26.07.2021 Views

Design Yearbook 2016

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2016</strong><br />

School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape<br />

Newcastle University


Contents<br />

Welcome 3<br />

BA (Hons) Architecture 4<br />

Charrette<br />

Stage 1<br />

Stage 2<br />

Stage 3<br />

BA Dissertation<br />

Fieldwork and Site Visits<br />

4<br />

BA Architecture & Urban Planning (AUP) 80<br />

Stage 1<br />

Stage 2<br />

Stage 3<br />

MArch 90<br />

Stage 5 - Semester 1<br />

Thinking-Through-Making Week<br />

Stage 5 - Semester 2<br />

Stage 6<br />

MArch Dissertation<br />

Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology - Zeynep Kezer<br />

Linked Research<br />

90<br />

Research in Architecture 164<br />

Mountains & Megastructures<br />

A Mountain Near Thebes - Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Taught Masters Programmes<br />

PhD / PhD by Creative Practice<br />

Architecture Research Collaborative<br />

164


Welcome<br />

Professor Graham Farmer – Director of Architecture<br />

Welcome to this <strong>Yearbook</strong> which is a wonderful record of the hard work and achievements of staff<br />

and students during the past 12 months. The School has seen a number of positive changes this year<br />

and we have integrated new full and part-time colleagues, introduced numerous new teaching and<br />

research initiatives and integrated a wide range of new design projects and studios, each of which have<br />

delivered some outstanding work at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels.<br />

I would like to take the opportunity to thank those colleagues who have taken up new teaching<br />

management roles this year; Sam Austin and Zeynep Kezer as BA and MArch Programme Directors<br />

respectively, and the new Stage coordination teams; Ed Wainwright and Claire Harper in Stage 2,<br />

Matthew Margetts, Matt Ozga-Lawn and Josep-Maria García-Fuentes in Stage 3, James Craig and<br />

Steve Parnell in Stage 5 and Adam Sharr in Stage 6. Each of them has brought innovation but also<br />

a concern for continuity to their new roles and this is represented by the work in this book which<br />

once again conveys the diversity, sense of invention, energy, enthusiasm and relevance that continue<br />

to characterise and define our teaching and research. This year we will also graduate the first cohort<br />

of students from our cross-disciplinary undergraduate degree programme in Architecture and Urban<br />

Planning (AUP) and a selection of their work is included in this book for the first time. Establishing<br />

a new programme has brought substantial challenges and has required a real commitment on behalf<br />

of staff to get to this point. I would particularly like to thank Armelle Tardiveau and Daniel Mallo for<br />

their invaluable contribution in this respect and also to wish the first graduates from the programme<br />

all the best as they move into the next stages of their education or future careers.<br />

The Architecture Research Collaborative continues to go from strength to strength under the<br />

Directorship of Katie Lloyd-Thomas and Martyn Dade-Robertson and this year has seen a number of<br />

exciting developments in the context of architectural research in the School. One highlight of this year<br />

was the Mountains and Megastructures event which brought together staff and students to exhibit<br />

and present a diverse range of creative practice, historical, cultural and geographic research into large,<br />

landscape-scale artifices – mountainous, real, fictitious and otherwise. The active participation of<br />

our students in this event is evidence of our ongoing commitment to developing and supporting<br />

a research-based culture within our taught programmes and this in turn helps to support design<br />

outputs of the very highest quality. During the past year the work of our students has been recognised<br />

in numerous competitions and particular mention goes to Assia Stefanova and Rob Arthur who<br />

were placed first and runner-up in the RIBA Hadrian Medal for Part 2 with Randi Karangizi also<br />

runner-up at Part 1. Stage 5 students Becky Wise, Katie Fisher and Noor Jan-Mohamed were also<br />

awarded first place in the North Pennines Community Observatory design competition which is<br />

now being built at Allenheads. Our success in design competitions has also been mirrored by the<br />

Newcastle University Architecture Society (NUAS) who were this year recognised by the Student’s<br />

Union as the University’s Best Departmental Society. I would like to take the opportunity to thank<br />

NUAS President Regen-James Gregg and all of his excellent team, who have made an invaluable<br />

contribution to the wider life of the School and who have been so important in helping to maintain<br />

the sense of identity and community that so defines the character of our School.<br />

Fifty years ago the School of Architecture moved into what we know as our current home – a<br />

newly refurbished Architecture Building and a brand new Building Science wing. Those building<br />

developments brought the staff and students of Architecture together for the first time in many years<br />

because for most of the 1960s the School had to function in scattered accommodation in various<br />

buildings on campus and for a while even in temporary huts.<br />

We are now undergoing the first major redevelopment of our estate since 1966 and during the next<br />

academic year we will move into our new workshop facilities and studio accommodation which<br />

will extend the existing Building Science wing and provide us with significantly enhanced facilities.<br />

The new building will certainly help support our pedagogical and research ambitions well into the<br />

future but it is also interesting to look back at the thoughts of our predecessors as they moved into<br />

their new home fifty years ago. In his speech to mark the opening of the new School of Architecture,<br />

Professor Jack Napper, (then Head of School) took the opportunity to outline the character of the<br />

architectural programmes at Newcastle, describing design pedagogy as a continual and uncertain<br />

experiment and suggesting that an ideal specification for a programme in Architecture would be one<br />

that could educate in the best and widest sense, that could develop the ability in students to apply<br />

their developing knowledge to new situations, and could propagate a strong sense of human values.<br />

As we reflect on another year of positive change and look forward to the next stage in our evolution<br />

it is reassuring to know that the educational values held by those who came before us are still both<br />

recognisable and relevant today.<br />

3


BA (Hons) Architecture<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Newcastle’s RIBA Part I accredited BA programme fosters an inclusive, research-led approach to<br />

architecture. Alongside a thorough grounding in all the skills required to become an imaginative,<br />

culturally informed, socially aware and technically competent design professional, it offers<br />

opportunities to engage in developments at the forefront of current research, from computation and<br />

material science to architectural history and theory. Emphasising collaboration as well as independent<br />

critical enquiry, we encourage students to draw on diverse methods and fields of knowledge, to follow<br />

their own interests and to develop their own design approach.<br />

We believe that to produce good architecture requires more than rounded abilities and knowledge;<br />

it requires judgements about what we value in the buildings and cities we inhabit, what to prioritise<br />

in the spaces and structures we propose and what contribution architecture can make. The course<br />

doesn’t claim to offer simple – or correct – responses to these challenges. Our diverse community<br />

of researchers and practitioners, each with their own interests and expertise, introduce students to<br />

a range of issues, ideas, traditions and techniques in architectural design and scholarship. We help<br />

students develop fine grained skills in interpreting spaces and texts, critical thinking to understand<br />

the implications of design decisions, and spatial and material imagination to stretch the boundaries of<br />

what architecture can achieve. Rather than teach a single way of working, we give students the tools<br />

to discover what kind of architect they want to be.<br />

A lively design studio is central to this learning process and to the life of the School. <strong>Design</strong><br />

projects, taught by a mix of in-house tutors and practitioners from across the UK, account for<br />

half of all module credits. We promote design as thinking-through-making, an integrated process<br />

of researching and testing ideas in sketchbook, computer, workshop and on site, of responding to<br />

diverse issues and requirements all at once – spatial, material, functional, social, economic etc. This<br />

approach is reinforced by collaborative projects involving artists and engineers, and at the beginning<br />

of each year by week-long design charrettes where students from all stages of all design programmes<br />

work together to respond to diverse design challenges, through installations around the School and<br />

beyond. Lectures, seminars and assignments in other modules examine the theoretical, historical,<br />

cultural, practical and professional dimensions of architecture, and support students to embed these<br />

concerns in studio work.<br />

Stages 1 and 2 are structured to guide students through increasingly challenging scales, kinds and<br />

contexts of design projects, a breadth of related constructional and environmental principles and<br />

varied themes in architectural history and theory. Briefs invite experimentation with different<br />

architectural ideas and representational skills, first through projects set in Newcastle, then<br />

incorporating study trips to regional towns and cities. As work increases in depth and complexity<br />

– from room to house, community to city, simple enclosure to multi-storey building – students<br />

have more opportunities to develop and focus their own interests. A dissertation – an in-depth<br />

original study into any architecturally related topic – sets the scene for a year-long Stage 3 final<br />

design project. With a choice of diverse thematic studios, each with its own expert contributors and<br />

international study trip, students acquire specialist skills and knowledge, allowing them to craft their<br />

own distinctive portfolio.<br />

5


Charrette<br />

The academic year kicks off in style with a long, School-wide, intensive workshop known as Charrette Week. It is an extremely creative, explorative<br />

and thought-provoking week, allowing all years and courses to come together to experiment with a wide range of studio themes, which are delivered by<br />

guest artists, engineers and architects. This year’s broad theme of Spectacle/Material/Resistance, generated some fantastic outcomes for the exhibition<br />

at the end of the week, including an indoor beach, a baroque fashion show, mesmerising optical illusions, an immersive theatre production and allencompassing<br />

inflatable structures.<br />

Charrette 1: A Hole in One Week<br />

Holly Hendry<br />

Charrette 2: Aural Dynamics<br />

Gillian Peskett and Joseph Finlay<br />

Charrette 3: Framing Newcastle<br />

Yatwan Hui, Andrea Fox and Liz Leech<br />

Charrette 4: From Precarity to Permanence<br />

Charlotte Gregory and Julia Heslop<br />

Charrette 5: Illusion of Architecture<br />

Jennie Webb and Matt Lawes<br />

Charrette 6: Inflate!<br />

Michael Simpson and Cara Lund<br />

Charrette 7: Migratory Hides<br />

Matt Rowe<br />

Charrette 8: Nu Baroque<br />

Tom Randle and Matt Charlton<br />

Charrette 9: Play! Summer is Not Over<br />

Amara Roca Inglesias and Nicholas Henninger<br />

Charrette 10: Site Specfic Theatre<br />

Hanna Benihoud and Hannah Pierce<br />

Charrette 11: Spectacle, Ruin Value and the Ruination of Spectacle<br />

Gareth Hudson and Nathan Hudson<br />

Charrette 12: Tracing Echoes<br />

Andrew Walker and Kyveli Anastassiadi<br />

Charrette 13: Wonder & Success<br />

Hazel McGregor<br />

6


Stage 1<br />

Stage 1 is a varied introduction to architecture, characterised by numerous workshops, visits and hands-on<br />

activities, and students respond to it with great energy. For the first semester Stage 1 architecture students<br />

share their modules with students who are on the BA in Architecture and Urban Planning.<br />

In the first week of term students take part in a number of intense design charrettes with all students<br />

from across the School. First year begins with a number of skill-building exercises involving measuring,<br />

observation and photography in buildings in and around Newcastle, as well as life and object drawing.<br />

Their first design project explores the domestic interiors of Pieter de Hooch through model-making<br />

and drawing. Students are then asked to design a small community reading room on a suburban site<br />

in Newcastle, where site analysis skills and the ability to design at different scales are developed. Theory,<br />

history and technology are taught through lectures, seminars and group work, and are also integrated into<br />

the design teaching.<br />

In semester two, students start by studying a series of 20th and 21st century row house precedents before<br />

designing their own house for an artist on an inner-city site, where scale, function, materiality and<br />

construction of space are developed. A final semester two project focusses on unbuilt and lost architecture<br />

and asks students to convey architectural ideas through the use of digital media, before students bring<br />

together the great range of work they have undertaken for the portfolio. Finally, there is a whole-year<br />

history trip to Fountains Abbey in Yorkshire.<br />

Year Coordinator<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

Jennie Webb<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Contributors<br />

Alex Borrell<br />

Becky Wise<br />

Cath Keay<br />

Charlotte Powell<br />

Chloe Gill<br />

Chris Beale<br />

Chris Elias<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Damien Wootten<br />

David Davies<br />

Di Leitch<br />

Elizabeth Gray<br />

Ewan Thomson<br />

Georgina Robinson<br />

Greg Murrell<br />

Henna Asikainen<br />

James Harrington<br />

James Longfield<br />

James Perry<br />

Jamie Morton<br />

Jennie Webb<br />

Joanna Hinchcliffe<br />

Joe Dent<br />

Justin Moorton<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Katie Fisher<br />

Katie Lloyd-Thomas<br />

Keri Townsend<br />

Kevin Vong<br />

Laurence Ashley<br />

Louise Squires<br />

Malcolm Pritchard<br />

Mariya Lapteva<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Matt Charlton<br />

Matt Wilcox<br />

Michael Chapman<br />

Mike Veitch<br />

Nedelina Atasanova<br />

Nik Ward<br />

Nikoletta Karastashi<br />

Nita Kidd<br />

Olga Gogoleva<br />

Patrick McMahon<br />

Peter St Julien<br />

Richard McDonald<br />

Rumen Dimov<br />

Ruth Sidey<br />

Sana Al-Naimi<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Smajo Beso<br />

Sneha Solanki<br />

Sophia Banou<br />

Stephen Brookes<br />

Steve Tomlinson<br />

Tara Stewart<br />

Tony Watson<br />

Tracey Tofield<br />

Vili-Valtteri Welroos<br />

Wallace Ho<br />

William Tavernor<br />

Xi Chen<br />

Students<br />

Aaron Swaffer<br />

Abigail May Smart<br />

Aleksandra Iachinskaia<br />

Alesia Berahavaya<br />

Alysia Lara Arnold<br />

Amna Ahmad I M Fakhro<br />

Anna Christian Moroney<br />

Arran James Noble<br />

Bahram Yaradanguliyev<br />

Benedict Thornton Wigmore<br />

Boris Larico Villagomez<br />

Brandon Athol Few<br />

Calum James Luke<br />

Charlie William Donaldson<br />

Cheng Wan Mak<br />

Ching Wah Hong<br />

Chloe McSweeney<br />

Chou Ee Ng<br />

Ciara Catherine McClelland<br />

Cooper Taylor<br />

Danielle Helena Berg<br />

Darcy Eleanor Arnold-Jones<br />

David Michael Gray<br />

David Richard Osorno G?z<br />

Dianne Kwene Aku Odede<br />

Dominica Ruby Bates<br />

Dora Mary Frances Farrelly<br />

Eleanor Waugh<br />

Elliot Matthew Dolphin<br />

Elliott James Crowe<br />

Eloise Aliza Coleman<br />

Emily Catherine Child<br />

Emily Reta Spencer<br />

Emma Elizabeth Kemp<br />

Emma Imogen Moxon<br />

Ethan John Archer<br />

Euan McGregor<br />

Eve Kindon<br />

Faith Mary Hamilton<br />

Finlay William Lohoar Self<br />

Fope Foluwa Olaleye<br />

Freya Jane Emerson<br />

Gemma Louise Duma<br />

Grace Charlotte Ward<br />

Hannah Emily McAvoy<br />

Harry Cameron Tindale<br />

Harry Robert Henderson<br />

Hattie Florence Reeve<br />

Hazel Ruth Cozens<br />

Helena Genevieve Taylor<br />

Henri Robert Cooney<br />

Henry James Cahill<br />

Ho Sze Jose Cheng<br />

Ibadullah Shigiwol<br />

Ioana Buzoianu<br />

Irvano Irvian<br />

Jack Adam Collins<br />

Jack Oscar Sweet<br />

Jake Andrew Holding<br />

Jake Williams-Deoraj<br />

James Gillis<br />

James Edward Bacon<br />

James Edward Knapp<br />

Jamie Schwarz<br />

Jay Antony Hallsworth<br />

Jemima Alice Smith<br />

Jerome Sripetchvandee<br />

Jhon Sebastian Cortes<br />

Joanne Lois May Cain<br />

Joel Pacini<br />

Jonathan Pilosof<br />

Jordan Middleton<br />

Jordan Paige Ince<br />

Jose Diogo Marques Figueira<br />

Joseph Henry Noah Elbourn<br />

Joshua Willem Jago Knight<br />

Junyi Chen<br />

Ka Chun Rico Chow<br />

Kai Lok Cheng<br />

Katie Ann Campbell<br />

Katrina Barritt-Cunningham<br />

Katy Rose Barnes<br />

Kieran Harrison<br />

Kieron Thomas Dawson<br />

Kiran Kaur Basi<br />

Kotryna Navickaite<br />

Levente Mate Borenich<br />

Liam Kieran Rogers<br />

Liam Michael Marcel Davi<br />

Lilian Winifred Davies<br />

Louis Windsor Page-Laycock<br />

Luc James Askew-Vajra<br />

Malgorzata Nicoll Szarnecka<br />

Man Cheong Gabriel Leung<br />

Mathilda Louise Durkin<br />

Matilda Marie Barratt<br />

Matthew Edward Harrison<br />

Matthew Oliver Ward<br />

Michalakis Georgiou<br />

Monica Said<br />

Myeongjin Suh<br />

Nadia Beatriss Young<br />

Nancy Margaret Marrs<br />

Nicholas James Morrison<br />

Nicholas Juan Tatang<br />

Nitichot Setachanadana<br />

Nophill Damaniya<br />

Olga Barkova<br />

Pablo Larrea Wheldon<br />

Phoebe Shepherd<br />

Polina Morova<br />

Qian Wang<br />

Rachael Helena Burleigh<br />

Rachel Spencer<br />

Rachel Marie Cummings<br />

Rebecca Charlotte Glancey<br />

Rebecca Jean Maw<br />

Reece Oliver Jay<br />

Robert Walker Ashworth<br />

Rowena Saffron Covarr<br />

Rufus Giles Wilkinson<br />

Sam Henry Carroll<br />

Samuel George Brooke<br />

Samuel James Hawkins<br />

Samuel Joseph Robinson<br />

Seyoung Han<br />

Simone Pausha Pearce<br />

Siriwardhanalage De Saram<br />

Siroun Elise Button<br />

Sophie Ogilvie-Graham<br />

Steven Gary Lennox<br />

Susanna Emily Jane Smith<br />

Tanya Naresh Haldipur<br />

Tian Hong Kevin Wong<br />

Tian Yee Lim<br />

Toghrul Mammadov<br />

Weihao Wang<br />

Wiktoria Sypnicka<br />

Wing Yung Janet Tam<br />

Yuan Xue<br />

Yuen Sum Tiffany Liu<br />

Yuze Tian<br />

8


Architectural Representation<br />

Kati Blom<br />

In the first three weeks of the first year, students undertake different analogical exercises such as life drawing, drawing in various places in the city and<br />

photographing and constructing multi-view drawings based on measurements. These exercises prepare them for the design projects.<br />

10 City Drawing Photos courtesy of Damien Wootten and Sneha Solanki


11


Beyond the Frame<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

The project focusses on orderly domestic interiors depicted by Pieter de Hooch in Holland during the mid to late seventeenth century. We begin by<br />

observing, drawing and modelling the fragment of the house in the painting, before designing a new room beyond it.<br />

12<br />

Top - Xi Lin<br />

Bottom - Rachael Cummings


Top left to bottom right - Chou Ee Ng , Kotryna Navickaite, Joseph Elbourn, Chou Ee Ng, Jack Sweet, Jose Figueira, Nikshith Reddy, Xi Lin Ng, Jose Figueira<br />

13


Heaton Reading Room<br />

Jennie Webb<br />

Students were asked to design a small community reading room in the vibrant and culturally diverse suburb of Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne. The<br />

local area currently lacks library facilities of its own and so through the creation of a reading room, comes the opportunity to foster a love for reading,<br />

writing, storytelling and community mindfulness. The design for the reading room, run by a specially formed literary cooperative, needed to address<br />

the relatively tight urban site conditions and be multifunctional; capable of hosting reading and writing groups, book clubs and childrens’ storytelling<br />

sessions.<br />

14<br />

Top - Rebecca Glancey


RENDER<br />

Top - Bahram Yaradanguliyev<br />

Bottom - Choue Ee Ng<br />

15


Row House Typologies and Living<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Students are asked to design a modest 3-bedroom row house and studio for an artist and their family. The site, in the Ouseburn Valley, is an area close<br />

to Newcastle city centre with a rich industrial past.<br />

16 Jose Figueira


Top left to bottom right - Joseph Elbourn, Henry Cahill, Phoebe Shepherd, Jonathan Pilosof,<br />

17


Unbuilt Architecture<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

Unbuilt Architecture is designed to introduce the use of digital media within the creative architectural design process. Digital communication tools<br />

are used to re-analyse and re-interpret three unbuilt and lost works of architecture: Cedric Price, Fun Palace; Louis Khan, US Consulate in Luanda;<br />

and John Dobson, Royal Arcade.<br />

18


19


Stage 2<br />

Economy forms the basis of our architectural investigations and design explorations in Stage 2 this year.<br />

How architecture is produced by, and productive of, the economies within which we live has been explored<br />

through analysis of urban environments and the imagination of their futures; the design of collective<br />

housing and communal spaces; projects crossing the boundaries between art, architecture and engineering;<br />

and the design of spatial experience.<br />

With projects set in Edinburgh’s historic port, Leith, and the Northumberland border town of Berwickupon-Tweed,<br />

and in the fictional realms of film, projects have moved between the scale of the dwelling to<br />

the scale of space; from the digital to the material and practices of making: always asking the question of<br />

architectures’ role and relation to the economies it is embedded in.<br />

A year of transition, Stage 2 seeks to encourage a growing sense of criticality towards design decisions, a<br />

developing autonomy of thought and action, and an understanding of architectures’ position in times of<br />

social, cultural and economic flux.<br />

Year Coordinators<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Jennie Webb<br />

Project Tutors<br />

Jamie Anderson<br />

Amy Butt<br />

Dan Kerr<br />

Nita Kidd<br />

Luke Rigg<br />

Christos Kakalis<br />

Gillian Peskett<br />

Hazel Cowie<br />

David McKenna<br />

Yasser Megahed<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

Fine Art Tutors<br />

Alexia Mellor<br />

Holly Hendry<br />

Isabelle Southwood<br />

Gareth Hudson<br />

Julia Heslop<br />

Rosie Morris<br />

Isabel Lima<br />

Peter Sharp<br />

Contributors<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Amara Roca Iglesias<br />

Amy Linford<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

Corbin Wood<br />

Emily-Jane Harper<br />

Ewan Thomson<br />

Greta Varpucianskyte<br />

Hannah Pierce<br />

Imogen Holden<br />

Iona Howell<br />

James Longfield<br />

James Perry<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Lam Nguyen Tran<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Martyn Dade Robertson<br />

Matt Lawes<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Patrick Devlin<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Richard Murphy<br />

Richard Talbot<br />

Rob Paton<br />

Rumen Dimov<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Sam Clark<br />

Sarah Tulloch<br />

Seva Karetnikov<br />

Simon Hacker<br />

Steve Dudek<br />

Tim Pitman<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Students<br />

Aadil Abdul Rashid Toorawa<br />

Agatha Savage<br />

Aishath Rasheed<br />

Alena Pavlenko<br />

Alexander McCulloch<br />

Alexander Mackay<br />

Alexander Gardner<br />

Alice Reeves<br />

Alice Simpkins-Woods<br />

Amber Farrow<br />

Ameeta Ladwa<br />

Andreas Haliman<br />

Angus Campbell Brown<br />

Anna Vershinina<br />

April Glasby<br />

Ashleigh Usher<br />

Assem Nurymbayeva<br />

Benjamin Taylor<br />

Boram Kwon<br />

Chao Shen<br />

Charlotte Goodfellow<br />

Charlotte Armstrong<br />

Chi-Yao Lin<br />

Ciaran Horscraft<br />

Claudia Bannatyne<br />

Connor O’Neill<br />

Daniel Barrett<br />

Daniel Francis Hill<br />

David Stuart Jones<br />

Eliza Hague<br />

Elizabeth Rose Ridland<br />

Elle-May Simmonds<br />

Emily Georgina O’Hara<br />

Emma Kate Burles<br />

Esme Hallam<br />

Farrah Noelle Colilles<br />

Gabrielle Faith Beaumont<br />

George Oliver<br />

Grace de Rome<br />

Hannah Ysia Hiscock<br />

Hao Zhuang<br />

Harrison Jack Avery<br />

Hector Adam Laird<br />

Henry Orlando Valori<br />

Ho Yin Chung<br />

Huey Ee Yong<br />

Isabel Mills Lyle<br />

Jack David Ranby<br />

Jacob Alexander Smith<br />

James Kennedy<br />

Jennifer Betts<br />

Ji Chuen Ng<br />

Joe Thomas Dolby<br />

John Knight<br />

John Joseph O’Brien<br />

Jonathon McDonald<br />

Joseph William Firth Smith<br />

Juan Felipe Lopez Arbelaez<br />

Ka Chun Tsang<br />

Kate Francis Byrne<br />

Kate Helena Stephenson<br />

Katherina Weiwei Bruh<br />

Katherine Isabel Rhodes<br />

Katherine Mitchell<br />

Katie Hannah Longmore<br />

Laura Jane Cushnie<br />

Lawrence Loc Man Wong<br />

Liam Costain<br />

Lily Francis Street<br />

Lily Rebekah Travers<br />

Lucy Emily Heal<br />

Marina Ryzhkova<br />

Marisa Rachel Bamberg<br />

Mark Andrew Laverty<br />

Matthew Layford<br />

Matthew Lovat Hearn<br />

Matthew Patrick Rooney<br />

Melitini Athanasiou<br />

Men Hin Choi<br />

Muhammad Ahmed Asfand<br />

Natalie Mok<br />

Natasha Diyamanthi Trayner<br />

Nial Simran Parkash<br />

Nicholas Honey<br />

Nita Harieth Semgalawe<br />

Nurul ‘Aqilah Binti Ali<br />

Octorino Tjandra<br />

Pannawat Sermsuk<br />

Paul Mathew Johnson<br />

Philippa McLeod-Brown<br />

Philippa Jane Smith<br />

Pitaruthai Longyan<br />

Prajwal Limbu<br />

Pui Wing Clarins Chan<br />

Quynh Dang Le Tu<br />

Rebecca Rowland<br />

Regen James Gregg<br />

Rhiannon Jade Graham<br />

Richard Harry Mayhew<br />

Robert Thurtell<br />

Robert John Thackeray<br />

Rufaro Natalie Matanda<br />

Ryan Daniel Bemrose<br />

Ryoga Dipowikoro<br />

Sam McDonough<br />

Sam Welbourne<br />

Samuel Richards Nicholls<br />

Sean Martyn Hoisington<br />

Shien Min Gooi<br />

Shuyi Chen<br />

Sirawat Thepcharoen<br />

Thasnia Haque<br />

Timothy Seymour Lucas<br />

Tin Ho Lee<br />

Tristan Patrick C Searight<br />

Trung Hieu Tran<br />

Tung Son Cao<br />

Vincent MacDonald<br />

Wai Yip Tsang<br />

William Mansell<br />

Wing Kei So<br />

Wing Kin Wong<br />

Xueyang Bai<br />

Yanjie Song<br />

Yee Yuen Ku<br />

Yi Shu<br />

Ziyun Wang<br />

20 Opposite - Charlotte Armstrong Exploring Experience


At Home in the City<br />

Amy Butt & Dan Kerr; Nita Kidd & Luke Rigg; Christos Kakalis & Gillian Peskett; Hazel Cowie & David McKenna; Claire Harper & Ed Wainwright<br />

How housing is produced, where it is built and who it is for are essential questions, not only for architectural practitioners, but for society at large.<br />

Semester one’s main project, set in Leith, Edinburgh, explored the changing conditions of housing and collective living within a set of specific economic<br />

and social constraints.<br />

22 Leith Symposium


Top from left to right - Matthew Rooney, Marina Ryzhkova, Michael Choi, Agatha Savage, Daniel Barrett, Yee Yuen Ku, April Glasby<br />

23


Engineering Experience<br />

Amy Butt, Dan Kerr & Alexia Mellor; Nita Kidd, Luke Rigg & Rosie Morris ; Christos Kakalis, Gillian Peskett & Gareth Hudson; Hazel Cowie,<br />

David McKenna & Julia Heslop; Claire Harper, Ed Wainwright & Peter Sharp<br />

Through a collaborative project involving students, staff and practitioners from architecture, fine art and engineering, filmic environments were<br />

reimagined as a set of physical artworks to be moved into, through, over, under – experienced through human motion and the camera, and re-filmed<br />

to re-tell a specific experience from each film.<br />

24<br />

Top - Group D3<br />

Bottom - Group D4


Top from left to right - Groups C3, D4, B2, D3, B1<br />

25


Exploring Experience<br />

Amy Butt & Dan Kerr; Nita Kidd, Luke Rigg & Yasser Megahed; Christos Kakalis & Gillian Peskett; Hazel Cowie & Jamie Anderson; Claire Harper<br />

& Ed Wainwright<br />

How can architecture bring the body, the spatially experienced state of being, back into activities, practices & processes that are progressively moving<br />

online? How can those events, desires, acts and experiences be explored physically and in combination with digital technologies? This project, set<br />

in Berwick-upon-Tweed, explores how spatial design can embody the digital, and bring a sensual, haptic and material quality into an increasingly<br />

technologically mediated society.<br />

26 Top - Nicholas Honey Bottom - Mark Andrew Laverty


Top left to bottom right - Richard Mayhew, Agatha Savage, Robert Thackeray, Kate Stephenson, Panawat Semsuk, Timothy Lucas, Katie Longmore, Charlotte<br />

Armstrong, Bai Xuey, Mark Laverty, Liam Costain, Benjamin Taylor<br />

27


28 Top left to bottom right - Panamat Semsuk, Chi Yao Lin, Angus Brown, Ziyun Wan


Top - Matthew Rooney<br />

Bottom - Chao Shen<br />

29


Stage 3<br />

Stage 3 is coordinated into year-long design studios, with students entering immediately after the<br />

Charrette exercise. This year, we ran eight separate studios – our most ever in Stage 3. Over these pages,<br />

each studio is described in more detail, from experimental architecture to explorations of ‘The Long Now’.<br />

As part of these varied studios students undertake a field trip in the first semester, travelling to locations<br />

as diverse as Venice, Rome, Tenerife, Lisbon, Malmo, Copenhagen, London and Lindisfarne. Students’<br />

design work is supported by three non-design modules: Architectural Technology, Professional Practice,<br />

and Principles and Theories. All three tie-in with the student’s evolving design thesis and culminate in an<br />

extensive design portfolio document.<br />

In all studios, the project kicks off with a short ‘Primer’ exercise, culminating in a year-wide event<br />

exhibiting and celebrating the diversity of the studios in Stage 3. The Primer, and the range of approaches<br />

it demonstrates, embodies our attitude as a School to design work at this level: that rather than asking<br />

students to convey what they’ve learnt so far, our third year is about taking those first steps into the<br />

unknown, the particular and the extraordinary, and so help them start to define whatever’s next for them<br />

in their endeavours in architecture.<br />

Year Coordinators<br />

Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />

Amy Linford<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Carolina Figueroa<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

David McKenna<br />

James Longfield<br />

Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Libby Makinson<br />

Luis Hernandez<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Michael Simpson<br />

Sean Douglas<br />

Simon Hacker<br />

Tony Watson<br />

Contributors<br />

Alex Gordon<br />

Andrew Byrne<br />

Aurelie Guyet<br />

Austen Smith<br />

Cara Lund<br />

Colin Riches<br />

Colin Ross<br />

Damien Wootten<br />

Darren Conboy<br />

David Bailey<br />

Declan McCaffertyand<br />

Javier Rodriguez Corral<br />

Jo McCafferty<br />

Kate Wilson<br />

Kevin Gray<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Libby Makinson<br />

Luciano Cardellicchio<br />

Marc Horn<br />

Mark Johnson<br />

Mark Johnson<br />

Nick Peters<br />

Nigel Bidwell<br />

Peter Brittain<br />

Peter Mouncey<br />

Peter Mouncey<br />

Rachel Currie<br />

Ray Verrall<br />

Sam Clark<br />

Sergi Garriga<br />

Sophia Banou<br />

Stephen Ibbotson<br />

Stephen Richardson<br />

Tim Mosedale<br />

Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

Valerio Morabito<br />

Yasser Megahead<br />

Students<br />

Abdul Rahim<br />

Adam Kamal Najia<br />

Adnan Ahmed Issa Qatan<br />

Aldrich Jun Lin Choy<br />

Alex Jusupov<br />

Alexander Jack Ferguson<br />

Alexander Leopold Borrell<br />

Alice Chilangwa Farmer<br />

Alice Jane Chilman<br />

Alicia Charlotte Beaumont<br />

Amy Louise Callaghan<br />

Anna Leilani Denker<br />

Anthony Roger Metelerkamp<br />

Antonis Kypridemos<br />

Antonius Tanady<br />

Ashok Jahan Mathur<br />

Becky Somerville<br />

Benjamin Joshua Risby<br />

Benjamin Michael Simpson<br />

Benjamin Patrick Martin<br />

Bethan Hannah Thomas<br />

Bethany Laura Elmer<br />

Bradley John Davidson<br />

Caitlin Latimer-Jones<br />

Cheuk Yan Debby Chung<br />

Chloe Alexandra Weston<br />

Christopher Gabe<br />

Clement Ting Yiung Tang<br />

Cristina Mercedes Perez Diaz<br />

Darragh O’Keeffe<br />

David Philip Winter<br />

Declan Joseph Wagstaff<br />

Edgar Yat-Fei Sin<br />

Eleanor Gwenllian Brent<br />

Elise Khoury<br />

Ellen Rita White Peirson<br />

Emily Sarah Rosie Hinchliffe<br />

Erica Alexis Mote Caballero<br />

Finian John Orme<br />

Finlay Giovanni McGregor<br />

Frances Grace Fen-Yi Lai<br />

Frederick Armitage<br />

Frederick Lewis<br />

Gaurav Hemant Kapoor<br />

George Parfitt<br />

George Edward Entwistle<br />

George William Marr<br />

Georgina Molly McEwan<br />

Hayley Lauren Graham<br />

Hiu Yan Lau<br />

Hoi Yuet Chau<br />

Holly Julia Tisson<br />

Hsin-Wei Lin<br />

Ioi Teng Tsang<br />

Iona Frances Haig<br />

Ivo Patrick Pery<br />

Jack Andrew Cross<br />

Jack Michael Ryan<br />

Jack Munro Glasspool<br />

Jack Peter Lewandowski<br />

Jade Angela Moore<br />

Jaimie Alexandra Claydon<br />

James George Clark<br />

Jenna Catherine Sheehy<br />

Jennifer Anne MacFadyen<br />

Jessica Katherine Wheeler<br />

Jie Loon Lee<br />

Jordi Ryano<br />

Josephine Margaret Foster<br />

Julian Job Besems<br />

Justyna Anna Jaroszewicz<br />

Ka Hei Surin Tong<br />

Kai Wing Phoebe Mo<br />

Kimberly Baker<br />

Kiran Alexander John Milton<br />

Lauren Ly<br />

Loretta Ming Wai So<br />

Lucy Hartley<br />

Luke Christopher Rossi<br />

Luke Victor James Dunlop<br />

Lydia Bronwyn Hyde<br />

Lydia Sarah Elizabeth Mills<br />

Man Chun Ip<br />

Marios Kypridemos<br />

Matthew Davies Smith<br />

Melissa Holly Wear<br />

Meshal Abdulrasool Hasan<br />

Michael Bautista-Trimming<br />

Michael Teasdale Wilkinson<br />

Mojan Kavosh<br />

Naomi Howell Sivosh<br />

Natasha Heyes<br />

Navneet Kaur Sihra<br />

Nicholas David Green<br />

Nicholas Peter Harmer<br />

Patrick Charles King<br />

Pui Ying Chu<br />

Rui Huang<br />

Sara Kelly<br />

Scott Matthew Doherty<br />

Shiyun Chen<br />

Sihyun Kim<br />

Simon Angus Quinton<br />

Sin Yi Wong<br />

Sun Yen Yee<br />

Tanatswa Lesley Borerwe<br />

Thomas Badger<br />

Thomas Adam Reeves<br />

Thomas George Ardron<br />

Tooka Taheri<br />

Tsz Wai Fung<br />

Tulsi Vikram Phadke<br />

Wan Yee Chong<br />

Wei Zhang<br />

Xavier Paul Alleyne Smales<br />

Yiwen Fu<br />

Yuet So<br />

Yuk Lun Chong<br />

Zhi Wei Chad Seah<br />

Zhuoran Li<br />

Zineb Khadri<br />

30<br />

Opposite - Allan Chong ‘Formless’ An Alternative Typology to Preservation


Studio 1 – Building on What is Already Built - 15th Lincoln’s Inn Fields<br />

Josep-Maria García-Fuentes & Aldric Rodriguez Iborra<br />

This studio explored architecture as preservation, as it understands they both are placed within a cultural continuum and are the outcome of a complex<br />

cultural, social and political struggle. It challenged students to design a major addition to an existing heritage building. This requires understanding the<br />

existing building in all of the ways its architecture and materials express the values it sought to represent and serve at the time, and in the ways that these<br />

meanings might or might not be extended, enriched or transformed and reshaped by the new addition.<br />

32<br />

Top - Alicia Beaumont An Extension to Sir John Soane’s Museum Middle - Ashok Mathur Soane Architecture School<br />

Bottom - Allan Chong ‘Formless’


Top - Ashok Mathur Soane Architecture School Bottom - Beth Thomas An Extension to Sir John Soane’s Museum 33


34 Top - Sara Kelly Institute of Integrative Pedagogical <strong>Design</strong> Bottom left - Jenna Sheehy Extending Sir John Soane’s vision of an ‘Academy of Arts’<br />

Bottom right - Tom Ardron Institute of Interdisciplinary Exchange


Top left - Lucy Hartley Sir John Soane’s Architectural Association<br />

Bottom Left -Tom Ardron Institute of Interdisciplinary Exchange<br />

Right - Sara Kelly Institute of Integrative Pedagogical <strong>Design</strong><br />

35


Studio 2 – Aperture<br />

Daniel Mallo & Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Aperture studio proposed an exploration of light and material quality, a journey through the craft of photography as a means to expose and render<br />

light vibrant. The design of a camera obscura, a room-sized observatory that records the passing of time and the urban landscape, becomes the starting<br />

point of an urban investigation of the Georgian Market Town of Richmond (North Yorkshire). This remarkable urban townscape with its characteristic<br />

pitched roofs and stone buildings is the setting for the graduation project, a photographic institute situated at the point where the town meets the soft<br />

rolling hills of Yorkshire.<br />

36 Top - Lydia Hyde Aperture Institute Bottom - Freddie Armitage The Light Institute


Top - Alice Chilman<br />

Middle and Bottom - Jennifer MacFadyen A New Cultural Centre for Richmond<br />

37


38<br />

Top - Frances Lai<br />

Middle left to bottom left - Jack Ryan, Amy Callaghan, Steven Lin, Jack Ryan, Jack Lewandowski


Top - Lauren Ly Aperture Bottom left - Erica Caballero Aperture Bottom right - Frances Lai The Aperture Institution 39


40<br />

Top left to Bottom right - Lydia Hyde, Nick Harmer, Christie Chu, Jenny MacFadyen, Lei Denker


Top left to bottom right - Tulsi Phadke, Lei Denker, Freddie Armitage, Jack Lewandowski, Nick Harmer, Lei Denker<br />

41


Studio 3 – Experimental Architecture<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson, Luis Hernandez & Carolina Figueroa<br />

This year started by focusing on developing a new type of hydromorphic material based on the application of bacteria spores. Hygromorophic materials<br />

change their morphology in the presence of water, and bacteria based hygromorphs offer the potential for actuators that can mechanically respond<br />

to humidity, creating the possibility to design new types of responsive building skin. The studio embarked in a primer to design new systems and<br />

mechanisms, developing our hydromorphic technology both in the lab and the workshop. We then used a trip to Venice as the basis of the final project<br />

to create spaces for experimentation, including the integration of labs, workshops and public functions.<br />

42<br />

George Entwistle The City & The City


Top - Adam Najia - The Venice Cleanup<br />

Bottom, left to right - Bradley Davidson, Aldrich Choy, Iona Haig<br />

43


44 Top left to Bottom right - Michael Bautista, Julian Besems, Adnan Qatan, Julian Besems, Adam Najia


Top and Middle - Simon Quinton Eudoxia<br />

Bottom - Michael Bautista-Trimming Zaira<br />

45


Studio 4 – Infrastructures<br />

Matthew Margetts & Michael Simpson<br />

The Infrastructures studio explored the interface between the human scale ‘ritual’ and city scale infrastructure, responding to varied dynamic systems.<br />

The gaps left behind when infrastructures change can be physical, social or emotional; operating at a personal or collective level.<br />

The studio started at the individual scale, looking at very personal ‘rituals’ – articulated and exaggerated through ‘contraptions’. Through these we<br />

developed tactics for looking at systems and processes at a larger scale.<br />

We chose Brentford as our location for the studio as it contains in a relatively small area an intense confluence of infrastructures – both past and present.<br />

Students were challenged to think at different scales, and to identify a particular circumstance to explore an opportunistic, dynamic architecture,<br />

responsive to human needs.<br />

46 Top - Ellen Peirson An Agricultural Primary Education Bottom - George Parfitt Brentford Droneport


N E W E X H I B I T I O N<br />

r e c e p t i o n<br />

a theatrical entrance ....<br />

Top left - George Parfitt Brentford Droneport<br />

Top middle, Top left, Bottom - Ben Martin Kew A Santuary for Sensory Atmospheres<br />

47


48 Top left to bottom right - Chloe Weston, Cheuk Y D Chung, Yuet So, Cheuk Y D Chung, Chloe Weston, Ben Simpson. Cheuk Y D Chung


Top and Middle - Jordi Ryano The Brentford Ear<br />

Bottom - Yuet So Brentford Hub<br />

49


50 Rui Huang Unbalanced City


Top left to Bottom right - Ben Simpson, Rui Huang, Mishal Hasan, Jordi Ryano, Ellen Peirson, Mishal Hasan, Ivo Pery, Caitlin Latimer-Jones<br />

51


Studio 5 – Material Poetics<br />

James Longfield & Amy Linford<br />

Materials qualities are central to the production of architecture, technically, in terms of the pragmatics of construction, and through the social meanings,<br />

rituals and memories they embody. Our studio encouraged students to engage with material as the ‘stuff’ of architecture, real, rather than rendered, the<br />

thickness, thinness, density, weight of building elements, and the effect these qualities have on the sensory experience of occupation.<br />

Through the studio each student has explored a specific material through hands-on investigations, using the process of making as a way of thinking<br />

about building design and detailing; a thoughtful and critical process of material assembly which emerges out of the pragmatics and poetics of material.<br />

52 Holly Tisson


Top - Natasha Heyes Middle - Naomi Howell Sivosh Bottom - Hayley Graham<br />

53


54 Top - Chad Seah Bottom - Holly Tisson


Top - Chad Seah Middle- Naomi Howell Sivosh Bottom - Justyna Jaroszewicz<br />

55


Studio 6 – Ruskin and The Long Now<br />

Andrew Ballantyne & Libby Makinson<br />

John Ruskin said, ‘When we build, let us think that we build forever’. The Long Now Foundation was set up to promote long-term<br />

thinking, and is building a 10,000–year clock. When we start thinking about buildings with a long–term view in mind then we<br />

think about processes of adaptation, re–use and renewal, as well as erosion and decay. In the long term everything is dynamic. We<br />

are looking beyond the immediate function of the building to think about what happens when things change. Ruskin wrote about<br />

Venice, which is a model of precarious resilience: mud into magic.<br />

56 Chris Gabe Prospective Preservation for the Long Now


Top left - Melissa Wear Top right - Surin Tong Middle right -David Winter Bottom left - Kiran Milton Bottom right - Phoebe Mo<br />

57


58 Top - Kiran Milton The Timeless Architecture of Evolutionary Predisposition Bottom right - Surin Tong Building Happiness<br />

Bottom left - Phoebe Mo Building for Permanence and Sensibility through an Experience of Concrete


Jack Glasspool - Long Term Preservation of Short-term Industry<br />

59


Studio 7 – Trace<br />

Simon Hacker & Tony Watson<br />

The studio focused on man-made traces – the marks, indications and imprints that we make across a multitude of scales and their relationships to human<br />

experience. Whilst some of these marks are relatively permanent, many traces change or fade over time.<br />

The studio has considered various ways in which traces may be located, observed, researched and represented. These have then fed into considering<br />

strategies that can be employed to draw, form, copy, follow and imprint new and contemporary traces and changes within both urban and rural contexts.<br />

60 Alex Borrell The Sheep Counting Institute


Top - James Clark Long Term Preservation of Short-term Industry Middle - Declan Wagstaff Place of Experience Bottom - Jaimie Claydon<br />

61


62 Top - Declan Wagstaff Middle - Jess Wheeler Middle - Jack Cross Bottom - Tom Badger


Top left to bottom right - Becky Somerville, Emily Hinchliffe, Jack Cross, Freddie Lewis, Luke Dunlop, Ellie Brent, Luke Dunlop, Nick Green, Jess Wheeler,<br />

Tom Badger<br />

63


64 Top - Tom Badger Architecture and the Inevitable Bottom - Bethany Elmer Returning the Lindisfarne Gospels


Top left - Elise Khoury Top right - Josie Foster Bottom left - Declan Wagstaff Bottom right - Georgie McEwan<br />

65


Studio 8 – Variations<br />

Kati Blom, David McKenna & Sean Douglas<br />

Students developed a series of small scale prototypes in order to establish a design methodology and programme for a larger proposal, consisting of two<br />

buildings and an urban plan.<br />

In the first project, CHAMBER, we started with a small rehearsal space and a construction fragment. From these emerged a residential institute for a<br />

quartet of musicians. The larger project, SHOW & STORE, began with a pavilion to store and exhibit a single object, extrapolated to a building to<br />

house a larger compendium.<br />

66 Top - Alex Jusupov Alison & Peter Smithson Architectural Foundation Bottom - Alice Farmer


Top left to Bottom right - Antonius Tanady, Gaurav Kapoor, Cristina Diaz, Ben Risby, Antonius Tanady, Ben Risby, Rackel Chong, Loretta So, Lee Jieloon,<br />

Vance Zhang, Sean Kim<br />

67


MODERN NATURE<br />

FLUENCY DISORIENTATION RESISTANCE HISTORY<br />

Edit line<br />

68 Top - Ben Risby Middle - Sean Kim Middle - Shiyun Chen Bottom - Cristina Perez Diaz


Alex Jusupov Alison & Peter Smithson Architectural Foundation<br />

69


70 Top left - Tanatswa Borerwe Top right - Shiyun Chen Bottom left - Alice Farmer Bottom right - Rackel Chong


Top left - Edgar Sin Top right - Lee Jieloon Bottom left - Lee Jieloon Bottom right - Mojan Kavosh<br />

71


Highlighted Project –‘Formless,’ An Alternative Typology to Preservation<br />

Allan Chong<br />

This project takes a theoretical path in creating an alternative typology for preservation. It introduces a compromise between the desire for preservation and the cultural shift<br />

necessary for architectural expansion in the city’s future. ‘Formless does not mean the absence of form, for preservation certainly depends on pre-existing architectural forms. But while<br />

preservation aesthetics respond to the existing building’s form, they do not change it. Instead they supplement it with new interpretive frames altering the reception of its cultural meaning.’<br />

Koolhaas, R., Otero, P. J. (2014) ‘Preservation is Overtaking Us’.<br />

Interpreting the concept of ‘formless’ in preservation means that architecture and heritage are no longer seen as permanent objects, but they keep transforming to re-frame their<br />

key spaces. The project becomes a series of processes and imagines an endless architectural development in terms of space, material and technology. The processes form a unique<br />

methodology – ‘Extraction’ & ‘Projection’, through which the extension completes a cycle. As it keeps changing over time, it gives rise to many cycles which each reframe the<br />

previous cycle, and each provide different functions to support the theme of preservation. At a certain point of growth, when people trace back to the beginning of the process,<br />

all of the cycles and spaces are hinged on the heritage, as the extended spaces are derived from the existing spaces.<br />

72


Highlighted Project – The Sheep Counting Institute<br />

Alex Borrell<br />

The Institute is a place for artists, writers, and inventors to dream up new alternatives to pressing issues. Along the way they research, gather and create<br />

new dream archetypes, absorbing traces of the collective unconscious but also paving the way for future development. These images are archived and<br />

later attached to sheep which, rescued from the sea, pass through the building on a conveyor belt.<br />

73


BA Dissertation<br />

Experimenting with Informality: How can the hyper-complexity of informal growth be<br />

integrated into architectural design?<br />

Chris Gabe<br />

‘The process of creating a neointestine (tissue engineered intestine) involves the construction of a<br />

“scaffold matrix” that replicates the three-dimensional form of the existing tissue. This should allow<br />

the local cells to populate the structure and multiply, creating new tissue. It must replicate the dual<br />

function of the organic tissue acting as both an absorptive surface and a barrier against the external<br />

environment. It must also facilitate the development of a vascular network, allowing a functional<br />

blood supply into and out of the scaffold…’<br />

‘…This is an example of encouraging growth by creating a biologically responsive scaffold matrix.<br />

This does not rely on mathematical principles designed to mimic the fundamental complexity of<br />

a prerequisite system, but rather nurtures the existing biological networks into growth and repair.<br />

This concept could be explored in the world of informal urbanism. An example of this system of<br />

framework driven growth can be found in the occupancy of Torre David…’<br />

Postmodernity and Postmodernism: ‘A glance backwards is part of the way we go forwards’<br />

Ellen Peirson<br />

Postmodernism’s first aim was always to end the ‘grand narrative’ and to dismiss the idea of working<br />

towards a prescribed single look or a style. However, in doing this, to the general public some of the<br />

ideas seemed so extreme that it created a recognisable aesthetic. The discussion on postmodernism<br />

has been recently opened up again with a revival of sorts a possibility. This revival is more concerned<br />

with the attitude of postmodernism as opposed to any connotations of a particular style or aesthetics.<br />

In AD’s ‘Radical Post-Modernism’, architects and thinkers polemicize on the possibility of this. From<br />

these discussions, the most resonant phrase seems to be: ‘sometimes history repeats itself better if<br />

the architects don’t know it’. A successful revival may rely on the misconceptions of the movement<br />

to be forgotten and for just the relevant values to be taken forward. The movement was expansive<br />

and unrestrained, and produced a wide range of architecture that cannot be compared stylistically.<br />

It offered many opportunities for reform and improvement which are still relevant today such as its<br />

user centred and site specific approach to design. However, as with movements that have gone before,<br />

it has been judged mainly on aesthetics. In truth, there can be no completely postmodern building.<br />

Therefore, for it to flourish, it may be better for it not to be considered a movement but more an<br />

approach or attitude to design.<br />

‘Depressingly Irrelevant’:<br />

Interrogating the Criticism of Speculative <strong>Design</strong> and Exploring the Value of Such Projects<br />

George Entwistle<br />

‘This is a period of slackening - I refer to the colour of times. From every direction we are being urged<br />

to put an end to experimentation, in the arts and elsewhere’ - Jean-François Lyotard<br />

With criticism from writers such as Patrik Schumacher being given such a prominent platform, in<br />

popular design journals such as The Architectural Review, speculative design has been left in a fragile<br />

state. There is a danger that designers will become reluctant to engage with speculative design for fear<br />

of being heavily criticised and that it might be phased out. There is perhaps already evidence of this<br />

beginning to take place as ‘there are already utterances of critical practice being little more than design<br />

for design’s sake, “design for designers” or perhaps more appropriately, design for critical designers’.<br />

Speculative design as a practice stands at a crossroads in how it deals with this criticism. One way<br />

is to continue on its current path, to retreat to within the community of the avant-garde, being<br />

‘overly self reflective and introverted’, hiding from critics outside of their ‘closed community’ such<br />

as Schumacher. Jean-François Lyotard describes this path: ‘Artists and writers must be brought back<br />

to the bosom of the community, or at least, if the latter is considered to be ill, they must be assigned<br />

the task of healing it’.<br />

The alternate path is explained by Dunne and Raby: ‘Speculative designs depend on dissemination<br />

and engagement with a public or expert audience; they are designed to circulate’. Dunne and Raby<br />

propose the opposite of what is described by Lyotard, calling for speculative design to be thrust onto<br />

a public stage, suggesting that by hiding the practice within a ‘closed community’, ‘its usefulness as<br />

part of a larger disciplinary project is undermined’.<br />

74


Spraying the City: An exploration of graffiti and street art as a democratic creative expression<br />

Georgina McEwan<br />

Graffiti and street art, as the voice of the unelected and disadvantaged, intends to regain possession<br />

of public space in a rebellion against authoritative dictations of the urban environment: to ‘reclaim<br />

the streets’. No urban space can be defined as neutral, with walls and street topography symbolic<br />

of boundaries for socially constructed zones and territories. Graffiti writers in 1970s New York<br />

considered urban developers and architects of the rapidly evolving city as callous decision makers,<br />

an attitude still reflected in the aggressive and territorial language of the graffiti community: ‘writing<br />

graffiti is “bombing”, a tag is a “hit” and advanced letter formations are “burners’’’. Instances of profitdriven<br />

architectural gentrification associated with the mundane metropolis lifestyle in developing<br />

cities have led to environments that are often constrained by limitations inhibiting liberated social<br />

action. Graffiti and street art, through transgressive artistic reclamation, highlights the importance<br />

of democratic creative free expression in its ability to drive and shape urgent issues in today’s culture.<br />

The Future of Concert Halls: A first exploration<br />

Julian Besems<br />

Whilst classical music is primarily performed in traditional concert halls without the use of<br />

amplification devices, a concern has been expressed that recording and reproduction quality has<br />

started to create an expectation of excellence that cannot be met in live performances.<br />

This evokes the question of how the advanced development of recording, reproduction and<br />

amplification devices will influence the need for and form of new and existing purpose built music<br />

venues in relation to classical music.<br />

This research question will be answered through a recording experiment and a public survey.<br />

Recordings of both live performances, and hi-fi reproductions of the same pieces of music are<br />

taken. These are played blind to respondents who express their preference. The samples are analysed<br />

through spectrograms. The public survey investigates the respondent’s primary reason to attend a live<br />

performance and how they listen to music.<br />

The overall results from the listening experiment show that there is no significant preference for live<br />

over hi-fi reproduced audio quality. There is however a significant preference for hi-fi reproduction<br />

quality for female voices, and live quality for male voices. The spectrogram analysis explains the<br />

preference difference: the reproduction samples have a higher high frequency incidence; the live<br />

samples have a higher low frequency density. The survey outcome states that people primarily visit<br />

classical performances for the audio quality.<br />

Lessons for the Tonlé Sap Lake: Can the living conditions of Kampong Khleang be improved<br />

by rural development?<br />

Sara Kelly<br />

The Tonlé Sap Lake is South-East Asia’s largest inland fishery. It passes through nine districts of<br />

Cambodia, including Kampong Khleang, which forms the focus of this dissertation. The Tonlé Sap<br />

Lake annually absorbs around 20% of the Mekong River’s flood capacity. As a result, the area around<br />

the lake becomes flooded and inhabits both floating and stilted communities.<br />

In contrast to modern approaches, where there is a reluctance to develop marginal land , the<br />

communities of this district have developed their own approach and are looking to consolidate this.<br />

Farming and fishing communities adapt to the local ecology and have managed a 10-meter water<br />

level rise. Communities such as Kampong Khleang have developed an innovative architectural<br />

morphology that permits them to live in these conditions, however imperfectly.<br />

This response is shaped by their environmental, social and political conditions. Neal Mongold<br />

explains this observation. He argued that architecture is the shaping of the physical environment and<br />

thus it is involved in the shaping of the economic, political, spiritual, and psychological environment.<br />

These communities offer a unique insight into this relationship between the development of social<br />

and physical form. One could argue that the prospect of uncertainty of global warming has stimulated<br />

the architectural field to radically change its relationship with water.<br />

75


BA Dissertation<br />

Tokyo: The Urban Laboratory<br />

The birth, death and legacy of Metabolism, with a case study of the Capsule Tower as an<br />

emblematic microcosm.<br />

Caitlin Latimer-Jones<br />

Japan experienced devastating destruction through World War Two and multiple natural disasters.<br />

With financial and technical assistance from global superpowers, Tokyo experienced unprecedented<br />

urban growth and infrastructural and industrial progress. The capital became an urban laboratory for<br />

Metabolism’s utopian megastructures. The post war movement’s ideas stem from viewing the city as<br />

an adaptive entity and relied on advanced technology. However, megastructures never reached the<br />

intended global success, experiencing the same demise as the movement by the 1970s. This paper<br />

explores Tokyo’s mid-1900s landscape, what Metabolism was responding to and how the movement<br />

has enlightened contemporary urban design and planning. Contemporary designs should be led by<br />

concerns related to sustainability, green spaces, users’ interconnectivity and the existing city. The<br />

‘metabolic development’ of the world’s societies should continue to evolve, to ameliorate and surpass<br />

the 1960s utopian proposals.<br />

From an Era of Welfare to an Era of Consumption: Proposing a loss of ethic in the regeneration<br />

of Park Hill Estate<br />

Tom Ardron<br />

Park Hill Estate was granted Grade II* listing in 1998 amongst a selection of other post-war housing<br />

estates. In 2007, Manchester-based Urban Splash began work on regenerating the estate. This thesis<br />

traces the changes throughout the history of Park Hill from its original intentions to present day<br />

in order to propose a loss of the public-housing ethic ingrained in our understanding of the estate.<br />

Beginning with a chronological analysis from the design conception, I discuss the influence The New<br />

Brutalism had on the design of Park Hill and how devices in both architectural and urban design<br />

enhanced the ethic of social housing as architectural self-justification within the estate. Following this<br />

I evaluate the changes in public policy which played a major part in the decline of the estate from the<br />

1980s to its listing and how echoes of these policies could still be influencing both the redevelopment<br />

of Park Hill and housing markets in the UK today.<br />

The founding motives of both English Heritage and the developer Urban Splash within the<br />

regeneration initiate the second part of this study. This highlights factors such as financing and a<br />

contradiction in practice between the stakeholders as a possible directive to some changes. A shift<br />

from a social to a profit-orientated motive is proposed as one of the main transitions within the<br />

development.<br />

An Assessment of Exhibition as the Means of Appropriating Egyptian Style, with example of<br />

Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly.<br />

Melissa Wear<br />

I have chosen to study the appropriation of Egyptian aesthetics because of its cyclic relationship<br />

with Western Europe. One of the earliest civilisations developed in Egypt. A specific movement<br />

of Egyptian architectural style into Greece, Rome, and then through to Western Europe creates an<br />

interesting cycle when considering the human desire of returning to one’s roots. It is useful to observe<br />

what is gained or lost in the translation of styles. Equally, in a growing era of continentalism, it is<br />

interesting to consider why people choose to retain identity using cultural divisions. As architecture<br />

is increasingly designed by international firms and away from local values, it is important to recognise<br />

why we choose to keep or lose certain elements of identity. It is most clear to study this subject using<br />

an age that has entirely passed.<br />

Britain’s interest in Egypt lasted roughly a century, most aptly bracketed by two London buildings:<br />

the 1812 Egyptian Hall in Piccadilly and the 1928 Carreras Cigarette Factory in Camden. However,<br />

a more general interest in Egypt can be traced back to the thirteenth century; historian James Curl<br />

predicts, ‘The inspiration of Egyptian art and architecture for the West is not yet dissipated’.<br />

Mass Egyptianising has led Egyptomania to become associated with garishness (of bright colours and<br />

secular ornamentation). This is perhaps linked to the method of exhibition in sharing the splendours<br />

of decoration associated with Egyptian style.<br />

76


AUP Creative Practice / Social Sciences Dissertation<br />

Tyne Deck in the 21st Century: How can architectural interventions be used to improve the<br />

relationship between Newcastle and Gateshead?<br />

Tom Wessely<br />

This Creative Practice Dissertation analyses how the infrastructure at Quayside has developed since<br />

the Roman period. It focuses on the key changes at Quayside such as the construction of the High<br />

Level Bridge, built in 1847. Following this, it critically examines in greater detail the structures<br />

built in the contemporary era, such as the Millennium Bridge and the Sage. The aim is to establish<br />

through a design proposal how the quayside area might help improve the relationship between<br />

Newcastle and Gateshead. Information obtained through interviews and focus groups influences the<br />

design proposal. Through a mapping exercise, I unpack the urban quality of Quayside and propose<br />

possible ways of improving the relationship at Quayside through architectural interventions. The<br />

proposal is influenced by the Tyne Deck, designed in 1969 by Gordon Ryder and Peter Yates (but<br />

never built) reflects on the controversial Garden Bridge by Thomas Heatherwick. In the conclusion,<br />

I discuss what impact such proposed infrastructure could have on local organisations such as the<br />

NewcastleGateshead Initiative and how it might improve the relationship between Newcastle and<br />

Gateshead.<br />

Public Spaces in Kibera<br />

Veenay Patel<br />

This dissertation looks to unfold the production and consumption of public spaces in Kibera.<br />

The research was conducted in the Gatwekera district of the informal settlement and focuses on<br />

six public spaces in the area. The information collected about each space is portrayed through six<br />

narratives, where I express conversed, observatory and researched findings. The intention is to try<br />

and understand the relationship between people and place within the settlement. Furthermore, the<br />

aim is to explore the possibilities that may enhance these spaces for the residents and enable them<br />

to effect change for a better future.<br />

The focus of this study is to look in particular at the production and use of public spaces within the<br />

settlement. Kibera is structured upon government owned land and therefore, in layman’s terms is all<br />

considered to be public space. However, this is not the case as the informal city works with the same<br />

notions of public and private as the formal city. For the purpose of this study, a public space can be<br />

defined as a social space that is generally open and accessible to the people. The characteristics of a<br />

public space in the formal city differ to those of the informal as the facets that define these spaces<br />

are dependent on the people that utilise them. This led to an exploration of ‘What defines a public<br />

space in Kibera?’ The insinuation being that the functional and symbolic value of a public space in<br />

an informal settlement like Kibera is based upon the foundation of what the residents require rather<br />

than being a simple space of leisure. Thus, this research aims to unravel some key concepts that can<br />

help us understand how public spaces work in Kibera and the bearing this has on the lives of the<br />

citizens that reside there.<br />

Identifying Inadequacies of Water and Sanitation Provision in the Slums of Mumbai and the<br />

Consequences of this for Female Access to Education and Employment.<br />

Rebecca Alexander<br />

Water and sanitation provision is a concern for many informal settlements in the cities of<br />

developing countries. Cultural norms in many countries mean that women from low-income urban<br />

communities find that their lives and opportunities are shaped by the inadequate provision of basic<br />

services. Mumbai is a city with one of the largest informal populations in the world. Understanding<br />

the nature of these informal settlements is necessary in order to intervene most effectively. This study<br />

examines the challenges of delivering adequate water and sanitation services to the slums of Mumbai.<br />

The inadequacies of both formal and informal systems were explored to identify the consequences of<br />

such shortfalls. The research found that many aspects of life within Mumbai slums were connected<br />

to water and sanitation related activities. Furthermore it was found that because women and girls<br />

bare the brunt of the burden of these activities their education and employment opportunities are<br />

negatively impacted by insufficiencies.<br />

77


Fieldwork & Site Visits<br />

BA (Hons) Architecture<br />

As part of Stage 3 the varied studios undertake a field trip in the first semester, travelling to locations as diverse as Venice, Rome, Tenerife, Lisbon,<br />

Malmo, Copenhagen, London and Lindisfarne.<br />

Studio 1: Building on what is already built<br />

Rome, Venice and Verona, Italy<br />

Studio 2: Aperture<br />

Tenrife<br />

Studio 3: Experimental Architecture<br />

Venice, Italy<br />

Studio 4: Infrastructures<br />

Brentford, United Kingdom<br />

Studio 5: Material Poetics<br />

Copenhagen, Denmark + Malmo and Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Studio 6: Ruskin and the Long Now<br />

Venice, Italy<br />

Studio 7: Trace<br />

Norway<br />

Studio 8: The Variations<br />

Portugal<br />

MArch Architecture<br />

Stage 5: Whole year<br />

Rotterdam, Netherlands<br />

Stage 6: Zazibar Studio<br />

Zanzibar, Tanzania<br />

MA Architecture and Urban <strong>Design</strong><br />

Nantes, France<br />

78


BA Architecture & Urban Planning (AUP)<br />

The BA (Hons) Architecture and Urban Planning (AUP) is an evolving three year programme which<br />

began in September 2013 and is now reaching its first cycle of maturity. The degree programme is a<br />

broad one that seeks to unite academic themes and approaches from the architecture and urban planning<br />

programmes across the School. But whilst many joint degrees can sometimes simply mesh two existing<br />

programmes together, we wanted to do something different. The AUP degree carries its own intellectual<br />

and pedagogical themes that cannot be found on other programmes elsewhere in the School. There are<br />

four conceptual strands, which includes one major theme, ‘alternative practice’, and three minor themes:<br />

visual culture, urban design and social enterprise.<br />

The alternative practice strand responds to a critique of twentieth century architecture and planning as<br />

overly technocratic and individualised. Returning to these critiques, alternative practice intends to address<br />

these issues by a greater focus on social, cultural, political and environmental concerns in the design and<br />

construction of the built environment. Our course has drawn inspiration from a range of thinkers and<br />

practitioners concerned with the built environment (including philosophers, political activists, sociologists,<br />

geographers, architects and planners) that have sought to engage and include communities in design<br />

and building (sometimes self-build, sometimes co-production).<br />

The following section which contains images of design work from Stage 1, 2 and 3 of the programme<br />

effectively showcases much of the intellectual and practical academic content of the degree – particularly<br />

the degree’s internal themes – and should be of interest to all with a firm awareness of the connections<br />

between social, environmental and design issues and the built environment more specifically. We hope you<br />

will enjoy the work shown here and derive as much pleasure from these projects as we have in helping their<br />

creators to realise their own personal goals.<br />

Directors<br />

Andrew Law<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

David McKenna<br />

Rutter Carroll<br />

Tim Townshend<br />

Contributors<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Ali Madanipour<br />

Andrew Donaldson<br />

Andy M Law<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Cat Button<br />

Chris Beale<br />

Cristina Pallini<br />

Damien Wootten<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

Dave Webb<br />

Dhruv Sookhoo<br />

Geoff Vigar<br />

Georgia Giannopoulou<br />

Helen Robinson<br />

Ian McCaffery<br />

Irene Curulli<br />

Irene Mosley<br />

James Longfield<br />

James Street<br />

Jane Midgely<br />

Joe Dent<br />

John Pendlebury<br />

Jules Brown<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Ken Hutchinson<br />

Loes Veldpaus<br />

Marion Talbot<br />

Mark Tewdwr-Jones<br />

Martin Beatie<br />

Martin Bonner<br />

Matt Ozga Lawn<br />

Matt Wilcox<br />

Montse Ferres<br />

Neil Powe<br />

Paola Gazzola<br />

Paul Crompton<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Peter Mouncey<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Raphael Selby<br />

Ray Verrall<br />

Roger Maier<br />

Rose Gilroy<br />

Rutter Carroll<br />

Scott Savin<br />

Steve Dudek<br />

Steve Graham<br />

Steve Parnell<br />

Stuart Cameron<br />

Su Ann Lim<br />

Sue Speak<br />

Teresa Strachan<br />

Tibo Labat<br />

Tim Mosedale<br />

Tim Townshend<br />

Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

Stage 1<br />

Abbey JoForster<br />

AdilZeynalov<br />

AhmadNamazli<br />

Ahmet Halil Hayta<br />

Ben Edward Johnson<br />

Callum Robert<br />

Campbell<br />

Conrad Chi WahLi<br />

EmilyWhyman<br />

Fatma Beyza Celebi<br />

Flynn Christopher<br />

Linklater-Johnson<br />

Georgia AnneMiles<br />

HarryBloomfield<br />

Huiyu Zhou<br />

Jemima Anulika<br />

Manasoko Onugha<br />

Jiewen Tan<br />

Jieyang Zhou<br />

John-Kervin Marcos<br />

Joshua Edward Beattie<br />

Joshua Thomas Goodliffe<br />

Junqiang Chen<br />

Ka Hei Chan<br />

Ka Hei Wong<br />

Konstantins Briskins<br />

Marvin Shikanga Mbasu<br />

Max James Hardy<br />

Mehboob Chatur<br />

Michael John<br />

Rosciszewski Dodgson<br />

Minsub Lee<br />

Nikshith Reddy<br />

Nagaraja Reddy<br />

Photbarom Korworrakul<br />

Racheal Felicia<br />

Modupeayo Osinuga<br />

Richard George Gilliatt<br />

Ryan Patrick Thomas<br />

Sahir Thapar<br />

Shaoyun Wang<br />

Siddhant Agarwal<br />

Sonali Venkateswaran<br />

Stephen Johnston<br />

Sutong Yu<br />

Theodore Christian<br />

Robert VostBond<br />

Ting En Wu<br />

Vaios Tsoupos<br />

Van Abner Tabigue<br />

Consul<br />

Winnie Wing Yee<br />

Wong<br />

Xi LIN<br />

Xinyun Zhang<br />

Xuanzhi Huang<br />

Yasmine Khammo<br />

Yuan Xu<br />

Zeynab Bozorg<br />

Stage 2<br />

Alex Joseph Robson<br />

Ali Alshirawi<br />

Andrew John Laurence<br />

Blandford-Newson<br />

Chia-Yuan Chang<br />

Christopher Hau<br />

Eleanor Kate Chapman<br />

Filip Ferkovic<br />

George Jeavons-Fellows<br />

Hannah Rose Knott<br />

Henry Andrew Morgan<br />

Hiu Ying Sung<br />

Jieyu Xiong<br />

Jonas Wohni Grytnes<br />

Lok Hang L Leung<br />

Nadine Landes<br />

Phuong Anh Pham<br />

Runyu Zhang<br />

Seyed Masoumi Fard<br />

Sheryl Lee<br />

Simona Penkauskaite<br />

Sze Chai Anthony Choy<br />

Thomas Gibbons<br />

Yeqian Gao<br />

Yilan Zhang<br />

Stage 3<br />

Yuxiang Wang<br />

Adem Mehmet<br />

Altunkaya<br />

Blair Forrest Nimmo<br />

Charles Richard Moore<br />

Charlotte Harrison<br />

Fedelis Fernando<br />

Tosandi<br />

Harry George<br />

Treanor<br />

Jack William Burnett<br />

Jessica Lily Poyner<br />

Martin Kruczyk<br />

Po-Yen Chang<br />

Rebecca Mary<br />

Alexander<br />

Richard Keeling<br />

Rutheep Prabhakaran<br />

Ryan Thomas Conlon<br />

Safeer Shersad<br />

Shu Ting Tang<br />

Sophie Hannah Laverick<br />

Thomas Bartholomew<br />

Charles Wessely<br />

Veenay Patel<br />

Zheng Kit Leong<br />

80<br />

Opposite - First Graduating Year AUP


AUP Stage 1 – Measure<br />

David McKenna<br />

There are 14 boat houses belonging to various colleges, schools and amateur rowing clubs located along the Wear in Durham. The earliest date from<br />

the early 1800s and coincide with the founding of the university. Measure required the design of a 15th boat house and cafe that would form a gateway<br />

from the city centre to the university playing fields.<br />

82<br />

Top left - Konstantins Briskins Top right - Callum Campbell Middle - Callum Campbell Bottom left - yasmine khammo bottom left - Xi Lin


Top left to bottom right - Ka Chan, Xi Lin, Sutong Yu, Ka Chan, Yasmine Khammo, Winnie Wong, Sutong Yu 83


AUP Stage 2 – Theory and Form<br />

Rutter Carroll<br />

In semester two of Twentieth Century Architecture, students were asked to consider a Theory + Form approach to the submission of an essay and design<br />

project, through a strategy for the reuse/conversion/extension/adaptation of an existing post war building in the Tyneside area.<br />

Wallsend Central Library, a key building from the post war period in the region, was identified for study and analysis with respect to its reuse. Built in<br />

1967 as the main library in the town of Wallsend, and designed by local architects Faulkner Brown (formerly Williamson Faulkner Brown and Partners),<br />

the building allowed students to assess the design through a series of Theory + Form lectures, seminars, design analysis tutorials and exercises.<br />

84 Top - Wallsend Central Library, Williamson, Faulkner Brown and Partners, 1966 Bottom - Seyed Masoumi Fard, Yuxiang Wang, Jonas Grytnes


Group work: Jieyu Xiong, Lok Hang Leung, Chia-Yuan Chang, Seyed Masoumi Fard, Yuxiang Wang, Jonas Grytnes, Thomas Gibbons, Alex Robson,<br />

Christopher Hau, Henry Morgan, Yilan Zhang, Runyu Zhang, Sze Chai Anthony Choy, Hui Ying Sung<br />

85


AUP Stage 3 – A Home for All: Housing for Vulnerable Population<br />

Tim Townshend<br />

During the 2020s a point will be reached when 25% of the UK population will aged 65 and over. People are living more active lifestyles into older<br />

age and there is a huge challenge to meet the needs and aspirations of these ‘active third agers’. APL 3002 explored the complexities of providing<br />

a stimulating, safe, appropriate and desirable home for older persons in an existing setting, Armstrong House, a listed Arts-and-Crafts property in<br />

Bamburgh. Armstrong House Bamburgh is an independent charitable trust providing ‘independent living with support’ affiliated to the national<br />

Abbeyfield society. The students were charged with thinking holistically about the place of older persons’ housing in a settlement such as Bamburgh<br />

and how it might be more fully integrated into the everyday life of the community, by providing ‘places of encounter’ learning from Dutch experience.<br />

86


87


AUP Stage 3 – Alternative Practice: Co-producing Space<br />

Daniel Mallo & Armelle Tardiveau<br />

For Alternative Practice: Co-producing Space, students focused on a live project at Denton Burn Community Association which concerns the design<br />

of a community garden and a playful area for an unused derelict plot. The project included the mapping of the Network of Social and Environmental<br />

Initiatives in the neighbourhood and aimed to engage students with existing community-led initiatives. The project culminated with a series of design<br />

proposals and temporary installations on site, which allowed the community to experience the transformed space and trigger conversations about the<br />

potential of the place as well as learning together through the enactment of a temporary community space.<br />

88 Installation at Denton Burn


89


MArch<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

‘What can architecture do? Where might architectural thinking take us?’ Newcastle’s<br />

two-year MArch fosters a research-led approach – one that challenges students to stretch<br />

their architectural and critical imaginations, to think harder and more deeply about what<br />

architecture is and what it could be. Work is diverse, threaded by an interest in architecture<br />

as a collective, cultural endeavour. Projects interrogate architectural production in all its<br />

aspects, from material processes, to modes of design, representation and construction, to<br />

the ways that architecture shapes – and is shaped by – the society and culture in which<br />

it is situated.<br />

As an RIBA accredited Part II programme – the second of three steps towards qualification<br />

as a UK architect – MArch is geared to develop advanced skills in analysis, representation,<br />

design and technical resolution through projects of considerable scale and complexity.<br />

But it is also rooted in the belief that architectural training must go beyond professional<br />

competence. MArch draws on the diverse expertise of ARC, our School’s multidisciplinary<br />

research collaborative, to push explorative ways of working and thinking architecturally.<br />

Students are encouraged to undertake original investigations into issues and techniques at<br />

the forefront of contemporary developments in architecture and beyond – from synthetic<br />

biology to the space of the psyche – while at the same time grounding their work in<br />

a specific material, social, cultural and intellectual context. Cross-studio reviews and<br />

symposia support a lively exchange of ideas and challenge students to position their work<br />

in relation to trends in architectural production and discourse.<br />

Teaching in MArch cuts across common distinctions between design, technology and<br />

history and theory, promoting an integrated approach that treats all aspects of architecture<br />

as opportunities for critical creative enquiry. Studio modules play a central role,<br />

incorporating lectures, seminars, consultancies and workshops spanning the curriculum,<br />

as well as cross-year events such as Charrette and Thinking-Through-Making. Projects are<br />

undertaken in small design-research studios, each exploring particular issues or themes that<br />

resonate with the research interests of tutors. Briefs invite an open process of investigation<br />

between staff and students, encouraging the development of an independent approach and<br />

distinctive critical stance, all grounded in rigorous research. In Stage 5, two semester-long<br />

projects set in a major European city interrogate the complexities of architecture’s relation<br />

to context, from urban to detail-scale, allowing students to test new approaches, methods<br />

and ideas. With most of the prescribed curriculum covered, Stage 6 is freed up to focus on<br />

a specific interest or question, pursued in depth through a year-long thesis project.<br />

With a rich range of opportunities for specialisation, the MArch programme at Newcastle<br />

allows students to develop their own fields of expertise and to showcase these in a distinctive<br />

portfolio. Alongside the design studio, students can choose to pursue independent research<br />

through a dissertation, to join a linked research studio where they collaborate on a live<br />

research project led by a member of staff, or to take a tailored set of modules from one<br />

of our other specialist Masters programmes – such as <strong>Design</strong> and Emergence, or Urban<br />

<strong>Design</strong> – with the potential of accumulating credits towards a second postgraduate<br />

degree. Bridging between the two years of MArch, these activities spark ideas and develop<br />

skills that feed into thesis projects. The School also has a series of exchange agreements<br />

with leading schools of architecture in Europe and around the world, including KTH<br />

Stockholm, National University of Singapore, and The University of Sydney. MArch<br />

students can study abroad for one or two semesters of Stage 5, and the programme benefits<br />

from the diverse skills and experiences of students who join our projects.<br />

91


Stage 5<br />

Stage 5 is a year for in-depth experimentation: for exploring architecture in all its cultural, social, political,<br />

material and historical contexts, for testing new approaches to design, representation and technology.<br />

Briefs emphasize critical thinking and require students to engage with current debates in architecture<br />

and society at large. The year’s work focusses on a particular international city – this year Rotterdam<br />

– beginning with an intensive week-long study visit, including architectural tours, excursions, talks,<br />

group urban analysis and social events. Students undertake a critical reimagining of the city through two<br />

semester-long projects which challenge them to work at two radically different scales – first urban, then<br />

detail. Framing design as a rigorous, as well as speculative process, they foster design-research skills and<br />

interests in preparation for Stage 6.<br />

In semester one, Plan Rotterdam asked students to engage with the urban fabric of the city, its historical<br />

layers, cultural currents and social differences. The project was taught as five distinct studios that each took<br />

on a different urban area and issue. Common themes include the interplay of buildings, infrastructure,<br />

land and water in a city below sea level, architecture’s role in the production of images, experiences and<br />

lifestyles, and the politics of regeneration in a place renowned for visionary architectural and urban ideas.<br />

The project is paired with the Tools for Thinking about Architecture module, which introduces a range of<br />

critical approaches through lectures, workshops and seminars.<br />

Semester two’s Rematerializing Rotterdam switched focus to material and technical imagination, taking<br />

detail, construction and atmosphere as opportunities for creative and critical exploration. The brief<br />

asked students to interrogate a [g]host architecture – built or unbuilt, in Rotterdam or elsewhere – and<br />

to reimagine it in the contemporary city. A detail and environment lecture series, supported by expert<br />

consultancies, encouraged students to pursue a technical specialism that embodies the intentions of the<br />

project.<br />

Year Coordinators<br />

James Craig<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Hanna Benihoud<br />

James Craig<br />

Laura Harty<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

Contributors<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Aidan Hoggart<br />

Ben Bridgens<br />

Chantelle Stewart<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

Dik Jarman<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Jonnie McGill<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Leon Walsh<br />

Luis Hernan<br />

Mark Clarke<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Miguel Paredes<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

Nita Kidd<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Sarah Jane Stewart<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Students<br />

Adam Hampton-Matthews<br />

Alexander Baldwin-Cole<br />

Alexandra Paula Carausu<br />

Amit Chhaganbhai Patel<br />

Carl Matthew Reid<br />

Cleo Kyriacou<br />

Daniel Richard Duffield<br />

David Livingstone Boyd<br />

Deryan Teh<br />

Gavin Jia Chung Wu<br />

Hei Man Lau<br />

James Richard Street<br />

Jessica Raine Wilkie<br />

Joseph Wilson<br />

Joseph Philip Dent<br />

Justin William Moorton<br />

Kathleen Rebecca Jenkins<br />

Katie Anne Fisher<br />

Kayleigh Anne Creighton<br />

Kim Alicia Gault<br />

Laurence William Ashley<br />

Malcolm Greer Pritchard<br />

Mariya Lapteva<br />

Martin James Parsons<br />

Matthew Westgate<br />

Matthew Michael Wilcox<br />

Matthew Sharman-Hayles<br />

Michael James Southern<br />

Nedelina Atanasova<br />

Nicola Jane Blincow<br />

Nikolas Kirris Fennell Ward<br />

Noor Aliya Jan-Mohamed<br />

Raphael Tevel Selby<br />

Rebecca Elizabeth Daisy Wise<br />

Richard John Spilsbury<br />

Robert George Evans<br />

Rose Eleanor O’Halloran<br />

Ruochen Zhang<br />

Samuel Edward Halliday<br />

Shiu Tung Wallace Ho<br />

Sophie Cobley<br />

Stavroula Rousounidou<br />

Su Ann Lim<br />

Theodora Kyrtata<br />

Thomas James Saxton<br />

Thomas Richard Cowman<br />

Ulwin Paul Beetham<br />

Vili-Valtteri Welroos<br />

Erasmus Students<br />

Camille Bourneuf<br />

Delia Heitmann<br />

Gustav Lundstrom<br />

Insa Thiel<br />

Stephanie Chiu<br />

92 Opposite - Joe Dent Metropolitan Imaginaries - Site Plan


Metropolitan Imaginaries<br />

James Craig<br />

Metropolitan Imaginaries asked students to map, analyse, and condense the myriad architectural elements that constitute Rotterdam’s metropolitan<br />

image. Using Ivan Leonidov’s social condenser as a key reference, each student set about creating an urban strip that would act as a vessel to contain<br />

architectural interpretations of Rotterdam’s metropolitan conditions. Each strip was articulated, combined, and placed in the Maashaven basin – a site<br />

that lies adjacent to Rotterdam’s prime metropolitan location: the Wilhelminapier. The proposed masterplan is a layered, multi-programmed terrain that<br />

highlights and exaggerates Rotterdam’s extant desire to be seen as a metropolitan city.<br />

94<br />

Kathleen Jenkins


A D A M H A M P T O N - M A T T H E W S<br />

Top from left to right - Joe Dent, James Street, Stavri Rousounidou, Adam Hampton-Matthews, Noor Jan-Mohamed, Justin Moorton<br />

95


Iterations & Intensities<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

The studio looked with a close and critical eye at the design processes associated with two major Rotterdam-based practices, OMA and MVRDV.<br />

Students were asked to emulate and embody these practices, in order to gain an understanding of Rotterdam as the site that allows for and encourages<br />

these means of producing architecture. A mock competition was held between the two practices for the same masterplan site in Delfshaven, with large,<br />

group-produced masterplan models alongside individual explorations.<br />

96<br />

Top - MVRDV - Intensities Group Masterplan From Minecraft Blocks to a Building Masterplan


Top - Nik Ward Top Right - Stephanie Chiu Bottom Left - Jessica Wilkie Bottom Right - Carl Reid<br />

97


The City as a Platform<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

This studio was based on the premise that it is the architecture of the underlying immaterial ‘platforms’ – the operating systems of the city – its rules,<br />

regulations, frameworks, social morals, systems, etiquette, traditions, networks, legislation, and so on, that is most influential on the design of the city.<br />

Students were asked, as a group, through mapping and desktop research, to come up with a definition of what a ‘platform’ is in the context of urban<br />

environment. They then had to individually design a building based upon that idea. The intention was to question the architect’s traditional role in<br />

society and investigate original models of ‘spatial agency’.<br />

98 Top - Michael Southern


Top - Rosie O’Halloran Middle - Malcolm Pritchard B ottom - Cleo Kyriacou<br />

99


Urban Hacker<br />

Hanna Benihoud<br />

‘Operation Rotterdam’ was the mission that the students acting as special agents were deployed on. Their mission was to hack into the city unlocking the<br />

upcoming changes in society: Individualisation, Internationalisation, Informalisation, Intensification and Information as described by the Netherlands<br />

Institute for Social Research. Each target area had an affiliated person of interest (P.O.I) who engaged with the agents to inform their hack. Hacking<br />

into a city meant that a sophisticated method of mapping was needed to understand the rules that govern it. The urban hacks then transformed into<br />

architectural interventions which continued to engage their P.O.I and transformed their target area.<br />

100 Top - Wallace Ho Bottom - Insa Thiel


Left to right, from top - Katie Fisher, Tom Cowman, Wallace Ho, Matthew Wilcox, Joe Wilson, Matthew Westgate<br />

101


What Makes a City Vital?<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Students in this studio engaged in analyses of urban conditions that are deeper and broader than the self-congratulatory language architects, developers,<br />

and civic boosters tend to use to describe supposed success in cities. Relative to this, analyses based on use rather than exchange were encouraged, while<br />

writings on cities by Lefebvre and Rykwert provided some of the main textual sources for the students’ work. In particular, students were encouraged to<br />

consider those aspects of cities that make them vital but are non-commodifiable, related more to civic virtues and dreaming than to exchange. As part<br />

of their research, students developed a series of strategies for re-urbanising OMA/Koolhaas’ De Rotterdam complex, the quarter it sits in (and ostensibly<br />

establishes), and Rotterdam more generally.<br />

102 What Makes a City Vital? Suspended Symposium Group Model<br />

ARB CRITERIA COVERED:


Marketing Collage<br />

Ulwin Beetham<br />

“The success of a city therefore cannot be measured in terms of<br />

financial growth and of a share in those markets it may have managed to capture,<br />

or even of its place in the process of globalization which is the inescapable<br />

phenomenon of our time- but depends on the inherent strength of the fabric<br />

and its availability to the social forces that mold the life of its inhabitants.”<br />

Joseph rykwert, The Seduction Of Place<br />

When examining the image of rotterdam and its architecture and<br />

what it wants it to convey through the slick and seductive imagery of brochures<br />

and city guides, a strong identity emerges that underpins both what it believes<br />

it is and the perceived power it holds over shaping its own future. Critically<br />

dissecting this imagery and information reveals one of the many inevitabilities<br />

of the sale: The reality never meets the expectation.<br />

Truly the International City, gradually stripped bare of any localised<br />

context rotterdam is both anywhere and nowhere simultaneously. As neoliberal<br />

policies drive the agenda of 21st century discourse, the unique circumstance<br />

afforded rotterdam have led it to become debased to a carousel of skyscrapers<br />

housing infinite quantifiable commodities, the program. The model of success<br />

based on a series of overreaching potentials rather than realities that form a<br />

city for tomorrow but not for today.<br />

After the Luftwaffe bombing in 1940, Rotterdam became a target<br />

for a wave of policy-making and urban renewal, systematically restructuring<br />

the city to a post-modernist utopian vision. This included the significant<br />

redevelopment of areas such as Kop Van Zuid to become a ‘Manhattan on the<br />

Maas’, constructing monoliths of economic power, an illusion of achievement,<br />

attempting to compete within the growing capitalist market.<br />

A dominant environment was created, operating on the control and<br />

subordination of a significantly (49%) non-dutch population. The majority of<br />

developments on Kop Van Zuid have been privately financed office buildings &<br />

commercial exploits, however despite this ‘working image’, unemployment is at<br />

8.5%, twice that of the national average. The area is significantly unpopulated<br />

and desolate, an ‘isolated and unnatural urban space’.<br />

I argue that the cultural, and hence economic, failures of Rotterdam<br />

are a direct result of the Masculinist approach to urban design, gentrifying and<br />

excluding those not valued by traditional white ‘Masculinism’: women, ethnic<br />

minorities (majorities), and alternative sexualities. To establish social cohesion<br />

and equal representation, difference of the ‘other’ to the existing ‘Masculinity’<br />

must be embodied in the urban environment.<br />

The BroChUre<br />

THE MYTH OF MASCULINITY<br />

Left to right, from top - Vili Welroos, Ulwin Beetham, Gavin Wu, Mariya Lapteva, Deryan Teh, Daniel Duffield, Becky Wise<br />

103


Thinking-Through-Making Week<br />

Thinking-Through-Making continues our theme of collaborations with artists, engineers, architects, musicians, thinkers and makers. This is for final<br />

year BA and MArch students in the second semester of the year. With a focus on material and making, this week-long series of lectures and workshops<br />

asks students to approach architecture through the process of making and drawing at large-scales, bringing material back to the core of architecture’s<br />

exploration.<br />

Articulated Structures<br />

Holly Hendry<br />

Articulated Structures<br />

Sebastian Kite and Benjamin Custance<br />

Chemical droplet workshop<br />

Professor Rachel Armstrong<br />

The Golden Journey<br />

Matt Rowe<br />

Dis-Connect to Re-Combine<br />

Dr Luciano Cardellicchio<br />

Illigraphy<br />

Russ Coleman<br />

Jesmonite<br />

Matt Rowe<br />

Lino cut with embossing<br />

Northern Print<br />

Material Processes<br />

Amy Linford<br />

Sculpted Polystyrene Spaces<br />

Magnus Casselbrant and Jesper Henriksson<br />

Spatial Possibilities<br />

Dr Rachel Cruise<br />

Stitch<br />

Helen Pailing<br />

Stonemasonry<br />

David France<br />

Temporary liquid<br />

Russ Coleman<br />

The Golden Journey<br />

Matt Rowe<br />

Your ideal multi-dimensional growing edible building<br />

Henry Amos<br />

104<br />

https://thinkingthroughmaking.org/workshops/


Another Architecture [Brutal]<br />

Stephen Parnell<br />

This studio looked at the much polarised movement of Brutalism and the issue of what to do with a large listed Brutalist building. Brutalist architecture<br />

is coming to an age where questions about what to do with them are being asked – should they be conserved, restored, renovated, refurbished, reused,<br />

or demolished? What is Brutalism anyway and what does it mean for 21st century architecture? Students were asked to consider these questions while<br />

re-programming the Meelfabriek Latenstein (flour factory) on the Rijnhaven basin in Rotterdam.<br />

106 Top - Joe Wilson Bottom - Kayleigh Creighton


Left to right, from top - Raphael Selby, Matthew Sharman-Hayles, Katie Fisher, Justin Moorton, Robbie Evans, Insa Thiel, Stavri Rousonidou<br />

Right - Robbie Evans<br />

107


De-Tale<br />

Hanna Benihoud<br />

This studio is inspired by the discussion in ‘The Tell-The-Tale Detail’, where Marco Frascari explains the architectural ‘joint’ which creates a transition<br />

from one element to another. The relationship may not occur between just one material and another, or a traditional wall and floor, but between the<br />

transition of light and dark space, between volumes, temperatures, thresholds, solids and voids or any other transitional moment within a building. Each<br />

student chose a material to become obsessed with and used that to explore the idea of a ‘joint’. Building 1:1 ‘joints’ reconnected the draftsman and the<br />

craftsman and designing details first created a narrative that informed their architectural language for the entire scheme.<br />

108<br />

Noor Jan-Mohamed


Top Left - Rebecca Wise Top Right - Gavin Wu Bottom - Deryan Teh<br />

109


In Praise of Folly<br />

Laura Harty<br />

In this studio, we drew on the 1509 essay ‘In Praise of Folly’, in which Erasmus of Rotterdam uses Folly, neutered feminine, to manipulate and disguise<br />

his fundamental critique of the overarching powers of the day. In cloaking his critique in Folly, he allows otherwise stark and punishable observations to<br />

be accepted as trite amusements. His satire permits superficial reading, while allowing room for oppositional and reformative propositions. As Erasmus<br />

engages Folly as vehicle and decoy, so too each student adopted an attendant persona to drive a material investigation, interrogate an attendant brief<br />

and deliver an inquisitive proposal.<br />

110 Daniel Duffield


Top Left - Ulwin Beetham Top Right - Adam Hampton-Matthews Bottom Left to Right - Ulwin Beetham, Nicola Blincow, Angie Lau<br />

111


Hybrid Objects<br />

James Craig<br />

Hybrid Objects asked students to create an architectural response to the complex space that exists between viewers and objects. This space, a foggy<br />

territory where myriad meanings can be made, is the zone where projected meanings collide to create a space of betweenness. The result is a hybrid<br />

object; constituted from entangled meanings that exist between observers and objects. Through the selection and unpacking of an object from the<br />

permanent collection of the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, each student developed their own art depository in the Museumpark area of Rotterdam.<br />

112 Laurence Ashley


Top Wallace Ho<br />

Bottom from left to Right - Laurence Ashley, Delia Heitmann, Vili Welroos<br />

Middle from left to Right - Ruochen Zhang, Kim Gault, Ruochen Zhang<br />

113


Spectres of Utopia and Modernity<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Students in this studio investigated the ghosts of modernity by charting its traces in selected surviving examples of heroic modern architecture from<br />

the 1920s and 1930s, and in projects from the post-World War II period of its greatest orthodoxy, 1945-1960. In developing their individual projects,<br />

students were challenged to consider how their study building harbours both the ghosts of modernity and the spectre of Utopia that has struck fear<br />

into the hearts of architects (and others) since at least the 1950s. Through their investigation of the core topics of modernity and Utopia, students were<br />

encouraged to confront their own Utopia-Anxiety as directly as they could by proposing a new, ‘alien’ structure correlated with their study building.<br />

114<br />

Left / Top - Malcolm Pritchard<br />

Right - Sam Halliday


Left - Joe Dent Top Right - Nik Ward Bottom Right - Sam Halliday<br />

115


Stage 6<br />

In Stage 6 students undertake a year-long thesis project with a self-generated brief, within a theoretical<br />

framework established by their chosen studio. This year, five studios were on offer:<br />

Border Territories: Adam Sharr and Sam Austin<br />

Experimental Architecture: Rachel Armstrong and Paul Rigby<br />

Landscapes of Human Endeavour: James Craig and Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Matter: Graham Farmer and Paul Rigby<br />

Zanzibar: Prue Chiles<br />

These studios offer a comparable level of complexity as graduation projects, but they cover a broad range<br />

of issues and geographies leading to a diverse variety of outcomes. They showcase the interactions between<br />

studio leaders’ research expertise and the evolving interests and specialisms of Stage 6 students. To achieve<br />

this, every year, students’ individual thesis projects are developed within each studio’s theme, balancing<br />

their individual learning objectives and interests against those already covered in Stage 5.<br />

As in previous years, the thesis projects were located in a variety of strategically selected urban or wilderness<br />

landscapes, in sites from Zanzibar to Whitley Bay to Orlando. They tackled issues from the master plan<br />

to the molecular scale and with temporal ambitions stretching into millennia. Students have built upon<br />

experience gained from previous years’ representational techniques and experimentation.<br />

This is the fifth year Newcastle has run a studio-based thesis model with cross-year/cross-studio interactions<br />

that keep students aware of the work undertaken by their peers in other parts of the school. This year, in<br />

addition to the Technical Review, Thinking-Through-Making Week and an expansion of the Academic<br />

Portfolio, we also inaugurated a vertical exhibition in the 6-7th week of the first semester, showcasing in a<br />

cascading manner the preliminary work of Stages 2-6.<br />

This has been a successful and stimulating year academically, and we would like to express our gratitude to<br />

all the various contributors throughout the year.<br />

Year Coordinators<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Project Leaders<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

James Craig<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Paul Ribgy<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Contributors<br />

Alistair Robinson<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Andrew Carr<br />

Andrew English<br />

Claire Harper<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

Emma Cheatle<br />

Gary Caldwell<br />

Howard Evans<br />

Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />

Katie Lloyd-Thomas<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Maurice Mitchell<br />

Mhairi McVicar<br />

Nat Chard<br />

Neil Armstrong<br />

Nick Heyward<br />

Patrick Devlin<br />

Pete Brittain<br />

Peter Hoare<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Philip Beesley<br />

Steve Parnell<br />

Students<br />

Alanah Marie Honey<br />

Alexander Glen Burnie<br />

Alyssia Katherine Booth<br />

Anna Elizabeth Cumberland<br />

Carrie Yee<br />

Christopher James Bulmer<br />

Corbin Wood<br />

Emily Daisy Page<br />

Emily-Jayne Harper<br />

Ewan George Thomson<br />

Gregory David Walton<br />

Greta Varpucianskyte<br />

Imogen Alexandra Holden<br />

Jack Roberto Scaffardi<br />

Joshua Long<br />

Katherine Grace Gomm<br />

Kevin Vong<br />

Lee Daniel Whitelock<br />

Matas Belevicius<br />

Matthew Joe Mouncey<br />

Matthew Clubbs Coldron<br />

Matthew Robert Jackson<br />

Megan Meleri Jones<br />

Mundumuko Sinvula<br />

Robert Philip Paton<br />

Roubini Hadjicosti<br />

Rumen Rumenov Dimov<br />

Ruth Eleanor Sidey<br />

Simon David Baker<br />

Thierry Guy Neu<br />

Thomas Henderson Schwartz<br />

Vlasios Sokos<br />

Vsevolod Karetnikov<br />

Wei Sheng Kwan<br />

116<br />

Opposite - Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney


Studio 1 – Border Territories<br />

Adam Sharr & Sam Austin<br />

This studio is about border conditions. Borders produce spatial conditions, from dividing walls (think of Berlin, Belfast or San Diego-Tijana) to lines<br />

which exist on a map but not on the ground; from enclaves of one jurisdiction within another (embassies, airports) to distinctive economic and political<br />

effects. Borders can be psychological and cultural as much as physical. Students have chosen their own border conditions to work with including: the<br />

green line of Nicosia, Cyprus; Campione d’Italia (an Italian exclave in Switzerland); Newcastle Airport; the ‘interzone’ of post-War Tangiers; the border<br />

transgressions of shortwave radio; and the psychological border between risk, fear and pleasure.<br />

118<br />

Jack Scaffardi Freeport Municipale


Rumen Dimov Lost in Transmission 119


120 Ewan Thomson The Airside City


Thierry Neu Unravelling Risk<br />

121


122 Megan Jones Literary Constructs of an Interzone


Roubini Hadjicosti Palimpsest of Memories<br />

123


Studio 2 – Experimental Architecture<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Experimental Architecture establishes an organic platform for thinking and practice through iterative experiments that engage directly with the natural<br />

realm. It seeks to explore the complexity of the natural world without reducing it into a series of soluble problems but also opens up the practice to poetic<br />

and artistic engagement. For example, experimental architecture asks: can we grow an artificial reef around the city of Venice to save it and connect<br />

human populations with the marine environment? Can we grow a new island for Venice using the pollutants in the lagoon (algae and plastics) and reinvest<br />

in future generations through the production of ‘functional’ earths, or can we design ‘super’ soils to support life on other planets and bring new<br />

kinds of flourishing to extreme environments?<br />

124<br />

Seva Karetnikov Please don’t tap on the glass


Imogen Holden The Opera of Shalott<br />

125


126 Matthew Mouncey Of Death and Decomposition


Kevin Vong Experimental Junk<br />

127


128 Corbin Wood The Delormer’s Creed


Carrie Yee Resurrecting Memories: Sustainable Crematory Landscape<br />

129


Studio 3 – Landscapes of Human Endeavour<br />

James Craig & Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

Human endeavour has long been associated with expansive and unknowable landscapes, from George Mallory’s first attempt to ‘conquer’ the summit of<br />

Mount Everest in 1924 through to Felix Baumgartner’s recent skydive from a helium balloon 24 miles above the Earth’s surface. These varied projects<br />

are concerned with representing architectures sited between the psyche of a chosen endeavour and the landscape (in the broadest sense of the word) that<br />

they are engaged with. They include an interpretation of Walt Disney’s delirious deathbed fantasy of E.P.C.O.T., a secular retreat based on C.S. Lewis’s<br />

notion of Epicurean Life, and a garden of mechanical computation derived from the life of Ada Lovelace.<br />

130<br />

Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney


Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney<br />

131


132 Alexander Burnie Z


Chris Bulmer Magical Realism<br />

133


134 Greta Varpucianskyte Scripted Spaces: Biographical Landscapes of Ada Lovelace


Robert Paton The Nuclear Family<br />

135


136 Lee Whitelock At Home with War


Emily Page The Archive of Destroyed Monuments<br />

137


138 Emily-Jayne Harper Between Subject and Object: Landscape Beyond Reach


Joshua Long Epicurean Life<br />

139


Studio 4 – Matter<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

The studio celebrates the ‘liveliness’ of matter and encourages design processes founded on a dialogic and emergent understanding of architectural<br />

materiality. In doing so the studio challenges any notion of buildings as static assemblies of inert or neutral products and instead seeks concrete material<br />

practices in which technology is always both performative and contextual. Students have selected their own matter to collaborate with and have explored<br />

new understandings of conventional construction materials like sand, brick and timber or experimented with new materialities. Themes of making,<br />

manufacture, entropy, sensuality, transformation and environmental renewal have all surfaced as key themes in the work of the studio.<br />

140<br />

Matas Belevicius St. Anthony’s Mycelium Works


Matas Belevicius St. Anthony’s Mycelium Works<br />

141


142 Mundu Sinvula Sensory Deprivation


Alyssia Booth Weather Architecture<br />

143


144 Matthew Jackson Modular Imagination


Vlasios Sokos Research Centre for the Development of Prototype Materials and Building Components<br />

145


146 Simon Baker Shifting Sands


Ruth Sidey Beauty in Precision?<br />

147


Studio 5 – Zanzibar<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Zanzibar has a romantic multi-cultural history; spices, gold, ivory and slaves have travelled between the East African Swahili Coast, the Arabian<br />

Peninsula and the Indian subcontinent for 20,000 years on dhow boats. Today, the archipelago’s population of 1.3 million is growing rapidly. This<br />

semi-autonomous archipelago off the coast of Tanzania urgently needs to address its future growth. Zanzibar’s challenges are a microcosm of the most<br />

critical global development issues. The studio is working with a new architecture and planning department in Zanzibar, who have ambitions to create the<br />

most sustainable island in East Africa, physically, socially, and environmentally. Scenario planning and mapping have formed a basis to understand the<br />

whole island scale, coupled with ethnographic field research, including interviewing local people and a small-scale building project with a local school.<br />

Linked Research students (Stage 5) have joined the team to develop a foundation for a major research project. The team has developed a critical position<br />

on the colonial past and the new development plans for the future of the island. Stage 6 thesis proposals form a ’chain’ across the buffer zone of the World<br />

Heritage Site capital of Zanzibar, Stone Town, and move out across the island. All projects support key development aims of the island; firstly to retain<br />

the historic core of a rapidly developing city as a place to live and work. Secondly, to develop successful, well connected neighbourhoods with innovative<br />

ideas for more ecological and mixed development. Lastly, to find sustainable ways of developing coastal villages and island agriculture.<br />

148<br />

Matt Clubbs Caldron Zanzibar Central Bus Terminal and Urban Forum


Alanah Honey Zanzibar Institute for <strong>Design</strong><br />

149


150 Anna Cumberland From the Ground Up: An Agricultural Future for Chwaka


Thomas Henderson Schwartz Catching the Winds of Trade<br />

151


152 Wei Kwan Guerrilla Aqueduct


Katherine Gomm Mnazi Tatu (Three Coconuts) Maternity Hospital and Women’s Health Centre<br />

153


Highlighted Project – Freeport Municipale<br />

Jack Scaffardi<br />

This project is set in the Italian exclave of Campione d’Italia – a tax haven with a rich artistic history and home to Europe’s largest casino. This thesis aims to serve as a critique of art<br />

as a commodity, taking the form of a cemetery of objects.<br />

154<br />

Jack Scaffardi Freeport Municipale


Highlighted Project – After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney<br />

Greg Walton<br />

This story tells of an old man so devoted to the idea of creating and preserving a legacy that he dedicated his entire life to it. For four decades the man had gone from success to<br />

success, infecting modern culture in a way no one else ever had, with barely anything eluding him. The man had two sides; the public benevolent figure that the world adored, the<br />

other is what he thought of himself, his psyche tormented. Rather curiously, he was inherently unknowable. He was a myth, an invention, a character in a storybook, meticulously<br />

designed by the master storyteller himself. This story begins at the end, as the man finally comes face to face with his own mortality; in a hospital bed awake, motionless and staring<br />

at the ceiling.<br />

Greg Walton After Happily Ever After: An Architectural Fairy Tale of Walt Disney<br />

155


MArch Dissertations<br />

The 10,000 word MArch dissertation offers students the opportunity to undertake a sustained enquiry into a topic of particular interest to them and to<br />

develop their own modes of writing and presentation. Where appropriate the timing of the dissertation allows for topics explored to inform their final<br />

thesis design project. The research has a growing profile in the School, with two public presentations taking place in October and February, and the<br />

dissertation is now a feature of the Degree Shows in Newcastle and London.<br />

Lost in the Wild:<br />

An Exploration into Spatial Dislocation within Survivalist Landscapes<br />

Matthew Mouncey<br />

McCandless’s Alaskan Odyssey struck a chord with a large portion of society when it was first covered<br />

by the media; his tragic tale gained notoriety for the social angst it accentuated within people in the<br />

Western World. But more so than that, it highlighted glaring shortcomings in civilization as we<br />

understand it. Within this dissertation I unpack the story of McCandless, such that it highlights the<br />

driving factors behind spatial dislocation within survivalist landscapes.<br />

These notions of longing for the unknown set the context for a deep-seated social angst that comes<br />

to explain why characters like McCandless flee. Their actions are reactionary to their perceived<br />

view of civilization, which I unpack throughout the course of the text. Both the spatial necessaries<br />

and implications of their actions are explored such that they pinpoint and question the core issues<br />

associated with spatial dislocation. The description of architecture as a metaphor for the power and<br />

authority that orchestrates this social neurosis calls into sharp relief the power and influence of the<br />

built environment around us. The removal of the body into heterotopic survivalist landscapes implies<br />

the basic re-ignition of fundamental human mechanisms that have been repressed. The architectural<br />

condition we’re facing is one of power and authority; by exploring subversive courses of action it may<br />

be possible to reconcile the problematic areas of civilization through a discussion with survivalist<br />

landscapes.<br />

The System of Houses<br />

Jack Scaffardi<br />

This piece is an investigation into how housing operates as commodity within capitalist society,<br />

one that is designed to maximise what Karl Marx termed exchange-value at the expense of its usevalue<br />

– use-value being the usefulness of a thing and exchange value being its monetary relation.<br />

Neil Brenner states: ‘the commodification of housing is the handling of housing not as one of<br />

life’s necessities, something that provides shelter, protection, privacy, space for personal and family<br />

activities, but rather as something that is bought and sold and used to make money’. This study<br />

investigates how housing’s operation as a consumer good manifests in the domestic environment.<br />

What Does the Commission of the CCTV Headquarters, and Rem Koolhaas’ Winning <strong>Design</strong>,<br />

Say about the Current Political, Economic and Architectural Climate of Beijing and China?<br />

Emily Page<br />

Commissioned in 2002 by the People’s Republic of China, the CCTV Headquarters is widely<br />

regarded as political propaganda and an ‘institute of censorship’, intended to project China onto the<br />

world stage and showcase its ascendency. The focus for my MArch dissertation was to understand<br />

the interrelationships between the building and China’s economic growth, branding strategies and<br />

soft power initiatives.<br />

The dissertation discusses China’s use of starchitect Koolhaas and the use of a highly recognisable<br />

logo form as a branding tool for both building and country. China is pursuing a strategy of greater<br />

international engagement to increase its influence on the world stage. The thesis examines China’s<br />

attempts to improve its worldwide branding and perception, considering strategies such as the 2006<br />

‘Ten Mile Brand Strategy’ that attempted to establish brand promotional systems. It also studies the<br />

impact the CCTV building has on China’s soft power initiatives, both in aiding and abetting soft<br />

power strategies.<br />

156


Rebuilding to Remember: How the ruins of war have been used in urban reconstruction<br />

Alyssia K. Booth<br />

‘To be sure a cityscape is not made of flesh. Still, sheared-off buildings are almost as eloquent as body<br />

parts… Look, the photographs say, this is what it’s like. This is what war does. War tears, war rends,<br />

war rips open, eviscerates. War scorches. War dismembers. War ruins.’ – (Virginia Woolfe)<br />

Architectural heritage is often attacked in times of conflict, and post-war reconstruction presents a<br />

number of potential challenges: limited economic funding; the necessity to rebuild; the difficulties of<br />

clearing huge areas of rubble. However, over the past few decades, advances in modern architecture<br />

have allowed many ruins of war to be rebuilt in some capacity, owing to recognition of their<br />

associations with collective memory, the identity and history of places, and of the educational<br />

importance of commemorating the darker periods of human history as well as successes. Although<br />

undeniably a time of great trauma, the aftermath of war can also be seen as a political opportunity<br />

for rebuilding, creating potential for ‘radical’ architectural speculations within the reconstruction.<br />

This paper is a study of the ways in which people engaged with the destroyed architecture of<br />

WWII, the choices of different methods of rebuilding with the ruins; replica, retention, integration,<br />

(including the impacts of these choices) and how integrating ruins alongside modern architecture can<br />

help restore the collective memory, identity or culture of a war-torn city, playing an important role<br />

in the future of post-war reconstruction. The study aims to reveal that the post-war reconstruction of<br />

cultural heritage is not only important to the successful moving on of societies, but also a significant<br />

political tool to manipulate communities and the remembrance of history in a post-war environment,<br />

giving cause to question the current lack of architects involvement in the reconstruction of war ruins.<br />

Prefabricated Masonry and its Place within the UK House Building Industry:<br />

Can we normalise prefabrication and make it desirable through the use of brick; whilst<br />

increasing the efficiency and sustainability of new homes?<br />

Katherine Gomm<br />

Brick has long been a staple component of British architecture, used for palaces, factories and<br />

homes and our preference for the material is still strong. However, with growing pressures on the<br />

government to increase the number of houses built, can we adapt the use of the humble brick to<br />

increase the efficiency and sustainability of new homes in the UK? Prefabricated brick cavity wall<br />

panels have the ability to meet these demands, but is it possible to remove the stigmatism associated<br />

with prefabrication and embrace this new technology? Can we normalise the notion of prefabrication<br />

and increase its desirability through the reinvention of the familiar brick in order to build better<br />

homes for the future?<br />

The results of my survey of the British public conducted to understand their needs and desires show<br />

that in general people do not want a prefabricated house. However, in studying the UK’s first and<br />

only private dwelling built using prefabricated brick cavity walls, it is clear that this new system has<br />

favourable benefits when compared to traditional construction methods. It merits further research,<br />

development and consideration as a valid new building technology.<br />

Mankind’s Box<br />

Christopher James Bulmer<br />

Rabbits have hutches, hamsters have cages and mankind has an architecture of Manspace. Manspace<br />

began with the agricultural revolution, it is the turning point in which mankind departed from its<br />

intimate symbiosis with nature, and began laboriously carving out an artificial human island out of<br />

the surrounding wilds. Manspace was born, and at the centre of this island of Manspace peasants<br />

lived their lives in a wood, stone, brick or mud structure consisting of foundations, walls and roof–<br />

the house. The house remains the centre of this Manspace, and like flowers being fed in a glass<br />

vase mankind desperately tries to supplement his own needs within his own enclosure. Continually<br />

seeking to instil the idea that the house is in fact full of life rather than void of it. This lack of life is<br />

all around the house, in the fresh cut flowers with their promise to die, in the pests which mankind<br />

exterminates, in the stuffed animals real or otherwise and in the images of landscapes on multiple<br />

forms of media. Through all these elements mankind attempts to fulfil his biophilic needs and repress<br />

his ecological boredom; he tries to feel alive. However these efforts are in vain for mankind is not<br />

truly alive in the house, yet nor is he dead; mankind is merely existing within his box.<br />

157


Is Essex the Only Way?<br />

Tracing echoes of Essex in regional housing development<br />

Imogen A E Holden<br />

This dissertation seeks to untangle the suggestive frameworks put forward by the inaugural Essex<br />

<strong>Design</strong> Guide. In exploring its shaping of new housing developments and identifying moments of<br />

Essex-ness, this research aims to prove that the Guide is a document of distinction and worthy of<br />

research in its own right. Whilst on the surface the Guide reflects the standardised planning policy<br />

document, in exploring the richness of the document’s cultural, historical and theoretical contexts,<br />

it becomes increasingly difficult to categorise. An eclectic combination of social commentary, policy<br />

checklist, design sketchbook and materiality mood-board, the Guide slides across category boundaries<br />

raising broader questions relating to assumed knowledge, sense of place and the Local. In exploring<br />

moments of inner logic and assumed understanding, occurring both within the Guide and in its<br />

connections to external factors, the relationship between the Local and locality will be challenged in<br />

reference to the Essex-ification of new UK development.<br />

Building Normalities<br />

Ewan Thomson<br />

One in four people in the UK will experience a mental illness in any given year. However, public<br />

perceptions of mental illness do not reflect this, with stigma still rife. Stigmatisation of the mentally ill<br />

is an issue architecture cannot shy away from, as it’s already played a major part in it. Take Oakwood<br />

hospital, Barming Heath. A former Victorian mental hospital, it has since been turned into flats. The<br />

slogan they used to sell them was ‘with prices like these, you’d be barmy not to buy!’<br />

The inpatient facility is a specialised building typology with important architectural ordering, and<br />

a complex set of power relationships. This study seeks to understand if and how architecture can<br />

help normalise spaces of mental illness, both in the public eye and for people using mental health<br />

buildings.<br />

Don’t Just Hope for a Better Life. Buy Into One.<br />

Ruth Sidey<br />

This dissertation, through an analysis of Nigella Lawson’s latest kitchen, highlights the conflicts that<br />

arise between the ‘ideal’ and the ‘real’ in the domestic sphere. Idealised constructions of the domestic<br />

have been utilised since the dichotomy between the home and the place of work was established.<br />

These curated environments have been used variously to promote consumption, national identity<br />

and most recently to provide an aspirational ‘lifestyle’ model. Nigella’s performance of a ‘perfect’<br />

lifestyle, in the wake of her widely publicised divorce, is dissected and placed in historical, social<br />

and political contexts. The author concludes that Nigella willingly places herself within traditional<br />

domestic ideals and stereotypical gender roles, presenting an ultimately pleasing femininity. Her<br />

image, through a form of retrospective imagining, conjures up images of an era that promised a<br />

‘better life’ through social mobility. In the neoliberal context of today, however, this nostalgic image<br />

serves to mask an uncomfortable truth; that achieving our aspirations is now, in many ways, blocked.<br />

The gap between the ‘ideal’ and the ‘real’ is in fact a glass wall which can never be penetrated, and the<br />

‘perfect’ remains in the idealised, unachievable realm.<br />

<strong>Design</strong>ing and Building With / For / Around / About a Community?<br />

Reflections from a Live Project in Borneo<br />

Thomas Henderson Schwartz<br />

The dissertation examines the role of western architects, designers and students working in developing<br />

countries through the lens of a personal experience of the design and build of a community centre in<br />

Kampung Buayan, Sabah, Borneo, 2013-14. It is structured as a semi-chronological theorised diary,<br />

borrowing ideas from post-colonial theory, sociology and contemporary understandings of space.<br />

The opening of the dissertation situates the stakeholders of the project and explains how each came<br />

to be involved. The second part deconstructs motivations and responsibilities of the stakeholders<br />

and critiques the idea that ‘local is good’. The third part analyses the design process within the<br />

framework of Bhabha’s understanding of post-colonial translation and hybridity. Next, the fourth<br />

part investigates to what extent one can integrate into a community and the cultural and ethical<br />

considerations of such an integration. The fifth part examines the role of authorship and ownership<br />

of a piece of architecture. Here the motivations of the architect are re-examined and the success and<br />

failures of the project are elaborated. The final part examines the role of recognising the naivety and<br />

ambivalence of an architect working in a similar context and how that recognition is productive.<br />

158


Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

BUILDING<br />

MODERN TURKEY<br />

STATE, SPACE,<br />

AND IDEOLOGY IN<br />

THE EARLY REPUBLIC<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Zeynep Kezer’s book, Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology was published in<br />

December 2015 by the University of Pittsburgh Press as part of its Politics, Culture and<br />

the Built Environment Series. The book provides a critical account of how space and spatial<br />

practices mediated Turkey’s transition from an empire into a modern nation-state. Kezer<br />

deliberately juxtaposes the making of new types of spaces to accommodate the demands of<br />

this new politico-cultural formation with the dismantling of ethnic and religious enclaves and<br />

the practices they engendered, exposing the inextricable relationship between the creative and<br />

destructive forces deployed in the nation-state building process. Building Modern Turkey surveys<br />

a broad terrain of state activities – from achieving internal pacification to gaining international<br />

recognition – and how these played out in sites prominent, ordinary, and marginal. In so<br />

doing, she demonstrates how, as an indisputably spatial process, state formation necessarily<br />

operates at multiple and interdependent scales from that of the individual body to that of<br />

regional geopolitics.<br />

The nationalists’ bid to reinvent Turkey as a modern nation-state following the Ottoman<br />

Empire’s collapse at the end of WWI was a formidable challenge. On the home front, the<br />

move meant not only importing wholesale an alien form of government with its laws and<br />

institutions, but repudiating an indigenous legacy that had shaped this land and its people for<br />

over six centuries. This entailed tearing down communitarian structures that had historically<br />

constituted the social fabric of the empire and instituting a centralized legal and institutional<br />

network enabling state penetration into ever-expanding areas of people’s everyday lives. On<br />

the international front, Turkey’s nation-statehood depended on gaining recognition as a peer<br />

within the Westphalian system of states.<br />

Nowhere were these tensions played out more dramatically than in the built environment<br />

where a feverish drive to create the spaces (governmental and institutional buildings,<br />

monuments, public works, etc) to accommodate this new order was coupled with an equally<br />

intense determination to obliterate Turkey’s ethnic and religious landscapes, the persistence<br />

of which – claimed the nationalists – obstructed national unification and secularization.<br />

Meanwhile, the construction of embassies in the new capital Ankara, and, by implication,<br />

Turkey’s international recognition as a peer state, hinged on regional geopolitical rivalries and<br />

unsettled scores from WWI. So did the question of which foreign experts and whose credit<br />

would shape Turkish modernization.<br />

The first book to provide a spatial account of the making of the modern Turkish state, this<br />

volume addresses important omissions in architectural history and, more generally in Turkish<br />

historiography, regarding the costs and consequences of imposing an imported concept<br />

of ‘the modern’ on a multicultural, complex indigenous society and destroying the built<br />

environment which underpinned it. The broad range of spatial scales considered in this study<br />

exposes previously overlooked interrelations and tensions between local, national and regional<br />

productions of space. Interdisciplinary in approach, this book seeks to explain the complex<br />

factors that inform the physical and ideological shaping of the modern world of the unified<br />

nation state.<br />

159


Linked Research<br />

The 40 credit Linked Research module is unique to the Newcastle curriculum and it spans the two years of<br />

the MArch enabling year-long collaborative research projects between staf and students. Linked Research<br />

encourages approaches that extend beyond the conventional studio design project or ‘lone researcher’<br />

dissertation model allowing space for multiple and speculative forms of research. Projects are often openended<br />

and collaborative and, because they are long term and involve groups working together, they can<br />

enable participatory projects and large-scale production with a wide range or partners inside and outside<br />

the university.<br />

Coordinator<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

2015-16 Projects<br />

Testing Ground<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

<strong>2016</strong>-17 Projects<br />

Architecture Default<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Testing Ground<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Alexander Burnie<br />

Rumen Dimov<br />

Megan Jones<br />

Joshua Long<br />

Mundu Sinvula<br />

Corbin Wood<br />

Simon Baker<br />

Atlas of Artificial<br />

Mountains<br />

Josep-Maria García-Fuentes<br />

Matas Belevicius<br />

Seva Karetnikov<br />

Noor Jan-Mohamed<br />

James Street<br />

Brutalism<br />

Steve Parnell<br />

Raphael Selby<br />

Insa Thiel<br />

Joe Wilson<br />

Building Adaptability<br />

John Kamara<br />

Gustav Lundstrom<br />

Empty Pool<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Rona Lee<br />

Theodora Kyrtata<br />

Stavri Rousonidou<br />

Martin Parsons<br />

Laurence Ashley<br />

Alex Baldwin-Cole<br />

Ulwin Beetham<br />

Sophie Cobley<br />

Robert Evans<br />

Katie Fisher<br />

Sam Halliday<br />

Kathleen Jenkins<br />

Matthew Westgate<br />

Newcastle After Dark<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Delia Heitmann<br />

Tom Saxton<br />

Matt Sharman Hayles<br />

Rosie O’Halloran<br />

Zanzibar<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Nicola Blincow<br />

Malcolm Pritchard<br />

Alexandra Carausu<br />

Matt Wilcox<br />

Beyond Representation<br />

James Craig<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />

David Boyd<br />

Joseph Dent<br />

Nick Ward<br />

Ruochen Zhang<br />

Learning Spaces<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Tom Cowman<br />

Kayleigh Creighton<br />

Carl Reid<br />

Jessica Wilkie<br />

Gavin Wu<br />

160 Opposite - Testing Ground 2015-16 The Rochester Roundhouse


Testing Ground<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

The Testing Ground Project is now in its third year and it provides the opportunity for students to collaborate with other disciplines in a wide range of<br />

‘live’ situations with the aim of creating public facing architecture and related activities. The main project this year has been the design and construction<br />

of The Rochester Roundhouse, Northumberland. The project included extensive community consultation and has responded to residents’ wishes to<br />

reuse the dilapidated Brigantium roundhouse to create a community resource. The students involved have had to design and construct the project as<br />

well as navigating complex statutory processes and managing time and cost. The regenerated site provides an open air amphitheatre and contemporary<br />

timber pavilion which will be used for stargazing, musical performances and a range of community workshops. The roof of the existing stone circle<br />

has been removed to turn it into an open-air space and local craftsmen have worked with students to carry out repairs to the dry stone wall, before the<br />

addition of new seating and flooring. The larch-clad timber pavilion is located next to the stone circle and includes a sedum green roof. The pavilion<br />

and associated landscaped outdoor spaces will provide a multifunctional, bookable facility that will be managed by the community. It will also become<br />

a key performance venue for the annual Redefest folk music festival.<br />

162


163


Research in Architecture<br />

Research in the School is flourishing and we’ve seen some very exciting developments this year. These<br />

include new collaborative projects, internal and external recognition of our work and significant funding<br />

success, all of which are enabling growth in the numbers of PhD and post-doctoral researchers in<br />

architecture, and the development of research-led teaching at all levels of the degrees we offer.<br />

Colleagues have had considerable success winning grants this year that firmly establish us as a leading centre<br />

for interdisciplinary architectural research in the UK and will bring early career researchers to the School.<br />

External high profile grants include Computational Colloids (EPSRC, Dr Martyn Dade-Robertson –<br />

£158k), LIAR – Living Architecture – (EC, Professor Rachel Armstrong – £175k), Imaginaries of the<br />

Future (Leverhulme International Research Network, Dr Nathaniel Coleman – £109k) and eVis (EPSRC,<br />

Dr Neveen Hamza – £128k). Martyn Dade-Robertson and Rachel Armstrong have also been awarded<br />

a share of a substantial University internal Research Investment Fund (RIF) grant for their joint APL<br />

research project ‘Ageing City’.<br />

In terms of growth as a research centre, Dr Emma Cheatle joined us at the start of the year, having<br />

won the highly competitive Newcastle University Humanities Research Institute three year postdoctoral<br />

fellowship, to pursue her project ‘Tales of Confinement’, an investigation into the role of architectural<br />

spaces and buildings in the history of maternity, and Dr Tom Brigden has just embarked on his three<br />

year Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship. We are currently recruiting a third post-doctoral researcher in<br />

<strong>Design</strong>-led Architectural Research to start in September <strong>2016</strong> and will be advertising a fourth post for<br />

2017. At the same time as becoming the home, to our knowledge, of the largest body of post-doctoral<br />

researchers in a UK architectural school, we are also seeing our research strengths informing teaching at<br />

all levels. Curriculum changes in the BA are enabling research-led teaching in history and theory, and<br />

in design, and our unique ‘Linked Research’ offering in the MArch which involves students working<br />

together with colleagues’ own projects has expanded, including projects as different as lab-based research<br />

and building for communities. Some of this work was presented at the Association of Architectural<br />

Educators annual conference at UCL in April, and linked research students joined colleagues and visiting<br />

speakers to present their own projects at our very successful Mountains and Megastructures symposium<br />

and exhibition in March.<br />

We continue to provide PhD studentships with Aldric Rodriguez Iborra taking up the <strong>Design</strong> Office<br />

position, and we had PhD completions from Abdelatif El-Allous, Mohamed Elnabawy Mahgoub,<br />

Mabrouk Alsheliby, Yohannes Firzal, Amira Hasanein, Antonius Karel Muktiwibowo, Tugce Sanli and<br />

Deva Swasto. Notable achievements from our PhD cohort include the award to Catalina Mejia Moreno<br />

of an Andrew W. Mellon Fellowship in ‘Architecture and/for Photography’ at the Canadian Centre for<br />

Architecture and Sana Al-Naimi’s participation in the Vice Chancellor’s ‘Celebrating Success in the<br />

University’ for her contribution to the ‘Extraordinary Gertrude Bell Exhibition’ at the Great North<br />

Museum. Congratulations to all!<br />

Cultures and Transition<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Ian Thompson<br />

Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Zeynep Keyzer<br />

Futures, Values and<br />

Imaginaries<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Ian Thompson<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

Steven Dudek<br />

Mediated Environments<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

John Kamara<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Steven Dudek<br />

Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Rachel Armstrong<br />

Social Justice,<br />

Well-being and Renewal<br />

Armelle Tardiveau<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

Daniel Mallo<br />

Kati Blom<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Peter Kellett<br />

Prue Chiles<br />

Specifications,<br />

Prescriptions and<br />

Translations<br />

John Kamara<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas<br />

Matthew Margetts<br />

Simon Hacker<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Visiting Professors,<br />

PhD examiners and<br />

contributors:<br />

Professor Dana Arnold<br />

Sebastian Aedo Jury<br />

Sophia Banou<br />

Dr Camillo Boano<br />

James Craig<br />

Professor Mark Dorrian<br />

Professor Paul Emmons<br />

Professor Katja Grillner<br />

Professor Katherine Gough<br />

Dr Amin Kamete<br />

Thomas Kern<br />

Astrid Lund<br />

Professor Julia Morgan<br />

Professor Dejan Mumovic<br />

Charlie Sutherland<br />

Professor Robert Tavernor<br />

Ed Wainwright<br />

Tony Watson<br />

PhD students<br />

Abdelatif El-Allous<br />

Antonius Muktiwibowo<br />

Artem Holstov<br />

Ashley Mason<br />

Catalina Moreno<br />

Charles Makun<br />

Chen-Yu Hung<br />

Deva Swasto<br />

Dhruv Sookhoo<br />

James Longfield<br />

Javier Urquizo<br />

Jose Hernandez<br />

Katriina Blom<br />

Khalid Setaih<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

Mabrouk Alsheliby<br />

Macarena Rodriguez<br />

Maimuna Saleh-Bala<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />

Mohamed Elnabawi<br />

Mohammed Mohammed<br />

Najla Mansour<br />

Ni Ketut Agusintadewi<br />

Oluwafemi Olajide<br />

Oluwatoyin Akin<br />

Paola Figueroa<br />

Pattamon Selanon<br />

Rand Agha<br />

Sam Clark<br />

Sana Salman Dawood<br />

Al-Naimi<br />

Sarah Cahyadini<br />

Stephen Grinsell<br />

Thomas Kern<br />

Tijana Stevanovic<br />

Tugce Sanli<br />

Ulviye Kalli<br />

Usue Arana<br />

Wido Tyas<br />

Xi (Frances) Ye<br />

Xi Chen<br />

Yasser Megahed<br />

Yohannes Firzal<br />

Yun Dai<br />

164 Opposite - STASUS Everest Death Zone: Mallory


Mountains and Megastructures<br />

The Mountains & Megastructures symposium took place on the 16th and 17th of March in the Architecture Building. The symposium was organised<br />

by ARC (Architecture Research Collaborative) at Newcastle University, and is intended as the first in a series of events addressing particular themes<br />

emerging through our collective research. We were joined by two keynote speakers, Stéphane Degoutin, an artist and writer whose paper ‘Fake Mountain<br />

Metaphysics’ demonstrated the range of ways artificial mountains can be imagined and realised, and Jonathan Hill, Professor of Architecture and Visual<br />

Theory at the Bartlett, whose talk ‘A Landscape of Architecture, History and Fiction’ discussed the ‘shock of the old’ as alternative to the ‘shock of the<br />

new’. Speakers from the School included Professors Rachel Armstrong, Andrew Ballantyne, Graham Farmer, Stephen Graham, Prue Chiles and Adam<br />

Sharr among many others, including Linked Research students Seva Karetnikov and Matas Belevicius.<br />

The talks and discussion were accompanied by an exhibition of work on the joint theme, including projects from STASUS (James A. Craig & Matt<br />

Ozga-Lawn), Amy Butt, Ray Verrall and Christos Kakalis. Images of the event are opposite, and following is Andrew Ballantyne’s paper from the event.<br />

166


Mountains and Megastructures Symposium<br />

167


A Mountain Near Thebes<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

It was Deleuze and Guattari who said we should make deserts of ourselves. We can make<br />

ourselves receptive to being settled by nomadic ideas that live in us for a while and then<br />

move on. ‘The desert, experimentation on oneself, is our only identity, our single chance<br />

for all the combinations which inhabit us’. The concepts that inhabit us shape who we are<br />

and how we interact, so they are part of us even if they move on from us, and they have<br />

a political dimension to them. Deleuze and Guattari make this image of thought seem<br />

like a personal discipline, something we can encourage in ourselves and in our attitudes<br />

to dealing with the world. As an image it seems benign and welcoming, and it has much<br />

in common with Foucault’s sense of the self and the ideas that operate through it; but<br />

where Deleuze and Guattari’s desert is a temporary home for ideas that seem more-or-less<br />

welcome, Foucault’s is rather different. It is a place where the tribes of ideas might set up<br />

camp rather forcibly. Their presence might not be welcome and they might not move on.<br />

With Deleuze and Guattari the sense of the self is fluid and constantly engaged with the<br />

surrounding milieu, and Foucault shares that sense of engagement but with him the self<br />

often seems not so much fluid as malleable. It adapts and can be reshaped in any number<br />

of ways, but it is hammered into shape. Nietzsche’s thought lies behind all of them as a<br />

formative influence, and Deleuze remade Nietzsche in his own way, but Foucault carries<br />

more-evident traces of philosophising with a hammer. He wrote about the prison, the<br />

psychiatric hospital and the school: institutions in which people are remade for the sake<br />

of society. These institutions take in people who have a will of their own that may be<br />

as-yet unformed, or be actively antisocial, and they are knocked into shape, learning and<br />

internalising attitudes and patterns of behaviour that allow them to lead productive wellregulated<br />

lives in the social world.<br />

Foucault coined the term ‘heterotopia’ for such spaces that are apart from the<br />

commonplace world where a society’s dominant values freely operate. In a heterotopia<br />

they are suspended to a degree and maybe one is held in it until one can show a suitable<br />

degree of conformity to the norms. The conditions may be coercive and brutalising, or<br />

might offer greater-than-usual freedoms for transgression, but they are set apart from the<br />

places where normal polite behaviour is in play, and where routine transactions are made.<br />

There are some identifiable places where such conditions apply, but the heterotopia is<br />

a heterotopia not because it is a particular spot, but because the range of concepts and<br />

power-relations there are outside the societal norm. It can be institutionalised, as in a<br />

prison, a school, or a honeymoon hotel, but equally it can be more personal than that – a<br />

interior space withdrawn from social conformity – such as a room of one’s own, or the<br />

desert.<br />

Saint Anthony lived in Egypt in the third century AD – one of the church’s ‘desert<br />

fathers’. Foucault wrote a commentary not on Anthony himself, but on La tentation<br />

de Saint Antoine, a novel by Gustave Flaubert (1821-80) which takes the persona of the<br />

saint as a vehicle to explore a range of ideas. The place in which the action unfolds – if<br />

it can be called ‘action’ – is heterotopic. The place is specified by Flaubert as the summit<br />

of a mountain near Thebes in Upper Egypt. There is some historical reason for this, as<br />

early monasteries, including some associated with Anthony, were in deliberately remote<br />

places, and mountains were seen as deserted, set apart from society. It is this remoteness<br />

that makes the place heterotopic and appropriate as a place of retreat when there is a<br />

need to distance oneself from society’s established normative thought. In cities the forms<br />

of behaviour are required by convention and it is one’s mastery of the convention that<br />

demonstrates effective participation in society, whether that be as a productive machinelike<br />

worker, or as a participant in a Proustian salon. Anthony’s isolation is in many ways<br />

like that of a prisoner, except that he has chosen to be shut away with his thoughts: it is<br />

the place’s remoteness that is its crucial characteristic. The external world does not figure<br />

at all. The subject-matter is internal to Anthony – his states of mind, his reading of the<br />

Bible, his hallucinations – made apparent in the text on the page.<br />

Flaubert re-visited and re-wrote The Temptation of Saint Anthony over many years,<br />

eventually publishing it in 1874. It is less like a novel than a screenplay. It uses the format<br />

of a work for the theatre, but the ‘stage directions’ include elaborate special effects that<br />

cry out for computer-generated images: apparitions of literary characters, fabulous beasts,<br />

deadly sins and heresiarchs. It opens with Saint Anthony involved with his reading of the<br />

Bible and the visitations – apparitions or hallucinations – prompted by it. The desert is a<br />

168<br />

Martin Schongauer - The Torment of Saint Anthony


heterotopia, and in it the saint remakes himself. The process of transformation is effected<br />

by meeting and disputing with the apparitions, building up to an ecstatic culmination<br />

with a vision of the face of Christ in the disc of the sun at dawn, as Anthony deliriously<br />

declaims.<br />

O joy! O bliss! I have beheld the birth of life. I have seen the beginning of motion! My<br />

pulses throb even to the point of bursting. I long to fly, to swim, to bark, to bellow, to<br />

howl. Would that I had wings, a carapace, a shell, – that I could breathe out smoke,<br />

weird a trunk, – make my body writhe, – divide myself everywhere, – be in everything,<br />

– emanate with all the odours, – develop myself like the plants, – flow like water,<br />

– vibrate like sounds, – shine like light, – assume all forms – penetrate each atom –<br />

descend to the very bottom of matter, – be matter itself!<br />

Anthony is shedding his human conceptions and becoming part of nature – in Biblical<br />

terms, recapturing the state of affairs before the fall of Adam and Eve and their expulsion<br />

from the Garden of Eden. He is becoming instinctual and matter-like, responding to<br />

stimuli without the mediation of intellectual processes. Foucault articulates this as the<br />

‘relationship between sainthood and stupidity’. Saint Anthony, he says, ‘wished to be a<br />

saint through a total deadening of his senses, intelligence, and emotions’.<br />

If Saint Anthony is becoming matter, the matter is not inert but formative – vibrant and<br />

pulsating. We are moving away from a position where ‘man’ gives form to matter that is<br />

seen as characterless substance, to one where the matter has an innate form-generating<br />

role, but the matter’s idea of form might be very different from man’s. This brings us into<br />

the realm of the posthuman, which developed after Foucault’s death but in his wake. It<br />

is a world in which matter and things have a role, and (all things being equal) sometimes<br />

have a say. This was taken up by Jane Bennett in her discussion of ‘thing-power’. Her<br />

‘vibrant matter’ is clearly recognisable as a relative of Anthony’s.<br />

There is liveliness in matter before there is organic life, such as the interactions in chemical<br />

processes that are in effect highly localised decisions that bring about results that are<br />

statistically predictable but at the level of individual molecules they are events that<br />

can resolve one way or another, depending on the proximity of another molecule, the<br />

pressure, the temperature and so on. The sedimentations and turbulences of geological<br />

formation leave traces in the strata of a bed of limestone, or the whorls in a slab of marble.<br />

The characteristic shapes of mountain ranges or drifts of sand dunes are determined not<br />

by a designer working out the form from outside, but by the materials deciding the form<br />

from within, interacting with the circumstances. The hylomorphic model of design – a<br />

term taken up from Gilbert Simondon by Deleuze and Guattari – resolves form from<br />

outside, and has ways of measuring and determining the form that involve delineation of<br />

geometric shapes. There has been significant development of thinking about this issue in<br />

recent years, and the idea of form being generated from within – or seeing the human<br />

agents as part of a material formation – takes forward the thinking that Foucault set in<br />

play.<br />

Anthony’s mountain is a heterotopia not of social coercion – like the prisons, madhouses<br />

and schools – but a heterotopia of liberation, where the self can open up to experiment,<br />

rewilded, inhabited by the rocks and wind, miraculated by sunbeams. On such a plateau<br />

of immanence the self can lose its outline and be washed away by lapping waves, or<br />

dispersed like the morning vapours as the sun rises and shines on Saint Anthony.<br />

Master of the Osservanza - The Meeting of Saint Anthony and Saint Paul<br />

169


MA in Urban <strong>Design</strong> (MA_UD)<br />

Daniel Mallo, Georgia Giannopoulou, Tim Townshend<br />

Contributors: Ali Madanipour, Tim Townshend, Colin Haylock, Suzanne Speak, Prue Chiles, Jules Brown, Michael Crilly, Daniel Mallo, Richard Smith,<br />

Aidan Oswell, Montse Ferres, Martin Bonner, Armelle Tardiveau, Dhruv Sookhoo, Georgia Giannopoulou, Roger Meier, Roger Higgins, Victoria Keen<br />

The MA in Urban <strong>Design</strong> is a well-established interdisciplinary programme at Newcastle University that draws on expertise from the disciplines<br />

represented in the School, namely Architecture, Planning and Landscape. The programme brings to the foreground a strong agenda of social and<br />

ecological engagement together with a relational approach to the built environment and public life. Three distinct design projects punctuate the year<br />

and are supported by theory courses and critical debate around the practice of Urban <strong>Design</strong>. The projects introduce students to contemporary and<br />

topical themes including Urban Agriculture which allows us to rethink urban regeneration through the lenses of grass-roots processes whilst engaging<br />

with the strategic thinking of a large territory. The European field trip to Nantes (France) aims to introduce alternative approaches to Urban <strong>Design</strong><br />

including landscape and tactical urbanism. The project is sited in an abandoned quarry at the heart of the city and provides the opportunity to rethink<br />

design as a process over time. Finally, Housing Alternatives examines new models of neighbourhood design in the context of the housing crisis and<br />

housing needs; the project explores concepts of affordability, sustainable living and community led-models, centred around the increasingly popular in<br />

the UK cohousing model. The year concludes with the Urban <strong>Design</strong> Thesis, a major research-led design project. The course offers many opportunities<br />

for visiting places within the UK and in Europe in the context of the projects.<br />

B<br />

A<br />

Platform<br />

B<br />

A<br />

Lunar<br />

Tree<br />

Green<br />

Roof<br />

PPER PARK<br />

QUARRY CLIFF<br />

CREATIVE AREA<br />

CENTRAL AREA<br />

AND LEISURE AREA<br />

PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES<br />

(repurposing of abandoned<br />

buildings on site)<br />

cycle path<br />

main road<br />

divider + planters<br />

main road<br />

cycle path<br />

REGENERATION OF CAP44<br />

(maintaining the primary structure as<br />

framework for future intervention)<br />

NEW MARKET<br />

PIER<br />

SECTION A-A’<br />

Ramp<br />

170<br />

Group - Cities and Cultures - Su Ann Lim, Guan Wang, Bo Li


Laurence Farshid Bonner, Guan Wang, Bo Li, Yixi Lu, Qingyi Du, Daniel Viana Santos<br />

171


MA in Architecture, Planning and Landscape – <strong>Design</strong><br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Contributors: Nathaniel Coleman, Astrid Lund, Tony Watson<br />

The Master of Architecture, Planning and Landscape-<strong>Design</strong> (MAAPL-D) course encourages students to develop a deeper understanding of varieties<br />

of identity in cities. Students conduct detailed studies of particular urban communities, concentrating on determining strategies of appropriate<br />

development for specific urban sites. In each of the three semesters of the course, developing projects presuppose devising community based urban<br />

design frameworks for selected sites that broadly consider the surrounding context. In each semester, holistic design frameworks articulating the<br />

potential character and quality of the environment initiated by the proposed project support reasonably complex building designs.<br />

Semester one is divided proportionally between group explorations of the city and individual project work, augmented by developing research into<br />

the history, theory and design of cultural buildings in an urban context. The second semester project explores ideas of meaning and identity in the<br />

urban environment and the role that public space and buildings play in articulating notions of citizenship and community. Students produce three<br />

architectural/urban design schemes of increasing scale and complexity for a specific urban location. Architecture as a civic element is emphasised,<br />

including concentration on the relation between exterior and interior spaces.<br />

The problematic of public space within an increasingly privatised built environment; the degree to which theory can be verified by the design; and the<br />

support of both by close readings of set theoretical texts that consider architecture and the city from a range of perspectives are central to the course; as<br />

is a developing understanding of architecture within the expanded field of an urban context in relation to notions of identity, community, and culture<br />

more generally. No matter their scale, projects are construed as complex public buildings with key interior and exterior public spaces specific to their<br />

location and purpose. Thesis projects developed during the third semester provide students with opportunities for elaborating on many of the themes<br />

introduced earlier in the course. The thesis is a major design project framed by individual students that they largely produce independently.<br />

The MAAPL-D course challenges students’ preconceived notions of architecture, planning, urban design and the city, as well as their ingrained habits<br />

of architectural conceptualization and representation. In the course, individual buildings are considered as component parts of cities, rather than as<br />

isolated objects within it. As such, tendencies to overemphasise buildings as spectacular image, interesting form, or virtuosic technological novelty are<br />

counterbalanced by the urban, social, and tectonic qualities of projects. Within the expanded field of the city, urban buildings are emphasised as sociocultural<br />

elements rather than primarily as abstract objects of aesthetic (or visual) appreciation.<br />

172 Ling Shuang Yue


Da Yu<br />

173


MSc in Sustainable Buildings and Environments<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

Contributors: Andrew Arnold, Dr. Alan J Murphy, Barry Rankin, Clive Gerrar, Dan Jestico, Halla Huws, Dr. Hassan Hemida, Jess Tindal, Liam Haggarty,<br />

Richard Allenby, Dr. Samuel Austin, Stuart Franklin, Dr. Wael Nabih<br />

Students on the Sustainable Buildings and Environments MSc use building and urban performance simulation tools and a deeper understanding of building<br />

physics to underpin their architectural design approaches. This academic year we were joined by students from the MArch and MAPL-D route in projects.<br />

The students worked on three live projects with their estates departments and Newcastle City Council. They engaged with a number of well-established<br />

professionals in the field.<br />

Engineering Excellence Quarter (Newcastle University): we were asked by the University to start looking at massing ideas for projects to maximize capturing<br />

sustainability aspects of the site. Students looked into environmental impacts (such as wind speed and shadowing studies) on pedestrians and how different<br />

massing ideas could lead to a unified campus, where pedestrian movement is facilitated and the natural environment is moderated.<br />

Sunderland Royal Hospital: we worked closely with the estate department to improve the 1960s building. Occupants complain about drafts in winter and<br />

overheating and less effective natural ventilation in the wards all year round. The project addressed possibilities of aesthetic improvements, and insertions of<br />

social interaction spaces, while moderating the indoor climate using building performance simulations. Students also expanded their explorations to look at<br />

climate change scenarios and environmental architectural concepts which can prevent the need for cooling.<br />

Fisherman’s Lodge in Jesmond Dene: the students presented design proposals for the public consultation that was managed by English Heritage and Newcastle<br />

City Council. The Fisherman’s Lodge has been derelict for over ten years and ideas for its revival and extensions into various possible functions were<br />

introduced to the council to help them build ideas for potential usage. Building and urban performance simulation were used to maximize the sustainability<br />

potential of the projects and underpin design decisions in such a dark and historic valley.<br />

174<br />

Top - Zhengkai Lu<br />

Bottom - Group Student Analysis


Top - Groupwork Engineering Excellence Quarter<br />

Bottom - Rosy Rivera Lara Fishermans Lodge - Perspectives<br />

175


PhD and PhD by Creative Practice Students<br />

Towards a Synthetic Morphogenesis for Architecture<br />

Paola Carolina Ramirez Figueroa<br />

p.c.ramirez-figueroa@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

www.syntheticmorphologies.com<br />

Synthetic Morphologies is a design exploration project that emerges from a growing<br />

design discourse on the possibilities afforded by Synthetic Biology. The 21st century<br />

is poised to be the era of biology, very much like the 20th has been the age of digital<br />

information. The notion comes from recent advances from Synthetic Biology in<br />

manipulating and creating new living organisms that exhibit unprecedented traits<br />

in nature. <strong>Design</strong>, as many other fields, has felt the influence of such a paradigmatic<br />

shift. In architecture, for instance, a growing body of speculative work imagines a<br />

future material reality enacted by hybrids of machine and living organisms, whereby<br />

building are grown rather than constructed.<br />

Yet, Synthetic Morphologies poses the possibility that, in fact, Synthetic Biology<br />

presents design with a more profound challenge – one that stirs the restating of the<br />

discipline of design itself. To think, for instance, of buildings which are grown out<br />

of pre-programmed living organisms is, in effect, to continue the classic paradigm<br />

of design wherein the designer is an almighty giver of form. I propose an alternative<br />

approach – an organicist-inspired material practice for synthetic biology.<br />

I believe the intersection of design and synthetic biology invites us to think<br />

of design as a negotiation between different actors, some of which include the<br />

chemical environment, mechanical conditions, designers and living organisms<br />

themselves. Throughout my doctoral research I’ve engaged in different projects<br />

which characterise and trace the evolution of the speculative discourse initiated by<br />

synthetic biology, and which eventually leads to the notion of a biologically-oriented<br />

material practice: a technique to engage with the processes of designing through and<br />

with living organisms.<br />

Architecture By Default<br />

Kieran Connolly<br />

k.i.connolly@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Rem Koolhaas’s polemical essay ‘Junkspace’, written at the turn of the millennium,<br />

recalls a contemporary landscape of generic sameness, latent with subliminal<br />

and ideological messages. The text rejects traditional ideas of architectural space,<br />

dissolving ideas of order, type and hierarchy into a chaotic amalgam that is<br />

apparently ordered and bound together by its globalised ubiquity. Junkspace, as<br />

Koolhaas describes it, is the space of material human waste that has become a<br />

measure of modernity. Fourteen years after the publication of this seminal essay, this<br />

research began by examining a Junkspace par excellence – the suspended ceiling.<br />

Organised on a standard grid of 600mm x 600mm, set-out using aluminium<br />

sections, supporting lightweight tiles, it repeats, room after room in what can be<br />

seen as an almost limitless horizontal expansion. The suspended ceiling has become<br />

a seemingly ubiquitous feature in twenty-first century architecture, as recently<br />

demonstrated by Koolhaas himself at the 2014 Venice Biennale.<br />

Using Koolhaas’s observations as a starting point, the research has focused on the<br />

relationship between the repetitive organisational qualities of the aforementioned<br />

grid and the void spaces it conceals above – known as the Plenum. These spaces not<br />

only deal with ventilation, but also hold an ever-increasing network of services that<br />

give comfort and ‘power’ to the inhabited spaces below.<br />

Through a series of investigations, often recalling the evocative imagery and<br />

representation techniques of the radical Italian design collective Superstudio, this<br />

relationship has been explored in order to expose our growing reliance on ‘serviced’<br />

space. As such, the thesis examines these forgotten, hidden but vitally important<br />

environments of Junkspace, in order to explore a much broader question – how<br />

reliant are we becoming on these concealed service spaces? And what impact does<br />

this have on the field of architecture?<br />

176 Top, Middle - Paola Carolina Ramirez Figueroa Bottom - Kieran Connolly


The Contemporary Role and Transformation of Civic Public Architecture: The<br />

Case of Tripoli’s Central Municipal Building, Libya<br />

Abdelatif El-Allous<br />

abdelatif.el-allous@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Space Thickening and the Digital Ethereal:<br />

Production of Architecture in the Digital Age<br />

Jose-Luis Hernandez-Hernandez<br />

j.l.hernandez-hernandez@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

www.digitalethereal.com<br />

Digital Ethereal came about as a design discourse on digital technologies, and the<br />

invisible infrastructure underpinning it. I believe our interaction with this landscape<br />

of electromagnetic signals, described by Antony Dunne as Hertzian Space, can be<br />

characterised in the same terms as that with ghosts and spectra. They both are<br />

paradoxical entities, whose untypical substance allows them to be an invisible<br />

presence. In the same way, they undergo a process of gradual substantiation to<br />

become temporarily available to perception. Finally, they both haunt us: ghosts, as<br />

Derrida would have it, with the secrets of past generations; Hertzian space, with the<br />

frustration of interference and slowness.<br />

But it is these same traits of Hertzian Space that affords the potential for a spatially<br />

rich interaction with information systems, one that more closely resembles the<br />

interaction with real architecture. The challenge however lies in how to design with<br />

systems that are fundamentally invisible. They can be ‘translated’ – changing their<br />

modality into one which is tangible. This modality change is however always laced<br />

with cultural charges, which changes the nature of Hertzian Space.<br />

In order to take advantage of hertzian space, I advocate for a creative practice aimed<br />

at creating new objects, indexed to hertzian space, but which also captures the<br />

cultural and social complexity imbued in the use of such technologies. I call this new<br />

series of objects the digital ethereal. The design work created throughout this project<br />

blends together disciplines and techniques such as performance, photography,<br />

design, programming and electronics.<br />

Shared Identity: Buildings, Memories, and Meanings<br />

Stephen Grinsell<br />

s.j.grinsell@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

News stories about either the decision to save or demolish many buildings of the<br />

1960s and early 1970s regularly use the noun monstrosity, usually prefaced by the<br />

word concrete. However, not all concrete buildings create animosity. The recently<br />

demolished Birmingham Central Library, whilst derided by Prince Charles as<br />

looking like ‘a place where books are incinerated, not kept’ (Birmingham Mail,<br />

2014) is also commonly and affectionately called the ‘Ziggurat’, a reference to the<br />

stepped terraces of ancient temples. David Parker and Paul Long in their article<br />

‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives of Urban Decline and Regeneration’<br />

write ‘For all their faults, the buildings of the 1960s and 1970s currently being<br />

destroyed supplied Birmingham with an identity’ (Parker and Long, 2004 p.18).<br />

Buildings are given their identity and meaning, or more accurately, given a<br />

multiplicity of meanings, by those who gaze upon them and allow the building<br />

to impact upon them. This impact, or the experience as a result of that gaze, stirs<br />

emotions and evokes memories, memories that heighten a sense of identity. This<br />

identity then becomes a shared identity as people share their memories, and what<br />

the building means to them.<br />

Parker, D., & Long, P. (2004). ‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives of<br />

Urban Decline and Regeneration’. Visual Culture in Britain, 5(1), 37-58.<br />

Natural Ventilation: An Evaluation of Strategies for Improving Indoor Air<br />

Quality in Hospitals of Semi-Arid Climates<br />

Mohamed Mahgoub Elnabawi<br />

m.elnabawi-mahgoub@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Learning from Vernacular Natural Ventilated Residential Houses in<br />

Mediterranean Climate Zone of Lebanon; and Developing its Application<br />

Methods in <strong>Design</strong>ing Contemporary Housing in Beirut<br />

Najla Mansour<br />

n.mansour@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Top, Middle - Jose-Luis Hernandez-Hernandez<br />

Bottom - Stephen Grinsell<br />

177


A Coincidental Plot, For Architecture<br />

Ashley Mason<br />

ashley.mason@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Practiceopolis: The City of Architectural Practice<br />

Yasser Megahed<br />

yasser.megahed@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

This Research sets out to interrogate a dominant stance towards technology that<br />

prioritises a narrow approach to architectural production, which I have identified<br />

as Techno‐rational practice. The imaginary city of Practiceopolis is introduced as<br />

a site for the critical reading of diverse contemporary architectural practices. This<br />

reading draws from the philosopher Andrew Feenberg’s classification of varying<br />

stances towards technology.<br />

Practiceopolis is a city built on diagrammatic relations between nine theoretical<br />

modes of practice covering a wide spectrum of the contemporary architectural<br />

world. Its morphology is set out according to the influence of technology and<br />

technical knowledge in shaping different modes of architectural practice. It<br />

highlights tensions between what Feenberg might call Determinist/Instrumentalist<br />

approaches on the one hand, and Critical Theory/Substantivist approaches on the<br />

other. Practiceopolis has two dimensions; the first sets out a parallel world created<br />

as a tool for mapping the multiplicity of modes of architectural practice, of which<br />

Techno‐rational approach is only one. The second maps architectural practices<br />

critically from a dedicated map library in the city of Practiceopolis, located at an<br />

intermediate place between the Instrumentalist and Critical-Theory stances of<br />

technology.<br />

On Repetition: Photograhpy in/as Architectural Criticism - Working through<br />

the Archives of Mies van der Rohe and Lilly Reich’s German Pavilion and the<br />

North American Concrete Grain Elevators<br />

Catalina Mejia-Moreno<br />

c.mejia-moreno@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

www.travesiafoundation.org<br />

‘Many of us, maybe all of us, look at some images repeatedly, but it seems that we do not<br />

write about that repetition, or think it, once written, worth reading by others’.<br />

T.J.Clark. The Sight of Death. An experiment in Art Writing. (New Haven and<br />

London: Yale University Press, 2006) pp. 9.<br />

In the photo-archives of two of the most recognised British architectural historians of<br />

the late twentieth century - Robin Evans and Reyner Banham - two iconic buildings<br />

come across repeatedly, almost compulsively. In Evans’, the Barcelona Pavilion (1929-<br />

reconstructed 1986) and in Banham’s, the Buffalo Grain Elevators (late nineteenth<br />

Century). While these slide sets can be understood as the result of the empiricist<br />

English tradition and the relevance of direct experience for the buildings’ histories<br />

and criticisms, they are also evidence of a wider phenomenon in architectural<br />

history: the drive to re-visit, the compulsion to re-photograph and the instinct<br />

to repeat. In this context, my PhD project questions photography as the inherent<br />

means of repetition in architectural history, while arguing that the photograph as<br />

material object and object of representation also performs as the criticism itself.<br />

By studying two important moments in time for the photographic dissemination<br />

of the two aforementioned buildings, and by understanding the material history<br />

of photographs as commodities and objects of transaction, I critically examine the<br />

relationship between architectural history, architectural criticism, and photographic<br />

and ideological techniques of (re)production.<br />

Natural Ventilation: An Evaluation of Strategies for Improving Indoor Air<br />

Quality in Hospitals of Semi-Arid Climates<br />

Mohammed Mohammed<br />

m.mohammed@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Architecture for All in the megacity: Spatially Integrated Settlements in<br />

Istanbul Dominated by Desirable Affordable Housing that Values More than<br />

the Total Cost of Construction and Land Values<br />

Ulviye Nergis Kalli<br />

u.n.kalli@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

178 Top - Yasser Megahed Middle, Bottom - Catalina Mejia-Moreno


Impact of Community Participation on Peri-Urban Development Projects in<br />

Akure, Nigeria<br />

Oluwatoyin Akim<br />

o.t.akin@ncl.ac.uk<br />

Cities, People, Nature: An Exploration<br />

Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

u.ruiz-arana@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

mynaturehood.tumblr.com<br />

With more than half of the world’s population now living in cities, it is the nature<br />

within the city that has the potential to enhance people’s lives on a daily basis. The<br />

city-people-nature trinomial raises a number of questions that form the basis of this<br />

research. My first installation coincided with the ‘Landscape, Wilderness and the<br />

Wild’ conference and explored two initial questions:<br />

Is there a boundary between the natural and cultural in the city?<br />

The relation between nature and culture is complex. The classical notion of nature is<br />

the world devoid of human interaction or activity; and urbanization, the antithesis<br />

of nature. At the other end of the spectrum there is the notion of nature as a social<br />

constructed phenomenon, and the idea that nature as the untouched doesn’t exist<br />

anymore, as human activity has affected the whole world. What is evident is that<br />

cities depend on nature to survive and vice versa, and it is therefore difficult to see<br />

where one ends and the other starts.<br />

Could the expectation of nature in the city be challenged and what could we tolerate<br />

within the urban?<br />

Within the city we tend to arrest the progression of nature in order to maintain<br />

landscapes and spaces looking a certain way, and avoid the chaos or fear that might<br />

result from a ‘wild’ nature. ‘Wilderness’ is found on abandoned sites, on former<br />

industrial sites, in the cracks of the pavements, in the joints of the walls, reclaimed<br />

by nature whilst waiting to be developed or cleared out. Are looks the reason why we<br />

arrest nature, and how is nature experienced through the other senses?<br />

Revealing <strong>Design</strong>: A Dialogic Approach<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

matthew.ozga-lawn@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/staff/profile/matthew.ozga-lawn<br />

My research project attempts to reveal hidden or overlooked agencies within the<br />

studio space and the representational modes therein, which is normally conceived<br />

of as a neutral zone through which designs are simply ‘transmitted’. In my study,<br />

the studio is conflated with a rifle range. The studio, in adopting the characteristics<br />

and agencies of the military space, opens architectural representation onto codes<br />

and phenomena normally considered to be outside its remit. These phenomena are<br />

drawn into the project through historical and theoretical links established by the<br />

rifle range space.<br />

My research blurs the agencies of the military and studio spaces, revealing coded<br />

agencies that we as designers often take for granted in how we relate and engage with<br />

representational artefacts in the studio.<br />

Usage of Thermally Comfortable Outdoor Space through the Lens of Adaptive<br />

Microclimate<br />

Khalid Setaih<br />

k.m.setaih@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Becoming Planners and Architects: the Formation of Perspectives on<br />

Residential <strong>Design</strong> Quality<br />

Dhruv Sookhoo<br />

d.a.sookhoo@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

After the Blueprint: Questions around the Unfinished in New Belgrade<br />

Tijana Stevanović<br />

t.stevanovic@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Modelling the Effects of Household Practices on Heating Energy<br />

Consumption in Social Housing. A Case Study in Newcastle upon Tyne<br />

Macarena Beltan Rodriguez<br />

m.rodriguez@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Top - Usue Ruiz Arana<br />

Middle, Bottom - Matthew Ozga-Lawn<br />

179


The Impacts of Owners’ Participation on ‘Sense of Place’,<br />

the Case of Tehran, Iran<br />

Goran Erfani<br />

g.erfani@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

A key aspect for urban designers and managers concerns how urban transformation<br />

arising from regeneration of inner-city areas is associated with ‘sense of place’.<br />

Although much academic work tracks individual sense of place, little interrogates<br />

the community aspect and its link with urban renewal. This study investigated how<br />

the urban renewal schemes in Tehran, Iran have attempted to adopt the owners’<br />

participation into their planning and implementation. It concentrated especially on<br />

diverse ways that different stakeholders perceived the methods of these schemes and<br />

the significance for community sense of place.<br />

The study examined the urban renewal projects conducted by the municipality<br />

of Tehran which concerns these areas as deprived neighbourhoods with various<br />

physical, social and environmental problems. Two cases were studied, namely the<br />

Oudlajan bazar and the Takhti neighbourhood, which both are located in the inner<br />

city (district 12). Despite similarities, they are distinctive cases. Oudlajan, which<br />

has outstanding heritage value to the city, is a commercial public space. The Takhti<br />

project was about the residential private space. In addition, each case had diverse<br />

socio-cultural and physical transformation. The selecting of the distinctive cases<br />

shaped a better picture of urban transformation in Tehran.<br />

The techniques applied seek to represent different types of participants, by means<br />

of local observation and semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders<br />

in these schemes. Additionally, to elicit what constitutes the interrelationships<br />

between people and place, Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI) was carried out. The<br />

photos captured by the residents were discussed with them to reveal the potential<br />

impact of urban renewal projects on place-based community attachment, identity<br />

and satisfaction in the eyes of individuals. Concurrently, planners, managers<br />

and developers were interviewed. To signify the intersubjectivity, the results and<br />

evidence from the previous phases were separately discussed with other participant<br />

and non-participant residents in the renewal schemes. Furthermore, the study<br />

considered the potential and limitations for sense of place associated with the urban<br />

regeneration schemes.<br />

Making Byker: The Situated Practices of the Citizen Architect<br />

James Longfield<br />

j.d.longfield@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

My work draws from the site-based architectural approaches employed in Byker by<br />

Ralph Erskine and Vernon Gracie, to explore a mode of practice where the skills and<br />

expertise of the professional overlap with the personal commitment of the citizen to<br />

the social and political context of their location of residence.<br />

Through a series of projects, drawings, made pieces and activism, within the<br />

Byker area, where I now live, my thesis traces the nature of a situated approach to<br />

architectural practice, reflecting on convergences with conventional practice, as well<br />

as identifying key points of divergence where my work steps beyond professional<br />

boundaries to engage in a directly personal way.<br />

The trajectory of these actions are observed and recorded in order to describe an<br />

alternative approach to producing and appropriating the built environment, before<br />

finally questioning whether architectural practice, in its professionally bound form,<br />

is capable of delivering a social architecture.<br />

Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Construction – Case of Tower<br />

Buildings in Libya<br />

Salem Tarhuni<br />

The Conservation of Twentieth Century Architecture in China<br />

Yun Dai<br />

y.dai@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

180 Top - Goran Erfani Middle, Bottom, Opposite - James Longfield


Comprehensive Intelligence in Sustainable Courtyard House Architecture<br />

Rand Agha<br />

r.h.m.agha@ncl.ac.uk<br />

A Spatial Carbon Analysis Model for Retrofitting the Guayaquil’s Residential<br />

Sector – GURCC as a Case Study<br />

Javier Urquizo<br />

j.urquizo@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

Crisis of Traditional Identity in Built Environment of the Saudi Cities. A Case<br />

Study: The Old City of Tabuk<br />

Mabrouk Alsheliby<br />

m.alsheliby@ncl.ac.uk<br />

Looking Towards Retirement: Alternative <strong>Design</strong> Approaches to Third-Ager<br />

Housing<br />

Sam Clark<br />

s.clark4@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

UK society was first categorised ‘aged’ during the 1970s, and is currently heading<br />

towards ‘super-aged’ status, whereby 20 per cent of the population will be aged<br />

sixty-five and over by the year 2025. Indeed scientific evidence indicates linear<br />

increases in life expectancy since 1840, such that UK population ‘pyramids’ are now<br />

looking more like ‘columns’, with fewer younger people at the base and increasing<br />

numbers and proportions of older people at the top. There are 10,000 centenarians<br />

living in the UK today, with demographers anticipating a five-fold increase by 2030.<br />

Half of all babies born this year can expect to live one hundred years.<br />

Housing plays a significant role in sustaining a good quality of life, and there is<br />

growing opinion that moving to specialist or more age-appropriate housing has<br />

a positive impact on the wellbeing of older people, as well as potential benefits<br />

to the property market as a whole. Recent design research includes a competition<br />

commissioned by McCarthy & Stone to ‘re-imagine ageing’, and an RIBA report<br />

illustrating future scenarios in which ‘Active Third-Agers’ have made a huge impact<br />

on UK towns and cities. Both initiatives were predicated on the idea that today’s<br />

older population (colloquially known as the ‘baby-boomers’) have alternative and<br />

more demanding lifestyle expectations that are likely to drive a step-change in<br />

housing choice for older people.<br />

Sam is working in collaboration with national house builder, Churchill Retirement<br />

Living, to further explore the needs and aspirations of those entering retirement. In<br />

this instance a PhD by Creative Practice is being used as a vehicle for applied design<br />

research that will contribute to contemporary visions for retirement living.<br />

181


ARC – Architecture Research Collaborative<br />

With a threefold increase in research income this year since the Architectural Research Collaborative (ARC) launched in 2012, thanks to a number of successful<br />

funding bids by colleagues, new collaborative ventures and two postdoctoral fellows starting their research in architecture with us in 2015-16 and two more posts<br />

to come in September <strong>2016</strong> and 2017, ARC is firmly establishing itself as a major centre for research in architecture. Our remit is to promote and investigate<br />

high quality architectural research as a necessarily interdisciplinary activity, which produces knowledge through multiple methodologies and practices including<br />

creative practice, history and theory, and building, engineering and social sciences. ARC is therefore structured by key themes cutting across the various disciplines<br />

constituting architectural research, with a view to facilitating collaborative projects involving Newcastle researchers and partners at other institutions. Themes<br />

such as ‘Industries and Technologies of Architecture’ and ‘Experimental Architecture’ are responsive to topical issues and to change in ARC membership and are<br />

updated as new themes emerge. Through a programme of small-scale responsive funding we actively support collaborations between colleagues and early career<br />

and doctoral research.<br />

Our commitment to interdisciplinary research has an international presence through the Cambridge University Press journal arq – Architectural Review Quarterly<br />

– whose managing editor, Professor Adam Sharr, and the majority of the editorial team are based in ARC. This year saw the publication of a special issue of arq<br />

on the subject of design-led research put together by the speculative design practice STASUS – comprising ARC members James Craig and Matt Ozga-Lawn, and<br />

two publications from the conference Industries of Architecture held here in 2014; a book of the same name (Routledge, 2015) and special issue of the journal<br />

Architecture and Culture entitled ‘Into the Hidden Abode: Architecture and Production’, edited by Katie Lloyd Thomas and Adam Sharr (with Tilo Amhoff,<br />

University of Brighton, and Nick Beech, Queen Mary’s University, London). ARC members continue to publish widely and have presented their research across<br />

the UK, Europe, in Canada, the USA, and in the Middle East, and also engage in co-production projects. They are also active in engagement and design research<br />

with local communities, such as Fenham Pocket Park, a local project whose stakeholders include Sustrans, Newcastle City Council, Fenham Community Pool,<br />

Your Homes Newcastle, Fenham Library and Fenham Model Allotment. A successful bid by Armelle Tardiveau and Daniel Mallo to the Department of Communities<br />

and Local Government funding led to the creation of a new piece of public space, and enabled a co-production process amongst stakeholders equally<br />

meaningful as the space itself.<br />

This year’s ARC Special Theme event Mountains & Megastructures (16th – 17th March) was a great success, involving linked research students, colleagues and<br />

invited speakers, artist Stéphane Degoutin and Professor Jonathan Hill, UCL. The exhibition and symposium explored topics ranging from early endeavours<br />

to ‘conquer’ the Everest to Alphand’s picturesque artificial hills in Paris, and their literal and figurative constructions and reconstructions at different scales from<br />

miniature megastructures such as the Apollo Pavilion to the concrete megastructures of the north-east, from the vertical megastructures of science fiction to the<br />

complex of megadams on the Tigris and Euphrates. We are currently preparing a book proposal from the event to showcase ARC’s form of interdisciplinary<br />

architectural research, and have put forward a follow-up public event ‘Scaling the Heights’ to the AHRC Being Human Festival (November, <strong>2016</strong>) to be housed<br />

in the north tower of the Tyne Bridge.<br />

CURE: Creative Upcycled Resource<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />

This cross-disciplinary research project brings together architecture, engineering,<br />

social sciences, and business. It explores the technical, social, economic and design<br />

related barriers to material upcycling, and seeks to propose solutions to enable<br />

widespread, creative re-use of designed products and packaging.<br />

U-TEC Cafe<br />

Collaborators: CeG - Newcastle University, Newcastle Business School<br />

Replicas<br />

Adam Sharr, Zeynep Kezer<br />

Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />

Replica architectures employ selective ideas of the past to construct the image of<br />

states, cultures, organizations or powerful individuals in the present, often operating<br />

in service of radically conservative ideologies. Promoted through the rhetoric of<br />

reconstruction, replica projects are seldom ‘literal’ reconstructions. Rather, they<br />

involve the tendentious reclamation of historic architectural or urban forms to<br />

reinforce particular national or cultural identity narratives, however counterfactual<br />

their historical veracity. The idea of Replicas was the subject of a session at the SAH<br />

conference in Chicago in 2015 and this material will form an edited book.<br />

Collaborators: Society of Architectural Historians Conference, Chicago, 2015<br />

182


Utopias and Architecture<br />

Nathaniel Coleman<br />

Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />

Utopian thought, though commonly characterized as projecting a future without<br />

a past, depends on golden models for re-invention of what is. This general theme<br />

encompasses a range of projects examining the social and formal dimensions of<br />

architecture through the concept of utopia and integrating architectural thinking<br />

into Utopian Studies. The projects and outputs range from the interdisciplinary<br />

Utopography workshop to a special issue of Utopian Studies as well as Lefebvre for<br />

Architects, recently published by Routledge, and papers for journals including the<br />

‘Journal of Architectural Education’, ‘Architectural Research Quarterly’, and the<br />

‘Journal or Architecture’.<br />

Coleman N. ‘Architecture and Dissidence: Utopia as Method’, Architecture and<br />

Culture, 2014, 2(1), pp. 45-60.<br />

Energy, Society and Cities<br />

Carlos Calderon<br />

Mediated Environments<br />

These projects involve understanding, modelling and designing for new energy<br />

futures. Themes include the effects of household practices on heating energy<br />

consumption, smart energy technologies, decentralised energy, energy systems<br />

to reduce fuel poverty and developing new ways of planning for spatial energy<br />

infrastructure in cities. This work is supported by contributions from Your Homes<br />

Newcastle, Newcastle City Council and Newcastle Science City and involves<br />

collaborations across fields of architecture, engineering and planning.<br />

Collaborators: Newcastle City Council, Your Homes Newcastle, Newcastle Science City,<br />

Cambridge Architectural Research<br />

Byker Hobby Rooms<br />

James Longfield, Adam Sharr<br />

Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />

This project was investigated as part of Linked Research with Stage 5 and 6 students<br />

on the MArch degree program. The project investigated the unique phenomena of<br />

the hobby rooms in the Byker redevelopment which are currently under-occupied.<br />

By investigating their intentions and mapping the spaces of current hobby activity<br />

the project developed speculative proposals for alternative hobby spaces that offered<br />

greater flexibility and specificity. The project concluded with the construction of key<br />

items of furniture which imagined the hobby rooms as specific mobile spaces, able to<br />

support a process of redevelopment.<br />

http://makingbyker.wordpress.com<br />

Collaborators: The Byker Lives Project<br />

Bacilla Vitruvius<br />

Martyn Dade-Robertson, Carolina Figueroa<br />

Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />

Vitruvius suggested in his texts On Architecture that ‘architecture is an imitation of<br />

nature’ (Vitruvius, 2009) but what happens when architecture becomes nature and<br />

we begin, through the design of biological systems, to become architects of nature?<br />

This project explores the relationship between architecture and the emerging field of<br />

Synthetic Biology. The project explores both the applications of Synthetic Biology for<br />

new types of building material and the implications of architectural design practice<br />

on the development of Synthetic Biology.<br />

Collaborators: Northumbria University, The Centre for Synthetic Biology and<br />

Bioexploitation<br />

183


Architecture’s Unconscious<br />

Kati Blom, Nathaniel Coleman, Andrew Ballantyne,<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas, Sam Austin<br />

Social Justice, Wellbeing and Renewal<br />

This project is built around a series of informal meetings including architects, artists,<br />

philosophers and scholars of cognitive science and psychoanalysis. The project aims<br />

to uncover the processes of environmental perception – with particular emphasis<br />

on stories of unexpected, non-verbal encounters which are born of a pre-linguistic<br />

sensation of space. These incidental sensuous encounters with place – whether<br />

labelled as unconscious or not - are vital when discovering the qualities of spaces.<br />

Collaborators: Isis Brook (Writtle University), Lorens Holm (University of Dundee),<br />

Wolfram Bergande (Bauhaus- University Weimar)<br />

Re-interpreting Sustainable Architecture<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />

This research aims to bring together recent debates in philosophy and social /<br />

cultural theory to the study and practice of sustainable architecture and urbanism. In<br />

adopting a critical, comparative and interdisciplinary perspective and by theorising<br />

sustainability, my aim is to bring the discussion of a sustainable built environment<br />

centrally into the social sciences and humanities.<br />

G. Farmer (2013) ‘Re-contextualising <strong>Design</strong>: Three ways of Practicing Sustainable<br />

Architecture’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 17(2).<br />

G. Farmer & S. Guy (2010) ‘Making Morality: Sustainable Architecture and the<br />

Pragmatic Imagination’, Building Research and Information, 38(4), 368-378.<br />

S.Guy & G.Farmer (2001), ‘Re-interpreting Sustainable Architecture: The place of<br />

Technology’, Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3) Feb. pp140-148.<br />

Demolishing Whitehall<br />

Adam Sharr<br />

Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />

In 1965, the architect Leslie Martin submitted to Harold Wilson’s Labour<br />

government a plan to rebuild London’s government district, Whitehall. Presented<br />

to an administration which had been elected on the promise of remaking Britain<br />

in the ‘white heat’ of technology, the plan’s architecture embodied the 1960s idea<br />

of an imminent jet age that seemed not just possible but imminent. Our co-written<br />

book, Demolishing Whitehall, tells the story of the Whitehall plan and investigates its<br />

inherent tensions between ideas of technology and history, science and art, socialism<br />

and elitism.<br />

Collaborators: Stephen Thornton, Politics, Cardiff University<br />

Industries of Architecture<br />

Katie Lloyd Thomas, Adam Sharr<br />

Specifications, Prescriptions and Translations<br />

Developing out of research and an earlier symposium on architecture’s technical<br />

literatures ‘Further Reading Required’ (The Bartlett, 2011) this international<br />

conference took place at Newcastle in November 2014. IOA invited architectural<br />

theorists, historians, designers and others to explore the industrial, technical and<br />

socio-economic contexts in which building is constituted that are all too often<br />

sidelined within the architectural humanities. IOA also hosted a number of openstructured<br />

debate-oriented workshops with the aim of bringing into the discussion<br />

those working in building, technology, law, practice management, construction or in<br />

industry together with researchers in the architectural humanities.<br />

Collaborators: Tilo Amhoff (University of Brighton), Nicholas Beech (Oxford Brookes<br />

University), ProBE (University of Westminster), John Gelder (NBS), Sofie Pelsmakers<br />

(UCL Energy Institute), Rob Imrie (Sociology, Goldsmiths), Emma Street (Real Estate &<br />

Planning, University of Reading), Liam Ross (ESALA).<br />

184


Visualising Energy<br />

Neveen Hamza<br />

Mediated Environments<br />

http://www.eviz.org.uk/<br />

This project is based on the EPSRC funded Eviz (Energy Visualisation for Carbon<br />

Reduction) project. The project brings together an interdisciplinary team of engineers<br />

and designers to develop applications which close the gap between abstract, invisible<br />

energy flows and people’s desire to understand their energy use and become more<br />

energy efficient. The key idea is to increase understanding of energy dynamics as<br />

a function of occupant behaviour and building characteristics and to allow experts<br />

to make better predictions of energy efficiency and design buildings around human<br />

behaviour.<br />

Collaborators: Plymouth University, University of Birmingham, University of Bath<br />

Landscape Visions<br />

Ian Thompson<br />

Futures, Values and Imaginaries<br />

This project, led by a landscape architect/photographer in collaboration with<br />

landscape archaeologists, an oral historian and a specialist in heritage interpretation,<br />

considers the legacy of land reclamation within the Great Northern Coalfield,<br />

following the closure of the last deep mines. We aim to understand the reclamation<br />

process, not just the social, political and economic drivers, but also the visions which<br />

shaped the reclaimed landscape. How did these arise? What was not valued and what<br />

has been lost?<br />

Collaborators: Dr Arieti Galani (heritage studies), Professor Sam Turner, Dr Oscar<br />

Aldred (archaeology), Sue Bradley (oral history), McCord Centre for Historic and Cultural<br />

Landscapes, Durham County Record Office, Woodhorn Museum Northumberland<br />

<strong>Design</strong> Pedagogy as Material Practice<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />

This research explores the role of material practice as a means to connect design,<br />

pedagogy, research and social engagement. This work provides the opportunity for<br />

‘live’ experimentation with materials, performance and varying modes of design<br />

practice.<br />

Stonehaugh Stargazing Pavilion<br />

G. Farmer (2013) ‘Re-contextualising <strong>Design</strong>: Three ways of Practicing Sustainable<br />

Architecture’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 17(2).<br />

G. Farmer & M. Stacey (2012) ‘In the Making: Pedagogies from MARS’, Architectural<br />

Research Quarterly, 16(4), 301-312.<br />

Rethinking Heritage<br />

Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes<br />

Cultures and Transition<br />

http://valuablereside.upc.edu/<br />

This project examines the modern conceptualization of heritage and its associated<br />

preservation and conservation techniques and policies. The research takes an<br />

interdisciplinary approach and includes anthropologists, geographers, political<br />

scientists and scholars in tourism. It deals with both theory and particular case<br />

studies, and is currently funded through several competitive grants in Spain and<br />

Chile, with collaborators in the US, UK, Italy, Chile and Spain. The project relates<br />

research to professional practice and teaching – like the international workshop<br />

‘Valuable-RESIDE’, funded by the EU.<br />

Collaborators: School of Architecture of Barcelona-Valles, UPC-BarcelonaTECH<br />

(Spain); Universidad de Concepción (Chile); Politecnico di Torino (Italy); West Chester<br />

University of Pennsylvania (US). FIC Barcelona Architects.<br />

185


Architecture and the Machinic Unconscious<br />

Andrew Ballantyne<br />

Cultures and Transition<br />

Our responses to architecture have a cultural dimension, but our cultures are ways<br />

of dealing with our instincts – inherited from millions of years of evolution. Modern<br />

humans have been around for tens of thousands of years, identifiable buildings for<br />

only about 10,000 years, since the global warming that brought the Ice Age to an end.<br />

This project draws together some insights from the recent literature of evolutionary<br />

psychology and the schizoanalysis of Deleuze and Guattari in trying to understand<br />

how we unconsciously interact with one another in and through buildings. Most of<br />

what we do, we do unconsciously. What can we learn from our animal-becomings?<br />

-- from burrowing, nest-building, the construction work of ants and beavers, and the<br />

territorializing effects of music.<br />

Beyond Representation<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn, James Craig<br />

Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />

This project seeks to better understand architectural representation through an<br />

interrogation of its limits; the vastness of landscape, and the internalised space of<br />

consciousness. The research stems from an investigation into landscapes of human<br />

endeavour – in which both limits are potentially at their most extreme – with a<br />

project examining the bodies of ‘failed’ attempts to conquer Mount Everest. The<br />

research is developing in conjunction with an MArch studio exploring these themes.<br />

Craig J, Ozga-Lawn M. ‘Everest Death Zone’. Paper for Emerging Architectural<br />

Research 2014, 1(5).<br />

Curating APL<br />

Matthew Ozga-Lawn, James Craig<br />

Research by <strong>Design</strong><br />

Curating Architecture, Planning and Landscape is ongoing research into the<br />

dissemination of the School’s outputs and identity, including the annual yearbook<br />

and exhibitions, online materials and publications and conference materials. The<br />

work includes wide-ranging research into these forms of communication, including<br />

analysing materials from Schools across the UK and further afield. The aim is to<br />

generate key understandings of how APL could present and curate its identity.<br />

Newcastle University School of Architecture Planning and Landscape <strong>Yearbook</strong> 2014<br />

Collaborators: Thomas Kendall, Simon Bumstead, Richard Taylor, Ed Wainwright<br />

The Edge of State<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Cultures and Transition<br />

In my current project, I examine the Turkish government’s efforts to modernize<br />

Eastern Anatolia and consolidate its authority over the region’s ethnically and<br />

religiously mixed population over the last century. I am especially interested in the<br />

expansion of the state apparatus – through the build up of institutional structures,<br />

military installations, transport & communications infrastructure, and resource<br />

extraction – and the resistance it encountered, with a view toward understanding the<br />

limits of state capacity and official ideology.<br />

‘Spatializing Difference: The Making of an Internal Border in Early Republican<br />

Elazıg, Turkey’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians.<br />

186


A Participatory-<strong>Design</strong> Study for Cobalt Business Park<br />

Armelle Tardiveau, Daniel Mallow<br />

Social Justice, Wellbeing and Renewal<br />

Cobalt Office Park is the largest of its kind in the UK with 12000 workers. Located<br />

in North Tyneside, this edge city environment is neither urban in the traditional<br />

sense, nor a greenfield science or technology park yet constitutes a highly significant,<br />

and under-researched, type of place in people’s daily lives. Greater or lesser ecological<br />

sustainability can be enacted and take root in such spaces; for this the project seeks<br />

to engage Cobalt workers, particularly in optimising their work-life balance as well<br />

as engaging local residents in extending existing sustainable practices in such ‘nonplaces’<br />

bordering their residential areas.<br />

Collaborators: Prof Geoff Vigar (PI) Dr Abigail Schoneboom (urban sociologist)<br />

Building Lifecycle Integration<br />

John Kamara<br />

Specifications, Prescriptions and Translations<br />

This research explores the hypothesis that effective integration of the different<br />

interfaces (e.g. information/knowledge, organisations) over the lifecycle of a building<br />

will enhance its performance (with respect to how it supports the immediate and<br />

changing business needs of clients/users and other actors that interact with it, and<br />

how its impact on society and the environment is optimised). Current work is<br />

focused on the interface between clients and the design/construction industry at both<br />

the development and handover stages of a project.<br />

Kamara, J. M. (2013) ‘Exploring the Client-AEC Interface in Building Lifecycle<br />

Integration’, Buildings 3(3), 462-48.<br />

Building the Nation State<br />

Zeynep Kezer<br />

Cultures and Transition<br />

In Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology, I examine how space and spatial<br />

practices mediated Turkey’s transition from empire to nation-state. By juxtaposing the<br />

making of new spaces, responding to the demands of a new politico-cultural order,<br />

with the obliteration of ethnic and religious enclaves characterizing the Ottoman<br />

way of life, I expose the interdependence between the creative and destructive forces<br />

in this process. My survey of broad ranging spatial transformations demonstrates<br />

how state formation operates at multiple and interdependent scales from that of the<br />

individual body to that of regional geopolitics.<br />

Building Modern Turkey: State, Space and Ideology (University of Pittsburgh Press for<br />

the Politics, Culture and the Built Environment Series, 2015).<br />

Problems of Translation<br />

Martin Beattie<br />

Cultures and Transition<br />

This research aims to understand the processes by which different cultures meet in the<br />

context of avant-garde architecture, art and literature. In particular the project maps<br />

and compares the linkages and spread of modernism between European and Indian<br />

avant-gardes, through its art and architecture of the 1920s. Specific case studies<br />

include analysis of the Bengali artist Gaganendranath Tagore along with the Bauhaus<br />

painter Lyonel Feininger and the collaboration between Rabindranath Tagore, the<br />

Bengali poet, novelist, and winner of the Nobel Prize for literature and Sir Patrick<br />

Geddes, the Scottish town planner at Santiniketan.<br />

‘Problems of Translation: Lyonel Feininger and Gaganendranath Tagore’ at the<br />

Fourteenth Annual Indian Society of Oriental Art Exhibition, Kolkata, India.<br />

Collaborators: Association of Art Historians<br />

187


188


Newcastle University School of<br />

Architecture, Planning and Landscape<br />

<strong>Yearbook</strong> ‘16<br />

Editorial Team<br />

Sam Austin<br />

Vili-Valtteri Welroos<br />

Matthew Wilcox<br />

Special Thanks<br />

Graham Farmer<br />

Matt Ozga-Lawn<br />

James Craig<br />

Anne Fry<br />

Rumen Dimov<br />

& Linked Research Group<br />

“Curating APL” 2014-15<br />

Printing & Binding<br />

Statex Colour Print<br />

www.statex.co.uk<br />

Typography<br />

Adobe Garamond Pro<br />

Paper<br />

GF Smith<br />

Colourplan, Turquoise, 350gsm<br />

First published in June <strong>2016</strong> by:<br />

The School of Architecture<br />

Planning and Landscape,<br />

Newcastle University<br />

Newcastle upon Tyne.<br />

NE1 7RU<br />

United Kingdom<br />

w: www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/<br />

t: +44 (0) 191 222 5831<br />

e: apl@newcastle.ac.uk<br />

ISBN 978-0-7017-0256-4


ISBN 9780701702564<br />

90000 ><br />

£10<br />

9<br />

780701<br />

702564

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!