28.11.2023 Views

RBU Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol 25, 2023

The RBU Journal of Library & Information science is a scholarly communication for education, research and development of the Library & Information science field. The first volume was published in the year 1997. It has ISSN -0972-2750. This Journal was enlisted under UGC List of Journals No. 45237, Sl. No. 2023 when UGC published a list of research journals published across the country in its website. Later this journal enlisted under UGC-CARE List w.e.f. 14.6.2019. Present publication is its 25th Volume published in the year 2023. • Dr Sudip Ranjan Hatua is the editor from Vol. 15 to Vol. 25.

The RBU Journal of Library & Information science is a scholarly communication for education, research and development of the Library & Information science field. The first volume was published in the year 1997. It has ISSN -0972-2750. This Journal was enlisted under UGC List of Journals No. 45237, Sl. No. 2023 when UGC published a list of research journals published across the country in its website. Later this journal enlisted under UGC-CARE List w.e.f. 14.6.2019. Present publication is its 25th Volume published in the year 2023. • Dr Sudip Ranjan Hatua is the editor from Vol. 15 to Vol. 25.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RBU Journal of library & Information Science, V. 25, 2023

improved accuracy and timeliness of the information

provided through SDI.

Kannappanavar B.U and Chidanandswamy H.M

(2013)conducted study in Agricultural Science

University Libraries in India with special reference

to South India. They focused the issues related CAS

and SDI services in surveyed libraries. Author found

as most of the respondents (80)%) exprssed their

need as they require index of articles and (90%) as

abstracts are essential for their studies and research.

It was also found by author as more or less 25% 0f

respondents of PG, research and faculty members are

satisfied with CAS services. And almost half (48%)

research scholars and 51% faculty members are

satisfied with SDI services provided by libraries.

Oliveria and Tavares (2017) investigated user

satisfaction with integrated CAS and SDI services in

engineering college libraries. The findings indicated

that users highly valued the

integrated approach, as it offered them both the latest

information and personalized content. However users

provided suggestions for enhancing the flexibility

and ease of use of the system to further improve user

satisfaction.

Ramiah and Babu (2020) explored user perceptions

of CAS effectiveness in a university library setting.

The author highlighted the importance of timely and

relevant information in increasing the user

satisfaction.

Li (2019) conducted a study on the impact of service

quality on user satisfaction with CAS and SDI

services in a research library. The author found as

factors such as responsiveness, reliability and content

relevancy significantly affect user satisfaction.

Mohana and Swain (2018)compared the

effectiveness of traditional CAS and SDI methods

with modern technology- driven approaches. The

study emphasized the advantages of technology

driven services in terms of accessibility, efficiency

and personalization.

Venkatesan and Rajendran (2019) identified the

barriers such as inadequate user awareness, limited

resources and technical issues. It also addressed these

challenges is essential for improving the overall

effectiveness of CAS and SDI services.

Senthil Kumaran et. Al (2021) explored the

successful implementation of CAS and SDI in an

engineering college.

Research Identification

The researcher is working in reputed engineering

college since 15 years as a Librarian and taking

efforts to know the satisfaction of users every year

and enhancing the library CAS and SDI services and

increasing the user’s satisfaction. Researcher thought

to apply the obtained knowledge on users of all the

engineering colleges in Pune city to facilitate the

respective college authorities and librarians to

understand the level of satisfaction of their users with

Current Awareness Service, and Selective

Dissemination of Information Services and design

the same services as per user needs/expectations and

increase the user satisfaction and achieve excellence.

Hypothesis of the study

30

https://lisrbu.wixsite.com/dlis/rbu-journal-of-lis

Null Hypothesis (Ho)

“There is no significant difference in satisfaction

level between three designated groups of users with

Current awareness Service (CAS) and Selective

Dissemination of Information service (SDI) in

Engineering colleges of Pune city”

Alternative Hypothesis (H1)

“There is a significant difference in satisfaction level

between three designated groups with Current

awareness Service (CAS) and Selective

Dissemination of Information service (SDI) in

Engineering colleges of Pune city”

This study rejects the null hypothesis in favour of

alternative hypothesis. The findings of Chi square

test show evidence of existence of a significant

difference in satisfaction level between three

designated groups with Current awareness Service

(CAS) and Selective Dissemination of Information

service (SDI) in engineering colleges of Pune city”

Methodology

A descriptive research methodology was used for

this study. :BE/B Tech students, ME/M Tech

students and regular faculty members of engineering

colleges located in Pune city constitute the

population for this study. There are 34 engineering

colleges located in Pune city area. Out of them the

researcher has collected data from 33 engineering

colleges as one college authorities are not allowed

for data collection.The methodology used to select

sample users for this study was simple random

sampling. Chi Square test applied to Chi Square

value calculated to know the existence of difference

in satisfaction level according to respondents’

academic status. And mean scores were calculated to

know the point of satisfaction level of respondents

Response Rate: Total 660 questionnaires were

distributed among the students and faculty members.

Hence Sample Size of 379 respondents needed for

30000 Population as per Morgan Table. For present

study, 509 questionnaires were received which is

suitably more than the required number. The

response rate was satisfactory for this survey. Total

509 questionnaires received were appropriate for the

study from the total sent 660.

Sample Design

The methodology used to select sample users for this

study was simple random sampling. The results

obtained from random sampling can be assured in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!