07.01.2013 Views

The Philippine Clinical Practice Guideline on the Diagnosis and ...

The Philippine Clinical Practice Guideline on the Diagnosis and ...

The Philippine Clinical Practice Guideline on the Diagnosis and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Categories reflecting <strong>the</strong> strength of recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

Appendix 1<br />

Grading System for Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

GRADE DEFINITION<br />

A Good evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> for use<br />

B Moderate evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> for use<br />

C Poor evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> for or against use<br />

D Moderate evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> against use<br />

E Good evidence to support a recommendati<strong>on</strong> against use<br />

Appendix 2<br />

Quality filters in assessing <strong>the</strong> evidence from <strong>the</strong> literature<br />

1. Studies <strong>on</strong> effectiveness of treatment <strong>and</strong> accuracy of diagnostic tests: Level of quality of evidence<br />

I Evidence from at least <strong>on</strong>e properly r<strong>and</strong>omized c<strong>on</strong>trolled trial.<br />

II Evidence from at least <strong>on</strong>e well-designed clinical trial without r<strong>and</strong>omizati<strong>on</strong>, from cohort or casec<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />

analytic studies (preferable from more than <strong>on</strong>e center), from multiple time-series studies, or<br />

from dramatic results in unc<strong>on</strong>trolled experiments.<br />

III Evidence from opini<strong>on</strong>s of respected authorities <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of clinical experience, descriptive studies, or<br />

reports of expert committees.<br />

2. Studies <strong>on</strong> prognosis or causati<strong>on</strong>: Criteria for assessing quality of evidence<br />

A. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was chosen.<br />

B. Reproducible <strong>and</strong> inclusi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> exclusi<strong>on</strong> criteria were used.<br />

C. Follow-up was complete for at least 80% of subjects.<br />

D. Statistical adjustment was carried out for c<strong>on</strong>founders or extraneous factors.<br />

E. Reproducible descripti<strong>on</strong>s of outcome measures were used.<br />

Level of Quality of Evidence:<br />

I. All of <strong>the</strong> criteria were satisfied.<br />

II. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was selected but <strong>on</strong>ly 3 of 4 remaining criteria were satisfied.<br />

III. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was selected but <strong>on</strong>ly 2 of 4 remaining criteria were satisfied.<br />

IV. An incepti<strong>on</strong> cohort was selected but <strong>on</strong>ly 1 of 4 remaining criteria was satisfied<br />

V. N<strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> 5 criteria was met.<br />

Appendix 3<br />

Laboratory criteria for significant pyuria <strong>and</strong> bacteriuria<br />

Strength of Cut-off for Strength of<br />

Syndrome<br />

Cut-off for pyuria* recommendati<strong>on</strong> bacteriuria recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

1. Acute uncomplicated a. ≥ 8 pus cells/ mm<br />

cystitis<br />

3 C<br />

≥ 100 cfu/ml<br />

A<br />

b. ≥ 5 pus cells/ hpf C<br />

≥ 1000 cfu/ml<br />

(clinical trials)<br />

C<br />

2. Acute uncomplicated<br />

pyel<strong>on</strong>ephritis<br />

≥ 5 pus cells/hpf C ≥ 10,000 cfu/ml B<br />

3.Asymptomatic bacteriuria > 10 pus cells/ hpf C ≥ 100,000 cfu/ml A<br />

4. Complicated UTI ≥ 100,000 cfu/ml<br />

(with excepti<strong>on</strong>s) C<br />

5. UTI in males a. ≥ 10 pus<br />

cells/mm 3<br />

C ≥ 1000 cfu/ml C<br />

b. ≥ 5 pus cells/ hpf C<br />

*Pus cell per mm 3 <strong>and</strong> per hpf refer to number found in uncentrifuged <strong>and</strong> centrifuged urine respectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!