02.01.2013 Views

CNPA BASIC PETROLEUM GEOLOGY TRAINING - CCOP

CNPA BASIC PETROLEUM GEOLOGY TRAINING - CCOP

CNPA BASIC PETROLEUM GEOLOGY TRAINING - CCOP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.0 WELL LOG ANALYSIS<br />

MODULE 5<br />

5.1 Wireline Geophysical Well Log<br />

– continuous recording of a geophysical parameter along a borehole.<br />

Table 5-1. Common wireline geophysical well measurements (Rider, 1996)<br />

Measurement Log Type Parameter Measured<br />

Mechanical Caliper Hole diameter<br />

Spontaneous Temperature Borehole temperature<br />

Self-Potential (SP) Spontaneous electrical currents<br />

Gamma Ray (GR) Natural radioactivity<br />

Induced Resistivity Resistance to electric current<br />

Induction Conductivity of electric current<br />

Sonic Velocity of sound propagation<br />

Density Reaction to gamma ray bombardment<br />

Photoelectric Reaction to gamma ray bombardment<br />

Neutron Reaction to neutron bombardment<br />

Table 5-2. Principal uses of wireline logs (modified after Rider, 1996)<br />

General<br />

Geology<br />

Uses<br />

Log<br />

Temperature<br />

Caliper<br />

Lithology -- general - - - + + + + -<br />

Unusual lithology: Volcanics - - - - -<br />

Evaporites - + + - - - -<br />

Mineral identification - + - + - -<br />

Correlation: stratigraphy - - - - - - -<br />

Facies, dep. environment - - - - - - - -<br />

Fracture identification - - + + +<br />

Reservoir<br />

Geology<br />

Over-pressure identification - + + -<br />

Geochemistry Source rock identification + + + + + -<br />

Maturity + +<br />

Petrophysics Porosity + C C C<br />

Permeability - + - +<br />

Shale volume + + -<br />

Formation water salinity C -<br />

Hydrocarbon saturation C +<br />

Gas identification - - - - -<br />

Seismic Interval velocity<br />

Acoustic impedance<br />

C<br />

C C<br />

dip dip<br />

Legend: (-) essentially qualitative; (+) qualitative and semi-quantitative; (C) strictly quantitative<br />

SP<br />

Resistivity<br />

Gamma Ray<br />

Spectral GR<br />

Sonic<br />

Density<br />

Photoelectric<br />

Neutron<br />

Dipmeter<br />

Image logs


5.1.1 Log Presentation<br />

The values of the parameter measured are plotted continuously against depth<br />

in the well. Hard copies of well logs are in standard API (American Petroleum<br />

Institute) log format. The overall log width is 8.25 in., with three tracks of 2.5<br />

in. wide each. A column 0.75 in. wide separates tracks 1 and 2 where the<br />

depths are indicated. Track 1 is always linear, with ten division of 0.25 in.<br />

while tracks 2 and 3 may have a linear scale similar to track1, a 4-cycle<br />

logarithmic scale, or a combination of logarithmic scale in track 2 and linear<br />

scale in track 3.<br />

For most well logs, the common vertical scales used are l:200 and 1:500 but<br />

for image logs (microresistivity) it is usually 1:20 and 1:40.<br />

Every log is preceded by a header. It shows pertinent information for proper<br />

interpretation of the log and in addition, some details of the well and the log<br />

run.<br />

5.1.2 The Logging Environment<br />

Pressure<br />

Formation pressure – the pressure under which the subsurface<br />

formation fluids and gases are confined.<br />

Hydrostatic pressure – the pressure exerted by a column of fluid. In<br />

the borehole, it is due to the column of drilling mud and is:<br />

Ph (psi) = 0.052 x height of fluid column (ft.) x density (ppg)<br />

Overpressure – any pressure above the hydrostatic (or normal)<br />

pressure<br />

Temperature<br />

Geothermal gradient<br />

G = 100 ( Tf −Ts)<br />

/ D<br />

Formation temperature<br />

Tf = Ts + G(D/100)<br />

G = geothermal gradient, °F/100 ft.<br />

Tf = formation temperature, °F<br />

Ts = surface temperature (80°F)<br />

D = depth of formation, ft.<br />

Graphical solution of formation temperature is provided by Schlumberger<br />

Gen-6 chart.


Borehole Geometry<br />

From caliper<br />

Gauged hole – diameter of hole is about equal to the bit size<br />

Increased borehole diameter<br />

Washout – general drilling wear, esp. in shaly zones and dipping beds,<br />

both caliper larger than bit size, considerable vertical extent<br />

Keyseat – asymmetric oval holes, formed by wear against the drill<br />

string at points where the borehole inclination changes<br />

(doglegs)<br />

Breakout – similar to keyseat but not due to doglegs, small brittle<br />

fractures (spalling) due to existing stress regime of the country<br />

rock<br />

Decreased borehole diameter<br />

- generally due to formation of mud cake<br />

Mud cake thickness = (bit size diameter – caliper diameter reading)/2<br />

- mud cake formation indicates permeability and involves loss of mud<br />

filtrate into a permeable formation – invasion.<br />

Invasion Profile<br />

Figure 5-1 (Gen-3, Schlumberger Charts) shows invasion by mud filtrate of a<br />

permeable bed in a borehole. Also shown are the nomenclature of the<br />

corresponding resistivities and saturations in each zone.


5.1.3 Process of Interpretation<br />

• Identify potential reservoir intervals; distinguish non-permeable, nonreservoir<br />

intervals from porous potential intervals.<br />

• Estimate thickness of the potential reservoirs.<br />

• Determine lithology (rock type) of the potential reservoirs.<br />

• Calculate porosity (Φ).<br />

• Determine resistivity of formation water (Rw).<br />

• Calculate water saturations (Sw, Sxo) using resistivity (Rt, Rxo).<br />

• Estimate in-place and movable hydrocarbons.<br />

Figure here (Flow chart for log interpretation, Asquith, p.104-5)<br />

5.2 Resistivity Logs<br />

Resistance is the opposition offered by a substance to the passage of electric<br />

current. Resistivity is the resistance measured between opposite faces of a<br />

unit cube of the substance at specified temperature. Resistivity is measured<br />

in ohm-meter 2 /meter, more commonly shortened to just ohm-meter.<br />

Resistivity logs do not always measure resistivity directly. Some resistivity<br />

logs (actually induction logs) measures conductivity instead which is the<br />

reciprocal of resistivity.<br />

resistivity (ohms m 2 /m)<br />

1× 1000<br />

= (millimhos/m)<br />

conductivity<br />

Induction logs are used in wells drilled with a relatively fresh-water mud (low<br />

salinity) to obtain more accurate value of true resistivity.<br />

Table 5-3. Principal uses of the resistivity and induction logs<br />

Used for Knowing<br />

Quantitative Fluid saturation:<br />

Formation water resistivity (Rw)<br />

Formation<br />

Mud filtrate resistivity (Rmf)<br />

Invaded zone<br />

Porosity (φ) [and F]<br />

(detect hydrocarbons) Temperature<br />

Semi- Texture Calibration with cores<br />

quantitative Lithology Mineral resistivities<br />

and Correlation<br />

qualitative Facies, bedding<br />

characteristics<br />

Gross lithologies<br />

Compaction, overpressure Normal pressure trends<br />

and shale porosity<br />

Source rock identification Sonic and density log values<br />

Source rock maturation Formation temperature


Figure 5-2. Idealized resistivity log.<br />

5.3 Spontaneous Potential and Gamma Ray<br />

The SP and GR logs measures naturally occurring physical phenomena in insitu<br />

rocks.<br />

5.3.1 Spontaneous Potential<br />

The SP log is a measurement of the natural potential difference or self<br />

potential between an electrode in the borehole and a reference electrode at<br />

the surface (problem with offshore wells, no ground). No artificial currents are<br />

applied.<br />

Three factors are necessary to produce an SP current:<br />

1. a conductive fluid in the borehole,<br />

2. a porous and permeable bed surrounded by an impermeable<br />

formation, and<br />

3. a difference in salinity (or pressure) between the borehole fluid<br />

and the formation fluid.


Figure 5-3. Idealized SP log.<br />

Table 5-3. Principal uses of the SP log<br />

Used for Knowing<br />

Quantitative Formation-water resistivity Mud filtrate resistivity and<br />

formation temperature<br />

Shale volume SSP (static SP) and shale line<br />

Qualitative Permeability indicator Shale line<br />

Facies (shaliness) Clay/Grain size relationships<br />

Correlation<br />

Bed Boundary Definition and Bed Resolution<br />

Sharpness of a bed boundary depends on the shape and extent of the SPO<br />

current patterns. When there is considerable difference between mud and<br />

formation water resistivity, currents will spread widely and the SP will deflect<br />

slowly: definition is poor. When the resistivities are similar, boundaries are<br />

sharper. In general, SP should not be used to determine bed boundaries. If it<br />

has to be used, place the bed boundary at the point of maximum curve slope.<br />

(GR defines bed boundaries better.)<br />

Shale Baseline and SSP<br />

SP has no absolute values and thus treated quantitatively and qualitatively in<br />

terms of deflection, which is the amount the curve moves to the left or to the<br />

right of a defined zero. The definition of the SP zero, called shale baseline, is<br />

made on thick shale intervals where the SP curve does not move. All values<br />

are related to the shale baseline.


The theoretical maximum deflection of the SP opposite permeable beds is<br />

called the static SP or SSP. It represents the SP value that would be<br />

measured in an ideal case with the permeable bed isolated electrically. It is<br />

the maximum possible SP opposite a permeable, water-bearing formation<br />

with no shale. The SSP is used to calculate formation-water resistivity (Rw).<br />

Formation-water Resistivity (Rw)<br />

(S)SP =<br />

( Rmf ) e<br />

− K log<br />

( Rw)<br />

e<br />

S(SP) = SP value: this should be the SSP<br />

(Rmf)e = equivalent mud filtrate resistivity: closely related to Rmf<br />

(Rw)e = equivalent formation water resistivity: closely related to Rw<br />

K = temperature-dependent coefficient<br />

K = 61+ (0.133 x T°F)<br />

K = 65 + (0.24 x T°C)<br />

Shale Volume<br />

PSP<br />

Vsh (%) = ( 1.<br />

0 − ) × 100<br />

SSP<br />

PSP (Pseudo-static SP) – the SP value in the water–bearing shaly sand zone<br />

read from the SP log.<br />

SSP (Static SP)– the maximum SP value in a clean sand zone.<br />

The formula simply assumes that the SP deflection between the shale base<br />

line (100% shale) and the static SP in a clean sand (0% shale) is proportional<br />

to the shale volume. This is qualitatively true but quantitatively there is no<br />

theoretical basis. Shale content from SP is subject to complications due to<br />

SP noise, Rw/Rmf contrast, HC content, and high salinity drilling fluids.


5.3.2 Gamma Ray<br />

Volume of Shale from GR<br />

Figure 5-4. Idealized GR and SGR log.<br />

Vsh = 0.33 [2 (2 x I )<br />

GR - 1.0]<br />

Vsh = 0.083 [2 (3.7 x I )<br />

GR - 1.0]<br />

I GR<br />

GR<br />

=<br />

GR<br />

log<br />

max<br />

− GR<br />

− GR<br />

min<br />

min


5.4 Porosity Calculations – sonic, density, and neutron logs<br />

5.4.1 Sonic<br />

Wyllie’s Time Average Equation<br />

Figure 5-5. Idealized Sonic log.<br />

∆t = Φ ∆tf + (1- Φ) ∆tma<br />

Φ = porosity<br />

∆t = log reading in microseconds/foot (µs/ft.)<br />

∆tf = transit time for the liquid filling the pore (usually 189 µs/ft.)<br />

∆tma = transit time for the rock type (matrix) comprising the formation<br />

Φ =<br />

∆t<br />

− ∆t<br />

∆t<br />

− ∆t<br />

f<br />

ma<br />

ma


5.4.2 Density<br />

Figure 5-6. Idealized Density log.<br />

ρb = Φ ρf + (1- Φ) ρma<br />

Φ = porosity<br />

ρ = log reading in microseconds/foot (µs/ft.)<br />

ρ f = transit time for the liquid filling the pore (usually 189 µs/ft.)<br />

ρ ma = transit time for the rock type (matrix) comprising the formation<br />

Φ =<br />

ρ<br />

ρ<br />

ma<br />

ma<br />

−<br />

ρb<br />

− ρ<br />

f


5.4.3 Neutron<br />

Read directly from logs<br />

May need matrix correction<br />

Φ =<br />

Figure 5-7. Idealized Neutron log.<br />

φ D + φN<br />

Φ =<br />

2<br />

φ D + φN<br />

2<br />

if no light hydrocarbons<br />

if light hydrocarbons as present


5.5 Water Saturation (Sw) Calculations<br />

Archie’s Equation<br />

F = Ro/Rw<br />

F = formation resistivity factor or simply formation factor<br />

Ro = resistivity of rock when water saturation is 1<br />

(100% saturated)<br />

Rw = resistivity of saturating water<br />

a<br />

F = m<br />

φ<br />

Φ =porosity<br />

a = cementation factor<br />

m = cementation exponent<br />

Figure 5-8. Schematic illustration of three formations with same porosity but<br />

different values of F (formation factor).<br />

Formation factor equations have been approximated through the years by<br />

various workers and the following are the commonly used.<br />

0.<br />

62<br />

F = 2.<br />

15<br />

φ<br />

best average for sands (Humble)<br />

0.<br />

81<br />

F = 2<br />

φ<br />

simplified Humble<br />

1<br />

F = 2<br />

φ<br />

compacted formations


Sw n = Ro/Rt<br />

Sw = water saturation<br />

Rt = resistivity of rock when Sw < 1<br />

Combining the above equations gives Archie’s equation, the most<br />

fundamental equation in well logging.<br />

Sw n =<br />

aRw<br />

m<br />

φ Rt<br />

Rw<br />

= F<br />

Rt<br />

Practical average Archie’s Equation – general equation for finding water<br />

saturation.<br />

Sw =<br />

0.<br />

62×<br />

Rw<br />

2.<br />

15<br />

φ × Rt<br />

Symbol Character Derived from<br />

Φ Porosity Porosity logs (sonic, neutron,<br />

0.<br />

62<br />

2.<br />

15<br />

φ<br />

density), cross-plots, etc.<br />

F (formation factor) Calculated using empirical formulae<br />

(e.g. Humble formula) and porosity as<br />

above<br />

Rw Formation water resistivity SP or laboratory measurements of<br />

resistivities of formation water<br />

Ro Rock resistivity saturated<br />

samples<br />

Ro = F x Rw (can only be calculated,<br />

100% with water<br />

cannot be measured with logs)<br />

Rt True formation resistivity Induction Logs and Laterologs (deep<br />

resistivity)<br />

Sw Water saturation of pores Sw hydrocarbons<br />

Ro<br />

=<br />

Sw100%<br />

water Rt<br />

Sw Calculations<br />

Conventional<br />

Quick look<br />

Rwa<br />

“F” overlay<br />

SP Quick Look<br />

Clean Formation<br />

Shaly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!