02.01.2013 Views

Iolkos and Pagasai: Two New Thessalian Mints* - Royal Numismatic ...

Iolkos and Pagasai: Two New Thessalian Mints* - Royal Numismatic ...

Iolkos and Pagasai: Two New Thessalian Mints* - Royal Numismatic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IOLKOS AND PAGASAI 27<br />

sculptural type, probably of the 4th/3rd century BC. 27 Schultz took the argument<br />

further, 28 using another coin of the Magnetes with a portrait of Julia Domna (AD<br />

211-217) on the obverse, <strong>and</strong> on the reverse an enthroned female figure. Rogers<br />

had read the reverse legend as ���������� ������ ���, 29 but Schultz<br />

corrected it to� ������� ������� <strong>and</strong> noted an enthroned female figure with a<br />

fuller version of the legend,� �������� ������� ��������, on coins of the<br />

Magnetes under Antoninus Pius (AD 138-161). This figure holds a flower (?) in<br />

one h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> an arrow in the other, <strong>and</strong> has a quiver at her shoulder. The minor<br />

differences in attributes do not undermine the hypothesis that a single statue lies<br />

behind these representations of Artemis Iolkia, as Schultz rightly notes. 30<br />

The warship prow on the reverse of the coins of <strong>Iolkos</strong> is rendered in<br />

considerable detail 31 <strong>and</strong> their good state of preservation allows us to discern the<br />

deck, the stem-post, the beak, the ram <strong>and</strong> the apotropaic eye. This prow differs<br />

from those depicted at other mints in the area, namely Thebes in Phthiotis 32<br />

(though a few dies show a similarity in the depiction of the stem-post 33 ), <strong>and</strong><br />

Demetrias (see nn. 18-20). The prow with slightly curving stem-post on several<br />

silver issues of the Magnetes in the 2nd century BC bears some resemblance,<br />

although there the waves on the keel are more skilfully drawn. 34 Nor does the<br />

prow on the bronze coins of Demetrios Poliorketes attributed to the northern<br />

region bear much resemblance. 35 The prow emblem, ���������, found on the<br />

seals of Demetrias is very different from the prow on the Iolkian coins (see<br />

below).<br />

Was the prow on the reverse of the coins of <strong>Iolkos</strong> simply a warship, or was it<br />

the Argo? The prow on the coins of Demetrias, both those issued a few years<br />

after the synoecism (287-285/284 BC; see nn. 18-19) <strong>and</strong> those struck around<br />

192/191 BC (see n. 20), has nothing to identify it as the Argo. Before 168 BC<br />

the silver <strong>and</strong> bronze coins issued by the Koinon of the Magnetes (see n. 34) had<br />

the same types as the coins of Demetrias, but with the legend ��������. After<br />

168/167 BC, when the Second Koinon of the Magnetes was established, its<br />

drachms depicted Artemis on the prow, 36 identified as Artemis ��������,<br />

27 Franke 1967, pp. 62-4, figs 1-3 (with sources <strong>and</strong> bibliography). See also the discussion in Kron<br />

– Furtwängler 1983, p. 168 (with n. 66) (Furtwängler).<br />

28 Schultz 1975, pp. 14-6, figs 1-6.<br />

29 Rogers 1932, pp. 118-9, no. 370, fig. 190.<br />

30 Schultz 1975, p. 16. See also Kahil – Icard 1984, p. 671, no. 657, s.v. Artemis.<br />

31 For the parts of the prow, see Svoronos 1914, pp. 81-152; Höckmann 1985, pp. 154-5; Morello<br />

1998, pp. 28-9, 38, 93-4.<br />

32 BMC (Thessaly to Aetolia), p. 50, no. 1, Pl. 11, no. 3; Rogers 1932, pp. 174-5, nos 550-1, figs<br />

306-8.<br />

33<br />

Winterthur 1723.<br />

34<br />

BMC (Thessaly to Aetolia), p. 34, no. 1, Pl. 7, no. 2; Furtwängler 1990, pp. 310-5, Emission C–<br />

F, Pls 5, 7-8.<br />

35<br />

<strong>New</strong>ell 1927, Pl. 17, nos 15, 19 (in the Hellespont region).<br />

36<br />

Furtwängler 1990, pp. 312-6, Emission D-G, Pls 7-8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!