13.09.2022 Views

2022 Issue 5 Sept/Oct Focus - Mid-South magazine

Nerds!

Nerds!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

By creating a replication of nonnormative genders<br />

through visual media, a set of rules are created on<br />

how a member of society should exist; however, queerness<br />

is an abstract and fluid identity that transcends the conventions<br />

of linguistic barriers. There is no room for permanence in<br />

queerness, and by crafting stereotypes of our community,<br />

cis-centric society writes a rulebook for a game that<br />

is designed to have no rules.<br />

adapted to the prescribed<br />

identities that are deemed<br />

acceptable to dominant<br />

society. In doing so, we<br />

cast shadows on the parts<br />

of the community that do<br />

not comfortably sit within<br />

the prescribed framework<br />

of gender and sexual<br />

identities. “The shunning<br />

of ‘unintelligible’ gender<br />

embodiments and queer<br />

desire by mainstream<br />

media and culture creates<br />

the shame and shudder<br />

of… rejection.” 5 In other<br />

words, bodies that are<br />

“unintelligible” or exist<br />

outside of our linguistic<br />

capabilities are cast out<br />

for not conforming to the<br />

stereotypes. So, how do we<br />

change the conversation of<br />

queer representation in a<br />

way that expands the cisnormative<br />

understanding<br />

of queerness to<br />

encapsulate rejected<br />

positions? Through<br />

monsters, of course.<br />

In order to imagine<br />

“distinctly queer and<br />

alternative futures,” we<br />

need a device that twists<br />

identity. 6 Removing<br />

preconceived associations<br />

of queer expression by<br />

distorting the human form<br />

creates further possibilities<br />

to express abstract<br />

and expansive ideas. In<br />

providing an alternative<br />

visual representation to<br />

communicate queerness,<br />

the idea is much more<br />

approachable to the nonqueer<br />

eye. It retracts the<br />

linguistic conventions that<br />

allow political hierarchies.<br />

We are no longer bull<br />

dykes, trannies, queers,<br />

hermaphrodites, tomboys,<br />

sissies, gays, lesbians, and<br />

fags. We are monsters:<br />

unknown and intriguing.<br />

We are something<br />

otherworldly and strange,<br />

worth investigating,<br />

cautiously, for beasts lie in<br />

the shadows. Transgender<br />

theorist Susan Stryker<br />

beautifully outlines the<br />

power of monstrosity:<br />

“Monsters, like angels,<br />

function as messengers<br />

and heralds of the<br />

extraordinary. They serve<br />

to announce impending<br />

revelation, saying, in effect,<br />

‘Pay attention: something<br />

of profound importance is<br />

happening.” 7<br />

By transforming queer<br />

identity from the human<br />

to the non-human, people<br />

are able to set aside<br />

notions of prescribed fear<br />

for a different element<br />

of fear–fear of the<br />

unknown. The unknown<br />

is unexplainable, and so<br />

is queerness. “To detour<br />

around the obstruction<br />

of unbearable reality,” is<br />

to forge a new path of<br />

representation, one that<br />

relies on the ambiguous<br />

tactics ingrained in queer<br />

theory. 8 Through altering<br />

our reality, we provide<br />

spaces for new one–ones<br />

that are fantastic, fabulous,<br />

crude and unapologetic.<br />

There becomes room<br />

for the queers, freaks,<br />

monsters, dragons,<br />

ghouls, fairies, furries,<br />

cenobites, werewolves,<br />

demons, vampires, the<br />

undead, witches, warlocks,<br />

angels, aliens, sentient<br />

orbs, celestial beings, and<br />

creatures of the night.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. Jones, Stacy Holman, and Anne<br />

Harris. (2016).<br />

2. Jones, Stacy Holman, and Anne<br />

Harris. (2016).<br />

3. Butler, J. (2014).<br />

4. Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On<br />

the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York:<br />

Routledge.<br />

5. Jones, Stacy Holman, and Anne<br />

Harris. “Monsters, Desire and the<br />

Creative Queer Body.” Continuum 30,<br />

no. 5 (2016): 518–30. https://doi.org/10.<br />

1080/10304312.2016.1210748.<br />

6. Halberstam, J. 2011. The Queer Art of<br />

Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University<br />

Press.<br />

7. Stryker, S. 2006. “My Words to Victor<br />

Frankenstein above the Village of<br />

Chamounix: Performing Transgender<br />

Rage.” In The Transgender Studies<br />

Reader, edited by S. Stryker and S.<br />

Whittle, 244–251. New York: Routledge.<br />

8. Solnit, R. 2014. The Faraway Nearby.<br />

New York: Penguin.<br />

focuslgbt.com | Nerds! 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!