Metu Arch 301 Fall 2019-2020 Logbook

3 1920 F
log
301
ARCH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FALL 2019-2020
book
METU ARCHITECTURE
ÇETİN ERTAN YAVUZATMACA

ARCH 301 TEAM
INSTRUCTORS:
HASAN OKAN ÇETIN
SEREN ERTAN
MERCAN YAVUZATMACA
STUDENTS:
ABDULLAH ZAMIR
AKTEKİN TOZUN
ARİF EREN YILDIRIM
ASRIN ONAT ŞENGÜL
AYŞENUR GÖKHAN
BERFE NAZ HAŞEMOĞLU
BUSENUR GÜNGÖR
BÜŞRA AŞCI
BÜŞRA BALLI
BÜŞRA KARAGÖZLÜ
DAVUT BALCİ
DİLARA GÜNEY
EKİN MANSUROĞLU
ELİF GÜNGÖR
EMEL UÇAK
FURKAN TÜRKER
GAZİ CAN ŞAHİN
İBRAHİM HALİL KELLECİ
İZGESU GÜVEN
MAHMUT EMRE KARCI
NADINE YOUSIF
NİHAN MUTLU
ONURCAN MIZRAK
PINAR TALAŞ
RECEP SELİM YARBAŞI
ŞEYMA SEZEN
UMUTKAĞAN DURĞUT
ZEYNEP ERİŞTİ

log
301
ARCH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FALL 2019-2020
book
1

2

01
230919 / M.A
course outline
3

tutors
objectives
Hasan Okan Çetin > (hocetin@metu.edu.tr) Office No: 404
Seren Ertan > (serenertan@hotmail.com) Office No: 317
Mercan Yavuzatmaca > (mercany@metu.edu.tr) Office No: 315
Design of buildings in relation to their particularly historical urban
context is emphasized. Issues of settlement dwelling relationships,
buildings of functional complexity and spatial variety and
architectonic interpretations of structural systems are analyzed and
designed. (Arch 301-302 METU Catalog- 2015-2017)
New version: Analysis and design of buildings in relation to their
urban context and structural form. Term projects include large-scale
housing settlements, new buildings in historical environments and
large span structures, with emphasis on programmatic complexity
and diversity, spatial variety and architectonic expression.
Knowledge
• Building up of culture and repertoire for the analysis and design
of housing with mixed-use schemes, innovative structures and
multifunctional public buildings.
• Develop critical thinking, and knowledge about problems
of architecture within an environmental context (historical,
traditional, urban),
Skills
• Improvement of skills in architectural planning, construction and
presentation techniques; advanced proficiency in oral, visual
and written mediums for communication of design ideas.
Attitudes
• Awareness development for the cultural heritage and sites of
natural and historical significance; acquaintance with the legal
and ethical aspects of working in such contexts.
outcomes
The following outcomes are common to Arch 301 and 302
studios, which can be given in either of the terms (depending on
the organization of studio trips). By the end of two consecutive
courses, the student will be able to:
Knowledge
• identify, discuss and interpret prominent cases from world
literature on relevant works of pioneering features;
• carry out, critically, analysis of design problems in relation to
environmental, social and urban aspects;
• pursue and use reliable knowledge in sustainable design,
building tectonics, and design of new buildings in historical
context;
• propose a building program based on social and cultural
scenarios, with the guidance of sample briefs provided in class;
• create alternative concept designs and work out master plan
ideas at neighborhood scales;
4

• explore and apply intermediary and advanced technologies in
Skills
giving structural form to spaces.
• accurately produce base maps, site plans and sectionelevations,
with correct representation of the proposed design
and its environmental context;
• demonstrate dexterity in presentation techniques, using
advanced computer programs skillfully; using both manual and
computer aided drawings and models.
• articulate the structural and tectonic form of buildings with
precision and expressive quality;
• work out coherent transitions between multiple scales (from
1/5000 to 1/50), with demonstrated skill in full expression of
each scale;
• prepare reports in mature language on proposed program and
design ideas.
Attitudes
• develop maturity in managing teamwork, demonstrating
individual responsibility and commitment to collective
achievement;
• develop consiousness on poetics of space and structure;
• demonstrate adoption of values concerning natural and cultural
diversity, with utmost care for heritage sites and buildings;
• demonstrate evidence of professional ethics to resist and
challenge real life procedures of practice.
Panel and table critiques, lectures and group discussions.
Diversification in subject matter and working habits throughout term
projects, each being planned to expose the students to different
learning experiences.
Students’ regular and timely attendance to the studio is important
yet this does not ensure their progress and contribution to
the educational milieu. The regular and sustainable intellectual
development of each student will be observed by means of group
and individual production via panel and individual critics, sketch
problems, home-works, preliminary juries etc.
course conduct
attendance
An attendance less than 80% during the semester means failing
the course. Students with such poor attendance will not be
allowed to submit their work for the final jury. For any project
given, even though the student may have been physically
present in class during the semester, if the studio critics have not
seen adequate work of the student in progress, submission for
the jury of that particular project will not be accepted. The exact
measure of ‘adequate work’ may vary in each studio group.
Students are required to get feedback each week regularly.
5

evaluation
Students of architecture are expected to be on time in submitting
project, since this is demanded from them as prospective
professional architects. In order to develop the necessary virtue of
being punctual, the studio project submissions will be required to
be strictly on time.
Late submission or partial submission of the missing items will
cause half or one grade deduction from the final jury grade decided
during the final jury period. Grade deduction will be in comparable
amount to the missing work. If there is no valid excuse (such as a
medical report), the extra time given for the late submission cannot
be more than one additional day.
Failing to submit the final jury project may result in NA, a failing
grade.
Grading percentages of studio works can vary in different groups
depending upon the work schedule, workload and processing of
the different types of studies. Besides the grades received from
term projects and assignments (preliminary and final juries, sketch
problems, site studies, case studies), opinion based on observations
of student conduct in the studio (attendance and participation,
performance in panel and table critiques, and demonstration of
progress) will have a role in the determination of the final grades.
For the improvement of the grades received from assignments and
juries, the instructors may request (or permit) additional work. An
improved grade is not guaranteed simply because additional work
is done.
Group work is a part of the academic and professional life of
architects. Students are to create positive social and physical
atmosphere and act in union with the group members, share
information, effort, and work load.
grading
10% Term Studies (Assignments / Case Studies / Site Analysis /
Sketch Problem etc.)
20% Preliminary Jury 1
20% Preliminary Jury 2
10% Preliminary Jury 3
40% Final Jury
reminders
Students must be aware of the University’s policies regarding
academic integrity, honesty, and plagiarism; they are advised to
read the following regulations and take them seriously:
Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Öğrenciler için Akademik
Dürüstlük Kılavuzu (http://oidb.metu.edu.tr/sites/oidb.metu.edu.
tr/files/ODTUAkademikDurustluk-Kilavuzu-7.3.2016.son_.pdf)
Middle East Technical University, Academic Integrity Guide for
Students (http://oidb.metu.edu.tr/en/system/files/Academic%20
Integrity%20Guide%20for%20Students.pdf)
• Carefully read the documents concerning academic integrity
6

which have been issued to you and the related regulations on
the University’s website. Learn in detail which situations fall
into the scope of plagiarism in academic studies from relevant
resources (e.g. ODTÜ UEAM website).
• If any distrust about authorship occurs, students can be
examined on the basis of their design project documents
produced during the semester.
• In cases of plagiarism, excuses such as “I wasn’t aware that what
I’ve done is within the scope of plagiarism” are unacceptable.
Be informed that the responsibility for such behavior is entirely
yours.
• Use your own ideas in all of your work such a piece of homework,
project etc. Indicate the source of any thought, idea, text,
document or finding which does not belong to you.
• Prepare all your homework, projects, reports etc. by referring to
the accessible original (primary) sources.
• During examinations/evaluations, abide by the rules in the
“Middle East Technical University Guide for Rules To Be Followed
in an Examination Environment” as well as the rules determined
by the instructor of the course are used.
• The conduct of the studio requires mutual understanding and
respect.
• The studio environment must be kept tidy and clean and
maintained in silence.
• Personal belongings must be kept in individual care and
responsibility.
• Use of harmful adhesive bonding material like Pattex is strictly
forbidden.
• Studios are not places for having meals.
• Mobile phones must be in silent mode and out of sight during
lectures and discussions.
• Students with special needs or disabilities should inform the
studio tutors at the beginning of the semester in order to provide
appropriate arrangements in the class.
7

academic integrity
guide for students
Middle East Technical University aims to access knowledge and
produce, apply and disseminate it for the social, cultural, economic,
scientific and technological development of both our society
and humanity by carrying out activities of education, research
and community services at universal standards, and to educate
individuals who are equipped with this knowledge and at the same
time who respect knowledge and the rights of others. In accordance
with this aim, all members and students of our university adopt the
following METU Code of Honor:
“As reliable, responsible and honorable individuals, all members
of Middle East Technical University embrace only the success and
recognition they deserve, and act with integrity in the use, evaluation
and presentation of facts, data and documents.”
What is academic integrity?
Academic Integrity entails carrying out original work and sharing
ideas and findings of others provided that the source is cited.
What are infringements of academic integrity?
1. Plagiarism,
2. Cheating,
3. Presenting or submitting in different courses the whole or part
of a personal study, homework or project done previously with
a different purpose without citing the source,
4. Indicating sources that do not actually exist as references or
creating a false data set,
5. Conducting academic work on behalf of other students,
6. Behaving in a manner so as to obtain an unfair advantage
(obtaining false medical reports, declaring false excuses for
period extensions and make-ups, transferring or obtaining the
right of enrollment to a course in exchange for a personal gain,
etc.),
7. Producing or making use of fraudulent documents (reference
letters, medical reports, proficiency documents/scores,
transcripts, etc.)
8. Impersonating someone else in an exam; having someone else
impersonate oneself.
Plagiarism:
“Plagiarism is intentionally or unintentionally acquiring and using
someone else’s ideas and opinions and presenting them as if one’s
own without making a reference to or citing the source.” (ODTÜ
UEAM)
8

Detailed information on the types of plagiarism can be found at the
address http://ueam.metu.edu.tr/intihal.
Cheating:
Cheating is described as any attempt or action involving the use of
disallowed sources secretly while answering exam questions. Each
item below is within the scope of cheating:
1. Peeking at another student’s paper during an exam,
2. Peeking at another student’s paper during an exam and copying
the answers onto one’s own paper,
3. Talking to other students during the exam,
4. Any kind of sharing of information and sources during an exam
(exchanging notes, etc.)
5. Taking exam questions and/or answers out of the exam hall
without permission by writing them down or photographing
them,
6. Transmitting exam questions to someone else or obtaining
answers through cellular phones or any other electronic gadget
during the exam,
7. Writing notes concerning the content of the exam on desks
and accessories used during the exam, or on one’s body or
elsewhere,
8. Having someone else do the academic work; doing work to be
done individually with other students,
9. Submitting to the course instructor reports/documents such as
homework or projects prepared by others as if one’s own work.
Disciplinary action to be taken against cheating is arranged by the
Rules and Regulations Governing Student Disciplinary Actions in
Institutions of Higher Education, which can be found at the address
http://oidb.metu.edu.tr/yonetmelikler.
9

10

01
230919 / M.A
timetable
11

Arch 301_Architectural Design III_Fall 2019-20_ÇETİN.YAVUZATMACA.ERTAN_Studio Timetable (tentative)
10:40 - 12:30 13:40 - 17:30
1
M September 23 - General Introduction
T September 26 Discussions on the Assignment 01 : The ONE (G) Discussions on the Assignment 02: The PEEK (P)
2
M September 30 SITE TRIP SITE TRIP
T October 03 Reading Presentations (G) (4)
Presentation : Olgu Çalışkan,Urban Space Morphologies
Discussions on Site Analysis & Project Program (Digital) (G)
3
M October 07 Discussions on Case Studies / Literature (Digital) (G) Discussions on Case Studies / Literature (Digital) (G)
T October 10 Presentation : Nuray Bayraktar, Ankara Konut Envanteri Workshop : Brainstorming / Conceptual Background (G)
4
M October 14 Case Trip: Dormitories, ODTÜ Case
Presentation : Elif Düzel, InfoGraphics
Discussions on Case Studies / after Brainstorming (Digital) (G)
T October 17 Presentation : Gizem Nur Aydemir, Observations on 100.YIL FIRST PROPOSALS by using DIAGRAMS
5
M October 21 Presentation : Neris Parlak, Housing Typologies PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
T October 24 Presentation : Lale Özgenel, ODTÜ DORM Experiences PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
6
M October 28 REPUBLIC DAY REPUBLIC DAY
T October 31 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
7
M November 04 PRELIMINARY JURY 01 PRELIMINARY JURY 01
T November 07
Presentation : ..., from 2D to PRESENTATION (PHOTOSHOP)
Presentation : ..., from 2D to PRESENTATION (CAD, AI, ID)
Presentation : Revit Techniques for 2D presentation
Discussions on Assignment 10 (Presentation Techniques)
8
M November 11 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
T November 14 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
9
M November 18 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
T November 21 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
10
M November 25 PRELIMINARY JURY 02 PRELIMINARY JURY 01
T November 28
Presentation : ... , from 3D to RENDERING (LUMION)
Presentation : ... , from 3D to RENDERING (CORONA)
Presentation : Revit Techniques for 3D presentation
Discussions on Assignment 11 (Presentation Techniques)
11
M December 02 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
T December 05 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
12
M December 09 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (1/2)
T December 12 PANEL CRITICS (1/2) PANEL CRITICS (2/2)
13
M December 16 PRELIMINARY JURY 03 (Presentation) (Rehearsal) PRELIMINARY JURY 01 (Presentation) ((Rehearsal)
T December 19 RECITATION - LAST CHECK RECITATION - LAST CHECK
14
M December 23 FINAL JURY WEEK FINAL JURY WEEK
T December 26 FINAL JURY WEEK FINAL JURY WEEK
12

Arch 301_Architectural Design III_Fall 2019-20_ÇETİN.YAVUZATMACA.ERTAN_Studio Timetable (tentative)
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION NOTES
01 : The ONE (G)
02 : The PEEK (P)
03 : Reading List (G)
Project Program (in general)
Assignment 01 - 02 (digital)
04: Site Analysis (G)
05: Site Documentation & Model (Digital&Physical)
06 : Case Studies / LITERATURE Assignment 04 (digital)
07 : Brainstorming / Conceptual Background Assignment 06 (digital)
08 : Case Studies / after BRAINSTORMING Assignment 05
09 : on The WAY on ANALYSIS (MyBest on Diagramatic
PT)
Assignment 08
Site Analysis and Decisions
Project Program (in detail) Assignment 09 Site Analysis and Decisions
1/500 decisions
PJ01 - Requirement List
1/500 decisions
Last discussisons on 1/500 decisions
HOC > jury member for HZ Group
10 : on The WAY on 2D PRESENTATON (MyBest on 2D
PT)
PJ01 - RL
Assignment 10
first steps for 1/200 decisions and solutions
1/200 decisions and solutions
1/200 decisions and solutions
PJ02 - Requirement List
1/200 decisions and solutions
11 : on The WAY on 3D PRESENTATION (MyBest on 3D
PT)
PJ02 - RL
Assignment 11
HOC > jury member for HZ Group
through the final jury
through the final jury
through the final jury
PJ03 - Requirement List (Presentation)
through the final jury
PJ03 - RL
13

14

01
260919 / T.M
You are asked to present one of the favorite housing projects of
the ONE
a well-known architect considering the total construction area
around 15.000 m2.
assignment 01
You will be worked in groups of 2 and the presentations will be in
PECHA KUCHA style.
PECHA KUCHA style: 20 slides, 20 seconds for each.
Slide transitions should be automatic.
Submission: 26.09.2019 Thursday at 10:40
15

Büşra Aşçı - Selim Yarbaşı
busra ascı r. selim yarbasi
‘the one’
aranya low cost housing
16

A01
The ONE
23.09.2019 Büşra Ballı - Uğur Durğut
Ballı B.
Durğut U.
ROMERO #114
METU ARCHITECTURE ARCH 301 Hasan Okan Çetin . Mercan Yavuzatmaca . Seren Ertan
17

18
Busenur Güngör - İzgesu Güven - Şeyma Sezen

A01
The ONE
23.09.2019 Emel Uçak
co-Housing Bahçelievler Hybrid
Elevated Street - Inside Out
EMEL UÇAK
e project - co-Housing in Bahçelievler - includes
6 individual part and 1 communal part where all 6
parts builds physical relationship and also social and
communal.
A
What the street life offers in a popular site, is tried to
be further elaborated by carrying its characteristics to
the most upper oor. at’s why Elevated Street became
the essential of the project.
Indıvial part of mine, on the other hand, carries the
boundaries and traces of Elevated street both pyshially
and functional. e service spaces of communal space
also becomes the private service spaces. Other than self
sufficient individual units, each of them encourages
collective living by offering spaces with diferent spatial
and functional qualities.
A’
Ground Floor Plan
B
B’
First Floor Plan
BAZAAR
TRANSITIVITY
CONTRAST
POROSITY
Second Floor Plan
ird Floor Plan
DIALECTIC
INTEGRATION
LIGHTWEIGHT
Forth Floor Plan
Scale: 1/100
19

20
Elif Güngör - Nihan Mutlu

A01
The ONE
23.09.2019 Nadine Yousif - Zeynep Erişti
21

Onurcan Mızrak - Ayşenur Gökhan
onurcan mızrak
ayşenur gökhan
PECHA KUCHA
22

A01 The
ONE 23.09.2019
Dilara Güney - M. Emre Karcı
23

24
Pınar Talaş - Ekin Mansuroğlu

A01
The ONE
23.09.2019
Asrın Onat Şengül - Arif Eren Yıldırım
25

26
Furkan Türker - Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu

A01
The ONE
23.09.2019 Abdullah Zamir - Gazi Can Şahin
THE ONE
MIT BAKER HOUSE ALVAR AALTO
ABDULLAH ZAMIR - GAZİ CAN ŞAHİN
27

28

01
260919 / T.A
the PEAK
You are asked to present your ARCH202 project in one A1 poster.
Selections and the presentation techniques are totally among you.
assignment 02
The base organization for poster design will be given to you in
INDESIGN format.
You will be worked individually and the presentations will be in
DIGITAL format.
Submission: 26.09.2019 Thursday at 13:40
29

30
Abdullah Zamir

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Arif Eren Yıldırım
31

32
Asrın Onat Şengül

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Ayşegül Gökhan
33

34
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Busenur Güngör
35

36
Büşra Aşçı

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Büşra Ballı
37

38
Büşra Karagözlü

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Davut Balcı
39

40
Dilara Güney

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Ekin Mansuroğlu
41

42
Elif Güngör

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Emel Uçak
43

44
Furkan Türker

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Gazi Can Şahin
45

46
İzgesu Güven

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 M. Emre Karcı
47

48
Nadine Yousif

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Nihan Mutlu
49

50
Onurcan Mızrak

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Pınar Talaş
51

52
R. Selim Yarbaşı

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Şeyma Sezen
53

54
Umutkağan Durgut

A02
The PEAK
23.09.2019 Zeynep Erişti
55

56

02
300919 / M.MA
site trip
57

58

02
031019 / T.M
READING LIST
• Ali Cengizkan_kultur nesnesi olarak konut.docx
• Ece Kumkale_Turkiyede Yeni Konut Egilimleri.docx
• Floor Plan Atlas.pdf
• Ilker Teker_100.Yil Worker’s Houses Neighborhood.pdf
• KONUT_SPO2015.pdf
• Reyner Benham_a home is not a house.pdf
• Roger Sherwood_Modern Housing Prototypes.pdf
• TMMOB ANK_DOSYA20_kent ve konut.pdf
• Ugur Tanyeli_Grameri Bozuk Toplumda Mimarlik.pdf
• VCMD-konut-yapilari-kitap-5.pdf
assignment 03
• Zerrin Ezgi Kahraman_Konut Memnuniyeti Arastirmasi.pdf
• Esra Alkim Karaagac_From Shelter to Product_100.YIL
Housing.pdf
• IKSV_Design Chronology of Turkey_Housing.pdf
• Sibel Bozdogan_TURKEY_modern architectures in
history.pdf
59

60
GROUP 03

A03
READING list
Gökhan
03.10.2019
. Güngör . Güven . Mutlu . Mızrak . Sezen . Erişti
61

62
GROUP 01

A03
READING list
Zamir
03.10.2019
. Tozun . Güngör . Karagözlü . Balci . Uçak . Şahin
63

64
GROUP 04

A03
READING list
Ballı
03.10.2019
. Güney . Karcı
65

66

02
031019 / T.A
presentation 01
Olgu Çalışkan
Urban Space Morphologies
67

68

03
031019 / T.A
Urban Focus X 1
- The main characteristics of Eskişehir - Konya Road and Malazgirt
Boulevard
- The functional characteristic of the site within these main roads
- The urban decisions related with settlement and green strategies
Landuse Pattern, Functional Typologies X 1
-Existing building typologies and landuse pattern
-Indicate whether the surrounding buildings are used for commercial,
cultural, administrative, residential etc. purposes
- Day/night usage
Landscape, Greenery X 1
- Parks, green areas, gardens, playgrounds in and around the site
- Location of trees and vegetation in the site.
Mobility, Traffic Circulation X 1
- Road analysis
- Bus, taxi stops
- Parking areas/lots in and around the site
- Density of pedestrian and vehicular circulation
Elevations X 1
- Pay attention to the sizes and proportions
- Take photos for every street around the site. Produce panoramic
street views from those photos.
- Draw continuous street elevations
Sections X 1
- Draw continuous site sections which include the neighboring
buildings and streets. You should draw at least two sections for
each direction (2 longitudinal sections, 2 transverse sections)
- Pay attention to the sizes and proportions
Landmarks, Vistas, Street Furniture X 1
- Document landmarks and vistas in and around the site with
photos and sketches
......................................................................................................
Base Documentation and Modeling
• Documentation (2D CAD . Base Drawings)
• Physical Model (Topography Modification & Physical Model)
• Digital Model (Digital Model & Conversion)
site analysis
in detail at the project information page
assignment 04.05
69

70

03
071019 / M.MA
You are asked to analyze the housing projects in terms of
the following criteria:
• The total capacity of the facility (how many residents?)
• The category of the housing project. (Is it perimeter block, point
block, slab block, cluster housing, linear scheme, low rise-high
density or terrace housing?)
• Variety of housing units (Number of different types of units, their
sizes and locations)
• Interior organization of the units. (Provide the plans and sections
in 1/200 and 1/500.
• Vertical and horizontal circulation. (Pedestrian and vehicular
movements)
• Open spaces. (Common and/or private gardens/courtyards)
• Public spaces and auxiliary functions of the housing. (Garages,
health/gym facilities, shopping facilities, cultural facilities
(cinema, theater, etc.), offices, religious buildings, educational
buildings (kindergarten, school, etc.), etc.
• Relations with the site. Orientation to view and cardinal
directions.
• Mass, façade and roof articulation
You are asked to analyze the dormitory projects in terms of
the following criteria:
• The total capacity of the facility (how many students?)
• How are students living (Rooms, large halls apartments?)
• Is there a difference for the freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and
seniors? Are there facilities for the couples?
• Size of the rooms
• Interior organization of the rooms. (Provide the plans and
sections in 1/200 and 1/500. Color the plans and sections in
terms of the functions. Study areas
CASE STUDIES
assignment 06
• The location of wet places (wc, shower etc.)
• Cooking facilities (central, individual)
• Laundry
• Physical exercise facilities
• Open spaces, gardens, terraces
71

HOUSING STUDIES
PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT LOCATION YEAR
Lakeshore Drive Apts. Mies van der Rohe Chicago 1951
Unite d’Habitation Le Corbusier Marseille 1952
Pedrogulho Estate A. Eduardo Reidy Rio de Janerio 1952
Price Tower Frank Llyod Wright Bartlesville 1956
Cinnah 19 Nejat Ersin Ankara 1957
Marina City Bertrand Goldberg Chicago 1964
Habitat 67 Moshe Safdie Montreal 1967
Walden 7 Ricardo Bofill Barcelona 1974
Alexandria Road Neave Brown London 1978
Rokko (Stage 1 & 2) Tadao Ando Kobe 1983
Cubuswoningen Piet Blom Rotterdam 1984
Nemausus Jean Nouvel Nimes 1988
Aranya Low Cost Housing Balkrishna Doshi Indore , India 1989
Teras Evler M.& N. Karaaslan / M. Günday Ankara 1990
Nexus Housing Rem Koolhaas Fukuoka 1991
Dikmen Bridge and Housing Doruk Pamir Ankara 1996
Wozoko Apartments MVRDV Amsterdam 1997
The Whale de Architekten Cie. Amsterdam 2000
Mirador MVRDV & Lleo Madrid 2005
Levent Loft Tabanlıoğlu Architects İstanbul 2007
Mountain Dwellings BIG Architects Copenhagen 2009
35. Cadde Teğet Mimarlık İzmir 2010
House 8 BIG Architects Copenhagen 2010
Elemental Alejandro Aravena Chile 2010
New Academic Lodgements CAG Mimarlık Ankara 2013
40 Housing Units LAN Architecture Paris 2014
Romero 114 HGR Arquitectos Ciudad De México 2017
Competitions on HOUSING in
Turkey
72

DORMITORY STUDIES
PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT LOCATION YEAR
Swiss Pavillion Le Corbusier France 1931
MIT Baker House Dorm. Alvar Aalto USA 1948
Brazil Pavillion Le Corbusier France 1959
St. Andrew Dorm. James Stirling Scotland 1964
Tandoğan Dorm. Şevki Vanlı/Ersen Gömleksizoğlu Ankara 1967
MIT Simmons Hall Steven Holl Architects USA 2002
Tietgen Dorm. Lundgaard&Tranberg Architects Denmark 2005
Student Residence in Paris LAN Architecture France 2007
METU NCC Dorm. (2 nd Stage) Tektonika (Semra Teber) N. Cyprus 2007
Student Housing in Epinay ECDM France 2008
Student Dorm. Nickl & Partner Architekten Germany 2009
Student Housing in Bordeaux Lanoire & Courrian France 2009
METU NCC Dorm (3 rd Stage) TECE Mimarlık (T. Hadi / C. İlhan) N. Cyprus 2009
ROC Mondriaan Laak II LIAG Netherlands 2011
METU Undergraduate Dorm. URBAR (Ali Kural) Ankara 2011
METU Graduate Dorm. Uygur Mimarlık Ankara 2011
West Campus Student Housing Mahlum USA 2012
Uni. of S. Denmark Student Hou. C.F. Møller Architects Denmark 2012
Student Apartments in Luzern Durisch + Nolli Architetti Switzerland 2013
Boeselburg Council Student
Housing
Kresings GmbH Germany 2014
Carlaw Park Student Accom. Warren and Mahoney New Zealand 2014
Stüdyo Santral Yurtları Erginoğlu-Çalışlar Mimarlık İstanbul 2014
Republika Academic Aparts Gökhan Avcıoğlu İstanbul 2014
Murat Karamancı Student Center Alataş Architecture And Consulting İstanbul 2016
Competitions on Social Centers
(for Youth&Elders) in Turkey
73

Housing . Villa Verde
Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu . Onurcan Mızrak
74

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . St. Andrews Dormitory
07.10.19 Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu . Onurcan Mızrak
75

Housing . Unite D’Habitation
Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
76

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . Student Residence in Paris
07.10.19 Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
77

Housing . Aranya Low Cost Housing
R. Selim Yarbaşı . Büşra Aşçı
78

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . METU Graduate Dormitory
07.10.19 R. Selim Yarbaşı . Büşra Aşçı
79

Housing . Nemausus
Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti
80

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . METU NCC Dorm (3rd Stage)
07.10.19 Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti
81

Housing . The Whale
Abdullah Zamir . Gazi Can Şahin
82

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . Uni. of S. Denmark Student Hou.
07.10.19 Abdullah Zamir . Gazi Can Şahin
83

Housing . Teras Evler
Şeyma Sezen . İzgesu Güven
84

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . MIT Baker House Dorm
07.10.19 Şeyma Sezen . İzgesu Güven
MIT BAKER
HOUSE
DORMITORY
Şeyma SEZEN
İzgesu GÜVEN
PRIVATE ROOMS
COMMON AREAS
WET SPACES
CIRCULATION
The dormitory houses 318 undergraduates in single, double, triple, and quadruple rooms.
smallest room: 105-120 square feet.
largest room: 395-445 square feet.
ROOM TYPES
Single: 60 %
Double: 18%
Triples: 10%
Quads: 6%
Dining halls in common areas.
85

Competitions on HOUSING in Turkey
M. Emre Karcı . Dilara Güney
86

A06
CASE STUDIES
Competitions on HOUSING in Turkey
07.10.19 M. Emre Karcı . Dilara Güney
87

Housing . Pedrogulho Estate
Pınar Talaş . Ekin Mansuroğlu
88

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . Tietgen Dorm
07.10.19 Pınar Talaş . Ekin Mansuroğlu
89

Housing . Mountain Dwellings / Dormitory . Swiss Pavillion
Büşra Karagözlü . Aktekin Tozun
90

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . MIT Simmons Hall / Housing . Cinnah 19
07.10.19 Emel Uçak . Davut Balci
91

Housing . Price Tower
Busenur Güngör . Nadine Yousif
92

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . Brazil Pavillion
07.10.19 Busenur Güngör . Nadine Yousif
93

Housing . Romero 114
Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut
94

A06
CASE STUDIES
Dormitory . METU NCC Dorm. (2nd Stage)
07.10.19 Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut
95

Competitions on Social Centers (for Youth&Elders) in Turkey
Arif Eren Yıldırım . Asrın Onat Şengül
96

A06
CASE STUDIES
Competitions on Social Centers (for Youth&Elders) in
Turkey
07.10.19 Arif Eren Yıldırım . Asrın Onat Şengül
97

98

03
101019 / T.M
presentation 02
Nuray Bayraktar
Ankara Konut Envanteri
99

100

03
101019 / T.A
assignment 07
Conceptual Background
Workshop : Brainstorming
101

102

04
141019 / M.M
case trip
METU Case
Dormitories
103

104

04
141019 / M.A
presentation 03
Elif Düzel
InfoGraphics
105

106

04
141019 / M.A
DIAGRAMS
assignment 08 CASE STUDIES
107

108
Dilara Güney . Emre Karcı

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19
R. Selim Yarbaşı . Büşra Aşçı
109

110
Aktekin Tozun . Büşra Karagözlü

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19 Aktekin Tozun . Büşra Karagözlü
111

112
Arif Eren Yıldırım

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19 Asrın Onat Şengül
113

Busenur Güngör . Nadine Yousif
ARCH301
CASE STUDIES
MAISON DU BRESIL
LE CORBUSIER
THEATRE
Busenur Güngör – Nadine Yousif
HALL
HALL
CAFETRIA
ENTRANCE
HALL
ADMIN.
HALL
MANAGER
PLANS COMBINED
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
CORRIDOR COMMON KIT. STAIRCASE
DOUBLE RM. SINGLE RM. SINGLE RM. TERRACE
FLOOR PLANS
EXPLODED DIAGRAM
Location in paris
Le corbusier
PROJECT AIM : building a residence for Brazilian students and
teachers in Paris.
CONTEXT : a five-story concrete volume that stands above the ground
level, also made of concrete. Beneath this volume is an irregular first
floor that hosts administrative spaces on the west, and on the east
communal spaces :
• the library
• the theatre
• the exhibition space and gathering space.
“Since its creation, the House of Brazil has a series of public spaces
dedicated to the diffusion of the Brazilian culture”.
Theatre and its capacity is 80 to 150 seats.
Large glazed hall 330m2, surrounded with greens.
Meeting room for of 25 places.
SOME OF THE FIVE POINT OF ARCHITECTURE
• PILOTIS
• FREE PLAN
• FREE FAÇADE
• STRIP WINDOWS in this case balkoies
OPENSPACES AND GREENS : making use of the ground
level by lifting the building over pillars and making use of
open spaces and well integration with the greens.
BRUTALISM : in the use of materials, his aim was always to
explore the abilities of the materials rather that covering
them.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Brazil+Ho
https://en.wikiarquitectura.com/building/maison-du-bresil/
http://www.maisondubresil.org/le-batiment/visite-virtuelle/
https://www.archdaily.com/328057/ad-classics-maison-du-bresil-le-corbusier
114

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19
Busenur Güngör . Nadine Yousif
115

116
Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19
Büşra Ballı . Umutkağan Durgut
117

118
Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19 Ayşenur Gökhan . Zeynep Erişti
119

120
İzgesu Güven . Şeyma Sezen

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19 Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu . Onurcan Mızrak
121

122
Pınar Talaş . Ekin Mansuroğlu

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19 Emel Uçak . Davut Balci
123

124
Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19 Furkan Türker . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
125

126
Gazi Can Şahin . Abdullah Zamir

A08
CASE STUDIES / DIAGRAMS
10.10.19 Gazi Can Şahin . Abdullah Zamir
127

128

04
171019 / T.M
presentation 04
Gizem Nur Aydemir
Observations on 100.YIL
129

130

05
241019 / T.M
presentation 05
Lale Özgenel
ODTÜ DORM Experiences
131

132

A STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT
in 100. YIL
project brief
2019-2020 Fall term project consists of a student housing complex
within an urban setting containing residential, commercial and social
facilities in public, semi-public and private relations. It is located in
the 100. Yıl district of Çankaya, Ankara that has been converted
from a typical residential zone to a student-based new urban
setting in the last decade. At the intersection of several universities
such as METU, Çankaya University, and Ufuk University, 100. Yıl
district has been developing as a multi-functional center for youths
including different types of social and commercial facilities with
dwelling units.
The plot is located on the opposite side of Turk-İş Blokları Primary
School, between the 1427th and 1505th main roads. It forms a
large rectangular plot with an approximately 25.000 m2 ground
area and 25-meter level differences. At the frontal facade of the
site, there exist 4 residential blocks including commercial units on
the ground level. Keeping them as it is or reinterpreting them within
the new complex is totally on behalf of the designers.
At first, students are asked to analyze the site problems and to
present some pioneer samples from Turkey and abroad in case
studies. The analysis and the presentations constitute the first steps
of the project and to be worked in groups. In the second stage, they
are asked to produce their proposals in an approximately 25.000 m2
architectural program including residential, administrative, social,
cultural and commercial facilities for both students and existing
users. The complex is expected to be used by 800 students and 40
families together. The variety of the spatial organization generated
on the concept of “living units” is asked to be designed according
to the different life pattern proposals.
133

134

site analysis
135

136

137

Urban Focus
BUSENUR GÜNGÖR
EMEL UÇAK
DAVUT BALCİ
NADINE YOUSIF
Landuse pattern, Functional Typologies
ASRIN ONAT ŞENGÜL
FURKAN TÜRKER
ARİF EREN YILDIRIM
BERFE NAZ HAŞEMOĞLU
Landscape, Greenery
AKTEKİN TOZUN
BÜŞRA KARAGÖZLÜ
GAZİ CAN ŞAHİN
ABDULLAH ZAMIR
Mobility, Traffic Circulation
DİLARA GÜNEY
MAHMUT EMRE KARCI
UMUTKAĞAN DURĞUT
BÜŞRA BALLI
Elevations
ONURCAN MIZRAK
ZEYNEP ERİŞTİ
ŞEYMA SEZEN
İZGESU GÜVEN
Sections
AYŞENUR GÖKHAN
NİHAN MUTLU
ELİF GÜNGÖR
İBRAHİM HALİL KELLECİ
Landmarks, Vistas, Street Furniture
PINAR TALAŞ
RECEP SELİM YARBAŞI
BÜŞRA AŞCI
EKİN MANSUROĞLU
138

G01
Urban Focus
Emel
Uçak . Nadine Yousif . Busenur Güngör . Davut Balci
ARCH 301
MACRO ANALYSIS
SITE ANALYSIS - URBAN FOCUS
Site survey on 100.Yil Ankara, Turkey
Emel Nadine Busenur Davout
MEEZO ANALYSIS
ROADS
There are 3 important roads surrounding
the site
Malazgirt bulivard , eskisehir and
konya (connected). Two of them are
the surrounding roads of Ankara as
it was planed by Ubaydin Yucel in
master plan of Ankara in 1957. Caracteristics
of those roads come
from their ability of distribution
such as the roads going to the
centre.
THE SCALE OF ANKARA
showing the site relation with the
centre of Ankara.
DIFFENT FUNCTIONAL SPACES
The site has a rich environment
in terms of spaces. This
gains site strategic importance.
Because health institutions,
public institutions, and educational
area and also commercial
areas are very close .
Social
Education
Health
Instutıtıons
SCALE OF CANKAYA
Commercial & Eating
DENSITY
100.yil housing typologies and
settlements show greater constructe
area than others. Also the minimum
living expenses is more appropriate
for the lower level income groups such
as students or people with minimum
salaries.
In a larger scale, the density of the districts
of Kizirlimak and Cukurambar is
similar and less dense than 100. yil district.
The reason arises from both the typology
of the housing and the differences
in living costs of the districts. density
varies even from one plot to another es
pecially the newly constructed buildings
Kızılırmak District
Çukurambar District
100. Yıl District
SCALE OF THE DISTRICTS
Active Green
Passive Green
GREENRY
The 100.yil district has a rich green
environment . One is at the east side of
the neighbourhod nearby yhe site there
is linear and continuous green composed
of 100.yill park, Fisum sayke park, Ece Ulku
parkand Prof.Dr Turkan saylan park that
enable people to be part of it.Also some
other green spaces such as cinar park
Teoman Ozturk park have green that people
actively involved. On the contrary, some
passive green areas such as ODTU forests,
GATA 100.yil forest and TSK Ankara Garnizonu
and Hrita greens creates a rich green that
people cannot use.
STREET PATERNS
There is an organic street pattern
(distributed grid) in 100. yil
neighbourhood. The strets have a
free development being typical facbric
of late 20th century urbanism. Organic
and free development of the strets and
their connections to other major strets
and roads enable high accessibilty to
the site and its surrounding
neighborhood.
SCALE OF THE 100YIL
MICRO ANALYSIS
climate conditions roads pedestrian circulation
USER PROFILES
transportation
green areas
00
18
6
Blue are the
workers
Red are the
families,
40%.
Green are the
students,
30%.
Orange are the
elderly, 30%.
Purple are the
sport player
12
139

Landuse pattern, Functional Typologies
Arif Eren Yıldırım . Asrın Onat Şengül . Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu . Furkan Türker
G02
140

G03
Landscape, Greenery
Abdullah Zamir . Aktekin Tozun . Büşra Karagözlü . Gazi Can Şahin
141

Büşra Ballı . Uğur Durğut . Dilara Güney . Emre Karcı
Mobility, Traffic Circulation
G04
142

G05 Elevations
İzgesu Güven . Onurcan Mızrak . Şeyma Sezen . Zeynep Erişti
143

Ayşenur Gökhan . Elif Güngör . Nihan Mutlu
Sections
G06
144

G07
Landmarks, Vistas, Street Furniture
Büşra Aşçı . Ekin Mansuroğlu . Pınar Talaş . Selim Yarbaşı
street furnitures
arch 301 site analysis
landmarks, street furniture and vistas
busra ascı ekin mansuroglu pınar talas r. selim yarbası
vistas
145

ACCOMODATION for STUDENTS
Units for Undergraduate Students
Units for Graduate Students
* The variety of the spatial organization will be designed
according to the proposed different life patterns.
* At least two variations are expected for each category.
* The complex will be designed for 800 students.
12.800 m2
Administration
Manager’s Room, Meeting Rooms, Secretary, Offices,
Personnel Rooms, etc.
300 m2
Room Services
Cleaning Room, WC-Shower, Cooking Area, Laundry, Ironing
Room, etc.
600 m2
Common Spaces
Lobby, Cafe-Canteen, TV-Hobby Room, Study Rooms,
Music Room, etc.
600 m2
Service Spaces
Storage, HVAC Room, Bunker (Haven), etc. (at the basement
floors)
1.200 m2
ACCOMODATION for EXISTING USERS
15500 m2
Units for Family Housing
* There will be 40 family units in total. (* * At least two
variations (2+1 & 3+1) are expected.
3.600 m2
SOCIAL & CULTURAL FACILITIES
3600 m2
Social & Cultural Facilities It should be interpreted by the designer. 900 m2
COMMERCIAL FACILITIES
900 m2
Commercial Facilities
It should be interpreted by the designer according to the
needs of the complex and existing commercial services.
600 m2
600 m2
Net Area : 20.600 m2 . %25 Circulation : 5.150 m2 . Total Area : 25.750 m2 (~E=1)
AUXILARY AND OPEN SPACES
AUXILARY SPACES
Garage (at least for 250 cars), Storage, Service Spaces, etc.
Total area could be changed according to the basement
solutions and organizations.
…
Outdoor Parking & Taxi Stops
…
BikeRacks
…
Green Areas
Sports / Recreational Facilities
Existing trees should be taken into consideration. Green
Areas are to be designed to encourage the social life in this
node.
Sports / recreational facilities are to be designed to enhance
the social life.
…
…
146

program
147

148

07
041119 / M.MA
preliminary jury 01
149

150

A STUDENT HOUSING
PROJECT
Conceptual Drawings, Diagrams, Analysis
Please make sure that individual site analysis and your design
concept / approach / method is explicitly presented.
1/500 Site Plan; showing;
• surrounding streets and nearby buildings,
• landscape (trees, green areas), hardscape (pavements etc.)
• entrances to the complex (main entrances, garage and
service entrances) using arrows as indicators,
• stairs, ramps, level differences and retaining walls,
• all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level
1/500 Site Sections; (2 sections in different directions, use the
sections drawn by site analysis group); showing;
• the silhouette of nearby buildings,
• major levels
1/500 Physical Model (to be placed on the site model)
1/500 Digital Model (optional)
1/500 Ground Floor Plan; showing;
• structural members and axes,
• open spaces (courtyards, green areas, etc.),
• all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level,
• circulation members
1/500 Typical Room Floor Plan; showing;
• structural members and axes,
• organizations of unit types,
• circulation members
PJ01 requirements
151

152
Abdullah Zamir

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Aktekin Tozun
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
153

Arif Eren Yıldırım
Not Submitted
154

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Asrın Onat Şengül
155

Ayşenur Gökhan
Not Submitted
156

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
157

Busenur Güngör
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
158

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Büşra Aşçı
159

Büşra Ballı
Not Submitted
160

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Büşra Karagözlü
161

Davut Balci
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
162

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Dilara Güney
163

Emre Mansuroğlu
Not Submitted
164

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Elif Güngör
Not Submitted
165

166
Emel Uçak

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Furkan Türker
Not Submitted
167

168
Gazi Can Şahin

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
M. Emre Karcı
169

Nadine Yousif
Not Submitted
170

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Nihan Mutlu
171

Onurcan Mızrak
Not Submitted
172

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Pınar Talaş
Not Submitted
173

174
R. Selim Yarbaşı

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019
Şeyma Sezen
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
175

176
Umutkağan Durgut

PJ01
PRELIMINARY JURY_01
04.11.2019 Zeynep Erişti
Not Submitted
177

178

07
041119 / M.MA
preliminary jury 02
179

180

A STUDENT HOUSING
PROJECT
Conceptual Drawings, Diagrams, Analysis
Please make sure that individual site analysis and your design
concept / approach / method is explicitly presented.
1/500 Site Plan; showing;
• surrounding streets and nearby buildings,
• landscape (trees, green areas), hardscape (pavements etc.)
• entrances to the complex (main entrances, garage and
service entrances) using arrows as indicators,
• stairs, ramps, level differences and retaining walls,
• all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level
1/500 Site Sections; (2 sections in different directions, use the
sections drawn by site analysis group); showing;
• the silhouette of nearby buildings,
• major levels
1/500 Physical Model (to be placed on the site model)
1/500 Digital Model (optional)
1/500 Ground Floor Plan; showing;
• structural members and axes,
• open spaces (courtyards, green areas, etc.),
• all levels with reference to a preset ±0.00 level,
• circulation members
1/500 Typical Room Floor Plan; showing;
• structural members and axes,
• organizations of unit types,
• circulation members
PJ02 requirements
181

182
Abdullah Zamir

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Aktekin Tozun
Not Submitted
183

Arif Eren Yıldırım
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
184

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Asrın Onat Şengül
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
185

186
Ayşenur Gökhan

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
Not Submitted
187

Busenur Güngör
Not Submitted
188

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Büşra Aşçı
189

Büşra Ballı
Not Submitted
190

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Büşra Karagözlü
191

192
Davut Balci

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Dilara Güney
193

Ekin Mansuroğlu
Not Submitted
194

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Elif Güngör
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
195

196
Emel Uçak

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Furkan Türker
197

198
Gazi Can Şahin

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
M. Emre Karcı
199

Nadine Yousif
Not submitted due to technical promlems
Not submitted due to technical promlems
Not submitted due to technical promlems
Not submitted due to technical promlems
200

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Nihan Mutlu
201

202
Onurcan Mızrak

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Pınar Talaş
Not Submitted
203

204
R. Selim Yarbaşı

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Şeyma Sezen
Not Submitted
205

206
Umutkağan Durgut

PJ02
PRELIMINARY JURY_02
25.11.2019
Zeynep Erişti
Not Submitted
207

208

10
281119 / M.MA
workshop
Osman Sümer
Visualization
209

210

WS
Visualization Workshop
28.11.2019
211

212

WS
Visualization Workshop
28.11.2019
213

214

13
191219 / M.MA
PJ3 presentation jury
215

216

14
261219 / M.MA
Final jury
217

218

A STUDENT HOUSING
PROJECT
For the Final jury, students are expected to prepare;
-Six A1 posters (portrait)
-compulsory additional digital presentation (slide by slide)
-a small booklet based on their posters
-1/500 Physical Model (to be placed on the site model)
-Digital Model
The final jury posters and presentations should include;
-Main image;
A render taken from the main road that shows your project and the
site.
-Report;
General information regarding their project (m2 of the whole project,
designated m2 for student and family accommodations, designated
m2 for commercial solutions, etc.) concepts and analysis.
-Conceptual Drawings, Diagrams, Analysis
-1/1000 Site Plan;
-1/1000 Site Sections; (2 sections in different directions, use the
sections drawn by site analysis group); showing;
-1/500 Ground Floor and Floor Plans;
-1/500 Sections;
-1/200 Partial Floor Plans;
-1/50 or 1/100 Typical Room Floor Plan;
-3d render or image of the characteristic living units;
-Additional renders;
Final requirements
219

Abdullah Zamir
Aktekin Tozun
Arif Eren Yıldırım
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
Busenur Güngör
Büşra Aşçı
Davut Balci
Dilara Güney
Ekin Mansuroğlu
Furkan Türker
Gazi Can Şahin
M. Emre Karcı
Onurcan Mızrak
Pınar Talaş
R. Selim Yarbaşı
220

261219 / M.MA
Asrın Onat Şengül
Ayşenur Gökhan
Büşra Ballı
Büşra Karagözlü
A STUDENT HOUSING
PROJECT
Elif Güngör
Nadine Yousif
Umutkağan Durgut
Emel Uçak
Nihan Mutlu
Zeynep Erişti
Final Jury Models
221

222
Abdullah Zamir

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Abdullah Zamir
CC+
2.18
223

224
Aktekin Tozun

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Aktekin Tozun
CB-
2.33
225

226
Arif Eren Yıldırım

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Arif Eren Yıldırım
BA-
3.30
227

228
Asrın Onat Şengül

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Asrın Onat Şengül
CC+
2.11
Not Submitted
229

230
Ayşenur Gökhan

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Ayşenur Gökhan
BA-
3.41
231

Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
Not Submitted
232

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Berfe Naz Haşemoğlu
BA+
3.66
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
233

234
Busenur Güngör

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Busenur Güngör
BA-
3.30
235

236
Büşra Aşçı

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Büşra Aşçı
AA-
3.75
237

238
Büşra Ballı

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Büşra Ballı
CB+
2.60
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
239

240
Büşra Karagözlü

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Büşra Karagözlü
BA-
3.32
Not Submitted
241

242
Davut Balci

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Davut Balci
CB+
2.68
243

244
Dilara Güney

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Dilara Güney
AA
3.95
245

246
Ekin Mansuroğlu

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Ekin Mansuroğlu
BB-
2.84
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
247

248
Elif Güngör

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Elif Güngör
CC+
2.14
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
249

250
Emel Uçak

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Emel Uçak
BA
3.55
251

252
Furkan Türker

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Furkan Türker
BA
3.45
253

254
Gazi Can Şahin

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Gazi Can Şahin
CB
2.43
255

256
M. Emre Karcı

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
M. Emre Karcı
AA-
3.75
257

258
Nadine Yousif

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Nadine Yousif
CB
2.45
259

260
Nihan Mutlu

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Nihan Mutlu
BB+
3.20
261

262
Onurcan Mızrak

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Onurcan Mızrak
BB+
3.23
263

264
Pınar Talaş

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Pınar Talaş
BA-
3.32
265

266
R. Selim Yarbaşı

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
R. Selim Yarbaşı
BA+
3.68
267

Şeyma Sezen
Not Submitted
268

FINAL
FINAL JURY
26.12.2019 - 27.12.2019
Şeyma Sezen
DD+
1.16
FD+
0.66
(Late submission)
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
Not Submitted
269

270
Umutkağan Durgut

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Umutkağan Durgut
BA-
3.42
271

272
Zeynep Erişti

FINAL
26.12.2019
FINAL JURY
- 27.12.2019
Zeynep Erişti
BB+
3.16
273

274