14.01.2013 Views

Sala Grande - 19th IAFS World Meeting - 9th WPMO Triennial Meeting

Sala Grande - 19th IAFS World Meeting - 9th WPMO Triennial Meeting

Sala Grande - 19th IAFS World Meeting - 9th WPMO Triennial Meeting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6<br />

19 th <strong>IAFS</strong> WORLD MEETING<br />

9 th <strong>WPMO</strong> TRIENNIAL MEETING<br />

5 th MAFS MEETING<br />

THE EFFECT OF USING CRIME SCENE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES TO THE<br />

UNDERSTANDING OF A CRITICAL CRIMINAL CASE: PRELIMINARY STUDY<br />

Author(s): Yilmaz R 1 ; Yakupoglu A 1 ; Demircan T 1 ; Yukseloglu H 1 ; Yorulmaz C 2<br />

Institution(s): 1 ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE; 2 ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, CERRAHPASA FACULTY OF MEDICINE<br />

Abstract: According to Turkish Criminal Procedure Code (CMK) came in to force in 2005, when a special or technical knowledge is<br />

required, it may be decided to obtain the vote and opinion of an expert, by the court’s own demand, by the demand of the public<br />

prosecutor, or by demand of the intervening party; of his representative, of the suspect or the accused or his defense counsel. Crime<br />

reconstruction requires the ability to put together a puzzle using pieces of unknown dimensions without a guiding picture. At the courts,<br />

there is a fundamental shift from oral to visual mediation and this modern evidence presentation technology needs to be analyzed.<br />

According to the Turkish Criminal Procedure Law mentioned above, this modern evidence presentation can be requested by the lawyer,<br />

prosecutor or the court. Thus, the objective of the study is to analysis the effect of using crime scene reconstruction technologies at a<br />

criminal case. In this study 20 lawyers who are actively working, has been homogeneously selected and the evidence of a criminal case is<br />

presented to those lawyers. Firstly, participants are divided into two groups, named A and B with 10 lawyers in one group. Then Group A<br />

participants just studied the case from original court file. They haven’t participated any modern evidence presentations. Group B<br />

participants first studied the case from file. Then they were able to attend the modern evidence presentations in order of mockup, video<br />

animation and real time reconstruction. After the presentations, a descriptive and exploratory survey is performed to all participants.<br />

The questions of the survey were like "How many gunshot were fired?, How many bullets were penetrated to victim? Which one was<br />

fatal? Are the statements of witnesses compatible with the blood patterns? Is the location of witnesses proper to see the crime scene<br />

clearly?" After the response of all participants, the level of understanding the case is evaluated. Results show that most of the<br />

participants in Group B reported better understanding when it is compared with Group A. It is clear that, by the new regulations about<br />

expert witnessing in Criminal Procedure Code (CMK), it is easier than before to understand and recognize the criminal cases.<br />

Keywords: Crime; Crime Scene; Reconstruction; Evidence Presentation; Forensic Animation; Forensic Science

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!