Man Wong<br />
Liam Costain<br />
Lily Francis Street<br />
Lily Rebekah Travers<br />
Lucy Emily Heal<br />
Marina Ryzhkova<br />
Marisa Rachel Bamberg<br />
Mark Andrew Laverty<br />
Matthew Layford<br />
Matthew Lovat Hearn<br />
Matthew Patrick Rooney<br />
Melitini Athanasiou<br />
Men Hin Choi<br />
Muhammad Ahmed Asfand<br />
Natalie Mok<br />
Natasha Diyamanthi Trayner<br />
Nial Simran Parkash<br />
Nicholas Honey<br />
Nita Harieth Semgalawe<br />
Nurul ‘Aqilah Binti Ali<br />
Octorino Tjandra<br />
Pannawat Sermsuk<br />
Paul Mathew Johnson<br />
Philippa McLeod-Brown<br />
Philippa Jane Smith<br />
Pitaruthai Longyan<br />
Prajwal Limbu<br />
Pui Wing Clarins Chan<br />
Quynh Dang Le Tu<br />
Rebecca Rowland<br />
Regen James Gregg<br />
Rhiannon Jade Graham<br />
Richard Harry Mayhew<br />
Robert Thurtell<br />
Robert John Thackeray<br />
Rufaro Natalie Matanda<br />
Ryan Daniel Bemrose<br />
Ryoga Dipowikoro<br />
Sam McDonough<br />
Sam Welbourne<br />
Samuel Richards Nicholls<br />
Sean Martyn Hoisington<br />
Shien Min Gooi<br />
Shuyi Chen<br />
Sirawat Thepcharoen<br />
Thasnia Haque<br />
Timothy Seymour Lucas<br />
Tin Ho Lee<br />
Tristan Patrick C Searight<br />
Trung Hieu Tran<br />
Tung Son Cao<br />
Vincent MacDonald<br />
Wai Yip Tsang<br />
William Mansell<br />
Wing Kei So<br />
Wing Kin Wong<br />
Xueyang Bai<br />
Yanjie Song<br />
Yee Yuen Ku<br />
Yi Shu<br />
Ziyun Wang<br />
20 Opposite - Charlotte Armstrong Exploring Experience
At Home in the City<br />
Amy Butt & Dan Kerr; Nita Kidd & Luke Rigg; Christos Kakalis & Gillian Peskett; Hazel Cowie & David McKenna; Claire Harper & Ed Wainwright<br />
How housing is produced, where it is built and who it is for are essential questions, not only for architectural practitioners, but for society at large.<br />
Semester one’s main project, set in Leith, Edinburgh, explored the changing conditions of housing and collective living within a set of specific economic<br />
and social constraints.<br />
22 Leith Symposium
Top from left to right - Matthew Rooney, Marina Ryzhkova, Michael Choi, Agatha Savage, Daniel Barrett, Yee Yuen Ku, April Glasby<br />
23
Engineering Experience<br />
Amy Butt, Dan Kerr & Alexia Mellor; Nita Kidd, Luke Rigg & Rosie Morris ; Christos Kakalis, Gillian Peskett & Gareth Hudson; Hazel Cowie,<br />
David McKenna & Julia Heslop; Claire Harper, Ed Wainwright & Peter Sharp<br />
Through a collaborative project involving students, staff and practitioners from architecture, fine art and engineering, filmic environments were<br />
reimagined as a set of physical artworks to be moved into, through, over, under – experienced through human motion and the camera, and re-filmed<br />
to re-tell a specific experience from each film.<br />
24<br />
Top - Group D3<br />
Bottom - Group D4
Top from left to right - Groups C3, D4, B2, D3, B1<br />
25
Exploring Experience<br />
Amy Butt & Dan Kerr; Nita Kidd, Luke Rigg & Yasser Megahed; Christos Kakalis & Gillian Peskett; Hazel Cowie & Jamie Anderson; Claire Harper<br />
& Ed Wainwright<br />
How can architecture bring the body, the spatially experienced state of being, back into activities, practices & processes that are progressively moving<br />
online? How can those events, desires, acts and experiences be explored physically and in combination with digital technologies? This project, set<br />
in Berwick-upon-Tweed, explores how spatial design can embody the digital, and bring a sensual, haptic and material quality into an increasingly<br />
technologically mediated society.<br />
26 Top - Nicholas Honey Bottom - Mark Andrew Laverty
Top left to bottom right - Richard Mayhew, Agatha Savage, Robert Thackeray, Kate Stephenson, Panawat Semsuk, Timothy Lucas, Katie Longmore, Charlotte<br />
Armstrong, Bai Xuey, Mark Laverty, Liam Costain, Benjamin Taylor<br />
27
28 Top left to bottom right - Panamat Semsuk, Chi Yao Lin, Angus Brown, Ziyun Wan
Top - Matthew Rooney<br />
Bottom - Chao Shen<br />
29
Stage 3<br />
Stage 3 is coordinated into year-long design studios, with students entering immediately after the<br />
Charrette exercise. This year, we ran eight separate studios – our most ever in Stage 3. Over these pages,<br />
each studio is described in more detail, from experimental architecture to explorations of ‘The Long Now’.<br />
As part of these varied studios students undertake a field trip in the first semester, travelling to locations<br />
as diverse as Venice, Rome, Tenerife, Lisbon, Malmo, Copenhagen, London and Lindisfarne. Students’<br />
design work is supported by three non-design modules: Architectural Technology, Professional Practice,<br />
and Principles and Theories. All three tie-in with the student’s evolving design thesis and culminate in an<br />
extensive design portfolio document.<br />
In all studios, the project kicks off with a short ‘Primer’ exercise, culminating in a year-wide event<br />
exhibiting and celebrating the diversity of the studios in Stage 3. The Primer, and the range of approaches<br />
it demonstrates, embodies our attitude as a School to design work at this level: that rather than asking<br />
students to convey what they’ve learnt so far, our third year is about taking those first steps into the<br />
unknown, the particular and the extraordinary, and so help them start to define whatever’s next for them<br />
in their endeavours in architecture.<br />
Year Coordinators<br />
Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />
Matthew Margetts<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />
Project Leaders<br />
Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />
Amy Linford<br />
Andrew Ballantyne<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
Carolina Figueroa<br />
Daniel Mallo<br />
David McKenna<br />
James Longfield<br />
Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />
Kati Blom<br />
Libby Makinson<br />
Luis Hernandez<br />
Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />
Matthew Margetts<br />
Michael Simpson<br />
Sean Douglas<br />
Simon Hacker<br />
Tony Watson<br />
Contributors<br />
Alex Gordon<br />
Andrew Byrne<br />
Aurelie Guyet<br />
Austen Smith<br />
Cara Lund<br />
Colin Riches<br />
Colin Ross<br />
Damien Wootten<br />
Darren Conboy<br />
David Bailey<br />
Declan McCaffertyand<br />
Javier Rodriguez Corral<br />
Jo McCafferty<br />
Kate Wilson<br />
Kevin Gray<br />
Kieran Connolly<br />
Libby Makinson<br />
Luciano Cardellicchio<br />
Marc Horn<br />
Mark Johnson<br />
Mark Johnson<br />
Nick Peters<br />
Nigel Bidwell<br />
Peter Brittain<br />
Peter Mouncey<br />
Peter Mouncey<br />
Rachel Currie<br />
Ray Verrall<br />
Sam Clark<br />
Sergi Garriga<br />
Sophia Banou<br />
Stephen Ibbotson<br />
Stephen Richardson<br />
Tim Mosedale<br />
Usue Ruiz Arana<br />
Valerio Morabito<br />
Yasser Megahead<br />
Students<br />
Abdul Rahim<br />
Adam Kamal Najia<br />
Adnan Ahmed Issa Qatan<br />
Aldrich Jun Lin Choy<br />
Alex Jusupov<br />
Alexander Jack Ferguson<br />
Alexander Leopold Borrell<br />
Alice Chilangwa Farmer<br />
Alice Jane Chilman<br />
Alicia Charlotte Beaumont<br />
Amy Louise Callaghan<br />
Anna Leilani Denker<br />
Anthony Roger Metelerkamp<br />
Antonis Kypridemos<br />
Antonius Tanady<br />
Ashok Jahan Mathur<br />
Becky Somerville<br />
Benjamin Joshua Risby<br />
Benjamin Michael Simpson<br />
Benjamin Patrick Martin<br />
Bethan Hannah Thomas<br />
Bethany Laura Elmer<br />
Bradley John Davidson<br />
Caitlin Latimer-Jones<br />
Cheuk Yan Debby Chung<br />
Chloe Alexandra Weston<br />
Christopher Gabe<br />
Clement Ting Yiung Tang<br />
Cristina Mercedes Perez Diaz<br />
Darragh O’Keeffe<br />
David Philip Winter<br />
Declan Joseph Wagstaff<br />
Edgar Yat-Fei Sin<br />
Eleanor Gwenllian Brent<br />
Elise Khoury<br />
Ellen Rita White Peirson<br />
Emily Sarah Rosie Hinchliffe<br />
Erica Alexis Mote Caballero<br />
Finian John Orme<br />
Finlay Giovanni McGregor<br />
Frances Grace Fen-Yi Lai<br />
Frederick Armitage<br />
Frederick Lewis<br />
Gaurav Hemant Kapoor<br />
George Parfitt<br />
George Edward Entwistle<br />
George William Marr<br />
Georgina Molly McEwan<br />
Hayley Lauren Graham<br />
Hiu Yan Lau<br />
Hoi Yuet Chau<br />
Holly Julia Tisson<br />
Hsin-Wei Lin<br />
Ioi Teng Tsang<br />
Iona Frances Haig<br />
Ivo Patrick Pery<br />
Jack Andrew Cross<br />
Jack Michael Ryan<br />
Jack Munro Glasspool<br />
Jack Peter Lewandowski<br />
Jade Angela Moore<br />
Jaimie Alexandra Claydon<br />
James George Clark<br />
Jenna Catherine Sheehy<br />
Jennifer Anne MacFadyen<br />
Jessica Katherine Wheeler<br />
Jie Loon Lee<br />
Jordi Ryano<br />
Josephine Margaret Foster<br />
Julian Job Besems<br />
Justyna Anna Jaroszewicz<br />
Ka Hei Surin Tong<br />
Kai Wing Phoebe Mo<br />
Kimberly Baker<br />
Kiran Alexander John Milton<br />
Lauren Ly<br />
Loretta Ming Wai So<br />
Lucy Hartley<br />
Luke Christopher Rossi<br />
Luke Victor James Dunlop<br />
Lydia Bronwyn Hyde<br />
Lydia Sarah Elizabeth Mills<br />
Man Chun Ip<br />
Marios Kypridemos<br />
Matthew Davies Smith<br />
Melissa Holly Wear<br />
Meshal Abdulrasool Hasan<br />
Michael Bautista-Trimming<br />
Michael Teasdale Wilkinson<br />
Mojan Kavosh<br />
Naomi Howell Sivosh<br />
Natasha Heyes<br />
Navneet Kaur Sihra<br />
Nicholas David Green<br />
Nicholas Peter Harmer<br />
Patrick Charles King<br />
Pui Ying Chu<br />
Rui Huang<br />
Sara Kelly<br />
Scott Matthew Doherty<br />
Shiyun Chen<br />
Sihyun Kim<br />
Simon Angus Quinton<br />
Sin Yi Wong<br />
Sun Yen Yee<br />
Tanatswa Lesley Borerwe<br />
Thomas Badger<br />
Thomas Adam Reeves<br />
Thomas George Ardron<br />
Tooka Taheri<br />
Tsz Wai Fung<br />
Tulsi Vikram Phadke<br />
Wan Yee Chong<br />
Wei Zhang<br />
Xavier Paul Alleyne Smales<br />
Yiwen Fu<br />
Yuet So<br />
Yuk Lun Chong<br />
Zhi Wei Chad Seah<br />
Zhuoran Li<br />
Zineb Khadri<br />
30<br />
Opposite - Allan Chong ‘Formless’ An Alternative Typology to Preservation
Studio 1 – Building on What is Already Built - 15th Lincoln’s Inn Fields<br />
Josep-Maria García-Fuentes & Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />
This studio explored architecture as preservation, as it understands they both are placed within a cultural continuum and are the outcome of a complex<br />
cultural, social and political struggle. It challenged students to design a major addition to an existing heritage building. This requires understanding the<br />
existing building in all of the ways its architecture and materials express the values it sought to represent and serve at the time, and in the ways that these<br />
meanings might or might not be extended, enriched or transformed and reshaped by the new addition.<br />
32<br />
Top - Alicia Beaumont An Extension to Sir John Soane’s Museum Middle - Ashok Mathur Soane Architecture School<br />
Bottom - Allan Chong ‘Formless’
Top - Ashok Mathur Soane Architecture School Bottom - Beth Thomas An Extension to Sir John Soane’s Museum 33
34 Top - Sara Kelly Institute of Integrative Pedagogical <strong>Design</strong> Bottom left - Jenna Sheehy Extending Sir John Soane’s vision of an ‘Academy of Arts’<br />
Bottom right - Tom Ardron Institute of Interdisciplinary Exchange
Top left - Lucy Hartley Sir John Soane’s Architectural Association<br />
Bottom Left -Tom Ardron Institute of Interdisciplinary Exchange<br />
Right - Sara Kelly Institute of Integrative Pedagogical <strong>Design</strong><br />
35
Studio 2 – Aperture<br />
Daniel Mallo & Armelle Tardiveau<br />
Aperture studio proposed an exploration of light and material quality, a journey through the craft of photography as a means to expose and render<br />
light vibrant. The design of a camera obscura, a room-sized observatory that records the passing of time and the urban landscape, becomes the starting<br />
point of an urban investigation of the Georgian Market Town of Richmond (North Yorkshire). This remarkable urban townscape with its characteristic<br />
pitched roofs and stone buildings is the setting for the graduation project, a photographic institute situated at the point where the town meets the soft<br />
rolling hills of Yorkshire.<br />
36 Top - Lydia Hyde Aperture Institute Bottom - Freddie Armitage The Light Institute
Top - Alice Chilman<br />
Middle and Bottom - Jennifer MacFadyen A New Cultural Centre for Richmond<br />
37
38<br />
Top - Frances Lai<br />
Middle left to bottom left - Jack Ryan, Amy Callaghan, Steven Lin, Jack Ryan, Jack Lewandowski
Top - Lauren Ly Aperture Bottom left - Erica Caballero Aperture Bottom right - Frances Lai The Aperture Institution 39
40<br />
Top left to Bottom right - Lydia Hyde, Nick Harmer, Christie Chu, Jenny MacFadyen, Lei Denker
Top left to bottom right - Tulsi Phadke, Lei Denker, Freddie Armitage, Jack Lewandowski, Nick Harmer, Lei Denker<br />
41
Studio 3 – Experimental Architecture<br />
Martyn Dade-Robertson, Luis Hernandez & Carolina Figueroa<br />
This year started by focusing on developing a new type of hydromorphic material based on the application of bacteria spores. Hygromorophic materials<br />
change their morphology in the presence of water, and bacteria based hygromorphs offer the potential for actuators that can mechanically respond<br />
to humidity, creating the possibility to design new types of responsive building skin. The studio embarked in a primer to design new systems and<br />
mechanisms, developing our hydromorphic technology both in the lab and the workshop. We then used a trip to Venice as the basis of the final project<br />
to create spaces for experimentation, including the integration of labs, workshops and public functions.<br />
42<br />
George Entwistle The City & The City
Top - Adam Najia - The Venice Cleanup<br />
Bottom, left to right - Bradley Davidson, Aldrich Choy, Iona Haig<br />
43
44 Top left to Bottom right - Michael Bautista, Julian Besems, Adnan Qatan, Julian Besems, Adam Najia
Top and Middle - Simon Quinton Eudoxia<br />
Bottom - Michael Bautista-Trimming Zaira<br />
45
Studio 4 – Infrastructures<br />
Matthew Margetts & Michael Simpson<br />
The Infrastructures studio explored the interface between the human scale ‘ritual’ and city scale infrastructure, responding to varied dynamic systems.<br />
The gaps left behind when infrastructures change can be physical, social or emotional; operating at a personal or collective level.<br />
The studio started at the individual scale, looking at very personal ‘rituals’ – articulated and exaggerated through ‘contraptions’. Through these we<br />
developed tactics for looking at systems and processes at a larger scale.<br />
We chose Brentford as our location for the studio as it contains in a relatively small area an intense confluence of infrastructures – both past and present.<br />
Students were challenged to think at different scales, and to identify a particular circumstance to explore an opportunistic, dynamic architecture,<br />
responsive to human needs.<br />
46 Top - Ellen Peirson An Agricultural Primary Education Bottom - George Parfitt Brentford Droneport
N E W E X H I B I T I O N<br />
r e c e p t i o n<br />
a theatrical entrance ....<br />
Top left - George Parfitt Brentford Droneport<br />
Top middle, Top left, Bottom - Ben Martin Kew A Santuary for Sensory Atmospheres<br />
47
48 Top left to bottom right - Chloe Weston, Cheuk Y D Chung, Yuet So, Cheuk Y D Chung, Chloe Weston, Ben Simpson. Cheuk Y D Chung
Top and Middle - Jordi Ryano The Brentford Ear<br />
Bottom - Yuet So Brentford Hub<br />
49
50 Rui Huang Unbalanced City
Top left to Bottom right - Ben Simpson, Rui Huang, Mishal Hasan, Jordi Ryano, Ellen Peirson, Mishal Hasan, Ivo Pery, Caitlin Latimer-Jones<br />
51
Studio 5 – Material Poetics<br />
James Longfield & Amy Linford<br />
Materials qualities are central to the production of architecture, technically, in terms of the pragmatics of construction, and through the social meanings,<br />
rituals and memories they embody. Our studio encouraged students to engage with material as the ‘stuff’ of architecture, real, rather than rendered, the<br />
thickness, thinness, density, weight of building elements, and the effect these qualities have on the sensory experience of occupation.<br />
Through the studio each student has explored a specific material through hands-on investigations, using the process of making as a way of thinking<br />
about building design and detailing; a thoughtful and critical process of material assembly which emerges out of the pragmatics and poetics of material.<br />
52 Holly Tisson
Top - Natasha Heyes Middle - Naomi Howell Sivosh Bottom - Hayley Graham<br />
53
54 Top - Chad Seah Bottom - Holly Tisson
Top - Chad Seah Middle- Naomi Howell Sivosh Bottom - Justyna Jaroszewicz<br />
55
Studio 6 – Ruskin and The Long Now<br />
Andrew Ballantyne & Libby Makinson<br />
John Ruskin said, ‘When we build, let us think that we build forever’. The Long Now Foundation was set up to promote long-term<br />
thinking, and is building a 10,000–year clock. When we start thinking about buildings with a long–term view in mind then we<br />
think about processes of adaptation, re–use and renewal, as well as erosion and decay. In the long term everything is dynamic. We<br />
are looking beyond the immediate function of the building to think about what happens when things change. Ruskin wrote about<br />
Venice, which is a model of precarious resilience: mud into magic.<br />
56 Chris Gabe Prospective Preservation for the Long Now
Top left - Melissa Wear Top right - Surin Tong Middle right -David Winter Bottom left - Kiran Milton Bottom right - Phoebe Mo<br />
57
58 Top - Kiran Milton The Timeless Architecture of Evolutionary Predisposition Bottom right - Surin Tong Building Happiness<br />
Bottom left - Phoebe Mo Building for Permanence and Sensibility through an Experience of Concrete
Jack Glasspool - Long Term Preservation of Short-term Industry<br />
59
Studio 7 – Trace<br />
Simon Hacker & Tony Watson<br />
The studio focused on man-made traces – the marks, indications and imprints that we make across a multitude of scales and their relationships to human<br />
experience. Whilst some of these marks are relatively permanent, many traces change or fade over time.<br />
The studio has considered various ways in which traces may be located, observed, researched and represented. These have then fed into considering<br />
strategies that can be employed to draw, form, copy, follow and imprint new and contemporary traces and changes within both urban and rural contexts.<br />
60 Alex Borrell The Sheep Counting Institute
Top - James Clark Long Term Preservation of Short-term Industry Middle - Declan Wagstaff Place of Experience Bottom - Jaimie Claydon<br />
61
62 Top - Declan Wagstaff Middle - Jess Wheeler Middle - Jack Cross Bottom - Tom Badger
Top left to bottom right - Becky Somerville, Emily Hinchliffe, Jack Cross, Freddie Lewis, Luke Dunlop, Ellie Brent, Luke Dunlop, Nick Green, Jess Wheeler,<br />
Tom Badger<br />
63
64 Top - Tom Badger Architecture and the Inevitable Bottom - Bethany Elmer Returning the Lindisfarne Gospels
Top left - Elise Khoury Top right - Josie Foster Bottom left - Declan Wagstaff Bottom right - Georgie McEwan<br />
65
Studio 8 – Variations<br />
Kati Blom, David McKenna & Sean Douglas<br />
Students developed a series of small scale prototypes in order to establish a design methodology and programme for a larger proposal, consisting of two<br />
buildings and an urban plan.<br />
In the first project, CHAMBER, we started with a small rehearsal space and a construction fragment. From these emerged a residential institute for a<br />
quartet of musicians. The larger project, SHOW & STORE, began with a pavilion to store and exhibit a single object, extrapolated to a building to<br />
house a larger compendium.<br />
66 Top - Alex Jusupov Alison & Peter Smithson Architectural Foundation Bottom - Alice Farmer
Top left to Bottom right - Antonius Tanady, Gaurav Kapoor, Cristina Diaz, Ben Risby, Antonius Tanady, Ben Risby, Rackel Chong, Loretta So, Lee Jieloon,<br />
Vance Zhang, Sean Kim<br />
67
MODERN NATURE<br />
FLUENCY DISORIENTATION RESISTANCE HISTORY<br />
Edit line<br />
68 Top - Ben Risby Middle - Sean Kim Middle - Shiyun Chen Bottom - Cristina Perez Diaz
Alex Jusupov Alison & Peter Smithson Architectural Foundation<br />
69
70 Top left - Tanatswa Borerwe Top right - Shiyun Chen Bottom left - Alice Farmer Bottom right - Rackel Chong
Top left - Edgar Sin Top right - Lee Jieloon Bottom left - Lee Jieloon Bottom right - Mojan Kavosh<br />
71
Highlighted Project –‘Formless,’ An Alternative Typology to Preservation<br />
Allan Chong<br />
This project takes a theoretical path in creating an alternative typology for preservation. It introduces a compromise between the desire for preservation and the cultural shift<br />
necessary for architectural expansion in the city’s future. ‘Formless does not mean the absence of form, for preservation certainly depends on pre-existing architectural forms. But while<br />
preservation aesthetics respond to the existing building’s form, they do not change it. Instead they supplement it with new interpretive frames altering the reception of its cultural meaning.’<br />
Koolhaas, R., Otero, P. J. (2014) ‘Preservation is Overtaking Us’.<br />
Interpreting the concept of ‘formless’ in preservation means that architecture and heritage are no longer seen as permanent objects, but they keep transforming to re-frame their<br />
key spaces. The project becomes a series of processes and imagines an endless architectural development in terms of space, material and technology. The processes form a unique<br />
methodology – ‘Extraction’ & ‘Projection’, through which the extension completes a cycle. As it keeps changing over time, it gives rise to many cycles which each reframe the<br />
previous cycle, and each provide different functions to support the theme of preservation. At a certain point of growth, when people trace back to the beginning of the process,<br />
all of the cycles and spaces are hinged on the heritage, as the extended spaces are derived from the existing spaces.<br />
72
Highlighted Project – The Sheep Counting Institute<br />
Alex Borrell<br />
The Institute is a place for artists, writers, and inventors to dream up new alternatives to pressing issues. Along the way they research, gather and create<br />
new dream archetypes, absorbing traces of the collective unconscious but also paving the way for future development. These images are archived and<br />
later attached to sheep which, rescued from the sea, pass through the building on a conveyor belt.<br />
73
BA Dissertation<br />
Experimenting with Informality: How can the hyper-complexity of informal growth be<br />
integrated into architectural design?<br />
Chris Gabe<br />
‘The process of creating a neointestine (tissue engineered intestine) involves the construction of a<br />
“scaffold matrix” that replicates the three-dimensional form of the existing tissue. This should allow<br />
the local cells to populate the structure and multiply, creating new tissue. It must replicate the dual<br />
function of the organic tissue acting as both an absorptive surface and a barrier against the external<br />
environment. It must also facilitate the development of a vascular network, allowing a functional<br />
blood supply into and out of the scaffold…’<br />
‘…This is an example of encouraging growth by creating a biologically responsive scaffold matrix.<br />
This does not rely on mathematical principles designed to mimic the fundamental complexity of<br />
a prerequisite system, but rather nurtures the existing biological networks into growth and repair.<br />
This concept could be explored in the world of informal urbanism. An example of this system of<br />
framework driven growth can be found in the occupancy of Torre David…’<br />
Postmodernity and Postmodernism: ‘A glance backwards is part of the way we go forwards’<br />
Ellen Peirson<br />
Postmodernism’s first aim was always to end the ‘grand narrative’ and to dismiss the idea of working<br />
towards a prescribed single look or a style. However, in doing this, to the general public some of the<br />
ideas seemed so extreme that it created a recognisable aesthetic. The discussion on postmodernism<br />
has been recently opened up again with a revival of sorts a possibility. This revival is more concerned<br />
with the attitude of postmodernism as opposed to any connotations of a particular style or aesthetics.<br />
In AD’s ‘Radical Post-Modernism’, architects and thinkers polemicize on the possibility of this. From<br />
these discussions, the most resonant phrase seems to be: ‘sometimes history repeats itself better if<br />
the architects don’t know it’. A successful revival may rely on the misconceptions of the movement<br />
to be forgotten and for just the relevant values to be taken forward. The movement was expansive<br />
and unrestrained, and produced a wide range of architecture that cannot be compared stylistically.<br />
It offered many opportunities for reform and improvement which are still relevant today such as its<br />
user centred and site specific approach to design. However, as with movements that have gone before,<br />
it has been judged mainly on aesthetics. In truth, there can be no completely postmodern building.<br />
Therefore, for it to flourish, it may be better for it not to be considered a movement but more an<br />
approach or attitude to design.<br />
‘Depressingly Irrelevant’:<br />
Interrogating the Criticism of Speculative <strong>Design</strong> and Exploring the Value of Such Projects<br />
George Entwistle<br />
‘This is a period of slackening - I refer to the colour of times. From every direction we are being urged<br />
to put an end to experimentation, in the arts and elsewhere’ - Jean-François Lyotard<br />
With criticism from writers such as Patrik Schumacher being given such a prominent platform, in<br />
popular design journals such as The Architectural Review, speculative design has been left in a fragile<br />
state. There is a danger that designers will become reluctant to engage with speculative design for fear<br />
of being heavily criticised and that it might be phased out. There is perhaps already evidence of this<br />
beginning to take place as ‘there are already utterances of critical practice being little more than design<br />
for design’s sake, “design for designers” or perhaps more appropriately, design for critical designers’.<br />
Speculative design as a practice stands at a crossroads in how it deals with this criticism. One way<br />
is to continue on its current path, to retreat to within the community of the avant-garde, being<br />
‘overly self reflective and introverted’, hiding from critics outside of their ‘closed community’ such<br />
as Schumacher. Jean-François Lyotard describes this path: ‘Artists and writers must be brought back<br />
to the bosom of the community, or at least, if the latter is considered to be ill, they must be assigned<br />
the task of healing it’.<br />
The alternate path is explained by Dunne and Raby: ‘Speculative designs depend on dissemination<br />
and engagement with a public or expert audience; they are designed to circulate’. Dunne and Raby<br />
propose the opposite of what is described by Lyotard, calling for speculative design to be thrust onto<br />
a public stage, suggesting that by hiding the practice within a ‘closed community’, ‘its usefulness as<br />
part of a larger disciplinary project is undermined’.<br />
74
Spraying the City: An exploration of graffiti and street art as a democratic creative expression<br />
Georgina McEwan<br />
Graffiti and street art, as the voice of the unelected and disadvantaged, intends to regain possession<br />
of public space in a rebellion against authoritative dictations of the urban environment: to ‘reclaim<br />
the streets’. No urban space can be defined as neutral, with walls and street topography symbolic<br />
of boundaries for socially constructed zones and territories. Graffiti writers in 1970s New York<br />
considered urban developers and architects of the rapidly evolving city as callous decision makers,<br />
an attitude still reflected in the aggressive and territorial language of the graffiti community: ‘writing<br />
graffiti is “bombing”, a tag is a “hit” and advanced letter formations are “burners’’’. Instances of profitdriven<br />
architectural gentrification associated with the mundane metropolis lifestyle in developing<br />
cities have led to environments that are often constrained by limitations inhibiting liberated social<br />
action. Graffiti and street art, through transgressive artistic reclamation, highlights the importance<br />
of democratic creative free expression in its ability to drive and shape urgent issues in today’s culture.<br />
The Future of Concert Halls: A first exploration<br />
Julian Besems<br />
Whilst classical music is primarily performed in traditional concert halls without the use of<br />
amplification devices, a concern has been expressed that recording and reproduction quality has<br />
started to create an expectation of excellence that cannot be met in live performances.<br />
This evokes the question of how the advanced development of recording, reproduction and<br />
amplification devices will influence the need for and form of new and existing purpose built music<br />
venues in relation to classical music.<br />
This research question will be answered through a recording experiment and a public survey.<br />
Recordings of both live performances, and hi-fi reproductions of the same pieces of music are<br />
taken. These are played blind to respondents who express their preference. The samples are analysed<br />
through spectrograms. The public survey investigates the respondent’s primary reason to attend a live<br />
performance and how they listen to music.<br />
The overall results from the listening experiment show that there is no significant preference for live<br />
over hi-fi reproduced audio quality. There is however a significant preference for hi-fi reproduction<br />
quality for female voices, and live quality for male voices. The spectrogram analysis explains the<br />
preference difference: the reproduction samples have a higher high frequency incidence; the live<br />
samples have a higher low frequency density. The survey outcome states that people primarily visit<br />
classical performances for the audio quality.<br />
Lessons for the Tonlé Sap Lake: Can the living conditions of Kampong Khleang be improved<br />
by rural development?<br />
Sara Kelly<br />
The Tonlé Sap Lake is South-East Asia’s largest inland fishery. It passes through nine districts of<br />
Cambodia, including Kampong Khleang, which forms the focus of this dissertation. The Tonlé Sap<br />
Lake annually absorbs around 20% of the Mekong River’s flood capacity. As a result, the area around<br />
the lake becomes flooded and inhabits both floating and stilted communities.<br />
In contrast to modern approaches, where there is a reluctance to develop marginal land , the<br />
communities of this district have developed their own approach and are looking to consolidate this.<br />
Farming and fishing communities adapt to the local ecology and have managed a 10-meter water<br />
level rise. Communities such as Kampong Khleang have developed an innovative architectural<br />
morphology that permits them to live in these conditions, however imperfectly.<br />
This response is shaped by their environmental, social and political conditions. Neal Mongold<br />
explains this observation. He argued that architecture is the shaping of the physical environment and<br />
thus it is involved in the shaping of the economic, political, spiritual, and psychological environment.<br />
These communities offer a unique insight into this relationship between the development of social<br />
and physical form. One could argue that the prospect of uncertainty of global warming has stimulated<br />
the architectural field to radically change its relationship with water.<br />
75
BA Dissertation<br />
Tokyo: The Urban Laboratory<br />
The birth, death and legacy of Metabolism, with a case study of the Capsule Tower as an<br />
emblematic microcosm.<br />
Caitlin Latimer-Jones<br />
Japan experienced devastating destruction through World War Two and multiple natural disasters.<br />
With financial and technical assistance from global superpowers, Tokyo experienced unprecedented<br />
urban growth and infrastructural and industrial progress. The capital became an urban laboratory for<br />
Metabolism’s utopian megastructures. The post war movement’s ideas stem from viewing the city as<br />
an adaptive entity and relied on advanced technology. However, megastructures never reached the<br />
intended global success, experiencing the same demise as the movement by the 1970s. This paper<br />
explores Tokyo’s mid-1900s landscape, what Metabolism was responding to and how the movement<br />
has enlightened contemporary urban design and planning. Contemporary designs should be led by<br />
concerns related to sustainability, green spaces, users’ interconnectivity and the existing city. The<br />
‘metabolic development’ of the world’s societies should continue to evolve, to ameliorate and surpass<br />
the 1960s utopian proposals.<br />
From an Era of Welfare to an Era of Consumption: Proposing a loss of ethic in the regeneration<br />
of Park Hill Estate<br />
Tom Ardron<br />
Park Hill Estate was granted Grade II* listing in 1998 amongst a selection of other post-war housing<br />
estates. In 2007, Manchester-based Urban Splash began work on regenerating the estate. This thesis<br />
traces the changes throughout the history of Park Hill from its original intentions to present day<br />
in order to propose a loss of the public-housing ethic ingrained in our understanding of the estate.<br />
Beginning with a chronological analysis from the design conception, I discuss the influence The New<br />
Brutalism had on the design of Park Hill and how devices in both architectural and urban design<br />
enhanced the ethic of social housing as architectural self-justification within the estate. Following this<br />
I evaluate the changes in public policy which played a major part in the decline of the estate from the<br />
1980s to its listing and how echoes of these policies could still be influencing both the redevelopment<br />
of Park Hill and housing markets in the UK today.<br />
The founding motives of both English Heritage and the developer Urban Splash within the<br />
regeneration initiate the second part of this study. This highlights factors such as financing and a<br />
contradiction in practice between the stakeholders as a possible directive to some changes. A shift<br />
from a social to a profit-orientated motive is proposed as one of the main transitions within the<br />
development.<br />
An Assessment of Exhibition as the Means of Appropriating Egyptian Style, with example of<br />
Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly.<br />
Melissa Wear<br />
I have chosen to study the appropriation of Egyptian aesthetics because of its cyclic relationship<br />
with Western Europe. One of the earliest civilisations developed in Egypt. A specific movement<br />
of Egyptian architectural style into Greece, Rome, and then through to Western Europe creates an<br />
interesting cycle when considering the human desire of returning to one’s roots. It is useful to observe<br />
what is gained or lost in the translation of styles. Equally, in a growing era of continentalism, it is<br />
interesting to consider why people choose to retain identity using cultural divisions. As architecture<br />
is increasingly designed by international firms and away from local values, it is important to recognise<br />
why we choose to keep or lose certain elements of identity. It is most clear to study this subject using<br />
an age that has entirely passed.<br />
Britain’s interest in Egypt lasted roughly a century, most aptly bracketed by two London buildings:<br />
the 1812 Egyptian Hall in Piccadilly and the 1928 Carreras Cigarette Factory in Camden. However,<br />
a more general interest in Egypt can be traced back to the thirteenth century; historian James Curl<br />
predicts, ‘The inspiration of Egyptian art and architecture for the West is not yet dissipated’.<br />
Mass Egyptianising has led Egyptomania to become associated with garishness (of bright colours and<br />
secular ornamentation). This is perhaps linked to the method of exhibition in sharing the splendours<br />
of decoration associated with Egyptian style.<br />
76
AUP Creative Practice / Social Sciences Dissertation<br />
Tyne Deck in the 21st Century: How can architectural interventions be used to improve the<br />
relationship between Newcastle and Gateshead?<br />
Tom Wessely<br />
This Creative Practice Dissertation analyses how the infrastructure at Quayside has developed since<br />
the Roman period. It focuses on the key changes at Quayside such as the construction of the High<br />
Level Bridge, built in 1847. Following this, it critically examines in greater detail the structures<br />
built in the contemporary era, such as the Millennium Bridge and the Sage. The aim is to establish<br />
through a design proposal how the quayside area might help improve the relationship between<br />
Newcastle and Gateshead. Information obtained through interviews and focus groups influences the<br />
design proposal. Through a mapping exercise, I unpack the urban quality of Quayside and propose<br />
possible ways of improving the relationship at Quayside through architectural interventions. The<br />
proposal is influenced by the Tyne Deck, designed in 1969 by Gordon Ryder and Peter Yates (but<br />
never built) reflects on the controversial Garden Bridge by Thomas Heatherwick. In the conclusion,<br />
I discuss what impact such proposed infrastructure could have on local organisations such as the<br />
NewcastleGateshead Initiative and how it might improve the relationship between Newcastle and<br />
Gateshead.<br />
Public Spaces in Kibera<br />
Veenay Patel<br />
This dissertation looks to unfold the production and consumption of public spaces in Kibera.<br />
The research was conducted in the Gatwekera district of the informal settlement and focuses on<br />
six public spaces in the area. The information collected about each space is portrayed through six<br />
narratives, where I express conversed, observatory and researched findings. The intention is to try<br />
and understand the relationship between people and place within the settlement. Furthermore, the<br />
aim is to explore the possibilities that may enhance these spaces for the residents and enable them<br />
to effect change for a better future.<br />
The focus of this study is to look in particular at the production and use of public spaces within the<br />
settlement. Kibera is structured upon government owned land and therefore, in layman’s terms is all<br />
considered to be public space. However, this is not the case as the informal city works with the same<br />
notions of public and private as the formal city. For the purpose of this study, a public space can be<br />
defined as a social space that is generally open and accessible to the people. The characteristics of a<br />
public space in the formal city differ to those of the informal as the facets that define these spaces<br />
are dependent on the people that utilise them. This led to an exploration of ‘What defines a public<br />
space in Kibera?’ The insinuation being that the functional and symbolic value of a public space in<br />
an informal settlement like Kibera is based upon the foundation of what the residents require rather<br />
than being a simple space of leisure. Thus, this research aims to unravel some key concepts that can<br />
help us understand how public spaces work in Kibera and the bearing this has on the lives of the<br />
citizens that reside there.<br />
Identifying Inadequacies of Water and Sanitation Provision in the Slums of Mumbai and the<br />
Consequences of this for Female Access to Education and Employment.<br />
Rebecca Alexander<br />
Water and sanitation provision is a concern for many informal settlements in the cities of<br />
developing countries. Cultural norms in many countries mean that women from low-income urban<br />
communities find that their lives and opportunities are shaped by the inadequate provision of basic<br />
services. Mumbai is a city with one of the largest informal populations in the world. Understanding<br />
the nature of these informal settlements is necessary in order to intervene most effectively. This study<br />
examines the challenges of delivering adequate water and sanitation services to the slums of Mumbai.<br />
The inadequacies of both formal and informal systems were explored to identify the consequences of<br />
such shortfalls. The research found that many aspects of life within Mumbai slums were connected<br />
to water and sanitation related activities. Furthermore it was found that because women and girls<br />
bare the brunt of the burden of these activities their education and employment opportunities are<br />
negatively impacted by insufficiencies.<br />
77
Fieldwork & Site Visits<br />
BA (Hons) Architecture<br />
As part of Stage 3 the varied studios undertake a field trip in the first semester, travelling to locations as diverse as Venice, Rome, Tenerife, Lisbon,<br />
Malmo, Copenhagen, London and Lindisfarne.<br />
Studio 1: Building on what is already built<br />
Rome, Venice and Verona, Italy<br />
Studio 2: Aperture<br />
Tenrife<br />
Studio 3: Experimental Architecture<br />
Venice, Italy<br />
Studio 4: Infrastructures<br />
Brentford, United Kingdom<br />
Studio 5: Material Poetics<br />
Copenhagen, Denmark + Malmo and Stockholm, Sweden<br />
Studio 6: Ruskin and the Long Now<br />
Venice, Italy<br />
Studio 7: Trace<br />
Norway<br />
Studio 8: The Variations<br />
Portugal<br />
MArch Architecture<br />
Stage 5: Whole year<br />
Rotterdam, Netherlands<br />
Stage 6: Zazibar Studio<br />
Zanzibar, Tanzania<br />
MA Architecture and Urban <strong>Design</strong><br />
Nantes, France<br />
78
BA Architecture & Urban Planning (AUP)<br />
The BA (Hons) Architecture and Urban Planning (AUP) is an evolving three year programme which<br />
began in September 2013 and is now reaching its first cycle of maturity. The degree programme is a<br />
broad one that seeks to unite academic themes and approaches from the architecture and urban planning<br />
programmes across the School. But whilst many joint degrees can sometimes simply mesh two existing<br />
programmes together, we wanted to do something different. The AUP degree carries its own intellectual<br />
and pedagogical themes that cannot be found on other programmes elsewhere in the School. There are<br />
four conceptual strands, which includes one major theme, ‘alternative practice’, and three minor themes:<br />
visual culture, urban design and social enterprise.<br />
The alternative practice strand responds to a critique of twentieth century architecture and planning as<br />
overly technocratic and individualised. Returning to these critiques, alternative practice intends to address<br />
these issues by a greater focus on social, cultural, political and environmental concerns in the design and<br />
construction of the built environment. Our course has drawn inspiration from a range of thinkers and<br />
practitioners concerned with the built environment (including philosophers, political activists, sociologists,<br />
geographers, architects and planners) that have sought to engage and include communities in design<br />
and building (sometimes self-build, sometimes co-production).<br />
The following section which contains images of design work from Stage 1, 2 and 3 of the programme<br />
effectively showcases much of the intellectual and practical academic content of the degree – particularly<br />
the degree’s internal themes – and should be of interest to all with a firm awareness of the connections<br />
between social, environmental and design issues and the built environment more specifically. We hope you<br />
will enjoy the work shown here and derive as much pleasure from these projects as we have in helping their<br />
creators to realise their own personal goals.<br />
Directors<br />
Andrew Law<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
Project Leaders<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
David McKenna<br />
Rutter Carroll<br />
Tim Townshend<br />
Contributors<br />
Adam Sharr<br />
Ali Madanipour<br />
Andrew Donaldson<br />
Andy M Law<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
Cat Button<br />
Chris Beale<br />
Cristina Pallini<br />
Damien Wootten<br />
Daniel Mallo<br />
Dave Webb<br />
Dhruv Sookhoo<br />
Geoff Vigar<br />
Georgia Giannopoulou<br />
Helen Robinson<br />
Ian McCaffery<br />
Irene Curulli<br />
Irene Mosley<br />
James Longfield<br />
James Street<br />
Jane Midgely<br />
Joe Dent<br />
John Pendlebury<br />
Jules Brown<br />
Kati Blom<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />
Ken Hutchinson<br />
Loes Veldpaus<br />
Marion Talbot<br />
Mark Tewdwr-Jones<br />
Martin Beatie<br />
Martin Bonner<br />
Matt Ozga Lawn<br />
Matt Wilcox<br />
Montse Ferres<br />
Neil Powe<br />
Paola Gazzola<br />
Paul Crompton<br />
Peter Kellett<br />
Peter Mouncey<br />
Prue Chiles<br />
Raphael Selby<br />
Ray Verrall<br />
Roger Maier<br />
Rose Gilroy<br />
Rutter Carroll<br />
Scott Savin<br />
Steve Dudek<br />
Steve Graham<br />
Steve Parnell<br />
Stuart Cameron<br />
Su Ann Lim<br />
Sue Speak<br />
Teresa Strachan<br />
Tibo Labat<br />
Tim Mosedale<br />
Tim Townshend<br />
Usue Ruiz Arana<br />
Stage 1<br />
Abbey JoForster<br />
AdilZeynalov<br />
AhmadNamazli<br />
Ahmet Halil Hayta<br />
Ben Edward Johnson<br />
Callum Robert<br />
Campbell<br />
Conrad Chi WahLi<br />
EmilyWhyman<br />
Fatma Beyza Celebi<br />
Flynn Christopher<br />
Linklater-Johnson<br />
Georgia AnneMiles<br />
HarryBloomfield<br />
Huiyu Zhou<br />
Jemima Anulika<br />
Manasoko Onugha<br />
Jiewen Tan<br />
Jieyang Zhou<br />
John-Kervin Marcos<br />
Joshua Edward Beattie<br />
Joshua Thomas Goodliffe<br />
Junqiang Chen<br />
Ka Hei Chan<br />
Ka Hei Wong<br />
Konstantins Briskins<br />
Marvin Shikanga Mbasu<br />
Max James Hardy<br />
Mehboob Chatur<br />
Michael John<br />
Rosciszewski Dodgson<br />
Minsub Lee<br />
Nikshith Reddy<br />
Nagaraja Reddy<br />
Photbarom Korworrakul<br />
Racheal Felicia<br />
Modupeayo Osinuga<br />
Richard George Gilliatt<br />
Ryan Patrick Thomas<br />
Sahir Thapar<br />
Shaoyun Wang<br />
Siddhant Agarwal<br />
Sonali Venkateswaran<br />
Stephen Johnston<br />
Sutong Yu<br />
Theodore Christian<br />
Robert VostBond<br />
Ting En Wu<br />
Vaios Tsoupos<br />
Van Abner Tabigue<br />
Consul<br />
Winnie Wing Yee<br />
Wong<br />
Xi LIN<br />
Xinyun Zhang<br />
Xuanzhi Huang<br />
Yasmine Khammo<br />
Yuan Xu<br />
Zeynab Bozorg<br />
Stage 2<br />
Alex Joseph Robson<br />
Ali Alshirawi<br />
Andrew John Laurence<br />
Blandford-Newson<br />
Chia-Yuan Chang<br />
Christopher Hau<br />
Eleanor Kate Chapman<br />
Filip Ferkovic<br />
George Jeavons-Fellows<br />
Hannah Rose Knott<br />
Henry Andrew Morgan<br />
Hiu Ying Sung<br />
Jieyu Xiong<br />
Jonas Wohni Grytnes<br />
Lok Hang L Leung<br />
Nadine Landes<br />
Phuong Anh Pham<br />
Runyu Zhang<br />
Seyed Masoumi Fard<br />
Sheryl Lee<br />
Simona Penkauskaite<br />
Sze Chai Anthony Choy<br />
Thomas Gibbons<br />
Yeqian Gao<br />
Yilan Zhang<br />
Stage 3<br />
Yuxiang Wang<br />
Adem Mehmet<br />
Altunkaya<br />
Blair Forrest Nimmo<br />
Charles Richard Moore<br />
Charlotte Harrison<br />
Fedelis Fernando<br />
Tosandi<br />
Harry George<br />
Treanor<br />
Jack William Burnett<br />
Jessica Lily Poyner<br />
Martin Kruczyk<br />
Po-Yen Chang<br />
Rebecca Mary<br />
Alexander<br />
Richard Keeling<br />
Rutheep Prabhakaran<br />
Ryan Thomas Conlon<br />
Safeer Shersad<br />
Shu Ting Tang<br />
Sophie Hannah Laverick<br />
Thomas Bartholomew<br />
Charles Wessely<br />
Veenay Patel<br />
Zheng Kit Leong<br />
80<br />
Opposite - First Graduating Year AUP
AUP Stage 1 – Measure<br />
David McKenna<br />
There are 14 boat houses belonging to various colleges, schools and amateur rowing clubs located along the Wear in Durham. The earliest date from<br />
the early 1800s and coincide with the founding of the university. Measure required the design of a 15th boat house and cafe that would form a gateway<br />
from the city centre to the university playing fields.<br />
82<br />
Top left - Konstantins Briskins Top right - Callum Campbell Middle - Callum Campbell Bottom left - yasmine khammo bottom left - Xi Lin
Top left to bottom right - Ka Chan, Xi Lin, Sutong Yu, Ka Chan, Yasmine Khammo, Winnie Wong, Sutong Yu 83
AUP Stage 2 – Theory and Form<br />
Rutter Carroll<br />
In semester two of Twentieth Century Architecture, students were asked to consider a Theory + Form approach to the submission of an essay and design<br />
project, through a strategy for the reuse/conversion/extension/adaptation of an existing post war building in the Tyneside area.<br />
Wallsend Central Library, a key building from the post war period in the region, was identified for study and analysis with respect to its reuse. Built in<br />
1967 as the main library in the town of Wallsend, and designed by local architects Faulkner Brown (formerly Williamson Faulkner Brown and Partners),<br />
the building allowed students to assess the design through a series of Theory + Form lectures, seminars, design analysis tutorials and exercises.<br />
84 Top - Wallsend Central Library, Williamson, Faulkner Brown and Partners, 1966 Bottom - Seyed Masoumi Fard, Yuxiang Wang, Jonas Grytnes
Group work: Jieyu Xiong, Lok Hang Leung, Chia-Yuan Chang, Seyed Masoumi Fard, Yuxiang Wang, Jonas Grytnes, Thomas Gibbons, Alex Robson,<br />
Christopher Hau, Henry Morgan, Yilan Zhang, Runyu Zhang, Sze Chai Anthony Choy, Hui Ying Sung<br />
85
AUP Stage 3 – A Home for All: Housing for Vulnerable Population<br />
Tim Townshend<br />
During the 2020s a point will be reached when 25% of the UK population will aged 65 and over. People are living more active lifestyles into older<br />
age and there is a huge challenge to meet the needs and aspirations of these ‘active third agers’. APL 3002 explored the complexities of providing<br />
a stimulating, safe, appropriate and desirable home for older persons in an existing setting, Armstrong House, a listed Arts-and-Crafts property in<br />
Bamburgh. Armstrong House Bamburgh is an independent charitable trust providing ‘independent living with support’ affiliated to the national<br />
Abbeyfield society. The students were charged with thinking holistically about the place of older persons’ housing in a settlement such as Bamburgh<br />
and how it might be more fully integrated into the everyday life of the community, by providing ‘places of encounter’ learning from Dutch experience.<br />
86
87
AUP Stage 3 – Alternative Practice: Co-producing Space<br />
Daniel Mallo & Armelle Tardiveau<br />
For Alternative Practice: Co-producing Space, students focused on a live project at Denton Burn Community Association which concerns the design<br />
of a community garden and a playful area for an unused derelict plot. The project included the mapping of the Network of Social and Environmental<br />
Initiatives in the neighbourhood and aimed to engage students with existing community-led initiatives. The project culminated with a series of design<br />
proposals and temporary installations on site, which allowed the community to experience the transformed space and trigger conversations about the<br />
potential of the place as well as learning together through the enactment of a temporary community space.<br />
88 Installation at Denton Burn
89
MArch<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
‘What can architecture do? Where might architectural thinking take us?’ Newcastle’s<br />
two-year MArch fosters a research-led approach – one that challenges students to stretch<br />
their architectural and critical imaginations, to think harder and more deeply about what<br />
architecture is and what it could be. Work is diverse, threaded by an interest in architecture<br />
as a collective, cultural endeavour. Projects interrogate architectural production in all its<br />
aspects, from material processes, to modes of design, representation and construction, to<br />
the ways that architecture shapes – and is shaped by – the society and culture in which<br />
it is situated.<br />
As an RIBA accredited Part II programme – the second of three steps towards qualification<br />
as a UK architect – MArch is geared to develop advanced skills in analysis, representation,<br />
design and technical resolution through projects of considerable scale and complexity.<br />
But it is also rooted in the belief that architectural training must go beyond professional<br />
competence. MArch draws on the diverse expertise of ARC, our School’s multidisciplinary<br />
research collaborative, to push explorative ways of working and thinking architecturally.<br />
Students are encouraged to undertake original investigations into issues and techniques at<br />
the forefront of contemporary developments in architecture and beyond – from synthetic<br />
biology to the space of the psyche – while at the same time grounding their work in<br />
a specific material, social, cultural and intellectual context. Cross-studio reviews and<br />
symposia support a lively exchange of ideas and challenge students to position their work<br />
in relation to trends in architectural production and discourse.<br />
Teaching in MArch cuts across common distinctions between design, technology and<br />
history and theory, promoting an integrated approach that treats all aspects of architecture<br />
as opportunities for critical creative enquiry. Studio modules play a central role,<br />
incorporating lectures, seminars, consultancies and workshops spanning the curriculum,<br />
as well as cross-year events such as Charrette and Thinking-Through-Making. Projects are<br />
undertaken in small design-research studios, each exploring particular issues or themes that<br />
resonate with the research interests of tutors. Briefs invite an open process of investigation<br />
between staff and students, encouraging the development of an independent approach and<br />
distinctive critical stance, all grounded in rigorous research. In Stage 5, two semester-long<br />
projects set in a major European city interrogate the complexities of architecture’s relation<br />
to context, from urban to detail-scale, allowing students to test new approaches, methods<br />
and ideas. With most of the prescribed curriculum covered, Stage 6 is freed up to focus on<br />
a specific interest or question, pursued in depth through a year-long thesis project.<br />
With a rich range of opportunities for specialisation, the MArch programme at Newcastle<br />
allows students to develop their own fields of expertise and to showcase these in a distinctive<br />
portfolio. Alongside the design studio, students can choose to pursue independent research<br />
through a dissertation, to join a linked research studio where they collaborate on a live<br />
research project led by a member of staff, or to take a tailored set of modules from one<br />
of our other specialist Masters programmes – such as <strong>Design</strong> and Emergence, or Urban<br />
<strong>Design</strong> – with the potential of accumulating credits towards a second postgraduate<br />
degree. Bridging between the two years of MArch, these activities spark ideas and develop<br />
skills that feed into thesis projects. The School also has a series of exchange agreements<br />
with leading schools of architecture in Europe and around the world, including KTH<br />
Stockholm, National University of Singapore, and The University of Sydney. MArch<br />
students can study abroad for one or two semesters of Stage 5, and the programme benefits<br />
from the diverse skills and experiences of students who join our projects.<br />
91
Stage 5<br />
Stage 5 is a year for in-depth experimentation: for exploring architecture in all its cultural, social, political,<br />
material and historical contexts, for testing new approaches to design, representation and technology.<br />
Briefs emphasize critical thinking and require students to engage with current debates in architecture<br />
and society at large. The year’s work focusses on a particular international city – this year Rotterdam<br />
– beginning with an intensive week-long study visit, including architectural tours, excursions, talks,<br />
group urban analysis and social events. Students undertake a critical reimagining of the city through two<br />
semester-long projects which challenge them to work at two radically different scales – first urban, then<br />
detail. Framing design as a rigorous, as well as speculative process, they foster design-research skills and<br />
interests in preparation for Stage 6.<br />
In semester one, Plan Rotterdam asked students to engage with the urban fabric of the city, its historical<br />
layers, cultural currents and social differences. The project was taught as five distinct studios that each took<br />
on a different urban area and issue. Common themes include the interplay of buildings, infrastructure,<br />
land and water in a city below sea level, architecture’s role in the production of images, experiences and<br />
lifestyles, and the politics of regeneration in a place renowned for visionary architectural and urban ideas.<br />
The project is paired with the Tools for Thinking about Architecture module, which introduces a range of<br />
critical approaches through lectures, workshops and seminars.<br />
Semester two’s Rematerializing Rotterdam switched focus to material and technical imagination, taking<br />
detail, construction and atmosphere as opportunities for creative and critical exploration. The brief<br />
asked students to interrogate a [g]host architecture – built or unbuilt, in Rotterdam or elsewhere – and<br />
to reimagine it in the contemporary city. A detail and environment lecture series, supported by expert<br />
consultancies, encouraged students to pursue a technical specialism that embodies the intentions of the<br />
project.<br />
Year Coordinators<br />
James Craig<br />
Stephen Parnell<br />
Project Leaders<br />
Hanna Benihoud<br />
James Craig<br />
Laura Harty<br />
Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />
Nathaniel Coleman<br />
Stephen Parnell<br />
Contributors<br />
Adam Sharr<br />
Aidan Hoggart<br />
Ben Bridgens<br />
Chantelle Stewart<br />
Claire Harper<br />
Daniel Mallo<br />
Dik Jarman<br />
Ed Wainwright<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Jonnie McGill<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />
Kieran Connolly<br />
Leon Walsh<br />
Luis Hernan<br />
Mark Clarke<br />
Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />
Miguel Paredes<br />
Neveen Hamza<br />
Nita Kidd<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Sarah Jane Stewart<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
Students<br />
Adam Hampton-Matthews<br />
Alexander Baldwin-Cole<br />
Alexandra Paula Carausu<br />
Amit Chhaganbhai Patel<br />
Carl Matthew Reid<br />
Cleo Kyriacou<br />
Daniel Richard Duffield<br />
David Livingstone Boyd<br />
Deryan Teh<br />
Gavin Jia Chung Wu<br />
Hei Man Lau<br />
James Richard Street<br />
Jessica Raine Wilkie<br />
Joseph Wilson<br />
Joseph Philip Dent<br />
Justin William Moorton<br />
Kathleen Rebecca Jenkins<br />
Katie Anne Fisher<br />
Kayleigh Anne Creighton<br />
Kim Alicia Gault<br />
Laurence William Ashley<br />
Malcolm Greer Pritchard<br />
Mariya Lapteva<br />
Martin James Parsons<br />
Matthew Westgate<br />
Matthew Michael Wilcox<br />
Matthew Sharman-Hayles<br />
Michael James Southern<br />
Nedelina Atanasova<br />
Nicola Jane Blincow<br />
Nikolas Kirris Fennell Ward<br />
Noor Aliya Jan-Mohamed<br />
Raphael Tevel Selby<br />
Rebecca Elizabeth Daisy Wise<br />
Richard John Spilsbury<br />
Robert George Evans<br />
Rose Eleanor O’Halloran<br />
Ruochen Zhang<br />
Samuel Edward Halliday<br />
Shiu Tung Wallace Ho<br />
Sophie Cobley<br />
Stavroula Rousounidou<br />
Su Ann Lim<br />
Theodora Kyrtata<br />
Thomas James Saxton<br />
Thomas Richard Cowman<br />
Ulwin Paul Beetham<br />
Vili-Valtteri Welroos<br />
Erasmus Students<br />
Camille Bourneuf<br />
Delia Heitmann<br />
Gustav Lundstrom<br />
Insa Thiel<br />
Stephanie Chiu<br />
92 Opposite - Joe Dent Metropolitan Imaginaries - Site Plan
Metropolitan Imaginaries<br />
James Craig<br />
Metropolitan Imaginaries asked students to map, analyse, and condense the myriad architectural elements that constitute Rotterdam’s metropolitan<br />
image. Using Ivan Leonidov’s social condenser as a key reference, each student set about creating an urban strip that would act as a vessel to contain<br />
architectural interpretations of Rotterdam’s metropolitan conditions. Each strip was articulated, combined, and placed in the Maashaven basin – a site<br />
that lies adjacent to Rotterdam’s prime metropolitan location: the Wilhelminapier. The proposed masterplan is a layered, multi-programmed terrain that<br />
highlights and exaggerates Rotterdam’s extant desire to be seen as a metropolitan city.<br />
94<br />
Kathleen Jenkins
A D A M H A M P T O N - M A T T H E W S<br />
Top from left to right - Joe Dent, James Street, Stavri Rousounidou, Adam Hampton-Matthews, Noor Jan-Mohamed, Justin Moorton<br />
95
Iterations & Intensities<br />
Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />
The studio looked with a close and critical eye at the design processes associated with two major Rotterdam-based practices, OMA and MVRDV.<br />
Students were asked to emulate and embody these practices, in order to gain an understanding of Rotterdam as the site that allows for and encourages<br />
these means of producing architecture. A mock competition was held between the two practices for the same masterplan site in Delfshaven, with large,<br />
group-produced masterplan models alongside individual explorations.<br />
96<br />
Top - MVRDV - Intensities Group Masterplan From Minecraft Blocks to a Building Masterplan
Top - Nik Ward Top Right - Stephanie Chiu Bottom Left - Jessica Wilkie Bottom Right - Carl Reid<br />
97
The City as a Platform<br />
Stephen Parnell<br />
This studio was based on the premise that it is the architecture of the underlying immaterial ‘platforms’ – the operating systems of the city – its rules,<br />
regulations, frameworks, social morals, systems, etiquette, traditions, networks, legislation, and so on, that is most influential on the design of the city.<br />
Students were asked, as a group, through mapping and desktop research, to come up with a definition of what a ‘platform’ is in the context of urban<br />
environment. They then had to individually design a building based upon that idea. The intention was to question the architect’s traditional role in<br />
society and investigate original models of ‘spatial agency’.<br />
98 Top - Michael Southern
Top - Rosie O’Halloran Middle - Malcolm Pritchard B ottom - Cleo Kyriacou<br />
99
Urban Hacker<br />
Hanna Benihoud<br />
‘Operation Rotterdam’ was the mission that the students acting as special agents were deployed on. Their mission was to hack into the city unlocking the<br />
upcoming changes in society: Individualisation, Internationalisation, Informalisation, Intensification and Information as described by the Netherlands<br />
Institute for Social Research. Each target area had an affiliated person of interest (P.O.I) who engaged with the agents to inform their hack. Hacking<br />
into a city meant that a sophisticated method of mapping was needed to understand the rules that govern it. The urban hacks then transformed into<br />
architectural interventions which continued to engage their P.O.I and transformed their target area.<br />
100 Top - Wallace Ho Bottom - Insa Thiel
Left to right, from top - Katie Fisher, Tom Cowman, Wallace Ho, Matthew Wilcox, Joe Wilson, Matthew Westgate<br />
101
What Makes a City Vital?<br />
Nathaniel Coleman<br />
Students in this studio engaged in analyses of urban conditions that are deeper and broader than the self-congratulatory language architects, developers,<br />
and civic boosters tend to use to describe supposed success in cities. Relative to this, analyses based on use rather than exchange were encouraged, while<br />
writings on cities by Lefebvre and Rykwert provided some of the main textual sources for the students’ work. In particular, students were encouraged to<br />
consider those aspects of cities that make them vital but are non-commodifiable, related more to civic virtues and dreaming than to exchange. As part<br />
of their research, students developed a series of strategies for re-urbanising OMA/Koolhaas’ De Rotterdam complex, the quarter it sits in (and ostensibly<br />
establishes), and Rotterdam more generally.<br />
102 What Makes a City Vital? Suspended Symposium Group Model<br />
ARB CRITERIA COVERED:
Marketing Collage<br />
Ulwin Beetham<br />
“The success of a city therefore cannot be measured in terms of<br />
financial growth and of a share in those markets it may have managed to capture,<br />
or even of its place in the process of globalization which is the inescapable<br />
phenomenon of our time- but depends on the inherent strength of the fabric<br />
and its availability to the social forces that mold the life of its inhabitants.”<br />
Joseph rykwert, The Seduction Of Place<br />
When examining the image of rotterdam and its architecture and<br />
what it wants it to convey through the slick and seductive imagery of brochures<br />
and city guides, a strong identity emerges that underpins both what it believes<br />
it is and the perceived power it holds over shaping its own future. Critically<br />
dissecting this imagery and information reveals one of the many inevitabilities<br />
of the sale: The reality never meets the expectation.<br />
Truly the International City, gradually stripped bare of any localised<br />
context rotterdam is both anywhere and nowhere simultaneously. As neoliberal<br />
policies drive the agenda of 21st century discourse, the unique circumstance<br />
afforded rotterdam have led it to become debased to a carousel of skyscrapers<br />
housing infinite quantifiable commodities, the program. The model of success<br />
based on a series of overreaching potentials rather than realities that form a<br />
city for tomorrow but not for today.<br />
After the Luftwaffe bombing in 1940, Rotterdam became a target<br />
for a wave of policy-making and urban renewal, systematically restructuring<br />
the city to a post-modernist utopian vision. This included the significant<br />
redevelopment of areas such as Kop Van Zuid to become a ‘Manhattan on the<br />
Maas’, constructing monoliths of economic power, an illusion of achievement,<br />
attempting to compete within the growing capitalist market.<br />
A dominant environment was created, operating on the control and<br />
subordination of a significantly (49%) non-dutch population. The majority of<br />
developments on Kop Van Zuid have been privately financed office buildings &<br />
commercial exploits, however despite this ‘working image’, unemployment is at<br />
8.5%, twice that of the national average. The area is significantly unpopulated<br />
and desolate, an ‘isolated and unnatural urban space’.<br />
I argue that the cultural, and hence economic, failures of Rotterdam<br />
are a direct result of the Masculinist approach to urban design, gentrifying and<br />
excluding those not valued by traditional white ‘Masculinism’: women, ethnic<br />
minorities (majorities), and alternative sexualities. To establish social cohesion<br />
and equal representation, difference of the ‘other’ to the existing ‘Masculinity’<br />
must be embodied in the urban environment.<br />
The BroChUre<br />
THE MYTH OF MASCULINITY<br />
Left to right, from top - Vili Welroos, Ulwin Beetham, Gavin Wu, Mariya Lapteva, Deryan Teh, Daniel Duffield, Becky Wise<br />
103
Thinking-Through-Making Week<br />
Thinking-Through-Making continues our theme of collaborations with artists, engineers, architects, musicians, thinkers and makers. This is for final<br />
year BA and MArch students in the second semester of the year. With a focus on material and making, this week-long series of lectures and workshops<br />
asks students to approach architecture through the process of making and drawing at large-scales, bringing material back to the core of architecture’s<br />
exploration.<br />
Articulated Structures<br />
Holly Hendry<br />
Articulated Structures<br />
Sebastian Kite and Benjamin Custance<br />
Chemical droplet workshop<br />
Professor Rachel Armstrong<br />
The Golden Journey<br />
Matt Rowe<br />
Dis-Connect to Re-Combine<br />
Dr Luciano Cardellicchio<br />
Illigraphy<br />
Russ Coleman<br />
Jesmonite<br />
Matt Rowe<br />
Lino cut with embossing<br />
Northern Print<br />
Material Processes<br />
Amy Linford<br />
Sculpted Polystyrene Spaces<br />
Magnus Casselbrant and Jesper Henriksson<br />
Spatial Possibilities<br />
Dr Rachel Cruise<br />
Stitch<br />
Helen Pailing<br />
Stonemasonry<br />
David France<br />
Temporary liquid<br />
Russ Coleman<br />
The Golden Journey<br />
Matt Rowe<br />
Your ideal multi-dimensional growing edible building<br />
Henry Amos<br />
104<br />
https://thinkingthroughmaking.org/workshops/
Another Architecture [Brutal]<br />
Stephen Parnell<br />
This studio looked at the much polarised movement of Brutalism and the issue of what to do with a large listed Brutalist building. Brutalist architecture<br />
is coming to an age where questions about what to do with them are being asked – should they be conserved, restored, renovated, refurbished, reused,<br />
or demolished? What is Brutalism anyway and what does it mean for 21st century architecture? Students were asked to consider these questions while<br />
re-programming the Meelfabriek Latenstein (flour factory) on the Rijnhaven basin in Rotterdam.<br />
106 Top - Joe Wilson Bottom - Kayleigh Creighton
Left to right, from top - Raphael Selby, Matthew Sharman-Hayles, Katie Fisher, Justin Moorton, Robbie Evans, Insa Thiel, Stavri Rousonidou<br />
Right - Robbie Evans<br />
107
De-Tale<br />
Hanna Benihoud<br />
This studio is inspired by the discussion in ‘The Tell-The-Tale Detail’, where Marco Frascari explains the architectural ‘joint’ which creates a transition<br />
from one element to another. The relationship may not occur between just one material and another, or a traditional wall and floor, but between the<br />
transition of light and dark space, between volumes, temperatures, thresholds, solids and voids or any other transitional moment within a building. Each<br />
student chose a material to become obsessed with and used that to explore the idea of a ‘joint’. Building 1:1 ‘joints’ reconnected the draftsman and the<br />
craftsman and designing details first created a narrative that informed their architectural language for the entire scheme.<br />
108<br />
Noor Jan-Mohamed
Top Left - Rebecca Wise Top Right - Gavin Wu Bottom - Deryan Teh<br />
109
In Praise of Folly<br />
Laura Harty<br />
In this studio, we drew on the 1509 essay ‘In Praise of Folly’, in which Erasmus of Rotterdam uses Folly, neutered feminine, to manipulate and disguise<br />
his fundamental critique of the overarching powers of the day. In cloaking his critique in Folly, he allows otherwise stark and punishable observations to<br />
be accepted as trite amusements. His satire permits superficial reading, while allowing room for oppositional and reformative propositions. As Erasmus<br />
engages Folly as vehicle and decoy, so too each student adopted an attendant persona to drive a material investigation, interrogate an attendant brief<br />
and deliver an inquisitive proposal.<br />
110 Daniel Duffield
Top Left - Ulwin Beetham Top Right - Adam Hampton-Matthews Bottom Left to Right - Ulwin Beetham, Nicola Blincow, Angie Lau<br />
111
Hybrid Objects<br />
James Craig<br />
Hybrid Objects asked students to create an architectural response to the complex space that exists between viewers and objects. This space, a foggy<br />
territory where myriad meanings can be made, is the zone where projected meanings collide to create a space of betweenness. The result is a hybrid<br />
object; constituted from entangled meanings that exist between observers and objects. Through the selection and unpacking of an object from the<br />
permanent collection of the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, each student developed their own art depository in the Museumpark area of Rotterdam.<br />
112 Laurence Ashley
Top Wallace Ho<br />
Bottom from left to Right - Laurence Ashley, Delia Heitmann, Vili Welroos<br />
Middle from left to Right - Ruochen Zhang, Kim Gault, Ruochen Zhang<br />
113
Spectres of Utopia and Modernity<br />
Nathaniel Coleman<br />
Students in this studio investigated the ghosts of modernity by charting its traces in selected surviving examples of heroic modern architecture from<br />
the 1920s and 1930s, and in projects from the post-World War II period of its greatest orthodoxy, 1945-1960. In developing their individual projects,<br />
students were challenged to consider how their study building harbours both the ghosts of modernity and the spectre of Utopia that has struck fear<br />
into the hearts of architects (and others) since at least the 1950s. Through their investigation of the core topics of modernity and Utopia, students were<br />
encouraged to confront their own Utopia-Anxiety as directly as they could by proposing a new, ‘alien’ structure correlated with their study building.<br />
114<br />
Left / Top - Malcolm Pritchard<br />
Right - Sam Halliday
Left - Joe Dent Top Right - Nik Ward Bottom Right - Sam Halliday<br />
115
Stage 6<br />
In Stage 6 students undertake a year-long thesis project with a self-generated brief, within a theoretical<br />
framework established by their chosen studio. This year, five studios were on offer:<br />
Border Territories: Adam Sharr and Sam Austin<br />
Experimental Architecture: Rachel Armstrong and Paul Rigby<br />
Landscapes of Human Endeavour: James Craig and Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />
Matter: Graham Farmer and Paul Rigby<br />
Zanzibar: Prue Chiles<br />
These studios offer a comparable level of complexity as graduation projects, but they cover a broad range<br />
of issues and geographies leading to a diverse variety of outcomes. They showcase the interactions between<br />
studio leaders’ research expertise and the evolving interests and specialisms of Stage 6 students. To achieve<br />
this, every year, students’ individual thesis projects are developed within each studio’s theme, balancing<br />
their individual learning objectives and interests against those already covered in Stage 5.<br />
As in previous years, the thesis projects were located in a variety of strategically selected urban or wilderness<br />
landscapes, in sites from Zanzibar to Whitley Bay to Orlando. They tackled issues from the master plan<br />
to the molecular scale and with temporal ambitions stretching into millennia. Students have built upon<br />
experience gained from previous years’ representational techniques and experimentation.<br />
This is the fifth year Newcastle has run a studio-based thesis model with cross-year/cross-studio interactions<br />
that keep students aware of the work undertaken by their peers in other parts of the school. This year, in<br />
addition to the Technical Review, Thinking-Through-Making Week and an expansion of the Academic<br />
Portfolio, we also inaugurated a vertical exhibition in the 6-7th week of the first semester, showcasing in a<br />
cascading manner the preliminary work of Stages 2-6.<br />
This has been a successful and stimulating year academically, and we would like to express our gratitude to<br />
all the various contributors throughout the year.<br />
Year Coordinators<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
Adam Sharr<br />
Project Leaders<br />
Adam Sharr<br />
James Craig<br />
Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Paul Ribgy<br />
Prue Chiles<br />
Rachel Armstrong<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Contributors<br />
Alistair Robinson<br />
Andrew Ballantyne<br />
Andrew Carr<br />
Andrew English<br />
Claire Harper<br />
Ed Wainwright<br />
Emma Cheatle<br />
Gary Caldwell<br />
Howard Evans<br />
Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />
Katie Lloyd-Thomas<br />
Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />
Maurice Mitchell<br />
Mhairi McVicar<br />
Nat Chard<br />
Neil Armstrong<br />
Nick Heyward<br />
Patrick Devlin<br />
Pete Brittain<br />
Peter Hoare<br />
Peter Kellett<br />
Philip Beesley<br />
Steve Parnell<br />
Students<br />
Alanah Marie Honey<br />
Alexander Glen Burnie<br />
Alyssia Katherine Booth<br />
Anna Elizabeth Cumberland<br />
Carrie Yee<br />
Christopher James Bulmer<br />
Corbin Wood<br />
Emily Daisy Page<br />
Emily-Jayne Harper<br />
Ewan George Thomson<br />
Gregory David Walton<br />
Greta Varpucianskyte<br />
Imogen Alexandra Holden<br />
Jack Roberto Scaffardi<br />
Joshua Long<br />
Katherine Grace Gomm<br />
Kevin Vong<br />
Lee Daniel Whitelock<br />
Matas Belevicius<br />
Matthew Joe Mouncey<br />
Matthew Clubbs Coldron<br />
Matthew Robert Jackson<br />
Megan Meleri Jones<br />
Mundumuko Sinvula<br />
Robert Philip Paton<br />
Roubini Hadjicosti<br />
Rumen Rumenov Dimov<br />
Ruth Eleanor Sidey<br />
Simon David Baker<br />
Thierry Guy Neu<br />
Thomas Henderson Schwartz<br />
Vlasios Sokos<br />
Vsevolod Karetnikov<br />
Wei Sheng Kwan<br />
116<br />
Opposite - Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney
Studio 1 – Border Territories<br />
Adam Sharr & Sam Austin<br />
This studio is about border conditions. Borders produce spatial conditions, from dividing walls (think of Berlin, Belfast or San Diego-Tijana) to lines<br />
which exist on a map but not on the ground; from enclaves of one jurisdiction within another (embassies, airports) to distinctive economic and political<br />
effects. Borders can be psychological and cultural as much as physical. Students have chosen their own border conditions to work with including: the<br />
green line of Nicosia, Cyprus; Campione d’Italia (an Italian exclave in Switzerland); Newcastle Airport; the ‘interzone’ of post-War Tangiers; the border<br />
transgressions of shortwave radio; and the psychological border between risk, fear and pleasure.<br />
118<br />
Jack Scaffardi Freeport Municipale
Rumen Dimov Lost in Transmission 119
120 Ewan Thomson The Airside City
Thierry Neu Unravelling Risk<br />
121
122 Megan Jones Literary Constructs of an Interzone
Roubini Hadjicosti Palimpsest of Memories<br />
123
Studio 2 – Experimental Architecture<br />
Rachel Armstrong<br />
Experimental Architecture establishes an organic platform for thinking and practice through iterative experiments that engage directly with the natural<br />
realm. It seeks to explore the complexity of the natural world without reducing it into a series of soluble problems but also opens up the practice to poetic<br />
and artistic engagement. For example, experimental architecture asks: can we grow an artificial reef around the city of Venice to save it and connect<br />
human populations with the marine environment? Can we grow a new island for Venice using the pollutants in the lagoon (algae and plastics) and reinvest<br />
in future generations through the production of ‘functional’ earths, or can we design ‘super’ soils to support life on other planets and bring new<br />
kinds of flourishing to extreme environments?<br />
124<br />
Seva Karetnikov Please don’t tap on the glass
Imogen Holden The Opera of Shalott<br />
125
126 Matthew Mouncey Of Death and Decomposition
Kevin Vong Experimental Junk<br />
127
128 Corbin Wood The Delormer’s Creed
Carrie Yee Resurrecting Memories: Sustainable Crematory Landscape<br />
129
Studio 3 – Landscapes of Human Endeavour<br />
James Craig & Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />
Human endeavour has long been associated with expansive and unknowable landscapes, from George Mallory’s first attempt to ‘conquer’ the summit of<br />
Mount Everest in 1924 through to Felix Baumgartner’s recent skydive from a helium balloon 24 miles above the Earth’s surface. These varied projects<br />
are concerned with representing architectures sited between the psyche of a chosen endeavour and the landscape (in the broadest sense of the word) that<br />
they are engaged with. They include an interpretation of Walt Disney’s delirious deathbed fantasy of E.P.C.O.T., a secular retreat based on C.S. Lewis’s<br />
notion of Epicurean Life, and a garden of mechanical computation derived from the life of Ada Lovelace.<br />
130<br />
Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney
Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney<br />
131
132 Alexander Burnie Z
Chris Bulmer Magical Realism<br />
133
134 Greta Varpucianskyte Scripted Spaces: Biographical Landscapes of Ada Lovelace
Robert Paton The Nuclear Family<br />
135
136 Lee Whitelock At Home with War
Emily Page The Archive of Destroyed Monuments<br />
137
138 Emily-Jayne Harper Between Subject and Object: Landscape Beyond Reach
Joshua Long Epicurean Life<br />
139
Studio 4 – Matter<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
The studio celebrates the ‘liveliness’ of matter and encourages design processes founded on a dialogic and emergent understanding of architectural<br />
materiality. In doing so the studio challenges any notion of buildings as static assemblies of inert or neutral products and instead seeks concrete material<br />
practices in which technology is always both performative and contextual. Students have selected their own matter to collaborate with and have explored<br />
new understandings of conventional construction materials like sand, brick and timber or experimented with new materialities. Themes of making,<br />
manufacture, entropy, sensuality, transformation and environmental renewal have all surfaced as key themes in the work of the studio.<br />
140<br />
Matas Belevicius St. Anthony’s Mycelium Works
Matas Belevicius St. Anthony’s Mycelium Works<br />
141
142 Mundu Sinvula Sensory Deprivation
Alyssia Booth Weather Architecture<br />
143
144 Matthew Jackson Modular Imagination
Vlasios Sokos Research Centre for the Development of Prototype Materials and Building Components<br />
145
146 Simon Baker Shifting Sands
Ruth Sidey Beauty in Precision?<br />
147
Studio 5 – Zanzibar<br />
Prue Chiles<br />
Zanzibar has a romantic multi-cultural history; spices, gold, ivory and slaves have travelled between the East African Swahili Coast, the Arabian<br />
Peninsula and the Indian subcontinent for 20,000 years on dhow boats. Today, the archipelago’s population of 1.3 million is growing rapidly. This<br />
semi-autonomous archipelago off the coast of Tanzania urgently needs to address its future growth. Zanzibar’s challenges are a microcosm of the most<br />
critical global development issues. The studio is working with a new architecture and planning department in Zanzibar, who have ambitions to create the<br />
most sustainable island in East Africa, physically, socially, and environmentally. Scenario planning and mapping have formed a basis to understand the<br />
whole island scale, coupled with ethnographic field research, including interviewing local people and a small-scale building project with a local school.<br />
Linked Research students (Stage 5) have joined the team to develop a foundation for a major research project. The team has developed a critical position<br />
on the colonial past and the new development plans for the future of the island. Stage 6 thesis proposals form a ’chain’ across the buffer zone of the World<br />
Heritage Site capital of Zanzibar, Stone Town, and move out across the island. All projects support key development aims of the island; firstly to retain<br />
the historic core of a rapidly developing city as a place to live and work. Secondly, to develop successful, well connected neighbourhoods with innovative<br />
ideas for more ecological and mixed development. Lastly, to find sustainable ways of developing coastal villages and island agriculture.<br />
148<br />
Matt Clubbs Caldron Zanzibar Central Bus Terminal and Urban Forum
Alanah Honey Zanzibar Institute for <strong>Design</strong><br />
149
150 Anna Cumberland From the Ground Up: An Agricultural Future for Chwaka
Thomas Henderson Schwartz Catching the Winds of Trade<br />
151
152 Wei Kwan Guerrilla Aqueduct
Katherine Gomm Mnazi Tatu (Three Coconuts) Maternity Hospital and Women’s Health Centre<br />
153
Highlighted Project – Freeport Municipale<br />
Jack Scaffardi<br />
This project is set in the Italian exclave of Campione d’Italia – a tax haven with a rich artistic history and home to Europe’s largest casino. This thesis aims to serve as a critique of art<br />
as a commodity, taking the form of a cemetery of objects.<br />
154<br />
Jack Scaffardi Freeport Municipale
Highlighted Project – After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney<br />
Greg Walton<br />
This story tells of an old man so devoted to the idea of creating and preserving a legacy that he dedicated his entire life to it. For four decades the man had gone from success to<br />
success, infecting modern culture in a way no one else ever had, with barely anything eluding him. The man had two sides; the public benevolent figure that the world adored, the<br />
other is what he thought of himself, his psyche tormented. Rather curiously, he was inherently unknowable. He was a myth, an invention, a character in a storybook, meticulously<br />
designed by the master storyteller himself. This story begins at the end, as the man finally comes face to face with his own mortality; in a hospital bed awake, motionless and staring<br />
at the ceiling.<br />
Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney<br />
155
MArch Dissertations<br />
The 10,000 word MArch dissertation offers students the opportunity to undertake a sustained enquiry into a topic of particular interest to them and to<br />
develop their own modes of writing and presentation. Where appropriate the timing of the dissertation allows for topics explored to inform their final<br />
thesis design project. The research has a growing profile in the School, with two public presentations taking place in October and February, and the<br />
dissertation is now a feature of the Degree Shows in Newcastle and London.<br />
Lost in the Wild:<br />
An Exploration into Spatial Dislocation within Survivalist Landscapes<br />
Matthew Mouncey<br />
McCandless’s Alaskan Odyssey struck a chord with a large portion of society when it was first covered<br />
by the media; his tragic tale gained notoriety for the social angst it accentuated within people in the<br />
Western World. But more so than that, it highlighted glaring shortcomings in civilization as we<br />
understand it. Within this dissertation I unpack the story of McCandless, such that it highlights the<br />
driving factors behind spatial dislocation within survivalist landscapes.<br />
These notions of longing for the unknown set the context for a deep-seated social angst that comes<br />
to explain why characters like McCandless flee. Their actions are reactionary to their perceived<br />
view of civilization, which I unpack throughout the course of the text. Both the spatial necessaries<br />
and implications of their actions are explored such that they pinpoint and question the core issues<br />
associated with spatial dislocation. The description of architecture as a metaphor for the power and<br />
authority that orchestrates this social neurosis calls into sharp relief the power and influence of the<br />
built environment around us. The removal of the body into heterotopic survivalist landscapes implies<br />
the basic re-ignition of fundamental human mechanisms that have been repressed. The architectural<br />
condition we’re facing is one of power and authority; by exploring subversive courses of action it may<br />
be possible to reconcile the problematic areas of civilization through a discussion with survivalist<br />
landscapes.<br />
The System of Houses<br />
Jack Scaffardi<br />
This piece is an investigation into how housing operates as commodity within capitalist society,<br />
one that is designed to maximise what Karl Marx termed exchange-value at the expense of its usevalue<br />
– use-value being the usefulness of a thing and exchange value being its monetary relation.<br />
Neil Brenner states: ‘the commodification of housing is the handling of housing not as one of<br />
life’s necessities, something that provides shelter, protection, privacy, space for personal and family<br />
activities, but rather as something that is bought and sold and used to make money’. This study<br />
investigates how housing’s operation as a consumer good manifests in the domestic environment.<br />
What Does the Commission of the CCTV Headquarters, and Rem Koolhaas’ Winning <strong>Design</strong>,<br />
Say about the Current Political, Economic and Architectural Climate of Beijing and China?<br />
Emily Page<br />
Commissioned in 2002 by the People’s Republic of China, the CCTV Headquarters is widely<br />
regarded as political propaganda and an ‘institute of censorship’, intended to project China onto the<br />
world stage and showcase its ascendency. The focus for my MArch dissertation was to understand<br />
the interrelationships between the building and China’s economic growth, branding strategies and<br />
soft power initiatives.<br />
The dissertation discusses China’s use of starchitect Koolhaas and the use of a highly recognisable<br />
logo form as a branding tool for both building and country. China is pursuing a strategy of greater<br />
international engagement to increase its influence on the world stage. The thesis examines China’s<br />
attempts to improve its worldwide branding and perception, considering strategies such as the 2006<br />
‘Ten Mile Brand Strategy’ that attempted to establish brand promotional systems. It also studies the<br />
impact the CCTV building has on China’s soft power initiatives, both in aiding and abetting soft<br />
power strategies.<br />
156
Rebuilding to Remember: How the ruins of war have been used in urban reconstruction<br />
Alyssia K. Booth<br />
‘To be sure a cityscape is not made of flesh. Still, sheared-off buildings are almost as eloquent as body<br />
parts… Look, the photographs say, this is what it’s like. This is what war does. War tears, war rends,<br />
war rips open, eviscerates. War scorches. War dismembers. War ruins.’ – (Virginia Woolfe)<br />
Architectural heritage is often attacked in times of conflict, and post-war reconstruction presents a<br />
number of potential challenges: limited economic funding; the necessity to rebuild; the difficulties of<br />
clearing huge areas of rubble. However, over the past few decades, advances in modern architecture<br />
have allowed many ruins of war to be rebuilt in some capacity, owing to recognition of their<br />
associations with collective memory, the identity and history of places, and of the educational<br />
importance of commemorating the darker periods of human history as well as successes. Although<br />
undeniably a time of great trauma, the aftermath of war can also be seen as a political opportunity<br />
for rebuilding, creating potential for ‘radical’ architectural speculations within the reconstruction.<br />
This paper is a study of the ways in which people engaged with the destroyed architecture of<br />
WWII, the choices of different methods of rebuilding with the ruins; replica, retention, integration,<br />
(including the impacts of these choices) and how integrating ruins alongside modern architecture can<br />
help restore the collective memory, identity or culture of a war-torn city, playing an important role<br />
in the future of post-war reconstruction. The study aims to reveal that the post-war reconstruction of<br />
cultural heritage is not only important to the successful moving on of societies, but also a significant<br />
political tool to manipulate communities and the remembrance of history in a post-war environment,<br />
giving cause to question the current lack of architects involvement in the reconstruction of war ruins.<br />
Prefabricated Masonry and its Place within the UK House Building Industry:<br />
Can we normalise prefabrication and make it desirable through the use of brick; whilst<br />
increasing the efficiency and sustainability of new homes?<br />
Katherine Gomm<br />
Brick has long been a staple component of British architecture, used for palaces, factories and<br />
homes and our preference for the material is still strong. However, with growing pressures on the<br />
government to increase the number of houses built, can we adapt the use of the humble brick to<br />
increase the efficiency and sustainability of new homes in the UK? Prefabricated brick cavity wall<br />
panels have the ability to meet these demands, but is it possible to remove the stigmatism associated<br />
with prefabrication and embrace this new technology? Can we normalise the notion of prefabrication<br />
and increase its desirability through the reinvention of the familiar brick in order to build better<br />
homes for the future?<br />
The results of my survey of the British public conducted to understand their needs and desires show<br />
that in general people do not want a prefabricated house. However, in studying the UK’s first and<br />
only private dwelling built using prefabricated brick cavity walls, it is clear that this new system has<br />
favourable benefits when compared to traditional construction methods. It merits further research,<br />
development and consideration as a valid new building technology.<br />
Mankind’s Box<br />
Christopher James Bulmer<br />
Rabbits have hutches, hamsters have cages and mankind has an architecture of Manspace. Manspace<br />
began with the agricultural revolution, it is the turning point in which mankind departed from its<br />
intimate symbiosis with nature, and began laboriously carving out an artificial human island out of<br />
the surrounding wilds. Manspace was born, and at the centre of this island of Manspace peasants<br />
lived their lives in a wood, stone, brick or mud structure consisting of foundations, walls and roof–<br />
the house. The house remains the centre of this Manspace, and like flowers being fed in a glass<br />
vase mankind desperately tries to supplement his own needs within his own enclosure. Continually<br />
seeking to instil the idea that the house is in fact full of life rather than void of it. This lack of life is<br />
all around the house, in the fresh cut flowers with their promise to die, in the pests which mankind<br />
exterminates, in the stuffed animals real or otherwise and in the images of landscapes on multiple<br />
forms of media. Through all these elements mankind attempts to fulfil his biophilic needs and repress<br />
his ecological boredom; he tries to feel alive. However these efforts are in vain for mankind is not<br />
truly alive in the house, yet nor is he dead; mankind is merely existing within his box.<br />
157
Is Essex the Only Way?<br />
Tracing echoes of Essex in regional housing development<br />
Imogen A E Holden<br />
This dissertation seeks to untangle the suggestive frameworks put forward by the inaugural Essex<br />
<strong>Design</strong> Guide. In exploring its shaping of new housing developments and identifying moments of<br />
Essex-ness, this research aims to prove that the Guide is a document of distinction and worthy of<br />
research in its own right. Whilst on the surface the Guide reflects the standardised planning policy<br />
document, in exploring the richness of the document’s cultural, historical and theoretical contexts,<br />
it becomes increasingly difficult to categorise. An eclectic combination of social commentary, policy<br />
checklist, design sketchbook and materiality mood-board, the Guide slides across category boundaries<br />
raising broader questions relating to assumed knowledge, sense of place and the Local. In exploring<br />
moments of inner logic and assumed understanding, occurring both within the Guide and in its<br />
connections to external factors, the relationship between the Local and locality will be challenged in<br />
reference to the Essex-ification of new UK development.<br />
Building Normalities<br />
Ewan Thomson<br />
One in four people in the UK will experience a mental illness in any given year. However, public<br />
perceptions of mental illness do not reflect this, with stigma still rife. Stigmatisation of the mentally ill<br />
is an issue architecture cannot shy away from, as it’s already played a major part in it. Take Oakwood<br />
hospital, Barming Heath. A former Victorian mental hospital, it has since been turned into flats. The<br />
slogan they used to sell them was ‘with prices like these, you’d be barmy not to buy!’<br />
The inpatient facility is a specialised building typology with important architectural ordering, and<br />
a complex set of power relationships. This study seeks to understand if and how architecture can<br />
help normalise spaces of mental illness, both in the public eye and for people using mental health<br />
buildings.<br />
Don’t Just Hope for a Better Life. Buy Into One.<br />
Ruth Sidey<br />
This dissertation, through an analysis of Nigella Lawson’s latest kitchen, highlights the conflicts that<br />
arise between the ‘ideal’ and the ‘real’ in the domestic sphere. Idealised constructions of the domestic<br />
have been utilised since the dichotomy between the home and the place of work was established.<br />
These curated environments have been used variously to promote consumption, national identity<br />
and most recently to provide an aspirational ‘lifestyle’ model. Nigella’s performance of a ‘perfect’<br />
lifestyle, in the wake of her widely publicised divorce, is dissected and placed in historical, social<br />
and political contexts. The author concludes that Nigella willingly places herself within traditional<br />
domestic ideals and stereotypical gender roles, presenting an ultimately pleasing femininity. Her<br />
image, through a form of retrospective imagining, conjures up images of an era that promised a<br />
‘better life’ through social mobility. In the neoliberal context of today, however, this nostalgic image<br />
serves to mask an uncomfortable truth; that achieving our aspirations is now, in many ways, blocked.<br />
The gap between the ‘ideal’ and the ‘real’ is in fact a glass wall which can never be penetrated, and the<br />
‘perfect’ remains in the idealised, unachievable realm.<br />
<strong>Design</strong>ing and Building With / For / Around / About a Community?<br />
Reflections from a Live Project in Borneo<br />
Thomas Henderson Schwartz<br />
The dissertation examines the role of western architects, designers and students working in developing<br />
countries through the lens of a personal experience of the design and build of a community centre in<br />
Kampung Buayan, Sabah, Borneo, 2013-14. It is structured as a semi-chronological theorised diary,<br />
borrowing ideas from post-colonial theory, sociology and contemporary understandings of space.<br />
The opening of the dissertation situates the stakeholders of the project and explains how each came<br />
to be involved. The second part deconstructs motivations and responsibilities of the stakeholders<br />
and critiques the idea that ‘local is good’. The third part analyses the design process within the<br />
framework of Bhabha’s understanding of post-colonial translation and hybridity. Next, the fourth<br />
part investigates to what extent one can integrate into a community and the cultural and ethical<br />
considerations of such an integration. The fifth part examines the role of authorship and ownership<br />
of a piece of architecture. Here the motivations of the architect are re-examined and the success and<br />
failures of the project are elaborated. The final part examines the role of recognising the naivety and<br />
ambivalence of an architect working in a similar context and how that recognition is productive.<br />
158
Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
BUILDING<br />
MODERN TURKEY<br />
STATE, SPACE,<br />
AND IDEOLOGY IN<br />
THE EARLY REPUBLIC<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
Zeynep Kezer’s book, Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology was published in<br />
December 2015 by the University of Pittsburgh Press as part of its Politics, Culture and<br />
the Built Environment Series. The book provides a critical account of how space and spatial<br />
practices mediated Turkey’s transition from an empire into a modern nation-state. Kezer<br />
deliberately juxtaposes the making of new types of spaces to accommodate the demands of<br />
this new politico-cultural formation with the dismantling of ethnic and religious enclaves and<br />
the practices they engendered, exposing the inextricable relationship between the creative and<br />
destructive forces deployed in the nation-state building process. Building Modern Turkey surveys<br />
a broad terrain of state activities – from achieving internal pacification to gaining international<br />
recognition – and how these played out in sites prominent, ordinary, and marginal. In so<br />
doing, she demonstrates how, as an indisputably spatial process, state formation necessarily<br />
operates at multiple and interdependent scales from that of the individual body to that of<br />
regional geopolitics.<br />
The nationalists’ bid to reinvent Turkey as a modern nation-state following the Ottoman<br />
Empire’s collapse at the end of WWI was a formidable challenge. On the home front, the<br />
move meant not only importing wholesale an alien form of government with its laws and<br />
institutions, but repudiating an indigenous legacy that had shaped this land and its people for<br />
over six centuries. This entailed tearing down communitarian structures that had historically<br />
constituted the social fabric of the empire and instituting a centralized legal and institutional<br />
network enabling state penetration into ever-expanding areas of people’s everyday lives. On<br />
the international front, Turkey’s nation-statehood depended on gaining recognition as a peer<br />
within the Westphalian system of states.<br />
Nowhere were these tensions played out more dramatically than in the built environment<br />
where a feverish drive to create the spaces (governmental and institutional buildings,<br />
monuments, public works, etc) to accommodate this new order was coupled with an equally<br />
intense determination to obliterate Turkey’s ethnic and religious landscapes, the persistence<br />
of which – claimed the nationalists – obstructed national unification and secularization.<br />
Meanwhile, the construction of embassies in the new capital Ankara, and, by implication,<br />
Turkey’s international recognition as a peer state, hinged on regional geopolitical rivalries and<br />
unsettled scores from WWI. So did the question of which foreign experts and whose credit<br />
would shape Turkish modernization.<br />
The first book to provide a spatial account of the making of the modern Turkish state, this<br />
volume addresses important omissions in architectural history and, more generally in Turkish<br />
historiography, regarding the costs and consequences of imposing an imported concept<br />
of ‘the modern’ on a multicultural, complex indigenous society and destroying the built<br />
environment which underpinned it. The broad range of spatial scales considered in this study<br />
exposes previously overlooked interrelations and tensions between local, national and regional<br />
productions of space. Interdisciplinary in approach, this book seeks to explain the complex<br />
factors that inform the physical and ideological shaping of the modern world of the unified<br />
nation state.<br />
159
Linked Research<br />
The 40 credit Linked Research module is unique to the Newcastle curriculum and it spans the two years of<br />
the MArch enabling year-long collaborative research projects between staf and students. Linked Research<br />
encourages approaches that extend beyond the conventional studio design project or ‘lone researcher’<br />
dissertation model allowing space for multiple and speculative forms of research. Projects are often openended<br />
and collaborative and, because they are long term and involve groups working together, they can<br />
enable participatory projects and large-scale production with a wide range or partners inside and outside<br />
the university.<br />
Coordinator<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
2015-16 Projects<br />
Testing Ground<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
<strong>2016</strong>-17 Projects<br />
Architecture Default<br />
Kieran Connolly<br />
Testing Ground<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Alexander Burnie<br />
Rumen Dimov<br />
Megan Jones<br />
Joshua Long<br />
Mundu Sinvula<br />
Corbin Wood<br />
Simon Baker<br />
Atlas of Artificial<br />
Mountains<br />
Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />
Matas Belevicius<br />
Seva Karetnikov<br />
Noor Jan-Mohamed<br />
James Street<br />
Brutalism<br />
Steve Parnell<br />
Raphael Selby<br />
Insa Thiel<br />
Joe Wilson<br />
Building Adaptability<br />
John Kamara<br />
Gustav Lundstrom<br />
Empty Pool<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />
Rona Lee<br />
Theodora Kyrtata<br />
Stavri Rousonidou<br />
Martin Parsons<br />
Laurence Ashley<br />
Alex Baldwin-Cole<br />
Ulwin Beetham<br />
Sophie Cobley<br />
Robert Evans<br />
Katie Fisher<br />
Sam Halliday<br />
Kathleen Jenkins<br />
Matthew Westgate<br />
Newcastle After Dark<br />
Ed Wainwright<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Delia Heitmann<br />
Tom Saxton<br />
Matt Sharman Hayles<br />
Rosie O’Halloran<br />
Zanzibar<br />
Prue Chiles<br />
Nicola Blincow<br />
Malcolm Pritchard<br />
Alexandra Carausu<br />
Matt Wilcox<br />
Beyond Representation<br />
James Craig<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />
David Boyd<br />
Joseph Dent<br />
Nick Ward<br />
Ruochen Zhang<br />
Learning Spaces<br />
Matthew Margetts<br />
Tom Cowman<br />
Kayleigh Creighton<br />
Carl Reid<br />
Jessica Wilkie<br />
Gavin Wu<br />
160 Opposite - Testing Ground 2015-16 The Rochester Roundhouse
Testing Ground<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
The Testing Ground Project is now in its third year and it provides the opportunity for students to collaborate with other disciplines in a wide range of<br />
‘live’ situations with the aim of creating public facing architecture and related activities. The main project this year has been the design and construction<br />
of The Rochester Roundhouse, Northumberland. The project included extensive community consultation and has responded to residents’ wishes to<br />
reuse the dilapidated Brigantium roundhouse to create a community resource. The students involved have had to design and construct the project as<br />
well as navigating complex statutory processes and managing time and cost. The regenerated site provides an open air amphitheatre and contemporary<br />
timber pavilion which will be used for stargazing, musical performances and a range of community workshops. The roof of the existing stone circle<br />
has been removed to turn it into an open-air space and local craftsmen have worked with students to carry out repairs to the dry stone wall, before the<br />
addition of new seating and flooring. The larch-clad timber pavilion is located next to the stone circle and includes a sedum green roof. The pavilion<br />
and associated landscaped outdoor spaces will provide a multifunctional, bookable facility that will be managed by the community. It will also become<br />
a key performance venue for the annual Redefest folk music festival.<br />
162
163
Research in Architecture<br />
Research in the School is flourishing and we’ve seen some very exciting developments this year. These<br />
include new collaborative projects, internal and external recognition of our work and significant funding<br />
success, all of which are enabling growth in the numbers of PhD and post-doctoral researchers in<br />
architecture, and the development of research-led teaching at all levels of the degrees we offer.<br />
Colleagues have had considerable success winning grants this year that firmly establish us as a leading centre<br />
for interdisciplinary architectural research in the UK and will bring early career researchers to the School.<br />
External high profile grants include Computational Colloids (EPSRC, Dr Martyn Dade-Robertson –<br />
£158k), LIAR – Living Architecture – (EC, Professor Rachel Armstrong – £175k), Imaginaries of the<br />
Future (Leverhulme International Research Network, Dr Nathaniel Coleman – £109k) and eVis (EPSRC,<br />
Dr Neveen Hamza – £128k). Martyn Dade-Robertson and Rachel Armstrong have also been awarded<br />
a share of a substantial University internal Research Investment Fund (RIF) grant for their joint APL<br />
research project ‘Ageing City’.<br />
In terms of growth as a research centre, Dr Emma Cheatle joined us at the start of the year, having<br />
won the highly competitive Newcastle University Humanities Research Institute three year postdoctoral<br />
fellowship, to pursue her project ‘Tales of Confinement’, an investigation into the role of architectural<br />
spaces and buildings in the history of maternity, and Dr Tom Brigden has just embarked on his three<br />
year Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship. We are currently recruiting a third post-doctoral researcher in<br />
<strong>Design</strong>-led Architectural Research to start in September <strong>2016</strong> and will be advertising a fourth post for<br />
2017. At the same time as becoming the home, to our knowledge, of the largest body of post-doctoral<br />
researchers in a UK architectural school, we are also seeing our research strengths informing teaching at<br />
all levels. Curriculum changes in the BA are enabling research-led teaching in history and theory, and<br />
in design, and our unique ‘Linked Research’ offering in the MArch which involves students working<br />
together with colleagues’ own projects has expanded, including projects as different as lab-based research<br />
and building for communities. Some of this work was presented at the Association of Architectural<br />
Educators annual conference at UCL in April, and linked research students joined colleagues and visiting<br />
speakers to present their own projects at our very successful Mountains and Megastructures symposium<br />
and exhibition in March.<br />
We continue to provide PhD studentships with Aldric Rodriguez Iborra taking up the <strong>Design</strong> Office<br />
position, and we had PhD completions from Abdelatif El-Allous, Mohamed Elnabawy Mahgoub,<br />
Mabrouk Alsheliby, Yohannes Firzal, Amira Hasanein, Antonius Karel Muktiwibowo, Tugce Sanli and<br />
Deva Swasto. Notable achievements from our PhD cohort include the award to Catalina Mejia Moreno<br />
of an Andrew W. Mellon Fellowship in ‘Architecture and/for Photography’ at the Canadian Centre for<br />
Architecture and Sana Al-Naimi’s participation in the Vice Chancellor’s ‘Celebrating Success in the<br />
University’ for her contribution to the ‘Extraordinary Gertrude Bell Exhibition’ at the Great North<br />
Museum. Congratulations to all!<br />
Cultures and Transition<br />
Andrew Ballantyne<br />
Ian Thompson<br />
Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />
Martin Beattie<br />
Peter Kellett<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Zeynep Keyzer<br />
Futures, Values and<br />
Imaginaries<br />
Adam Sharr<br />
Andrew Ballantyne<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Ian Thompson<br />
Kati Blom<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />
Nathaniel Coleman<br />
Neveen Hamza<br />
Steven Dudek<br />
Mediated Environments<br />
Carlos Calderon<br />
John Kamara<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />
Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />
Neveen Hamza<br />
Rachel Armstrong<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Steven Dudek<br />
Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />
Adam Sharr<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
Daniel Mallo<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />
Matthew Margetts<br />
Prue Chiles<br />
Rachel Armstrong<br />
Social Justice,<br />
Well-being and Renewal<br />
Armelle Tardiveau<br />
Carlos Calderon<br />
Daniel Mallo<br />
Kati Blom<br />
Nathaniel Coleman<br />
Peter Kellett<br />
Prue Chiles<br />
Specifications,<br />
Prescriptions and<br />
Translations<br />
John Kamara<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />
Matthew Margetts<br />
Simon Hacker<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
Visiting Professors,<br />
PhD examiners and<br />
contributors:<br />
Professor Dana Arnold<br />
Sebastian Aedo Jury<br />
Sophia Banou<br />
Dr Camillo Boano<br />
James Craig<br />
Professor Mark Dorrian<br />
Professor Paul Emmons<br />
Professor Katja Grillner<br />
Professor Katherine Gough<br />
Dr Amin Kamete<br />
Thomas Kern<br />
Astrid Lund<br />
Professor Julia Morgan<br />
Professor Dejan Mumovic<br />
Charlie Sutherland<br />
Professor Robert Tavernor<br />
Ed Wainwright<br />
Tony Watson<br />
PhD students<br />
Abdelatif El-Allous<br />
Antonius Muktiwibowo<br />
Artem Holstov<br />
Ashley Mason<br />
Catalina Moreno<br />
Charles Makun<br />
Chen-Yu Hung<br />
Deva Swasto<br />
Dhruv Sookhoo<br />
James Longfield<br />
Javier Urquizo<br />
Jose Hernandez<br />
Katriina Blom<br />
Khalid Setaih<br />
Kieran Connolly<br />
Mabrouk Alsheliby<br />
Macarena Rodriguez<br />
Maimuna Saleh-Bala<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />
Mohamed Elnabawi<br />
Mohammed Mohammed<br />
Najla Mansour<br />
Ni Ketut Agusintadewi<br />
Oluwafemi Olajide<br />
Oluwatoyin Akin<br />
Paola Figueroa<br />
Pattamon Selanon<br />
Rand Agha<br />
Sam Clark<br />
Sana Salman Dawood<br />
Al-Naimi<br />
Sarah Cahyadini<br />
Stephen Grinsell<br />
Thomas Kern<br />
Tijana Stevanovic<br />
Tugce Sanli<br />
Ulviye Kalli<br />
Usue Arana<br />
Wido Tyas<br />
Xi (Frances) Ye<br />
Xi Chen<br />
Yasser Megahed<br />
Yohannes Firzal<br />
Yun Dai<br />
164 Opposite - STASUS Everest Death Zone: Mallory
Mountains and Megastructures<br />
The Mountains & Megastructures symposium took place on the 16th and 17th of March in the Architecture Building. The symposium was organised<br />
by ARC (Architecture Research Collaborative) at Newcastle University, and is intended as the first in a series of events addressing particular themes<br />
emerging through our collective research. We were joined by two keynote speakers, Stéphane Degoutin, an artist and writer whose paper ‘Fake Mountain<br />
Metaphysics’ demonstrated the range of ways artificial mountains can be imagined and realised, and Jonathan Hill, Professor of Architecture and Visual<br />
Theory at the Bartlett, whose talk ‘A Landscape of Architecture, History and Fiction’ discussed the ‘shock of the old’ as alternative to the ‘shock of the<br />
new’. Speakers from the School included Professors Rachel Armstrong, Andrew Ballantyne, Graham Farmer, Stephen Graham, Prue Chiles and Adam<br />
Sharr among many others, including Linked Research students Seva Karetnikov and Matas Belevicius.<br />
The talks and discussion were accompanied by an exhibition of work on the joint theme, including projects from STASUS (James A. Craig & Matt<br />
Ozga-Lawn), Amy Butt, Ray Verrall and Christos Kakalis. Images of the event are opposite, and following is Andrew Ballantyne’s paper from the event.<br />
166
Mountains and Megastructures Symposium<br />
167
A Mountain Near Thebes<br />
Andrew Ballantyne<br />
It was Deleuze and Guattari who said we should make deserts of ourselves. We can make<br />
ourselves receptive to being settled by nomadic ideas that live in us for a while and then<br />
move on. ‘The desert, experimentation on oneself, is our only identity, our single chance<br />
for all the combinations which inhabit us’. The concepts that inhabit us shape who we are<br />
and how we interact, so they are part of us even if they move on from us, and they have<br />
a political dimension to them. Deleuze and Guattari make this image of thought seem<br />
like a personal discipline, something we can encourage in ourselves and in our attitudes<br />
to dealing with the world. As an image it seems benign and welcoming, and it has much<br />
in common with Foucault’s sense of the self and the ideas that operate through it; but<br />
where Deleuze and Guattari’s desert is a temporary home for ideas that seem more-or-less<br />
welcome, Foucault’s is rather different. It is a place where the tribes of ideas might set up<br />
camp rather forcibly. Their presence might not be welcome and they might not move on.<br />
With Deleuze and Guattari the sense of the self is fluid and constantly engaged with the<br />
surrounding milieu, and Foucault shares that sense of engagement but with him the self<br />
often seems not so much fluid as malleable. It adapts and can be reshaped in any number<br />
of ways, but it is hammered into shape. Nietzsche’s thought lies behind all of them as a<br />
formative influence, and Deleuze remade Nietzsche in his own way, but Foucault carries<br />
more-evident traces of philosophising with a hammer. He wrote about the prison, the<br />
psychiatric hospital and the school: institutions in which people are remade for the sake<br />
of society. These institutions take in people who have a will of their own that may be<br />
as-yet unformed, or be actively antisocial, and they are knocked into shape, learning and<br />
internalising attitudes and patterns of behaviour that allow them to lead productive wellregulated<br />
lives in the social world.<br />
Foucault coined the term ‘heterotopia’ for such spaces that are apart from the<br />
commonplace world where a society’s dominant values freely operate. In a heterotopia<br />
they are suspended to a degree and maybe one is held in it until one can show a suitable<br />
degree of conformity to the norms. The conditions may be coercive and brutalising, or<br />
might offer greater-than-usual freedoms for transgression, but they are set apart from the<br />
places where normal polite behaviour is in play, and where routine transactions are made.<br />
There are some identifiable places where such conditions apply, but the heterotopia is<br />
a heterotopia not because it is a particular spot, but because the range of concepts and<br />
power-relations there are outside the societal norm. It can be institutionalised, as in a<br />
prison, a school, or a honeymoon hotel, but equally it can be more personal than that – a<br />
interior space withdrawn from social conformity – such as a room of one’s own, or the<br />
desert.<br />
Saint Anthony lived in Egypt in the third century AD – one of the church’s ‘desert<br />
fathers’. Foucault wrote a commentary not on Anthony himself, but on La tentation<br />
de Saint Antoine, a novel by Gustave Flaubert (1821-80) which takes the persona of the<br />
saint as a vehicle to explore a range of ideas. The place in which the action unfolds – if<br />
it can be called ‘action’ – is heterotopic. The place is specified by Flaubert as the summit<br />
of a mountain near Thebes in Upper Egypt. There is some historical reason for this, as<br />
early monasteries, including some associated with Anthony, were in deliberately remote<br />
places, and mountains were seen as deserted, set apart from society. It is this remoteness<br />
that makes the place heterotopic and appropriate as a place of retreat when there is a<br />
need to distance oneself from society’s established normative thought. In cities the forms<br />
of behaviour are required by convention and it is one’s mastery of the convention that<br />
demonstrates effective participation in society, whether that be as a productive machinelike<br />
worker, or as a participant in a Proustian salon. Anthony’s isolation is in many ways<br />
like that of a prisoner, except that he has chosen to be shut away with his thoughts: it is<br />
the place’s remoteness that is its crucial characteristic. The external world does not figure<br />
at all. The subject-matter is internal to Anthony – his states of mind, his reading of the<br />
Bible, his hallucinations – made apparent in the text on the page.<br />
Flaubert re-visited and re-wrote The Temptation of Saint Anthony over many years,<br />
eventually publishing it in 1874. It is less like a novel than a screenplay. It uses the format<br />
of a work for the theatre, but the ‘stage directions’ include elaborate special effects that<br />
cry out for computer-generated images: apparitions of literary characters, fabulous beasts,<br />
deadly sins and heresiarchs. It opens with Saint Anthony involved with his reading of the<br />
Bible and the visitations – apparitions or hallucinations – prompted by it. The desert is a<br />
168<br />
Martin Schongauer - The Torment of Saint Anthony
heterotopia, and in it the saint remakes himself. The process of transformation is effected<br />
by meeting and disputing with the apparitions, building up to an ecstatic culmination<br />
with a vision of the face of Christ in the disc of the sun at dawn, as Anthony deliriously<br />
declaims.<br />
O joy! O bliss! I have beheld the birth of life. I have seen the beginning of motion! My<br />
pulses throb even to the point of bursting. I long to fly, to swim, to bark, to bellow, to<br />
howl. Would that I had wings, a carapace, a shell, – that I could breathe out smoke,<br />
weird a trunk, – make my body writhe, – divide myself everywhere, – be in everything,<br />
– emanate with all the odours, – develop myself like the plants, – flow like water,<br />
– vibrate like sounds, – shine like light, – assume all forms – penetrate each atom –<br />
descend to the very bottom of matter, – be matter itself!<br />
Anthony is shedding his human conceptions and becoming part of nature – in Biblical<br />
terms, recapturing the state of affairs before the fall of Adam and Eve and their expulsion<br />
from the Garden of Eden. He is becoming instinctual and matter-like, responding to<br />
stimuli without the mediation of intellectual processes. Foucault articulates this as the<br />
‘relationship between sainthood and stupidity’. Saint Anthony, he says, ‘wished to be a<br />
saint through a total deadening of his senses, intelligence, and emotions’.<br />
If Saint Anthony is becoming matter, the matter is not inert but formative – vibrant and<br />
pulsating. We are moving away from a position where ‘man’ gives form to matter that is<br />
seen as characterless substance, to one where the matter has an innate form-generating<br />
role, but the matter’s idea of form might be very different from man’s. This brings us into<br />
the realm of the posthuman, which developed after Foucault’s death but in his wake. It<br />
is a world in which matter and things have a role, and (all things being equal) sometimes<br />
have a say. This was taken up by Jane Bennett in her discussion of ‘thing-power’. Her<br />
‘vibrant matter’ is clearly recognisable as a relative of Anthony’s.<br />
There is liveliness in matter before there is organic life, such as the interactions in chemical<br />
processes that are in effect highly localised decisions that bring about results that are<br />
statistically predictable but at the level of individual molecules they are events that<br />
can resolve one way or another, depending on the proximity of another molecule, the<br />
pressure, the temperature and so on. The sedimentations and turbulences of geological<br />
formation leave traces in the strata of a bed of limestone, or the whorls in a slab of marble.<br />
The characteristic shapes of mountain ranges or drifts of sand dunes are determined not<br />
by a designer working out the form from outside, but by the materials deciding the form<br />
from within, interacting with the circumstances. The hylomorphic model of design – a<br />
term taken up from Gilbert Simondon by Deleuze and Guattari – resolves form from<br />
outside, and has ways of measuring and determining the form that involve delineation of<br />
geometric shapes. There has been significant development of thinking about this issue in<br />
recent years, and the idea of form being generated from within – or seeing the human<br />
agents as part of a material formation – takes forward the thinking that Foucault set in<br />
play.<br />
Anthony’s mountain is a heterotopia not of social coercion – like the prisons, madhouses<br />
and schools – but a heterotopia of liberation, where the self can open up to experiment,<br />
rewilded, inhabited by the rocks and wind, miraculated by sunbeams. On such a plateau<br />
of immanence the self can lose its outline and be washed away by lapping waves, or<br />
dispersed like the morning vapours as the sun rises and shines on Saint Anthony.<br />
Master of the Osservanza - The Meeting of Saint Anthony and Saint Paul<br />
169
MA in Urban <strong>Design</strong> (MA_UD)<br />
Daniel Mallo, Georgia Giannopoulou, Tim Townshend<br />
Contributors: Ali Madanipour, Tim Townshend, Colin Haylock, Suzanne Speak, Prue Chiles, Jules Brown, Michael Crilly, Daniel Mallo, Richard Smith,<br />
Aidan Oswell, Montse Ferres, Martin Bonner, Armelle Tardiveau, Dhruv Sookhoo, Georgia Giannopoulou, Roger Meier, Roger Higgins, Victoria Keen<br />
The MA in Urban <strong>Design</strong> is a well-established interdisciplinary programme at Newcastle University that draws on expertise from the disciplines<br />
represented in the School, namely Architecture, Planning and Landscape. The programme brings to the foreground a strong agenda of social and<br />
ecological engagement together with a relational approach to the built environment and public life. Three distinct design projects punctuate the year<br />
and are supported by theory courses and critical debate around the practice of Urban <strong>Design</strong>. The projects introduce students to contemporary and<br />
topical themes including Urban Agriculture which allows us to rethink urban regeneration through the lenses of grass-roots processes whilst engaging<br />
with the strategic thinking of a large territory. The European field trip to Nantes (France) aims to introduce alternative approaches to Urban <strong>Design</strong><br />
including landscape and tactical urbanism. The project is sited in an abandoned quarry at the heart of the city and provides the opportunity to rethink<br />
design as a process over time. Finally, Housing Alternatives examines new models of neighbourhood design in the context of the housing crisis and<br />
housing needs; the project explores concepts of affordability, sustainable living and community led-models, centred around the increasingly popular in<br />
the UK cohousing model. The year concludes with the Urban <strong>Design</strong> Thesis, a major research-led design project. The course offers many opportunities<br />
for visiting places within the UK and in Europe in the context of the projects.<br />
B<br />
A<br />
Platform<br />
B<br />
A<br />
Lunar<br />
Tree<br />
Green<br />
Roof<br />
PPER PARK<br />
QUARRY CLIFF<br />
CREATIVE AREA<br />
CENTRAL AREA<br />
AND LEISURE AREA<br />
PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES<br />
(repurposing of abandoned<br />
buildings on site)<br />
cycle path<br />
main road<br />
divider + planters<br />
main road<br />
cycle path<br />
REGENERATION OF CAP44<br />
(maintaining the primary structure as<br />
framework for future intervention)<br />
NEW MARKET<br />
PIER<br />
SECTION A-A’<br />
Ramp<br />
170<br />
Group - Cities and Cultures - Su Ann Lim, Guan Wang, Bo Li
Laurence Farshid Bonner, Guan Wang, Bo Li, Yixi Lu, Qingyi Du, Daniel Viana Santos<br />
171
MA in Architecture, Planning and Landscape – <strong>Design</strong><br />
Nathaniel Coleman<br />
Contributors: Nathaniel Coleman, Astrid Lund, Tony Watson<br />
The Master of Architecture, Planning and Landscape-<strong>Design</strong> (MAAPL-D) course encourages students to develop a deeper understanding of varieties<br />
of identity in cities. Students conduct detailed studies of particular urban communities, concentrating on determining strategies of appropriate<br />
development for specific urban sites. In each of the three semesters of the course, developing projects presuppose devising community based urban<br />
design frameworks for selected sites that broadly consider the surrounding context. In each semester, holistic design frameworks articulating the<br />
potential character and quality of the environment initiated by the proposed project support reasonably complex building designs.<br />
Semester one is divided proportionally between group explorations of the city and individual project work, augmented by developing research into<br />
the history, theory and design of cultural buildings in an urban context. The second semester project explores ideas of meaning and identity in the<br />
urban environment and the role that public space and buildings play in articulating notions of citizenship and community. Students produce three<br />
architectural/urban design schemes of increasing scale and complexity for a specific urban location. Architecture as a civic element is emphasised,<br />
including concentration on the relation between exterior and interior spaces.<br />
The problematic of public space within an increasingly privatised built environment; the degree to which theory can be verified by the design; and the<br />
support of both by close readings of set theoretical texts that consider architecture and the city from a range of perspectives are central to the course; as<br />
is a developing understanding of architecture within the expanded field of an urban context in relation to notions of identity, community, and culture<br />
more generally. No matter their scale, projects are construed as complex public buildings with key interior and exterior public spaces specific to their<br />
location and purpose. Thesis projects developed during the third semester provide students with opportunities for elaborating on many of the themes<br />
introduced earlier in the course. The thesis is a major design project framed by individual students that they largely produce independently.<br />
The MAAPL-D course challenges students’ preconceived notions of architecture, planning, urban design and the city, as well as their ingrained habits<br />
of architectural conceptualization and representation. In the course, individual buildings are considered as component parts of cities, rather than as<br />
isolated objects within it. As such, tendencies to overemphasise buildings as spectacular image, interesting form, or virtuosic technological novelty are<br />
counterbalanced by the urban, social, and tectonic qualities of projects. Within the expanded field of the city, urban buildings are emphasised as sociocultural<br />
elements rather than primarily as abstract objects of aesthetic (or visual) appreciation.<br />
172 Ling Shuang Yue
Da Yu<br />
173
MSc in Sustainable Buildings and Environments<br />
Neveen Hamza<br />
Contributors: Andrew Arnold, Dr. Alan J Murphy, Barry Rankin, Clive Gerrar, Dan Jestico, Halla Huws, Dr. Hassan Hemida, Jess Tindal, Liam Haggarty,<br />
Richard Allenby, Dr. Samuel Austin, Stuart Franklin, Dr. Wael Nabih<br />
Students on the Sustainable Buildings and Environments MSc use building and urban performance simulation tools and a deeper understanding of building<br />
physics to underpin their architectural design approaches. This academic year we were joined by students from the MArch and MAPL-D route in projects.<br />
The students worked on three live projects with their estates departments and Newcastle City Council. They engaged with a number of well-established<br />
professionals in the field.<br />
Engineering Excellence Quarter (Newcastle University): we were asked by the University to start looking at massing ideas for projects to maximize capturing<br />
sustainability aspects of the site. Students looked into environmental impacts (such as wind speed and shadowing studies) on pedestrians and how different<br />
massing ideas could lead to a unified campus, where pedestrian movement is facilitated and the natural environment is moderated.<br />
Sunderland Royal Hospital: we worked closely with the estate department to improve the 1960s building. Occupants complain about drafts in winter and<br />
overheating and less effective natural ventilation in the wards all year round. The project addressed possibilities of aesthetic improvements, and insertions of<br />
social interaction spaces, while moderating the indoor climate using building performance simulations. Students also expanded their explorations to look at<br />
climate change scenarios and environmental architectural concepts which can prevent the need for cooling.<br />
Fisherman’s Lodge in Jesmond Dene: the students presented design proposals for the public consultation that was managed by English Heritage and Newcastle<br />
City Council. The Fisherman’s Lodge has been derelict for over ten years and ideas for its revival and extensions into various possible functions were<br />
introduced to the council to help them build ideas for potential usage. Building and urban performance simulation were used to maximize the sustainability<br />
potential of the projects and underpin design decisions in such a dark and historic valley.<br />
174<br />
Top - Zhengkai Lu<br />
Bottom - Group Student Analysis
Top - Groupwork Engineering Excellence Quarter<br />
Bottom - Rosy Rivera Lara Fishermans Lodge - Perspectives<br />
175
PhD and PhD by Creative Practice Students<br />
Towards a Synthetic Morphogenesis for Architecture<br />
Paola Carolina Ramirez Figueroa<br />
p.c.ramirez-figueroa@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
www.syntheticmorphologies.com<br />
Synthetic Morphologies is a design exploration project that emerges from a growing<br />
design discourse on the possibilities afforded by Synthetic Biology. The 21st century<br />
is poised to be the era of biology, very much like the 20th has been the age of digital<br />
information. The notion comes from recent advances from Synthetic Biology in<br />
manipulating and creating new living organisms that exhibit unprecedented traits<br />
in nature. <strong>Design</strong>, as many other fields, has felt the influence of such a paradigmatic<br />
shift. In architecture, for instance, a growing body of speculative work imagines a<br />
future material reality enacted by hybrids of machine and living organisms, whereby<br />
building are grown rather than constructed.<br />
Yet, Synthetic Morphologies poses the possibility that, in fact, Synthetic Biology<br />
presents design with a more profound challenge – one that stirs the restating of the<br />
discipline of design itself. To think, for instance, of buildings which are grown out<br />
of pre-programmed living organisms is, in effect, to continue the classic paradigm<br />
of design wherein the designer is an almighty giver of form. I propose an alternative<br />
approach – an organicist-inspired material practice for synthetic biology.<br />
I believe the intersection of design and synthetic biology invites us to think<br />
of design as a negotiation between different actors, some of which include the<br />
chemical environment, mechanical conditions, designers and living organisms<br />
themselves. Throughout my doctoral research I’ve engaged in different projects<br />
which characterise and trace the evolution of the speculative discourse initiated by<br />
synthetic biology, and which eventually leads to the notion of a biologically-oriented<br />
material practice: a technique to engage with the processes of designing through and<br />
with living organisms.<br />
Architecture By Default<br />
Kieran Connolly<br />
k.i.connolly@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Rem Koolhaas’s polemical essay ‘Junkspace’, written at the turn of the millennium,<br />
recalls a contemporary landscape of generic sameness, latent with subliminal<br />
and ideological messages. The text rejects traditional ideas of architectural space,<br />
dissolving ideas of order, type and hierarchy into a chaotic amalgam that is<br />
apparently ordered and bound together by its globalised ubiquity. Junkspace, as<br />
Koolhaas describes it, is the space of material human waste that has become a<br />
measure of modernity. Fourteen years after the publication of this seminal essay, this<br />
research began by examining a Junkspace par excellence – the suspended ceiling.<br />
Organised on a standard grid of 600mm x 600mm, set-out using aluminium<br />
sections, supporting lightweight tiles, it repeats, room after room in what can be<br />
seen as an almost limitless horizontal expansion. The suspended ceiling has become<br />
a seemingly ubiquitous feature in twenty-first century architecture, as recently<br />
demonstrated by Koolhaas himself at the 2014 Venice Biennale.<br />
Using Koolhaas’s observations as a starting point, the research has focused on the<br />
relationship between the repetitive organisational qualities of the aforementioned<br />
grid and the void spaces it conceals above – known as the Plenum. These spaces not<br />
only deal with ventilation, but also hold an ever-increasing network of services that<br />
give comfort and ‘power’ to the inhabited spaces below.<br />
Through a series of investigations, often recalling the evocative imagery and<br />
representation techniques of the radical Italian design collective Superstudio, this<br />
relationship has been explored in order to expose our growing reliance on ‘serviced’<br />
space. As such, the thesis examines these forgotten, hidden but vitally important<br />
environments of Junkspace, in order to explore a much broader question – how<br />
reliant are we becoming on these concealed service spaces? And what impact does<br />
this have on the field of architecture?<br />
176 Top, Middle - Paola Carolina Ramirez Figueroa Bottom - Kieran Connolly
The Contemporary Role and Transformation of Civic Public Architecture: The<br />
Case of Tripoli’s Central Municipal Building, Libya<br />
Abdelatif El-Allous<br />
abdelatif.el-allous@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Space Thickening and the Digital Ethereal:<br />
Production of Architecture in the Digital Age<br />
Jose-Luis Hernandez-Hernandez<br />
j.l.hernandez-hernandez@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
www.digitalethereal.com<br />
Digital Ethereal came about as a design discourse on digital technologies, and the<br />
invisible infrastructure underpinning it. I believe our interaction with this landscape<br />
of electromagnetic signals, described by Antony Dunne as Hertzian Space, can be<br />
characterised in the same terms as that with ghosts and spectra. They both are<br />
paradoxical entities, whose untypical substance allows them to be an invisible<br />
presence. In the same way, they undergo a process of gradual substantiation to<br />
become temporarily available to perception. Finally, they both haunt us: ghosts, as<br />
Derrida would have it, with the secrets of past generations; Hertzian space, with the<br />
frustration of interference and slowness.<br />
But it is these same traits of Hertzian Space that affords the potential for a spatially<br />
rich interaction with information systems, one that more closely resembles the<br />
interaction with real architecture. The challenge however lies in how to design with<br />
systems that are fundamentally invisible. They can be ‘translated’ – changing their<br />
modality into one which is tangible. This modality change is however always laced<br />
with cultural charges, which changes the nature of Hertzian Space.<br />
In order to take advantage of hertzian space, I advocate for a creative practice aimed<br />
at creating new objects, indexed to hertzian space, but which also captures the<br />
cultural and social complexity imbued in the use of such technologies. I call this new<br />
series of objects the digital ethereal. The design work created throughout this project<br />
blends together disciplines and techniques such as performance, photography,<br />
design, programming and electronics.<br />
Shared Identity: Buildings, Memories, and Meanings<br />
Stephen Grinsell<br />
s.j.grinsell@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
News stories about either the decision to save or demolish many buildings of the<br />
1960s and early 1970s regularly use the noun monstrosity, usually prefaced by the<br />
word concrete. However, not all concrete buildings create animosity. The recently<br />
demolished Birmingham Central Library, whilst derided by Prince Charles as<br />
looking like ‘a place where books are incinerated, not kept’ (Birmingham Mail,<br />
2014) is also commonly and affectionately called the ‘Ziggurat’, a reference to the<br />
stepped terraces of ancient temples. David Parker and Paul Long in their article<br />
‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives of Urban Decline and Regeneration’<br />
write ‘For all their faults, the buildings of the 1960s and 1970s currently being<br />
destroyed supplied Birmingham with an identity’ (Parker and Long, 2004 p.18).<br />
Buildings are given their identity and meaning, or more accurately, given a<br />
multiplicity of meanings, by those who gaze upon them and allow the building<br />
to impact upon them. This impact, or the experience as a result of that gaze, stirs<br />
emotions and evokes memories, memories that heighten a sense of identity. This<br />
identity then becomes a shared identity as people share their memories, and what<br />
the building means to them.<br />
Parker, D., & Long, P. (2004). ‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives of<br />
Urban Decline and Regeneration’. Visual Culture in Britain, 5(1), 37-58.<br />
Natural Ventilation: An Evaluation of Strategies for Improving Indoor Air<br />
Quality in Hospitals of Semi-Arid Climates<br />
Mohamed Mahgoub Elnabawi<br />
m.elnabawi-mahgoub@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Learning from Vernacular Natural Ventilated Residential Houses in<br />
Mediterranean Climate Zone of Lebanon; and Developing its Application<br />
Methods in <strong>Design</strong>ing Contemporary Housing in Beirut<br />
Najla Mansour<br />
n.mansour@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Top, Middle - Jose-Luis Hernandez-Hernandez<br />
Bottom - Stephen Grinsell<br />
177
A Coincidental Plot, For Architecture<br />
Ashley Mason<br />
ashley.mason@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Practiceopolis: The City of Architectural Practice<br />
Yasser Megahed<br />
yasser.megahed@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
This Research sets out to interrogate a dominant stance towards technology that<br />
prioritises a narrow approach to architectural production, which I have identified<br />
as Techno‐rational practice. The imaginary city of Practiceopolis is introduced as<br />
a site for the critical reading of diverse contemporary architectural practices. This<br />
reading draws from the philosopher Andrew Feenberg’s classification of varying<br />
stances towards technology.<br />
Practiceopolis is a city built on diagrammatic relations between nine theoretical<br />
modes of practice covering a wide spectrum of the contemporary architectural<br />
world. Its morphology is set out according to the influence of technology and<br />
technical knowledge in shaping different modes of architectural practice. It<br />
highlights tensions between what Feenberg might call Determinist/Instrumentalist<br />
approaches on the one hand, and Critical Theory/Substantivist approaches on the<br />
other. Practiceopolis has two dimensions; the first sets out a parallel world created<br />
as a tool for mapping the multiplicity of modes of architectural practice, of which<br />
Techno‐rational approach is only one. The second maps architectural practices<br />
critically from a dedicated map library in the city of Practiceopolis, located at an<br />
intermediate place between the Instrumentalist and Critical-Theory stances of<br />
technology.<br />
On Repetition: Photograhpy in/as Architectural Criticism - Working through<br />
the Archives of Mies van der Rohe and Lilly Reich’s German Pavilion and the<br />
North American Concrete Grain Elevators<br />
Catalina Mejia-Moreno<br />
c.mejia-moreno@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
www.travesiafoundation.org<br />
‘Many of us, maybe all of us, look at some images repeatedly, but it seems that we do not<br />
write about that repetition, or think it, once written, worth reading by others’.<br />
T.J.Clark. The Sight of Death. An experiment in Art Writing. (New Haven and<br />
London: Yale University Press, 2006) pp. 9.<br />
In the photo-archives of two of the most recognised British architectural historians of<br />
the late twentieth century - Robin Evans and Reyner Banham - two iconic buildings<br />
come across repeatedly, almost compulsively. In Evans’, the Barcelona Pavilion (1929-<br />
reconstructed 1986) and in Banham’s, the Buffalo Grain Elevators (late nineteenth<br />
Century). While these slide sets can be understood as the result of the empiricist<br />
English tradition and the relevance of direct experience for the buildings’ histories<br />
and criticisms, they are also evidence of a wider phenomenon in architectural<br />
history: the drive to re-visit, the compulsion to re-photograph and the instinct<br />
to repeat. In this context, my PhD project questions photography as the inherent<br />
means of repetition in architectural history, while arguing that the photograph as<br />
material object and object of representation also performs as the criticism itself.<br />
By studying two important moments in time for the photographic dissemination<br />
of the two aforementioned buildings, and by understanding the material history<br />
of photographs as commodities and objects of transaction, I critically examine the<br />
relationship between architectural history, architectural criticism, and photographic<br />
and ideological techniques of (re)production.<br />
Natural Ventilation: An Evaluation of Strategies for Improving Indoor Air<br />
Quality in Hospitals of Semi-Arid Climates<br />
Mohammed Mohammed<br />
m.mohammed@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Architecture for All in the megacity: Spatially Integrated Settlements in<br />
Istanbul Dominated by Desirable Affordable Housing that Values More than<br />
the Total Cost of Construction and Land Values<br />
Ulviye Nergis Kalli<br />
u.n.kalli@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
178 Top - Yasser Megahed Middle, Bottom - Catalina Mejia-Moreno
Impact of Community Participation on Peri-Urban Development Projects in<br />
Akure, Nigeria<br />
Oluwatoyin Akim<br />
o.t.akin@ncl.ac.uk<br />
Cities, People, Nature: An Exploration<br />
Usue Ruiz Arana<br />
u.ruiz-arana@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
mynaturehood.tumblr.com<br />
With more than half of the world’s population now living in cities, it is the nature<br />
within the city that has the potential to enhance people’s lives on a daily basis. The<br />
city-people-nature trinomial raises a number of questions that form the basis of this<br />
research. My first installation coincided with the ‘Landscape, Wilderness and the<br />
Wild’ conference and explored two initial questions:<br />
Is there a boundary between the natural and cultural in the city?<br />
The relation between nature and culture is complex. The classical notion of nature is<br />
the world devoid of human interaction or activity; and urbanization, the antithesis<br />
of nature. At the other end of the spectrum there is the notion of nature as a social<br />
constructed phenomenon, and the idea that nature as the untouched doesn’t exist<br />
anymore, as human activity has affected the whole world. What is evident is that<br />
cities depend on nature to survive and vice versa, and it is therefore difficult to see<br />
where one ends and the other starts.<br />
Could the expectation of nature in the city be challenged and what could we tolerate<br />
within the urban?<br />
Within the city we tend to arrest the progression of nature in order to maintain<br />
landscapes and spaces looking a certain way, and avoid the chaos or fear that might<br />
result from a ‘wild’ nature. ‘Wilderness’ is found on abandoned sites, on former<br />
industrial sites, in the cracks of the pavements, in the joints of the walls, reclaimed<br />
by nature whilst waiting to be developed or cleared out. Are looks the reason why we<br />
arrest nature, and how is nature experienced through the other senses?<br />
Revealing <strong>Design</strong>: A Dialogic Approach<br />
Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />
matthew.ozga-lawn@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/staff/profile/matthew.ozga-lawn<br />
My research project attempts to reveal hidden or overlooked agencies within the<br />
studio space and the representational modes therein, which is normally conceived<br />
of as a neutral zone through which designs are simply ‘transmitted’. In my study,<br />
the studio is conflated with a rifle range. The studio, in adopting the characteristics<br />
and agencies of the military space, opens architectural representation onto codes<br />
and phenomena normally considered to be outside its remit. These phenomena are<br />
drawn into the project through historical and theoretical links established by the<br />
rifle range space.<br />
My research blurs the agencies of the military and studio spaces, revealing coded<br />
agencies that we as designers often take for granted in how we relate and engage with<br />
representational artefacts in the studio.<br />
Usage of Thermally Comfortable Outdoor Space through the Lens of Adaptive<br />
Microclimate<br />
Khalid Setaih<br />
k.m.setaih@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Becoming Planners and Architects: the Formation of Perspectives on<br />
Residential <strong>Design</strong> Quality<br />
Dhruv Sookhoo<br />
d.a.sookhoo@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
After the Blueprint: Questions around the Unfinished in New Belgrade<br />
Tijana Stevanović<br />
t.stevanovic@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Modelling the Effects of Household Practices on Heating Energy<br />
Consumption in Social Housing. A Case Study in Newcastle upon Tyne<br />
Macarena Beltan Rodriguez<br />
m.rodriguez@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Top - Usue Ruiz Arana<br />
Middle, Bottom - Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />
179
The Impacts of Owners’ Participation on ‘Sense of Place’,<br />
the Case of Tehran, Iran<br />
Goran Erfani<br />
g.erfani@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
A key aspect for urban designers and managers concerns how urban transformation<br />
arising from regeneration of inner-city areas is associated with ‘sense of place’.<br />
Although much academic work tracks individual sense of place, little interrogates<br />
the community aspect and its link with urban renewal. This study investigated how<br />
the urban renewal schemes in Tehran, Iran have attempted to adopt the owners’<br />
participation into their planning and implementation. It concentrated especially on<br />
diverse ways that different stakeholders perceived the methods of these schemes and<br />
the significance for community sense of place.<br />
The study examined the urban renewal projects conducted by the municipality<br />
of Tehran which concerns these areas as deprived neighbourhoods with various<br />
physical, social and environmental problems. Two cases were studied, namely the<br />
Oudlajan bazar and the Takhti neighbourhood, which both are located in the inner<br />
city (district 12). Despite similarities, they are distinctive cases. Oudlajan, which<br />
has outstanding heritage value to the city, is a commercial public space. The Takhti<br />
project was about the residential private space. In addition, each case had diverse<br />
socio-cultural and physical transformation. The selecting of the distinctive cases<br />
shaped a better picture of urban transformation in Tehran.<br />
The techniques applied seek to represent different types of participants, by means<br />
of local observation and semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders<br />
in these schemes. Additionally, to elicit what constitutes the interrelationships<br />
between people and place, Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI) was carried out. The<br />
photos captured by the residents were discussed with them to reveal the potential<br />
impact of urban renewal projects on place-based community attachment, identity<br />
and satisfaction in the eyes of individuals. Concurrently, planners, managers<br />
and developers were interviewed. To signify the intersubjectivity, the results and<br />
evidence from the previous phases were separately discussed with other participant<br />
and non-participant residents in the renewal schemes. Furthermore, the study<br />
considered the potential and limitations for sense of place associated with the urban<br />
regeneration schemes.<br />
Making Byker: The Situated Practices of the Citizen Architect<br />
James Longfield<br />
j.d.longfield@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
My work draws from the site-based architectural approaches employed in Byker by<br />
Ralph Erskine and Vernon Gracie, to explore a mode of practice where the skills and<br />
expertise of the professional overlap with the personal commitment of the citizen to<br />
the social and political context of their location of residence.<br />
Through a series of projects, drawings, made pieces and activism, within the<br />
Byker area, where I now live, my thesis traces the nature of a situated approach to<br />
architectural practice, reflecting on convergences with conventional practice, as well<br />
as identifying key points of divergence where my work steps beyond professional<br />
boundaries to engage in a directly personal way.<br />
The trajectory of these actions are observed and recorded in order to describe an<br />
alternative approach to producing and appropriating the built environment, before<br />
finally questioning whether architectural practice, in its professionally bound form,<br />
is capable of delivering a social architecture.<br />
Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Construction – Case of Tower<br />
Buildings in Libya<br />
Salem Tarhuni<br />
The Conservation of Twentieth Century Architecture in China<br />
Yun Dai<br />
y.dai@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
180 Top - Goran Erfani Middle, Bottom, Opposite - James Longfield
Comprehensive Intelligence in Sustainable Courtyard House Architecture<br />
Rand Agha<br />
r.h.m.agha@ncl.ac.uk<br />
A Spatial Carbon Analysis Model for Retrofitting the Guayaquil’s Residential<br />
Sector – GURCC as a Case Study<br />
Javier Urquizo<br />
j.urquizo@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
Crisis of Traditional Identity in Built Environment of the Saudi Cities. A Case<br />
Study: The Old City of Tabuk<br />
Mabrouk Alsheliby<br />
m.alsheliby@ncl.ac.uk<br />
Looking Towards Retirement: Alternative <strong>Design</strong> Approaches to Third-Ager<br />
Housing<br />
Sam Clark<br />
s.clark4@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
UK society was first categorised ‘aged’ during the 1970s, and is currently heading<br />
towards ‘super-aged’ status, whereby 20 per cent of the population will be aged<br />
sixty-five and over by the year 2025. Indeed scientific evidence indicates linear<br />
increases in life expectancy since 1840, such that UK population ‘pyramids’ are now<br />
looking more like ‘columns’, with fewer younger people at the base and increasing<br />
numbers and proportions of older people at the top. There are 10,000 centenarians<br />
living in the UK today, with demographers anticipating a five-fold increase by 2030.<br />
Half of all babies born this year can expect to live one hundred years.<br />
Housing plays a significant role in sustaining a good quality of life, and there is<br />
growing opinion that moving to specialist or more age-appropriate housing has<br />
a positive impact on the wellbeing of older people, as well as potential benefits<br />
to the property market as a whole. Recent design research includes a competition<br />
commissioned by McCarthy & Stone to ‘re-imagine ageing’, and an RIBA report<br />
illustrating future scenarios in which ‘Active Third-Agers’ have made a huge impact<br />
on UK towns and cities. Both initiatives were predicated on the idea that today’s<br />
older population (colloquially known as the ‘baby-boomers’) have alternative and<br />
more demanding lifestyle expectations that are likely to drive a step-change in<br />
housing choice for older people.<br />
Sam is working in collaboration with national house builder, Churchill Retirement<br />
Living, to further explore the needs and aspirations of those entering retirement. In<br />
this instance a PhD by Creative Practice is being used as a vehicle for applied design<br />
research that will contribute to contemporary visions for retirement living.<br />
181
ARC – Architecture Research Collaborative<br />
With a threefold increase in research income this year since the Architectural Research Collaborative (ARC) launched in 2012, thanks to a number of successful<br />
funding bids by colleagues, new collaborative ventures and two postdoctoral fellows starting their research in architecture with us in 2015-16 and two more posts<br />
to come in September <strong>2016</strong> and 2017, ARC is firmly establishing itself as a major centre for research in architecture. Our remit is to promote and investigate<br />
high quality architectural research as a necessarily interdisciplinary activity, which produces knowledge through multiple methodologies and practices including<br />
creative practice, history and theory, and building, engineering and social sciences. ARC is therefore structured by key themes cutting across the various disciplines<br />
constituting architectural research, with a view to facilitating collaborative projects involving Newcastle researchers and partners at other institutions. Themes<br />
such as ‘Industries and Technologies of Architecture’ and ‘Experimental Architecture’ are responsive to topical issues and to change in ARC membership and are<br />
updated as new themes emerge. Through a programme of small-scale responsive funding we actively support collaborations between colleagues and early career<br />
and doctoral research.<br />
Our commitment to interdisciplinary research has an international presence through the Cambridge University Press journal arq – Architectural Review Quarterly<br />
– whose managing editor, Professor Adam Sharr, and the majority of the editorial team are based in ARC. This year saw the publication of a special issue of arq<br />
on the subject of design-led research put together by the speculative design practice STASUS – comprising ARC members James Craig and Matt Ozga-Lawn, and<br />
two publications from the conference Industries of Architecture held here in 2014; a book of the same name (Routledge, 2015) and special issue of the journal<br />
Architecture and Culture entitled ‘Into the Hidden Abode: Architecture and Production’, edited by Katie Lloyd Thomas and Adam Sharr (with Tilo Amhoff,<br />
University of Brighton, and Nick Beech, Queen Mary’s University, London). ARC members continue to publish widely and have presented their research across<br />
the UK, Europe, in Canada, the USA, and in the Middle East, and also engage in co-production projects. They are also active in engagement and design research<br />
with local communities, such as Fenham Pocket Park, a local project whose stakeholders include Sustrans, Newcastle City Council, Fenham Community Pool,<br />
Your Homes Newcastle, Fenham Library and Fenham Model Allotment. A successful bid by Armelle Tardiveau and Daniel Mallo to the Department of Communities<br />
and Local Government funding led to the creation of a new piece of public space, and enabled a co-production process amongst stakeholders equally<br />
meaningful as the space itself.<br />
This year’s ARC Special Theme event Mountains & Megastructures (16th – 17th March) was a great success, involving linked research students, colleagues and<br />
invited speakers, artist Stéphane Degoutin and Professor Jonathan Hill, UCL. The exhibition and symposium explored topics ranging from early endeavours<br />
to ‘conquer’ the Everest to Alphand’s picturesque artificial hills in Paris, and their literal and figurative constructions and reconstructions at different scales from<br />
miniature megastructures such as the Apollo Pavilion to the concrete megastructures of the north-east, from the vertical megastructures of science fiction to the<br />
complex of megadams on the Tigris and Euphrates. We are currently preparing a book proposal from the event to showcase ARC’s form of interdisciplinary<br />
architectural research, and have put forward a follow-up public event ‘Scaling the Heights’ to the AHRC Being Human Festival (November, <strong>2016</strong>) to be housed<br />
in the north tower of the Tyne Bridge.<br />
CURE: Creative Upcycled Resource<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />
This cross-disciplinary research project brings together architecture, engineering,<br />
social sciences, and business. It explores the technical, social, economic and design<br />
related barriers to material upcycling, and seeks to propose solutions to enable<br />
widespread, creative re-use of designed products and packaging.<br />
U-TEC Cafe<br />
Collaborators: CeG - Newcastle University, Newcastle Business School<br />
Replicas<br />
Adam Sharr, Zeynep Kezer<br />
Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />
Replica architectures employ selective ideas of the past to construct the image of<br />
states, cultures, organizations or powerful individuals in the present, often operating<br />
in service of radically conservative ideologies. Promoted through the rhetoric of<br />
reconstruction, replica projects are seldom ‘literal’ reconstructions. Rather, they<br />
involve the tendentious reclamation of historic architectural or urban forms to<br />
reinforce particular national or cultural identity narratives, however counterfactual<br />
their historical veracity. The idea of Replicas was the subject of a session at the SAH<br />
conference in Chicago in 2015 and this material will form an edited book.<br />
Collaborators: Society of Architectural Historians Conference, Chicago, 2015<br />
182
Utopias and Architecture<br />
Nathaniel Coleman<br />
Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />
Utopian thought, though commonly characterized as projecting a future without<br />
a past, depends on golden models for re-invention of what is. This general theme<br />
encompasses a range of projects examining the social and formal dimensions of<br />
architecture through the concept of utopia and integrating architectural thinking<br />
into Utopian Studies. The projects and outputs range from the interdisciplinary<br />
Utopography workshop to a special issue of Utopian Studies as well as Lefebvre for<br />
Architects, recently published by Routledge, and papers for journals including the<br />
‘Journal of Architectural Education’, ‘Architectural Research Quarterly’, and the<br />
‘Journal or Architecture’.<br />
Coleman N. ‘Architecture and Dissidence: Utopia as Method’, Architecture and<br />
Culture, 2014, 2(1), pp. 45-60.<br />
Energy, Society and Cities<br />
Carlos Calderon<br />
Mediated Environments<br />
These projects involve understanding, modelling and designing for new energy<br />
futures. Themes include the effects of household practices on heating energy<br />
consumption, smart energy technologies, decentralised energy, energy systems<br />
to reduce fuel poverty and developing new ways of planning for spatial energy<br />
infrastructure in cities. This work is supported by contributions from Your Homes<br />
Newcastle, Newcastle City Council and Newcastle Science City and involves<br />
collaborations across fields of architecture, engineering and planning.<br />
Collaborators: Newcastle City Council, Your Homes Newcastle, Newcastle Science City,<br />
Cambridge Architectural Research<br />
Byker Hobby Rooms<br />
James Longfield, Adam Sharr<br />
Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />
This project was investigated as part of Linked Research with Stage 5 and 6 students<br />
on the MArch degree program. The project investigated the unique phenomena of<br />
the hobby rooms in the Byker redevelopment which are currently under-occupied.<br />
By investigating their intentions and mapping the spaces of current hobby activity<br />
the project developed speculative proposals for alternative hobby spaces that offered<br />
greater flexibility and specificity. The project concluded with the construction of key<br />
items of furniture which imagined the hobby rooms as specific mobile spaces, able to<br />
support a process of redevelopment.<br />
http://makingbyker.wordpress.com<br />
Collaborators: The Byker Lives Project<br />
Bacilla Vitruvius<br />
Martyn Dade-Robertson, Carolina Figueroa<br />
Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />
Vitruvius suggested in his texts On Architecture that ‘architecture is an imitation of<br />
nature’ (Vitruvius, 2009) but what happens when architecture becomes nature and<br />
we begin, through the design of biological systems, to become architects of nature?<br />
This project explores the relationship between architecture and the emerging field of<br />
Synthetic Biology. The project explores both the applications of Synthetic Biology for<br />
new types of building material and the implications of architectural design practice<br />
on the development of Synthetic Biology.<br />
Collaborators: Northumbria University, The Centre for Synthetic Biology and<br />
Bioexploitation<br />
183
Architecture’s Unconscious<br />
Kati Blom, Nathaniel Coleman, Andrew Ballantyne,<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas, Sam Austin<br />
Social Justice, Wellbeing and Renewal<br />
This project is built around a series of informal meetings including architects, artists,<br />
philosophers and scholars of cognitive science and psychoanalysis. The project aims<br />
to uncover the processes of environmental perception – with particular emphasis<br />
on stories of unexpected, non-verbal encounters which are born of a pre-linguistic<br />
sensation of space. These incidental sensuous encounters with place – whether<br />
labelled as unconscious or not - are vital when discovering the qualities of spaces.<br />
Collaborators: Isis Brook (Writtle University), Lorens Holm (University of Dundee),<br />
Wolfram Bergande (Bauhaus- University Weimar)<br />
Re-interpreting Sustainable Architecture<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />
This research aims to bring together recent debates in philosophy and social /<br />
cultural theory to the study and practice of sustainable architecture and urbanism. In<br />
adopting a critical, comparative and interdisciplinary perspective and by theorising<br />
sustainability, my aim is to bring the discussion of a sustainable built environment<br />
centrally into the social sciences and humanities.<br />
G. Farmer (2013) ‘Re-contextualising <strong>Design</strong>: Three ways of Practicing Sustainable<br />
Architecture’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 17(2).<br />
G. Farmer & S. Guy (2010) ‘Making Morality: Sustainable Architecture and the<br />
Pragmatic Imagination’, Building Research and Information, 38(4), 368-378.<br />
S.Guy & G.Farmer (2001), ‘Re-interpreting Sustainable Architecture: The place of<br />
Technology’, Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3) Feb. pp140-148.<br />
Demolishing Whitehall<br />
Adam Sharr<br />
Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />
In 1965, the architect Leslie Martin submitted to Harold Wilson’s Labour<br />
government a plan to rebuild London’s government district, Whitehall. Presented<br />
to an administration which had been elected on the promise of remaking Britain<br />
in the ‘white heat’ of technology, the plan’s architecture embodied the 1960s idea<br />
of an imminent jet age that seemed not just possible but imminent. Our co-written<br />
book, Demolishing Whitehall, tells the story of the Whitehall plan and investigates its<br />
inherent tensions between ideas of technology and history, science and art, socialism<br />
and elitism.<br />
Collaborators: Stephen Thornton, Politics, Cardiff University<br />
Industries of Architecture<br />
Katie Lloyd Thomas, Adam Sharr<br />
Specifications, Prescriptions and Translations<br />
Developing out of research and an earlier symposium on architecture’s technical<br />
literatures ‘Further Reading Required’ (The Bartlett, 2011) this international<br />
conference took place at Newcastle in November 2014. IOA invited architectural<br />
theorists, historians, designers and others to explore the industrial, technical and<br />
socio-economic contexts in which building is constituted that are all too often<br />
sidelined within the architectural humanities. IOA also hosted a number of openstructured<br />
debate-oriented workshops with the aim of bringing into the discussion<br />
those working in building, technology, law, practice management, construction or in<br />
industry together with researchers in the architectural humanities.<br />
Collaborators: Tilo Amhoff (University of Brighton), Nicholas Beech (Oxford Brookes<br />
University), ProBE (University of Westminster), John Gelder (NBS), Sofie Pelsmakers<br />
(UCL Energy Institute), Rob Imrie (Sociology, Goldsmiths), Emma Street (Real Estate &<br />
Planning, University of Reading), Liam Ross (ESALA).<br />
184
Visualising Energy<br />
Neveen Hamza<br />
Mediated Environments<br />
http://www.eviz.org.uk/<br />
This project is based on the EPSRC funded Eviz (Energy Visualisation for Carbon<br />
Reduction) project. The project brings together an interdisciplinary team of engineers<br />
and designers to develop applications which close the gap between abstract, invisible<br />
energy flows and people’s desire to understand their energy use and become more<br />
energy efficient. The key idea is to increase understanding of energy dynamics as<br />
a function of occupant behaviour and building characteristics and to allow experts<br />
to make better predictions of energy efficiency and design buildings around human<br />
behaviour.<br />
Collaborators: Plymouth University, University of Birmingham, University of Bath<br />
Landscape Visions<br />
Ian Thompson<br />
Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />
This project, led by a landscape architect/photographer in collaboration with<br />
landscape archaeologists, an oral historian and a specialist in heritage interpretation,<br />
considers the legacy of land reclamation within the Great Northern Coalfield,<br />
following the closure of the last deep mines. We aim to understand the reclamation<br />
process, not just the social, political and economic drivers, but also the visions which<br />
shaped the reclaimed landscape. How did these arise? What was not valued and what<br />
has been lost?<br />
Collaborators: Dr Arieti Galani (heritage studies), Professor Sam Turner, Dr Oscar<br />
Aldred (archaeology), Sue Bradley (oral history), McCord Centre for Historic and Cultural<br />
Landscapes, Durham County Record Office, Woodhorn Museum Northumberland<br />
<strong>Design</strong> Pedagogy as Material Practice<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />
This research explores the role of material practice as a means to connect design,<br />
pedagogy, research and social engagement. This work provides the opportunity for<br />
‘live’ experimentation with materials, performance and varying modes of design<br />
practice.<br />
Stonehaugh Stargazing Pavilion<br />
G. Farmer (2013) ‘Re-contextualising <strong>Design</strong>: Three ways of Practicing Sustainable<br />
Architecture’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 17(2).<br />
G. Farmer & M. Stacey (2012) ‘In the Making: Pedagogies from MARS’, Architectural<br />
Research Quarterly, 16(4), 301-312.<br />
Rethinking Heritage<br />
Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />
Cultures and Transition<br />
http://valuablereside.upc.edu/<br />
This project examines the modern conceptualization of heritage and its associated<br />
preservation and conservation techniques and policies. The research takes an<br />
interdisciplinary approach and includes anthropologists, geographers, political<br />
scientists and scholars in tourism. It deals with both theory and particular case<br />
studies, and is currently funded through several competitive grants in Spain and<br />
Chile, with collaborators in the US, UK, Italy, Chile and Spain. The project relates<br />
research to professional practice and teaching – like the international workshop<br />
‘Valuable-RESIDE’, funded by the EU.<br />
Collaborators: School of Architecture of Barcelona-Valles, UPC-BarcelonaTECH<br />
(Spain); Universidad de Concepción (Chile); Politecnico di Torino (Italy); West Chester<br />
University of Pennsylvania (US). FIC Barcelona Architects.<br />
185
Architecture and the Machinic Unconscious<br />
Andrew Ballantyne<br />
Cultures and Transition<br />
Our responses to architecture have a cultural dimension, but our cultures are ways<br />
of dealing with our instincts – inherited from millions of years of evolution. Modern<br />
humans have been around for tens of thousands of years, identifiable buildings for<br />
only about 10,000 years, since the global warming that brought the Ice Age to an end.<br />
This project draws together some insights from the recent literature of evolutionary<br />
psychology and the schizoanalysis of Deleuze and Guattari in trying to understand<br />
how we unconsciously interact with one another in and through buildings. Most of<br />
what we do, we do unconsciously. What can we learn from our animal-becomings?<br />
-- from burrowing, nest-building, the construction work of ants and beavers, and the<br />
territorializing effects of music.<br />
Beyond Representation<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn, James Craig<br />
Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />
This project seeks to better understand architectural representation through an<br />
interrogation of its limits; the vastness of landscape, and the internalised space of<br />
consciousness. The research stems from an investigation into landscapes of human<br />
endeavour – in which both limits are potentially at their most extreme – with a<br />
project examining the bodies of ‘failed’ attempts to conquer Mount Everest. The<br />
research is developing in conjunction with an MArch studio exploring these themes.<br />
Craig J, Ozga-Lawn M. ‘Everest Death Zone’. Paper for Emerging Architectural<br />
Research 2014, 1(5).<br />
Curating APL<br />
Matthew Ozga-Lawn, James Craig<br />
Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />
Curating Architecture, Planning and Landscape is ongoing research into the<br />
dissemination of the School’s outputs and identity, including the annual yearbook<br />
and exhibitions, online materials and publications and conference materials. The<br />
work includes wide-ranging research into these forms of communication, including<br />
analysing materials from Schools across the UK and further afield. The aim is to<br />
generate key understandings of how APL could present and curate its identity.<br />
Newcastle University School of Architecture Planning and Landscape <strong>Yearbook</strong> 2014<br />
Collaborators: Thomas Kendall, Simon Bumstead, Richard Taylor, Ed Wainwright<br />
The Edge of State<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
Cultures and Transition<br />
In my current project, I examine the Turkish government’s efforts to modernize<br />
Eastern Anatolia and consolidate its authority over the region’s ethnically and<br />
religiously mixed population over the last century. I am especially interested in the<br />
expansion of the state apparatus – through the build up of institutional structures,<br />
military installations, transport & communications infrastructure, and resource<br />
extraction – and the resistance it encountered, with a view toward understanding the<br />
limits of state capacity and official ideology.<br />
‘Spatializing Difference: The Making of an Internal Border in Early Republican<br />
Elazıg, Turkey’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians.<br />
186
A Participatory-<strong>Design</strong> Study for Cobalt Business Park<br />
Armelle Tardiveau, Daniel Mallow<br />
Social Justice, Wellbeing and Renewal<br />
Cobalt Office Park is the largest of its kind in the UK with 12000 workers. Located<br />
in North Tyneside, this edge city environment is neither urban in the traditional<br />
sense, nor a greenfield science or technology park yet constitutes a highly significant,<br />
and under-researched, type of place in people’s daily lives. Greater or lesser ecological<br />
sustainability can be enacted and take root in such spaces; for this the project seeks<br />
to engage Cobalt workers, particularly in optimising their work-life balance as well<br />
as engaging local residents in extending existing sustainable practices in such ‘nonplaces’<br />
bordering their residential areas.<br />
Collaborators: Prof Geoff Vigar (PI) Dr Abigail Schoneboom (urban sociologist)<br />
Building Lifecycle Integration<br />
John Kamara<br />
Specifications, Prescriptions and Translations<br />
This research explores the hypothesis that effective integration of the different<br />
interfaces (e.g. information/knowledge, organisations) over the lifecycle of a building<br />
will enhance its performance (with respect to how it supports the immediate and<br />
changing business needs of clients/users and other actors that interact with it, and<br />
how its impact on society and the environment is optimised). Current work is<br />
focused on the interface between clients and the design/construction industry at both<br />
the development and handover stages of a project.<br />
Kamara, J. M. (2013) ‘Exploring the Client-AEC Interface in Building Lifecycle<br />
Integration’, Buildings 3(3), 462-48.<br />
Building the Nation State<br />
Zeynep Kezer<br />
Cultures and Transition<br />
In Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology, I examine how space and spatial<br />
practices mediated Turkey’s transition from empire to nation-state. By juxtaposing the<br />
making of new spaces, responding to the demands of a new politico-cultural order,<br />
with the obliteration of ethnic and religious enclaves characterizing the Ottoman<br />
way of life, I expose the interdependence between the creative and destructive forces<br />
in this process. My survey of broad ranging spatial transformations demonstrates<br />
how state formation operates at multiple and interdependent scales from that of the<br />
individual body to that of regional geopolitics.<br />
Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology (University of Pittsburgh Press for<br />
the Politics, Culture and the Built Environment Series, 2015).<br />
Problems of Translation<br />
Martin Beattie<br />
Cultures and Transition<br />
This research aims to understand the processes by which different cultures meet in the<br />
context of avant-garde architecture, art and literature. In particular the project maps<br />
and compares the linkages and spread of modernism between European and Indian<br />
avant-gardes, through its art and architecture of the 1920s. Specific case studies<br />
include analysis of the Bengali artist Gaganendranath Tagore along with the Bauhaus<br />
painter Lyonel Feininger and the collaboration between Rabindranath Tagore, the<br />
Bengali poet, novelist, and winner of the Nobel Prize for literature and Sir Patrick<br />
Geddes, the Scottish town planner at Santiniketan.<br />
‘Problems of Translation: Lyonel Feininger and Gaganendranath Tagore’ at the<br />
Fourteenth Annual Indian Society of Oriental Art Exhibition, Kolkata, India.<br />
Collaborators: Association of Art Historians<br />
187
188
Newcastle University School of<br />
Architecture, Planning and Landscape<br />
<strong>Yearbook</strong> ‘16<br />
Editorial Team<br />
Sam Austin<br />
Vili-Valtteri Welroos<br />
Matthew Wilcox<br />
Special Thanks<br />
Graham Farmer<br />
Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />
James Craig<br />
Anne Fry<br />
Rumen Dimov<br />
& Linked Research Group<br />
“Curating APL” 2014-15<br />
Printing & Binding<br />
Statex Colour Print<br />
www.statex.co.uk<br />
Typography<br />
Adobe Garamond Pro<br />
Paper<br />
GF Smith<br />
Colourplan, Turquoise, 350gsm<br />
First published in June <strong>2016</strong> by:<br />
The School of Architecture<br />
Planning and Landscape,<br />
Newcastle University<br />
Newcastle upon Tyne.<br />
NE1 7RU<br />
United Kingdom<br />
w: www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/<br />
t: +44 (0) 191 222 5831<br />
e: apl@newcastle.ac.uk<br />
ISBN 978-0-7017-0256-4
ISBN 9780701702564<br />
90000 ><br />
£10<br />
9<br />
780701<br />
702564