THE RUDOLF REPORT - Holocaust Handbooks

46 GERMAR RUDOLF · THE RUDOLF REPORT
meat, animal offal might have been disposed in garbage trenches in the
camp’s vicinity. 92 )
4.4.2.2. Faurisson and the Consequences
As a result of Prof. Faurisson’s activities as described in chapter 3,
forensic research on Auschwitz boomed since 1988. Each time a researcher
came to a conclusion contradicting the widely held views, he
was socially ostracized and persecuted, like Prof. Faurisson, Fred
Leuchter and Germar Rudolf, but when the results confirmed the reigning
paradigms, the researchers were darlings of the media and politicians,
like Jean-Claude Pressac, the researchers from the Jan Sehn Institute
in Krakow, and more recently Prof. Robert van Pelt. 74
It must therefore be stated that forensic research on Auschwitz is not
at all reprehensible, as stated by the Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart.
Such research was always done, more or less intensively. What is often
considered to be reprehensible, however, is a research result that is unwanted
by the public. This is an unfortunate bias, because science can
prosper only where any result is openly and freely published and discussed
without researchers fearing punitive measures.
The present book is an attempt to give the reader an update about the
results of the ongoing forensic research on the two major camps of
Auschwitz, the Stammlager or main camp close to the town of Auschwitz
itself, and the Birkenau camp some 3 km to the northwest of the
town. May it not lead to more persecution and ostracism of its author
than he already has experienced. 93
92 C. Mattogno, “Auschwitz – 60 Jahre Propaganda,” Vierteljahreshefte für freie
Geschichtsforschung, 9(2), (2005), pp. 171f.; “Bestandplan des provisorischen Schlachthauses
BW 33B,” GARF, 7021-108-48, p. 14.
93 For this, see the appendix at the end of this book.