06.09.2021 Views

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 2014-2015, 2014a

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 2014-2015, 2014a

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 2014-2015, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

unnecessary material. The proceedings during the first appeal are included to cover the possibility<br />

that independent error in the intermediate appeal, for example failure to follow appropriate<br />

procedures, may be assigned in the court <strong>of</strong> appeals. Paragraph (iii) provides for the transmission<br />

<strong>of</strong> the record and tracks the appropriate subsections <strong>of</strong> Rule 11. Paragraph (iv) provides for the<br />

filing <strong>of</strong> the record and notices to the parties. Paragraph (ii) and Paragraph (iv) both refer to "a<br />

certified copy <strong>of</strong> the docket entries". The "docket entries" referred to are the docket entries in the<br />

district court or the bankruptcy appellate panel, not the entire docket in the bankruptcy court.<br />

Notes <strong>of</strong> Advisory Committee on <strong>Rules</strong>—1993 Amendment<br />

Note to Subparagraph (b)(2)(i). The amendment accompanies concurrent changes to Rule<br />

4(a)(4). Although Rule 6 never included language such as that being changed in Rule 4(a)(4),<br />

language that made a notice <strong>of</strong> appeal void if it was filed before, or during the pendency <strong>of</strong>, certain<br />

posttrial motions, courts have found that a notice <strong>of</strong> appeal is premature if it is filed before the<br />

court disposes <strong>of</strong> a motion for rehearing. See, e.g., In re X-Cel, Inc., 823 F.2d 192 (7th Cir. 1987);<br />

In re Shah, 859 F.2d 1463 (10th Cir. 1988). The Committee wants to achieve the same result here<br />

as in Rule 4, the elimination <strong>of</strong> a procedural trap.<br />

Committee Notes on <strong>Rules</strong>—1998 Amendment<br />

The language and organization <strong>of</strong> the rule are amended to make the rule more easily<br />

understood. In addition to changes made to improve the understanding, the Advisory Committee<br />

has changed language to make style and terminology consistent throughout the appellate rules.<br />

These changes are intended to be stylistic only.<br />

Subdivision (b). Language is added to Rule 6(b)(2)(A)(ii) to conform with the<br />

corresponding provision in Rule 4(a)(4). The new language is clarifying rather than substantive.<br />

The existing rule states that a party intending to challenge an alteration or amendment <strong>of</strong> a<br />

judgment must file an amended notice <strong>of</strong> appeal. Of course if a party has not previously filed a<br />

notice <strong>of</strong> appeal, the party would simply file a notice <strong>of</strong> appeal not an amended one. The new<br />

language states that the party must file "a notice <strong>of</strong> appeal or amended notice <strong>of</strong> appeal."<br />

Committee Notes on <strong>Rules</strong>—2009 Amendment<br />

Subdivision (b)(2)(B). The times set in the former rule at 10 days have been revised to 14<br />

days. See the Note to Rule 26.<br />

References in Text<br />

The Bankruptcy <strong>Rules</strong>, referred to in subd. (b)(2)(A)(i), (B)(i), are set out in the Appendix<br />

to Title 11, Bankruptcy.<br />

Rule 7. Bond for Costs on Appeal in a Civil Case<br />

In a civil case, the district court may require an appellant to file a bond or provide other<br />

security in any form and amount necessary to ensure payment <strong>of</strong> costs on appeal. Rule 8(b) applies<br />

to a surety on a bond given under this rule.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!