04.01.2013 Views

TEST METHOD VALIDATION Randall J. Troutman CPP Senior ...

TEST METHOD VALIDATION Randall J. Troutman CPP Senior ...

TEST METHOD VALIDATION Randall J. Troutman CPP Senior ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>TEST</strong> <strong>METHOD</strong><br />

<strong>VALIDATION</strong><br />

<strong>Randall</strong> J. <strong>Troutman</strong> <strong>CPP</strong><br />

<strong>Senior</strong> Engineering Manager<br />

Oliver Medical


Presentation Disclaimer<br />

Oliver Medical is devoted to building awareness while<br />

enhancing educational value among medical packaging<br />

professionals through seminars such as this.<br />

The views, topics, and suggestions discussed today are<br />

for educational purposes only and therefore should not<br />

be considered the last word on these issues.<br />

It is the sole responsibility of the attendee and his or her<br />

company to determine the suitability of information<br />

presented today. As well as to investigate all other<br />

sources of information in regards to application of the<br />

content.


• Background<br />

Presentation Overview<br />

• ASTM Guidance / Definitions<br />

• ASTM F88-05 (overview)<br />

• ASTM F1929-98 (overview)<br />

• Getting Started in your lab<br />

• References


• FDA “hot button” issue -<br />

What is all the buzz?<br />

– Recent release of revised 11607 documents have caused<br />

confusion in regards to listed test methods<br />

– Test method validation statement in both parts<br />

• Part 1 - Clause 4.4 Test Methods<br />

• Part 2 - Clause 4.3 Test Methods<br />

– This statement was included in the previous revision<br />

• ISO 11607 Clause 4.3.2


4.4 Test Methods<br />

11607 part 1<br />

4.4.1 All test methods used to show compliance with this part of ISO 11607 shall be<br />

validated and documented.<br />

NOTE Annex B contains a list of suitable test methods.<br />

4.4.2 The test method validation shall demonstrate the suitability of the method used. The<br />

following elements shall be included:<br />

- establishment of a rationale for the selection of the appropriate test for the packaging system;<br />

- establishment of acceptance criteria;<br />

NOTE Pass/fail is a type of criteria;<br />

- determination of test method repeatability;<br />

- determination of test method reproducibility; and<br />

- establishment of test method sensitivity for integrity tests.


4.3 Test Methods<br />

11607 part 2<br />

4.3.1 All test methods used to show compliance with this part of ISO 11607 shall be<br />

validated and documented.<br />

NOTE Annex B in ISO 11607-1 contains a list of suitable test methods.<br />

4.3.2 The test method validation shall demonstrate the suitability of the method used. The<br />

following elements shall be included:<br />

- establishment of a rationale for the selection of the appropriate test for the packaging system;<br />

- establishment of acceptance criteria;<br />

NOTE Pass/fail is a type of criteria;<br />

- determination of test method repeatability;<br />

- determination of test method reproducibility; and<br />

- establishment of test method sensitivity for integrity tests.


11607 part 1 – Annex B<br />

• What does the list include?<br />

– Standard guides<br />

– Standard practices<br />

– Standard test methods<br />

• Including some that can not be validated<br />

• From various organizations…..


11607 part 1 – Annex B<br />

• Includes standards from the following organizations;<br />

– ASTM (Examples – peel, dye, bubble emission, etc.)<br />

– ISO (Examples – air permeance, biological evaluation, etc.)<br />

– EN (Example – sterilization wrap requirements and test methods)<br />

– USP (Examples – Biological reactivity test, in vitro)<br />

– TAPPI (Example – dirt in paper)<br />

– DIN (Example – testing of paper board – bending stiffness)


Validation 1<br />

General Definitions<br />

confirmation by examination and provision of objective<br />

evidence that the particular requirement for a specific intended use<br />

can be consistently fulfilled<br />

Verification 2<br />

confirmation by examination and provision of objective evidence that<br />

specified requirements have been fulfilled<br />

Qualification<br />

referred to as the process of events used to establish feasibility of a<br />

concept, process, or method<br />

1. 11607 part 1<br />

2. 21 CFR Part 820


ASTM Guidance<br />

ATSM E 177<br />

Standard Practice for Use of Terms<br />

Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods<br />

ATSM E 1169<br />

Standard Guide for Conducting Ruggedness Tests<br />

ATSM E 691<br />

Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study<br />

to Determine the Precision of a Test Method


ASTM Guidance cont.<br />

ASTM E 2282<br />

Standard Guide for Defining the<br />

Test Result of a Test Method<br />

ATSM E 1488<br />

Standard Guide for Statistical Procedures to Use in<br />

Developing and Applying Test Methods<br />

ATSM E 456<br />

Standard Terminology Relating to Quality and Statistics


ASTM E 177<br />

Standard Practice for Use of Terms the<br />

Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods<br />

– Purpose is to provide a basis for;<br />

• Precision & Bias statements (for quantitative methods)<br />

• Describes methods of expressing precision and bias<br />

• Gives examples of how P&B statements may be written


Definitions<br />

precision<br />

the closeness of agreement among test results obtained under<br />

prescribed conditions<br />

repeatability<br />

addresses variability between independent test results gathered<br />

from within a single laboratory (otherwise known as intralaboratory<br />

testing)<br />

reproducibility<br />

addresses variability among single test results gathered from<br />

different laboratories (otherwise known as interlaboratory testing)


Definitions<br />

bias<br />

a generic concept related to a consistent or systematic difference<br />

between a set of test results from the process and an accepted<br />

reference value of the property being measured<br />

accuracy<br />

a generic concept of exactness related to the closeness of<br />

agreement between the average of one or more test results and an<br />

accepted reference value<br />

– Accuracy should be used when comparing test results, not in terms<br />

of the output result generated from execution of test a process. But<br />

as - is this test result accurate, verses what is the accuracy of these<br />

results compared to previously generated results.


ASTM E 1169<br />

Standard Guide for<br />

Conducting Ruggedness Tests<br />

– Purpose is to provide a basis for;<br />

• Finding the variables that influence measurements<br />

– experimental factors using Plackett-Burman designs<br />

• Determining how closely these factors need to be controlled<br />

– The test does not determine optimum conditions for<br />

the test method


uggedness (robustness)<br />

Definitions<br />

determination of variables associated with the performance of a test<br />

method that is ultimately critical to the accuracy of the precision<br />

statistical control<br />

point when the test results obtained vary in a predictable manner,<br />

showing no unassignable trends, cycles, abrupt changes, excess<br />

scatter, or other unpredictable variations as determined by<br />

application of appropriate statistical methods


ASTM E 691<br />

Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory<br />

Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method<br />

– Purpose is to provide a basis for;<br />

• Addressing inherent variability in test methods<br />

– Includes (a.) Operator, (b.) equipment used, (c.) calibration<br />

of equipment, (d.) environment (temp, humidity, & etc.)<br />

• Developing protocol w/ details<br />

– Calibration, specific methods of testing, etc.<br />

• Sample preparation<br />

– Sample preparation tips, including conditioning<br />

– Statistically valid sampling plans<br />

• Statistical evaluation methods


ASTM E 2282<br />

Standard Practice for<br />

Defining the Test Result of a Test Method<br />

– Purpose is to provide a basis for;<br />

• Identifying the elements that comprise the test<br />

results of a test method and to illustrate how<br />

these elements combine into the test result.


Definitions<br />

test method<br />

a definitive procedure for the identification, measurement and evaluation of one or<br />

more qualities, characteristics, or properties of a material, product, system, or service<br />

that produces a test result<br />

observation or observed value<br />

the most elemental single reading or corrected reading obtained in the process of<br />

making a measurement<br />

test determination<br />

(1) the process of calculating from one or more observations a property of a single<br />

test specimen, or (2) the value obtained from the process<br />

test result<br />

the value obtained by carrying out the complete protocol of the test method once,<br />

being either a single test determination or a specified combination of a number of test<br />

determinations


ASTM E 1488<br />

Standard Guide for Statistical Procedures<br />

to Use in Developing and Applying Test Methods<br />

– Purpose is to provide a basis for;<br />

• Using statistical procedures for use in<br />

– developing new test methods or<br />

– revising or evaluating existing test methods<br />

• Types of data<br />

– Numerical vs. Categorical / Attribute Data<br />

• Statistical Analysis Methods<br />

– Analysis of Means (ANOM)<br />

– Analysis of Ranges (ANOR)


ASTM E 456<br />

Standard Terminology Relating to Quality and<br />

Statistics<br />

– Purpose is to provide a basis for;<br />

• Terminology used in quality and statistical based ASTM<br />

methods in which standard definitions appear<br />

– attribute data: observed values or determinations which<br />

indicate the presence of absence of specific characteristics.<br />

– variables data: measurements which vary and may take any<br />

of a specified set of numerical values.


Formal Process to Evaluate<br />

• As taken from 11607;<br />

– Suitability of particular test method<br />

– Robustness (ruggedness)<br />

– Precision and / or bias<br />

– Repeatability (within lab precision)<br />

– Reproducibility (between lab precision)<br />

– Range and / or Sensitivity of Detection


Document the Exercise<br />

• The engineering exercise should include:<br />

–Protocol<br />

• Objective / Scope<br />

• Sampling plan, w/ statistical rationale<br />

• Predetermined acceptance criteria<br />

– Report w/ supporting data<br />

• Demonstrates all requirements have been met<br />

– Statement of validation / successful execution<br />

• Includes “proof of work”


Applying the process….<br />

• ASTM F88-05<br />

– Quantitative test method application<br />

– Statistical comparison of test results w/ controlled variation<br />

• ASTM F1929-98<br />

– Qualitative test method application<br />

– Determining sensitivity levels for pass / fail tests<br />

• “In house” test method validation<br />

– Modified standard test method for use by MDM<br />

– Internal test method developed by MDM


1. Scope<br />

1.1 method covers the measurement of the strength<br />

of seal in flexible materials<br />

1.2 method may be conducted on seals between a<br />

flexible and rigid material<br />

1.3 the seals tested may be from any source,<br />

laboratory, or commercial<br />

1.4 method measures the force required to separate<br />

a test strip of material containing a seal. Also<br />

identifies the mode of specimen failure


Conducting a Test Method Evaluation<br />

• Evaluate / Read the Test Method<br />

– Scope meets intended use<br />

– Understand the sources of variation<br />

• Material combinations<br />

– Flexible vs. rigid application<br />

• Number and types of equipment involved<br />

– Equipment calibration details<br />

» What, how, and when<br />

• Test sample conditioning


Conducting a Test Method Evaluation<br />

• Conduct an evaluation to expose how these<br />

factors affect the test result<br />

– “ruggedness test”<br />

• Objective is to evaluate how the test method variables<br />

affect the test determination<br />

• The results of this test will provide you with an<br />

accurate “sample” to use in the repeatability<br />

phase of your evaluation


Conducting a Test Method Evaluation<br />

• Conduct “reproducibility” studies with other pieces of like<br />

equipment in other locations using “samples” proven in<br />

the ruggedness and repeatability studies<br />

• Use a statistician to help determine the predetermined<br />

“Precision” acceptance criteria for the method in your lab<br />

• Based on the data compiled within your R&R study you<br />

may use a one-way analysis of variance (ASTM E 691) to<br />

evaluate the data<br />

• Compare your data to the “Precision” data recorded in<br />

the actual standard (Section 11)


Applying the process….<br />

• ASTM F88-05<br />

– Quantitative test method application<br />

– Statistical comparison of test results w/ controlled variation<br />

• ASTM F1929-98<br />

– Qualitative test method application<br />

– Determining sensitivity levels for pass / fail tests<br />

• “In house” test method validation<br />

– Modified standard test method for use by MDM<br />

– Internal test method developed by MDM


1. Scope<br />

1.1 defines materials and a procedure that will<br />

detect and locate a leak equal or greater<br />

than a channel of 0.002 in.<br />

1.2 intended for use on packages with an<br />

edge seal formed between a transparent<br />

film and a porous material<br />

1.3 requires a contrasting dye penetrant<br />

solution be used


Conducting a Test Method Evaluation<br />

• Evaluate / Read the Test Method<br />

– Scope meets intended use<br />

• Objective is to determine if the method that<br />

you conduct internally meets the sensitivity<br />

claim in the standardized method<br />

– For this particular method the sensitivity level is<br />

a channel down to 0.002 in. in seal


Conducting a Test Method Evaluation<br />

• Overall evaluation should consider;<br />

– Sufficient sample sizes<br />

– Variation in dye mixture methods<br />

– Variation in sourced ingredients<br />

– Variation in exposure times<br />

• 5 seconds vs. 20 seconds<br />

– Variation in the actual procedure / process<br />

– Variation in voids detected


Conducting a Test Method Evaluation<br />

• While considering those variables you<br />

should prove the sensitivity of the method<br />

– Establish a range, w/ control limits<br />

• Example range –<br />

» Control (no void)<br />

» 0.001” void (min limit)<br />

» 0.002” void (detectable)<br />

» 0.003” void (detectable)<br />

» 0.005” void (detectable)


Applying the process….<br />

• ASTM F88-05<br />

– Quantitative test method application<br />

– Statistical comparison of test results w/ controlled variation<br />

• ASTM F1929-98<br />

– Qualitative test method application<br />

– Determining sensitivity levels for pass / fail tests<br />

• “In house” test method validation<br />

– Modified standard test method for use by MDM<br />

– Internal test method developed by MDM


Non-Standardized Test<br />

Methods<br />

• Acceptable for use but validation is more<br />

difficult because there is no data for<br />

comparison<br />

• You must ensure that the test is measuring the<br />

intended attribute<br />

• US regulators expect more data from the<br />

validation process


Getting started in your lab….<br />

• Review the standard test methods that you<br />

currently execute within your company<br />

– How was the standardized method evaluated?<br />

• Review the ASTM standards mentioned in this<br />

presentation for guidance<br />

• Develop a plan to “validate” (evaluate) your<br />

methods separately and be prepared to employ<br />

varying strategies to fulfill the requirement


<strong>Randall</strong> <strong>Troutman</strong> <strong>CPP</strong><br />

Thank You<br />

Oliver Medical<br />

800.253.3893 ext. 7914<br />

616.456.7711 ext. 7914<br />

rtroutman@olivermedical.com<br />

www.olivermedical.com


References<br />

� Tyvek® Rx Newsletter (Vol. 15 Issue 2 October 2006)<br />

� “Fact vs. Fiction”, ASTM Standardization News, Pat Picariello<br />

� “Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Toxicological Test Methods”,<br />

ad hoc Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of<br />

Alternative Methods, 1997<br />

� ISO EN 11607-1 2006<br />

� ISO EN 11607-2 2006<br />

� ASTM F1929-98<br />

� ASTM F88-05<br />

� ASTM E 177<br />

� ASTM E 1169<br />

� ASTM E 691<br />

� ASTM E 2282<br />

� ASTM E 1488<br />

� ASTM E 456


Additional Research<br />

• Test Method Validation Techniques<br />

– Analytical Chemistry Test Methods<br />

– Toxilogical Test Methods<br />

– Forensic Test Methods

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!