09.01.2013 Views

Oral Presentations - Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies

Oral Presentations - Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies

Oral Presentations - Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S28 Abstracts<br />

F.34 Gleevec: A New Therapeutic for Type I<br />

Diabetes?<br />

Cedric Louvet, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Diabetes<br />

Center at University <strong>of</strong> California, San Francisco, San<br />

Francisco, CA, Gregory L. Szot, Islet Transplant Facility<br />

Manager, Diabetes Center, San Francisco, CA, Jiena Lang,<br />

Staff Research Associate, Diabetes Center at University <strong>of</strong><br />

California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey A.<br />

Bluestone, Diabetes Center Director, Diabetes Center at<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,<br />

Michael R. Lee, Staff Research Assistant, Diabetes Center at<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA<br />

Gleevec (Imatinib, formerly STI571) is the first FDA-approved<br />

drug to directly turn <strong>of</strong>f a specific protein known to cause a<br />

cancer. Although targeted to the Bcr-Abl kinase, Gleevec has<br />

been shown to modestly affect related kinases including PDGF,<br />

c-fms and c-kit potentially involved in various cell types critical<br />

to the development and progression <strong>of</strong> autoimmune diseases.<br />

Based on these fundamental properties, we embarked on a<br />

study to determine the clinical effects <strong>of</strong> Gleevec in T1D in NOD<br />

mice.<br />

NOD mice were treated by gavage daily with 1.5 mg/<br />

mouse <strong>of</strong> commercially available Gleevec suspended in<br />

peanut oil. Pre-diabetic mice treated with Gleevec, but not<br />

with peanut oil only, were protected from spontaneous<br />

diabetes. More importantly, when Gleevec treatment was<br />

initiated at the time <strong>of</strong> disease onset (blood sugars between<br />

250 and 350 mg/dl), the majority <strong>of</strong> mice went into remission<br />

and b10% relapsed during the course <strong>of</strong> the therapy. When<br />

therapy was discontinued at 2 weeks, the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mice became hyperglycemic within 1–2 weeks. However,<br />

longer therapy (8–10 weeks) resulted in long-term normoglycemia<br />

in a majority <strong>of</strong> treated animals even after drug<br />

cessation suggesting that Gleevec does not have to be given<br />

continuously to promote long-lasting protection. The possibility<br />

that short-term therapy with Gleevec can lead to longterm<br />

effects makes it a very attractive potential therapeutic<br />

for the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with new onset T1D as well as<br />

potentially patients undergoing an islet transplant.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.clim.2007.03.249<br />

F.38 Characterization <strong>of</strong> Peptide Agonists and<br />

Antagonists for the Interaction <strong>of</strong> CD200 with<br />

CD200R1 and Their Efficacy in Modulation <strong>of</strong><br />

LPS-induced TNFα Production and Mortality In Vivo<br />

Reginald Gorczynski, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, University Health Network,<br />

Toronto, ON, Canada, Ivo Boudakov, PDF, University Health<br />

Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, Ismat Khatri, PDF,<br />

University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada<br />

After engagement <strong>of</strong> the Ig-supergene family members<br />

CD200R1 and CD200, immunosuppressive and/or antiinflammatory<br />

signals augment allograft survival and<br />

decrease production <strong>of</strong> inflammatory cytokines. The primary<br />

domains <strong>of</strong> both CD200 and CD200R1 implicated in<br />

these interactions are found in the NH2-terminal region <strong>of</strong><br />

each molecule. We investigated the capacity <strong>of</strong> 10–15 mer<br />

synthetic peptides defining the three complementaritydetermining<br />

(CDR1–3) regions <strong>of</strong> mouse CD200 to reproduce<br />

the function <strong>of</strong> full-length CD200, or antagonize that<br />

function, assaying the suppression <strong>of</strong> LPS-induced TNFα<br />

production (in vivo/in); suppression <strong>of</strong> MLC responses in<br />

vitro; and LPS-induced mortality (d7) in vivo. Peptides<br />

located in the CDR2 region, but not CDR1 or CDR3 were<br />

potent agonists in vitro and in vivo, recapitulating the<br />

effects seen with the full-length molecule (CD200Fc). These<br />

small molecular weight agonists <strong>of</strong> CD200 might have<br />

efficacy in vivo in models <strong>of</strong> sepsis (and TNFα production).<br />

In a further analysis we explored the ability <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

peptides to block the suppressive and anti-inflammatory<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the full-length CD200Fc which was seen in MLCs<br />

and after LPS administration both in vitro and in vivo. In<br />

these studies peptides located in the CDR1 and CDR3<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> the NH2-terminal <strong>of</strong> CD200 were found to be<br />

antagonists <strong>of</strong> the biological effects <strong>of</strong> CD200. Our data<br />

confirm that discrete small molecular weight agonists and<br />

antagonists can be defined for the interactions <strong>of</strong> CD200<br />

and the CD200R1 receptor. Since these interactions result in<br />

regulation <strong>of</strong> both acquired immune responses, and<br />

inflammatory responses, these peptides may have clinical<br />

utility.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.clim.2007.03.250<br />

F.39 Calculating the Number <strong>of</strong> Ordered Mutations<br />

Necessary to Cause a Specific Cancer in a Specific<br />

Risk Group and the Fraction <strong>of</strong> the Group that is<br />

Immune to the Cancer<br />

Ivan Kramer, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, UMBC, Canada Physics,<br />

Catonsville, MD<br />

The series <strong>of</strong> ordered mutations that cause a cell to<br />

become cancerous is modeled so that the fraction <strong>of</strong> a risk<br />

group (e.g., white men) that has developed a specific cancer<br />

(e.g., melanoma) at any age can be computed. The saturated<br />

model constructed here allows the possibility that a fraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> a risk group may be immune to developing a specific<br />

cancer but is otherwise isomorphic to the physical model<br />

describing an ordered chain <strong>of</strong> radioactive nuclear decays.<br />

The model’s cancer incidence function depends on only<br />

three independent parameters: the number <strong>of</strong> mutations<br />

necessary for a cell to become cancerous, the fraction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

group that is immune to developing the cancer, and the time<br />

required for 50% <strong>of</strong> the group to experience an average<br />

mutation (defined as the mutation half-life). These three<br />

parameters are determined by fitting the model’s cancer<br />

incidence function to the cancer incidence data. For<br />

example, the modeling predicts that all white males in the<br />

USA are vulnerable to developing melanoma, five ordered<br />

mutations are required to develop it, and the mutation halflife<br />

is 33.5 years. By contrast, the modeling also predicts that<br />

80.7% <strong>of</strong> white females in the USA are immune to developing<br />

melanoma, three ordered mutations are required to develop<br />

it, and the mutation half-life is 54.7 years. Thus, different<br />

risk groups can develop the same cancer through different<br />

pathways. The mechanism underlying female immunity to<br />

melanoma should become a research priority. Stimulating

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!