12.01.2013 Views

Uncertain calculus with renewal process

Uncertain calculus with renewal process

Uncertain calculus with renewal process

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fuzzy Optim Decis Making (2012) 11:285–297<br />

DOI 10.1007/s10700-012-9132-y<br />

<strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong><br />

Kai Yao<br />

Published online: 27 April 2012<br />

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012<br />

Abstract <strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> is a branch of mathematics that deals <strong>with</strong> differentiation<br />

and integration of function of uncertain <strong>process</strong>es. As a fundamental concept,<br />

uncertain integral has been defined <strong>with</strong> respect to canonical <strong>process</strong>. However,<br />

emergencies such as economic crisis and war occur occasionally, which may cause<br />

the uncertain <strong>process</strong> a sudden change. So far, uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> has been<br />

employed to model these jumps. This paper will present a new uncertain integral<br />

<strong>with</strong> respect to <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. Besides, this paper will propose a type of uncertain<br />

differential equation driven by both canonical <strong>process</strong> and <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>.<br />

Keywords <strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> · <strong>Uncertain</strong> integral · Renewal <strong>process</strong> ·<br />

<strong>Uncertain</strong> differential equation · <strong>Uncertain</strong>ty theory<br />

1 Introduction<br />

Brownian motion is named after the Scottish biologist Brown who first observed the<br />

motion of pollen in the water in 1827. After that, it was studied by many researchers,<br />

and modeled by Wiener (1923) in 1923 as a continuous stochastic <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> stationary<br />

and independent increments which follow a normal distribution. In mid-twentieth<br />

century, Ito (1944) founded stochastic <strong>calculus</strong> to deal <strong>with</strong> integration and differentiation<br />

of a stochastic <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to Brownian motion. Following that, stochastic<br />

differential equation, a type of differential equation driven by Brownian motion, was<br />

studied and applied widely. In filtration, Kalman and Bucy (1961) applied stochastic<br />

differential equation to filtering the noise away from the observations in 1961.<br />

K. Yao (B)<br />

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China<br />

e-mail: yaok09@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn<br />

123


286 K. Yao<br />

In finance, Black and Scholes (1973) assumed that the stock price follows a geometric<br />

Brownian motion and proposed the famous Black–Scholes stock model in 1977.<br />

Randomness sometimes exists <strong>with</strong> jumps in economics and natural sciences, for<br />

example, emergency occurs occasionally in daily life, which may cause the stock price<br />

a sudden shift. In order to describe the jumps, researchers proposed stochastic <strong>calculus</strong><br />

<strong>with</strong> respect to Poisson <strong>process</strong> as a supplement of Ito <strong>calculus</strong>. Besides, stochastic<br />

differential equation driven by both Wiener <strong>process</strong> and Poisson <strong>process</strong> was also<br />

proposed.<br />

Although randomness has been used to describe undetermined properties for a long<br />

time, some imprecise quantities, such as information and knowledge represented by<br />

human language, do not behave like randomness. In order to model these imprecise<br />

quantities, an uncertainty theory was founded by Liu (2007) in 2007 and refined by<br />

Liu (2010a) in 2010. Many researchers have contributed a lot in this area, such as<br />

Gao (2009); You (2009); Peng and Iwamura (2010), and Wang et al. (2012). Nowadays,<br />

uncertainty theory has become a branch of axiomatic mathematics, and has found many<br />

applications in mathematical programming (Liu 2009a; Bhattacharyya et al. 2010),<br />

uncertainriskanalysis(Liu2010c),uncertainfinance(Huang2011),uncertaininference<br />

(Liu 2010b; Gao et al. 2010) and uncertain logic (Liu 2011; Chen and Ralescu 2011).<br />

In the framework of uncertainty theory, Liu (2008) introduced a concept of uncertain<br />

<strong>process</strong> to study the evolution of uncertain phenomena <strong>with</strong> time in 2008, and<br />

Liu (2009b) designed a canonical <strong>process</strong> in 2009. The concept of uncertain integral<br />

was proposed by Liu (2008) to integrate an uncertain <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to the<br />

canonical <strong>process</strong>, and later this type of uncertain integral was called Liu integral by<br />

the academic community. After that, Liu (2009b) recast his work via the fundamental<br />

theorem and thus produced the techniques of chain rule, change of variables, and<br />

integration by parts. Since then, an uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> theory was founded.<br />

Based on Liu integral, Liu (2008) defined uncertain differential equation driven by<br />

canonical <strong>process</strong>. Following that, Chen and Liu (2010) gave an existence and uniqueness<br />

theorem for uncertain differential equations. By means of uncertain differential<br />

equation, Liu (2009b) assumed the stock price follows a geometric canonical <strong>process</strong>,<br />

and proposed an uncertain stock model. Then Chen (2011) gave the American option<br />

pricing formula for the stock model. In 2010, Peng and Yao (2010) proposed another<br />

uncertain stock model to describe the stock prices in long-run. Besides, Zhu (2010)<br />

presented optimal control policy in uncertain environment.<br />

In this paper, we will present a new uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> which deals <strong>with</strong> the integration<br />

and differentiation of uncertain <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> instead of<br />

canonical <strong>process</strong>. The rest of this paper is structured as follows. The next section is<br />

intended to introduce some concepts of uncertain <strong>process</strong> and Liu integral. In Sect. 3,<br />

uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> is proposed. In Sect. 4, uncertain differential<br />

<strong>with</strong> respect to <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> is proposed. In Sect. 5, uncertain differential<br />

equation <strong>with</strong> jumps is presented. Finally, some remarks are made in Sect. 6.<br />

2 Preliminary<br />

In this section, we will introduce some useful definitions about uncertain <strong>process</strong> and<br />

uncertain <strong>calculus</strong>. An uncertain <strong>process</strong> is a sequence of uncertain variables indexed<br />

123


<strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> 287<br />

by time and space. The most important uncertain <strong>process</strong>es are canonical <strong>process</strong> and<br />

<strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>.<br />

Definition 1 (Liu 2009b) An uncertain <strong>process</strong> Ct is said to be a canonical <strong>process</strong> if<br />

(i) C0 = 0 and almost all sample paths are Lipschitz continuous,<br />

(ii) Ct has stationary and independent increments,<br />

(iii) every increment Cs+t − Cs is a normal uncertain variable <strong>with</strong> expected value<br />

0 and variance t 2 , whose uncertainty distribution is<br />

� � ��−1 −π x<br />

�(x) = 1 + exp √ , x ∈ℜ.<br />

3t<br />

Note that �Ct and �t are infinitesimals <strong>with</strong> the same order. Since Ct is a normal<br />

uncertain variable N(0, t),wehaveCt/tis a normal uncertain variable N(0, 1) by the<br />

operational law of uncertain variables. The uncertain <strong>process</strong> exp(et + σ Ct) is called<br />

a geometric canonical <strong>process</strong>, which is usually used to describe the stock price in<br />

uncertain market.<br />

Based on canonical <strong>process</strong>, an uncertain integral named Liu integral was defined<br />

by Liu (2007), thus offering a theory of uncertain <strong>calculus</strong>.<br />

Definition 2 (Liu 2009b) LetXtbe an uncertain <strong>process</strong> and Ct be a canonical<br />

<strong>process</strong>. For any partition of closed interval [a, b] <strong>with</strong> a = t1 < t2 < ···< tk+1 = b,<br />

the mesh is written as<br />

Then Liu integral of Xt is defined by<br />

�b<br />

a<br />

� = max<br />

1≤i≤k |ti+1 − ti|.<br />

XtdCt = lim<br />

k�<br />

Xti<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

· (Cti+1 − Cti )<br />

provided that the limit exists almost surely and is finite. For this case, the uncertain<br />

<strong>process</strong> Xt is said to be Liu integrable.<br />

For example, a continuous function f (t) is Liu integrable, and<br />

�s<br />

0<br />

⎛<br />

�s<br />

⎞<br />

f (t)dCt ∼ ⎝0, | f (t)|dt⎠<br />

is a normal uncertain variable at each time s. The canonical <strong>process</strong> Ct is a Liu integrable<br />

<strong>process</strong>, and<br />

�s<br />

0<br />

0<br />

CtdCt = 1<br />

2 C2 s .<br />

123


288 K. Yao<br />

Definition 3 (Liu 2009b) LetCt be a canonical <strong>process</strong> and Zt be an uncertain<br />

<strong>process</strong>. If there exist uncertain <strong>process</strong>es μs and σs such that<br />

Zt = Z0 +<br />

�t<br />

�t<br />

μsds + σsdCs<br />

for any t ≥ 0, then Zt is said to have a Liu differential<br />

0<br />

dZt = μtdt + σtdCt.<br />

For example, the uncertain <strong>process</strong> C 2 t has a Liu differential dC2 t = 2CtdCt. The<br />

uncertain <strong>process</strong> tCt has a Liu differential d(tCt) = Ctdt + tdCt.<br />

Liu (2009b) verified the fundamental theorem of uncertain <strong>calculus</strong>, i.e., for a<br />

canonical <strong>process</strong> Ct and a continuous differentiable function h(t, c), the uncertain<br />

<strong>process</strong> Zt = h(t, Ct) is differentiable and has a Liu differential<br />

dZt = ∂h<br />

∂t (t, Ct)dt + ∂h<br />

(t, Ct)dCt.<br />

∂c<br />

Based on the fundamental theorem, Liu proved the chain rule, i.e., for two continuously<br />

differentiable functions f and g, the uncertain <strong>process</strong> f (g(Ct)) has a Liu<br />

differential<br />

d f (g(Ct)) = f ′ (g(Ct))g ′ (Ct)dCt,<br />

and the integration by parts theorem, i.e., for two Liu differentiable <strong>process</strong>es Xt and<br />

Yt, the uncertain <strong>process</strong> XtYt has a Liu differential<br />

d(XtYt) = YtdXt + XtdYt.<br />

Definition 4 (Liu 2008) Letξ1,ξ2,... be iid positive uncertain variables. Define<br />

S0 = 0 and Sn = ξ1 + ξ2 +···+ξn for n ≥ 1. Then the uncertain <strong>process</strong><br />

is called a <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>.<br />

Nt = max<br />

n≥0 {n|Sn ≤ t}<br />

Each sample-path of Nt is a right-continuous and increasing step function taking<br />

only nonnegative integer values. Assuming the interarrival times have a common<br />

uncertainty distribution �, Liu (2010a) proved that Nt has an uncertainty distribution<br />

123<br />

�<br />

�(x) = 1 − �<br />

0<br />

t<br />

⌊x⌋+1<br />

�<br />

,


<strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> 289<br />

where ⌊x⌋ represents the maximal integer less than or equal to x. Besides, Liu (2010a)<br />

proved that Nt/t converges in distribution to 1/ξ1. Based on this, Liu (2010a) proved<br />

the elementary <strong>renewal</strong> theorem, i.e.,<br />

provided that E[1/ξ1] exists.<br />

lim<br />

t→∞ E<br />

3 <strong>Uncertain</strong> integral <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong><br />

� � � �<br />

Nt 1<br />

= E<br />

t ξ1<br />

Liu integral deals <strong>with</strong> uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to canonical <strong>process</strong>, which is a<br />

continuous uncertain <strong>process</strong>. However, emergencies such as war and economic crisis<br />

occur occasionally, and bring the <strong>process</strong> a sudden shift. To describe such jumps, we<br />

try to found a new kind of uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong><br />

from this section. First, the concept of uncertain integral <strong>with</strong> respect to <strong>renewal</strong><br />

<strong>process</strong> is defined as follows.<br />

Definition 5 Let Xt be an uncertain <strong>process</strong> and Nt a <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. For any partition<br />

of a closed interval [a, b] <strong>with</strong> a = t1 < t2 < ···< tk+1 = b, the mesh is written<br />

as<br />

� = max<br />

i≤i≤k |ti+1 − ti|.<br />

Then the uncertain integral of Xt <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt is<br />

�b<br />

a<br />

XtdNt = lim<br />

k�<br />

Xti<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti )<br />

provided that the limit exists almost surely and is finite. For this case, the uncertain<br />

<strong>process</strong> Xt is said to be integrable <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt.<br />

Example 1 Let Nt be an uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. Then for any partition 0 = t1 <<br />

t2 < ···< tk+1 = s, wehave<br />

That is,<br />

�s<br />

0<br />

dNt = lim<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

k�<br />

(Nti+1 − Nti ) ≡ Ns − N0 = Ns.<br />

�s<br />

0<br />

dNt = Ns. (1)<br />

123


290 K. Yao<br />

Example 2 Let Nt be an uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. Then for any partition 0 = t1 <<br />

t2 < ···< tk+1 = s, wehave<br />

as � → 0. That is,<br />

N 2 s =<br />

=<br />

k�<br />

i=1<br />

k�<br />

i=1<br />

�<br />

N 2 ti+1 − N 2 �<br />

ti<br />

� Nti+1<br />

�<br />

→ Ns + 2<br />

�s<br />

0<br />

0<br />

s<br />

− Nti<br />

NtdNt<br />

� 2 + 2<br />

k�<br />

i=1<br />

Nti<br />

� Nti+1<br />

− Nti<br />

NtdNt = 1<br />

2 Ns(Ns − 1). (2)<br />

Example 3 Let Nt be an uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. Then for any partition 0 = t1 <<br />

t2 < ···< tk+1 = s, wehave<br />

as � → 0. That is,<br />

sNs =<br />

=<br />

k� �<br />

ti+1Nti+1 − ti<br />

�<br />

Nti<br />

i=1<br />

k�<br />

Nti+1 (ti+1 − ti) +<br />

i=1<br />

s<br />

� �s<br />

→ Ntdt + tdNt<br />

0<br />

�s<br />

0<br />

0<br />

k�<br />

i=1<br />

�s<br />

Ntdt + tdNt = sNs<br />

0<br />

�<br />

ti Nti+1<br />

− Nti<br />

Theorem 1 If Nt is a <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> and Xt is an integrable uncertain <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong><br />

respect to Nt on [a, b], then Xt is integrable <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt on each subinterval<br />

of [a, b]. Moreover, if c ∈[a, b], then<br />

123<br />

�b<br />

a<br />

XtdNt =<br />

�c<br />

a<br />

�<br />

XtdNt +<br />

c<br />

b<br />

XtdNt.<br />

�<br />

�<br />

(3)


<strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> 291<br />

Proof Since Xt is an integrable uncertain <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt on [a, b], for any<br />

partition of the closed interval [a, b] <strong>with</strong> a = t1 < t2 < ···< tk+1 = b, the limit<br />

lim<br />

k�<br />

Xti<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti )<br />

exists almost surely and is finite. Thus for any subinterval [a ′ , b ′ ]⊂[a, b] and any<br />

partition a = t ′ 1 < t′ 2 < ···< t′ k = b, we obtain that the limit<br />

lim<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

k�<br />

Xt ′ · (N<br />

i t ′ − N<br />

i+1 t ′ )<br />

i<br />

exists almost surely and is finite. It follows from Definition 5 that Xt is integrable <strong>with</strong><br />

respect to Nt on [a ′ , b ′ ]. Furthermore, for any partition of the closed interval [a, b]<br />

<strong>with</strong> a = t1 < t2 < ···< tk = c < tk+1 < tk+2 < ···< tn+1 = b, wehave<br />

Thus<br />

n�<br />

i=1<br />

Xti<br />

k−1<br />

�<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti ) =<br />

�b<br />

a<br />

i=1<br />

Xti<br />

XtdNt =<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti ) +<br />

�c<br />

a<br />

�<br />

XtdNt +<br />

c<br />

b<br />

n�<br />

i=k+1<br />

XtdNt.<br />

Xti<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti ).<br />

Theorem 2 If Nt is a <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>, and Xt and Yt are two integrable uncertain<br />

<strong>process</strong>es <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt on [a, b], then αXt + βYt is an integrable uncertain<br />

<strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt on [a, b] for any real numbers α and β, and<br />

�b<br />

a<br />

�b<br />

�b<br />

(αXt + βYt)dNt = α XtdNt + β YtdNt.<br />

a<br />

Proof Since Xt and Yt are two integrable uncertain <strong>process</strong>es <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt on<br />

[a, b], for any partition of the closed interval [a, b] <strong>with</strong> a = t1 < t2 < ···< tk+1 = b,<br />

the limits<br />

lim<br />

k�<br />

Xti<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti )<br />

a<br />

⊓⊔<br />

123


292 K. Yao<br />

and<br />

lim<br />

k�<br />

Yti<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

exist almost surely and are finite. Thus<br />

�b<br />

a<br />

(αXt + βYt)dNt = lim<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

= α lim<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti )<br />

k�<br />

(αXti + βYti ) · (Nti+1 − Nti )<br />

k�<br />

Xti<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

a<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti ) + β lim<br />

�b<br />

�b<br />

= α XtdNt + β YtdNt,<br />

a<br />

k�<br />

Yti<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

· (Nti+1 − Nti )<br />

and the uncertain <strong>process</strong> αXt + βYt is integrable <strong>with</strong> respect to Nt on [a, b]. ⊓⊔<br />

4 <strong>Uncertain</strong> differential <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong><br />

Definition 6 Let Nt be a <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> and Zt an uncertain <strong>process</strong>. If there exist<br />

uncertain <strong>process</strong>es μs and γs such that<br />

Zt = Z0 +<br />

�t<br />

�t<br />

μsds + γsdNs<br />

for any t ≥ 0, then Zt is said to have an uncertain differential<br />

0<br />

dZt = μtdt + γtdNt.<br />

For this case, Zt is called a differentiable uncertain <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> drift μt and jump γt.<br />

Example 4 Let Nt be an uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. It follows from the Eq. (1) that<br />

Nt =<br />

�t<br />

0<br />

dNs.<br />

Thus the uncertain <strong>process</strong> Nt is an uncertain differentiable <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to<br />

<strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> Nt and has an uncertain differential dNt.<br />

123<br />

0


<strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> 293<br />

Example 5 Let Zt = μt + γ Nt be an uncertain <strong>process</strong>. Since<br />

Zt =<br />

�t<br />

0<br />

�t<br />

μds + γ dNs,<br />

we obtain that the uncertain <strong>process</strong> Zt is an uncertain differentiable <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong><br />

respect to <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> Nt and has an uncertain differential<br />

dZt = μdt + γ dNt.<br />

Example 6 Let Nt be an uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. It follows from the Eq. (2) that<br />

N 2 t<br />

�t<br />

�t<br />

= 2 NsdNs + dNs.<br />

0<br />

Thus the uncertain <strong>process</strong> N 2 t is an uncertain differentiable <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to<br />

<strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> Nt and has an uncertain differential<br />

dN 2 t = 2NtdNt + dNt.<br />

Example 7 Let Nt be an uncertain <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. It follows from the Eq. (3) that<br />

tNt =<br />

�t<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

�t<br />

Nsds + sdNs.<br />

Thus the uncertain <strong>process</strong> tNt is an uncertain differentiable <strong>process</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to<br />

<strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> Nt and has an uncertain differential<br />

d(tNt) = Ntdt + tdNt.<br />

Theorem 3 (Fundamental Theorem) Let Nt be a <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>, and h(t,n) a continuously<br />

differentiable function. Then the uncertain <strong>process</strong> Zt = h(t, Nt) has an<br />

uncertain differential<br />

dZt = ∂h<br />

∂t (t, Nt)dt + h(t, Nt) − h(t, Nt−).<br />

Proof Since the function h is continuous differentiable, by Taylor series expansion,<br />

we have<br />

�Zt = h(t, Nt) − h(t − �t, Nt−�t)<br />

= h(t, Nt−�t) − h(t − �t, Nt−�t) + h(t, Nt) − h(t, Nt−�t)<br />

= ∂h<br />

∂t (t, Nt−�t)�t + h(t, Nt) − h(t, Nt−�t) + o(�t).<br />

123


294 K. Yao<br />

Letting �t → 0, we have<br />

dh(t, Nt) = ∂h<br />

∂t (t, Nt−)dt + h(t, Nt) − h(t, Nt−)<br />

= ∂h<br />

∂t (t, Nt)dt + h(t, Nt) − h(t, Nt−).<br />

Example 8 Consider the uncertain <strong>process</strong> μt +γ Nt. For this case, we have h(t, n) =<br />

μt + γ n. It is clear that<br />

∂h<br />

∂t (t, n) = μ, h(t, Nt) − h(t, Nt−) = γ dNt.<br />

It follows from the fundamental theorem that<br />

d(μt + γ Nt) = μdt + γ dNt.<br />

Example 9 Consider the uncertain <strong>process</strong> tNt. For this case, we have h(t, n) = tn.<br />

It is clear that<br />

∂h<br />

∂t (t, c, n) = n, h(t, Nt) − h(t, Nt−) = tdNt.<br />

It follows from the fundamental theorem that<br />

d(tNt) = Ntdt + tdNt.<br />

Theorem 4 (Integration by Parts Theorem) Suppose Xt and Yt are two differentiable<br />

uncertain <strong>process</strong>es <strong>with</strong> respect to <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. Then we have<br />

d(XtYt) = YtdXt + XtdYt + (Xt − Xt−)(Yt − Yt−).<br />

Proof For any partition of closed interval of [0, t] <strong>with</strong> 0 = t1 < t2 < ···< tk+1 = t,<br />

we have<br />

123<br />

XtYt = X0Y0 + lim<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

= X0Y0 + lim<br />

�→0<br />

i=1<br />

k�<br />

(Xti+1<br />

Yti+1 − Xti<br />

Yti )<br />

k�<br />

�<br />

Xti<br />

(Yti+1 − Yti )<br />

+Yti (Xti+1 − Xti ) + (Xti+1 − Xti )(Yti+1 − Yti )� .<br />

⊓⊔


<strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> 295<br />

It follows from the definition of the uncertain integral that<br />

XtYt = X0Y0 +<br />

Thus we have<br />

�<br />

0<br />

t<br />

�<br />

YsdXs +<br />

0<br />

t<br />

XsdYs + �<br />

(Xs − Xs−)(Ys − Ys−).<br />

0


296 K. Yao<br />

Thus the uncertain differential equation has a solution<br />

Xt = X0 + αt + βCt + γ Nt.<br />

Example 12 Let α, β and γ be real numbers. Consider an uncertain differential equation<br />

<strong>with</strong> jumps<br />

It is equivalent to<br />

Integrating on both sides, we have<br />

�t<br />

0<br />

dXt = αXtdt + β XtdCt + γ Xt N −1<br />

t dNt.<br />

X −1<br />

t dXt = αdt + βdCt + γ N −1<br />

t dNt.<br />

X −1<br />

s dXs =<br />

�t<br />

0<br />

�t<br />

�<br />

αds + βdCs +<br />

Thus the uncertain differential equation has a solution<br />

0<br />

Xt = X0 exp(αt + βCt) · γ Nt.<br />

0<br />

t<br />

γ N −1<br />

s dNs.<br />

Example 13 Let α, β and γ be real numbers. Consider an uncertain differential equation<br />

<strong>with</strong> jumps<br />

dXt = αXtdt + β XtdCt + γ Xt−dNt.<br />

It is easy to verify that the uncertain differential equation has a solution<br />

6 Conclusions<br />

Xt = X0 exp(αt + βCt)(1 + γ) Nt .<br />

This paper first proposed an uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> respect to <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> to<br />

supplement the uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> theory. Then it gave the fundamental theorem of<br />

uncertain <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong>. Besides, this paper presented an uncertain<br />

differential equation <strong>with</strong> jumps to model the sudden drifts in uncertain systems.<br />

Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant<br />

No. 91024032 and No. 60874067.<br />

123


<strong>Uncertain</strong> <strong>calculus</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>renewal</strong> <strong>process</strong> 297<br />

References<br />

Bhattacharyya, R., Chatterjee, A., & Kar, S. (2010). <strong>Uncertain</strong>ty theory based novel multi-objective<br />

optimization technique using embedding theorem <strong>with</strong> application to R& D project portfolio<br />

selection. Applied Mathematics, 1, 189–199.<br />

Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political<br />

Economy, 81, 637–654.<br />

Chen, X. (2011). American option pricing formula for uncertain financial market. International Journal<br />

of Operations Research, 8(2), 32–37.<br />

Chen, X., & Liu, B. (2010). Existence and uniqueness theorem for uncertain differential equations. Fuzzy<br />

Optimization and Decision Making, 9(1), 69–81.<br />

Chen, X., & Ralescu, D. A. (2011). A note on truth value in uncertain logic. Expert Systems <strong>with</strong><br />

Applications, 38, 15582–15586.<br />

Gao, X. (2009). Some properties of continuous uncertain measure. International Journal of <strong>Uncertain</strong>ty,<br />

Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 17(3), 419–426.<br />

Gao, X., Gao, Y., & Ralescu, D. A. (2010). On Liu’s inference rule for uncertain systems. International<br />

Journal of <strong>Uncertain</strong>ty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 18(1), 1–11.<br />

Huang, X. (2011). Mean-risk model for uncertain portfolio selection. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision<br />

Making, 10(1), 71–89.<br />

Ito, K. (1944). Stochastic integral (pp. 519–524). Tokyo, Japan: Proceedings of the Japan Academy.<br />

Kalman, R. E., & Bucy, R. S. (1961). New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Journal of<br />

Basic Engineering, 83, 95–108.<br />

Liu, B. (2007). <strong>Uncertain</strong>ty Theory (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.<br />

Liu, B. (2008). Fuzzy <strong>process</strong>, hybrid <strong>process</strong> and uncertain <strong>process</strong>. Journal of <strong>Uncertain</strong> Systems, 2(1),<br />

3–16.<br />

Liu, B. (2009a). Theory and practice of uncertain programming (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.<br />

Liu, B. (2009b). Some research problems in uncertainty theory. Journal of <strong>Uncertain</strong> Systems, 3(1), 3–10.<br />

Liu, B. (2010a). <strong>Uncertain</strong>ty theory: A branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty.<br />

Berlin: Springer.<br />

Liu, B. (2010b). <strong>Uncertain</strong> set theory and uncertain inference rule <strong>with</strong> application to uncertain<br />

control. Journal of <strong>Uncertain</strong> Systems, 4(2), 83–98.<br />

Liu, B. (2010c). <strong>Uncertain</strong> risk analysis and uncertain reliability analysis. Journal of <strong>Uncertain</strong> Systems,<br />

4(3), 163–170.<br />

Liu, B. (2011). <strong>Uncertain</strong> logic for modeling human language. Journal of <strong>Uncertain</strong> Systems, 5(1), 3–20.<br />

Peng, J., & Yao, K. (2010). A new option pricing model for stocks in uncertainty markets. International<br />

Journal of Operations Research, 7(4), 213–224.<br />

Peng, Z., & Iwamura, K. (2010). A sufficient and necessary condition of uncertainty distribution. Journal<br />

of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(3), 277–285.<br />

Wang, X., Gao, Z., & Guo, H. (2012). Delphi method for estimating uncertainty distributions, Information:<br />

An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(2), 449–460.<br />

Wiener, N. (1923). Differential space. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2, 131–174.<br />

You, C. (2009). Some convergence theorems of uncertain sequences. Mathematical and Computer<br />

Modelling, 49(3–4), 482–487.<br />

Zhu, Y. (2010). <strong>Uncertain</strong> optimal control <strong>with</strong> application to a portfolio selection model. Cybernetics<br />

and Systems, 41(7), 535–547.<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!