27.12.2012 Views

A gap or a chasm? - National Police Library Online Catalogue

A gap or a chasm? - National Police Library Online Catalogue

A gap or a chasm? - National Police Library Online Catalogue

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>gap</strong> <strong>or</strong> a <strong>chasm</strong>? Attrition in rep<strong>or</strong>ted rape cases<br />

26<br />

Table 3.2 presents disaggregated data f<strong>or</strong> prosecutions and convictions involving adults and<br />

children (under 16-years-olds) f<strong>or</strong> the years 1998-2002, covering all rape and attempted<br />

rape cases. Conviction data include guilty pleas; convictions at trial are lower than this<br />

overall rate. F<strong>or</strong> adults, around one-quarter of prosecuted cases result in a conviction; the<br />

figure was m<strong>or</strong>e than one-third f<strong>or</strong> child cases, until a dramatic fall of 12 percentage points<br />

f rom 2000 to 2001, although it re c o v e red very slightly in 2002. Cases considered the<br />

‘weakest’ evidentially are not referred up to the CPS by the police. These data suggest that<br />

even cases deemed relatively strong by police and supp<strong>or</strong>ted by CPS fare po<strong>or</strong>ly in the later<br />

stages of the criminal justice process.<br />

Table 3.2: Comparison of prosecution outcomes in adult and child rape cases 1998-2002<br />

Rapes and attempted rapes Rapes and attempted rapes of<br />

adult females and males of child (under-16) females and males<br />

Year Prosecutions Convictions Prosecutions Prosecutions Convictions Prosecutions<br />

resulting in resulting in<br />

convictions convictions<br />

1998 1366 382 28% 810 291 36%<br />

1999 1319 317 24% 846 335 40%<br />

2000 1245 329 26% 788 264 34%<br />

2001 1528 326 21% 1112 241 22%<br />

2002 1646 352 21% 1288 292 23%<br />

Source: Home Office data<br />

The 2001 and 2002 Home Office data are revealing in other ways (see Appendix 1). Here<br />

re p o rting, prosecution and conviction data are presented by police f<strong>or</strong>ce area; f<strong>or</strong> the<br />

purposes of this rep<strong>or</strong>t, additional calculations of the conviction rate and rates of rep<strong>or</strong>ting<br />

by population were undertaken. The conviction rate shows a considerable range between<br />

a reas, varying from one to 14 per cent across the two years. A number of potential<br />

confounding fact<strong>or</strong>s were expl<strong>or</strong>ed, including whether there were higher rep<strong>or</strong>ting rates per<br />

head of population, but were not linked to the variations in conviction rates in any obvious<br />

way. 21 N<strong>or</strong> were higher <strong>or</strong> lower rates simply a function of either metropolitan versus rural<br />

areas <strong>or</strong> the number of cases dealt with per year: areas with conviction rates above ten per<br />

cent in 2002 (Cleveland, Cumbria, Gwent, South Wales and South Yo r k s h i re) and those<br />

21. There were, however, interesting variations in the number of notifiable offences per 100,000: taking the 2002<br />

data, the maj<strong>or</strong>ity of f<strong>or</strong>ce areas had rates of between 15 and 25 (n=25), nine areas had rates of below 15<br />

and eight rates of m<strong>or</strong>e than 25. The higher rates were not associated with Metropolitan areas, apart fro m<br />

London that had the highest overall.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!