15.01.2013 Views

Body Mass Index: From Quételet to Evidence ... - Giorgio Bedogni

Body Mass Index: From Quételet to Evidence ... - Giorgio Bedogni

Body Mass Index: From Quételet to Evidence ... - Giorgio Bedogni

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

<strong>Giorgio</strong> <strong>Bedogni</strong>, Claudio Tiribelli and Stefano Bellentani<br />

Figure 2. Relationship between percent body fat and BMI in a sample of 1423 Italian elderly women.<br />

Abbreviations: R 2 = coefficient of determination; SEE = standard error of the estimate; SEE% = percent<br />

standard error of the estimate. Modified from <strong>Bedogni</strong> et al. [18].<br />

The traditional approach <strong>to</strong> establish the accuracy of BMI as an index of body fat is <strong>to</strong><br />

perform a regression analysis as described above. Another approach, which is more suitable<br />

for screening purposes, is based on the calculation of the sensitivity (true positive rate) and<br />

specificity (true negative rate) of BMI in detecting excess body fat [19]. BMI has generally a<br />

low sensitivity and a high specificity in detecting excess adiposity. For instance, in a study of<br />

934 Italian children aged 8-12 years [20], sensitivity and specificity of BMI in detecting a<br />

value of percent body fat greater than the 85 th percentile were 0.39 and 0.99 for the 95 th<br />

percentile and 0.65 and 0.95 for the 85 th percentile of BMI, respectively. When a direct<br />

measure of adiposity is needed, skinfold thicknesses offer a low-cost and easy way <strong>to</strong><br />

evaluate subcutaneous adipose tissue [17]. In the study performed on Italian children [20], the<br />

sensitivity of the log-transformed sum of four skinfolds (biceps, triceps, subscapular and<br />

suprailiac [14]) in detecting excess adiposity were 0.75 and 0.94 for the 85 th percentile. Thus,<br />

the use of the 85 th percentile of the sum of four skinfolds instead of the 85 th percentile of BMI<br />

may increase the sensitivity of screening programs of excess adiposity in children without any<br />

relevant loss in specificity.<br />

The use of BMI as an index of adiposity is more difficult in children than in adults<br />

because of varying growth rates and maturity levels [21]. Standardization of BMI for age is<br />

always necessary in children <strong>to</strong> avoid spurious interpretations [21]. Likewise, similar values<br />

of BMI may reflect a different body composition in elderly as compared <strong>to</strong> young adults [22].<br />

For instance, when matched with young women of similar weight and stature, elderly women<br />

have higher body fat and lower fat-free mass, <strong>to</strong>tal body water and bone mineral content [23].<br />

There is also increasing evidence that the relationship between body fat and BMI may differ<br />

among individuals of different ethnic background [24, 25]. This evidence, <strong>to</strong>gether with that<br />

derived from epidemiological studies of morbidity and mortality (see next paragraph), has<br />

suggested the need of ethnic-specific BMI cut-off points [26].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!