31.08.2022 Views

September 2022

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14<br />

Wanstead Village Directory<br />

For those who don’t know, the<br />

Evergreen Field is that square patch<br />

of fenced-off land on Wanstead High<br />

Street beside Christ Church Green. The<br />

site has not been inhabited since 1944,<br />

when two homes which stood there were<br />

bombed and then demolished in 1967.<br />

Some 25 years ago, the field was owned by<br />

the Metropolitan Police and was intended<br />

to serve as the location of a new Wanstead<br />

Police Station to replace the smaller, iconic<br />

Spratt Hall Road building. Unfortunately,<br />

before any plans could be drawn up, a new<br />

directive was issued by the Met which said any<br />

undeveloped land owned by the Met must be<br />

sold, so the site was put up for auction.<br />

A group of local Wanstead residents clubbed<br />

together to crowdfund a bid to purchase the<br />

site. They were unsuccessful. However, not all<br />

the sponsors wanted their money back and<br />

the residents were left with approximately<br />

£10,000. It was decided to give half the money<br />

to a local charity and then, in May 1997, the<br />

remainder was used to form the Wanstead<br />

Society.<br />

A committee was formed and their first<br />

task was to try to look after the site that<br />

had eluded their bid. When the successful<br />

developer submitted a planning application,<br />

the Wanstead Society lodged an objection.<br />

Redbridge Council agreed the proposal was<br />

not in keeping with the area and refused the<br />

application. The developer took the matter to<br />

the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol on appeal.<br />

After a site visit, the inspector dismissed the<br />

appeal (the planning inspector decided the<br />

view of the spire and the east end of Christ<br />

Church – a Grade II* listed building – from the<br />

High Street was of paramount importance).<br />

At this point, Redbridge Council issued a CR1<br />

protection order for the site, declaring it to be<br />

an “important open urban space” that should<br />

not be developed.<br />

In 2012, a local businessman purchased the site<br />

saying he could overturn the protection order.<br />

He met with the Wanstead Society saying he<br />

would ‘donate’ half the site to public use if<br />

the Society would lobby the council to have<br />

the protection order lifted. We responded by<br />

saying we would get our solicitors to meet<br />

with his and agree the terms of the transfer.<br />

This was not what he wanted. He would retain<br />

ownership of the entire plot. The society was<br />

not prepared to spend money maintaining<br />

a plot they did not own and which could<br />

therefore be reclaimed at any moment, so the<br />

‘deal’ fell through.<br />

A couple of months ago, some 10 years after<br />

that meeting in 2012, a very similar proposal<br />

emerged from Caerus Developments, this<br />

time being put to local residents with a<br />

quasi consultation. The plans now are for a<br />

four-storey building containing 24 homes<br />

(nine one-bed, 11 two-bed and four threebed<br />

apartments) and a ground-floor nursery,<br />

again with half the site being ‘donated to the<br />

community’.<br />

There is insufficient detail in the glossy<br />

brochure that has been issued which, frankly,<br />

raises more questions than answers. For<br />

example, we need to know exactly what is<br />

meant by the word ‘donate’ used in the<br />

brochure to whet the appetite of<br />

some land for public use. Who<br />

will own the ‘donated’ land?<br />

Presumably, it should be<br />

Redbridge – especially if it is<br />

an adjunct to Christ Church<br />

Green. Has the council been<br />

approached to determine<br />

the viability of this proposal?<br />

Who will pay to make the land<br />

safe for public use? Who will<br />

maintain the land over time?<br />

These are just some of the questions<br />

raised by this proposal and a recent meeting<br />

with the developers did little to enlighten us.<br />

Without all the answers, the consultation is<br />

meaningless. So, just as we did in 1997 and<br />

2012, we’ll be watching this space very closely<br />

indeed.<br />

For more information on the Wanstead<br />

Society, visit wnstd.com/ws<br />

To view the Evergreen Field development<br />

proposals, visit wnstd.com/field<br />

To advertise, call 020 8819 6645 or visit wnstd.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!