Response to EPA Comments: RCRA Facility Investigation Phase I ...
Response to EPA Comments: RCRA Facility Investigation Phase I ...
Response to EPA Comments: RCRA Facility Investigation Phase I ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Status Report, June 10, 1997<br />
Envirite Corporadon<br />
<strong>RCRA</strong> Docket No. 1-90-103<br />
of data. In consultatioo witii Mr. Gr ^ Lawrence of EAS Labora<strong>to</strong>ries (EAS), I detemuned that the data package<br />
was incomplete.<br />
In a letter (copy enclosed) dated April 2, 1997 addressed <strong>to</strong> Dr. Brian Abraham (Target) I identified the specific type<br />
of infomiaticxi that I needed, and I stated several quesdons for which I was seeking answers. In his letter (copy<br />
enclosed) of April 14, 1997 Dr. Abraham answered my questions, but he did not provide any additional data. Upon<br />
receiving Dr. Abraham's letter, I contacted Mr. Tim Niblett (Target) and asked when the data would be forthcoming.<br />
Mr. Niblett reported that Taiget would be unable <strong>to</strong> provide the data for at least three weeks, since the lab instrument<br />
that was s<strong>to</strong>ring tbe data was going <strong>to</strong> be shipped <strong>to</strong> an off-site location for use in an environmental project. On May<br />
22 I called Mr. Niblett <strong>to</strong> request an update of this matter. He said that the instniment had still not been returned<br />
fixm the field. On June 4 I called Mr. Niblett again, and I learned that the instnunent would be in the field for an<br />
additional three weeks. I am hopefiil that I will receive the data shordy dTereafter.<br />
As noted in the June 4 cover letter that accompanied the data validation report for the UST project, a few more bits<br />
of information must be provided <strong>to</strong> die vaUda<strong>to</strong>r by the labora<strong>to</strong>ry, EAS Labora<strong>to</strong>ries. Having consulted with Mr.<br />
Lawrence (EAS) this aftemocxi I believe that the outstanding infomiaticMi will be in the hands of the data valida<strong>to</strong>r<br />
<strong>to</strong>morrow, and the valida<strong>to</strong>r will send theremainder of data validation report <strong>to</strong> you on or before June 20.<br />
Before the end of this week, I plan <strong>to</strong> send you the second revision of the LTR stability/permeabilitv' work plan..<br />
Proiected Tasks<br />
Upon finalizing the LTR stability/permeability workplan, Envirite anticipates that field sampling operations will<br />
commence two weeks hence. The workplan itself provides the remainder of scheduling activities<br />
Please do not hesitate <strong>to</strong> contact me if you require additional infomiation.,<br />
Very truly yours.<br />
WiUiam R. McTigue, Jr. Q I f<br />
Direc<strong>to</strong>r, Environmental Afifeirs<br />
cc: C. Brammer, 1st Selectman, Thomas<strong>to</strong>n<br />
D Duva, CT DEP<br />
F Marrazza, Environ<br />
T. Mueller, Thomas<strong>to</strong>n WPCA<br />
status09.doc