Adjusting for forage variability via on-farm analysis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Water Has a Strong NIR Absorbance Spectral changes of a <strong>for</strong>age during drying Getting More from Forages – July 29-30, 2009
Monochromator vs Diode array Monochromator Lab bench instrument Dedicated (sample presentation not modifiable) Expensive (35-50K USD) Good equation transferability Getting More from Forages – July 29-30, 2009 Diode arrays Rugged instrument Sample presentation more flexible Less expensive (15-35K USD) Equation transferability is more difficult
Page 1 and 2: Targeted feeding strategies: Accoun
Page 3 and 4: Forage variability
Page 5 and 6: Variation in forag
Page 7 and 8: Variation in forag
Page 9 and 10: Effect of rain (20mm) on a 30% DM F
Page 11 and 12: Effects of Feed Variability Animal
Page 13 and 14: Why do we need to feed cows precise
Page 19 and 20: Feed Quality Control Program • Re
Page 21 and 22: Slit - monochromator systems Gratin
Page 23 and 24: Water peaks Getting More from Forag
Page 25: Diode Array Sensors Getting More fr
Page 29 and 30: Materials and Methods 10 weeks: 8 e
Page 31 and 32: John Deere HarvestLab TM •Diode a
Page 33 and 34: Material and Methods 48 cows (selec
Page 35 and 36: Experimental week BASELINE CHG RECO
Page 37 and 38: Materials and Methods Cows were fed
Page 39 and 40: Variation in DM content of alfalfa
Page 41 and 42: Variation in aNDFom content of TMR
Page 43 and 44: Changes in DM Intake: by TRT DMI, k
Page 45 and 46: Changes in milk fat relative to bas
Page 47 and 48: Changes in Milk Yield relative to b
Page 49 and 50: Cycle of Feeding What ration is the
Page 51: Targeted feeding strategies: Accoun

Adjusting for forage variability via on-farm analysis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?