88 <strong>Chapter</strong> 2 <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Energy there were no frictional heating, exactly zero energy would be required in order to operate the system. A similar counterweighting principle is used in aerial tramways in mountain resorts, <strong>and</strong> in elevators (with a solid weight, rather than a second car, as counterweight).
Water in a U-shaped tube example 13 ⊲ The U-shaped tube in figure q has cross-sectional area A, <strong>and</strong> the density <strong>of</strong> the water inside is ρ. Find the gravitational energy as a function <strong>of</strong> the quantity y shown in the figure, <strong>and</strong> show that there is an equilibrium at y=0. ⊲ The question is a little ambiguous, since gravitational energy is only well defined up to an additive constant. To fix this constant, let’s define U to be zero when y=0. The difference between U(y) <strong>and</strong> U(0) is the energy that would be required to lift a water column <strong>of</strong> height y out <strong>of</strong> the right side, <strong>and</strong> place it above the dashed line, on the left side, raising it through a height y. This water column has height y <strong>and</strong> cross-sectional area A, so its volume is Ay, its mass is ρAy, <strong>and</strong> the energy required is mgy=(ρAy)gy=ρgAy 2 . We then have U(y) = U(0) + ρgAy 2 = ρgAy 2 . To find equilibria, we look for places where the derivative dU/dy = 2ρgAy equals 0. As we’d expect intuitively, the only equilibrium occurs at y=0. The second derivative test shows that this is a local minimum (not a maximum or a point <strong>of</strong> inflection), so this is a stable equilibrium. 2.1.7 Predicting the direction <strong>of</strong> motion Kinetic energy doesn’t depend on the direction <strong>of</strong> motion. Sometimes this is helpful, as in the high road-low road example (p. 84, example 9), where we were able to predict that the balls would have the same final speeds, even though they followed different paths <strong>and</strong> were moving in different directions at the end. In general, however, the two conservation laws we’ve encountered so far aren’t enough to predict an object’s path through space, for which we need conservation <strong>of</strong> momentum (chapter 3), <strong>and</strong> the mathematical technique <strong>of</strong> vectors. Before we develop those ideas in their full generality, however, it will be helpful to do a couple <strong>of</strong> simple examples, including one that we’ll get a lot <strong>of</strong> mileage out <strong>of</strong> in section 2.3. Suppose we observe an air hockey puck gliding frictionlessly to the right at a velocity v, <strong>and</strong> we want to predict its future motion. Since there is no friction, no kinetic energy is converted to heat. The only form <strong>of</strong> energy involved is kinetic energy, so conservation <strong>of</strong> energy, ∆E = 0, becomes simply ∆K = 0. There’s no particular reason for the puck to do anything but continue moving to the right at constant speed, but it would be equally consistent with conservation <strong>of</strong> energy if it spontaneously decided to reverse its direction <strong>of</strong> motion, changing its velocity to −v. Either way, we’d have ∆K = 0. There is, however, a way to tell which motion is physical <strong>and</strong> which is unphysical. Suppose we consider the whole thing again in the frame <strong>of</strong> reference that is initially moving right along with the puck. In this frame, the puck starts out with K = 0. What we originally described as a reversal <strong>of</strong> its velocity from v to −v is, in this q / Water in a U-shaped tube. Section 2.1 Energy 89