07.08.2023 Views

ASTM - Intensive Quenching Systems - Engineering and Design 2010 - N I Kobasko, M A Aronov, J A Powell, G E Totten

engineering

engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2 n TRANSIENT NUCLEATE BOILING AND SELF-REGULATED THERMAL PROCESSES 31

where:

q cr1 is the first critical heat flux density (W/m 2 ); and

q cr2 is the second critical heat flux density (W/m 2 ).

This dependence is very important and widely used for

the computation of temperature fields for steel quenching in

liquid media.

In most cases, steel parts are heated up to the austenization

temperature of the steel, higher than A C3 temperature. In

this case, the temperature field is uniform, since all points

within the part are at the furnace temperature T 0 . Upon

immersion into the cold quenchant, the boundary liquid layer

is formed. When compared to the duration of quenching process,

the formation of the boundary layer is very short, and its

duration in many cases can be neglected. What is most important

is not the time for formation of the boundary liquid boiling

layer, but the process of further cooling that can proceed

with or without film boiling. These processes are completely

different, and their development depends on events during the

initial period of time. Therefore, the study of the processes

occurring at the initial period of time are extremely important.

Assume that there is no film boiling and the main cooling

process is nucleate boiling followed by single-phase convection.

The mathematical model for computation of the

temperature fields for steel quenching when there is no film

boiling and nucleate boiling prevails has the form:

Cr @T þ divðk grad TÞ ¼0;

@r ð23Þ

@T

@r þ bm k ðT

T SÞ m

Tðr; 0Þ ¼T 0 :

¼ 0;

S

ð24Þ

ð25Þ

Boundary conditions in Eq 24 can be also obtained

using approximate equations (see Table 5). At the establishment

of single-phase convection, these boundary conditions

are the normal boundary conditions of the third kind:

@T

@r þ a conv

k ðT T mÞ

¼ 0:

S

ð26Þ

Initial conditions include temperature distribution of the

cross-section after nucleate boiling, which can be shown as:

Tðr; s nb Þ¼uðrÞ;

ð27Þ

where:

a conv is the heat transfer coefficient during convection;

r is a radius of a cylinder or a sphere, and r ¼ x for a plate;

s nb is time of transient nucleate boiling;

/(r) is the temperature field of the cross-section at the time

of completion of nucleate boiling; and

T m is bulk temperature.

It should be noted that T m < T S , where T S is a saturation

temperature of the quenchant in a boundary liquid layer.

The time of transition from nucleate boiling to the

single-phase convection is determined from:

q nb ffi q conv ;

ð28Þ

where:

q nb is the heat flux density at the conclusion of nucleate

boiling; and

q conv is heat flux density at the beginning of convection.

For the approximate analytical solution of this problem,

a method of variational calculus will be used [8]. The process

of cooling is divided into two stages. The first stage is an

irregular thermal process. Minimizing functions are built on

the basis of laws of calculus of variations. The solution

found will satisfy Eqs 23 and 24. The method of solving this

problem is described below [9–12].

2.4 ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO THERMAL

PROBLEMS RELATED TO STEEL QUENCHING

2.4.1 Statement of the Problem

In the process of heating and cooling of steel parts (heat

treatment technology), new structures and mechanical properties

of material are formed [1,13]. The selection of optimal

conditions for heat treatment of metals is impossible without

the computation of temperature fields, which are necessary

to predict structural and thermal stresses. When there is a

wide range of different parts being heat-treated, the use of

numerical methods is even more difficult because of the

time and expense involved, especially for parts with a complex

configuration. In these cases, approximate solutions are

often utilized. Therefore, it is important to develop approximate

analytical methods to facilitate the calculations of temperature

fields encountered during quenching.

The mathematical model describing the heat transfer

during quenching is [8]:

C V ðTÞT s ¼ div½kðTÞr ! TŠþq V ðTÞ; s > 0; ð29Þ

Tðx; 0Þ ¼f ðxÞ; x 2 D; ð30Þ

kðTÞ @T

@ n ! þ FðTÞ

¼ 0; x 2 S; ð31Þ

S

where:

C V (T) is volumetric heat capacity;

k(T) is thermal conductivity;

!

n is outer normal;

S is the surface surrounding area D;

q V (T) is the density of internal heat sources; and

F(T) is the heat flux density at the surface.

The system of equations 29–31 describes both heating and

cooling processes. During heating, F(T) is a total heat flux density

due to processes of radiation, convection, and heat transfer

and during cooling, processes of boiling and convection.

2.4.2 Statement of the Variational Problem

The variational problem equivalent to problem of Eqs 29–31

is a universal approach [9,10] that is used in nonequilibrium

thermodynamics for the description of quasi-linear processes

of heat transfer. For the heat transfer processes discussed

here, the function will be:

I < T > ¼

Z s

Z

ds

0 V

Z T

3

f

Z s

0

Z

þ

V

(

½CVðTÞT s

q V ðTÞŠ

)

kðTÞdT 1 !

2 k2 ðTÞðrTÞ 2 dV

Z

ds

dV

Z T0

f

ds

Z T

f

FðTÞkðTÞdT

C V ðT 0 Þ½T 0 f ðxÞŠkðT 0 ÞdT 0 ! min ð32Þ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!