29.12.2012 Views

Lawrence Today - Lawrence University

Lawrence Today - Lawrence University

Lawrence Today - Lawrence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Teaching Physics Students to Innovate<br />

Whether they were inducing atomic transparency, employing<br />

lasers to examine atomic structures or prolonging the trapping<br />

of electrons in a toroidal magnetic field, nine <strong>Lawrence</strong><br />

physics students, under the direction of five faculty physicists<br />

last summer, found themselves embracing various personal<br />

characteristics related to innovation — and they soon began<br />

exhibiting behaviors and mindsets associated with innovative<br />

thinking relevant to science and beyond.<br />

One might ask why <strong>Lawrence</strong> physicists — students and<br />

professors — were (and still are) exploring innovation, or, more<br />

precisely, the teaching of innovation? The answer, according to<br />

John Brandenberger, Alice G. Chapman Professor of Physics<br />

Emeritus, is that “physicists, perhaps more than most individuals,<br />

recognize that innovation occupies center stage in a serious<br />

research program or scholarly venture. Innovation, in fact,<br />

constitutes the lifeblood of a productive research program<br />

in physics. Once we physicists at <strong>Lawrence</strong><br />

recognized this fact and began thinking about how<br />

we might teach students to be more innovative,<br />

we realized that our existing, ongoing faculty<br />

research programs could probably serve as powerful<br />

settings in which to incubate innovative mindsets<br />

among our students.”<br />

This interest in innovation by <strong>Lawrence</strong> physicists<br />

emerged from a recent search for a new venture<br />

that might enhance departmental offerings. The<br />

resulting decision to focus on the teaching of innovation stemmed<br />

from assertions by numerous experts that a major strengthening<br />

of K-12 education, basic scientific research, creative engineering,<br />

technological development and innovative thinking are absolutely<br />

critical if the United States is to arrest its widespread slippage in<br />

global competitiveness — and by the recognition that solutions<br />

to our globally significant problems are going to require major<br />

innovative thinking worldwide. Supported by a $150,000 grant from<br />

the National Science Foundation and additional support from other<br />

sources as well as <strong>Lawrence</strong>, a formal program is now underway in<br />

which <strong>Lawrence</strong> physicists are exploring approaches to the teaching<br />

of innovation. Most all members of the department — professors<br />

Matthew Stoneking, Jeffrey Collett, Megan Pickett, Douglas Martin,<br />

right: Faraz Choudhury ’11 (left)<br />

and Eric Frater ’11 (right) install the<br />

vacuum components and filament<br />

hardware that they developed last<br />

summer for Associate Professor<br />

Matthew Stoneking’s <strong>Lawrence</strong><br />

Non-neutral Torus.<br />

“ Most students<br />

don’t become<br />

published authors<br />

during their<br />

undergraduate<br />

careers”<br />

Shannon O’Leary, Adam Clausen and John Brandenberger — are<br />

participating in the investigation.<br />

Thus far the more prominent component of this program has<br />

involved the use of six ongoing faculty research programs<br />

supplemented by various innovation-centered discussions and<br />

presentations arranged each week during the summer. In this part<br />

of the investigation, the student researchers are encouraged to<br />

embrace various character traits such as being creative, ambitious,<br />

curious, perseverant and risk-taking thought to be conducive to or<br />

at least strongly associated with innovation. While the students<br />

find that the summer research/innovation activities are demanding,<br />

all nine students last summer agreed that the program was eyeopening,<br />

stimulating and virtually certain to influence their futures.<br />

“That program forced me to think a lot about innovation — about<br />

aspects of innovation that I wouldn’t have considered otherwise,”<br />

said Gennady Malyshev ’10. “There was considerable<br />

free thinking in terms of how we could solve this<br />

or that problem, along with an emphasis on trying<br />

to cultivate certain attitudinal and behavioral traits<br />

within ourselves. Being more aware of those<br />

characteristics made me more likely to embrace<br />

them.” Working alongside Brandenberger, Malyshev<br />

employed three-step laser spectroscopy to measure<br />

several “fine structure splittings” in excited states<br />

of rubidium atoms. The pair enjoyed the satisfaction<br />

of having their findings published in The Physical<br />

Review. “Most students don’t become published authors during<br />

their undergraduate careers,” said Malyshev. “I was very pleased.”<br />

Eric Frater ’11 enjoyed the broad latitude that Professor Mathew<br />

Stoneking granted him in his attempt to solve a variety of<br />

experimental problems connected with the <strong>Lawrence</strong> Nonneutral<br />

Torus. Frater drew sketches and drawings, constructed<br />

experimental components in the machine shop and eventually<br />

incorporated these components into the large toroidal vessel so<br />

that the electron plasma could be examined in ways never before<br />

attempted. “This was an opportunity that I wouldn’t have gotten<br />

in most places,” Frater said. “Often in this sort of situation, the<br />

student just buys parts or has other people build things rather<br />

<strong>Lawrence</strong> <strong>Today</strong><br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!