16.01.2013 Views

Download - Kuwait Times

Download - Kuwait Times

Download - Kuwait Times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2012<br />

TOKYO: A Tokyo Stock Exchange employee works<br />

at the computer terminal yesterday. Asian stocks<br />

markets mostly posted tentative gains yesterday<br />

following a mixed bag of US and European economic<br />

reports and as oil prices rose to a new ninemonth<br />

high. —AP<br />

Poll tension puts<br />

$2bn Malaysian<br />

IPO in doubt<br />

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia could delay a $2-billion listing of a<br />

state-linked palm oil firm as farmers’ opposition to the deal risks<br />

undermining the ruling coalition in fiercely contested national<br />

polls expected this year. The listing of FELDA Global Ventures<br />

(FGVH), originally set for mid-2012, aimed to give Malaysia’s<br />

$27-billion palm oil sector much-needed financial firepower to<br />

boost yields and expand when top producer Indonesia is gaining<br />

market share.<br />

But the initial public offering has triggered unexpectedly<br />

strong resistance from some of the 113,000 farmers who<br />

together own 60 percent of the land given to them by FGVH’s<br />

parent, the Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA).<br />

Although the listing would bring each family a one-time windfall,<br />

opponents say it would deprive them of financial control of<br />

an asset they have held for generations.<br />

Pressing on with the IPO without addressing these concerns<br />

would be risky for Prime Minister Najib Razak, who calls the<br />

farmers his “safe deposit” in the fight to win elections that must<br />

be called by April 2013, but are expected this year. Najib is<br />

fighting to reverse a dismal election showing by his ruling coalition<br />

in 2008, when the opposition made historic inroads in parliament.<br />

“The prime minister is concerned about this. He wants<br />

the listing to happen but he may take a step back to ensure the<br />

settlers are satisfied,” said a senior government official with<br />

direct knowledge of the listing plans.<br />

“The process needs to take time. In the worst case scenario,<br />

Najib will push the IPO after the elections,” said the official, who<br />

declined to be identified. The farmers, or FELDA settlers, as they<br />

are known, number about 1.6 million, including their extended<br />

families. They form the bulk of the voters in 54 of Malaysia’s 222<br />

parliamentary seats and are mostly ethnic Malay, the core support<br />

base of the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition.<br />

The opposition has backed the farmers over the deal as it<br />

seeks to push its way into the traditional rural strongholds of<br />

Najib’s United Malays National Organisation (UMNO). Najib’s<br />

father, former prime minister Abdul Razak, started FELDA in the<br />

1950s, handing out land to Malays to fight poverty. The farms<br />

expanded to 880,000 hectares (or 2.2 million acres), making for<br />

the world’s biggest plantation scheme, with FELDA owning<br />

about 40 percent of the land bank.<br />

The farmers and FELDA played a crucial role in making<br />

Malaysia the world’s second-largest palm oil producer. “There is<br />

now the potential for widespread dissatisfaction over the listing,<br />

with the younger generation of settlers questioning the<br />

economic benefits,” said Ibrahim Suffian, director of Merdeka<br />

Centre, an independent polling group. “It is a generational<br />

gap.”<br />

Growing resistance<br />

The listing plan envisages FVGH taking over the plantation<br />

group’s commercial arm, Felda Holdings, which is 51-percent<br />

owned by farmers through an investment cooperative (KPF).<br />

On paper, it fits Malaysia’s plan to privatize state assets and<br />

draw in investors seeking exposure to palm oil prices that have<br />

risen six percent this month alone. —Reuters<br />

business<br />

Chinese investors tread<br />

more carefully in Africa<br />

China eyes more partnerships with foreign firms<br />

BEIJING: China’s oil and commodities firms<br />

are set to tread more carefully in Africa after<br />

being stung by kidnappings, seizures of cargo<br />

and, most recently, the expulsion of a<br />

chief executive . But they won’t pull back. If<br />

anything, China will broaden its exposure to<br />

the region, home to some of the world’s<br />

most resource-rich but unstable countries,<br />

as it scours the globe for resources needed<br />

by the factories and businesses of the<br />

world’s fastest-growing economy. Any major<br />

change is instead likely to be in tone rather<br />

than intent, with Chinese investors expected<br />

to take a less aggressive approach and to<br />

increasingly partner with other foreign firms<br />

in dangerous and unpredictable markets.<br />

“When Chinese firms started in Africa, it<br />

was more driven by the political motivations<br />

of top executives of state energy giants,”<br />

said a Beijing-based oil executive. “So the<br />

investments were made in a rushed and<br />

aggressive manner ... But (now) I think they<br />

will be more cautious when it comes to due<br />

diligence and investment decisions.” Recent<br />

problems in Sudan have shown China the<br />

risks of being a big and politicised investor in<br />

a continent that accounted for 24 percent of<br />

China’s crude oil imports last year.<br />

Rebel forces operating in Sudan, near the<br />

border with South Sudan, kidnapped 29<br />

Chinese workers last month, apparently<br />

using them as political pawns before releasing<br />

them 10 days later. It was the fourth case<br />

of abduction of Chinese in Sudan. Chinese<br />

oil firms have also become tangled in an oil<br />

row between Sudan and newly independent<br />

South Sudan, leading to production shutdowns<br />

and the expulsion this week from<br />

South Sudan of the head of Chinese-<br />

Malaysian oil consortium Petrodar, the main<br />

oil firm operating in the new African nation.<br />

As Chinese firms go overseas in pursuit of<br />

profit and raw material, such problems have<br />

multiplied. In the last year alone, China has<br />

seen two dozen cement factory workers kidnapped<br />

by Bedouin tribesmen in Egypt, and<br />

a spate of strikes for better pay and conditions<br />

at mining operations in Zambia and<br />

Zimbabwe.<br />

No option<br />

Given that stepping back from Africa is<br />

not an option, China must learn to better<br />

navigate the region’s hazards, experts say.<br />

China’s state-owned energy and mineral<br />

Fitch downgrades<br />

3 Australian banks<br />

SYDNEY: Fitch yesterday downgraded the prized credit ratings<br />

of three of Australia’s big four banks, citing higher funding<br />

costs. It downgraded by one notch Commonwealth Bank,<br />

Westpac Banking Corp., and National Australia Bank Ltd. to AA<br />

minus from AA. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group,<br />

which already had a AA minus rating, remained unchanged.<br />

It follows Standard & Poor’s downgrading of the credit ratings<br />

of all four banks from AA to AA minus in December as<br />

part of changes to the way it assesses risk. “In Fitch’s view,<br />

wholesale funding, particularly when sourced cross borders,<br />

has become more vulnerable to swings of confidence,” it said<br />

in a statement explaining its move.<br />

“Despite some improvement since 2008, all four banks<br />

retain a reliance on wholesale funding, particularly from offshore<br />

markets.” Despite the downgrade, the four major<br />

Australian banks remain among the strongest for Fitch<br />

globally. —AFP<br />

firms have usually tried to remain above the<br />

fray, saying disputes with workers or ethnic<br />

groups are the local government’s responsibility,<br />

but experts say they should work on<br />

their public relations savvy.<br />

“They become associated too closely<br />

with the government and don’t make<br />

enough effort to tell the local people and<br />

the NGOs at home or from abroad that they<br />

are doing a good job,” said Zha Daojiong, a<br />

professor at Peking University who studies<br />

China’s energy deals abroad. At the very<br />

least, China will certainly strive to improve<br />

the security of its projects in Africa, said<br />

Michael Arruda, a specialist in energy deals<br />

and partner with legal firm Jones Day in<br />

Beijing.<br />

“China isn’t going to change its strategy<br />

when it comes to Africa. They are going to<br />

go where the oil is. You can’t say you’d like<br />

to go to nice places like California because<br />

that’s not where the super-sized resources<br />

are. In contrast, the resource potential of<br />

Africa remains enormous.” “But I think they<br />

are going to be more cautious about the<br />

safety of their operations on the ground<br />

there.”<br />

While Sudan may provide far less oil to<br />

China than Iran or Saudi Arabia, it ranks as<br />

Chinese oil company CNPC’s most valuable<br />

overseas investment. In building investment<br />

ties, China sometimes trades off long political<br />

ties to many of the regimes in charge.<br />

And it also has a lot of human capital invested<br />

in Africa and elsewhere around the world,<br />

with more than 800,000 citizens employed<br />

abroad.Jobs for hundreds of thousands of<br />

Chinese at these overseas locations also<br />

relieves pressure on the teeming domestic<br />

job market, said Zha of Peking University.<br />

“China is in a vulnerable position. It is different<br />

from the United States or Britain or other<br />

countries primarily because of the employment<br />

of its own nationals,” he said.<br />

China’s focus on Africa and some other<br />

emerging markets also reflects its struggle to<br />

make inroads in other, more established<br />

regions, and not just because of political<br />

opposition. “(That) is one of the explanations<br />

and it remains true, but I don’t think it is the<br />

only explanation,” said Zha. “Oil and other<br />

energy investment is a competitive market<br />

and Chinese companies in comparison with<br />

their peers-not only in Europe and America<br />

but closer to home in Japan and South<br />

Korea-are not as competitive in terms of<br />

quality and efficiency, the quality of equipment,<br />

post-project services. “In more stable<br />

places, the demand for quality ... is higher<br />

and it is an issue whether Chinese companies<br />

are capable of winning contracts in<br />

those countries.”<br />

Political blowback<br />

China describes its investments in Africa<br />

as “normal commercial practice”, but many<br />

of its state-owned firms have won contracts<br />

on the back of a high-profile campaign by<br />

Beijing to expand its political, diplomatic and<br />

economic presence on the continent. They<br />

have thus been exposed to political blowback.<br />

The China Non-Ferrous Metals Mining<br />

Corporation (CNMC) has had more problems<br />

than most, and became the much-maligned<br />

face of Chinese investment during a bitter<br />

election campaign last year in Zambia,<br />

where it owns several lucrative copper<br />

deposits.<br />

Many of the troubles facing Petrodar-a<br />

consortium of Chinese state firms Sinopec<br />

and CNPC along with Malaysia’s Petronasare<br />

derived from China’s support for<br />

Khartoum during decades of civil war<br />

between the Muslim north and mainly<br />

Christian South that killed two million people.<br />

One way Chinese firms can lower their<br />

profile in Africa is by joining consortia led by<br />

foreign firms.<br />

On Tuesday, state oil firm CNOOC<br />

teamed up with France’s Total to sign a $2.9<br />

billion deal to join British firm Tullow to<br />

develop an oil field in Uganda. Metals conglomerate<br />

Chinalco has also sought to cut its<br />

exposure by teaming up with Anglo-<br />

Australian miner Rio Tinto to develop the<br />

huge, politically troublesome Simandou iron<br />

ore project in Guinea. “You are seeing them<br />

taking stakes in consortia instead of looking<br />

for 100 percent control over an asset,” said<br />

Arruda.<br />

“As time goes on, they are more confident<br />

in taking positions that are smaller,<br />

and they are doing so not just to get access<br />

to reserves but also to knowledge and<br />

expertise.” The trend is likely to continue,<br />

said Zha, the Peking University professor. “It<br />

will help internationalise our operations and<br />

increase the number of stakeholders when<br />

it comes to such issues as political risk,” he<br />

said. —Reuters<br />

AIA’s new business<br />

grows 40 percent<br />

HONG KONG: Asian insurance giant AIA said yesterday its new<br />

business grew 40 percent year-on-year, a better-than-expected<br />

result thanks to strong growth in Singapore, Malaysia and<br />

China. The firm, which is one-third owned by the troubled<br />

American International Group (AIG), said the value of its new<br />

business rose to US$932 million in the 12 months to November<br />

30, up from $667 million a year earlier. The result beat an average<br />

forecast of $870.5 million in new business by eight analysts<br />

polled by Dow Jones Newswires.<br />

Value of new business is a common growth measure used in<br />

the insurance industry, which takes into account the present<br />

value of expected future profits arising from new policies sold<br />

during the year. “We have continued to deliver strong growth<br />

in our key performance measures,” AIA group chief executive<br />

Mark Tucker said in a statement. “These results demonstrate<br />

that the momentum in value creation which we generated in<br />

2010 has been sustained throughout 2011.” —AFP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!