19.06.2023 Views

TLA61_AllPages

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At first glance, it doesn’t appear that ELDs have resulted<br />

in a reduction of highway fatalities at all. But while the DOT<br />

is working on that evaluation, David Heller, TCA’s senior vice<br />

president of safety and government affairs, has a different<br />

take.<br />

Heller believes they’re asking the wrong question.<br />

“When you look at the ELD in a nutshell, it’s a tool,” he explained.<br />

“It measures compliance with the HOS regulations.<br />

It is those regulations, the (hours spent actively driving),<br />

that are designed to save lives — not the ELD in itself.”<br />

If the government agencies<br />

and the trucking industry<br />

want to save lives on<br />

the highway through use of<br />

ELDs, they should be looking<br />

at HOS regulations —<br />

and those regulations, Heller<br />

says, are inefficient.<br />

“We’re not any getting anywhere<br />

close to what that 11<br />

hours of drive time actually<br />

is,” he said. “We’re averaging<br />

somewhere in the neighborhood<br />

of six-and-a-half hours<br />

of drive time. That’s so insane.<br />

Why aren’t we having the<br />

conversation of making those<br />

regulations more flexible?”<br />

Every carrier knows where<br />

those hours are going: Detention<br />

time, traffic congestion,<br />

weather, inspections<br />

and other things take valuable<br />

driving time from each driver’s day. While each of these<br />

could be addressed, Heller thinks one change to the HOS<br />

regulations would help drivers cope with all of them.<br />

“I would work on flexibility regarding the HOS and increasing<br />

the splits, making that 10-hour rest break either a six/four<br />

or five/five split so the drivers have more flexibility of how to<br />

address their day as that day presents itself,” he said.<br />

Such a change would require modifying both the 11-hour<br />

driving rule and the 14-hour daily work period. These modifications<br />

could provide the driver with more ability to, for example,<br />

spend time resting while avoiding a rush hour period in<br />

a metro area or a traffic jam caused by an accident up ahead.<br />

Planning what time a driving period ends has a benefit, too.<br />

“It’s tricky to find truck parking these days,” Heller said.<br />

Splitting the rest period might allow drivers to arrive at their<br />

selected rest spot before the spaces are all filled, or to delay<br />

arrival until a time when drivers are leaving those spaces.”<br />

To be sure, splitting the rest period is allowed — but with<br />

mandates of two periods of at least seven and three hours.<br />

Heller says six/four, or even five/five, would be a great place<br />

to start. Unfortunately, efforts to make HOS regulations<br />

more flexible aren’t a priority right now for regulators.<br />

“I will tell you, there’s no lobbying efforts in regard to<br />

this right now,” Heller said. “The agency is starting to<br />

partake in a detention time study, which will probably see<br />

the results of that study sometime in 2025, I believe.”<br />

The results of that detention time study could prompt a<br />

proposed rule change, but drivers and carriers must still<br />

operate under the current rules until that happens. And the<br />

study isn’t likely to shed any new light on the topic.<br />

“If it’s anything like the previous three or four studies,<br />

then at that point you know, certainly, detention is a very real<br />

and prevalent issue in our industry. We have to do something<br />

about it,” he remarked.<br />

As an example, Australia does things a little differently. The<br />

country mandates sevenhour<br />

“non-working” periods<br />

without specifying whether<br />

If it’s anything like<br />

the previous three or<br />

four studies, then at that point<br />

you know, certainly, detention<br />

is a very real and prevalent<br />

issue in our industry. We have<br />

to do something about it.”<br />

— David Heller<br />

Senior Vice President of Safety and Government<br />

Affairs for the Truckload Carriers Association<br />

they are “sleeper berth”<br />

or “off duty,” and no more<br />

than 17 hours between nonwork<br />

periods. Rather than a<br />

seven-day or eight-day rule,<br />

Australia allows 168 hours<br />

within any 14-day period<br />

and mandates two periods<br />

of 24 hours of non-work<br />

time. There are other regulations,<br />

including some differences<br />

between drivers on<br />

Australia’s highway system<br />

and those operating in the<br />

Outback, but the drivers<br />

generally have much more<br />

flexibility in scheduling than<br />

their U.S. counterparts.<br />

“You can’t stop and have<br />

a 10-hour break in 110 degrees<br />

(in the Outback). It just doesn’t work,” explained Dean<br />

Croke, principal freight analyst for DAT Freight & Analytics,<br />

who drove for years in Australia before moving to the U.S.<br />

“So, what they do is they allow a lot of flexibility. They take<br />

the focus off the daily limit, and they give you a two-week period<br />

of hours to work,” Croke said. “Some days you work more;<br />

some days you work less, so it’s a very flexible HOS system.”<br />

Here in the U.S., most carriers and many drivers agree<br />

that the use of ELDs has greatly reduced many of the problems<br />

that plagued the paper log system. The task of collecting<br />

and auditing daily records is much easier, and falsification<br />

is more difficult with ELDs.<br />

“The ELD is a necessary tool based on where we once<br />

were, and it certainly highlights what the drivers are doing<br />

with their day,” Heller said. “But the tool, in and of itself, is<br />

not designed to save lives. It’s the HOS regulations that are<br />

designed to do that.”<br />

While there are currently no efforts to overhaul HOS regulations<br />

in the U.S., Heller believes the issue will be addressed<br />

in the future.<br />

“Nothing moves quickly in government — it never did, and<br />

it never will,” Heller said. “Could there be something in our<br />

future? Certainly, I think you have to acknowledge that flexibility<br />

would benefit the drivers as a whole.”<br />

TCA JULY/AUGUST 2023 www.Truckload.org | Truckload Authority 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!