12.01.2013 Views

i on thomas paine reviews: origins of crisis in ussr - Common Sense

i on thomas paine reviews: origins of crisis in ussr - Common Sense

i on thomas paine reviews: origins of crisis in ussr - Common Sense

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Trial by Space: Reflecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> Lefebvre Page 19<br />

"reasserti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> space <strong>in</strong> critical social theory" and an explorati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tersecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

geography and the Marxist traditi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Harvey, for example, has d<strong>on</strong>e much to advance our understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the processes <strong>of</strong><br />

urban and regi<strong>on</strong>al restnctur<strong>in</strong>g over the last two decades. Sigruficant <strong>in</strong> this respect has<br />

been his attempts to elaborate up<strong>on</strong> the ways <strong>in</strong> which these processes manifest<br />

themselves <strong>in</strong> a spatially uneven way <strong>in</strong> and through the c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ual producti<strong>on</strong> and<br />

des'mcti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the built envir<strong>on</strong>ment. This emphasis reflects Harvey's belief that<br />

"historical materialism has to be u p m to historical-geographical materialism" and this<br />

is to be achieved through "the <strong>in</strong>tegrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the producti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> space and spatial<br />

c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong>s as an active element with<strong>in</strong> the core <strong>of</strong> Marxian theoris<strong>in</strong>gW(l989 pp 6.4).<br />

Smith also seeks the <strong>in</strong>tegrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> nature and space <strong>in</strong>to the Marxian theory <strong>of</strong> capitalist<br />

development and advances the propositi<strong>on</strong> "that uneven development is the hallmark <strong>of</strong> the<br />

geography <strong>of</strong> capitalism. ... the systematic geographical expressi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> the very c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> and structure <strong>of</strong> capital." Like Harvey, he draws up<strong>on</strong><br />

Mm's analysis <strong>of</strong> capitalism. "For", declares Smith. "when <strong>on</strong>e draws out the spatial<br />

implicati<strong>on</strong>s and dimensi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Mm's analysis, especially m Capital, the basis <strong>of</strong> uneven<br />

development theory is then ready at hand." (Smith 1990 pp xii, xvi). Soja disagrees with<br />

this <strong>in</strong>terpretati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> "Mm's analysis" but shares a comm<strong>on</strong> desire. By build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> the<br />

work <strong>of</strong> Foucaul~ Giddens. Berger, Breman, James<strong>on</strong> and, above all, Henri Lefebvre, Soja<br />

seeks "to spatialise the historical narrative. to attach to duree an endur<strong>in</strong>g critical human<br />

gwgraphy .... to make room for the <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terpretative human geography, a spatial<br />

hermeneutic." (Soja 1989 ppl-2) This desire, by Soja and others, to redress the balance<br />

away from historicism and towards a new spatialised discourse <strong>of</strong> social change reflects a<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g belief that c<strong>on</strong>temporary society is mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to "the epoch <strong>of</strong> space" (Foucault<br />

1986 p22) <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>in</strong>nocent spatiality <strong>of</strong> social life hides c<strong>on</strong>sequences for us. As<br />

Soja, for example, puts it, "today ... it may be space more than time that hides<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sequences from us, the mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> geography' more than the 'mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> history' that<br />

provides the most reveal<strong>in</strong>g tactical and theoretical world." (1989 p 1) In this way,<br />

postmodemism becomes a periodis<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>cept <strong>in</strong> which gwgraphy <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly matters as<br />

a vantage po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> critical <strong>in</strong>sight, <strong>on</strong>e which, <strong>in</strong> James<strong>on</strong>'s terms, "raise(s) spatial issues<br />

as a fundamental organis<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>cern" (1984 p 89)<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this review article, however, is not to address this c<strong>on</strong>temporary debate but<br />

to return to <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> its most important founders - Henri L$ebvre. Lefebvre was perhaps<br />

the most <strong>in</strong>fluential figure shap<strong>in</strong>g the course and character <strong>of</strong> French Marxist theory and<br />

philosophy from the early 1930's to at least the late 1950's. Furthermore. as Soja rightly<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts out, he became, after the 1950's. the lead<strong>in</strong>g spatial theoretician <strong>in</strong> Western<br />

Marxism and the most forceful advocate for the reasserti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> space <strong>in</strong> critical social<br />

theory.(1989 p 47) But knowledge <strong>of</strong> his c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to this debate is still limited partly<br />

because few <strong>of</strong> his works have been translated <strong>in</strong>to English. More significant, however,<br />

is the fact that most Angleph<strong>on</strong>e commentators <strong>on</strong> Lefebvre have focused <strong>on</strong> his<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> existential Marxism and his critique <strong>of</strong> Althusser and usually pass over his<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> space and spatiality with a cursory nod or even blank <strong>in</strong>comprehensi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

(chFY (1994) ~355)<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Soja (1989 p47), Hegelian <strong>in</strong>fluences permeate Lefebvre's early Marxism and<br />

this led him to reta<strong>in</strong> a strand <strong>of</strong> 'objective idealism' with<strong>in</strong> the materialist dialectic. He<br />

also took a stance, throughout his works, aga<strong>in</strong>st dogmatic reducti<strong>on</strong>ism <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> a<br />

more open ended dialectic which resulted <strong>in</strong>, what Soja refers to as, a "flexible, open and<br />

cautiously eclectic Marxism able to grow and adapt without predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed truncati<strong>on</strong>."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!