24.12.2012 Views

GUNS Magazine April 1956

GUNS Magazine April 1956

GUNS Magazine April 1956

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Heavy 1/^" steel plate fired at in tests reveals comparative power of U.S. .45 cartridge and German service bullet.<br />

call it an old fiend. The .45 actually<br />

has more stopping power than smaller<br />

calibers, which is the main argument<br />

put up by supporters. But that doesn't<br />

mean it has much, if any more killing<br />

power. If the argument of stopping<br />

power would hold water as well as a<br />

shotgunned Stetson hat, why not re-<br />

place the .30/06 rifle with the .600<br />

Nitro Express? As a matter of fact, we<br />

are going to have an even lighter rifle<br />

and cartridge, and for very good rea-<br />

sons, that also should apply to the<br />

pistol.<br />

Much has been written about com-<br />

parative tests between the .45 and the<br />

9mm Luger load. Any user of the<br />

Luger knows that the gun is subject to<br />

malfunctions of one kind or another<br />

which can be traced directly to the<br />

weak American ammo of low power as<br />

loaded by Winchester and Remington<br />

commercially. Although glorified by<br />

"Super-X" or other high speed trade<br />

names, the U.S. cartridges are inferior<br />

to the European loads.<br />

To settle in my own mind the dif-<br />

ferences between the .45 and 9mm, I<br />

ran some penetration tests for <strong>GUNS</strong>.<br />

We don't have much ice down here in<br />

Texas, but wood and steel were used.<br />

Five 1" x 6" boards 25 inches long<br />

were nailed together to make test<br />

blocks. Bullets were fired into the cen-<br />

ter board from 12 inches away.<br />

A Luger and a Smith & Wesson 1917<br />

.45 were used for this test. The block<br />

was reversed so that it could be used<br />

German service 9mm bullet shed its jacket (left) in penetrating l/C steel plate<br />

but .45 slug burst jacket, flattened out and stopped -cold (right) on steel.<br />

18<br />

to test both calibers in the same wood.<br />

The bullet channels were cut open<br />

when the blocks were disassembled.<br />

Ammo I used included the hot Ger-<br />

man 9mm load, a 124 grain bullet ai<br />

about 1300 feet per second in a 12"<br />

barrel. The exact figure in my shorter<br />

Luger barrel I don't know. The G.F.L.<br />

38 cartridges, used in Italian subma-<br />

chine guns and loaded by Fiocchi, also<br />

used in my tests, developed 1250 f.p.s.<br />

in a 6" barrel, according to the Fiocchi<br />

factory records. It gained this velocity<br />

with a 115 grain bullet developing<br />

slightly more than 25,000 pounds per<br />

square inch pressure.<br />

The heavy German bullet pene-<br />

trated Sy^," of pine. Contrasting, the<br />

.45 fired in the 5 q S & W revolver<br />

barrel which maintains velocity equal<br />

to or greater than the auto pistol's<br />

short barrel, penetrated only 4%" in<br />

the same board. No expansion of the<br />

jacketed bullets was noticed in either<br />

caliber.<br />

On Vyr' steel plates, the difference in<br />

penetration was significant. The 9mm<br />

went through (from 12 feet distant) ;<br />

the .45 didn't. Even on a curved plate<br />

at an angle, the .45 ricocheted doing<br />

little damage, while the old Western<br />

truncated cone bullet made a huge<br />

dent.<br />

I cross checked my results with Val<br />

Forgett, formerly of Aberdeen Proving<br />

Ground and now a hot-temperec

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!