Progress of offshore longline culture in Sungo - Yslme.org
Progress of offshore longline culture in Sungo - Yslme.org
Progress of offshore longline culture in Sungo - Yslme.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />
mari<strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Jihong Zhang, Jianguang Fang, Zengjie Jiang<br />
zhangjh@ysfri.ac.cn<br />
Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, CAFS Q<strong>in</strong>gdao<br />
266071, Ch<strong>in</strong>a
Contents<br />
• Brief <strong>in</strong>troduce the progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />
<strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
• Potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> scallops<br />
Chlamys farreri<br />
• Discussion
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Mov<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>of</strong>fshore area would be a way to<br />
overcome the conflicts <strong>of</strong> space allotment and utilization<br />
and reduc<strong>in</strong>g environment impact <strong>of</strong> mari<strong>culture</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry (Benetti et al., 2003; Michler-Cieluch et al., 2009).
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Currently, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
emphasis worldwide is on the<br />
<strong>of</strong>fshore farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>fish,<br />
and because <strong>of</strong> the high<br />
costs and risks <strong>of</strong> practic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong>fshore aqua<strong>culture</strong>, <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
attempts have focused<br />
largely on the production <strong>of</strong><br />
high value species (Lipton<br />
and Kim, 2007).<br />
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar);<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss)
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Australia, New Zealand<br />
and New Hampshire <strong>of</strong> USA<br />
are engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />
mussel <strong>culture</strong> at exposed<br />
site several miles from<br />
shore (Langan and Horton,<br />
2004).
North Yellow Sea<br />
Zhang Zidao island<br />
Mid-Yellow Sea<br />
<strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
South Yellow Sea<br />
Qian Sandao island<br />
East Sea<br />
Sheng Si<br />
National High Technique<br />
Program: “Offshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />
mari<strong>culture</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
technique”: 2006-2010
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
•Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g: moor<strong>in</strong>gs, ropes or l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ment equipment<br />
•Choice on the potential target species:<br />
high value species, or simple<br />
management.
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
80-100 m<br />
Concrete/<br />
wooden<br />
stake<br />
Lantern<br />
net<br />
1.5m<br />
2.5m<br />
100m<br />
1 m<br />
Ear<br />
hand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
石坠重2.5kg<br />
Float<strong>in</strong>g<br />
buoys<br />
Sketch map on the <strong>of</strong>fshore surface <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong>
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Numerical modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
research and Simulation the<br />
raft resistant to the different<br />
current.
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Float<strong>in</strong>g buoys<br />
Sketch map on the <strong>of</strong>fshore submerged <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong>
1. <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Conta<strong>in</strong>ment equipment<br />
abalone<br />
octopus<br />
Sea cucumber<br />
Japanese scallop
2. Potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> scallops<br />
Scallop Chlamys farreri is one <strong>of</strong> most<br />
important species that is farmed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
northern coast <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In Shandong<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>ce, the mari<strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>of</strong> the<br />
scallop developed very quickly s<strong>in</strong>ce 1992.
2. Potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> scallops<br />
cultivated area (*10 3 ha)<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
area (ha) production (t)<br />
1986<br />
1988<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
year<br />
The annual production and cultivated<br />
area <strong>of</strong> scallop Chlamys farreri <strong>in</strong><br />
Shandong prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
2002<br />
2004<br />
900<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
production (*10 3 t)<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>culture</strong><br />
species shifts from<br />
Chlamys farreri to bay<br />
scallop Argopecten<br />
irradians for the<br />
reason <strong>of</strong> high<br />
summer mortality rate.
2. Potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> scallops<br />
• The cause <strong>of</strong> the high mortalities <strong>in</strong><br />
summer has not been entirely identified,<br />
environment problem is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hypothesized causes.
2. Potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore <strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> scallops<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this experiment is to study the<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> long-l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> scallop Chlamys<br />
farreri <strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore areas and to evaluate the<br />
optimized <strong>culture</strong> mode.
Inshore<br />
5-20m<br />
Offshore<br />
30-40m<br />
3.5 mile<br />
Experiment <strong>of</strong> scallop <strong>culture</strong> <strong>in</strong> different water depth
Material and methods<br />
Experiment design<br />
Inshore<br />
(<strong>in</strong>d./disk)<br />
Offshore<br />
(<strong>in</strong>d./disk)<br />
20 20<br />
Scallop Density<br />
(<strong>in</strong>d./m 2 )<br />
280<br />
30 30<br />
425<br />
40 40<br />
565
Material and methods<br />
20 scallops were sampled at random for each<br />
experimental groups every month from May 2007 to April<br />
2008. Shell height, wet weight and dry weight <strong>of</strong> shell and<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t body tissue were recorded.<br />
Meanwhile, environmental parameters: temperature,<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ity, chlorophyll a, suspended particle materials,<br />
particle <strong>org</strong>anic materials and dissolved <strong>in</strong><strong>org</strong>anic<br />
nutrients were measure monthly. The current velocity at<br />
<strong>in</strong>shore and <strong>of</strong>fshore were measured <strong>in</strong> May 2008 .
Concentration <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll a<br />
(mg m -3 )<br />
Results<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
May July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Mar.<br />
Inshore chla: 2.67±2.35<br />
Offshore : 1.90±1.56 mg/m3<br />
Organic content<br />
(POM/TPM, %)<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
May<br />
July<br />
Aug.<br />
Sep.<br />
Oct.<br />
Nov.<br />
Mar.<br />
Particulate <strong>org</strong>anic matter<br />
Suspended particulate matter<br />
(POM, mgl -1 )<br />
(TPM, mgl -1 )<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
0<br />
5<br />
0<br />
May<br />
May<br />
July<br />
Aug.<br />
POM (mg/l)<br />
Inshore:12.29±9.07<br />
Offshore:16.99±8.09<br />
Sep.<br />
Oct.<br />
Nov.<br />
Mar.<br />
July<br />
Aug.<br />
Sep.<br />
Oct.<br />
Nov.<br />
Mar.<br />
TPM (mg/l)<br />
Inshore: 43.98±35.56<br />
Offshore: 65.82±31.61<br />
Temperature ( o C)<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
May July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Mar.<br />
<strong>in</strong>shore <strong>of</strong>fshore
Tidal current (cm s -1 )<br />
Results<br />
Mean current speed at one tidal cycle <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>shore and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fshore area were 1.39±0.385 and 20.40±12.24cm s -1 ,<br />
respectively, with a maximal speed <strong>of</strong> 2.60 and 46.0cm<br />
s -1 , respectively.<br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0:01<br />
2008-5-4<br />
4:01 8:01 12:01 16:01 20:01 0:01<br />
2008-5-5<br />
Date&Time<br />
<strong>of</strong>fshore<br />
4:01 8:01 12:01 16:01 20:01<br />
0<br />
0:01<br />
2008-5-4<br />
Current velocity <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>shore and <strong>of</strong>fshore area <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sungo</strong> Bay<br />
Tidal current (cm s -1 )<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
4:01 8:01 12:01 16:01 20:01 0:01<br />
2008-5-5<br />
Date&Time<br />
Inshore<br />
4:01 8:01 12:01 16:01 20:01
Scallop cultivated<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore area<br />
Scallop cultivated<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>shore area
Results<br />
Mean survival (% survivors related to the <strong>in</strong>itial number) <strong>of</strong><br />
scallops Chlamys farreri for 11 months (average ±SE).<br />
Initial density<br />
(Ind./disk)<br />
Offshore site<br />
(%)<br />
Inshore site<br />
(%)<br />
20 92±2 86±1<br />
30 90±1 83±2<br />
40 86±3 82±2
Results<br />
Shell height<br />
Dry tissue weight<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Inshore site Offshore site<br />
A<br />
IS-20<br />
IS-30<br />
IS-40<br />
May July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Mar.<br />
E<br />
May July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Mar.<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
B<br />
OS-20<br />
OS-30<br />
OS-40<br />
May July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Mar.<br />
F<br />
May July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Mar.<br />
The groups OS-<br />
30 and OS-20<br />
had greater dry<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />
weights than the<br />
others (ANOVA,<br />
p
Results<br />
Instantaneous growth rate <strong>of</strong> the scallop (dry tissue weight )<br />
OS-20 OS-30 OS-40 IS-20 IS-30 IS-40<br />
July 3.34 2.28 3.10 3.52 3.22 3.25<br />
Aug. 1.05 2.86 0.35 1.46 2.00 0.88<br />
Sep. 1.44 0.59 2.23 0.34 0.06 1.08<br />
Oct. 0.58 0.87 0.00 0.30 -0.14 0.28<br />
Nov. 0.58 1.05 0.64 0.12 0.69 -0.07<br />
Jan. 0.66 1.01 1.80<br />
Mar. 0.13 0.27 0.11 0.32 -0.25 -0.18<br />
April 1.03 1.13 0.99 0.95 1.01 0.52
Results<br />
The growth <strong>of</strong> the scallop at <strong>in</strong>shore and <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />
sites were described us<strong>in</strong>g Von Bertalanffy model:<br />
H t =H ∞ (1-e -k(t-to) )<br />
H t : predicted standard shell height at age t;<br />
H ∞ : the asymptotic height;<br />
k is a growth constant;<br />
t 0 : age at which the theoretical height is 0.
Results<br />
Estimated results <strong>of</strong> Von Bertalanffy growth parameter for<br />
different treatment groups.<br />
H ∞<br />
K (year -1 )<br />
OS-20 75.48 2.73<br />
OS-30 100.66 1.25<br />
OS-40 69.34 2.55<br />
IS-20 72.08 3.04<br />
IS-30 65.76 3.43<br />
IS-40 68.90 2.96<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Asymptotic height<br />
OS-20<br />
fit-os20<br />
0 200 400 600 800
Conclusion<br />
Item OS-20 OS-30 OS-40 IS-20 IS-30 IS-40<br />
Wet weight per scallop (g) 34.13 36.54 28.11 34.02 26.39 29.61<br />
Survival rate (%) 92 90 86 86 83 82<br />
Yields per lantern net (kg) 9.42 9.87 7.25 8.78 6.57 7.28<br />
Seed<strong>in</strong>g cost per lantern net<br />
(US$)<br />
Simple economic evaluation<br />
0.17 0.26 0.34 0.17 0.26 0.34<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>it per lantern net (US$) 5.21 5.38 3.80 4.84 3.50 3.82
Conclusion<br />
• Offshore long-l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> scallop<br />
Chlamys farreri is successful.<br />
• OS-30 treatment group has higher<br />
production, larger shell height and<br />
economic benefit.
Prospect<br />
A major problem with<br />
<strong>longl<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>culture</strong> <strong>of</strong> lantern<br />
cage is the bi<strong>of</strong>oul<strong>in</strong>g, which<br />
may reduce growth rates <strong>in</strong><br />
scallop <strong>culture</strong>.
Work is go<strong>in</strong>g …..
Work is go<strong>in</strong>g …..<br />
• The <strong>in</strong>dividual filtration rate, excretion rate and<br />
respiration rate <strong>of</strong> the scallop at <strong>in</strong>shore and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fshore area had been measured, we will try to<br />
evaluate the carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fshore.<br />
Biodeposit trap
Work is go<strong>in</strong>g …..<br />
food outside<br />
<strong>in</strong>flow<br />
food 1<br />
consumption1<br />
number <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
growth 1<br />
length<br />
depth flow<br />
transport 1<br />
fiiltration rate<br />
scallop density<br />
food 2<br />
scallop 1 scallop 2<br />
k<br />
flow rate<br />
number <strong>of</strong> scallop per l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
consumption 2<br />
growth 2<br />
transport2<br />
Conceptual model for the food consumption<br />
•To simulate and evaluate<br />
the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> cultivated<br />
density on the growth<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> scallop.<br />
•To expect the growth<br />
and production <strong>of</strong> scallop<br />
at different area.
Thanks