10.01.2013 Views

11:7,6 - The Mennonite

11:7,6 - The Mennonite

11:7,6 - The Mennonite

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gay Brunt Miller<br />

of Franconia<br />

Conference and<br />

Wayne<br />

Hochstetler of<br />

Illinois<br />

Conference discuss<br />

issues at the<br />

Constituency<br />

Leaders Council.<br />

For six years<br />

we’ve been<br />

talking about<br />

racial/ethnic<br />

issues, but<br />

nothing has<br />

changed.<br />

Unless<br />

something<br />

changes,<br />

we’re going<br />

to lose<br />

people.<br />

—Yvonne<br />

Bailey<br />

Gordon Houser<br />

24 <strong>The</strong><strong>Mennonite</strong> November 7, 2006<br />

Leaders look at role of area conferences<br />

Constituency Leaders Council also hears “power still exists for white males.”<br />

One year after calling for a task force to look at<br />

the role of area conferences in <strong>Mennonite</strong><br />

Church USA, members of the Constituency<br />

Leaders Council (CLC) heard and responded to a<br />

report from that task force. While mixed, the<br />

response was predominantly positive. <strong>The</strong> report<br />

and the responses now go to the denomination’s<br />

Executive Board, which meets in January 2007.<br />

Around 70 CLC members gathered Oct. 13-15 at<br />

the Lindenwood Retreat Center near Donaldson,<br />

Ind., primarily to consider the report.<br />

<strong>The</strong> report proposed four sets of practices for<br />

conferences and for Executive Leadership and its<br />

agencies: structural alignment, relational alignment,<br />

financial alignment and communication.<br />

While one role of conferences is to tend to the<br />

relationships of the church, they must collaborate<br />

with other parts of the church for this to be effective,<br />

the report said.<br />

One of the structural recommendations in the<br />

report was to add a section to the bylaws that<br />

describes racial/ethnic groups. Graham Cyster,<br />

Lancaster, Pa., said that while he supports the<br />

idea, having racial/ethnic groups should be recognized<br />

as “a dysfunction … what the Bible calls a<br />

sin.”<br />

Cyster said it’s like apartheid. If we have it in<br />

the bylaws, it should only be temporary; otherwise<br />

we could be institutionalizing racism. We should<br />

enlarge our vision and “go for the gold,” he said.<br />

“We keep saying we’re not there yet. Let’s do<br />

something to get there.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposed relational alignment called for<br />

creating a CLC forum similar to the task force,<br />

that had 14 members and served as a place for<br />

candid discussion.<br />

Some CLC members expressed caution. Some<br />

did not want it to be a regular group but ad hoc.<br />

Some questioned the extra cost—about $12,000 for<br />

the task force’s three meetings, according to one<br />

member. Others wanted that kind of honest discussion<br />

to happen in CLC.<br />

Task force chair Sue Biesecker-Mast said the<br />

size of a group affects the quality of the conversation;<br />

70 people cannot do what 14 people can.<br />

Jim Schrag, executive director of <strong>Mennonite</strong><br />

Church USA, said such a forum would be a helpful<br />

tool for Executive Leadership, though it would<br />

always go through CLC.<br />

Yvonne Bailey, Hampton, Va., returned to an<br />

earlier topic.<br />

“For six years we’ve been talking about<br />

racial/ethnic issues,” she said, “but nothing has<br />

changed. Unless something changes we’re going<br />

to lose people.”<br />

She lamented that power still exists with white<br />

males. <strong>The</strong> formation of another layer of bureaucracy<br />

“feels like the kind of sop we have come to<br />

expect from Washington,” she said.<br />

Earlier, other CLC members had called for concrete,<br />

measurable outcomes in the denomination’s<br />

antiracism goals. Others called for greater attention<br />

to nurturing women in leadership.<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial alignment section of the report<br />

stressed the desire that all parts of the church be<br />

“abundantly funded for the mandate that has been<br />

entrusted to them.” It presented short- and longterm<br />

strategies that met general agreement,<br />

though no clear answers seemed evident.<br />

<strong>The</strong> task force observed that “the various parts<br />

of the church are not communicating well<br />

enough.” One area where there is a lack of clarity,<br />

said the report, is “who does or does not have<br />

direct access to congregations.” <strong>The</strong> report<br />

offered strategies for improving communication<br />

from both executive leadership and its agencies<br />

and from the area conferences.<br />

On its final day of meeting, CLC members<br />

responded in one of four ways to each part of the<br />

report: (1) I affirm; (2) I affirm with reservations;<br />

(3) I have reservations but I am willing to allow<br />

this to go forward; (4) I am not able to support<br />

this because … . Most received strong affirmation,<br />

yet three areas received more than one vote of<br />

opposition: (1) that CLC membership be revised to<br />

include representation from agencies and executive<br />

leadership ministries, (2) the creation of a<br />

CLC forum, (3) the financial strategies.<br />

Now the Executive Board, which is to begin a<br />

six-year review of <strong>Mennonite</strong> Church USA in<br />

February 2007, will look at these responses and<br />

decide how to use them. <strong>The</strong> next CLC meeting is<br />

scheduled for March 22-24, 2007, in Excelsior<br />

Springs, Mo.—Gordon Houser

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!