Hyperion - Nietzsche Circle
Hyperion - Nietzsche Circle
Hyperion - Nietzsche Circle
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
English have any talent for the novel, with a few exceptions.<br />
MCP. Contemporary, you mean?<br />
P. No, all through. I think the English novel much inferior to the French novel<br />
or the Russian novel—or even the American novel. We have not written<br />
novels very long but I think France, Russia and America and Spain have<br />
much greater novelistic imagination. The only English novels that I think are<br />
really distinguished from the point of view of imagination are Emily Brontë’s,<br />
Lawrence Sterne’s. But I think the other English novels are really sociological.<br />
Dickens is much inferior to Dostoievski, I think, or Turgeniev, or Flaubert,<br />
or Proust. He’s an entertainer. Of course he’s wonderful, he’s a wonderful<br />
writer, but I don’t think he’s a great writer like Flaubert. The English novel is<br />
very stodgy and middle class. The great Elizabethan plays are not that. The<br />
Victorians are the worst—Thackeray and George Eliot—I like George Eliot the<br />
best but I find her too parochial, in the worst sense. There is nothing wrong<br />
about writing about rural life but I don’t find what they had in the plays.<br />
MCP. What about French writers?<br />
P. My favorite is Flaubert. And I like Rabelais—parts of him. I like him when<br />
he piles up word after word. The word play: I love that. Now I have the original<br />
French so I can look at that. Some of Balzac I like. But I don’t admire Balzac<br />
so much as an artist. For me there is too much in it. But I greatly admire Les<br />
Illusions Perdues—that’s very great. I think he’s a very great writer. Much<br />
greater than Dickens. Because Dickens had that Victorian—there is no sex in<br />
Dickens, it’s all disguised in very strange ways—and you feel that the sawdust<br />
is coming out of the characters. They are not flesh and blood characters.<br />
They’re dolls. And George Eliot too. And I don’t like Thackeray, ugh! The one<br />
English novelist I admire is Thomas Hardy. For me, there’s Emily Brontë and<br />
Lawrence Sterne, and Thomas Hardy, and Samuel Butler’s The Way of All<br />
Flesh. Those are great.<br />
MCP. You would not say that you like a French writer like Voltaire?<br />
P. No. There is too much reason. I used to like Candide. But for me it’s too<br />
intellectual and rational.<br />
MCP. Candide is a little like Malcolm.<br />
P. Yes. Well I love that book. I’ve read it many many times. But among other<br />
French writers one I like is Rousseau: The Confessions—I love that—and<br />
Proust I admire greatly. I think he’s a giant.<br />
MCP. Gide?<br />
P. No. I don’t like him. He is too “bourgeois” too. I think I keep using that word<br />
for want of a better. But I don’t like him at all. Some of Sartre and some of<br />
Facing Page:<br />
Portrait of Richard Purdy by Gertrude Abercrombie, 1955 /<br />
unidentified photographer: photographic print: b&w; 25 x 20 cm.<br />
Courtesy of the Gertrude Abercrombie papers, 1880-1986,<br />
Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution.<br />
<strong>Hyperion</strong>—Volume VI, issue 1, March 2011 138