16.01.2013 Views

W0XjdP

W0XjdP

W0XjdP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lowed to bring a suit [2], he would then need to demonstrate<br />

either that Tony Stark's actions were not protected by the<br />

Business Judgment Rule, or that even if they were, that Tony's<br />

actions were so colossally bad that they constituted waste<br />

[3]. There are many good reasons to exit a profitable business<br />

or decline to pursue a profitable opportunity, and it is fairly<br />

easy to claim that an action was taken with a view towards<br />

long-term profit. In the case of weapons manufacture, this<br />

seems a pretty easy case. More egregious examples have been<br />

upheld, including a baseball stadium choosing not to install<br />

lights because the owner thought that night games spoiled<br />

the purity of the sport [4].<br />

The other way to get around the business judgment rule is<br />

to allege that the corporation engaged in self-dealing — i.e.,<br />

that the bad business decision benefited some of the directors<br />

and officers personally. When this is alleged, a court will look<br />

at the transaction closely, and if the transaction seems unfair,<br />

will reverse it or compensate shareholders. I don't think<br />

there's any suggestion of self-dealing in Iron Man though, unless<br />

you consider the pretty attenuated theory that Tony as<br />

Iron Man benefits by a dearth of weapons supplied to other<br />

parties.<br />

I am assuming that "stop manufacturing weapons" doesn't<br />

mean immediately fire all employees, destroy all inventory,<br />

and destroy all weapons manufacturing and research facilities<br />

— I'm assuming that Stark Industries would divest the<br />

weapons business in a competitive auction (if it's a separable<br />

business), or reallocate resources over time to other manufacturing<br />

areas (if it's not). Shutting down a profitable business<br />

in a value-destructive way might constitute waste if it's done<br />

poorly enough.<br />

As above, I think that this would be a pretty hard fight<br />

for an investor to win [5], but it is a fact-dependent inquiry,<br />

and we really don't have enough information from the movies<br />

to tell. If someone wants to write a sequel, Iron Man 3:<br />

Stark Industries Derivative Litigation, it'd be worth fleshing<br />

out the corporate governance structure of Stark Industries,<br />

the business units of the company, and its financials and how<br />

diversified they are.<br />

[1] First assumption because it seems most likely and be-<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!