08.01.2013 Views

Upgrading of Kigumba-Masindi-Hoima-Kabwoya Road - African ...

Upgrading of Kigumba-Masindi-Hoima-Kabwoya Road - African ...

Upgrading of Kigumba-Masindi-Hoima-Kabwoya Road - African ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prepared for:<br />

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY<br />

P. O. Box 28487, Kampala, Uganda.<br />

Plot 11, Yusuf Lule <strong>Road</strong>, Kampala<br />

By:<br />

AIR WATER EARTH (AWE) LTD<br />

Environmental, Civil Engineers & Project Management Consultants<br />

M1, Plot 27 Binayomba <strong>Road</strong>, Bugolobi<br />

P.O.Box 22428, Kampala, Uganda.<br />

T: 041-4268466, Mob: 078-2580480/ 077-2496451<br />

E: mail@awe-engineers.com<br />

W: www.awe-engineers.com<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

2222222222<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Uganda<br />

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)<br />

OF PROPOSED UPGRADING OF<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-<strong>Masindi</strong>-<strong>Hoima</strong>-<br />

<strong>Kabwoya</strong> ROAD TO BITUMINOUS<br />

STANDARDS<br />

October 2012


Document Control<br />

Client: Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority, UNRA<br />

Report Title:<br />

Resettlement action plan (RAP) <strong>of</strong> proposed upgrading <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-<strong>Masindi</strong>-<strong>Hoima</strong>-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> road to bituminous standards<br />

(Note: AfDB will fund <strong>Kigumba</strong> - Bulima (69 km) and Bulima -<br />

<strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) sections.<br />

Revision Description Originator Reviewed<br />

4 Final Report LK, TP, FN, DO HK<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> this report has been undertaken within agreed<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> reference using all reasonable skill and care. AWE<br />

accepts no responsibility or legal liability arising from<br />

unauthorized use by third parties <strong>of</strong> data or pr<strong>of</strong>essional opinions<br />

herein contained.<br />

This document has been double-side printed to<br />

reduce our carbon footprint and ecological impact.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Project No. EA/1024<br />

Date: Oct 2012<br />

Doc. No.: unra-rkki-001<br />

Distribution<br />

Official<br />

Public<br />

Confidential


Consultants<br />

LEAD TEAM<br />

Eng. Lammeck KAJUBI:<br />

BScEng (1.1 Hons) MAK, MEngSc (UQ-Australia),<br />

NEMA-CEnvP, REng.<br />

Herbert M. KALIBBALA:<br />

BSc MSc, PhD (Sweden), NEMA-CEnvP<br />

Pamela TASHOBYA<br />

BA (Env Mgt), MSc (Norway), NEMA-CEnvP<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Team Leader, RAP Specialist<br />

Civil Engineer<br />

Sociologist/Development Specialist<br />

David Oyen, BEnvEng & Mgt Environmental consultant<br />

SUPPORT TEAM<br />

Faith Mugerwa Sociologist<br />

Seryazi Lamek Communication Specialist<br />

Ritah Nabaggala Community Mobilization/Primary Data Collection


Acronyms:<br />

Acronyms, Definitions & Units<br />

AfDB: <strong>African</strong> Development Bank<br />

AIDS: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome<br />

CFR: Central Forest Reserves<br />

CGV: Chief Government Valuer<br />

CMP: Construction Management Plan<br />

CSO: Civil society organisations<br />

DBST: Double Bituminous Surface Treatment<br />

EAC: East <strong>African</strong> Community<br />

ESIA: Environmental & Social Impact Assessment<br />

GoU: Government <strong>of</strong> Uganda<br />

HHD: Head <strong>of</strong> Household<br />

LC: Local Council<br />

M&E: Monitoring and Evaluation<br />

MoWT: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Works & Transport<br />

NEMA: National Environmental Management Authority<br />

NFA: National Forestry Authority<br />

NGO: Non-Governmental Organization<br />

NRDMP: National <strong>Road</strong> Development and Maintenance Plan<br />

PAH: Project-Affected Households<br />

PAP: Project Affected Persons<br />

PCR: Physical Cultural Resources<br />

PEAP: Poverty Eradication Action Plan<br />

PWD: Persons with disabilities<br />

RAP: Resettlement Action Plan<br />

UAC: Uganda AIDS Commission<br />

UNRA: Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority<br />

UWA: Uganda Wildlife Authority<br />

WHO: World Health Organisation<br />

Measures:<br />

m: Metre<br />

m 2 : Square metre<br />

km: Kilometre (= 1000 m)<br />

Ha: Hectare (= 10000 m 2 or 2.471 acres)<br />

P a g e | i


Currency:<br />

UgShs: Uganda Shilling<br />

USD: United States Dollar<br />

Definitions:<br />

Asset Inventory: A complete count and description <strong>of</strong> all property that will be acquired by the project.<br />

Carriageway: Area <strong>of</strong> road used by vehicles. It is bounded on either side by road shoulders.<br />

P a g e | ii<br />

Compensation: Payment made in cash or in kind at replacement value for an asset or a resource affected by the<br />

project at the time the assets need to be replaced.<br />

Displaced Persons: People or entities directly affected by a project through the loss <strong>of</strong> land and the resulting loss <strong>of</strong><br />

residences, other structures, businesses, or other assets.<br />

Economic Displacement: Loss <strong>of</strong> income or means <strong>of</strong> livelihood resulting from land acquisition or obstructed access<br />

to resources (land, water or forest) caused by the construction or operation <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />

Economic Rehabilitation: This implies measures taken for restoration <strong>of</strong> income or economic recovery so that the<br />

affected population can improve or at least restore its previous standard <strong>of</strong> living.<br />

Eligibility: The criteria for qualification to receive benefits under a resettlement program.<br />

Eminent Domain: The right <strong>of</strong> the state to acquire land, using its sovereign power, for public purpose. National law<br />

establishes which public agencies have the prerogative to exercise eminent domain.<br />

Grievance Procedures: The processes established under law, local regulations, or administrative decision to enable<br />

property owners and other displaced persons to redress issues related to acquisition,<br />

compensation, or other aspects <strong>of</strong> resettlement.<br />

Kibanja: “Kibanja” is a Luganda word for a parcel <strong>of</strong> land on Mailo land. No title deed is associated with<br />

kibanja purchase: the Mailo owner (who holds the title deed) simply writes a purchase agreement<br />

witnessed by village local leaders (LCs), giving a person buying kibanja full rights to own and use<br />

the purchased portion <strong>of</strong> Mailo land. Such buyers can sell their bibanja to new owners but notify<br />

Mailo owner and local leaders about the changed ownership. “Bibanja” is plural for kibanja.<br />

Luganda is language <strong>of</strong> Baganda- the largest tribe in Uganda. Bibanja ownersare protected by<br />

Ugandan law, but are obliged to pay annual royalties to the Mailo owner. Mailo land tenure system<br />

is feudal land ownership introduced by the British in 1900 under the Buganda Agreement (<strong>of</strong> 1900).<br />

"Mailo" is a Luganda word for “mile” as the original grants under the agreement were measured in<br />

square miles. Mailo land is owned in perpetuity by owners and all such land parcels have title<br />

deeds.<br />

Land Acquisition: This is the process <strong>of</strong> acquiring land under the legally mandated procedures <strong>of</strong> eminent domain<br />

Physical Displacement: Loss <strong>of</strong> shelter and assets resulting from land acquisition associated with the project,<br />

requiring affected persons to move to other locations.


P a g e | iii<br />

Population Census: A count <strong>of</strong> the people or persons who would be affected by land acquisition and related<br />

impacts. When properly conducted, the population census provides information necessary for<br />

determining eligibility for compensation.<br />

Project Cycle: This is the process <strong>of</strong> identifying, planning, approving, and implementing a Bank-supported<br />

development activity. In the <strong>African</strong> Development Bank, the project cycle is divided into the<br />

following stages: Identification, Preparation, Appraisal, Negotiations, Approval, Loan Effectiveness,<br />

and Implementation.<br />

Project-Affected Area: The area subject to a change in use as a result <strong>of</strong> construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />

Project-Affected Households (PAH): A PAH is a household that includes one or several project-affected persons<br />

and usually comprises a head <strong>of</strong> household, their spouses, children and other dependents (for<br />

example, parents, grandchildren).<br />

Project-Affected Person (PAP): Any person who, as a result <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project, loses the right to<br />

own, use, or otherwise benefit from a built structure, land (residential, agricultural, pasture or<br />

undeveloped/unused land), annual or perennial crops and trees, or any other fixed or moveable<br />

asset, either in full or in part, permanently or temporarily. Affected people might be displaced either<br />

physically (“Physically Displaced People”) or economically (“Economically Displaced People”).<br />

Replacement Value: The rate <strong>of</strong> compensation for lost assets, that is, the market value <strong>of</strong> the assets plus<br />

transaction costs (taxes, registration fees and cost associated with registration or transfer <strong>of</strong> new<br />

land). The replacement value <strong>of</strong> an item must reflect the cost at the time it is due for replacement.<br />

For land and structures, “replacement value” is defined as follows:<br />

i) Agricultural land: the market value <strong>of</strong> land <strong>of</strong> equal productive use or potential located in the<br />

vicinity <strong>of</strong> the affected land, plus the cost <strong>of</strong> preparation to levels similar to or better than those<br />

<strong>of</strong> the affected land including fees <strong>of</strong> any registration and transfer taxes;<br />

ii) Land in urban areas: the market value <strong>of</strong> land <strong>of</strong> equal size and use, with similar or improved<br />

public infrastructure facilities and services, preferably located in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the affected<br />

land, plus the cost <strong>of</strong> any registration and transfer taxes;<br />

iii) Household and public structures: the cost <strong>of</strong> purchasing or building a new structure, with an<br />

area and quality similar to or better than those <strong>of</strong> the affected structure, or <strong>of</strong> repairing a<br />

partially affected structure, including labor, contractors’ fees and any registration and transfer<br />

taxes.<br />

Resettlement Action Plan: A planning document describing measures to address direct social and economic<br />

impacts associated with involuntary land acquisition for the project.<br />

Resettlement Assistance: Support provided to people who are going to be physically displaced by the project.<br />

Assistance may include transportation and other services that are provided to affected people<br />

during relocation. Assistance may also include cash allowances to compensate affected people for<br />

inconveniences associated with resettlement and settle up expenses during transition to a new<br />

locale and lost workdays.<br />

Resettlement Entitlements: Resettlement entitlements with respect to a particular eligibility category are the sum<br />

total <strong>of</strong> compensation and other forms <strong>of</strong> assistance provided to displaced persons in the<br />

respective eligibility category.


P a g e | iv<br />

Resettlement Strategy: The approaches used to assist people in their efforts to improve (or at least to restore) their<br />

incomes, livelihoods, and standards <strong>of</strong> living in real terms after resettlement. The resettlement<br />

strategy typically consists <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> compensation at replacement cost, transition support<br />

arrangements, relocation to new sites (if applicable), provision <strong>of</strong> alternative income-generating<br />

assets (if applicable), and assistance to help convert income-generating assets into income<br />

streams.<br />

<strong>Road</strong> reserve: Area <strong>of</strong> land typically extending from the centre line <strong>of</strong> the road, owned by the road and within<br />

which the roads authority has rights to extend the road and place associated infrastructure. This<br />

area can also be used for placing surface or subsurface utilities (water mains, electricity, telephone<br />

cables etc).<br />

Stakeholders: A broad term that covers all parties affected by or interested in a project or a specific issue—in other<br />

words, all parties who have a stake in the project. Primary stakeholders are those most directly<br />

affected—in resettlement situations, the population that loses property or income because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project. Other people who have interest in the project such as the UNRA itself, beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project (e.g., road users), etc are termed secondary stakeholders.<br />

Vulnerable Groups: People who may by virtue <strong>of</strong> gender, ethnicity, age, physical or mental disability, economic<br />

disadvantage or social status get more adversely affected by resettlement than others; and who<br />

may have limited ability to claim or take advantage <strong>of</strong> resettlement assistance and related<br />

development benefits.


Contents<br />

P a g e | v<br />

ACRONYMS, DEFINITIONS & UNITS .............................................................................................................................................. I<br />

LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................................................... VII<br />

LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................................ VIII<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. IX<br />

1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE RAP ........................................................................................................................................ 1<br />

1.3 SCOPE OF THE RAP .................................................................................................................................................. 2<br />

2 SURVEYING AND VALUATION METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 4<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

2.2 APPROACH FOR SOCIAL SURVEY .......................................................................................................................... 4<br />

2.3 SOCIAL SURVEY ........................................................................................................................................................ 4<br />

2.4 VALUATION OF PROPERTY ...................................................................................................................................... 5<br />

2.5 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................................ 8<br />

3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ADJUSTMENTS TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS........................................................... 29<br />

3.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................................................... 29<br />

3.2 PROJECT AREA OF INFLUENCE ............................................................................................................................ 30<br />

3.4 PROJECT PROPONENT AND FUNDING AGENCY ................................................................................................ 31<br />

4 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 32<br />

4.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK............................................................................................................................................... 32<br />

4.2 REQUIREMENTS OF AfDB....................................................................................................................................... 36<br />

4.3 INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 38<br />

4.4 VALUATION AND COMPENSATION OF ASSETS ................................................................................................... 40<br />

5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE .............................................................................................................................. 46<br />

5.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />

5.2 PROJECT AFFECTED DISTRICTS .......................................................................................................................... 46<br />

5.3 SOCIAL ORGANIZATION ......................................................................................................................................... 46<br />

5.4 SOURCES OF LIVELIHOOD IN PROJECT AREAS ................................................................................................. 46<br />

5.5 LANDUSE AND SETTLEMENT IN PROJECT AREA ............................................................................................... 48<br />

5.6 WELFARE OF HOUSEHOLDS ................................................................................................................................. 51<br />

5.7 VULNERABLE GROUPS........................................................................................................................................... 52<br />

5.8 HEALTH ..................................................................................................................................................................... 53<br />

5.9 SANITATION ............................................................................................................................................................. 55<br />

5.10 WASTE DISPOSAL INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................................................ 55<br />

5.11 SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECT AFFECTED COMMUNITIES ........................... 55<br />

6 RESOURCES TO BE AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT ........................................................................................... 57<br />

6.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 57<br />

6.2 ASSETS AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................. 57<br />

6.4 LIVELIHOODS ........................................................................................................................................................... 59<br />

6.5 INJURIOUS DAMAGE TO PROPERTY .................................................................................................................... 59<br />

6.6 PROJECT COMPONENTS RELATED TO RESETTLEMENT .................................................................................. 59<br />

7 COMPENSATION AND RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES ....................................................................................... 61<br />

7.1 KEY PRINCIPLES ..................................................................................................................................................... 61<br />

7.2 ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION ........................................................................................................................ 61


P a g e | vi<br />

7.3 OVERVIEW OF ENTITLEMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 62<br />

7.4 VALUATION AND COMPENSATION LOSSES ........................................................................................................ 64<br />

7.5 PAYMENT MODALITIES ........................................................................................................................................... 66<br />

8 CONSULTATION WITH AFFECTED COMMUNITIES ............................................................................................. 72<br />

9 GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT AND REDRESS PROCEDURES ............................................................................ 76<br />

9.1 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE ....................................................................................................................................... 76<br />

9.2 GRIEVANCE MECHANISM ....................................................................................................................................... 76<br />

9.3 SPECIFIC PROCESS FOR ADDRESSING VALUATION GRIEVANCES ................................................................ 80<br />

10 RAP IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................................................................................... 81<br />

10.1 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. 81<br />

10.2 RESETTLEMENT BUDGET ................................................................................................................................. 81<br />

11 MONITORING, EVALUATION AND COMPLETION AUDIT .................................................................................... 85<br />

11.1 GENERAL OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH ....................................................................................................... 85<br />

11.2 INTERNAL MONITORING PROCESS ................................................................................................................. 85<br />

11.3 EXTERNAL EVALUATION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 86<br />

12 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................................... 89<br />

REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................................... 90<br />

ANNEX 1: PUBLIC FACILITIES ALONG THE PROPOSED ROAD ......................................................................................... 91<br />

ANNEX 2: RECORD OF STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS ................................................................................................ 95<br />

ANNEX 3: SOCIAL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE .................................................................................................................... 240<br />

ANNEX 4: LISTS OF VULNERABLE PAPS AND REQUIRED ASSISTANCE ....................................................................... 246<br />

ANNEX 5: NUMBER OF PAPS PER ROAD SECTION ........................................................................................................... 253<br />

ANNEX 6: RADIO ANNOUNCEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 254<br />

ANNEX 7: PROJECT DISCLOSURE ....................................................................................................................................... 255<br />

ANNEX 8: RAP BUDGET DETAIL FOR SECTION FUNDED BY AFDB ................................................................................ 261


List <strong>of</strong> Tables<br />

P a g e | vii<br />

TABLE 2.1: KEY STAKEHOLDERS IDENTIFIED WITH THEIR CORRESPONDING MANDATE AND ROLES ........................................................... 26<br />

TABLE 3.1: TRADING CENTRES ALONG ROAD ....................................................................................................................................... 29<br />

TABLE 4.1: INSTITUTIONAL ROLES IN RAP IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................................ 39<br />

TABLE 4.2: GAPS BETWEEN AFDB RESETTLEMENT POLICY AND UGANDAN LEGISLATION APPLICABLE TO EACH IMPACT ........................... 42<br />

TABLE 5.1: OCCUPATION TYPES AMONGST PROJECT AFFECTED HOUSEHOLD HEADS.............................................................................. 46<br />

TABLE 5.2: AGRICULTURE INCOME LEVELS AMONG THE PAP................................................................................................................ 47<br />

TABLE 5.3: SPENDING PATTERNS AMONG AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS....................................................................................................... 47<br />

TABLE 5.4: NUMBER AND AGE OF RESIDENTS IN AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS ............................................................................................. 50<br />

TABLE 5.5: GENDER MARITAL STATUS ................................................................................................................................................ 50<br />

TABLE 5.6: RELIGION OF PEOPLE IN AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS SURVEYED .............................................................................................. 51<br />

TABLE 5.7: PROPORTION OF HOUSEHOLDS (%) WITH SELECTED ASSETS, 2002 ..................................................................................... 51<br />

TABLE 5.8: SOURCES OF ENERGY AT AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS ............................................................................................................. 51<br />

TABLE 5.9: TYPES OF LIGHTING FUEL IN HOUSEHOLDS ......................................................................................................................... 52<br />

TABLE 5.10: TYPE OF DRINKING WATER SOURCES IN HOUSEHOLDS ...................................................................................................... 52<br />

TABLE 5.11: MOST COMMON DISEASES AMONG THE HOUSEHOLDS ....................................................................................................... 53<br />

TABLE 5.12: EXPENSE ON THE MOST COMMON DISEASES..................................................................................................................... 53<br />

TABLE 5.13: ETHNICITY OF PAPS SURVEYED ..................................................................................................................................... 55<br />

TABLE 5.14: EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OF THE PAP ................................................................................................................................... 55<br />

TABLE 5.15: GENDER AND LEVEL OF EDUCATION ................................................................................................................................. 56<br />

TABLE 6.1A: NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE AFFECTED AND LAND TAKE ALONG ENTIRE ROAD .................................................... 57<br />

TABLE 6.1B: NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE AFFECTED ALONG ROAD SECTIONS TO BE FUNDED BY AFDB ................................... 57<br />

TABLE 6.1C: ASSETS TO BE AFFECTED ALONG ROAD SECTIONS BE FUNDED BY AFDB ............................................................................ 58<br />

TABLE 7.1: ENTITLEMENT MATRIX ....................................................................................................................................................... 69<br />

TABLE 8.1: STAKEHOLDER VIEWS ....................................................................................................................................................... 72<br />

TABLE 10.1: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE........................................................................................................................................... 82<br />

TABLE 10.2: RESETTLEMENT BUDGET FOR ENTIRE ROAD ..................................................................................................................... 83<br />

TABLE 10.2: RAP COSTS FOR THE ROAD SECTION BE FUNDED BY AFDB............................................................................................... 84<br />

TABLE 11.1: MONITORING INDICATORS DURING RESETTLEMENT (QUARTERLY BASIS) ............................................................................. 87


List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />

P a g e | viii<br />

FIGURE 2.1 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS GRID ............................................................................................................................ 28<br />

FIGURE 3.1 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ROAD AND ITS CONNECTION TO ROAD NETWORK IN THE REGION ............ 30<br />

FIGURE 3.2 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ROAD THROUGH THE PROJECT DISTRICTS ................................................. 31<br />

FIGURE 5.1 PAPS WHO’S RESIDENTIAL OR AGRICULTURAL LAND WOULD BE AFFECTED .............................................. 49<br />

FIGURE 5.2 OWNERSHIP OF LAND OWNERSHIP ACCORDING TO SEX OF PAPS ................................................................ 49<br />

FIGURE 5.3 AGE DISTRIBUTION IN THE AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS ...................................................................................... 50<br />

FIGURE 5.4 DISTANCE TO WATER SOURCE ............................................................................................................................. 52<br />

FIGURE 5.5 DISABILITIES AND CHRONIC DISEASES IN PROJECT AFFECTED AREA .......................................................... 54<br />

FIGURE 5.6 PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AT HEALTH CENTERS ............................................................................................ 54<br />

FIGURE 6.1 LOCATION OF BRANCH-OFFS TO PUBLIC FACILITIES ALONG THE ROAD ....................................................... 60<br />

FIGURE 8.1: GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT MECHANISM. .......................................................................................................... 80


Executive Summary<br />

P a g e | ix<br />

Project Name: <strong>Road</strong> Sector Support Project 4: <strong>Upgrading</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kyenjojo – <strong>Hoima</strong> – <strong>Masindi</strong> – <strong>Kigumba</strong> <strong>Road</strong><br />

to Bituminous Standard.<br />

Country: UGANDA<br />

Project Number: ………………<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Uganda (GoU) through Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority (UNRA) is seeking funding from the <strong>African</strong><br />

Development Bank (AfDB) to finance the upgrading <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kigumba</strong> - Bulima (69 km) and Bulima - <strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) road<br />

section which is part <strong>of</strong> the 238 km “Kyenjojo–<strong>Hoima</strong>–<strong>Masindi</strong>–<strong>Kigumba</strong>” <strong>Road</strong> that is currently a gravel road<br />

originating from Kyenjojo Town through towns <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hoima</strong> and <strong>Masindi</strong>, ending at <strong>Kigumba</strong>. According to AfDB<br />

environmental screening guidelines, projects involving upgrading and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> major roads, are classified<br />

“Category 1”. AfDB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy (2003) requires a full Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) prepared<br />

if number <strong>of</strong> project affected persons (PAP) exceeds 200 people. This project affected 9005 property owners, hence<br />

this RAP study. The study was undertaken by Air Water Earth (AWE) on behalf <strong>of</strong> an engineering design consortium<br />

comprising Mott MacDonald and Kagga & Partners LTD.<br />

Currently, the existing road is dilapidated and not able to meet current demand for service provision. It is anticipated<br />

that the road project and development induced by it, will stimulate and uplift economic activity and increase demand<br />

for infrastructure services along areas it passes through. Without the project, access to these areas will continue to<br />

be difficult which inhibits socio-economic development. Different sections <strong>of</strong> the road are:<br />

� Kyenjojo–<strong>Hoima</strong>: 150.5 km (Note: Section between Kyenjojo Town and River Muzizi, all in Kibaale District<br />

will not be funded by AfDB);<br />

� <strong>Hoima</strong>–<strong>Masindi</strong>: 54 km;<br />

� <strong>Masindi</strong>–<strong>Kigumba</strong>: 33 km.<br />

2. Project Description and Justification<br />

The road to be upgraded is 238 km with gravel carriage way located in Western Uganda, running through Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Kyenjojo, Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and end up at <strong>Kigumba</strong> Town Council in the newly created Kiryandongo District<br />

connecting to Gulu highway. It is subdivided into three links (Table E1).<br />

Table E1: Lengths <strong>of</strong> sections along the road<br />

Link Section Length (km)<br />

I Kyenjojo to <strong>Hoima</strong> 150.5<br />

II <strong>Hoima</strong> to <strong>Masindi</strong> 54<br />

III <strong>Masindi</strong> to <strong>Kigumba</strong> 33<br />

Total length 238<br />

The gravel road will be upgraded to Class II paved road standard with a carriageway width <strong>of</strong> 6 meters and 15 meter<br />

road reserve. The rationale for the upgrade is comprised in the following key objectives:<br />

� Provide a strategic link between the northern corridor (specifically south western Uganda, Rwanda and<br />

Burundi and eastern DRC) and the Kampala - Gulu -Juba corridor. The Northern Corridor anchored by the<br />

port <strong>of</strong> Mombasa in Kenya, is a key transport route for national, regional, and international trade <strong>of</strong> the five<br />

East <strong>African</strong> Community (EAC) countries - Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda.


P a g e | x<br />

� Improve access to markets, social and health services and employment possibilities for residents within the<br />

zone <strong>of</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> the proposed road.<br />

� Provide a high standard road to support on-going and future oil and gas operations in the area.<br />

The proposed project <strong>of</strong>fers enormous distance and journey time savings for traffic to Fort Portal, southwestern<br />

Uganda and eastern Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo (DRC) and in areas north <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kigumba</strong> (Gulu, Sudan and<br />

northeastern DRC). The distance between Kyenjojo and <strong>Kigumba</strong> via Kampala is approximately 485 km; via the<br />

proposed road it is 234 km, a saving <strong>of</strong> 251 km. Once the proposed project is completed, transport costs would<br />

reduce by 50%.<br />

3. Potential Impacts<br />

Although upgrade <strong>of</strong> the gravel road to a paved surface will follow existing alignment, there will be social impacts<br />

such as land take and impact on residential and commercial houses, business units, kiosks, crops and trees<br />

(including fruit trees) where the road alignment is altered either to widen the carriageway or remove dangerous<br />

corners. Several structures will be affected in Kagadi Trading Centre, Muhorro, Haikoona, Bwijanga and in other<br />

places as detailed on strip maps. Along each section <strong>of</strong> the road, table below shows number <strong>of</strong> people affected and<br />

land take.<br />

Table E.1: Number <strong>of</strong> property owners to be affected and land take along entire road<br />

<strong>Road</strong> section No. <strong>of</strong> property owners Land area (Hectares)<br />

Kyenjojo - <strong>Hoima</strong> 6270 334.33<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong> - <strong>Masindi</strong> 1549 104.89<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong> - <strong>Kigumba</strong> 1186 77.67<br />

Total 9005 516.89<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> people in buildings to be demolished by the project along the section AfDB will fun are shown in table<br />

below.<br />

Table E.2: Number <strong>of</strong> property owners to be affected along road sections to be funded by AfDB<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section Total No. <strong>of</strong> people<br />

losing various types<br />

<strong>of</strong> property<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Households to<br />

be physically<br />

relocated<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> persons in households to be<br />

physically relocated<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) 2406 59 354<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima (69 km) 1866 32 144<br />

Total 4272 91 498<br />

Along Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) section, 59 buildings comprising 354 people will be demolished while the respective<br />

numbers along <strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima (69 km) section are 34 households comprising 144 people. All together however, as<br />

documented by the property count and valuation exercise, 4272 people were recorded to be losing various types <strong>of</strong><br />

assets along both these sections. These assets range from crops, fences, kiosks to permanent buildings.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> structures affected in towns and trading centres are permanent buildings while in rural areas both permanent<br />

and semi-permanent buildings will be impacted by the project. Disruption to businesses and temporary loss <strong>of</strong><br />

income during relocation can be minimized if owners are allowed to rebuild replacement structures before completely<br />

vacating the old ones where possible during the regulatory 6-month “notice to quit” period. Economically-displaced<br />

people are people whose livelihoods are affected by the proposed road project and associated land acquisition. This<br />

only applies to those whose business that will be required to relocate, but also to those employed in a business, or<br />

those who lose livelihood (income or subsistence) due to loss <strong>of</strong> crops.


P a g e | xi<br />

The proposed project <strong>of</strong>fers enormous distance and journey time savings for traffic to Fort Portal, southwestern<br />

Uganda and eastern Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo (DRC) and in areas north <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kigumba</strong> (Gulu, Sudan and<br />

northeastern DRC). The distance between Kyenjojo and <strong>Kigumba</strong> via Kampala is about 485 km; via the proposed<br />

road it is 234 km, a saving <strong>of</strong> 251 km. Once the proposed project is completed, transport costs would reduce by 50%.<br />

It is expected that during construction, over 150 local people will benefit employment opportunities working on the<br />

road sites or various economic activities such as support services (catering, housekeeping, etc) at workers camps.<br />

There will be financial benefit for material suppliers and owners <strong>of</strong> land to be rented for camps, equipment yards and<br />

borrow sites will. As indicated in the property valuation report, several churches, schools and health centres will lose<br />

strips <strong>of</strong> land to the road reserve. Many community resources would lose land to the project and road redevelopment<br />

could also cause temporary disruption to their access, such as when overburden is dumped into junctions leading to<br />

these faculties such as to render them impossible to be accessed by women, children elderly or disabled people.<br />

In some places, water mains and 33 kV power lines adjoining the existing road will need relocation during road<br />

upgrade, causing temporary disruption in supply. There may also arise injurious damage (e.g. cracking) <strong>of</strong> private<br />

property which, since outside project area, would not normally be compensated. Injurious damage to property during<br />

project implementation can be mitigated or compensated as follows:<br />

a) Monetary compensation to owners from contractor’s insurance.<br />

b) Contractor to repair or replace, to owner satisfaction, any injuriously damaged property.<br />

4. Organizational Responsibility for RAP Implementation<br />

Uganda National <strong>Road</strong> Authority (UNRA) will be responsible for implementing the RAP. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Lands,<br />

Housing and Urban Development (MoLUHD) is a key institutional agency in which the Chief Government Valuer<br />

(CGV) who approves valuation and compensation reports is found. The Ministry is also responsible for issuance <strong>of</strong><br />

land title deeds. District Land Boards in respective local governments develop compensation rates and will be useful<br />

during RAP implementation, monitoring and grievance management. Local Councils will authorize compensation<br />

payment schedules. Local councils will be involved in verifying identity <strong>of</strong> PAPs and grievance redress. UNRA may<br />

sub-contract a contractor to implement the RAP but this is expected to work through the District Committees which<br />

will comprise members from the District Land Board, Parish Land Committees, Local Councils (I-V), local leaders,<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> the PAP and identified NGO/CBO active in the area.<br />

5. Public Consultations and Community Participation<br />

Consultations with affected people were conducted from 22 nd September 2010 to 11 th November 2010. Consultations<br />

also involved local leaders in the project Districts <strong>of</strong> Kyenjojo, Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandongo (which until<br />

01 July 2010 was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Masindi</strong> District). Largely upgrading the road from gravel to bituminous standards was<br />

prevalently considered a timely and beneficial to the districts/ region and country. In spite <strong>of</strong> this, some <strong>of</strong> the key<br />

issues were: UNRA to ensure equitable and timely compensation for all affected assets before road construction<br />

commences. Property located away from the road and otherwise not eligible for compensation should be duly<br />

compensated if damaged by contractors. Besides structures, this applies to water mains or power lines in towns e.g.<br />

Katooke Trading Center. If 90% one’s land is affected and the remaining parcel is so small that it is not useful for<br />

farming or settlement, the project should provide compensation for all the land so that affected persons can resettle<br />

elsewhere they can purchase sufficient land. Additionally, PAPs required UNRA to ensure quick and proper<br />

grievance resolution during RAP implementation.<br />

6. Integration with Host Communities<br />

It is expected that most affected home owners would have some land to reconstruct their dwellings a little back from<br />

affected locations. Conversely, due to linear settlement pattern along roads and small size <strong>of</strong> commercial land<br />

parcels (plots) in towns and trading centres, this may not always be possible and affected persons would have to


P a g e | xii<br />

relocate to new plot <strong>of</strong> land but still within town. There is thus little possibility that a large population <strong>of</strong> PAPs would<br />

be relocated to an entirely new host community.<br />

7. Socio-economic baseline conditions<br />

The existing road lies in five districts <strong>of</strong> Kyenjojo, Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandongo, in western Uganda. The<br />

population comprised <strong>of</strong> Banyoro, Batooro, Banyankole and migrant tribes such as Bakiga, Baganda, Bafumbira and<br />

Alur plus other migrants are from surrounding countries <strong>of</strong> Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo. Despite some regional and<br />

localized differences, poverty in the districts is generally considerable and attributed to inadequate skills, land<br />

shortage, poor farming methods, gender inequalities, low productivity, morbidity due to malaria and HIV/AIDS. More<br />

men than women owned land in the project-affected area. Prevalently land is owned under tenure customary tenure.<br />

The average affected household comprised <strong>of</strong> 6 people (higher than the national mean household size <strong>of</strong> 5.08). The<br />

most affected age group was between 36 and 40 years. Most affected households were headed by males compared<br />

to female-headed households. Firewood is the principal source <strong>of</strong> energy for cooking in the project districts. The<br />

road project would not affect wood stock or access to firewood. Proportions <strong>of</strong> households using other types <strong>of</strong> fuels<br />

like paraffin and electricity are almost negligible. Prevalently, households in project districts use paraffin candles for<br />

indoor night lighting and only 9.5% <strong>of</strong> households had access to grid electricity for lighting.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> households with vulnerable PAPs, headed by terminally ill, widows, elderly people, orphans or disabled<br />

people were identified along the road. These sought additional assistance during resettlement as documented in the<br />

RAP. Malaria fever was the most prevalent disease in affected households followed by respiratory ailments (coughs<br />

and flu). Most people (97% <strong>of</strong> people interviewed) in the project areas were aware <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and how it is<br />

transmitted. Health centres at sub-county levels and major hospitals (<strong>Hoima</strong> Referral Hospital, <strong>Masindi</strong> Hospital and<br />

Kiryandongo Hospital) play a central role in the fight against HIV/AIDS and provide treatment, nutrition, free testing<br />

and counselling including other outreach programmes like community sensitization through drama, music and sports.<br />

From the survey, findings indicated that 19% <strong>of</strong> people aged 10 years and above have never attended school, while<br />

20% completed primary school and only 8% completed secondary school with 5% have attained high tertiary<br />

education. Primary data shows that a majority (51.4%) <strong>of</strong> PAPs dispose their waste in their gardens while (36%)<br />

dispose it in a compost pit at the back yard while 12.6% <strong>of</strong> respondents burn their waste.<br />

Significant historical buildings and monuments were found in this area. The region is an ancient place with evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> ancient settlement starting from colonial building together with Indian settlement terraces. Old buildings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

colonial nature (1920-1930s) were observed especially at administration institutions. Fortunately they sites (old<br />

buildings) will not be directly affected since they are about 70m from the road center. Monuments were also<br />

recorded and these might not be affected except Businge monument which located in a roundabout <strong>of</strong> Kyenjojo-<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong> -<strong>Masindi</strong> <strong>Road</strong>. This can be covered during construction but also maintained after construction phase.<br />

Settlements along the project area are generally linear especially in trading centres. There is a mix <strong>of</strong> residential,<br />

commercial and small scale industrial (maize, mills saw mills, welding) buildings including shops and market stalls along<br />

the road. However, most buildings especially residential ones are located away from the road.<br />

8. Institutional and Legal Framework<br />

Key legislations governing compensation and resettlement in Uganda are the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Uganda (1995) and the<br />

Land Act (1988). Article 237(1) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution vests land ownership in citizens <strong>of</strong> Uganda, however under Article<br />

237(1)(a), the Central or Local Government may acquire land in the public interest. The Constitution prescribes<br />

various tenure regimes in accordance with which rights and interests over land may be held. It provides procedures<br />

to follow in acquiring land in the public interest and provides for the “prompt payment <strong>of</strong> fair and adequate<br />

compensation” prior to taking possession <strong>of</strong> land. The Land Act (1988) is the principal legislation on land tenure in<br />

Uganda which emphasizes adequate, fair and prompt compensation by the developer <strong>of</strong> the occupier or owner <strong>of</strong>


P a g e | xiii<br />

land. The Act creates a series <strong>of</strong> land administration institutions consisting <strong>of</strong> Uganda Land Commission (ULC),<br />

District Land Boards (DLB), Parish Land Committees (PLC) and Land Tribunals. Section 78 <strong>of</strong> the Act gives valuation<br />

principles for compensation i.e. compensation rates to be yearly approved by DLBs.<br />

The following legal instruments provide the legal framework for compensation and resettlement in Uganda:<br />

� The Uganda Constitution (1995)<br />

� The Local Government’s Act 1997<br />

� The Land Act, 1988<br />

� Physical Planning Act , 2010<br />

� Valuation Act 1965<br />

� The Access to <strong>Road</strong>s Act ,1965<br />

UNRA’s Land Acquisition Manual (LAM) was designed to satisfy regulatory and key financiers resettlement<br />

requirements, based on the following principles: (i) Compensation should be aimed at minimizing social disruption<br />

and assist those who have lost assets to maintain their livelihoods. In accordance with Ugandan laws and standards,<br />

a disturbance allowance is to be provided to PAPs to cover costs <strong>of</strong> relocation during resettlement; and (ii)<br />

Community infrastructure must be replaced and ideally be improved in situations where it was deficient. This for<br />

example includes roadside water sources.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> the RAP has taken into consideration safeguard policies <strong>of</strong> the AfDB (Involuntary Resettlement Policy,<br />

2003) with the aim to ensure that project-affected persons should be assisted to improve their livelihoods and<br />

standards <strong>of</strong> living or restore them to pre-displacement levels or levels.<br />

9. Eligibility<br />

The cut-<strong>of</strong>f date was considered by the surveying and valuation consultant as the last day <strong>of</strong> the census <strong>of</strong> affected<br />

people and properties, i.e. 10 February 2011. No structure or field established in the project-affected area after that<br />

date would be eligible for compensation. The cut-<strong>of</strong>f date after which no settlers or developers are eligible for<br />

compensation was publicized among potentially affected people. This was explained during the census and valuation<br />

exercise to all stakeholders in the area, including: Project-affected people, identified and individually surveyed, Parish<br />

Land Committee (LC2 level), District Land Board (LC5 level), LC <strong>of</strong>ficials in which consultations were undertaken<br />

The following categories are eligible for compensation:<br />

� People who have been in the surveyed part <strong>of</strong> the proposed road reserve and working areas;<br />

� Landlords owning land affected by the road;<br />

� People whose structures are to be affected by the development;<br />

� People who rent land for cultivation (sharecroppers) and their crops or trees are to be removed or damaged<br />

due to land acquisition activities.<br />

� Any other group <strong>of</strong> persons that has not been mentioned above but is entitled to compensation according to<br />

the laws <strong>of</strong> Uganda and World Bank/Donor policies.<br />

� Public or community facilities such as churches, schools and water sources.<br />

10. Valuation <strong>of</strong> and Compensation <strong>of</strong> Assets<br />

Section 78 <strong>of</strong> the Land Act (1988) prescribes valuation principles for compensation including compensation rates<br />

which are approved by District Land Boards and are updated on yearly basis. Other requirements for assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

compensation <strong>of</strong> assets are provided under the Valuation Act 1965. A full census <strong>of</strong> affected persons and survey/<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> and their assets will was completed on the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date by Surveying /Valuation Teams who worked with


P a g e | xiv<br />

Local Councils, especially LC1 <strong>of</strong> affected villages and towns centres to verify identity <strong>of</strong> affected persons and their<br />

physical assets including land sizes, crops, trees and buildings.<br />

The basis <strong>of</strong> valuation for compensation purposes is provided in the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Uganda 1995 and the<br />

Land Act 1998. The value <strong>of</strong> land and buildings is based on the market value, that is, the probable value the property<br />

will fetch when <strong>of</strong>fered for sale. Affected land was categorized as semi-urban, rural or dry land and hence different<br />

rates applied for each category. Valuation rates used for affected land were “market values” based on evidence<br />

obtained during property inspection and surveys. Most project-affected residential and commercial buildings are<br />

constructed in permanent materials such as burnt clay bricks and iron ro<strong>of</strong> sheets. However, valuation also<br />

encountered many semi-permanent and temporary structures built in very low-cost materials such as timber.<br />

Buildings and structures were valued on the basis <strong>of</strong> Replacement Cost Method to arrive at their market value.<br />

District compensation rates were applied to derive compensation values for crops, fruit trees, flowers and shrubs<br />

owned by PAPs. According to Uganda’s compensation regulations, annual crops which could be harvested during<br />

the period <strong>of</strong> notice to vacate given to land landowners are excluded in determining compensation values.<br />

Along <strong>Kigumba</strong> - Bulima (69 km) and Bulima - <strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) sections to be funded by AfDB, the following assets<br />

are to be affected and 17 strips <strong>of</strong> gardens <strong>of</strong> estimated area 16 acres.<br />

Table E.3: Assets to be affected along road sections be funded by AfDB<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section<br />

Affected Property<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) <strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima (69 km)<br />

1 Permanent Houses 13 13<br />

2 Shops 56 24<br />

3 Kitchens 0 0<br />

4 Schools 0 0<br />

5 Medical Clinics 0 0<br />

6 Churches 0 0<br />

7 Mosques 0 0<br />

8 Toilets 0 0<br />

9 Pit Latrines 2 1<br />

10 Shades 2 1<br />

11 Maize Stores 0 0<br />

12 Kiosks 1 3<br />

13 Barbed wire Fences 64 20<br />

14 Local Live Hedges 37 25<br />

15 Earth Graves 0 10<br />

16 Paved/Concrete Yards 1 0<br />

17 Gates 2 0<br />

18 Septic Tanks 2 0<br />

19 Boundary/Retaining Walls 2 1<br />

20 Water Tanks 1 0<br />

21 Kraals 0 0<br />

22 Well 0 0<br />

23 Fuel Pumps 6 0<br />

24 Fuel Tanks 2 0<br />

25 Petrol Station Canopies 2 0<br />

TOTAL 193 98


11. Costs and Budget<br />

P a g e | xv<br />

The resettlement budget including RAP implementation consultant, Monitoring & evaluation and provisional sum for<br />

special assistance to vulnerable people along entire road amounts to UgShs 19,759,033,059 (or US $ 8,064,911.45<br />

at exchange rate Shs 2450 per US$).<br />

For the sections to be funded by AfDB, RAP costs are shown in Table E.4 below (also see Annex 8).


Table E.4: RAP costs for the road section be funded by AfDB<br />

RAP Costs (relocation and compensation)<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section<br />

Value for Land<br />

(UGX)<br />

Value for Buildings & Other<br />

Improvements (UGX)<br />

Value for Crops (UGX) Sub Total (UGX) Disturbance<br />

Allowance at 15%<br />

<strong>of</strong> compensation<br />

sum (UGX)<br />

P a g e | xvi<br />

Total (UgX)<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> 3,701,920,738 1,173,732,506 241,076,850 5,116,730,094 1,535,019,028 6,651,749,122<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima 1,753,981,949 741,283,743 147,015,500 2,642,281,192 792,684,358 3,434,965,550<br />

Total 5,455,902,687 1,915,016,249 388,092,350 7,759,011,286 2,327,703,386 10,086,714,672<br />

Assistance for restoring crop production: 11,642,770.50 UgX<br />

(i.e. opening new gardens, seeds,<br />

etc):<br />

Compensation to relocate graves: 2,500,000.00 UgX<br />

Income restoration for businesses (shops,<br />

etc) : 57,450,487.47 UgX<br />

Provisional sum for assistance to<br />

vulnerable people: 40,500,000.00 UgX<br />

RAP implementation cost: 170,168,067.00 UgX<br />

Exchange rate (as <strong>of</strong> 2Oct 2012) : 1 USD = UgX 2552<br />

RAP monitoring and evaluation: 56,722,689.00 UgX<br />

TOTAL RAP budget for AfDB section 10,425,698,685.85 UgX<br />

Contingency for eventualities (put at 10% <strong>of</strong> total compensation sum)*:<br />

Grand total<br />

1,042,569,868.58 UgX<br />

11,468,268,554.43 UgX


12. Grievance Redress Mechanism<br />

P a g e | xvii<br />

Based on experience <strong>of</strong> earlier RSSP projects, most grievances will be related to property valuation. These are likely<br />

to arise when households consider compensation values for their assets insufficient, especially when PAPs doubt if<br />

valuation values do indeed provide replacement value or if PAPs misunderstood the compensation process and<br />

believe they are entitled to additional compensation. Given this, UNRA will constitute a dedicated committee and<br />

procedure to manage and close out grievances. While some grievances would be resolved by the committee, others<br />

might not, such as when claimants contest compensation rates developed by District Land Boards. Inspite <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grievance procedure, if, the aggrieved person is not satisfied with resolutions <strong>of</strong> the Grievance Committee at local<br />

level/village, he/she will have the choice <strong>of</strong> resorting to courts <strong>of</strong> law.<br />

12. Monitoring and Evaluation<br />

Monitoring is essential to ensure that RAP implementation achieves desired results. A monitoring and evaluation<br />

framework for RAP implementation has been developed to include a plan for monitoring and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

compensation packages with indicators for measuring performance, impacts and outcomes. This plan also provides<br />

for reviews by stakeholders including AfDB. The Framework includes a review <strong>of</strong> financial disbursements,<br />

compensation complaints and grievance redress, adherence to compensation payment schedule and support <strong>of</strong><br />

vulnerable PAPs. Monitoring will be both Internal monitoring by UNRA, and External evaluations by AfDB and other<br />

national stakeholders. During resettlement, monitoring shall focus on resettlement issues such as:<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> families that have been compensated;<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> people who have acquired legal documents to new property,<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> business owners who have restored their businesses,<br />

� Efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> grievance redress mechanism.<br />

Post resettlement monitoring should focus on rehabilitation issues, for example:<br />

� Success level <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> livelihoods<br />

� Success level <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

� Efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> grievance redress mechanism.<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> regular progress reports produced by UNRA will be carried out by all stake holders both at national and<br />

local levels including the AfDB. After completion <strong>of</strong> resettlement, a final report will be submitted by UNRA to AfDB<br />

prior to preparation <strong>of</strong> the project implementation report. The report shall indicate effectiveness <strong>of</strong> project<br />

implementation and disbursement <strong>of</strong> compensation payments, effectiveness <strong>of</strong> public involvement and socioeconomic<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> roadside communities. This report will give overall assessment <strong>of</strong> the RAP process indicating<br />

activities undertaken, success <strong>of</strong> mitigation action and monitoring and well as useful lessons learnt.<br />

A key aim <strong>of</strong> resettlement is to ensure compensation and other mitigation measures restore or enhance affected<br />

people’s quality <strong>of</strong> life and income levels. If quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> PAPs can be demonstrated to have been restored, then<br />

resettlement and compensation process can be considered “complete”. The purpose <strong>of</strong> Completion Audit will<br />

therefore be to establish whether UNRA implemented all activities needed to ensure compliance with proposed<br />

resettlement commitments and applicable national and AfDB requirements.


1.1 BACKGROUND<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

P a g e | 1<br />

Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority (UNRA) received funds from the Government <strong>of</strong> Uganda (GoU) and intends to<br />

apply a portion <strong>of</strong> the proceeds towards the cost <strong>of</strong> The National <strong>Road</strong> Development and Maintenance Plan<br />

(NRDMP). One <strong>of</strong> the gravel roads to be upgraded to bituminous standard is Kyenjojo – <strong>Hoima</strong> – <strong>Masindi</strong> – <strong>Kigumba</strong>.<br />

<strong>African</strong> Development Bank (AfDB) will finance only <strong>Kigumba</strong> - Bulima (69 km) and Bulima - <strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) section”.<br />

Despite periodic maintenance, there is inadequate drainage and the road alignment needs to be improved. The<br />

whole stretch lies in hilly and rolling terrain with dense forests in Kibaale district and parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hoima</strong> district. There are<br />

2 bridges along this link: the Muzizi Bridge constructed from reinforced concrete and Nkusi Bridge which is more <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Bailey bridge. The <strong>Hoima</strong> - <strong>Masindi</strong> link is 54 km that connects <strong>Hoima</strong> District to <strong>Masindi</strong> District. Some parts <strong>of</strong> this<br />

link were also in fairly good condition following periodic maintenance while other parts were characterized by surface<br />

corrugations, potholes, inadequate drainage and poor alignment. The <strong>Masindi</strong> - <strong>Kigumba</strong> link is 33 km that connects<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong> Town to <strong>Kigumba</strong> Town Council. At <strong>Kigumba</strong>, the road connects to Kampala - Gulu Highway. This section<br />

was in poor condition characterized by surface corrugations, potholes, inadequate drainage and poor alignment.<br />

Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority (UNRA) contracted Mott MacDonald, a UK-based engineering consultancy firm in<br />

association with Kagga & Partners (Ugandan) to carry out the feasibility studies, detailed design, tender document<br />

preparations and project management for upgrading the road. Air Water Earth (AWE) LTD was contacted by the<br />

consortium to undertake a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) to guide land acquisition for the project.<br />

The road will no doubt play a major role in economic development <strong>of</strong> the project Districts by providing an essential<br />

link to markets and social services, industry, health and education. While the upgrade will for most sections follow the<br />

existing alignment, road widening will in some cases affect private land, permanent and semi-permanent residential<br />

and commercial structures. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this RAP is to guide implementing <strong>of</strong> the impending resettlement and<br />

ensure equitable compensation. The road and its reserve <strong>of</strong> 30 m (15 m on either side <strong>of</strong> its centerline) would affect<br />

about 9005 property owners, with effects ranging from loss <strong>of</strong> strips <strong>of</strong> land adjoining the road and structures.<br />

It is currently a policy <strong>of</strong> Uganda Government to have all road projects comply with national as well as donor<br />

safeguard policies among whose requirements is a RAP. The goal <strong>of</strong> this RAP is therefore to minimize economic and<br />

social impacts that would arise from involuntary resettlement such as:<br />

� relocation or loss <strong>of</strong> shelter;<br />

� loss <strong>of</strong> assets or inability to access to assets;<br />

� loss <strong>of</strong> income sources and livelihood.<br />

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE RAP<br />

This RAP was designed to provide guidance on how project-affected persons in the project-affected areas should be<br />

equitably compensated and upon relocation, able to cope and lead a normal life as was previously lived or a better<br />

one. The RAP is primarily for property and landowners adjoining the proposed road project.<br />

Cadastral surveys and property valuation that informed this RAP were done with the aim to:<br />

i) Delineate private land and properties to be affected,


P a g e | 2<br />

ii) Compile an accurate list <strong>of</strong> the project-affected persons (that is, owners and land users having an interest in<br />

the road reserve)<br />

iii) Establish monetary worth <strong>of</strong> all immoveable assets, including structures (permanent or semi-permanent),<br />

perennial and annual crops and trees within the road reserve.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the foregoing, the main objectives <strong>of</strong> this RAP were to:<br />

i) Prepare social pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> PAPs through a social-economic survey.<br />

ii) Ensure that the displaced people receive equitable compensation prior to their displacement.<br />

iii) Raise awareness <strong>of</strong> the project and its consequences among affected communities.<br />

iv) Carry out consultations with relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons and obtain their views<br />

and suggestions regarding social impacts <strong>of</strong> the proposed project and measures to cover the losses. The results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the consultations will be made available to all relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons<br />

through RAP disclosure.<br />

v) Determine the extent <strong>of</strong> the impacts due to involuntary resettlement associated with the land acquisition for<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> construction and alignment <strong>of</strong> the road, and put in place measures to mitigate those impacts. The<br />

impacts here are to do with land acquisition and the accompanying losses or interruption <strong>of</strong> livelihoods <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project affected people due to the construction activities related to the proposed roads, etc.<br />

vi) Establish the actual compensation costs necessary for resettlement and quantify the land area to be acquired for<br />

the road reserve.<br />

vii) Prepare resettlement strategies including entitlement matrix and arrangements for implementation that would<br />

mitigate adverse socio-economic impacts and grievances.<br />

viii) Prepare strategies to mitigate adverse socio-economic impacts and possible grievances arising from<br />

resettlement.<br />

1.3 SCOPE OF THE RAP<br />

The RAP will set the parameters and establish entitlements for project affected people (PAP), the institutional<br />

framework, mechanisms for consultation and grievance resolution, the time schedule and the budget, and propose a<br />

monitoring and evaluation system.<br />

The package <strong>of</strong> agreed entitlements in the form <strong>of</strong> a matrix that will include both compensation and measures to<br />

restore the economic and social base for those affected. It will address the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong><br />

Uganda and the Policy <strong>of</strong> AfDB on Involuntary Resettlement. Therefore the RAP shall follow the policy <strong>of</strong> AfDB on<br />

Involuntary Resettlement (2003) which requires that people who are adversely affected by project activities receive<br />

compensation to the extent that their livelihoods and standard <strong>of</strong> living is restored to at least a pre-project level.<br />

Similarly, the resettlement shall be carried out in line with requirements <strong>of</strong> the legal, policy and regulatory framework<br />

<strong>of</strong> Uganda. However, where there are gaps, the policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>African</strong> Development Bank overrides in order to ensure that<br />

the losses <strong>of</strong> the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) are well addressed.<br />

Therefore to achieve the objectives <strong>of</strong> the RAP, activities were limited to the following:<br />

i) Identification persons or groups affected by the project either through destruction <strong>of</strong> buildings or crops or loss <strong>of</strong><br />

land and income.<br />

ii) Consultation with project affected people (PAP) in each village along the road. The consultations sought to<br />

involve PAPs in formulating ideal compensation and resettlement strategies.


P a g e | 3<br />

iii) Identification <strong>of</strong> options for resettlement and compensation <strong>of</strong> project affected persons (PAPs), which according<br />

to the legal requirements <strong>of</strong> Uganda Legal Legislation and are consistent with the relevant policies <strong>of</strong> UNRA and<br />

the <strong>African</strong> Development Bank<br />

iv) Review <strong>of</strong> Uganda legislation and guidelines on land acquisition, compensation and development <strong>of</strong><br />

infrastructure projects.<br />

v) Census <strong>of</strong> property owners to be affected by the road project and property valuation.<br />

vi) Socio-economic survey on a representative sample <strong>of</strong> affected households to obtain a social pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> affected<br />

persons. The survey aimed at establishing a baseline against which effectiveness <strong>of</strong> resettlement assistance<br />

could be measured. It was based on a comprehensive socio-data questionnaire (Annex 3) and covered the<br />

following:<br />

� information on family/ household members<br />

� household land holdings and assets<br />

� livelihood in affected households<br />

� health & vulnerability<br />

� welfare indicators<br />

� expenditure patterns<br />

vii) Preparation <strong>of</strong> a resettlement action plan (RAP) comprising <strong>of</strong> an entitlement matrix with impact categories.<br />

Compensation and assistance for resettlement were based on the premise that lives <strong>of</strong> the affected people<br />

should not be worse than before displacement.<br />

viii) Arrangements for implementation providing guidance on proper implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP including<br />

institutional arrangements; implementation timeframe and compensation budget derived from property<br />

valuation.<br />

ix) Consultation and participation <strong>of</strong> affected communities were undertaken throughout preparation <strong>of</strong> the RAP<br />

and their feedback incorporated in designing resettlement strategies.<br />

x) Developing a grievance redress mechanism.<br />

xi) Developing a monitoring, evaluation and completion audit framework.


2.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

2 SURVEYING AND VALUATION METHODOLOGY<br />

P a g e | 4<br />

The RAP was conducted using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Affected households and property were<br />

determined from the road survey and a census <strong>of</strong> PAPs. Social data <strong>of</strong> affected persons was obtained from<br />

interviews, meetings and questionnaires. Property surveying and valuation entailed inspection and referencing <strong>of</strong><br />

land and buildings. Crops (including fruit and timber trees) were counted and their value established basing on<br />

compensation rates <strong>of</strong> respective District Local Governments. Sections below provide the methodology used.<br />

2.2 APPROACH FOR SOCIAL SURVEY<br />

A social survey was conducted to establish the social pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the project affected people and project area in<br />

accordance with Ugandan requirements for involuntary resettlement. Information obtained from the social survey was<br />

used to analyze poverty and welfare indicators in households, social-economic needs and impact on livelihoods <strong>of</strong><br />

affected people if the project is implemented as proposed. Broadly, site-specific data gathered from the survey<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> three main categories: population and demographics; landownership and land use; businesses and<br />

socio-cultural resources. Among other things, ethnicity, gender, health, household income levels and sources were<br />

captured in the social survey. These categories and respective survey criteria are presented in Box 1.<br />

Box 1: Social-economic data survey categories and criteria<br />

Population and demographics:<br />

a) Number <strong>of</strong> physically or economically displaced people<br />

b) Ethnicity in project-affected area<br />

c) Views <strong>of</strong> project-affected people<br />

d) Vulnerable people<br />

e) Literacy levels<br />

f) Size <strong>of</strong> households including dependants<br />

Land ownership and land use:<br />

a) Number <strong>of</strong> PAP dependant on agriculture for livelihood<br />

b) Land uses, crops and livestock types, type <strong>of</strong> housing<br />

c) Land tenure<br />

d) Income from agriculture and value <strong>of</strong> agricultural land<br />

e) Views <strong>of</strong> project-affected people<br />

Social-cultural and business:<br />

a) Presence, number and types <strong>of</strong> cultural resources<br />

b) Presence and number <strong>of</strong> communal social facilities (schools, prayer houses, etc)<br />

c) Businesses (restaurants, video halls, eateries, bars, etc)<br />

d) Income from agriculture and value <strong>of</strong> agricultural land<br />

e) Views <strong>of</strong> project-affected people<br />

f) Expenditure patterns in households<br />

2.3 SOCIAL SURVEY<br />

2.3.1 Criteria for Identifying PAPs<br />

The criteria for identifying the project-affected people (PAP) was that everybody whose property (land, building,<br />

crops) is affected in part or whole by widening the road, would be eligible for compensation. These PAPs were


P a g e | 5<br />

identified by the cadastral surveying team and through follow-up surveys and were included in the census.<br />

Employees and tenants were to be established at the stage <strong>of</strong> disclosing individual household entitlements.<br />

Prior to undertaking the detailed social survey, sensitization meetings were held in each village along the road to<br />

disclose and explain the forthcoming RAP study, explain the valuation process and how it is conducted according to<br />

Ugandan guidelines. These meetings were conducted by social survey teams and a representative <strong>of</strong> the property<br />

valuation consultant. In the meetings, the project planning schedule was disclosed, cut-<strong>of</strong>f for eligibility explained,<br />

rights <strong>of</strong> PAPs and grievance procedures outlined.<br />

All meetings were chaired by either the village’s Local Council (LC1) chairperson or LC 3 Council member<br />

(Councillor). These meetings aimed to create awareness about upcoming RAP, quell any apprehensions PAPs might<br />

have about resettlement hence, enabling them to provide true household and personal information during the social<br />

survey.<br />

2.3.2 Fieldwork, Socio-survey and Data Analysis Tools<br />

To develop a social pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> PAPs, a structured questionnaire (Annex 3) was administered for a representative<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> 40% <strong>of</strong> all affected people. Prior to administering the questionnaire to each PAP, its content was explained<br />

and purpose <strong>of</strong> requested information carefully explained. Social data collected in the questionnaires was cleaned<br />

up, coded, entered in a database then analyzed using SPSS 1 microcomputer package.<br />

2.3.3 Census and Property Valuation<br />

The census was conducted by AWE and findings compiled into a MS Access database, linked with the property<br />

valuation data. Property census and valuation was conducted by Associated Engineering (AES).<br />

Census entailed enumeration <strong>of</strong> all project affected persons and their household members and dependants. The<br />

census was conducted all along the road between 1 st October 2010- 9 th February 2011.<br />

2.4 VALUATION OF PROPERTY<br />

Valuation <strong>of</strong> property, the results <strong>of</strong> which fed into the RAP, was executed by an independent chartered surveying<br />

and valuation firm based on prevailing market prices. Property valuation and census were conducted.<br />

2.4.1 Topographical and Cadastral Surveys<br />

Land <strong>of</strong> all the people was surveyed and mapped indicating respective tenure systems. Customary land tenants and<br />

registered proprietors were recorded and a strip map produced. Survey beacons were placed at locations where the<br />

cadastral lines cross the road alignment. This information is presented on a strip map <strong>of</strong> the road showing the<br />

position <strong>of</strong> the proposed works on the existing cadastral maps. No land title deed mutations were signed as the<br />

registered proprietors can only sign after compensation. Based on this, acreage <strong>of</strong> land affected for both the<br />

registered plots and customary interests were calculated and a property valuer determined the commensurate<br />

compensation values for each affected property.<br />

2.4.2 Inspection, Referencing and Valuation<br />

Data collected covered registered land, bibanja holdings, permanent- and semi-permanent structures, crops and<br />

economic trees.<br />

1 SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.


P a g e | 6<br />

This data was entered on the compensation assessment forms. Enumeration <strong>of</strong> crops and trees and referencing <strong>of</strong><br />

property was witnessed by property owners or their representatives and area local council leaders (LCI <strong>of</strong>ficials). This<br />

ensured that all queries associated with ownership, quantity <strong>of</strong> items and sizes <strong>of</strong> land are accurately documented.<br />

The land surveyors provided acreage <strong>of</strong> affected land which was used by property valuers to establish<br />

commensurate compensation conforming to Uganda Government laws.<br />

2.4.3 Basis <strong>of</strong> Valuation<br />

The basis <strong>of</strong> valuation for compensation purposes is provided in the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Uganda 1995 and the<br />

Land Act 1998. The value <strong>of</strong> land and buildings is based on the market value, that is, the probable value the property<br />

will fetch when <strong>of</strong>fered for sale. In arriving at market values, it was assumed that:<br />

� The owner is a willing seller,<br />

� Prior to the date <strong>of</strong> valuation, there had been a reasonable period (having regard to the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

property and the state <strong>of</strong> the market) for the proper marketing <strong>of</strong> the interest, for the agreement <strong>of</strong> price and<br />

the completion <strong>of</strong> the sale,<br />

� The state <strong>of</strong> the market, level <strong>of</strong> values and other circumstances were, on any earlier assumed date <strong>of</strong><br />

exchange <strong>of</strong> contracts, the same as on the date <strong>of</strong> valuation,<br />

� No account is taken <strong>of</strong> any additional bid by a prospective purchaser with a special interest,<br />

� Both parties to the transaction had acted knowledgeably, prudently and without coercion.<br />

2.4.4 Derivation <strong>of</strong> Compensation Rates<br />

a) Land<br />

Wherever available, recent agreements <strong>of</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> physical property (land and buildings) were reviewed during<br />

surveys. This information provided insight into purchase prices that were prevailing in the project area at that time.<br />

These values were analyzed and adjusted before use because <strong>of</strong> the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> land parcels to which they<br />

were applied to determine the market value.<br />

Affected land was categorized as semi-urban, rural or dry land and hence different rates applied for each category.<br />

Valuation rates used for affected land were “market values” based on evidence obtained during property inspection<br />

and surveys.<br />

b) Buildings and structures<br />

Most project-affected residential and commercial buildings are constructed in permanent materials such as burnt clay<br />

bricks and iron ro<strong>of</strong> sheets. However, valuation also encountered many semi-permanent and temporary structures<br />

built in very low-cost materials such as timber. Buildings and structures were valued on the basis <strong>of</strong> Replacement<br />

Cost Method to arrive at their market value. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank stipulates that depreciation <strong>of</strong> an asset and<br />

value derived from salvaging materials from razed structures should not be discounted when deriving replacement<br />

cost. Additionally AfDB policy on resettlement requires replacement value to include cost <strong>of</strong> materials transport to<br />

site, labour costs and any transfer fees or taxes involved in replacing an asset.


P a g e | 7<br />

For rented commercial properties, Investment Method 1 <strong>of</strong> valuation was used and necessary adjustments made to<br />

derive the final value. For PAPs losing businesses, production or rental income occasioned by loss <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />

structures, additional compensation <strong>of</strong> 6% was allowed on top <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> affected building. This additional value<br />

was estimated sufficient to cover loss <strong>of</strong> sales over the time replacement buildings would be reconstructed. Semipermanent<br />

and temporary structures including pit-latrines were valued using District compensation rates. In both<br />

cases, the design, standard <strong>of</strong> construction, fittings, finishes and general condition <strong>of</strong> repair were taken into<br />

consideration in arriving at property values.<br />

c) Crops<br />

District compensation rates were applied to derive compensation values for crops, fruit trees, flowers and shrubs<br />

owned by project-affected persons. According to Ugandan compensation regulations, annual crops which could be<br />

harvested during the period <strong>of</strong> notice to vacate given to land landowners/ occupiers are excluded in determining<br />

compensation values. The valuation rates for crops takes into account the possible income generated from crops.<br />

2.4.5 Assumptions and Limitations <strong>of</strong> Valuation<br />

The following assumptions and limitations were encountered during property valuation:<br />

i) Bibanja owners on Mailo land have legal ownership rights as provided for by Ugandan law. An<br />

apportionment <strong>of</strong> land value <strong>of</strong> 60% and 40% share <strong>of</strong> the market value was given to the landlord and<br />

bibanja owners respectively, depending on developments invested on the affected land. For example, a<br />

kibanja owner who has a permanent structure such as a house or perennial crops is entitled to a 60% share<br />

<strong>of</strong> the compensation value while a person with only temporary structures or annual (seasonal) crops is only<br />

entitled to 40%. This is generally adequate for replacement value, and if a new kibanja ownership<br />

agreement was to be sought on a new piece <strong>of</strong> land, it would cost the same 60/40 split applied depending<br />

on the temporal permanency <strong>of</strong> developments there<strong>of</strong>.<br />

ii) Acreage <strong>of</strong> kibanja holdings provided by the land surveyors represents the actual physical land taken from<br />

each kibanja owner.<br />

iii) The acreage on "Private Mailo' titles are assumed to be the correct record as entered in the Lands and<br />

Surveys Department Registry.<br />

iv) The compensation assessed is for land and property as they existed at the time <strong>of</strong> inspection and valuation.<br />

Subsequent developments and structural improvements after the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date will not be considered for<br />

compensation purposes.<br />

v) The property owners expect to be given a 3-month “notice to vacate”, hence a 30% statutory disturbance<br />

allowance has been provided in property values.<br />

vi) Buildings which only have portions damaged are assessed as wholly affected and necessitating full<br />

compensation.<br />

vii) Incomplete buildings and structures were valued in their existing (“as is”) state.<br />

viii) Where private Mailo land owners could not be identified or verified due to lack <strong>of</strong> records in Central Lands<br />

Registry, the valuer assessed value <strong>of</strong> the land taken against the Plot Numbers on cadastral maps.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> valuation assessment <strong>of</strong> every owner/claimants property are presented in a separate Valuation Report.<br />

1 “Investment Method”was used for commercial (and residential) property that is producing future cash flows through letting or renting. The method derives market value <strong>of</strong> a subject<br />

property by reference to observed recent transactions <strong>of</strong> similar properties in the same area. Note that this method is really a comparison method, since the main variables are<br />

determined in the market.


2.5 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS<br />

2.5.1 Introduction<br />

A “stakeholder” can be defined as:<br />

Any individual, group, or institution with a vested interest in the natural resources <strong>of</strong> the project area and/or<br />

who potentially will be affected by project activities and have something to gain or lose if conditions change<br />

or stay the same 1 .<br />

P a g e | 8<br />

Stakeholders are all those who need to be considered in achieving project goals and whose participation and support<br />

are crucial to its success. Stakeholder analysis identifies all primary and secondary stakeholders who have a vested<br />

interest in the project. It is a process <strong>of</strong> systematically gathering and analyzing qualitative information to determine<br />

whose interests should be taken into account when developing and implementing a project. The analysis includes<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> stakeholders such as knowledge <strong>of</strong> the project, interests related to the project, position for or<br />

against the project, potential alliances with other stakeholders, and ability to affect the project process (through power<br />

and/or leadership).<br />

A stakeholder analysis will help the road project to identify:<br />

a) Interests <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders who may affect or be affected by the programme/project;<br />

b) Potential conflicts or risks that could jeopardize the project;<br />

c) Opportunities and relationships that can be built on during implementation;<br />

d) Groups that should be encouraged to participate in different stages <strong>of</strong> the project;<br />

e) Appropriate strategies and approaches for stakeholder engagement; and<br />

f) Ways to reduce negative impacts on vulnerable and disadvantaged groups.<br />

Three essential steps utilized 2 in stakeholder analysis were:<br />

� Identifying key stakeholders and their interests (positive or negative) in the project;<br />

� Assessing influence, importance and level <strong>of</strong> impact upon each stakeholder;<br />

� Identifying how best to engage stakeholders.<br />

2.5.2 Identification <strong>of</strong> Key Stakeholders and their Interests<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> different groups <strong>of</strong> stakeholders started with investigating specific threat and opportunity factors and<br />

developing a list <strong>of</strong> associated key stakeholders. This was based on key questions indicated below:<br />

� Who will benefit or be affected by the road project?<br />

� Who are the key players in the development and implementation <strong>of</strong> the road project?<br />

� What key resources will be impacted?<br />

� Who is most dependent on these resources?<br />

� Who possesses claims on resources to be affected – including legal jurisdiction and customary use?<br />

� Are several government sectors and ministry departments involved?<br />

� Are there any national and/or international bodies involved either as funding agencies or because <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

laws or treaties?<br />

1 Golder. B, Gawler. M, 2005: Cross-Cutting Tool: Stakeholder Analysis, WWF (USA).<br />

2 Ibid


P a g e | 9<br />

� Which agencies license certain aspects <strong>of</strong> the road project or are most knowledgeable about, and capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> dealing with project impacts or resources to be affected (forestry, wetlands, wildlife areas)? Who is<br />

managing these resources?<br />

� Are there major events or trends currently affecting the stakeholders (for example, development initiatives,<br />

migration, and population growth).<br />

Key stakeholders identified are presented in Table 2.1.<br />

2.5.3 Interests, Influence & Importance <strong>of</strong> Stakeholders<br />

To assess influence and importance <strong>of</strong> each stakeholder and the potential impact <strong>of</strong> the project upon each<br />

stakeholder, key issues investigated included:<br />

� Who is directly responsible for decisions on issues important to the project?<br />

� Who holds positions <strong>of</strong> responsibility in interested organizations?<br />

� Who is influential in the project area (both thematic and geographic areas)?<br />

� Who will be affected by the project?<br />

� Who will promote or support the project, provided that they are involved?<br />

� Who will obstruct or hinder the project if they are not involved?<br />

� Who has been involved in the area (thematic or geographic) in the past?<br />

� Who has not been involved up to now but should have been?<br />

To assess influence, importance and level <strong>of</strong> impact upon each stakeholder – a simple grid, presented in Table 2.1,<br />

was used for developing strategies on how different types <strong>of</strong> stakeholders might be engaged. The grid was utilized to<br />

organize stakeholders according to their likely influence over decisions to be made, and likely impact <strong>of</strong> project<br />

decisions upon them.<br />

Issues below were useful when considering where stakeholders sit on the Influence/Impact analysis quadrant:<br />

� Are they likely to influence success or failure <strong>of</strong> the proposed road project?<br />

� What is their relationship with the project?<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> final influence is presented in Figure 2.1.<br />

2.5.4 Engagement <strong>of</strong> Stakeholders<br />

Finally, the third step involved determining how to involve the different stakeholders identified. It was evident that<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> stakeholders would be engaged in different ways at the various stages <strong>of</strong> the road project, from<br />

gathering and giving information, to consultation and dialogue. For some aspects <strong>of</strong> project implementation like<br />

HIV/AIDS awareness, NGOs such as those engaged in related activities should be engaged by UNRA during road<br />

construction. The avenues for stakeholder engagement include:<br />

a) Consultation meetings<br />

Discussions were organized with various people and stakeholders along the road to verify general perspective <strong>of</strong><br />

stakeholders. The people consulted included Local Council (LC) <strong>of</strong>ficials, opinion leaders and NGOs.


P a g e | 10<br />

Consultations aimed to inform people about the project, explain RAP process, and seek views on valuation and<br />

compensation criteria as well as possible impact mitigation recommendations. Also discussed were gender-specifics<br />

benefits, vulnerable people, income restoration and replacement cost for lost property.<br />

b) Survey interviews<br />

Interviews and discussions were held with boda-boda cyclists, commuter omnibus and taxi operators who operate on<br />

the various sections <strong>of</strong> the road. Most transporters were concerned about the future <strong>of</strong> their operations in case the<br />

new road design removed existing bus stops. Discussions were also held along the road and key questions received<br />

were about criteria for compensation <strong>of</strong> affected assets. Criteria as provided by Uganda government was explained<br />

as well as additional resettlement requirements required by <strong>African</strong> Development Bank such as income restoration<br />

and assistance to vulnerable people identified during resettlement process. Women predicted the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic violence resulting from compensation, if men deny family fair access to resettlement payments and benefits<br />

or squander it on multiple new marriages. Although solution to this is provided in the Land Act where spouses must<br />

consent to and witness compensation due to the household, local leaders were encouraged to take active role in<br />

grievances management to avoid domestic violence.<br />

During consultations conducted between September 22, 2010 and January 2011, above stakeholders expressed<br />

support for the road project and willingness to participate if their involvement, as either witnesses or monitors, is<br />

sought in RAP implementation. However, a key factor indicated to influence this involvement was financial facilitation<br />

from the implementation agency (UNRA).<br />

All RAP implementation agencies would report to UNRA, which has the technical and institutional capacity to<br />

coordinate and supervise implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP. Entities involved in RAP implementation have that mandate;<br />

some like lower local administrations (Local Councils- LC I, III) to be involved in monitoring activities will need<br />

financial facilitation for travel and lunch allowances. These costs have been provided for in the RAP implementation<br />

budget under “monitoring & evaluation.


Table 2.1: Key stakeholders identified with their corresponding mandate and roles<br />

Category Stakeholder Mandate Potential role Marginalized? Key?<br />

Government-National Water Resources Management Directorate<br />

(WRMD) in Ministry <strong>of</strong> Water &<br />

Environment<br />

Permitting water abstraction<br />

and construction <strong>of</strong><br />

infrastructure across<br />

watercourses<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Works & Transport, MoWT Lead agency on roads in<br />

Uganda<br />

Petroleum Supply Department in Ministry Permits transportation and<br />

<strong>of</strong> Energy & Mineral Development<br />

storage <strong>of</strong> petroleum products<br />

Occupational Health & Safety Department Inspects quality <strong>of</strong> occupational<br />

in Ministry <strong>of</strong> Gender, Labour & Social health and safety in workplace<br />

Development<br />

environment<br />

National Forestry Authority, NFA Oversees management and<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> forests<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Museums and Monuments, Preservation <strong>of</strong> artefacts and<br />

DMM<br />

antiquities <strong>of</strong> cultural heritage<br />

value<br />

Government-Local Kyenjojo, Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and<br />

Kiryandongo District Local Governments<br />

Local Council Leaders (LC I-V)<br />

Local Communities<br />

along road<br />

Communities along entire road (meetings<br />

were held in trading centres and villages)<br />

Vulnerable Groups These include disabled persons, elderly,<br />

women, or people who admitted being<br />

terminally ill (especially <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS)<br />

Institutions, NGOs,<br />

CBOs<br />

Churches, schools, CBOs and NGOs along<br />

the road<br />

Have jurisdiction over project<br />

areas<br />

Receive project, own land/<br />

property affected by road<br />

project<br />

Mobilise communities, provide<br />

social services<br />

Issue permit for contractor to abstract water<br />

and permit for bridge construction<br />

MoWT develops and overseas road sector<br />

policies<br />

Will issue contractor permit for onsite fuel<br />

storage<br />

Inspection <strong>of</strong> labour conditions during road<br />

construction<br />

Permits road work through central forest<br />

reserve.<br />

Salvage <strong>of</strong> “chance-finds”; monitoring major<br />

excavations to ensure resources <strong>of</strong> cultural<br />

heritage value are not destroyed<br />

Political goodwill; community sensitization;<br />

monitoring construction activities<br />

Project recipients; provide construction labour;<br />

land for road<br />

Community mobilisation, cooperation with<br />

UNRA on provision <strong>of</strong> services e.g. HIV/AIDS<br />

awareness during road construction<br />

P a g e | 26<br />

No Yes, since water use<br />

inevitable during road<br />

construction and several<br />

bridges will be built<br />

No Yes<br />

No Yes<br />

No Yes<br />

No Yes<br />

No Yes<br />

No Yes<br />

Some vulnerable<br />

Yes<br />

project-affected<br />

persons could be<br />

encountered<br />

Yes (usually) Yes<br />

No Yes


General public:<br />

� People in project area, not necessarily ones affected by<br />

the road project<br />

� Affected communities along road<br />

� Schools and other learning institutions,<br />

� Healthcare facilities<br />

LESS IMPACTED<br />

UPON<br />

Opinion formers:<br />

� Churches leaders,<br />

� CBOs and NGOs<br />

Figure 2.1 Stakeholder analysis grid<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

MORE INFLUENCE<br />

Information giving<br />

Information gathering Consultation<br />

LESS INFLUENCE<br />

Dialogue<br />

� Vulnerable Groups<br />

� Project District Local Governments<br />

� Local Council Leaders (LC I-V)<br />

Government departments<br />

P a g e | 28<br />

MORE IMPACTED<br />

UPON<br />

� National Forestry Authority, NFA<br />

� Ministry <strong>of</strong> Works & Transport<br />

� Ministry <strong>of</strong> Energy & Mineral Development<br />

� Ministry <strong>of</strong> Lands, Housing & Urban Development<br />

� Project District Local Governments<br />

� Project District Land Boards<br />

� Uganda Land Commission


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 29<br />

3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ADJUSTMENTS TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS<br />

3.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

The road section to be funded by AfDB (Figure 3.1) is <strong>Kigumba</strong> - Bulima (69 km) and Bulima - <strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km)<br />

in Western Uganda. This stretch is part <strong>of</strong> the entire road from Kyenjojo to <strong>Kigumba</strong> through the Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandongo. The entire road is subdivided into three links: Kyenjojo–<strong>Hoima</strong><br />

(150.5 km), <strong>Hoima</strong>-<strong>Masindi</strong> (54 km) and <strong>Masindi</strong> – <strong>Kigumba</strong> (33 km).<br />

The proposed project road is categorized as a Class II bitumen road and will have a road reserve <strong>of</strong> 30 m in rural<br />

areas and 20 m in urban areas including trading centres. Kyenjojo - <strong>Hoima</strong> section passes through Kibaale<br />

District and this stretch lies in hilly and rolling terrain with dense forest reserves in Kibaale district and parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Hoima</strong> district. There are two bridges along this link: Muzizi Bridge constructed from reinforced concrete and<br />

Nkusi Bridge which is a Bailey bridge. Various trading centres along the road are indicated in Table 3.1.<br />

Table 3.1: Trading centres along road<br />

Kyenjojo to <strong>Hoima</strong> <strong>Hoima</strong> to <strong>Kigumba</strong><br />

1. Kagadi Town Council 19. <strong>Hoima</strong> Town Council<br />

2. Kinyara trading centre 20. Apiida trading centre<br />

3. Katooke trading centre 21. Kyakapeya trading centre<br />

4. Katara trading centre 22. Kakindo trading centre<br />

5. Kamutunsi trading centre 23. Kyabigambire trading centre<br />

6. Nyanseke trading centre 24. Bulindi trading centre<br />

7. Muhurro trading centre 25. Bulima trading centre<br />

8. Kyenzige trading centre 26. Bwijanga trading centre<br />

9. Mabale trading centre 27. Ikoba trading centre<br />

10. Paacwa trading centre 28. Bujenje trading centre<br />

11. Karama trading centre 29. Nyamigisa trading centre<br />

12. Kabwooya trading centre 30. Pakanyi trading centre<br />

13. Kayigo trading centre 31. Nyambindo trading centre<br />

14. Munteme trading centre 32. Nyakabale trading centre<br />

15. Nyati trading centre 33. Kizibu trading centre<br />

16. Buhimba trading centre 34. <strong>Kigumba</strong> Town Council<br />

17. Buswekera trading centre<br />

18. Kasingo trading centre<br />

The existing road has uneven width varying between 3.0 and 7.0 m and the ground material on the road varies<br />

between laterite gravel and a mixture <strong>of</strong> laterite and sand with rock outcrops at various points. Geometrical<br />

alignment <strong>of</strong> existing road is sub-standard, drainage inadequate and the running surface poorly maintained in<br />

most areas. The existing geometrical elements include:<br />

� Inconsistent road alignment due to difficult terrain<br />

� Inadequate cross-falls and super- elevations<br />

� Poor visibility splays<br />

� Inconsistent traffic speeds, costly and unreliable journey times.


Legend:<br />

Kyenjojo - <strong>Hoima</strong> 150.5 km Section to be funded by AfDB<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong> - <strong>Masindi</strong> 54 km<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong> - <strong>Kigumba</strong> 33 km<br />

Figure 3.1 Location <strong>of</strong> the project road and its connection to road network in the region<br />

The proposed upgrade has three objectives:<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 30<br />

� Provide a strategic link between the northern corridor (specifically south western Uganda, Rwanda and<br />

Burundi and eastern DRC) and the Kampala-Gulu-Juba corridor.<br />

� Provide a high standard road for the expected increase in transport <strong>of</strong> oil and refined products from<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong> to <strong>Hoima</strong> and from <strong>Hoima</strong> to Kyenjojo.<br />

� Improve access to markets, social and health services and employment possibilities for residents within<br />

the zone <strong>of</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> the proposed road.<br />

3.2 PROJECT AREA OF INFLUENCE<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> influence denotes the zone which will be most affected by the project. To understand potential<br />

impacts and design appropriate mitigation measures, the areas under project’s zone <strong>of</strong> influence (zoi) have been<br />

mapped. The zone <strong>of</strong> influence is that area which will receive primary impacts resulting from project activities.<br />

Width <strong>of</strong> a corridor to be studied depends on legal requirements and the predicted extent <strong>of</strong> the impacts identified


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 31<br />

during the project scoping. Corridor widths range from 100 m to 10 km for green-field (or new) roads 1 . The study<br />

considered a 2-km direct impact area/ zone <strong>of</strong> influence for primary impacts. However, secondary impacts could<br />

take on a wider spatial local, national or even regional extent. The 2-km impact zone <strong>of</strong> influence was considered<br />

for this project based on the most probable extent <strong>of</strong> direct impacts especially during the construction phase,<br />

namely: accidents, dust plumes, noise, sources <strong>of</strong> construction labour and social effects, for example influx <strong>of</strong><br />

people seeking construction jobs. The proposed road project is shown in Figures 3.2.<br />

Figure 3.2 Location <strong>of</strong> the proposed road through the project districts<br />

3.4 PROJECT PROPONENT AND FUNDING AGENCY<br />

The proponent and funding agency <strong>of</strong> this project is Uganda Government through Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s<br />

Authority (UNRA) with contact detail below:<br />

Executive Director,<br />

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY,<br />

P. O. Box 28487, Kampala, Uganda, Plot 11, Yusuf Lule <strong>Road</strong>, Kampala<br />

1 <strong>Road</strong>s and the environment: A Handbook /edited by Christopher Hoban and Koji Tsunokawa. (World Bank technical paper<br />

No. 376) 1997. ISBN 0-8213-4031-X, pg5.<br />

Section to be funded by AfDB


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

4 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK<br />

P a g e | 32<br />

Uganda Government requires that compensation is paid to affected entities if a project would damage structures<br />

and other property, or take private land. The same requirement is also articulated by policies <strong>of</strong> the <strong>African</strong><br />

Development Bank (the funding agency <strong>of</strong> this project), key <strong>of</strong> which in regard to this RAP is the Policy on<br />

Involuntary Resettlement (2003). Sections below discuss the legal and institutional set up governing this RAP.<br />

The legal section summarises entities, laws and regulations relating to implementation <strong>of</strong> resettlement activities<br />

and legal set up associated with effective implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP including recognition the claim to land<br />

rights under various tenure systems. The institutional section provides arrangements, resources and inter-agency<br />

cooperation necessary to implement this RAP. The RAP will be implemented by UNRA and the institutional<br />

section therefore evaluates the capacity <strong>of</strong> this agency<br />

4.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK<br />

Land take refers to acquiring <strong>of</strong> land for some public purpose by government agency, as authorised by the law<br />

from land owner(s) after paying compensation for losses incurred by land owner(s) due to surrendering their<br />

land. For land take and displacement <strong>of</strong> people, specific attention is drawn to two Ugandan laws that will be<br />

applicable to land tenure, compensation and resettlement in this project, namely:<br />

� The Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Uganda, 1995<br />

� The Land Act, Cap 227<br />

4.1.1 The Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Uganda (1995)<br />

This gives government and local authorities a statutory power <strong>of</strong> compulsory acquisition <strong>of</strong> land in public interest<br />

and makes provision; inter alia, for “prompt payment <strong>of</strong> fair and adequate compensation” prior to the taking <strong>of</strong><br />

possession <strong>of</strong> any privately-owned property.<br />

Such compensation is assessed in accordance with the valuation principles laid out in Section 78 <strong>of</strong> the Land Act<br />

(Cap 227), briefly outlined below:<br />

� The value for customary land is the open market value <strong>of</strong> unimproved land;<br />

� The value <strong>of</strong> buildings on the land is taken at open market value for urban areas, and depreciated<br />

replacement cost for rural areas;<br />

� The value <strong>of</strong> standing crops on the land is determined in accordance with the district compensation<br />

rates established by respective District Land Board. Annual crops which could be harvested during the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> notice to vacate given to the landowner or occupier <strong>of</strong> the land are excluded in determining<br />

compensation values;<br />

� In addition to the total compensation assessed, there is a disturbance allowance paid <strong>of</strong> 15% or, if less<br />

than six months’ notice to vacate is given, 30% <strong>of</strong> the total sum assessed.<br />

4.1.2 The Land Act, Cap 227<br />

This addresses four issues namely; holding, control, management and land disputes. In regard to tenure, the Act<br />

repeats (in Section 3) provisions <strong>of</strong> Article 237 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution which vests all land ownership in the citizens <strong>of</strong><br />

Uganda, to be held under customary, freehold, mailo or leasehold tenure systems. However, the Land Act<br />

provides for acquisition <strong>of</strong> land or rights to use land for execution <strong>of</strong> public works.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 33<br />

Regarding control <strong>of</strong> land, the Act reaffirms the statutory power <strong>of</strong> compulsory acquisition conferred on the<br />

government and local authorities under articles 26 (2) and 237(2) (a) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution (Section 43). Since the<br />

Act does not repeal the Land Acquisition Act No. 14 <strong>of</strong> 1965, it is assumed that this legislation, meets<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> Article 26(2) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution that requires a law to be in place for payment <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />

and access to courts. The Act also requires that landowners manage and utilize land in accordance with<br />

regulatory land use planning (Sections 44 and 46).<br />

Section 77(2) <strong>of</strong> the revised edition (2000) <strong>of</strong> the Land Act 1998 provides for a disturbance allowance on top <strong>of</strong><br />

the computed compensation amount as shown below:<br />

� 30% <strong>of</strong> compensation amount if quit notice is given within 6 months.<br />

� 15% <strong>of</strong> compensation amount if quit notice is given after 6 months.<br />

The foregoing laws form the basis <strong>of</strong> compensation requirements necessary to fulfil Uganda’s regulatory<br />

requirements.<br />

4.1.3 The Local Government Act (1997)<br />

Local Government Act 1997 provides for a system <strong>of</strong> Local Governments based on the District. Under the District<br />

there are lower Local Governments and administrative units. This system provides for elected Councils whereby<br />

chairmen nominate the executive committee <strong>of</strong> each council, functions <strong>of</strong> which include:<br />

� Initiating and formulating policy for approval by council;<br />

� Overseeing the implementation <strong>of</strong> Government and Council policies, and monitoring and coordinating<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> Non-Government Organizations in the district; and<br />

� Receiving and solving disputes forwarded to it from lower local governments.<br />

Because local leaders participate in above roles and will be crucial not only during compensation process but<br />

also project implementation, this law is important.<br />

4.1.4 Land Acquisition Act (1965)<br />

This Act makes provision for procedures and method <strong>of</strong> compulsory acquisition <strong>of</strong> land for public purposes<br />

whether for temporary or permanent use. The Minister responsible for land may authorize any person to enter<br />

upon the land, survey the land, dig or bore the subsoil or any other actions necessary for ascertaining whether<br />

the land is suitable for a given public purpose. However, compensation should be paid to any person who suffers<br />

damage as a result <strong>of</strong> such actions.<br />

The Land Acquisition Act stops at payment <strong>of</strong> compensation to the affected people. In Uganda, it is not a legal<br />

requirement for a project to purchase alternative land for affected people. Once affected people are promptly and<br />

adequately compensated, the project proponent’s obligations stop at this extent and there is no legal requirement<br />

that people should be moved or provided with alternative land. In Ugandan legal context, once people are<br />

compensated, they are expected to vacate affected properties without further claim.<br />

4.1.5 The Access to <strong>Road</strong>s Act (1965)<br />

This Act seeks that a private landowner who has no reasonable means <strong>of</strong> access to public highway may apply<br />

for leave to construct a road <strong>of</strong> access to a public highway. This law also establishes a mechanism <strong>of</strong> applying<br />

for such access. It also establishes a legal regime to ensure the safety <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring environment.<br />

The Act permits an owner <strong>of</strong> land who is unable through negotiations to obtain leave from adjoining land owners<br />

to construct a road <strong>of</strong> access to the public highway, to apply to a magistrate for leave to construct a road <strong>of</strong>


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 34<br />

access over any land lying between his land and the public highway. This law also provides for means by which<br />

an order for the construction <strong>of</strong> an access road can be revoked.<br />

The Act further provides for maintenance <strong>of</strong> the access road in a good and efficient state <strong>of</strong> repair, and for<br />

payment <strong>of</strong> compensation in respect <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the land, the destruction <strong>of</strong> crops <strong>of</strong> trees and such other<br />

property. This law may be invoked by property owners who may be cut <strong>of</strong>f from the new road in places where<br />

alignment <strong>of</strong> existing road is changed from original location.<br />

4.1.6 The <strong>Road</strong>s Act (1964)<br />

The <strong>Road</strong>s Act <strong>of</strong> 1964 is a critical piece <strong>of</strong> legislation with respect to road development projects in Uganda. It<br />

defines a road reserve as that area bounded by imaginary lines parallel to and not more than fifty feet distant<br />

from the centerline <strong>of</strong> any road. The Act prohibits erection <strong>of</strong> buildings or planting permanent crops within a road<br />

reserve.<br />

The Minister or, with the consent <strong>of</strong> the Minister, a District Commissioner (currently referred to as “Chief<br />

Administrative Officer”), in relation to any road within or passing through any government town or an<br />

administrator in respect <strong>of</strong> any area not being in a government town, may by order: -<br />

� Prescribe the line in which buildings shall be erected in such town or area, or;<br />

� Prescribe distance from the centre <strong>of</strong> the road within, which no building shall be erected in such town or<br />

area.<br />

The road authority is required to give written notice to the owner or occupier <strong>of</strong> land on which prohibited activities<br />

have been carried out so as:<br />

� To pull down or remove the building or structures; or<br />

� To cut down or uproot trees or crops;<br />

The Act allows the road authority to dig and take away materials required for construction and maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

roads in any part <strong>of</strong> a road reserve approved by the local government authority without payment to any person.<br />

For the forgoing reasons, this law is relevant to the proposed project.<br />

4.1.7 Land Tenure Regimes and Transfer <strong>of</strong> Land<br />

Article 237 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, 1995, vests land ownership in the citizens <strong>of</strong> Uganda and identifies four land<br />

tenure systems, namely: customary; freehold; mailo; and leasehold. The incidents <strong>of</strong> these systems are detailed<br />

under Section 4 <strong>of</strong> the Land Act (Cap 227). Those relevant to the road project are:<br />

� This tenure is governed by rules generally accepted as binding and authoritative by the class <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

to which it applies. In other words customary regime is not governed by written law.<br />

� Land is owned in perpetuity.<br />

� Customary occupants occupy former public land, and occupy land by virtue <strong>of</strong> their customary rights;<br />

they have proprietary interest in the land and are entitled to certificates <strong>of</strong> customary ownership which<br />

may be acquired through application to the Parish Land Committee and eventual issuance by the<br />

District Land Board.<br />

4.1.7.2 Freehold tenure<br />

� This tenure derives its legality from the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Uganda and its incidents from the written law.<br />

� It involves holding land in perpetuity or for a period less than perpetuity fixed by a condition.


� It enables the holder to exercise, subject to the law, full powers <strong>of</strong> ownership.<br />

4.1.8 Leasehold tenure<br />

This tenure system is:<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 35<br />

� Created either by contract or by operation <strong>of</strong> the law;<br />

� A form under which the landlord <strong>of</strong> lessor grants the tenant or lessee exclusive possession <strong>of</strong> the land,<br />

usually for a period defined and in return for a rent;<br />

� The tenant has security <strong>of</strong> tenure and a proprietary interest in the land.<br />

Although only these latter forms <strong>of</strong> tenure are legally defined under the Land Act, the context <strong>of</strong> common law also<br />

recognizes the statute <strong>of</strong> “Licensee” or “Sharecroppers”, these terms having similar meanings in practice.<br />

Licensees are persons granted authority to use land within for agricultural production. Traditionally, such<br />

production would be limited to annual crops. Licensees have no legal security <strong>of</strong> tenure or any propriety right in<br />

the land. Their tenure is purely contractual.<br />

4.1.9 Right <strong>of</strong> spouse and children<br />

The rights <strong>of</strong> spouse and children are protected under the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Uganda and the Land Act (Cap 227).<br />

The consent <strong>of</strong> spouse and children must be acquired prior to any transaction by the head <strong>of</strong> household on land<br />

on which the family ordinarily resides.<br />

Section 40 <strong>of</strong> the Land Act, 1998 requires that no person shall:<br />

a. Sell, exchange, transfer, pledge, mortgage or lease any land; or enter into any contract for the sale,<br />

exchange, transfer, pledge, mortgage or lease <strong>of</strong> any land;<br />

b. Give away any land inter vivos, or enter into any transaction in respect <strong>of</strong> land:<br />

� In the case <strong>of</strong> land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her spouse, and from which<br />

they derive their sustenance, except with the prior written consent <strong>of</strong> the spouse;<br />

� In the case <strong>of</strong> land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her dependent children <strong>of</strong><br />

majority age, except with the prior written consent <strong>of</strong> the dependent children <strong>of</strong> majority age;<br />

� In the case <strong>of</strong> land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her dependent children<br />

below the majority age, except with the prior written consent <strong>of</strong> the Committee 1 ;<br />

� In the case <strong>of</strong> land on which ordinarily reside orphans below majority age with interest in<br />

inheritance <strong>of</strong> the land, except with prior written consent <strong>of</strong> the Committee.<br />

4.1.10 Local Governments Act, Cap 243<br />

This Act provides for decentralized governance and devolution <strong>of</strong> central government functions, powers and<br />

services to local governments that have own political and administrative set-ups. Districts have powers to<br />

oversee implementation <strong>of</strong> development activities. They also have units such as District Land Tribunals<br />

responsible for solving complaints that arise from land acquisition valuations and compensation payments.<br />

According to Section 9 <strong>of</strong> the Act, a local government is the highest political and administrative authority in its<br />

area <strong>of</strong> jurisdiction and shall exercise both legislative and executive powers in accordance with the Constitution.<br />

1 “Committees” are defined under Section 65 <strong>of</strong> the Land Act ; they are Parish Land Committees.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 36<br />

District Local Governments, through which the road passes, namely: Kyenjojo, Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and<br />

Kiryandongo will be key stakeholders in RAP implementation and monitoring.<br />

4.1.11 The Persons with Disability Act, (2006)<br />

The Government published its National Policy on Disability in February, 2006. It states that “four in every 25<br />

persons in Uganda are persons with disabilities”. Thus, the disability fraternity appreciates that by enacting the<br />

disability policy and other relevant pieces <strong>of</strong> legislation, the government <strong>of</strong> Uganda is fulfilling its constitutional<br />

obligation <strong>of</strong> addressing the plight <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities (NUDIPU, 2007).<br />

The strategic objective <strong>of</strong> this policy is "promoting equal opportunities and enhanced empowerment, participation<br />

and protection <strong>of</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> persons with disabilities (PWDs) irrespective <strong>of</strong> gender, age and type <strong>of</strong> disability".<br />

Article 16 recognizes the rights <strong>of</strong> persons with disability and states that the "Society and the State shall<br />

recognize the right <strong>of</strong> persons with disability to respect and human dignity". This law is relevant to the proposed<br />

project and the proposed road should have provision that allows access and movement <strong>of</strong> pedestrians, including<br />

persons with disabilities.<br />

4.2 REQUIREMENTS OF AfDB<br />

4.2.1 Requirements <strong>of</strong> AfDB<br />

The proposed road project will trigger the AfDB “Involuntary Resettlement” policy in so far as road upgrade will<br />

involve involuntary land acquisition. The AfDB’s involuntary resettlement policy <strong>of</strong> 2003 stipulates and considers<br />

among other things;<br />

“a category <strong>of</strong> displaced persons who have no recognisable legal right or claim to the land they are<br />

occupying in the project area will be entitled to resettlement assistance in lieu <strong>of</strong> compensation for land.<br />

Nevertheless at the minimum, under the bank’s policy (with no contradiction to the borrower’s<br />

legislation), land, housing and infrastructure will be provided to the adversely affected population,<br />

including indigenous groups, ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities, and pastoralists who may have<br />

usufruct rights to the land or other resources taken for the project”.<br />

The primary goal <strong>of</strong> the involuntary resettlement policy therefore is to ensure that displaced people are treated<br />

equitably, and that they share in the benefits <strong>of</strong> the project that involves their resettlement. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

policy are to ensure that the disruption <strong>of</strong> the livelihood <strong>of</strong> people in the project’s area is minimized, ensure that<br />

the displaced persons receive resettlement assistance so as to improve their living standards.<br />

The bank puts people at the centre <strong>of</strong> development. Hence in all operations the Bank pays a close attention to<br />

projects that may result in the displacement and resettlement <strong>of</strong> people, particularly when they are the<br />

disadvantaged group such as elderly and children, female headed households, the poorest and the marginalized<br />

communities. The involuntary policy therefore helps to further reinforce the bank’s vision <strong>of</strong> which poverty<br />

reduction is an overarching objective.<br />

AfDB has several safeguard policies applicable to the project, namely:<br />

1. Involuntary Resettlement Policy, 2003,<br />

2. Policy and Guidelines on Cooperation with Civil Society Organizations 1999;<br />

3. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank Group Policy on the Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Information, 2005;<br />

4. The Gender Policy, 2001;<br />

5. Environmental and Social Assessment Procedures for Public Sector Operations 2001;<br />

6. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank Group’s Policy on the Environment, 2004.


Only policies 1, 2 and 3 apply to this resettlement study and these are discussed below.<br />

i) AfDB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, 2003<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 37<br />

The primary goal <strong>of</strong> the involuntary resettlement policy is to ensure that when people must be displaced they are<br />

treated equitably, and that they share in the benefits <strong>of</strong> the project that involves their resettlement. The objectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> the policy are to ensure that the disruption <strong>of</strong> the livelihood <strong>of</strong> people in the project’s area is minimized, ensure<br />

that the displaced persons receive resettlement assistance so as to improve their living standards, provide<br />

explicit guidance to Bank staff and to borrowers, and set up a mechanism for monitoring the performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resettlement programs. Most importantly, the resettlement plan should be prepared based on a development<br />

approach that addresses issues <strong>of</strong> livelihood and living standards <strong>of</strong> displaced persons as well as compensation<br />

for loss <strong>of</strong> assets, using a participatory approach at all stages <strong>of</strong> project design and implementation.<br />

Compensation at the full replacement cost for loss <strong>of</strong> lands and other assets should be paid prior to projects<br />

implementation with the view to improve the former living standards, income earning capacity and production<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> the affected population. The improvement <strong>of</strong> these living standards should also apply to host<br />

communities. In addition, the needs <strong>of</strong> disadvantaged groups (landless, female headed households, children,<br />

elderly, minority ethnic, religious and linguistic groups, etc.) must be at the centre <strong>of</strong> the development approach.<br />

Resettlement associated with the proposed road project has been addressed in a separate document- the<br />

Resettlement Action Plan (RAP).<br />

It is expected that most affected home owners would have some land to reconstruct their dwellings a little back<br />

from affected locations. Conversely, due to linear settlement pattern along roads and small size <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />

land parcels (plots) in towns and trading centres, this may not always be possible and affected persons would<br />

have to relocate to new plot <strong>of</strong> land but still within town. There is thus little possibility that a large population <strong>of</strong><br />

PAPs would be relocated to an entirely new host community.<br />

ii) AfDB’s Policy and Guidelines on Cooperation with Civil Society Organizations 1999<br />

Civil society organisations (CSOs) extend beyond NGOs to encompass people's organizations, trade unions,<br />

human rights bodies, religious groups, community-based organizations, policy advocacy bodies, associations <strong>of</strong><br />

business and pr<strong>of</strong>essional people. The <strong>African</strong> Development Bank has recognized the importance <strong>of</strong> such<br />

organizations in achieving sustainable development. In its 1999 Vision statement and elsewhere, the Bank has<br />

clearly stated its commitment to participatory practices and constructive engagement with civil society as<br />

responsible and promising ways forward. The Bank, in pursuing its development goals and objectives, will draw<br />

on the knowledge, contacts, experience, and delivery capacity <strong>of</strong> individual CSOs and networks. Where they<br />

possess necessary skills and experience, CSOs may be involved as volunteers or as contracted agents.<br />

Effective CSO participation, starting in the ‘up-stream’ stages is expected throughout the project cycle.<br />

The bank puts people at the centre <strong>of</strong> development. Hence in all operations the Bank pays a close attention to<br />

projects that may result in the displacement and resettlement <strong>of</strong> people, particularly when they are the<br />

disadvantaged group such as elderly and children, female headed households, the poorest and the marginalized<br />

communities. AfDB policy seeks to promote participation <strong>of</strong> affected people in resettlement planning and<br />

implementation, and its key economic objective is to assist displaced persons in their efforts to improve or at<br />

least restore their incomes and standards <strong>of</strong> living after displacement. This policy aims to avoid involuntary<br />

resettlement to the extent feasible, or to minimize its adverse social and economic impacts.<br />

iii) AfDB’s Policy on Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Information, 2005<br />

In December, 1997, the Boards <strong>of</strong> Directors approved a policy for Public Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Information which<br />

established the procedures and the types <strong>of</strong> information for disclosure in the absence <strong>of</strong> compelling reasons for<br />

confidentiality. The Bank Group’s Policy on Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Information became effective in 1998. The policy was<br />

based on the principle that the Bank Group should be open and transparent in its operations. The main lessons<br />

from the implementation <strong>of</strong> the 1997 policy is that many institutions, civil groups and individuals have come to<br />

understand, appreciate and get involved in the work <strong>of</strong> the Bank Group. There has also been increased demand


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 38<br />

for disclosure <strong>of</strong> Bank Group documents and information on its activities. This RAP report prepared for the<br />

proposed project has been disclosed as shown in Annex 7.<br />

4.3 INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES<br />

The main actors to be involved in carrying out resettlement and/or compensation as required in the upgrading <strong>of</strong><br />

the road are discussed in the sub-sections below while their roles are outlined in Table 4.1.<br />

4.3.1 Ministry <strong>of</strong> Works and Transport<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Uganda and development partners requires preparation <strong>of</strong> a Resettlement Action Plan for road<br />

development projects. This is done to ensure equitable compensation and minimize social disruptions or<br />

negative effects on people’s livelihoods arising from construction <strong>of</strong> roads. Compensations assist PAPs to<br />

restore their livelihood. During RAP implementation, MoWT would mainly be involved in supervision and ensuring<br />

compliance with policies <strong>of</strong> the transport sub-sector.<br />

4.3.2 Ministry <strong>of</strong> Lands, Housing and Urban Development<br />

The Chief Government Valuer in the Valuation Division in the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Housing and Urban Development is<br />

responsible for approving the Valuation Roll. This demands fair and transparent compensation and as such all<br />

property valued are first inspected by the Chief Government Valuer. Chief Government Valuer’s <strong>of</strong>fice is also<br />

involved in resolving public complaints that arise from valuation for land acquisition and compensation payments.<br />

4.3.3 Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority (UNRA)<br />

This RAP will be implemented by UNRA in conjunction with respective district local governments (Kyenjojo,<br />

Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandongo Districts and village-level local councils) and key implementation<br />

processes will include: (a) payment <strong>of</strong> compensation to affected people; (b) rehabilitation assistance to<br />

vulnerable people identified in this RAP or by local leaders/RAP implementation unit; (c) possible jobs as<br />

employees on the road rehabilitation project; (d) monitoring and evaluation.<br />

The overall implementation responsibility will be <strong>of</strong> UNRA through the Resident Engineer and appointed<br />

consultant. UNRA will ensure that PAPs have adequate time to replace their assets and will work with such<br />

affected persons to ensure they are able to achieve this before expiry <strong>of</strong> notice to vacate their affected<br />

properties. UNRA will make available financial resources necessary to meet compensation and resettlement<br />

costs, as well as additional actions necessary to satisfy AfDB guidelines.<br />

4.3.4 District Local Governments<br />

All the districts traversed by the road (Kyenjojo, Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandongo), like all other Uganda<br />

districts, have five levels <strong>of</strong> local councils (LCs), namely: District, County, Sub-county, Parish and Village these<br />

are referred to as LC5, LC4, LC3, LC2 and LC1 respectively. Local Councils are responsible for local policy<br />

matters, economic development, resolving local conflicts and providing orderly leadership and democratic<br />

practices at the grass roots level in their respective areas. The system has facilitated mass participation in<br />

government affairs and awakened the rural population to their rights <strong>of</strong> citizenship and obligations particularly<br />

regarding involvement in development programs and projects. In the project-affected area LC1s and LC3s are<br />

very active and directly interact with the affected population. These councils will thus be helpful during the<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> rightful property owners and resolving compensation grievances.<br />

4.3.5 District Land Boards<br />

District Land Boards set compensation rates for crop and semi-permanent structures. Therefore it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

important that RAP implementation involves participation <strong>of</strong> district land boards. In this regard, Kyenjojo, Kibaale,


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 39<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandongo district land boards will have roles <strong>of</strong> overseeing appropriation <strong>of</strong> district land;<br />

facilitating registration and transfer <strong>of</strong> interests in land.<br />

Note that in performance <strong>of</strong> its functions, district land boards are independent <strong>of</strong> the Uganda Land Commission<br />

but takes into account national and district council policy on land.<br />

4.3.6 Uganda Land Commission<br />

The Uganda Land Commission holds and manages land in Uganda vested in or acquired by Government <strong>of</strong><br />

Uganda and would be involved where such land is affected by the proposed road project.<br />

4.3.7 Private Sector Entities<br />

RAP implementation will entail involvement <strong>of</strong> private sector consultants hired by UNRA for verification and<br />

actual payment <strong>of</strong> compensation to PAPs. These entities are not known at this time since they will be hired<br />

through competitive bidding as per Uganda’s procurement laws.<br />

All foregoing institutions are considered to have sufficient skills to undertake their respective tasks, which for<br />

government ministries/ agencies are within their mandate. LCs however would need facilitation to enable their<br />

active participation in project activities.<br />

4.3.8 National Forestry Authority, NFA<br />

All gazetted forests in Uganda are managed by NFA and Sector (District) Offices <strong>of</strong> this institution will be<br />

stakeholders if any loss <strong>of</strong> trees protected national forest reserves (e.g. Kagombe Central Forest Reserve on the<br />

northern bank <strong>of</strong> River Muzizi) occurred.<br />

Institutions and their roles during implementation <strong>of</strong> this RAP are provided in Table 4.1 below.<br />

Table 4.1: Institutional roles in RAP implementation<br />

Agency Roles Capacity needs<br />

1 Ministry <strong>of</strong> Lands, � Chief Government Valuer (CGV) in the Valuation This ministry has adequate<br />

Housing and Urban<br />

Division in this ministry will be responsible for capacity and institutional<br />

Development<br />

approving the valuation roll.<br />

mandate.<br />

� CGV inspects all affected property before granting<br />

final approval for compensation <strong>of</strong> affected assets.<br />

� Will be important party in grievance redress.<br />

2 Ministry <strong>of</strong> Works & During RAP implementation, MoWT would mainly be MoWT has adequate<br />

Transport<br />

involved in supervision and ensuring compliance with capacity and institutional<br />

policies <strong>of</strong> the transport sub-sector.<br />

mandate.<br />

3 UNRA<br />

� As project proponent and implementation agency, UNRA has capacity to<br />

UNRA is fully responsible for resource mobilization,<br />

supervising compensation payment and grievance<br />

management.<br />

execute its roles.<br />

� Co-coordinating all agencies involved in<br />

resettlement activities.<br />

4 Project District Local � Local Councils will be important in identification <strong>of</strong> Will need financial support<br />

Governments<br />

property owners,<br />

from UNRA.<br />

(Kyenjojo, Kibaale,<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and<br />

Kiryandongo)<br />

� Resolving resettlement grievances,


Agency Roles Capacity needs<br />

5 District Land Boards<br />

and other relevant<br />

district <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

6 Uganda Land<br />

Commission (ULC)<br />

7 Private Sector Entities<br />

including NGOs<br />

8 National Forestry<br />

Authority, NFA<br />

9 Power distribution<br />

company<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

� District Land Boards in <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong> districts set compensation rates for crop<br />

and semi-permanent structures and their<br />

involvement in RAP implantation might not only<br />

entail explaining basis <strong>of</strong> the rates but also<br />

involvement in resolving grievances associated with<br />

prevailing compensation rates.<br />

� Oversee appropriation <strong>of</strong> district land,<br />

� Facilitate registration and transfer <strong>of</strong> interests in<br />

land,<br />

� Monitor implementation <strong>of</strong> resettlement,<br />

� And be part <strong>of</strong> Grievance Committee<br />

� Oversee appropriation <strong>of</strong> land owned by<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Uganda<br />

� Independent observe and monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />

resettlement activities.<br />

� Grievance resolution.<br />

Custodian <strong>of</strong> compensation for trees damaged in central<br />

Might need financial<br />

support from UNRA.<br />

P a g e | 40<br />

ULC has capacity and<br />

regulatory mandate<br />

Might need financial<br />

support from UNRA.<br />

NFA has capacity and<br />

forest reserves (Kagombe Forest Reserve).<br />

regulatory mandate.<br />

Realign power distribution lines affected by the project It was contracted by<br />

Government to operate<br />

and maintain power<br />

distribution<br />

UNRA will maintain communication channels among these institutions or from them to itself through its (UNRA’s)<br />

Land Acquisition Specialist.<br />

4.4 VALUATION AND COMPENSATION OF ASSETS<br />

Land take, compensation and relocation were the most frequent issues <strong>of</strong> debate encountered during<br />

consultations with PAP. Hence, at the core <strong>of</strong> this RAP is an aim to ensure project development embraces<br />

equitable and appropriate compensation approaches that meet Ugandan law and international requirements.<br />

Valuation and compensation are in accordance with rates set at district level for crops and “non-permanent”<br />

structures. The rates, which are enacted by District Land Boards, are established and updated at District level. It<br />

should be noted however that, unlike for crops and semi-permanent structures, land value is not determined by<br />

districts. Permanent structures and land are valued based on market value.<br />

However, to meet AfDB requirements, in some cases, additional compensation measures were identified in order<br />

to ensure that all households improve, or at least restore, their livelihoods and standards <strong>of</strong> living. Since no<br />

household will be moved by the project, this applies to income restoration where roadside businesses are<br />

temporarily disrupted or lost.<br />

There are some gaps between Uganda and AfDB resettlement requirements (Tables 4.2). For example, while<br />

AfDB requires provision <strong>of</strong> resettlement assistance where needed, according to Uganda’s laws project<br />

proponents are not legally bound to procure alternative land nor provide relocation assistance to affected people<br />

if they provided fair financial compensation based on a legally accepted valuation process. Additionally, <strong>African</strong><br />

Development Bank does not recognize “depreciated value” for replacement <strong>of</strong> assets while Uganda’s Land Act<br />

Cap 227 (excerpted below) allows depreciated replacement cost in rural areas.<br />

The Land Act, 1998:


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 41<br />

1. The District Land Tribunal shall, in assessing compensation referred to in paragraph (b) <strong>of</strong><br />

subsection (1) <strong>of</strong> section 77 take into account the following:<br />

a. In the case <strong>of</strong> a customary owner, the value <strong>of</strong> land shall be the Market Value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unimproved land;<br />

b. The value <strong>of</strong> the buildings, which shall be taken at market value in urban areas and<br />

depreciated replacement cost in rural areas;<br />

c. The value <strong>of</strong> standing crops on the land, excluding annual crops which could be harvested<br />

during the period <strong>of</strong> notice given to the owner, tenant or licensee.<br />

2. In addition to compensation assessed under this section, there shall be paid as a Disturbance<br />

Allowance <strong>of</strong> fifteen per cent or if less than six months’ notice to give vacant possession is given,<br />

thirty per cent <strong>of</strong> any sum assessed under subsection (1) <strong>of</strong> this section.


Table 4.2: Gaps between AfDB Resettlement Policy and Ugandan legislation applicable to each impact<br />

No. Impact AfDB Uganda requirement Gaps and how these will be addressed<br />

1. Project Affected Displaced people who have no recognisable legal rights Compensation should be provided to legal land owners Gap.<br />

People, PAPs<br />

or claim to the land they are occupying in the project area (including mailo land owners and kibanja owners). No<br />

will be entitled to resettlement assistance <strong>of</strong><br />

compensation is provided to land users.<br />

Project will provide compensation to legal and non-legal land<br />

compensation <strong>of</strong> land.( land, housing and infrastructure<br />

will be provided to the adversely affected population)<br />

owners, and to legal users <strong>of</strong> affected property.<br />

2. Loss <strong>of</strong> land and<br />

assets<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

For land owners:<br />

Compensation for land and all assets at full replacement<br />

cost, OR replacement <strong>of</strong> land at equal/ greater value and<br />

compensation for other assets.<br />

AfDB does not recognize “depreciated value” for<br />

replacement <strong>of</strong> assets (which should be replaced at<br />

“market value”).<br />

For tenants (land use holders):<br />

Compensated for assets (crops, improvements) other<br />

than land and other losses (time it takes to restore<br />

livelihood: dead time),<br />

AND<br />

Relocation assistance (including assistance in acquiring<br />

replacement land, financial payment for the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relocation)<br />

Non- legal land users:<br />

Compensated for assets (crops, improvements) other<br />

than land and other losses (time it takes to restore<br />

livelihood: dead time)<br />

AND<br />

Relocation assistance (including assistance in acquiring<br />

replacement land, financial payment for the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relocation)<br />

Provide additional targeted assistance and opportunities<br />

to restore/ improve livelihood.<br />

To ensure that displaced people receive resettlement<br />

assistance, preferably under the project, so that their<br />

standards <strong>of</strong> living, income earning capacity, and<br />

production levels are improved;<br />

Cash compensation based upon market value <strong>of</strong><br />

unimproved land + disturbance allowance (15%) if<br />

household is moved within 6 months (this rises to 30% if<br />

households are moved before 6 months).<br />

Uganda’s Land Act Cap 227 allows depreciated<br />

replacement cost in rural areas.<br />

Entitled to compensation based on the amount <strong>of</strong> right they<br />

hold to the land.<br />

Gap.<br />

No compensation is applicable under Ugandan legislation. Gap.<br />

Not a legal requirement in Uganda but presumed catered<br />

for by the disturbance allowance <strong>of</strong> 15-30% <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><br />

property lost.<br />

No legislative requirement, but presumed catered for by<br />

the disturbance allowance <strong>of</strong> 15-30% <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><br />

property lost.<br />

Market value is based on recent transactions and thus if<br />

alternative property is purchased within a reasonable period <strong>of</strong><br />

the payment <strong>of</strong> compensation, it is likely that market value will<br />

reflect replacement value. However, local inflation in price land<br />

or construction materials can affect what is determined as<br />

replacement cost. If this is not reflected in recent transactions,<br />

market value may not reflect replacement value and hence<br />

inflation will be addressed.<br />

Replacement <strong>of</strong> assets affected by this project will be done<br />

based on market value.<br />

Gap.<br />

Land owners and users will be compensated whatever the legal<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> their tenure/occupancy. If tenants have no legal<br />

land title deed, they will be compensated for crops or any<br />

improvements they have made to the land.<br />

Relocation assistance will be provided.<br />

Non-legal land users will be considered eligible under the RAP.<br />

Gap.<br />

Livelihood restoration assistance to be provided.<br />

Gap.<br />

Transitional assistance to be provided.<br />

P a g e | 42


No. Impact AfDB Uganda requirement Gaps and how these will be addressed<br />

3 Loss <strong>of</strong> crops and Compensation for crops, trees, and other fixed assets at Sharecroppers: Not entitled to compensation for land, Gap.<br />

trees<br />

full replacement cost and should be sufficient to enable entitled to compensation for crops.<br />

affected people to restore their standard <strong>of</strong> living after<br />

For sharecroppers and annual (seasonal) crops, the Project will<br />

resettlement.<br />

Annual (seasonal) crops: No compensation since the 3 provide time to enable these to be harvested by households.<br />

or 6-month notice is supposed to allow people to harvest Once harvested, there will be no further planting. A disturbance<br />

their annual crops.<br />

allowance will be paid to overcome any time delays and any lost<br />

benefit as a result <strong>of</strong> the delays.<br />

4 Loss <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

and other<br />

improvements<br />

(fences, etc)<br />

including communal<br />

structures<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Compensation for structures should cover full<br />

replacement cost exclusive <strong>of</strong> depreciation and inclusive<br />

<strong>of</strong> all fees (such as construction permits and title<br />

charges) and labour costs.<br />

5 Loss <strong>of</strong> business Compensate the affected business owner for the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

re-establishing commercial activities elsewhere, for lost<br />

net income during the period <strong>of</strong> transition and for costs <strong>of</strong><br />

transfer and reinstallation <strong>of</strong> the business.<br />

Resettlement planning should be based on a<br />

development approach which would involve <strong>of</strong>fering the<br />

displaced persons and host communities several<br />

development options consisting <strong>of</strong> activities to<br />

reconstruct the production foundation <strong>of</strong> the resettled and<br />

making them self-sustaining producers and wage<br />

earners.<br />

Perennial crops: Cash compensation based upon rates<br />

per square meter /bush/tree/plant established at District<br />

level plus disturbance allowance (15% or 30%). Rates are<br />

calculated as the one-year net agricultural income.<br />

Disturbance allowance is meant to compensate the re-<br />

establishment period for these crops.<br />

Owners <strong>of</strong> “Permanent” Buildings:<br />

Valuation by valuer + disturbance allowance (15%).<br />

Valuation is based on depreciated market value.<br />

Walls: classed as permanent structures, but value<br />

calculated on investment method.<br />

Owners <strong>of</strong> “Non-permanent” Buildings:<br />

Cash compensation based upon rates per square meter<br />

established at District level plus disturbance allowance<br />

(15%).<br />

Note: Rates are based on depreciated market value.<br />

Tenants <strong>of</strong> structures: repayment <strong>of</strong> unused rent, and 6<br />

months’ notice to vacate structure.<br />

Fences: barbed wire fences valued by government rate,<br />

based on the investment method.<br />

No compensation. The 6-month notice is supposed to<br />

allow people to re-establish their business.<br />

For perennial crops, compensation will be based on estimated<br />

income lost for 3 years, so as to provide replacement value. A<br />

disturbance allowance will be paid as per Uganda law.<br />

Gap.<br />

Project will provide compensation based on replacement value.<br />

This will include the payment <strong>of</strong> market value for assets and a<br />

disturbance allowance.<br />

Gap.<br />

The project will provide transition allowance to cover lost income<br />

during the period before business is up and running.<br />

P a g e | 43


No. Impact AfDB Uganda requirement Gaps and how these will be addressed<br />

6 Loss <strong>of</strong> dwelling Provide adequate replacement housing OR cash Owners <strong>of</strong> “Permanent” Buildings:<br />

Gap.<br />

structures<br />

compensation at full replacement value.<br />

Valuation by valuer + disturbance allowance (15%).<br />

The total cost <strong>of</strong> the project as a result should include the Valuation is based on depreciated market value.<br />

Project will provide compensation based on the replacement<br />

full cost <strong>of</strong> all resettlement activities, factoring in the<br />

value. This will include the payment <strong>of</strong> asset market value, a<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood and earning potential among affected Walls: classed as permanent structures, but value<br />

disturbance allowance, and a top up allowance (based on the<br />

peoples<br />

calculated on investment method.<br />

Owners <strong>of</strong> “Non-permanent” Buildings:<br />

Cash compensation based upon rates per square meter<br />

established at District level plus disturbance allowance<br />

(15%).<br />

current inflation rate) to compensate for the rise in construction<br />

materials.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Note: Rates are based on depreciated market value.<br />

Tenants <strong>of</strong> structures: repayment <strong>of</strong> unused rent, and 6<br />

months’ notice to vacate structure.<br />

Provide relocation assistance (cash, food, etc). If provided, determined by private negotiation. To be paid<br />

for by disturbance allowance <strong>of</strong> 15-30%.<br />

Provide security <strong>of</strong> tenure at the new site. No legislative requirement. Gap.<br />

Provide improved living conditions at the new<br />

resettlement site.<br />

Gap. No dwelling will be demolished by the project before any<br />

relocation assistance is paid<br />

Secure tenure will be replaced if lost.<br />

No legislative requirement. The project will provide replacement value to ensure pre-project<br />

conditions to the extent possible.<br />

P a g e | 44


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 45<br />

In a number <strong>of</strong> situations, as shown in Table above, AfDB requirements are more favourable to affected persons<br />

than Ugandan law. UNRA is committed to undertaking appropriate compensation approaches to meet Ugandan<br />

law and AfDB requirements such as:<br />

� Compensating for loss <strong>of</strong> income after affected persons are displaced.<br />

� Compensation for tenants who might not have legal land rights, but have undertaken development or<br />

farming activities on affected land.<br />

� Wherever feasible and acceptable to the affected persons, provide land-for-land compensation.<br />

� Provide property owners with cash compensation at full replacement cost.<br />

� Wherever appropriate, provide skills assistance to affected farmers in areas such as improved crop and<br />

animal husbandry and records keeping.


5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE<br />

P a g e | 46<br />

The socio-economic study was confined to the road environment. The aims were to suggest ways and means to<br />

complete the economic rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> PAPs along the roads so that they would recover a living standard at<br />

least equal to or better than the one they enjoyed previously and in any case raise their living standards above<br />

the poverty line.<br />

5.2 PROJECT AFFECTED DISTRICTS<br />

The existing road is found in five districts <strong>of</strong> Kyenjojo, Kibaale, <strong>Hoima</strong>, <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandogo, in western<br />

Uganda. The population comprised <strong>of</strong> Banyoro, Batooro, Banyankole and migrant tribes such as Bakiga,<br />

Baganda, Bafumbira and Alur plus other migrants are from surrounding countries <strong>of</strong> Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Congo. People living in these areas are the same since this region follows under Bunyoro Kitara Kingdom, and<br />

Kiryandongo district was original part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Masindi</strong> district before it was it was given district status. All these districts<br />

are renowned for subsistence agriculture, mainly food crops and a few plantations.<br />

5.3 SOCIAL ORGANIZATION<br />

The project area districts belong to the western region <strong>of</strong> Uganda which is among the better-<strong>of</strong>f regions in<br />

Uganda as the economy in the region is not affected by acute poverty. The five districts have attained<br />

remarkable improvements in poverty reduction and human development indicators compared to the northern and<br />

eastern regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

Despite some regional and localized differences, poverty in the districts is generally associated with low incomes<br />

at household level, food insecurity, high levels <strong>of</strong> illiteracy and low levels <strong>of</strong> employment. The major causes <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty being inadequate skills, land shortage, poor farming methods, gender inequalities, low productivity,<br />

morbidity due to Malaria, HIV/AIDS and climate change. The nuclear family and to some extent, the clan<br />

constitutes significant traditional social support system for their members especially in times <strong>of</strong> difficulties.<br />

Beyond the family and the clan, there is currently a socio-political system <strong>of</strong> organization the Local Council (LC)<br />

system that was introduced in 1986. It starts from the village level up to the District level. The LCs play important<br />

roles in community matters for the development <strong>of</strong> community infrastructure such as communal access roads,<br />

water sources and in provision <strong>of</strong> other basis needs <strong>of</strong> community wellbeing e.g. the living environment, housing,<br />

sanitation, access to public services and in settlement <strong>of</strong> disputes.<br />

5.4 SOURCES OF LIVELIHOOD IN PROJECT AREAS<br />

Subsistence farming is the principal source <strong>of</strong> livelihood in all the project districts. In all the five districts most<br />

affected households are dependent on earned income from subsistence agriculture. Subsistence agriculture in<br />

the project affected area comprised <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> bananas, Millet, Rice, cassava, beans, sweet potatoes,<br />

ground nuts, and sugarcane. In addition to the agricultural activities there are other income generating economic<br />

activities as indicated by Table 5.1.<br />

Table 5.1: Occupation types amongst project affected household heads<br />

Occupation %<br />

Farmer 72.8<br />

Trader 12.8<br />

Hotel owner/restaurant owner 0.1<br />

Mechanic 0.5<br />

Carpenter 1.0<br />

Teacher 4.6


Butcher 0.4<br />

Builder 0.8<br />

Administrator 2.5<br />

Nurse 0.5<br />

Not employed 0.9<br />

Other 3.0<br />

5.4.1 Monetary income from subsistence agriculture<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 47<br />

Subsistence agriculture was noted to be a significant source <strong>of</strong> livelihood for the project- affected households in<br />

the villages. Consultation with affected persons revealed that subsistence farmers selling their surplus produce<br />

earn as much as UgShs 5,000 per day or as little as UgShs 1000 per day depending on the season and type <strong>of</strong><br />

crops sold. In busy towns and trading centers like <strong>Hoima</strong> Town Council, <strong>Masindi</strong> Town Council and <strong>Kigumba</strong><br />

Trading Centers, PAPs earned higher.<br />

Table 5.2: Agriculture income levels among the PAP.<br />

Gender<br />

50 -500<br />

Range <strong>of</strong> revenue from agriculture (,000 UgShs)<br />

510 - 960 970 - 1,420 1,430 - 1,880 Total %<br />

Male (%) 50 16.7 16.7 - 83.3<br />

Female (%) - - - 16.7 16.7<br />

Total (%) 50 16.7 16.7 17.7 100<br />

5.4.2 Spending Patterns<br />

From interviews, potentially affected households spend their incomes on food, housing (rent), medical bills,<br />

clothing, dependants and transport as shown in Table 5.3.<br />

Table 5.3: Spending patterns among affected households<br />

Cost item Rank <strong>of</strong> expenditure*<br />

Clothing 4<br />

Transport 1<br />

House/shop rent 6<br />

School fees 3<br />

Food and domestic water 5<br />

Medical expenses 2<br />

Dependants 7<br />

Other expenses 8<br />

* Rank 1= Item most spent on; 10= item least spent on<br />

Source: Primary data<br />

The relatively high expenditure on transport is explained by the poor state <strong>of</strong> existing road, which is unattractive<br />

for public transport operators, so the few taxis or trucks plying this route charge exorbitant fares. In absence <strong>of</strong><br />

affordable public transport, proximity to trading centers, which are the sources <strong>of</strong> employment, goods and<br />

services, are essential for the project-affected people. If affected persons relocate further from towns, they might<br />

suffer higher cost <strong>of</strong> living resulting from higher transport costs.<br />

Medical expenses were noted high due to a lack <strong>of</strong> adequate healthcare facilities (clinics and drug stores) in the<br />

affected area. Most <strong>of</strong> the commonly used hospitals in the affected areas included <strong>Hoima</strong> Referral Hospital,<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong> Hospital, Kiryandongo Hospital and Kagadi Hospital plus a number <strong>of</strong> health centres along the proposed<br />

road. However, due to inadequate services at the health centres, many people were reported to move long<br />

distances to referral hospitals in search for better services. The list <strong>of</strong> health centre in the affected areas is given<br />

below.


KYENJOJO -HOIMA<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

GOVERNMENT NGO PRIVATE TOTAL<br />

HOSPITALS 1 0 2 3<br />

HC IV 0 0 0 0<br />

HC 111 4 0 0 4<br />

HC 11 3 0 0 3<br />

TOTAL 8 0 2 10<br />

HOIMA-MASINDI<br />

GOVERNMENT NGO PRIVATE TOTAL<br />

HOSPITALS 0 0 0 0<br />

HC IV 2 0 0 2<br />

HC 111 5 0 0 5<br />

HC 11 4 0 0 4<br />

TOTAL 9 0 0 9<br />

MASINDI-KIGUMBA<br />

GOVERNMENT NGO PRIVATE TOTAL<br />

HOSPITALS 0 0 0 0<br />

HC IV 0 0 0 0<br />

HC 111 2 0 0 2<br />

HC 11 2 0 0 2<br />

TOTAL 4 0 0 4<br />

5.5 LANDUSE AND SETTLEMENT IN PROJECT AREA<br />

P a g e | 48<br />

Sections below present results <strong>of</strong> a socio-economic survey for a 40% sample <strong>of</strong> PAPs surveyed. The aim was to<br />

understand socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the project-affected people. The road passes through subsistence<br />

agricultural land and residential areas that comprise houses some <strong>of</strong> which were built with burnt brick with iron<br />

sheet ro<strong>of</strong>s; some <strong>of</strong> mud/wattle with iron-sheet ro<strong>of</strong>s while others were <strong>of</strong> mud/wattle with grass thatched ro<strong>of</strong>s.<br />

The road project with a reserve <strong>of</strong> 30 m would affect 9005 property owners with effects ranging from taking land<br />

strips along the road mainly in <strong>Hoima</strong> and <strong>Masindi</strong> districts, demolition <strong>of</strong> temporary and permanent residential<br />

and commercial buildings which is mainly in Kiryandongo District. The number <strong>of</strong> PAPs whose residential or<br />

agricultural land would be affected are presented in Figure 5.1 while number <strong>of</strong> permanent (P) and semipermanent<br />

(SP) structures to be affected in each district along the section AfDB will fund are listed below:<br />

� Kibaale District: P = 55; SP = 47<br />

� <strong>Hoima</strong> District : P = 53; SP = 26<br />

� <strong>Masindi</strong> District: P = 26; SP = 08<br />

� Kiryandongo District: P = 05; SP = 01<br />

5.5.1 Land Ownership and Tenure<br />

More men than women owned land in the project-affected area (Figure 5.2). When asked under which tenure<br />

they owned land, most affected people indicated customary tenure. In most <strong>of</strong> the affected areas men owned<br />

more land than women.


Not affected<br />

Affected<br />

0 20 40 60<br />

Affected<br />

Percentage<br />

Not affected<br />

Residential land 60 40<br />

Agricutural land 45,5 54,5<br />

Figure 5.1 PAPs who’s residential or agricultural land would be affected<br />

Total<br />

licensee<br />

Tenant<br />

Land owner<br />

Figure 5.2 Ownership <strong>of</strong> land ownership according to sex <strong>of</strong> PAPS<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Land owner Tenant<br />

%<br />

licensee Total<br />

Male( %) 78,5 0,0 0,2 79<br />

female(%) 21,2 0,1 0 21,3<br />

P a g e | 49


5.5.2 Demographic Information<br />

a)Average age <strong>of</strong> household heads<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 50<br />

Social survey data indicate that average affected household comprised <strong>of</strong> 6 people (higher than the national<br />

mean household size <strong>of</strong> 5.08 1 ). The most affected age group was between 36 and 40 years as indicated in<br />

Figure 5.3.<br />

Percentage<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

0<br />

20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 above<br />

55<br />

Proportion by age 7 16 13 18 12 11 6 17<br />

Figure 5.3 Age distribution in the affected Households<br />

b) Average number <strong>of</strong> children in affected households<br />

Theresults from the survey indicated that affected households comprised <strong>of</strong> an average <strong>of</strong> 6 people (higher than<br />

the national mean household size <strong>of</strong> 5.08 2 ). Occupants below and above 18 years in the affected households are<br />

presented in Table 5.4.<br />

Table 5.4: Number and age <strong>of</strong> residents in affected households<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Residents 2-5 6-10 1 None Total<br />

Above18 years 200 20 160 1 381<br />

Percentage 52.4 5.24 41.9 0.26 100<br />

Below 18 years 340 40 20 31 431<br />

Percentage 78.8 9.2 4.6 7.19 100<br />

Dependants <strong>of</strong> all age 220 30 10 260<br />

Percentage 84.6 11.53 3.86 0 100<br />

c) Gender and marital status <strong>of</strong> household heads<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the affected households surveyed were headed by males compared to female-headed households(Table<br />

5.5). Female household heads were mostly widows in comparison to unmarried or single women. A few elderly<br />

female household heads were encountered and these were <strong>of</strong>ten grandparents looking after grandchildren<br />

orphaned by HIV/AIDS. These constitute part <strong>of</strong> a “vulnerable category”.<br />

Table 5.5: Gender Marital status<br />

1 Uganda Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, UBOS<br />

2 Uganda Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, UBOS<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2


Gender<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Gender and marital status <strong>of</strong> HHDs (%)<br />

Single Married Divorced Widowed<br />

P a g e | 51<br />

Male 2.5 76 1.2 1.2 80.9<br />

Female 0.7 11.1 2.9 4.5 19.1<br />

Total 3.2 87.1 4 5.7 100<br />

d)Religion<br />

Most dominant religion <strong>of</strong> people in affected households surveyed was Roman Catholic. This was followed by<br />

Protestants and Muslims, respectively (Table 5.6). In <strong>Hoima</strong> district, the most dominant religion is Catholic<br />

followed by the Protestants, Moslems and other religions respectively. This applies for both <strong>Masindi</strong> and<br />

Kiryandongo districts.<br />

Table 5.6: Religion <strong>of</strong> people in affected households surveyed<br />

Religion Percentage<br />

Catholic 49.5<br />

protestant 26.6<br />

Muslim 4.5<br />

Others 19.5<br />

5.6 WELFARE OF HOUSEHOLDS<br />

Status <strong>of</strong> the welfare <strong>of</strong> the households in the project districts is presented according to selected parameters as<br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> assets, energy sources for cooking and lighting, access to safe drinking water and availability <strong>of</strong><br />

basic minimum consumer needs.<br />

5.6.1 Ownership <strong>of</strong> Assets<br />

Ownership <strong>of</strong> minimum household assets in all districts is presented in Table 5.7. About half <strong>of</strong> the affected<br />

households owned bicycles and almost all <strong>of</strong> the households had radios. Ownership <strong>of</strong> television or cellular<br />

phones was low combined with very poor network coverage probably due to the hilly terrain.<br />

Table 5.7: Proportion <strong>of</strong> households (%) with selected assets, 2002<br />

Assets YES(%) NO(%)<br />

Two sets <strong>of</strong> clothes 97.5 2.5<br />

Radios 93 7<br />

Phones (mobile and fixed) 71 29<br />

Bicycles 53.9 46.1<br />

5.6.2 Energy Sources<br />

Firewood is the principal source <strong>of</strong> energy for cooking in the project districts (Table 5.8). There is also usage <strong>of</strong><br />

charcoal but it is limited to a small proportion <strong>of</strong> households. Proportions <strong>of</strong> households using <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong><br />

fuels like paraffin and electricity are almost negligible. Prevalently, households in project districts use paraffin<br />

candles for indoor night lighting and only about 9.5% <strong>of</strong> households had access to grid electricity for lighting<br />

(Table 5.9).<br />

Table 5.8: Sources <strong>of</strong> energy at affected households<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> fuel Percentage<br />

Firewood 97.3<br />

Charcoal 2.4<br />

Kerosene 0.3<br />

Total


Table 5.9: Types <strong>of</strong> lighting fuel in households<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Fuel %<br />

Electricity 9.5<br />

Lantern 0.9<br />

Tadooba 88.1<br />

Firewood(reeds) 1.4<br />

Solar 0.1<br />

5.6.3 Source <strong>of</strong> Drinking Water<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 52<br />

It was observed that around 70% <strong>of</strong> the households in the project districts use borehole, protected wells and<br />

rivers (Table 5.10).Piped water was mainly in trading centres while the majority (85%) <strong>of</strong> residences are more<br />

than 100 m from the nearest water source (Figure 5.4).<br />

Table 5.10: Type <strong>of</strong> drinking water sources in households<br />

Water source Proportion (%)<br />

Communal boreholes/ hand dug wells 21.6<br />

Rivers 28.7<br />

Standpipes 0.3<br />

Protected springs 49.4<br />

Figure 5.4 Distance to water source<br />

5.7 VULNERABLE GROUPS<br />

Vulnerability is the degree to which a population, individual or organization is unable to anticipate, cope with, resist<br />

and recover from the impacts <strong>of</strong> misfortunes (WHO, 2002). Children, elderly people, malnourished people, and<br />

people who are ill or immune compromised, are particularly vulnerable. Poverty – and its common consequences<br />

such as malnutrition, homelessness, poor housing and destitution – is a major contributor to vulnerability.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> households with vulnerable PAPs, headed by the terminally ill, widows, elderly, orphans, female<br />

headed households or disabled people (Annex 4) were identified with a number <strong>of</strong> challenges including a heavy


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 53<br />

workload on women, male dominance over women and low participation in household or community decisions,<br />

high levels <strong>of</strong> girl child school dropout, early marriages for girls and general poverty. Such vulnerable homes<br />

might need special assistance during compensation and resettlement process. Number <strong>of</strong> vulnerable people in<br />

each district through which the road passes are shown below.<br />

� <strong>Hoima</strong> District: 45<br />

� <strong>Masindi</strong> District: 41<br />

� Kiryandogo District: 19<br />

� Kyenjojo District: 20<br />

5.8 HEALTH<br />

Malaria fever was the most prevalent disease in affected households followed by respiratory ailments (coughs<br />

and flu). Although most PAPs were reluctant to give their HIV/AIDS status, a few responses from several people<br />

who were frank about their sero-status confirmed high prevalence <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS along the road. Other common<br />

ailments included waterborne diseases like cholera and dysentery attributed to lack <strong>of</strong> safe drinking water.<br />

Common diseases along the project road and expenses on treatment are presented in Tables 5.11 and 5.12<br />

respectively.<br />

Table 5.11: Most common diseases among the households<br />

Diseases Valid Percentage<br />

Malaria 97.48<br />

Flu 0.70<br />

Cough 1.68<br />

HIV AIDS 0.14<br />

Table 5.12: Expense on the most common diseases<br />

Disease<br />

Annual expenditure on healthcare (,000 UgShs) Total<br />

5-10 10-15 16-20 21-25 Over 25 Free<br />

Malaria % 3.7 3.3 8.4 0.4 5.5 76.4 97.7<br />

Cough/flu % - - - - 0.1 0.6 0.7<br />

HIV/AIDS % - - - - - 0.1 0.1<br />

Most people (97% <strong>of</strong> people interviewed) in the project areas were aware <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and how it is spread. Their<br />

main sources <strong>of</strong> information are health centres, local radio stations and NGOs involved in HIV/AIDS prevention<br />

programs. Nonetheless, risky sexual behaviour still prevails. Of the people interviewed, 17% <strong>of</strong> men and 4% <strong>of</strong><br />

women reported multiple sexual partners. Female-headed households were found to be more vulnerable to<br />

HIV/AIDS than male-headed counterparts because <strong>of</strong> poverty which lead them to sexual exploitation for material<br />

favours from men.<br />

Health centres at sub-county levels and major hospitals (<strong>Hoima</strong> Referral Hospital, <strong>Masindi</strong> Hospital and<br />

Kiryandongo Hospital) play a central role in the fight against HIV/AIDS and provide treatment, nutrition, free<br />

testing and counselling including other outreach programmes like community sensitization through drama, music<br />

and sports. However, it was reported that most health centres lack drugs, have inadequate staff, and lack space<br />

to accommodate a large numbers <strong>of</strong> patients. The proportions <strong>of</strong> disabilities and chronic disease cases in the<br />

project affected area are presented in Figure 5.5 while problems, by proportion, encountered at health centres<br />

and distances travelled are presented in Figures 5.6 and 5.7.


Figure 5.5 Disabilities and chronic diseases in Project Affected Area<br />

Figure 5.6 Problems encountered at health centers<br />

Figure 5.7 Distance to health centres<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 54


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 55<br />

There are also community based groups and NGOs active in community sensitization and empowering people<br />

living with HIV/AIDS by providing them with free seeds, bee-keeping skills, poultry and improved farming<br />

methods and finding markets for their produce.<br />

5.9 SANITATION<br />

Access to good sanitation is very crucial to the health <strong>of</strong> the population. Poor sanitation poses one <strong>of</strong> the greatest<br />

threats to health. Within the project area it was observed that pit latrines are used for human waste disposal.<br />

However some very poor households in <strong>Masindi</strong>, Kiryandongo and <strong>Kigumba</strong> district do not have latrines and<br />

people relieve themselves in the bush. Therefore keeping the area clean is a challenge because <strong>of</strong> the poor<br />

hygiene practices in the communities.<br />

5.10 WASTE DISPOSAL INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

There are no designated waste management sites in the project affected area and households discard rubbish in<br />

the nearest bush or a compost pit in the backyard. Primary data shows that a majority <strong>of</strong> respondents (51.4%)<br />

dispose their waste in their gardens while (36%) dispose it in a compost pit at the back yard. Only 12.6% <strong>of</strong><br />

respondents burn their waste.<br />

5.11 SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECT AFFECTED COMMUNITIES<br />

5.11.1 Ethnicity<br />

The most dominant ethnic groups <strong>of</strong> PAPs in Kyenjojo, Kibaale and <strong>Hoima</strong> districts were Banyoro and Batooro<br />

(Table 5.13). Banyoro were the dominant tribe in <strong>Masindi</strong> and Kiryandongo but due to Lord’s Resistance Army<br />

(LRA) insurgency in the North, many migrant tribes (for example, Alurs, Baruuli and Acholi) settled in the area. All<br />

these tribes have equal access to resources and economic opportunities without discrimination.<br />

Table 5.13: Ethnicity <strong>of</strong> PAPS surveyed<br />

Tribe Valid Percentage<br />

Munyoro 86<br />

Mukiga 10<br />

Mutoro 1<br />

Mufumbira 1<br />

Muganda 1<br />

Other 2<br />

5.11.2 Education<br />

From the survey, findings indicated that 19% <strong>of</strong> the population aged 10 and above have never attended school,<br />

while 20% completed primary school and only 8% managed to complete secondary school with 5% have<br />

attained high tertiary education (Table 5.14). Table 5.15 presents the level <strong>of</strong> education by gender, from which it<br />

is clear that the literacy level for the females within the project area is much lower than for the males.<br />

Table 5.14: Educational level <strong>of</strong> the PAP<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> education Valid Percentage<br />

Illiterate 19<br />

Can read and write 49<br />

Completed primary education 20<br />

Completed secondary education 8<br />

Completed university education 5


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 56<br />

Table 5.15: Gender and level <strong>of</strong> education<br />

Gender and Literacy levels <strong>of</strong> HHDs (%) Total<br />

Gender<br />

illiterate<br />

Can read<br />

and write<br />

Completed Primary<br />

education<br />

Completed<br />

secondary<br />

education<br />

Completed<br />

University<br />

Male 14.2 42 15.4 6.1 3.3 81.1<br />

Female 4.6 9.4 3.8 1 0.1 18.9<br />

Total 18.8 51.4 19.3 7 3.5 100<br />

5.11.3 Cultural Characteristics and Physical Cultural Resources<br />

The cultural characteristics <strong>of</strong> the project area are as diverse as the tribes living in the area. Each migrant tribe<br />

comes with its own culture; however there are some cultures which are universal to all tribes. These include<br />

families where households are headed by men, and marriage which demands that men pay dowry for their<br />

brides. Widow inheritance was common in the past but the act is slowly dying out mainly because HIV/AIDS.<br />

Polygamy is also another practice common in the project area.<br />

A physical cultural resources assessment along the road (Annex 6) documented archaeological artefacts,<br />

features pottery scatters and iron slags. The analyzed pottery finds follow in the later Iron Age periods (Roulette<br />

decorations) which are not very rare in archaeological finds hence less significance but are good indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

possibility to encounter older finds, hence the need for monitoring <strong>of</strong> road construction activities.<br />

No paleontological remains were observed during surface inspection in the project area although the geological<br />

formation suggests possible sites far beyond the project area.<br />

Historical building and monuments significant as per the historical Monuments Act were found in this area. The<br />

region is an ancient place with evidence <strong>of</strong> ancient settlement starting from colonial building together with Indian<br />

settlement terraces. Old buildings <strong>of</strong> the colonial nature (1920-1930s) were observed especially at administration<br />

institutions. Fortunately they sites (old buildings) will not be directly affected since they are about 70m from the<br />

road center. Monuments were also recorded and these might not be affected except Businge monument which<br />

located in a roundabout <strong>of</strong> Kyenjojo-<strong>Hoima</strong> -<strong>Masindi</strong> <strong>Road</strong>. This can be covered during construction but also<br />

maintained after construction phase.<br />

It should be noted that archaeological and paleontological deposits are usually underground level. Should any <strong>of</strong><br />

this kind be disinterred during road construction activities, such activities should be stopped, and Museums and<br />

Monuments Department engaged to investigate, evaluate and protect these chance finds.<br />

5.11.4 Settlement Pattern and Housing <strong>of</strong> the PAPs<br />

Settlements along the project area are generally linear especially in trading centres. There is a mix <strong>of</strong> residential,<br />

commercial structures along the road that will be affected by the project. For example in Kyatiri, Pakanyi and<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong> Trading Centers, buildings to be affected include shops and market stalls along the road (maize, mills<br />

saw mills, welding). However, most residential structures are located away from the road and this is why no<br />

fewer dwellings will be affected during road upgrade.


6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

6 RESOURCES TO BE AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT<br />

P a g e | 57<br />

This section presents categories and inventory <strong>of</strong> property to be affected based on records in the valuation roll.<br />

Wherever applicable, project components and activities leading to resettlement have been presented with the<br />

specific sections <strong>of</strong> road where resettlement shall occur. A summary <strong>of</strong> project impacts is presented in Table 6.1.<br />

6.2 ASSETS AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT<br />

Land to be affected by upgrading and operation <strong>of</strong> the road is the road reserve measuring 15 m on either side <strong>of</strong><br />

the road centerline. In some areas, the existing road is wide enough to take into consideration the proposed<br />

adjustments without significant effect. Owners <strong>of</strong> affected land with perennial crops, timber trees and fruit trees<br />

(mango, jack fruit, guava, oranges, oil palm, etc) which are important sources <strong>of</strong> income for households, shade,<br />

timber, building/fencing poles, herbal medicines, etc would be compensated basing on District property rates.<br />

Considering that they can be harvested within the six-month “notice to quit” period, annual crops would not be<br />

compensated.<br />

Table 6.1a: Number <strong>of</strong> property owners to be affected and land take along entire road<br />

<strong>Road</strong> section Number <strong>of</strong> property owners Land area (Hectares)<br />

Kyenjojo-<strong>Hoima</strong> 6270 334.33<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong>-<strong>Masindi</strong> 1549 104.89<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong>-<strong>Kigumba</strong> 1186 77.67<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> property owners 9005 516.89<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> people in buildings to be demolished by the project along the section AfDB will fun are shown in table<br />

below.<br />

Table 6.1b: Number <strong>of</strong> property owners to be affected along road sections to be funded by AfDB<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section Total No. <strong>of</strong> people losing<br />

various types <strong>of</strong> property<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Households to be<br />

physically relocated<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> persons in<br />

households to be<br />

physically relocated<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) 2406 59 354<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima (69 km) 1866 32 144<br />

Total 4272 91 498<br />

Along Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) section, 59 buildings comprising 354 people will be demolished while the<br />

respective numbers along <strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima (69 km) section are 34 households comprising 144 people. All<br />

together however, as documented by the property count and valuation exercise, 4272 people were recorded to<br />

be losing various types <strong>of</strong> assets along both these sections. These assets range from crops, fences, kiosks to<br />

permanent buildings.<br />

From consultations with PAPs, it was established that it would be possible for some people to rebuild affected<br />

structures a small distance behind the damaged buildings. This will reduce the adverse socio-economic effects <strong>of</strong><br />

resettlement. Disruption to businesses and temporary loss <strong>of</strong> income during relocation can be minimized if<br />

owners are allowed to rebuild replacement structures before completely vacating the old ones where possible<br />

during the regulatory 3-month “notice to quit” period.<br />

Table below shows types and number <strong>of</strong> assets affected along the road sections to be funded by AfDB.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 58<br />

Table 6.1c: Assets to be affected along road sections to be funded by AfDB<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section<br />

Affected Property<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> (66 km) <strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima (69 km)<br />

1 Permanent Houses 13 13<br />

2 Shops 56 24<br />

3 Kitchens 0 0<br />

4 Schools 0 0<br />

5 Medical Clinics 0 0<br />

6 Churches 0 0<br />

7 Mosques 0 0<br />

8 Toilets 0 0<br />

9 Pit Latrines 2 1<br />

10 Shades 2 1<br />

11 Maize Stores 0 0<br />

12 Kiosks 1 3<br />

13 Barbed wire Fences 64 20<br />

14 Local Live Hedges 37 25<br />

15 Earth Graves 0 10<br />

16 Paved/Concrete Yards 1 0<br />

17 Gates 2 0<br />

18 Septic Tanks 2 0<br />

19 Boundary/Retaining Walls 2 1<br />

20 Water Tanks 1 0<br />

21 Kraals 0 0<br />

22 Well 0 0<br />

23 Fuel Pumps 6 0<br />

24 Fuel Tanks 2 0<br />

25 Petrol Station Canopies 2 0<br />

TOTAL 193 98<br />

As indicated in table 6.1c above, several churches, schools and health centres will lose strips <strong>of</strong> land to the road<br />

reserve. Many community resources would lose land to the project and road redevelopment could also cause<br />

temporary disruption to their access, such as when overburden is dumped into junctions leading to these<br />

facilities such as to render them impossible to access by women, children elderly or disabled people. Location <strong>of</strong><br />

community facilities (schools, health centres, places <strong>of</strong> worship and water sources) is shown in Annex 1.<br />

In some places, water mains and 33 kV power lines (Plate 1) adjoining the existing carriageway will need<br />

relocation during road upgrade, causing temporary disruption in supply. Facilities along the project road are<br />

presented in Figure 6.1.<br />

Plate 1: Some <strong>of</strong> the power<br />

lines that will need<br />

relocating during road<br />

construction


6.4 LIVELIHOODS<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 59<br />

Economically-displaced people are people whose livelihoods are affected by the proposed road project and<br />

associated land acquisition. This only applies to those whose business are required to be relocated, but also to<br />

those employed in a business, or those who lose livelihood (income or subsistence) due to loss <strong>of</strong> crops.<br />

Because buildings in both rural and urban sections <strong>of</strong> the road are built away from the carriageway, no significant<br />

economic displacement is envisaged. Several commercial structures housing income-generating businesses will<br />

be affected. Along sections to be funded by AfDB, 17 strips <strong>of</strong> gardens <strong>of</strong> estimated area <strong>of</strong> 16 acres will be lost<br />

to the project but these will not result into food insecurity to affected owners.<br />

6.5 INJURIOUS DAMAGE TO PROPERTY<br />

Injurious damage to property (whether structures or crops) during implementation <strong>of</strong> the road project will be<br />

mitigated or compensated as follows:<br />

� Monetary compensation to owners from contractor’s insurance.<br />

� Contractor to repair or replace, to owner satisfaction, any injuriously damaged property.<br />

6.6 PROJECT COMPONENTS RELATED TO RESETTLEMENT<br />

During preparation <strong>of</strong> this RAP consideration was given to project components/ activities that would give rise to<br />

resettlement. This mainly included sections <strong>of</strong> the road where resettlement would be undertaken and alternatives<br />

and mechanisms to avoid or minimize resettlement were also considered. Considering that the road will follow<br />

existing alignment, trading centers/ townships were identified as areas that would require larger resettlement cost<br />

than road sections through rural areas. It was noted that some construction in new upcoming trading centers did<br />

not conform to building lines from existing road, therefore to minimize impact on built structures hence<br />

resettlement, the design provided for a 30 m reserve in rural sections and 20 m in urban areas.


Figure 6.1 Location <strong>of</strong> branch-<strong>of</strong>fs to public facilities along the road<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 60


7.1 KEY PRINCIPLES<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

7 COMPENSATION AND RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES<br />

Key principles that the proponent (UNRA) will commit to during resettlement are presented in Box 2.<br />

Box 2: Key principles to heed during compensation<br />

P a g e | 61<br />

� Resettlement and compensation <strong>of</strong> Project-Affected People (PAP) will be carried out in compliance with<br />

relevant Ugandan laws and AfBD standards. All physically or economically displaced people shall be<br />

adequately and equitably compensated. Wherever possible, UNRA shall assist affected people in<br />

restoring their livelihoods by providing transitional assistance, where necessary, if livelihoods are not<br />

restored to pre-project level.<br />

� Resettlement shall be implemented in a gender-sensitive manner. Consent <strong>of</strong> spouses shall be sought,<br />

as provided by the law (e.g. Section 40 <strong>of</strong> the Land Act, 1998). In addition, resettlement-based options<br />

shall be strongly promoted, since cash compensation to male household heads is <strong>of</strong>ten detrimental to<br />

women.<br />

� Cash compensation, although sought after by heads <strong>of</strong> households, cash payment could be detrimental<br />

in the medium-term to other household members, particularly female spouses and children. Wherever<br />

agreeable, the project should provide “land-for-land” compensation rather than cash compensation.<br />

� Compensation shall aim to ensure that people are not worse <strong>of</strong>f after resettlement and attention and<br />

should be given to ‘vulnerable’ categories such as the child-headed and female-headed households.<br />

7.2 ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION<br />

In resettlement terms, eligibility is defined as the criteria for qualification to receive benefits under a resettlement<br />

program.<br />

7.2.1 Eligibility, Census and Cut-Off Date<br />

The cut-<strong>of</strong>f date was considered by the surveying and valuation consultant as the last day <strong>of</strong> the census <strong>of</strong><br />

affected people and properties, i.e. 10 February 2011. No structure or field established in the project-affected<br />

area after that date would be eligible for compensation. The cut-<strong>of</strong>f date after which no settlers or developers are<br />

eligible for compensation was publicized among potentially affected people. This was explained during the<br />

census and valuation exercise to all stakeholders in the area, including:<br />

� Project-affected people, identified and individually surveyed,<br />

� Parish Land Committee (LC2 level),<br />

� District Land Board (LC5 level),<br />

� LC <strong>of</strong>ficials in which consultations were undertaken<br />

The following categories are eligible for compensation:<br />

� People who have been in the surveyed part <strong>of</strong> the proposed road reserve and working areas;<br />

� Landlords owning both cultivated and uncultivated land that is affected by the road;<br />

� People whose structures are to be affected by the development;<br />

� People who rent land for cultivation (sharecroppers) and their crops or trees are to be removed or<br />

damaged due to land acquisition activities.


P a g e | 62<br />

� Any other group <strong>of</strong> persons that has not been mentioned above but is entitled to compensation<br />

according to the laws <strong>of</strong> Uganda and AfDB/Donor policies.<br />

� Public or community facilities such as churches, schools and water sources.<br />

Public facilities along the road are presented in Annex 1 and any <strong>of</strong> these which would be affected by<br />

the road project were valued and included among those eligible for compensation. Compensation would<br />

be given to respective communities through local government structures or owners (in case <strong>of</strong> private<br />

schools) and administrative structures in case <strong>of</strong> places <strong>of</strong> worship.<br />

7.2.2 Speculative Structures<br />

Opportunistic uninhabitable structures established for the sole purpose <strong>of</strong> compensation pose a specific eligibility<br />

problem and will be addressed through the use <strong>of</strong> the following methods to ascertain the validity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

compensation claim:<br />

� Inspection <strong>of</strong> the structure to determine whether it is indeed habited or not;<br />

� Consultation with LC chairpersons’ authorities to ascertain whether the contested structure existed at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date or census and whether it was established in good faith or for an opportunistic<br />

compensation purpose.<br />

7.3 OVERVIEW OF ENTITLEMENTS<br />

7.3.1 Categories <strong>of</strong> Affected People<br />

During compensation, an important legal requirement is that contained in Section 40 <strong>of</strong> the Land Act that makes<br />

it compulsory to seek consent <strong>of</strong> spouses before compensation packages is paid out. As mentioned earlier<br />

(Section 7.1, Box 2), cash compensation entails a number <strong>of</strong> risks for impoverishment <strong>of</strong> female spouses and<br />

children, when for example, a household head decides to marry another wife or buy luxuries instead <strong>of</strong> rebuilding<br />

a new home.<br />

Affected persons irrespective <strong>of</strong> their status (whether they have formal title, legal rights, non-legal right) are<br />

eligible for some kind <strong>of</strong> assistance if they occupied the land before cut-<strong>of</strong>f date.<br />

Vulnerable people are people who by virtue <strong>of</strong> gender, ethnicity, age, physical or mental disability, economic<br />

disadvantage, or social status, may be more adversely affected by resettlement than others and who may be<br />

limited in their ability to claim or take advantage <strong>of</strong> resettlement assistance and related development benefits. In<br />

this case, stakeholders form the PAP identified vulnerable people as the following:<br />

� Widows;<br />

� Orphans;<br />

� Disabled or terminally ill people (particularly people living with HIV/AIDS and other illnesses);<br />

� Second or third wives, particularly those where there is a risk that they will be abandoned by their<br />

husbands after compensation;<br />

� The elderly;<br />

� Households whose heads are female and who live with limited resources.<br />

� Households whose heads are orphans (child-headed households).<br />

It should be noted that vulnerability is not a static condition. For instance PAPs who were normal at the time<br />

valuation/ surveys might be found vulnerable a year later at the time <strong>of</strong> effecting compensation payments. Others<br />

who were found terminally ill with AIDS and therefore vulnerable during field surveys might have passed on but<br />

their heirs healthy and not vulnerable. This situation should therefore be handled on a case-by-case basis during<br />

RAP implementation.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 63<br />

Based on the above, information provided on vulnerable PAPs (Annex 4) should serve to inform RAP<br />

implementation team to identify nature and state <strong>of</strong> prevailing vulnerability and accord special assistance<br />

necessary.<br />

7.3.2 Compensation and Resettlement Measures<br />

Two main resettlement packages, the details <strong>of</strong> which are provided in the section below, have been designed to<br />

ensure adequate compensation for PAPs who lose assets or livelihoods when the project is implemented. These<br />

packages have been developed in consultation with the affected community, including PAPs and local<br />

councillors to give PAPs, depending on their vulnerability categorization, the opportunity to choose options that<br />

best suit their relocation needs and circumstances.<br />

Entitlement measures were developed basing on facts below:<br />

� The majority <strong>of</strong> PAPs will only lose a small section <strong>of</strong> land that abuts the road reserve. In some cases, this<br />

will also result in the loss <strong>of</strong> permanent or temporary structures, or crops. If they have room on their<br />

remaining land holding, PAPs are likely chose to construct new structures or plant crops on their adjacent<br />

land, rather than moving to a new village. As such, current social ties and access to infrastructure or<br />

services such as water sources, schools, shops, transport services and places <strong>of</strong> worship will be maintained.<br />

� The majority <strong>of</strong> PAPs have expressed a strong preference for cash compensation rather than replacement <strong>of</strong><br />

assets. This is despite their concerns regarding the rising price <strong>of</strong> land and construction materials;<br />

� Some PAPs however, particularly vulnerable groups, demonstrated a preference for replacement assets.<br />

a) Option 1: Primary entitlement measures<br />

These measures are designed to be appropriate for the majority <strong>of</strong> PAPs, who are likely to only lose small strips<br />

<strong>of</strong> land adjoining existing road, some permanent or temporary structures. The measures include a mix <strong>of</strong> cash<br />

compensation for lost assets (including land, structures and crops), other assistance measures such as<br />

relocation assistance, and where appropriate, measures to cover any short-term changes in livelihood. It is<br />

presumed that the cash compensation will be used by PAPs to replace lost assets by purchasing new land<br />

where necessary and/or constructing a new structure on remaining portions <strong>of</strong> their current land plots.<br />

Livelihoods will be replaced through the development <strong>of</strong> new structures.<br />

b) Option 2: Other entitlement measures (provided to vulnerable groups or those whose land will become<br />

unviable as a result <strong>of</strong> the Project)<br />

These measures have been developed to assist vulnerable groups, or those whose land will become unviable<br />

after the resettlement. In this scenario, land and structures would be replaced (with the same tenure as preresettlement),<br />

and assistance would be provided to move household or business goods. No cash compensation<br />

would be provided for assets, but a transition and disturbance allowance shall be provided to overcome any<br />

short-term changes in livelihood.<br />

c) Measures common to both scenarios<br />

Taxes and charges associated with the purchase <strong>of</strong> new land will be paid directly by the Project. PAPs choosing<br />

cash compensation will have a choice <strong>of</strong> either receiving a cash payment or into a bank account opened by the<br />

Project (if a PAP does not have one) covering all associated bank fees and charges associated with opening a<br />

new account.<br />

The following provides a description <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the entitlement measures for loss <strong>of</strong> assets, loss <strong>of</strong> livelihoods<br />

and other entitlement measures.


7.4 VALUATION AND COMPENSATION LOSSES<br />

7.4.3 Description <strong>of</strong> Entitlement Measures<br />

7.4.3.1 Compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> land<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 64<br />

Compensation for the loss <strong>of</strong> land will be <strong>of</strong>fered to all PAPs who currently own or use land, irrespective <strong>of</strong><br />

legality their tenure. Strip maps showing location <strong>of</strong> PAPs by road section or location and detail <strong>of</strong> type and<br />

amount and value <strong>of</strong> assets (crops, trees, structures, dwelling houses, storage facilities, ancillary structures like<br />

fences and latrines) are provided in a separate volume “Property Valuation Report” prepared by an independent<br />

consultant. Reference should be made to this document for detail <strong>of</strong> PAPs and assets affected.<br />

Under the Primary Entitlement Measures (Option 1), cash compensation will be provided, based on market value<br />

and disturbance allowance <strong>of</strong> 30%. This is considered adequate for replacement value. During consultation,<br />

households mentioned that they had already begun looking for replacement land and were waiting on the<br />

compensation payment to affect the purchases.<br />

For vulnerable groups or those whose land will become unviable, an option will be provided for replacement land<br />

<strong>of</strong> similar size, quality and tenure (freehold or lease).<br />

7.4.3.2 Compensation for Loss <strong>of</strong> Crops<br />

a) Perennial crops<br />

Cash compensation will be provided for the loss <strong>of</strong> perennial crops, calculated using the approved district rates.<br />

However, since Uganda government rates do not include provision for loss <strong>of</strong> income associated with these<br />

crops, a transitional allowance will also be provided to cover any loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood during the period between loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> crops and availability <strong>of</strong> income from new (replanted) crops.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the perennial crop transition allowance is to cover lost income incurred by households during the<br />

transition period until replacement crops are ready for harvest. Compensation is paid based on assumption that<br />

10% <strong>of</strong> perennial crops are sold annually. Farmers are aware <strong>of</strong> possible future road expansions and do not<br />

grow permanent (perennial) crops in road reserves, or near roads generally. Since perennial crops are grown<br />

away from the road, 10% is suggested as a realistic proportion <strong>of</strong> potentially affected perennial crops. PAPs will<br />

be paid 10% <strong>of</strong> their annual crop income for 3 years to provide a transition allowance while new crops are grown.<br />

Considering the small strips <strong>of</strong> land to be lost along the road, respective compensation values shall be<br />

proportionately derived for each affected land size.<br />

b) Annual (seasonal) crops<br />

The project will provide all compensation under the entitlement matrix three months prior to the commencement<br />

<strong>of</strong> construction. At the time <strong>of</strong> payment, the timing <strong>of</strong> the project will be made clear and instruction provided as to<br />

how crops will be managed during this time. This timeframe provide adequate opportunity for all seasonal (or<br />

“annual”) crops to be harvested, and thus there is no impact to annual crops. As such, no direct compensation<br />

will be paid for these crops.<br />

A transitional allowance will be provided to ensure that any changes in livelihood derived from such crops is<br />

adequately compensated. Compensation will be paid in the amount <strong>of</strong> Ug. Shs 24,000 per household which<br />

loses annual crops. This is calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> the average daily income from agriculture, for a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> one month. The assumptions that underpin this calculation are as follows:


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 65<br />

� The range <strong>of</strong> income earned from agricultural products in the project affected areas is Ug.Shs 1,700 -25,000<br />

daily, thus an average <strong>of</strong> Ug.Shs 12,000 per day. This includes income derived from livestock, which will not<br />

be affected by the Project;<br />

� Most households will only lose a small percentage <strong>of</strong> their land plot, and thus agricultural activities and<br />

income derived from them would mostly remain unaffected in the remaining land;<br />

� Adequate time will be provided for the harvest <strong>of</strong> crops and compensation for lost land and other assets will<br />

be provided in advance, enabling replacement. Impacts therefore, are likely to be minimal.<br />

These measures are the same under Option 1 and 2. Compensation rates for crops are guided by district rates<br />

usually updated regularly.<br />

c) Unintentional damage to crops<br />

If there is unintentional damage to crops during road construction whether owned by PAPs or not, compensation<br />

will be paid for both annual and perennial crops, based on the approved district rates.<br />

7.4.3.3 Compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> structures<br />

a) Owners <strong>of</strong> permanent structures<br />

For current land owners, under the primary entitlement measures (Option 1), cash compensation for permanent<br />

structures will be provided, calculated basing on prevailing market value, and a disturbance allowance <strong>of</strong> 30%.<br />

In addition, a further payment is recommended to cover the increase in cost <strong>of</strong> construction materials from the<br />

time government rates were developed in each <strong>of</strong> the two districts. This will be calculated at the current inflation<br />

rate.<br />

Those who would prefer the non-cash based compensation (Option 2), a new permanent structure (either<br />

business or residential) will be provided. This will be <strong>of</strong> similar size, design and tenure as current structures, and<br />

where possible, will be located in the same village as the current structure. This process will be undertaken in<br />

consultation with the affected household/business.<br />

b) Tenants <strong>of</strong> permanent structures (residential and commercial)<br />

Under the primary entitlement measures (Option 1), if tenants <strong>of</strong> permanent or temporary structures are<br />

identified, they will be provided with cash compensation for any fixed assets that cannot be relocated. It is<br />

however unlikely that these will exist since tenants are not usually allowed to develop permanent assets on<br />

rented premises.<br />

c) Owners and tenants <strong>of</strong> temporary structures<br />

Affected persons may salvage building materials at their own cost from old structures to reuse elsewhere.<br />

Also, for those moving to a new settlement, or non-adjacent land, transport assistance will be provided by UNRA<br />

forthe households or business goods. In addition, for vulnerable groups only, labor will be provided where<br />

necessary to assist with loading and unloading <strong>of</strong> property, as determined on a case by case basis. This<br />

measure is considered unnecessary for non-vulnerable households, as they would prefer this to be done by<br />

household members to avoid theft, and maintain privacy about their household or business property. Districts<br />

have also established compensation rates for temporary structures that are updated regularly.<br />

d) Damage to structures (permanent and temporary)<br />

If there is unintentional damage to the structures during the construction process, compensation will be paid for<br />

all losses by the contractor. This will be calculated based on approved district rates (for semi-permanent


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 66<br />

structures) and market value (for permanent structures) and will be available for all structures whether owned by<br />

PAPs or not.<br />

7.4.3.4 Compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> business (owners and tenants)<br />

Compensation will be paid to business owners and tenants for the potential loss <strong>of</strong> business income. A transition<br />

allowance will be provided in the amount <strong>of</strong> UgShs 240,000, which is calculated on 50% <strong>of</strong> the average daily<br />

income for a period <strong>of</strong> one month. This measure has been based on the following assumptions:<br />

� The range <strong>of</strong> income earned in businesses in the project affected areas is UgShs3,500-60,000 per day, thus<br />

an average <strong>of</strong> UgShs18,500 per day (see baseline section);<br />

� Most PAPs are likely to choose to relocate their business onto the adjoining portion <strong>of</strong> their land, and thus<br />

will remain in their current village (see above for compensation measures for the loss <strong>of</strong> land);<br />

� Much <strong>of</strong> the trade for retail or restaurant/bar businesses is from within the locality (town or trading center),<br />

and thus is likely to remain constant during the construction and operation phases <strong>of</strong> the Project; and<br />

� Households are likely to be able to continue to operate their current business from the old structure while<br />

new premises is constructed (using compensation payment), therefore income will still be generated during<br />

this time.<br />

7.4.3.5 Compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> PAPs who will lose employment as a result <strong>of</strong> the Project, even in the short term, is very low.<br />

Those most likely to be affected are those working in roadside wooden kiosks, shops, bars and restaurants. For<br />

those who do lose employment, a transition allowance <strong>of</strong> UgSh 95,000 will be provided for workers in all affected<br />

business. This is calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> the average wage for a period <strong>of</strong> one month. The assumptions that<br />

underpin this calculation include the following:<br />

� Bar or restaurant workers generally earn between UgShs 35,000 per month (when housed and UgShs<br />

70,000 per month if not housed. Shop workers generally earn slightly more, between UgShs 82,000 per<br />

month (when housed) and UgShs 125,000 per month (if not housed). The average income therefore is<br />

about UgSh 89,500 per month.<br />

� Most workers will continue their employment in the new premises, and thus there will be minimal change to<br />

livelihoods. However, a transition allowance will provide assurance that their livelihoods are not affected.<br />

7.5 PAYMENT MODALITIES<br />

7.5.1 Payment <strong>of</strong> bank charges<br />

For households which do not currently have a bank account, but would prefer compensation not to be made in<br />

cash, the Project will facilitate opening <strong>of</strong> a bank account and will pay all associated costs directly to the Bank.<br />

Account opening charges might also entail costs associated with acquisition <strong>of</strong> identification documents or<br />

recommendation documents from local councils and all these will be refunded by UNRA on a case-by-case<br />

basis. UNRA is aware <strong>of</strong> the possible risk <strong>of</strong> squandering compensation payments made in cash. This however<br />

will not preclude the choice <strong>of</strong> cash payment for PAP who so wishes.<br />

7.5.2 Transport refund when collecting compensation<br />

The project will provide cash compensation in advance for the payment <strong>of</strong> transport to payment stations for the<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> compensation payments. This will be in the amount <strong>of</strong> 20,000 per household, based on prevailing<br />

average transport costs in the project areas.


7.5.3 Payment options<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 67<br />

All PAPs will receive cash compensation in a lump sum before project implementation commences in line with<br />

<strong>African</strong> Development Bank Policy which calls for full compensation prior to property demolition or displacement.<br />

7.5.4 Notification <strong>of</strong> Compensation<br />

Before receiving their compensation, each PAP will have had chance to view their entitlement. The household<br />

entitlement will indicate details <strong>of</strong> their property valuation and compensation sum due, including the following:<br />

� Compensation amount approved by the Chief Government Valuer.<br />

� A description <strong>of</strong> methods used, including specifics <strong>of</strong> the valuation <strong>of</strong> structures, crops and land.<br />

� Additional measures to be paid by the project, such as transitional or transport allowance, and also detail the<br />

other support <strong>of</strong>fered by the Project, such as relocation assistance.<br />

� Information regarding documents required to claim compensation (such as original documentation or<br />

passport photos).<br />

Upon receiving the individual entitlement matrix, the PAP must sign acceptance <strong>of</strong> their entitlement choices. In<br />

addition, the claimant will be asked for identification.<br />

In cases where landowners do not reside in project areas:<br />

� UNRA will check with caretakers on the land to establish contact detail <strong>of</strong> actual owners.<br />

� If this fails, UNRA will place advertisements in national papers or radios to inform these land owners about<br />

their compensation entitlements.<br />

a) Payment Days<br />

Dates on which PAPs receive payment will depend on payment days assigned to the PAPs’ respective villages.<br />

Payment will be disbursed to PAPS two villages per day (“Village Payment Days”).<br />

Heads <strong>of</strong> households should be accompanied by spouses to receive compensation payments. However, if a<br />

spouse is unable to come along then claimant should carry a letter signed by the spouse to this effect. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> polygamous households, UNRA will encourage all their spouses to be present during compensation<br />

payments. Complaints arising from such compensation will be addressed under the grievance process. UNRA<br />

will ensure that communities are made aware <strong>of</strong> this during RAP disclosure.<br />

Also during disclosure, women will be encouraged to accompany their spouses to payment stations if there is a<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> misuse <strong>of</strong> compensation payments by their husbands. Wherever practical for such couples, UNRA<br />

will seek to know the proposed plan for use <strong>of</strong> compensation payments and provide appropriate advice.<br />

If a PAP misses their respective “Village Payment Days” – the PAP should make special arrangements with<br />

respective LC1s to collect their payment. However, every effort will be made by the Project to ensure that<br />

households are available on allocated payment days.<br />

b) Location<br />

Disbursements will be handed out at a local bank (“Disbursement Location”).


c) Who shall be present at payment location<br />

At least three <strong>of</strong> the following representatives will present at the Disbursement Location:<br />

� UNRA representative<br />

� Representatives <strong>of</strong> the local administration<br />

� A representative <strong>of</strong> the district administration<br />

d) Tracking payment:<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 68<br />

To track payments, photographs <strong>of</strong> all PAPs will be taken, which will be entered into the compensation log.<br />

e) Payment by instalment<br />

UNRA will provide full upfront payment before commencing construction <strong>of</strong> the proposed.<br />

f) Exceptional situations<br />

� Deceased Owners: A heir or representative <strong>of</strong> the deceased appointed by the Administrator General<br />

will receive compensation on behalf <strong>of</strong> a deceased person. During RAP disclosure, PAPs will be<br />

informed <strong>of</strong> documentation required for this purpose.<br />

� Joint Owners: Before compensation is done to one <strong>of</strong> joint owners, a signed letter must be presented<br />

showing that the other parties have authorised the said person to receive payment on their behalf.<br />

� Disputed Ownership: In case <strong>of</strong> property disputes, ownership <strong>of</strong> a property has to be verified by a<br />

letter from the local village council (LC1). Ownership <strong>of</strong> a disputed property is resolved by a land<br />

committee (at Sub-country level) together with local council (LC) leadership <strong>of</strong> the village in which the<br />

property is located. Modalities and processes for resolving such disputes are already in place within the<br />

local government administration system. If these free structures fail, a person resorts to the courts <strong>of</strong><br />

law.<br />

7.5.5 Mutation <strong>of</strong> Compensated Land<br />

Upon payment, Mutation Forms will be filled and Letters <strong>of</strong> Surrender issued to title deed holders. Land<br />

compensated by the project will be mutated from title deeds and ownership reverts to UNRA as a road reserve.<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> entitlement matrix is shown in Table 7.1.


Table 7.1: Entitlement matrix<br />

Impact Description Entitled Compensation Measure Unit<br />

For all Project affected households<br />

a) RESETTLEMENT<br />

ASSISTANCE<br />

Banking fees � Payment <strong>of</strong> any bank charges associated<br />

with receipt <strong>of</strong> cash compensation<br />

� Payment <strong>of</strong> fees for opening new bank<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

account (if required)<br />

Transport costs � Transport to the location where<br />

compensation will be provided<br />

All affected PAPs<br />

(per household)<br />

All PAPs (per<br />

household)<br />

Payment <strong>of</strong> all relevant fees and charges<br />

directly to the bank (cash compensation to<br />

individual households is not applicable).<br />

UgSh/ household<br />

Cash compensation UgSh /household<br />

P a g e | 69


Impact Description Entitled Compensation Measure Unit<br />

Specific Entitlements<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> land � No permanent structure on the land<br />

� Permanent structure will not be<br />

demolished<br />

� Remaining land still viable for current use<br />

� No permanent structure on the land or<br />

permanent structure thereon will not be<br />

demolished<br />

� Land used or owned by vulnerable<br />

households, or<br />

� Land owner becomes landless (as defined<br />

by Ugandan law) or land reduction results<br />

in food insecurity<br />

� Land on which permanent structure to be<br />

demolished is located;<br />

� Land used or owned by vulnerable<br />

households.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Lease<br />

Freehold<br />

Government<br />

Lease<br />

Freehold<br />

Government<br />

Lease<br />

Freehold<br />

Government<br />

Cash compensation<br />

Cash compensation 1 .<br />

Note: <strong>African</strong> Development Bank policy strongly<br />

urges land-for-land compensation. This should be<br />

provided where appropriate.<br />

Cash compensation<br />

Note: <strong>African</strong> Development Bank policy strongly<br />

urges land-for-land compensation. This should be<br />

provided where appropriate.<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> structures � Permanent dwelling Owner Cash compensation at replacement value<br />

� Permanent dwelling Tenant Disturbance allowance<br />

� Permanent business structure Owner, nonvulnerable<br />

Cash compensation<br />

� Permanent business structure Owner, vulnerable Cash compensation<br />

� Permanent business structure Tenant Disturbance allowance<br />

� Permanent structure used for both<br />

Owner, non- Cash compensation equivalent to demonstrable lost<br />

dwelling and business<br />

vulnerable<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

� Permanent structure used for both<br />

Owner, vulnerable Cash compensation equivalent to demonstrable lost<br />

dwelling and business<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

� Permanent structure used for both<br />

dwelling and business<br />

Tenant Disturbance allowance<br />

� Temporary structure (e.g. pit latrine, fence<br />

etc)<br />

Owner Cash compensation<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> perennial crops � Crops with growth period more than a Crop owner � Cash compensation<br />

year.<br />

� Transition allowance<br />

� Payment for damage to crops (if any)<br />

P a g e | 70<br />

Various amounts dependant<br />

on crop/plant.


Impact Description Entitled Compensation Measure Unit<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> annual crops � Six months or more notice provided prior<br />

to use <strong>of</strong> the land by the Project.<br />

Owner � No compensation payable.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Farmer free to harvest their crops even<br />

after expropriation if they have not been<br />

damaged by construction.<br />

� Less than 6 months’ notice provided prior<br />

to use <strong>of</strong> the land by the Project<br />

Note: Farmers will be free to harvest their<br />

crops even after expropriation if they have<br />

not been damaged by construction.<br />

Owner � Crops that take more than 3 months to grow to<br />

harvesting stage are not considered seasonal<br />

crops and are eligible for compensation.<br />

Transition allowance<br />

� Payment for damage to crops (if any)<br />

Set amount<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> business � Businesses who move to new settlement Owners<br />

� Transport assistance to move business goods. UgShs/ trip<br />

or to non-adjacent land<br />

Tenants<br />

� Transition allowance<br />

UgShs/ business<br />

� Businesses who move to adjacent land Owners<br />

Tenants<br />

� Transition allowance UgShs/ business<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> employment � Employees in business where structure is Employees � Transitional allowance<br />

UgShs/ individual<br />

to be demolished due to Project activities<br />

� If feasible ensure continuity <strong>of</strong> employment <strong>of</strong><br />

affected persons by contactor providing job on<br />

road project (where any PAP is interested in<br />

such jobs).<br />

P a g e | 71<br />

1. Defined here as the government rates, and disturbance allowance under Ugandan law (15% or 30%). All cash compensation will include a disturbance allowance.<br />

Affected people prevalently preferred cash compensation for assets (land and structures) in spite <strong>of</strong> inherent risks (e.g. squandering resources before rebuilding their livelihoods, theft, inflation, etc). For buildings PAPs<br />

would have liberty to salvage construction materials or any material they desire from affected structures.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

8 CONSULTATION WITH AFFECTED COMMUNITIES<br />

P a g e | 72<br />

Consultations were carried out with project affected people and district <strong>of</strong>ficers during preparation <strong>of</strong> this RAP to<br />

provide opportunity for them to know project objectives, possible social-economic impacts and resettlement<br />

options were available to them. Feedback from consultations was analysed, documented and integrated in<br />

resettlement measures reported in this report. During consultations, it was clearly explained to PAPs that<br />

resettlement did not only mean displacement and relocation in the literal sense but also loss <strong>of</strong> income<br />

(economic displacement). The cut-<strong>of</strong>f date was communicated to stakeholders and its implication on assets<br />

developed after that date explained.<br />

Consultations were conducted from 22 nd September, 2010 to 9 th August, 2012 in each trading center <strong>of</strong> village<br />

along the road in form <strong>of</strong> town-hall meetings open to all PAPs and stakeholders. Villages suitably located near<br />

each other were <strong>of</strong>ten consulted in a joint meeting. Notably, there was no restriction on women to attend<br />

consultation meetings, which in some places were attended almost in equal numbers by both men and women.<br />

In each district, consultants started with Local Government Officials before meeting communities.<br />

Table below gives a summary <strong>of</strong> key stakeholder views detailed in Annex 2.<br />

Table 8.1: Stakeholder views<br />

Issues/ Concerns Stakeholder suggestions or consultant responses<br />

1 PAPs were concerned that receiving and To avoid this, people preferred to receive large compensation<br />

keeping cash payments at home could payments in bank accounts. Most PAPs actually did not have bank<br />

lead to robberies.<br />

accounts and requested UNRA to facilitate opening them at local<br />

banks such as Stanbic, Centenary Bank and Post Bank.<br />

2 Lack <strong>of</strong> legal title deeds for land and<br />

buildings to prove ownership may preclude<br />

such PAPs from receiving compensation.<br />

3 Lack <strong>of</strong> letters <strong>of</strong> administration and family<br />

conflicts about rightful person to receive<br />

compensation may cause delay in<br />

receiving compensation.<br />

4 PAPs developing property wanted to know<br />

if construction should cease or continue<br />

after a given building had been valued for<br />

compensation.<br />

5 When would compensation payments be<br />

made?<br />

6 There is need to protect existing public<br />

infrastructure such as water sources,<br />

water mains and electricity mains.<br />

7 We are concerned that Local Councils levy<br />

a 10% fee on compensation payments<br />

made to each PAP. Should this be the<br />

case, is it legal?<br />

8 Gender violence may increase in<br />

households as a result <strong>of</strong> men controlling<br />

All persons irrespective <strong>of</strong> their ownership status (i.e. with or without<br />

title deeds and users) are eligible for compensation so long as they<br />

existed during property census and valuation period.<br />

Any conflicts between titled land owners and occupants will be<br />

managed through the grievance process developed as part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

RAP.<br />

In such cases, money will be kept until family grievances are resolved.<br />

Any additional investment made on affected buildings will not be<br />

compensated if they were not captured during property census and<br />

valuation exercise.<br />

UNRA will communicate these dates to PAPs.<br />

These facilities shall be protected and be restored if ever damaged<br />

during road construction.<br />

This should not happen and UNRA should ensure this is<br />

communicated during RAP disclosure. Resettlement is not a<br />

commercial “for-pr<strong>of</strong>it” transaction. Affected assets are not sold for a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it and compensation payment simply replaces lost assets,<br />

therefore it is not taxable income.<br />

Involve local leaders in grievance redress <strong>of</strong> household violence<br />

associated with misuse <strong>of</strong> compensation payments.


and squandering compensation payments.<br />

9 What happens if wrong names are given<br />

to valuers by caretakers due to the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> actual property owner.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 73<br />

Those property owners should inform valuers as soon as possible for<br />

records to be corrected.<br />

In summary key issues routinely encountered in communities along the road are outlined below:<br />

� Keeping cash payments at home could induce spates <strong>of</strong> robberies after compensation.<br />

� Lack <strong>of</strong> asset ownership documents (title deeds) may preclude PAPs from compensation.<br />

� There was need to know exact project commencement date and when compensation would be<br />

undertaken.<br />

� UNRA needs to protect existing infrastructure such as water sources, electricity mains and repair them<br />

if damaged by road works<br />

� Gender violence in households can increase if men control /squander compensation payments.<br />

These and other findings were utilized in development <strong>of</strong> resettlement strategies for the project.<br />

Representative photographs <strong>of</strong> typical meetings are provided below.<br />

Plate 8.1: PAPs meeting at Kyakapeya Trading Center


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 74<br />

Plate 8.2: Meeting with Kyenjojo District Local<br />

Government Officials held at district Headquarters<br />

Plate 8.3: PAPs meeting in Kikwatamigo village<br />

Plate 8.4: PAPs meeting in Bulima village


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 75<br />

Plate 8.5: PAPs meeting in Kasindizi Trading<br />

Center<br />

Plate 8.6: PAPs meeting in Kibaire Trading Center<br />

Plate 8.7: PAPs meeting in Kyabagambire Subcounty<br />

headquarters


9 GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT AND REDRESS PROCEDURES<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 76<br />

This section describes avenues for PAPs to lodge a complaint or express a grievance against the project, its staff<br />

or contractors during RAP implementation. It also describes procedures, roles and responsibilities in grievance<br />

management process.<br />

This grievance procedure will not replace existing legal process in Uganda rather it seeks to resolve issues<br />

quickly so as to expedite receipt <strong>of</strong> entitlements and smooth resettlement without resorting to expensive and<br />

time-consuming legal process. If the grievance procedure fails to provide a settlement, complainants can still<br />

seek legal redress in courts <strong>of</strong> law. The grievance system will operate for a total <strong>of</strong> three years.<br />

The project will put in place an extra-judicial mechanism for managing grievances and disputes based on<br />

explanation and mediation. Every aggrieved person shall be able to trigger this mechanism, while still being able<br />

to resort to the formal judicial system. Objectives <strong>of</strong> the grievance process are as follows:<br />

� Provide affected people with avenues for making a complaint or resolving any dispute that may arise during<br />

land and asset acquisition,<br />

� Ensure that appropriate and mutually acceptable corrective actions are identified and implemented to<br />

address complaints,<br />

� Verify that complaints are satisfied with outcomes <strong>of</strong> corrective actions,<br />

� Avoid the need to resort to judicial proceedings.<br />

9.1 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE<br />

A dedicated Grievance Committee will be established to assess grievances during RAP implementation. This<br />

committee must have a quorum <strong>of</strong> at least 3 people and decisions will be reached by simple majority. The<br />

Grievance Committee should be constituted for as long unresolved grievances are pending.<br />

This will include the following members:<br />

� Two representatives <strong>of</strong> PAPs (one woman and man)<br />

� Local Council III (LC3);<br />

� District Land Officer - Surveyor;<br />

� UNRA representative<br />

� A property valuer,<br />

� Grievance Officer (GO): This is sociologist provided by the RAP implementation consultant contracted<br />

by UNRA.<br />

9.2 GRIEVANCE MECHANISM<br />

The Grievance mechanism will receive inputs from three main sources:<br />

� Directly from PAPs residents or other members <strong>of</strong> community and not necessarily PAPs.<br />

� From implementation teams executing the resettlement.<br />

� From Monitoring and Evaluation Officer who will forward concerns identified in project affected areas.<br />

Main actions <strong>of</strong> the grievance process are illustrated in Figure 8.1 and described in sections below.


Step 1: Receipt <strong>of</strong> complaint<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 77<br />

A verbal or in written complaint from a PAP will be received by the Grievance Officer and recorded in a grievance<br />

log (electronically if possible) which will be held at UNRA field <strong>of</strong>fice. There will be need for the grievance team to<br />

hold meetings at sub-county headquarters where grievances are received by a contact person such as the Subcounty<br />

Chief. This would then hand over received complaints to UNRA’s grievance <strong>of</strong>ficer, for entering into the<br />

grievance log. The log would indicate grievances, date lodged, actions taken or reasons the grievance was not<br />

acted on (i.e. the grievance was not related to the resettlement process); information provided to complainant<br />

and date the grievance was closed. Grievances can be lodged at any time, either directly to UNRA <strong>of</strong>fice or<br />

through a grievance committee member. The process for lodging a complaint is outlined below:<br />

� The Grievance Officer will receive a complaint from complainant.<br />

� The Grievance Officer will ask the claimant questions in their local language, write the answers in<br />

English and enter them into the Grievance Form.<br />

� The local leader and complainant both sign the Grievance Form after they both confirm the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

the grievance.<br />

� The Grievance Officer lodges the complaint in the Grievance Log.<br />

Step 2: Determination <strong>of</strong> corrective action<br />

If in their judgement, the grievance can be solved at this stage, the Grievance Officer and will determine a<br />

corrective action in consultation with the aggrieved person. A description <strong>of</strong> the action; the time frame in which<br />

the action is to take place and party responsible for implementing the action will be recorded in the grievance<br />

database.<br />

Grievances will be resolved and status reported back to complainants within 30 days. If more time is required,<br />

this will be communicated in advance to the aggrieved person. For cases that are not resolved within the<br />

stipulated time, detailed investigations will be undertaken and results discussed in the monthly meetings with<br />

affected persons.<br />

Step 3: Meeting with the complainant<br />

Corrective action and timeframe in which it is to be implemented will be discussed with the complainant within 30<br />

days <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the grievance. Written agreement to proceed with the corrective action will be sought from the<br />

complainant (e.g. by use <strong>of</strong> an appropriate consent form). If no agreement is reached, Step 2 will be re-visited.<br />

Step 4: Implementation <strong>of</strong> corrective action<br />

Agreed corrective action will be undertaken by the project or its contractors within the agreed timeframe and<br />

completed action recorded in the grievance database.<br />

Step 5: Verification <strong>of</strong> corrective action<br />

To verify satisfaction, the aggrieved person will be approached by the Grievance Officer to verify that corrective<br />

actions have been implemented. A signature <strong>of</strong> the complainant will be obtained and recorded in the log and/or<br />

on the consent form (see Step 3). If the complainant is not satisfied with outcome <strong>of</strong> the corrective action,<br />

additional steps may be undertaken to reach agreement.


Step 6: Action by local leaders and project contractors<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 78<br />

If the Grievance Officer and independent observer cannot solve the grievance, it will be referred to UNRA for a<br />

solution that satisfies the aggrieved party.<br />

Step 7: Action by Grievance Committee<br />

If the complainant remains dissatisfied and a satisfactory resolution cannot be reached, the complaint will be<br />

handled by the Grievance Committee. Once the Grievance Committee has determined its approach to the<br />

lodged grievance, this will be communicated to the Grievance Officer, who will communicate this to the<br />

complainant. If satisfied, the complainant signs to acknowledge that the issue has been resolved satisfactorily.<br />

However if the complainant is not satisfied, outstanding issues may be re-lodged with the Grievance Committee<br />

or the complainant may proceed with judicial proceedings. This grievance management process recognizes that<br />

the formal judicial process would be lengthy and costly for PAPs and is recommended only after all free redress<br />

options are exhausted.<br />

Step 8: Action by UNRA management<br />

If no satisfactory solution can be provided by the Grievance Committee the complaint will be resolved by UNRA<br />

top management and the independent <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the Chief Government Valuer. If after management intervention,<br />

resolution is not reached the complaint has the option to pursue recourse by judicial processes in courts <strong>of</strong> law.<br />

Sections below provide key people involved in the grievance redress process and associated actions.<br />

a) Grievance Officer<br />

A Grievance Officer (GO), who is a member <strong>of</strong> the implementation team, will lead the grievance mechanism.<br />

Principal responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the GO will include:<br />

� Recording grievances <strong>of</strong> affected people, categorizing and prioritizing them and providing solutions<br />

within a specified time period.<br />

� Discussing grievances on a regular basis and developing decision/actions for issues that can be<br />

resolved at that level.<br />

� Reporting to the aggrieved parties about developments regarding their grievances and decisions taken.<br />

� Providing inputs into the Monitoring and Evaluation process.<br />

All PAPs along the road will have access to the grievance process.<br />

b) Specific tasks <strong>of</strong> the GO<br />

i) Set up a systematic process <strong>of</strong> recording grievances in a register (“Grievance log”) as well as<br />

electronically (database). Upon request, PAPs may view a log <strong>of</strong> their grievances.<br />

The grievance log will be sent to the implementation team and UNRA management monthly so as to be<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> complaints being filed. Where confidentiality is sought by the aggrieved parties,<br />

their names would be concealed in this log.<br />

ii) Record both written and verbally communicated grievances.<br />

iii) Categorize issues in 3-4 broad categories in order to review and resolve them more efficiently. Suggested<br />

categories are grievances regarding:


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

1. Replacement structure or land, and procurement <strong>of</strong> construction materials;<br />

2. Agriculture and crops;<br />

3. Livelihoods; and<br />

4. Valuation process and payment <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

P a g e | 79<br />

iv) Prepare a database for recording and keeping track <strong>of</strong> grievances and how they were resolved. The<br />

database shall be a ‘living’ document, updated weekly. Access to making entries into the database<br />

shall be restricted to the implementation team, but a PAP will be able to obtain feedback on the status <strong>of</strong><br />

his/her grievance at any time.<br />

v) Communicate the grievance procedure to people, process <strong>of</strong> recording their complaints and timelines<br />

for redress. Communication will be provided during household disclosure process and to community<br />

leaders. Information will also be provided to affected persons outlining procedures and commitments <strong>of</strong><br />

the grievance mechanism.<br />

vi) Raise grievances at the regular Implementation Team meeting for discussion. Some resolutions will<br />

require coordination with the local authorities, which the GO should follow up, while some would require<br />

intervention from UNRA.<br />

c) Capacity building <strong>of</strong> the GO<br />

Since his/her role is crucial in ensuring that the RAP process is transparent, UNRA will select the GO not only<br />

based on educational qualifications and experience, but also commitment and communication ability. A flawed<br />

grievance process can disrupt the RAP process, leading to resentment and dissatisfaction among affected<br />

communities. Depending on the GO’s experience, capacity building for the GO may require initial orientation and<br />

a follow-up training program. In such cases, training should include the following:<br />

� Use <strong>of</strong> computers and maintenance <strong>of</strong> databases to record and update the Grievance Register,<br />

� Effective use <strong>of</strong> communication mediums and methods to interact with the community as well as for conflict<br />

resolution, and<br />

� Coordination with relevant stakeholders which may include the implementation team, contract team, or local<br />

authorities.<br />

Other members <strong>of</strong> the committee are considered to have straight forward roles in grievance redress process,<br />

similar to their usual job mandate, as outlined below:<br />

� Local Council III would provide counsel related to verification <strong>of</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> property ownership and related<br />

citizenry complaints.<br />

� The District Land Surveyor will provide guidance on complaints related to property survey.<br />

� The valuer will guide about how property values are derived based on either market value or District<br />

Compensation Rates.<br />

� The UNRA present positions representing the institutions view.


9.3 SPECIFIC PROCESS FOR ADDRESSING VALUATION GRIEVANCES<br />

9.3.1 Valuation<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 80<br />

In addition to the overall management process for grievances (Figure 8.1), there are likely to be grievances<br />

specifically related to property valuation. These are likely to come when households consider compensation<br />

values for their assets insufficient. This might arise when PAPs doubt if valuation values do indeed provide<br />

replacement value. If PAPs misunderstood the compensation process and believe they are entitled to additional<br />

compensation, they might lodge complaints. Given this, the project has developed a dedicated procedure to<br />

manage and close out grievances relating to valuation.<br />

9.3.2 Valuation grievance decision making procedures<br />

While some grievances would be resolved by the committee, others might not, such as when the claimant<br />

contests District property or crop compensation rates. Therefore the Grievance Officer (GO) will determine<br />

whether a complaint can be resolved by the committee or, if not, referred to the Chief Government Valuer<br />

(“CGV”).<br />

� If not, the GO refers the complaint to the CGV.<br />

� CGV refers grievance to the valuer and surveyor. If no settlement is reached at this stage, the<br />

aggrieved person can resort to judicial process.<br />

� If a complaint concerns the road contractor, the Grievance Officer refers such a complaint to UNRA<br />

Management.<br />

Affected Residents<br />

Communicate decision<br />

Yes<br />

Grievance Database<br />

Grievance Officer and<br />

Independent Organization<br />

Executive<br />

Director<br />

UNRA<br />

Can it be<br />

resolved?<br />

File grievance<br />

No<br />

Figure 8.1: Grievance management mechanism.<br />

No<br />

Is it<br />

resolved?<br />

Yes<br />

Key:<br />

Local Leaders, UNRA –<br />

SEO, Construction<br />

Contractor,<br />

Valuer<br />

Grievance<br />

Committee,<br />

UNRA<br />

Grievances/issues<br />

Response<br />

Yes<br />

Can it be<br />

resolved?<br />

No


10.1 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS<br />

10.1.1 RAP Implementation Unit<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

10 RAP IMPLEMENTATION<br />

P a g e | 81<br />

Before road works commence, affected people will be fully compensated before taking their land or demolishing<br />

structures. RAP implementation will be a responsibility <strong>of</strong> UNRA, which may hire an independent consultant. This<br />

consultant will constituted a RAP implementation unit implement which will, at a minimum, comprise the<br />

following:<br />

� Land surveyor<br />

� Property Valuer<br />

� Accountant<br />

� Sociologist<br />

� Legal <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

Districts political leadership may be involved mainly serving as witnesses to the RAP implementation process. A<br />

technical representative, preferably from the District Land Office or Social Development Office will be useful in<br />

providing on-the-spot technical answers to PAPs, at the payment desk, when necessary.<br />

Before resettlement, the entities will be responsible for planning implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP, communicating<br />

compensation measures identified in the RAP to PAPs (disclosure <strong>of</strong> entitlements) and dealing with day-to-day<br />

activities associated RAP implementation. Throughout and after RAP implementation UNRA and AfDB will be<br />

responsible for monitoring and evaluation activities.<br />

10.1.2 Implementation Schedule<br />

RAP implementation is proposed over a period <strong>of</strong> 16 months during which monitoring would be undertaken<br />

throughout the construction period and for extra 6 months after construction (Table 10.1). The RAP<br />

implementation unit and local committees would be formed shortly afterward approval <strong>of</strong> valuation report by<br />

CGV’s <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

The implementation schedule in Table 10.1 covers all resettlement activities from preparation through<br />

implementation, including target dates for achievement <strong>of</strong> expected benefits.<br />

10.2 RESETTLEMENT BUDGET<br />

Compensation and resettlement budget (Table 10.2) was based on valuation surveyor’s computations <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong><br />

affected land, structures as required by Uganda’s Chief Government Valuer. In Table 10.2, RAP implementation<br />

costs have also been added to asset valuations to derive overall RAP budget that entails both resettlement and<br />

implementation.<br />

Table 10.3 provides RAP budgets for Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> <strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima road sections to be funded by AfDB and<br />

detailed in Annex 8.


Table 10.1: Implementation schedule<br />

Project activities Time (Months)<br />

a) RAP approval.<br />

b) RAP disclosure.<br />

c) 3 months’ notice to leave property<br />

d) Grievances management.<br />

e) Compensation payment.<br />

f) RAP monitoring<br />

g) RAP completion audit<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 82<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22<br />

Note: “-----“ indicates continuous activity. Grievances are expected to arise any time from disclosure through payment, construction and beyond (during monitoring and evaluation). They should thus be treated<br />

as such during RAP implementation. Completion Audit commences from the time compensation payment is accomplished.


Table 10.2: Resettlement budget for entire road<br />

a) Resettlement budget<br />

<strong>Road</strong><br />

section<br />

Kyenjojo -<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong><br />

<strong>Hoima</strong>-<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong><br />

<strong>Masindi</strong>-<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong><br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

affected<br />

property<br />

owners<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Land area<br />

(sq.m)<br />

Land Area<br />

(Hectares)<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> land<br />

(UgShs)<br />

Value for<br />

Buildings &<br />

Other<br />

Improvements<br />

(UGShs)<br />

Value <strong>of</strong><br />

trees, crops<br />

(UgShs)<br />

Subtotal<br />

15%<br />

Disturbance<br />

Allowance<br />

(UgShs)<br />

3% <strong>of</strong> crops value<br />

for livelihood<br />

restoration due to<br />

crop loss (UgShs) 1<br />

3% <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong><br />

buildings for income<br />

restoration due to<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> businesses/<br />

business structures 2<br />

P a g e | 83<br />

Total Compensation<br />

Award<br />

(UgShs)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D= (A+B+C) E= 15%*(D) F=3%*(C)<br />

G=3%*(B)<br />

(D+E+FG)<br />

6270 3,343,430.90 334.33 8,713,963,262 3,016,129,811 719,457,600 12,449,550,673 1,867,432,601 21,583,728 90,483,894.33 14,429,050,896.33<br />

1549 1,048,895.42 104.89 1,208,144,437 974,956,271 219,900,500 2,403,001,208 360,450,181 65,97,015 29,248,688.13 2,792,700,077<br />

1186 776,716.70 77.67 1,291,005,289 431,025,413 74,083,900 1,796,114,602 269,417,190 2,222,517 12,930,762.39 2,080,685,071.39<br />

Total 1 9005 5,169,043.02 516.89 11,213,112,988 4,422,111,495 1,013,442,000 16,648,666,483 2,497,299,972 30,403,260 132,663,344.85 19,309,033,059.85<br />

b) RAP implementation budget<br />

1 RAP implementation consultant 3 300,000,000<br />

2 Monitoring & evaluation 100,000,000<br />

3 Provisional sum for special assistance to vulnerable people 50,000,000<br />

Total 2 450,000,000<br />

Total RAP budget (resettlement and implementation)<br />

Grand total (Total 1 + Total 2)<br />

-------<br />

Budget notes:<br />

1 : Livelihood restoration related to loss <strong>of</strong> crops but minimal impact on crops will occur since affected land is in existing road reserve.<br />

2 : Income restoration in regard to impacted commercial buildings and businesses.<br />

3 : Provisional sum for RAP implementation. Actual figure to be determined by competitive bidding.<br />

19,759,033,059.85


Table 10.2: RAP costs for the road section be funded by AfDB<br />

RAP Costs (relocation and compensation)<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Value for Land<br />

(UGX)<br />

Value for Buildings & Other<br />

Improvements (UGX)<br />

Value for Crops (UGX) Sub Total (UGX) Disturbance<br />

Allowance at 15%<br />

<strong>of</strong> compensation<br />

sum (UGX)<br />

Total (UgX)<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> 3,701,920,738 1,173,732,506 241,076,850 5,116,730,094 1,535,019,028 6,651,749,122<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima 1,753,981,949 741,283,743 147,015,500 2,642,281,192 792,684,358 3,434,965,550<br />

Total 5,455,902,687 1,915,016,249 388,092,350 7,759,011,286 2,327,703,386 10,086,714,672<br />

Assistance for restoring crop production: 11,642,770.50 UgX<br />

(i.e. opening new gardens, seeds)<br />

Compensation to relocate graves: 2,500,000.00 UgX<br />

Income restoration for businesses (shops,<br />

etc) : 57,450,487.47 UgX<br />

Provisional sum for assistance to<br />

vulnerable people: 40,500,000.00 UgX<br />

RAP implementation cost: 170,168,067.00 UgX<br />

Exchange rate (as <strong>of</strong> 2Oct 2012) : 1 USD = UgX 2552<br />

RAP monitoring and evaluation: 56,722,689.00 UgX<br />

TOTAL RAP budget for AfDB section 10,425,698,685.85 UgX<br />

Contingency for eventualities (put at 10% <strong>of</strong> total compensation sum)*:<br />

1,042,569,868.58 UgX<br />

Grand total<br />

11,468,268,554.43 UgX<br />

P a g e | 84


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

11 MONITORING, EVALUATION AND COMPLETION AUDIT<br />

P a g e | 85<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> monitoring and evaluation for this RAP will be to check effectiveness <strong>of</strong> RAP implementation,<br />

covering resettlement, disbursement <strong>of</strong> compensation money and public involvement. Monitoring will also entail<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the grievance management process.<br />

Sections below present the proposed monitoring and evaluation framework for RAP implementation, including a plan<br />

for monitoring and evaluation <strong>of</strong> compensation packages with indicators for measuring performance, impacts and<br />

outcomes. This plan also provides for reviews by stakeholders including the AfDB. The Framework includes a review<br />

<strong>of</strong> financial disbursements, compensation complaints and grievance redress, adherence to compensation payment<br />

schedule and support <strong>of</strong> vulnerable PAPs.<br />

11.1 GENERAL OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH<br />

The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) mechanism provides a basis to assess overall success and effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

various resettlement processes and measures. This mechanism is based on two components:<br />

a) Internal monitoring – undertaken by the implementation unit’s Monitoring Officer,<br />

b) External evaluations –by AfDB and other national stakeholders.<br />

11.2 INTERNAL MONITORING PROCESS<br />

11.2.1 Overview<br />

Overall objectives and tasks <strong>of</strong> the internal monitoring process are:<br />

� Identification <strong>of</strong> suitable indicators;<br />

� Measurement <strong>of</strong> indicators at appropriate intervals;<br />

� Creation <strong>of</strong> a mechanism to analyze M&E data against a pre-resettlement baseline. This baseline should be<br />

contemporary and established by measurement, especially <strong>of</strong> incomes, income stability and livelihoods.<br />

� Set up a system to regularly respond to M&E findings by adapting existing measures or by modifying<br />

implementation processes.<br />

This monitoring process will be used to analyze progress and change at regular intervals. It shall be linked to the<br />

various stages <strong>of</strong> the RAP, as follows:-<br />

a) During resettlement<br />

During resettlement, M&E should focus on resettlement issues such as:<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> families that have been compensated;<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> people who have acquired legal documents to new property,<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> business owners who have restored their businesses,<br />

� Efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> grievance redress mechanism.


) After resettlement<br />

Post resettlement monitoring should focus on rehabilitation issues, for example:<br />

� Success level <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> livelihoods<br />

� Success level <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

� Efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> grievance redress mechanism.<br />

11.2.2 Key Activities and Responsibilities<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 86<br />

i) Set up a system: The RAP implementation team will provide a monitoring form to be completed monthly by<br />

a dedicated M&E <strong>of</strong>ficer. Information collected will be entered into a database at UNRA for further analysis<br />

and compilation into quarterly reports.<br />

ii) Ongoing Monitoring: The M&E Officer will be in-charge <strong>of</strong> regular monitoring <strong>of</strong> the implementation<br />

process. This will involve:<br />

a) Feedback and inputs from the Implementation Officers.<br />

b) Reviewing <strong>of</strong> the resettlement database.<br />

c) Receiving reports from Grievance Officer and <strong>of</strong> the grievance database.<br />

d) Receiving information from local representatives.<br />

e) Direct consultation with the resettled community at each location.<br />

iii) Monthly reports: Consolidated monthly reports with key findings from on-going monitoring should be<br />

submitted to the implementation team and discussed every month and action points determined. This<br />

monthly progress review should aim to ensure that the important issues are immediately rectified.<br />

iv) Vulnerability assessment: It is essential that vulnerability is closely monitored in order to provide timely<br />

support to susceptible households. A vulnerability assessment shall occur as part <strong>of</strong> quarterly auditing <strong>of</strong> all<br />

households, and those households that are most vulnerable shall be prioritized for monthly auditing and<br />

targeted assistance. This may be undertaken by the implementation Officer. Key activities are:<br />

a) Develop a set <strong>of</strong> criteria to identify vulnerable households (Note that this is intended to act as a<br />

guideline only and should be modified as appropriate).<br />

b) Every three months visit vulnerable households to assess key needs/ issues (e.g. unemployment) with<br />

the rehabilitation process.<br />

c) Develop a plan to address these issues in conjunction with members <strong>of</strong> the household.<br />

11.3 EXTERNAL EVALUATION PROCESS<br />

11.3.1 Overview<br />

In addition to internal monitoring, external assessment <strong>of</strong> the resettlement process should be undertaken through an<br />

external evaluation agency appointed by UNRA. The external evaluation process will be informed by internal<br />

monitoring reports prepared by UNRA, and also through independent surveys and consultation conducted by an<br />

evaluation agency UNRA may hire.<br />

The evaluation system will be based on:


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 87<br />

a) Process indicators that measure effectiveness (consultation, grievance) and inputs like people, equipment and<br />

materials and identify areas where improvements to existing processes are required. These may include the<br />

following:<br />

� Transparency <strong>of</strong> the implementation process.<br />

� Adequacy <strong>of</strong> staff and capacity <strong>of</strong> implementing entities agencies.<br />

� Compliance <strong>of</strong> the resettlement process with Ugandan law and <strong>African</strong> Development Bank<br />

standards.<br />

� Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the grievance mechanism.<br />

� Adequacy and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> public involvement.<br />

� Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the internal monitoring mechanism.<br />

b) Outcome indicators will assess effectiveness <strong>of</strong> resettlement and changes that have occurred to the<br />

communities’ standard <strong>of</strong> living. Key indicators are outlined in Table 11.1.<br />

Table 11.1: Monitoring indicators during resettlement (quarterly basis)<br />

Category Indicator<br />

Fund disbursement � Number <strong>of</strong> PAPs paid<br />

� Amount <strong>of</strong> money disbursed<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> PAPs not paid in prescribed time (respective quarter)<br />

� Reasons for not paying PAPs<br />

Restoration <strong>of</strong> and<br />

assets livelihoods<br />

� Projected disbursements in the next 3 months<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> PAPs who have reconstructed buildings<br />

� Reasons for not reconstructing dwellings<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> commercial buildings replaced<br />

� Reasons for not reconstructing commercial buildings<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> businesses restored<br />

� Reasons for not re-establishing businesses<br />

Public involvement � Participation <strong>of</strong> local leaders and community in resettlement process<br />

Grievance<br />

management<br />

Custody <strong>of</strong> legal<br />

documents<br />

Resettlement <strong>of</strong><br />

vulnerable PAPs<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> grievances received<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> grievances resolved<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> complaints reported to other government agencies and outcomes including how<br />

grievance was resolved<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> grievances refereed to Uganda Courts <strong>of</strong> Law<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> outstanding grievances and reasons for not resolving them<br />

� Land title deeds received<br />

� Land title returned to owners<br />

� Number <strong>of</strong> vulnerable PAPs resettled<br />

� Kind <strong>of</strong> special assistance provided<br />

11.3.2 Key Activities and Responsibilities<br />

UNRA will liaise with relevant ministries (MoLGD, MoFPED, AfDPlB, CGV’s <strong>of</strong>fice) to undertake external evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> resettlement mid-term and at end <strong>of</strong> resettlement. These evaluations will focus on reviewing the process and<br />

making necessary recommendations for modification to existing rehabilitation measures and grievance redress<br />

processes.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 88<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> its RAP supervision and monitoring, UNRA will at end <strong>of</strong> resettlement activities conduct a rapid socioeconomic<br />

survey, based on a sample <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> PAPs to establish effectiveness <strong>of</strong> resettlement. For the<br />

reason that baseline data in RAP will be old by end <strong>of</strong> resettlement activities, findings <strong>of</strong> this survey will also be<br />

compared with prevailing general socio-economic conditions along the road.<br />

RAP monitoring will also involve local government <strong>of</strong>fices such as the district Community Development Officer (CDO)<br />

who is mandated to address social issues including community mobilization. For this role, the district CDO can work<br />

with Assistant Community Development Officer (ACDO) at sub-county level. UNRA will identify and train NGOs to<br />

undertake monitoring <strong>of</strong> RAP implementation. It is noted however that local government structures (district and subcounty<br />

level) do not usually have the required knowledge, skills and financial resources to support RAP<br />

implementation and monitoring. It would be in the projects interest to develop a training program and provide<br />

necessary financial facilitation. UNRA therefore needs to sensitize district staff and other stakeholders about this<br />

RAP and implementation responsibilities required <strong>of</strong> them. This activity will be catered for under the budget line <strong>of</strong><br />

RAP monitoring and evaluation. During RAP implementation UNRA will submit to AfDB quarterly RAP<br />

implementation progress reports.<br />

11.3.3 RAP Completion Report<br />

After completion <strong>of</strong> resettlement, a final report will be submitted by UNRA to AfDB prior to preparation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

implementation report. The report shall indicate effectiveness <strong>of</strong> project implementation and disbursement <strong>of</strong><br />

compensation payments, effectiveness <strong>of</strong> public involvement and socio-economic impacts <strong>of</strong> roadside communities.<br />

This report will give overall assessment <strong>of</strong> the RAP process indicating activities undertaken, success <strong>of</strong> mitigation<br />

action and monitoring and well as useful lessons learnt.<br />

11.3.4 Completion Audit<br />

A key aim <strong>of</strong> resettlement is to ensure compensation and other mitigation measures restore or enhance affected<br />

people’s quality <strong>of</strong> life and income levels. If quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> PAPs can be demonstrated to have been restored, then<br />

resettlement and compensation process can be considered “complete”. The purpose <strong>of</strong> Completion Audit will<br />

therefore be to establish whether UNRA implemented all activities needed to ensure compliance with proposed<br />

resettlement commitments and applicable national and AfDB requirements.<br />

The completion audit will be based on progress and outcome evaluation indicators and shall aim to answer the<br />

following questions:<br />

Have the objectives <strong>of</strong> the RAP been reached in terms <strong>of</strong>:<br />

� Compensation for all impacts <strong>of</strong> all affected people,<br />

� Timely delivery <strong>of</strong> entitlements and compliance with Uganda’s and AfDB resettlement requirements,<br />

� Has compensation been fair and adequate to mitigate social impacts,<br />

� Have livelihoods been restored.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

12 CONCLUSION<br />

P a g e | 89<br />

The proposed project has considerable local and national socio-economic benefit. An improved road will bring<br />

considerable social benefits for Districts it passes through by stimulating trade and attracting public transport hence<br />

lowering transport cost for people and goods. Considering that the road project follows existing alignment,<br />

resettlement impacts are expected to be manageable with good planning, RAP implementation, grievance<br />

management and monitoring.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

REFERENCES<br />

P a g e | 90<br />

1. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank, 2003. Involuntary Resettlement Policy.<br />

2. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank, February 2004. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank Groups’ Policy on Environment<br />

3. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank, 2001. Environmental and Social Assessment Procedures<br />

4. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank, October 2003. Integrated Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines<br />

5. Constitution <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Uganda, 1995.<br />

6. Constitution <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Uganda, 1995.<br />

7. Crosby, Benjamin L. March 1992. "Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers." Technical<br />

Notes, no. 2. Washington, DC: Implementing Policy Change Project for the US Agency for International<br />

Development (USAID).<br />

8. Golder. B, Gawler. M, 2005: Cross-Cutting Tool: Stakeholder Analysis, WWF (USA).<br />

9. GoU MoWT (2008), <strong>Road</strong>s Sub-Sector Gender Policy Statement.<br />

10. GoU MoWT (2008), <strong>Road</strong>s Sub-Sector HIV/AIDS Policy Statement.<br />

11. GoU MoWT (2008), <strong>Road</strong>s Sub-Sector Policy Statement for Occupational Health and Safety<br />

12. IFC (Environment and Social Development Department) Resettlement Handbook<br />

13. <strong>Hoima</strong> District Local Government District Strategic Plan for Orphans and other Vulnerable Children 2007/08-<br />

2011/12.<br />

14. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Works, Transport & Communications (now MoWT) 1999: Sector Environmental Policy &<br />

Management Assessment <strong>of</strong> FRSP Volume III: <strong>Road</strong> Sector EIA Guidelines.<br />

15. MoWT (2005). General Specifications for <strong>Road</strong> and Bridge Works.<br />

16. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), 1997: Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines<br />

for Uganda.<br />

17. National Population and Housing Census, 2002, Uganda Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics.<br />

18. The World Bank 2007, General EHS Guidelines.<br />

19. Uganda Government, The Local Governments Act, 1997.<br />

20. WHO, 2002. Environmental health in emergencies and disasters: a practical guide.<br />

21. NUPIPU, 2007: Policy Brief on Mainstreaming and Operating the Disability policy in Government<br />

Development Programs and Plans.<br />

22. UNAPD, 2010: Publication <strong>of</strong> Selected Legal Provision in Domestic and International Laws on Physical<br />

Accessibility.<br />

23. <strong>African</strong> Development Bank 2003 “Involuntary Resettlement Policy”.<br />

Agencies from which baseline socio-economic data was obtained:<br />

� Ministry <strong>of</strong> Local Government, MoLG (orphans and vulnerable children statistics, local administration<br />

mandate, structure and roles)<br />

� Uganda Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics, UBOS (general district statistics)<br />

� Kyenjojo District Local Government (health statistics, literacy)<br />

� <strong>Hoima</strong> District Local Government (health statistics, literacy)<br />

� <strong>Masindi</strong> District Local Government (health statistics, literacy)<br />

� Kibaale District Local Government (health statistics, literacy)


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Annex 1: Public facilities along the proposed road<br />

a) Schools, Health Centres and other Institutions<br />

Note: These facilities will not be affected by the road project<br />

Waypoint GPS coordinates Feature and description<br />

KYENJOJO DISTRICT<br />

Easting Northing Altitude(m)<br />

P a g e | 91<br />

16 238100 69761 1368 Katoosa Primary School which is about 150 m from the road. Part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

school compound is in the road reserve<br />

17 238176 69840 1370 Access to St. Adolf High School. This school is away from the road<br />

reserve but its access can be affected by road expansion.<br />

19 238324 70038 1374 Petrol station which is about 3 m from the road and access to Bucuni<br />

Primary School<br />

22 238934 71922 1360 Living Hope Nursery and Primary School and access to Kasunga.<br />

24 239284 72965 1340 Junction to Kijugo Primary School and Kyenjojo District Local<br />

Government Production Department. On the opposite side are the<br />

District NAADS <strong>of</strong>fices.<br />

25 239702 74757 1379 J. Agaba Memorial Skills Training Centre which is about 20m from the<br />

road. This marks the beginning <strong>of</strong> Rwamukoora Trading Centre.<br />

26 242756 78832 1366 Access to Tanaga School which is about 250 m from the road<br />

29 242979 79179 1373 Access to Iraara Primary School.<br />

31 244048 81285 1384 Access to Katooke Subcounty LC3 Headquarters and Iborooga Primary<br />

School.<br />

34 245358 81781 1381 Access to Katooke Secondary School and Katooke Primary School.<br />

35 246628 82744 1376 St. Peter's College Mukole and a church. The school is about 15m from<br />

the road but it's compound is in the road reserve.<br />

39 249211 88196 1395 Our lady <strong>of</strong> Assumption Mabira Catholic Parish and Mabira Primary<br />

School which is 50m from the road.<br />

40 249192 88476 1388 Nyankwanzi High School. This is about 15 m from the road<br />

41 249210 88671 1376 Access to Mabira Demonstration Primary School and Rubowa Primary<br />

School.<br />

KIBAALE DISTRICT<br />

52 247692 98840 1299 Access to Nyabigata Primary School.<br />

54 248573 99651 1286 Nyanseke COU Primary School. This is 50 m from the road.<br />

56 250174 100609 1275 St. Adolf Tibeyalirwa Secondary School which is 10 m from the road.<br />

58 250336 100874 1284 Muhurro BSC Primary School, 5 m from the road.<br />

59 250342 100908 1283 St. Joseph Muhurro Catholic Parish and St. Margaret Mary Muhurro Girls<br />

SSS, 30m from the road.<br />

65 253252 101940 1266 Kibanga Primary School.<br />

66 253612 101610 1262 Access to Ruswiga Primary School.<br />

69 255265 102392 1242 Quality Education Centre, Kagadi – 150 m from the road<br />

71 256282 104155 1231 Kagadi Hospital and Kagadi Kindergarten & Primary School<br />

72 256419 104166 1227 Bishop Rwakaikara Primary School. Disabled children’s unit and a<br />

church.<br />

74 259047 106267 1213 Kiryane Primary School, 5m from the road<br />

77 260293 107748 1220 Kyenzige Primary School, 50m from the road. This is the beginning <strong>of</strong>


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Kyenzige Trading Centre.<br />

P a g e | 92<br />

81 264269 110808 1202 Mugalike Catholic Parish and Uganda Martyrs S.S. Mugalike and<br />

Mugalike Primary School.<br />

86 268335 116145 1200 Kyeya Primary School and a church.<br />

87 268512 116322 1218 Piped water supply system, Bless the Children Ministries Primary School,<br />

Excel Model Nursery and Primary School, Mabale Parents Nursery and<br />

Primary School<br />

89 269475 117363 1239 Mabale Secondary School, Mabale Primary School and St Andrew's<br />

C.O.U Mabale Parish<br />

91 271692 119611 1114 Access to St. Mary's PTR SS Kirya Rugonjo and St. Thereza, 2km from<br />

the road<br />

92 274139 121321 1154 Paacwa Model Primary School, 10m from the road.<br />

93 275899 122820 1110 Kahumiro Primary School, 5m from the road. This marks the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

Paacwa Trading Centre.<br />

102 286433 137422 1169 Kabwooya Primary School and Kabwooya Child Development Centre.<br />

106 295614 144329 1083 St. Martin's Institute <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences, Munteme Fatima Parish and St.<br />

John Bosco Munteme Primary School.<br />

107 295776 144479 1078 St. Joseph Munteme Technical School and Munteme Trading Centre.<br />

108 296071 144962 1072 Munteme Junior School, 5m from the road<br />

111 300282 147165 1099 Nyati Trading Centre and Sir Titowinyi Primary School<br />

114 301917 148087 1110 Karama Primary School.<br />

115 302144 148230 1107 Kikuube Health Centre IV and Kikuube BCS Primary School.<br />

118 308070 150733 1099 Kikoboza Primary School, 10m from the road.<br />

120 312035 148867 1143 Light College Buhimba Campus.<br />

122 312843 149341 1159 Kidege Muslim Primary School, 30m from the road<br />

123 313052 149765 1137 Makerere Comprehensive High School, 50m from the road<br />

125 314017 152746 1165 Buswekera Primary School, 10m from the road.<br />

126 314418 154148 1158 Mpaija Primary School, 20m from the road.<br />

134 319438 157415 1138 Good Hope Nursery and Primary School, 5m from the road.<br />

138 320802 158208 1154 Access to Mparo Primary School.<br />

141 323363 159676 1181 Access to Drucilla Memorial Primary School, 50m from the road.<br />

145 325371 160191 1170 Kyakapeya Primary School, 50m from the road and a church which is<br />

30m from the road.<br />

148 325996 161686 1164 Kakindo C.O.U Primary School.<br />

149 326129 161813 1159 Kakindo C.O.U Secondary School.<br />

154 328904 163952 1132 Kyamateera Wildlife Education Centre, 20m from the road.<br />

157 329978 164255 1136 St. Peter's Bulini BCS and a Church, 50m from the road.<br />

159 331097 164792 1150 Bulindi Integrated SSS, 200m from the road.<br />

160 331731 165126 1152 Another School and a Church just after Bulindi Integrated SSS.<br />

162 332494 165525 1152 Access to Sir Titowinyi Secondary School.<br />

163 332812 165599 1149 Bulindi Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, 5m from<br />

the road.<br />

166 334167 165636 1131 Access to Kibaire Primary School.<br />

167 334618 166076 1099 Upcoming school, 10m from the road.<br />

169 335079 166346 1101 Access to Kisalizi C.O.U Primary School.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 93<br />

171 336419 166579 1108 Bulima Valley Primary School, 30m from the road. This marks the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> Bulima Trading Centre.<br />

175 337559 167154 1120 Bulima Primary School, 50m from the road.<br />

180 342681 169716 1105 Bwijanga Health Centre IV and Kitamba Primary School, 50m from the<br />

road and Bwijanga Sub-county Headquarters.<br />

183 344582 170970 1128 Murro Primary School, 70m from the road.<br />

184 344670 171081 1125 Access to St. Kizito Murro primary school and Murro Catholic Parish.<br />

186 346222 173978 1116 Advent Pride Nursery and Primary School, 10m from the road.<br />

191 349695 176624 1154 Access to Ikoba Secondary School and Ikoba Girls C.O.U Primary<br />

School, 200m from the road.<br />

192 349889 176616 1157 Ikoba Boys Primary School, 80m from the road.<br />

195 351064 177391 1162 Kiina Primary School, 30m from the road.<br />

196 351082 177389 1163 Water pipeline at Kiina Primary School, 5m from the road.<br />

197 353879 179639 1129 Rukondwa Primary School, 90m from the road.<br />

199 354344 180005 1113 Access to Fumbya Central Forest Reserve, Rukondwa Nursery Garden,<br />

Alinda Nursery & Primary school and Kitonozi Primary School.<br />

203 355430 180759 1134 Katasenywa C.O.U Primary School, 100m from the road and Nyangahya<br />

Community Secondary School.<br />

204 355468 180801 1135 Access to Kichandi Primary School, Kalyango Primary School and Kidepo<br />

Grain Millers Ltd.<br />

205 356023 184230 1152 Access to St. Theresa Girls Secondary School and Nyamigisa Parish and<br />

Schools.<br />

209 357344 187188 1168 Kabalega Secondary School, 50m from the road.<br />

210 357433 187268 1165 St. Kizito Vocational and Apprenticeship Centre.<br />

212 357728 187502 1159 Muvule tree infront <strong>of</strong> St. Edward Primary School.<br />

218 359374 190254 1196 Uganda Technical College, Kyema.<br />

220 360542 192007 1154 Kisanja Primary School, 30m from the road.<br />

221 362933 194374 1121 Walyoba Infant Care School, and Walyoba Brilliant Primary School 10m<br />

from the road.<br />

224 364841 195118 1125 St. Paul's Secondary & Primary School, Pakanyi.<br />

229 368851 196032 1086 Nyakatoogo Primary School, 100m from the road.<br />

233 371095 196188 1106 Kisindizi 2 water point and a Primary School.<br />

238 375290 197782 1117 Kyatiri Trading Centre, St Blessed Damian School and St Mary's Kyatiri<br />

Primary School and a church 30m from the road.<br />

239 375709 198067 1121 Access to Kibibira Primary School.<br />

242 377816 198720 1103 Access to Mboira Primary School.<br />

250 381319 197900 1093 Kizibu C.O.U Primary School.<br />

254 384905 198328 1071 Kididima Primary School, 100m from the road.<br />

257 386699 199068 1083 Access to Uganda Cooperative College.<br />

260 387099 199279 1077 <strong>Kigumba</strong> Secondary School, 5m.<br />

264 388866 199727 1076 Access to <strong>Kigumba</strong> Centre Primary School.


) Water Supply Facilities<br />

East North Altitude(m) Feature and description<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 94<br />

237898 68225 1354 Kamagadi Water Works. This has a water pump which serves Kamagadi and the neibouring<br />

villages including some parts <strong>of</strong> Kyenjojo.<br />

242890 79064 1367 Water pump/ borehole and access to Produce Store Enjeru Sisimuka Cooperative Society.<br />

247567 84897 1368 Water pump/ borehole which is about 8m from the road<br />

249185 88785 1371 Water Pump which is 6m from the road<br />

247666 95639 1169 Small water source in Kamutunsi village which is 10m from the road<br />

247499 95934 1171 Pipe water source and Kamutunsi Trading Centre<br />

250470 101168 1272 Pipe/Tap water supply and a church. This marks the beginning <strong>of</strong> Muhurro Trading Centre.<br />

250875 101301 1265 Water pump, 5m from the road<br />

251013 101511 1262 Water supply unit, 50m from the road<br />

268221 115999 1182 Piped water supply system, 5m from the road<br />

268512 116322 1218 Piped water supply system near Bless the Children Ministries Primary School, Excel Model<br />

Nursery & Primary School, Mabale Parents Nursery & Primary School<br />

331850 165167 1152 Borehole water source, 2m from the existing road reserve<br />

334024 165655 1135 Borehole water source, 40m from the road<br />

351082 177389 1163 Water pipeline at Kiina Primary School, 5m from the road<br />

358249 187957 1138 Katama Piped Water Supply unit.<br />

365021 195003 1125 Borehole infront <strong>of</strong> the school compound, 20m from the road<br />

371095 196188 1106 Kisindizi 2 water points and a primary school<br />

380622 197986 1079 Borehole, 50m from the road<br />

382233 197897 1074 Borehole, 25m from the road


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Annex 2: Record <strong>of</strong> stakeholder consultations<br />

P a g e | 95<br />

Consultations were undertaken with district <strong>of</strong>ficials and in villages and trading centers along the road to inform people about the<br />

project, explain RAP process, and seek views on valuation and compensation criteria as well as possible impact mitigation<br />

recommendations. Below are minutes <strong>of</strong> meetings held during consultation with various stakeholders.<br />

Meeting 1: Kyenjojo District Administration<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 22 nd September, 2010 held at District headquarters. (Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Kalibbala Herbert, (Team leader)<br />

Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Project The project affected persons should be intensively sensitized on the mode <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />

to avoid discontent.<br />

They should also be sensitized about negative consequences <strong>of</strong> proposed development<br />

such as potential for spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.<br />

On Compensation Compensation rates should be updated and taken to the Chief Government Valuer for<br />

approval.<br />

On Language Government should caution the contractors on the vulgar language used in the community<br />

during road construction.<br />

On Employment Q: How much will the community be involved in terms <strong>of</strong> employment?<br />

A: The contractors will hire local labour for casual jobs.<br />

During construction, the welfare <strong>of</strong> the workers should be considered. Contractors should<br />

provide them with protective gears.<br />

On Accessibility Contractors should ensure that access to people’s homes is not blocked during construction.<br />

On Water pipes Contractors should take note <strong>of</strong> the water pipes within the road reserve right from the<br />

district town center up to Katooke trading center. They are mainly on the left hand side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

road. During construction these utilities should be well maintained.<br />

On Murram There is good murram at Rubanjo in Katooke Sub-county.<br />

Contractors should restore the burrow pits after excavating murram


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 96


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 97<br />

Meeting 2: Community meeting<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 23 rd September, 2010 for Katoosa held at Katoosa LCI. (Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: Why doesn’t government compensate for the 15 m road reserve that is on the titled land?<br />

A: During the survey <strong>of</strong> titled land, 15 m <strong>of</strong> road reserve are cut <strong>of</strong>f from the land so no<br />

compensation can be done after that. However, if there is any property that is affected on<br />

that land, the government compensates for it.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate the project Affected Persons before the actual road<br />

construction starts?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On road safety We request contractors to put humps on the road during construction so that they can<br />

minimize on road accidents and dust that could affect homesteads and road-side shops.<br />

On Project Project affected persons should be notified about dates when property surveyors will workin<br />

their communities so that they can be present to fill their forms in person.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 98


Meeting 3: Community meeting<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 23 rd September, 2010 held at Kabagunda Cell. (Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: How does government compensate for a school whose play ground is affected?<br />

A: Government compensates for the whole play ground and it is relocated elsewhere.<br />

On the project Q: When is actual road construction likely to start?<br />

A:The project has already started: surveyors and the valuers are already working.<br />

On Employment Q: Will government consider local people for casual labor during road construction?<br />

A: The contractors will hire local labor for casual work, wherever possible.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Q: If one’s land is 90% affected and the remaining parcel is so small that it is not useful for<br />

farming or settlement, how will government compensate for this?<br />

A: The government will pay for all the land and the affected person relocated elsewhere.<br />

P a g e | 99


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 100


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 101<br />

Meeting 4: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 22 nd September, 2010 held at Kabagunda/ Nyambya. (Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: Does government compensate for land that has no any structures on it?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q:For property valuation will government consider prevailing market value <strong>of</strong> land?<br />

A: Government considers all these factors during compensation.<br />

Q: Does government compensate project affected Person who don’t fill assessment forms?<br />

A: Government requires all project affected persons to fill these forms in person or by their<br />

next <strong>of</strong> kin. These forms should be countersigned by local leaders.<br />

On Land Q: If one’s land is 90% affected and the remaining parcel is such small that it is not useful<br />

for farming or settlement, how will government compensate for this?<br />

A: The government will pay for all the land and affected person relocates elsewhere.<br />

On Project Q: When is the actual road construction?<br />

A:Usually depends on government schedule.<br />

Q: How does government deal with contractors who commit crimes in society for example<br />

impregnating school-going girls or disrupting families.<br />

A: Community should endeavor to protect their children and wives against such injustice but<br />

just in case this happens, local leaders and the police should be notified.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 102


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 103


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 104<br />

Meeting 5: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 25 th September, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kijwiga, Rwamukoora, Icwamukono, and Lwesinga held<br />

at Rwamukoora trading center (Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation<br />

Q: Is compensation done after a project has started?<br />

A: No, government compensates PAPs before actual construction starts.<br />

Q: How does government deal with land that has ownership conflicts?<br />

A: Government surveys and values the land with property on it but it doesn’t compensate for<br />

it until any encumbrances or wrangles are resolved.<br />

Q: Do contractors compensate for land where road diversions are created during road<br />

construction?<br />

A: No, contractors don’t pay for that land because it is restored after use but any property<br />

that is destroyed on that piece <strong>of</strong> land is compensated.<br />

On the project Q: When are surveyors and land valuers starting their work?<br />

A: They are already working.<br />

Q: How does government deal with contractors who commit crimes in the society for<br />

example, impregnating school going children and also disorganizing marriages?<br />

A: Community should protect their children and wives but also local leaders and the police<br />

should be notified where this happens.<br />

Q: There is a belief that during construction children are sacrificed. How true is this?<br />

A: The community should protect children during this period because there are could<br />

becriminals who can take advantage <strong>of</strong> the project to do their heinous acts. There is no<br />

evidence that contractors sacrifice children during road construction.<br />

On Employment Q: Will government consider communitiesin Kyenjojo for casual labour during road<br />

construction?<br />

A: There will be job opportunities during road construction and these will go to local people<br />

wherever feasible.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 105


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 106


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 107


Meeting 6: Village meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 25 th September, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Nyamwandara, Kaiganga, and Kinogero held at<br />

Kaiganga trading Center (Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: Does the government compensate for titled land the same way as customary land?<br />

A: No, titled land gets more compensation.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate for a house without a plan houses?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate for a house near the road reserve?<br />

A: No, It only compensates for property that is within the road reserve.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate for affected land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate the project Affected persons that fall within the new<br />

alignment?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On the project Q: When are the surveyors and the land valuers starting to work?<br />

A: They are already underway.<br />

On Compensation: Q: Is titled and untitled land compensated the same way?<br />

A: No.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate for unplanned houses?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Will the road have re-alignment in some areas?<br />

A: Yes, it will have re-alignments for purposes <strong>of</strong> minimizing on the so many corners.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for the house near the road reserve?<br />

A: No, government compensates for only those houses within the road reserve.<br />

On Project Q: When is the actual road construction likely to start?<br />

A: The project has already started the surveyors and the valuers are already working.<br />

Q:Will the contractor buy gravel from Kyenjojo if it is available?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 108


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 109


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 110


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 111<br />

Meeting 7: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 25 th September, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Enjeru, Kyasemu at Enjeru Trading center. (Kyenjojo<br />

District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: Does government compensate for sign posts on my land?<br />

A: No, sign posts will be removed and reinstated after construction.<br />

Q: Do contractors compensate for land where road diversions are created during construction?<br />

A: No, contractors don’t pay for that land because it is restored after use but any property that is<br />

destroyed on that land is compensated.<br />

Q: Does government compensate grazing rangeland?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Land Q: How does government compensate for PAPs whose biggest part <strong>of</strong> land has been taken and<br />

the remaining is too little to have any activity thereon?<br />

A: Government compensates for all the remaining land and the person relocated.<br />

On Project Q: When is the actual road construction likely to start?<br />

A: Usually depends on the government schedule and hwne funds are secured.<br />

Contractors should be cautioned on the use <strong>of</strong> vulgar language.<br />

On Injurious impact Q: During road construction, there are some buildings affected they were not among those<br />

eligible for valuation and compensation. Will government also consider them?<br />

A: Yes, injurious damage will be compensated.<br />

On Employment Q: Will government consider local people for casual labor during road construction?<br />

A: The contractor will have job opportunities for local people.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 112


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 113


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 114<br />

Meeting 8: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 22 nd September, 2010 for the villages <strong>of</strong> Katooke held at Katooke Sub-county (Kyenjojo<br />

District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: Do contractors compensate for land where road diversion is created during construction?<br />

A: No, contractors don’t pay for that land because it is restored after use but any property<br />

that is destroyed on the land is compensated.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for a house that is damaged by road construction?<br />

A: If government proves that the house was damaged as a result <strong>of</strong> road construction, it is<br />

compensated.<br />

Q: How does government compensate deceased people?<br />

A: The family has to get a relative approved by Administrator General to be paid on their<br />

behalf.<br />

Q: Is titled land compensated the same way as untitled land?<br />

A: No.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On the project Q: There is a belief that children are sacrificed during road construction. Is this true?<br />

A: There is no evidence that contractors do sacrifice children.<br />

On Employment Q: How much will the community be involved in terms <strong>of</strong> employment?<br />

A: Very likely the contractors will hire local labour during construction.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 115


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 116<br />

Meeting 9: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 27 th September, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kyaduli, Mabira A and B held at Mabira Trading center.<br />

(Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: Does government compensate titled land?<br />

A: Yes<br />

Q: Does government compensate PAPs before the actual construction?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government consider current market prices during compensation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On project Q: Do contractors have identity cards?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Will there be re-alignments during construction?<br />

A:To the extent possible, the road project will follow existing road corridor.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 117


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 118


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 119


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 120


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 121<br />

Meeting 10: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 27 th September, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Haikona and Mubaki held at Haikona Trading center.<br />

(Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation: Q: Why doesn’t government compensate for annual crops?<br />

A: The community is given enough time to harvest those crops. Therefore government only<br />

compensates for land on which the crops are grown.<br />

Q: If a government school or church is affected, who does government compensate?<br />

A: For churches it will be the administration to be compensated and for government schools, the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education while private owners receive compensation for their schools.<br />

Q: Doesn’t government undervalue affected property?<br />

A: No, government ensures that it compensates the right value for all affected property.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 122


Meeting 11: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 27 th September, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Mirambi and Kabatooro at Hasanju Trading center.<br />

(Kyenjojo District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Land Q: Does government consider market valueduring property valuation?<br />

A:Government considers all these factors<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate before actual road construction commences?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Why doesn’t government allow PAP to bargain value<strong>of</strong> their property?<br />

A: It is government policy for District local governments to determine compensation values<br />

based for their district.<br />

Q: What if one’s house is affected and it was built with a loan from the bank, who does<br />

government compensate?<br />

A: Government compensates the property owner.<br />

Q: Are the widows compensated?<br />

A: Yes<br />

On assistance given<br />

provided by the local<br />

leaders during<br />

resettlement<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Q: Will there be a small allowance given to the LC’s if they assist during resettlement and<br />

project implementation?<br />

A:UNRA will facilitate such actors when they are engaged.<br />

P a g e | 123


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 124


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 125<br />

Meeting 12: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 27 th September, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kakindu, Kyeya, Muzizi A and B at Kyamutunzi Trading<br />

center.(Kyenjojo district)<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Can one use a friend’s account to get their money from the bank?<br />

A: No, one is required to get theirown bank account to in order to be paid.<br />

Does government compensate a PAP whose land is affected on either side <strong>of</strong> the road?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does contractor pay for property that is destroyed during the road diversion?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does the contractor pay for gravel that is excavated from some one’s land?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On income restoration Q: If one has fruit trees and they hope to gain from them over a period <strong>of</strong> time, how will<br />

government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for income restoration- payments are<br />

made for property “as is”. However resettlement requirements <strong>of</strong> multilateral funders provide for<br />

income restoration and this will be made in the RAP budget.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 126


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 127


HOIMA andMASINDI DISTRICTS<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 128<br />

Meeting 13: <strong>Hoima</strong> District Administration<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 29 th September, 2010 held at District Headquarters (<strong>Hoima</strong> District).<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Kampala- Busunju- <strong>Hoima</strong> road has disparity in compensation amounts yet some local<br />

people thought theyought to have got equal payments. So project affected persons should<br />

be educatedabout the mode <strong>of</strong> compensation to avoid discontent.<br />

On Land Land tenure here is mainly customary.There are very few people in the community that have<br />

titled or leasehold land.Land is a very contentious issue so to avoid conflicts, compensation<br />

has to be done before actual construction commences.<br />

On Sensitization Community should be sensitized about negative consequences <strong>of</strong> proposed development<br />

such as potential for spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 129


Meeting 14: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 1 st October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kanubi held at Kanubi trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Project<br />

commencement<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Q: When is the project starting?<br />

A: Usually depends on government acquiring necessary funds from funders.<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for titled land?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Injurious damage Q: During road construction there may be buildings affected yet were not among those<br />

eligible for valuation and compensation. Will government consider them?<br />

On documents proving<br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> property<br />

A: Yes, government considers such incidental damage eligible for compensation.<br />

Q: If a person has three names on the voter’s card and two in the bank which ones should<br />

he (she) use?<br />

A: The PAP should provide documents that are accurate and prove ownership <strong>of</strong> the<br />

property.<br />

P a g e | 130


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 131


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 132<br />

Meeting 15: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 1 st October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Mparo, Kicwamba, held at Pida center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: How does government compensate for lease land that is not yet renewed?<br />

A: The government doesn’t compensate for such land until it is renewed.<br />

Q: How does government compensate a kibanja owner who bought land from titled land<br />

owner?<br />

A: Government compensates both owners.<br />

Q:Will government compensate for property before the actual road construction starts?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: If one’s land is affected by the project before a land title deed is transferred in his names,<br />

how does government deal with this situation?<br />

A: The PAP has to prove ownership in ways acceptable to UNRA and local leaders.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 133


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 134


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 135


Meeting 16: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 1 st October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kikwatamigo at Kikwatamigo trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On documents Q: Does government require only the project affected persons to fill project documents?<br />

A: No, next <strong>of</strong> kin can help in filling document.<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for unfinished buildings?<br />

A: Yes, these are compensated to their true value at the time <strong>of</strong> valuation<br />

Q: Does government compensate leased land?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 136


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 137


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 138


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 139<br />

Meeting 17: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 1 st October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kyakapeya trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q:If one has perennial crops and they hope to gain from them over a period <strong>of</strong> time, how will<br />

the government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for income restoration- payments are<br />

made for property “as is” but RAP guidelines <strong>of</strong> multilateral funding agencies provide for<br />

income restoration.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for land where the affected house is built?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Will government compensate before the actual construction starts?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Project Q: When is the project starting?<br />

A: Usually depends on government acquiring necessary funds.<br />

Q: If water mains get damaged during road construction, will government restore them?<br />

A: It will be the duty <strong>of</strong> the contractor to avoiddamaged to utilities.<br />

On Land Q: If one’s land is 90% affected and the remaining parcel is<br />

such small that it is not useful for farming or settlement, how<br />

will government compensate for this?<br />

A: The government will pay for all the land and the affected<br />

person relocated.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 140


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 141


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 142<br />

Meeting 18: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kakindo, Kyamogi, Nyakakongi held at Kyabagambire subcounty.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q Does government compensate for affected property “as is” after valuation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On employment Q: Is there any employment for casual labor?<br />

A: Very likely the contractors will hire local labor during construction.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 143


Meeting 19: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Mparangase held at Kyabagambire sub-county.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for affected property “as is” after valuation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: How does government compensate the deceased?<br />

A: The family has to get heir or a relative approved by the Administrator General to receive<br />

payment on behalf <strong>of</strong> the deceased.<br />

On Project Q: Should the community stop cultivating crops in the 15m road reserve after survey and<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> property has been done?<br />

A: This can continue but at own risk that since these will not be captured in the valuation<br />

records, no compensation will be provided.<br />

Q: After surveying property, can the affected person salvage their materials and build<br />

elsewhere?<br />

A: Yes<br />

Q: Why do district have different compensation rates?<br />

A: It is the government policy for each district to have its own compensation rates set by<br />

District Land Board.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 144


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 145


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 146<br />

Meeting 20:<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kihiro, Katikara Kihambya, Kigugu held at Bulindi Church <strong>of</strong><br />

Uganda C.O.U .<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government consider other factors like labour that one put in while building the<br />

house?<br />

A: Yes, compensation is based on market value and replacement cost.<br />

Q: Does government compensate project Affected Persons without a bank account?<br />

A: The Project Affected Persons is required to get a bank account before compensation is<br />

done.<br />

Q: Does government consider recent market prices during compensation?<br />

A: Yes<br />

On project Q: If one has avocadoes within the road reserve should they be removed before<br />

construction commences?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: If one <strong>of</strong> the project Affected Persons don’t have any identity card, how can their proper<br />

names be got?<br />

Q: The project Affected Persons is required to get an identity card from the LCs for future<br />

use.<br />

Meeting 21: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.


Date held & place: 2 nd October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kibaire held at Kibaire Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any buildings on it?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: During road construction, there may be buildings affected<br />

yet they were not among those eligible for valuation and<br />

Compensation. Will government also consider them?<br />

A: Yes, government considers such incidental damage as eligible for compensation via a<br />

grievance process.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 147


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 148


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 149


MASINDI DISTRICT<br />

Meeting 22: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 5 th October, 2010 for villages, <strong>Masindi</strong> District Headquarters.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Murram � Borrow pits should be restored to original state after excavation and this should be a<br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> the contractor.<br />

� Contractors should not camp near schools.<br />

� The community should be sensitized about negative consequences <strong>of</strong> proposed<br />

development such as potential for spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted<br />

diseases.<br />

� People with disabilities and women should be given opportunity to work on the roads.<br />

On Compensation Q: Won’t government undervalue our property?<br />

A: No.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 150


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 151


Meeting 23: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 5 th October, 2010 for villages Kasaliza, Bulima, Kisoga at Bulima Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Project Q: Will government get the 30m road reserve from one side <strong>of</strong> the road?<br />

A: No, 15m will be got from either side <strong>of</strong> the centreline making it the total <strong>of</strong> 30m.<br />

On Compensation Q: Won’t government undervalue our property during compensation?<br />

A: No, government uses compensation prices developed by respective district local<br />

governments and these reflect prevailing local market conditions.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 152


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 153


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 154<br />

Meeting 24:Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 5 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Busoma ,Kyamukudumi at Bwijanga trading center (<strong>Masindi</strong><br />

District)<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: How does government compensate the deceased?<br />

A: The family has to get a relative approved by the Administrator General to be paid on the<br />

deceased’s behalf.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: If the project affected person has materials for building on the piece <strong>of</strong> land does<br />

government compensate for them?<br />

A: No.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for natural trees?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for a house without an approved plan?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: If water mains are damaged during road construction, will government compensate this?<br />

A: It will be a duty <strong>of</strong> the contractor to ensure that no utilities are damaged during road works<br />

and if they are, they would pay for their restoration.<br />

On Project Q: Why are some houses marked during survey?<br />

A: This is for the knowledge <strong>of</strong> contractors during road construction.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 155


Meeting 25: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 5 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Muuro at Muuro Trading center<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 156<br />

On Compensation Q: Most people along the road are renting and owners <strong>of</strong> affected property may not be ones<br />

actuallyliving in affected buildings. How will government handle this?<br />

A: Through local leaders, information can be got but during compensation they are required<br />

to attend in person.<br />

Q: Does government consider recent market prices during compensation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: How does government compensate for land that has conflicts?<br />

A: Property is valued but payment is not done until conflicts are resolved.<br />

Q:If one has perennial crops and hopes to gain from them over a period <strong>of</strong> time, how will<br />

government compensate this?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for income restoration- payments are<br />

made for property “as is” but resettlement guidelines <strong>of</strong> multilateral funding agencies provide<br />

for income restoration.<br />

On Project Q: Is it mandatory for the projected affected person to get an identity card?<br />

A: Yes, identification documents are necessary.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 157


Meeting 26: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 5 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Katuugo at Katuugo Trading center<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 158<br />

On Compensation Q:If one has perennial crops and they hope to gain from them over a period <strong>of</strong> time, how will<br />

government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for income restoration- payments are<br />

made for property “as is”.<br />

Q: Who determines the prices for our crops?<br />

A: It is the Land Board <strong>of</strong> that particular district.<br />

On Project Q: When are the surveyors coming?<br />

A: They are already working.<br />

Q: Will the road follow existing alignment?<br />

A: Yes, except for the few areas.<br />

On injurious Impacts Q: During road construction, there may be buildings affectedyet they were not among those<br />

eligible for valuation andCompensation. Will government also consider them?<br />

A: Yes, Government considers such incidental damage as eligible for compensation via a<br />

grievance process.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 159


Meeting 27: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 5 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kikayika held at Ikoba center<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Will compensation be done before actual construction commences?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: How will government compensate the deceased?<br />

A: The family has to get a relative approved by the district administration to be paid on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the rest.<br />

Q: Are contractors also sensitized on how to conduct themselves in the community?<br />

A: Yes the contractor will be required to have orientation programs for workers.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 160


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 161


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 162


Meeting 28: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 5 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Bikonzi I, II and Kiina at Bikonzi Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Employment Q: How much will localcommunity benefit in terms <strong>of</strong> employment?<br />

A: The road contractor will hire local labour for casual jobs.<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government consider current market prices during compensation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: WillProject Affected Persons get a chance to viewvalue for their property before the<br />

actual compensation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: If property for the sub-county is destroyed whom does government compensate?<br />

A: Government compensates the local government.<br />

Q: Incase a school’s football pitch is affected does government compensate for it?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 163


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 164


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 165<br />

Meeting 29: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 6 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kisomabutuzi, Rwabutuni, Kikaranga at Rukondwa Trading<br />

center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: If one’s land has both cassava and maize on it. How does the government compensate?<br />

A: Government compensates both the land and crops. Cassava and maize compensated<br />

because it is an annual crop and it is given time to be harvested.<br />

On Employment<br />

Q: Will locals be able to get some casual labor during the road construction?<br />

A: Yes, the contractors will hire local labor for casual jobs<br />

On Project Q: When are surveyors coming?<br />

A: They are already working.<br />

Q: Should people living near the road stop building?<br />

A: No, people should continue with their development activities unless the surveyors identify<br />

their developments as“affected property”.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 166


Meeting 30: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 6 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Katasenywa, at Katasenywa Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate a PAP without any identity card?<br />

A: No, one is required to get one before the actual compensation.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate for young perennial crops?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Is land without any property compensated?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Employment Q: Will there be some employment for the locals?<br />

A: Yes, contractors will hire the locals for casual jobs.<br />

On Project Q: How many meters does the government want as road reserve?<br />

A: 15 meters from both sides <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />

Q: In case one has murram outside the road reserve, does the contractor pay for it?<br />

A: In case this murram is good for the road construction, the contractor will pay for it.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 167


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 168


Meeting 31: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 7 th October, 2010 for villages <strong>of</strong> Kihande I and II at Kiyembe Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for posters?<br />

A: No.<br />

Q: Is titled and customary land compensated the same way?<br />

A: No.<br />

Q: During road construction, there may be buildings affected<br />

yet they were not among those eligible for valuation and<br />

Compensation. Will government also consider them?<br />

A: Yes, Government considers such incidental damage as eligible for compensation via a<br />

grievance process.<br />

On Project Q: If water mains get and electricity poles get damaged during road construction, will<br />

government compensate this?<br />

A: It will be the duty <strong>of</strong> the contractor to ensure that no utilities are damaged during road<br />

works and if they are, they would pay for their restoration.<br />

Q: Who is responsible for any grievances during construction?<br />

A: The RAP will develop grievance management procedures to be utilised during RAP<br />

implementation.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 169


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 170


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 171


MASINDI-KIGUMBA<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 172<br />

Meeting 32: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd November, 2010 for villages Kitamanya, Kyema, Katama, Kasalabwire at Kitamanya<br />

Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: How will the elderly people be able to access their compensation money?<br />

A: Governments will run announcements in local media to notify people about how to access<br />

their compensation.<br />

Q: How does government compensate for graves?<br />

A: Every district has compensation rates for graves but they have different compensation<br />

rates according to types <strong>of</strong> the grave.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for wild trees?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: How does government compensate the deceased?<br />

A: The family has to get a relative approved by the district administration to be paid on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the rest.<br />

Q: Is it possible for the Project Affected Person to salvage their materials for the house after<br />

compensation?<br />

A: Yes.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 173


Meeting 33: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd November, 2010 for villages Kisanja-Kichope, Nyaisimire, Kisanja-Kidebede at Kisanja<br />

Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Who determines the prices for crops?<br />

A: District Land board for every district determines the prices.<br />

On Project Q: Does government sensitize contractors, on issues regarding HIV/AIDS?<br />

A: Yes<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 174


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 175


Meeting 34: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd November, 2010 for villages Walyoba, Kyedikyo and Walyoba C.O.U<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation During construction, the contractors should not block access to peoples’ homes, schools<br />

and health centers.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for a house without a plan?<br />

Yes.<br />

Q: Should a PAP continue building their house even when it is affected?<br />

A: No<br />

On Land Q: Can the PAP whose land is taken and there is a small remaining piece <strong>of</strong> land use it for<br />

other developments?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Project Government should be aware that there are people who steal fuel from project vehicles<br />

during road construction.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 176


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 177


Meeting 35: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 3 rd November, 2010 for villages Pakanyi, Kasomoro, Kitooka at Pakanyi sub-county<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for utilities that are found in the affected house?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Is it mandatory for PAP to acquire IDs before their compensation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for land where the affected house is located?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Won’t government undervalue property for the PAPs?<br />

A: No, government ensures that the PAPs get compensation that is sufficient for them.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 178


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 179


Meeting 36: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd November, 2010 for villages Nyakantorogo, Kasindizi I and Kasindizi II at Kasindizi<br />

trading center<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On project Q: Is the road following the existing alignment?<br />

A: Yes to the extent possible.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 180


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 181


Meeting 37: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 2 nd November, 2010 for villages Nyambindo held at Nyambindo trading center<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for land without a title?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does the government compensate the wife if the husband is dead?<br />

A: Compensation will be collected by the heir or a person approved by the Administrator<br />

General.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 182


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 183


Meeting 38: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 4 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kyatiri, Kiboijangoro II and Kyambogo at Kyatiri trading<br />

center<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate only for the affected house and not land?<br />

A: Government will compensate both the house and land.<br />

Q: If a PAP’s house is used for rent to earn an income. How does the government<br />

compensate these people?<br />

A: The RAP will provide for income restoration.<br />

Q: Is it allowed for PAPs to salvage their materials for the house after compensation?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Will government compensate PAPs before actual road construction commences?<br />

A: Yes<br />

Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Project Q: How will valuers be able to identify earth graves?<br />

A: With help <strong>of</strong> local leaders.<br />

On Land Q: After taking <strong>of</strong>f the required road reserve, Can the PAP utilize the remaining land if it is<br />

enough for development.<br />

A: Yes<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 184


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 185


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 186


Meeting 39: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 4 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Nyakabale LC I and Kikooba at Nyakabale trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for houses that are damaged during road construction?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: During compensation <strong>of</strong> pine, does government consider expenses one incurred when<br />

growing such trees?<br />

A: District compensation rates are assumed to consider all these factors.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 187<br />

On Public utilities Q: Does government reinstate public utilities e.g. Bore holes that are damaged by road<br />

construction activities?<br />

A: Yes, when such utilities are removed, it is the duty <strong>of</strong> the project to construct another one<br />

elsewhere.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 188


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 189


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 190<br />

Meeting 40: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 4 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Lwebigaragara, Buhomozi held at Kizibu trading center<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Project Q: Will the contractors be sensitized too on issues regarding HIV/AIDS?<br />

A: Yes it the duty <strong>of</strong> the government to caution their workers on how to conduct themselves<br />

in communities where they will work.<br />

Q: If one plans to construct a house in the trading center should they wait until the surveyors<br />

have identified where the road were will pass?<br />

A: After surveying the road that is when the people living near the road will know who will be<br />

affected.<br />

Q: If one has land in the corner <strong>of</strong> an existing road. Should they stop developing that land?<br />

A: After survey that is when all the project affected persons will be identified.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 191


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 192<br />

Meeting 41: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 4 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kididima, Kaduku<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Why doesn’t government compensate for annual crops?<br />

A: Annual crops are given ample time to be harvested before the actual road construction<br />

commences.<br />

Q:If a PAP has perennial crops and they hope to gain from them over a period <strong>of</strong> time, how<br />

will government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for income restoration- payments are<br />

made for property “as is”. However RAP guidelines <strong>of</strong> multilateral funding agencies provide<br />

for income restoration.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 193


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 194


HOIMA DISTRICT –KIBAALE DISTRICT<br />

Meeting 42: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 6 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Buhimba Town, Buhimba East, West and Central held at<br />

Buhimba sub-county.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: If a house is affected and the remaining land is too small to have any activity there. How<br />

does government compensate such a person?<br />

A: Government compensates this person the whole amount and they relocate elsewhere.<br />

Q: Does government compensate a house that is damaged during road construction?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Project Q: Is there a fixed price for materials like murram?<br />

A: It is the district <strong>of</strong>fice that sets these prices.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 195


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 196


Meeting 43: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 6 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kikoboza LCI held at Kikooboza Primary school.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: How are PAPs valued in their absence?<br />

A: Llocal leaders will move with the surveyors and valuers such that they can get correct<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> PAPs.<br />

Q: Does the contractor compensate for road diversions?<br />

A: No, contractors don’t pay for that land because it is restored after use but any property<br />

that is destroyed on that piece <strong>of</strong> land is compensated.<br />

Q: Does contractor pay for murram outside the road reserve?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Is titled land compensated the same way as customary land?<br />

A: No.<br />

Q: Will the tarmac road follow the existing alignment?<br />

A: In most areas the tarmac road will follow the existing alignment.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 197


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 198


Meeting 44: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 6 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kyakuza, Kibalarwe held at Mairirwe trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith .Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Will compensation be done only at sub-counties?<br />

A: No, government can get other convenient central places.<br />

On Injurious impacts Q: During road construction, there are some residential houses that are affected yet they<br />

were not among those eligible for valuation and compensation. Will government also<br />

consider them?<br />

A: Yes, injurious damage will be compensated.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 199


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 200


Meeting 45: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 6 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kikuube at Kikuube primary school.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith .Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Will government compensate for religious buildings like churches?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for property that is destroyed during road construction?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: How does government compensate a PAP who is processing a land title?<br />

A: Yes as long as there is pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> ownership.<br />

Q: How does government compensate a PAP who has land with conflict?<br />

A: Conflicts have to be resolved before the compensation is done.<br />

On project Q: Can’t the government reduce the proposed 15m reserve from either side?<br />

A: No, that is the government policy.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 201


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 202


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 203


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 204<br />

Meeting 46: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 7 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kizirafumbi, Rujunju, Kichundu, Butyamba at Kizirafumbi<br />

sub-county.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Employment Q: Will community be involved in providingemployment for road construction?<br />

A: Yes, contractors will hire local labour for casual jobs.<br />

On project Q: Can’t the government reduce the proposed 15m reserve from either side?<br />

A: That is a standard for this size <strong>of</strong> road.<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate a house without a plan?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: If land is affected 99% and the remaining is not enough to build another house or perform<br />

any activities there. Does government compensate the whole area?<br />

A: Yes, government compensates the whole area and the affected person relocates<br />

elsewhere.<br />

Q: Why does the district determine compensation prices?<br />

A: It is government policy for District Land Boards to set compensation rates.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 205


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 206


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 207<br />

Meeting 47:<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 7 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Munteme, Kinywabeho, Kigozi at Munteme Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Employment<br />

On project Q: When is the project likely to start?<br />

A: Usually depends on the government schedule.<br />

On Injurious impacts Q: During road construction, there are some residential houses that are affected yet they<br />

were not among those eligible for valuation and compensation. Will government also<br />

consider them?<br />

A: Yes, injurious damage will be compensated.<br />

On income restoration Q: If one has eucalyptus trees and they hope to gain from them over a period <strong>of</strong> time, how<br />

will government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for<br />

Income restoration- payments are made for property “as is” but income restoration has been<br />

provided in the RAP budget as required by multilateral funding agencies.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 208


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 209<br />

Meeting 48: community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 8 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kaigo, Kyamugoba, Kisambyaat Kaigo Trading Center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: If the 15m road reserve falls on the house verandah does government remove the whole<br />

building?<br />

A: No.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for kiosks?<br />

A: Government does not compensate for any movable property.<br />

On Project Q: Will government sensitize contractors too on how to conduct themselves in the<br />

communities where they will work?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

During road construction, we request the government to put sign posts for the elderly and<br />

the school-going children to avoid accidents.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 210


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 211


Meeting 49: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 8 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Nyakabale, Kitore at Buboga trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for building materials that are in the road reserve?<br />

A: No, the PAP will be asked to take remove materials.<br />

Q: During compensation does government consider labor used to salvage materials for the<br />

affected household?<br />

A: No, material salvage will be done at own cost.<br />

Q: How much will the PAP know what will be compensated?<br />

A: Prices for crops and temporary structures are determined by the district Land Board.<br />

During the disclosure period after the assessment, the PAP can go to the district and find<br />

out how much will be compensated.<br />

On Project Q: Will the PAPs be valued in the absence?<br />

A: Yes, under witness bylocal leaders PAPs can be identified and their property surveyed<br />

and valued even when they are absent.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 212


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 213


Meeting 50: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 8 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kasindi, Kabaganda,Kikonda I and II at <strong>Kabwoya</strong> Trading<br />

Center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Who will paycharges levied bybanks when PAPs open accounts?<br />

A: The project should pay these costs<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Q: How does the government compensate PAPs who happen to be having conflicts with<br />

their property?<br />

A: Conflicts have to be resolved first before compensation is done.<br />

Q: If a school, church or mosque is affected. Who does the government compensate?<br />

A: It is the owners or governing authorities that are compensated.<br />

P a g e | 214


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 215


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 216


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 217<br />

Meeting 51: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 8 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kitooke at Kitooke trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith .Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: How does government compensate the deceased?<br />

A: The family has to get a relative approved by the district administration to be paid on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the rest.<br />

Q: How will the vulnerable PAPs be able to access their money from banksuopn<br />

compensation?<br />

A: Local leaders and next <strong>of</strong> kin can help such people.<br />

On Project<br />

Q: How will the community be able to identify the contractors and those who have come with<br />

criminal-intentions?<br />

A: The contractors move with identity cards to identify themselves.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 218


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 219<br />

Meeting 52: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 8 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kitaganya at Kitaganya trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On income restoration Q: If one has perennial crops and they hope to gain from them<br />

over a period <strong>of</strong> time, how does government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for<br />

Income restoration- payments are made for property “as is”. However this RAP has provided<br />

for income restoration as required by multilateral funding agencies.<br />

On Project Q: Does the contractor pay for property lost where the road diverts?<br />

A: No, since this land will revert to the owner.<br />

On Compensation Q: How does government compensate the deceased?<br />

A: The family has to get a relative approved by the Administrator General to receive<br />

compensation payment.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 220


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 221


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 222


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 223


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 224<br />

Meeting 54: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 10 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kibego, Gayaza A & B, Kinyambire held at Gayaza<br />

Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: If the woman <strong>of</strong> the affected property was abandoned by her husband. How is this family<br />

compensated?<br />

A: With the help <strong>of</strong> the local leaders the rightful person can be identified and compensated<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> the family.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for a house without a plan?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Who determines the prices for the materials <strong>of</strong> the affected house?<br />

A: The valuers determine these prices.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 225


Meeting 55: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 10 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Mabaale held at Mabaale sub-county<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Project Q: Should one stop building a house near the road because it might be affected?<br />

A: It will be only when the surveyors and the valuers identify what will be affected that one<br />

will be sure.<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Why the districts Land Board determine compensation rates?<br />

A: That is a government policy for districts to determine the market prices.<br />

Does government compensate before the actual road construction?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Injurious Impact Q: During road construction, there are some buildings affected they were not among those<br />

eligible for valuation and compensation. Will government also consider them?<br />

A: Yes, injurious damage will be compensated.<br />

Q: How does government compensate for land whose title is not processed?<br />

A: The title has to be fully processed before compensation is done.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 226


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 227


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 228<br />

Meeting 56: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 11 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kitemuzi East, West Kamuyange, Dida and Dida B held<br />

at Kitemuzi Trading center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Will government need more than one identity card?<br />

A: No, government needs just one identity card for proper names and identification.<br />

Q: How does government compensate squatters and the land owners?<br />

A: Government will compensate both the land owner and squatters.<br />

How does government compensate a squatter who has perennial crops on titled land?<br />

A: Government compensates squatters for the crops and the land owner for their land.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for annual crops that are given less than three months for<br />

harvesting?<br />

Yes.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 229


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 230<br />

Meeting 57: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 11 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kaitemba, Kinogora ,Bihanga at Kaitemba trading center<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for a house without a plan?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Does government compensate for stones that lie within the affected area?<br />

A: Only when the stone is <strong>of</strong> significant importance.<br />

Q: Is it possible for a friend or relative to obtain an account for the affected person in their<br />

absence?<br />

A: No.<br />

On Project Q: Does government sensitize the contractors on issues to do with AIDS and the on how to<br />

conduct themselves in areas where they will work?<br />

Yes, it is the duty <strong>of</strong> the government to do so.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 231


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 232<br />

Meeting 58: Community meetings<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 11 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Mugalike, Kyangamwoyo, Nyambuzi at Mugalike trading<br />

center.<br />

Present: Seryazi .Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On compensation Q: Does government compensate for both the land owner and the kibanja owner?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On income restoration Q: If one has trees for example mango trees and they hope to gain from them over a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> time, how will government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for Income restoration, payments are<br />

made for property “as is”.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 233


Meeting 59:<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 11 th November, 2010 for village <strong>of</strong> Kyenzige A & B held at Kyenzige Trading Center.<br />

Present: Seryazi Lamek, Sociologist<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Issues raised:<br />

On Project Q: Does the government allow the PAP to relocate to another piece <strong>of</strong> land if there is<br />

enough land for development?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On Compensation Q: Does government compensate for land without any property?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 234<br />

On Injurious Impact Q: Does government compensate a house that is destroyed during road construction?<br />

A: Yes.<br />

On income restoration Q: If one has trees for example mango trees and they hope to gain from them over a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> time, how will government compensate?<br />

A: Existing Uganda compensation laws do not provide for Income restoration- payments are<br />

made for property “as is”.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 235


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 236


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 237<br />

Meeting 60: National forestry Authority (NFA)<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place 9th August, 2012 held at National Forestry Authority headquarters<br />

Present: Rukundo Tom , EIA & Research Specialist (NFA)<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Ritah Nabaggala, Environmental consultant (AWE)<br />

On Forests � Apart from Kagombe CFR which is found on the northern bank <strong>of</strong> R. Muzizi there<br />

could be other forest reserves that are existent along the project road.<br />

� A good road will ease operations <strong>of</strong> patrolling and management <strong>of</strong> forests by NFA<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers along the project road.<br />

� There are also negative effects that will come along with the upgrading <strong>of</strong> the road<br />

for example people who carry out illegal activities charcoal burning and timber will<br />

find it easier to enter into the forests.<br />

� There would be increase <strong>of</strong> farmers reclaiming forest land for farming activities.<br />

Meeting 61: with Uganda Aids commission (UAC)<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> meeting: To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 9th August, 2012 held at Uganda Aids Commission headquarters (Kampala District).<br />

Present:<br />

Issues raised<br />

Tigawalana David, Research Specialist (UAC)<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Ritah Nabaggala, Environmental consultant (AWE)<br />

On Contractors � Contractors are mobile people and when they are in an area they increase economic<br />

activities for example increasing in trade within the project area because they will be<br />

buying commodities from the communities.<br />

� Contractors are always young, energetic and sexually active and this leads to<br />

transaction <strong>of</strong> sex and hence prostitution and increased HIV/ AIDS and other sexually<br />

related diseases.<br />

Recommendations<br />

� Contractor’s camps should have clear rules and guidelines that will be given to the<br />

workers in order to guide them on how they should behave in the communities. The<br />

workers should also be sensitized on how to use condoms and provide them if<br />

possible.<br />

� It is a governmental principle for contractors to mainstream HIV/AIDS activities among<br />

their activities. It is recommended that they should set up an HIV/AIDS policy. The<br />

contractors should also have a focal person to create a good relationship between the<br />

contractor and the communities.<br />

� The road contractor should coordinate with local HIV/AIDS organisation to<br />

sensitisation about HIV/AIDS in the worker’s camp<br />

Meeting 62: National Environment Authority (NEMA)<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> the meeting To obtain their views on the proposed project.<br />

Date held & place: 9 th August, 2012 held at National Environment Authority <strong>of</strong>fices.<br />

Present: Naomi Obbo Odongo, Environment Impact Assessment Officer (NEMA)<br />

Faith Mugerwa, Sociologist (AWE)<br />

Ritah Nabaggala, Environmental consultant (AWE)<br />

Issues raised<br />

On project � Q: Have you identified areas for the contractor’s camp?<br />

� A: UNRA to identify.<br />

� NEMA will need a project brief for the contractor’s camp to be approved before project<br />

implementation.<br />

� UNRA should also develop an independent project brief for the area from where the<br />

murram will be obtained.<br />

� Borrow pits should be properly restored


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 238<br />

� The consultant should obtain the GPS coordinates for the water abstraction points that<br />

will be used during construction and the likely impacts it will cause to the community<br />

using the same water source.<br />

� The road contractor should provide measures to control siltation <strong>of</strong> wetlands along the<br />

road during construction.<br />

� The consultant should provide maps and GPS coordinates for the rivers, wetlands<br />

bridges and culverts along the project road.<br />

� Consultant should include the EHS management plan and the contracture agreements<br />

from UNRA in the appendix <strong>of</strong> the report.<br />

� NEMA as the lead agency will carry out the project monitoring with UNRA and the<br />

contractor.<br />

On waste � Hazardous wastes should be managed properly to avoid oil spillage and other related<br />

impacts on the soil and ground water.<br />

On Community � The contractor should identify trading centres along the project road and sensitise the<br />

people about road safety and impacts associated with a new road.<br />

� The road contractor should sensitise the community and road workers about<br />

HIV/AIDS.<br />

Meeting 63: Uganda wildlife Authority (UWA)<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> the meeting To obtain their views on the proposed project<br />

Date held & place: 9 th August, 2012 held at National Environment Authority <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

Present John Makobo, Director Conservation (UWA)<br />

Charles Tumwesigye, Ag. Chief Conservation Area Manager (UWA)<br />

Pamela Tashobya, sociologist (AWE)<br />

Mugerwa Faith, sociologist (AWE)<br />

Ritah Nabaggala, Environmental Consultant (AWE)<br />

On road project � UWA <strong>of</strong>ficers suggested that long the road there should be some corners and also<br />

humps to reduce on the speed.<br />

� <strong>Road</strong> signs are always stolen by the local people for steel production, we suggest the<br />

contractor to provide monitoring to control theft <strong>of</strong> road signs.<br />

� The construction <strong>of</strong> the road will stimulate economic growth in the project area.<br />

On wildlife � UWA <strong>of</strong>ficers clarified that there is no wildlife conservation areas along the project<br />

road however; the chimpanzees noted in <strong>Kabwoya</strong> might be from the nearby CFR.<br />

They requested for warning signs to identify animals and wildlife crossing areas to<br />

minimise the possible road kills.<br />

On Tourists � With the development <strong>of</strong> the project road it will ease and also increase the number <strong>of</strong><br />

tourists travelling from Murchison Falls national park to Queen Elizabeth National park<br />

in Kasese.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 239


Annex 3: Social Survey Questionnaire<br />

Kyenjojo – <strong>Hoima</strong> – <strong>Masindi</strong>-<strong>Kigumba</strong> <strong>Road</strong> RAP, 2010<br />

AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY FORM<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> interviewer: _______________<br />

Date <strong>of</strong> interview: ____/______/2010____ Village: _________________<br />

Section 1: FAMILY INFORMATION<br />

LO _________ Tenant ________ Licensee _________ Co-owner ______________<br />

(Tick appropriate response)<br />

Household Head________________________________________________ (Surname, First Name)<br />

Photo Ref/House Number ___________________ Sex: _____________________<br />

Date/Year <strong>of</strong> Birth: ___________ Age: ________ (exact/appropriate)<br />

Where were you born? _________________ When did you come here? _________________<br />

Are your parents alive? Yes/No If alive, which? ___________________________<br />

Where do/did your parents live? ______________________________________________________<br />

Identity-card/Graduated Tax/Other ID _________ Presented? Yes/No ID No _________________<br />

Name on ID _________________ Address on ID ____________________<br />

Marital status (tick appropriate response):<br />

Single<br />

Married<br />

(No. <strong>of</strong> spouses): __<br />

Divorced<br />

Widowed<br />

Tribe/Clan: ___________________________________________________<br />

Village: _______________________________________________________<br />

Main occupation <strong>of</strong> head <strong>of</strong> household: _____________________________<br />

Where do you work? _____________________________________________<br />

Other working persons in household:<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Yes<br />

P a g e | 240


Any other working person in household?: No<br />

Main occupation: ________________________________________________<br />

Where do you work? ______________________________________________<br />

Religion:<br />

Catholic<br />

Protestant<br />

Muslim<br />

Other______________________<br />

Is the affected plot a principal place <strong>of</strong> residence? (tick appropriate response)<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS:<br />

Household Member<br />

Spouse(s)<br />

Full Name Year <strong>of</strong> Birth Residing on<br />

Affected Land<br />

(Yes/No)<br />

Children (Age 18+)<br />

Children (Below 18)<br />

Other Dependents<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 241<br />

Literacy Level*/education [see<br />

footprint below]<br />

* Use these codes for literacy levels: 1. Illiterate 2. Can read and write 3: Completed Primary Education 4: Completed<br />

Secondary Education 5: Completed University Education


SECTION 2: HOUSEHOLD LAND HOLDINGS AND ASSETS<br />

Agricultural Plots (Note: Land size and type and crop in valuation report)<br />

Location<br />

(Village)<br />

Surface<br />

(Acres)<br />

Residential Plots<br />

Location<br />

(Village)<br />

Surface<br />

(Acres)<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Status <strong>of</strong> Occupation<br />

(Owner “O”/Co-owner “CO”/Tenant “T”/Co-tenant<br />

“COT”/Licensee “L”)<br />

Agricultural Use (Crops<br />

typically grown)<br />

P a g e | 242<br />

Affected<br />

(Yes/No)<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

Status <strong>of</strong> Occupation<br />

(Owner “O”/Co-owner “CO”/Tenant “T”/Co-tenant<br />

“COT”/Licensee “L”)<br />

Structures on<br />

Plot<br />

Affected<br />

(Yes/No)<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

O CO T COT L Y N<br />

Structures (Note: details <strong>of</strong> structures are in the valuation report)<br />

Location<br />

(Village)<br />

Construction materials<br />

(Permanent “P”)/ Non-<br />

Permanent “NP”)<br />

Status <strong>of</strong> Occupation (Owner<br />

“O”/Co-owner “CO”/Tenant “T”/Co-tenant<br />

“COT”/Licensee “L”)<br />

Condition Affected<br />

(Yes/No)<br />

P NP O CO T COT L Y N<br />

P NP O CO T COT L Y N<br />

P NP O CO T COT L Y N<br />

P NP O CO T COT L Y N<br />

P NP O CO T COT L Y N


SECTION 3: LIVELIHOOD IN AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS<br />

Item Description Cash for year<br />

2009<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

(Ug Shillings)<br />

Income from household enterprises<br />

(Note: Together with a PAP, you can make calculations from a person’s description <strong>of</strong> sold goods )<br />

Crop farming<br />

Other agricultural income (e.g. livestock, poultry)<br />

� Cattle<br />

� Pigs<br />

� Goats<br />

� Chicken<br />

� Other<br />

Non-agricultural income<br />

Property income<br />

Rent received from rented property (land, housing)<br />

Benefits<br />

Family allowances/social security benefits<br />

Remittances and assistance received from others<br />

Other (inheritance, alimony, scholarships, etc)<br />

Employment<br />

Formal employment income<br />

� Fishing<br />

� Trading<br />

� Cultivation<br />

� Transport<br />

� Education<br />

� Leadership/administration<br />

� Other<br />

Temporal status <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

TOTAL<br />

� Fishing<br />

� Trading<br />

� Cultivation<br />

� Transport<br />

� Education<br />

� Leadership/administration<br />

� Other<br />

* Information about incomes:<br />

Is all household income in cash or some barter for commodities or services done?<br />

____________<br />

Do you have a bank account? Yes/No<br />

If yes, where? (e.g. bank name, location, distance): __________________________<br />

In kind*<br />

e.g. Cow/Labor/Grain<br />

_____________


SECTION 4: HEALTH & VULNERABILITY<br />

Are there disabled or chronically ill people in the household? YES NO<br />

If YES: Type <strong>of</strong> disability/illness:_______________________<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> care required: ________________________<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> births and deaths in the household over the last 12 months:<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Births: ________________________<br />

Deaths: _______________________ Cause: _________________<br />

Has a child under age <strong>of</strong> 5 died in the household in last 3 years?, YES NO<br />

If YES, Cause: _________________<br />

What are the 3 commonest diseases that affect the family?<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

How much do you spend on treating the above commonest diseases? :________________<br />

What is the nearest health facility known to the family? :________________<br />

Is it actually used by the family? YES NO<br />

If NO, why not?__________________________________<br />

Do you practice family planning? YES NO<br />

Have you heard <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS? YES NO<br />

Do you know how HIV is contracted? YES NO (verify knowledge if correct response given)<br />

Do you know how HIV is avoided? YES NO (verify knowledge if correct response given)<br />

SECTION 5: WELFARE INDICATORS<br />

(Tick appropriate response)<br />

Does everyone in the household have atleast two sets <strong>of</strong> clothes? Yes No<br />

Does anyone in the household own a radio? Yes No<br />

Does anyone in the household own a mobile telephone?<br />

Does anyone in the household own a fixed telephone?<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

No<br />

Does the household own a bicycle? Yes No<br />

Does the household have any other transport vehicle other than a bicycle?<br />

Yes No<br />

If yes, what type <strong>of</strong> vehicle?_________________________________________________<br />

If someone in the household had a serious problem, is there anybody in this settlement that you could<br />

ask assistance from?<br />

Where do you get drinking water from? (Tick appropriate response)<br />

� Communal borehole,<br />

P a g e | 244<br />

Yes No


� River<br />

� Lakeshore<br />

Distance from residence _________ metres<br />

Do you fish: YES NO<br />

If YES, where? ___________________ How <strong>of</strong>ten?_________________________<br />

Do you hunt: YES NO<br />

If YES, where? __________________________ How <strong>of</strong>ten?_________________________<br />

What fuel do you use for lighting in the household?<br />

Firewood<br />

Gas<br />

Charcoal<br />

Solar<br />

Kerosene<br />

Biogas<br />

Electricity<br />

Other<br />

What fuel do you use for cooking in the household?:<br />

Firewood<br />

Gas<br />

Charcoal<br />

Solar<br />

Kerosene<br />

Biogas<br />

Electricity<br />

Other<br />

SECTION 6: EXPENDITURE PATTERNS<br />

Rank the following items according to which you spend most money on per month (1= Most spent on; 7= least spent on)<br />

Item Rank<br />

School fees<br />

Healthcare/medical expenses<br />

Food<br />

Clothing<br />

Transport<br />

Dependants<br />

Rent<br />

AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 245


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Annex 4: Lists <strong>of</strong> Vulnerable PAPs and required assistance<br />

District Village Name Age Sex Vulnerability Assistance necessary<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong> Kicumba Regina Kabayanja 70 F Widow, Elderly Recommended to deliver compensation<br />

payment to her residence and involve<br />

next <strong>of</strong> kin at the time <strong>of</strong> payment.<br />

“ Safina Kabonako 76 F Widow, Elderly “<br />

Kikwatamigo Birigenda Alyosious 65 M Widow Promote and support self-help housing<br />

programmes.<br />

“ Katie Tibeita 65 F Widow “<br />

Kyakapeya Alinda Betty 33 F Widow Where possible, provide her employment<br />

during road construction.<br />

“ Bategeka Venna 62 F Widow Recommended to deliver compensation<br />

payment to her residence and involve<br />

next <strong>of</strong> kin in signing paperwork.<br />

“ Amanya Joy 40 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Nyamuhungu Mary 43 F Widow “<br />

“ Kabagahya Yedida 43 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Yerusa Mugahya 70 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Hadija Okello 46 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Kabamori Florence 45 F Widow “<br />

Mparo Kiiza Mary Tereza 60 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Kabonesa Joyce 60 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Abudu Mugisa 46 M Widow “<br />

“ Ann Mary Barungi 54 F Widow “<br />

Bwikya Tibeita Ruth 70 F Elderly It is recommended to deliver<br />

compensation payment to her residence<br />

and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

payment.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 247<br />

“ Nakasumba Edinansi 50 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Fatuma Teriimuka 68 F Widow “<br />

“ Birungi Christine 38 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Butale Nyangoma Teopas 74 F Widow, Ill Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> payment.<br />

“ Nakku Dolic 68 F Widow “<br />

Kiryateete Mboneko nyensi 80 F Elderly, Ill It is recommended to deliver<br />

compensation payment to her residence<br />

and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

payment.<br />

“ Alibankoha Rose 66 F Widow “<br />

“ Kabwanga Gloria 50 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />

“ Rwesemereza Ruth 70 F Elderly, widow<br />

Mpaija Basasibwaki Roselyn 38 F Female headed<br />

Involve her in road construction activities<br />

household<br />

such as through employment opportunity<br />

“ Mugisa violet 35 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

Kisalizi Kabonesa Joyce 56 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />

Kibaire Diana Mugisa 60 F Widow “<br />

Kihambya Nyandera Sarah 56 F Widow “<br />

Katikara Kamwanda M. Daisy 56 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Kaheru Mitusera 80 F Ill/elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

“ Kasigwa Rhoda 50 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Dina Rwakaikara 85 F Ill/elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

“ Anna Nyangoma 41 F Female headed<br />

Involve her in road construction activities-<br />

household<br />

flag bearers.<br />

Kihora Jane Kyahorwa 71 F Widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

“ Matovu Elizabeth 78 F Elderly “<br />

“ Nyamahungu Teddy 56 F Female headed Deliver compensation payment to her


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 248<br />

household residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Tinkasimire Polotida 60 F Widow “<br />

Kyamongi Mabone Faridah 62 F Widow “<br />

“ Nyakebosike Penninal 60 F Widow “<br />

“ Bujune Abisigi 60 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“ Wandera Yerusa 60 F Widow “<br />

“ Hanifa biganbwinda 57 F Widow “<br />

District Village Name Age Sex Vulnerability<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong> Kigungu Buliko Teopista 56 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kyamukuduma Kabagamba Efulaim 80 M Elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Ndozerehe Consolate 50 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Ngarosa Joan 50 F Widow “<br />

Ikoba Ayesiga Aida 48 F Widow “<br />

“ Kyengera Aisha 85 F Elderly, widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Hahira Agnes 75 F Elderly, widow “<br />

Katungo Ahebwa Olive 37 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Murro Abel Bitamazire 90 M Ill / elderly Involve next <strong>of</strong> kin during compensation.<br />

“ Kalyebale Joniva 76 F Widow<br />

“ Kaahwa Harriet 42 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Korotida Matama 70 M Widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 249<br />

Kihande Wamala Sebastian 86 M Ill/elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Nantume Anne 74 F Elderly “<br />

“ Tibahwa Justine 64 F Widow “<br />

“ Basemera Zaina 50 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kyakatabuka Twesigwa Sarah 35 F Widow “<br />

Katesenywa Kasanja Florentina 68 F Ill/elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Kaahwa Beatrice 53 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Byaruhanga James 54 M Widow “<br />

“ Matovu Hadija 71 F Widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Bikonzi Kakwanzi katongole 65 M Widow “<br />

“ Nakirya Flora 50 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kisomabutuzi Tebagwa Katie 49 M Widow “<br />

“ Tibananuka Mariam 60 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Kyamanwa Alice 44 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Murumba Sarah 65 F Widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Majalija Gladys 68 F Widow “<br />

“ Erukaana Bakabihirwa 75 M Elderly “<br />

“ Kyokuhairwa Harriet 40 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Elizabeth Nalumu 42 F Widow “<br />

“ Nyanjerwa Alice 47 F Female headed<br />

household<br />


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 250<br />

Kikoba Byakagaba George 54 M Widow “<br />

Nyambindo Kazarabana Jovia 40 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

Kyemakyakatto Kakongoro Florence 61 F Widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Isoke Petronila 70 F Widow “<br />

“ Mbabazi Donate 30 F Widow “<br />

“ Isingoma George 77 M Ill/elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Nyamagenyi Manjeri 65 F Widow “<br />

“ Nakirya Noam 65 F Widow “<br />

“ Byamukama charles 19 M Child headed household “<br />

District Village Name Age Sex Vulnerability<br />

Kiryandongo Kizibu Kabachot Joniva 80 F Ill/elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kyatiri Byabali veronica 69 F Widow “<br />

Kisekula Kababindi Florence 50 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kyambogo Monu Roselyne 65 F Widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Kiiza Magadaline 58 F Widow “<br />

Kididima Masaba Fosca 36 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Musamiri zaifur 50 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kitamanya Kamara Joyce 62 F Widow Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 251<br />

Katama Nora Kiiza 75 F Elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Munaku Edirisa 70 F Elderly “<br />

Kisalabwire Fred Kandore 69 M Widow “<br />

“ Kisembo Evans 70 M Ill/elderly “<br />

Isiimba Yokos<strong>of</strong>at Kaijamurubi 78 M Ill/elderly “<br />

Kyedikyo Makumbi Mariam 70 F Ill/Elderly “<br />

“ Yayeri Erebura 70 M Elderly “<br />

Kisingizi Byabaro Veronica 62 F Widow “<br />

“ Nyakato Jamila 57 F Female headed<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

household<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Nyambindo Abifaisil Miteeto 60 F Widow “<br />

“ Kayikara Florence 54 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

District Village Name Age Sex Vulnerability<br />

Kyenjojo Rujunju Kasamira Sarah 63 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“ Nyamijumbi Florence 48 F Widow “<br />

“ Kwesiga Ibrahim 55 M Widow “<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kikuyu Kakwani Byaruhanga 19 M Child headed households “<br />

Kinywambeho Bitekereza Jane 45 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

“ Omuhereza Sande 35 M Widow “<br />

“ Kobusingye Justine 20 F Child headed household “<br />

“ Nseke Puhikewa 62 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

Butyamba Norah Kakengi 56 F Widow “<br />

Munteme Manyireki Victoria 83 F Ill/elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kicaaya Arali Simon 30 F Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Bahatungir Olivier 50 F Widow “<br />

Kiziramfumbi Kiiza Sarah 47 F Widow “


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 252<br />

Kisiiga Bonobera Daizy 62 F Female headed<br />

household<br />

“<br />

Kigorra Namyero Erina 62 F Widow “<br />

Buswekera Njurungu Deo 60 M Widow “<br />

“ Taibu Safina 75 F Elderly Deliver compensation payment to her<br />

residence and involve next <strong>of</strong> kin.<br />

Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

Kikoboza Mbabazi Frank 42 M Widow Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.<br />

“ Arinaitwa Patrick 21 M Child headed household Provide financial advice on proper use<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> compensation.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Annex 5: Number <strong>of</strong> PAPs per road section<br />

<strong>Road</strong> section Number <strong>of</strong> PAPs<br />

Kyenjojo-<strong>Hoima</strong> 6270<br />

<strong>Hoima</strong>-<strong>Masindi</strong> 1549<br />

<strong>Masindi</strong>-<strong>Kigumba</strong> 1186<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> property owners 9005<br />

A full list <strong>of</strong> these and other affected persons and their property is presented in the property valuation report.


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Annex 6: Radio announcements<br />

RADIO ANNOUNCEMENT<br />

P a g e | 254<br />

THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY (UNRA) – KAMPALA<br />

UPGRADING OF KYENJOJO – HOIMA – MASINDI – KIGUMBA ROAD TO BITUMEN STANDARDS<br />

Environmental & Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Action Plan, Valuation <strong>of</strong> Property and Cadastral<br />

Survey.<br />

The Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority (UNRA), notifies project affected persons living within 15 metre width on<br />

either side, along KYENJOJO – HOIMA – MASINDI – KIGUMBA road, that the exercise <strong>of</strong> Valuation <strong>of</strong> Property,<br />

Social Impact Assessment and Cadastral Surveying is ongoing. The project affected persons are requested to<br />

stay at their homes as a team <strong>of</strong> RAP consultants and Valuers and Surveyors will be visiting them.<br />

UNRA therefore notifies the affected persons that the Valuation <strong>of</strong> Property, Social Impact Assessment and<br />

Cadastral Surveying will be effected as detailed below.<br />

Date: This exercise begins on 4 th April 2010.<br />

Project affected Persons in possession <strong>of</strong> land title deeds are requested to disclose and present a photocopy <strong>of</strong> their<br />

land titles to the consultants.<br />

All LCs are requested to notify people living along the road to be available for the exercise and to accord necessary<br />

cooperation to the consultants.<br />

The Executive Director,<br />

Uganda National <strong>Road</strong>s Authority (UNRA),<br />

P.O.Box 28487, Kampala.<br />

1 May 2010


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Annex 7: PROJECT DISCLOSURE<br />

P a g e | 255


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 256


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 257


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 258


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 259


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

P a g e | 260


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Annex 8: RAP BUDGET DETAIL FOR SECTION FUNDED BY AfDB<br />

List <strong>of</strong> affected property (by category) along Bulima-<strong>Kigumba</strong> <strong>Road</strong> Section to be<br />

funded by AfDB<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong> - Bulima 69 km and Bulima - <strong>Kabwoya</strong> 66 km (135 km <strong>of</strong> total 238 km)<br />

Affected Property<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong><br />

(66 km)<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima (69<br />

km)<br />

1 Permanent Houses 13 13<br />

2 Shops 56 24<br />

3 Kitchens 0 0<br />

4 Schools 0 0<br />

5 Medical Clinics 0 0<br />

6 Churches 0 0<br />

7 Mosques 0 0<br />

8 Toilets 0 0<br />

9 Pit Latrines 2 1<br />

10 Shades 2 1<br />

11 Maize Stores 0 0<br />

12 Kiosks 1 3<br />

13 Barbed wire Fences 64 20<br />

14 Local Live Hedges 37 25<br />

15 Earth Graves 0 10<br />

16 Paved/Concrete Yards 1 0<br />

17 Gates 2 0<br />

18 Septic Tanks<br />

Boundary/Retaining<br />

2 0<br />

19 Walls 2 1<br />

20 Water Tanks 1 0<br />

21 Kraals 0 0<br />

22 Well 0 0<br />

23 Fuel Pumps 6 0<br />

24 Fuel Tanks 2 0<br />

25 Petrol Station Canopies 2 0<br />

TOTAL 193 98<br />

Note: 17 strips <strong>of</strong> gardens <strong>of</strong> estimated area <strong>of</strong> 16 acres along the road<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> District<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Households to<br />

be physically<br />

relocated<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> PAPs (HHs)<br />

in buildings/<br />

dwellings to be<br />

demolished 1<br />

Total No. <strong>of</strong><br />

people losing<br />

various types <strong>of</strong><br />

property 2<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> 59 354 2406<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima 32 144 1866<br />

Total 91 498 4272<br />

1. This is number <strong>of</strong> people in buildings/ households to be demolished by the road project (a household is a group <strong>of</strong> people<br />

living in the same dwelling).<br />

354 PAPs are in 59 households and 144 PAPs in 32 households.<br />

2. This is number <strong>of</strong> people documented by the property survey/ valuation consultant whose assets <strong>of</strong> various types (a fence, kiosk, building, crops, etc) were to be affected by the road project.<br />

Not all HH had families/ dependants.<br />

RAP Costs (relocation and compensation):<br />

<strong>Road</strong> Section<br />

Value for Land<br />

(UGX)<br />

Value for Buildings<br />

& Other<br />

Improvements<br />

(UGX)<br />

Value for Crops<br />

(UGX)<br />

Sub Total Disturbance<br />

Allowance at<br />

15% <strong>of</strong><br />

compensation<br />

sum<br />

Total (UgX)<br />

Bulima-<strong>Kabwoya</strong> 3,701,920,738 1,173,732,506 241,076,850 5,116,730,094 1,535,019,028 6,651,749,122<br />

<strong>Kigumba</strong>-Bulima 1,753,981,949 741,283,743 147,015,500 2,642,281,192 792,684,358 3,434,965,550<br />

Total 5,455,902,687 1,915,016,249 388,092,350 7,759,011,286 2,327,703,386 10,086,714,672<br />

Exchange rate (as <strong>of</strong> 2 Oct 2012) : 1 USD = UgX 2552


AWE Engineers<br />

www.awe-engineers.com<br />

Assistance for restoring crop production:<br />

(i.e. opening new<br />

gardens, seeds, etc):<br />

Compensation to<br />

relocate graves:<br />

Income restoration for businesses (shops,<br />

etc) :<br />

Provisional sum for assistance to<br />

vulnerable people:<br />

RAP implementation<br />

cost:<br />

RAP monitoring and<br />

evaluation:<br />

11,642,770.50 UgX<br />

2,500,000.00 UgX<br />

57,450,487.47 UgX<br />

40,500,000.00 UgX<br />

170,168,067.00 UgX<br />

56,722,689.00 UgX<br />

TOTAL RAP budget for AFDB section 10,425,698,685.85 UgX<br />

Contingency for eventualities (put at 10% <strong>of</strong> total compensation<br />

sum)*:<br />

* Sum suggested by AfDB<br />

Grand total<br />

1,042,569,868.58 UgX<br />

11,468,268,554.43 UgX<br />

P a g e | 262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!