07.08.2023 Views

ASTM - Intensive Quenching Systems - Engineering and Design 2010 - N I Kobasko, M A Aronov, J A Powell, G E Totten

engineering

engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2 n TRANSIENT NUCLEATE BOILING AND SELF-REGULATED THERMAL PROCESSES 37

sound effects ceased because the nucleate boiling process

ended and convection was established.

The duration of transient nucleate boiling will now be

estimated using Eq 36 and then compared with the experimental

data. The following initial conditions were used:

T 0 ¼ 850°C;

T S ¼ 120°C;

# 0 ¼ T 0 – T S ¼ 850°C – 120°C ¼ 730°C;

k ¼ 22 W/mK;

a ¼ 5.36 3 10 6 m 2 /s;

R ¼ 0.01 m; and

a conv ¼ 427 W/m 2 K.

Using these data and Eq 36, the time of transient nucleate

boiling s nb is equal to 15.5 s. Experimentally, it was

determined to be approximately 16 s, which agrees reasonably

well with the calculated result. The computational result

is less by 0.5 s because the existence of shock boiling and

possible localized vapor films were considered [36].

A portable device has been developed for recording

sound effects directly in a production quench tank so that similar

computations can be performed in the heat treating shop

[29–31]. The results of calculations of the time of the selfregulated

thermal process and time of sound effects for pins

of various diameters are shown in Table 14. Experimental and

computational results are in excellent agreement for these

parts of simple configuration. If parts possess a more complicated

configuration consisting of thin and thick sections, it is

difficult to determine the time of nonstationary nucleate boiling

precisely, since thin sections are cooled much faster, while

the quenching process (and noise associated with this portion

of the overall cooling) continues for thicker sections. However,

using Eq 36, it is still possible to estimate with sufficient precision

the average time of the self-regulated thermal process,

which coincides with nonstationary nucleate boiling.

2.7 DISCUSSION

Boiling is a phase change process in which vapor bubbles

are formed either on a heated surface or in a superheated

liquid layer adjacent to the heated surface. Dhir [2] reported

that heat flux on polished surfaces varies with wall superheat

approximately as:

q / DT m ;

ð43Þ

where m has a value between 3 and 4. This means that wall

superheat DT during quenching of steel parts does not

change significantly with a change of q. This process was

investigated by French [26] by quenching a steel ball 38.1

mm in diameter in cold water containing a small amount of

salts and making calculations of the duration of the selfregulated

thermal process and the surface temperature at

the beginning and end of the quenching process.

In this study, the steel ball was heated to 875°C and

then cooled in water at 20°C containing mineral salts. For

these calculations, the following input data were used:

T 0 ¼ 875°C;

T m (bath temperature) ¼ 20°C;

T S (saturation temperature) ¼ 100°C;

a conv ¼ 1,200 W/m 2 K;

k ¼ 22 W/mK; and

R ¼ 0.01905 m.

Overheat DT at the beginning and at the conclusion of

the self-regulated thermal process can be evaluated from Eqs

36–38, where:

K is Kondratjev form factor in m 2 (see Chapter 6);

a is the thermal diffusivity of steel (m 2 /s);

k is the thermal conductivity of steel (W/mK);

T 0 is the initial temperature (°C);

T I is the initial temperature of the surface at the beginning

of nucleate boiling (°C);

T II is the temperature of the surface at the end of nucleate

boiling (°C);

# 0 ¼ T 0 – T S ;

# I ¼ T I – T S ;

# II ¼ T II – T S ;

# uh ¼ T S – T m ;

a conv is convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m 2 K); and

b ¼ 7.36 [3].

Overheat at the beginning of the self-regulated thermal

process can be evaluated using Eq 37:

# I ¼ 1

2 3 22 3 ð775 # I Þ 0:3

¼ 10:28C;

7:36 0:01905

and overheat at the end of the process can be evaluated

using Eq 38:

# II ¼ 1 ½

7:36 1; 200 3 ð775 þ # IIÞŠ ¼ 4; 38C:

The duration of the self-regulated thermal process is

then calculated from Eq 36:

s nb ¼ 0:48 þ 3:21 ln 10:2 36:77 3 10

6

4:3 5:36 3 10 6 ¼ 22:4s:

Here K ¼ R2

p 2 ¼ 36:77 3 10 6 m 2 which is the Kondratjev

form factor for a ball of 38.1-mm diameter. The thermal diffusivity

of steel is a ¼ 5.36 3 10 6 m 2 /s. From these calculations,

the surface temperature during the self-regulated

thermal process changes from 110.2°C to104.3°C anditsduration

is 22.4 s. If an average temperature of (110.2°C þ

104.3°C)/2 ¼ 107.25°C is used, the difference between the

actual temperature and the average temperature is ±2.7 % This

difference decreases as the diameter increases, which means

that the simplified approach provided by Eq 36 can be used.

This is important, since it provides a practice approach for

heat treaters to delay the transformation of austenite into martensite

during the intensive quenching process and facilitates

the development various customized quenching processes.

2.7.1 Quench Process Investigations

Performed by French

Quenching is a very old technology. Ancient experienced

heat treaters—blacksmiths—had their own specialized knowhow

for quenching products, evaluating the duration of transient

nucleate boiling (although they probably didn’t recognize

this particular physical process in this way). The key

element of heat treating was to transfer quenched products

from one quenchant to another at the end of nucleate boiling.

The duration of nucleate boiling was evaluated simply

by the noise and small vibrations the blacksmiths felt in

their hands. Only experienced heat treaters could do this job,

and they were highly respected in ancient societies. Nowadays,

heat treating may be completely automated, and production

lines are equipped with the conveyors, robots, and

various kinds of hardware and software.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!