Iolkos and Pagasai: Two New Thessalian Mints* - Royal Numismatic ...
Iolkos and Pagasai: Two New Thessalian Mints* - Royal Numismatic ...
Iolkos and Pagasai: Two New Thessalian Mints* - Royal Numismatic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IOLKOS AND PAGASAI 27<br />
sculptural type, probably of the 4th/3rd century BC. 27 Schultz took the argument<br />
further, 28 using another coin of the Magnetes with a portrait of Julia Domna (AD<br />
211-217) on the obverse, <strong>and</strong> on the reverse an enthroned female figure. Rogers<br />
had read the reverse legend as ���������� ������ ���, 29 but Schultz<br />
corrected it to� ������� ������� <strong>and</strong> noted an enthroned female figure with a<br />
fuller version of the legend,� �������� ������� ��������, on coins of the<br />
Magnetes under Antoninus Pius (AD 138-161). This figure holds a flower (?) in<br />
one h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> an arrow in the other, <strong>and</strong> has a quiver at her shoulder. The minor<br />
differences in attributes do not undermine the hypothesis that a single statue lies<br />
behind these representations of Artemis Iolkia, as Schultz rightly notes. 30<br />
The warship prow on the reverse of the coins of <strong>Iolkos</strong> is rendered in<br />
considerable detail 31 <strong>and</strong> their good state of preservation allows us to discern the<br />
deck, the stem-post, the beak, the ram <strong>and</strong> the apotropaic eye. This prow differs<br />
from those depicted at other mints in the area, namely Thebes in Phthiotis 32<br />
(though a few dies show a similarity in the depiction of the stem-post 33 ), <strong>and</strong><br />
Demetrias (see nn. 18-20). The prow with slightly curving stem-post on several<br />
silver issues of the Magnetes in the 2nd century BC bears some resemblance,<br />
although there the waves on the keel are more skilfully drawn. 34 Nor does the<br />
prow on the bronze coins of Demetrios Poliorketes attributed to the northern<br />
region bear much resemblance. 35 The prow emblem, ���������, found on the<br />
seals of Demetrias is very different from the prow on the Iolkian coins (see<br />
below).<br />
Was the prow on the reverse of the coins of <strong>Iolkos</strong> simply a warship, or was it<br />
the Argo? The prow on the coins of Demetrias, both those issued a few years<br />
after the synoecism (287-285/284 BC; see nn. 18-19) <strong>and</strong> those struck around<br />
192/191 BC (see n. 20), has nothing to identify it as the Argo. Before 168 BC<br />
the silver <strong>and</strong> bronze coins issued by the Koinon of the Magnetes (see n. 34) had<br />
the same types as the coins of Demetrias, but with the legend ��������. After<br />
168/167 BC, when the Second Koinon of the Magnetes was established, its<br />
drachms depicted Artemis on the prow, 36 identified as Artemis ��������,<br />
27 Franke 1967, pp. 62-4, figs 1-3 (with sources <strong>and</strong> bibliography). See also the discussion in Kron<br />
– Furtwängler 1983, p. 168 (with n. 66) (Furtwängler).<br />
28 Schultz 1975, pp. 14-6, figs 1-6.<br />
29 Rogers 1932, pp. 118-9, no. 370, fig. 190.<br />
30 Schultz 1975, p. 16. See also Kahil – Icard 1984, p. 671, no. 657, s.v. Artemis.<br />
31 For the parts of the prow, see Svoronos 1914, pp. 81-152; Höckmann 1985, pp. 154-5; Morello<br />
1998, pp. 28-9, 38, 93-4.<br />
32 BMC (Thessaly to Aetolia), p. 50, no. 1, Pl. 11, no. 3; Rogers 1932, pp. 174-5, nos 550-1, figs<br />
306-8.<br />
33<br />
Winterthur 1723.<br />
34<br />
BMC (Thessaly to Aetolia), p. 34, no. 1, Pl. 7, no. 2; Furtwängler 1990, pp. 310-5, Emission C–<br />
F, Pls 5, 7-8.<br />
35<br />
<strong>New</strong>ell 1927, Pl. 17, nos 15, 19 (in the Hellespont region).<br />
36<br />
Furtwängler 1990, pp. 312-6, Emission D-G, Pls 7-8.