Geo11_89_Baltanas_Danielopol_Geometric_Morphometrics

Recommendations

Info

STRACKE, A., DANIELOPOL, D.L. & PICOT, L. (2008a): Comparison of Fabaeformiscandona caudata (Kaufmann) and Fabaeformiscandona lozeki (Absolon) from the sublittoral of Lake Mondsee. – Berichte des Institutes für Erdwissenschaften Karl-Franzens Universität Graz, 13: 75- 82, Graz. STRACKE, A., DANIELOPOL, D.L. & NEUBAUER, W. (2008b): Comparative study of Candona neglecta valves from the shallow and deep sites of Lake Mondsee.– Berichte des Institutes für Erdwissenschaften Karl-Franzens Universität Graz, 13: 83-88, Graz. STRAUSS, R.E. (2010): Discriminating Groups of Organisms. – In: ELEWA, A.M.T. (ed.): Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians. – 1 st edition: 73-91, Springer, Berlin. STRAUSS, R. & BOOKSTEIN, F.L. (1982): The truss: body form reconstructions in morphometrics. – Systematic Zoology, 31: 113-135, New Haven. TANAKA, G. (2009): Adaptive modifications of carapace outlines in the Cytheroidea (Ostracoda: Crustacea). – Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 97: 810-821, London. TÉTART, J. (1982): Etude de la variation morphologique de la carapace chez Eucypris virens (Ostracode Cyprididè). – Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, 122: 341-351, Paris. THOMPSON, D’A.W. (1917, 1942): On Growth and Form. – Macmillan, London. [1942 edition published by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge]. TINN, O. & OAKLEY, T.H. (2008): Erratic rates of molecular evolution and incongruence of fossil and molecular divergence time estimates in Ostracoda (Crustacea). – Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 48: 157-167, Amsterdam. VAN MORKHOVEN, F.P.C.M. (1962): Post-Palaeozoic Ostracoda. – 1 st edition, 204 p. Elsevier, Amsterdam. WEBSTER, G. & GOODWIN, B. (1996): Form and Transformation. – 1 st edition, 287 p., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. WHATLEY, R. & STEPHENS, J. (1976): The Mesozoic explosion of the Cytheracea. – Abhandlungen und Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 18/19: 63-76, Hamburg. WHATLEY, R. & STEPHENS, J.M. (1977): Precocious sexual dimorphism in fossil and recent Ostracoda. – In: LÖFFLER, H. & DANIELOPOL, D.L. (eds.): Aspects of ecology and zoogeography of recent and fossil Ostracoda. – 1 st edition: 69-91, Springer, Berlin. WILLIAMS, M., SIVETER, D.J., ASHWORTH, A.C., WILBY, P.R., HORNE, D.J., LEWIS, A.R. & MARCHANT, D.R. (2008): Exceptionally preserved lacustrine ostracods from the Middle Miocene of Antarctica: implications for high-latitude palaeoenvironment at 77° south. – Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 275: 2449-2454, London. WILLS, M.A. (2001): Morphological disparity: A primer. – In: ADRAIN, J.M., EDGECOMBE, G.D. & LIE- BERMAN, B.S. (eds.): Fossils, phylogeny, and form. – 1 st edition: 55-144, Springer, Berlin. WILLS, M. A., BRIGGS, D.E. & FORTEY, R. (1994): Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. – Paleobiology, 20: 93-130, New Haven. WYSOCKA, A., SELL, J. & SYWULA, T. (2000): Genetic Variability in Natural Populations of Eurytopic Ostracod Candona neglecta Sars. – Zoological Science, 17: 55-59, Tokyo. YAMAGUCHI, S. & ENDO, K. (2003): Molecular phylogeny of Ostracoda (Crustacea) inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences: implication for its origin and diversification. – Marine Biology, 143: 23-38, Berlin. 269
ZAHN, C. & ROSKIES, R. (1972): Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. – IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-21: 269-281, Boston. ZELDITCH, M.L., FINK, W. & SWIDERSKI, D.L. (1995): Morphometrics, Homology, and Phylogeneties: Quantified Characters as Synapomorphies. – Systematic Biology, 44: 179-189, New Haven. ZELDITCH, M., SWIDERSKI, D., SHEETS, D.H. & FINK, W. (2004): Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. – 1 st edition, 443 p., Elsevier, Amsterdam. Appendix: Software for Morphometric analysis The Morphometric Website at SUNY Stony Brook contains lots of information useful to anyone interested in Morphometry (including news, bibliographic references, software, announcements, etc). It is actively maintained since nearly two decades by F. JAMES ROHLF. [http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/] TPS range (by F. JAMES ROHLF) and excellent series of free compiled programs (Windows) aimed for morphometric analysis, from data acquisition (tpsDig) to superimposition methods (tpsSuper) and Thin-plate splines (tpsSplin, tpsRelw, tpsTree, …). Downloadable from the morphometrics website at SUNY Stony Brook. [http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/] R . – R is a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics suitable for both basic users and developers, and can run on most operating systems (Windows, Linux, or Apple OS). R is freely distributed over the Internet and gathers the achievements of the “R core development team” and numerous contributors of online available packages. It is highly flexible and evolvable; suitable for beginners and for the advanced user that can develop and modify his/her own or programmed functions. Finally, there is a book explaining how to use R to perform morphometrics (CLAUDE 2008). Morphomatica – A user-friendly computer program designed and written for the morphometric analysis of ostracod outlines using the B-splines approach. It was developed during 2001–2007 by J. LINHART, W. BRAUNEIS and W. NEUBAUER (University of Salzburg) with the biological background of DAN. L. DANIELOPOL (Austrian Academy of Sciences; see BRAUNEIS et al. 2008). [http://palstrat.uni-graz.at/methods%20in%20ostracodology/Morphomatica.zip] MorphoJ (KLINGENBERG 2008) – MorphoJ is an integrated program package for doing geometric morphometrics for both 2D and 3D data. MorphoJ is available for free under the Apache License, Version 2.0. [http://www.flywings.org.uk/MorphoJ_page.htm] 270
Page 1 and 2: Inner city of Graz (mausoleum). 232
Page 3 and 4: Participants of the 1 st workshop
Page 5 and 6: That statement is nearly 30 years o
Page 7 and 8: stances ostracodologists focus on c
Page 9 and 10: a) it contains a large subjective e
Page 11 and 12: Undoubtedly, it is the Eiffel Tower
Page 13 and 14: Accordingly, the first thing we mus
Page 15 and 16: so-called “Pinocchio effect”; C
Page 17 and 18: 1990b; Fig. 8). Obviously, a list o
Page 19 and 20: tions are generated using an algebr
Page 21 and 22: Eigenshape analysis was first appli
Page 23 and 24: each of three main categories of nu
Page 25 and 26: lysis (and defined by criteria othe
Page 27 and 28: Obviously, MD is measuring the volu
Page 29 and 30: BALTANÁS, A., BRAUNEIS, W., DANIEL
Page 31 and 32: CIAMPAGLIO, C.N.; KEMP, M. & MCSHEA
Page 33 and 34: IWATA, H. & Y. UKAI (2002): SHAPE:
Page 35 and 36: MINATI, K., CABRAL, M.C., PIPÍK, R
Page 37: ROHLF, F.J. & SLICE, D.E. (1990): E
Page 41: MDA: Morphospace-Disparity Analysis

Geo11_89_Baltanas_Danielopol_Geometric_Morphometrics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?