08.01.2013 Views

in the family? - Association of Corporate Counsel

in the family? - Association of Corporate Counsel

in the family? - Association of Corporate Counsel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y outside counsel. If this is <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>in</strong>-house lawyers could engage <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>vestigation that<br />

concludes with an oral report to management.<br />

Which ethics rules do you th<strong>in</strong>k would govern <strong>the</strong> Davenport Paris <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

with respect to its representation <strong>of</strong> Bristol?<br />

A. New York<br />

B. Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<br />

C. France<br />

D. European Union<br />

A lawyer is governed by <strong>the</strong> ethics rules <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> jurisdiction <strong>in</strong> which she is admitted to<br />

practice, regardless <strong>of</strong> where she is provid<strong>in</strong>g services. Thus, <strong>the</strong> lawyers <strong>in</strong> Davenport’s Paris<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice normally will be governed by rules <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> French bar. Those rules prohibit conflicts that<br />

arise only from representation <strong>of</strong> clients <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same matter. By contrast, Rule 1.7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ABA<br />

Model Rules <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Conduct prohibits a lawyer from undertak<strong>in</strong>g representation<br />

adverse to a current client <strong>in</strong> any matter.<br />

Model Rule 8.5, however, which has been adopted <strong>in</strong> most states, says that a lawyer not<br />

admitted to practice <strong>in</strong> a jurisdiction is subject to <strong>the</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>ary authority <strong>of</strong> that jurisdiction if<br />

she “provides or <strong>of</strong>fers to provide any legal services” <strong>in</strong> that jurisdiction. In this case, <strong>the</strong><br />

lawyers from Davenport’s Paris <strong>of</strong>fice attended a meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> New York <strong>in</strong> connection with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

work for Bristol on <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> LeDoux to Globalco. This provides some possibility that <strong>the</strong><br />

lawyers might be subject to United States ethics rules.<br />

The problem, however, is that New York does not have a version <strong>of</strong> Rule 8.5. Thus,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is no basis for attempt<strong>in</strong>g to apply New York ethics rules to <strong>the</strong> French lawyers.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, as a practical matter it would be difficult to enforce such rules aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>se<br />

lawyers. The matter on which <strong>the</strong>y are work<strong>in</strong>g is a transaction, which does not <strong>in</strong>volve<br />

appearance before a tribunal that could disqualify <strong>the</strong>m for a conflict <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

It’s worth not<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> CCBE, <strong>the</strong> European Union Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct for European<br />

Lawyers, applies only to lawyers <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> cross-border practice with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Union.<br />

In addition, even if it did apply here, its conflicts provision relates only to <strong>the</strong> representation <strong>of</strong><br />

two or more clients <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same matter.<br />

Should you change your policy on contact with represented persons to<br />

reflect <strong>the</strong> different rules <strong>in</strong> each country <strong>in</strong> which you do bus<strong>in</strong>ess? In each<br />

state <strong>in</strong> which you do bus<strong>in</strong>ess?<br />

ABA Model Rule 4.2 provides that a lawyer shall not communicate about <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong><br />

a representation with a person she knows is represented by ano<strong>the</strong>r lawyer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter,<br />

without <strong>the</strong> consent <strong>of</strong> that lawyer. Employees <strong>of</strong> an organization such as Barco generally are<br />

<strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Counsel</strong>’s “Ethical Issues for <strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Counsel</strong>”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!