09.01.2013 Views

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

Proceedings World Bioenergy 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MaIN spONsOR:<br />

WORLD<br />

BIOENERGY<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

pROCEEDINGs<br />

Edited by:<br />

The Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association


© Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association and Authors <strong>2010</strong><br />

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including<br />

photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the<br />

copyright holder and the publisher.<br />

ISBN 978-91-977624-1-0<br />

Cover photo: Ugur Evirgen, iStockphoto


ORGaNIsED BY:<br />

The swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> association, svebio<br />

Torsgatan 12, SE-111 23 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 8 441 70 80, Fax +46 8 441 70 89<br />

E-mail worldbioenergy@svebio.se<br />

www.svebio.se<br />

Coordinator: Gustav Melin, Svebio, Sweden<br />

Elmia aB<br />

Box 6066, SE-550 06 Jönköping, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 36 15 20 00, Fax +46 36 16 46 92<br />

E-mail worldbioenergy@elmia.se<br />

www.elmia.se<br />

Coordinator: Jakob Hirsmark, Elmia, Sweden<br />

pROCEEDINGs puBLIshED BY:<br />

The swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> association, svebio<br />

Torsgatan 12, SE-111 23 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 8 441 70 80, Fax +46 8 441 70 89<br />

E-mail worldbioenergy@svebio.se<br />

www.svebio.se<br />

paTRON Of WORLD BIOENERGY:<br />

His Majesty King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden<br />

CONfERENCE ChaIRpERsON:<br />

Prof. Tomas Kåberger, Director General of the Swedish Energy Agency<br />

Patron of<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

His Majesty King Carl XVI<br />

Gustaf of Sweden<br />

Chair person of<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Tomas Kåberger, Director<br />

General, Swedish Energy<br />

Agency<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Photo: Eva-Marie Rundquist<br />

Photo: Johan Wingborg<br />

3


WORLD BIOENERGY <strong>2010</strong><br />

Dear Colleague,<br />

Renewable energy is growing rapidly worldwide. Fossil fuels are creating not only climate<br />

change damages but also local disasters when oil is spread, for example in the Mexican Gulf.<br />

The purpose of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference and Exhibition is to inform, show and discuss<br />

how bioenergy solutions in a profitable way can replace fossil fuels and dangerous nuclear.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> is the international forum that facilitates the transfer of bioenergy technology,<br />

know-how and experience with the unique concept of combining excellent presentations with<br />

a large exhibition and numerous study visits showing bioenergy in practice. The conference is<br />

unique as it aims to connect scientific advances with practical implementations of bioenergy<br />

innovations and successful market advances. This proceedings gives you an in depth look at<br />

some of the scientific advances that were presented at the conference.<br />

These proceedings are the collection of papers from speeches and posters presented at the<br />

conference. If you do not find the speech you look for in this paper you can find it on the <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> website www.worldbioenergy.com. This paper is based on a voluntary supply from<br />

speakers, poster exhibition and tendered abstracts. We wish you interesting reading and welcome<br />

back to Jönköping in 29-31 May 2012.<br />

Gustav Melin,<br />

President Svebio,<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference Manager<br />

Project managers Gustav Melin, Svebio and Jakob Hirsmark, Elmia.<br />

4 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Photo: Anders Haaker


a<br />

B<br />

C<br />

CONTENTs<br />

OpENING sEssION 7<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> outrivals oil in Sweden,<br />

showing that growth in a green economy is possible 8<br />

Gustav Melin<br />

COMBINED hEaT aND pOWER (Chp),<br />

COMBusTION, hEaTING aND CO-fIRING 11<br />

Slagging and fouling risk of Mediterranean biomasses for<br />

combustion 12<br />

Daniel J. Vega-Nieva, Raquel Dopazo, Luis Ortiz<br />

Improved flexibility and economy by using small fluidised<br />

bed boilers in district heating 17<br />

Alpo Sund, Matti Lilja<br />

fOREsT REsIDuEs – sLash, sTuMps,<br />

sMaLL TREE haRVEsT 20<br />

Procurement costs of slash and stumps in Sweden –<br />

a comparison between south and north Sweden 21<br />

Athanassiadis, Dimitris., Lundström, Anders, Nordfjell Tomas<br />

Harvesting for energy or pulpwood in early thinnings? 25<br />

Dan Bergström, Fulvio Di Fulvio<br />

CO 2 -EQ emissions of forest chip production in Finland 2020 29<br />

Arto Kariniemi, Kalle Kärha<br />

Large-scale forest biomass supply with long-distance<br />

transport methods 34<br />

Ranta, T., Korpinen, O.-J., Jäppinen, E., Karttunen, K.<br />

Biomass functions for young Scots pine-dominated forest 43<br />

K. Ahnlund Ulvcrona, U. Nilsson, T. Lundmark<br />

Estimating potentials of solid wood-based fuels in Finland 2020 47<br />

Kalle Kärhä, Juha Elo, Perttu Lahtinen, Tapio Räsänen, Heikki Pajuoja<br />

pOLICY –<br />

hOW TO MaKE IT aLL happEN 51<br />

Climate change in Brazil: Public policies,<br />

political agenda and media 52<br />

Magda Adelaide Lombardo, Ruimar Costa Freitas<br />

Barriers of implementing renewable energy and energy<br />

efficiency in northern periphery 56<br />

Renvall, J., Puhakka-Tarvainen, H., Kuittinen, V., Okkonen, L., Rice, L., Pappinen, A.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

5


D<br />

E<br />

f<br />

6 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> in Ukraine: State of the art and prospects<br />

for the development 59<br />

Georgiy Geletukha, Tetiana Zheliezna<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> at climate negotiations:<br />

Visions, challenges and opportunities 62<br />

McCormick, K.<br />

Supply chains of forest chip production in Finland 65<br />

Kalle Kärhä<br />

The economic, political and social issues, hindering<br />

the adoption of bioenergy in pakistan: A case study 69<br />

Umair Usman<br />

BIOfuELs fOR TRaNspORT –<br />

BIOGas, BIOEThaNOL aND BIODIEsEL 78<br />

Biogas upgrading by temperature swing adsorption 79<br />

Tamara Mayer, Michael Url, Hermann Hofbauer<br />

pELLETs –<br />

ThE NEW LaRGE ENERGY COMMODITY 84<br />

Emissions charecteristics of a residential<br />

pellet boiler and a stove 85<br />

Kaung Myat Win, Tomas Persson<br />

New insights in the ash melting behaviour and improvements<br />

of biomass energy pellets using flour bond 89<br />

J. van Soest, J. Renirie, S. Moelchand, M. Schouten, A. van der Meijden, J. Plijter<br />

ENERGY CROps, aGRICuLTuRaL<br />

REsIDuEs aND BY-pRODuCTs 93<br />

Use of ashes as a fertilizer in Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris<br />

Arundinacea L.) grown as an energy crop for combustion 94<br />

Eva Lindvall<br />

Intercropping of Reed Canary Grass, Phalaris Arundinacea L.,<br />

with legumes can cut costs for N-fertilization 95<br />

Cecilia Palmborg, Eva Lindvall<br />

Organisational frameworks for straw-based energy<br />

systems in Ukraine and western Eurpope 98<br />

Y. Voytenko, P. Peck<br />

ORaL CONfERENCE pROGRaMME 108


OpENING sEssION<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

7


8 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

WORLD BIOENERGY CONFERENCE <strong>2010</strong>, OPENING SESSION 25 MAY<br />

BIOENERGY OUTRIVALS OIL IN SWEDEN,<br />

SHOWING THAT GROWTH IN A GREEN ECONOMY IS POSSIBLE.<br />

Gustav Melin<br />

President<br />

Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

Torsgatan 12<br />

111 23 Stockholm<br />

Sweden<br />

ABSTRACT: From a situation when use of fossil oil covered 77 per cent of the Swedish energy mix in the 1970-ties,<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> is since 2009 the number one energy source when counting final energy use in Sweden. The last 20 years the<br />

economy (GDP) grow by 45 per cent and emissions of green house gases decreases by 12 per cent. This paper gives a<br />

background to why this development has taken place. It also claims that the same decisions and development is possible<br />

in any country and will lead to positive economical development and reduced emissions. The main instrument used is the<br />

carbon dioxide tax, a most efficient instrument to combat climat change.<br />

Keywords: <strong>Bioenergy</strong> policy, <strong>Bioenergy</strong> financing, strategy, CO 2 emission reduction, carbon dioxide tax.<br />

1. BIOENERGY SURPASS OIL IN SWEDEN<br />

In April <strong>2010</strong> the Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

calculated official Swedish energy statistics<br />

published by the Swedish Energy Agency. Svebio<br />

were able to announce that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> was the<br />

number one energy source in Swedish energy<br />

consumption. The use of bioenergy exceeded the use<br />

of fossil oil for energy. Actually the use of<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> has increased in a rate corresponding to<br />

an additional volume of 6400 cubic meters of oil<br />

every week for almost 20 years. Clearly we had<br />

foreseen that bioenergy would surpass oil any year<br />

now, nevertheless it was a bit surprising that it<br />

actually happened already in 2009.<br />

For a long time there has been no doubt about the<br />

direction, the use of renewable energy and especially<br />

bioenergy has been growing for 30 years.<br />

In the year 2009 bioenergy represented 31,7 per cent of<br />

the total energy use. Almost one third of the energy use<br />

from <strong>Bioenergy</strong> that’s a good figure.<br />

However I have been working in this sector for more than<br />

20 years. It has been a good development but it has not at<br />

all been optimal. A similar or even faster change would<br />

be possible in almost any country.<br />

2. SWEDEN ALREADY NOW CLOSE TO REACH<br />

2020 RENEWABLE TARGET<br />

Then if we take a look at the share of renewables it was<br />

already in 2009 46,3 per cent of the Swedish energy use.<br />

The red curve is the obligated level of renewables for<br />

Sweden according to the 2020-target. The blue curve is<br />

the forecasted development with the current legislation<br />

and incentives calculated by the Swedish Energy Agency.


The black curve is what actually has been registered, also<br />

figures from the Swedish Energy Agency. It is obvious<br />

that the ambitions are low compared to what is possible<br />

and that it is similar for other countries.<br />

3. REASONS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN SWEDEN<br />

I would like to briefly give a background of the reasons<br />

why this fairly good development has taken place in<br />

Sweden. I would also like to point out why I believe a<br />

similar development is possible and profitable in almost<br />

every country.<br />

Reasons for a good development I Sweden:<br />

3.1 No domestic fossil energy sources<br />

In the 1970-ties Sweden like most countries had more<br />

than 75 % of oil in the energy mix and also some<br />

additional percentage of coal. When the first oil crises hit<br />

the market in 1973, it became a wake up call for Swedish<br />

politicians. It became obvious that it was not clever to be<br />

so dependent on an imported energy source. Especially<br />

since price could change quickly, create unpredictable<br />

costs and ruin Swedish economy. Governmental research<br />

and investment money was at this time directed towards<br />

domestic energy production like nuclear power and<br />

renewables. At the same time it was obvious that oil and<br />

coal created environmental problems like spreading of<br />

heavy metals and acidification. Energy tax and sulphur<br />

fees were introduced on oil due to environmental reasons<br />

and to encourage use of domestic energy sources.<br />

3.2 No industry propagating for oil or coal<br />

One very important factor has been that there is no<br />

industry defending the fossil fuel position on the market.<br />

The Swedish industry has always focused on keeping a<br />

low electricity price, to be able to compete better on a<br />

global market. The Swedish government has had a<br />

similar view and increased energy taxes on households<br />

but kept taxes on an international level towards the<br />

industry.<br />

3.3 Efficient forest industry sector<br />

The Swedish forest industry sector consists of a leading<br />

pulp and paper industry as well as a large saw mill<br />

industry. The sector is very productive and consists also<br />

of a lot of different supply and manufacturing companies<br />

able to develop and manufacture forest harvesting<br />

equipment and equipment to collect and chip forest<br />

residues for energy. You are able to meet many of these<br />

companies at the exhibition here at <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong>.<br />

The industry continuously has invested in increased<br />

bioenergy use and production. Investments were also<br />

enhanced by the introduction of the renewable electricity<br />

certificates in 2003 which doubles the price for<br />

renewable electricity producers. As an example of the<br />

development the pulp industry Wärö owned by Södra<br />

becomes the worlds first fossil free pulp industry in the<br />

beginning of this year. Other parts of the industry invest<br />

in production of biofuels for transport, which you are<br />

able to hear from in session D2.<br />

3.4 A common view of a free market and market<br />

conditions.<br />

Finally, the most important factor has been the<br />

politicians’ ability to create a market situation that gives<br />

companies a predictable future to invest in market<br />

opportunities they believe in. The Swedish policy has<br />

mainly been decided with the polluter pays principle in<br />

mind. We have sulphur fees, NOX-fees and from 1991<br />

also carbon dioxide tax. Taxing emissions is a<br />

predictable, logical, environmentally friendly system that<br />

companies understand. Sweden as a small country has<br />

always been dependent on international trade, and<br />

therefore it has come quite natural to develop bioenergy<br />

during free market conditions. The polluter pays principle<br />

does not give any particular advantage to any type of<br />

solution. The solutions can be energy efficiency, solar,<br />

hydro, bioenergy or something else. The most profitable<br />

solutions are chosen.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

9


4. SWEDEN FIRST COUNTRY TO DECOUPLE<br />

ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GHG-EMISSIONS<br />

This slide shows blue curve: the economic growth in<br />

Sweden, red curve: emission of Green House Gases,<br />

GHG. Green curve: development of <strong>Bioenergy</strong> in<br />

Sweden.<br />

5. POSSIBILITIES FOR GOOD DEVELOPMENT IN<br />

MOST OTHER COUNTRIES<br />

.<br />

5.1 Domestic fossil fuels<br />

Domestic fossil fuels in a country make it harder for the<br />

parliament to agree on important decisions like carbon<br />

dioxide tax, deposit fees on coal ash etc. However the<br />

actual situation for development and economic growth in<br />

a country with domestic fossil fuels are not less than in a<br />

country like Sweden that lack the resource of fossil fuel.<br />

5.2 Industry propagating for oil or coal<br />

The national debate and company interest are more<br />

difficult to handle than in the Swedish situation but it is<br />

not a reason for not making the right decisions.<br />

10 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

5.3 Lots of forests and other raw material.<br />

There are always various opportunities to use energy<br />

more efficient. Combined heat and power is extremely<br />

profitable compared to wasting heat when producing<br />

power and buy the heat separately.<br />

There is a lot more forest globally than most of us<br />

believes. Professor Pekka Kauppi University of Helsinki<br />

has calculated figures from FAO reports and will share<br />

his knowledge about expanding forests in session A1<br />

“Raw material availability and market development”. In<br />

this session we will also be able to hear about wastes like<br />

old rubber trees from Liberia used in European coal<br />

power stations. There are by-products or wastes<br />

everywhere many of which profitably could be used for<br />

energy production. Olive residues, kernels and pruning,<br />

citrus pulp, palm kernels, sunflower husks, almond shells,<br />

straw, saw dust, manure, land fill gas, forest residues and<br />

million hectares of additional arable land for food, feed<br />

or energy production. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong> will give<br />

hundreds of opportunities to discuss possible and<br />

impossible ideas for further development and<br />

investments. Different solutions are available<br />

everywhere.<br />

5.4 A clear and simple policy<br />

Finally I would like to emphases that a clear and simple,<br />

understandable policy is a good way to have the whole<br />

society moving in the right direction. It is not sufficient to<br />

reach the 2020 target. We need good policy to solve the<br />

sustainability problems. Carbon tax is one simple and<br />

understandable measure with the benefit to strike towards<br />

use of fossil fuels getting us closer the overall goal -<br />

stopping the climate change. The Swedish <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

Association ask you to help us to argue for a global<br />

carbon dioxide tax and a floor price on emission trading<br />

rights making emitters pay for damages caused by carbon<br />

dioxide. Sweden has showed that polluter pays principle<br />

is an efficient and simple way to increase the use of<br />

profitable renewable energy.<br />

In some decades we are heading for 100 per cent<br />

renewables – It can be done!<br />

Svebio and Elmia wish you most welcome to Jönköping<br />

and the <strong>World</strong> of <strong>Bioenergy</strong>.


a<br />

COMBINED hEaT aND pOWER (Chp),<br />

COMBusTION, hEaTING aND CO-fIRING<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

11


12 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

SLAGGING AND FOULING RISK OF MEDITERANEAN BIOMASSES FOR COMBUSTION<br />

Daniel J. Vega-Nieva 1 , Raquel Dopazo 2 and Luis Ortiz 3 .<br />

Contact: CÁTEDRA ENCE. University of Vigo (Spain).<br />

Forestry School. A Xunqueira Campus. 36005. Pontevedra (Spain).<br />

Tel: 1-2: +34/986801948; 3: +34/986801902.<br />

Email: 1. DanielJVN@gmail.com 2. dopazo.raquel@gmail.com; 3. lortiz@uvigo.es.<br />

ABSTRACT: The interest in biomass combustion has grown exponentially in the last years, as a means for renewable<br />

heat and energy promoting local development and mitigating climate change. Various Mediterranean agricultural and<br />

forest resources such as olive stone, almond shell or pinecone chips remain large unutilized, despite their potential for<br />

being utilized in biomass combustion. New energy crops such as Cardoon, Brassica or Sorghum, are being introduced in<br />

Mediterranean countries for <strong>Bioenergy</strong> production; however, the slagging and fouling risk of many of these potential<br />

feedstocks are currently limiting their application in combustion processes given their high alkali, silica or chlorine<br />

contents. In this publication, various methods for biomass slagging and fouling hazard monitoring and prediction are<br />

presented based on recent studies with Mediterranean biomasses combustion in Spain.<br />

Keywords: slagging, fouling, biomass combustion.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION.<br />

The interest in biomass combustion has grown<br />

exponentially in the last years, as a means for renewable<br />

heat and energy promoting local development and<br />

mitigating climate change.<br />

However, various Mediterranean agricultural and<br />

forest resources such as almond shell or pinecone seed<br />

shells remain large unutilized. The slagging and fouling<br />

risk remain as important barriers that are currently<br />

limiting the use of various agricultural residues and<br />

potential agricultural energy crops feedstocks such as<br />

Cardoon, Brassica, or Sorghum [1], [2], [3].<br />

Slagging occurs in the boiler sections that are<br />

directly ex posed to flame irradiation. The mechanism<br />

of slagging formation involves stickiness, ash melting<br />

and sintering. Slagging de posits consist of an inner<br />

powdery layer followed by silicate and alkali<br />

compounds [4], [5].<br />

Fouling deposits form in the convective parts of<br />

the boiler. The mechanism of fouling is mainly due to<br />

condensation of volatile species that have been<br />

vaporised in previous boiler sections and are loosely<br />

bonded [5]<br />

In this publication, various methods for biomass slagging<br />

and fouling hazard monitoring and prediction are<br />

presented based on recent studies with Mediterranean<br />

biomasses combustion in Spain.<br />

2. ASH MELTING BEHAVIOUR: SLAGGING AND<br />

FOULING INDICES AND FUSION<br />

TEMPERATURES.<br />

2.1. Slagging and Fouling Indexes.<br />

Various authors have proposed a series of slagging and<br />

fouling indexes to explain the accumulation of ashes into<br />

the radiation and convection areas of biomass boilers,<br />

respectively. Although originally developed for coal,<br />

these indices seem to have potential for application on<br />

biomass combustion behaviour prediction (i.e. [6],<br />

[7]). Most widely used slagging and fouling indexes and<br />

currently proposed thresholds are synthesized below:<br />

Base to acid index [1], [6], [7], [8]:<br />

Critical value for coal: < 0.75 slagging trend<br />

Alkaki Index [9]:<br />

where HHV: Higher Heating value (MJ/Kg) at H=0%<br />

if index > 0.17 kg alkali /MJ probable fouling<br />

if index > 0.34 kg alkali /MJ fouling is certain to occur<br />

Slagging index [1], [7], [10]:<br />

where S d is % S from elementary analysis<br />

if RS < 0.6 low slagging trend<br />

if 0.6 < RS < 2 medium trend<br />

if 2.0 < RS < 2.6 high trend<br />

if RS > 2.6 very high trend


Chlorine Index: Cl content (%) of the sample dry weight.<br />

According to [1], [7]:<br />

if Cl < 0.2 low slagging trend<br />

if 0.2 < Cl < 0.3 medium trend<br />

if 0.3 < Cl < 0.5 high trend<br />

if Cl > 0.5 very high trend<br />

; whereas [11 ] gives a more conservative threshold:<br />

if Cl > 0.1 corrosion and HCl emissions<br />

2.2.Ash Fusion Temperatures.<br />

Ashes fusion is a continuous process which can be<br />

characterized by the following temperatures, according to<br />

norms ISO 540:2008 and DIN 51730:1998-04:<br />

Deformation temperature (DT). Temperature at<br />

which the first signs of rounding, due to melting, of the<br />

tip or edges of the test piece occur.<br />

Sphere temperature (ST). The temperature at which<br />

the edges of the test piece become completely round,<br />

with its height being equal to the width of the base line.<br />

Hemisphere temperature (HT). The temperature at<br />

which the test piece is approximately hemispherical, with<br />

the height being equal to half the base diameter.<br />

Flow temperature (FT). The temperature at which the<br />

test piece material has spread out so that its height is onethird<br />

of that at the hemisphere temperature.<br />

A large number of authors have proposed predictive<br />

functions of ash fusion temperatures from ash<br />

composition for coals (i.e. see [4] for a comprehensive<br />

review). Information on such predictive functions for<br />

biomass, however, remains scarce (i.e. [12], [13]).<br />

.Mineral composition in biomass differs significantly<br />

from coal, especially in the amount of potassium, calcium<br />

and chlorine, therefore, most appropriate slagging indices<br />

definition and threshold calibration, as well as ash fusion<br />

predictive functions must be different [9].<br />

Additionally, biomass disintegration laboratory tests have<br />

recently been proposed as a complementary means to<br />

characterize slagging tendency of biomass fuels, with<br />

significant potential to reproduce sintering and fouling<br />

behaviour observed in biomass boiler combustion tests<br />

[14].<br />

Results using the above mentioned methodologies for<br />

characterizing slagging and fouling tendency of various<br />

Mediterranean biomass fuels are presented.<br />

The effect of ash composition on ash behaviour as<br />

characterized by laboratory ash fusion and ash<br />

disintegration tests and boiler combustion tests, as well as<br />

the potential of biomass ash slagging indices to predict<br />

ash behaviour in terms of slagging and fouling hazard is<br />

discussed below.<br />

2. SLAGGING AND FOULING RISK OF<br />

MEDITERRANEAN BIOMASSES IN COMBUSTION<br />

Various recent studies (i.e. [01], [02], [03] and [04]) have<br />

recently analyzed the slagging and fouling tendency of<br />

several forest and agricultural residues and energy crops<br />

by means of laboratory ash characterization tests and<br />

combustion tests in Spain.<br />

The results of the ash composition of some of the main<br />

Mediterranean biomasses analyzed by these studies are<br />

synthezised in Table I below.<br />

Table I: Ash composition (wt% dry basis) at 550 ºC of<br />

various Mediterranean Biomasses from studies [01], [02],<br />

[03] and [04] in Spain.<br />

Sample SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O P2O5 Ref.<br />

Poplar I 2.80 -- -- 33 3.70 0.14 18 -- [14]<br />

Poplar II 4.20 0.34 0.36 29 3.00 0.14 16 3.00 [15]<br />

Eucalyptus 41 -- -- 18 4.20 1.90 8.70 -- [14]<br />

Thistle I 13 -- -- 14 2.50 9.20 15 -- [14]<br />

Thistle II 20 -- -- 33 3.30 4.70 6.60 -- [14]<br />

Almond<br />

shell I<br />

Almond<br />

shell II<br />

Olive<br />

stontes<br />

4.60 -- -- 15 1.50 0.30 22 -- [14]<br />

3.50 0.49 0.27 16 2.60 0.49 31 2.40 [17]<br />

24 -- -- 4.40 1.70 0.52 27 -- [14]<br />

Brassica I 7.60 0.61 0.28 23 3.20 0.69 21 9.10 [15]<br />

Brassica II 1.30 0.16 0.60 25 2.70 1.10 27 8.40 [16]<br />

Wheat<br />

straw<br />

44 -- -- 8.10 2.40 0.22 18 -- [14]<br />

Rice straw 51 -- -- 8.9 3.5 2.8 16 -- [14]<br />

Sorghum 40 2.60 1.00 5.50 2.50 0.29 23 2.10 [16]<br />

Forest biomasses (i.e. Poplar, Eucalyptus chips) have<br />

very beneficial properties for combustion, namely a high<br />

Ca content, low silica content, and generally lower K<br />

content when compared to most agricultural feedstocks<br />

and residues, this resulting in high initial deformation<br />

and ash fusion temperatures, generally well above 1200-<br />

1400 ºC, as shown in Table II.<br />

It has to be noted, however, that woody fuels can often be<br />

contaminated during harvest operations with soil<br />

particles, resulting in a higher silica content (i.e.<br />

Eucalyptus sample in Table I), which can lower the ash<br />

fusion temperatures. This situation has been noted by<br />

various authors (i.e. [18]. More careful harvest methods<br />

need to be implemented in order to minimize soil<br />

contamination.<br />

Herbaceous fuels such as brassica, wheat and sorghum<br />

have large contents of both silica and potassium, resulting<br />

in the potential formation of K silicates (i.e. [4], [8],<br />

[19]). These compounds create deposits in the boiler,<br />

potentially causing slagging and fouling problems at<br />

temperatures above 700-800ºC, as illustrated by the<br />

sintering temperatures DT in Table II.<br />

Table II. Ash fusibility temperature of various<br />

Mediterranean feedstocks from Spain.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

13


14 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Fusibility temperatures (ºC)<br />

Sample D S H F Source<br />

Poplar I<br />

>1400 >1400 >1400 >1400 [14]<br />

Eucalyptus 1160 1170 1190 1230 [14]<br />

Thistle I 640 660 1150 1150 [14]<br />

Thistle II 1450 1450 1450 1450 [14]<br />

Almond shell I 750 770 n.d 1450 [14]<br />

Olive stones 1030 n.d 1090 1160 [14]<br />

Brassica I 730 n.d n.d 1450 [15]<br />

Brassica II 770 n.d n.d 1450 [16]<br />

Wheat straw 850 1040 1120 1320 [14]<br />

Rice straw 860 980 1100 1220 [14]<br />

Sorghum 830 1000 1080 1350 [16]<br />

D, deformation; S, sphere; H, hemisphere; F, fluid;<br />

n.d, not detected.<br />

Table III. Laboratory Sintering disintegration test results<br />

for Mediterranean biomasses from Spain.<br />

Disintegration test<br />

Sample 800 °C 900 ºC 1000 °C Source<br />

Poplar I E E E [14]<br />

Eucalyptus VE VE VE [14]<br />

Thistle I VD VD VD [14]<br />

Thistle II D D D [14]<br />

Almond shell<br />

I E D VD<br />

[14]<br />

Olive stones VE E VD [14]<br />

Brassica I VD VD VD [15]<br />

Brassica II - - VD [16]<br />

Wheat straw E VD VD [14]<br />

Rice straw D VD VD [14]<br />

Sorghum - - VD [16]<br />

VE, very easy disintegration; E, easy; D, difficult;<br />

VD, very difficult disintegration.<br />

Disintegration tests seem to offer a complementary<br />

criteria for rapid biomass characterization (Tables II and<br />

III). The development of comprehensive predictive<br />

functions for biomass ash fusion temperature based on<br />

ash composition is still required for a deeper<br />

understanding of ash sintering and melting processes.<br />

Table IV. Slagging indexes and agglomeration level<br />

observed in biomass combustion tests in [14], [15].<br />

Sample<br />

Ash<br />

(%, d.b)<br />

B/A<br />

index<br />

Alkali<br />

index<br />

(kg/GJ)<br />

BedAgg Source<br />

Poplar I 3.40 19.58 0.32 NO [14]<br />

Eucalyptus 4.30 0.8 0.23 NO [14]<br />

Thistle II 13.70 2.38 0.89 Part [14]<br />

Thistle I 14.10 3.13 1.96 Total [14]<br />

Brassica I 5.80 5.87 0.68 Total [15]<br />

Almond shell I 1.00 8.43 0.11 Part [14]<br />

BedAgg, bed agglomeration; NO, not agglomerated;<br />

Part, partially agglomerated; Total, totally agglomerated.<br />

The ash content can be a good indicator of the<br />

problematic nature of a biomass fuel. Herbaceous fuels<br />

typically show a higher value of ash content, this being<br />

correlated with their intrinsic K content [Jenkins et al].<br />

The Base to acid index, which has proven some<br />

predictive potential for prediction of slagging-related<br />

problems in studies such as [6] does not seem capable of<br />

reflecting the bed agglomeration tendency shown in<br />

Table IV. More refined alternative expressions may be<br />

required to account for the role of silica-based<br />

compounds on ash slagging hazard.<br />

Alkali index seems to have potential for discriminating<br />

potentially hazardous fuels in the light of results in Table<br />

IV, with lower values of the index -below the 0.34 kg<br />

alkali/MJ threshold proposed by [9]- corresponding to the<br />

samples where no agglomeration was detected in the<br />

boiler bed during the combustion test. One exception to<br />

this is the almond shell sample, where the low ash<br />

content, considered in the numerator of the alkali index,<br />

amy have masked the intrinsically hazardous nature of<br />

this fuel, with proven agglomeration effects, as proved<br />

both by a DT of 750ºC and a partial agglomeration<br />

observed in the boiler. An alternative alkali index may<br />

allow to account for fuels such as almond with a low<br />

amount of potentially problematic ashes.<br />

The higher alkali (Na+K) content present in the first<br />

sample of cardoon in Table IV (24% vs 11% in Thistle I<br />

and II, respectively), as detected by alkali indices of 1.96<br />

and 0.89, respectively, results in a higher temperature of<br />

sinterizing for the first sample, and a total vs partial<br />

agglomeration observed in the combustion test of these<br />

two biomasses in [01] study.<br />

Alkali metals react with silica contained in the residue's<br />

ash forming silicates with very low melting point<br />

(


The DOMOHEAT European project is focused on<br />

the demonstration of two innovative and sustainable<br />

medium size Centre European heating systems, for<br />

domestic and tertiary buildings, using as fuel mediumlow<br />

quality wastes from South European Regions<br />

agro/forest/wood production. Biomasses selected for this<br />

project are olive stone, pine wood chips, pine cone chips,<br />

pine cone seed shells, almond shells, hazelnut shells,<br />

eucalyptus wood chips, straw pellets, oak and pine<br />

sawdust pellets, vine shoot chips, olive pruning chips,<br />

oak chips, poplar chips, and paulownia chips.<br />

Fuel and ash characterization is being carried out for each<br />

one of the different biomasses at laboratory to determine<br />

the proximate analysis (ash, volatiles, fixed carbon),<br />

moisture content, ultimate analysis (C, H, N, S, O), Cl<br />

content, gross and net calorific value, contents of major<br />

and minor ash forming elements, particle size distribution<br />

and mass density. Laboratory evaluations of ash slagging<br />

tendency are being performed.<br />

Combustion tests in 25, 100, 150 kW experimental<br />

boilers are currently being carried out both in Vigo<br />

(Spain) and KWB Austria, in order to achieve knowledge<br />

about biomass behaviour during combustion, ash melting<br />

behaviour and relevant emissions (CO, CO , H O, CxHy,<br />

2 2<br />

NOx, O2, SO2 and HCl) are being determined. Slag<br />

deposits composition will be analyzed and ash-limiting<br />

thresholds will be explored as a means to limit the<br />

amount of silica, alkali and chlorine present in the fuels<br />

as validated by boiler combustion tests and to predict the<br />

slagging tendency of the biomasses.<br />

The tendency of slagging and ash deposition will be<br />

evaluated based on these combustion tests to select the<br />

most promising fuels for further combustion test in two<br />

demonstrative boilers at Spain (Vigo and Leon). Based<br />

on biomass characterization results and combustion test<br />

results, criteria for rejecting/accepting biomasses will be<br />

developed.<br />

On a second stage, based on established ash slagging<br />

risk thresholds calibrated with combustion test results,<br />

biomass mixtures will be performed as a strategy to<br />

diminish the sintering and slagging tendency of initially<br />

rejected biomasses in 10 new combustion tests of<br />

biomass mixtures.<br />

More information of the project can be found at<br />

http://www.escansa.com/domoheat/<br />

REFERENCES.<br />

[1] Fernandez J. Los cultivos energéticos en España y las<br />

tendencias de su desarrollo. [Energy Crops in Spain and<br />

the trends for their development]. In: I International<br />

Congress Bioenergia. Valladolid, Spain, 18-20 October<br />

2006.<br />

[2] Vega-Niena, D. J., Dopazo, R., Ortiz. L. Reviewing the<br />

potential of Forest <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Plantations: Woody Energy<br />

crop plantations management and breeding for increasing<br />

biomass productivity. In: <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2008.<br />

Jönköping, Suecia 27-29 Mayo 2008<br />

[3] Dopazo, R. D. J. Vega, Ortiz, L. A Review of<br />

Herbaceous Energy Crops for <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Production in<br />

Europe. In: 17 th European Biomass Conference &<br />

Exhibition, Hamburgo (29 Junio-3 Julio 2009).<br />

[4] Bryers, R. W. Fireside slagging, fouling, and hightemperature<br />

corrosion of heat-transfer surface due to<br />

impurities in steam-raising fuels. Prog. Energy Combust.<br />

Sci. 22 (1996) 29-120<br />

[5] Tortosa-Masiá, A.A., Ahnert F., Spliethoff H., Loux J.C.,<br />

Hein K.R.G. Slagging and fouling in biomass cocombustion.<br />

Thermal science 9 (2005) 3, 85-98.<br />

[6] Salour, D. Jenkins, B. M. Vafaei, T M., Kayhanian M.<br />

Control of in-bed agglomeration by fuel blending in a<br />

pilot scale straw and wood fueled AFBC. Biomass and<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 117-133, 1993<br />

[7] Pronobis M. Evaluation of the influence of biomass cocombustion<br />

on boiler furnace slagging by means of<br />

fusibility correlations. Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 28 (2005)<br />

375-383<br />

[8] Jenkins B.M., Baxter L.L., Miles T.R. Jr., Miles T.R.<br />

Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Processing<br />

Technology 54 (1998) 17-46.<br />

[9] Miles T.R., Miles T.R. Jr., Baxter L.L., Bryers R.W.,<br />

Jenkins B.M., Oden L.L. Boiler deposits from firing<br />

biomass fuels. Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 10 (1996) 125-<br />

138.<br />

[10] Vamvuka D., Zografos D. Predicting the behaviour of<br />

ash from agricultural wastes during combustion. Fuel 83<br />

(2004) 2051-2057.<br />

[11] Obernberger, I., Brunner, T., Bärnthaler G. Chemical<br />

properties of solid biofuels-significance and impact.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 30 (2006) 973–982<br />

[12] Friedl A., Padouvas E., Rotter H., Varmuza K.<br />

Prediction of heating value of biomass fuel and ash<br />

melting behaviour using elemental compositions of fuel<br />

and ash. In: 9th International Conference on<br />

Chemometrics in Analytical Chemistry, September 2004.<br />

Lisbon, Portugal.<br />

[13] Seggiani, M. Empirical correlations of the ash fusion<br />

temperatures and temperature of critical viscosity for coal<br />

and biomass ashes. Fuel 78 (1999) 1121–1125<br />

[14] Fernandez Llorente, M.J. Carrasco Garcia. J.E.<br />

Comparing methods for predicting the sintering of<br />

biomass ash in combustión. Fuel 84 (2005) 1893–1900<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

15


[15] Fernández Llorente M.J., Murillo J.M., Escalada R.,<br />

Carrasco J.E. Ash behaviour of lignocellulosic biomass in<br />

bubbling fluidised bed combustion. Fuel 85 (2006) 1157-<br />

1165.<br />

[16] Fernández Llorente M. J., Borjabad E., Barro R., Losada<br />

J., Bados R., Ramos R., Carrasco J. E. 2007. Estudio<br />

sobre sinterización de las cenizas de biomasas en la<br />

combustión. CIEMAT.<br />

[17] Fernández Llorente M.J., Escalada R., Murillo J.M.,<br />

Carrasco J.E. Combustion in bubbling fluidised bed with<br />

bed material of limestone to reduce the biomass ash<br />

agglomeration and sintering. Fuel 85 (2006) 2081-2092.<br />

[18] Zevenhoven-Onderwater, M., Blomquist, J.-P.,<br />

Skrifvars, B.-J., Backman, R., Hupa, M. The prediction<br />

of ehaviour of ashes from five different solid fuels in<br />

fluidised bed combustion. Fuel 79 (2000) 1353–1361<br />

[19] Werther J., Saenger M., Hartge E.-U., Ogada T., Siagi Z.<br />

Combustion of agricultural residues. Progress in Energy<br />

and Combustion Science 26 (2000) 1–27.<br />

[20] Arvelakis, S., Vourliotis, P., Kakaras, E., Koukios, E. G.<br />

Effect of leaching on the ash behavior of wheat straw and<br />

olive residue during fluidized bed combustion. Biomass<br />

and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> (2001) 20(6) 459-470<br />

16 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


IMPROVED FLEXIBILITY AND ECONOMY BY USING SMALL FLUIDISED BED BOILERS IN DISTRICT<br />

HEATING<br />

Alpo Sund 1 , Matti Lilja 2<br />

1 Nurmijärven Sähkö Oy, Kauppanummentie 1, 01900 Nurmijärvi, Finland<br />

2 Renewa Oy, Teknobulevardi 3, 01530 Vantaa, Finland<br />

matti.lilja@renewa.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: The Finnish heating company Nurmijärven Sähkö generates annually over 80 GWh heat with wood based<br />

fuels. To ensure optimal flexibility and minimal emissions, company has chosen fluidised bed combustion for two of its<br />

below 12 MW heating plants. These plants have shown a capability to operate at very low partial loads during low<br />

demand seasons, thus reducing the need to use oil fired reserve boilers. Exploiting of lower cost fuels, like slash from<br />

local forests, has been possible due to the flexible combustion process. Emissions have been successfully kept clearly<br />

below set limits, also at partial load operation or when using variable quality of fuels.<br />

Keywords: fluidised bed, heat generation, district heating, operating experience<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Nurmijärven Sähkö Oy is a municipality owned<br />

energy service company in Southernmost Finland. It<br />

provides 9500 inhabitants with 90 GWh heat<br />

annually. About 95 % of the heat is generated with<br />

wood based fuels in company’s three plants. This<br />

equals to 120 000 cubic meters of wood.<br />

To ensure economical heat for its customers,<br />

Nurmijärven Sähkö needs heat generation with is<br />

flexible to meet fluctuating heat demands, as well as<br />

digest versatile fuel and take the advantage of lower<br />

priced slash or waste wood batches from near-­‐by<br />

sources.<br />

In order to be able to maximise the operational<br />

flexibility, the company has chosen bubbling fluidised<br />

bed (BFB) combustion for two of its heating plant. The<br />

8 MWth and 11 MWth units have been operated since<br />

2002 and 2007. The units are normally unmanned<br />

and controlled remotely.<br />

2 COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY<br />

Heating plants in the localities Nurmijärvi and<br />

Rajamäki have a capacity of 8 MW th and 11 MW th,<br />

respectively. Their combustion system is based on<br />

bubbling fluidised bed technology, where the fuel is<br />

introduced in the furnace where a 4 ton sand bed and the<br />

primary combustion air form a homogenous mixture with<br />

about 800 o C of temperature.<br />

The furnace and fluidized bed with the boiler form an<br />

integrated structure which is completely enclosed in a<br />

water cooled structure. There are refractories on the side<br />

walls in order to achieve correct combustion temperature<br />

and to prevent erosion. The boiler has a fully welded<br />

hermetic structure of membrane walls. The furnace is in<br />

the shape of rectangle. The structure is self-supporting<br />

and propped up from below which allows thermal<br />

expansion upwards.<br />

Because only few kilos of fuels are in the furnace at<br />

each moment, the gasification and combustion is fast.<br />

The heat capacity of the sand is so big that any amount of<br />

fuel humidity is easily evaporated and doesn’t harm the<br />

combustion itself.<br />

Fluidized bed temperature is controlled by<br />

combustion air distribution to primary, secondary and<br />

tertiary air. The well controlled furnace temperature is<br />

important for minimising of the temperature-derived<br />

NOx creation. With dry fuels, when the fluidized bed<br />

temperature might otherwise become too high, circulating<br />

gas is used in the fluidising air system.<br />

Figure 1. Hot water boiler with a Renewa bubbling<br />

fluidised bed<br />

Fluidised bed combustion is better known for utility<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

17


oilers of 100 MWth or larger. The Renewa BFB<br />

technology, used in the Nurmijärven Sähkö’s plants, is<br />

based on same principle as any bubbling bed. However,<br />

since the first application in 1985, the design has been<br />

optimised for small and medium sized boilers and thus<br />

can be implemented cost-efficiently. There are more than<br />

30 applications of steam and hot water BFB boilers in the<br />

capacity range of 3 – 30 MWth.<br />

3 OPERATION EXPERIENCE<br />

The two Nurmijärven Sähkö’s boilers have been in<br />

commercial operation for 8 and 3 years. The utility<br />

operates also another biomass fired boiler with<br />

reciprocating grate so observations between different<br />

combustion technologies have been made. The most<br />

visible advantage of the BFB boilers is their fast response<br />

to load change needs. The output can be decreased or<br />

increased by 12 % units within 10 minutes. This is a<br />

clear advantage in district heating plants where the daily<br />

demand curve has major variations. One just has to<br />

secure evenly chipped fuel.<br />

Flexibility to utilise different fuels has practical<br />

benefits e.g. in cold winter days when high calorific fuels<br />

can be used to achieve outputs even above nominal point,<br />

and thus postpone the start of expensive peaking plants.<br />

The same benefit there is during the summer when very<br />

low output level can be achieved with high calorific<br />

biomass. This saves costs of operating fossil fuelled<br />

plants and thus buying emission credits can be avoided.<br />

Figure 2. Rajamäki heating plant with 11 MWth<br />

fluidised bed boiler<br />

Nurmijärven Sähkö has successfully used fuels like<br />

forest slash, fresh and dry, from final forest felling, nontrimmed<br />

and trimmed small forest slash, saw dust, bark,<br />

grain sorting residues and even oat kernels with 10 %<br />

mixture. The non-trimmed forest slash, including green<br />

particles with chlorophyll, has not caused any problems<br />

in occasional use, even at operation on 100 % load, if the<br />

humidity has been inside the guaranteed window (± 12 %<br />

range around nominal point). No findings of chlorine<br />

caused corrosion have been detected. Very long time<br />

operation on full load with only such fuel has not for the<br />

time being been performed, however.<br />

During typical operation period, the main advantage<br />

of BFB flexibility comes from optimising fuel economy.<br />

18 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cheaper low quality fuel lots can be exploited which<br />

reflects also as a better bargaining power when buying<br />

fuel. Nurmijärven Sähkö’s policy is to use only<br />

renewable biomass based fuels, but many Finnish BFB<br />

operators actively optimise their fuels costs by allowing<br />

biomass and peat suppliers to offer their best prices.<br />

Fluidised beds, however, have more stringent<br />

requirement than grates on the impurities coming with<br />

the fuel. Therefore magnetic separators and disc screens<br />

are highly recommended to screen out coarse particles<br />

and metal pieces before they enter the furnace. If such<br />

material, however, get inside the combustion chamber,<br />

they can be removed through the bottom funnels which<br />

are normally used for bed sand replacement. The inclined<br />

shape of the furnace bottom helps the coarse particles to<br />

roll towards the hoppers.<br />

4 FLUIDISED BED BOILER MAINTENANCE<br />

Concerning maintenance costs, a certain advantage<br />

has been recorded in a smaller need to replace<br />

components. Normally only bearings of motors and<br />

pumps need to be replaced, while fuidised bed boiler<br />

internals don’t have any moving mechanical components<br />

which could be subject to any wear and tear. Only the<br />

bed temperature sensors need regular replacement.<br />

Another advantage has been the possibility to use<br />

short shut-downs for maintenance works. This is possible<br />

because after shutting down there remains no fuel in the<br />

furnace and the structures can be cooled down in 3-4<br />

hours. The service persons can then enter the boiler or<br />

make the convection section soot blowing during one<br />

operation shift. In this way the scheduled annual<br />

maintenance outages can be shortened. Typically annual<br />

service outages have taken some 120 hours.<br />

5 OPERATION COSTS<br />

The main costs of operation, except the fuel, come<br />

from power autoconsumption, bed sand make-up and ash<br />

disposal. The recorded power demand of the two plants is<br />

33 kW per produced MWth of heat. The figure includes<br />

also the energy consumed by the district heat pumps.<br />

The ash amount from the electrostatic precipitator is<br />

below 4,4 kg per MW th produced, representing thus<br />

below 1 % of the consumed fuel mass. Bottom ash<br />

volume is negligible in the BFB boilers. The small ash<br />

volumes have been most economical to bring to a landfill<br />

but the company is now actively looking for alternative<br />

uses for the ash. The nutrient contents of the ash might<br />

help to recycle it.<br />

Part of the bed material, which is normal<br />

equigranular construction quality sand, is replaced daily.<br />

The recorded sand consumption has been 3,8 kg/MWth<br />

(at the 11 MW boiler) and below 2 kg/MWth (at the 8<br />

MW boiler). This means that the sand silo, capable to<br />

receive a full truckload, needs to be filled only a couple<br />

of times a year. Presently, the rejected sand is transported<br />

to a landfill. Nurmijärven Sähkö is looking for<br />

possibilities to sell this practically very clean sand to<br />

potential users or recycle it in the process by screening.<br />

The manpower costs are quite reasonable. Both plants<br />

have an advanced control system and they can be<br />

remotely controlled from each other’s control room.<br />

Therefore only one of them, normally the Nurmijärvi


plant, is permanently manned. Rajamäki plant is visited<br />

shortly once per day, due to requirements of legislation,<br />

but all operations are performed from the control centre.<br />

During the night time and weekend the operator can<br />

control the plants with a portable PC even from his home.<br />

6 EMISSIONS OF FLUIDISED BED COMBUSTION<br />

Emissions of Rajamäki plant have been measured by<br />

an independent authority. Table 1 shows emissions on 3<br />

MW partial load, i.e. below 30% of nominal capacity.<br />

Table I: Rajamäki heating plant emissions at 3 MW<br />

partial load<br />

Rajamäki Actual load: 3 MWth<br />

heating plant<br />

Performed by: Suomen<br />

Analyysipalvelut Oy<br />

Date:<br />

14.3.2008<br />

Parameter Value unit<br />

Flue gas temperature 51,8<br />

o<br />

C<br />

CO2 in flue gas 12, 3 ±0,7 %<br />

O2 in flue gas 8, 3 ±0,4 %<br />

Dust content 20 ± 4 mg/m 3 n<br />

Dust emission 0,14 ± 0,05 kg/h<br />

Dust contents red. at 6% O2 23 ± 5 mg/m 3 n<br />

Specific emissions 9 ± 3 mg/MJ<br />

NOx 97 ppm<br />

NO2 contents red. at 6% O2 236 ± 18 mg/m 3 n<br />

SO2


B<br />

20 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

fOREsT REsIDuEs –<br />

sLash, sTuMps, sMaLL TREE haRVEsT


PROCUREMENT COSTS OF SLASH AND STUMPS IN SWEDEN<br />

– A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AND NORTH SWEDEN.<br />

Athanassiadis, Dimitris., Lundström, Anders & Nordfjell Tomas<br />

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

S-90183 Umeå, Sweden<br />

Dimitris.Athanassiadis@srh.slu.se, Tomas.Nordfjell@srh.slu.se, Anders.Lundstrom@srh.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: Marginal cost curves were used to appreciate the amount of slash and stumps that could be harvested at<br />

certain costs in Sweden as a whole as well as in two regions (Upper Norrland and South Sweden). The expected region<br />

specific variations were quantified and region specific estimates on harvestable potentials of stumps and slash were made.<br />

The results in this work were based on data collected in the Swedish Forest Inventory (SFI) from 2002 to 2006<br />

Keywords: forestry residues, harvesting, resource potential<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The demand for use of wood as raw material for heat<br />

and power generation has increased considerably at a<br />

global level. Sweden is a leading country in the use of<br />

bioenergy. According to the Swedish Energy Authority,<br />

20% of the total energy use, comes from biofuels (incl.<br />

peat) [1]. By-products from sawmills and the pulp and<br />

paper industry account for the greatest part and are used<br />

for the production of heat and power for the companies’<br />

own needs or for the provision to consumers. The<br />

introduction in 2003 of a green electricity certificate<br />

system aimed in supporting electricity production using<br />

renewable energy sources (solar energy, wind power,<br />

hydropower and bioenergy) and peat. The main objective<br />

was to increase the amount of electricity coming from<br />

renewable resources by 17 TWh by year 2016 (base level<br />

is year 2002 when 6.5 TWh of electricity from renewable<br />

resources were produced).<br />

The Swedish national forest inventory (NFI) indicates<br />

a productive economic forest cover (designated for the<br />

production of timber and non-timber forest products) of<br />

23 million ha, 56% percent of the total land area of<br />

Sweden. The total growing stock is about 3.2 billions of<br />

forest m 3 [2]. Within the near future the demand on forest<br />

woody materials is believed to get higher than the annual<br />

growth.<br />

In 2006, logging residues were extracted from 36%<br />

of the 229 000 ha of regeneration fellings in Sweden.<br />

Logging residues are today the largest assortment of<br />

forest biomass available for energy production.<br />

Depending on the level of ecological, technical and<br />

economical restrictions the potential amount of branches,<br />

tops and foliage resulting from regeneration fellings is<br />

from 3.2 to 7.4 (no restrictions) million oven dry tons<br />

(ODT) annually (for the time period <strong>2010</strong>-2019) while<br />

the potential from stumps with attached root system is 4.2<br />

to 11.7 (no restrictions) million ODT annually and for the<br />

same time period [3]. The corresponding annual figures<br />

in thinning for branches, tops and foliage and stumps<br />

with attached root system is 1,7 to 3,9 (no restrictions)<br />

and 1,7 to 5,7 (no restrictions) million ODT annually<br />

respectively. Furthermore, 0.5 million ODT, orginating<br />

from pre commercial thinning, can be added to the above<br />

mentioned potentials.<br />

Harvest and transport costs of logging residues are<br />

site specific and differ due to site characteristics (i.e. size<br />

of operational units, ecological restrictions, tree size and<br />

species, varying terrain conditions, varying forwarding<br />

distances, harvest type, transport distance to the receiving<br />

plant), regional and local differences (i.e. operation<br />

overhead costs, acquisition of harvesting rights, customer<br />

demand) and harvesting system used (i.e. type of<br />

machinery, cost and produz


Figure 1: The studied regions<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

For the estimation of the potential harvestable<br />

amount of slash and stumps from regeneration fellings<br />

given a scenario according to which Swedish silvicultural<br />

practices are not going to change ten years in the future<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>-2019), NFI sample plots (more than 3000 sample<br />

plots evenly spread over the complete forest area of<br />

Sweden) were utilized. Each individual plot was used as<br />

the unit for decision for different future silviculture and<br />

felling measures and a growth prognosis for the trees of<br />

each plot was produced.<br />

In order to decide from which stands slash and<br />

stumps will be extracted and the quantity that should<br />

remain in the forest the following restrictions were taken<br />

under consideration.<br />

• no extraction was counted with for productive<br />

forest areas that are situated in areas of nature<br />

protection.<br />

• wet areas as well as peat soils with low bearing<br />

capacity as well as all areas that are located 25<br />

meters from a lake, sea, waterline or any other<br />

ownership category than forest were not<br />

considered for extraction<br />

• 40% of the logging residues were left at the<br />

felling site<br />

• no hardwood stumps were extracted<br />

• areas that have an uneven ground structure<br />

and/or a slope of more than 19.6 0 according to<br />

the Swedish terrain classification scheme were<br />

not considered for extraction.<br />

• regeneration felling areas of a size of less than<br />

1 ha were not included<br />

The costs for harvesting the residues, transforming it<br />

to chips and bringing it to the end user were also<br />

calculated. For slash the machine systems that were used<br />

were the following<br />

Slash system 1: Slash forwarder, roadside<br />

chipper, container truck.<br />

Slash system 2: Slash forwarder, slash<br />

truck, industry chipper<br />

Concerning stump harvesting, stumps were<br />

forwarded to the roadside, transported by truck to the<br />

industry and crushed there. Productivity and machine<br />

22 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

cost data employed in this study were obtained from<br />

practical experience and scientific studies (Table I). All<br />

calculations were made with the FLIS tool [5].<br />

Table I: Compilation of machine costs (SEK/ODT) for<br />

the slash and stump machine systems<br />

Slash Stumps<br />

System 1 System 2<br />

Stump lifter - - 187<br />

Forwarder<br />

180 m (420 m)* 163(208) 163(208) 163(208)<br />

Chipper 166 119 119<br />

Truck<br />

50 km (100 km) 108(191) 124(197) 218(364)<br />

* Average forwarding distance(one-way), ** Average<br />

transport distance<br />

The moisture, dry matter and heat content for both<br />

slash and stumps was assumed to be 50%, 0.82 MWh/m 3<br />

loose raw chips and 0.17 ODT/m 3 loose raw chips,<br />

respectively. Compensation to the land owner was set to<br />

172 SEK/ODT (2.5 SEK/m 3 loose raw chips) while<br />

administration costs were set to 73.5 SEK/ODT (13<br />

SEK/m 3 loose raw chips). Cost for machine allocations<br />

between production sites (2500 SEK/machine and<br />

allocation) was related to the amount of the harvestable<br />

amount (ODT) available in the production sites [6].<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Potentials<br />

In Table II an estimation of the harvestable potential<br />

of slash and stumps in the different regions of Sweden is<br />

given. A majority of the potential (55%) is located in the<br />

south half of the country (Central and South Sweden).<br />

Table I: Annual regional harvestable potential of stumps<br />

and slash in Sweden<br />

Slash Stumps Total<br />

Million ODT/year<br />

Upper Norrland 0.63 0.90 1.53<br />

Central Norrland 0.78 1.08 1.86<br />

Central Sweden 0.78 1.06 1.84<br />

South Sweden 0.98 1.20 2.18<br />

Whole Sweden 3.17 4.24 7.41<br />

3.2 Marginal costs of slash and stump procurement for<br />

the whole of Sweden<br />

The potential annually harvestable amount of slash<br />

and stumps is ca. 3.2 and 4.2 million ODT, respectively.<br />

Slash can be harvested at a lower cost than stumps which<br />

leads to that the marginal curve for slash starts at a lower<br />

level than the curve for stumps. When the curves<br />

approach the maximum harvestable potential they bend<br />

strongly upwards. That is due to the fact that a part of the<br />

logging residues is located in small production sites, far<br />

away from the industry making transport costs very high.


Figure 2: Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of slash<br />

and stumps from regeneration fellings in Sweden,<br />

cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a function of million<br />

ODT/year).<br />

3.3 Regional marginal costs for slash with system 1<br />

The amount of slash that could be harvested up to a<br />

certain cost (SEK/ODT) varies for the different regions<br />

that have been studied. Marginal costs were lowest in<br />

South Sweden. The costs rose rapidly with increasing<br />

distance to the industry. In South Sweden 90% of the<br />

harvestable potential could be harvested for a cost up to<br />

800 SEK/ODT (Figure 2). For the north of Sweden two<br />

different pictures were given. To harvest 90% of the<br />

harvestable potential it would cost up to 950 SEK/ODT in<br />

the coastal area of Upper Norrland and ca. 1100 SEK/ODT<br />

in Upper Norrland Lappland (Figure 3).<br />

Figure 3: Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of slash<br />

from regeneration fellings in Upper Norrland and South<br />

Sweden, cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a function of<br />

million ODT/year).<br />

3.4 Regional marginal costs for stumps<br />

As expected marginal cost curves for stump<br />

harvesting start a higher cost level. In South Sweden to<br />

harvest 50% of the harvestable potential would cost up to<br />

ca. 900 SEK/ODT while at the coastal area of Upper<br />

Norrland and at Upper Norrland Lappland the cost would<br />

be 1100 and 1300 SEK/ODT respectively (Figure 4).<br />

Figure 4: Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of<br />

stumps from regeneration fellings in Upper Norrland and<br />

South of Sweden, cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a<br />

function of million ODT/year).<br />

Chipping slash in the industry proved to be more<br />

economical than chipping it at the roadside and<br />

transporting it to the industry. In the Lappland area of<br />

Upper Norrland the decrease in SEK/ODT was 5.5%<br />

while in the coastal area of Upper Norrland and in South<br />

Sweden the decrease was 4.5% and 3.5% respectively<br />

(Figure 5)<br />

Figure 5. Marginal cost curves for the harvesting of slash<br />

from regeneration fellings in Upper Norrland and South<br />

Sweden with a) a slash supply system based on chipping<br />

at roadside (uppermost line in each region) and b) a<br />

system based on chipping in the industry (lower line on<br />

each region). Cumulative values (SEK/ODT as a function<br />

of million ODT/year).<br />

4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> systems are characterized by negative<br />

economies of scale; as demand increases, the average<br />

transport distance increases. This it is especially<br />

pronounced where CHP plants are located close to the<br />

coast (raw material supply area half circle). Localization<br />

of CHP plants is mainly near bigger cities with an<br />

existing district heating distribution network and a great<br />

demand for heat. In this way a lot of electricity can be<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

23


produced within the electricity certificate system.<br />

However, forest biomass production is spread out over<br />

large geographical areas.<br />

The production of economically competitive energy<br />

(electric power or heat) from primary forest fuels, is<br />

strongly dependent on the availability of low-cost raw<br />

material. Forest biomass production takes place over<br />

extended geographical areas and collection and transport<br />

to the receiving facility is costly.<br />

Some measures that could be taken in order to make<br />

the whole supply chain more effective are:<br />

� Increased use of terminals located near the raw<br />

material source<br />

� Increased use of train transport from terminals<br />

to the plant<br />

� Use of supply systems suitable for the different<br />

sites<br />

� Increment of the mass on the trucks (e.g. precrushing<br />

of stumps)<br />

� Establishment of bioenergy combines (e.g.<br />

heat, electricity, pellets)<br />

The annual potential of forest energy is not fully utilized.<br />

For the future, it is important to consider the regional<br />

potential when new CHP plants are established.<br />

5 REFERENCES<br />

[1] Swedish Energy Agency 2009. Energy in Sweden.<br />

Swedish Energy Agency. ET 2009:30. ISSN 1403-1892.<br />

[2] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 2009.<br />

Forestry Statistics 2009. Department of forest resource<br />

management. ISSN 0280-0543. (In Swedish)<br />

[3] Swedish Forest Agency 2008. Skogliga<br />

konsekvensanalyser 2008. SKA-VB 08. Rapport 25.<br />

http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/episerver4/dokument/sks/a<br />

ktuellt/press/2008/rapport%20SKA.pdf (In Swedish)<br />

[4] Berg, S. 1992. Terrain Classification System for<br />

forestry work. Forestry Research Institute of Sweden,<br />

Uppsala, Sweden. ISBN 91-7614-078-4.<br />

[5] v Hofsten, H., Lundström, H., Nordén, B., & Thor, M.<br />

2006. Systemanalys för uttag av skogsbränsle – ett<br />

verktyg för fortsatt utveckling. Skogforsk. Resultat nr 6.<br />

(In Swedish)<br />

[6] Athanassiadis, D., Melin, Y., Nordfjell, T &<br />

Lundström, A. (2009). Harvesting Potential and<br />

Procurement Costs of Logging Residues in Sweden. In<br />

M. Savolainen (Ed.), <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2009: Sustainable<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Business. 4th International <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

conference.<br />

24 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


HARVESTING FOR ENERGY OR PULPWOOD IN EARLY THINNINGS?<br />

Dan Bergström & Fulvio Di Fulvio<br />

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences<br />

SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden<br />

Dan.Bergstrom@srh.slu.se, Fulvio.Di.Fulvio@srh.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: The objectives of the study were to compare the profitability between pulpwood and energy wood harvesting<br />

systems in early thinnings. The availability of merchantable volumes of pulpwood and energy wood was calculated for three<br />

different types of first thinning stands of pine, spruce and birch, i.e. nine different stands. The energy wood and pulpwood<br />

prices were based on year 2009 market prices for Sweden and a system analysis was carried out including costs for<br />

harvesting and forwarding to roadside. The tree volume of removal ranged from 15 to 84 dm 3 and was in average 38 dm 3 . In<br />

average the biomass to pulpwood ratio of the gross income in the pine, spruce and birch stands was 2.1, 2.9 and 2.3,<br />

respectively. The net income for the pulpwood system was negative (generating costs) in all stands. The net income for the<br />

energy wood system was profitable in 67% of the stands; 133 €×ha -1 in pine stands, ranging from 37 to 145 €×ha -1 in spruce<br />

stands, and 19 to 76 €×ha -1 in birch stands. If the market price for energy wood increases with 30% (compared to the current<br />

level) harvesting for energy wood in early thinnings could generate a considerable income for the forest owner.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy, forestry, thinnings, young forests, harvesting, wood chips.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

In Sweden there are large areas of young forests that<br />

have not being subjected to a pre-commercial thinning<br />

(PCT) and thus are dense and rich of biomass. However,<br />

performing a late PCT in such stands is expensive and the<br />

only alternative is to perform an early thinning. In early<br />

thinnings about 20-30% of the cut trees are too small<br />

sized for pulpwood and are left unutilized at the felling<br />

site. However, in the energy wood system full trees are<br />

merchantable and there are no restrictions of tree size and<br />

therefore all tree biomass are commercial available.<br />

Energy wood thinning can be a profitable alternative<br />

compared to pulpwood thinning [1]; the biomass removal<br />

can be 15-50% higher and the harvesting costs from<br />

stump to road side can be reduced by 20-40% [2].<br />

In early thinning operations for pulpwood multi-stem<br />

processing heads are used which render higher efficiency<br />

compared to using single-tree processing heads. In the<br />

multiple-tree handling of whole trees in thinning for<br />

energy wood accumulating felling heads (AFH) are used<br />

which can be mounted on single-grip harvesters or<br />

specially designed feller-bunchers [3] [4]. These multitree<br />

handling system shown to increase productivity by as<br />

much as 35-40 % when compared to single-tree handling<br />

[5]. In energy wood harvesting the felling and bunching<br />

operation still remains the largest cost component in the<br />

system (forwarding and comminution included) [4] [6].<br />

In 2009 the wood fuel (chips) costs for the thermal<br />

industry in Sweden was in average 167 SEK×MWh -1 (~<br />

317 SEK×(m 3 solid) -1 and the pulpwood price at road<br />

side was in average 310 SEK×(m 3 solid under-bark) -1 [7].<br />

The most profitable alternative depends on the relation<br />

between merchantable volumes, biomass prizes and the<br />

costs of respectively harvesting systems and supply<br />

chains.<br />

The objectives of the study were to compare the<br />

profitability between pulpwood and energy wood<br />

harvesting systems in early thinnings, from stump to road<br />

side.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The availability of merchantable volumes of<br />

pulpwood and energy wood thinning in different types of<br />

first thinning stands was estimated using pine, spruce and<br />

birch type stands from Bredberg (1972). In the analysis<br />

three stands per species aged from 22 to 42 years (age<br />

classes: “young”, “middle” and “old”) were used. In each<br />

of the stands the volume availability per treatment were<br />

calculated at a 30% level of intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area. Only trees with a dbh ≥ 5cm were used in<br />

calculations and trees where thinned from below<br />

according to a pre-suggested thinning “priority” [8]. The<br />

minimum pulpwood stem diameter under-bark was set to<br />

5 cm and the merchantable logs length range between 3.0<br />

and 5.5 m. The oven-dry weight of stem, branches and<br />

needles biomass was calculated using Marklund’s (1987)<br />

[9] functions and was then converted into solid volume<br />

by using stem basic densities and values for crown<br />

biomass by Hakkila (1978) [10].<br />

Stumpage prices were based on year 2009 market<br />

prices for Sweden: the roadside price of pulpwood overbark<br />

was 278 SEK×m -3 (340 SEK×m -3 u. b.) and the<br />

energy wood price at roadside (tree parts) of 200<br />

SEK×m - ³biomass -1 . Prices and costs were translated into<br />

Euro (€), assuming an exchange rate of 1€=10SEK.<br />

A system analysis was carried out including costs for<br />

biomass harvesting and forwarding to roadside. The<br />

harvesting productivity (productive work time; PW [11])<br />

was set to 5.4 m 3 pulpwood×PW-hour -1 in pulpwood<br />

treatment and 11.0 m 3 biomass×PW-hour -1 in energy<br />

wood treatment, according to Kärhä et al. (2004) [12] and<br />

Kärhä et al. (2006) [13] functions. The productivity of<br />

pulpwood forwarding was based on Nurminen et al.<br />

(2006) [14] study giving an average value of 13.8<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

25


m³×PW-hour -1 . The productivity of energy wood<br />

forwarding was assumed 15% lower than pulpwood<br />

forwarding, as suggested by Heikkilä et al. (2005) [15],<br />

who noticed productivity in forwarding whole trees 10-<br />

20% lower than forwarding delimbed wood. The<br />

productivity calculations were made for a forwarding<br />

distance of 200 m and a haulage load size of 8 m 3 solid.<br />

The PW were converted to main work time (MW) [11]<br />

using the coefficient 1.3 for the harvester and 1.2 for<br />

forwarding. The operating costs of the harvester were set<br />

to 80 €×MW-hour -1 and for the forwarder to 70 €×MW -1 -<br />

hour -1 . The transferring costs per machine were set to 200<br />

€ and the thinning stand areal was set to 3 ha.<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

The stem volume of harvested trees ranged between<br />

15 to 84 dm 3 with an average of 38 dm 3 . In average, the<br />

ratio of the harvested biomass to the pulpwood volume<br />

ranged from 1.5 to 2.0 in the “old” stands. The<br />

corresponding ratio in the “middle” age stands ranged<br />

from 2.4 to 2.9 and in the “young” stands it ranged from<br />

4.8 to 7.2. The highest volume ratio was found in the<br />

spruce stands since spruce have a relative higher share of<br />

branches compared to pine and birch. In average the<br />

biomass to pulpwood ratio of the gross income in the<br />

pine, spruce and birch stands was 2.1, 2.9 and 2.3,<br />

respectively (Table I-III).<br />

In pine stands (Table I) the gross income for<br />

pulpwood compared to energy wood was 7% lower in the<br />

“old”, 71% lower in the “young” and 45% lower in the<br />

“middle”.<br />

Table I: Characteristics of pine dominated stands and<br />

harvesting results at a 30% intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area<br />

Initial stand Old Middle Young<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 121 53 35<br />

Basal area (m 2 ×ha -1 ) 31.3 20.2 18.4<br />

Total stem volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 229 121 97<br />

Removal<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 79 27 18<br />

Pulpwood volume (m 3 o. b.×ha -1 ) 52 15 7<br />

Biomass volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 78 38 33<br />

Volume ratio, biomass/pulpwood 1.5 2.5 4.8<br />

Pulpwood gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1443 420 192<br />

Biomass gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1554 764 658<br />

In spruce stands (Table II) the gross income for<br />

pulpwood was 32% lower in the “old”, 81% lower in the<br />

“young” and 52% lower in the “middle” compared to<br />

energy wood.<br />

Table II: Characteristics of spruce dominated stands and<br />

harvesting results at a 30% intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area<br />

26 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Initial stand Old Middle Young<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 160 58 31<br />

Basal area (m 2 ×ha -1 ) 27.6 20.7 21.5<br />

Total stem volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 240 130 100<br />

Removal<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 84 31 15<br />

Pulpwood volume (m 3 o. b.×ha -1 ) 40 19 7<br />

Biomass volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 81 54 50<br />

Volume ratio, biomass/pulpwood 2.0 2.9 7.2<br />

Pulpwood gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1101 523 192<br />

Biomass gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1620 1082 994<br />

In birch stands (Table III) the gross income for<br />

pulpwood compared to energy wood was 12% lower in<br />

the “old”, 74% lower in the “young” and 43% lower in<br />

the “middle”.<br />

Table III: Characteristics of birch dominated stands and<br />

harvesting results at a 30% intensity of removal of the<br />

basal area<br />

Initial stand Old Middle Young<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 99 45 33<br />

Basal area (m 2 ×ha -1 ) 29.9 25.1 21.8<br />

Total stem volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 172 120 117<br />

Removal<br />

Stem volume (dm 3 ) 52 23 15<br />

Pulpwood volume (m3 o. b.×ha -1 ) 37 18 6<br />

Biomass volume (m 3 ×ha -1 ) 58 43 30<br />

Volume ratio, biomass/pulpwood 1.6 2.4 5.0<br />

Pulpwood gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1025 496 155<br />

Biomass gross income (€×ha -1 ) 1170 865 601<br />

In average the harvesting cost per m 3 (forwarding<br />

included) of the energy wood system was 37 - 40% lower<br />

compared to the pulpwood system. The net income for<br />

the pulpwood system was negative (generating costs) in<br />

all stands. The net income for the energy wood system<br />

was profitable in 67% of the stands; 133 €×ha -1 in pine<br />

stands, ranging from 37 to 145 €×ha -1 in spruce stands,<br />

and 19 to 76 €×ha -1 in birch stands.<br />

4 DISCUSSION<br />

Under current market price conditions the energy<br />

wood system gives in average about 2.4 times higher<br />

gross income than pulpwood in the studied stands. The<br />

systems would give the same gross income if the biomass<br />

to pulpwood ratio equals about 1.4. In the studied stands<br />

this situation would be possible only in the “old” stands<br />

at a harvesting intensity of at least 40% of the basal area.<br />

In present study the current price ratio of energy<br />

wood to pulpwood was 0.7, but market prices fluctuate<br />

and this ratio changes over time. If the energy wood price<br />

would increase with 30%, from 20 to 26 €×m -3 , the price<br />

ratio would increase to 0.9. At this situation, the<br />

differences in net income (€×ha -1 ) between pulpwood and<br />

energy wood, would increase considerable (Fig. I-II-III):<br />

the energy wood harvesting would becomes profitable in<br />

all considered conditions giving a net income ranging<br />

from 120 to 533 €×ha -1 in pine stands, 306 to 556 €×ha -1<br />

in spruce stands, and 139 to 390 €×ha -1 in birch stands.


Figure 1: The net income as function of biomass to<br />

pulpwood volume ratio at different energy wood prices in<br />

the pine stands.<br />

Figure 2: The net income as function of biomass to<br />

pulpwood volume ratio at different energy wood prices in<br />

the spruce stands.<br />

Figure 3: The net income as function of biomass to<br />

pulpwood volume ratio at different energy wood prices in<br />

the birch stands.<br />

The analyses of which the results are based on are<br />

somewhat simplified, e.g. the same operative coefficients<br />

were used for both systems which in practice probably<br />

differ between usage of different technology. For<br />

example, accumulating felling heads have less<br />

sophisticated components and functions and would<br />

probably have less time reduction due to work delays<br />

compared to accumulating processing heads. Further, the<br />

forwarding work in the energy wood system (full trees)<br />

was based on data for pulpwood forwarding. In practice<br />

the differences in productivity could probably differ<br />

somewhat more, especially at longer forwarding<br />

distances, since the payloads at energy wood forwarding<br />

are lower than pulpwood loads. However, we believe the<br />

data and assumptions used in the analyses are adequate<br />

and gives a reasonable comparison of the two systems.<br />

5 CONCLUSIONS<br />

The available volumes of biomass for energy in early<br />

thinning are considerately higher compared to pulpwood<br />

volumes. With current market prices the gross income of<br />

the energy wood is higher even in stands containing trees<br />

with a relative high proportion of pulpwood. The net<br />

income becomes higher in the energy wood system<br />

compared to pulpwood when using conventional<br />

machinery. If the market prices for energy wood<br />

increases with 30% (compared to the current level)<br />

harvesting for energy wood in early thinnings could<br />

generate a considerable income for the forest owner.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study was financed by the Forest Power project<br />

which is a part of the Botnia-Atlantica program.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Sirén M., Heikkila J. & Sauvula T. 2006.<br />

Combined production of industrial and energy<br />

wood in Scots pine stands. Forestry Studies.<br />

Metsanduslikud Uurimused. 45: 150-163.<br />

[2] Hakkila P. 2003. Developing technology for<br />

large-scale production of forest chips. Wood<br />

Energy Technology Programme 1999–2003, Tekes-<br />

Technology programme report 5/2003 54p.<br />

[3] Johansson, J. & Gullberg, T. 2002. Multiple<br />

tree handling in the selective felling and bunching<br />

of small trees in dense stands. International Journal<br />

of Forest Engineering 13(2): 25–34.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K., Jouhiaho, A., Mutikainen, A. &<br />

Mattila, S. 2005. Mechanized energy wood<br />

harvesting from early thinnings. International<br />

Journal of Forest Engineering 16(1): 15–26.<br />

[5] Jylhä P. & Laitila J. 2007. Energy wood and<br />

pulpwood harvesting from young stands using a<br />

prototype whole-tree bundler. Silva Fennica 41 (4):<br />

763-779.<br />

[6] Laitila, J. 2008. Harvesting technology and the<br />

cost of fuel chips from early thinnings. Silva<br />

Fennica 42(2): 267–283.<br />

[7] Anon. 2009. Swedish statistical yearbook of<br />

forestry. Swedish Forest Agency. ISSN 0491-7847.<br />

ISBN 978-91-99462-87-9.<br />

[8] Bredberg, C.-J. 1972. Type stands for the first<br />

thinning. Research Notes 55. Department of<br />

operational efficiency. Royal College of Forestry.<br />

Stockholm. 42 p.<br />

[9] Marklund L.G. 1987. Biomassafunktioner för<br />

tall, gran och björk i Sverige. Biomass functions for<br />

pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Sveriges<br />

lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för<br />

skogstaxering, Rapport 45, 79p (in Swedish with<br />

English Summary).<br />

[10] Hakkila, P. 1978. Pienpuun korjuu<br />

polttoaineeksi. Harvesting small-sized trees for<br />

fuel. Folia Forestalia 342. 38 p. (In Finnish with<br />

English abstract).<br />

[11] Anon. 1995. IUFRO WP 3.04.02. Forest work<br />

study nomenclature. Test editionvalid 1995-2000.<br />

Department of Operational Efficiency, Sedish<br />

University of Agriculture Sciences, Garpenberg. 16<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

27


pp. ISBN 91-576-5055-1.<br />

[12] Kärhä K., Rönkkö E. & Gumse S.-I. 2004.<br />

Productivity and Cutting Costs of Thinning<br />

Harvesters. International Journal of Forest<br />

Engineering 15(2): 43–56.<br />

[13] Kärhä K., Keskinen S., Liikkanen R. &<br />

Lindroos J. 2006. Kokopuun korjuu nuorista<br />

metsistä (Harvesting small-sized whole trees from<br />

young stands). Metsätehon raportti 193 79 p. (In<br />

Finnish).<br />

[14] Nurminen T., Korpunen H. & Uusitalo J. 2006.<br />

Time consumption analysis of cut-to-lenght<br />

harvesting system. Silva Fennica 40 (2): 335-363.<br />

[15] Heikkilä J., Laitila J., Tanttu V., Lindblad J.,<br />

Sirén M. & Asikainen A. 2006. Harvesting<br />

alternatives and cost factors of delimbed energy<br />

wood. Forestry Studies 45: 49-56<br />

28 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


CO 2-EQ EMISSIONS OF FOREST CHIP PRODUCTION IN FINLAND IN 2020<br />

Arto Kariniemi & Kalle Kärhä<br />

Metsäteho Oy<br />

P.O. Box 101, FI-00171 Helsinki, Finland<br />

arto.kariniemi@metsateho.fi, kalle.karha@metsateho.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: The research carried out by Metsäteho Oy calculated what would be the total fuel consumption and CO 2-eq<br />

emissions of forest chip production if the use of forest chips is 24 TWh in 2020 in Finland in accordance with the target<br />

set of Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy. CO 2-eq emissions were determined with Metsäteho Oy’s updated<br />

Emissions Calculation Model. If the production and consumption of forest chips in Finland are 24 TWh in 2020, then the<br />

total CO 2-eq emissions would be around 230 000 tonnes. The volume of diesel consumption was 73 million litres and<br />

petrol 1.7 million litres. Electric rail transportation and chipping at the mill site consumed 17 GWh of electricity. The<br />

supply chain with the lowest CO 2-eq emissions was logging residues comminuted at plant. Conversely, the highest CO 2eq<br />

emissions came from stump wood when operating with terminal comminuting. Less than 3% of the energy content<br />

was consumed during the forest chip production. Energy input/output ratio in the total volume was 0.026 MWh/MWh<br />

which varied from 0.019 to 0.038 between the supply systems researched. Hence, forest chip production gave a net of<br />

some 97% of the energy content delivered at the plant.<br />

Keywords: CO 2-eq emissions, Forest biomass, Finland.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The use of forest chips in Finland has increased<br />

rapidly in the 21 st century: In the year 2000, the total use<br />

of forest chips for energy generation was 1.8 TWh (0.9<br />

mill. m 3 ), while in 2009 it was 12.2 TWh (6.1 mill. m 3 )<br />

[1]. Of this amount, 10.8 TWh was used in heating and<br />

power plants, and 1.4 TWh in small-sized dwellings, i.e.<br />

private houses, farms, and recreational dwellings, in 2009<br />

[1].<br />

Of the forest chips used in heating and power plants<br />

(10.8 TWh), the majority (36%) was produced from<br />

logging residues in final cuttings in 2009 [1]. Forest chips<br />

derived from stump and root wood totalled 15% and 20%<br />

came from large-sized (rotten) roundwood. 29% of the<br />

total amount of commercial forest chips used for energy<br />

generation came from small-diameter (d 1.3


asis for machine and truck units in the calculations of<br />

CO 2-eq emissions.<br />

In the emissions calculations, the production and<br />

consumption of forest chips was 24 TWh in 2020. It was<br />

assumed that 45% of the forest chips used in 2020 would<br />

be produced from logging residues, 20% from stump and<br />

root wood, and 35% from small-sized thinning wood<br />

harvested in young stands [cf. 1, 3, 4, 24]. The main<br />

supply chain of chips from logging residues and smalldiameter<br />

thinning wood was roadside chipping, and for<br />

stumps crushing at the plant [cf. 4, 24, 25].<br />

Road transportation was the most widely used longdistance<br />

transportation method in the calculations.<br />

Almost 60% of forest biomass (m 3 km) was transported<br />

by truck from roadside landings to the energy plant, or to<br />

some other production mill. 10% transportation volume<br />

was by train, with either electric or diesel locomotives,<br />

and 14% by barge.<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Fuel and electricity consumption<br />

If the production and consumption of forest chips in<br />

Finland are 24 TWh in 2020, then the total CO 2-eq<br />

emissions would be around 230 000 tonnes (Fig. 1). Of<br />

this amount, the proportion of forest chip harvesting<br />

operations was 68%, long-distance transportation 19%,<br />

silviculture and forest improvement works 3%, and<br />

production of diesel and fertilizer 10%. The volume of<br />

diesel consumption was 73 million litres and petrol 1.7<br />

million litres (Fig. 2). Electric rail transportation and<br />

comminuting at the mill site consumed 17 GWh of<br />

electricity.<br />

3.2 Energy input/output ratio<br />

In the study, the supply chain with the lowest CO 2-eq<br />

emissions was logging residues comminuted at plant<br />

(Fig. 3). Conversely, the highest CO 2-eq emissions came<br />

from stump wood when operating with terminal<br />

comminuting (Fig. 3). In other words, the supply chains<br />

with the best energy input/output ratio were logging<br />

residues with comminution at roadside landing and plant,<br />

as well as logging residues bundles with comminution at<br />

terminal. Correspondingly, stump and root wood supply<br />

chain with comminution at terminal had the highest ratio.<br />

Less than 3% of the energy content was consumed<br />

during the forest chip production. Energy input/output<br />

ratio in the total volume was 0.026 MWh/MWh which<br />

varied from 0.019 to 0.038 between the supply chain<br />

alternatives studied (Figs. 4–6). Hence, forest chip<br />

production gave a net of some 97% of the energy content<br />

delivered at the plant.<br />

30 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 1: Volume of CO 2-eq emissions of a study,<br />

227 000 tonnes in total, with the supply sources used.<br />

Figure 2: Volume of diesel consumption of a study, 73<br />

million litres in total, with the supply sources used.<br />

Figure 3: Relative CO 2-eq emissions of forest chip<br />

supply chains in the study. CO 2-eq emissions of 100 =<br />

Logging residues, comminution at roadside landing.


Figure 4: CO 2-eq emissions (kg/m 3 ) of logging residue<br />

chips with roadside comminution supply chain in the<br />

study.<br />

Figure 5: CO 2-eq emissions (kg/m 3 ) of small-diameter<br />

thinning wood chips with roadside comminution supply<br />

chain in the study.<br />

Figure 6: CO 2-eq emissions (kg/m 3 ) of stump and root<br />

wood chips with supply chain based on comminution at<br />

plant in the study.<br />

4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

A lot of discussion about the energy efficiency of<br />

forestry production chains and the CO 2-eq emissions of<br />

different fuels have been presented. The importance of<br />

decreasing energy use, as well as monitoring and<br />

reducing greenhouse gases are a general subject for<br />

further development. Therefore, Metsäteho Oy undertook<br />

this study on the CO 2-eq emissions in forest chip<br />

production by alternative supply chains in Finland in<br />

2020. The study results indicated that the energy<br />

input/put ratio of forest biomass is good. With our supply<br />

mix, forest chip production gave a net of some 97% of<br />

the energy content delivered at the plant. The findings are<br />

in line with the earlier CO 2-eq emissions made in Finland<br />

[26, 27].<br />

Emissions calculations have to continue to provide<br />

information that is vital for the future development. In<br />

Finland, the comprehensive forest work studies of<br />

mechanized felling and forest haulage was carried out in<br />

the 1980’s and 90’s, and now is time for deep<br />

understanding of production of forest chip technology<br />

and energy efficiency, as well as realistic alternatives of<br />

forest chip supply chains in future.<br />

This study gives a reasoned estimation of forest<br />

biomass supply sources, supply chains and machinery, as<br />

well as CO 2-eq emissions related to the target for the year<br />

2020 (24 TWh). Calculation the CO 2-eq emissions were<br />

determined for different chip raw material flows (chips<br />

from small-sized thinning wood, logging residues, and<br />

stump and root wood), and for various supply chains<br />

(comminution at roadside landings, at terminals, and at<br />

power plants, or at some other production mills).<br />

In the calculations, it was assumed that the share of<br />

stump wood chips will be increasing, as well as the share<br />

of terminal comminuting in the production of forest chips<br />

[cf. 3, 4, 24, 25]. The productivity levels of machines and<br />

vehicles are assumed to be almost at the same level than<br />

nowadays. In the future, development of machine and<br />

equipment technology, new technical and mechanical<br />

innovations and rationalization of working methods will<br />

help to boost the operating performance of machine and<br />

vehicle units and further to decrease the CO 2-eq<br />

emissions of forest chip production. In contrast, less<br />

favorable harvesting conditions (i.e. less removals, more<br />

difficult terrain, and longer forwarding distances) and<br />

lengthening transportation distances are obstacles to<br />

lowering energy consumption and CO 2-eq emissions of<br />

machinery [cf. 4, 24, 28].<br />

Just for understanding of causation for differences<br />

between supply chains based on different machinery and<br />

logistics, there need to be mention some examples: Forest<br />

haulage and long-distance transportation of logging<br />

residues are more productive compared with the other<br />

forest chip supply sources. Lifting operation and<br />

comminution of stump wood consume a lot of energy.<br />

Cutting of small-diameter thinning wood is not effective<br />

from a fuel consumption point of view.<br />

Silviculture and forest improvement activities’<br />

emissions were included into the Model, as well as<br />

machine transfers and transport-to-work and production<br />

of diesel and fertilizer. As an example, fuel consumption<br />

of truck has calculated by Metsäteho’s sensitive fuel<br />

consumption model. Emissions were calculated by type<br />

of forest chip supply chain, combined with appropriate<br />

long-distance transportation methods.<br />

As a significant part of the study, a sensitivity<br />

analysis was performed to point out the influence of<br />

different parameters and to underline the importance of<br />

data management behind the emissions calculations.<br />

In practice, the supply chain mix depends on the<br />

availability of supply chain combinations, machinery,<br />

and machine operators. The differences of emissions are<br />

due to the productivity and fuel consumption of different<br />

kind of technology, but also because of realistic<br />

combination of supply chains and available machinery.<br />

We have to look at the whole production system, hence<br />

there is no sense to compare supply chains without<br />

realistic, comprehensive boundaries.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Ylitalo, E. <strong>2010</strong>. Puun energiakäyttö 2009. (Use of<br />

wood for energy generation in 2009). Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute, Forest Statistical Bulletin 16/<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

[2] Anon. 2008. Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy.<br />

Government Report to Parliament 6 November 2008.<br />

Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the<br />

Economy, Energy and climate 36/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.tem.fi/files/21079/TEMjul_36_2008_energia<br />

_ja_ilmasto.pdf.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

31


[3] Kärhä, K., Elo, J., Lahtinen, P., Räsänen, T. &<br />

Pajuoja, H. 2009. Availability and use of wood-based<br />

fuels in Finland in 2020. Metsäteho Review 40. Available<br />

at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_40.pdf.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K., Strandström, M., Lahtinen, P. & Elo, J.<br />

2009. Forest chip production machinery and labour<br />

demand in Finland in the year 2020. Metsäteho Review<br />

41. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_41.pdf.<br />

[5] TYKO 2007. Available at:<br />

http://lipasto.vtt.fi/tyko/malli.htm.<br />

[6] RAILI 2007. Available at:<br />

http://www.lipasto.vtt.fi/raili/index.htm.<br />

[7] EcoData. Available at:<br />

http://www.kcl.fi/page.php?page_id=309.<br />

[8] Kärhä, K. & Kariniemi, A. 2008. Fuel consumption of<br />

the production machinery of forest chips In Finland.<br />

Metsäteho Oy, Unpublished report.<br />

[9] Rieppo, K. & Örn, J. 2003. Metsäkoneiden<br />

polttoaineen kulutuksen mittaaminen. (Measurement of<br />

the fuel consumption of forest machines). Metsäteho<br />

Report 148. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/j9ac717p0zbp1.pdf.<br />

[10] Väkevä, J., Pennanen, O. & Örn, J. 2004. Puutavaraautojen<br />

polttoaineen kulutus. (Fuel consumption of<br />

timber trucks). Metsäteho Report 166. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/52ewebln0acjs.pdf.<br />

[11] Kärhä, K., Keskinen, S., Liikkanen, R. & Lindroos,<br />

J. 2006. Kokopuun korjuu nuorista metsistä. (Whole-tree<br />

harvesting from young stands). Metsäteho Report 193.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Raportti_193_KK_ym.p<br />

df.<br />

[12] Kärhä, K. 2008. Integration of small-diameter wood<br />

harvesting in early thinnings using the two-pile cutting<br />

method. In: <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2008, <strong>Proceedings</strong> of<br />

Poster Session. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2008 Conference &<br />

Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, 27 th –29 th May 2008,<br />

Jönköping, Sweden. p. 124–128.<br />

[13] Kärhä, K. & Mutikainen, A. 2008. Integrated cutting<br />

of first-thinning wood with a Moipu 400ES. TTS<br />

Research, Forestry Bulletin 726.<br />

[14] Kärhä, K., Vartiamäki, T., Liikkanen, R., Keskinen,<br />

S. & Lindroos, J. 2004. Hakkuutähteen paalauksen ja<br />

paalien metsäkuljetuksen tuottavuus ja kustannukset.<br />

(Productivity and costs of slash bundling and bundle<br />

forwarding). Metsäteho Report 179. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/4djb1xxw0otzss5.pdf.<br />

[15] Laitila, J., Ala-Fossi, A., Vartiamäki, T., Ranta, T. &<br />

Asikainen, A. 2007. Kantojen noston ja metsäkuljetuksen<br />

tuottavuus. (Productivity of stump lifting and forest<br />

haulage). Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research<br />

Institute 46. Available at:<br />

32 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2007/mwp0<br />

46.pdf.<br />

[16] Kärhä, K., Mutikainen, A. & Kortelahti, I. 2009.<br />

Väkevä-kantopilkkuri Metsätehon ja TTS tutkimuksen<br />

pikatestissä. (The Väkevä Stump Processor in the test by<br />

Metsäteho and TTS Research). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 12/2009. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2009_<br />

12_Vakeva-kantopilkkuri_kk.pdf.<br />

[17] Rieppo, K. 2002. Hakkuutähteen metsäkuljetuksen<br />

ajanmenekki, tuottavuus ja kustannukset. (Time<br />

consumption, productivity and costs of forwarding<br />

logging residues). Metsäteho Report 136. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/f2b1et3t.pdf.<br />

[18] Asikainen, A., Ranta, T., Laitila, J. & Hämäläinen, J.<br />

2001. Hakkuutähdehakkeen kustannustekijät ja<br />

suurimittakaavaisen hankinnan logistiikka. (Cost factors<br />

and large-scale procurement of logging residue chips).<br />

University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Research<br />

Notes 131.<br />

[19] Korpilahti, A. & Suurniemi, S. 2001.<br />

Käyttöpaikallahaketukseen perustuva puupolttoaineen<br />

tuotanto. (Production of woody fuel chips based on<br />

comminution at power plant). Metsäteho Report 122.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/tff0fy8d5c7p.pdf.<br />

[20] Halonen, P. & Vesisenaho, A. 2002.<br />

Hakeautoseuranta. (Follow up study of chip trucks). VTT<br />

Prosessit, Tutkimusselostus PRO/T6046/02.<br />

[21] Ranta, T., Halonen, P., Frilander, P., Asikainen, A.,<br />

Lehikoinen, M. & Väätäinen, K. 2002. Metsähakkeen<br />

autokuljetuksen logistiikka. (Logistics of truck<br />

transportation of forest chips). VTT Prosessit,<br />

Tutkimusselostus PRO/T6042/02.<br />

[22] Ranta, T. & Rinne, S. 2006. The profitability of<br />

transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 30(3): 231–237.<br />

[23] Korpilahti, A. 2004. Oksapaalien autokuljetus.<br />

(Truck transportation of slash bundles). Metsäteho Report<br />

169. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/o42lhigkekx.pdf.<br />

[24] Kärhä, K. 2007. Supply chains and machinery in the<br />

production of forest chips in Finland. In: Savolainen, M.<br />

(Ed.). Book of <strong>Proceedings</strong>. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2007, 3 rd<br />

International <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference and Exhibition, 3 rd –<br />

6 th September 2007, Jyväskylä Paviljonki, Finland.<br />

Finbio Publications 36: 367–374.<br />

[25] Kärhä, K. 2009. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut<br />

Suomessa vuonna 2008. (Industrial supply chains of<br />

forest chip production in Finland in 2008). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 14/2009. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2009_<br />

14_Metsahakkeen_tuotantoketjut_kk_2.pdf.<br />

[26] Korpilahti, A. 1998. Finnish forest energy systems<br />

and CO 2 consequences. Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 15(4/5):<br />

293–297.


[27] Wihersaari, M. 2005. Greenhouse gas emissions<br />

from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 28(5): 435–443.<br />

[28] Kärhä, K. 2007. Production machinery for forest<br />

chips in Finland in 2007 and in the future. Metsäteho<br />

Review 28. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_28.pdf.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

33


34 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

LARGE-SCALE FOREST BIOMASS SUPPLY WITH LONG-DISTANCE TRANSPORT METHODS<br />

Ranta, T. Korpinen, O.-J. Jäppinen, E. & Karttunen, K.<br />

Lappeenranta University of Technology<br />

Prikaatinkatu 3 E, 50100 Mikkeli, Finland<br />

tel.: +358 40 864 4994, e-mail: tapio.ranta@lut.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: Finnish forest companies aim to produce biodiesel based on the Fischer-Tropsch process from forest<br />

residues. This study presents method to evaluate biomass availability and supply costs to the selected biorefinery site.<br />

Forest-owners’ willingness to sell, buyers’ market share, and regional competition were taken into account when biomass<br />

availability was evaluated. Supply logistics was based either on direct truck transportation deliveries from forest or on<br />

railway/waterway transportation via regional terminals. The large biomass need of a biorefinery demanded both of these<br />

supply structures, since the procurement area was larger than the traditional supply area used for CHP plants in Finland.<br />

The average supply cost was 17 €/MWh for an annual supply of 2 TWh of forest biomass. Truck transportation of chips<br />

made from logging residues covered 70% of the total volume, since direct forest chip deliveries from forest were the<br />

most competitive supply solution in terms of direct supply costs. The better supply security and lower vehicle capacity<br />

needs are issues that would favour also terminal logistics with other raw-material sources in practical operations. One<br />

finding was that the larger the biomass need, the less the variation in biomass availability and supply costs, since almost<br />

the whole country will serve as a potential supply area. Biomass import possibilities were not considered in this study.<br />

Keywords: logistics, forest residues, supply chain, biorefinery<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

In Finland, the target for renewable energy as a<br />

share of final energy consumption will be 38% by<br />

2020 [1]. In 2008, the share was 28%, but it fell to<br />

26% in 2009 because of the declining production<br />

volumes in the forest industry [2]. In particular, wood<br />

fuels will be tasked with a considerable share of the<br />

work to meet Finnish targets. Wood fuels accounted<br />

for 75% (263 PJ) of renewable energy primary use<br />

(350 PJ) in 2009 [2]. The Climate and Energy Strategy<br />

of Finland presupposes wood fuel primary use to<br />

achieve the level of 335 PJ (forest chips: 76 PJ) under<br />

the base scenario or 349 PJ (forest chips: 86 PJ) in the<br />

target scenario by 2020 [1]. The target scenario<br />

strives toward the aim of RES for Finland. The<br />

difference between the scenarios follows from the<br />

increased forest chip use, while use of forest industry<br />

volume-­‐dependent wood by-­‐products and black<br />

liquor is forecast to decline according to both<br />

scenarios. which underpins the development of forest<br />

chip use. The study by Pöyry estimated that supply by<br />

products would decline some 16% (16 PJ) between<br />

2005 and <strong>2010</strong> [3].<br />

Under the Climate and Energy Strategy, the total use<br />

of forest chips (86 PJ) involves some 12 million solid<br />

cubic metres. The latest aim stated by the Government of<br />

Finland is to increase this volume to the level of 13.5<br />

million solid cubic metres (90 PJ). Techno-economical<br />

potential will lie somewhere around 151–168 PJ [3] by<br />

2020; therefore, the target is challenging to utlilise more<br />

than half of the potential within this time frame.<br />

Uncertainties arise from the development of roundwood<br />

felling levels, energy wood subsidy schemes, pricing of<br />

emission allowances and prices of alternative fuels. In<br />

addition, Finland aims to build three biorefineries, each<br />

needing 1 million solid m 3 of forest chips a year. These<br />

targets and related incentives will be announced in a<br />

national action plan for the European Commission by the<br />

end of June. The incentives include a chipping subsidy<br />

for energy wood from first thinnings, a feed-in tariff for<br />

small-scale CHP (< 20 MW) using wood, and a dynamicsubsidy<br />

model for electricity produced from wood in cocombustion<br />

boilers. The idea is to replace peat and coal<br />

with wood and link the level of the subsidy to the price<br />

development of CO 2 allowances.<br />

The development of forest chips’ use has been rapid<br />

so far in the 21 century. From 2000 to 2009, the use of<br />

forest chips increased from 7 PJ (0.9 million solid m 3 ) to<br />

44 PJ (6.1 million solid m 3 ). The energy industry (district<br />

heat and power production) used 39 PJ and small houses<br />

5 PJ in 2009 [4]. Forest chips consisted of logging<br />

residues (36%), small-diameter energy wood (29%),<br />

stumps (15%), and roundwood (20%). The share of<br />

roundwood increased till sixfold from the last year<br />

because of import from Russia.<br />

So far, all forest chips (both uncomminuted and<br />

comminuted material) have been transported by truck,<br />

except in trials with railway and waterway vehicles in the<br />

inland lake area ]4]. It was found that waterway<br />

transportation may become an option with longer<br />

transport distances (over 150 km) if the barge logistics is<br />

managed well and barge structures modified for forest<br />

chip transportation [5]. A winter season with iced-over<br />

lake areas (3–4 months) will decrease the logistical<br />

effectiveness of the waterway system. In contrast, railway<br />

logistics offers more route options and year-round<br />

operation possibilities. Experiences of railway logistics<br />

for forest chips from Sweden have been promising [6].<br />

The terminal operations are an especially essential part of<br />

railway logistics for keeping the train capacity in use [7].<br />

It could be expected that other transport modes will<br />

claim a certain part of domestic transport markets for<br />

forest chips. Larger forest chip supply volumes calls for<br />

logistics systems including buffer terminals and transport


modes suitable for longer distances. Supply costs will<br />

increase because of more handling and storage, but at the<br />

same time it is possible to increase the availability and<br />

supply security.<br />

The larger forest chip volumes and longer transport<br />

distances will be clearly manifested with biorefineries<br />

despite their integration into paper and pulp mills.<br />

Finnish forest companies aim to produce biodiesel from<br />

domestic forest chip raw-material sources, where the<br />

biofuel production technology will use the Fischer-<br />

Tropsch process. At the moment, the production<br />

technology is being further developed and evaluated for<br />

forest chips through demonstration and pilot plants. Also<br />

tentative production sites for commercial-scale plants<br />

have been selected and biomass availability estimated. In<br />

practical terms, only existing forest integrates would be<br />

suitable sites in Finland. The advantages of process<br />

integration will increase the conversion efficiency from<br />

60% to 90% [8]. There are three groups of operators<br />

interested in investing in a biorefinery and thus three<br />

parallel projects in progress in Finland. The additional<br />

biomass need per commercial site is at least 1 million m 3<br />

– i.e., 2 TWh of biomass and hundreds of truckloads per<br />

day, depending on the use of other modes of transport.<br />

The maximum need would be double this: 4 TWh of<br />

biomass.<br />

The analysis tool reported upon in this study will be<br />

targeted at assisting availability and alternative supply<br />

chain studies for potential biorefinery sites in Finland.<br />

The biorefinery scale is commercial, with production of<br />

100,000 tonnes of biodiesel a year. The analysis will be<br />

bound to a regional operational environment of supply<br />

infrastructure, including alternative transport networks<br />

such as roads, inland waterways and railways, potential<br />

forest biomass resources and alternative supply logistics<br />

structures. Regional competition is an important part of<br />

the study, for evaluating realistic biomass availability.<br />

Logistical structures dictate how the supply chain is<br />

constructed between supply and demand site including<br />

storage phases and the form in which material is handled<br />

in the various stages. Geographical information system<br />

(GIS) use is applied for analysing biomass resources in a<br />

competitive situation among end users and alternative<br />

supply logistics structures and for examining supply<br />

costs.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

2.1 Forest biomass reserves<br />

Calculations of biomass potential were based on<br />

commercial fellings reported upon at municipality level<br />

in Metinfo forest information services [9]. Volumes were<br />

obtained for 2004–08 and averaged. The biomass<br />

calculation method was reported upon in an earlier study,<br />

where techno-economical logging residue and stump<br />

volumes were converted from roundwood felling<br />

volumes [10]. The calculation method for small-diameter<br />

energy wood was based on National Forest Inventory<br />

data and also reported in the earlier study [11]. Biomass<br />

volumes at municipal level (448 units) were distributed<br />

over smaller collection points (55,292 units). These<br />

points were based on actual regeneration felling points<br />

from 2002–04. In this way, the municipal volume was<br />

spread to forestry land where fellings will occur also in<br />

the future. The volume was divided equally across points<br />

within each municipality, for more fine-grained<br />

geographical coverage. The coverage of collection points<br />

was greater in areas where regeneration felling activity<br />

has been higher, such as eastern and central Finland (see<br />

Fig. 1). With the volume assigned to these points, the<br />

regional availability and logistics calculations could be<br />

made more detailed.<br />

2.2 Competition among end users<br />

Alternative end users of forest chips were<br />

geographically pinpointed to take into account the<br />

regional competition. Only large-scale users with more<br />

than 50 GWh of annual actual or planned use (approx. 30<br />

sites) were selected (Fig. 1). In practice, these were<br />

municipal or industrial CHP plants. Also future potential<br />

user sites were taken into account, where the investment<br />

has been decided on or is under construction. No<br />

potential biorefinery sites were selected, as no<br />

construction site decision has yet been made. Small-scale<br />

heating plant sites (approx. 400) were omitted, since their<br />

effect on regional use is rather low. Large-scale users<br />

account for 75% of forest chips’ end use, and the smallscale<br />

use could have been incorporated into large-scale<br />

use [4]. The regional coverage of users was extensive<br />

except in northern Finland.<br />

Figure 1: The coverage of forest biomass collection<br />

points and large-scale (> 50 GWh/a) users of forest chips<br />

The forest chips are supplied mainly in the proximity<br />

of existing CHP plants, since the typical procurement<br />

area lies within 100 km. Because of the extensive<br />

geographical coverage and plants’ proximity to each<br />

other, the procurement areas are overlapped, especially in<br />

the southern part of Finland. End users have access to<br />

only certain of the biomass sources surrounding the<br />

plants, since the biomass supply market is oligopolistic<br />

by nature. Many organisations supply biomass to<br />

alternative end users in the same region; in this study, the<br />

maximum market share was assumed to be 50%.<br />

At first, for each CHP plant the supply areas were<br />

calculated via road network to build an isodistance area<br />

(same road distance at outer ring) that could meet the full<br />

demand. This area was called the inside supply area.<br />

From this area, 50% was allocated to the plant accounting<br />

for the maximum market share. The rest was available for<br />

other users. Secondly, the outside supply area was<br />

calculated with a distance double that used in the first<br />

stage. The supply area will be quadrupled with double the<br />

distance, and 17% of this area was allocated to the plant,<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

35


with the rest being volume free for other users (Fig. 2).<br />

From the overlapping area, the free volume (i.e.,<br />

collection sites) was allocated by a method minimising<br />

the transport distance between alternative users.<br />

Especially in areas with high forest fuel demand and<br />

several overlapping supply areas, the transport distances<br />

increased. However, the areas with the highest demand<br />

also had the highest potential in central and eastern<br />

Finland. The western part of the country was outside the<br />

scope of the study. The intensity of the competition was<br />

illustrated through the use of colors in the map<br />

presentation (see Fig. 3). Areas depicted in red had the<br />

highest competition, and 50% of the volume was<br />

allocated to CHP plants in the region. By contrast, in<br />

areas shown in brown, 17% was allocated; for those in<br />

green, all biomass volume was free and no competition<br />

existed. The greatest competition was in central and<br />

eastern Finland, where are many large-scale CHP-plants<br />

with high demand. The individual points with the highest<br />

demand were in Jyväskylä, in central Finland (1,000<br />

GWh), and in the city of Lappeenranta (800 GWh), in<br />

eastern Finland. The north-eastern part of the country had<br />

the least competition from biomass.<br />

Figure 2: Isodistance areas and biomass volume<br />

allocation rules from the areas<br />

Forest biomass availability was illustrated in a map<br />

presentation via color shading, with darker color<br />

indicating better biomass availability (Fig. 3). The map<br />

showed the biomass free after competition. Therefore,<br />

availability was best in the northern part of the country,<br />

where there was the least competition. Both the potential<br />

and the availability of small diameter energy wood are<br />

increasing in the northern part of Finland. Normally, the<br />

potential maps without competition showed the opposite<br />

situation, since the potential of spruce logging residues<br />

and stumps is concentrated in central and eastern Finland<br />

[12].<br />

36 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 3: Competition from biomass. The map at the left<br />

illustrates the degree of competition (red for high<br />

competition, orange for minor competition, green for no<br />

competition) and the one on the right shows the<br />

availability after competition has been taken into account<br />

(the darker the better availability). All biomass fractions<br />

are included<br />

2.3 Factors in availability of biomass to a biorefinery<br />

Forest resources, types, and felling activity dictate the<br />

biomass potential. So far, the spruce-dominated<br />

regeneration fellings have been the main source for forest<br />

chips’ recovery. Nowadays, also pine-dominated small<br />

diameter energy wood fellings and pine stump recovery<br />

has become more common. Regional competition is a<br />

very important factor in examination of availability to a<br />

specific end-user site. The market share of roundwood<br />

fellings and forest-owners’ willingness to sell biomass for<br />

energy determine the actual free biomass availability.<br />

Logging residues and stumps’ recovery are typically<br />

integrated into roundwood fellings; therefore, access to<br />

roundwood fellings provides the possibility of harvesting<br />

also energy wood from the same felling site if forest<br />

owners are willing to sell it. Forest industry companies<br />

are potential biorefinery investors in Finland, and the<br />

domestic market share of one company is, on average,<br />

one third, although it varies a great deal by region.<br />

Forest-owners’ willingness to sell was examined in a<br />

survey done in the county of Etelä-Savo in 2009.<br />

Alternative stumpage prices were taken into<br />

consideration. The results concerning willingness<br />

indicated 80% for logging residues, 75% for smalldiameter<br />

energy wood, and 50% for stumps (Fig. 4). The<br />

main reason for declining energy wood harvesting was<br />

lack of information and fear of jeopardising the nutrient<br />

balance at the forest site.<br />

End-user site location and its proximity to biomass<br />

resources, regional geography, and transport networks<br />

and related infrastructure are site-dependent factors that<br />

dictate availability to the selected end user. The railway<br />

and waterway network will widen the procurement area<br />

beyond the normal area of less than 100 km via road<br />

network. Overall, the counties of Pohjois-Karjala,<br />

Kainuu, and Pohjois-Savo (in the north-east) and the<br />

southern part of Lapland are especially suitable for<br />

railway or waterway transport logistics.


Figure 4: End users’ market share (in this case one third)<br />

and forest-owners’ willingness to sell different energy<br />

biomass fractions<br />

2.4 Supply logistics alternatives<br />

Supply logistics decisions were based on either<br />

roadside chipping and direct truck transportation or<br />

terminal chipping and railway/waterway transportation to<br />

the end-user site. The terminal chipping option included<br />

loose material’s transportation by trucks to terminals.<br />

Only inland and lake-area domestic supply was<br />

examined. Import options were excluded from this study.<br />

The terminal sites were existing terminals, and<br />

selection for the study was based on suitability to act as a<br />

biomass supply terminal for the selected end-user site.<br />

Primarily, each location’s proximity to biomass sources<br />

and transport networks (railway/waterway) dictated the<br />

terminal sites. The secondary selection criteria were<br />

technical properties and the terminal site’s suitability in<br />

terms of storage capacity, loading capacity and length of<br />

the loading rail or quay, and chipping conditions<br />

(remoteness from residential areas). The maximum pre<br />

hauling distance for loose material was set to 80 km.<br />

Waterway terminals were on Lake Saimaa, along the<br />

deep channel (4.2 m). In total, 28 railway terminals and<br />

three waterway terminals were chosen (Fig. 5).<br />

Railway transportation was based on container<br />

logistics. Railway shipment involved 20 wagons (20 ft,<br />

48 m 3 ), for a total frame volume of 2,880 m 3 of forest<br />

chips (Fig. 6). The properties of loading places imposed a<br />

limit on the train length, less than 450 m, or a 20-wagon<br />

train. The maximum net load would in this case be 976<br />

tonnes, which yields 2,380 MWh. Each wagon took three<br />

containers, with the total, approx. 140 m 3 , being<br />

equivalent to a full 140 m 3 trailer truck. The bearing<br />

capacity of one wagon is 61 tonnes, so a fifth of the<br />

bearing capacity will remain unused. Loading was done<br />

by front loader and unloading with a forklift truck (Fig.<br />

7). Forklifts could be equipped with a weighing appliance<br />

and RFID-marking system. Biomass was chipped at the<br />

railway terminal to keep the degree of capacity utilisation<br />

of chipping facilities and trains as high as possible.<br />

Biomass was stored for the long term in uncomminuted<br />

form, to avoid material loss and any risk of self-ignition.<br />

Waterway transportation was based on barge<br />

logistics, wherein a tugboat operates with a barge .Only<br />

the Lake Saimaa area is suitable for this option, apart<br />

from in the winter season, 3–4 months for which the lake<br />

is frozen. A typical suitable barge size for the Lake<br />

Saimaa area is the Europa IIa type: hold: 2,650 m 3 , load<br />

with heaped shape: 4,000 m 3 , approx. 1,200 tonnes.<br />

Storage and chipping were done as with railway logistics.<br />

Loading and unloading were done by heavy material<br />

machines or excavators (Fig. 8). Larger loads are possible<br />

with extended sides, since there is still a lot of carrying<br />

capacity (maximum: 2,500 tonnes) left. Biomass from<br />

islands will come as deck load, but for this study those<br />

options were excluded.<br />

Figure 5: Railway and waterway terminals<br />

Figure 6: Container railway shipment (Innofreight)<br />

Figure 7: Loading and unloading of railway containers<br />

(Innofreight)<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

37


Figure 8: Waterway transportation by barge<br />

2.5 Supply costs of alternative supply chain options<br />

First supply cost without transport was calculated for<br />

each biomass fraction. Each collection point had<br />

alternative transportation options, either direct truck<br />

transportation to the end user or transportation via<br />

terminals to the end user (Fig. 9). Direct transport<br />

involved roadside chipping and truck transport of forest<br />

chips. Stump biomass was chipped not at the roadside but<br />

at terminals only, or it was transported as uncomminuted<br />

loads to the end user. Terminal options included also<br />

loose biomass truck transportation to terminals and<br />

further forest chip transportation to the end user by either<br />

railway or waterway, according to the terminal type.<br />

Figure 9: Alternative supply chain option for forest<br />

chips: waterway route (A), railway route (B), and road<br />

transport route (C) by truck<br />

Logging residues were the cheapest source of raw<br />

material, ahead of stumps and small-diameter energy<br />

wood. Small-diameter energy wood harvesting and<br />

chipping received a production subsidy. Without that,<br />

they would not be a competitive source (Fig. 10).<br />

38 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure: 10: Supply costs without transportation<br />

Secondly, the transportation cost was calculated for<br />

each collection site, for the end user and alternative<br />

terminals. The cheapest option was selected, either direct<br />

transport or transport via terminal. The increase in truck<br />

transportation costs was much greater than the increase<br />

for railway or waterway transport (Fig. 11). The larger<br />

individual loads – by railway 20 trucks and by water 30–<br />

40 trucks – flatten out the growth in transport costs with<br />

these options. The cost functions were based on earlier<br />

studies, with updated cost parameters applied [5, 13, 14].<br />

Figure 11: Transportation cost with alternative long<br />

distance transport options (label rank the same as the line<br />

rank in the figure)<br />

2.6 Estimation of vehicle and chipper capacity needs<br />

An important part of the supply logistics planning is<br />

estimation of how many vehicles and other machines are<br />

needed to feed enough biomass to the biorefinery in view<br />

of the supply logistics structure selected. Capacity<br />

calculation was based on the annual output of alternative<br />

vehicles and machines (Table I). Values were gathered<br />

from earlier studies [5, 6, 13, 14] and modified.


Table I: Annual capacity of vehicles and chippers<br />

Vehicle/Chipper m 3 /a<br />

Trucks<br />

-­‐ logging residues 21, 200<br />

-­‐ stumps 23, 600<br />

-­‐ energy wood 21, 200<br />

-­‐ forest chips 26, 800<br />

Train 160, 000<br />

Barge 245, 000<br />

Mobile chipper<br />

-­‐ logging residues at roadside 46, 700<br />

-­‐ stumps at terminal 80, 800<br />

-­‐ energy wood at terminal 92, 300<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

The main results of the study concerned the annual<br />

availability of forest biomass in relation to the supply<br />

cost and the logistical choices behind this solution for the<br />

selected site. This paper presents the results without<br />

specification of the exact site. Also, precise values of<br />

supply costs and biomass volumes in figure presentations<br />

were omitted because of their confidential nature for the<br />

selected site. The shape of the availability function was a<br />

logistics growth curve where the cost increase was faster<br />

at the beginning but slowed in the middle to increase<br />

again at the end (Fig. 12). The procurement area was<br />

limited to below 300 km when defined as a direct truck<br />

transport distance and less than 80 km when defined as a<br />

pre-hauling distance to supply terminals. Therefore, the<br />

maximum availability was 4.5 TWh to the selected site.<br />

In particular, the market share and forest-owners’<br />

willingness to sell limited the total biomass potential to<br />

one fourth of the original free techno-economical<br />

potential. Local competition, taken into account to<br />

determine the free techno-economical potential,<br />

decreased availability particularly in eastern Finland.<br />

The average supply costs were used in the figures,<br />

while with marginal costs the shape would have been an<br />

exponential growth curve. The average supply cost<br />

increased steadily at around 2 TWh, which was the<br />

targeted supply volume for the plant, corresponding to<br />

approx. 1 million solid m 3 . The average supply cost was<br />

17 €/MWh for a 2 TWh supply. One source of supply<br />

cost variation was the biomass source. The cheapest was<br />

logging residues (16 €/MWh), ahead of stumps (17.5<br />

€/MWh), and the most expensive was small diameter<br />

energy wood (21 €/MWh), regardless of the production<br />

subsidies (Fig. 13). Production subsidies decreased the<br />

costs of small-diameter energy wood supply by 5.2 €/<br />

MWh and made these sites one potential energy source. It<br />

was assumed that 25% of energy wood sites were<br />

subsidised. The reason for lower availability of stump<br />

biomass was stricter collection site selection rules and<br />

less willingness of forest-owners to sell them. Without<br />

subsidies, the energy wood fraction would be too<br />

expensive.<br />

Figure 12: Forest biomass supply cost as a function of<br />

total biomass availability<br />

Figure 13: Forest biomass supply cost as a function of<br />

biomass availability, divided among alternative energy<br />

biomass sources (label rank the same as the line rank in<br />

the figure)<br />

Logging residues accounted for the majority of<br />

supply volumes, approx. 70% of 2 TWh supply, and<br />

decreased slowly after this. Stumps accounted for approx.<br />

20% and subsidised energy wood roughly 10% (Fig. 14).<br />

Unsubsidised energy wood became an option until the<br />

volume surpassed 2.5 TWh and the supply cost more than<br />

20 €/MWh.<br />

Figure 14: The shares of alternative biomass sources as a<br />

function of total biomass availability (label rank the same<br />

as the line rank in the figure)<br />

Truck transport vehicles dominated the<br />

transportation, at approx. 70% for 2 TWh supply, and<br />

decreased with larger volumes, to 60% (Fig. 15). The<br />

selected site did not have any waterway option.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

39


Figure 15: The share of transport modes as a function of<br />

the total biomass availability (label rank the same as the<br />

line rank in the figure)<br />

The map illustrations showed the aerial supply<br />

solution, where direct deliveries and delivery via railways<br />

terminals take place, and on which raw-material sources<br />

these deliveries were based. Direct truck loads were<br />

delivered at a transport distance of less than 300 km, and<br />

the railway option was possible outside that area, except<br />

for small areas surrounding terminals (Fig. 16). All<br />

biomass sources were transported by truck, but for longer<br />

distances only energy wood and finally logging residues<br />

were viable option. Stumps were too costly an option for<br />

railway transportation.<br />

The vehicle needs for supply of 2 TWh biomass were<br />

estimated. In this case, the forest chip trucks and mobile<br />

chippers were needed because of the large number of<br />

direct deliveries from the roadside. The need for units of<br />

other transport modes was marginal (Table II). To<br />

increase the supply from this level will require, in<br />

particular, trucks for uncomminuted biomass and mobile<br />

chippers for logging residues and energy wood.<br />

Figure 16: Map illustrating transport mode selection (left<br />

side red for trucks and yellow for railway) and biomass<br />

raw-material options (right side, dark green for all<br />

fractions, middle green without stumps and light green<br />

only logging residues ) for 2 TWh supply<br />

40 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Table II: Vehicle needs assuming a supply of 2 TWh<br />

Vehicle Units<br />

Truck (uncomminuted biomass) 9<br />

Truck (forest chips) 22<br />

Train (20 wagons) 2<br />

Barge 0<br />

Mobile chippers (logging residues,<br />

energy wood)<br />

16<br />

Mobile crushers (stumps) 2<br />

4 DISCUSSION<br />

The results of biomass availability and supply cost<br />

studies are typically very site-dependent, because of the<br />

variation in biomass resources, geography, and transport<br />

infrastructure. In particular, end-user sites near coastal or<br />

border areas have been ranked as poorer sites in<br />

comparison to inland sites in this respect [12]. However,<br />

long-distance transport with terminal logistics will level<br />

off their difference when biomass is also transported<br />

outside the typical procurement area, in which solely<br />

truck transportation is used. Coastal sites with their own<br />

harbours also have better possibilities for import of a<br />

large variety of biomass streams from abroad via large<br />

seagoing vessels.<br />

This study shows that the biomass need of a<br />

biorefinery is so great that procurement areas must be<br />

extended beyond the normal supply area handled with<br />

trucks. Typically, truck transport is a suitable option for<br />

less than 100 km, because of a rapid increase in transport<br />

costs [13]. However, they are still the cheapest transport<br />

option for longer distances, with the cost parameters used<br />

in this study. The transport costs increase to a lesser<br />

extent with other transport modes (cf. Fig. 11), but the<br />

extra stage of pre-hauling to the terminal increases the<br />

supply costs with terminals above those of direct<br />

transport. However, terminal handling costs form a rather<br />

minor cost component, because of efficient material<br />

handling machines (cf. Fig. 10). If the biorefinery will be<br />

somewhere in eastern or central Finland, the variation in<br />

biomass availability and supply cost will be minor,<br />

because of the need for a large procurement area. The<br />

greater the biomass need, the less the variation in<br />

biomass availability and supply costs, since almost the<br />

whole country will be a potential supply area. Only sites<br />

in the north-western and northern part of the country will<br />

have a poorer supply situation, especially because of<br />

scarcity of logging residues and stumps in that area.<br />

Particularly important is a site’s location in relation to<br />

transport networks, where there should be easy access in<br />

all directions, as for a transport node or inland logistics<br />

hub.<br />

Mainly terminals outside the 300 km supply area<br />

became part of the supply solution, and supply via closer<br />

terminals was less in this study. This phenomenon was<br />

taken into account in the selection of terminal sites. The<br />

terminal network was rather dense outside the truck<br />

supply area (cf. Fig. 5). The railway network reaches all<br />

over the country well, and the best terminal sites are at<br />

branching points of the network or points along the main<br />

railway. The loading track length, at minimum 450 m for<br />

20 wagons, is one important planning parameter – and<br />

another is the capacity and characteristics of the storage<br />

area. Terminals act also as buffer storage; therefore,<br />

enough space is needed for both uncomminuted and


comminuted biomass, as is stable ground (asphalted<br />

concrete), for chipping machines and trucks. Ease of<br />

access and short distance between storage and loading<br />

track are a self-evident need. For biorefineries, buffer<br />

storage capability is particularly essential for maintaining<br />

even supply year-round. From forest sites only via direct<br />

deliveries, this would not be possible. Therefore, the<br />

result of this case study is to some extent theoretical, and<br />

more biomass should be directed via terminal supply. The<br />

results rely solely on minimising supply costs on the<br />

basis of summing costs of supply stages and transport<br />

costs. In this case, supply security issues and availability<br />

of free vehicle capacity and labour were omitted. In the<br />

terminal system, there are better possibilities to increase<br />

biomass quality, by controlling the moisture content and<br />

impurity levels. There is the possibility of sieving out<br />

impurities and selecting and mixing separate biomass lots<br />

to homogenise deliveries. Vehicle needs (trucks and<br />

mobile chippers) will be lower for a terminal system<br />

feeding in the same amount of biomass, in comparison to<br />

decentralised supply from forest sites to the biorefinery.<br />

In the study, only railway transport was used via<br />

terminals, and in this way 20 truckloads were transported<br />

in one shipment. Depending on the terminal’s location<br />

(remote or in the immediate vicinity), also truck transport<br />

from terminals would be an option, but it was not<br />

considered in this study. Waterway transport based on<br />

barges could take 30–40 truckloads at a time. The<br />

waterway option is viable only in the Lake Saimaa area,<br />

where the best terminal sites are existing harbours for<br />

roundwood or other commodities. These sites have the<br />

best facilities for handling biomass. The waterway deep<br />

water channel (4.35 m) reaches a rather large area in<br />

eastern Finland, but the maximum transport distances<br />

will be to the line between south and north. For example,<br />

the route between harbours of Lappeenranta<br />

(southernmost) and Joensuu (northernmost on the east<br />

channel route) is 312 km and Lappeenranta and<br />

Siilinjärvi (northernmost on the western channel route) is<br />

339 km. These distances are rather short for making<br />

waterways a competitive solution, since in most cases the<br />

practical distance will be much shorter in this area.<br />

Waterway transport will become part of a supply solution<br />

only if the biorefinery has its own harbour and is in the<br />

lake area. The Saimaa canal connects the lake to the sea,<br />

the Gulf of Finland, and also makes imports from abroad<br />

possible. The sea transport would be based on dry cargo<br />

vessels instead of the barges used in the lake area.<br />

A common challenge with other transport modes is<br />

the under-utilisation of capacity, both bearing capacity<br />

and utilisation rate. The latter could be addressed with<br />

better management of logistics and the first with vehicle<br />

structure development. Both railway wagon and barge<br />

capacity could be increased by enlarging the load frame.<br />

It is possible to use higher containers in railway wagons<br />

or extended sides in barges. Wagon frames could be<br />

increased approx. 20%, but to make multi-mode<br />

transportation possible, containers should be dimensioned<br />

in view of truck logistics. Also, various compacting<br />

systems could be used, such as vacuum feed for<br />

containers and pressing the load down by running over it<br />

with heavy machines for barge loads.<br />

Logistics management is more important when<br />

transport is scheduled and routed to keep the<br />

pulling/pushing unit (locomotive or tugboat) constantly<br />

running while the load units (wagons or barges) move<br />

between the terminals and the end user. Also essential is<br />

guaranteed adequate biomass volume for loading points.<br />

Otherwise, the costs of railway or waterway supply<br />

chains will increase very intensively as the utilisation rate<br />

of trains and waterborne vessels decreases. To keep other<br />

transport modes part of a realistic year-round supply<br />

solution, the utilisation of vehicle capacity should be<br />

maximised. It is not possible to build an efficient supply<br />

solution based on occasional ad-hoc transport. The major<br />

drawback of waterway transport is the downtime during<br />

the winter season, from January to April.<br />

So far, no biorefinery investment has been decided on<br />

in Finland. The first site’s location will have a major<br />

effect on the site decision for other potential sites,<br />

because of the tighter competition for biomass in the<br />

proximity of the biorefinery. Also, other biomass sources<br />

may come into play, such as pulpwood, short-rotation<br />

forestry, and agro biomass. At the moment, these are<br />

more expensive sources, but if there arises a shortage of<br />

biomass, other sources will be mobilised. Peat would be<br />

an abundant source of biomass, especially in the northern<br />

part of the country, but biofuel produced from it would<br />

not have an RES label and Finland will not be able to<br />

count it toward the commitment set for RES fuel in the<br />

traffic sector.<br />

5 REFERENCES<br />

[1] Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy. Government<br />

Report to Parliament 6 November 2008. Työ- ja<br />

elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja, Energia ja ilmasto<br />

(36/2008).<br />

[2] Energy consumption 2008 and preliminary energy<br />

statistics 2009 (Energy 2009). Statistics Finland.<br />

[3] Pöyry Energy Oy (2009). Metsäbioenergian saatavuus<br />

energiantuotantoon eri markkinatilanteissa.<br />

Loppuraportti 30.4.2009. Energiateollisuus ry. 43 p<br />

[4] E. Ylitalo, Puun energiakäyttö 2009.<br />

Metsäntutkimuslaitos, Metsätilastotiedote (16/<strong>2010</strong>).<br />

[5] K. Karttunen, E. Jäppinen, K. Väätäinen & T. Ranta,<br />

(2008). Metsäpolttoaineiden vesitiekuljetus<br />

proomukalustolla. Waterway transportation of forest<br />

fuels by barges. (abstract). Lappeenrannan teknillinen<br />

yliopisto, Teknillinen tiedekunta, Energia- ja<br />

ympäristötekniikan osasto, Loppuraportti. EN B-177.<br />

107 p.<br />

[6] J. Enström (2008). Efficient handling of wood fuel<br />

within the railway system. In publication: K. Suadicani<br />

& B. Talbot (eds). The Nordic–Baltic Conference on<br />

Forest Operations – Copenhagen, 23–25 September<br />

2008. Forest and Landscape Working Papers<br />

(30/2008), pp. 53–55.<br />

[7] O-J. Korpinen, K. Karttunen, T. Ranta & E. Jäppinen<br />

(2008). Integration of railroads and waterways with<br />

forest fuel logistics in Finland. K. Suadicani & B.<br />

Talbot (eds). The Nordic–Baltic Conference on<br />

Forest Operations – Copenhagen, 35–25 September<br />

2008. Forest and Landscape Working Papers.<br />

(30/2008), pp. 65–67.<br />

[8] P. McKeough & E. Kurkela (2008). Process<br />

evaluations and design studies in the UCG project<br />

2004-2007. Espoo. VTT Tiedotteita - Research notes<br />

2434. 45 p.<br />

[9] Metinfo. Forest information services (2009).<br />

http://www.metla.fi/metinfo/index-en.htm.<br />

[10] J. Laitila, A. Asikainen & P. Anttila (2008).<br />

Energiapuuvarat. In publication: M. Kuusinen & H.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

41


Ilvesniemi (eds). Energiapuun korjun<br />

ympäristövaikutukset, tutkimusraportti. Tapion ja<br />

Metlan julkaisuja.<br />

[11] P. Anttila, K.T. Korhonen & A. Asikainen (2009).<br />

Forest energy potential of small trees from young<br />

stands in Finland. In: Mia Savolainen (ed.).<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2009. Sustainable <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Business. 4th<br />

International <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference from 31st of<br />

August to 4th of September 2009. Book of<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong> Part I. FINBIOn julkaisusarja - FINBIO<br />

Publications 1(44), pp. 221–226.<br />

[12] T. Ranta (2005). Logging residues from regeneration<br />

fellings for biofuel production – a GIS-based<br />

availability analysis in Finland. Biomass and<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong>, vol. 28, pp. 171–182.<br />

[13] T. Ranta & S. Rinne (2006). The profitability of<br />

transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland.<br />

Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong>, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 231–237.<br />

[14] R. Ryymin, P. Pohto, J. Laitila, I. Humala, M.<br />

Rajahonka, J. Kallio, J. Selosmaa, P. Anttila & T.<br />

Lehtoranta (2008). Metsäenergian hankinnan<br />

uudistaminen. Loppuraportti 12/2008.<br />

42 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


BIOMASS FUNCTIONS FOR YOUNG SCOTS PINE-DOMINATED FOREST<br />

K. Ahnlund Ulvcrona 1 , U. Nilsson 2 , T. Lundmark 3<br />

1<br />

Vindeln Experimental Forests, Svartberget Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, SE-922 91<br />

Vindeln, Sweden<br />

2<br />

Southern Swedish Forest Research centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden<br />

3<br />

Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden<br />

Kristina.ulvcrona@esf.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to develop predictive biomass functions for young stands of Scots pine-dominated<br />

forests in northern Sweden. Above ground biomass was destructively sampled, and biomass functions for all tree fractions<br />

(e.g. stem including bark, branch and foliage) were developed, based on independent variables. Functions to estimate dry<br />

weight of the whole tree were also developed. No significant regressions could be found for the dead branch fraction. DBH<br />

for sampled trees in this study was in the range of 11 - 136 mm (Pinus sylvestris), 10 - 121 mm (Picea abies L. Karst) and 9 –<br />

113 mm (Betula spp.).<br />

Keywords: bioenergy strategy, biomass characteristics, forestry residues<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Global emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of<br />

coal and oil need to be reduced. Consequently, there is a<br />

need for further development of more environmentally<br />

friendly energy sources [1]. In the future, it may be<br />

possible to use biofuel to satisfy some of the global<br />

energy demand, and therefore knowledge that supports<br />

the development of new silvicultural regimes is also<br />

required. Studies have shown that wood quality and<br />

branch characteristics tend to improve when Scots pine<br />

(Pinus sylvestris) is thinned at a greater stand height [2].<br />

To meet the increasing demand for raw material from the<br />

forest, biomass growth has to increase. A high stem<br />

density results in high biomass production [3]. Dense,<br />

young forest can thus contribute to this increasing<br />

demand for raw material. Terrestrial vegetation can also<br />

be a CO 2 sink that may mitigate greenhouse gas<br />

emissions.<br />

An increased interest in small stems as well as branches<br />

for biomass harvest has led to the need for biomass<br />

functions suitable for these stands. The aim of this study<br />

was to find biomass functions based on easily measured<br />

variables (DBH and height) for the estimation of DW<br />

(dry weight) biomass.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

2.1 The sites<br />

Biomass was sampled at six different sites (Renfors,<br />

Degerön, Kulbäcksliden, Gagnet, Lillarmsjö and Unbyn;<br />

table 1). The sites are all young self-regenerated pinedominated<br />

mixed forest. Four of the sites (Renfors,<br />

Degerön, Kulbäcksliden and Gagnet) used for biomass<br />

sampling are part of a factorial experiment comparing<br />

thinning/no thinning combined with three different levels<br />

of fertilization. The field experiment was established in<br />

1997 and 1998 (Gagnet) after the first biomass sampling.<br />

The sizes of the experimental plots are 30 x 30 m or 45 x<br />

20 m, and each plot is surrounded by a 5 m buffer zone.<br />

Table 1. The sites for biomass sampling<br />

Site Latitude Altitude H100 (m)<br />

Renfors 64.22 190 18<br />

Degerön 64.15 175 20<br />

Kulbäcksliden 64.17 170 20<br />

Gagnet 63.25 125 24<br />

Lillarmsjö 63.97 220 21<br />

Unbyn 65.70 20 19<br />

2.2 Sample trees<br />

The trees for biomass sampling were randomly<br />

sampled from each DBH-class in the stand, but damaged<br />

trees were not chosen.<br />

In total, 387 trees were included in this destructive<br />

above-ground biomass study, of which 54 were from the<br />

pre commercial thinning (PCT)-treatment. The first<br />

samples were taken in June 1997 (Renfors, Degerön,<br />

Kulbäcksliden), June 1998 (Lillarmsjö) and August 1998<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

43


(Gagnet and Unbyn) [4]. The second samples were taken<br />

in May and the first days of June 2003, before the trees<br />

started to grow, and the end of August and September<br />

after the growing season had finished. In 2003, birches<br />

were only sampled in August and September when the<br />

leaves were developed but had not started to fall. In 2004,<br />

biomass sampling from the thinned plots was done in<br />

April.<br />

2.3 Operations in the field<br />

The sample tree was cut down at a stump height of<br />

about 2 cm. DBH was marked and measured by cross<br />

callipering, starting towards the north side of the tree. All<br />

trees were measured in the same direction. The north side<br />

of the tree was also marked to aid selection of sample<br />

branches after felling. The thickness of the bark on Pinus<br />

sylvestris and Picea abies was measured using a bark<br />

gauge at the height of 1.35 m. The total length of the tree<br />

and the length of living crown were measured with a<br />

tape-measure. The living crown was defined as the first<br />

living branch, if no more than two whorls of dead<br />

branches separated the first living branch and the next<br />

living branches.<br />

The living crown was divided into four sections or strata<br />

(25% of the crown each) (Figure 1). One branch was<br />

chosen from each stratum for dry weight determination.<br />

The sampled branch was subjectively selected to<br />

represent all the branches from that section of the crown.<br />

The first branch, from the first section of the crown, was<br />

chosen from the first quarter (0 - 90 o ) of the stem circle<br />

starting at north. The second branch was sampled from<br />

the second quarter (90 – 180 o ) in the second section of<br />

the crown, the third from the third quarter in the third<br />

section and the fourth branch was from the fourth section<br />

of the crown and the fourth quarter of the stem. All<br />

branches from each section of the living crown were<br />

weighed, and a sample of dead branches was also<br />

collected from below the living crown for determination<br />

of the DW of dead branches.<br />

Figure 1. Sample tree for biomass studies<br />

44 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

All branches were cut using pruning shears, and live and<br />

dead branches were weighed separately. Six stem discs<br />

were taken, the first from the butt end of the stem, from<br />

the height of 130 cm (= DBH) and four further discs were<br />

taken from 30%, 55%, 70% and 85% of the stem height<br />

(Figure 1). The diameter of the disc was cross-callipered<br />

over bark and all discs were cut to a 50 mm thickness.<br />

The discs and the single sample branch were weighed in<br />

the field on a laboratory balance (6 kg maximum ±<br />

0.0005 kg). The log sections and all other branches were<br />

weighed on a scale (30 kg maximum ± 0.002 kg).<br />

2.3 In the laboratory<br />

The four branches, a sample of dead branches from<br />

below the living crown, and the 6 discs were put in<br />

separate airtight bags and stored in a freezer (-20°C)<br />

within 8 hours of sampling, until the dry weight was to be<br />

determined. The bark was separated from the disc before<br />

drying and all samples were dried in a ventilated oven<br />

(85°C for 48 hours). The discs were dried to constant<br />

weight, that is to say to the point where further drying<br />

resulted in a decrease in weight of < 1%.<br />

2.4 Statistics<br />

Anderson-Darling´s test for normality was performed<br />

on the data using MINITAB 13 [5]. A logarithmic<br />

transformation was applied to the data to obtain a<br />

constant variance [6. ]The regressions in this paper are<br />

based on the following model:<br />

Yi = β 0 + β 1x i + ε I (I = 1,2,…..n)<br />

[7]. In this simple linear form, Y i is referred to as log DW<br />

(kg), β 0 the intercept and x i to ln DBH * ln H.<br />

The models were fitted using MINITAB 13 [5] software.<br />

Statistical analysis of mean residuals for the sites showed<br />

no significant difference between sites (results not<br />

presented) [5]. Biomass for all treatments, each species<br />

and component, was related to the natural logarithm of<br />

DBH (cm) multiplied by the natural logarithm of height<br />

(H) (dm). Biomass functions were created for all species<br />

(i.e. Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp.), and<br />

for all tree fractions (whole tree, stem, branches and<br />

foliage).<br />

For each biomass function, the correction for logarithmic<br />

error was calculated as<br />

[6].<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Pinus sylvestris<br />

The regression explained 77% - 97% of the biomass<br />

variation (table 2 – 4). In the case of the PCT stand,<br />

biomass functions were only established for Pinus<br />

sylvestris (tables 2 – 4). For the whole tree and stem<br />

fractions, no significant differences between trees<br />

originating from the dense stand or the PCT stand could<br />

be detected. Therefore, only one biomass function was<br />

constructed for Pinus sylvestris for these fractions (table


2). In the data for branches and foliage, significant<br />

differences were found between the different stand<br />

densities, but not for the fertilizer treatment. Therefore,<br />

different biomass functions were constructed for the unthinned<br />

stand and the PCT stand (table 3 - 4). No<br />

significant regressions for the dead branch fraction were<br />

found. Therefore, the dead branch fraction is excluded<br />

from the tables. However, the biomass functions worked<br />

well for estimating dry weight (DW) for Pinus sylvestris<br />

trees with DBH 11 - 136 mm.<br />

Table 2. Biomass function for Pinus sylvestris tree and<br />

stem wood<br />

Pinus<br />

Tree P Stem P<br />

sylvestris<br />

wood<br />

Intercept -0.61492 0.000 -0.82388 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.190018 0.000 0.19395 0.000<br />

N 199 199<br />

R 2<br />

0.97 0.99<br />

s 0.0841 0.0607<br />

Table 3. Biomass function for Pinus sylvestris branches<br />

Pinus<br />

sylvestris<br />

Branches<br />

from unthinned<br />

stand<br />

P Branches<br />

from<br />

thinned<br />

stand<br />

Intercept -1.6709 0.000 -1.4625 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.21155 0.000 0.1900 0.000<br />

N 145 54<br />

R 2<br />

0.84 0.75<br />

s 0.2579 0.2627<br />

Table 4. Biomass function for Pinus sylvestris foliage<br />

Pinus<br />

sylvestris<br />

Foliage<br />

from unthinned<br />

stand<br />

P Foliage<br />

from<br />

thinned<br />

stand<br />

Intercept -1.33295 0.000 -1.3069 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.16936 0.000 0.17107 0.000<br />

N 145 54<br />

R 2<br />

0.77 0.92<br />

s 0.2582 0.1203<br />

3.2 Picea abies<br />

The regression explained 83% - 92% of the biomass<br />

variation (tables 5 – 6). Only Picea abies trees from the<br />

un-thinned treatment were sampled (tables 5-6). The<br />

biomass functions worked well for estimating the dry<br />

weight (DW) of Picea abies trees of DBH 10 – 121 mm.<br />

Table 5. Biomass function for Picea abies tree and stem<br />

wood<br />

Picea abies Tree P Stem P<br />

Intercept 0.3564 0.000 -0.7912 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.1664 0.000 0.18297 0.000<br />

N 83 83<br />

P<br />

P<br />

R 2<br />

0.92 0.97<br />

s 0.1248 0.0796<br />

Table 6. Biomass function for Picea abies branches and<br />

foliage (un-thinned stand)<br />

Picea abies Branches P Foliage P<br />

Intercept -1.0065 0.000 0.7866 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.1569 0.000 0.1519 0.000<br />

N 83 83<br />

R 2<br />

0.83 0.83<br />

s 0.1794 0.1727<br />

3.3 Betula spp.<br />

The regression explained 91% - 99% of the biomass<br />

variation (tables 7 – 8). Only Betula spp. trees from the<br />

un-thinned treatment were sampled (tables 7 - 8).<br />

Because the first sampling was performed in early spring,<br />

it was not possible to use all of the sample trees when<br />

analyzing the foliage. Therefore, the number of sample<br />

trees for foliage is lower, compared with other fractions.<br />

The biomass functions worked well for estimating dry<br />

weight (DW) for trees of DBH 9 – 113 mm.<br />

Table 7. Biomass function for Betula spp. tree and stem<br />

wood<br />

Betula spp. Tree P Stem P<br />

Intercept -0.6512 0.000 -0.7606 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.1948 0.000 0.1925 0.000<br />

N 106 106<br />

R 2<br />

0.99 0.99<br />

s 0.0647 0.0561<br />

Table 8. Biomass functions for Betula spp. branches and<br />

foliage (un-thinned stand).<br />

Betula spp Branches P Foliage P<br />

Intercept -1.4079 0.000 -1.83747 0.000<br />

ln DBH * ln H 0.19367 0.000 0.19964 0.000<br />

N 106 40<br />

R 2<br />

0.91 0.87<br />

s 0.1721 0.1832<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Participation in this conference was sponsored by Forest<br />

power – a project sponsored by the Botnia-Atlantica<br />

programme; a cross-border cooperation programme<br />

intended to co-fund projects within the Botnia-Atlantica<br />

area. Thanks also to Sees-editing Ltd. For correcting the<br />

English language.<br />

4.3 REFERENCES<br />

[1]. NREL (2002). Transitions to a new energy future.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

45


Research Review, U.S. Department of Energy´s National<br />

renewable Energy Laboratory.<br />

[2]. Ulvcrona, K., Claesson, S., Sahlén, K. And<br />

Lundmark, T. 2007. The effects of timing of precommercial<br />

thinning and stand density on stem form and<br />

branch characteristics of Pinus sylvestris. Forestry 80:<br />

323-335.<br />

[3]. Satoo, T. and Madgwick, H.A.I. 1982. Forest<br />

Biomass. The Hague, Boston, London. Martinus<br />

Nijhopp/Dr W. Junk publishers.<br />

[4]. Claaesson, S., Sahlén, K. and Lundmark, T. 2001.<br />

Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus<br />

sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. From stands in<br />

northern Sweden with high stand densities. Scandinavian<br />

Journal Forestry Research 16: 138-146<br />

[5]. Anonymous 1999. Minitab statistical software<br />

release 13 for Windows.<br />

[6]. Finney, D.J. 1941. On the distribution of a variate<br />

whose logarithm is normally distributed. Journal of the<br />

Royal Statistical Society., Supp B7 7(2) pp. 155-161.<br />

46 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


ESTIMATING POTENTIALS OF SOLID WOOD-BASED FUELS IN FINLAND IN 2020<br />

Kalle Kärhä 1 , Juha Elo 2 , Perttu Lahtinen 2 , Tapio Räsänen 1 & Heikki Pajuoja 1<br />

1 Metsäteho Oy, P.O. Box 101, FI-00171 Helsinki, Finland<br />

kalle.karha@metsateho.fi, tapio.rasanen@metsateho.fi, heikki.pajuoja@metsateho.fi<br />

2 Pöyry Energy Oy, P.O. Box 93, FI-02151 Espoo, Finland<br />

juha.elo@poyry.com, perttu.lahtinen@poyry.com<br />

ABSTRACT: In the context of the Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy, it is estimated that the primary use of woodbased<br />

fuels in Finland will be 93 to 97 TWh by the year 2020. The overall target set for forest chips is 12 million m 3 , i.e.<br />

around 24 TWh. The objective of the research carried out by Metsäteho Oy and Pöyry Energy Oy was to produce as<br />

realistic as possible a total analysis of the possibilities of increasing the usage of wood-based fuels in Finland by 2020.<br />

The research showed that the growth objective set in the Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy can be attained through<br />

the supply and demand of wood-based fuels. However, realizing this potential would require major investments in the<br />

entire forest chip production system, because the competitiveness of wood-based fuels in energy generation is currently<br />

not at a sufficient level. Considering the huge resources required by the forest chip production system and the current low<br />

competitiveness of forest chips, it is estimated that the use of forest chips in Finland will reach the level of 20 TWh at the<br />

earliest by the year 2020.<br />

Keywords: Energy wood, Fuelwood, Forest chips, Pontentials, Finland.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The total energy consumption in 2008 was 389 TWh<br />

(1,400 PJ) in Finland [1]. The most important energy<br />

source in 2008 were oil products which made up around<br />

one fourth (98 TWh) of the total energy consumption in<br />

Finland [1].<br />

In 2008, wood-based fuels covered more than one<br />

fifth (82 TWh) of the total energy consumption in<br />

Finland, and hence they were the second most important<br />

source of energy after oil [1]. This makes Finland one of<br />

the leading countries in the <strong>World</strong> when it comes to<br />

utilizing wood for energy generation. In Finland, woodbased<br />

fuels are divided into industrial waste liquors –<br />

mainly black liquor produced by pulping industries – and<br />

solid wood fuels. Further, solid wood fuels are divided<br />

into 1) wood fuels consumed by heating and power plants<br />

and 2) fuelwood consumed by small-sized dwellings, i.e.<br />

private houses, farms, and recreational dwellings [2].<br />

In 2008, a half of wood-based fuel consumption (41<br />

TWh) was covered by waste liquors [2]. Solid wood fuels<br />

were consumed to the total of 41 TWh, or 20.5 million<br />

m 3 , of which the heating and power plants accounted for<br />

27 TWh, 14 million m 3 [2]. The small-sized dwellings<br />

use currently a total of 14 TWh, or 7 million m 3 of wood<br />

for heating [2].<br />

The total consumption of forest chips for energy<br />

generation in 2008 was equivalent to 9.2 TWh (4.6 mill.<br />

m 3 ) in Finland [2]. Of the forest chips used in heating and<br />

power plants (8.0 TWh) in 2008, the majority (58%) was<br />

produced from logging residues in final cuttings [2]. 14%<br />

came from stump and root wood, and 4% from largesized,<br />

rotten roundwood. 24% of the total amount of<br />

commercial forest chips used for energy generation came<br />

from the small-diameter (d 1.3


Table 1: The assumptions related roundwood supply and<br />

the production of forest industry in 2020 in Finland in the<br />

research.<br />

Industrial<br />

roundwood supply,<br />

mill. m 3<br />

- Domestic<br />

roundwood cuttings<br />

- Import of<br />

roundwood<br />

By-products of<br />

forest industry (i.e.<br />

bark, sawdust, and<br />

waste wood chips)<br />

in energy<br />

generation, TWh<br />

Waste liquors of<br />

forest industry in<br />

energy generation,<br />

TWh<br />

48 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

2007<br />

75.4<br />

57.7<br />

17.7<br />

Basic<br />

scenario<br />

59.4<br />

56.6<br />

2.8<br />

2020<br />

Maximum<br />

scenario<br />

73.7<br />

67.9<br />

5.7<br />

19.2 17.1 18.5<br />

42.5 38.1 44.2<br />

The consumption of by-products (bark, sawdust and<br />

waste wood chips) and black liquor in energy generation<br />

were estimated to decrease in the Basic scenario<br />

compared to the year 2007. In the Maximum scenario, the<br />

energy usage of by-products also lowered but the use of<br />

black liquor increased slightly (Table 1).<br />

The cuttings by Forestry Centre and further by<br />

municipality in 2020 were allocated applying the latest<br />

National Forest Inventory data by the Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute and the Stand Data Base by Metsäteho<br />

Oy. Metsäteho Oy Stand Data Base included more than<br />

150,000 thinning and final cutting stands harvested by<br />

Metsäliitto Group, Stora Enso Wood Supply Finland,<br />

UPM Forest, and Metsähallitus in 2006 and 2007. The<br />

calculated small-diameter wood supply potentials were<br />

based on the 10 th National Forest Inventory data of the<br />

Finnish Forest Research Institute.<br />

Three different levels of potentials were determined<br />

in the study (Fig. 1). In the research, the theoretical<br />

potential was the amount of:<br />

• Logging residues and stumps, which are produced<br />

in regeneration cutting areas in the Basic and<br />

Maximum scenarios, and<br />

• Small-diameter wood (whole trees) produced<br />

when tending and cutting operations in young<br />

stands are carried out on time.<br />

The techno-ecological supply potential was the forest<br />

chip material raw base, which is harvestable when the<br />

following limitations are taken into consideration:<br />

• Recovering percentage is less than 100,<br />

• Substantial amounts of pulpwood are not burnt,<br />

• Recommendations in the Guide for Energy Wood<br />

Harvesting [5] are followed when choosing<br />

harvesting sites, and<br />

• All energy wood does not come onto the market<br />

(forest owners' willingness to supply energy<br />

wood).<br />

And techno-economical usage potential included the<br />

total supply costs and the willingness to pay of energy<br />

plants (Fig. 1).<br />

Figure 1: The principle picture of the supply potentials<br />

determined in the research.<br />

The harvesting conditions for recovering sites were<br />

created applying Metsäteho Stand Data. The total supply<br />

system costs for forest chip quantities were calculated by<br />

Metsäteho Energy Wood Procurement Calculation<br />

Models. It was assumed that in 2020 the total supply<br />

system costs are 20% higher than currently.<br />

Pöyry Energy Oy’s Boiler and Energy Plant, Pellet,<br />

and Forest Industry Data Bases gave a possible to<br />

research the usage of wood-based fuels in the study.<br />

Pöyry Energy Data Bases included almost all current<br />

plants and factories, as well as those under planning and<br />

contracting.<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Theoretical and techno-ecological potential<br />

According to the calculations, the technical usage<br />

potential of solid wood fuels in energy plants was 53<br />

TWh in 2020 in Finland. The proportion covered by<br />

logging residues and small-sized thinning wood was<br />

estimated to be 28 TWh. Theoretical supply potential of<br />

forest chips was 105 TWh in the Basic scenario and 115<br />

TWh in the Maximum scenario of the research (Fig. 2).<br />

Correspondingly, the techno-ecological supply potential<br />

was 43 TWh in the Basic scenario and 48 TWh in the<br />

Maximum scenario in the year 2020.<br />

Figure 2: Estimate of theoretical and techno-ecological<br />

supply potential of forest chips in 2020 based on the<br />

Basic and Maximum scenarios of the research. The<br />

calculated small-diameter wood supply potentials were<br />

based on the 10 th National Forest Inventory data of the<br />

Finnish Forest Research Institute.


3.2 Techno-economical potential<br />

When modelling the usage of solid wood fuels in<br />

energy generation in the Basic scenario in 2020, the<br />

consumption of solid wood fuels was 44 TWh of which<br />

the usage of forest industry by-products lowered from the<br />

current level to 17 TWh and the consumption of forest<br />

chips increased up to 27 TWh (Fig. 3).<br />

Particularly stumps raised significantly their<br />

proportion of total forest chip volumes (Fig. 4). The most<br />

expensive forest chip quantities delivered to energy plant<br />

were more than 20 €/MWh in the study. In this case,<br />

pulpwood starts to be cheaper than that kind of very<br />

expensive forest chip volumes.<br />

In the Maximum scenario, the usage of solid wood<br />

fuels increased to 48 TWh in 2020 (Fig. 3). Especially in<br />

the Maximum scenario the delivered quantities of logging<br />

residue chips and stump wood chips increased and the<br />

quantities of small-diameter thinning wood chips<br />

delivered decreased (Fig. 4).<br />

Figure 3: Use of solid wood-based fuels in energy plants<br />

in 2007 and the estimated usage in 2020 in the Basic<br />

scenario (domestic industrial roundwood cuttings 57<br />

million m 3 ) and in the Maximum scenario (68 mill. m 3 ).<br />

In these calculations, the price for emission rights is 30<br />

€/t CO 2 and the support for chips from small-diameter<br />

thinning wood from young forests 4 €/MWh (average<br />

stem size of removal as whole trees


and high (30 €/t CO 2), and the Kemera support for chips<br />

from small-diameter thinning wood is 0 to 8 €/MWh in<br />

2020. The presuppositions for the Kemera support<br />

claimed for small-diameter wood cut in young forests<br />

are:<br />

• When the average stem size of removal as whole<br />

trees is less than 60 dm 3 in stands, the Kemera<br />

support is at three different levels in the<br />

calculations (8, 4 and 0 €/MWh).<br />

• When the average stem size of removal as whole<br />

trees is more than 60 dm 3 in stands, the Kemera<br />

support is always 0 €/MWh in the calculations.<br />

4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

The research showed that the growth objective set in<br />

the Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy [3] can be<br />

attained through the supply and demand of wood-based<br />

fuels because for instance in the Basic scenario the<br />

techno-economical supply potential was 27 TWh of<br />

forest chips in 2020 (cf. Fig. 4). However, realizing this<br />

potential would require major investments in the entire<br />

forest chip production system, because the<br />

competitiveness of wood-based fuels in energy<br />

generation is currently not at a sufficient level.<br />

Also we have to pay attention to the fact that the<br />

forest chip production resources are very huge. Kärhä et<br />

al. [6] mapped out how much machinery and labour<br />

would be needed for large-scale forest chip production if<br />

the use of forest chips increases extensively in Finland.<br />

According to Kärhä et al. [6] calculations, if the<br />

production and consumption of forest chips are 25 to 30<br />

TWh in Finland in 2020, 1,900 to 2,200 units of<br />

machinery, i.e. machines and trucks, would be needed.<br />

This would mean total investments in production<br />

machinery of 530 to 630 million (VAT 0%). The labour<br />

demand would be 3,400 to 4,000 machine operators and<br />

drivers, and 4,200 to 5,100 labour years including<br />

indirect labour.<br />

We clarified forest chip procurement potentials in the<br />

study using only as a raw material for forest chips so<br />

called traditional raw material sources, i.e. logging<br />

residues, stumps, and small-diameter wood. On the other<br />

words, we assumed that pulpwood is primary utilized in<br />

pulping industry. Nevertheless, it can be estimated that<br />

when the total supply costs of most expensive forest chip<br />

volumes are around 18–22 €/MWh, the pulpwood will<br />

remove this kind of the most expensive forest chip<br />

quantities.<br />

Considering the huge resources required by the forest<br />

chip production system and the current low<br />

competitiveness of forest chips, it is estimated that the<br />

use of forest chips in Finland with the low price for<br />

emission rights and current incentives by the State will<br />

reach the level of 20 TWh at the earliest by the year<br />

2020. Therefore, in the practise there are no possibilities<br />

to achieve the set targets of renewable energy with woodbased<br />

fuels in Finland if the competitiveness of woodbased<br />

energy does not improve strongly.<br />

We will need certain measures for improving<br />

operation environment in the field of forest chip<br />

production. And we need measures very fast because we<br />

have time only ten years for our targets of 2020.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

50 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

[1] Preliminary Energy Statistics. 2009. SVT, Statistics<br />

Finland, Energy. Available at:<br />

http://www.stat.fi/tup/julkaisut/isbn_978-952-244-019-<br />

8.pdf.<br />

[2] Ylitalo, E. 2009. Puun energiakäyttö 2008. (Use of<br />

wood for energy generation in 2008). Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute, Forest Statistical Bulletin 15.<br />

[3] Long-term Climate and Energy Strategy. Government<br />

Report to Parliament 6 November 2008. 2008.<br />

Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the<br />

Economy, Energy and climate 36. Available at:<br />

http://www.tem.fi/files/21079/TEMjul_36_2008_energia<br />

_ja_ilmasto.pdf.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K., Elo, J., Lahtinen, P., Räsänen, T. &<br />

Pajuoja, H. 2009. Availability and use of wood-based<br />

fuels in Finland in 2020. Metsäteho Review 40. Available<br />

at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_40.pdf.<br />

[5] Koistinen, A. & Äijälä, O. 2006. Energiapuun korjuu.<br />

(Energy Wood Harvesting). Metsätalouden<br />

kehittämiskeskus Tapio, Hyvän metsänhoidon opassarja.<br />

[6] Kärhä, K., Strandström, M., Lahtinen, P. & Elo, J.<br />

2009. Forest chip production machinery and labour<br />

demand in Finland in the year 2020. Metsäteho Review<br />

41. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_41.pdf.


C pOLICY – hOW TO MaKE IT aLL happEN<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

51


52 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

CLIMATE CHANGE IN BRAZIL: PUBLIC POLICIES, POLITICAL AGENDA AND MEDIA<br />

Magda Adelaide Lombardo; Ruimar Costa Freitas<br />

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) / Universidade de São Paulo (USP)<br />

Av. 24A, nº 1515, Bela Vista, 14506-900 Rio Claro – SP /<br />

Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 338. Cidade Universitária, 05508-000 São Paulo- SP<br />

ABSTRACT: The climate change and sustainable development issue, especially in the context of energy production, have<br />

been on the current national policy rhetoric, reflecting the focus of the issue on the world scenario. The Brazilian Agroenergy<br />

Plan (2006-2011), considered as an strategic action of the federal government, is an attempt to organize a propose for<br />

Research, Development, Innovation and Technology Transfer, aiming to grant sustainability, competitiveness and greater<br />

equity between the agroenergy chain agents, starting with the reality analysis and future perspectives for the world energetic<br />

matrix. In this context, this research seeks to analyze the proposals of the State of São Paulo to the laws implementations that<br />

allows the goal accomplishment of 20% reduction on the greenhouse effect emissions until 2020 (base 2005), through action<br />

to the deforestation control, creation of an adaptation fund, establishment of a sustainable transportation system, mapping the<br />

vulnerabilities of the territory and financial mechanisms to the development of a low carbon economy. From the perspective<br />

of the national media coverage agenda, that has extensively approached the climate changes theme, this research collaborates<br />

to the analysis of sustainable projects inside the Brazilian perspective and context. This research will emphasize the relation<br />

between media, political speech and public policies.<br />

Keywords: Climate Change, Brazil, São Paulo, Public Policies, Political Agenda, Media, sustainability<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The world lives a crisis that may be unprecedented,<br />

regarding changes in the global climate. Although the<br />

causes and accountabilities had not been fully understood<br />

by the scientific community, the consequences of these<br />

changes no longer can be ignored.<br />

Until now, the main concern of the global community<br />

was development. However, in this new context,<br />

development cannot be considered without sustainability<br />

due to the impacts of inadequate anthropic intervention in<br />

the environment associated with reckless use of natural<br />

resources and concentration of the populations in urban<br />

centers. The concentration of the populations itself in<br />

relatively small amounts of land makes them more<br />

susceptible to natural catastrophes and the improper<br />

occupation and use of the soil in the urban areas and its<br />

adjacencies escalates the threats.<br />

The world energetic matrix, based on nonrenewable<br />

sources, drives the world to a new paradigm: the need to<br />

seek sustainability. It has also been driven by the concern<br />

that carbon dioxide emissions from the burn of fossil<br />

fuels affects the world climate, accelerating and<br />

intensifying natural warming and cooling cycles.<br />

The efforts worldwide to mitigation and adaptation to<br />

the new reality and foreseen future, have its main player<br />

in governments, which are looked after for an agenda that<br />

balances the need to sustainability with the quest for<br />

development. The role of governments in the market and<br />

social arena are present through many prisms<br />

(interventionist, minimum state… and so on) but we can<br />

considerer that, in the end, the main role of any State<br />

should be to orientate society and markets in all areas<br />

through incentives and/or restrictions to meet the needs<br />

and goals of communities.<br />

Nation-states, remain reluctant to assume early<br />

mitigation measures to climate change, making the<br />

international arena a complex and intricate path to the<br />

convergence of climate-friendly initiatives, but although<br />

local and regional initiatives have been proven to be more<br />

often easier to be taken, the international efforts still<br />

seeks agreements with sovereign states, denying space in<br />

the international agenda for local and regional initiatives.<br />

Seems the working logic goes with efforts that grow from<br />

the local/regional to national and global.<br />

Boykoff (2007) [1] states that research has pointed to<br />

the fact that the media content powerfully manipulate the<br />

translation between climate science, policy and public.<br />

Bennet (apud Boykoff, 2007) adds by saying that few<br />

things are as integral part of our lives as the news, so, that<br />

turned into a kind of a snapshot file of the pace, progress,<br />

problems and hopes of society. He also says that<br />

scientists tend to qualify their findings in light of the<br />

uncertainties that pervade their research. For journalists<br />

and political actors, these issues involving precaution,<br />

probability and uncertainty are all difficult to translate in<br />

a fluid, firm and unequivocal commentary, often valued<br />

in the context of communication and decision making.<br />

McBean and Hengeveld (2000) [2] argue that often<br />

the government’s response to the perceived risk of threat<br />

are often based on individual assessment and/or<br />

collective probability of exposure to danger, and the<br />

economic and social consequences of such exposure. It<br />

should be noted that, generally, these assessments are<br />

built from data supplied by the scientific community and<br />

translated by the media.<br />

Closer one is to the problem, more motivated it will<br />

be to participate in solutions and easier will be to<br />

implement actions that wouldn’t be considered in a larger<br />

scale scenario. That is why the working logic of solutions<br />

to mitigate and adapt to climate change should be<br />

considered from the local to the global and there is no<br />

way any real change is possible in the community<br />

without the enrollment of the community itself, and one


of the best (if not the best) way to inform and enlist the<br />

communities into a project, are the mass media.<br />

2 CLIMATE CHANGE IN BRAZIL: PUBLIC<br />

POLICIES, POLITICAL AGENDA AND MEDIA<br />

In the face of global climate change and its<br />

repercussions in the energy, construction, industry,<br />

agriculture, commerce and industries specialized in the<br />

carbon market, the environmental issue makes entrance<br />

to the stage, especially in the election campaign for the<br />

Presidency in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

In discussion agenda of the parties, three key points<br />

are: sanitation, violence and ethics in politics.<br />

During the current government, according to surveys<br />

by the National Institute for Space Research - INPE,<br />

deforestation in the Amazon region was approximately<br />

80,000 km² between the years 2004 and 2008. Also, the<br />

government granted an environmental license for the<br />

transposition of the São Francisco River and large dams<br />

in the Amazon.<br />

About the media coverage about climate change, we<br />

can highlight researches conducted by ANDI (News<br />

Agency for Childhood Rights) [3] in partnership with the<br />

British Embassy and British Council in Brazil, on the last<br />

12 years as pointing to relevant aspects:<br />

• Migration of a highly internationalized<br />

coverage to a more regional context and<br />

local aspects, establishing links between a<br />

so broad phenomena and the daily life of<br />

the public that access the information<br />

offered by the news vehicles;<br />

• In a first moment, the coverage of the<br />

theme was based by the perception that the<br />

responsibility for presenting solutions for<br />

the climate change issue was at the hands<br />

of foreign governments and these solutions<br />

could be reached through partnerships and<br />

agreements between nations (as in the case<br />

of the agreements for emissions reduction)<br />

(24%); more recently (2007/2008) the<br />

research pointed that this responsibility was<br />

transferred to the national government,<br />

especially the Brazilian executive power<br />

(32,2%).<br />

• There is an increase in the mention of the<br />

adaptation need allied with mitigation, due<br />

to the acceleration and escalation of the<br />

impacts caused by the climate change;<br />

• Is clearly seen a valorization of the debate<br />

around the necessity of public policies that<br />

reduce directly the volume of greenhouse<br />

gases in the atmosphere;<br />

• However, the weather unbalances keeps<br />

been approached as an issue exclusively<br />

environmental by a significant part of the<br />

Brazilian media.<br />

Below, is a table of mitigation strategies by area of<br />

incidence presented by the media in two periods:<br />

Table I: Mitigation strategies by incidence areas<br />

(% of total news relating to climate change that mention<br />

forms of mitigation - 45.9% in 2005/2007 and 51.1% in<br />

2007/2008)<br />

Incidence Areas 2005/2007 2007/2008<br />

Forests and soil use 26,4% 25,4%<br />

Energy offers 45,0% 20,8%<br />

Industry 6,8% 10,0%<br />

Carbon Credits Sales 0,0% 9,8%<br />

Transportation 7,5% 9,2%<br />

Waste 6,4% 4,9%<br />

Agriculture 4,1% 3,0%<br />

Others 3,8% 16,9%<br />

Total 100,0% 100,0%<br />

Climate Change in Brazilian Press (page 56 - Table 32)<br />

It is worth noting that the increase in the reference to<br />

"other" options, is due to the increased attention devoted<br />

mainly to focus on different processes of public<br />

awareness towards a more conscious consumption of<br />

nonrenewable resources, besides the neutralization of<br />

carbon through the planting of trees.<br />

It is not possible to think about solutions dissociated<br />

of the contexts of public policies, economic development<br />

models and consumption and behavior patterns of the<br />

contemporary societies.<br />

3 ENVIRONMENT AND LANDSCAPE: CONFLICTS<br />

AND ADVANCES<br />

The conflicts that sometimes impose itself on the<br />

relationship between public policies, natural resources<br />

depletion and landscape changes in different Brazilian<br />

ecosystems, points out the discussion of development and<br />

sustainability, since often, the eco-capitalism is<br />

incompatible with the solution of ecological problems<br />

due to their own internal rationality of the economic<br />

system based on capital accumulation.<br />

The predictability of negative impacts of capitalist<br />

production in nature dynamics is fragile, since it does not<br />

consider the local and regional geodynamic processes<br />

character.<br />

For that, one should consider and identify a set of<br />

geo-environmental units that configure large territorial<br />

compartments in which the external geodynamic<br />

processes behave similarly and can be triggered,<br />

accelerated or even intensified by different socioeconomic<br />

activities such as internal urbanization process,<br />

agriculture, mining, energy matrix exploration, infrastructure<br />

works varying magnitude according to the way<br />

which each intervention in the environment is produced.<br />

In this sense, the concept of risk is evidenced by the<br />

vision of sustainability, where restrictions on the<br />

indiscriminate use of natural resources should be defined<br />

by their ability to support and renewal.<br />

Risk analysis, according to Egler (1996) [4] has the<br />

challenge of working within the limits of behavior<br />

predictability of complex systems and, in most cases,<br />

potentially hazardous to life.<br />

The levels of environmental risks seem to be arising<br />

from three categories: natural, technological and social<br />

risks.<br />

4 SÃO PAULO STATE AND CLIMATE CHANGE<br />

INITIATIVES<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

53


The State of São Paulo began to have concerns about<br />

climate change in 1995, when the PROCLIMA program<br />

(Climate Change Prevention Program) was created and<br />

the main contribution of this effort was the collaboration<br />

with the federal government in the preparation of the<br />

National Emissions Inventory (SMA, 2005) [5]; in 2002,<br />

was published the AGENDA 21, in which climate change<br />

figures as a great concern; in the same year the State<br />

government with other regional authorities started the<br />

Network of Regional Governments for Sustainable<br />

Development (NRG4SD), aiming to become a channel to<br />

share climate mitigation and other sustainable<br />

development experiences, and being the main<br />

representative in international negotiations; in 2002 also,<br />

was established a 5-year renewable licensing process for<br />

stationary sources of air pollutants, correcting the<br />

previous “right to pollute” situation of previous<br />

enterprises, demanding a gradual reduction of emissions<br />

in industries, either by technology update or shutting<br />

down facilities, effort expanded in 2004 with the<br />

approval of the Decree 48.523, that regulates the<br />

emissions of NO x, SO 2, PM 10, CO and nonmethane<br />

volatile organic compounds; just before the last COP, in<br />

2009, the government proposed also a 20% reduction on<br />

the greenhouse effect emissions until 2020 (base 2005),<br />

through the magnification of actions to the deforestation<br />

control, creation of an adaptation fund, establishment of a<br />

sustainable transportation system, mapping the<br />

vulnerabilities of the territory and financial mechanisms<br />

to the development of a low carbon economy.<br />

REI and CUNHA (2008: 7) [6] highlights that<br />

even though nation-states may remain reluctant<br />

to assume early climate change mitigation<br />

measures, thus making the international arena a<br />

complex and difficult path for the convergence<br />

of climate-friendly initiatives, there is enough<br />

space for alternative structures and approaches<br />

in both developing and developed countries.<br />

Due to its economic profile (32% of the national<br />

economic productivity), the energy consumption of São<br />

Paulo State is about 27% of the national mix (SMA, 2002<br />

[7]), been the industrial (39%) and transportation (26%)<br />

sectors the main consumers of energy. Although a great<br />

part of energy consumed by the industrial sector are<br />

produced from biomass (44% - been 36% from sugarcane<br />

bagasse), the major part of energy that moves de<br />

transportation sector comes from fossil fuels, mainly<br />

diesel (44%) (BEESP, 2005 [8]). The State participates<br />

with about 25% of Brazil’s total emissions.<br />

The projected Brazilian growth rate for the next years<br />

suggests a high increase on energy demand, thus, the<br />

need to reconsider the expansion model for the energetic<br />

matrix, a key issue regarding actions against climate<br />

change.<br />

5 FINAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Managing environmental issues in Brazil should be<br />

considered in national, regional and local scales. In the<br />

context of Brazilian territory, should be respected the<br />

geodynamics of landscapes and ecosystems in the<br />

proposal of candidates for Republic Presidency in <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

considering the destructive impact of capitalist economic<br />

production that has occurred throughout the country.<br />

The socio-environmental management should be the<br />

54 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

contribution of candidates aiming to propose realistic<br />

alternatives for sustainability.<br />

At regional level, there is need to include in<br />

governance a system for accident prevention and<br />

effective monitoring of environmental conditions in<br />

selected areas.<br />

Locally, within the municipality, it is necessary an<br />

effective participation of the community and the local<br />

authorities in dealing with socio-environmental issues.<br />

A key challenge for proper governance of the<br />

environment to be implemented by the State of São Paulo<br />

is the need to consider global and local environmental<br />

aspects of ethanol production and use as an alternative to<br />

fossil fuels. To ensure the benefits of both global<br />

mitigation and local environmental quality, it is essential<br />

that government incentives a broader discussion and<br />

participation among all sectors and stakeholders,<br />

including the community enrollment.<br />

We can say that, nowadays, the environmental issue<br />

is at the center of global and national policy and thus, it is<br />

becoming a recurrent theme on the media agenda, and so,<br />

on the presidency candidates as well and overlaps others<br />

as it puts into discussion the model of civilization<br />

predatory consumerism grounded by the reproduction of<br />

capital. This discussion should promote extensive debates<br />

throughout the country that may lead to global climate<br />

change effective combat and managing social and<br />

environmental risks in the Brazilian territory.<br />

The use of the mass media as tool to drive the change<br />

in the patterns of social consumption and relationship<br />

with the environment is an expedient yet completely<br />

underused by governments around the globe.<br />

As conclusion of this paper, we highlight the lack of<br />

synchronism between the emergency in political speeches<br />

and the chronogram for public policies enforcement<br />

under national, state and municipal levels. It is necessary<br />

the creation of a social consciousness that emphasizes the<br />

need of personal engagement in combat of environmental<br />

degradation inside the communities, through the<br />

development of action projects as: solid residues<br />

recycling, environmental education, communal garden<br />

development, reforestation, riparian vegetation, among<br />

others. There cannot be any change in the society without<br />

the mobilization of the society itself.<br />

6 BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

[1] BOYKOFF, M. T. From Convergence to Contention:<br />

United States Mass Media Representations of<br />

Anthropogenic Climate Change Science.<br />

Transactions of the Institute of British<br />

Geographers. Vol. 32, pp. 477-489, 2007.<br />

[2] MCBEAN, G. A.; HENGEVELD, H. G.<br />

Communicating the Science of Climate Change: A<br />

Mutual Challenge for Scientists and Educators.<br />

Canadian Journal of Environmental Education.<br />

Vol. 5, pp. 9-23, 2000.<br />

[3] ANDI - Agência de Notícias dos Direitos da Infância.<br />

Mudanças Climáticas na Mídia Brazileira. ANDI,<br />

2009. <br />

[4] EGLER, Cláudio Antônio G. Risco ambiental como<br />

critério de gestão do território: uma aplicação à zona<br />

costeira brasileira. Território. LAGET, UFRJ - Vol.


1, nº 1(Jul/Dez.1996)-Rio de janeiro: Relume-<br />

Dumará, 1996.<br />

[5] SMA – Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente do<br />

Governo do Estado de São Paulo. No reason to wait:<br />

the benefits of greenhouse gas reduction in São Paulo<br />

and California. Hewlett Foundation, 2005.<br />

[6] REI, Fernando; CUNHA, Kamyla. Regional Actions<br />

and Sustainable Development Strategies Against<br />

Climate Change: São Paulo State, Brazil.<br />

INTERFACEHS - A Journal on Integrated<br />

Management of Occupational Health and the<br />

Environment, v.2, n.5, Art 3, december 2007.<br />

[7] SMA – Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente do<br />

Governo do Estado de São Paulo. Agenda 21 in São<br />

Paulo 1992-2002. São Paulo, 2002.<br />

[8] BEESP - Balanço Energético do Estado de São<br />

Paulo, 2005 – ano base 2004. São Paulo: Secretaria<br />

de Energia, 2005.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

55


BARRIERS OF IMPLEMENTING RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN NORTHERN<br />

PERIPHERY<br />

56 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Renvall, J. ( ¹, Puhakka - Tarvainen, H. ( ¹, Kuittinen, V. ( ¹, Okkonen, L. ( ¹, Rice, L. ( ², Pappinen, A. ( ¹<br />

1) North Karelia University of Applied Sciences (NKUAS), Centre for Natural Resources<br />

Väisälänkatu 4, FI-80160 Joensuu, FINLAND<br />

Tel: +358 13 260 6900 Fax: +358 13 260 6901<br />

Email: jarmo.renvall@pkamk.fi<br />

2) Action Renewables, The Innovation Centre, NI Science Park<br />

Queens Road, Belfast, BT3 9DT, NORTHERN IRELAND<br />

Tel: +44 28 9073 7868<br />

ABSTRACT: There is need to increase efforts in implementation of renewable energy solutions and energy efficiency in the<br />

rural communities across the European Union Northern Periphery (NP). EU and state policies are encouraging people,<br />

communities and companies to invest in renewable energy solutions also in rural regions. However, investments are low in<br />

some of Europe's Northern Periphery countries and local decision-makers may have reserved attitude to them due to the need<br />

for certainty of profits and feasibility. Attitude to renewable energy itself is usually positive, but the activities in decisionmaking<br />

can be inadequate. This statement is supported by the results from interviews distributed to local decision-makers in<br />

North Karelia, Finland, during the autumn 2009. Our recent findings from North Karelia, show that local decision-makers<br />

need more decent and objective information about renewable energy for supporting their decision making. Our long term tool<br />

- supported by our recent findings - will be ”Decision Makers Academy” to help local decision-makers in their everyday<br />

work. First pilots of this new tool are under progress in North Karelia in Finland.<br />

Keywords: barriers, decision-making, renewable energy solutions, policy intervention, policymaking<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

North Karelia University of Applied Sciences is a<br />

partner of the EU Northern Periphery Programme (NPP)<br />

project SMALLEST (Solutions for Microgeneration to<br />

ALLow Energy Saving Technology), which aims at<br />

addressing renewable energy development in small<br />

communities. In general, our objectives in the<br />

SMALLEST project are to monitor and analyze the<br />

barriers and bottlenecks of implementing renewable<br />

energy investments and solutions and energy efficiency<br />

in Northern Periphery. The goal for this part of the<br />

project is to help local actors to overcome these barriers,<br />

identify policy interventions and political best practices<br />

and give suggestions for policy interventions needed in<br />

the future. We are elucidating these challenges e.g. by<br />

questionnaires, interviews and conversations in events<br />

arranged during the SMALLEST project in every project<br />

region of NP area.<br />

2 DECISION-MAKING CONTEXT IN NORTHERN<br />

PERIPHERY REGION<br />

In the project we have outlined procedures<br />

concerning renewable energy decision-making in<br />

Finland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Faroe Islands,<br />

Iceland and Sweden.<br />

In general there are four similar main bodies in<br />

decision-making context in Northern Periphery (Fig.1).<br />

We can clearly identify financing bodies, advisory<br />

organisations, interest groups and customers. Similarities<br />

are obvious whilst differences occur inside each body.<br />

Basically the funding opportunities are similar. Same<br />

kind on funding elements can be identified in each<br />

country but there are some certain specialities. A very<br />

good example can be found from Northern Ireland.<br />

Financing for renewable energy can be granted from<br />

outer Irish funds. Also lottery funding in this context is a<br />

special way of funding in Scotland and Northern Ireland.<br />

For example, in Finland lottery funding is given most for<br />

culture or sport.<br />

Figure 1: Decision-making context in Northern<br />

Periphery<br />

In Scandinavian countries one significant feature is the<br />

role of municipalities. Communities (i.e. particular


consortiums of people) do not have as extensive role as<br />

they do in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Municipalities<br />

are local administrative units and they even have a right<br />

to collect taxes. They have officials and also politically<br />

chosen council and municipal executive board.<br />

Municipalities are mainly administrative organs but they<br />

also do some financing. They can also be customers.<br />

A special feature in Finland is also the existence of<br />

regional development companies. These are independent<br />

bodies financed by various municipalities. Their target<br />

groups are both starting and existing companies in the<br />

region. They do not give any direct funding to the<br />

enterprises but they are advising them and constructing<br />

networks for them. The advisory service is mostly free<br />

for starting enterprises. Existing enterprises will be<br />

provided with valuable advisory services in return for<br />

network fees.<br />

There are various interest groups in the regions. The<br />

role of the interest group like a lobbying group appears to<br />

be very important in every country. They have a strong<br />

influence on decision making at all levels.<br />

Influencing factors outside the four main bodies can<br />

be identified as media, values, legislation, public opinion,<br />

research evidence, global situation and not least the<br />

culture.<br />

3 BARRIERS AND NEED OF SUPPORT<br />

EXPERIENCED BY ENERGY OPERATORS IN<br />

SMALL COMMUNITIES<br />

Diverse energy operators in Northern Periphery area<br />

(Finland, Sweden, Faroe Islands, Iceland, Scotland and<br />

Northern Ireland) were interviewed. The interviews took<br />

place after the operator had made a fairly big investment<br />

in renewable energy systems. Part of the questions<br />

covered experienced barriers (Table I) and some of them<br />

covered various support needs (Table II).<br />

Table I: Barriers experienced by energy operators<br />

Faroe<br />

Islands<br />

Finland<br />

Iceland<br />

Northern<br />

Ireland<br />

Scotland<br />

Sweden<br />

Level of commitment<br />

Globalized financial policy<br />

Knowledge on legal and contractual<br />

questions<br />

Attitudes of some of the authorities and<br />

advisory organisations<br />

Access to best practice examples<br />

Lack of similar cases in grant decisions<br />

Fluctuating level on subsidies<br />

Dependence on national policy (feed-in<br />

tariffs etc.)<br />

Piloting the technology<br />

No advisory organisations existing<br />

Cheaper ways to produce energy exists<br />

(geothermal, hydropower)<br />

Funding application bureaucracy<br />

Grant money payment afterwards<br />

No flexibility in financing<br />

Lack of renewable energy awareness<br />

amongst staff members<br />

Attitudinal approach, amount of ambition<br />

Access to best practice examples for, and<br />

knowledge of funding programmes in small<br />

and very small communities and villages.<br />

The remarkable barriers (Table I) in the researched<br />

cases were lack of know-how, attitudes with advisory<br />

organizations and authorities and amount of bureaucracy<br />

in all stages before and during the investments. In some<br />

cases the investors had to operate as pioneers. Last but<br />

not least, difficulties in financing were experienced as<br />

significant barriers.<br />

Table II: Need of support experienced by energy<br />

operators<br />

Faroe Islands Updated advisory services (legal and<br />

contractual questions)<br />

Finland Training in technology maintenance<br />

Centralized advisory services<br />

Holistic and objective advisory on<br />

investment and technologies<br />

Iceland Lack of development context for<br />

bioenergy<br />

Northern<br />

Ireland<br />

Holistic and objective advisory on<br />

investment and technologies<br />

Training in technologies<br />

Scotland Real life experiences of advisors<br />

(legislation, regulations)<br />

Sweden Increased proactive advisory services<br />

aimed at small and very small<br />

communities and villages.<br />

The operators would have needed the support of<br />

centralized and comprehensive advisory services (an<br />

advisory organization which understand the operational<br />

environment as a whole) (Table II). Thus operators<br />

needed more objectivity and independency from advisory<br />

organizations. There were also lack of skills and knowhow,<br />

so training needs were obvious.<br />

4 FACTORS IN DECISION-MAKING IN FINNISH<br />

MUNICIPALITIES<br />

Savikko [1] has found in her research some<br />

significant barriers and drivers in policymaking around<br />

municipalities in Finland. The research was carried out<br />

through an internet questionnaire in two stages among the<br />

municipalities of Finland.<br />

An interesting finding was the gap between strategic<br />

and operative actions in municipalities’ climate policy.<br />

This gab can form a significant barrier for decision<br />

making. It can be explained by economical situation in<br />

municipalities, old customary ways of action and the lack<br />

of time. The public discussion in media on biofuels was<br />

not a barrier.<br />

The results also indicate several drivers for municipal<br />

decision-making, such as municipal energy efficiency<br />

agreements or energy programmes. Those help<br />

municipalities in renovating their energy systems into<br />

renewables. Also the attitudes of municipal leaders and<br />

public discussion can be significant drivers.<br />

Preliminary results from a survey responded by<br />

decision-makers in North Karelia, Finland, in 2009<br />

supported the findings of Savikko’s research [1]. The<br />

decision-makers (participants of a seminar) were among<br />

other issues asked to point out the three most significant<br />

factors which would affect the decision-making in energy<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

57


issues in the municipalities. The factors selected most<br />

often were employment, use of natural resources and<br />

climate change. The received answers gave a good<br />

picture and guidelines on how to collect more detailed<br />

and specific information in the future. The main<br />

conclusions from the survey can be found in the<br />

following sections.<br />

4.1 Optimism or not at the region<br />

Decision makers were asked to describe the<br />

atmosphere for renewable energy in their<br />

working/residential areas. There has been a positive<br />

change in attitudes in last years. There is also a<br />

willingness to act but, on the other hand, there is a lack of<br />

actions. Renewable energy sources are considered as a<br />

possibility. On the other hand, “I feel that” –way of<br />

thinking can be still seen.<br />

The received information was also experienced<br />

insufficient and some of the respondents had negative<br />

experiences. Also the concepts used by decision makers<br />

have not been consistent.<br />

4.2 Drivers and barriers<br />

Decision-makers find the existing good examples,<br />

such as raw material resources (mostly from forests) and<br />

enterprises (in the region), as very effective drivers. Both<br />

knowledge and expertise can be found from the region.<br />

University of Eastern Finland, North Karelia University<br />

of Applied Sciences, Finnish Forest Research Institute<br />

and European Forest Institute are located in the region.<br />

Despite that, there is still difficulties accessing the<br />

information, for example, on substance or financing.<br />

Inefficient decision-making, such as indecision or<br />

toing and froing (waffling) does occur. On one hand,<br />

there is the lack of information in the background and, on<br />

the other hand, the lack of funding and resources.<br />

4.3 What kind of outside help would be needed?<br />

Respondents needed objective and comparative<br />

information, as well as economic and technical<br />

consultancy.<br />

5 NORTH KARELIA CLIMATE AND ENERGY<br />

PROGRAMME 2020<br />

The Regional Council of North Karelia is<br />

establishing a “Climate and energy programme 2020” for<br />

the region. Programme work proceeds according to the<br />

regional working plan. Smallest-project provides<br />

information from diverse surveys such as comparative<br />

municipal level information and the actual baseline in<br />

terms of energy use and production. Project operates<br />

according to the model described in Figure 2.<br />

Cooperation consists of the work in steering group and<br />

themed teams, diverse surveys, and organizing<br />

municipality events. So called pre-discussions precede<br />

the actual municipality tour. During the pre-discussions<br />

some of the municipalities and regional development<br />

companies are interviewed to receive more information<br />

for designing the municipal events. In addition,<br />

interviewers are trained unify and harmonize the<br />

interviews.<br />

After the municipal events there will be regional and<br />

county level seminars to disseminate the results.<br />

58 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 2: Operational model between the project and the<br />

Regional Council of North Karelia<br />

6 CONCLUSIONS<br />

Decision-makers have positive attitude toward<br />

renewable energy investments, but at the same time there<br />

is a lack of actions. There is clearly need for<br />

comprehensive advisory services and training in all<br />

levels.<br />

Smallest-project is initiating the Decision Makers<br />

Academy (DMA) -concept. The Academy will gather<br />

local decision- makers for follow-up seminars. Seminars<br />

will be themed to different aspects of climate and energy.<br />

The DMA concept is being developed and tested along<br />

the “Climate and energy programme 2020”.<br />

References<br />

[1] Savikko,R. 2009. Climate Policy in Finnish<br />

Municipalities, Association of Finnish Local and<br />

Regional Authorities (AFLRA).


BIOENERGY IN UKRAINE: STATE OF THE ART AND PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT<br />

Georgiy Geletukha, Tetiana Zheliezna<br />

Scientific Engineering Center “Biomass”<br />

PO Box 66, 03067, Kyiv, Ukraine; t./f. (+380 44) 456 94 62, geletukha@biomass.kiev.ua; www.biomass.kiev.ua<br />

ABSTRACT: Ukraine has good preconditions for the dynamic development of bioenergy sector. The main drivers for<br />

this are permanent rise in prices of traditional energy carriers, first of all natural gas, and big potential of biomass<br />

available for energy production. The economic potential is estimated at 19-23 mtoe/yr, and it depends mainly on the<br />

annual yield of agricultural crops. Existing law on biofuels and the law on green tariff supports the introduction of<br />

bioenergy technologies for heat and power production. Nevertheless existing legislation needs further improvement. One<br />

of the serious barriers for bioenergy development in Ukraine is distortion of natural gas prices for some kinds of<br />

consumers. The price for population and communal services is artificially low that renders it impossible to introduce<br />

bioenergy technologies in these sectors. Establishment of the market price of natural gas for all kinds of consumers is a<br />

necessary precondition for large-scale substitution of natural gas by biomass. National targets on energy production from<br />

biomass must be stated in an official document like Biomass Action Plan. We consider the following targets to be real:<br />

1% of the total energy consumption at the expense of biomass in <strong>2010</strong> (that is equivalent to consumption of about 1.4<br />

mtoe), 5% in 2020, and 10% in 2030.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy strategy, bioenergy policy, bioenergy regulations, boilers, legal aspects<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Ukraine is facing now such vital tasks as to reduce its<br />

dependence on the imported energy carriers, first of all<br />

natural gas, to replace fossil fuels partly by renewable<br />

energy sources, first of all biomass (BM), and to increase<br />

energy efficiency in all the sectors of the national<br />

economy. At present natural gas makes the major<br />

contribution to Ukraine’s total primary energy<br />

consumption (40%) followed by coal (28%), nuclear<br />

energy (18%) and oil products (12%). Of the whole<br />

required volume of nature gas, only about 35% is covered<br />

by own production while 65% is exported mostly from<br />

Russia. The share of renewables in the total energy<br />

consumption is 2.5% including large hydro 2% and<br />

biomass (mainly firewood and peat) 0.5%.<br />

Price of natural gas in Ukraine has been rising<br />

constantly since 2005, from 61 to 305 $/1000 m 3 in the<br />

first quarter of <strong>2010</strong> (Figure 1). The high price of natural<br />

gas is one of the strong drivers for bioenergy<br />

technologies introduction.<br />

At that biomass as fuel is comparatively cheap.<br />

Comparison of costs recalculated per energy content of<br />

the fuels shows that firewood and baled straw are about 4<br />

times as cheaper and wood pellets are 1.6 times as<br />

cheaper than natural gas intended for industrial and statefinanced<br />

organizations (Table I).<br />

2 POTENTIAL OF BIOMASS<br />

Ukraine has quite big potential of biomass available<br />

for energy production. The economic potential is<br />

estimated at 19-23 mtoe/yr, and it depends mainly on<br />

agricultural crops annual yield (Table II). Two main<br />

constituents of the potential are agricultural residues and<br />

energy crops – 10.2 mtoe and 9.6 mtoe respectively (the<br />

data of 2008 when Ukraine had the biggest crops harvest<br />

for the past 10 years). At that agricultural residues are the<br />

“real” part of the potential, and energy crops are the<br />

“virtual” one. At present there are only a few small pilot<br />

plantations of energy crops in Ukraine but fast<br />

development of this sector is expected in the near future.<br />

It is due to the fact that currently there are 4-5 mill ha of<br />

unused agricultural lands in the country of which,<br />

according to expert estimation, up to 3 mill ha can be<br />

used for energy crops production without causing<br />

competition with food and feed production.<br />

* 1st quarter of <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 1: Rise in price of natural gas in Ukraine<br />

Moreover Ukraine has further room to increase the<br />

biomass potential by approaching the European level of<br />

agricultural crops yield as now the yield of some crops<br />

like rapeseed, corn for grain and others in Ukraine is 2-3<br />

times as less than in Europe. Utilisation of the biomass<br />

potential can cover about 14% of Ukraine’s total primary<br />

energy consumption.<br />

Table I: Comparison of prices of natural gas and solid<br />

biofuels<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

59


Fuel type<br />

60 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Typical<br />

price,<br />

EUR/t<br />

LHV,<br />

MJ/kg<br />

Cost of<br />

fuel<br />

energy,<br />

EUR/GJ<br />

Ratio: cost<br />

of NG<br />

energy*/<br />

cost of BM<br />

energy<br />

Wood<br />

processing<br />

residues 0-0.87 11 0-0.08 >85<br />

Firewood** 17 11 1.6 4.3<br />

Wood<br />

pellets 70 17 4.1 1.6<br />

Wood<br />

briquettes 61 17 3.6 1.9<br />

Baled<br />

straw** 26 14 1.9 3.6<br />

* 6.7 EUR/GJ<br />

** delivered price<br />

Table II: Potential of biomass in Ukraine (2008)<br />

Types of<br />

Energy potential, mtoe<br />

biomass<br />

Straw of grain<br />

Theoretical Technical Economic<br />

crops 14.21 7.12 2.32<br />

Straw of rape<br />

Residues of<br />

production of<br />

2.06 1.44 1.44<br />

corn for grain<br />

Residues of<br />

sunflower<br />

6.15 4.31 3.02<br />

production<br />

Secondary<br />

agricultural<br />

4.68 3.14 3.14<br />

residues 0.79 0.64 0.44<br />

Wood biomass 1.77 1.45 1.14<br />

Biodiesel 0.97 0.97 0.48<br />

Bioethanol<br />

Biogas from<br />

2.43 2.43 0.85<br />

manure 2.17 1.62 0.25<br />

Landfill gas 0.54 0.32 0.18<br />

Sewage gas<br />

Energy crops:<br />

- poplar,<br />

miscanthus,<br />

acacia, alder,<br />

0.15 0.09 0.06<br />

willow 8.47 7.20 7.2<br />

- rape (straw) 1.36 0.95 0.95<br />

- rape (biodiesel) 0.64 0.64 0.64<br />

- corn (biogas)<br />

Peat (only<br />

1.03 0.72 0.72<br />

renewable part) 0.54 0.32 0.28<br />

TOTAL 47.95 33.36 23.11<br />

3 RECENT LEGISLATION<br />

With the view of encouraging energy production<br />

from biomass, Ukrainian Parliament passed two<br />

important laws in 2009. The first one is the Law of<br />

Ukraine “On Amendments to Some Pieces of Legislation<br />

of Ukraine with regard to encouraging production and<br />

use of biofuels” [1]. The law introduced a number of tax<br />

privileges for the participants of biofuels market. In<br />

particular, the producers of biofuels and producers of heat<br />

or combined heat and power from biofuels have been free<br />

of the relevant profit tax since 1.01.<strong>2010</strong> for a 10-year<br />

period.<br />

The second law is the Law of Ukraine “On<br />

Amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Energy<br />

Industry” with regard to encouraging use of alternative<br />

energy sources” [2]. The law determined the green tariff<br />

for power produced from renewable energy sources. The<br />

minimum green tariff for biomass power plants is 12.39 €<br />

cents/kWh that is 2.3 times as higher than the regular<br />

retail tariff for the consumers of electricity.<br />

Comparison with other European green tariff shows<br />

that the value of Ukrainian green tariff for biomass plants<br />

is quite high. For example, it is higher than the German<br />

green tariffs in most cases except for some particular<br />

ones, for example for biogas plants and cogeneration<br />

plants ≤150 kW. It is expected that application of the<br />

green tariff will stimulate power production from<br />

biomass in Ukraine.<br />

4 CURRENT STATUS OF BIOENERGY<br />

TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Current status of introducing bioenergy technologies<br />

in Ukraine is the following. Over 20 straw fired boilers,<br />

mostly below 1 MW, are in operation in rural areas.<br />

About 500 modern wood fired boilers, mostly below 2<br />

MW, are already installed, and over 1000 old boilers,<br />

which were converted from coal and oil to biomass,<br />

operate on enterprises of forest and wood processing<br />

industry. Production of heat is feasible in Ukraine:<br />

payback period of wood and straw fired boilers is about 2<br />

years.<br />

Three big biogas plants are in operation in the<br />

country, and over 10 biogas plants are under<br />

construction/designing. Payback period of the biogas<br />

plants is 3-6.5 years taking into account the green tariff.<br />

The lower value of the payback period range is for the<br />

case when there is an income from sale of digested<br />

manure as a fertilizer and from the sale of emission<br />

reduction units.<br />

In 2009, a mini-CHP plant on the oil-extracting plant<br />

Kirovogradoliya obtained green tariff on the power to be<br />

sold to the grid. The installation operates on sunflower<br />

seed husks, and at the moment it is the only CHP plant on<br />

solid biomass in Ukraine. Further appearance of such<br />

installations is expected in the near future due to<br />

availability of the green tariff on power produced from<br />

renewables.<br />

Payback period of a typical mini-CHP plant is about<br />

5 years for zero cost of biomass and 7 years for the cost<br />

of 17 EUR/t. If a mini-CHP plant is reconstructed from a<br />

steam or hot water boiler installation the payback period<br />

is 3.6 and 5 years, respectively.<br />

Still, some types of bioenergy equipment of domestic<br />

manufacture are missing in Ukraine’s market. They are<br />

biomass boilers > 2 MW, steam biomass boilers, and<br />

reasonably priced individual boilers of 10-50 kW<br />

including boilers for pellets. The latter would help to<br />

develop internal market for biomass pellets.<br />

5 CONCEPTION FOR BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT<br />

Under the current conditions the following<br />

conception for introduction of bioenergy equipment in


Ukraine till 2015 can be suggested (Table III). First, it is<br />

necessary to install biomass boilers since they have the<br />

shortest payback period and can directly replace natural<br />

gas for heat production. The first-priority equipment also<br />

includes wood and straw mini-CHP plants taking into<br />

account introduced green tariff on power production from<br />

renewables. Total capacity of the proposed equipment is<br />

8380 MWth + 100 MWe that gives opportunity to replace<br />

5.3 bill m 3 /yr of natural gas and decrease СО 2 emission<br />

by 9 mill t/yr. Cost of the replaced natural gas is about<br />

1201 mill EUR, and cost of biomass which is used for<br />

operation of the equipment is about 243 mill EUR. Then<br />

money saving from the replacement of natural gas by<br />

biomass is 958 mill EUR. At that total investments<br />

required for this are 736 mill EUR (see Table III) that is<br />

1.3 times as less than the obtained annual money saving.<br />

So, introduction of the bioenergy equipment can be<br />

considered an attractive investment project.<br />

Table III: Conception for the introduction of bioenergy<br />

equipment till 2015<br />

Type of equipment<br />

/ No of units<br />

Wood fired<br />

heating boilers<br />

0.5-10 MW th / 900<br />

Wood fired<br />

industrial boilers,<br />

0.1-5 MW th / 400<br />

Wood fired<br />

domestic boilers,<br />

10-50 kW th /35000<br />

Wood fired<br />

mini-CHPPs,<br />

1-10 MW e / 10<br />

Straw fired farm<br />

boilers,<br />

0.1-1 MW th /<br />

10000<br />

Straw fired heating<br />

boilers,<br />

1-10 MW th / 1000<br />

Straw fired<br />

mini-CHPPs,<br />

1-10 MW e / 10<br />

Installed<br />

capacity,<br />

MW th+<br />

MW e<br />

Replacement<br />

of<br />

NG,<br />

bill m 3 /yr<br />

Required<br />

investments,<br />

mill EUR<br />

450 0.26 21<br />

280 0.22 13<br />

1050 0.60 69<br />

100+50 0.21 137<br />

2000 1.18 151<br />

2000 1.18 113<br />

100+50 0.20 137<br />

Farm boilers for<br />

sunflower<br />

and corn stalks,<br />

0.1-1 MWth / 9000<br />

1800 1.06 136<br />

Peat boilers,<br />

0.5-1 MWth / 800<br />

TOTAL<br />

600<br />

8380+100<br />

0.34<br />

5.26<br />

28<br />

805<br />

We consider that priority lines of bioenergy<br />

development must be determined in the state program<br />

which would have status of law that is would be<br />

compulsory for implementation. Ukraine’s national<br />

targets on biomass contribution to the total primary<br />

energy consumption should be fixed in an official<br />

document like Biomass Action Plan. Such a document<br />

was already drafted within the framework of a Dutch-<br />

Ukrainian intergovernmental project “Biomass and<br />

Biofuels in Ukraine” (2008-2009). Biomass Action Plan<br />

for Ukraine identifies the main challenges of Ukraine’s<br />

biomass sector and suggests actions to solve the<br />

problems. One of the suggested actions is adopting a<br />

political declaration with a clear statement of the national<br />

targets on biomass. The following contribution of<br />

biomass/biofuels to the final energy consumption seems<br />

to be realistic: 1% (1.4 mtoe) in <strong>2010</strong>, 5% (7 mtoe) in<br />

2020, 10% (14 mtoe) in 2030.<br />

6 CONCLUSIONS<br />

Ukraine has good preconditions for the dynamic<br />

development of bioenergy sector. The main drivers for<br />

this are permanent rise in prices of traditional energy<br />

carriers and quite big potential of biomass available for<br />

energy production.<br />

Effectiveness of bioenergy development in Ukraine<br />

depends a lot on coordination of activity in this sector<br />

and right choice of priorities. In our opinion, the<br />

government should appoint a single state body fully<br />

responsible for all the issues concerning bioenergy and<br />

for the coordination of work of all the institutions related<br />

to this sector. Priority lines for the development must be<br />

stated in the state program for bioenergy development in<br />

Ukraine, and financial sources for the program<br />

implementation must be clear determined.<br />

Existing legislation also needs further improvement.<br />

The law on biofuels and the law on green tariff have<br />

some week points to be corrected. In addition we suggest<br />

to exempt biomass as a fuel from VAT and grant a state<br />

subsidy to purchasers of bioenergy equipment in the<br />

amount of 20% of the equipment cost.<br />

One of the serious barriers for bioenergy<br />

development in Ukraine is distortion of natural gas prices<br />

for some kinds of consumers. The price for population<br />

and communal services is artificially low that renders it<br />

impossible to introduce bioenergy technologies in these<br />

sectors. Establishment of the market price of natural gas<br />

for all kinds of consumers is a necessary precondition for<br />

large-scale substitution of natural gas by biomass.<br />

National targets on energy production from biomass<br />

must be stated in a official document like Biomass Action<br />

Plan. We consider the following targets to be real: 1% of<br />

the total energy consumption at the expense of biomass in<br />

<strong>2010</strong> (that is equivalent to consumption of about 1.4<br />

mtoe), 5% in 2020, and 10% in 2030.<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

[1] Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Some Pieces of<br />

Legislation of Ukraine with regard to encouraging<br />

production and use of biofuels” N 1391-VI from<br />

21.05.2009.<br />

[2] Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Law of<br />

Ukraine “On Energy Industry” with regard to<br />

encouraging use of alternative energy sources” N<br />

1220-VI from 01.04.2009.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

61


62 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

BIOENERGY AT CLIMATE NEGOTIATIONS: VISIONS, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES<br />

McCormick, K.<br />

International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE) at Lund University<br />

PO Box 196, 22100 Lund, Sweden<br />

ABSTRACT: This paper provides observations and commentary on how bioenergy was presented and communicated at<br />

the 15 th Conference of the Parties (COP 15) held in Denmark in December 2009, including the main conference and side<br />

events as well as “unofficial” parallel events and activities. We can learn significantly from the experiences of COP 15 in<br />

regards to how to develop and present visions for bioenergy, the major challenges confronting the expansion of<br />

bioenergy, and the near-term opportunities for the bioenergy industry. With the 16 th Conference of the Parties (COP 16)<br />

to be held in Mexico in November <strong>2010</strong>, this paper contributes to a better understanding of how the bioenergy industry<br />

can influence policy-makers, attract media attention, and engage the general public and key stakeholders in a constructive<br />

dialogue to take full advantage of the potential of bioenergy to contribute to climate mitigation and adaptation. At COP<br />

16 we need “to make it all happen”.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy industry, public awareness, climate change, political legitimacy, stakeholder involvement<br />

1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND<br />

The 15 th Conference of the Parties (COP 15) held in<br />

Denmark in December 2009 was a dramatic global event<br />

on climate change that culminated in the Copenhagen<br />

Accord. While there are strong differences of opinion on<br />

whether or not COP 15 and the Copenhagen Accord can<br />

be considered a “step in the right direction” or an outright<br />

failure, as well as who should do what and when, nothing<br />

has changed regarding climate science. A rapid<br />

transformation of our economies and societies towards<br />

low or zero carbon systems remains a fundamental<br />

requirement for reducing the effects of global warming<br />

over the next century.<br />

COP 15 attracted thousands of delegates and<br />

representatives from industry, government, academia,<br />

and civil society from around the world – many of which<br />

attended COP 15 to actively put forward visions and<br />

strategies for the future. In this context, we can ask what<br />

profile did bioenergy have at COP 15? This paper<br />

provides observations and commentary on how bioenergy<br />

was presented and communicated at COP 15 – both the<br />

official activities and the many “unofficial” events<br />

organised around the climate negotiations. Much can be<br />

learned from these experiences and applied at the 16 th<br />

Conference of the Parties (COP 16) to be held in Mexico<br />

in November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

This paper talks about the bioenergy industry in<br />

relation to climate negotiations. But what is the bioenergy<br />

industry? The bioenergy industry refers to a myriad of<br />

organisations and networks that are directly (and<br />

indirectly) involved in bioenergy resources, systems and<br />

technologies. Such organisations and networks cover a<br />

number of sectors, including energy, agriculture, forestry<br />

and the environment, as well as different spheres, such as<br />

government, industry and academia. The bioenergy<br />

industry does not “speak” with a unified voice. However,<br />

on the national level, the bioenergy industry is often<br />

represented by associations, such as the Swedish<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association, and on the international level, the<br />

recently established <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

(http://www.worldbioenergy.org/). This organisation has<br />

taken a leading role in promoting bioenergy on the<br />

international “stage”.<br />

2 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The most significant document prepared and<br />

presented at COP 15 was the position paper by the <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association based on a commissioned report<br />

entitled “Global Potential of Sustainable Biomass for<br />

Energy” [1]. This position paper and report highlight the<br />

very large potentials for bioenergy estimated by some<br />

studies. The “danger” with these estimated potentials is<br />

they are based on a range of assumptions that are under<br />

intense debate, such as land availability. Importantly, the<br />

position paper and report discuss the major challenges for<br />

expanding bioenergy, namely direct and indirect impacts<br />

on land use, as well as the overall sustainability of<br />

bioenergy and the need for robust certification schemes<br />

[2]. It is “smart” of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association to<br />

not only raise these issues in such documents but also<br />

show that the bioenergy industry is actively working with<br />

them.<br />

Kent Nyström of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

argues “There is a lack of awareness of the enormous<br />

potential of bioenergy worldwide both among politicians,<br />

the media and the public” [3]. There is indeed a lack of<br />

public awareness of bioenergy technologies and<br />

potentials, as well as the benefits of sustainable bioenergy<br />

systems that can go far beyond energy supply and include<br />

significant opportunities for regional development.<br />

Raising the profile of bioenergy in the public<br />

“consciousness” is very important. However, far greater<br />

resources will have to be invested by the bioenergy<br />

industry to achieve this goal.<br />

COP 15 involved hundreds of side events and<br />

exhibits – a number of which focused directly on<br />

bioenergy, and others which were relevant to the


ioenergy industry. The Climate Consortium Denmark<br />

and the Danish Agriculture and Food Council organised a<br />

side event called “Bio-based Society: A Sustainable<br />

Future based on Agriculture, Biotechnology and<br />

Resource Management” [4]. This event tackled the issues<br />

of increasing population and climate change through<br />

presentations on the role of agriculture and biotechnology<br />

to produce food, energy and materials. The challenge of<br />

reducing fossil fuels while at the same time producing<br />

more food for the growing population was debated. This<br />

type of event appears to be important to work through<br />

these major issues.<br />

Another side event at COP 15 entitled “Renewable<br />

Energy and Climate Change Abatement” organised by<br />

IEA <strong>Bioenergy</strong> and IEA Renewable Energy Technology<br />

Development, involved a presentation by Uwe Fritsche<br />

on better use of biomass for energy [5]. This presentation<br />

discussed a range of issues, including land use change<br />

and increased production of biomass for energy purposes.<br />

But there was also a strong point on how to maximise<br />

GHG emissions reductions from bioenergy, including the<br />

option to connect bioenergy systems with Carbon<br />

Capture and Storage (CCS) to produce “negative” carbon<br />

emissions. Overall, the presentation suggested that more<br />

stringent climate change policy will drive a better use of<br />

biomass for energy. The bioenergy industry should<br />

support such strong policy and continue to work towards<br />

more sustainable bioenergy systems.<br />

A range of parallel events, seminars and activities<br />

were organised in Denmark and its close neighbour<br />

Sweden in the lead-up to COP 15. Of particular interest<br />

was the largest alternative NGO meeting, called the<br />

Peoples Climate Summit (http://klimaforum.org/). At the<br />

summit a number of themes were very relevant to<br />

bioenergy, including “Sustainable Energy Technology<br />

and Energy Systems” and “Sustainable Agriculture and<br />

Forestry” [6]. This type of NGO event is likely to grow at<br />

COP 16 and perhaps receive greater media attention. The<br />

Peoples Climate Summit concluded with the statement<br />

“systems change not climate change”, which suggests the<br />

NGO movement is looking for more “radical” shifts in<br />

our societies and economies. What role bioenergy can<br />

play in such visions and discussions deserves some<br />

attention – at the very least to avoid confrontations and<br />

“listen” to concerns about bioenergy from the NGO<br />

sector.<br />

Lund University in Sweden hosted a number of<br />

events related to COP 15. The workshop on “Governance<br />

for a Low-Carbon Society” organised by Atomium<br />

Culture (http://atomiumculture.org/) focused on how the<br />

emerging low-carbon society can be governed [7]. There<br />

are a number of points from this workshop relevant for<br />

bioenergy. First, Atomium Culture actively works with<br />

universities, businesses, governments and newspapers.<br />

The inclusion of newspapers highlights the important role<br />

of the media and communication in establishing a lowcarbon<br />

society. Second, bioenergy was a major topic of<br />

discussion in relation to meeting sustainability goals.<br />

Again, we see the importance of institutions, policies and<br />

schemes that can ensure sustainable bioenergy systems.<br />

Third, CCS was on the agenda, and the link to bioenergy<br />

systems was also discussed and highlighted. This point<br />

about the synergy between CCS, bioenergy and<br />

producing “negative” carbon emissions should be more<br />

actively communicated by the bioenergy industry to the<br />

media and key stakeholders.<br />

COP 15 started with worldwide attention (and<br />

enthusiasm) about defining a strong global agreement but<br />

this did not eventuate. Joelle Brink for Biofuels Digest<br />

(http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/) perhaps best<br />

summarised the reactions from the bioenergy industry at<br />

COP 15 by saying that the first week of negotiations was<br />

promising with the UN assurance that bioenergy would<br />

be a priority in renewable energy plans. However, in the<br />

second week the UN negotiations stalled and resulted in a<br />

small group of nations (USA, China, India, South Africa<br />

and Brazil) developing the Copenhagen Accord with<br />

many other countries dissenting – “leaving the real work<br />

for Mexico in November <strong>2010</strong>” [8]. It seems fair to argue<br />

that COP 16 will be under even greater “pressure” to<br />

move the climate negotiations forwards.<br />

3 CONCLUSION AND REFLECTIONS<br />

This paper perhaps asks far more questions that it<br />

answers? However, the main point is to raise discussions<br />

on how to improve the profile of bioenergy at major<br />

climate negotiations, especially the up-coming COP 16 to<br />

be held in Mexico in November <strong>2010</strong>. This paper<br />

concludes with some reflections and suggestions for<br />

action. Many of these points could be debated and need<br />

to be further developed so as to make them more concrete<br />

and practical.<br />

Showing potentials is very important, but a major<br />

challenge for the bioenergy industry is to put bioenergy<br />

technologies and systems, and the overall potentials of<br />

bioenergy, into tangible contexts. In other words, it is<br />

vital to document and present functioning “real-life”<br />

bioenergy systems. This includes both case studies of<br />

specific places, and country studies that show the<br />

development of bioenergy over time.<br />

Working with all actors engaged in promoting<br />

renewable energy only strengthens the position of<br />

bioenergy. The decision of the WBA to join and support<br />

the International Renewable Energy Alliance<br />

(http://www.ren-alliance.org/) shows that there is<br />

cooperation between bioenergy and other renewable<br />

energy. There is little doubt that we will need all<br />

renewable energy to make significant reductions in GHG<br />

emissions and replace fossil fuels.<br />

Engaging with cities and regions should be a<br />

priority for the bioenergy industry at COP 16.<br />

Thousands of representatives from cities and regions<br />

attended COP 15. Cities and regions can often implement<br />

far more “radical” plans to reduce GHG emissions<br />

compared to nations, but they need help to find<br />

“solutions”. <strong>Bioenergy</strong>, in all its forms, can really<br />

contribute to cities and regions in their efforts on climate<br />

change.<br />

Learning from how the Copenhagen Accord was<br />

brokered is important to all actors working on climate<br />

change, including the bioenergy industry. The group of<br />

nations that really developed the Copenhagen Accord<br />

included China, India, the USA, South Africa and Brazil.<br />

This is a particularly interesting group of nations in<br />

respect to bioenergy, since they all have growing<br />

bioenergy sectors. Brazil, in particular, is a global leader<br />

on bioenergy.<br />

Enhancing communication activities and key<br />

collaborations in the lead-up to COP 16 is vital to<br />

successfully lifting the profile of bioenergy.<br />

Communication and stakeholder involvement are on the<br />

agenda more than ever for the fast-growing bioenergy<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

63


industry. Avoiding major confrontations on controversial<br />

issues, such as sustainability certification schemes and<br />

land use changes, requires greater efforts on engagement<br />

with diverse actors.<br />

4 REFERENCES<br />

1. Ladanai, S. & Vinterbäck, J. (2009) Global Potential of<br />

Sustainable Biomass for Energy. Uppsala: Swedish<br />

University for Agricultural Sciences.<br />

2. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association. (2009) Global Potential<br />

of Sustainable Biomass for Energy. Position Paper<br />

3. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association. (2009) Global Potential<br />

for <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Sufficient to meet Global Energy Demand.<br />

Press Release.<br />

4. Climate Consortium Denmark and the Danish<br />

Agriculture and Food Council. (2009) Bio-based Society:<br />

A Sustainable Future based on Agriculture,<br />

Biotechnology and Resource Management. Workshop.<br />

5. Fritsche, U. (2009) Better Use of Biomass for Energy.<br />

Presentation.<br />

6. Klimaforum (2009) The Themes of Klimaforum at<br />

COP15.<br />

URL: http://www.klimaforum.org/<br />

7. Atomium Culture. (2009) Governance for a Low-<br />

Carbon Society.<br />

URL: http://atomiumculture.org/<br />

8. Brink, J. (2009) <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Industry Reacts at COP15.<br />

URL: http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/<br />

5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This paper is part of a research effort entitled “The<br />

emerging bio-economy: Investigating the role of<br />

communication and stakeholder involvement” which is<br />

funded for <strong>2010</strong>-2013 by the Swedish Research Council<br />

for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial<br />

Planning. Visit the interactive bio-economy blog<br />

(http://bio-literacy.blogspot.com/) to follow the progress<br />

and developments of this work, make comments, and ask<br />

questions.<br />

64 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


SUPPLY CHAINS OF FOREST CHIP PRODUCTION IN FINLAND<br />

Kalle Kärhä<br />

Metsäteho Oy<br />

P.O. Box 101, FI-00171 Helsinki, Finland<br />

kalle.karha@metsateho.fi<br />

ABSTRACT: The Metsäteho study investigated how logging residue chips, stump wood chips, and chips from smallsized<br />

thinning wood and large-sized (rotten) roundwood used by heating and power plants were produced in Finland in<br />

2008. Almost all the major forest chip suppliers in Finland were involved in the study. The total volume of forest chips<br />

supplied in 2008 by these suppliers was 6.5 TWh. The study was implemented by conducting an e-mail questionnaire<br />

survey and telephone interviews. Research data was collected in March-May 2009. The majority of the logging residue<br />

chips and chips from small-sized thinning wood were produced using the roadside chipping supply chain in Finland in<br />

2008. The chipping at plant supply chain was also significant in the production of logging residue chips. 70% of all stump<br />

wood chips consumed were comminuted at the plant and 29% at terminals. The role of the terminal chipping supply chain<br />

was also significant in the production of chips from logging residues and small-sized wood chips. When producing chips<br />

from large-sized (rotten) roundwood, nearly a half of chips were comminuted at plants and more than 40% at terminals.<br />

Keywords: Comminution, Energy wood, Finland.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The use of forest chips in Finland has increased<br />

rapidly in the 21 st century: In the year 2000, the total use<br />

of forest chips for energy generation was 1.8 TWh (0.9<br />

mill. m 3 ), while in 2008 it was 9.2 TWh (4.6 mill. m 3 )<br />

[1]. Of this amount, 8.1 TWh was used in heating and<br />

power plants, and 1.1 TWh in small-sized dwellings, i.e.<br />

private houses, farms, and recreational dwellings, in 2008<br />

(Fig. 1) [1].<br />

Of the forest chips used in heating and power plants<br />

(8.1 TWh), the majority (58%) was produced from<br />

logging residues in final cuttings in 2008 (Fig. 1) [1].<br />

Forest chips derived from stump and root wood totalled<br />

14% and 4% came from large-sized (rotten) roundwood.<br />

24% of the total amount of commercial forest chips used<br />

for energy generation came from small-diameter (d 1.3200 GWh in<br />

2008) power plants in Finland [2]. However, they<br />

consume approximately 40% of forest chips used in<br />

Finland (Fig. 2) [2]. The use of forest chips is currently<br />

the greatest in Central Finland, and relatively low in<br />

Northern Finland (Fig. 3) [1].<br />

Figure 2: Use of forest chips by the class of energy<br />

content (GWh) used in heating and power plants in 2008<br />

in Finland [2]. The figures are based on the data of the<br />

Finnish Forest Research Institute: the use of forest chips<br />

7.8 TWh in total of 427 energy plants in 2008. The<br />

figures exclude the data of TTS Research’s small heating<br />

plants (0.2 TWh & 333 plants).<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

65


Figure 3: Use of forest chips by forestry centre in 2008<br />

in Finland [1].<br />

Metsäteho Oy has annually surveyed the supply<br />

chains [3] used in the production of forest chips in the<br />

21 st century in Finland [4–8]. The Metsäteho study also<br />

investigated how logging residue chips, stump wood<br />

chips, and chips from small-sized thinning wood and<br />

large-sized (rotten) roundwood used by heating and<br />

power plants were produced in Finland in 2008. The<br />

main results of the study are presented in this conference<br />

paper.<br />

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The supply chains of forest chips were investigated in<br />

the questionnaire of Supply Chains of Forest Chips in<br />

2008, which covered the production of logging residue<br />

chips, stump wood chips, chips from small-sized thinning<br />

wood, and chips from large-sized (rotten) roundwood. In<br />

the survey, the supply chains were determined as follows:<br />

• Terrain chipping: comminution at the harvesting<br />

site,<br />

• Roadside chipping (separate chipper and chip<br />

truck): comminution with a chipper or crusher at<br />

a roadside landing and road transportation of<br />

chips using a separate chip truck from the<br />

roadside to the plant,<br />

• Roadside chipping (integrated chipper–chip<br />

truck): comminution and road transportation of<br />

chips with the same unit, a so-called integrated<br />

chipper–chip truck,<br />

• Terminal chipping: forest chip raw materials<br />

(loose or bundled) to the terminal for<br />

comminution, and then transportation of the chips<br />

by truck/train/barge from the terminal to the<br />

plant, and<br />

• Chipping at plant: forest chip raw materials<br />

(loose or bundled) to the plant for comminution.<br />

Almost all the major forest chip suppliers in Finland<br />

were involved in the study. The total volume of forest<br />

chips supplied in 2008 by these (34) suppliers was 6.5<br />

TWh (Table 1). The study was implemented by<br />

conducting an email questionnaire survey and telephone<br />

interviews. Research data was collected in March-May<br />

2009.<br />

Table 1: Use of different types of forest chips at heating<br />

and power plants in 2008 in Finland [1], and the total<br />

volume supplied in 2008 by the forest chip suppliers who<br />

66 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

participated in the survey.<br />

Type of forest chips<br />

Total volume<br />

used<br />

in Finland [1]<br />

Total volume<br />

supplied<br />

by suppliers<br />

TWh<br />

Logging residue chips 4.7 3.5<br />

Stump wood chips 1.2 1.2<br />

Chips from small-sized<br />

thinning wood<br />

1.9 1.4<br />

Chips from large-sized<br />

roundwood<br />

0.4 0.5<br />

Total 8.1 6.5<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

3.1 Logging residue chips<br />

The best sites in Finland, and therefore those mainly<br />

used for recovering logging residues, are Norway spruce<br />

(Picea abies L. Karst.) dominated final cuttings. The<br />

typical logging residue removal is approximately 70–100<br />

MWh/ha. In 2008, the area where logging residues were<br />

recovered was more than 50,000 ha in Finland.<br />

Figure 4 shows that the most common place to<br />

comminute logging residues for chips is a roadside<br />

landing. In 2008, the total proportion of roadside<br />

chipping supply chains was 58%. The share of roadside<br />

chipping with a separate chipper and chip truck was 55%,<br />

and the share of roadside chipping with an integrated<br />

chipper–chip truck was 3% (Fig. 4).<br />

31% of the logging residues were comminuted at<br />

power plants in 2008 (Fig. 4). The share of chipping<br />

loose residues at the plant was 14%, and the share of<br />

chipping logging residue bundles at the plant was 17%.<br />

Currently, logging residues are bundled by around 15<br />

slash bundlers in Finnish forests [cf. 9, 10]. The<br />

proportion of terminal chipping supply chain was 11% in<br />

2008 (Fig. 4).<br />

Figure 4: Proportions of different supply chains in the<br />

production of logging residue chips during 2004–2008 in<br />

Finland.<br />

3.2 Stump wood chips<br />

Intensive development of stump and root wood<br />

harvesting began in Finland in the early 2000’s. Today<br />

stump wood is a competitive wood fuel, especially for<br />

large power plants. This is clearly evident in the stump<br />

chip supply chain figures: 70% of all stump wood chips<br />

used for energy generation in 2008 were produced at<br />

power plants (Fig. 5). In 2008, 29% of all the stump<br />

wood comminution was performed at terminals. Small


stump wood batches were also comminuted at the<br />

roadside landings by mobile crushers.<br />

In Finland, stumps for energy generation are<br />

extracted almost exclusively from spruce-dominated,<br />

final felling stands. The typical stump wood removal is<br />

150–180 MWh/ha. The period for stump lifting is limited<br />

to May–November when the ground is thawed. In 2008,<br />

stumps were removed from a total of around 7,000<br />

hectares. Heavy-duty (working weight around 20 tonnes)<br />

tracked excavators are mainly used for the lifting of<br />

stumps [9, 10]. Approximately 150 excavators are<br />

currently used for stump lifting in Finland [cf. 9, 10].<br />

Figure 5: Proportions of different supply chains in the<br />

production of stump wood chips during 2004–2008 in<br />

Finland.<br />

3.3 Chips from small-sized thinning wood<br />

Chips from small-sized thinning wood are produced<br />

in Finland from small-diameter (mainly d 1.3


increased cost pressures on the total supply chain costs of<br />

forest chips.<br />

In the future, the management of supply costs in all<br />

phases of the logistics chain will hold vital positions [12].<br />

The individual parts of the supply chains should work<br />

more efficiently (e.g. utilize the most efficient working<br />

methods, adoption of the most suitable production<br />

technology, maximization of loads in forest haulage and<br />

road transportation) and especially, increase integration<br />

between supply chains (e.g. minimization of waiting and<br />

terminal times). Moreover, quality management of chips<br />

(i.e. moisture content in the case of logging residues, and<br />

impurities with stumps) has to be increased to a suitable<br />

level than it is presently.<br />

Kärhä [12] estimated that chipping will move from<br />

roadside locations closer to the heating and power plants,<br />

partly to terminals, and partly directly to the plants. This<br />

will undoubtedly prove to be the case as, in approximate<br />

terms, the closer to the plant chipping is performed, the<br />

more cost-efficient it is. Differences will, nevertheless,<br />

remain between forest chip suppliers regarding the<br />

volumes of forest chips produced in terminals and at the<br />

plant. As the volumes of road transportation of<br />

uncomminuted raw materials for forest chips will greatly<br />

increase in the future, more efficient long-distance<br />

transportation solutions are required. The status of the<br />

terminals will also become more important.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Ylitalo, E. 2009. Puun energiakäyttö 2008. (Use of<br />

wood for energy generation in 2008). Finnish Forest<br />

Research Institute, Forest Statistical Bulletin 15/2009.<br />

[2] Ylitalo, E. 2009. Use of forest chips by heating and<br />

power plants in Finland in 2008. Finnish Forest Research<br />

Institute, Unpublished statistics.<br />

[3] Kärhä, K. 2008. Metsähakkeen<br />

tuotantoprosessikuvaukset. (Flowcharts of supply<br />

systems for forest chip production in Finland). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 3/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2008_<br />

03_Metsahakkeen_tuotantoprosessi_kk_3.pdf.<br />

[4] Kärhä, K. 2005. Hakkuutähteiden korjuu<br />

päätehakkuualoilta. (Harvesting of logging residues from<br />

final cutting stands). In: Kariniemi, A. (Ed.). Kehittyvä<br />

puuhuolto 2005 – Seminaari metsäammattilaisille, 16.–<br />

17.2.2005, Paviljonki, Jyväskylä. Seminaarijulkaisu. p.<br />

68–75.<br />

[5] Kärhä, K. 2005. Tienvarsihaketuksella yleisimmin<br />

metsähaketta. (Forest chips most commonly with<br />

roadside chipping). BioEnergia Magazine 2/2005: 4–5.<br />

[6] Kärhä, K. 2006. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut<br />

Suomessa vuonna 2005. (Industrial supply chains of<br />

forest chips in Finland in 2005). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 6/2006. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_357_m<br />

etsahakkeen_tuotantoketjut_2005.pdf.<br />

[7] Kärhä, K. 2007. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut 2006 ja<br />

metsähakkeen tuotannon visiot. (Industrial supply chains<br />

of forest chips in 2006 and the visions of forest chip<br />

68 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

production). Metsäteho Tuloskalvosarja 5/2007.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2007_<br />

05_Metsahakkeet_kk.pdf.<br />

[8] Kärhä, K. 2008. Metsähakkeen tuotantoketjut<br />

Suomessa vuonna 2007. (Industrial supply chains of<br />

forest chips in Finland in 2007). Metsäteho<br />

Tuloskalvosarja 4/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2008_<br />

04_Metsähakkeen_tuotantoketjut_kk_1.pdf.<br />

[9] Kärhä, K. 2007. Machinery for forest chip production<br />

in Finland in 2007. Metsäteho Tuloskalvosarja 14/2007.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Tuloskalvosarja_2007_<br />

14_forest_chips_machinery_kk_1.pdf.<br />

[10] Kärhä, K. 2007. Production machinery for forest<br />

chips in Finland in 2007 and in the future. Metsäteho<br />

Review 28. Available at:<br />

http://www.metsateho.fi/uploads/Katsaus_28.pdf.<br />

[11] Kärhä, K. 2006. Whole-tree harvesting in young<br />

stands in Finland. Forestry Studies 45: 118–134.<br />

[12] Kärhä, K. 2007. Supply Chains and Machinery in<br />

the Production of Forest Chips in Finland. In: Savolainen,<br />

M. (Ed.). Book of <strong>Proceedings</strong>. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 2007, 3 rd<br />

International <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Conference and Exhibition, 3 rd –<br />

6 th September 2007, Jyväskylä Paviljonki, Finland.<br />

Finbio Publications 36: 367–374.<br />

[13] Anon. 1999. Finland’s National Forest Programme<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Publications<br />

2/1999.<br />

[14] Anon. 2003. Uusiutuvan energian edistämisohjelma<br />

2003–2006. Työryhmän ehdotus. (A programme to<br />

promote renewable energy 2003–2006. Proposal of<br />

working group). Ministry of Trade and Industry, Working<br />

group and committee papers 5/2003. Available at:<br />

http://julkaisurekisteri.ktm.fi/ktm_jur/ktmjur.nsf/all/4B1<br />

BDE137F9B5121C2256CE5002B3AC1/$file/tyto5eos.p<br />

df.<br />

[15] Anon. 2008. Long-term Climate and Energy<br />

Strategy. Government Report to Parliament 6 November<br />

2008. Publications of the Ministry of Employment and<br />

the Economy, Energy and climate 36/2008. Available at:<br />

http://www.tem.fi/files/21079/TEMjul_36_2008_energia<br />

_ja_ilmasto.pdf.


INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF PAPERS<br />

THE ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES, HINDERING THE ADOPTION OF BIOENERGY IN<br />

PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY<br />

Umair Usman<br />

UCH<br />

Moonoo Chowk, Raiwind/Defence Road E. Lahore, Pakistan<br />

Umair@uch.com.pk, Tel: 92-42-5321636, Fax: 92-42-5321638<br />

ABSTRACT: The paper will inform the audience about the energy crisis that has crippled Pakistan’s economic growth<br />

since the last 4 years, and the role that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play in resolving the issue. In order to help ease Pakistan in its<br />

effort to curb this crisis and to get useful insights into the role that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play in solving Pakistan’s problems,<br />

business ventures were attempted. The results were not encouraging and shed light onto the financial and technical<br />

hindrances involved in creating and running bioenergy businesses in Pakistan. These issues themselves linked to the more<br />

general Social, Economic and Political barriers for the adoption of <strong>Bioenergy</strong>. The paper concludes by providing<br />

suggestions and recommendations, as to what the government, private sector as well as the international community can<br />

do in order to overcome the crisis.<br />

Keywords: Bio energy Policy, Biogas, Bio-ethanol, Third <strong>World</strong>, Pakistan<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Energy is considered to be the life line of any<br />

economy. It is significant determinant of socioeconomic<br />

development and is therefore one of the most important<br />

strategic commodities [26]. Traditional growth theories<br />

focus on the labour, capital and technology as major<br />

factors of production and ignore the importance of energy<br />

in the economic growth process [16].<br />

In the era of globalization, even though dependence<br />

of economies on energy and its demand is rapidly<br />

increasing, the supply of it remains uncertain. Therefore<br />

energy shortage will be one of the biggest problems<br />

facing mankind in the next century [16].<br />

One such country which is already facing an energy<br />

crisis is Pakistan. Energy plays an important role as<br />

compared to other variables included in the production<br />

and consumption function for Pakistan, as it is in an early<br />

stage of development [10]. Already Pakistan’s economy<br />

has been under constant stress due to is energy crisis [7],<br />

leading to a sharp decrease in its economic growth rate.<br />

In order to study the role that <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play in<br />

overcoming the energy crisis, two business ventures were<br />

attempted i.e. selling Biogas plants and Bio-ethanol.<br />

Biomass seemed like a logical alternative energy solution<br />

due to the country’s large agricultural base. However<br />

both businesses failed at different stages of development<br />

due to several micro and macro factors. Reflecting on<br />

these failures, new business models are discussed that can<br />

help create a formal Biomass industry.<br />

However before details of the ventures are looked<br />

into, it is imperative that Pakistan’s energy profile is<br />

studied first, in order to better understand its needs.<br />

.<br />

2 PAKISTAN’S ENERGY PROFILE<br />

2.1 Country profile<br />

Pakistan is a middle income economy, with an<br />

estimated population of around 170 million, among the<br />

highest in the world. It is the founding member of<br />

SAARC, G-8 and the OIC. Not only is it a major military<br />

and nuclear power, but South Asia’s second largest<br />

economy and a front line state on the war in terror.<br />

It has sustained excellent growth record in the past<br />

decade thanks to liberalization, and an opening up of the<br />

economy. Due to economic growth that took place in in<br />

the first half of the 2000s, the GDP of Pakistan doubled<br />

between 1999 and 2007. The growth in GDP was even<br />

higher than the population growth and therefore GDP per<br />

capita increased by almost sixty percent between 2000<br />

and 2008. Recognizing Pakistan’s economic growth,<br />

Goldman Sachs now considers Pakistan to be among the<br />

‘Next Eleven Countries’ i.e. nations that are likely to<br />

become sizable economic powers and have greater<br />

impact on global business in the new century [34]. As<br />

Pakistan’s agriculture, industry, trade and services sectors<br />

have been growing rapidly, the government has remained<br />

negligent to the surge in energy demand, leading to a<br />

massive shortfall in energy, which is only expected to<br />

widen [26].<br />

One of the key strategic objectives of the Musharraf<br />

era was to turn Pakistan into an energy corridor,<br />

connecting Central Asia (China and the oil producing<br />

countries) to the rest of the world (14; 13; 26). However<br />

Pakistan itself is now facing a major energy crisis. To<br />

look into this crisis in detail, it is imperative to look at<br />

Pakistan’s energy profile in order to better understand the<br />

supply and demand of different sources.<br />

2.2 Energy Profile:<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

69


The primary energy supply in Pakistan is<br />

concentrated to only a few sources. The average share of<br />

Oil and Gas between 1997-2007 was 44.36% and 32.58%<br />

respectively i.e. 77% of the total supply (relatively,<br />

Hydroelectricity and coal accounted for 18% and other<br />

sources accounted for 5%). The share now stands at 31%<br />

for oil (82% is imported) and 48% for gas i.e. the total<br />

share has grown to 79%, where the share of oil decreased<br />

to 31 percent (relatively hydroelectricity and coal account<br />

for 20% and 1 percent from nuclear and imported energy)<br />

[16; 24].<br />

Looking at total consumption of each source, the<br />

average percentage share of oil in energy consumption<br />

was 40.9% during 1998 to 2007, followed by gas 34.6%,<br />

electricity 15.7%, coal 7.5% and LPG 1.3% [16]. Noting<br />

consumption of energy by sector, the industrial sector<br />

consumed 37.3% of the energy, followed by transport<br />

sector with a share of 32.2% and domestic sector with a<br />

share of 22.2%. The agriculture sector, government and<br />

the commercial sector respectively consumed only 2.6%,<br />

2.5% and 3.3%.<br />

During the 1980s, about 86% of the energy demand<br />

was met by domestic sources and remaining 14% gap<br />

was filled by the imports [7]. At present Pakistan meets<br />

75% of its energy needs by domestic resources including<br />

gas, oil and hydroelectricity production [24]. Only 25%<br />

energy needs were managed through imports. Oil and<br />

Gas have taken major share in the energy mix and are<br />

likely to maintain their dominance [16].<br />

It can be seen that from the above that Pakistan’s<br />

energy supply is dependent largely on Oil and Gas and<br />

electricity, and the share of imported energy is increasing<br />

over time. It can be noted therefore that shortages or<br />

difficulties in imports can have disastrous effects on<br />

industry and transport, and therefore cripple the industry.<br />

2.2 Energy crisis:<br />

During the mid 200s, the average economic growth<br />

rate of 7.6% in the 2000s. It was believed that assuming<br />

the growth of 6-7 percent which Pakistan had during the<br />

mid 2000s, energy demand will growth at 8% or rougly<br />

double within a decade [24]. However insufficient<br />

generation and exploration, limited planning and<br />

negligence of successive regimes, and inefficient use and<br />

wastage of energy resources [31], has created an acute<br />

energy crisis in Pakistan since 2006. [24; 26; 7].<br />

[16]<br />

Table I: Energy Supply and Demand Gap (MTOE:<br />

Millions of Tons Oil equivalent)<br />

On the other hand according to Pakistan’s Energy<br />

Security Plan for 2005-2030 [16], the total primary<br />

energy consumption in Pakistan is expected to increase<br />

seven times to 360 MTOE and over eight-fold increase in<br />

the requirement of power by 2030 (Table I).<br />

As none of these problems were dealt with, Pakisan’s<br />

GDP growth rate plummeted to just 2.3% in 2008-2009<br />

growth, and 4.1% 2009-<strong>2010</strong>. Due to energy shortages, th<br />

large scale manufaturing sector declined by 7.7% last<br />

70 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

year, while overall manufacturing declined by 3.3% [7].<br />

It must be noted that as GDP growth declines, the<br />

estimations of the widening gap already discussed might<br />

not materialize, but severe shortages will probabaly<br />

remain. In paticular Pakistan is likely to face a major<br />

shortage of natural gas, electricity and oil, the three major<br />

sources, in the next three to four year that could choke<br />

the economic growth. The biggest shortfall is expected in<br />

the natural gas supplies [16].<br />

The demand-supply gap has therefore increased and<br />

is likely to increase in the future, exerting strong pressure<br />

on the energy resources in the Country [16; 33].<br />

2.2.1 Gas<br />

Natural gas has emerged as the most important fuel<br />

in the recent past and the trends indicate its dominant<br />

share in the future energy mix as well [26].<br />

Demand for natural gas in Pakistan increased by<br />

roughly 10 percent annually from 2000-01 to 2007-08,<br />

reaching around 3,200 cubic feet per day (MMCFD)<br />

against the total production of 3,774 MMCFD while by<br />

2008-2009, the demand for natural gas exceeded the<br />

available supply, with production of 4,528 MMCFD gas<br />

against demand for 4,731 MMCFD, indicating a shortfall<br />

of 203 MMCFD [30]. Hagler Bailly, a global<br />

management consulting firm warned in a 2006 study that<br />

Pakistan is going to witness gas shortage starting in 2007,<br />

and defecit will grow until it will cripple the economy by<br />

2025, when shortage will be 11,092 MMCFD (Million<br />

standard cubic feet per day) against total 13,259 MMCFD<br />

production i.e. demand will be 24351 [8]. This winter<br />

alone, the country dealt with a shortfall of 700 MMCFD<br />

of gas due to increasing use of heaters and geysers [17].<br />

There are also about 2718 Compressed Natural Gas<br />

(CNG) stations in the country and approximately 1.9<br />

million vehicles are using CNG. Pakistan has seen an<br />

investment of Rs 70 billion has been made, creating some<br />

100,000 job [24]. With roughly 29,167 vehincles are<br />

converted run on CNG every month, Pakistan has now<br />

become the third largest CNG consumer in the world<br />

after Argentina and Brazil, and the biggest in Asia [20;<br />

28], However due to a shortage of Natural Gas, CNG<br />

stations are required to go on ‘forced holidays’ where two<br />

days in a week they are not allowed to sell gas. Gas<br />

powered generators for domestic use, have therefore been<br />

banned as well [37].<br />

Industry too has been made to cut their gas usage for<br />

3 days every week, otherwise their gas supply will be cut.<br />

In winters, gas supplies to industry are cut for upto 2-3<br />

weeks, when demand is highest. During the same period,<br />

many residential areas, even within major urban centers<br />

do not have access to gas for weeks at a time [34].<br />

2.2.2 Oil<br />

Oil is the second biggest source of primary energy for<br />

Pakistan, and imports 82% of all its needs [24]. The issue<br />

with oil has to do more with trade deficits than depletion<br />

of resources. Between 2008-2009 (July-March)<br />

Petroleum products and crude oil made up 28.5% of<br />

Pakistan’s imports, totaling to about 7.4 billion and by<br />

2009-<strong>2010</strong>, the share in imports has increased to 29.2%<br />

or $7.3 billion [19].<br />

The situation reached its worst point in 2008. The<br />

2007-2008 Pakistan Oil bill was an all time high of $11<br />

billion, due to record world oil prices, and the<br />

depreciation in the rupee’s value. This put huge stress on<br />

the trade and current account deficit, and therefore


Pakistan’s reserves. Pakistani bureaucracy rushed to<br />

reach an agreement with the Saudi government to provide<br />

$5.9 billion of Oil on deferred payments i.e. 6 month<br />

supply [26]. Prior to this, oil prices in Pakistan reached<br />

unbearable levels and first signs of severe shortage had<br />

begun to appear as the government did not have the<br />

reserves to buy oil [30]. This incident exposed a major<br />

flaw in Pakistan’s energy security.<br />

2.2.3 Electricity<br />

Electricity is another important source of energy in<br />

Pakistan. The average share of electricity as a percentage<br />

of the total energy consumed was was about 18% during<br />

1998-2007. Electricity consumption grew in all economic<br />

sectors during the last five years. Currently Pakistan is<br />

facing severe electricity crisis as the shortfall has varies<br />

between 3000 to 4000 MW [24].<br />

The current energy crisis stems from the decline in<br />

hydro sources of energy and over reliance on the<br />

expansive source of electricity. On top there are 30%<br />

transmission losses due to poor quality<br />

infrastructure and large scale power theft [25]. Another<br />

issues is what has come to be known as circular debt.<br />

IPPs or Independent Power Producers make up 45.23%<br />

of Pakistan’s electricity supply. These IPPs sell<br />

electricity to the government, however many of them<br />

have faced delay in payments, and many remain unpaid.<br />

Therefore many IPPs has stopped operations as they<br />

could no longer finance themselves [3].<br />

The issue is also related to the problem of oil as oilbased<br />

thermal plants accounts supply 68% of generating<br />

capacity, far more than the 30% share of hydroelectric<br />

plants [7]. Rising oil prices and the depreciation of the<br />

rupee has led to huge generation costs, while several IPPs<br />

saw their costs rising and were forced to close down as<br />

payments were not made [5]. As a result, manufacturing<br />

costs and inflation are rising and, Pakistani exports are<br />

becoming expensive, further pushing pressure on the<br />

deficit ridden balance of payments [24]. All of this has<br />

negatively impacted economic growth. Overall the<br />

energy sector of Pakistan is poorly managed, service<br />

quality is low, theft of power and gas is rampant and until<br />

recently, most utilities are still receiving subsidies<br />

making them even more inefficient [32].<br />

Therefore, it can see that Pakistan’s energy mix relies<br />

heavily on Oil, Gas and electricity, all of which are<br />

creating uncertainty for Pakistan’s energy needs. Even<br />

though average consumption of oil is falling, its unstable<br />

price creates havoc for Pakistan. Gas reserves too have<br />

depleted and soon Pakistan will start importing gas from<br />

Iran to fulfill its needs. Coming to electricity, generation<br />

is not keeping up with demand and there is a dire need to<br />

fill the gap as it has already has a significant negative<br />

impact on industry. To get Pakistan out of this crisis and<br />

prepare for the future there is an urgent need to expand<br />

and upgrade the domestic resource base, by exploring<br />

new sources, exploiting existing ones, improving<br />

efficiency, undertaking conservation efforts and diversity<br />

the energy mix through alternative energy [16; 7]. One of<br />

such alternative energy solution is Biomass, which seems<br />

very promising for Pakistan.<br />

3 POTENTIAL FOR BIOMASS:<br />

There are several alternative energy solutions being<br />

implemented throughout the world. Efforts range from<br />

capturing wind power though wind turbines, Solar energy<br />

using PV cells and even capturing kinetic energy of tidal<br />

waves in the oceans to produce what is known as Tidal<br />

Power. Biomass is one such solution which shows<br />

promise and potential within Pakistan. However to look<br />

at the significance and potential of Biomass as an<br />

alternate energy of fuel it is important to get insights into<br />

exactly what it really is.<br />

3.1 What is Biomass?<br />

Biomass essentially is organic matter i.e. plants, that<br />

can be used as renewable energy. The energy comes from<br />

stored sun light through photosynthesis, known as Bio<br />

energy. Unlike Fossil fuels, which have been created<br />

through millions of years of heat and pressure, Biomass<br />

comes from fresh sources that can be grown again with<br />

relative ease [22]. Most Biomass fuels recycle agriculture<br />

byproducts. This can be from, cow dung [biogas] and<br />

agricultural residues [bio diesel or ethanol] or non<br />

agriculture byproducts such as fuel wood from forests,<br />

while traditional biomass, relies on such things as directly<br />

incineration firewood or cow dung, have serious<br />

implications for health and emissions [34]; however they<br />

are still prevalent in developing countries, where 2.4-2.5<br />

billion people still rely on it (mainly for cooking), a<br />

number that is set to increase to 2.7 billion by the year<br />

2030. Already in the South Asia region 70-80%<br />

individuals rely in some way to traditional Biomass. In<br />

Pakistan 19% of Biomass energy is sourced from, cow<br />

dung, 22% from crop residue and 60% from fuel wood<br />

[10].<br />

As the source of Biomass is basically agriculture (and<br />

forestry), there is immense potential for Biomass within<br />

Pakistan, which is largely an agricultural economy.<br />

3.2 Bio energy Potential of Pakistan<br />

Agriculture accounts for for 21% of the GDP and<br />

employees 45% of the total workforce and is hence the<br />

largest employer [11; 7]. 62% of the population already<br />

lives in the rural areas, where agriculture is the main<br />

source of income.<br />

Of the Total area of 79.61 million hectares of the<br />

country, 27% is cultivated while only 8% is forest [12].<br />

The ratio of cultivated land to population is 0.16 ha per<br />

person. Of the cropped area, Food grains are grown on<br />

56%, cash crops on 17%, pulses on 7%, oilseeds on 3%,<br />

fruits on 2%, vegetables and condiments on 1% each, and<br />

other crops, including fodder, on 13%. Most of the 17.2<br />

million hectares of cultivated area is irrigated and 70% of<br />

the water is supplied by canals, thanks to the Indus Basin,<br />

the largest continuous irrigation system in the world,<br />

provides most of the canal irrigation. 30% of water<br />

comes from wells. Traditionally monsoons in July and<br />

August and conventional winter rains ,in January and<br />

February have been a source of irrigation as well.<br />

It must be noted that Maize and Sugar Cane, are both<br />

large sources of Bio-ethanol, and are among the top 5<br />

major crops of the country [7]. Looking at livestock,<br />

while the contribution of the crop sector declined from 65<br />

percent of the total agricultural activity in 1990-91 to just<br />

43.9 percent in 2009-<strong>2010</strong>, the share of livestock has<br />

risen from 30 percent to 53.2 percent over this period, or<br />

11.4% of the total GDP, therefore becoming the biggest<br />

contributor to agriculture [7; 8]. This is derived from an<br />

estimated livestock population of 30.8 millon Buffaloes,<br />

34.3 million cattle, 59.9 million goats , sheep 27.8 and<br />

610 milion chickens [7], averaging close to 2-5 cattle per<br />

household [23]. The estates for making biogas from these<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

71


sources varies between 57488 million m³ [4] to around<br />

858,000 million m³ per day [11], cattle size estimates,<br />

and the amount of biogas that can be produced,<br />

However, even though it looks as if Pakistan is all set<br />

to embrace Biomass, it must be remembed that Pakistan<br />

is currently under severe ‘Water Stress’, and is likely to<br />

become a water scarce nation perhaps as soon as <strong>2010</strong><br />

[29]. The issue has been related to Pakistan’s<br />

mismanagement of water resources as well as what is<br />

allegedly regarded as India’s illegal construction of dams<br />

to collect water for itself, which is against the Indus<br />

Water Treaty. Water scarcity will not only have a<br />

devastation impact on crops, where already there is a<br />

‘water schedule’ in place to distribute the limited amount<br />

of water to fields at particular times only [18]. This will<br />

likely have an impact on livestock as well, as water<br />

shortage is leading to the emergence of ‘waste lands’ that<br />

have caused a shortage of fodder for livestock, situation<br />

that will only worsen in the future if nothing is done [1].<br />

In any case, noting the potential for Bio liquid fuels<br />

and Biogas, it seemed logical to attempt business<br />

ventures in these fields. However, even though there<br />

were opportunities in the field, there were may<br />

unforeseen hindrances as well.<br />

4 HINDRANCES TO BIOENERGY VENTURES<br />

Keeping the view that commercialization of Biomass<br />

solutions could create a private industry through<br />

demonstration effects of a profitable model, two<br />

businesses were planned. The intention was to get better<br />

insights into the opportunities presented by Biomass and<br />

how it can be used to resolve the energy crisis.<br />

4.1 Biogas<br />

Biogas has several advantages for communities. Apart<br />

from the health benefits of using dung in such a manner,<br />

it saves time and money, while the left over manure from<br />

the Biogas plant can be a used as an even better fertilizer<br />

than traditional dung [29].<br />

4.1.1 Commercializing Biogas Plants<br />

A simple and cheap fixed dome Biogas plant, was to<br />

be constructed for each home in a village on the outskirts<br />

of Lahore. The location was selected due to the low<br />

levels of penetration by non profit groups that establish<br />

Biogas plants for free. To try out the plan, a household<br />

with 4 Buffaloes was selected and taught how to use the<br />

plant, in terms of loading, cleaning and maintenance.<br />

Although they were skeptical in the beginning,<br />

particularly because as it was expensive, the household<br />

eventually agreed to use it on a lease of 5 years. However<br />

several factors created massive hindrances to the growth<br />

of the idea<br />

4.1.1.1 Micro level Hindrances:<br />

There was alot of suspicion, skepticism and resistance<br />

to the idea of using Biogas. Villagers, often simply did<br />

not accept the fact that burning cow dung in a traditional<br />

manner effects health, or that the waste slurry from the<br />

plant will be a better fertilizer.<br />

Another issue was the price. Although subsidies of<br />

over Rs 17,000 for a BioGas plant are available from the<br />

government, simply getting this subsidy was hectic and<br />

72 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

full of red tape [6]. The cost of the system increased<br />

further when it was realized that the household would to<br />

change their cooking utensils and stoves to work with the<br />

new supply of energy.<br />

Biogas often was not enough as there were only 4<br />

buffaloes, to support a large family of six and the<br />

buffaloes themselves were mal-nutritioned. The<br />

uncertainty of supply, was therefore an issue. The<br />

household stopped using Biogas themselves in a few<br />

months, and did not pay.<br />

This experience sheds light on to why not many<br />

private sector companies would not want to join Biogas<br />

initiatives. It is still a relatively new product and there is<br />

not much awareness among consumers about its long<br />

term financial and health benefits, making the market too<br />

uncertain and immature. However the biggest issue<br />

remains the initial price, which remains high for the<br />

average villager. This gets worse when it is learned that<br />

powerful local land owners, who are often politicians, are<br />

not willing to support such small businesses either.<br />

4.1.1.2 Macro- level hindrances<br />

Biogas, although subsidized, has not bee pushed out<br />

to the masses the way it should have been. The biggest<br />

promoter and installer of Biogas systems in Pakistan is<br />

still SNV, a Dutch initiative [29]. Even though there have<br />

been past claims by the government to promote the<br />

concept, not much has been done and villagers still use<br />

cow dung and other traditional fuels. Therefore<br />

government will and support seem to be the biggest<br />

hindrance to the growth of Biogas usage.<br />

There are also social issues, namely resistance to<br />

change, as here a large population would not only have to<br />

change the way they heat themselves or cook their food,<br />

but even change the cooking utensils they use, in order to<br />

adapt to the new system. It is therefore likely to take<br />

some time to catch on. Another problem however is that<br />

there are no formal distribution networks for those who<br />

do not have enough of their own manure, which is likely<br />

for villagers with smaller holdings. All of these would<br />

require heavy government action, and support from<br />

private for and non profit organizations, all of which<br />

have been limited until now.<br />

4.1.2 Commercializing Bio-ethanol fuel:<br />

Most cars in Pakistan are run on Petrol and therefore it<br />

was natural to go for a Bio-ethanol plant with a capacity<br />

of annual production of 1 milion gallons, with the support<br />

from American consultants. Sweet Sorghum was chosen<br />

as the feedstock for several reasons. It can give 2-3 crop<br />

rotations a year and unlike maize, or sugar cane, is not a<br />

major food source. Fuel grade ethanol was initially to be<br />

marketed directly to domestic car owners and businesses<br />

to reduce their cost of fuel who could make their own<br />

ethanol mixtures such as E-10 or E-20. However, even<br />

before the business begun there were several limitations<br />

that stopped its inception.<br />

4.1.2.1 Micro Level hindrances<br />

A major problem was the availability of Sweet<br />

Sorghum. It is usually not sown on a large, commercial<br />

scale anywhere in Pakistan, as it is not used as cattle<br />

fodder or as a food source. Due to little market value<br />

there is just not enough supply for a medium scale<br />

business of the sort. Maize and Sugar Cane could have<br />

been used, but due to the exploitative nature of food


distributors in Pakistan, and the reputation of Biofuel<br />

businesses to increase food prices, it was not attempted.<br />

Another problem was the continuous power shortages<br />

in the city of Lahore, where the plant was to be based. At<br />

the time of planning, 12-14 hours of power outages were<br />

common, while the system being employed needed to be<br />

in continuous operation, as it did not start well.<br />

Employing a generator using ethanol itself, was not found<br />

to be feasible either.<br />

This brings us to the issue of financial feasibility.<br />

Although cost savings were identified when used with<br />

petrol (an E-10 to E-20 mixture was envisioned), the<br />

margin was not large, and slight changes in petrol, power<br />

or feedstock prices could have offset any price advantage<br />

of the fuel. If a generator was to be used, it was<br />

impossible to sell the product on a ‘price’ basis, due to<br />

higher costs. Ethanol based fuels were never going to<br />

sell the fact that they were ‘eco friendly’ and ‘renewable’<br />

in a price conscious market like Pakistan in any case.<br />

Overall the system was too expensive (fixed and running<br />

costs) for it to be a viable business, unless subsidies were<br />

available, but there were none.<br />

4.2.1.2 Macro level hindrances<br />

Government support had been promised since<br />

General Musharraf was in power, however even though a<br />

policy was drafted, it was never implemented. Therefore<br />

government delay in taking action can be noted as a<br />

major hindrance to the promotion and adoption of<br />

Biomass.<br />

A major, and perhaps the biggest hindrance to the<br />

development of Bio-ethanol is the market price of crops.<br />

Sugarcane and Maize, are still the best contenders for<br />

making Biofuels as they are grown on a massive scale<br />

that can be used as feedstock. However even slight<br />

shortages in supply can cause the prices to rise<br />

exuberantly. This is due to the illegal cartels who control<br />

food distribution and supply and regularly exploit<br />

rumours of slight shortages. This could have a<br />

devastating impact on inflation and the quality of life for<br />

the common man.<br />

A major hindrance is also the issue of creating a<br />

network. No business can expand on ethanol based fuels<br />

by themselves and therefore a distribution agreements<br />

with powerful ‘Oil Marketing Companies’ (OMC) is<br />

necessary. Approaching a massive OMC is not an easy<br />

task and creating a market through direct marketing will<br />

be a slow process that can never reach the masses. This<br />

issue was was to be resolved in the government draft,<br />

which was planned years ago but is still at the<br />

preliminary stage of its implementation [6; 24]. However<br />

the energy crisis itself also feeds into the problem of<br />

large scale manufacturing (which includes producing<br />

ethanol), which has been declining since a couple of<br />

years, due to ever increasing costs of production [7].<br />

A major hindrance, to the adoption of Biogas and Bioethanol<br />

that was identified was the unwillingness or the<br />

half hearted support of the government to such efforts in<br />

terms of passing legislation, enforcing laws and<br />

providing subsidies [5]. Another problem is the fact that<br />

the political system is highly corrupt and non transparent,<br />

which means usually funds are not acounted for. Another<br />

issue is that usually, official policies change successive<br />

governments [33] and unless there is deep involvement of<br />

foreigners and the private for and nonprofit sectors, such<br />

policies are unlikely to sustain over a longer period.<br />

5 Recommendations<br />

It is apparent that there are no quick solutions to the<br />

problem of energy in Pakistan, however many<br />

possibilities exist to create a successful future.<br />

For the mass promotion and acceptance of biomass, it<br />

is imperative that the private and public sector work<br />

together. Neither the public, nor the private sector alone<br />

has the will and the resources to create a sustainable<br />

biomass industry on their own. This includes federal and<br />

local governments and agencies, businesses and industry<br />

associations, universities, supra national agencies such as<br />

Asian Development or <strong>World</strong> Bank as well as not for<br />

profit organizations.<br />

Universities could train personnel, undertake<br />

research, disseminate information and overall develop the<br />

necessary human resource, banks can help fund projects,<br />

and of course entrepreneurs could organize all these<br />

resources and networks to make it happen. The public<br />

sector on the other hand would need to promote the<br />

industry by controlling market prices and overall supply<br />

of feedstock, especially food items and manure. It would<br />

also play a major role by disseminating information<br />

among rural areas where the private sector does not have<br />

sufficient networks, and also provide help in providing<br />

funds and subsidies to these projects. Other stake holders<br />

and international agencies such as USAID and the <strong>World</strong><br />

Bank can also be involved for providing funding and<br />

expertise. However the major role will still be of the<br />

government which would have to bring all stake holders<br />

together. Red tape would have to be reduced, the transfer<br />

of funds would have to be made transparent and fair, and<br />

ensure that there is total commitment resolving the issue<br />

of energy shortage, for the long term.<br />

5.1 Possible Biogas Public-private partnership for<br />

households<br />

A possible business model for a private-public<br />

partnership could be based on Community Biogas plants,<br />

which at one point was to be attempted on a large scale<br />

by the government [20]. The federal government could<br />

help acquire and direct funds from local governments to<br />

subsidize community plants, which will help involve the<br />

whole community rather than a household and therefore<br />

reduce resistance to change and lower costs. Knowledge<br />

and expertise would be brought in by the private sector,<br />

which will also monitor progress, conduct R&D and<br />

improve the design. The private sector will also be<br />

responsible for establishing a constant supply of raw<br />

material by providing sufficient quantities of manure<br />

when not available. They can also provide after sales<br />

service for which they can charge a minimal price and<br />

also help install standardized kitchen utensils. An area<br />

could be identified by the government, which can then<br />

work on it together with private vendors, or, it can be the<br />

other way around as well. The government can identify<br />

what vendors to work with based on experience, expertise<br />

and finance. This approach is similar to the partnership<br />

between the private plastics firm ‘Sintex’ and the Indian<br />

government, which have been working together for the<br />

development of rural biogas [15].<br />

The biggest role would be played by the government<br />

however, which will have to pass laws that would make<br />

Biogas compulsory and eventually ban the use of<br />

traditional manure incineration. This will require strict<br />

policing of the new local laws. It is possible that the<br />

government’s Gas distribution company, the Sui<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

73


Southern or Northern Pipelines, could help spread<br />

awareness and educate villagers about the benefits of<br />

Biogas, as it is directly responsible for the distribution of<br />

natural gas.<br />

Consultants can also be hired in order to learn from<br />

expertise of the ones who have been successful at Biogas<br />

deployments. Working with non-profit organizations<br />

such as SNV, which has had immense success in Asia,<br />

will be necessary. The Indian Government, which has<br />

deployed community biogas plants on a large scale, and<br />

has had public-private partnership program in place since<br />

a couple of years, can also be asked for support [15].<br />

However a major hindrance to such a system would<br />

be the issue of availability of suitable land. Even though<br />

it might be leased from a private landholder, or provided<br />

by the government, it would definitely slow the process<br />

as land ownership can be a serious issue in the rural area.<br />

A short term disruption of availability of fertilizer in a<br />

community may also arise until slurry can be used. A<br />

long term disadvantage of such a system is that it can<br />

eventually lead to a higher market price of manure, which<br />

is widely used as fertilizer. Another problem in the long<br />

run could be animals that are acutely malnourished, as<br />

they might be fed to produce manure rather than quality<br />

meat and milk, however this might already be the case, as<br />

manure can be used as fertilizer or sold in the market.<br />

Of course such a system is for domestic use only,<br />

and Natural gas for transportation will require a different<br />

model than this, characterized by a distribution channel<br />

that connects the rural and urban areas of the country. On<br />

the other hand, gas for industry too will require a<br />

different model.<br />

5.2 Possible ethanol fuel Public-private partnership for<br />

use in transport<br />

The cost of producing ethanol fuel is still high,<br />

therefore the best way to produce it would be to take the<br />

path the government has been trying to attempt for a<br />

couple of years. Pakistan has a massive sugar refining<br />

industry that uses sugar cane to make refined sugar.<br />

Many of these are already making ethanol, and they are<br />

most likely to already have the existing scale, financial<br />

strength, and the cost base, to produce ethanol in large<br />

quantities, on their existing sugar mills [9]. The<br />

government would have to work with these Sugar Mill<br />

owners and give them incentives to start producing fuel<br />

grade ethanol from Sugar cane. One of the incentives that<br />

can be given to these Sugar Mill owners would be a fixed<br />

price of ethanol, independent of market price. On top of<br />

that, simply finding a steady buyer would be a great<br />

incentive as well, as it would help reduce overall risk and<br />

uncertainty. The role of foreign private and public sector<br />

would be to support in terms of expertise, technology<br />

transfers and of course, bringing in funds. The help of<br />

experts from Brazil and the US, which are by far leaders<br />

in terms of technology and prevalence of Bio-ethanol,<br />

will be necessary. Work has already begun on such a<br />

business model, however it is currently at the testing<br />

stage and only the government owned ‘Pakistan State<br />

Oil’ is allowed to sell it. It is currently being supplied in<br />

the south of the country.<br />

It must be remembered that this model needs to be<br />

further expanded to include all Major Oil Marketing<br />

Companies and perhaps also encourage mill owners to<br />

use multiple feed stocks, such as Maize or Sweet<br />

Sorghum as well, rather than just sugar cane, in order<br />

ease the supply pressures that will be put on sugar cane.<br />

74 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Therefore the most important part of the government<br />

would be to control the prices of Sugar Cane and Sugar<br />

Cane products, and therefore prices in the market, which<br />

would be highly open to exploitation by distributors to<br />

produce artificial shortages in such a condition. Hence<br />

apparent that the possible setbacks of this model is that if<br />

it is not implemented correctly with proper policing,<br />

sugar supplies can fall (genuinely and artificially) as<br />

resources are diverted to making ethanol, ultimately<br />

resulting in high prices (and rising imports) of Sugar (or<br />

any other crop). Ideally, a non food source should be<br />

used as feedstock; however that will require heavy<br />

investments of time and effort before a complete industry<br />

can be established, as such crops usually have little<br />

market value and therefore are short in supply to begin<br />

with.<br />

In the end, it must be remembered that the problems<br />

of an inattentive and negligent governance, corrupting<br />

and misappropriation of funds is something that is likely<br />

to continue in the current political and bureaucratic<br />

culture in Pakistan. It is a long term challenge and needs<br />

to be solved for any real progress, in any field. Already<br />

Pakistan’s current energy policy is not being<br />

implemented [5]. Also Pakistan dwells in a fragile<br />

political system that is both corrupt and uncertain.<br />

Usually, policies are not retained or sustained over longer<br />

periods and successive governments. Stakeholders such<br />

as the IMF, or Asian Development Bank, whose help<br />

would be needed in acquiring fund and expertise, could<br />

become tools of accountability. Also involvement of<br />

other stake holders such as universities, domestic and<br />

foreign private and public sector companies and nonprofit<br />

organization, could help keep accountability, and also<br />

make sure that policies transcend governments.<br />

6 CONSLUSION<br />

The energy crisis in Pakistan is deep and worsening.<br />

By 2030, energy supply and demand gap is expected to<br />

increase to over 140.9 MTOE i.e. 64% of the total supply<br />

[16]. Due to Pakistan’s large agriculture base, Biomass is<br />

one of the alternative energy solutions that can help ease<br />

this crisis. However it cannot be done by the private or<br />

public sectors alone, and would require help of all kinds<br />

from foreign governments, agencies (e.g. The <strong>World</strong><br />

Bank or USAID), technology companies, nonprofit<br />

organizations (such as SNV), universities and<br />

consultancies, in order acquire the expertise and the funds<br />

to make it all happen.<br />

It must be remembered though that there are serious<br />

long term issues that need to be overcome for any real<br />

progress. One such issues is that of water stress that<br />

Pakistan is under. Water could soon be scarce in<br />

Pakistan, which can have a significant negative impact on<br />

the economy in general and the agriculture sector,<br />

including crops and livestock, in particular (1; 28; 30).<br />

Overall, Pakistan’s culture of corruption and the<br />

inability to implement and sustain policies with changing<br />

governments is another major issue. can be overcome by<br />

involving as many stakeholders a possible, including<br />

international agencies, foreign and domestic private<br />

companies, therefore helping put pressure on successive<br />

governments to continue legislation and government<br />

initiatives.<br />

However, Bio Energy alone cannot solve Pakistan<br />

problems. With all the issues arising from Biomass, and


other sources of energy, it is imperative Pakistan utilizes<br />

its immense Hydro, Thermal and Wind power potentials<br />

as well. Each approach has its own advantages,<br />

disadvantages, according to the location, distribution,<br />

costs, maintenance and sustainability [5]. This will also<br />

help Pakistan diversify its energy mix, which relies<br />

heavily on oil, gas and electricity [24; 26]. One estimate<br />

of the potential electricity generation capability of<br />

Pakistan’s coastal areas from wind power is over 50,000<br />

MW [5]. The hydel power potential of the Indus River<br />

System itself is estimated to be around 54,000 MW<br />

while coal resources are estimated at 185 billion tons ( oil<br />

equivalent, this is higher than the reserves of Saudi<br />

Arabia and Iran, combined) [24]. Therefore it is<br />

imperative that Pakistan does not reply on a few sources<br />

of energy and rather have a very diverisified energy mix<br />

(in which <strong>Bioenergy</strong> can play a very important role).<br />

Even though the crisis Pakistan faces is severe, if the<br />

intenrational community works with the private and<br />

public sector organizations in Pakistan, in a ‘war like<br />

urgency’, not only can the problem be solved, but<br />

Pakistan will be able able to become an economy with a<br />

broad energy mix, with heavy reliance on bioenergy.<br />

Therefore becoming self sufficient to a very large extent,<br />

and in the process developing new business, technologies<br />

and generate continuous economic growth and prosperity.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

(1) Ali, T., <strong>2010</strong> Shortage of quality Livestock<br />

fodders. [Online]. Dawn.com. Available at:<br />

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn<br />

-content-library/dawn/in-papermagazine/economic-and-business/shortage-ofquality-livestock-fodder-150<br />

[Accessed on 28th<br />

May, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(2) Akhtar, P., 2009. Consumers to have renewable<br />

energy on subsidised rates. [Online]. Daily<br />

Times. Available at:<br />

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page<br />

=2009\04\21\story_21-4-2009_pg5_9<br />

[Accessed on 13th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(3) Arifeen, M., <strong>2010</strong>. Circular Debt stays un paid.<br />

[Online]. The Financial Daily. Availvlae at:<br />

http://thefinancialdaily.com/NewsDetail/92442.<br />

aspx [Accessed on 11th May <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(4) BETAPAK., <strong>2010</strong>. BioGas Plants, Equipments<br />

and Services. [Online]. Betapk.org. Available<br />

at: http://betapk.org/potential.html [Accessed<br />

on 15th May, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(5) Bhatti, M.W., <strong>2010</strong>. Renewable energy policy<br />

not being implemented. The News. Available<br />

at:<br />

http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=239<br />

573 [Accessed on 17 th May <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(6) Chaudary, S., 2008. Ethanol Manufacturers<br />

Demand Subsidies. [Online]. The Daily Times.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page<br />

=2008\02\17\story_17-2-2008_pg5_9<br />

[Accessed on 12th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(7) ESP., <strong>2010</strong>. Economic Survey of Pakistan<br />

[Online] . Ministry of Finance. Available at:<br />

http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_0910.html<br />

[Accessed at 3th of June, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(8) FAS., 2009. Pakistan Agriculture Economy and<br />

Policy. [Online]. Federation of American<br />

Scientists. Available at:<br />

http://www.fas.usda.gov/country/Pakistan/Paki<br />

stan%20Agriculture%20and%20Policy%20Rep<br />

ort.pdf [Accessed at 6th June <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(9) Haq., <strong>2010</strong>. Pakistan’s Twin energy shortages<br />

of Gas and Electricity. [Online]. Haq’s<br />

Musings. Available at:<br />

http://www.riazhaq.com/<strong>2010</strong>/01/pakistanstwin-energy-crises-of-gas-and.html.<br />

[Accessed<br />

on 19th May <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(10) IAE, 2008. <strong>World</strong> Energy Outlook: Energy and<br />

Development. [Online]. International Energy<br />

Agency. Available at:<br />

http://www.iea.org/weo/slide_library.pdf<br />

[Accessed on 13th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(11) Illyas. S.Z., 2006. A Case Study to Bottle the<br />

Biogas in cylinders as Source of Power for<br />

Rural Industries Development in Pakistan.<br />

<strong>World</strong> Applied Sciences Journal, 1(2), 127-130.<br />

(12) ILRI <strong>2010</strong>. Pakistan. [Online]. International<br />

Livestick Research Institute. Aavilable at<br />

http://www.ilri.org/infoserv/webpub/fulldocs/w<br />

ana/Pakistan.htm [Accessed on 22nd April,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(13) Iqbal, A., 2006. US investors to explore energy<br />

sector. [Online]. Dawn. Available at:<br />

http://www.dawn.com/2006/08/21/top10.htm<br />

[Accessed on 23rd March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

75


(14) Jize, Q., 2006. Pakistan mulls building trade,<br />

energy corridor for China. [Online].<br />

ChinaDaily. Avaliable at:<br />

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/200<br />

6-02/22/content_522558.htm [Accessed on<br />

23rd March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(15) Kahn, J., 2008. Waste not, want not. [Online].<br />

CNN Money. Available at:<br />

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/26/news/interna<br />

tional/kahn_biogas.fortune/index.htm?postversi<br />

on=2008022704 [Accessed on 13 th March<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(16)<br />

(17) Khan, A., Usman, M., and Usman, A., 2009.<br />

Energy Demand in Pakistan: A disaggregate<br />

Analsysis. [Online]. Pakistan Institute of<br />

Development Economics. Available at:<br />

http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/15056/1/MPRA_paper_15056.pd<br />

f [Accessed on 29th April, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(18) Khan, M. U. H., 2009. Gas load-shedding<br />

plan’s socio-economics. [Online]. Jang:<br />

Business and Finance Review. Available at:<br />

http://jang.com.pk/thenews/nov2009weekly/busrev-16-11-2009/p6.htm<br />

[Accessed<br />

on 9th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(19) MEDindia., 2007. Pakistan may face Water<br />

scarcity by <strong>2010</strong>. MedIndia. Available at:<br />

http://www.medindia.net/news/Pakistan-may-<br />

Face-Water-Scarcity-by-2012-30496-2.htm.<br />

[Accessed on 29th March, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(20) Ministry of Commerce., <strong>2010</strong>. Trade Statistics.<br />

[Online]. Commerce.gov.pk. Available at:<br />

http://www.commerce.gov.pk/trade_statistics.p<br />

hp [Accessed on 4th June, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(21) Mirza, B., 2006. CNG: On the footsteps of<br />

Technology. [Online]. United Nations<br />

University. Available at:<br />

http://www.ocw.unu.edu/maastricht-economicand-social-research-and-training-centre-oninnovation-and-technology/the-socialconstruction-of-technology-indevelopment/Bilal_Mizra_Paper_Bijker_2006.<br />

pdf [Accessed on 13th May, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(22) Mizra, U.K., Ahmad, N., and Majeed, T., 2008.<br />

An overview of Biomass energy utilization in<br />

Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy<br />

Reviews. 12(7). 1988-1996.<br />

(23) NACD., <strong>2010</strong>. Biomass. [Online]<br />

NACDNet.org. Available at:<br />

http://www.nacdnet.org/resources/guides/biom<br />

ass/pdfs/Chapter2.pdf [Accessed on 12th<br />

March, <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

76 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

(24) PDDC., 2006. The White Revolution: White<br />

paper on Pakistan’s Dairy Sector. Pakistan<br />

Dairy Development Company. Available at:<br />

http://www.pddc.com.pk/DairyPakistan-<br />

Publication.pdf. [Accessed on 25th April,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(25) Planning Commission, 2009. Energy Security.<br />

[Online]. Annual Plan. Available at:<br />

http://115.186.133.3/pcportal/annualplan2009-<br />

10.htm [Accessed on 13th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(26) RECIPES, 2006. Coutry Energy Information<br />

Pakistan. [Online]. Developing Renewables.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.energyrecipes.org/reports/genericD<br />

ata/Asia/061129%20RECIPES%20country%20<br />

info%20Pakistan.pdf [Accessed on 7th June,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(27) Reuters, 2008. Saudi agrees to defer Pakistan<br />

oil payments. [Online]. ArbianBusiness.com.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/524503-saudiagrees-to-defer-pakistan-oil-payments<br />

[Accessed on 12th March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(28) Sahir, M.H., and Qureshi, A.H., 2006. Specific<br />

concerns of Pakistan in the context of energy<br />

security issues and geopolitics of the region.<br />

Energy policy, 35(4), 2031-2037.<br />

(29) Sindhu, A.S., 2008 . Energy and Road<br />

Transport in Pakistan: Situation, Issues and<br />

Options. [Online]. South Asian Electronic<br />

Forum of Energy. Available at: http://www.saenergy.net/m/EnergyPakistan.doc<br />

[Accessed on<br />

15th May, <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(30) SNV, 2009. SNV Asia Regional Results and<br />

Strategies 2007-<strong>2010</strong>. [Online]. Sustainable<br />

Poverty Reduction. Avilable at:<br />

http://www.snvworld.org/en/regions/asia/Docu<br />

ments/SNV%20Asia%20Regional%20strategie<br />

s_and_%20results_final.pdf [Accessed on 18th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(31) Telegraph,, 2008. Pakistan accuses India of<br />

‘stealing’ water. [Order]. Telegraph.co.uk.<br />

Available at:<br />

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/as<br />

ia/pakistan/5052150/Pakistan-accuses-India-ofstealing-water.html<br />

[Accessed on 9th April,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(32) ThaiIndian., 2008. Saudi Arabia Defers 5.9 bn<br />

dollars payment for oil sales to Pakistan.<br />

[Online]. Thaindian News. Available at:<br />

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/southasia/saudi-arabia-defers-59-bn-dollarspayment-for-oil-sales-topakistan_10070748.html<br />

[Accessed on 10th<br />

May <strong>2010</strong>]<br />

(33) The Nation, 2009. 10pc annual increase in gas<br />

demand being witnessed. The Nation on Web.<br />

Available at:


http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-newsnewspaper-daily-english-online/Business/07-Mar-2009/10pc-annual-increase-in-gasdemand-being-witnessed<br />

[Accessed on 16th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(34) The Nation, <strong>2010</strong>a. Coal: a way out of energy<br />

crisis. [Online]. The Nation on Web. Available<br />

at: http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-newsnewspaper-daily-englishonline/Opinions/Columns/28-Jan-<strong>2010</strong>/Coal-away-out-of-energy-crisis<br />

[Accessed on 18th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(35) The Nation, <strong>2010</strong>b. SNGPL starts gas holiday<br />

for industrial sector in Punjab. [Online]. The<br />

Nation on Web. Available at:<br />

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-newsnewspaper-daily-english-online/Business/14-Apr-<strong>2010</strong>/SNGPL-starts-gas-holiday-forindustrial-sector-in-Punjab<br />

[Accessed on 18th<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(36) Victor, N.M., and Victor, D.G., 2002. Macro<br />

Patterns in the Use of Traditional Biomass<br />

fuels. [Online]. Stanford/TERI workshop on<br />

“Rural Energy Transitions”. Available at:<br />

http://iisdb.stanford.edu/pubs/20186/macro_patterns.pdf<br />

. [Accessed on 15th April <strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(37) Wilson, D., and Stupnytska, A., 2007. The N-<br />

11: More than an Acronym. [Online]. Global<br />

Economics Paper No: 153. Available at:<br />

http://www.chicagobooth.edu/alumni/clubs/pak<br />

istan/docs/next11dream-march%20%2707goldmansachs.pdf<br />

[Accessed on 2 nd March<br />

<strong>2010</strong>].<br />

(38) Yasin, A., <strong>2010</strong>. Exemption from gas holidays:<br />

CNG stations’ strike continues. [Online]. The<br />

Daily Times. Available at:<br />

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page<br />

=<strong>2010</strong>\01\01\story_1-1-<strong>2010</strong>_pg11_1.<br />

[Accessed on 13th March].<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

77


78 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

D BIOfuELs fOR TRaNspORT<br />

– BIOGas, BIOEThaNOL aND BIODIEsEL


BIOGAS UPGRADING BY TEMPERATURE SWING ADSORPTION<br />

Tamara Mayer, Michael Url, Hermann Hofbauer<br />

Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology<br />

Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria<br />

Phone: +43 1 58801 15901, Fax: +43 1 58801 15999, Mail: tamara.mayer@tuwien.ac.at<br />

ABSTRACT: This paper presents a novel process for biogas upgrading by means of temperature swing adsorption.<br />

Temperature swing adsorption process experiments were carried out in a laboratory test rig focusing on the process<br />

step of desorption. Desorption experiments were performed using three different variations of regeneration. Further<br />

on, performance and efficiency of the applied desorption variations were investigated. As a result, desorption by any<br />

combination of direct and indirect heating is considered as the best and most efficient way. Referring to the<br />

adsorption step, separation performance is excellent, carbon dioxide is fully adsorbed and pure methane can be<br />

obtained.<br />

Keywords: biogas, upgrading, adsorbents<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Natural gas had a share of 24% in the gross energy<br />

consumption of the EU-27 in the year 2007. Therefore<br />

Europe’s dependence on natural gas can be considered as<br />

quite high. Due to the fossil origin of natural gas, it has<br />

two drawbacks. First, it will for sure run out at some<br />

point in the future and second, emissions deriving from<br />

natural gas are not carbon neutral but they affect the<br />

climate involving the whole issue of green house gas<br />

emissions and global warming. For these two reasons<br />

alternatives for natural gas have to be found and biogas<br />

represents one option thereby.<br />

Biogas is a renewable energy source deriving from<br />

anaerobic digestion of organic matter. If biogas should<br />

replace natural gas, it has to possess a certain quality<br />

similar to natural gas. In order to achieve this quality and<br />

to obtain gas which is suitable for replacing natural gas,<br />

biogas must be upgraded.<br />

This paper investigates a novel process for biogas<br />

upgrading based on the principle of temperature swing<br />

adsorption (TSA).<br />

2 OVERVIEW OF BIOGAS UPGRADING<br />

TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Biogas typically consists of about two thirds methane<br />

balanced by about one third carbon dioxide and<br />

impurities such as hydrogen sulphide [1]. Moreover,<br />

biogas is usually saturated with water when leaving the<br />

anaerobic digestion plant. If biogas should be injected<br />

into the natural gas grid, it needs to exhibit a certain<br />

quality similar to natural gas which consists mainly of<br />

methane. Hence, gas components such as carbon dioxide<br />

and hydrogen sulphide have to be removed from biogas<br />

in order to obtain a high amount of methane.<br />

The entire process of biogas upgrading roughly<br />

comprises separation of water and hydrogen sulphide as<br />

well as methane enrichment.<br />

2.1 Overview<br />

Among currently available biogas upgrading<br />

technologies, water scrubbing and pressure swing<br />

adsorption are clearly the two most applied ones [2] and<br />

they can therefore be classified as state of the art for<br />

biogas upgrading. Other technologies like chemical or<br />

organic physical absorption processes along with<br />

membrane based techniques are in an advanced state of<br />

development or even under demonstration. Although<br />

there are established technologies, which are already well<br />

developed and going to be continuously improved and<br />

optimized, innovative technologies find their way. These<br />

emerging biogas upgrading technologies include for<br />

instance cryogenic upgrading or in situ methane<br />

enrichment.<br />

Comprehensive reviews of biogas upgrading<br />

technologies and further related information are given<br />

elsewhere (e.g. in [3] or [4]).<br />

2.2 Comparison of biogas upgrading technologies<br />

Biogas upgrading processes can be categorized into<br />

wet and dry processes depending on whether a liquid<br />

phase is required or not. Accordingly, all kinds of<br />

absorption processes are related to wet processes whereas<br />

dry processes involve adsorption processes and<br />

membrane processes like gas permeation. Wet biogas<br />

upgrading processes are characterized by the need of a<br />

liquid such as water or organic solvents in order to<br />

perform removal of carbon dioxide along with further<br />

undesired components. Disadvantages deriving from<br />

utilization of any kind of liquid are on the one hand the<br />

need of disposal and on the other hand possible treatment<br />

of the liquid before disposal. Moreover, wet processes<br />

require drying of the upgraded gas before it leaves the<br />

plant, what represents an additional process step<br />

compared to dry processes. However, pressure swing<br />

adsorption processes use activated carbon beds as guard<br />

filter for protection of the actual adsorbent which is a<br />

carbon molecular sieve. This process configuration<br />

causes the need of disposal of saturated activated carbon.<br />

Furthermore, biogas upgrading processes can be<br />

categorized according to the need of pressurization of<br />

raw gas. Correspondingly, the processes of pressure<br />

swing adsorption, water scrubbing, organic physical<br />

scrubbing as well as gas permeation require the raw gas<br />

to be compressed in order to perform the upgrading.<br />

On the contrary, chemical scrubbing with amines and<br />

the temperature swing adsorption process presented in<br />

this paper are so called pressure less processes. Further<br />

similarities of these two processes are utilization of<br />

amines as sorbent, low methane losses during the process<br />

and high methane content in the upgraded gas (98% or<br />

even above) because of excellent selectivity of the amine<br />

for carbon dioxide. However, there are differences<br />

concerning regeneration of saturated amines. Regarding<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

79


chemical scrubbing, amines are regenerated with steam,<br />

indicating the need of high temperatures and<br />

consequently high energy demand. Regeneration within<br />

the temperature swing adsorption process requires only<br />

low temperature heat.<br />

The presented temperature swing adsorption process<br />

shows some advantages compared to the other biogas<br />

upgrading processes mentioned above. Among them are,<br />

e.g. high methane content in the enriched biogas - typical<br />

values are 98% or even above, and very low methane<br />

losses during the whole process. Moreover, low energy<br />

demand represents another advantage since for ad- and<br />

desorption processes low temperature heat is used instead<br />

of electricity or process steam. The heat is mainly<br />

achieved from combined heat and power processes which<br />

are located at a biogas plant in most cases. Considering<br />

the point of compression of upgraded biogas, it would<br />

take place after carbon dioxide removal. Hence, the mass<br />

flow of the enriched gas is noticeable lower than that of<br />

raw biogas and consequently less compression power is<br />

needed.<br />

3 TEMPERATURE SWING ADSORPTION<br />

The process of temperature swing adsorption is based<br />

on the correlation of different equilibrium loads of the<br />

adsorbent to different temperatures. At low or ambient<br />

temperatures equilibrium load of the adsorbent is high<br />

and therefore the adsorbent is able to bind high quantities<br />

of gases. On the contrary, at elevated temperature levels<br />

equilibrium load decreases, the amount of gas possible to<br />

be bound by the adsorbent decreases too and this may<br />

lead to desorption of already adsorbed gases [5].<br />

Adsorption of gases on the adsorbent is performed at<br />

ambient temperatures whereas for desorption of already<br />

adsorbed gases higher temperatures are required.<br />

During the adsorption process, the temperature in the<br />

column rises due to the exothermic characteristic of the<br />

adsorption leading to lower gas uptake of the adsorbent<br />

due to lower equilibrium load at this elevated<br />

temperature. In order to prolong adsorption time and thus<br />

enlarge the amount of gas adsorbed, one possibility is to<br />

cool the adsorbent during the adsorption phase by an<br />

integrated cooling system. This system should keep<br />

temperature at a quite low level where equilibrium load is<br />

high.<br />

At the end of the adsorption process the adsorbent is<br />

saturated with gas components. Hence, it has to be<br />

regenerated by desorbing the bound gas components. In<br />

the case of temperature swing adsorption processes,<br />

desorption is performed at elevated temperature levels.<br />

Therefore, increasing the temperature is necessary<br />

because of the endothermic characteristic of desorption<br />

and in order to achieve higher temperature levels. This<br />

could be done either by direct heating, which means that<br />

a hot purge gas passes through the column and heats the<br />

adsorbent, or by indirect heating. In the latter case a<br />

heating system is built inside or outside the column and a<br />

heating medium such as hot water warms the adsorbent<br />

indirectly. As mentioned above, elevated temperature<br />

levels are correlated to low equilibrium load causing<br />

desorption of the adsorbed gas (see figure 1). After all the<br />

desorbed gas left the column, the column needs to be<br />

cooled down to ambient temperatures in order to assure<br />

optimal adsorption conditions for the next cycle.<br />

80 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

4 ADSORBENT<br />

In the present work the adsorbent Diaion WA21J<br />

provided by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation was used.<br />

This adsorbent consists of amine groups integrated into a<br />

polymeric matrix made of polystyrene (see Table I).<br />

Table I: Properties of Diaion WA21J [6]<br />

Matrix<br />

DVB-crosslinked<br />

copolymer of styrene<br />

Functional group Ternary amine<br />

Operating temperature 100°C max<br />

Particle size 300 – 1180 µm<br />

Apparent density approx. 643 g/l<br />

The weakly basic property due to the functional<br />

amine group enables the adsorbent to selectively and<br />

reversibly bind sour gases such as carbon dioxide or<br />

hydrogen sulphide.<br />

The adsorbents adsorption capacity for carbon<br />

dioxide was determined by means of thermo gravimetric<br />

analysis. Thermo gravimetric analysis measures changes<br />

in weight in a material under a controlled atmosphere as a<br />

function of temperature and time [7]. The analyzer,<br />

roughly outlined, consists of a high-precision balance<br />

connected to a dish filled with the sample which is, in<br />

this case, the adsorbent. The dish is placed in an oven and<br />

the atmosphere within the oven can be purged with<br />

different gases. Analysis is carried out by increasing the<br />

temperature and/or purging with gases leading to changes<br />

in weight of the sample. During the analysis, weight<br />

against temperature and time is measured.<br />

Adsorption isotherms of carbon dioxide on Diaion<br />

WA21J are shown in figure 1.<br />

Figure 1: Equilibrium adsorption isotherms of carbon<br />

dioxide on Diaion WA21J [8]<br />

The adsorbent exhibits high selectivity for carbon<br />

dioxide whereas its affinity for methane can be<br />

considered as negligible. Moreover, investigations have<br />

shown that the adsorption capacity is not reduced by<br />

simultaneous adsorption of water.<br />

5 LABORATORY TEST RIG<br />

TSA process experiments were carried out using a<br />

laboratory test rig shown in figure 2. First of all, the<br />

desired gas mixture is adjusted with the help of mass<br />

flow controllers, thereby the single gases are provided by<br />

pressurized gas bottles. Afterwards the gas mixture flows


into the adsorber (more information see table II), either<br />

straightly or indirectly making a detour through a gas<br />

heater. Within the adsorber, which is filled with the<br />

adsorbent Diaion WA21J, adsorption of the gas takes<br />

place. Not adsorbed gas leaves the adsorber and is<br />

analyzed with regard to its composition and concentration<br />

by an NDIR-analyzer (non-dispersive infrared).<br />

Inside the adsorber, a tube bundle is placed providing<br />

the possibility of water passing through. Water which is<br />

let through the tubes can either be cold or warm. In this<br />

way, the adsorbent is cooled or warmed indirectly. In<br />

case of cooling, adsorption time is prolonged due to<br />

Figure 2: Flow sheet of laboratory test rig<br />

6 EXPERIMENTAL<br />

TSA experiments focused on investigating the<br />

process step of desorption. In order to desorb a saturated<br />

adsorbent, it has to be heated up whereas for heating<br />

different ways are available. On the one hand, heating<br />

can be carried out directly, i.e. with preheated gas passing<br />

through the adsorber. On the other hand, heating can be<br />

done indirectly, i.e. by heat exchange with hot water. In<br />

the course of the experiments three ways of desorption<br />

were tested<br />

• desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

• desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

and afterwards purging (with N 2)<br />

• desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

and simultaneous direct heating with purge gas<br />

(N 2).<br />

All TSA process experiments followed a certain<br />

procedure. During the process step of adsorption a binary<br />

gas mixture containing methane and carbon dioxide was<br />

applied. Thereby, carbon dioxide and small amounts of<br />

methane were adsorbed while methane passed through<br />

and left the adsorber. Moreover, during the adsorption<br />

step cold water was applied in order to prolong<br />

adsorption time by dissipating heat deriving from the<br />

actual adsorption process. At the moment when carbon<br />

dioxide breakthrough occurred, application of the binary<br />

gas mixture was stopped and the process was switched<br />

from adsorption to desorption. During the process step of<br />

desorption the adsorbent was heated up in one of the<br />

ways mentioned above. The heating let to desorption of<br />

the adsorbed carbon dioxide and methane. Desorption<br />

was stopped when neither methane nor carbon dioxide<br />

were detected in the gas analyzer placed after the<br />

keeping the adsorbent at low temperatures by dissipating<br />

adsorption heat. Warm water is applied for the process<br />

step of desorption.<br />

Table II: Adsorber dimensions<br />

Height 1000 mm<br />

Inner diameter 41,4 mm<br />

Outer diameter 46 mm<br />

Material Borosilicate glass<br />

adsorber. After desorption, the adsorbent was cooled<br />

down to ambient temperatures with cold water and then a<br />

new cycle including adsorption, desorption and cooling<br />

was carried out. One entire TSA process experiment<br />

consisted of five cycles, each cycle including adsorption,<br />

desorption and cooling.<br />

In table III all test parameters are given.<br />

Table III: Test parameters<br />

Adsorption<br />

Gas mixture 65% CH 4, 35% CO 2<br />

Gas flow rate 2.2 Nl/min<br />

Water temperature approx. 10°C<br />

Desorption<br />

Water temperature 75°C<br />

Purge gas N 2<br />

Purge gas temperature 75°C<br />

Purge gas flow rate 25 Nl/min<br />

7 RESULTS<br />

Results obtained from the TSA process experiments<br />

carried out in the laboratory test rig are described in the<br />

subsections below.<br />

Figures depicted in these subsections show only the<br />

first cycle of each TSA process experiment. The<br />

temperature illustrated in these figures presents the<br />

temperature in the middle of the adsorber.<br />

7.1 Desorption by indirect heating with hot water<br />

Figure 3 shows the TSA process with desorption<br />

carried out by indirect heating with hot water.<br />

During the adsorption step the binary gas mixture fed<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

81


in the adsorber is separated, carbon dioxide is adsorbed<br />

entirely and pure methane is obtained. Adsorption lasts<br />

for about 950 sec and is ended when breakthrough of<br />

carbon dioxide occurs.<br />

Figure 3: TSA process with desorption by indirect<br />

heating with hot water<br />

Desorption is achieved by heating the adsorbent<br />

indirectly with hot water. Thereby, water is heated and is<br />

let through tube bundles placed inside the adsorber. As a<br />

consequence, heat exchange between the hot water and<br />

the cold adsorbent takes place and heats the adsorbent.<br />

During the desorption step methane is desorbed at<br />

first. Methane comes to the most part from the space<br />

between the adsorbent grains (porosity approx. 45%) as<br />

well as from the space under the adsorber, since<br />

adsorption capacity of the adsorbent with regard to<br />

methane is quite low. The peak of carbon dioxide<br />

desorption occurs after methane desorption, but after this<br />

peak the flow rate of carbon dioxide decreases steadily<br />

and in the end remains at a very low level. Desorption<br />

lasts about 2000 s what is twice as long as adsorption<br />

time.<br />

Referring to temperature, the temperature increase<br />

during the adsorption step indicates the arrival of the<br />

adsorption layer. Adsorption is an exothermic process, so<br />

heat is released and it heats the adsorbent. This<br />

phenomenon can be clearly seen with the steep rise of the<br />

temperature of 30°C. Although cold water is applied<br />

during the entire adsorption step, its coolness is not<br />

sufficient in order to carry off the released heat.<br />

Nevertheless, cold water application has an effect<br />

because after the peak the temperature decreases very fast<br />

and this allows adsorption to take place for a prolonged<br />

time period. Temperature during desorption increases<br />

steadily but it takes about 2000 s in order to get to a<br />

temperature of 70°C.<br />

Regarding the following cycles of this experiment,<br />

adsorption capacity in each of them decreased to one<br />

third of the capacity in the first cycle. The reason for this<br />

lies in the only partial desorption of carbon dioxide.<br />

Desorption by heating with hot water does not allow<br />

complete desorption of the entire adsorbed gas<br />

components; only partial desorption, correlated to the<br />

equilibrium and adsorption capacities at certain<br />

temperatures, is possible.<br />

Desorption by indirect heating with water is<br />

considered as a very inefficient way of desorption due to<br />

long desorption time as well as low desorption efficiency.<br />

7.2 Desorption by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

afterwards purging<br />

Figure 4 depicts the TSA process with desorption<br />

82 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

carried out by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

afterwards purging with nitrogen.<br />

This process is very similar to that described above<br />

with one difference occurring not until the end of the<br />

desorption step.<br />

During the adsorption step separation performance is<br />

excellent as well and also here adsorption lasts for about<br />

950 s. Within the first 2000 s of desorption, desorption is<br />

also carried out indirectly by application of hot water<br />

functioning as heat exchange medium. The characteristics<br />

of desorbed gases are similar too, with methane<br />

desorbing at first followed by carbon dioxide.<br />

Figure 4: TSA process with desorption by indirect<br />

heating with hot water and afterwards purging<br />

After 2000 s of indirect heating, no more desorption<br />

of methane or carbon dioxide takes place. As already<br />

explained above, complete desorption is not achievable<br />

by indirect heating and therefore purge gas (N 2) was<br />

applied, for about 200 s. Desorption with purge gas<br />

allows complete desorption due to changes in partial<br />

pressure and the correlated adsorption capacity at<br />

equilibrium. As a consequence, still adsorbed gas<br />

components should theoretically be desorbed. Figure 4<br />

shows clearly that application of purge gas leads to<br />

further desorption of gas components. Obviously, the<br />

desorbed gas consists for the most part of carbon dioxide<br />

but also contains small amounts of methane.<br />

Regarding temperature, during the desorption step of<br />

indirect heating with hot water, temperature increases<br />

steadily but during purging temperature decreases again,<br />

although the purge gas is preheated to 75°C. The reason<br />

for temperature decrease is the desorption process itself<br />

which is of endothermic nature. Desorption of this<br />

remarkable amount carbon dioxide and methane needs<br />

energy and this causes temperature decrease.<br />

Referring to the following cycles of this experiment,<br />

adsorption capacity in each of them decreased only by<br />

approximately 1 w% compared to the capacity in the first<br />

cycle.<br />

Desorption by indirect heating with water is<br />

considered as a rather inefficient. However, application<br />

of purge gas led to further desorption of methane and<br />

carbon dioxide, what causes extended adsorption<br />

capacities (compared to desorption only with hot water)<br />

in the following cycles and therefore improves the entire<br />

process efficiency.<br />

7.3 Desorption by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

simultaneous direct heating with purge gas<br />

Figure 5 illustrates the TSA process with desorption<br />

carried out by indirect heating with hot water and<br />

simultaneous direct heating with purge gas.


Once again, the binary gas mixture passing through<br />

the adsorber is separated during the adsorption step,<br />

carbon dioxide is adsorbed up to 100% and pure methane<br />

is obtained. Adsorption lasts for about 950 s and is ended<br />

when breakthrough of carbon dioxide occurs.<br />

Figure 5: TSA process with desorption by indirect<br />

heating with hot water and simultaneous direct heating<br />

with purge gas<br />

Desorption is carried out by heating the adsorbent<br />

indirectly with hot water and at the same time directly<br />

with preheated purge gas (N 2).<br />

During the desorption step methane and carbon<br />

dioxide are desorbed quite simultaneously. The<br />

concentrations depicted in figure 5 are rather low but this<br />

is due to the high purge gas flow rate of 25 Nl/min.<br />

Desorption lasts for about 1000 s what is in the same time<br />

range as adsorption time.<br />

Referring to temperature, during the desorption step<br />

temperature increases faster compared to desorption ways<br />

described above; it takes only about 1000 s instead of<br />

2000 s to reach a temperature of 70°C within the<br />

adsorber. The reason for this fast temperature increase is<br />

on the one hand the combined heating and on the other<br />

hand the high purge gas flow rate which enhances the<br />

heat transfer.<br />

The temperature profile shows one inflection point<br />

during the desorption step. The inflection point indicates<br />

the almost complete desorption of carbon dioxide. From<br />

that point on, supplied heat is used mainly for adsorbent<br />

heating, leading to a more steeply rise of the temperature<br />

profile.<br />

Regarding the entire experiment, adsorption capacity<br />

remained stable in each cycle.<br />

Desorption by indirect heating with hot water and at<br />

the same time direct heating with purge gas is a very<br />

effective way of desorption. This combined way of<br />

heating has two effects. First, temperature rises faster<br />

compared to only indirect heating, leading to a shorter<br />

time period of desorption. And second, desorption is very<br />

effective indicated by stable adsorption capacities in each<br />

cycle.<br />

8 CONCLUSION<br />

This paper presented a novel process for biogas<br />

upgrading by means of temperature swing adsorption<br />

(TSA). TSA process experiments were performed in a<br />

laboratory test rig. Results clearly show that biogas<br />

upgrading by TSA is feasible. Separation performance is<br />

excellent since during the adsorption step carbon dioxide<br />

is adsorbed to up to 100% and pure methane is obtained.<br />

Experiments also investigated different ways of<br />

desorption. Thereby, desorption by any combination of<br />

direct and indirect heating is considered to be the best<br />

and most efficient way of desorption, in terms of<br />

desorption time as well as of desorption efficiency. One<br />

drawback arises from purge gas application. Nitrogen as<br />

purge gas causes dilution of the desorbed gas, making the<br />

valuable desorbed gas complicated to handle for further<br />

utilization. In order to avoid dilution, alternative purge<br />

gases such as carbon dioxide or methane have to be<br />

evaluated.<br />

9 REFERENCES<br />

[1] P. Weiland, Biogas, Thieme Römpp Online (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

[2] M. Persson, O. Jönsson and A. Wellinger, Biogas<br />

Upgrading to Vehicle Fuel Standards and Grid Injection,<br />

IEA <strong>Bioenergy</strong> (2006)<br />

[3] W. Urban, K. Girod and H. Lohmann, Technologien<br />

und Kosten der Biogasaufbereitung und Einspeisung in<br />

das Erdgasnetz. Ergebnisse der Markterhebung 2007-<br />

2008, Fraunhofer UMSICHT (2009)<br />

[4] A. Petersson and A. Wellinger, Biogas upgrading<br />

technologies – developments and innovations, IEA<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> (2009)<br />

[5] W. Kast, Adsorption aus der Gasphase, VCH (1988)<br />

[6] Resindion, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Product<br />

Data Sheet and Material Safety Data Sheet (2004)<br />

[7] E. Buss, Gravimetric measurement of binary gas<br />

adsorption equilibria of methane-carbon dioxide mixtures<br />

on activated carbon, Gas Sep. Purif. Vol. 9 No. 3,<br />

Elsevier (1995)<br />

[8] H. Feichtner, Experimente und numerische<br />

Berechnungen zur Entwicklung eines Festbettverfahrens<br />

zur Abtrennung von Kohlendioxid aus Biogas durch<br />

Adsorption an einem polymeren Adsorbens, PhD Thesis,<br />

Vienna University of Technology (2007)<br />

10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial<br />

support of Klima- und Energiefonds.<br />

Dieses Projekt wurde aus Mitteln des Klima- und<br />

Energiefonds gefördert und im Rahmen des Programmes<br />

“ENERGIE DER ZUKUNFT“ durchgeführt.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

83


84 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

E pELLETs –<br />

ThE NEW LaRGE ENERGY COMMODITY


EMISSIONS CHARACTERISTICS OF A RESIDENTIAL PELLET BOILER AND A STOVE<br />

Kaung Myat Win, Tomas Persson<br />

Solar Energy Research Center, Dalarna University, 781 88 Borlänge, Sweden<br />

Tel: +46 23 778704, Fax: +46 23 778701, Email: kmw@du.se<br />

ABSTRACT: Gaseous and particulate emissions from a residential pellet boiler and a stove are measured at a realistic 6day<br />

operation sequence and during steady state operation. The aim is to characterize the emissions during each phase in<br />

order to identify when the major part of the emissions occur to enable actions for emission reduction where the savings<br />

can be highest. The characterized emissions comprised carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), total organic carbon<br />

(TOC) and particulate matter (PM 2.5). In this study, emissions were characterised by mass concentration and emissions<br />

during start-up and stop phases were also presented in accumulated mass. The influence of start-up and stop phases on<br />

the emissions, average emission factors for the boiler and stove were analysed using the measured data from a six-days<br />

test. The share of start-up and stop emissions are significant for CO and TOC contributing 95% and 89% respectively at<br />

the 20kW boiler and 82% and 879% respectively at the 12 kW stove. NO and particles emissions are shown to dominate<br />

during stationary operation.<br />

Keywords: emissions, pellet boiler, stove, combustion, start-up, stop.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Emission characteristics at each phase of pellet boiler<br />

operations are important aspect to reduce the annual<br />

emissions from residential pellet combustion.<br />

Characterisation of the emissions during different<br />

operation strategies makes it possible to identify the<br />

phase when the major part of the emissions occur and<br />

helps to take actions for emission reduction that can<br />

achieve highest possible savings. A residential pellet<br />

boiler may start and stop several thousand times [5] and a<br />

considerable part of uncombusted are emitted during start<br />

and stop periods [1, 2, 3]. Fiedler and Persson [2] and<br />

Persson [4, 5] showed that the dominating part of the COemissions<br />

in most pellet boilers were emitted during<br />

start-up and stop phases of the burner. Several simulation<br />

studies shows the possibility to substantially reduce the<br />

annual CO-emissions by changing from ON/OFF control<br />

to modulating operation, which results in fewer start-up<br />

and longer operation periods with lower combustion<br />

power [4, 5]. Good and Nussbaumer [3] have recently<br />

reported gaseous and particles emission factors for two<br />

pellet boilers.<br />

2 MEASUREMENTS<br />

A 20 kW wood pellet boiler and a 10 kW pellet stove<br />

(extended room heater) were measured during steady<br />

state operations and a six-days test. The six-days test was<br />

developed for measuring of solar heating systems during<br />

six days that should give results representative for annual<br />

operation [5]. The steady state operations were measured<br />

applying a constant heating load to avoid combustion<br />

power modulation. In order to take the average, the<br />

steady state measurement was repeated 3 times. In the<br />

realistic six day test, the combustion devices were<br />

connected to emulated domestic hot water and space<br />

heating load and run according to a measurement<br />

sequence developed by Bales [1] for comparable<br />

measurements of solar-combi systems, which are<br />

designed to give representative conditions of a full year<br />

operation. The stove was connected to a storage tank with<br />

a volume of 750 litres and an emulated 9 m 2 flat plate<br />

solar collector.<br />

The time of start-up and stop phases were chosen<br />

according to the related emissions and combustion<br />

power. Start-up phases commences after the ignition and<br />

lasts until the emission concentrations and combustion<br />

power have reached to the same level as a stationary<br />

operation. Similarly, stop phase begins with a abrupt rises<br />

of emissions followed by a slow decrease and continues<br />

until the emissions are completed. In case of an<br />

uncomplete stop phase followed by a start-up, the stop<br />

phase is only taken to the beginning of the following<br />

start-up.<br />

2.1 Measurement set up<br />

Figure 1: Schematic of the measurement set up<br />

The measurement set up was shown in figure 1. A set<br />

of multi-port averaging pitot-tubes calibrated in<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

85


combination with pressure transducers specifically to the<br />

installed chimney is used to measure the transient flue<br />

gas flow in the chimney during start-up and stop phases.<br />

The whole set of the boiler/stove was installed on a scale<br />

and the fuel consumption was continuously monitored.<br />

However, the fuel consumption during the start-up and<br />

stop period was too small relative to the scale’s<br />

measurement resolution. Therefore, the fuel consumption<br />

during start-up and stop phases are calculated using<br />

measured flue gas flow with the combustion calculation<br />

according to Wester [6].<br />

The sample flue gas is extracted from the chimney<br />

and transported via a heated tube (180°C). Carbon<br />

dioxide (CO 2), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxide<br />

(NO) are measured with an non- dispersive infra-red gas<br />

analyser, oxygen (O 2) with a paramagnetic gas analyser<br />

and total organic carbon (TOC) with a flame ionisation<br />

detector (FID). The emissions of TOC are presented in<br />

propane equivalent. The particle emissions are sampled<br />

in the dilution channel (Figure 1) with an electrical low<br />

pressure impactor (ELPI). Particulate matters are<br />

measured in number concentration and size distribution<br />

in the range of 7 nm to 10 µm and are characterized for<br />

PM 2.5.<br />

2.2 Combustion devices<br />

Both boiler and stove are modern pellet heating<br />

devices with electrical ignition and automatic pellet<br />

feeding from above. The 20 kW boiler has an integrated<br />

hot water preparation unit with water volume of 150<br />

liters. The maximum combustion power was set to 80%<br />

of the nominal power and combustion air supply and. The<br />

boiler has a cleaning routine during a stop phase in which<br />

the glowing pellet are blown with compressed air into the<br />

ash box and the stove has 1.5 cleaning routine at every<br />

1.5 hours of operation.<br />

2.3 Pellet<br />

Only a brand of soft wood pellet were used.<br />

However, two batch or order were made through all the<br />

measurements. The composition of the pellet fuel used in<br />

the measurements are listed in table I.<br />

Table I: Fuel composition of the pellet<br />

86 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

Element Unit Start-up Stop<br />

Carbon wt% dry 51.20 50.74<br />

Hydrogen wt% dry 42.00 42.52<br />

Oxygen wt% dry 6.30 6.23<br />

Nitrogen wt% dry 0.20 0.10<br />

Ash wt% dry 0.30 0.41<br />

Moisture wt% dry 8.20 6.80<br />

Lower heating<br />

value<br />

3 RESULTS<br />

MJ/kg 19.14 18.99<br />

The accumulated emissions measured during start-up<br />

and stop phase of the boiler and stove are presented in<br />

table II. The duration of the start-up phase and stop phase<br />

of the boiler are 5 minutes and 24 minutes. Comparing<br />

with the boiler, the stove has higher accumulated<br />

emissions during start-up with 12 minutes duration and<br />

lower emissions during stop phase with 25 minutes.<br />

Cleaning with compressed air during stop phases of the<br />

boiler caused glowing in the ash box resulting higher<br />

emissions for stop phase.<br />

Table II: Accumulated emissions of start-up and stop<br />

phase of 20 kW boiler and 12 kW stove<br />

Boiler* Stove<br />

Start-up Stop Start-up Stop<br />

CO (g) 0.72 8.99 1.05 6.78<br />

NO (g) 0.10 0.04 0.35 0.03<br />

TOC (g) 0.15 0.43 0.12 0.01<br />

PM 2.5 (g) 0.23 0.41 0.35 0.17<br />

Energy (MJ) 2.12 1.22 6.81 1.02<br />

* Win,. et al.[7]<br />

Emission concentrations during start-up, steady state and<br />

stop phases are compared in figure 2. Steady state<br />

emissions characterised per MJ combusted fuel are in<br />

general lower than start-up and stop emissions. CO<br />

emissions during steady state operation of the stove is<br />

higher than from the boiler due to the cleaning routine at<br />

every 1.5 hours occurred during long steady state periods.<br />

Figure 2: Average emission concentrations during startup,<br />

stationary periods and during stop periods<br />

Steady state emissions are lower than from start-up<br />

and stop periods, significantly in CO and TOC. Cleaning<br />

with compressed air during stop phases of the boiler<br />

caused the accumulation of uncombusted pellet in the ash<br />

box leading to glowing in the ash box resulting in higher<br />

stop emissions. The 1.5 hourly cleaning routine of the<br />

stove was taken into the steady state. Both the boiler and<br />

the stove has near zero TOC emissions during steady state.


Figure 3: Accumulated emissions from the boiler during<br />

first 12 hours operation in the realistic sequence.<br />

Figure 4: Accumulated emissions from the stove during<br />

first 12 hours operation in the realistic sequence.<br />

Accumulated total emissions during the six-days test<br />

are plotted together with CO emission to show operating<br />

cycles in figure 3 for the boiler and in figure 4 for the<br />

stove. The boiler had higher number of start-up and stop<br />

within the same time interval due to its higher nominal<br />

power and smaller heat storage. Sudden rises of CO and<br />

TOC emissions are shown during start-up and stop.<br />

The NO emissions emitted during the stop period was<br />

small in relation to the accumulated NO emission.<br />

Particles during start and stop periods are not as<br />

dominating as for CO and TOC although emissions peaks<br />

occur. The contribution of start-up and stop phases to<br />

total accumulated emissions are shown in figure 5. The<br />

start-up and stop phases contribute 39% of the total PM<br />

emission for the boiler and 23% of PM for the stove. The<br />

amount of start-up and stop emissions are dominating for<br />

CO and TOC emissions contributing by 95% and 89%<br />

respectively at the 20kW boiler and 82% and 89 %<br />

respectively at the 12 kW stove.<br />

Figure 5: Accumulated start-up and stop emissions<br />

during six days test<br />

Figure 6: Emission concentrations for whole six days<br />

test<br />

The calculated total emissions related to fuel<br />

consumption for the whole six days period are presented<br />

in figure 6 divided between emissions during start-up and<br />

stop periods and stationary operation. The 20 kW boiler<br />

has higher emissions contributed partly by the higher<br />

number of start-up and stop. Since the six-days should<br />

give representative condition of a full year operation of a<br />

domestic heating system, the average emissions<br />

concentration from the tests should give representative<br />

annual emissions factors for the heating devices. The<br />

average annual emissions factors for the boiler are CO<br />

(491 mg/MJ), NO (55 mg/MJ), TOC (54 mg/MJ) and<br />

PM2.5 (93 mg/MJ) and for the stove CO (159 mg/MJ),<br />

NO (54 mg/MJ), TOC (2 mg/MJ) and PM2.5 (39<br />

mg/MJ).<br />

4 CONCLUSIONS<br />

Substantial parts of CO and TOC emissions are<br />

contributed from start-up and stop while NO and particles<br />

dominate during stationary operation. Higher operating<br />

combustion power of the heating device in a domestic<br />

heating system can results higher number of start-up and<br />

stop and consequently higher annual emissions.<br />

5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

87


This work was performed within the project SWX-Energi<br />

financed by the European Union, Region Dalarna Region<br />

Gävleborg and Högskolan Dalarna.<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

1. Bales, C., Combitest - A New Test Method for<br />

Thermal Stores Used in Solar Combisystems, in<br />

Department of Building Technology. 2004,<br />

Chalmers University of Technology: Göteborg,<br />

Sweden.<br />

2. Fiedler, F. and T. Persson, Carbon monoxide<br />

emissions of combined pellet and solar heating<br />

systems. Applied Energy, 2009. 86(2): p. 135-<br />

143.<br />

3. Good, J. and T. Nussbaumer, Emissionsfaktoren<br />

moderner pelletkessel unter typischen<br />

heizbedingungen. 2009, Hochschule Luzern –<br />

Technik & Architektur: Bern, Switzerland.<br />

4. Persson, T., Solar and Pellet Heating Systems :<br />

Reduced Electricity Usage in Single-family<br />

Houses ed. V.V.D. Müller. 2009, Saarbrücken,<br />

Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. 153.<br />

5. Persson, T., F. Fiedler, M. Rönnelid, and C. Bales.<br />

Increasing efficiency and decreasing COemissions<br />

for a combined solar and wood pellet<br />

heating system for single-family houses. in<br />

Pellets 2006 Conference.30 May - 1 June.<br />

2006. Jönköping, Sweden.<br />

6. Wester, L., Förbrännings- och rökgasreningsteknik,<br />

in Compedium to the course: "Förbrännings<br />

och rökgasreningsteknik". 2009, Mälardalens<br />

Högskola: Västerås, Sweden.<br />

7. Win, K.M., Paavilainen, Janne, Persson, T. Emissions<br />

Characterisation of residential pellet boilers<br />

during start-up and stop periods in 3 rd<br />

International Scientific Conference on “Energy<br />

systems with IT".16-17 March. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Stockholm, Sweden.<br />

88 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong>


NEW INSIGHTS IN THE ASH MELTING BEHAVIOUR AND IMPROVEMENT OF BIOMASS ENERGY<br />

PELLETS USING FLOUR BOND<br />

J. van Soest, J. Renirie, S. Moelchand, M. Schouten, A. van der Meijden, J. Plijter<br />

Meneba B.V., www.meneba.com<br />

Brielselaan 115, 3081 AB Rotterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

Tel. +31 104238130, Fax. +31 104238299, J.vanSoest@meneba.com<br />

ABSTRACT: New insight was obtained in the effect of ash composition on the ash melting behavior. It was shown that<br />

there is a good correlation between the amount of calcium (Ca), silicon (Si) and potassium (K) contents of the ash and the<br />

ash melting temperature (Tmelt) of bio-energy products like wood, agro- and sludge pellets (n=164). Using PCA and<br />

linear regression analyses led to a good prediction of the Tmelt by using an easy to use formula:<br />

Ln [Tmelt] = 7,24 -0,33*Si-0,70*K+1,28*K*Ca (variance accounted for is 72%)<br />

The new formula gives much better predictions of ash Tmelt of wood pellets and other solid bio-energy or biofuel<br />

products than previous fits. As expected Ca plays an important positive role. K and Si sink the Tmelt. Other metals play a<br />

less dominant role, such as iron (Fe), aluminium (Al) and magnesium (Mg). The new insight was put into practice by<br />

showing that by adding FlourBond®, a pressing aid high in Ca, the Tmelt of wood pellet ash can be increased. It is<br />

envisaged that an elevated ash Tmelt reduces the risk of slagging of solid biofuels.<br />

Keywords: pellets, ash, biomass production, biomass characteristics, sintering<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Wood pellet combustion is nowadays known as a<br />

reliable and comfortable heating system. However,<br />

the pellets have to be of high quality to ensure stable<br />

and long-­‐term usage of the heaters. The pellets have<br />

to be made according to strict quality criteria as put<br />

down in the Önorm or DIN+ or ENplus [1]. It is<br />

important to control the pellet properties such as<br />

water content, hardness, abrasion, fines, ash content<br />

and heating value. In particular ash melting behaviour<br />

can create problems in ovens such as corrosion,<br />

erosion and slagging [2-­‐7].<br />

Some of the pellet properties can be improved by<br />

using pressing aids, such as starch or rye meal. Pure<br />

starches can be very expensive and rye meal, corn<br />

grits or lower quality starches can result in high ash<br />

content and melting temperature and severe slagging<br />

beside resulting in worse processing and pellet<br />

abrasion properties. Therefore, development of a, for<br />

the pellet market dedicated, cheap multifunctional<br />

pressing aid has become of great importance.<br />

New insight has been obtained in the behavior of<br />

pressing aids in the production of wood pellets. On the<br />

basis of this a novel multifunctional pressing aid was<br />

developed with a high calcium content (FlourBond®)[8].<br />

It was shown that free flowing properties were improved<br />

making the product easier to use in the pellet factory and<br />

control dosage level. The output of the pellet presses<br />

could be enhanced resulting in lower energy usage. The<br />

pellet properties were improved at lower contents than<br />

with currently used pressing aids such as most starches.<br />

The pressing aid is readily available and an excellent<br />

performing alternative for expensive starches.<br />

In this detailed study, the properties of ash from<br />

pellets produced in industrial conditions with various<br />

pressing aids were investigated. The study includes the<br />

effect of the new pressing aid with high calcium content<br />

on pellet ash properties. A broad range of pellets (n=35)<br />

were made on different industrial presses based on<br />

various wood resources (containing both soft and hard<br />

woods, see figure 1). The ash melting behavior and<br />

composition were studied and compared with data from<br />

literature on the ash composition and melting behavior of<br />

various pellets and other bio-energy products [9-20]. The<br />

total data set consisted of 164 products.<br />

Figure 1: Various pellets<br />

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Various wood pellets (n=35) were made based on<br />

miscellaneous wood resources (soft, hard and mixed<br />

woods as well as fresh and waste woods). Pellets were<br />

made using various presses and pressing aids, including<br />

FlourBond. Ash (composition and melting behavior) was<br />

characterized according to the following DIN standards:<br />

v Water content DIN CEN/TS 14774-3: 2004-11<br />

v Ash content DIN CEN/TS 14775: 2004-11<br />

v Ash composition DIN 51729 part 1 & 11 (as Oxide)<br />

v Ash melting DIN CEN/TS 15370-1<br />

Other ash melting data were taken from literature [9-<br />

19]. A large data set was obtained of in total 164<br />

products. Beside wood pellets, the data set contains<br />

products consisting of woods, grasses, hay, straw, cereal<br />

based products, whole crop products, sludge, municipal<br />

and food processing waste products, and waste streams<br />

from chemical industry such as paper and textile.<br />

From the raw data the metal compositions were<br />

calculated expressed as % of the total ash and as mg/kg<br />

of the bio-energy products or wood pellet. The sintering<br />

(SST), softening (DT), hemispheric (HAT) and flowing<br />

(FT) temperatures were used to characterize the ash<br />

melting behavior.<br />

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

89


It is seen that the total data set, existing of 164<br />

products, have a broad range of differences in ash content<br />

and composition. The lowest ash values are found for soft<br />

wood consumer pellets (0,20-0,64%). Hard, mixed and<br />

waste wood pellets have ash contents between 0,8-2,5%.<br />

Miscellaneous non-pellets woods (such as chips, logs,<br />

saw dust, flour, bark) have been studied with ash contents<br />

in the range of 0,23-5,9%. Non-wood plant based<br />

products were studied with ash contents varying between<br />

0,8-14,7%. Waste stream or sludge products had ash<br />

contents of 3,5-46%. The main elements of wood based<br />

products are calcium, silicon, potassium and magnesium.<br />

Calcium contents range from 386 mg/kg for a soft wood<br />

pellet to 12990 mg/kg for a product consisting of mixed<br />

bark. The waste stream and sludge products are much<br />

more divers in composition then the wood or plant based<br />

products, having also significant differences in Al, Fe, Na<br />

and P contents. Typically sewage sludge products have<br />

high iron contents in the range of 10-20 g/kg.<br />

The sintering melting temperatures (SST) are found<br />

in the range of 578°C for rye straw to 1585°C for kenaf.<br />

One has to take into account, while interpreting the<br />

results, that the determination of ash melting<br />

temperatures can have a standard deviation of up to 50°C.<br />

As expected, the melting T of ash of soft wood consumer<br />

pellets are higher than of the less clean industry pellets.<br />

Typically low melting ash is obtained from grasses and<br />

cereal based products (non wood based plants).<br />

Figure 2: %Ca of total ash versus ash melting<br />

temperature of all products. Logarithmic fit is shown<br />

without ash consisting of mixed ash from waste and<br />

sewage sludge ash [10].<br />

In figure 2 the ash melting T is shown as a function<br />

of %Ca of the total ash for the complete data set. It is<br />

known from literature that calcium plays an important<br />

role in the ash melting behavior. Authors [9,11,18,19]<br />

describe the increase of ash melting T by increasing the<br />

Ca content of incineration ash. However, it is clear that<br />

calcium content itself is not enough to predict ash melting<br />

temperatures of the products. In particular waste, sludge<br />

and non-wood plant based products show less correlation<br />

between T and %Ca of the ash.<br />

The ash melting temperature is correlated to all of<br />

wt% per element in the incineration ash (Ca, Mg, Fe, Si,<br />

Al, P, Na) for the complete data set studied (n=164).<br />

Clearly seen is that calcium is the most important element<br />

for affecting ash melting leading to an increase in ash<br />

melting T. Silicon and potassium are the 2nd and 3rd<br />

most important elements affecting ash melting by<br />

lowering the melting T. Fe and Al seem to have a limited<br />

effect while, within the data set studied. Na, P and Mg<br />

90 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

show hardly any significant effect. The results were<br />

confirmed with principle component analyses (PCA).<br />

Remarkable is that magnesium shows on average for this<br />

data set almost no negative influence on ash melting. In<br />

literature some authors have stressed the importance of<br />

magnesium in lowering ash melting T but others also<br />

have seen increased melting T. Of course, one has to take<br />

into account that probably also the interactions between<br />

the various elements play an important role. Mixed<br />

oxides will all have their different melting characteristics<br />

depending also on thermal-physical history of the ash.<br />

It is very likely that the total composition of the ash is<br />

of great importance for the ash melting behavior.<br />

Therefore, it is thought that the ratios of various elements<br />

are important. In figure 3 the most important example is<br />

given of ash melting T as function of a typical ratio of<br />

elements (Ca/[K+Si]).<br />

Figure 3: Ratio combined elements (mg/kg product)<br />

versus ash melting T of all products.<br />

It is seen that again, as expected, in particular<br />

calcium is having a positive influence on the effect of<br />

Mg, Si en K on the ash melting. The Ln-fit of the ratios<br />

Ca/K, Ca/Si en Ca/Mg show a reasonable correlation.<br />

The effect of calcium on sodium is less dominant. It is<br />

thought that calcium containing silicates have higher<br />

melting points than mixed Mg-K-Na silicates. The<br />

presence of Fe en Al probably gives a slight increase in<br />

the melting of mixed silicates compared to silicates,<br />

which have high Na and K content. Mg and P show no<br />

correlation with Si. Therefore, it is seen that the Ln of the<br />

ratio of the most dominant elements Ca/(K+Si) gives a<br />

good correlation with a R 2 of 0,65. The correlation with<br />

ratios without Si, K or Ca are worse or even bad. A slight<br />

improvement is found for ratios were Al or Fe are<br />

included as a positive effect and Na as a negative effect<br />

on the Tmelt. However, the improvements are small.<br />

Including Mg gives no significant improvement in the fit<br />

compared to the ratio Ca/(K+Si). The prediction using<br />

the Ln fit of the ratio Ca/(K+Si) is already good as well.<br />

Research was extended by using statistics (linear<br />

regression analyses) to gain more insight in the<br />

interactions between the elements. The main results are<br />

shown in figure 4 and 5.


Figure 4: Statistical analyses (linear regression) results.<br />

One could say that Ca, K, Si are indeed the most<br />

important elements (of the studied elements in this data<br />

set) for determining the ash melting T. Apparently, Mg<br />

plays less a role. In particular, the prediction of the ash<br />

melting T of the wood pellets is very good. Most outliers<br />

are from some non-wood plant based products such as<br />

kenaf and hemp or waste products.<br />

Figure 5: 3-D graphical representation of the model Ln<br />

Tmelt = 7,24 -0,33*Si-0,70*K+1,28*K*Ca. high T =<br />

right below (high Ca), low T = top left (high K).<br />

An extensive comparison of various literature fits<br />

(see figure 6 - more details of this study can be found in<br />

reference [20]), has been made, that have been taken<br />

from literature references [9,10,19]. It is obvious that the<br />

fits are reasonable for the limited data set used in the<br />

papers [9,10,19]. However, the fits do not give useful<br />

predictions for our more broad and larger data set. But<br />

they do not give a good, more universal applicable,<br />

prediction of the ash melting temperature. Some formulas<br />

make use of polynomial fits. This leads to large<br />

deviations of the predictions for products with large<br />

differences in ash compositions. The data set in the fit<br />

used to design the formulas was probably too small.<br />

Some formulas are already better but still there are large<br />

deviations and multiple outliers. According to most<br />

formula calcium and potassium are important as in<br />

agreement with our findings. The role of magnesium is<br />

also taken into some fits, while our findings show that<br />

magnesium plays not a dominant role. More important is<br />

the situation if silicon is left out of the equation. One<br />

formula takes into account silicon and calcium, but they<br />

do not take into account the effect of potassium. This is<br />

probably due to the fact that K is not a very dominant<br />

component in the incineration ash the authors studied.<br />

However, in lignocellulosics, such as wood pellets and<br />

plant based bio-energy products, this can be an important<br />

component of the ash. Probably a linear fit is also not the<br />

best option looking at the physical phenomenon it needs<br />

to describe.<br />

Figure 6: Comparison of formulas from literature and the<br />

new formula based on the Ca/(K+Si) ratio. Top: formula<br />

based on synthetic ash. Middle: fit based on<br />

lignocellulosics. Bottom: formulas based on waste-sludge<br />

ash.<br />

Figure 7: Influence addition FlourBond on pellet<br />

processing and properties.<br />

Pressing aids are used to obtain improved pellet<br />

processing and quality. A pressing aid can have effect on<br />

the ash melting. The effect of FlourBond , a pressing aid<br />

high in Ca, on soft wood pellets was studied, starting by<br />

comparing two properties, i.e. abrasion (%fines) and<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

91


amperage of the pellet press. Experiments (see figure 7)<br />

using 1% FlourBond in comparison with pellets made<br />

without additive, 1% corn starch or FlourBond-IP (a new<br />

product), were performed by Holzforschung Wien at<br />

controlled conditions and show the positive effects of<br />

FlourBond on pellet processing and quality.<br />

The effect of FlourBond on the ash Tmelt of<br />

consumer softwood based pellets and mixed waste wood<br />

pellets is shown in figure 8. The Ca/K ratio was taken<br />

because the Si level was constant for the pellets because<br />

the two type of woods used originated from the same<br />

resources and were processed during one production run.<br />

The amount of FlourBond was between 0-5% and 0-3%,<br />

respectively for the soft wood and mixed waste wood<br />

pellets. FlourBond has a high level of calcium compared<br />

to other pressing aids. It is shown that by adding<br />

FlourBond the Tmelt is clearly increased.<br />

Figure 8: Influence addition FlourBond on ash melting<br />

temperature.<br />

4 CONCLUSIONS<br />

The Ca/(Si+K) ratio can be used to give a good<br />

prediction of the ash melting temperatures of all kind of<br />

bio-energy products such as wood pellets. Using PCA<br />

and linear regression analyses led to an even better<br />

prediction of the Tmelt by using an easy to use formula:<br />

Ln [Tmelt] = 7,24 -0,33*Si-0,70*K+1,28*K*Ca<br />

(variance accounted for is 72%). By using FlourBond as<br />

the pressing aid, the ash melting temperature can be<br />

increased due to an increase of the Ca/(Si+K) ratio. It is<br />

envisaged that as a result the change or risk of slagging<br />

can be diminished for pellets made with more difficult<br />

woods or other biomass resources.<br />

5 REFERENCES<br />

92 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

1. Englisch, European standards, quality and<br />

certification systems in Europe, 8. Pellets Industry<br />

Forum, 2008, Conference Book, pp 102<br />

2. Arvelakis et al., Biomass and <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 20 (2001)<br />

pp. 459<br />

3. Friedl, Wopienka, Haslinger, Schlackebildung in<br />

Pelletsfeuerungen, Beitrag zum Stuttgart 7.<br />

InterPellets, 9.-10. Oktober 2007<br />

4. Paulrud, Upgraded Biofuels - Effects of Quality on<br />

Processing, Handling Characteristics, Combustion<br />

and Ash melting, Unit of Biomass Technology and<br />

Chemistry, Umeå, Doctoral thesis, Swedish Univ.<br />

Agric. Sci.<br />

5. Ottmann, Verbrennung biogener Brennstoffe in<br />

stationären Wirbelschichtfeuerungen, Vollständiger<br />

Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum<br />

Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und<br />

Umwelt der Technischen Universität München<br />

Dissertation. Technischen Universität München<br />

2007<br />

6. NEBrA – Nachhaltige Energieversorgung durch<br />

Biomasse aus regionalem Anbau, Vortrag<br />

Bloischdorf, 31.8.2007 H-B Rombrecht<br />

7. Thy et al., Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel<br />

Chem. 2004, 49 (1), 89<br />

8. Meneba, Flour Bond erhốht ergiebigkeit von<br />

Holzpellets, Pellets Markt und Trends 2008, nr. 5<br />

9. Hartmann et al., 2000, Naturbelassene biogene<br />

Festbrennstoff, Bayerisches Landesanstalt f.<br />

Landtechnik (Germany)<br />

10. Kim et al., 2000, www.cheric.org<br />

11. Launhardt, 2002, Thesis Umweltrelevante Einflüsse<br />

bei der thermischen Nutzung fester Biomasse in<br />

Kleinanlagen Schadstoffemissionen, Aschequalität<br />

und Wirkungsgrad, Dept für Biogene Rohstoffe und<br />

Technologie der Landnutzung, Lehrstuhl für<br />

Landtechnik der Technischen Universität München<br />

12. Analyseergebnisse aller mốgliche Rohstoffe zur<br />

Pelletproduktion, BTU Cottbus, Lehrstuhl<br />

Kraftwerkstechnik, www.kwt.tu-cottbus.de<br />

13. Ragland, D.J. Aerts, Bioresource Technology 37<br />

(1991) pp. 61<br />

14. Lasselsberger, Österreichischer Biomassetag 2006,<br />

Lecture Monitoringprojekte Der Bundesländer NÖ<br />

& OÖ<br />

15. Huber, Frieß, 1997 München, Emissionen<br />

Bayerischer Biomassefeuerungen Ergebnisse einer<br />

Grundsatzuntersuchung<br />

16. Bakker, Elbersen, Managing ash content and -quality<br />

in herbaceous biomass: An analysis from plant to<br />

product, WUR, Institute Agrotechnology & Food<br />

Innovations-Biobased Products\<br />

17. Anon. www.vt.tuwien.ac.at/Biobib/<br />

18. Behr, Einflußfaktoren auf das<br />

Ascheschmelzverhalten bei der Verbrennung von<br />

Holzpellets, Holz-Energie-Zentrum Olsberg GmbH,<br />

Tagungsband Vorlage 7. Industrieforum Pellets<br />

2007 Stuttgart<br />

19. Lin, J. Air & Waste Managem. Assoc. 56, pp. 1743<br />

20. van Soest, et al., Increasing the ash melting<br />

temperature of wood pellets, <strong>World</strong> Sustainable<br />

Energy Days 2009, Pellet Conference Book,<br />

Wels/Upper Austria, 2009.


f ENERGY CROps, aGRICuLTuRaL REsIDuEs<br />

aND BY-pRODuCTs<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

93


USE OF ASHES AS A FERTILIZER IN REED CANARY GRASS (PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA L.) GROWN AS AN ENERGY CROP FOR<br />

94 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

COMBUSTION<br />

Eva Lindvall<br />

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of agricultural research for northern Sweden,<br />

901 83 UMEÅ, Sweden<br />

eva.lindvall@njv.slu.se<br />

ABSTRACT: Use of reed canary grass (RCG) as biofuel for combustion produces relative high amounts of ash. Deposition<br />

cost of ash negatively influences the economy of RCG production and is not very environmentally friendly. Therefore it<br />

is of importance that RCG ashes, pure or in mixtures, can be recycled to the RCG field as a part of the nutrient supply.<br />

Results from this field trail do not show any negative effects on crop or soil caused by the ash.<br />

Keywords: reed canary grass, ash, heavy metals<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Reed canary grass (RCG) has been considered as the<br />

most interesting perennial grass for energy purposes in<br />

Sweden. RCG is high yielding and the root system is very<br />

large which enables the plant to very efficiently absorb<br />

nutrients from the soil. Stands of perennial grasses can<br />

have a lifetime of more than 10 years and therefore<br />

require less cultivation and have lower requirement of<br />

pesticides (Wrobel et al, 2009, Kätterer & Andren, 1999).<br />

Some of the machinery required for grass cultivation is<br />

already available on many farms. Perennial grasses have<br />

lower nutrient requirements than annual bioenergy crops<br />

as some of the nutrients used of the shoots can be<br />

remobilized to the roots during autumn.<br />

One disadvantage when using RCG as biofuel for<br />

combustion is the relatively high ash content (Burvall &<br />

Hedman, 1994, Burvall, 1997). Deposition cost of ashes<br />

negatively influences the economy of RCG production<br />

and is not very environmentally friendly. Therefore it is<br />

of importance that RCG ashes, pure or in mixtures, can<br />

be recycled to the RCG field as a part of the nutrient<br />

supply.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

One concern when using ash and other waste products on<br />

agricultural land is the risk of enrichment of heavy metals<br />

in the circulation from soil to plant and ash. A field trial<br />

was established at SLUs field station in Umeå, Sweden in<br />

the spring 2002. Three different fertilizer treatments were<br />

applied. Treatment A was fertilized with an ash from<br />

combustion of RCG together with municipal wastes,<br />

treatment B an ash from RCG only and for treatment C<br />

was only commercial fertilizers used. The total amounts<br />

of nutrient each year applied in the trial were 100 kg ha -1<br />

N, 15 kg ha -1 P and 80 kg ha -1 K. The amount of ash in<br />

treatment A and B was calculated from the chemical<br />

analysis of the ashes to be equal to the required amount<br />

of P. The required amounts of N and K within these<br />

treatments were complemented by commercial fertilizers.<br />

The trial was harvested each spring from 2003 to 2009.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The dry matter yield showed large variation between<br />

years but no significant differences between treatments<br />

were detected. Samples of grass and soil have been<br />

analyzed for heavy metal content some of the years. No<br />

significant differences between the treatments were found<br />

in the grass. When comparing samples from 2004 and<br />

2009 the content was lower for most elements in 2009,<br />

only Zn showed a significant higher level. Soil samples<br />

were taken from 3 levels; 0-5 cm, 5-10 cm and 10-20 cm.<br />

In the uppermost level there are significant differences<br />

between treatments for Cd, Pb and Zn, with higher<br />

contents in treatment A. The differences between levels is<br />

mainly small, and compared to results from 2003 there<br />

seems to be no tendency to enrichment during this period<br />

of time.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

We can conclude that the ash we used does not seem to<br />

cause any harm to the growth of RCG, content of<br />

undesired chemical elements in grass and soil and can be<br />

used as a complement to commercial fertilizers.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This project was founded by The Swedish Energy<br />

Agency through Värmeforsk (Thermal Engineering<br />

Research Institute) and Bioenergigårdar i ett nytt<br />

landskap, a project administrated by Västerbotten County<br />

Administrative Board and financed by Kempestiftelserna<br />

among others.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Burvall J, 1997. Influence of harvest time and soil type<br />

on fuel quality in reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea<br />

L). Biomass <strong>Bioenergy</strong> 12, 149-154.<br />

Burvall J. and Hedman B, 1994. Bränslekaraktärisering<br />

av rörflen - resultat från första och andra års vallar.<br />

Röbäcksdalen meddelar 5, 1-27. (in Swedish)<br />

Kätterer T. and Andren O, 1999. Growth dynamics of<br />

reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and its<br />

allocation of biomass and nitrogen below ground in a<br />

field receiving daily irrigation and fertilisation. Nutrient<br />

Cycling in Agroecosystems 54, 21-29.<br />

Wrobel C., Coulman B.E. and Smith D.L. 2009. The<br />

potential use of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea<br />

L.) as a biofuel crop. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica<br />

Section B-Soil and Plant Science 59, 1-18.


INTERCROPPING OF REED CANARY GRASS, PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA L., WITH LEGUMES CAN CUT<br />

COSTS FOR N-FERTILIZATION<br />

Cecilia Palmborg and Eva Lindvall<br />

Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, SLU<br />

90183 Umeå, Sweden<br />

ABSTRACT: In a field experiment close to Östersund in mid Sweden reed canary grass was intercropped with barley,<br />

Alsike clover, Trifolium hybridum L., red clover, T. pratense L., goats rue, Galega orientalis L. or a combination of red<br />

clover and goats rue. There were also three fertilization treatments: A: Recommended amounts of N, P and K. B:<br />

Recommended amounts of P and K and half amount of N. C: Sewage sludge application before sowing (establishment<br />

year) and recommended amounts of P and K and half amount of N. The biomass was lower where reed canary grass had<br />

been undersown in barley, and higher with full N-fertilization than with half N-fertilization. However there were no<br />

significant differences between legume intercrops with half N-fertilization and pure reed canary grass with full Nfertilization.<br />

Alsike clover was the most productive legume, followed by red clover. The amount of nitrogen fixed by the<br />

legumes was less with full N-fertilization (29 kg/ha as a mean) than with half N-fertilization (38 kg/ha). Intercropping<br />

with legumes could substitute half of the N in fertilization but similar experiments in other parts of Sweden has shown<br />

that there is a higher risk of weed problems.<br />

Keywords: autumn harvest, spring harvest, bioenergy crop, energy grass<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Cropping systems that will provide our future energy<br />

for society need to be sustainable in many ways. The<br />

system should use nutrients efficiently, the system should<br />

need a minimum of input of fossil fuels for machinery<br />

and transport and the system should bind at least as much<br />

carbon to the soil as is respired from the soil. Reed<br />

canary grass harvested in spring fulfills these criteria [1].<br />

However, to make the cropping profitable without heavy<br />

subsidies, costs must be cut. This paper focus on the<br />

possibilities to cut fertilization costs by intercropping<br />

between reed canary grass and legumes and by<br />

fertilization with sewage sludge.<br />

The legumes take some of their need for nitrogen<br />

from nitrogen fixation by symbiotic bacteria in their root<br />

nodules. Some of this nitrogen then can be transferred to<br />

the accompanying grass via decomposing legume litter<br />

both above and below ground. Reed canary grass as an<br />

energy crop is always grown in monoculture. There have<br />

been few experiments with intercropping with legumes.<br />

The only experiment that has studied intercropping in a<br />

system with spring harvest a Lithuanian study by<br />

Jasinskas et. al [2]. In that study there was no Nfertilization<br />

in the intercrops and this favored the legumes<br />

that increased from year to year and the third year they<br />

comprised 28-56 % of the crop. In our experiment we do<br />

not take away all fertilizers in order to favor reed canary<br />

grass and keep legumes as a minor component or the<br />

sward.<br />

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

A field experiment was established in Ås close to<br />

Östersund in mid Sweden (latitude 63 o 14’ longitude<br />

14 o 34’) in july 2008. Reed canary grass was intercropped<br />

with Alsike clover, Trifolium hybridum L., red clover, T.<br />

pratense L., goats rue, Galega officinalis L. or a<br />

combination of red clover and goats rue. There are also<br />

monoculture reed canary plots established alone or<br />

undersown in barley that was harvested as a whole crop,<br />

a strategy to get an income from the crop the first year.<br />

There are also three fertilization treatments: A:<br />

Recommended amounts of N (40 kg/ha first year and 100<br />

kg/ha second year), P (20 kg/ha first year) and K (40<br />

kg/ha first year and 50 kg/ha second year). B:<br />

Recommended amounts of P and K and half amount of<br />

N. C: Sewage sludge application before sowing<br />

(establishment year) and recommended amounts of P and<br />

K and half amount of N. The experiment has a split-plot<br />

design with fertilization treatment on the main plots and<br />

species mixtures on the sub-plots (2.8 x 9 m), and it is<br />

randomized in four replicate blocks.<br />

In the end of August 2009, 50 x 50 cm plots, 50 cm<br />

from the edge of the big plots were harvested by hand<br />

cutting in autumn 2009. The biomass was sorted in each<br />

sown species and weeds and the dry weight of each<br />

fraction was determined. The sown species were milled<br />

and N% and the proportions of the stable isotope 15 N<br />

were analyzed on an ANCA-SL coupled to a Sercon 20-<br />

20 IRMS (Sercon, United Kingdom). The data were used<br />

to calculate the nitrogen fixation using both the<br />

difference method and the 15 N natural abundance method<br />

[3]. In October, larger plots (1.5 x 7.5 m) were harvested<br />

with a plot harvester. However, since this harvest was<br />

interrupted by snow, only 2/3 of the plots were harvested.<br />

The harvested material was put back on the plots and<br />

collected and weighed again in May <strong>2010</strong> to determine<br />

winter losses.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

95


Figure 1: Amount of biomass and botanical composition<br />

in August 2009 in small plots 50 x 50 cm.<br />

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

There were significant differences in legume biomass<br />

between the species mixtures (Figure 1). Alsike clover<br />

was the most productive sown legume, followed by red<br />

clover. Goats rue was a slow starter and it formed a low<br />

but healthy undergrowth.<br />

The nitrogen fixation as determined by the difference<br />

method varied very much between plots and differences<br />

between legumes were not significant. However there<br />

was significantly less N-fixation, 28 kg N/ha, with full Nfertilization<br />

compared to half N-fertilization, 39 kg N/ha.<br />

The low nitrogen fixation rate was probably due to strong<br />

competition from the very dense reed canary grass crop.<br />

It was not possible to use the 15 N natural abundance<br />

method to determine the N-fixation since the difference<br />

in 15 N natural abundance in reed canary grass and<br />

legumes was too small.<br />

The amount of reed canary grass was higher with the<br />

higher N-fertilization level (Figure 1). However the<br />

difference was not significant. There were no significant<br />

differences between the treatment with sewage sludge<br />

and the corresponding treatment without sludge.<br />

Establishment of reed canary grass undersown in<br />

barley did not work well. The harvest was less than half<br />

of the other species mixtures. Also there were more<br />

weeds in the barley treatment. The reason is probably that<br />

the barley was harvested with a stubble height of only 7<br />

cm in early September 2008 and the reed canary grass<br />

probably was not able to grow enough rhizomes before<br />

winter to get a good spring growth 2009.<br />

Both in October 2009 and in May <strong>2010</strong>, the harvest<br />

of the larger plots showed the same pattern as the smaller<br />

plots, but due to the smaller variation there was<br />

significantly more biomass with full N-fertilization. The<br />

biomass harvest in spring was 64 % of the biomass<br />

harvest in autumn, and there were no significant<br />

differences in winter losses between treatments.<br />

Three similar experiments have also been established<br />

96 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

in other parts of Sweden. In two of these, there have been<br />

large problems with weeds: white clover in one site and<br />

couch grass in the other site. More information is given in<br />

a recent report [4].<br />

4 ECONOMICS AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

An economic calculation showed that the<br />

establishment costs (the first two growing seasons) can<br />

be lowered by intercropping with red clover (Table 1).<br />

However it is also involves more risks, related to weeds,<br />

and cannot be recommended on fallow soil with a large<br />

seed bank of weeds. Weed management with glyphosate<br />

(Roundup) the year before sowing and Basagran SG<br />

when the legumes have three full leaves, is recommended<br />

in order to decrease the total competition of weeds.<br />

Table 1: Establishment costs for reed canary grass. To<br />

calculate the cost per MWh the establishment cost were<br />

spread over 10 harvesting years with 5000 kg biomass<br />

harvest/ ha and year and 4,2 MWh/ton field dry material.<br />

RCG + red clover RCG<br />

Half fertilization Full fertilization<br />

SEK/ha SEK/ha<br />

Seeds 1105 825<br />

Fertilizer 2000 4000<br />

Herbicides 500 250<br />

Other 300 300<br />

Plowing 1000 1000<br />

Harrowing 675 675<br />

Seeding<br />

Spreading<br />

200 200<br />

of fertilizer<br />

Application<br />

825 825<br />

of herbicide 300 300<br />

Sum 6905 8375<br />

Cost/MWh 32.9 39.9


5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This project was founded by The Swedish Energy<br />

Agency through Värmeforsk (Thermal Engineering<br />

Research Institute). We thank Per-Erik Nemby and coworkers<br />

for skillful field work.<br />

6 References<br />

1. Wrobel, C., B.E. Coulman, and D.L. Smith, The<br />

potential use of reed canarygrass (Phalaris<br />

arundinacea L.) as a biofuel crop. Acta<br />

Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant<br />

Science, 2009. 59(1): p. 1-18.<br />

2. Jasinskas, A., A. Zaltauskas, and A. Kryzeuiciene,<br />

The investigation of growing and using of tall<br />

perennial grasses as energy crops. Biomass &<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong>, 2008. 32(11): p. 981-987.<br />

3. Unkovich, M., et al., 15 N Natural abundance method,<br />

in Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in<br />

agricultural systems. 2008, Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Research: Canberra,<br />

Australien. p. 132-162.<br />

4. Palmborg, C. and E. Lindvall, Optimering av<br />

odlingsåtgärder i rörflen för ökad lönsamhet.<br />

Fältstudier av sorter, samodling med baljväxter<br />

och korn, gödsling samt markpackning. <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

Värmeforsk: Stockholm. p. 44.<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

97


98 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

ORGANISATIONAL FRAMEWORKS FOR STRAW-BASED ENERGY SYSTEMS IN UKRAINE AND<br />

WESTERN EUROPE<br />

Y. Voytenko*, P. Peck<br />

*Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Nádor u. 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary,<br />

tel. + 36 1 327 3021; yuliya.voytenko@mespom.eu<br />

International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University, Tegnérsplatsen 4, 22100 Lund, Sweden,<br />

tel. +46 46 222 0200; fax: +46 46 222 0230; philip.peck@iiiee.lu.se<br />

Ukraine (UA) has large biomass potentials, and faces broad needs for energy security enhancement, agricultural sector<br />

revitalisation and environmental improvement. Cross case study analysis is applied to nine straw-fired installations in UA<br />

within a conceptual framework developed by the authors. The analysis yields three distinct straw-based frameworks for<br />

organisation and action including ‘small scale local heat production’, ‘small scale local straw production for fuel sale to<br />

municipality’, and ‘medium scale conversion and district heating’. Ukrainian case is then compared to countries with<br />

more advanced bioenergy sectors, i.e. Sweden (SE) and Denmark (DK). Individual business entrepreneurship qualities<br />

and knowledge are found crucial on small and medium scale. Straw use on large scale requires substantial and consistent<br />

support from the National government. Barriers to the expansion of bioenergy in UA include low access to technology<br />

and funding, lack of knowledge on bioenergy funding schemes, and bioenergy in general. The outcomes of the paper are<br />

transferable to various contexts on the condition that local specificities are taken into account.<br />

Keywords: bioenergy management, developing countries, logistics, non-technical barriers to bioenergy, straw<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

This paper has its point of departure from the<br />

recognition of a number of parameters that have been<br />

found important for the transformation of local<br />

energy systems towards bioenergy. These include<br />

resources available (i.e. physical, human and<br />

organisational capital) [1], financial and technological<br />

resources [2], social capital [3], and strategies for the<br />

transformation of local energy systems [4-­‐10]. The<br />

latter component (deliberate strategies) however,<br />

infers a need for “frameworks for organisation and<br />

action” that can support such transformation. Yet<br />

limited work is available in the area.<br />

Earlier research by the authors [11,12]<br />

highlighted four promising framework types for<br />

organisation of straw-­‐based energy systems in<br />

selected Western European (WE) countries, i.e.<br />

Sweden (SE), Denmark (DK) and Spain (ES), and key<br />

factors that define and foster energy system<br />

transition. Each country has gone down its own<br />

transition path but when viewed collectively, they<br />

constitute a good ‘learning environment’ for other<br />

regions where straw-­‐based systems are anticipated to<br />

emerge. That work [12] yielded four distinct types of<br />

agro-­‐biomass based frameworks (ABFs) for<br />

organisation and action including ‘small scale local<br />

heat production’, ‘medium scale local heat provision<br />

with excess for sale’, ‘medium scale conversion and<br />

district heating (DH)’, and ‘large scale power or<br />

combined heat and power generation (CHP)’.<br />

This work focuses on Ukraine (UA), which has<br />

significant potential for all bioenergy options and crop<br />

residues in particular [13-­‐17]. <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

development is driven by an urgent need for energy<br />

security enhancement, reduction of dependence on<br />

fuel imports, rural diversification, job creation,<br />

bioenergy business opportunities and potential for<br />

environmental improvement [14,18]. A tangible<br />

policy support environment for bioenergy and real<br />

straw-­‐based heating systems are both emerging in UA<br />

[18,19].<br />

This work aims to compile and analyse ABFs that<br />

seek to transform energy systems to bioenergy. The<br />

objectives of the paper are the following:<br />

• to collect and describe existing practices of<br />

straw use for energy in UA;<br />

• to generate empirical conceptual ABFs that<br />

ensure commercial use of straw for energy;<br />

• to compare and contrast ABF types in UA<br />

and WE.<br />

The paper has the following structure. Section 2<br />

provides a background on bioenergy production,<br />

potentials, technology, and markets for crop residues for<br />

energy in UA as well as on support mechanisms for<br />

bioenergy development in the country. Section 3 outlines<br />

a methodological approach to the work. Results on ABFs<br />

for organisation and action in UA are presented and<br />

analysed in Section 4. Section 5 discusses straw-toenergy<br />

experiences in UA and compares them to those in<br />

WE. Section 5 concludes the paper and presents areas<br />

and implications for future research.<br />

2 BIOENERGY IN UKRAINE<br />

2.1 <strong>Bioenergy</strong> production<br />

Current energy production from biomass in UA is<br />

about 38 PJ (0.9 Mtoe) per year, which comes only in the


form of heat and constitutes 0.65% in UA’s total primary<br />

energy supply (TPES) [20]. UA utilises biomass mainly<br />

as firewood [21]. Wood pellet production is primarily<br />

export oriented [22,23]. Crop residues are burnt in<br />

converted and specifically designed boilers [20,24,25].<br />

There exist up to 25 straw-fired boilers in rural areas in<br />

UA [26]. A few farms operate small-scale individual<br />

biogas units [20]. Among larger biogas installations a few<br />

pilot projects were carried out in 2004-2009 [27,28].<br />

Today only a few large-scale plantations of energy crops<br />

(i.e. coppice crops and perennial grasses) exist in UA<br />

[23]. All of them have been introduced quite recently,<br />

and have not been harvested yet. There exist six first<br />

generation bioethanol production plants with a total<br />

capacity of 135 000 million tonnes per year [29] and<br />

eight big oil-extracting plants that produce rapeseed oil<br />

[24] in the country.<br />

2.2 Potentials for energy from biomass and straw<br />

Total technical potential of biomass and peat is<br />

estimated at 1062 PJ per year or 18.11% in the country’s<br />

TPES [14]. Annual potentials for agricultural residues<br />

and energy crops constitute the main share equalling<br />

739 PJ (or 69.5% in the country’s overall biomass<br />

potential).<br />

Straw has the highest potential among all agricultural<br />

residues - 175 PJ per year (or 16.5% of total biomass<br />

potential). Every year from 6-8 [13] to 10.2 [17] million<br />

tonnes of straw can be used for energy production in UA<br />

without putting other needs in straw under pressure. In<br />

addition, straw is also considered to be one of the easiest<br />

and the cheapest biomass options that can be developed<br />

in Ukrainian conditions [13,15,30]. For the farms with<br />

their own straw resources a straw-fired boiler payback is<br />

1-2 years while for those that purchase straw at USD 26-<br />

33 per tonne it is about 3 years [15].<br />

Current total annual fuel consumption in all boiler<br />

houses in rural areas of UA constitutes about 84 PJ,<br />

which can be fully supplied with straw resources<br />

available in the country [31]. At present the main share of<br />

straw use for energy is performed in UTEM boilers [32],<br />

the total installed capacity of which is about 8.9 MW.<br />

Annual use of straw in these boilers is about 14 100<br />

tonnes (or 0.2 PJ) [33,16].<br />

2.3 Technology for crop residue use for energy<br />

Straw combustion technology in UA is represented<br />

with a few companies that produce straw-fired boilers<br />

and their parts, heat generators and grain-drying units that<br />

use straw and/or other crop residues as a fuel.<br />

The biggest straw-fired boiler manufacturer and the<br />

only one that produces water-based straw-fired boilers<br />

with the capacity of up to 1 MW that can be used for the<br />

heating of premises is OJSC UTEM [26,32]. UTEM<br />

produces boilers under the license of Danish company<br />

Passat Energi A/S; it also provides design works,<br />

arranges heat works and service maintenance [32].<br />

Currently up to 25 UTEM boilers are installed in<br />

different regions in UA [26], which in most cases<br />

produce heat for municipal buildings in the villages (i.e.<br />

schools, kindergartens, premises of village councils,<br />

cultural centres, multi-storeyed living houses, etc.) or/and<br />

for local agricultural enterprises.<br />

Scientific Engineering Centre (SEC) Biomass carries<br />

out research and development of straw-fired heat<br />

generators [34]. OJSC Bryg is one of the few companies<br />

that produce biomass-fired heat generators and grain-<br />

drying units on biomass [35]. Currently about 20 Bryg<br />

products are installed in the country [36]. There are also a<br />

few manufacturers of heat generators and boilers that<br />

work on a mixture of solid fuels [37-40].<br />

2.4 Market potential for crop residues<br />

SEC Biomass estimated technical and commercial<br />

potential for biomass boilers and suggests that by 2015<br />

total thermal capacity of wood-, straw- and peat-fired<br />

boilers in UA can reach 9000 MW [21]. This would<br />

allow to reduce GHG emissions by 11 million tonnes per<br />

year and substitute 5.44 billion m 3 of natural gas<br />

annually. The total estimated investment cost is about<br />

USD 0.64 billion [21].<br />

In October 2009 97% of briquettes from sunflower<br />

husk and 100% straw briquettes produced in UA were<br />

sold outside the country [41]. The main markets can be<br />

found in Poland with smaller amount sold in Germany,<br />

Czech Republic, Hungary and Lithuania.<br />

2.5 Support schemes and mechanisms<br />

Ukrainian government accepted a number of<br />

documents supporting bioenergy development in the<br />

country. The State Development Programme of Biofuel<br />

Production and Consumption is the framework policy. It<br />

aims to increase the share of biofuels in the national<br />

energy balance to 5-7% [42]. Other important laws in this<br />

area include the Law of UA On Amendments to Some<br />

Laws of Ukraine on Support of Biofuel Production and<br />

Consumption, which sets a target to increase the share of<br />

biofuel use to 20% in total fuel consumption in the<br />

country by 2020 [43]; the so called Law On Green<br />

Electricity Tariff, and a set of Laws On Minimisation of<br />

Financial Crisis Impact. The latter laws set specific<br />

economic support mechanisms. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> projects in UA<br />

can also be developed as joint implementation (JI)<br />

projects under Kyoto Protocol [44].<br />

3 METHODOLOGY<br />

3.1 General approach<br />

This work presents results on straw use for energy in<br />

UA and compares them to similar experiences in SE and<br />

DK. A detailed analysis of nine initiatives (Table I) on<br />

straw for energy is applied to underpin the proposal of<br />

three types of ABFs for organisation and action in<br />

Ukrainian setting. ABFs are developed for each case, and<br />

then contrasted and compared in a cross-case analysis<br />

and a broader cross-country context.<br />

Coverage topics that have driven case study selection<br />

are given in Table II.<br />

Table I: Cases on straw use for energy in Ukraine<br />

Village (region,<br />

province)<br />

Strutynka,<br />

(Lypovetsk,<br />

Vinnytsya)<br />

Lebedyn,<br />

(Shpola,<br />

Cherkasy)<br />

Olgopil<br />

(Chechelnyk,<br />

Vinnytsya)<br />

Stavy, (Kagarlyk,<br />

Kyiv)<br />

Boiler<br />

size, kW<br />

Purpose Informants<br />

250 Heat for agro- Director of the<br />

enterprise<br />

“Rapsodiya” and a<br />

mill<br />

agro-enterprise<br />

250 Heat for agro- Leading energy<br />

enterprise<br />

“Lebedyn Seed<br />

Plant”<br />

expert<br />

300 Heat for the local 1st deputy head<br />

secondary school of local<br />

administration<br />

350 Heat for local Project<br />

secondary school coordinator<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

99


Vyshnyuvate,<br />

(Rozivka,<br />

Zaporizzhya)<br />

Polkovnyche,<br />

(Stavyshche,<br />

Kyiv)<br />

Zlatoustivka,<br />

(Volnovakha,<br />

Donetsk)<br />

Drozdy (Bila<br />

Tserkva, Kyiv)<br />

Dyagova (Mena,<br />

Chernihiv)<br />

100 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

150 or<br />

350<br />

(project)<br />

and kindergarten<br />

Heat for local<br />

secondary school<br />

and (possibly) to<br />

local municipality<br />

600 Heat for trading<br />

company and agroenterprise<br />

“ROPA<br />

Ukraine”<br />

600 DH to municipal<br />

buildings in the<br />

village<br />

980 and<br />

150<br />

DH to municipal<br />

buildings in the<br />

village; for pigbreeding<br />

facility on<br />

the farm<br />

250 Heat for a grain<br />

dryer on the farm<br />

Project<br />

coordinator<br />

Director of the<br />

agro-enterprise<br />

Director of agroenterprise<br />

Deputy director<br />

of the agro-<br />

enterprise<br />

A farmer and a<br />

boiler operator<br />

3.2 Data collection<br />

This work involved both “desktop” and field research.<br />

Field studies were carried out in June 2009 – February<br />

<strong>2010</strong>, and involved 14 in-depth interviews with key actors<br />

within an agro-biomass production chain (Table I). Six<br />

interviews were conducted face-to-face and eight - over the<br />

telephone. This study also involved site visits to two grain<br />

producing farms with straw-fired installations, straw<br />

storages, baling equipment, premises with heating needs,<br />

etc.<br />

Interviews sought to reveal the main components of a<br />

conceptual framework to this study and answer the key<br />

overarching area of query framed as follows:<br />

“How did actors collect and combine the necessary<br />

resources in a new straw based business?”<br />

Table II: Coverage topics for case studies<br />

Coverage topic Comment<br />

Installation capacity One or two examples are examined in-depth for<br />

each straw-fired boiler capacity that is available<br />

in UA at present<br />

Purpose of<br />

installation<br />

Cases examined represent different ways of<br />

energy end-use (e.g. grain drying, local heating<br />

of industrial premises, DH of municipal<br />

buildings and dwelling houses)<br />

Boiler ownership Straw-fired boilers examined are owned by<br />

various actors i.e. agricultural enterprises,<br />

companies and municipalities<br />

Boiler manufacturer Initiatives described involve installations<br />

developed<br />

producers<br />

and manufactured by various<br />

Degree of the<br />

installation success<br />

Not only successful examples are included but<br />

also those facing constraints in their<br />

establishment or operation<br />

3.3 Conceptual framework<br />

Conceptual framework was developed by the authors<br />

in previous work [11,12]. It is based on theoretical<br />

considerations from neoinstitutional theory and studies<br />

on the legitimisation of new ventures 45,4,46,47,<br />

diffusion models that describe the variables critical to the<br />

rate of adoption of new ventures 4,7-9, studies on<br />

Technological Innovation Systems (TISs) 4,5,7-9, and<br />

work explaining the behaviour of actors 48-50.<br />

Four main categories in the conceptual framework<br />

include: 1) actors and their networks, 2) natural<br />

resources, 3) “hard” (technical) components, and<br />

4) “soft” (non-technical) components. They build the<br />

core of an ‘agro-biomass framework for organisation and<br />

action’. The frameworks are grouped according to the<br />

empirical examples of straw use for energy identified in<br />

UA (Section 4-1). These in turn are classified according<br />

to a number of industrial development stages suggested<br />

by Aldrich and Fiol [45] (Table IV).<br />

4 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS<br />

4.1 Agro-biomass frameworks for organisation and<br />

action<br />

Three distinct ABF types (Table III) were found in this<br />

study including:<br />

ABF 1: Small scale local heat production<br />

ABF 2: Small scale local straw production for fuel sale<br />

to municipality<br />

ABF 3: Medium scale conversion and DH<br />

Four principal categories, which were found<br />

important to group the variables describing each ABF<br />

type, include ‘general parameters’, ‘boiler<br />

characteristics’, ‘straw supply chain’ variables, and<br />

‘economy and reasons for transformation’.<br />

Aldrich and Fiol [45] identify four stages in the<br />

industry development (levels of analysis) – organisational,<br />

intraindustrial, interindustrial, and institutional. Ukrainian<br />

ABF types are analysed along these stages (Table IV).<br />

Discussion on comparison of Ukrainian and Western<br />

European realities [11,12] is presented in the Sub-sections<br />

4.2-4.4, 5.2.<br />

In comparison to WE two framework types are absent<br />

in UA namely ‘medium scale local heat provision with<br />

excess for sale’ and ‘large scale power or CHP generation’<br />

[11,12]. Instead an additional ABF type is identified in UA<br />

– ‘small scale local straw production with fuel sale to<br />

municipality’.<br />

Organisations in case studies within this research<br />

include agricultural enterprises, village councils, village<br />

schools, funding bodies, bioenergy and renewable energy<br />

consultancies, local authorities, boiler manufacturers, etc.<br />

4.2 ABF 1: Small scale local straw production for local<br />

use for heat<br />

ABF 1 is represented with a privately owned small<br />

scale straw-fired installation (a water-based boiler or an<br />

air-based heat generator) located on a grain producing<br />

agricultural enterprise that also yields significant amounts<br />

of crop residues and has substantial heating needs.<br />

In all cases [51,52,60,64] the land is rented from<br />

private users (long-term leasing) since in UA land sale is<br />

prohibited by law. Most of the enterprises are not only<br />

involved in agricultural activities on the farm but also deal<br />

with industrial production and trading/service provision.<br />

Table III. Types of empirical agro-biomass frameworks<br />

for organisation and action in Ukraine<br />

Case study Strutynka (Sn),<br />

Lebedyn (L),<br />

Polkovnyche (P),<br />

Dyagova (Dg)<br />

Farm size 800-2000 ha<br />

16 000 ha (L)<br />

ABF 1 ABF 2 ABF 3<br />

I GENERAL PARAMETERS<br />

Olgopil (O),<br />

Stavy (St),<br />

Vyshnyuvate (V)<br />

Zlatoustivka (Z),<br />

Drozdy (D)<br />

6000 ha (O) 10 000 ha (Z)<br />

3250 ha (D)<br />

Energy type Heat Heat Heat<br />

Energy end<br />

use<br />

Heat network<br />

ownership<br />

Enterprise<br />

(premises,<br />

facilities) or farm<br />

(e.g. a grain<br />

dryer) heating<br />

Heating of a<br />

village school/<br />

kindergarten<br />

Heating of<br />

village municipal<br />

buildings on a<br />

DH grid<br />

Private Municipal Municipal


II BOILER CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Capacity, kW 250-600


authorities, village schools and kindergartens, and third<br />

parties (e.g. consultancies). Hence there are more actors<br />

involved in ABF 2 as compared to ABF 1. They are also<br />

more diverse as they include not only buyers and sellers<br />

of straw feedstock but also researchers, consultants and<br />

other motivated enthusiasts.<br />

Currently ABF 2 is represented with up to 10<br />

examples of working UTEM boilers in different regions<br />

of UA [30,26]. The need to expand energy production<br />

from straw to supply village schools and other municipal<br />

buildings with heat is often mentioned by respondents<br />

[55,16,30].<br />

In two cases within ABF 2 the initiative to install a<br />

straw-fired boiler emerged from third parties (consultants<br />

or potential consultants) [55,30]. Neither the owners of<br />

the installations (municipalities) nor the producers of<br />

straw feedstock (local agricultural companies) have<br />

become the prime movers to introduce a straw-fired<br />

system although they had demonstrated an overall<br />

support and engagement in the activities. Only in the case<br />

of Olgopil it was the municipality that catalysed the<br />

transition towards bioenergy. However, Vinnytsya<br />

province, where the boiler is located, is recognised to be<br />

an exampleous one in the sense of straw use for energy in<br />

UA [16,66,55], and has the biggest number of<br />

functioning straw-fired boilers (seven) [58]. Vinnytsya<br />

province also has a working state programme on the<br />

promotion of renewable energy sources, which is being<br />

implemented via straw-fired boiler installations [53].<br />

In all cases straw handling and delivery is managed<br />

and organized either by feedstock growers or a third party<br />

(e.g. consultancy). The intention to put this responsibility<br />

on a school director in the case of Stavy did not bring any<br />

successful results but constrained the project<br />

implementation instead [16], which demonstrated a need<br />

for the correct assignation of responsibilities between the<br />

actors in the system.<br />

The case of Vyshnyuvate, which has not been<br />

implemented yet, faced numerous institutional constraints<br />

primarily caused by the constraining behaviour of market<br />

incumbents represented with the lobby of coal industry<br />

[55]. Also the lack of transparent vertical governmental<br />

influence (from top to bottom) was noted as a barrier for<br />

the project implementation [55].<br />

The reasons for a transition to straw use were of<br />

economic nature and also of a desire to increase the<br />

energy self-sufficiency in remote areas and provide<br />

continuous heat supply to village educational institutions.<br />

Since there are not so many working installations of<br />

ABF 2 in UA, the demonstration character of the projects<br />

has contributed to the justification of the reasons for their<br />

implementation.<br />

This ABF type is identified only for Ukrainian setting<br />

and has not been encountered in WE.<br />

4.4 ABF 3: Medium scale local straw production for heat<br />

sale<br />

ABF 3 cases involve private agricultural enterprises<br />

that produce heat from their own straw resources<br />

combusted in their own boilers, and sell it to a DH network<br />

in the village. Heat is supplied to local municipal buildings<br />

and dwelling houses that are connected to the grid, which<br />

is owned by local municipality [63,61].<br />

Straw supply is completely organised by the boiler<br />

owners, and they burn only straw produced on their farms<br />

[63,61]. Mainly wheat straw is used. Ash from straw<br />

102 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

combustion is then spread on the fields of the farms as a<br />

natural fertiliser.<br />

In Drozdy the boiler was produced by Danish company<br />

Passat Energi A/S and installed with technical and<br />

financial assistance of Danish partners [63] (Fig. 1). The<br />

boiler in Zlatoustivka was manufactured by UTEM and<br />

purchased at the company’s own expense [61].<br />

Figure 1: Straw-fired boiler (980 kW), Drozdy village,<br />

Kyiv province, Ukraine<br />

This ABF type represents intraindustrial level of<br />

analysis with a slightly bigger number and types of actors<br />

involved in the system as compared to ABF 2.<br />

Stakeholders include agricultural enterprises,<br />

municipalities, village councils, local secondary schools,<br />

kindergartens, community centres, hotels, dwelling<br />

houses, consultancies, project partners and executing<br />

bodies, etc.<br />

The system has medium degree of complexity and<br />

formalisation. Written contracts exist between heat<br />

producers (agricultural enterprises) and heat users (local<br />

municipalities).<br />

The installation of a straw-fired boiler for the<br />

provision of DH in villages was done in the substitution<br />

of existing installations fired with natural gas [63] or coal<br />

[61]. An important prerequisite for the success of the<br />

projects was the existence of quite broad heat distribution<br />

networks in place, where no significant technological<br />

changes and investments were required. The best proof of<br />

that a boiler has been a successful enterprise is the<br />

installation of an additional small (150 kW) straw-fired<br />

boiler by the managers of the agricultural company in<br />

Drozdy for their own needs on the farm a few years later<br />

[63].<br />

The owners of both installations are satisfied with<br />

their operation, and the boilers can be considered a<br />

success as they brought a number of economic, social and<br />

environmental co-benefits to the villages. First of all, the<br />

dependence of the village DH system on natural gas or<br />

coal was eliminated due to the fuel substitution with<br />

locally sourced straw. This enhanced local energy<br />

security and also resulted in cost savings from fuel<br />

purchase for the municipality, which buys heat at lower<br />

tariffs from the agricultural enterprises [63,61]. Besides,<br />

the enterprises created an additional source of their<br />

incomes by valorising their agricultural waste and selling<br />

the heat from straw combustion. Second, in social area


some optimisation in local employment was achieved and<br />

a few seasonal work places were created [63,61]. Third,<br />

the installations brought climate co-benefits due to GHG<br />

emission reduction from fuel substitution [34,63].<br />

The reasons for a transition towards straw use for<br />

energy were of economic and environmental origin. Boiler<br />

managers [63,61] were interested to substitute expensive<br />

imported fuel with locally sourced biomass, and also<br />

improve environmental conditions in the village. In the<br />

case of Drozdy the installation of a straw-fired boiler also<br />

had a demonstration purpose as it was the first straw-fired<br />

boiler installed in UA [34].<br />

Comparing ABF 3 to Danish and Swedish<br />

experiences, it should be noted that “medium scale” is<br />

defined differently for Ukrainian and Western European<br />

context. In UA these are small installations up to 1 MW<br />

(Fig. 1) while in WE medium scale implies that the boiler<br />

has a capacity larger than 1 MW [11,12] and thus<br />

represents a more complicated technological system<br />

(Fig. 2) with automatic straw feed in and shredding. It is<br />

rather the nature and shape of organisational factors and<br />

forms that enables comparability and certain degree of<br />

analogy between the systems in UA and WE.<br />

The reasons for transformation in SE and DK were<br />

somewhat different from those in UA, and included<br />

political and legal support in addition to economic gains<br />

achieved with fuel substitution. In UA one of the key<br />

drivers for transformation towards bioenergy on different<br />

scales is the issue of energy security provision.<br />

Figure 2: Straw-fired boiler house (1 MW) and straw<br />

storage, Horreby, Denmark<br />

V DISCUSSION<br />

5.1 Straw-to-energy realities in Ukraine<br />

Examples of Ukrainian initiatives on energy<br />

production from straw clearly demonstrate that straw-toenergy<br />

markets and the whole sector are in their latent<br />

phase of development, and straw is not commercialised<br />

as an energy carrier in the country yet. Working strawfired<br />

installations do not exceed 1 MW. This is to certain<br />

extent linked to the fact that in UA there exist no<br />

technological production lines of straw-fired boilers or<br />

heat-generators larger than 1 MW. UTEM is the<br />

dominating straw-fired boiler manufacturer in the<br />

country.<br />

The majority of straw-fired installations in rural areas<br />

in UA do not supply hot water in addition to heat supply.<br />

This can be most likely explained by the scarcity of<br />

central water distribution networks and sewage systems<br />

in the villages. However, potentially all of the boilers<br />

could supply hot water.<br />

Neither of the functioning boilers in UA have air<br />

emission abatement equipment. According to the law,<br />

flue gas cleaning systems are not required to be installed<br />

in small combustion facilities.<br />

Almost in all cases straw bailers are owned by<br />

agricultural enterprises, who are feedstock growers and<br />

straw suppliers either to their own boilers or to the boilers<br />

owned and operated by local municipality. In two cases<br />

bailers are rented by the farmers from their neighbours,<br />

which demonstrates that there exist a practice of sharing<br />

machinery and equipment between the actors in a strawsupply<br />

chain.<br />

Farmers and agricultural enterprises that have<br />

installed straw-fired boilers in UA are quite well off.<br />

They can both allow to purchase a boiler and to own<br />

necessary machinery and equipment for straw handling.<br />

In the case of private boilers no permits were noted to<br />

be required for the boiler installation and operation. Also<br />

since these installations are privately owned, not much<br />

intrusion from the side of local authorities is observed.<br />

Written contracts are put in place when there are a few<br />

actors involved, and a need for straw-supply agreement<br />

exists.<br />

The role of actors and human factor is noted<br />

important in the transformation towards straw use for<br />

energy in UA. Many farm managers who own straw-fired<br />

installations have higher education and sometimes hold a<br />

PhD degree. Often a determining role for the success of<br />

the project can be attributed to its enthusiastic initiators<br />

and leaders (i.e. businessmen, researchers, consultants,<br />

school teachers, representatives of local municipalities,<br />

etc.).<br />

In most cases it is reported that no additional jobs<br />

directly linked to the boiler operation and maintenance<br />

were created. However, a positive co-benefit observed in<br />

all cases is that money is kept and is circulating within<br />

the local budget. In all cases in UA valorisation of wasted<br />

straw, crop residues and sometimes wood waste was<br />

achieved with the installation of straw-fired systems.<br />

All straw-fired owners and operators report to be<br />

satisfied with the work of installations and quite happy<br />

with their payback periods.<br />

A more smooth and easy transition pathway towards<br />

straw use for energy can be attributed to the existing DH<br />

networks and old tradition of biomass use for energy in<br />

rural areas in UA. On the other hand, the absence of<br />

transparent governmental influence and targeted support<br />

could be attributed to the factors hindering the success of<br />

straw-based energy systems in the country.<br />

5.2 Comparison of straw use for energy in Ukraine and<br />

Western Europe<br />

The analysis yields three different generic<br />

frameworks for organisation and action in UA, two of<br />

which (ABF 1 and ABF 3) have been encountered in<br />

Western European context while one (ABF 2) is rather<br />

specific for Ukrainian conditions. All ABFs share key<br />

components but differ in accordance with the nature of<br />

goals and energy end-use needs, ownership of the<br />

installations, number of actors involved, degrees of<br />

system complexity and formalisation.<br />

For all ABF types in UA sizes of farms are larger on<br />

average than in WE. In UA on small scale the main users<br />

are not only grain-dryers but also enterprises. Besides,<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

103


there are no grain-drying installations that use waterbased<br />

boilers in UA.<br />

Straw bales in the majority of Ukrainian cases have<br />

an average weight of 300 kg (Fig. 3) while in Swedish<br />

and Danish systems these are standardised bales of<br />

500 kg each. However, this is also linked to the boiler<br />

scale in UA, which are smaller than those functioning on<br />

Swedish and Danish farms for all ABF types. Straw<br />

annual requirements are quite the same among countries,<br />

and depend on the boiler capacity. Straw storage is<br />

different for all cases, and there is no specific trend<br />

observed depending on the size or type of the installation.<br />

Both in UA and in WE, ash from straw combustion is<br />

mainly returned to the soil.<br />

In UA unlike WE no cooperative ownership of DH<br />

networks is encountered. For analogous installations in<br />

UA and WE investment costs are lower in UA while the<br />

payback periods are relatively the same (about 2-3 years<br />

for comparable systems below 1 MW).<br />

In UA energy security issue and a desire to achieve<br />

energy self-sufficiency in remote areas were observed to<br />

be some of the key driving forces for the transition<br />

towards straw. With increasing prices for natural gas<br />

imported from Russia [14] the trend towards the<br />

increased development of renewable energy alternatives<br />

is obvious in UA. Energy security can be forecasted to<br />

have a continuous influence and be a facilitating factor<br />

for the development of renewables and bioenergy in<br />

particular. However, it is not likely to bring groundbreaking<br />

changes in the existing energy system until<br />

market distortions in the form of cross-subsidised energy<br />

tariffs are removed in Ukrainian system [14], and when<br />

private users will be paying real price for conventional<br />

energy carriers.<br />

Figure 3: Field straw storage at agricultural enterprise<br />

LLC “DiM”, Drozdy village, Kyiv province, Ukraine<br />

Swedish and Danish examples of straw use for<br />

energy revealed that medium and large scale straw-fired<br />

installations often required political support in addition to<br />

purely economic reasons for transformation with targeted<br />

incentives in place [11,12]. This is the case for the large<br />

scale CHP plants in DK, and may be one of the reasons<br />

why in SE there are still no functioning large scale strawfired<br />

installations. As for the medium scale installations<br />

for neighbour and district heating, if privately owned<br />

(which is quite a spread practice in DK), they require<br />

significant private investments (in the range of EUR 0.5-<br />

2.3 million) both for the boiler installation and the DH<br />

network construction [67-70]. It can be assumed that<br />

these investments would be 2-3 times lower in Ukrainian<br />

104 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

reality, in case there were straw-fired boilers of domestic<br />

manufacture. However, financial constraints can still be<br />

quite significant taking into account the low purchasing<br />

capacity of Ukrainian agricultural producers. In this case<br />

feasible funding schemes will be required for the<br />

expansion of straw use for energy on medium scale.<br />

All straw-fired installations in UA are only<br />

generating heat, which can be explained by their small<br />

capacity. CHP plants on straw do not exist below<br />

10 MW, which can be demonstrated with Danish<br />

experiences [71]. With existing incentives on electricity<br />

generation from renewable sources (“feed in tariff”<br />

mechanism) electricity from straw could potentially<br />

become a pathway for residual straw utilisation in UA.<br />

However, this is not likely to occur until a more targeted<br />

governmental support of the activity is put in place like it<br />

happened in the case of DK [12].<br />

From Ukrainian experiences it can be concluded that<br />

private ownership of a straw-fired installation is one of<br />

the important predetermining factors for the enterprise<br />

success. This is also noted by Ukrainian bioenergy<br />

experts 30. In UA in ABF 1 and 3, where the majority of<br />

successful cases on straw for energy can be found,<br />

private business interests of actors or agricultural<br />

companies played the key role for the transition. In the<br />

initiatives within ABF 2, where a straw-fired boiler is<br />

owned by local municipality, a wide range of problems<br />

were encountered. The problems were mainly linked to<br />

the commitment of actors, their interests and a desire to<br />

participate in a collective action. For example, the main<br />

difference between the project case in Vyshyuvate and<br />

the functioning case in Zlatoustivka was the fact that in<br />

Zlatoustivka a straw-fired boiler was owned by the<br />

agricultural enterprise and the DH provision was ensured<br />

by entrepreneurs among their business activities [61]. In<br />

the case of Vyshnyuvate the boiler was planned to be<br />

financed from the state budget and owned by local<br />

municipality, which did not show any commitment but<br />

rather opposed the idea. The opposition was mainly<br />

linked to the lobby interests of the decision-makers [55],<br />

who were interested to keep the functioning coal supply<br />

system in place.<br />

Described types of problems are likely to be<br />

encountered where local authorities and municipalities<br />

play a key role as decision-makers. However, in case the<br />

energy installations and distribution grids are privatised,<br />

the owners become the definitive stakeholders.<br />

Successful examples from WE [11,12] show that strawto-energy<br />

facilities are very rarely owned by<br />

municipalities. Hence the privatisation can become one<br />

of the pathways for a more smooth transition towards<br />

increased straw use for energy in UA.<br />

In Ukrainian conditions similar to Western European<br />

context all successful examples of transformation<br />

towards straw/bioenergy include a number of economic,<br />

environmental and social co-benefits leveraged between<br />

the actors in one way or another.<br />

5 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH<br />

5.1 Conclusions<br />

Three types of ABFs are identified in Ukrainian<br />

context:<br />

• On organisational level – ABF 1: Small scale<br />

local straw production for local use for heat;<br />

• On intraindustrial level – ABF 2: Small scale


local straw production for fuel sale to<br />

municipality and ABF 3: Medium scale local<br />

straw production for heat sale.<br />

While ABF 1 and 3 were encountered in WE, ABF 2<br />

is specific for UA.<br />

Straw-to-energy is in the latent phase of system<br />

development in UA. All existing installations are below<br />

1 MW and there are no technology production lines for<br />

larger straw-fired boiler capacities.<br />

There is no significant political support of straw-toenergy<br />

activities in UA, which is a key prerequisite for<br />

large-scale straw use and is important on medium scale.<br />

Feasible funding schemes are desired to expand the<br />

scales of straw use for energy in the country.<br />

In UA currently only heat is produced from straw.<br />

Electricity generation could become one pathway since<br />

“feed-in tariff” is already in place. However, since<br />

electricity is only produced on large scale a targeted<br />

governmental support will be needed.<br />

Energy security is a driving force that is promising to<br />

have further influence on straw sector development in<br />

UA. However, cross-subsidised tariffs for energy need to<br />

be removed.<br />

Privatisation can be one of the pathways for a more<br />

smooth transition towards straw-to-energy in UA.<br />

5.2 Future research and implications<br />

Future research needs to be carried out to deliver a<br />

more detailed analysis on the constraints to bioenergy<br />

development in UA (i.e. technological and “know how”,<br />

financial, political barriers, etc.) with a consequent<br />

construction of recommended pathways for the sector<br />

development in the country.<br />

This work is a part of a full-time PhD research<br />

funded by Central European University, Budapest,<br />

Hungary, and conducted by the leading author under the<br />

supervision of the second author.<br />

The results of this paper are expected to be of direct<br />

use for policy makers, municipal leaders, business<br />

managers, researchers and other actors seeking for the<br />

transformation of local energy systems towards<br />

bioenergy. The outcomes of the paper are transferable to<br />

various contexts on the condition that local specificities<br />

are taken into account.<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

1. Barney, J.B. Firm resources and sustained<br />

competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17,<br />

99-120 (1991).<br />

2. Dollinger, M.J. Enterpreneurship: Strategies and<br />

Resources. (Homewood, IL, 1995).<br />

3. Greene, P.G. & Brown, T.E. Resource needs and the<br />

dynamic capitalism typology. Journal of Business<br />

Venturing 12, 161-173 (1997).<br />

4. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S. & Sandén, B.A.<br />

‘Legitimation’ and ‘Development of Positive<br />

Externalities’: Two Key Processes in the Formation<br />

Phase of Technological Innovation Systems.<br />

Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20<br />

(5), 575-592 (2008).<br />

5. Carlsson, B. & Stankiewicz, R. On the Nature,<br />

Function and Composition of Technological<br />

Systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 (2),<br />

93-118 (1991).<br />

6. Hektor, B. Planning Models for <strong>Bioenergy</strong>: Some<br />

General Observations and Comments. Biomass and<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> 18, 279-282 (2000).<br />

7. Hillman, K.M., Suurs, M.P., Hekkert, M.P. &<br />

Sandén, B.A. Cumulative Causation in Biofuels<br />

Development: a Critical Comparison of the<br />

Netherlands and Sweden. Technology Analysis &<br />

Strategic Management 20 (5), 593-612 (2008).<br />

8. Jacobsson, S. & Bergek, A. Transforming the Energy<br />

Sector: the Evolution of Technological Systems in<br />

Renewable Energy Technology. Industrial and<br />

Corporate Change 13 (5), 815-849 (2004).<br />

9. Jacobsson, S. & Johnson, A. Diffusion of Renewable<br />

Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and<br />

Key Issues for Research. Energy Policy 28, 625-640<br />

(2000).<br />

10. Mårtensson, K. & Westerberg, K. How to Transform<br />

Local Energy Systems towards <strong>Bioenergy</strong>? Three<br />

Strategy Models for Transformation. Energy Policy<br />

7, (2007).<br />

11. Voytenko, Y. & Peck, P. Agro-biomass frameworks<br />

for organisation in Southern Sweden. Presented at<br />

17 th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition<br />

29 June-3 July 2009, Hamburg, Germany<br />

12. Voytenko, Y. & Peck, P. Frameworks for<br />

Organisation of Straw-based Energy Systems.<br />

Presented at <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Network of Excellence<br />

(NoE) Final Seminar, 3 November 2009, Brussels,<br />

Belgium<br />

13. Dubrovin, V. et al. Biopalyva: technologiyi, mashyny<br />

i obladnannya [Biofuels: technologies, machines<br />

and equipment]. (CTI Energetyka i elekrofikatsiya:<br />

Kyiv, Ukraine, 2004).<br />

14. Geletukha, G. & Dolinsky, A. State of the art and<br />

prospects for bioenergy development in Ukraine.<br />

Presented at 5 th International Conference on<br />

Biomass to Energy, 22 September 2009, Kyiv,<br />

Ukraine<br />

15. Grynyuk, I. Vid pryrodnogo gazu do biomasy [From<br />

Natural Gas to Biomass]. Agrosector 4, (2009).<br />

16. Oliynyk, Y., a consultant at SEC Biomass. Telephone<br />

interview, 19 January <strong>2010</strong>, Lund, Sweden<br />

17. Radchenko, S., Bashtovoy, A. & Chaplygin, S.<br />

Osobennosti vybora potentsialnykh obyektov dlya<br />

ustanovki solomoszhygayushchikh kotlov [Specific<br />

parameters defining the choice of potential objects<br />

for the installation of straw-fired boilers]. (2009).<br />

18. Voytenko, Y., Israilava, A. & Peck, P. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Cobenefits<br />

in Ukraine and Belarus: Realities on the<br />

Ground. (2009).<br />

19. Zhelezna, T. & Geletukha, G. Analysis of Legal<br />

Frameworks on <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Development in Ukraine<br />

[Analiz zakonodavchoyi bazy rozvytku<br />

bioenergetyky v Ukrayini]. Presented at 5 th<br />

International Conference on Biomass to Energy,<br />

22 September 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

20. Geletukha, G., Zhelezna, T., Matveev, Y. & Zhovmir,<br />

M. Analysis of the present state and prospects for<br />

bioenergy development in Ukraine. Presented at 16 th<br />

European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 2-<br />

6 June 2008, Valencia, Spain<br />

21. Dolinsky, A. Resolution. Presented at 4 th<br />

International Conference on Biomass for Energy,<br />

22-24 September 2008, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

22. Geletukha, G., director of SEC Biomass and<br />

Department Head at the Institute of Engineering<br />

Thermophysics of National Academy of Sciences of<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

105


Ukraine. Personal interview, 19 March 2007, Kyiv,<br />

Ukraine<br />

23. Fominykh, O., a manager at LLC “Agrarna<br />

spivdruzhnist” - Green Energy. Personal interview,<br />

26 May 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

24. Listopad, V. Rol’ Ukrainy na mirovom rynke syr’ya<br />

dlya proizvodstva biodiselya [The Role of Ukraine<br />

on the <strong>World</strong> Market for Biodiesel Feedstock<br />

Production]. (2009).<br />

25. Zhelezna, T. & Morozova, O. Lushpynnya<br />

sonyashnyku dlya teplovyh potreb [Sunflower Husk<br />

for Heat]. Zelena energetyka 24-25 (2007).<br />

26. Svintsitskiy, R., UTEM sales director. Personal<br />

interview, 28 December 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

27. Kucheruk, P., Matveev, Y. & Plugatar, O.<br />

Ekonomichni aspekty rozvytku biogazovyh<br />

tehnologiy v Ukrayini [Economic Aspects of Biogas<br />

Technologies in Ukraine]. Kommunalnoe<br />

hozyaystvo 6, 30-31 (2007).<br />

28. Matveev, Y. The state of biogas technologies<br />

development in Ukraine. Presentation (2009).<br />

29. Korol, O. The Bioethanol Program. Presentation<br />

(2009).<br />

30. Oliynyk, Y., a consultant at SEC Biomass. Personal<br />

interview, 22 September 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

31. Zhovmir, M., Oliynyk, Y. & Chaplygin, S. Soloma<br />

obigriye sela [The Straw will Heat the Villages].<br />

Zelena energetyka 5, 28-29 (2007).<br />

32. UTEM Implementation of economically sound<br />

modern technologies. Issues of the day: OJSC<br />

UTEM is the only in Ukraine manufacturer of<br />

licensed straw boilers. (2009).<br />

33. Avdeev, A. UTEM Engineering Leaflet. (2008).<br />

34. SEC Biomass Scientific Engineering Centre<br />

"Biomass". Information bulletin. (2009).<br />

35. OJSC "Bryg" Zernosushilnye kompleksy na<br />

biomasse [Grain drying units on biomass].<br />

Oborudovanie dlya zernosushil'noy i<br />

zernopererabatyvayushchey promyshlennosti<br />

[Equipment for Grain Drying and Grain Processing<br />

Industry] (<strong>2010</strong>). URL: http://www.brigzerno.com.ua/pr19.htm<br />

36. Kuzmin, N., a chief engineer at OJSC “Bryg”.<br />

Telephone interview. 1 February <strong>2010</strong>, Lund,<br />

Sweden<br />

37. NVT "Technology" Oborudovanie i technologii.<br />

Ispolzovanie netraditsionnykh vidov topliva<br />

[Equipment and Technologies. The Use of<br />

Unconventional Fuels]. (2009).<br />

38. RETRA Zagalni kharaketrystyky kotliv "RETRA<br />

3M" [General Parameters of RETRA 3M Boilers].<br />

RETRA: Kotly na tverdom toplive [RETRA: Boilers<br />

on Solid Fuels] (2009).<br />

URL: http://www.retra.com.ua/page.php?2<br />

39. TM "Ukrsetka" Stalnoy otopitelnyi kotel na<br />

biotoplive (soloma, drevesina, pellety, shelukha<br />

semechki, stebli kukuruzy i podsolnechnika i t.d.)<br />

[Biofuel-fired Steel Heating Boiler (straw, wood,<br />

pellets, sunflower husk, corn and sunflower stems,<br />

etc.)]. Alternativnaya energetika: Otoplenie<br />

[Alternative energy: Heating] (2008).<br />

URL: http://www.ukrsetka.com/index.php?productI<br />

D=285<br />

40. Toropets, O., a director of heat generator production<br />

company "NVT-Technology". Personal interview.<br />

3 June 2009, Chernihiv, Ukraine<br />

41. FuelAlternative Rynok biotopliva. Ukraina: export<br />

106 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

(Biofuel market. Ukraine: Export). FuelAlternative<br />

1, 1-4 (2009).<br />

42. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Decree #276-p On<br />

Approval of State Targeted Scientific Technical<br />

Development Programme on Biofuel Production<br />

and Consumption. (2009).<br />

URL: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/cgibin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=276-2009-%F0<br />

43. Verkhovna Rada Ukrayiny Law of Ukraine #1391-VI<br />

On Changes to Some Laws of Ukraine on Support of<br />

Biofuel Production and Consumption. (2009).<br />

URL: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/cgibin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=1391-17<br />

44. Geletukha, G. & Konshyn, Y. Kiotskyi protocol ta<br />

dodatkovi invetytsiyi v energozberezhennya [Kyoto<br />

Protocol and Additional Investments in Energy<br />

Saving]. EtaR 4, 28-33 (2007).<br />

45. Aldrich, H. & Fiol, C. Fools Rush In? The<br />

Institutional Context of Industry Creation. The<br />

Academy of Management Review 19 (4), 645-670<br />

(1994).<br />

46. DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. The Iron Cage Revisited:<br />

Institutional Isomorphism and Collective<br />

Rationality in Organisational field. The New<br />

Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991).<br />

47. Mizruchi, M. & Fein, L. The Social Construction of<br />

Organisational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of<br />

Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism.<br />

Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 653-689<br />

(1999).<br />

48. Alsos, G.A., Ljunggren, E. & Pettersen, L.T. Farmbased<br />

Entrepreneurs: What Triggers the Start-up of<br />

New Business Activities? Journal of Small Business<br />

and Enterprise Development 10 (4), 435-443<br />

(2003).<br />

49. Mitchell, R., Agle, B. & Wood, D. Toward a Theory<br />

of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining<br />

the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.<br />

Academy of Management Review 22 (4), 853-856<br />

(1997).<br />

50. Neville, B., Menguc, B. & Bell, S. Stakeholder<br />

Salience Reloaded: Operationalising Corporate<br />

Social Responsibility. 1883-1889, (2003).<br />

51. Antonik, I., director and co-founder of agricultural<br />

enterprise “Rapsodiya”. Telephone interview,<br />

21 January <strong>2010</strong>, Lund, Sweden<br />

52. Demydov, O., leading energy expert at OJSC<br />

“Lebedynskyi Seed Plant”. Telephone interview,<br />

4 December 2009, Lund, Sweden<br />

53. Tkachynskyi, M., first deputy head of Chechelnyk<br />

regional administration, Vinnytsya province.<br />

Telephone interview, 30 November 2009, Lund,<br />

Sweden<br />

54. Geletukha, G. & Globenko, A. Dogovir pryimannyaperedachi<br />

#8-09 [Contract оn Taking over and<br />

Transfer #9-09]. (2009).<br />

55. Belay, V., a teacher of Physics at Vyshyuvate<br />

secondary school, Rozivka region, Zaporizzhya<br />

province. Telephone interview, 27 November 2009,<br />

Lund, Sweden<br />

56. Belay, V. Teplogeneratory na solomi - teplo dlya<br />

silskyh shkil [Straw-fired boilers - heat for village<br />

schools in Ukraine]. Zelena energetyka 4, 5-6<br />

(2009).<br />

57. Belay, V. Vykorystannya solomy dlya opalyuvannya<br />

prymishchennya Vyshyuvatskoyi zagalnoosvitnyoyi<br />

shkoly [Straw Use for the Heating of Vyshnyuvate


Secondary School]. (2009).<br />

58. Belay, V. Ne hvylyuyut' zovsim nas tsiny na<br />

rosiyskyi gaz! A yak u vas? [We Don't Care about<br />

Russian Gas Prices at All! What about You?].<br />

Zelena energetyka 4, (2009).<br />

59. Belay, G. & Belay, V. Biznes-plan stvorennya v<br />

Rozivskomu rayoni Zaporizkoyi oblasti<br />

energoservisnoyi kompaniyi ESKO [Business Plan<br />

on the Establishment of Energy Service Company<br />

ESKO in Rozivka Region]. (2009).<br />

60. Orlovskyi, V., director of the trading company<br />

"ROPA Ukraine". Telephone interview, 8 February<br />

<strong>2010</strong>, Lund, Sweden<br />

61. Yerkhov, O., director of agricultural enterprise<br />

"Rossiya". Telephone interview, 22 January <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

Lund, Sweden<br />

62. Khoba, Y. Byurokraty nagreli selo [Bureaucrats Have<br />

Heated up the Village]. Donbass (2008).<br />

63. Lytvyn, O., deputy director at agricultural enterprise<br />

“DiM”. Personal interview, 17 September 2009,<br />

Drozdy, Ukraine<br />

64. Butenko, O., private farmer and owner of biomassfired<br />

heat generator. 2 June 2009, Mena, Ukraine<br />

65. Belay, G. & Belay, V. Biznes-ideya stvorennya v<br />

Rozivskomu rayoni energoservisnoyi kompaniyi<br />

(ESKO) [Business Idea: Creation of Energy Service<br />

Company (ESCO) in Rozivka region]. (2009).<br />

66. Konechenkov, A., head of Ukrainian Wind<br />

Association; former editor-in-chief of Green Energy<br />

journal. Personal interview, 14 October 2009, Lund,<br />

Sweden<br />

67. Palle, P., a farmer and an owner of neighbour heating<br />

plant in Horreby, Denmark. Telephone interview,<br />

9 December 2009, Lund, Sweden<br />

68. Palle, P., a farmer and an owner of neighbour heating<br />

plant in Horreby, Denmark. Personal interview,<br />

27 January <strong>2010</strong>, Horreby, Denmark<br />

69. Rasmusen, J., a farmer and an owner of neighbour<br />

heating plant in Stokkemarke, Denmark. Personal<br />

interview, 27 January <strong>2010</strong>, Stokkemarke, Denmark<br />

70. Sejdenfaden, O., a farmer and owner of neighbour<br />

heating plant in Hunseby, Denmark. Personal<br />

interview, 27 January <strong>2010</strong>, Hunseby, Denmark<br />

71. Sander, B. & Skøtt, T. <strong>Bioenergy</strong> for Electricity and<br />

Heat – Experiences from Biomass-fired CHP Plants<br />

in Denmark. (DONG Energy and Vattenfall: 2007).<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

107


108 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

ORaL CONfERENCE pROGRaMME 25-27 MaY<br />

Presentations from the oral sessions can be downloaded at www.worldbioenergy.com.<br />

(Only open for conference delegates.)


CONfERENCE TuEsDaY 25 MaY<br />

09.00 OpENING pLENaRY sEssION<br />

Conference chairperson: Tomas Kåberger, Director General of the Swedish Energy Agency<br />

Opening speech, Eskil Erlandsson, Swedish minister of Agriculture and Forestry<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> opportunities in developing countries, Miguel Trossero, FAO, Argentina<br />

price ceremony and presentation of the winner of <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> award, Kent Nyström, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

speech by the winner of <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> award<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> for the world - Global Energy assessment, Thomas B Johansson, University of Lund, Sweden<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> outcompetes oil in sweden, showing that growth in a green economy is possible, Gustav Melin, Svebio, Sweden<br />

Tomas Kåberger Eskil Erlandsson Miguel Trossero Kent Nyström Thomas B Johansson<br />

Gustav Melin<br />

10.45 Coffee<br />

11.15 - 13.00 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

Rawmaterial availability and<br />

forest residues – slash,<br />

policy – how to make it all<br />

a1 B1 C1<br />

D1<br />

market development<br />

stumps, small tree harvest<br />

happen<br />

Chair. lena Söderberg, Svebio Chair. rolf björheden, Forest research institute of Sweden Chair. Kjell Andersson, Svebio Chair. david Frykerås, Ageratec<br />

Current status and challenges<br />

in the global availiability of<br />

biomass<br />

Hubert Röder, Pöyry Management<br />

Consulting<br />

Forest biomass availability<br />

in EU<br />

Robert Prinz, Finish forest<br />

research institute<br />

Clean power from discarded<br />

rubber trees – Benefits for<br />

Europe and Africa<br />

Annika Billstein Andersson, Vattenfall<br />

Competition between power<br />

stations for biomass in<br />

Poland<br />

Magdalena Walker,<br />

National Research Institute<br />

From shrinking to expanding<br />

biomass in forests of the<br />

world<br />

Pekka Kauppi, University of Helsinki<br />

Introduction – What is the<br />

overall potential, and what<br />

technologies can we use?<br />

Rolf Björheden, The Forest Research<br />

Institute of Sweden<br />

Can slash and stumps be<br />

harvested without negative<br />

effects on the environment?<br />

Hillevi Eriksson,<br />

Swedish Forest Agency<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> from mountain<br />

forests: Analysis of the<br />

woody biomass supply chain<br />

Clara Valente,<br />

Hedmark University College<br />

Cost-efficient small-sized<br />

energy wood harvesting<br />

method for young stands<br />

Kalle Kärhä, Metsäteho<br />

Harvest for energy or<br />

pulpwood in early thinnings<br />

Dan Bergström, Swedish<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

13.00 - 15.00 Lunch in Black & White restaurant in Lobby south and Exhibition<br />

15.00 - 18.00 sTuDY VIsITs aND sIDE EVENTs<br />

EU climate and renewable<br />

energy policy opens up new<br />

markets across Europe<br />

Jean-Marc Jossart, Aebiom<br />

The Renewable Energy<br />

Directive: A first step towards a<br />

sustainable bioenergy policy, or<br />

rather, another piece of red tape?<br />

Stefan Busse,<br />

University of Goettingen<br />

Biomass sustainability criteria:<br />

Case study in sustainability<br />

auditing for power generation<br />

Adrian Mason, Inspectorate<br />

International<br />

Barriers of implementing<br />

renewable energy and energy<br />

efficiency in northern periphery<br />

Jarmo Renvall, North Karelia<br />

University of Applied Sciences<br />

The Global <strong>Bioenergy</strong><br />

Development Fund – A path<br />

forward for social justice in the<br />

mitigation of anthropogenic<br />

emission of greenhouse gases<br />

Alfred Wong, Arbokem Inc.<br />

Biofuels are evolving –<br />

new innovations<br />

Green-LPG an ideal 2nd<br />

generation vehicle fuel<br />

Christian Hulteberg,<br />

Biofuel-Solution<br />

Ammonia treatment of cellulose<br />

is a key technology on dramatic<br />

improvement of cellulase activity<br />

Masahiro Samejima,<br />

The University of Tokyo<br />

Biogas upgrading by<br />

temperature swing adsorption<br />

Tamara Mayer, Vienna University<br />

of Technology<br />

Infrastructure system of<br />

textile waste recycling in<br />

Japan<br />

Chie Yoshimura, JEPLAN.Co.<br />

Why heterogeneous catalysis<br />

will be central to renewable<br />

fuels<br />

Curtis Conner, Chalmers Technical<br />

University<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

109


CONfERENCE WEDNEsDaY 26 MaY<br />

09.00 - 10.45 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

a2<br />

Chair. Andrew lang, SMArTimbers Chair. Christian rakos, proPellets Chair. Peter rechberger, Aebiom Chair. Tomas Kåberger, Swedish energy Agency<br />

The cost and management<br />

of moisture in the biomass<br />

to energy supply chain<br />

Ross Harding, Energy Launch<br />

Partners, USA<br />

Innovative technologies for<br />

long-distance biomass<br />

transports by rail<br />

Gerald Petschner, Innofreight<br />

Biomass pre-treatment by<br />

torrefaction – How to scale<br />

up the process<br />

Jaap Kiel, Energy Research Centre<br />

of the Netherlands<br />

Application development of<br />

bio-coke technology for<br />

Coppoloa furnace<br />

Tamio Ida, Kinki University<br />

The development of<br />

pyrolysis oil applications<br />

Dagmar Zwebe, BTG Bioliquids<br />

10.45 Coffee<br />

11.15 - 13.00 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

a3<br />

fuel preparation, production<br />

and logistics<br />

Large scale combustion and<br />

cofiring<br />

110 world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

U.S. wood pellet production<br />

and global market outlook<br />

Thomas Meth, Intrinergy Inc.<br />

Temperature controlled<br />

pelletizing – A new dimension<br />

of process control<br />

Sylvia Larsson, Swedish University<br />

of Agricultural Sciences<br />

Emerging pellets markets –<br />

Country profiles from<br />

around the globe<br />

Jan Wintzell, Pöyry Management<br />

Consulting<br />

Development of pellet<br />

production in Russia<br />

Olga Rakitova, The National<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> Union<br />

Best engineering, operating<br />

and maintenance practices for<br />

safety and health in the pellet industry<br />

Staffan Melin, Wood Pellet<br />

Association of Canada<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> – an opportunity<br />

for farmers?<br />

Christina Huhtasaari, Swedish Board<br />

of Agriculture<br />

Frameworks for organisation<br />

of straw-based energy<br />

systems in Ukraine<br />

Yuliya Voytenko, Central<br />

European University<br />

Modelling impact of climate<br />

change on willow potential<br />

productivity in Poland<br />

Jerzy Korzyra, Institute of Soil<br />

Sciences and Plant Cultivation<br />

Round bale harvest of willow<br />

plantations in Quebec<br />

Frédèric Lavoie,<br />

Agriculture and Agri-Food<br />

Intercropping of reed canary<br />

grass, with legumes can cut<br />

costs for N-fertilization<br />

Cecilia Palmborg, Swedish University of<br />

Agricultural Sciences<br />

Ethanol from wheat straw –<br />

A reality in Denmark from<br />

November 2009<br />

Rene Juul Strandgaard, Inbicon<br />

Commercial scale BTL<br />

production on the verge of<br />

becoming reality – The CHOREN<br />

Beta-Plant and future developments<br />

Jochen Vogels, Choren<br />

Small to medium scale<br />

biodiesel production<br />

Ulf Johansson, Ageratec<br />

GoBiGas – Efficient transfer<br />

of biomass to biofuels<br />

Åsa Burman, Göteborg Energi<br />

Wood-biorefineries in<br />

Northern Sweden, the<br />

Domsjö example<br />

Clas Engström,<br />

Processum Biorefinery Initiative<br />

Chair. Kent nyström, wbA Chair. Pekka Kauppi, University of Helsinki Chair. Jean-Marc Jossart, Aebiom Chair. gustav Melin, Svebio<br />

Large percentage cofiring of<br />

coal with biomass and 100 %<br />

fuel switch from coal to biomass<br />

Wlodzimierz Blasiak, Nalco Mobotec and<br />

Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden<br />

Large scale cofiring by GDF-<br />

Suez in Belgium, Poland and<br />

the Netherlands<br />

Yves Ryckmans, Laborelec<br />

Results from a 120 MW unit<br />

in northern Sweden for high<br />

steam technology<br />

Marcus Bolhar-Nordenkampf,<br />

AE&E Group<br />

District heating in the US –<br />

It can be done!<br />

Michael Burns, Ever-Green Energy<br />

Ontario’s huge biomass<br />

resource – Our steps forward<br />

to large-scale bioenergy<br />

Stephen Roberts, Ontario Ministry of<br />

Northern Development Mines and Forests<br />

pellets – the new large energy Energy crops, agricultural resi-<br />

E1 f1<br />

commodity<br />

dues and by-products<br />

D2<br />

B2<br />

forest residues – slash, stumps,<br />

small tree harvest<br />

Procurement costs of slash<br />

and stumps in Sweden<br />

Dimitris Athanassiadis, Swedish<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences<br />

10 years with slash bundles<br />

– More efficiency and flexibility<br />

to forest energy logistics<br />

Marica Kilponen, John Deere Forestry<br />

Mediterranean slash;<br />

olive oil tree, the green oil<br />

Marcos Martin, Spanish Biomass<br />

Association, AVEBIOM<br />

Effects of harvesting<br />

techniques and storage<br />

methods on fuel quality of stumps<br />

Erik Anerud, Swedish University of<br />

Agricultural Sciences<br />

The future of the<br />

Chilean native forest<br />

Hans Grosse, Chilean Forest Institute<br />

(INFOR)<br />

13.00 - 15.00 Lunch in Black & White restaurant in Lobby south and Exhibition<br />

15.00 - 18.00 sTuDY VIsITs aND sIDE EVENTs<br />

C2<br />

policy – how to make it all<br />

happen<br />

Global standards on<br />

solid biofuels<br />

Lars Sjöberg,<br />

Swedish Standards Institute<br />

Biomass Florida - Why and<br />

how Florida makes<br />

biomass work<br />

Mary Ellen Hogan, Bryant Miller Olive<br />

Mind efficiency in<br />

policy making<br />

Tomas Kåberger,<br />

Swedish Energy Agency<br />

Policy innovation system for<br />

clean energy security<br />

Benard Mouk, African Center for<br />

Technology Studies<br />

Expect more from France –<br />

Current and future bioenergy<br />

development<br />

Jean-Hugues Pierson,<br />

Invest in France Agency<br />

D3<br />

Leading global examples of<br />

biofuels<br />

how to build a market for<br />

biofuels<br />

Darkness at noon? Scenarios<br />

for bioenergy success<br />

Petri Vasara, Pöyry Management<br />

Consulting<br />

Bioethanol for sustainable<br />

transport, the BEST method<br />

for market development<br />

Jonas Ericsson, City of Stockholm<br />

How to build a biofuel<br />

market in China<br />

Zhang Nan, SF-Bio-Industrial Bio-tech<br />

Co. Ltd. & Yang Liu, Commercial Bureau<br />

of Administrative Committee<br />

Southeast Asia –<br />

The Saudi Arabia of biofuels?<br />

Per Dahlen, Portelet Asia Pte.,<br />

Singapore<br />

Brazilian sugarcane ethanol’s<br />

contribution to a more<br />

sustainable European<br />

transport mix<br />

Emmanuel Desplechin, UNICA


CONfERENCE ThuRsDaY 27 MaY<br />

09.00 paRaLLEL CONfERENCEs<br />

Improved energy efficiency, electri- pellets – the new large energy Energy crops, agricultural<br />

a4 E2<br />

f2<br />

city production and district heating<br />

commodity<br />

residues and by-products D4<br />

Chair. ross Harding, energy launch Partners Chair. niklas engström, neova Ab Chair. lennart ljungblom, bioenergy international Chair. Harry Stokes, gaia Association<br />

GHG-emissions and cost<br />

savings with district<br />

heating in Europe<br />

Peter Rechberger, Aebiom<br />

Business model ontology<br />

for heat entrepreneurship<br />

Helena Puhakka-Tarvainen, North<br />

Karelia University of Applied Science<br />

TopCycle – 55% electric<br />

efficiency from biofuel<br />

Leif R K Nilsson, Euroturbine<br />

The future of biomass - drying<br />

from classical drying to<br />

torrefaction<br />

Ulf Bojner, AB Torkapparater<br />

Advanced Bio CFB<br />

technology for large-scale<br />

power generation of biomass<br />

Timo Jäntti, Foster Wheeler Global<br />

Power<br />

Profitable small scale power<br />

generation from waste heat<br />

and steam<br />

Ingemar Olson, Opcon Energy<br />

Systems<br />

11.00 Coffee<br />

Australian plantation<br />

forestry and wood-biofuel<br />

pellets: Examining the role of<br />

management investment schemes<br />

Philip Peck, Lund University, Sweden<br />

The EN plus certificate –<br />

Striving for uniform pellet<br />

qualities in Europe<br />

Christian Rakos, ProPellets<br />

The residential market<br />

versus the export of industrial<br />

wood pellets in the mid and<br />

long term<br />

Leroy Reitsma, Pinnacle Pellets Inc.<br />

Influencing factors on<br />

the wood pellet price<br />

development on selective<br />

European markets<br />

Christiane Hennig, German<br />

Biomass Research Centre<br />

New insights in ash<br />

melting properties<br />

Jeroen van Soest, Meneba<br />

Torrefaction for biomass<br />

refinement<br />

Anders Nordin, Umeå University<br />

Showing how to create<br />

wealth from Jatropha<br />

Curcas<br />

Ohene Kwadwo Akoto,<br />

Jatropha Africa<br />

Effects of spacing in the<br />

proprieties of the wood<br />

and charcoal of eucalyptus<br />

clones from energetic forests<br />

Laércio Couto, Federal<br />

University of Viçosa (UFV)<br />

Ethanol from tropical<br />

sugar beet; an exciting<br />

new feedstock for Latin America,<br />

Asia and Africa<br />

Jan Örhvall, ANDITEC LTDA and<br />

Chematur Engineering<br />

Future vehicle fuel supply<br />

for agriculture –<br />

case study Sweden<br />

Andras Baky, JTI<br />

Biomethanation of solid<br />

biomass from agro-industries<br />

in India<br />

Dilip Ranade, Agharkar Research<br />

Institute, India<br />

Improve the productivity of<br />

agriculture and the<br />

sustainable development<br />

in Sub Saharan Africa<br />

Ralph Hanmbock Songo, ANCC<br />

Why biomass –<br />

and for what?<br />

Tone Knudsen, Bellona Europa<br />

<strong>Bioenergy</strong> and land use<br />

change – Impacts and<br />

mitigation options<br />

Andrea Egeskog,<br />

Chalmers Technical University<br />

How to verify the<br />

sustainability of biofuels?<br />

Sébastien Haye, Roundtable on<br />

Sustainable Biofuels<br />

Verified sustainable ethanol<br />

Emmi Jozsa, SEKAB<br />

Closing debate on the<br />

sustainability of biofuels.<br />

11.30 - 13.00 fINaL pLENaRY sEssION: sYMphONY Of ThE RENEWaBLEs – a REVOLuTION<br />

Chairperson: Tomas Kåberger, Director General of the Swedish Energy Agency<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> <strong>2010</strong> will close with a panel of representatives from The International Renewable Energy<br />

Alliance (REN Alliance) discussing the future of renewable energy in a global perspective.<br />

The panel will summarise key aspects of the renewable revolution relevant to the technologies they represent and discuss<br />

collectively how the various technologies are working together and can increase collaboration to provide safe, reliable, secure<br />

and clean energy services throughout the world, highlighting examples and case studies.<br />

Panel:<br />

Jan-Olov Dahlenbäck, International Solar Energy Society<br />

Gregory Tracz, International Hydropower Association<br />

Horst Rüter, International Geothermal Association<br />

Kent Nyström, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bioenergy</strong> Association<br />

Stefan Gsänger, <strong>World</strong> Wind Energy Association<br />

13.00 - 15.00 Lunch in Black & White restaurant in Lobby south and Exhibition<br />

15.00 - 18.00 sTuDY VIsITs aND sIDE EVENTs<br />

sustainability of biofuels<br />

world bioenergy <strong>2010</strong><br />

111


Welcome back to<br />

WORLD<br />

BIOENERGY<br />

2012 29-31 May<br />

29-31 May 2012<br />

JÖNKÖPING, SWEDEN<br />

WWW.WORLDBIOENERGY.COM<br />

Register<br />

your e-mail at<br />

WWW.WORLDBIOENERGY.COM<br />

Keep up to date!


TaKING YOu fROM KNOW-hOW TO shOW-hOW<br />

WWW.WORLDBIOENERGY.COM<br />

WOuLD YOu LIKE<br />

MORE INfORMaTION?<br />

Contact us and we’ll be happy to tell you more.<br />

Svebio office, conference organiser<br />

Tel: +46 8 441 70 80, Fax: +46 8 441 70 89<br />

E-mail: worldbioenergy@svebio.se<br />

Jakob Hirsmark, exhibition manager<br />

Tel: +46 36 15 22 14, Fax: +46 36 16 46 92<br />

Box 6066. SE-550 06 Jönköping, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 36-15 20 00. Fax +46 36-16 46 92<br />

Internet: www.elmia.se<br />

E-mail: jakob.hirsmark@elmia.se<br />

Torsgatan 12. SE-111 23 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Tel +46 8-441 70 80. Fax +46 8-441 70 89<br />

Internet: www.svebio.se<br />

Cover photo: Ugur Evirgen [istockphoto].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!