ECA Review - 2023-10-26
ECA Review - 2023-10-26
ECA Review - 2023-10-26
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6 October <strong>26</strong>'23 HANNA/CORONATION/STETTLER, AB. <strong>ECA</strong> REVIEW<br />
VIEWPOINTS<br />
The opinions expressed are not necessarily<br />
the opinions of this newspaper.<br />
<br />
MAIL BAG<br />
Transparent<br />
governance too<br />
much to ask?<br />
Dear Editor,<br />
Why is asking for open, honest, and<br />
transparent governance too much to<br />
ask?<br />
This story all begins at a ‘Meeting of<br />
The Whole’ shortly after our current<br />
village council was acclaimed.<br />
There were about 40 plus residents<br />
in attendance including five past<br />
council members (three of them being<br />
previous mayors).<br />
During this meeting, many questioned<br />
and pushed back on some<br />
decisions the council had or were<br />
planning to make.<br />
Council refused to take seriously<br />
what their residents were trying to say<br />
and decided that public meetings that<br />
included input from the residents<br />
were, and I quote our mayor’s words,<br />
nothing but “a shit show” and the<br />
deputy mayor inferring that the residents<br />
“do not need to know” what is<br />
going on with operations in the<br />
village.<br />
Months later, the council made a<br />
decision to purchase one of the last<br />
viable commercial properties left on<br />
main street, with the plan to supply a<br />
new location for our small library as<br />
it’s main focus, but also to create a<br />
new space for the Village Office with a<br />
board room.<br />
There was absolutely no indication<br />
to the residents that this new “Civic<br />
Centre” was being considered and<br />
there was no public input/debate on<br />
whether it was a good idea or even<br />
something that we wanted to spend<br />
almost $500,000 on!<br />
When the information finally made<br />
it to the residents’ ears, it was not supplied<br />
by the council as it appropriately<br />
should have been.<br />
Because the council refused to<br />
answer residents’ questions and concerns<br />
there was a public meeting<br />
organized by the residents, with about<br />
80 residents participating, to discuss<br />
options on how we could obtain transparent<br />
information from the council<br />
so we can better understand the reasoning<br />
behind these questionable<br />
decisions.<br />
It was easily concluded that residents<br />
were not at all in agreement of<br />
using this huge amount of infrastructure<br />
funds to unnecessarily improve<br />
already adequate municipal services.<br />
Especially because it involved gross<br />
misuse of the last viable commercial<br />
building left in town and was<br />
destroying our hopes of ever getting<br />
another decent grocery store in town.<br />
Thanks to efforts of a few residents,<br />
and our new business owner, Elnora is<br />
proud and grateful to welcome the<br />
Grocery Barn that now takes up half<br />
of this commercial space.<br />
This resident’s group produced a list<br />
of questions and concerns and<br />
requested a meeting between the three<br />
on council and three community representatives<br />
or a town hall meeting<br />
but we were told that we could send<br />
one delegate as a voice for the community<br />
to regularly scheduled council<br />
meetings and that only 15 minutes of<br />
the meeting would be allocated to our<br />
concerns.<br />
If we did not accept this format,<br />
council member Lisa Ferguson stated<br />
that “there will be no discussion of the<br />
concerns.”<br />
Starting in July, we moved forward<br />
with our questions and concerns but<br />
not really getting any answers or validation<br />
that our concerns were even<br />
being taken seriously.<br />
The August delegation, our residential<br />
delegate elicited admission from<br />
the CAO and Mayor that they did not<br />
handle the decisions involving the<br />
expenditures of the main street property<br />
correctly and even violated some<br />
sections of the Municipal Government<br />
Act (MGA).<br />
The residents still believe council<br />
was not being transparent and the<br />
deputy mayor confirmed as much<br />
when he said, and I quote, “It’s operational,<br />
you don’t need to know”.<br />
He also suggested that they were<br />
going to approach Municipal Affairs<br />
for a Viability Study, “because it<br />
makes sense to go back to the county<br />
as they are the richest in Alberta,<br />
while we sit here and nickel and<br />
dime”.<br />
Municipal Affairs later did refuse<br />
this request until the ongoing<br />
Municipal Inspection is complete.<br />
In September our delegate was<br />
denied by the CAO for no valid reason.<br />
Fortunately, that was overridden by<br />
the council after serious push back<br />
from the community.<br />
Then again, the October delegate<br />
was once again denied despite following<br />
all policies with follow-up<br />
questions because we had still not<br />
received promised answers to our<br />
questions.<br />
Policies versus procedural Bylaws<br />
We called attention to their<br />
Procedural Bylaw that does not state<br />
any of these rules they are trying to<br />
enforce, therefore could not be used to<br />
deny us a voice.<br />
Turn to Unable, Pg 7<br />
What is an editorial cartoon?<br />
Newspaper editorial cartoons are<br />
graphic expressions of their creator’s<br />
ideas and opinions. In addition, the editorial<br />
cartoon usually, but not always,<br />
reflects the publication’s viewpoint.<br />
Editorial cartoons are based on current<br />
events. That means that they are<br />
produced under restricted time conditions<br />
in order to meet publication<br />
deadlines.<br />
Editorial cartoons, sometimes<br />
known as political cartoons, like<br />
written editorials, have an educational<br />
purpose. They are intended to make<br />
readers think about current political<br />
issues.<br />
Editorial cartoonist<br />
use<br />
“<br />
various tools<br />
including:<br />
• Caricatures:<br />
Many editorial<br />
cartoons called<br />
caricatures are<br />
used to poke fun<br />
at popular<br />
people such as<br />
musicians, politicians,<br />
etc. in<br />
which certain<br />
physical features<br />
are<br />
humorously<br />
exaggerated to<br />
create joy.<br />
They may also<br />
assist the main editorial of the day or<br />
deal with some other news item events<br />
for the day.<br />
Caricatures of Richard M. Nixon<br />
often show him as needing to shave.<br />
• Stereotypes are formulaic images<br />
used to represent particular groups. A<br />
stereotypical cartoon mother might<br />
have messy hair, wear an apron, and<br />
hold a screaming baby in her arms.<br />
• Symbols are pictures that<br />
represent something else by tradition.<br />
A dove is a symbol for peace.<br />
• Analogies are comparisons that<br />
suggest that one thing is similar to<br />
something else. The title of a popular<br />
song or film might be used by a cartoonist<br />
to comment on a current<br />
political event.<br />
• Humour is the power to evoke<br />
laughter or to express what is<br />
amusing, comical or absurd.<br />
Evaluating a cartoon<br />
A good editorial cartoon combines a<br />
clear drawing and good writing.<br />
A good editorial<br />
cartoon expresses<br />
a recognizable<br />
point-of-view or<br />
opinion.<br />
In the best<br />
instances, the cartoon<br />
cannot be<br />
read or understood<br />
by only looking at<br />
the words or only<br />
looking at the picture.<br />
Both the<br />
words and the pictures<br />
must be read<br />
together in order<br />
to understand the<br />
cartoonist’s<br />
message.<br />
Not all editorial<br />
cartoons are<br />
meant to be funny. Some of the most<br />
effective editorial cartoons are not<br />
humorous at all. Humour is only one<br />
tool available to editorial cartoonists.<br />
Editorial cartoons provide a window<br />
into history by showing us what people<br />
were thinking and talking about at a<br />
given time and place. Today’s editorial<br />
cartoons will provide the same record<br />
of our own time.<br />
Not all editorial<br />
cartoons are meant<br />
to be funny. Some of<br />
the most effective<br />
editorial cartoons are<br />
not humorous at all.<br />
“<br />
R<br />
R<br />
R<br />
R<br />
R<br />
Published by<br />
Coronation<br />
<strong>Review</strong><br />
Limited<br />
Subscriptions:<br />
$52.50 in Canada; $98.70 in US;<br />
$183.75 Overseas.<br />
72 pt<br />
East Central Alberta<br />
EVIEW<br />
60 pt<br />
48 pt<br />
36 pt<br />
Website <strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
Office Hours Mon. - Fri. 9 am - 5 pm<br />
R<br />
30 pt<br />
4921 - Victoria Avenue<br />
Tel. (403) 578-4111<br />
R<br />
24 pt<br />
Mail: Box 70, Coronation, AB Canada, T0C 1C0<br />
LETTERS POLICY • Letters to the Editor are welcomed •<br />
Must be signed and a phone number included so the writer’s<br />
identity can be verified. • <strong>ECA</strong> <strong>Review</strong> reserves the right to edit<br />
letters for legal considerations, taste and brevity. Letters and<br />
columns submitted are not necessarily the opinion of this<br />
newspaper.<br />
MEMBER OF:<br />
Local Journalism Initiative is funded<br />
by the Government of Canada.<br />
JOYCE WEBSTER<br />
Publisher/Editor<br />
office@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
YVONNE THULIEN<br />
Marketing/Digital 403-575-9474<br />
digital@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
JUDY WALGENBACH<br />
Marketing 403-740-2492<br />
marketing@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
STU SALKELD<br />
LJI Reporter 403-741-<strong>26</strong>15<br />
reporter@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
LISA MYERS-SORTLAND<br />
Graphic Artist<br />
R<br />
18 pt