07.07.2022 Views

The Indian Weekender, Friday 8 July 2022

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK<br />

India’s digital infrastructure is rapidly improving. From education to healthcare,<br />

it has positively impacted lives across sectors. Technology has played<br />

a vital role in fighting the once in a century COVID-19 pandemic. Thanks to<br />

technology, the pace of India’s vaccination received a great impetus.<br />

– <strong>Indian</strong> PM Narendra Modi<br />

Editorial<br />

New Immigration<br />

Minister must fix ‘living<br />

together’ mess<br />

<strong>The</strong> new Immigration Minister, Michael Wood, will do a great service to both<br />

– the migrant communities and New Zealand by fixing the “living together”<br />

mess within the partnership visa – a mess that is largely created under the<br />

previous term of this Labour government.<br />

That there is a mess within NZ’s immigration rules for partnership visas is beyond<br />

any doubt and best depicted on numerous rejection letters sent by immigration<br />

officers where it acknowledges that “a relationship exists” yet it is not considered a<br />

“partnership” for a partnership visa as per immigration instructions.<br />

Ideally, once an immigration officer is convinced beyond any doubt that a conjugal<br />

relationship exists between the two individuals, then there should not be any<br />

constraint preventing them from issuing an entry visa.<br />

However, if the immigration officers are constrained by the immigration instructions<br />

to deny entry to individuals whose relationship with a New Zealand-based person is<br />

proven beyond any doubt, then the obvious question arises about the nature of<br />

immigration instructions received by the department.<br />

This is the question being raised consistently by different key stakeholders,<br />

including this newspaper, which has been leading the advocacy for the complete<br />

abrogation of the “living together” requirement for partnership visa, purely because<br />

it does not reflect the modern multicultural New Zealand that we have become in the<br />

last two or three decades.<br />

“Living together” before a ritualistic conjugal union is not an option in many<br />

cultures. <strong>The</strong>refore, NZ’s current immigration rules for partnership visa places an<br />

unrealistic and unfair requirement on many individuals to produce evidence of “living<br />

together” to be allowed entry into NZ and a union with their respective partners.<br />

NZ’s well-intentioned immigration officers do understand the messy situation<br />

where even after being convinced that a relationship exists are not able to issue a<br />

partnership visa. Over the years, an ad hoc system has emerged where immigration<br />

case officers were issuing an “exception” and granting a “General Visitor Visa (GVV)”<br />

based on relationships on a case-by-case basis and allowing people to enter the<br />

country and live together with their partners and meet the conditions of Partnership<br />

Visitor Visa (PVV) or Partnership Work Visa (PWV).<br />

However, that system was disturbed in mid-2019 when Immigration NZ’s then<br />

Mumbai office arbitrarily decided to stop giving “exceptions” whereby refusing to<br />

consider applicants as couples for visa purposes despite having social and cultural<br />

approval of the same.<br />

Clearly, it smacked arrogance by NZ’s immigration rules to not consider the<br />

otherwise genuinely socially and culturally approved couples as a partner for the<br />

visa purpose. Following a community outrage and persistent media attention, the<br />

previous Immigration Ministers have made some cosmetic changes in the partnership<br />

visa system. One of the measures then introduced was to expand the ambit of<br />

Culturally Arranged Marriage (CAM) visas which allowed people to come to NZ after<br />

getting married overseas (with NZ’s citizens and residents).<br />

However, despite the government’s boisterous claims, entry under a Culturally<br />

Arranged Marriage visa remains minuscule as a significant majority of people fail to<br />

fall within the highly restrictive definition of culturally arranged marriages.<br />

In the absence of direction and empathy from previous immigration ministers on<br />

this pressing issue affecting largely the migrant communities, the partnership visa<br />

system has gradually slipped back to the old ad hoc system where immigration<br />

officers arbitrarily approve entry via an exception and issue General Visitor Visa.<br />

Yet there is no accountability when an immigration officer chooses to grant an<br />

exception and issue a general Visitor Visa (GVV) and when they outrightly decline a<br />

partnership visa application despite being convinced that a relationship exists.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new Immigration Minister, Michael Wood, can fix this anomaly once and for all.<br />

With a stroke of a pen, the minister can issue an immigration instruction that can<br />

remove the culturally inappropriate requirement of “living together” for the purpose<br />

of a partnership visa.<br />

And this would not compromise NZ’s immigration system in any manner as the<br />

immigration officers are anyway acknowledging that a genuine socially approved<br />

relationship exists.<br />

It’s only that NZ’s immigration rules are less reflective of cultural diversity and<br />

demand a one-size-fits-all outcome.<br />

It is widely assumed and accepted that Minister Wood is deeply empathetic and<br />

considerate towards the ethnic migrant minority communities and hopefully aware<br />

of the cultural diversity in defining a conjugal relationship.<br />

It’s time for Minister Wood to shine as the new Minister of Immigration and remove a<br />

bottleneck that is affecting both – brand-NZ and the migrant communities adversely.<br />

If it makes it easier and politically more palatable, all political parties, including the<br />

National Party, Green Party and Act Party, have officially said that there was no need<br />

for a law change, and instead, the Minister of Immigration can issue an instruction to<br />

fix this living together mess in NZ’s partnership visa system.<br />

IN FOCUS : Picture of the week<br />

This week in New Zealand’s history<br />

<strong>July</strong> 9 1986<br />

Homosexual Law Reform Bill passed<br />

<strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Weekender</strong> : Volume 14 Issue16<br />

On her first visit<br />

to the UK since<br />

the COVID-19 pandemic,<br />

New Zealand Prime<br />

Minister Jacinda<br />

Ardern met with British<br />

Prime Minister Boris<br />

Johnson at Downing<br />

Street in London for a<br />

bilateral meeting – and<br />

to confirm an extension<br />

to the reciprocal Working<br />

Holiday/Youth Mobility<br />

Scheme that NZ currently<br />

has with the UK.<br />

Wellington Central MP Fran Wilde’s private member’s bill, which removed criminal<br />

sanctions against consensual male homosexual practices, was passed by 49<br />

votes to 44.<br />

<strong>July</strong> 10 1967<br />

New Zealand adopts decimal currency<br />

Pounds, shillings and pence were replaced by dollars and cents − 27 million new<br />

banknotes and 165 million new coins. <strong>The</strong> new money was valued at $120 million<br />

(more than $2.2 billion in today’s money) and weighed more than 700 tonnes.<br />

<strong>July</strong> 11 1877<br />

First woman graduates from a New Zealand university<br />

Kate Edger became the first woman in New Zealand to gain a university degree<br />

and the first woman in the British Empire to earn a Bachelor of Arts (BA)<br />

<strong>July</strong> 11 1983<br />

Lorraine Downes crowned Miss Universe<br />

Lorraine Downes became a household name overnight and spent the next 12<br />

months travelling the world accompanied by a chaperone, carrying out the duties<br />

of Miss Universe.<br />

<strong>July</strong> 12 1889<br />

First women’s trade union formed<br />

<strong>The</strong> first women’s trade union in New Zealand emerged in the late 19th century in<br />

response to poor working conditions in the clothing industry.<br />

<strong>July</strong> 14 1853<br />

New Zealand’s first general election begins<br />

For such a symbolic moment, the events of 14 <strong>July</strong> offered little drama – the<br />

first member of New Zealand’s inaugural Parliament, Hugh Carleton, was elected<br />

unopposed at Russell in the Bay of Islands.<br />

Publisher: Kiwi Media Publishing Limited<br />

Editor: Dev Nadkarni | dev@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Graphic Designer: Yashmin Chand | design@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Multimedia Specialist: Karan Bhasin | 022 0772 156 | karan@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Accounts and Admin.: 09-2173623 | accounts@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Auckland Reporter: Navdeep Kaur Marwah: | 021 952 246 | navdeep@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Waikato Reporter: Sandeep Singh | 021 952 245 | sandeep@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Wellington Reporter: Venu Menon | 021 538 356 | venu@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Christchurch Reporter: Mahesh Kumar | 021 952 218 | mahesh@indianweekender.co.nz<br />

Views expressed in the publication are not necessarily of the publisher and the publisher<br />

is not responsible for advertisers’ claims as appearing in the publication<br />

Views expressed in the articles are solely of the authors and do not in any way represent<br />

the views of the team at the <strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Weekender</strong><br />

Kiwi Media Publishing Limited - 133A, Level 1, Onehunga Mall, Onehunga, Auckland.<br />

Printed at Horton Media, Auckland<br />

Copyright ® <strong>2022</strong>. Kiwi Media Publishing Limited. All Rights Reserved.<br />

Send your suggestions and feedback to editor@indianweekender.co.nz

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!