click here to download - UniKL MIMET Official Website
click here to download - UniKL MIMET Official Website
click here to download - UniKL MIMET Official Website
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EDITORIAL<br />
CHIEF EDITOR<br />
Prof. Da<strong>to</strong>’ Dr. Mohd Mansor Salleh<br />
EXECUTIVE EDITOR<br />
Dr. Mohd Yuzri Mohd Yusop<br />
COORDINATING EDITOR<br />
Pn. Nurshahnawal Yaacob<br />
EDITOR<br />
En. Aminuddin Md Arof<br />
En. Atroulnizam Abu<br />
En. Ahmad Azmeer Roslee<br />
En. Iwan Zamil Mustaffa Kamal<br />
En. Hamdan Nuruddin<br />
En. Aziz Abdullah<br />
Pn. Nik Harnida Suhainai<br />
EDITORIAL MEMBERS<br />
En. Kamarul Nasser Mokri<br />
En. Sy Ali Rabbani Sy Bakhtiar Ariffin<br />
En. Rohaizad Hafidz Rozali<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong><br />
Dataran Industri Teknologi Kejuruteraan Marin<br />
Bandar Teknologi Maritim,<br />
Jalan Pantai Remis, 32200 Lumut, Perak Darul<br />
Ridzuan<br />
+(605)- 6909000(Phone)<br />
+(605)-6909091(Fax)<br />
enquiries@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
Page 119‐120<br />
http://www.mimet.edu.my<br />
R&D ACTIVITIES<br />
lUNIKL <strong>MIMET</strong> & ASM SDN. BHD. PROJECTl<br />
lPLASTIC TECHNOLOGY CENTER AT SIRIMl<br />
PLASTIC TECHNOLOGY<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
l CHIEF’S EDITOR MESSAGE l Page 2<br />
Feature 1 l DIRECTIONAL STABILITY ANALYSIS<br />
IN SHIP MANOEUVRING l<br />
Feature 2 l A WATER FUELLED ENGINE FOR<br />
FUTURE MARINE CRAFT l<br />
Feature 3 l SHIP REGISTERED IN THE PAST<br />
DECADE AND THE TRENDS IN SHIP<br />
REGISTRATION IN MALAYSIA: THE<br />
PREDICTION FOR THE NEW BUILDING AND<br />
DESIGN DEMAND IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS l<br />
Feature 4 l FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE USAGE<br />
OF PALM OIL AS ALTERNATIVE NON<br />
PETROLEUM‐BASED HYDRAULIC FLUID IN<br />
MARINE APPLICATION l<br />
Feature 5 l JOINING OF DISSIMILAR<br />
MATERIALS BY DIFFUSION BONDING/<br />
DIFFUSION WELDING FOR SHIP APPLICATION l<br />
Feature 6 l DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL<br />
FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE CARRIAGE OF<br />
LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) WITHIN<br />
COASTAL WATER FROM CARRIER ASPECT<br />
(OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE) l<br />
Feature 7 l OBSERVATION ON VARIOUS<br />
TECHNIQUES OF NETWORK<br />
RECONFIGURATIONl<br />
Feature 8 l MOVING FORWARD TO BE A HIGH<br />
PERFORMANCE CULTURE ORGANIZATION: A<br />
CASE OF UNIVERSITY KUALA LUMPURl<br />
Feature 9 lTIME‐DOMAIN SIMULATION OF<br />
PNEUMATIC TRANSMISSION LINEl<br />
Feature 10|REQUIREMENTS OF<br />
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAWS IN THE<br />
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A CHEMICAL<br />
TANKER|<br />
Page 3‐14<br />
Page 15‐25<br />
Page 26‐61<br />
Page 62‐68<br />
Page 69‐73<br />
Page 74‐82<br />
Page 83‐95<br />
Page 96‐105<br />
Page 106‐112<br />
Page 113‐118<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong>
Dear Readers,<br />
Welcome <strong>to</strong> the second issue of Marine Frontier@<strong>UniKL</strong>!<br />
We are happy that we are keeping <strong>to</strong> our targeted publication plan i.e the second issue is <strong>to</strong> be published in<br />
Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010 after the first issue in July 2010. It shows the strong commitment of the academic staff of MI‐<br />
MET <strong>to</strong>wards research and consultancy activities. I would like <strong>to</strong> congratulate the Edi<strong>to</strong>rial group under the<br />
able leadership of coordinating edi<strong>to</strong>r, Pn. Nurshahnawal Yaacob for the excellent work of getting the second<br />
issue out on time.<br />
As the journey progresses, we are now going<br />
<strong>to</strong> embark on improving quality, after getting<br />
the quantity! We will improve as we go along<br />
our journey so that “Marine Frontier@<strong>UniKL</strong>”<br />
will be a quality journal after a full year of pub‐<br />
lication. We will be looking at clustering the<br />
articles under different research areas grouped<br />
within the Departments or sections of <strong>MIMET</strong>.<br />
We are going <strong>to</strong> cast our net wider for research<br />
articles from within Malaysian Universities and<br />
research bodies or even international. Anything<br />
related <strong>to</strong> maritime studies including education<br />
is within our ambit and are welcome.<br />
I am glad <strong>to</strong> inform that we have already ob‐<br />
tained our ISSN Number recently: ISSN 2180‐<br />
4907. This means that our Marine Fron‐<br />
tier@<strong>UniKL</strong> can and will be distributed widely.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
We would like <strong>to</strong> receive feedback from our<br />
dear readers so that we can keep improving<br />
our technical bulletin. Intending authors are<br />
welcome <strong>to</strong> send in contributions. A guide for<br />
authors is also given at the end of this issue.<br />
Once again, congratulations <strong>to</strong> the Edi<strong>to</strong>rial<br />
group for a job well done.<br />
Happy Reading!<br />
Mohd Mansor Salleh<br />
Chief Edi<strong>to</strong>r<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
2
DIRECTIONAL STABILITY ANALYSIS IN SHIP MANOEUVRING<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
ASSOC. PROF. IR MD SALIM KAMIL*<br />
Department of Marine Design Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 20 May 2010; Revised: 8 July 2010 ; Accepted: 7 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010<br />
Feature Article 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The directional stability analysis method presented is useful for solving directional instability problems of a vessel during<br />
the feasibility studies and design stage of a new construction or for operational ships. The governing equations and the<br />
influences of trim, rudder and skeg on the stability criteria are briefly derived. The computation of the analysis is per‐<br />
formed using a simple program written in FORTRAN. Extracts from the computation output based on a known ship’s data<br />
are shown. One could provide recommendations for the solution of the directional instability problem of the vessel from<br />
the typical output. Apart from the stability criteria, a measure of manoeuvrability could also be investigated based on<br />
the turning radii evaluated.<br />
Keyword: Directional stability, manoeuvring<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Manoeuvring performance is one of the<br />
many technicalities normally checked by the<br />
ship designers during the initial stage of the<br />
design of a new construction. Corrections of<br />
directional instability can be made during or<br />
after the model tests phase. The standard<br />
tests on the particular free model are neces‐<br />
sary <strong>to</strong> be carried out <strong>to</strong> determine the ap‐<br />
propriate manoeuvring derivatives. The stan‐<br />
dard tests <strong>to</strong> determine the manoeuvring<br />
derivatives carried out utilizing models in<br />
special manoeuvring tanks are oblique, ro‐<br />
tating arm and planar motion mechanism<br />
tests. The planar motion mechanism tests<br />
which are necessary <strong>to</strong> be conducted for this<br />
*Corresponding Author:<br />
Assoc. Prof. Ir Md Salim Kamil CEng, CMarEng, PEng, FIMarEST, MIEM, was once the Dean and Head of Campus of Universiti Kuala Lumpur Malaysian Insti‐<br />
tute of Marine Engineering Technology and a retired Commander of the Royal Malaysian Navy. He graduated with an MSc in Naval Architecture (London<br />
University ), a BSc (Hons) in Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering (Glasgow University), a Diploma in Naval Architecture (University College London)<br />
and a Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia). He is currently pursuing a PhD course at St Petersburg State Marine Marine Tech‐<br />
nical University, Russia.<br />
Email: mdsalim@mimet.unikl.edu.my Tel:+605‐6909000<br />
purpose include the pure sway and pure yaw<br />
tests. The options available <strong>to</strong> solve the in‐<br />
stability problem without changing the ship<br />
hull form include altering the design trim,<br />
addition of a skeg, changing the rudder size<br />
or the rudder effectiveness and any combi‐<br />
nation of the above options.<br />
The Directional Stability Criteria<br />
The derivatives of the linearised non‐<br />
dimensionalised equations of yaw and sway<br />
motions are derived based on the Taylor’s<br />
Theorem. Taking in<strong>to</strong> consideration of small<br />
deviation or variation, the roll, surge and<br />
heave motions and the second derivatives<br />
are neglected. The linearised equations of<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
3
motions of yaw and sway are simplified as fol‐<br />
low:<br />
� � �<br />
� � � � � � � � � � � � �<br />
� � �<br />
�m<br />
� Y � � � v Y v Y m r Y<br />
��<br />
�<br />
v v<br />
v �<br />
' (1)<br />
�<br />
�I� � N��<br />
� r � N�v�<br />
� N�r�<br />
� N�<br />
��� �� ��<br />
v r<br />
r<br />
w<strong>here</strong><br />
m’ ‐ Non‐dimensionalised mass.<br />
Y� v ' Y� v '<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first derivative<br />
of sway force with respect <strong>to</strong> sway<br />
acceleration.<br />
Y ��<br />
v<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first derivative of<br />
sway force with respect <strong>to</strong> sway<br />
Y Y�� ��<br />
N �� ��<br />
r<br />
N ��<br />
v<br />
velocity.<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first derivative<br />
of sway force with respect <strong>to</strong> helm<br />
angle.<br />
�<br />
��<br />
�<br />
�<br />
��<br />
1<br />
2<br />
m<br />
� L<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first derivative<br />
of yaw moment with respect <strong>to</strong><br />
turning acceleration.<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first derivative<br />
of yaw moment with respect <strong>to</strong> sway<br />
velocity.<br />
(2)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
3<br />
�<br />
��<br />
�<br />
�<br />
��<br />
N Nr r<br />
N N� � �<br />
�<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first derivative of<br />
yaw moment with respect <strong>to</strong> rate<br />
of turning.<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first derivative<br />
of yaw moment with respect <strong>to</strong> helm<br />
angle.<br />
v' ‐ Non‐dimensionalised sway velocity.<br />
v �<br />
v� �<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised sway accelera‐<br />
tion.<br />
R ‐ Radius of curvature.<br />
�<br />
�<br />
r ‐ Non‐dimensionalised turning accel‐<br />
eration.<br />
�<br />
� �<br />
I �<br />
‐ Helm angle.<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised helm angle.<br />
��<br />
L L<br />
r� L L<br />
r��� ��<br />
x ��<br />
U R<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised turning rate.<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised second mo‐<br />
ment of inertia of mass.<br />
Equations (1) and (2) can be written as follow:<br />
�m��Y����� ��( m�<br />
� Y � � ��<br />
� ) D Y � r�<br />
Y<br />
��<br />
v<br />
v ��<br />
v v<br />
� �<br />
��N���r���N��I��N�) D�<br />
� ��<br />
(3)<br />
v�<br />
�<br />
v<br />
� N<br />
��<br />
r (<br />
��<br />
� (4)<br />
r<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
4
The determinant from equations (3) and (4) above equals <strong>to</strong> zero for zero control input, that is:<br />
2 �mI��D��N�m��Y�I��D��Y�N��N��m��Y����0 Equation (5) is a second order equation in the<br />
form of;<br />
(AD 2 + BD + C) x = 0, x = v or r<br />
For a ship, A and B are always positive, t<strong>here</strong>‐<br />
fore the directional stability criteria requires C<br />
> 0. Hence,<br />
Equation (6) can be written as follow <strong>to</strong> show<br />
the relationship between the levers of sway<br />
and yaw forces in the directional stability cri‐<br />
W<strong>here</strong><br />
Y r r��<br />
� O O<br />
r O v O<br />
v r v<br />
v<br />
mo '<br />
I<br />
'<br />
o<br />
� m�<br />
� Y��<br />
teria:<br />
‐ Non‐dimensionalised first deriva‐<br />
tive of sway force with respect <strong>to</strong><br />
turning rate.<br />
Effect of Trim, Rudder and Skeg Effectiveness<br />
The effects on the hull derivatives due <strong>to</strong><br />
trim, rudder and skeg effectiveness are as fol‐<br />
low;<br />
Due <strong>to</strong> Trim; Due <strong>to</strong> Trim;<br />
v<br />
� I � � N ��<br />
r<br />
�Y�����0 �N� � N�<br />
m<br />
Yv r v v<br />
N � r �<br />
Y � � m �<br />
r<br />
N � v<br />
Y �<br />
v<br />
�<br />
0<br />
(6)<br />
(7)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
(5)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
5
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
6
Table 1 ‐ Results of Stability Criteria and Manoeuvrability with Effects of Trims, Rudder and<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
Trim Rudder<br />
Effectivenes<br />
Skeg<br />
Effectivenes<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Y’R N’R Y’V N’V Directional<br />
Stability Criteria<br />
Turning<br />
Radius(m)<br />
‐0.50 1.00 0.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.002 ‐0.107 304.938<br />
‐0.50 1.00 0.5 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.002 ‐0.084 241.076<br />
‐0.50 1.00 1.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.002 ‐0.061 177.378<br />
‐0.50 1.00 1.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.039 113.844<br />
‐0.50 1.00 2.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.017 50.473<br />
‐0.50 1.00 2.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.004 ‐12.735<br />
‐0.50 1.00 3.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.025 ‐75.781<br />
‐0.50 1.25 0.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.002 ‐0.082 187.404<br />
‐0.50 1.25 0.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.002 ‐0.059 136.384<br />
‐0.50 1.25 1.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.037 85.495<br />
‐0.50 1.25 1.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.015 34.738<br />
‐0.50 1.25 2.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.007 ‐15.889<br />
‐0.50 1.25 2.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.028 ‐66.387<br />
‐0.50 1.25 3.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.049 ‐116.755<br />
‐0.50 1.50 0.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.002 ‐0.057 109.047<br />
‐0.50 1.50 0.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.034 66.589<br />
‐0.50 1.50 1.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.012 24.240<br />
‐0.50 1.50 1.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.009 ‐18.000<br />
‐0.50 1.50 2.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.030 ‐60.131<br />
‐0.50 1.50 2.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.051 ‐102.155<br />
‐0.50 1.50 3.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.072 ‐144.071<br />
‐0.50 1.75 0.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.032 53.079<br />
‐0.50 1.75 0.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.010 16.736<br />
‐0.50 1.75 1.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.012 ‐19.513<br />
‐0.50 1.75 1.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.033 ‐55.669<br />
‐0.50 1.75 2.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.054 091.733<br />
‐0.50 1.75 2.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.074 ‐127.703<br />
‐0.50 1.75 3.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.095 ‐163.582<br />
‐0.50 2.00 0.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.005 ‐0.001 ‐0.008 11.102<br />
‐0.50 2.00 0.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.014 ‐20.654<br />
‐0.50 2.00 1.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.035 ‐52.329<br />
‐0.50 2.00 1.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.056 ‐83.922<br />
‐0.50 2.00 2.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.077 ‐115.434<br />
‐0.50 2.00 2.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.097 ‐146.865<br />
‐0.50 2.00 3.00 0.002 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.118 ‐178.215<br />
‐0.50 2.25 0.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.016 ‐21.546<br />
‐0.50 2.25 0.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.038 ‐49.735<br />
‐0.50 2.25 1.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.059 ‐77.852<br />
‐0.50 2.25 1.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.079 ‐105.896<br />
‐0.50 2.25 2.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.100 ‐133.868<br />
‐0.50 2.25 2.50 0.002 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.120 ‐161.768<br />
‐0.50 2.25 3.00 0.002 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.140 ‐189.597<br />
‐0.50 2.50 0.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.040 ‐47.665<br />
‐0.50 2.50 0.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.061 ‐73.000<br />
‐0.50 2.50 1.00 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.082 ‐98.270<br />
‐0.50 2.50 1.50 0.001 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.102 ‐123.475<br />
‐0.50 2.50 2.00 0.002 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.123 ‐148.615<br />
‐0.50 2.50 2.50 0.002 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.143 ‐173.691<br />
‐0.50 2.50 3.00 0.002 ‐0.001 ‐0.006 ‐0.001 0.163 ‐198.702<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
7
The Program<br />
The computation was performed using a simple<br />
program written in FORTRAN or it can also be cal‐<br />
culated using COTS spread sheet software;<br />
C THIS PROGRAM CALCULATES DIRECTIONAL<br />
C STABILITY CRITERIA AND NON‐DIMENSIONAL<br />
C TURNING RADII<br />
REAL NVB<br />
REAL NRB<br />
REAL M<br />
REAL NV(7,7,7)<br />
REAL NR(7,7,7)<br />
REAL NVR(7)<br />
REAL NRR(7)<br />
REAL NRS(7)<br />
REAL NVS(7)<br />
REAL NVT(7)<br />
REAL NRT(7)<br />
REAL NDEL(7)<br />
DIMENSION TR(7)<br />
DIMENSION REFF(7)<br />
DIMENSION SEFF(7)<br />
DIMENSION YVR(7)<br />
DIMENSION YVS(7)<br />
DIMENSION YRS(7)<br />
DIMENSION YVT(7)<br />
DIMENSION YRT(7)<br />
DIMENSION YDEL(7)<br />
DIMENSION YRR(7)<br />
DIMENSION YV(7,7,7)<br />
DIMENSION YR(7,7,7)<br />
DIMENSION S(7,7,7)<br />
DIMENSION RAD(7,7,7)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
L=115<br />
T=3.92<br />
DISP=3708<br />
XR=50<br />
XS=45<br />
RO=1.023<br />
DEL=25*3.1416/180<br />
YVB=‐.00495<br />
YRB=.000973<br />
NRB=‐.000754<br />
NVB=‐.00165<br />
CLR=.00045<br />
CLS=CLR/2<br />
M=2*DISP/(RO*L**3)<br />
XRR=XR/L<br />
XSS=XS/L<br />
WRITE(1,*)’RESULTS OF STABILITY CRITERIA<br />
AND MANOEUVRABILITY<br />
$ WITH EFFECTS OF TRIM, RUDDER AND SKEG<br />
EFFECTIVENESS’<br />
WRITE(1,*)<br />
WRITE(1,*)’ TRIM REFF SEFF YR<br />
$ STAB T/RAD(m)’<br />
WRITE(1,*)<br />
DO 10 I=1,7<br />
TR(I)=(I‐3)/4.0<br />
NR YV NV<br />
YVT(I)=YVB*(1+(2*TR(I)/(3*T)))<br />
YRT(I)=YRB*(1+(.8*TR(I)/T))<br />
NVT(I)=NVB*(1‐(.27*TR(I)/(T*NVB/YVB)))<br />
NRT(I)=NRB*(1+(.3*TR(I)/T))<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
8
DO 20 J=1,7<br />
REFF(J)=1+((J‐1)*1.5/6.0)<br />
YDEL(J)=CLR*REFF(J)<br />
YVR(J)=‐YDEL(J)<br />
YRR(J)=XRR*YDEL(J)<br />
NDEL(J)=‐XRR*YDEL(J)<br />
NVR(J)=XRR*YDEL(J)<br />
NRR(J)=‐XRR**2*YDEL(J)<br />
DO 30 K=1,7<br />
SEFF(K)=(K‐1)/2.0<br />
YVS(K)=‐CLS*SEFF(K)<br />
YRS(K)=‐XSS*YVS(K)<br />
NVS(K)=‐XSS*YVS(K)<br />
NRS(K)=XSS**2*YVS(K)<br />
NV(I,J,K)=NVT(I)+NVR(J)+NVS(K)<br />
NR(I,J,K)=NRT(I)+NRR(J)+NRS(K)<br />
YV(I,J,K)=YVT(I)+YVR(J)+YVS(K)<br />
YR(I,J,K)=YRT(I)+YRR(J)+YRS(K)<br />
S(I,J,K)=(NR(I,J,K)/(YR(I,J,K)‐M))‐(NV(I,J,K)/YV<br />
(I,J,K))<br />
RAD(I,J,K)=(L*((YV(I,J,K)*NR(I,J,K))‐(NV(I,J,K)*<br />
(YR(I,J,K)<br />
$ ‐M))))/(DEL*((NV(I,J,K)*YDEL(J))‐(YV(I,J,K)<br />
*NDEL(J))))<br />
WRITE(1,5)TR(I),REFF(J),SEFF(K),YR(I,J,K),NR<br />
(I,J,K)<br />
$ ,YV(I,J,K),NV(I,J,K),S(I,J,K),RAD(I,J,K)<br />
5 FORMAT(1X,F5.2,2X,F5.2,2X,F5.2,X,<br />
F6.3,2X,F6.3,2X,F6.3,2X<br />
$ ,F6.3,2X,F6.3,2X,F8.3<br />
30 CONTINUE<br />
20 CONTINUE<br />
10 CONTINUE<br />
STOP<br />
END<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Ship’s Data<br />
The above program was run based on the<br />
following ship’s input data as shown in Table 2;<br />
Table 2: Ship’s input data<br />
Distance of rudder center from<br />
Longitudinal Centre Gravity<br />
(LCG), a<br />
50m aft of LCG<br />
Distance of skeg center from<br />
LCG, b<br />
45m aft of LCG<br />
Length between Perpendiculars<br />
(LBP), L<br />
115m<br />
Draught, T 3.92m<br />
Longitudinal position of the<br />
centre of buoayancy, LCB<br />
‐5.0m<br />
Density, ρ 1.023 <strong>to</strong>nnes/m 3<br />
Trim, t ‐0.5m < t < 1.0m<br />
Rudder Effectiveness, Reff 1.0 < (δCL/δα)r < 2.5<br />
Skeg Effectiveness, Seff<br />
Non‐dimensionalised first<br />
derivative of sway force of the<br />
0.0 < (δCL/δα)s < 3.0<br />
bare hull with respect <strong>to</strong> sway<br />
Y � v0<br />
velocity,<br />
Non‐dimensionalised first<br />
derivative of sway force of the<br />
‐0.00495<br />
bare hull with respect <strong>to</strong> turning 0.000973<br />
rate,<br />
Y � r0<br />
Non‐dimensionalised first<br />
derivative of yaw moment of<br />
the bare hull with respect <strong>to</strong><br />
sway velocity,<br />
N � v0<br />
Non‐dimensionalised first<br />
derivative of yaw moment of<br />
the bare hull with respect <strong>to</strong><br />
N � r0<br />
‐0.00165<br />
‐0.000754<br />
rate of turning,<br />
Rudder effectiveness fac<strong>to</strong>r,<br />
(δCL/δα)r<br />
0.00045<br />
Skeg effectiveness fac<strong>to</strong>r, (δCL/<br />
δα)s<br />
(δCL/δα)r/2<br />
Displacement 3708 <strong>to</strong>nnes<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
9
Computation Output<br />
Extracts from the computation output based on the ship’s data input for t = ‐0.5, 1.0 < Reff < 2.5 and 0.0 <<br />
Seff < 3.0 are given below;<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
Directional Stability<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=1.5<br />
-0.057 -0.034 -0.012 0.009 0.03 0.051 0.072<br />
Directional Stability Criteria<br />
(a)<br />
Directional Stability<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=1.75<br />
-0.032 -0.01 0.012 0.033 0.054 0.074 0.095<br />
Directional Stability Criteria<br />
(b)<br />
Directional Stability<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=2<br />
-0.008 0.014 0.035 0.056 0.077 0.097 0.118<br />
Directional Stability Criteria<br />
(c)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
10
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
Directional Stability<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=2.25<br />
0.016 0.038 0.059 0.079 0.1 0.12 0.14<br />
Directional Stability Criteria<br />
(d)<br />
Directional Stability<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=2.5<br />
0.04 0.061 0.082 0.102 0.123 0.143 0.163<br />
Directional Stablity Criteria<br />
(e)<br />
Figure 1: Directional Stability (a) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 1.5 (b) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 1.75 (c)<br />
at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 2 (d) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 2.25 (e) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 2.5<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
11
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Turning Circle Radius<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=1<br />
304.94 241.08 177.38 113.84 50.47 -12.74 -75.78<br />
Turning Circle Radius (m)<br />
(a)<br />
Turning Circle Radius<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=1.25<br />
187.40 136.38 85.50 34.74 -15.89 -66.39 -116.76<br />
Turning Circle Radius (m)<br />
(b)<br />
Turning Circle Radius<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=1.5<br />
109.05 66.59 24.24 -18.00 -60.13 -102.16 -144.07<br />
Turning Circle Radius (m)<br />
(c)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
12
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
Turning Circle Radius<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=1.75<br />
53.08 16.74 -19.51 -55.67 91.73 -127.70 -163.58<br />
Turning Circle Radius (m)<br />
(d)<br />
Turning Circle Radius<br />
11.10 -20.65 -52.33 -83.92 -115.43 -146.87 -178.22<br />
Turning Circle Radius (m)<br />
(e)<br />
(f)<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=2<br />
Turning Circle Radius<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=2.25<br />
-21.55 -49.74 -77.85 -105.90 -133.87 -161.77 -189.60<br />
Turning Circle Radius (m)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
13
Conclusion<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
(g)<br />
Figure 2: Turning Circle Radius (a) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 1 (b) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 1.25 (c)<br />
at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 1.5 (d) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 1.75 (e) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 2 (f) at t = ‐0.5,<br />
Reff = 2.25 (g) at t = ‐0.5, Reff = 2.5<br />
It can be concluded that the ship’s directional<br />
stability improves as the trim moves <strong>to</strong>wards<br />
positive values and so do with increasing rudder<br />
and skeg effectiveness. As the ship trimmed<br />
more by the stern (positive trims) and with<br />
increasing rudder and skeg effectiveness, the<br />
wetted surface area of the ship becomes larger.<br />
T<strong>here</strong>fore by virtue of its position, the centroid<br />
of the wetted surface shifts <strong>to</strong>wards aft, the<br />
directional stability increases. The magnitude of<br />
the stability criteria is an indicative of the degree<br />
of the directional stability. The ship is more<br />
directionally stable with numerically higher<br />
values of stability criteria. The negative values of<br />
the stability criteria indicate that the ship is<br />
directionally unstable. The lower the negative<br />
values of the stability criteria, the more unstable<br />
directionally the ship is. It can be deduced that<br />
the ship manoeuvrability increases with<br />
increasing directional stability, turning radius,<br />
positive trim, rudder effectiveness and skeg<br />
effectiveness.<br />
Skeg Effectiveness<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Turning Circle Radius<br />
t=-0.5, Reff=2.5<br />
-47.67 -73.00 -98.27 -123.48 -148.62 -173.69 -198.70<br />
Turning Circle Radius (m)<br />
References:<br />
1. R.K Burcher (1971) Development in Ship Manoeuvrability,<br />
Royal Institutions of Naval Architects (RINA).<br />
2. Inou, Hirano and Kajima (1981) Hydrodynamic Derivatives<br />
on Ship Manoeuvring, International Shipbuilding<br />
Progress,<br />
Vol. 20.<br />
3. E. C Tupper (2004) Introduction <strong>to</strong> Naval Architecture, 4 th<br />
Edition, 253‐261.<br />
4. K.J Rawson and E.C Tupper (2001) Basic Ship Theory, Vol.<br />
2, 5 th Edition, 539‐578<br />
5. Toshio ISEKI (2005) Ship Manoeuvrability, Theory and<br />
Assessment, Advanced Topics for Marine Technology by,<br />
Tokyo University of Science and Technology, Japan.<br />
6. Eda H. (1972‐1979) Directional Stability and Control of<br />
Ships in Waves, Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 16, Issue<br />
No. 3, Society of Naval Architects and Marine<br />
Engineers, 205‐218<br />
7. N. Minorsky (2009) Directional Stability of Au<strong>to</strong>matically<br />
Steered Bodies, Journal of the American Society of the<br />
Naval Engineers, Vol. 34, Issue 2, 280‐309<br />
8. Haw L. Wong, Cross Flow Computation for Prediction of<br />
Ship Directional Stability, Hydrodynamics, Theory and<br />
Application, Department of Mechanical<br />
Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Vol. 1, 285‐290<br />
9. B. V. Korvin‐Kroukovsky (2009) Directional Stability and<br />
Steering of Ships in Oblique Waves, Journal of the<br />
American Society of the Naval Engineers, Vol. 73, Issue 3,<br />
483‐487.<br />
10. Ship Fac<strong>to</strong>rs that affect Manoeuvring, SHIPS SALES.COM<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
14
A WATER FUELLED ENGINE FOR FUTURE MARINE CRAFT<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
AZMAN ISMAIL*, BAKHTIAR ARIFF BAHARUDIN<br />
Department of Marine Construction and Maintenance Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 23 May 2010; Revised: 19 July 2010 ; Accepted: 22 July 2010<br />
Feature Article 2<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The search for alternative energy is active in replacing the depletion of the reserve petroleum. The increase of oil price<br />
makes it more critical and suitable for new technology development. T<strong>here</strong>fore t<strong>here</strong> is a need <strong>to</strong> develop a new and cost<br />
‐saving technology especially for marine applications that meet severe regulations for environmental protection. The<br />
need for environment‐friendly engines is high <strong>to</strong> cater <strong>to</strong> this requirement nowadays. For whatever application, the cost<br />
competitiveness remains the most important. The water‐fuelled engine is the best solution. Water is available every‐<br />
w<strong>here</strong> and no need <strong>to</strong> worry about the rising oil price. While reducing emissions, it can save money and time, give more<br />
profit and at the same time keeping environment clean and preventing global warming.<br />
Keyword: Alternative energy, water fuel, hydrogen, electrolysis, environmental‐friendly.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The price of oil keeps increasing but the re‐<br />
serve oil keeps reducing and surely one day it<br />
will diminish. T<strong>here</strong>fore more research and<br />
development are needed <strong>to</strong> explore for new<br />
alternative energy <strong>to</strong> run the ships effectively<br />
at lower cost with abundant supply.<br />
Solar can be used as alternative sources, but<br />
t<strong>here</strong> will be no light during night, t<strong>here</strong>fore it<br />
cannot guarantee a constant supply. If wind is<br />
used, sometimes it blows well but sometimes<br />
it does not blow so much. Sometimes it can<br />
cause havoc (typhoon). In addition, the same<br />
problem can happen if using current (water/<br />
wave) as energy sources. The water itself can<br />
be used as the main source of energy. Fur‐<br />
thermore, the greenhouse effect will melt the<br />
iceberg in the Artic and Antarctica thus pro‐<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909055<br />
Email Address: azman@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
ducing a lot of water. Good resource man‐<br />
agement is needed <strong>to</strong> prevent more dry land<br />
being flooded by this enormous source of wa‐<br />
ter. This water can be used as fuel for internal<br />
combustion engine and at the same time pre‐<br />
venting the disaster from happening.<br />
Water covers 70% of the earth. Water con‐<br />
tains two a<strong>to</strong>ms of hydrogen and one a<strong>to</strong>m of<br />
oxygen, H2O. By electrolysis process, water<br />
breaks in<strong>to</strong> two parts of hydrogen and one<br />
part of oxygen gases. The hydrogen is used as<br />
fuel and release oxygen <strong>to</strong> the environment<br />
thus can prevent greenhouse effect. In order<br />
<strong>to</strong> enable hydrogen as fuel, a cus<strong>to</strong>mised en‐<br />
gine system is needed. The objective of the<br />
study is <strong>to</strong> expose and look at the possibility<br />
of water‐fuelled engine for future marine<br />
craft.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
15
Methodology<br />
In this case, water is used as fuel for in‐<br />
ternal combustion engines in marine craft with<br />
minimal adjustment or changes. The equipment<br />
such as electrolysis chamber, control circuit and<br />
the water tank are the only changes needed <strong>to</strong><br />
convert a petrol/diesel burning engine in<strong>to</strong> a wa‐<br />
ter burner. The existing battery and electrical<br />
system can be used <strong>to</strong> run this system easily. It<br />
requires no fancy s<strong>to</strong>rage or plumbing.<br />
Internal combustion is defined as a<br />
thermo‐vapor process since no liquid is in‐<br />
volved in the reaction. Most people are un‐<br />
aware that most of the petrol/diesel in a stan‐<br />
dard internal combustion engine is actually<br />
consumed, (cooked, and finally, broken down)<br />
in the catalytic converter after the fuel has<br />
been partially burnt in the engine. This means<br />
that most of the fuel consumed is used only <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
cool down the combustion process, a pollution<br />
‐ridden and inefficient means of doing that.<br />
A water‐fuelled engine system is shown<br />
in the Figure 1.0. From the water tank, water<br />
will be channeled <strong>to</strong> the electrolysis chamber.<br />
The water is pumped sufficiently <strong>to</strong> replenish<br />
and maintain the liquid level in the electrolysis<br />
chamber. The water level in the electrolysis<br />
chamber is set and controlled so that it well<br />
submerses the stainless steel pipe electrodes<br />
and yet leave some headroom for the hydro‐<br />
gen/oxygen vapor pressure <strong>to</strong> build up. The<br />
electrolysis chamber will vary in size with the<br />
size of the engine being used. For example, a<br />
quarter capacity is big enough for the ordinary<br />
car type engine (small engine).<br />
Fig. 1 : A water‐fuelled engine system.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
16
Stainless steel pipes are used as elec‐<br />
trodes in the electrolysis chamber while making<br />
sure it has a symmetric 1 <strong>to</strong> 5 mm gap in between<br />
these two pipes. The closer it is <strong>to</strong> 1mm gap the<br />
better. The electrodes are vibrated with a 0.5 <strong>to</strong><br />
5A electrical pulse which breaks the water in<strong>to</strong> its<br />
component gases which is oxygen and hydrogen.<br />
The theoretical power required <strong>to</strong> produce hydro‐<br />
gen from water is 79 kW per 1,000 cubic feet of<br />
hydrogen gas.<br />
The key can be turned on when the pres‐<br />
sure reached 30 <strong>to</strong> 60 psi <strong>to</strong> start the engine. High<br />
pressure could increase electrolysis efficiency. By<br />
pushing the throttle, more energy is sent <strong>to</strong> the<br />
electrodes thus produces more vapors <strong>to</strong> the cyl‐<br />
inders (i.e. fuel vapor on demand). Then the idle<br />
max‐flow rate is set <strong>to</strong> get the most efficient use<br />
of power.<br />
The heat from exhaust is used <strong>to</strong> heat the<br />
seawater in the desalination tank, which will re‐<br />
move the salt from seawater. The steam con‐<br />
denses in the process and is pumped <strong>to</strong> the water<br />
tank. Larger diameter of pipelines for exhaust is<br />
required <strong>to</strong> produce more fresh water.<br />
This hydrogen fuel does not need oxygen<br />
from the atmosp<strong>here</strong> <strong>to</strong> burn, which is an im‐<br />
provement over fossil fuels in saving the oxygen<br />
in the air supply. However, in this case, the hydro‐<br />
gen and oxygen are combined and ignited in the<br />
mo<strong>to</strong>r cylinder. The resultant flame is extremely<br />
hot and force is produced <strong>to</strong> move the pis<strong>to</strong>n. In<br />
fact, when hydrogen burns perfectly, the only<br />
product produced is water.<br />
The water contains hydrogen and hydrox‐<br />
ide ion which can be represented as equation be‐<br />
low:<br />
H2O → H + + OH ‐ …………………………....(1)<br />
Reaction at cathode:<br />
2H + + 2e ‐ → H2 ……………………………...(2)<br />
Reaction at anode:<br />
4OH ‐ → 2H2O + O2 + 4e ‐ ………………….(3)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Or can be simplified as:<br />
2(H2O) → 2H2 + O2 ………………………..(4)<br />
This means that two parts of hydrogen and one<br />
part of oxygen gases are produced during the<br />
electrolysis process. Hydrogen is collected at the<br />
negative pole (cathode, Eq.2) and oxygen at the<br />
positive (anode, Eq.3). The hydrogen and oxygen<br />
are introduced directly in<strong>to</strong> the electrolysis cham‐<br />
ber plus water. It is dangerous <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>re com‐<br />
pressed hydrogen in tank. As a result, the hydro‐<br />
gen is only produced in real time based on the<br />
system requirement. Only a certain amount of<br />
hydrogen is allowable in the electrolysis chamber<br />
<strong>to</strong> maintain constant flow of supply <strong>to</strong> the engine.<br />
This will prevent the problems associated with<br />
s<strong>to</strong>ring pressurized hydrogen.<br />
For extra safety precaution, a flashback arres<strong>to</strong>r<br />
unit is installed before the engine for accidental<br />
backfire protection for the electrolysis chamber.<br />
This will prevent the ignition from the engine<br />
from transferring <strong>to</strong> the electrolysis chamber<br />
which can cause explosion. All vapor/duct junc‐<br />
tions must be air‐tight and can hold full pressure<br />
without leakage. This system is considered suc‐<br />
cessful and properly adjusted when full power<br />
range at lower temperature and minimum vapor<br />
flow is obtained without blowing the pressure<br />
safety valve.<br />
This type of engine can give instantaneous start‐<br />
ing in any weather, elimination of fire hazards,<br />
cooler mo<strong>to</strong>r operation and fulfilling all mo<strong>to</strong>r<br />
requirements in power and speed. The engine<br />
would run for as long as water flows over the sys‐<br />
tem and regular maintenance will ensure this sys‐<br />
tem runs effectively. The technology can be en‐<br />
joyed for many years at very low expense as it is<br />
one of the most practical free‐energy devices,<br />
marked by extraordinary simplicity and effective‐<br />
ness. This system used low electricity out of the<br />
ship's battery, <strong>to</strong> separate water in<strong>to</strong> gas, burn<br />
efficiently and provide <strong>to</strong>ns of energy as needed.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
17
An engine (as with all internal combustion<br />
engines) turns heat energy in<strong>to</strong> mechanical en‐<br />
ergy. The mechanical energy is used <strong>to</strong> turn the<br />
electric genera<strong>to</strong>r which changes mechanical en‐<br />
ergy in<strong>to</strong> electrical energy. Since the water‐<br />
fuelled engine also produces mechanical energy,<br />
it can also be used <strong>to</strong> run as an electric genera<strong>to</strong>r.<br />
The advantages for water‐fuelled engine are:<br />
�� No more bunkering is needed t<strong>here</strong>fore<br />
save time and money. ‘Bunkering of wa‐<br />
ter’ can be done during travelling from<br />
one port <strong>to</strong> another port. Water is avail‐<br />
able everyw<strong>here</strong>.<br />
�� Increase ship’s mileage with longer dis‐<br />
tance at no cost thus increases transport<br />
efficiency and minimising the operation<br />
costs all the way.<br />
�� When burned, the only product is water<br />
without harmful chemicals emitted from<br />
this system thus cleaning up emissions<br />
that are hazardous <strong>to</strong> health. The overall<br />
effect is a dramatic reduction in harmful<br />
emissions.<br />
�� Hydrogen burns completely t<strong>here</strong>fore no<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Fig. 2: General arrangement<br />
carbon deposits is produced and this pre‐<br />
vents future carbon build up.<br />
�� The water produced will cool the engine<br />
via heat transfer thus protecting the envi‐<br />
ronment and the engine. This will greatly<br />
enhance the engine power and perform‐<br />
ance.<br />
�� A calmer, quieter and much smoother<br />
engine & gearshifts. This is due <strong>to</strong> the ef‐<br />
fect of water has on the combustion cycle<br />
inside the engine.<br />
�� Enjoy a longer life expectancy of engine,<br />
especially pis<strong>to</strong>ns, valves, rings and bear‐<br />
ings.<br />
�� In <strong>to</strong>day's high fuel prices, this simple<br />
technology will become more valuable<br />
asset.<br />
�� No more oil spill thus keeping the sea<br />
clean.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
18
Current development<br />
Hydrogen Oceanjet 600<br />
Ivo Veldhuis and Howard S<strong>to</strong>ne, <strong>to</strong>gether<br />
with Dr Neil Richardson and Dr Steve Turnock<br />
of Southamp<strong>to</strong>n's Ship Science Department<br />
are working on a container ship capable of 65<br />
knots and powered by hydrogen fuel. The re‐<br />
search started in the late nineties. It is a brave<br />
new approach <strong>to</strong> an established industry in<br />
order <strong>to</strong> cater worldwide fuel shortages and<br />
the increasing demand of manufacturers <strong>to</strong><br />
deliver their products <strong>to</strong> the consumers faster.<br />
Smaller and faster is the mantra associated<br />
with car manufacturers, and those in the con‐<br />
sumer of electronics industry but it is not the<br />
main fac<strong>to</strong>r when designing a container ship<br />
which travel thousands of nautical miles laden<br />
with cargo. In the world of seaborne freight,<br />
the bigger is better.<br />
The future of sea freight lie in a new<br />
breed of container vessels which travel two<br />
and half times the speed of their traditional<br />
counterparts but carry less containers, allow‐<br />
ing for more sailings between busy ports and<br />
t<strong>here</strong>fore delivering cargo within a smaller<br />
time frame. At 8,500TEU (one TEU equates <strong>to</strong><br />
one 20ft container), current container ships<br />
are leviathans of the ocean at 335m long. This<br />
size is reduced <strong>to</strong> just 600TEU per ship thus<br />
increased the present maximum speed of 25<br />
knots (46.3 kph) <strong>to</strong> a whopping 65 knots (120.4<br />
kph).<br />
Ship Design<br />
The design can be qualified by achievable<br />
engineering. In order <strong>to</strong> prove the concept, a<br />
new ship design must capable of completing<br />
the 18,000km roundtrip from Yokohama <strong>to</strong> L.A<br />
in half the time, thus allowing for double the<br />
amount of sailings per week. Hydrogen Ocean‐<br />
jet 600 is a work in progress which is fuelled<br />
exclusively by liquid hydrogen and powered by<br />
four gas turbine engines. The Oceanjet repre‐<br />
sents an ambitious new set of thinking and<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
offers real solutions <strong>to</strong> an industry <strong>to</strong> the new<br />
business improvements.<br />
Speed of 65 knots requires an extremely high<br />
level of propulsion power for the size of the craft<br />
proposed (175m/600TEU). With this in mind,<br />
Oceanjet will utilised gas turbine engines derived<br />
from similar turbine engines as those found on a<br />
Boeing 747, each capable of 49.2 MW of propul‐<br />
sive power when fuelled by hydrogen. This pro‐<br />
pulsive power has <strong>to</strong> be translated in<strong>to</strong> forward<br />
speed, and waterjets is used <strong>to</strong> give a high propul‐<br />
sive efficiency at this high speed.<br />
The design proposed allows for four such<br />
2.5m‐wide waterjets, two inside each demi‐hull<br />
transoms of each catamaran hull. This type of pro‐<br />
pulsion system is capable of rotating the outgoing<br />
waterjet flow and so the entire propulsion force is<br />
utilised <strong>to</strong> steer the ship at 65 knots.<br />
The schematic layout of the ship design, is a<br />
catamaran with long and twin hulls known as a<br />
'semi SWATH' (Small Water plane Area Twin Hull),<br />
an ideal shape <strong>to</strong> avoid unwanted wave resis‐<br />
tance. A significant part of the vessel's buoyancy<br />
is located beneath the waterline. As a result t<strong>here</strong><br />
is limited wave interaction and this translates in<strong>to</strong><br />
reduced wave resistance.<br />
Crucially, this type of design creates an aero‐<br />
foil‐shaped air cavity for running the ship with<br />
minimal foil friction. The hydrofoils create a verti‐<br />
cal lift force that reduces the draught of the cata‐<br />
maran and consequently reduces the ship's sur‐<br />
face area exposed <strong>to</strong> seawater. At such high‐<br />
speeds frictional resistance between seawater<br />
and the ship's hull surface is the biggest resistance<br />
component. By reducing the draught via the hy‐<br />
drofoils, the frictional resistance is reduced. An<br />
additional advantage from using the hydrofoils is<br />
damping of the ships motions.<br />
Another benefit of the catamaran layout lies<br />
in the speed of loading and unloading it creates.<br />
W<strong>here</strong>as conventional mono‐hulled container<br />
ships require cargo <strong>to</strong> be loaded vertically, via<br />
cranes, this design will allows for horizontal 'drive<br />
on and drop' container delivery, making the proc‐<br />
ess a lot swifter.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
19
Fuel system<br />
In maintaining such a speed for a long time<br />
about 3,000 <strong>to</strong>nnes diesel are required on‐<br />
board. That is about the same weight as the<br />
cargo. Methanol and ethanol are also <strong>to</strong>o<br />
heavy. T<strong>here</strong>fore hydrogen is used in the fuel<br />
system. It releases a lot more energy per kilo‐<br />
gram than conventional fuels, and the fuel de‐<br />
livery system devised can use both liquid and<br />
gaseous hydrogen, so no fuel is wasted.<br />
0.86kg of liquid hydrogen per second is<br />
required in order <strong>to</strong> operate the turbines at<br />
speed of 64 knots. This means 176 m³ of hydro‐<br />
gen burned every hour. For a ship <strong>to</strong> travel the<br />
distances required, it would t<strong>here</strong>fore require a<br />
fuel s<strong>to</strong>rage capability of 14,500 m³. The design<br />
of the Oceanjet allows for ten separate but in‐<br />
terconnected fuel tanks, with a <strong>to</strong>tal s<strong>to</strong>rage<br />
capacity of 1,001 <strong>to</strong>nnes of liquid hydrogen.<br />
Safety first<br />
Fig. 3: Hydrogen Oceanjet 600<br />
Naturally, the use of liquid hydrogen raises<br />
a number of key safety questions, not least how<br />
volatile a liquid fuel can be inside a ship travel‐<br />
ling in excess of 60 knots. Because of hydrogen<br />
behaves differently compared <strong>to</strong> other conven‐<br />
tional fuels, it requires a different approach al‐<br />
<strong>to</strong>gether. Current shipbuilding regulations do<br />
not allow for the use of liquid hydrogen as a<br />
fuel source.<br />
The liquefied hydrogen is kept at ‐253°C<br />
for safety reason. A safety system can vent the<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
hydrogen quickly in the event of an accident.<br />
Liquid hydrogen turns <strong>to</strong> gas instantaneously<br />
when in contact with the air and does not linger<br />
and burn longer like other fuels such as kero‐<br />
sene.<br />
SMART H‐2 Project<br />
The progress within the SMART‐H2 has<br />
been excellent. Already launched is an auxiliary<br />
engine on board a whale watching ship<br />
“Elding”. The opening ceremony was held at the<br />
harbour of Reykjavik, Iceland on April 24th 2008<br />
when media and guests were invited on the first<br />
trial run of using hydrogen on board a commer‐<br />
cial vessel.<br />
Fig. 4 “Elding”<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
20
Car industry<br />
A small group of local scientists in Malaysia<br />
have invented a technology called Hydrogen Fuel<br />
Technology (HFT) which could reduce petrol con‐<br />
sumption up <strong>to</strong> 50 percent. The HFT system was<br />
designed <strong>to</strong> fit all types of cars with particular em‐<br />
phasis on national cars, namely Pro<strong>to</strong>n Perdana,<br />
Pro<strong>to</strong>n Waja, Pro<strong>to</strong>n Wira, Pro<strong>to</strong>n Iswara, Pro<strong>to</strong>n<br />
Saga and Perodua Kancil. The pro<strong>to</strong>type has been<br />
tested in Pro<strong>to</strong>n Waja for a period of over two years<br />
and Perodua Kancil for one month. For every 10 li‐<br />
tres of petrol, the system uses 20 litres of water <strong>to</strong><br />
generate a fuel capacity of 20 litres. The mixture of<br />
petrol, hydrogen and oxygen will flow in<strong>to</strong> the<br />
carburet<strong>to</strong>r and the engine, enabling the car <strong>to</strong> run<br />
as usual.<br />
Besides that, a foreign car manufacturer<br />
Ford had introduced the Ford Focus H 2 RV which<br />
used an internal combustion engine powered<br />
by hydrogen, boosted by a supercharger, with a<br />
Ford patented Modular Hybrid Transmission<br />
System (MHTS) which incorporates a 300‐volt<br />
electric mo<strong>to</strong>r for full hybrid operation. The<br />
MHTS system can be used interchangeably. Hy‐<br />
drogen engines have logged thousands of hours<br />
on dynamometers, and more than 10,000 miles<br />
on the road.<br />
Table 1: H 2 RV vehicles specifications<br />
In comparison, the basis for the H 2 RV is its<br />
hydrogen‐powered internal combustion engine<br />
which is regarded as a transition or "bridging"<br />
strategy <strong>to</strong> stimulate the hydrogen infrastruc‐<br />
ture and related hydrogen technologies includ‐<br />
ing on‐board hydrogen fuel s<strong>to</strong>rage, hydrogen<br />
fuel dispensing and hydrogen safety sensors.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Table 2: H 2 RV performance<br />
Hydrogen producing ship.<br />
The Hydrogen Challenger GmbH devel‐<br />
oped a worldwide patented wind‐hydrogen‐<br />
production ship. Several wind turbines with dif‐<br />
ferent heights and power outputs are installed<br />
and operating on a ship. This ship may anchor in<br />
some areas with strong wind for instance in<br />
Bremerhaven or Helgoland, and the ship can<br />
produce hydrogen and oxygen gases from the<br />
regenerative energy (wind energy). The ex‐<br />
tracted electricity will be applied in<strong>to</strong> the elec‐<br />
trolysis of water, which will split the water<br />
molecule in<strong>to</strong> hydrogen and oxygen, and these<br />
gases will be continuously compressed in<strong>to</strong> the<br />
high‐pressure s<strong>to</strong>rage tanks on the ship. With<br />
fully loaded s<strong>to</strong>rage tanks, the gases are sold <strong>to</strong><br />
the cus<strong>to</strong>mer.<br />
Discussion<br />
Problems associated and possible solution with<br />
hydrogen as fuel;<br />
Hydrogen embrittlement.<br />
In an internal combustion engine, one of<br />
the problems with the burning of hydrogen is<br />
embrittlement which occurs when the walls of<br />
the cylinder become saturated with hydrogen<br />
ions. This will cause loss of ductility of metals<br />
due <strong>to</strong> corrosion as a result of intergranular at‐<br />
tack which may not readily be visible. The metal<br />
becomes fragile or porous and can shatter or<br />
fracture upon impact, thus damaging the en‐<br />
gine.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
21
As <strong>to</strong> embrittlement, the acidity of water<br />
has been found <strong>to</strong> have great effect on the<br />
speed and the degree <strong>to</strong> which a material can<br />
be dissolved. A metal corrodes because of the<br />
acidity of the solution in which it is immersed<br />
due <strong>to</strong> an interchange of hydrogen ions in the<br />
solution with the a<strong>to</strong>ms of the exposed metal.<br />
When the solution is in liquid form, the metal is<br />
dissolved in<strong>to</strong> the solution and hydrogen tends<br />
<strong>to</strong> plate out on the piece. Once a hydrogen film<br />
has deposited on the exposed surfaces, the dis‐<br />
solving of the metal will cease. Oxygen plays an<br />
important part in this process since the oxygen<br />
that dissolved in water will react with the film<br />
of hydrogen <strong>to</strong> eliminate it by forming water<br />
which allows the corrosion process <strong>to</strong> proceed.<br />
This problem can be solved by coating the<br />
pis<strong>to</strong>ns/cylinders ceramic. It cannot be delayed<br />
as these items will rust, either by sheer use or<br />
by neglect (i.e. letting it sits) and fitted with a<br />
stainless steel exhaust.<br />
Frosting.<br />
Some places such as in Europe are colder<br />
than Malaysia climate. In colder condition, the<br />
water inside the system can be easily getting<br />
frosted and disturb the system. In order <strong>to</strong> solve<br />
this problem, the heating coils <strong>to</strong> prevent water<br />
from freezing in the system.<br />
Hydrogen s<strong>to</strong>rage.<br />
Pure hydrogen is dangerous <strong>to</strong> be s<strong>to</strong>red in<br />
high‐pressure tanks. Like all fuels, hydrogen has<br />
in<strong>here</strong>nt hazards and must be handled care‐<br />
fully. In fact, hydrogen has been used for years<br />
in industrial processes and as a fuel by NASA,<br />
and has earned an excellent safety record. Like<br />
other fuels, hydrogen can be handled and used<br />
safely.<br />
In this case, hydrogen and oxygen were<br />
generated. All hydrogen and oxygen produced<br />
get consumed by the engine instantly. The suit‐<br />
able size of tank for certain pressure is needed<br />
<strong>to</strong> maintain constant flow of supply <strong>to</strong> the en‐<br />
gine. The presence of oxygen and water vapour<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
in the system makes hydrogen very safe. The<br />
mixture of hydrogen and oxygen give a power‐<br />
ful combustible gas but it is not explosive com‐<br />
pared <strong>to</strong> pure hydrogen. It does not need cool‐<br />
ing and will be ignited only by the strong spark<br />
inside the engine. The hydrogen can be com‐<br />
pressed in<strong>to</strong> a crystal matrix form in order <strong>to</strong><br />
make it safer but it is not so cost‐effective.<br />
Speed control.<br />
In getting the right speed at the right time<br />
and <strong>to</strong> maintain a constant supply, a control<br />
circuit is attached <strong>to</strong> the electrolysis chamber.<br />
This circuit (Figure 5.0) will produce square<br />
pulse signal which 'plays' the stainless steel<br />
electrodes like a tuning fork. The faster speed is<br />
needed, the wider the pulses go in<strong>to</strong> the elec‐<br />
trolysis chamber <strong>to</strong> create more hydrogen gases<br />
as needed. So when the throttle is pushed, it<br />
will electrically create more hydrogen gases for<br />
immediate consumption. On demand, low‐high<br />
flow rate is needed, from idle <strong>to</strong> maximum<br />
power. This signal is the input <strong>to</strong> the circuit as<br />
the primary control (i.e. throttle level = pulse<br />
width = gas rate).<br />
For carburet<strong>to</strong>r, the built‐in vents need <strong>to</strong><br />
be sealed and making a single way air‐intake.<br />
The throttle circuit is set in order <strong>to</strong> maintain<br />
minimum gas flow at idle and maximum gas<br />
flow at full power without blowing the pressure<br />
relief valve. In this way, the mixture is con‐<br />
trolled by the strength of the pulse (i.e. “width”<br />
at the optimum pulse frequency). If t<strong>here</strong> is in‐<br />
sufficient power at any throttle setting, some<br />
variables need <strong>to</strong> be changed such as the pulse<br />
frequency, the gap between the electrodes, the<br />
size (bigger) of the electrodes, or make a higher<br />
output pulse voltage (last resort).<br />
Excess heat.<br />
Excess heat due <strong>to</strong> combustion of hydrogen<br />
and oxygen can be rectified by recent material<br />
achievements and when the hydrogen is burned,<br />
water is produced thus cool down the engine<br />
down via heat transfer.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
22
Big oil companies.<br />
For business survival, big oil companies may<br />
s<strong>to</strong>p the emergence of this technology. These<br />
companies can buy the patent and keep the<br />
secret quietly. Many claims they have the tech‐<br />
nology but not many has come forward <strong>to</strong><br />
prove this. The rest have either been threat‐<br />
ened, sold out or keep the secret <strong>to</strong> themselves.<br />
Apparently, it is not a good idea <strong>to</strong> threaten big<br />
oil companies. Nowadays, with the increase of<br />
oil price and soon the depletion of the fossil<br />
fuel, this technology will have a better chance.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Fig. 5: Electric circuit diagram for control unit<br />
Water can be fully utilised. A lot of benefit can be<br />
extracted from it. T<strong>here</strong> were some recommenda‐<br />
tions regarding a water fuelled engine;<br />
�� This technology must be developed for the<br />
benefit of all. Big oil companies will cover up<br />
this innovation but with the current situation<br />
such as higher oil price, the depletion of oil<br />
in future, and higher coal price, it will<br />
strongly push the ship owners for other al‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
ternative which is water as fuel. T<strong>here</strong> are a<br />
lot of benefits can be get from this technol‐<br />
ogy.<br />
�� Thorough research and development must<br />
be done <strong>to</strong> design and optimise the engine<br />
capability <strong>to</strong> accept water as fuel so as <strong>to</strong><br />
fully utilise this technology at lower cost,<br />
meet owner requirement <strong>to</strong> get maximum<br />
profit and most importantly make it safe for<br />
all.<br />
�� Reliable data analysis and statistics must be<br />
recorded persistently for future reference<br />
thus the design can be<br />
simplified and impro‐<br />
vised. This will con‐<br />
vince the ship owners<br />
<strong>to</strong> use this water‐<br />
fuelled engine on‐<br />
board of their ship. It<br />
is the right time <strong>to</strong><br />
make a mindset shift<br />
for water fuelled en‐<br />
gine.<br />
Reduce petroleum<br />
demand and economy<br />
dependability since<br />
water is available for<br />
free everyw<strong>here</strong> and<br />
only a little of it is<br />
used. Global warming<br />
provides more than<br />
enough water supply.<br />
It is the ultimate solu‐<br />
tion for non depend‐<br />
ency on fossil fuels.<br />
�� Eliminate harmful exhaust emissions that<br />
pollute the environment and contribute <strong>to</strong><br />
global warming. This clean‐burning fuel will<br />
add only water and oxygen in<strong>to</strong> the atmos‐<br />
p<strong>here</strong> instead of polluting it.<br />
�� The engine that run on water could be an<br />
interesting project, thus give a great reward<br />
of never having <strong>to</strong> pay for petrol/diesel for‐<br />
ever and helping humanity at the same time.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
23
�� Financial assistance is needed <strong>to</strong> make this<br />
engine in<strong>to</strong> a reality. This will be a test run<br />
project in order <strong>to</strong> get the pro<strong>to</strong>type and fi‐<br />
nally get the practical design which is afford‐<br />
able for all.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Based on the discussion, water is the solu‐<br />
tion <strong>to</strong> energy problems as petrol dependency is a<br />
national security hazard. Petrol will increase in<br />
price and soon will deplete. T<strong>here</strong>fore, water is<br />
the best alternative. Water‐fuelled engines offer a<br />
cost effective and immediate solution <strong>to</strong> the en‐<br />
ergy crisis and pollution nowadays. In some de‐<br />
sign aspects, a thorough research and develop‐<br />
ment is needed <strong>to</strong> get a better practical design<br />
and free energy is hard <strong>to</strong> believe until it is actu‐<br />
ally happens.<br />
Nowadays, the industry has been<br />
tightly controlled by industrialists with political<br />
allies that have exploited mainly the transporta‐<br />
tion industry including shipping through cabotage<br />
or cartell practices. The key <strong>to</strong> overcoming this<br />
stronghold is the public enlightenment alterna‐<br />
tives and making these alternatives available <strong>to</strong><br />
the public. This water‐fuelled engine could be‐<br />
come a threat <strong>to</strong> those who already well estab‐<br />
lished in the petroleum business.<br />
Water is universal and a very powerful<br />
source of energy. It is an ideal fuel of the future.<br />
This fuel is re‐useable and does not give off any<br />
<strong>to</strong>xic chemicals. T<strong>here</strong>fore, diesel /petrol as a fuel<br />
are not necessary now. It is just an option. When<br />
water is used, it creates new opportunities, both<br />
economic and in ship design. It will become more<br />
investment in greener fuel production <strong>to</strong> fuel fu‐<br />
ture marine craft. The transition <strong>to</strong> a water‐<br />
fuelled engine is going <strong>to</strong> be a huge national and<br />
international challenge. Good support from all<br />
parties is needed <strong>to</strong> realise this technology for<br />
future used.<br />
Acknowledgement<br />
Thanks <strong>to</strong> Pn. Puteri Zarina Megat Khalid<br />
for checking my writing aspect, Mr. Fauzuddin<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Ayob, Dr. Mohd Yuzri Mohd Yusof, Pn. Nurshah‐<br />
nawal Yaakob and Mr. Ahmad Azmeer Roslee for<br />
their constructive opinion in reviewing my paper.<br />
Big thanks <strong>to</strong> Mr. Fuaad Ahmad Subki for his guid‐<br />
ance and invaluable knowledge. Their expert ad‐<br />
vice proved invaluable.<br />
References<br />
Documents;<br />
1. En Fuaad Ahmad Sabki, Advanced Marine De‐<br />
sign Lecture Notes, 2008, UTM.<br />
2. Klaas Van Dokkum, Ship Knowledge: Covering<br />
Ship Design, Construction and Operation, 3 rd<br />
Edition, 2006, DOKMAR, Netherland.<br />
3. B.R.Clay<strong>to</strong>n and R.E.D.Bishop, Mechanics of<br />
Marine Vehicles, 1981, University College Lon‐<br />
don.<br />
4. Robert Boylested and Louis Nashelsky, Elec‐<br />
tronic Devices and Circuit Theory, 6 th Edition,<br />
1996, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.<br />
5. Joseph J.Carr, Elements of Electronic Instrumen‐<br />
tation and Measurement, 3 rd Edition, 1997,<br />
Prentice Hall, Singapore.<br />
6. Stephen Chambers, Apparatus for Producing<br />
Orthohydrogen and/or Parahydrogen, US Pat‐<br />
ent 6126794, usp<strong>to</strong>.gov.<br />
7. Stanley Meyer, Method for the Production of a<br />
Fuel Gas, US Patent 4936961, usp<strong>to</strong>.gov<br />
8. Creative Science & Research, Fuel From Water,<br />
fuelless.com<br />
9. Carl Cella, A Water‐Fuelled Car, Nexus Maga‐<br />
zine Oct‐Nov 1996<br />
10. Peter Lindemann, W<strong>here</strong> in the World is All<br />
the Free Energy, free‐energy.cc<br />
11. George Wiseman, The Gas‐Saver and HyCO<br />
Series, eagle‐research.com<br />
12. C. Michael Holler, The Dromedary Newsletter<br />
and SuperCarb Techniques<br />
13. Stephen Chambers, Pro<strong>to</strong>type Vapor Fuel<br />
System, xogen.com<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
24
<strong>Website</strong>s:<br />
1. http://www.schatzlab.org/h2safety.html; 9.00am,<br />
23 Mac 2008.<br />
2. http://www.angelfire.com/sd/ZSPdomain/<br />
HydrogenHomepage/Cprop.html; 9.05am, 23 Mac<br />
2008.<br />
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen; 9.10am,<br />
23 Mac 2008.<br />
4. http://media.uow.edu.au/news/2005/1104c/<br />
index.html; 9.15am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
5. http://www.spiri<strong>to</strong>fmaat.com/archive/feb2/<br />
carplans.htm; 9.15am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<br />
Solar_Powered_Desalination_Unit; 9.15am, 23<br />
Mac 2008.<br />
7. http://www.raindancewatersystems.com/<br />
desalina<strong>to</strong>rs.html; 9.20am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
8. http://www.gas‐water‐car.com/; 9.20am, 23 Mac<br />
2008.<br />
9. http://jalopnik.com/cars/alternative‐energy/water<br />
‐engine; 9.20am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
10. http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/<br />
showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199601111; 9.20am,<br />
23 Mac 2008.<br />
11. http://www.dimewater.com/desalination.html;<br />
9.30am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
12. http://www.dolphindesalina<strong>to</strong>rs.com/<br />
operations.html; 9.30am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
13. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/<br />
els/01968904/1997/00000038/00000010/<br />
art00161; 9.30am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
14. http://books.google.com.my9.30am, 23 Mac<br />
2008.<br />
15. http://www.fuellesspower.com/water2.htm;<br />
9.35am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
16. http://www.able2know.org/forums/<br />
about26695.html; 9.35am, 23 Mac 2008.<br />
17. http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BT/<br />
Saturday/Corporate/BT548344.txt/Article/;<br />
2.00pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
18. http://www.au<strong>to</strong>world.com.my/forum/<br />
allposts.asp?<br />
summary=1&Forum=ap469682640&access=1&sta<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
tus=1&subject=Hydrogen+Fuel+Tech+By+Malaysia<br />
%3F; 2.00pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
19. http://www.au<strong>to</strong>intell.com/News‐2003/August‐<br />
2003/August‐2003‐2/August‐13‐03‐p1.htm;<br />
2.00pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
20. http://www.focaljet.com/allsite/content/<br />
h2rv.html; 2.10pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
21. http://fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage37.html;<br />
2.10pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
22. http://www.theage.com.au/news/environment/<br />
benvironmentb‐iceland‐aims‐<strong>to</strong>‐be‐free‐of‐fossil‐<br />
fuels/2008/01/25/1201157669193.html?page=3;<br />
2.10pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
23. http://www.so<strong>to</strong>n.ac.uk/ses/news/s<strong>to</strong>ries/<br />
hydrogenship.html; 2.20pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
24. http://www.newenergy.is/naha/; 2.20pm, 30 April<br />
2008.<br />
25. http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/01/<br />
whale‐watching.html; 2.20pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
26. http://www.hydrogen‐challenger.de/<br />
index_english.htm; 2.30pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
27. http://www.accagen.com/p‐electrolyzers.htm;<br />
2.30pm, 30 April 2008.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
25
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 3<br />
SHIP REGISTERED IN THE PAST DECADE AND THE TRENDS IN SHIP REGISTRATION<br />
IN MALAYSIA: THE PREDICTION FOR THE NEW BUILDING AND DESIGN DEMAND<br />
IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS<br />
SAMSOL AZHAR ZAKARIA*<br />
Department of Marine Design Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 25 May 2010; Revised: 8 July 2010 ; Accepted: 14 July 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Malaysia marine industry has been one of the key stepping s<strong>to</strong>nes <strong>to</strong> economic growth and prosperity all along its his<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />
In recent years, the shipping sec<strong>to</strong>r has expanded considerably. T<strong>here</strong> has been a considerable increase in the number of<br />
ships in operation, both in the international and domestic markets. Unfortunately, the economic crisis arrives at a mo‐<br />
ment in time when the Malaysian shipping sec<strong>to</strong>r is starting <strong>to</strong> boom and facing multiple challenges, including fierce<br />
competition from companies, human fac<strong>to</strong>r, piracy and terrorist threats of the international trade system. This paper<br />
describes the trend in ship registration in Malaysia. Also, from the analysis the prediction for new building and design<br />
demand in future is presented.<br />
Keywords Ship registration, shipbuilding, shipping<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Malaysia’s fleet, which was ranked in<br />
21 st position with the largest registered<br />
deadweight <strong>to</strong>nnage at the beginning of<br />
2006, has dropped <strong>to</strong> 23 rd position at begin‐<br />
ning of 2009 under the UNCTAD Maritime<br />
Review as shown Table 1. [1]<br />
A major national fleet expansion is espe‐<br />
cially taking place in the petroleum and gas<br />
tankers sec<strong>to</strong>r. Among the ship owners<br />
ahead with their expansion drive in the off‐<br />
shore shipping includes Bumi Armada<br />
Bhd,Tanjung Offshore,Alam Maritim Re‐<br />
sources Bhd, Scomi Marine Bhd and Petra<br />
Perdana Bhd. In the tanker sec<strong>to</strong>r, MISC Bhd,<br />
Gagasan Carrier Sdn Bhd, Malaysian Bulk<br />
Carrier Bhd, Nepline Berhad, Global Carrier<br />
Bhd and Swee Joo Shipping have placed or‐<br />
ders for more ships, including Very Large<br />
Crude Carriers (VLCC). [2]<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909049<br />
Email address: samsolazhar@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
The global financial crisis really started<br />
<strong>to</strong> show its effects in the middle of 2007 and<br />
in<strong>to</strong> 2008. Around the world s<strong>to</strong>ck markets<br />
have fallen, large financial institutions have<br />
collapsed or been bought out, and govern‐<br />
ments in even the wealthiest nations have<br />
had <strong>to</strong> come up with rescue packages <strong>to</strong> bail<br />
out their financial systems. In this conjunc‐<br />
tion, growth in international seaborne trade<br />
decelerated in 2008, expanding by 3.6 per<br />
cent as compared with 4.5 per cent in 2007.<br />
[1] Furthermore, the fall down in global dem‐<br />
mand has significant impacted growth in the<br />
world trade merchandise. In Malaysia, the<br />
situation directly affects some 14 shipping<br />
lines, which has caused them <strong>to</strong> reduce the<br />
number of vessels they have in service.<br />
Some orders for new ships have also been<br />
cancelled.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
26
Table 1: Global maritime Fleet Ranking (as of 1 January<br />
2009), Source: [1]<br />
2.0 Malaysian Shipping: An Overview.<br />
The Malaysian economy contracted moder‐<br />
ately by 1.7% in 2009 as recovery strengthened<br />
in the second half of the year. [3] The demand for<br />
ocean transportation in Malaysia’s international<br />
trade is very high and this is largely because of<br />
the size of the country’s external trade sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />
and its high dependence on foreign trade. The<br />
shipping industry in Malaysian comprises in two<br />
sec<strong>to</strong>r:<br />
1. International Shipping<br />
2. Domestic Shipping<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
2.1 Regula<strong>to</strong>ry Aspects of Shipping<br />
Shipping is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry<br />
of Transport. The Maritime Division of the Ministry<br />
is the administrative body responsible for the over‐<br />
all development of the shipping industry, while Ma‐<br />
rine Department is responsible for acting as registry<br />
of ships besides enforcing rules and regulations re‐<br />
lating <strong>to</strong> standards and safety of shipping in Malay‐<br />
sia. Shipping in Malaysia is regulated by the Mer‐<br />
chant Shipping Ordinance (MSO) 1952 that was ex‐<br />
tended <strong>to</strong> both Sabah and Sarawak.<br />
In order <strong>to</strong> own a Malaysian ship the person<br />
must be a Malaysian citizen or corporations which<br />
satisfy the requirement such as:<br />
1. incorporation is incorporated in Malaysia<br />
2. the principal office of the corporation is in<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
27
Malaysia<br />
3. the management of the corporation is car‐<br />
ried out mainly in Malaysia<br />
4. the majority, or if the percentage is deter‐<br />
mined by Minister, then the percentage so<br />
determined , of the direc<strong>to</strong>rs of the corpora‐<br />
tion are Malaysia citizen<br />
2.2 Ship Registration<br />
Registration of ships in Malaysia follow an<br />
almost identical practices as in United Kingdom<br />
from which much of existing Malaysian mari‐<br />
time laws and administrative practices are in‐<br />
volved. The Merchant Ship Ordinance (1952)<br />
provides for registration of ships in Malaysia.<br />
Port of Registries for national flag vessels are<br />
Port Klang, Penang, Kuching and Kota Kinabalu.<br />
The registry provision of MSO 1952 were ex‐<br />
tended <strong>to</strong> Sabah and Sarawak by the Merchant<br />
Shipping(Amendment and Extension) Act 1977<br />
(Act A393) on June 1991.While, Labuan offers<br />
registration of non national flags as part of an<br />
International Registry subject <strong>to</strong> specific condi‐<br />
tion .<br />
2.3 List of ship registered in the past decade in<br />
Malaysia (1996 – 2006)<br />
Compilation of this data mainly refers <strong>to</strong><br />
Marine Department Malaysia [4] and Malaysian<br />
Maritime Yearbook 2007‐2008 (from Malaysian<br />
Shipowner’s Association) [2]. This general data<br />
was segregate based on type of vessel, name of<br />
vessel, shipowner, GRT and year of registration.<br />
(Appendix 1 – Table 2 <strong>to</strong> Table 10)<br />
Table 2: Number of Ships Registered in Malaysia by<br />
Type (New Classification) and weight, 2001‐2006<br />
Table 3 : Tug boat Registered in Malaysia(1996‐2006)<br />
Table 4 : Barge Registered in Malaysia (1996‐2006)<br />
Table 5 : General Cargo Carrier Registered in Malay‐<br />
sia (1996‐2006)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Table 6 : Anchor Handling Tug & Supply Registered<br />
in Malaysia(1996‐2006)<br />
Table 7 : LNG Registered in Malaysia (1996‐2006)<br />
Table 8: Tankers Registered in Malaysia(1996‐2006)<br />
Table 9 : Bulk Carrier Registered in Malaysia (1996‐<br />
2006)<br />
Table 10: Passenger Ship Registered in Malaysia<br />
(1996‐ 2006)<br />
Table 11: Container Ships Registered in Malaysia<br />
(1996‐ 2006)<br />
3.0 Trends in ship registration in Malaysia (2001<br />
‐2006)<br />
From the analysis shown in Figure 1, it<br />
clearly shows that Malaysian merchant fleet has<br />
grown at a modest pace over the years with 284<br />
vessels was registered in 2006 with GRT reach <strong>to</strong><br />
33,238,000 <strong>to</strong>ns. This is mainly due <strong>to</strong> the policy<br />
of government, <strong>to</strong> actively involve in develop‐<br />
ment of Malaysian merchant fleet <strong>to</strong> reduce de‐<br />
pendence on foreign shipping services and em‐<br />
phasizing on greater self sufficient in shipping<br />
services.<br />
The domestic shipping services and its chain<br />
which comprises shipping lines such as tug<br />
boat, barges, passenger ships, also show the<br />
positive growth with increasing number of ves‐<br />
sels registered in 2006 ,w<strong>here</strong> tug boats and<br />
barge dominates the numbers and <strong>to</strong>nnage in<br />
registration (Figure 2 and Figure 3). It is esti‐<br />
mated that t<strong>here</strong> are about 300 Malaysian ship‐<br />
ping lines owning or operating about 3500 ships<br />
<strong>to</strong>taling 9.09 million GRT in Peninsular Malaysia,<br />
Sabah and Sarawak [4].<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
28
No. of Ships<br />
No. of Ships<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0<br />
170<br />
Total Number of Barge Registered in Malaysia (2001-2006)<br />
42<br />
51<br />
Total Ship Registered in Malaysia (2001-2006)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
31<br />
131<br />
45<br />
45<br />
229<br />
70<br />
2001 2002 2003<br />
Year<br />
2004 2005 2006<br />
No. of ships GRT<br />
57<br />
251<br />
89<br />
55<br />
84<br />
283 284<br />
286 338<br />
639 1181 1357<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Year<br />
No. of Ships GRT<br />
Figure 1: Total Ship Registered<br />
in Malaysia (2001‐2006)<br />
Figure 3 : Total Number of Barge Registered<br />
in Malaysia (2001‐2006)<br />
33238<br />
14000<br />
62 11991<br />
12000<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
0<br />
35000<br />
30000<br />
25000<br />
20000<br />
15000<br />
10000<br />
5000<br />
0<br />
GRT ('000)<br />
GRT ('000)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
29
The domestic shipping sec<strong>to</strong>r also consists of<br />
liner shipping services and non‐liner services es‐<br />
pecially in the transportation of general and bulk<br />
cargo. Non‐ liner service is more important com‐<br />
ponent due <strong>to</strong> its covers the oil & gas sec<strong>to</strong>r, off‐<br />
shore supply vessel, and also crude oil & product<br />
tankers serving between local refineries and con‐<br />
No. of Ships<br />
������������<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Total Number of Tug Boat Registered in Malaysia(2001-2006)<br />
33<br />
4<br />
36<br />
59<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
6<br />
9<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Figure 4 : Total Number of Tug Boat Registered<br />
in Malaysia (2001‐2006)<br />
Year<br />
64<br />
11<br />
No. of ships GRT<br />
58<br />
12<br />
68<br />
1469<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
sumption centers. For example, the LNG vessels<br />
registered in 2001‐2006 show that the constant<br />
growth and reaching <strong>to</strong> 194000 <strong>to</strong>n GRT (see<br />
Figure 5). In term of GRT , for LNG and LPG are<br />
stagnant with around 190,000 GRT per year from<br />
2003 until 2006. The AHTS as part of offshore<br />
support vessel show the rapid growth, w<strong>here</strong> in<br />
2005 the <strong>to</strong>tal registered vessels by local mari‐<br />
Total Number of LNG & LPG Registered in Malaysia (2001-<br />
2006)<br />
1<br />
1<br />
93<br />
3<br />
190<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003<br />
Year<br />
2004 2005 2006<br />
2<br />
189<br />
No. of ships GRT<br />
3<br />
194<br />
Figure 5 : Total Number of LNG &<br />
LPG Registered in Malaysia (2001‐2006)<br />
2<br />
191<br />
0<br />
0<br />
����������<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
GRT('000)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong>
time players is 30. The demand for oil tankers<br />
increase in 2005 and gradually reduced in the<br />
following years in 2006 (see Figure 6). The de‐<br />
mand for Bulk, Grain, Ore, Log carrier however<br />
seems decreasing over the years. This pattern<br />
also followed by full container ship with an ex‐<br />
ception of the year 2006 w<strong>here</strong> it hits 118,000<br />
GRT on that year.<br />
No. of ships<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
4.0 Prediction for new building in next five years.<br />
Based on the analysis, ship registered in<br />
Malaysia its show that the domestic and coastal<br />
trade is have a significant structural changes<br />
which are also having positive effects on local<br />
ports including by generating greater volume of<br />
trade and widening shipping connectivity ant its<br />
chain likes barges and tugs. The changes and<br />
trends is predict <strong>to</strong> be accentuate over the next<br />
five years with strong implications <strong>to</strong> develop‐<br />
ment of shipping and ports in this region. An‐<br />
other significant development is that, aside<br />
from expansion in the volume of trade, coastal<br />
shipping companies, especially liner opera<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />
are now expanding market outreach by linking<br />
their domestic shipping services with calls at<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
regional port. Local ports such as Northport,<br />
Westport , Port of Tanjung Pelepas, Penang<br />
Port, Bintulu are among the ports which have<br />
recorded increased ship calls ( source [5] : Fed‐<br />
eration of Malaysian Port Operating Companies<br />
‐FMPOC). Cargo volumes at the nation's ports<br />
are expected <strong>to</strong> increase further due <strong>to</strong> the im‐<br />
plementation of an ambitious free‐trade agree‐<br />
ment (FTA) between the Association of South‐<br />
Total Number of Petroluem Tankers Registered in<br />
Malaysia(2001-2006)<br />
4<br />
67<br />
1<br />
5<br />
5<br />
23<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Year<br />
No. of ships GRT<br />
Figure 6 : Total Number of Petroleum Tankers<br />
Registered in Malaysia(2001‐2006)<br />
3<br />
13<br />
7<br />
92<br />
east Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China. In Janu‐<br />
ary 2010, the ASEAN‐5 (Malaysia, Singapore,<br />
Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia) and Brunei<br />
signed an FTA with China, creating the world's<br />
third‐largest trade block. The agreement elimi‐<br />
nates tariffs on 90% of goods traded between<br />
the countries and China and is expected <strong>to</strong><br />
boost volumes of trade between them. Four<br />
other states, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam and<br />
Myanmar, are on course <strong>to</strong> join the trade bloc<br />
in 2015. [6]<br />
Several container liner opera<strong>to</strong>rs have in<br />
recent years started <strong>to</strong> introduce new and addi‐<br />
tional service at regional ports such as Ho Chi<br />
Minh, Bangkok, Yangoon, Cittagong as well as<br />
Jakarta. T<strong>here</strong>fore, parallel with this widening<br />
outreach the prediction for new building and<br />
0<br />
0<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
GRT('000)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
31
design demand in next five years is of course<br />
the deployment of bigger container ship both <strong>to</strong><br />
provide more space as well as <strong>to</strong> meet the need<br />
faster ships <strong>to</strong> cover longer journey. Ports also<br />
play a role in this development by providing<br />
appropriate facilities and services aimed at re‐<br />
gional trade. It is important <strong>to</strong> highlight that the<br />
implementation of Cabotage policy<br />
(implemented in Malaysia on 1 January 1980)<br />
marked the beginning of an important phase in<br />
the development of shipping in Malaysia. This<br />
will also reflected the growth of national ship‐<br />
ping fleet and the growth Malaysian shipping<br />
companies<br />
Malaysia's largest shipping line, MISC Ber‐<br />
had, launching its 10 th owned chemical tanker,<br />
the Bunga Allium, which sailed from South Korea<br />
<strong>to</strong> the port of Pasir Gudand. MISC is expanding<br />
heavily in<strong>to</strong> the chemical shipping sec<strong>to</strong>r, an<br />
area that expects <strong>to</strong> be a strong source of<br />
growth for shipping lines. The ship was the third<br />
in a series of eight chemical tanker new‐builds<br />
ordered from the shipbuilder. The delivery is<br />
part of a rapid expansion of the company's<br />
chemical fleet, which expects <strong>to</strong> receive 15 addi‐<br />
tional ships between 2010 and 2012. Tankers<br />
design characteristics such as bigger L/B ratio<br />
(remains around 5 <strong>to</strong> 6) as maneuverabil‐<br />
ity ,stability, safety and economically are the<br />
main concern apart from speed still remain. But,<br />
it will be significant changes in size and <strong>to</strong>nnage<br />
of the tankers are predicted <strong>to</strong> be bigger in the<br />
future and double hull vessel. With the new<br />
resolution or requirement by IMO <strong>to</strong> implement<br />
only double hull tankers in world fleet by 2010, it<br />
seems t<strong>here</strong> will be potential in new building for<br />
the next five years by Malaysian maritime player.<br />
Also the non‐liner sec<strong>to</strong>r such as require‐<br />
ment bigger and economical AHTS, LNG and<br />
tankers have a good potential in new building<br />
from local maritime player .Our LNG fleet is the<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
largest in the world while the tanker fleet is<br />
among the <strong>to</strong>p three in the world. It is expected<br />
that t<strong>here</strong> is a surge of order in the years <strong>to</strong><br />
come for AHTS and supply vessel. Average day<br />
rates for larger AHTS vessel in the world market<br />
have increase substantially, from less than £<br />
8000/ day (RM 38,211.12/day) during 1999 <strong>to</strong><br />
over £ 51000/ day (RM 243,667.37/day) during<br />
2007.<br />
The growth of <strong>to</strong>urism industry sec<strong>to</strong>r and<br />
Malaysian government is targeting 25.5 million<br />
<strong>to</strong>urists for 2008 and hope <strong>to</strong> bring in foreign<br />
revenue of RM50billion [6] . By 2010, the minis‐<br />
try hopes <strong>to</strong> achieve half of the <strong>to</strong>urists from<br />
SEA and the rest from other parts of the world.<br />
The passenger ferries trend also keep increasing<br />
showing t<strong>here</strong> is a demand for these kind of<br />
public transportation such as route from Malay‐<br />
sia <strong>to</strong> Indonesia. The accident of passenger<br />
ferry at Langkawi and Mersing may be give an<br />
impact on the requirement of the new vessels<br />
completes with navigation and safety features.<br />
The enforcement form government agencies <strong>to</strong><br />
strictly follow the rules and regulation are the<br />
main reason a requirement of new vessel by<br />
local maritime players.<br />
Malaysia has strong potential <strong>to</strong> grow its<br />
maritime and shipbuilding industry in the global<br />
front with the partnering of international ship‐<br />
ping company from a big maritime nation. Part‐<br />
nership is a big opportunity for Malaysia <strong>to</strong> go<br />
further in the maritime industry while proving<br />
the local company's capability and ability <strong>to</strong> the<br />
point of engaging the trust of a foreign country.<br />
Finally, the Malaysian marine industry is<br />
hoping that the industry rebounds in 2010,<br />
when the global economy begins <strong>to</strong> recover<br />
from the current recession.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
32
References<br />
[1] UNCTAD, Review Maritime Transport 2009,<br />
[2] Malaysian Shipowners’ Association, Malaysian Maritime<br />
Yearbook 2007‐2008, page 123‐216,<br />
[3] Bank Negara Malaysia‐ Annual Report 2009,<br />
[4] Marine Department of Malaysia –Registration,<br />
[5] Federation of Malaysian Port Operating Companies –<br />
FMPOC Magazine,<br />
[6] Business Moni<strong>to</strong>r International, Malaysia Shipping Report<br />
Q2 2010.<br />
Internet source :<br />
[1] www.mot.gov.my<br />
[2] www.lloydslist.com<br />
[3] www.malaysianshipowners.org<br />
[4] www.marine.gov.my<br />
[5] www.portsworld.com<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
33
Table 2: Number of Ships Registered in Malaysia by Type (New Classification) and weight, 2001‐2006<br />
Type of ship<br />
BIL<br />
No.<br />
GRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
NRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
DWT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
BIL<br />
No.<br />
GRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
NRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
DWT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
BIL<br />
No.<br />
GRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
NRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
Oil Tanker 11 14 7 15 4 6 3 10 4 161 101 305 13 722 436 1,362 14 561 341 108 5 9 4 11,473<br />
LNG, LPG Carrier 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 93 28 76 3 190 57 155 2 189 57 152 3 194 58 55 2 191 57 2<br />
Chemical/Petroleum<br />
Tanker<br />
4 67 28 111 1 5 2 8 5 23 13 39 3 13 8 24 7 92 37 29 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<br />
Bulk, Grain, Ore, Log<br />
Carrier<br />
5 96 54 155 2 32 17 52 2 32 17 50 2 56 34 103 1 47 27 10 1 13 7 19<br />
General Cargo, Semi<br />
Container<br />
Passenger,<br />
19 26 13 29 10 31 17 35 7 11 2 2 7 5 2 5 1 1 1 ‐ 10 2,264 1,174 9<br />
General/Passenger<br />
Ship<br />
27 2 ‐ ‐ 8 3 1 1 26 7 2 20 21 6 2 0 21 4 2 23 35 26 96 ‐<br />
RO‐RO ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 11 4 4 2 49 15 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 9 3 4 1 9 3 280<br />
Full Container 4 12 5 5 10 64 32 87 1 5 3 7 1 4 2 4 4 23 12 14 5 118 68 95<br />
Anchor Handling<br />
Tug & Supply (AHTS)<br />
9 3 1<br />
6 4 1 3 9 8 2 57 18 16 5 15 30 41 12 148 16 21 6 433<br />
Barge 42 51 19 38 31 45 14 47 45 70 22 3 57 89 30 143 55 84 26 12 62 11,991 3,657 4,386<br />
Landing Craft 5 2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 4 1 ‐ 8 5 2 3 7 4 1 5 8 5 2 ‐<br />
Tug Boat 33 4 1 ‐ 36 6 1 ‐ 59 9 3 ‐ 64 11 3 1 58 12 4 90 68 1,469 444 59<br />
Fisshing Vessel ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 1 0 ‐ 18 2 1 8 21 25 1 ‐<br />
Pleasure Vessel 4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 0 ‐ 3 ‐ ‐ 2 3 16 9 ‐<br />
Government Ship ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 12 1 0 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐<br />
Others 6 9 3 ‐ 21 38 11 11 40 70 21 25 36 65 20 27 60 284 155 81 47 17,081 8,268 10,259<br />
Total 170 286 131 353 131 338 131 334 229 639 261 663 251 1,181 600 1,839 283 1,357 678 590 284 33,238 13,796 27,015<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
DWT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
BIL<br />
No.<br />
GRT (<br />
'<br />
000)<br />
NRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
DWT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
BIL<br />
No.<br />
GRT (<br />
'<br />
000)<br />
NRT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
DWT<br />
( '<br />
000)<br />
BIL<br />
No.<br />
GRT ( '<br />
000)<br />
Appendix 1<br />
NRT ( '<br />
000)<br />
DWT (<br />
' 000)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
34
Table 3 : Tug boat Registered in Malaysia(1996‐2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Bosta Kayung No 11 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
61.00 1996<br />
2 Bosta Kayung No 12 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
61.00<br />
‐<br />
17.00 21.56 6.77 2.59 1996<br />
3 Bosta Kayung No 15 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
163.00 1996<br />
4 Bosta Kayung No 16 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
64.00 1996<br />
5 Canggih 7 Canggih Shipping sdn bhd 99.00 1996<br />
6 Canggih No 1 Canggih Shipping sdn bhd 91.00 1996<br />
7 Cathay 28 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 43.18 ‐ 10.71 16.38 4.88 1.83 1996<br />
8 Costal 45 Coastal Transport (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd 60.00 1996<br />
9 Continental No 1 Tung Yuen Tug Boat Sdn Bhd 70.88 1996<br />
10 Dai Feng Hang Hock Peng Furniture & General<br />
Contrac<strong>to</strong>r Sdn Bhd<br />
42.77 1996<br />
11 Delta 3 United Orix Leasing Bhd 100.00 ‐ 8.00 22.71 6.70 2.43 1996<br />
12 Dikson 4 Dickson Marine Co Sdn Bhd 18.00 1996<br />
13 Ever commander Pengagkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 91.70 ‐ 33.64 20.12 5.88 2.20 1996<br />
14 Ever Plying Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 38.71 1996<br />
15 Ever Profit Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 38.71 1996<br />
16 Ever Star Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 75.00 1996<br />
17 Ever Sunny Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 38.71 1996<br />
18 Ever Trust Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 38.71 1996<br />
19 Flora Ocarina Development Sdn Bhd 155.00 ‐ 47.00 23.61 7.60 3.20 1996<br />
20 Hung Ann No 2 WTK Realty Sdn Bhd 81.00 1996<br />
21 Jaysiang 1 Jaysiang Shipping Sdn Bhd 36.00 ‐ 9.69 15.15 4.75 2.44 1996<br />
22 Kencana Murni Lunar Shipping Sdn Bhd 107.00 ‐ 6.41 22.06 6.70 2.90 1996<br />
23 Kendredge 3 Kendredge Sdn bhd 104.73 ‐ 25.53 20.91 6.68 1.98 1996<br />
24 Kionhim 99 LKC Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 186.00 ‐ 55.00 24.36 7.92 3.65 1996<br />
25 Power 6 Natural Power Sdn Bhd 95.52 ‐ 35.53 20.48 6.10 2.44 1996<br />
26 Promex 16 Penguin Maritme Sdn Bhd 95.00 ‐ 18.00 20.74 6.10 2.75 1996<br />
27 Rajang 2 Tristar Shipping & Trading Sdn Bhd 41.00 ‐ 9.00 15.75 4.57 2.13 1996<br />
28 Rebecca No 1 Laut Sepakat Sdn Bhd 123.00 1996<br />
29 Rising No 2 Rising Transport Sdn Bhd 78.00 1996<br />
30 Sang Collie Sang Muara Sdn Bhd 228.00 1996<br />
31 Shin Yang 25 Shin Yang Shiping Sdn Bhd 58.00 ‐ 8.00 18.48 5.09 2.44 1996<br />
32 Shin Yang 26 Shin Yang Shiping Sdn Bhd 58.00 ‐ 8.00 18.48 5.09 2.44 1996<br />
33 Shin Yang 33 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 58.00 1996<br />
34 Sing Meu 2 KingLory Shipping Sdn Bhd 93.00 ‐ 28.00 19.41 6.07 2.71 1996<br />
35 Smooth Trend No 5 United Orix Leasing Bhd 84.00 1996<br />
36 Surplus Well 1 Surplus Well Sdn Bhd 94.15 ‐ 28.48 20.27 6.03 2.44 1996<br />
37 Timberwell No 1 Timberwell Enterprise Sdn Bhd 85.00 1996<br />
38 Tong Seng No 10 Mee Lee Shipping Sdn Bhd 100.00 1996<br />
39 Tung Yuen 16 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 33.41 ‐ 7.39 16.37 4.01 1.98 1996<br />
40 Brantas 25 Brantas Sdn Bhd 144.00 ‐ 44.00 22.04 7.30 3.20 1997<br />
41 Cathay 8 United Orix Leasing Malaysia Berhad 59.91 ‐ 12.87 16.82 4.88 2.29 1997<br />
42 Chico United Orix Leasing Berhad 88.45 ‐ 13.70 19.28 6.40 3.05 1997<br />
43 Chiong Hin No 8 Chung Sie Chiong 90.00 1997<br />
44 Crystal No 2 Hong Leong Leasing Sdn Bhd 49.00 1997<br />
45 Destiny Empayar Semarak Sdn Bhd 152.00 170.83 46.00 23.13 7.60 3.50 1997<br />
46 East Ocean 2 Samsilamsan Shipping Sdn Bhd 191.00 1997<br />
47 Fordeco 19 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 98.00 37.00 20.73 6.40 2.65 1997<br />
48 GHKO No 1 GHKO Shipping Company Sdn Bhd 86.00 1997<br />
49 Global I Kai Lee Shipping Sdn Bhd 99.00 ‐ 10.00 23.10 6.10 2.75 1997<br />
50 Hin Leong 98 Puh Tye Shipping Sdn Bhd 78.00 115.22 19.00 20.92 5.49 2.44 1997<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
35
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
51 Ilham Tiga Ilham Marine Services Sdn Bhd 46.00 27.70 13.00 16.75 5.00 2.13 1997<br />
52 Jayatung No 3 Rajang Palmcorp Sdn Bhd 120.96 1997<br />
53 Jimi Huak 96 Lea Wah Enterprise Sdn Bhd 56.07 ‐ 15.44 18.74 4.88 2.32 1997<br />
54 Jinway No 21 Bonworld Shipping Sdn Bhd 36.00 1997<br />
55 King Rich 96 Trans‐Sungai Development Sdn Bhd 114.81 ‐ 32.27 21.76 6.98 2.90 1997<br />
56 Kresna Raya I See Song & Sons Sdn Bhd 60.96 1997<br />
57 Kuari Rakyat No 8 Kuari Rakyat Sdn Bhd 90.32 1997<br />
58 Puh Tye No 5 Puh Tye Shipyard Sdn Bhd 76.00 1997<br />
59 Rank No 1 Multi Rank Sdn Bhd 28.00 1997<br />
60 Riki 15 Perkapalan Pelayaran Sdn Bhd 96.00 ‐ 33.00 20.66 6.19 2.36 1997<br />
61 Ronmas No 6 Ronmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 81.00 1997<br />
62 Ronmas No 7 Ronmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 99.00 1997<br />
63 Sabahtug No 9 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
55.73 1997<br />
64 Sarin<strong>to</strong> 2 Samlimsan Shipping Sdn Bhd 191.00 1997<br />
65 Seawell 9 Seawall Sdn Bhd 60.00 1997<br />
66 Seraya No 3 GoodWood (Sabah) Sdn Bhd 97.00 1997<br />
67 Sili Suai No 6 KTS Equiment Rental Sdn Bhd 70.00 1997<br />
68 Sili Suai No 8 KTS Equiment Rental Sdn Bhd 59.00 1997<br />
69 Sin Matu 18 Sin Matu Sdn Bhd 106.00 1997<br />
70 Sin Matu 22 Sin Matu Sdn Bhd 97.00 1997<br />
71 Sing Hong 97 Lee Siew Hee 81.00 1997<br />
72 Solid Marigin No 1 Solid Margin Sdn Bhd 91.00 1997<br />
73 Swee Swee Joo Coastal Shipping Sdn Bhd 117.00 1997<br />
74 Ta Ho No 1 Chieng Lee Hiong 93.00 1997<br />
75 Tai Feng Long Wang Nieng Lee Holdings Berhad 43.00 1997<br />
76 Togo Super Kim Huak Trading Sdn Bhd 67.09 1997<br />
77 Transspacific 1 Merit Metro Sdn Bhd 186.00 1997<br />
78 Trumpco Satu Trumpco Sdn Bhd 83.20 1997<br />
79 Bosta Kayung No 17 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
136.00 1998<br />
80 Bosta Kayung No 18 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
66.31 1998<br />
81 Cathay 38 United Orix Leasing Malaysia Berhad 59.91 ‐ 12.87 16.82 4.88 2.29 1998<br />
82 Cormorant 1 Penguin Maritime Sdn Bhd 104.00 ‐ 32.00 20.26 6.70 2.90 1998<br />
83 Dikson 8 Dickson Marine Co Sdn Bhd 123.28 1998<br />
84 Ever Splendid Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 38.71 1998<br />
85 Haggai 1 Brantas Sdn Bhd 99.00 ‐ 29.10 22.56 6.46 2.44 1998<br />
86 Juara Juara Marin Sdn Bhd 172.00 ‐ 51.00 22.85 7.60 3.70 1998<br />
87 Klih 1 Kuala Lumpur Indholding Bhd 109.00 ‐ 33.00 20.31 6.80 3.43 1998<br />
88 Poh lee hong 3 Hock Peng Furniture & General<br />
Contrac<strong>to</strong>r Sdn Bhd<br />
69.00 1998<br />
89 Poh Thai No 1 Ngie Lee Dockyard Sdn Bhd 40.09 1998<br />
90 Seawell 83 Double Dynasty Sdn Bhd 178.00 ‐ 54.00 24.26 7.60 3.50 1998<br />
91 Sharon WTK Realty Sdn Bhd 82.00 ‐ 23.00 18.45 5.88 2.29 1998<br />
92 Silvia WTK Realty Sdn Bhd 77.00 ‐ 21.00 18.45 6.10 2.44 1998<br />
93 Singawan Bunga Shing Liang Shipping Sdn Bhd 105.00 1998<br />
94 Bosta Kayung No 19 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
66.31 1999<br />
95 Brantas 22 Brantas Sdn Bhd 144.05 1999<br />
96 Bumban Jaya Mega shipping Sdn Bhd 87.71 1999<br />
97 Cathay 58 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 36.11 ‐ 7.68 16.18 4.11 2.13 1999<br />
98 Cathay 68 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 58.00 ‐ 50.00 17.20 5.70 2.62 1999<br />
99 Haggai 1 Vital Focus Shipping Sdn Bhd 99.26 ‐ 29.10 22.56 6.46 2.44 1999<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
36
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
100 Highline 1 Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd 192.00 1999<br />
101 Hongdar 99 Hung Leong Shipping Sdn Bhd 132.00 1999<br />
102 Kendredge 2 Kendredge Sdn bhd 136.00 1999<br />
103 Keng Seng Yoe Tian Sang 41.63 ‐ 12.10 15.35 4.88 2.31 1999<br />
104 Kuantan Kuantan Port Consortium Sdn Bhd 319.00 ‐ 95.00 28.46 9.60 4.36 1999<br />
105 Sin Matu No 23 Sin Matu Sdn Bhd 135.00 1999<br />
106 Teknik Juara Lunar Offshore Sdn Bhd 253.00 1999<br />
107 Cathay 78 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 40.57 ‐ 8.11 17.07 4.88 1.92 2000<br />
108 Coastal 55 Coastal Transport (Sandakan) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
60.00<br />
‐<br />
11.00 18.60 5.90 2.40 2000<br />
109 Ever Achieve Pengagkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 63.76 2000<br />
110 Fordeco 30 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 103.00 ‐ 31.00 23.04 6.82 3.63 2000<br />
111 Haggai 3 Vital Focus Shipping Sdn Bhd 115.00 2000<br />
112 Highline 21 Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd 102.46 ‐ 31.33 20.76 6.55 2.44 2000<br />
113 Kendredge Kendredge Sdn bhd 144.00 2000<br />
114 Reignmas No 1 Reignmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 136.97 2000<br />
115 Sabahtug No 10 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
81.00 2000<br />
116 Syukur Northport (Malaysia) Bhd 169.00 2000<br />
117 Teraya 1 Huang Teck Soo Sdn Bhd 45.69 2000<br />
118 Teraya 11 Huang Teck Soo Sdn Bhd 36.64 2000<br />
119 Transcend 1 Maju Kidurong Shipping 91.00 2000<br />
120 Botany bay Friendly Avenue Sdn Bhd 75.22 ‐ 12.61 19.51 6.30 2.92 2001<br />
121 Cathay 26 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 66.39 2001<br />
122 Cathay 36 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 66.39 2001<br />
123 Destiny No 4 Destiny Shipping Agency (M) Sdn Bhd 165.00 2001<br />
124 Inai Teratai 122 Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd 149.00 2001<br />
125 Jaya Raya LKC Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 91.00 2001<br />
126 Jayaraya LKC Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 91.00 2001<br />
127 Kismet 11 Bontalia Shipping Sdn Bhd 88.73 2001<br />
128 Robin 6 Robin Welding & Engineering Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
153.00<br />
‐<br />
7.78 13.02 3.32 1.04 2001<br />
129 Sabahtug No 11 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
144.00 2001<br />
130 Sapah No 51 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
49.00 2001<br />
131 Sapah No 52 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
55.73 2001<br />
132 Serdadu Jaya Kionhim Shipping Sdn Bhd 2001<br />
133 Shinta Perkasa Lee Teng Hooi & Sons Trd Sdn Bhd 92.35 2001<br />
134 Singawan Wira Shing Liang Shipping Sdn Bhd 105.06 2001<br />
135 Suria Permata Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 125.00 2001<br />
136 Triwise Lau Hua Ching 80.79 ‐ 26.96 19.42 5.37 2.23 2001<br />
137 Cathay 56 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 145.00 ‐ 14.43 18.73 7.32 2.44 2002<br />
138 Danum 2 Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 475.00 2002<br />
139 Destiny No 3 Destiny Shipping Agency (M) Sdn Bhd 432.00 2002<br />
140 Fonlink 1 Fonlink Shipping Sdn Bhd 85.12 2002<br />
141 Gerak Cekap Fast Meridian Sdn Bhd 171.00 2002<br />
142 GerakPantas Fast Meridian Sdn Bhd 171.00 2002<br />
143 Gerak Tegas Fast Meridian Sdn Bhd 164.00 2002<br />
144 Gunung Damai 1 Gunung Damai Shipping Sdn Bhd 265.00 2002<br />
145 Gunung Damai 1 LKC Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 265.00 2002<br />
146 Highline 23 Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd 207.00 2002<br />
147 Highline 26 Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd 271.00 2002<br />
148 Hilal Bintulu Port Sdn Bhd 242.00 65.40 73.00 24.00 9.60 3.60 2002<br />
149 Hock Mew XII Seawell Sdn Bhd 76.22 2002<br />
150 Inai Teratai 85 Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd 83.00 2002<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
37
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
151 Jemaja Wang Nieng Lee Holdings Berhad 110.00 2002<br />
152 Jin Hwa 8 Yimanda Corporation Sdn Bhd 52.71 2002<br />
153 Kantan Mesra Kantan Jaya Marine Services (Pg) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
232.00 2002<br />
154 Kismet 12 Bontalia Shipping Sdn Bhd 83.29 2002<br />
155 Sinar Pelutan 1 Woodman Avenue Sdn Bhd 256.00 2002<br />
156 Spring Star 1 Daily Venture Corporation Sdn Bhd 141.36 2002<br />
157 Sungai Silat 1 Woodman Mewah Sdn Bhd 271.00 2002<br />
158 Triple Light Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd 149.00 2002<br />
159 Tu<strong>to</strong>n Fast Meridian Sdn Bhd 171.00 2002<br />
160 Bosta Kayung No 20 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies<br />
Sdn bhd<br />
239.00 2003<br />
161 Cathay 76 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 78.46 2003<br />
162 Cathay 96 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 38.16 2003<br />
163 Chin Ung 1 Sawai Jugah Sendirian Berhad 46.83 2003<br />
164 Danum 11 Shin Yang Shipping 89.00 ‐ 27.00 22.00 6.10 2.70 2003<br />
165 Danum 6 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 89.00 ‐ 27.00 22.00 6.10 2.70 2003<br />
166 Danum 8 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 475.00 ‐ 143.00 34.92 11.40 4.95 2003<br />
167 Dolson Zengo corporation Sdn Bhd 139.50 2003<br />
168 Dolxin Zengo corporation Sdn Bhd 137.20 2003<br />
169 Dolyi Zengo corporation Sdn Bhd 138.60 2003<br />
170 Epic Challenger Epic OffShore (M) Sdn Bhd 404.00 2003<br />
171 Ever Armada Pengagkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 131.87 2003<br />
172 Fonlink No 2 Fonlink Shipping Sdn Bhd 120.90 2003<br />
173 Fordeco 25 Fordeco Shipping Sdn Bhd 202.00 2003<br />
174 Fordeco 33 Fordeco Shipping Sdn Bhd 83.00 2003<br />
175 Godri Satu Godrimaju Sdn Bhd 120.00 2003<br />
176 Grand Marine No 1 Grand Marine Shipping Sdn Bhd 434.00 2003<br />
177 Highline 29 Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd 271.00 ‐ 82.00 28.21 8.60 4.12 2003<br />
178 Highline 32 Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd 427.00 2003<br />
179 Highline 35 Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd 187.00 2003<br />
180 Inai Teratai 321 Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd 379.48 2003<br />
181 Inai Teratai 72 Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd 97.50 2003<br />
182 Indah Abadi 1 Woodman Indah Sdn Bhd 267.00 81.00 28.83 8.54 3.80 2003<br />
183 Jin Hwa 10 Wong Sie Tuong 114.00 2003<br />
184 Kendredge 5 Kendredge Sdn bhd 127.00 2003<br />
185 Kinsing Jaya Kionhim shipping Sdn Bhd 56.48 2003<br />
186 Kline 1 Tenaga Shipping Sdn Bhd 246.00 2003<br />
187 Poly 7 Omni Maritme Sdn Bhd 139.80 2003<br />
188 Reignmas 3 Reignmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 155.00 2003<br />
189 Royco 119 Roys<strong>to</strong>n Cole Marine Sdn Bhd 194.00 2003<br />
190 Salik Elik Sdn Bhd 86.25 2003<br />
191 Sing Hong 98 Lee Ting Hock 86.25 2003<br />
192 Sung Fatt Sung Fatt Shipping Sdn Bhd 54.39 ‐ 26.87 19.51 5.18 2.13 2003<br />
193 Sung Tahi lee 3 Sung Tahi Lee Sdn Bhd 144.00 2003<br />
194 Sungai Julan 1 Woodman Layun Sdn Bhd 271.00 2003<br />
195 Target Target Shipping Sdn Bhd 220.00 2003<br />
196 Taurians Three Bonafile Shipbuilders & Repairs Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
171.00 2003<br />
197 Tobi 9 James Lau King Wee 102.46 2003<br />
198 Tri zip Lau Hua Ching 60.00 2003<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
38
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH (D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
199 Cahaya 5 Straight Ace Sdn Bhd 117.00 ‐ 36.00 21.96 6.10 3.05 2004<br />
200 Cathay 17 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 89.78 ‐ 13.09 19.68 6.10 2.44 2004<br />
201 Cathay 86 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 40.39 ‐ 11.92 13.14 4.90 2.50 2004<br />
202 Epic Sasa Epic Industri (M) Sdn Bhd 229.00 2004<br />
203 Epillars Eastern Pillars Shipping Sdn Bhd 122.00 2004<br />
204 Ever Master Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 101.28 2004<br />
205 Everbright 9 Midas Choice Sdn Bhd 253.00 2004<br />
206 Fordeco 35 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 194.00 2004<br />
207 Fordeco 37 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 93.00 28.00 21.24 6.00 2.88 2004<br />
208 Fordeco 39 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 93.00 28.00 21.24 6.00 2.88 2004<br />
209 Goldlion Baker Marine Sdn Bhd 391.00 2004<br />
210 Harbour Aquarius Harbour Agencies(Sibu) Sdn Bhd 150.00 2004<br />
211 Inai Teratai 31 Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd 425.00 2004<br />
212 Jin Hwa 12 Teck Sing Hing Shipping Sdn Bhd 128.00 2004<br />
213 Jin Hwa 15 Gimhwak Enterprise Sdn Bhd 128.00 2004<br />
214 Kentjana No 6 Sawai Jugah Sdn Bhd 52.26 2004<br />
215 Rembros 21 Scyii Brothers Shipyard Sdn Bhd 114.00 2004<br />
216 Sabahtug No 12 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn Bhd 144.00 2004<br />
217 Se Mariam 1 Se Mariam Sdn Bhd 247.00 2004<br />
218 Se Mariam 2 Se Mariam Sdn Bhd 247.00 2004<br />
219 Searights Satu Right Attitude Sdn Bhd 177.00 2004<br />
220 Sungai Layun 1 Woodman Enterprise Sdn Bhd 261.00 ‐ 79.00 28.82 8.54 3.80 2004<br />
221 Texaron 1 Brantas Sdn Bhd 62.91 ‐ 24.50 17.88 4.90 2.36 2004<br />
222 Ever Venus Pengangkutan Kekal Sdn Bhd 133.20 ‐ 46.88 21.30 6.70 2.90 2005<br />
223 Johan Pioneer 1 Johan Shipping Sdn Bhd 269.00 ‐ 81.00 28.07 8.60 4.12 2005<br />
26293.40<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
39
Table 4 : Barge Registered in Malaysia (1996‐2006)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
N<br />
O<br />
SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
1 Bangga Ocean Contract Sdn Bhd 2,132.00 1996<br />
2 Bestvic 11 Hong Leong Sdn Bhd 1317.00 ‐ 376.00 67.30 18.29 4.27 1996<br />
3 Bestco 98 Ling Peng Noon Shipyard Sdn Bhd 602.00 1996<br />
4 Bonggoya 83 Syarikat Pengangkutan Bonggoya Sdn Bhd 1,097.00 1996<br />
5 Bonspeed Bonspeed Shipping Sdn Bhd 703.00 ‐ 211.00 54.88 17.07 3.05 1996<br />
6 Boo Hin No 26 Hong Leong Leasing Sdn Bhd 1,368 1996<br />
7 Canggih 8 Canggih Shipping Sdn Bhd 839.00 ‐ 252.00 52.67 17.07 3.66 1996<br />
8 Dimensi 1 WTK heli‐Logging Sdn Bhd 256.00 612.00 77.00 35.11 12.19 2.44 1996<br />
9 Econ 9 Akasuria Sdn Bhd 635.00 1996<br />
10 Fel 7 Mee Lee Shipping Sdn Bhd 909.00 ‐ 1293.00 69.49 19.20 3.66 1996<br />
11 Fordeco No 26 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 644.00 1996<br />
12 Fordeco No 20 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 1078.00 1996<br />
13 Fordeco No 23 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 1041.00 1996<br />
14 Fordeco No 2301 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 927.00 ‐ 589.00 57.60 22.00 4.00 1996<br />
15 Gantisan Satu Lembaga Letrik Sabah 1961.00 ‐ 589.00 57.60 22.00 4.00 1996<br />
16 King Rich 168 Trans‐Sungai Development Sdn Bhd 849.00 ‐ 265.00 52.68 17.07 3.66 1996<br />
17 Kingglory 8 Kinglory Shipping Sdn Bhd 1273.00 1996<br />
18 Kingglory 9 Kinglory Shipping Sdn Bhd 1273.00 1996<br />
19 Labu Jaya Omni Maritime Sdn Bhd 702.00 ‐ 211.00 52.67 17.07 3.05 1996<br />
20 Legendary 1 Kii Ek Ho 522.00 ‐ 157.00 43.89 15.24 3.05 1996<br />
21 Legendary 2 Kii Ek Ho 522.00 ‐ 158.00 43.89 15.24 3.05 1996<br />
22 Legendary 3 Rimbunan Hijau Sdn Bhd 251.00 ‐ 189.00 35.12 12.19 1996<br />
23 Legendary 4 Mrloh Shiiung Ming 499.00 150.00 42.14 1524.00 3.05 1996<br />
24 Liga No 2 Liga Muhibbah Sdn Bhd 829.00 1996<br />
25 Linau 26 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1223.00 ‐ 367.00 69.66 18.30 3.66 1996<br />
26 Linau 30 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1622.00 ‐ 953.00 61.45 18.30 4.57 1996<br />
27 Linau 38 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1444.00 ‐ 433.00 69.66 18.29 4.27 1996<br />
28 Linau 39 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1444.00 ‐ 433.00 69.66 18.29 4.27 1996<br />
29 Lingco 151 Tekun Enterprise Sdn Bhd 410.00 ‐ 123.00 43.89 12.19 3.05 1996<br />
30 MAC PB 3 Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd 188.00 ‐ 56.00 26.33 12.19 2.44 1996<br />
31 Malian Maju Ma Lien Shipping Sdn Bhd 841.00 ‐ 253.00 52.67 17.07 3.66 1996<br />
32 Manjung Damai United Orix Leasing Berhad 616.00 ‐ 185.00 52.67 15.24 3.05 1996<br />
33 Mayong No 10 Mayong (S)Sdn Bhd 243.00 1996<br />
34 Mayong No 2 United Orix Leasing Bhd 482.00 1996<br />
35 Mee Le No 9 Mee Lee Shipping Sdn Bhd 836.00 1996<br />
36 Megakina 9 Megakina Shipping Sdn Bhd 943.00 ‐ 283.00 58.52 17.07 3.66 1996<br />
37 Meranti 35 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1444.00 ‐ 433.00 69.66 18.29 4.27 1996<br />
38 Nan Hai Wehaai Shipping Sdn Bhd 1093.00 ‐ 328.00 58.52 17.07 4.27 1996<br />
39 One Up 36 Syarikat One Up Sdn Bhd 722.00 1996<br />
40 Otimber V Hornbilland Bhd 750.00 1996<br />
41 Power 3 Natural Power Sdn Bhd 763.00 1996<br />
42 Rakan Daya I Hong Leong Leasing Sdn Bhd 710.00 1996<br />
43 Rising No 1 Rising Transpot Sdn Bhd 507.00 1996<br />
44 Sea Kite RS&L Marine Sdn Bhd 37.03 1996<br />
45 Sebangun II Borneo Shipping& Timber Agencies Sdn Bhd 1349.00 1996<br />
46 Sigma 2 Sigma Ray Shipping Sdn Bhd 1277.00 1996<br />
47 Sin Lian No 5 Hong Leong Leasing Sdn Bhd 642.00 1996<br />
48 Singa Besar 10 United Orix Leasing Bhd 291.00 1996<br />
49 Singamas Ngang Hock Kung 443.00 1996<br />
50 Support Station 3 Amble Strategy Sdn Bhd 6135.00 1996<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
40
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
N<br />
O<br />
SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
51 SYN Kiong No5 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn Bhd 702.00 1996<br />
52 Tristar II Daily Venture Sdn Bhd 833.00 1996<br />
53 Vision 8 Next Corporation Sdn Bhd 2132.00 1996<br />
54 Vision 9 Next Corporation Sdn Bhd 2132.00 1996<br />
55 Vision 10 Next Corporation Sdn Bhd 1854.00 1996<br />
56 Wah Hai Satu Wah Hai Marine Supplies (M) Sdn Bhd 498.00 1996<br />
57 Wang Hin Lee No 2 Hoo Chong Yiang 322.00 1996<br />
58 Warisan 2 Lembing Megah Sdn Bhd 741.00 1996<br />
59 Yan Yan 5 Marine Quest Sdn Bhd 839.00 1996<br />
60 Bestvic 18 Hong Leong Sdn Bhd 1446.00 1997<br />
61 Blue Sky 99 Blue Sky Shipping Sdn Bhd 838.00 ‐ 251.00 52.70 17.07 3.66 1997<br />
62 Bonspeed Tiga Bonspeed Shipping Sdn Bhd 914.00 ‐ 275.00 52.70 18.30 3.66 1997<br />
63 Borneo Lighter 21 Kionhim Shipping Sds Bhd 519.00 ‐ 156.00 43.90 15.22 3.00 1997<br />
64 Cathay 2 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 322.00 ‐ 97.00 35.11 12.19 3.05 1997<br />
65 Cathay 18 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 259.00 600.00 77.00 35.11 12.19 2.44 1997<br />
66 Cathay 183 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 634.00 1600.00 190.00 51.46 15.24 3.00 1997<br />
67 Dong Feng Jaya 1 Dong Feng Gravel Merchant Sdn Bhd 730.00 ‐ 219.00 55.34 15.72 2.75 1997<br />
68 Dynaroy Empayar Semarak Sdn Bhd 1625.00 2462.08 488.00 70.23 19.51 4.57 1997<br />
69 EK Soon Ching 99 Reignmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 341.00 ‐ 103.00 38.90 12.15 2.42 1997<br />
70 Entimau No 9 Globular Sdn Bhd 844.00 1997<br />
71 Faedah Mulia dua Faedah Mulia Sdn Bhd 553.00 ‐ 166.00 46.82 15.24 3.05 1997<br />
72 Fauna Ocarina Development Sdn Bhd 553.00 1997<br />
73 Fordeco No 6 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 995.00 1997<br />
74 Fordeco No 31 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 3028.00 1997<br />
75 Fortuna No 9 John Wong Su Kiong 839.00 1997<br />
76 Ging lee No 1 Dragonic Shipping Sdn Bhd 633.00 1997<br />
77 Kian Lee No 7 Lee Ling Timber Sdn Bhd 838.00 1997<br />
78 Kiong Min I Pengangkutan Kiong Min Sdn Bhd 664.00 1997<br />
79 Kkong Thai No 1 Umas Sdn Bhd 477.00 1997<br />
80 Kong Thai No3 Umas Sdn Bhd 477.00 1997<br />
81 Kong Thai No 5 Umas Sdn Bhd 477.00 1997<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
41
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
82 Kong Thai No 7 Umas Sdn Bhd 477.00 1997<br />
83 Kuari Rakyat No 7 Kuari Rakyat Sdn Bhd 838.00 1997<br />
84 Lee Wah No 2 Kim Huak Trading Sdn Bhd 833.00 1997<br />
85 Longchyi 97 WTK Realty Sdn Bhd 302.00 1997<br />
86 Manjung Setia Lee Teng Hooi & Sons Trd Sdn Bhd 632.00 1997<br />
87 MEB C8 Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd 264.00 1997<br />
88 Meda Liziz 1 Kumpulan Meda Liziz Berhad 623.00 1997<br />
89 Meranti No 5 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 45.00 1997<br />
90 Navacso Navasco Shipping Sdn Bhd 486.00 1997<br />
91 One Up 52 Syarikat One Up Sdn Bhd 555.00 1997<br />
92 One Up 63 Syarikat One Up Sdn Bhd 710.00 1997<br />
93 Palma 5 Instant Bloom Sendirian Berhad 640.00 1997<br />
94 Pline 3 Metroco Timber Trading Sdn Bhd 1358.00 1997<br />
95 Prime Delta 1 Mega Shipping Sdn Bhd 1176.00 1997<br />
96 Profit 188 United Orix Leasing Berhad 604.00 1997<br />
97 Puh Tye No 6 Puh Tye Shipyard Sdn Bhd 493.00 1997<br />
98 Ronmas No 9 Ronmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 526.00 1997<br />
99 Sabahlight Tiga Laut Sepakat Sdn Bhd 270.00 1997<br />
100 Sanbumi B3 Sanbumi Sawmill Sdn Bhd 642.00 1997<br />
101 Sealine 1 Vec<strong>to</strong>r Omega Sdn Bhd 833.00 1997<br />
102 Seng No 2 Mbf Finance Berhad 605.00 1997<br />
103 Sinbee 2 Seawise Shipping Sdn Bhd 526.00 1997<br />
104 Singawan Maju Shing Liang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1078.00 1997<br />
105 Solid Marging No 2 Solid Margin Sdn Bhd 1165.00 1997<br />
106 Soon Hing No 3 Kini Abadi Sdn Bhd 758.00 1997<br />
107 Soon Hing No 32 Kini Abadi Sdn Bhd 1362.00 1997<br />
108 Sunlight 97 United Orix leasing Berhad 498.00 1997<br />
109 Vec<strong>to</strong>r 3 Vec<strong>to</strong>r Omega Sdn Bhd 833.00 1997<br />
110 Venus II Ladyang Shipping Sdn Bhd 78.00 1997<br />
111 Vistama 99 Vistama Shipping Sdn bhd 624.00 1997<br />
112 Winbuild 1608 Syarikat One Sdn Bhd 555.00 1997<br />
113 Winbuild 6 Phua Soon Heng Sdn Bhd 443.00 1997<br />
114 Yan Yan 3 Rajang Palmcorp Sdn Bhd 1232.00 1997<br />
115 Ying Li 11 Hi‐Trade (Sarawak) Sdn Bhd 526.00 1997<br />
116 Yong Hoe 10 Hi‐Trade (Sarawak) Sdn Bhd 346.00 1997<br />
117 Yu Lee 20 Hock Seng Lee Bhd 796.00 1997<br />
118 Yu Lee 22 Hock Seng Lee Bhd 734.00 1997<br />
119 Yu Lee 23 Hock Seng Lee Bhd 833.00 1997<br />
120 Yu Lee 24 Hock Seng Lee Bhd 841.00 1997<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
42
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
121 Carrier 1 Equal Tranport Sdn Bhd 256.00 1998<br />
122 Cathay 22 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 257.00 1998<br />
123 Cathay 181 United Orix Leasing Malaysia Sdn Bhd 630.00 1998<br />
124 Ekoon No 8 Dong Guan Enterprise Sdn Bhd 164.00 1998<br />
125 Ketara Tiga Port Klang Offshore Pilling Sdn Bhd 639.00 1998<br />
126 Labroy 149 LKC Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 948.00 1998<br />
127 Low Kim Chuan 1 Lkc Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 865.00 1998<br />
128 Lucky Star Miri Housing Development Realty Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1998<br />
129 MAC PB 9 Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd 502.00 1998<br />
130 MEB B 15 Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd 516.00 1998<br />
131 Petrobiz Satu Kembang Suci Sdn Bhd 158.00 1998<br />
132 Thompson No 1 Omni Maritime Sdn Bhd 553.00 1998<br />
133 Tidalmarine Perkasa Tidalmarine Engineering Sdn Bhd 44.00 1998<br />
134 Wantas 1 Wantas Shipping (Langkawi) Sdn Bhd 399.00 1998<br />
135 Atilla 23 Tinjar Transport Sdn Bhd 1067.00 1999<br />
136 Barges Island 19 Tristar Navigation Company 616.00 1999<br />
137 Benzoil No 1 Banzoil Shipping Sdn Bhd 604.00 1999<br />
138 Bersama Abadi 2201 Megah Mewah Shipping Sdn Bhd 1279.00 1999<br />
139 Cathay 182 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 633.00 1999<br />
140 MEB B22 Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd 2920.00 1999<br />
141 Reignmas No 2 Reignmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 838.00 1999<br />
142 Teknik Mutiara TI Jaya Sdn Bhd 20.56 1999<br />
143 Tidalmarine Putra Tidalmarine Engineering Sdn Bhd 799.00 1999<br />
144 Tidalmarine Putri Tidalmarine Engineering Sdn Bhd 799.00 1999<br />
145 Vger 4 lee Teng Hooi & Sons Trd Sdn Bhd 1171.00 1999<br />
146 Well Leader No 3 Katas Credit Leasing Sendirian Berhad 158.00 1999<br />
147 Asiapride 102 Bonafile Shipbuilder & Repair Sdn Bhd 3137.00 2000<br />
148 Bebas Jaya Tiga Nam Hua Shipping Sdn Bhd 1,368.00 2000<br />
149 Big Fair DB1 Hong Lian Shipping Sdn Bhd 811.00 2000<br />
150 Fordeco No 17 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 1078.00 2000<br />
151 Golden Peace Hung Tung Trading (Sarawak) Sendirian<br />
Berhad<br />
259.44 2000<br />
152 Golden Sea No 29 Tawau Tug Service Sdn Bhd 627.00 2000<br />
153 Golden Sea No 36 Tawau Tug Service Sdn Bhd 642.00 2000<br />
154 Golden Sea No 41 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn Bhd 868.00 2000<br />
155 Golden Sea No 42 Tawau Tug Service Sdn Bhd 642.00 2000<br />
156 Kiong Nguong 106 Koinhim Shipping Sdn Bhd 1078.00 2000<br />
157 Linau 46 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1829.00 2000<br />
158 Low Kim Chuan 8 Lkc Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 1434.00 2000<br />
159 MAC PB 15 Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd 466.00 2000<br />
160 MEB JB2 Muhibbah Engineering (M) Bhd 735.00 2000<br />
161 Sealink Pacific 108 Sealink Pacific Sdn Bhd 1368.00 2000<br />
162 Singa Besar 3 Rong Rong Marketing Sdn Bhd 1168.00 2000<br />
163 Singa Besar 5 Tropical Energy Sdn bhd 1692.00 2000<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
43
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
164 Singa Besar 11 Yong Yong Trading Sdn Bhd 259.00 2000<br />
165 Singa Besar 15 Singa Cerah Sdn Bhd 260.00 2000<br />
166 Sung Thai Lee 2 Sung Thai Lee Sdn Bhd 1002.00 2000<br />
167 Zambatek 88 Focus Fleet Sdn Bhd 1899.00 2000<br />
168 Alliance 88 Dickson Marine Co Sdn Bhd 181.00 2001<br />
169 Atilla 24 Tinjar Transport Sdn Bhd 1279.00 2001<br />
170 Atilla 25 Tinjar Transport Sdn Bhd 1,067.00 2001<br />
171 Bagusia No1 Bagusia Sdn Bhd 522.00 2001<br />
172 Bosta Jaya 18 Borneo Shipping & Timber Agencies Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
799.00 2001<br />
173 Dunga 2302 LKC Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 1811.00 2001<br />
174 Entimau No 2 Globular Sdn Bhd 512.00 2001<br />
175 Linau 48 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1829.00 2001<br />
176 Linau 49 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 812.00 2001<br />
177 Linau 50 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 895.00 2001<br />
178 Malindo No 2 Msgear Shipping Sdn Bhd 1218.00 2001<br />
179 Monarch 39 Castalia Sdn Bhd 1073.00 2001<br />
180 Sane No 1 Syarikat Sebangun Sdn Bhd 2132.00 2001<br />
181 Sin Matu 25 Sin Matu Sdn Bhd 1468.00 2001<br />
182 Singawan Raya Shing Liang Shipping Sdn Bhd 1069.00 2001<br />
183 Tairen II W & Y Enterprise Sdn Bhd 666.00 2001<br />
184 Togo Satu Globular Sdn Bhd 519.00 2001<br />
185 Bonggoya 90 Syarikat Pengangkutan Bonggoya Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,368.00 2002<br />
186 Dynaroy No 3 Destiny Shipping Agency(m) Sdn Bhd 3072.00 2002<br />
187 Pelepas Trainer Pelabuhan Tanjung Pelepas Sdn Bhd 256.00 2002<br />
188 Reignmas Jaya Reignmas Shipping Sdn Bhd 1416.00 2002<br />
189 Serafine 02 Bonafile Shipbuilders & Repairs Sdn Bhd 1352.00 2002<br />
190 Asiapride 3048 Bonafile Shipbuilder & Repair Sdn Bhd 3137.00 2003<br />
191 Asiapride 30617 Bonafile Shipbuilder & Repair Sdn Bhd 3137.00 2003<br />
192 Atilla 32 Tinjar Transport Sdn Bhd 419.00 2003<br />
193 Azimat 1 Azimat Engineering Services Sdn Bhd 256.00 2003<br />
194 Botany 1203 Friendly Avenue Sdn Bhd 256.00 2003<br />
195 Cathay 151 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 512.00 2003<br />
196 Cathay 189 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 729.00 2003<br />
197 Modermott Derrick Barge<br />
No 26<br />
Barmada Modermott (L) Limited 11213.00 2003<br />
198 Penaga Warni LKC Shipping Line Sdn Bhd 2142.00 2003<br />
199 Pulau Keladi Pekerjaan Piasau Konkerit Sdn Bhd 930.00 2003<br />
200 Sealink Pacific 202 Sutherfield Resources Sdn Bhd 2641.00 2003<br />
201 Sealink U285 Sealink Sdn Bhd 2641.00 2003<br />
202 Sealink U286 Euroedge Sdn Bhd 2641.00 2003<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
44
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
203 Sin Tung 120 CB Industrial Product Sdn Bhd 258.00 2003<br />
204 Singa Besar 19 Rong Rong Marketing Sdn Bhd 249.00 2003<br />
205 Singa Besar 21 Rong Rong Marketing Sdn Bhd 2167.00 2003<br />
206 Tai Hin 13 Lee Sooi Sean 256.00 2003<br />
207 Tian Li 28 John Wong Su Kiong And Fong Nyet Len 728.00 2003<br />
208 Asiapride 3087 Bonafile Shipbuilder & Repair Sdn Bhd 3137.00 2004<br />
209 Asiapride 3093 Bonafile Shipbuilder & Repair Sdn Bhd 3137.00 2004<br />
210 Asiapride 3095 Bonafile Shipbuilder & Repair Sdn Bhd 3137.00 2004<br />
211 Botany 1801 Friendly Avenue Sdn Bhd 634.00 2004<br />
212 Cathay 188 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 631.00 2004<br />
213 Emerald Ampangship & Marine Sdn Bhd 4472.00 2004<br />
214 Fordeco No 29 Fordeco Sdn Bhd 1416.00 2004<br />
215 Forest Prime No 2 Sipoh Shipping & Exporter Sdn Bhd 1446.00 2004<br />
216 Gainline No 5 Gainline Enterprise Sdn Bhd 702.00 2004<br />
217 Lucky Way Coastal Transport(Sandakan)Sdn Bhd 896.00 2004<br />
218 Mariam 281 Se Mariam Sdn Bhd 3327.00 2004<br />
219 Muhibbah B25 Muhibbah Engineering 1217.00 2004<br />
220 Mihibbah B26 Muhibbah Engineering (M) BHd 634.00 2004<br />
221 Muhibbah B27 Muhibbah Engineering (M) BHd 634.00 2004<br />
222 Pertiwi VII Pertiwi Shipping Sdn Bhd 468.00 2004<br />
223 Sealink Pacific 288 Sutherfield Resources Sdn Bhd 2987.00 2004<br />
224 Sealink Pacific 382 Navitex Shipping Sdn Bhd 2641.00 2004<br />
225 Silversea No 1 Makjaya Sdn Bhd 947.00 2004<br />
226 Silversea No 2 Makjaya Sdn Bhd 947.00 2004<br />
227 Silversea No 3 Makjaya Sdn Bhd 835.00 2004<br />
228 Silversea No 4 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn Bhd 835.00 2004<br />
229 Silversea No 5 Cowie Marine Transportation Sdn Bhd 1298.00 2004<br />
230 Sinar Samudera Alam Kejora Sdn Bhd 1271.00 2004<br />
231 Singa Besar I Rong Rong Marketing Sdn Bhd 1252.00 2004<br />
232 Singa Besar 27 Rong Rong Marketing Sdn Bhd 249.00 2004<br />
233 Singa Besar 29 Rong Rong Marketing Sdn Bhd 1404.00 2004<br />
234 Soon Hing No7 Kini Abadi Sdn Bhd 737.00 2004<br />
235 Sonn Hing No 168 Kini Abadi Sdn Bhd 737.00 2004<br />
236 Taclobo 1 Kwantas Oil Sdn Bhd 1342.96 2004<br />
237 Taclobo 3 Kwantas Oil Sdn Bhd 109.62 2004<br />
238 Wantas V Wantas Shipping (Langkawi) Sdn Bhd 629.00 2004<br />
239 Asiapride 23117 Fast Meridian Sdn Bhd 1338.00 2005<br />
240 Luna Jaya Lunar Shipping Sdn Bhd 1981.00 2005<br />
241 Luna Mulia Lunar Shipping Sdn Bhd 8484.00<br />
96320.58<br />
2006<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
45
Table 5 : General Cargo Carrier Registered in Malaysia (1996‐2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Able Ensign Tauladan Gigih Sdn Bhd 3898 98.66 16.33 8.4 1996<br />
2<br />
Amanah Amanah International Finance<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
3007<br />
5119 89.5 16.2 7.2<br />
1996<br />
3 Bahagia Maju Ngee Tai Shipping Sdn Bhd 498 40.35 11.57 3.7 1996<br />
4 Bintang Harapan Fajar Lawas Sdn Bhd 494 1996<br />
5 Budi Suryana Budisukma Sdn Bhd 3007 5115.52 89.5 16.21 7.2 1996<br />
6 Gee Hong Fokus Marine Sdn Bhd 9896 1996<br />
7 Ginhoting Ginhotin Sdn Bhd 305 1996<br />
8 Golden line Rasa Shipping Sdn Bhd 118.00 1996<br />
9 Hiap Kin No 2 Hiap Kian Enterprise Sdn Bhd 162.00 1996<br />
10 Hung Ann No 3 WTK Realty Sdn Bhd 69.00 1996<br />
11 Hung Lee vl Hung Lee shipping Sdn Bhd 1593.00 1996<br />
12 Ing Hua Seng Ing Hua Seng Shipping Sdn Bhd 497.00 1996<br />
13 Ing Hua Soon 96 Ling Liong Kiik 180.00 1996<br />
14 Joy 97 Bendindang Ak Manjah 301.00 1996<br />
15 Kahing dua Tetap Sugih Sdn Bhd 1220.00 1996<br />
16 Kedah Cement l Jumewah Shipping Sdn Bhd 10508.00 1996<br />
17 Kim Ma No 2 Welldone Shipping Sdn Bhd 233.00 1996<br />
18 Kim Yuen 95 Tang Siong Tiang 241.00 1996<br />
19 Kong Jun No 2 Malsuria Holding (M) Sdn Bhd 1,773.00 1996<br />
20 Lada Kargo l Belait Shipping Co Sdn Bhd 1,023.00 1996<br />
21 Lee Ung Su Tung Jem 127.00 1996<br />
22 Mega Harapan Hua Tai Shipping Sdn Bhd 427.00 1996<br />
23 Otimber 111 Hornbilland Bhd 699.00 1996<br />
24 Petu 9 Pi<strong>to</strong> Shipping Sdn.Bhd 738.00 1996<br />
25 Qian Feng<br />
Wang Hin Leong Shipping<br />
Sdn.Bhd<br />
499.00<br />
1996<br />
26 Raja Balleh Pelangi Sakti Sdn.Bhd 80.00 1996<br />
Rinwood Jaya<br />
27<br />
No11<br />
Ling Kiong hua 666.00<br />
1996<br />
28 Riverbank Star Riverbank Shipping Sdn.Bhd 528.00 1996<br />
29 Riverbank Riverbank Shipping Sdn.Bhd 495.00 1996<br />
30 Ronsan 88 Premier Fairview Sdn.Bhd 149.00 1996<br />
31 Salura Salura Sdn Bhd 200.00 1996<br />
32 San Tai Lee 1 Lau Kiing Ling 198.00 1996<br />
33 Senari Harvest Venture Sdn.Bhd 1476.00 1996<br />
34 Shinline 4 Shinline Sdn.Bhd 5,615.00 1996<br />
35 Song Kian Baru Soon Hai Kee Shipping Sdn.Bhd 381.00 1996<br />
36 Song Yong Wang Ling Soon Chiong 182.00 1996<br />
37 Soon Thai Crest Enrich sdn.Bhd 397.00 1996<br />
38 Superior Star Yong Hung Shipping Sdn.Bhd 1523.00 1996<br />
39 Swee Joo Satu<br />
Swee Joo Coastal Shipping<br />
Sdn.Bhd<br />
638.00<br />
1996<br />
40 Transallied Maju Trans‐Allied Sdn.Bhd 374.00 1996<br />
41 Unity II<br />
Golden Dollars Shipping<br />
Sdn.Bhd<br />
876.00<br />
1996<br />
42 Wei Ling Hong Yang Shipping Sdn.Bhd 408.00 1996<br />
43 Yiaw Yang Dunmas Shipping Sdn.Bhd 5577.00 1996<br />
44 Vistama 96 Vistama Shipping Sdn.Bhd 311.00 1996<br />
45 Able Fusilier Tauladan Gigih Sdn Bhd 5691 1997<br />
46 Buana Indah Roundtree Shipping Sdn Bhd 439 43.42 9.76 3.18 1997<br />
Builder Fortune<br />
47<br />
Chong Fui Shipping &<br />
Forwarding Sdn Bhd<br />
2679<br />
80.22 14 8.7<br />
1997<br />
Demak Indah 1<br />
48<br />
Wang Nieng Lee Holdings<br />
Berhad<br />
439<br />
43.42 9.76 3.18<br />
1997<br />
49 Eco Charger Charger Shipping Sdn Bhd 138.52 1997<br />
50 Etlee Ling Yeo Tung 259 1997<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
46
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
51 Fonwell Fonwell Shipping Sdn Bhd 291 1997<br />
52 Gihock Irama Marine Sdn Bhd 6377 111.39 18.6 10.2 1997<br />
53 Ging San Hon Ging San Hon Shipping Sdn Bhd 498 1997<br />
54 Hung Lee ll Wah Leang Shipping Sdn Bhd 362.12 1997<br />
55 Ing Hua Seng 2 Ing Hua Seng Shipping Sdn Bhd 731.00 1997<br />
56 Ing Kua Seng 2 Ing Hua Seng Shipping Sdn Bhd 731.00 1997<br />
57 Jamaliah West‐Mall Corporation Sdn Bhd 479.00 1997<br />
58 Jin Hwa<br />
Tele Kenyalang Engineering Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
5359.00 754.22 44.55 12.18 2.71 1997<br />
59 Kahing Tiga Tetap Sugih Sdn Bhd 1224.00 1997<br />
60 Lian moh No 1 Chiu Nik Kiong 720.00 1997<br />
61 Lick Teck Fonwell Shipping Sdn Bhd 291.00 1997<br />
62 Lipan Burau<br />
Lipan Enterprise & shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
433.00<br />
1997<br />
63 Maju Borneo<br />
Swee Joo Coastal Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
581.00<br />
1997<br />
64 Megaline No 1 Borneoply Shipping Sdn Bhd 347.00 1997<br />
65 Melati Mas Timor Offshore Sdn Bhd 3960.00 6414 90.41 20 7.7 1997<br />
66 Moh Hin No 2 GHwoods Sdn Bhd 193.00 1997<br />
67 Mulia Abadi Nam Hua Shipping Sdn Bhd 499.00 1997<br />
68 Ngie Tai No 5 Nutrajaya Shipping(M)Sdn.Bhd 3084.00 1997<br />
69 Pioneer 87 Chieng Tiew Sing 26.00 1997<br />
70 Riki 13 Riveron Shipping Sdn.Bhd 560.00 1997<br />
71 Ronmas No 8 Ronmas Shipping Sdn.Bhd 732.00 1997<br />
72 San Shun San Sun Shipping Sdn.Bhd 445.00 1997<br />
73 Selamat Bahagia United Orix Leasing Bhd 498.00 1997<br />
74 Senayong Jaya Senayong Jaya Sdn.Bhd 428.00 1997<br />
75 Shinline 5 Shinline Sdn.Bhd 5,554.00 1997<br />
76 Sigma 1 Sigma Ray Shipping Sdn.Bhd 636.00 1997<br />
77 Sin Moh Soon Tiang Chiong Ming 288.00 1997<br />
78 Sri Nam Hua 8 Virgo Metro Sdn.Bhd 499.00 1997<br />
79 Surya Baru Chua Eng Seng 462.00 1997<br />
80 Teck lee Sanleean Shipping Sdn.Bhd 339.00 1997<br />
81 Tiasa indah 96 Wong Sii Kieng 66.00 1997<br />
Transources Cargo<br />
82<br />
18<br />
Transport Resources Sdn.Bhd 308.00<br />
1997<br />
Transources Cargo<br />
83<br />
19<br />
Transport Resources Sdn.Bhd 308.00<br />
1997<br />
84 Vertex<strong>to</strong> 22 Compass Transport Sdn.Bhd 1142.00 1997<br />
85 Yong Hing 12 Tan Tiew Yong 556.00 1997<br />
86 Yung Fah Satu Yung Fah Sdn.Bhd 418.00 1997<br />
87 Zimyin Zim Yin Shipping Sdn.Bhd 526.00 1997<br />
88 Zuria Bonkinmas Shipping Sdn.Bhd 481.00 1997<br />
89 Bersatu Abadi Nam Hua Shipping Sdn Bhd 497 1998<br />
90 Foresline 3 Shinera Shipping Sdn Bhd 453 1998<br />
91 Ingtai Ing Tai Shipping Sdn Bhd 344.00 1998<br />
92 Lai Lai No 51 Lai Lai Development Sdn Bhd 89.00 1998<br />
93 Lian seng hin 3<br />
swee Joe Coastal shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
586.00<br />
1998<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
47
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
94 Marineline No 1 Sin Min Shipping Sdn Bhd 181.00 1998<br />
95 Megaline No 7 Tropical Vision Sdn Bhd 350.00 1998<br />
96 Nepline Teratai Nepline Berhad 2696.00 1998<br />
97 Singawan Timbul Lau Hui Lee 88.00 1998<br />
98 Sung Hing No 2 Tang Sing Kian 384.00 1998<br />
99 Thailine 8 Thailine Sdn.Bhd 6,178.00 94.59 18.8 13 1998<br />
100 Thailine 8 Thailine Sdn.Bhd 6,178.00 1998<br />
101 Yong Hua 2 Yong Hua Marine Sdn.Bhd 2359.00 80.29 21.34 4.88 1998<br />
102 Fortuneline 2000 Master Ace Terri<strong>to</strong>ry Sdn Bhd 383 37 10.2 3.8 1999<br />
103<br />
Guan Hoe Huat No<br />
3<br />
Guan Hoe Huat Fishmeal Co Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
250.00<br />
1999<br />
104 Ing Soon Lee No 1 Ing Soon Lee Shipping Sdn Bhd 569.00 1999<br />
105 Lian Soon Ting Yew kun 196.00 1999<br />
106 Linau 42 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 386.00 1999<br />
107 Megaline No 9 Tropical Vision Sdn Bhd 336.00 1999<br />
108 MMM Belinda Pan Pacific Shipping Sdn Bhd 5922.00 1999<br />
109 Santa Suria Bendera Mawar Sdn.Bhd 10889.00 15746 139.35 21.2 12.4 1999<br />
110 Shing Lian No 2 Shing Lian Realty Sdn.Bhd 231.00 1999<br />
111 Shinline 6 Shinline Sdn.Bhd 5,555.00 91.87 18.8 12.9 1999<br />
112 Shinline 8 Shinline Sdn.Bhd 5,433.00 1999<br />
113 Crystal No 1 Ing Tai Shipping Sdn Bhd 235 2000<br />
114<br />
Galactic Dolphin E & W Freights & Logistics Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
4477 2000<br />
115 Mas Sutra Metro Prominent Sdn Bhd 609.20 2000<br />
116 New Time 1 Yasmore Timbers Sdn Bhd 444.00 839.7 37.6 11.08 3.65 2000<br />
117 Shinline 9 Shinline Sdn.Bhd 5,551.00 2000<br />
118 Transveneer 200 Empayar Semarak Sdn.Bhd 434.00 37.54 11.08 3.65 2000<br />
119 Transveneer Jaya Empayar Semarak Sdn.Bhd 434.00 37.54 11.06 3.65 2000<br />
120 Transveneer Pearl<br />
Oriental Evermare Sendirian<br />
Berhad<br />
436.00 37.81 11.08 3.66 2000<br />
121 Wave Ruler<br />
Chromis Import & Export<br />
Sdn.Bhd<br />
956.00<br />
2000<br />
122 Bonsonic Zim Yin Shipping Sdn Bhd 712 2001<br />
123 Falcom Wise‐Synergy Sdn Bhd 27 2001<br />
124 Fonwell No 2 Fonwell Shipping Sdn Bhd 255 2001<br />
125 Lawas Mewah united orix Leasing Bhd 996.00 2001<br />
126 Lawas Venture Katex Shipping Sdn Bhd 356.00 2001<br />
127<br />
Lee Chiong Hing<br />
No 3<br />
Tie Teck Yew 494.00<br />
2001<br />
128 Lee Hong Sii Tiung Lok 181.00 2001<br />
129 Mee Nguong 2 Chiew Tieng Ping 135.00 2001<br />
130 Mee Nguong 3 Chiew Tieng Ping 135.00 2001<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
48
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
131 Mee Nguong 5 Chiew Tieng Ping 1323.00 2001<br />
132 Mee Nguong 6 Chiew Tieng Ping 194.00 2001<br />
133 New Time 2<br />
Oriental Evermore Sendirian<br />
Berhad<br />
418.00<br />
2001<br />
134 Nikka Bonai Shipping Sdn.Bhd 1886.00 2001<br />
135 Rena Asas Mewah Sdn.Bhd 1238.00 65.01 11 5.7 2001<br />
136 Riverbank Emas Pansutria Sdn.Bhd 492.00 2001<br />
137 Riverbank<br />
Rainbow<br />
Pansutria Sdn.Bhd 492.00<br />
2001<br />
138 Sen<strong>to</strong>sa Jaya JP Lines Sdn.Bhd 1,660.00 2001<br />
139 Thailine 2 Thailine Sdn.Bhd 5,552.00 2001<br />
140 Thailine 5 Thailine Sdn.Bhd 5,601.00 2001<br />
141 Tina Kusin Jaya Sdn.Bhd 1673.00 3865 68.01 13 7 2001<br />
142 Alica Realink Sdn Bhd 1591 2002<br />
143 Cora 1 Coralink Shipping Sdn Bhd 206 2002<br />
144 Rampai Rampai Kembara Sdn.Bhd 671.00 2002<br />
145 Santa Suria II Samudera Sempurna Sdn.Bhd 10598.00 16767 136.24 22.3 12.18 2002<br />
146 Sinmah Ting Pin Lu 641.00 2002<br />
147 Thailine 3 Thailine Sdn.Bhd 5,582.00 2002<br />
148<br />
Oriental Evermare Sendirian<br />
Transveneer Glory<br />
Berhad<br />
474.00<br />
2002<br />
149 Transveneer<br />
United<br />
Oriental Evermare Sendirian<br />
Berhad<br />
468.00<br />
2002<br />
150 Cathay SP 1 OG Marine Sdn Bhd 457 2003<br />
151 Linau 15 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 857.00 2003<br />
152 Marugawa Marugawa Sdn Bhd 1643.00 64.3 14 5.4 2003<br />
153 Meu Huat Meu Huat Navigation Sdn Bhd 706.00 2003<br />
154 New Primeline Mathew Apoi Njau 153.00 2003<br />
155 Sinlehinn Rajang Line Sdn.Bhd 229.00 2003<br />
156 Thailine 6 Thailine Sdn.Bhd 7,633.00 2003<br />
157 Malayan Progress Malayan Navigation Co Sdn Bhd 1193.00 1605 64.4 11.5 6.3 2004<br />
158 Malayan succes Malayan Navigation Co Sdn Bhd 997.00 2004<br />
159 Man Kee 88<br />
Perkapalan Man Kee (88) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
330.00<br />
2004<br />
160 Maricom No 5 Maricom Shipping Sdn Bhd 713.00 2004<br />
161<br />
MV Borcos Sabhan<br />
1<br />
Syarikat Borcos Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
219.00<br />
2004<br />
162<br />
MV Borcos Sabhan<br />
2<br />
Syarikat Borcos Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
219.00<br />
2004<br />
163<br />
MV Borcos Sabhan<br />
3<br />
Syarikat Borcos Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
219.00<br />
2004<br />
164<br />
MV Borcos Sabhan<br />
4<br />
Syarikat Borcos Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
219.00<br />
2004<br />
165 Psalm 23 Jaya Coastal Transport Sdn.Bhd 134.00 2004<br />
166 Bima Lima Sribima (M) Shipping Sdn Bhd 243<br />
4486.00<br />
2005<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
49
Table 6 : Anchor Handling Tug & Supply Registered in Malaysia(1996‐2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Dickson 4 Dickson Marine Co sdn Bhd 18.00 1996<br />
2 Jetta 7 Clamshell Dredging Sdn Bhd 99.38 0.00 54.15 17.14 6.71 2.44 1996<br />
3 Kencana Murni Lunar shipping sdn BHd 107.00 0.00 6.41 22.06 6.70 2.90 1996<br />
4 Sealink Maju Sealink Sdn Bhd 223.00 0.00 66.00 27.08 8.60 4.35 1996<br />
5 Setia Cekal Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Bhd 994.00 750.00 299.00 56.89 12.80 4.88 1996<br />
6 Jetta 8 Clamshell Dredging Sdn Bhd 87.67 92.30 25.95 18.00 6.71 2.44 1997<br />
7 Suria I Lunar Shipping Sdn Bhd 86.00 0.00 14.15 19.82 6.52 2.93 1997<br />
8 Armada Merak Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
75.00<br />
‐<br />
22.00 19.94 6.00 2.60 1997<br />
9 Armada Mutiara Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
75.00<br />
‐<br />
22.00 19.94 6.00 2.60 1997<br />
10 Armada Tuah 6 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
663.00 0.00 199.00 39.59 11.60 4.96 1998<br />
11 Jetta 16 See Yong & Son Construction<br />
sdn Bhd<br />
8765.00 0.00 21.41 18.30 6.71 2.44 1998<br />
12 Oliserve Beta Oilerve Marine Sdn Bhd 443.00 1998<br />
13 Oliserve Beta Oilerve Marine Sdn Bhd 443.00 1998<br />
14 Ajang Harapan Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 3757.00 2920.00 1127.00 70.81 18.29 8.27 1998<br />
15 Jetta 17 See Yong & Son Construction<br />
sdn Bhd<br />
493.00 45.00 7.66 16.50 5.18 2.13 1999<br />
16 MV Setia Jaguh Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 2023.00 2024.76 609.00 59.65 15.00 6.80 1999<br />
17 MV Shema Seri Mukali Sdn Bhd 339.00 1999<br />
18 Shema Seri Mukali Sdn Bhd 339.00 1999<br />
19 Armada Tuah 7<br />
Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
799.00<br />
2000<br />
20 Sealink Maju 2 Sealink Sdn Bhd 223.00 176.00 77.00 27.01 9.00 4.25 2000<br />
21 Armada Hydro Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
353.00 302.69 106.00 34.80 8.50 3.80 2000<br />
22 Cathay 16 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 93.15 0.00 12.78 17.56 7.70 2.49 2001<br />
23 Cathay 6 Oriental Grandeur Sdn Bhd 90.44 0.00 8.42 16.00 7.62 2.44 2001<br />
24 Jetta 22 See Yong & Son Construction<br />
sdn Bhd<br />
8,671,00 0.00 25.02 17.57 6.71 2.44 2001<br />
25 Armada Tuah 9 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,178.00<br />
‐<br />
353.00 55.55 13.80 5.50 2001<br />
26 Sealink Cassandra Sealink Sdn Bhd 490.00 580.00 147.00 45.31 11.00 3.50 2001<br />
27 Tugau Bintulu Port Sdn Bhd 33.00 ‐ 10.00 13.16 4.60 2.30 2001<br />
28 Ajang Ikhlas Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 475.00 143.00 34.92 11.40 4.95 2002<br />
29 Armada Tuah 8 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,173,00 1382.33 353.00 54.69 13.80 5.50 2002<br />
30 Armada Tuah 9 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,178,00 1382.33 353.00 55.55 13.80 5.50 2002<br />
31 Ella Deli‐Boyee Sdn Bhd 339.00 2002<br />
32 MV Ella Deli‐Boyee Sdn Bhd 339.00 2002<br />
33 Armada Salman Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
2,83.00 2,400.00 851.00 61.27 20.00 6.50 2002<br />
34 Armada Tugas 1 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
499.00<br />
‐<br />
149.00 45.31 11.00 3.50 2002<br />
35 Borcos Tasneem 1 Syarikat Borcos Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,369.00<br />
‐<br />
410.00 52.90 13.80 5.50 2002<br />
36 MV Setia Gagah Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Bhd 1,188.00 860.00 356.00 55.00 13.30 6.00 2002<br />
37 MV Setia Handal Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Bhd 681.00 ‐ 204.00 45.64 11.58 4.20 2002<br />
38 Armada Tuah 10 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,178,00 0.00 353.00 54.69 13.80 5.50 2003<br />
39 Permint Indah<br />
Jasa Merin (Malaysia) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1075.00<br />
2003<br />
40 Permint Perkasa Jasa Merin (Malaysia) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1075.00 0.00 352.00 55.58 13.80 5.50 2003<br />
41 Armada Firman Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
3,351.00 2,977.00 1,005.00 68.16 20.00 6.50 2003<br />
42 Armada Tuah 100 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,178.00<br />
‐<br />
696.00 66.04 16.00 6.50 2003<br />
43 Armada Tugas 2 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
846.00 889.00 253.00 46.81 13.80 4.50 2003<br />
44 Borcos Takdir<br />
Syarikat Borcos Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,369.00<br />
2003<br />
45 Royco 99 Roys<strong>to</strong>n Cole Marine Sdn Bhd 381.00 2003<br />
46 Sarku Santubong Sarku Resources Sdn Bhd 2,999.00 ‐ 899.00 75.09 17.25 7.00 2003<br />
47 Saz Supply Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 492.00 ‐ 147.00 42.74 11.00 3.43 2003<br />
48 Sealink Vanessa 3 Sealink Sdn Bhd 496.00 575.00 149.00 45.31 11.00 3.50 2003<br />
49 Sealink Vic<strong>to</strong>ria 3 Sealink Sdn Bhd 1,058.00 976.00 299.00 56.69 12.19 5.18 2003<br />
50 Statesman Service Tidewater Offshore Sdn Bhd 999.00 2003<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
50
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
51 Tanjung Jara Forsayth Offshore Pteltd 1,495.00 2003<br />
52 Armada Tuah 20 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,333,00 1457.00 399.00 55.54 15.00 5.50 2004<br />
53 Inai Lily 1 Inai Kiara sdn bhd 69.00 2004<br />
54 MV Epic Sasa Epic Industri (M) Sdn Bhd 229.00 0.00 69.00 27.03 8.53 4.27 2004<br />
55 MV Setia Emas Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 964.00 2004<br />
56 Perkasa II<br />
Tidalmarine Engineering Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1927.00<br />
2004<br />
Sealink Maju<br />
57<br />
6/Sealink Maju 7<br />
Sealink Sdn Bhd 254.00<br />
2004<br />
58 Ajang Safa Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 297.00 ‐ 89.00 27.88 9.50 3.80 2004<br />
59 Armada Tuah 21 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,333.00 1,458.15 399.00 55.54 15.00 5.50 2004<br />
60 Armada Tuah 22 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1.333.00 1,458.15 399.00 55.54 15.00 5.50 2004<br />
61 Armada Tugas 3 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
499.00<br />
‐<br />
149.00 45.31 11.00 3.50 2004<br />
62 Armada Tugas 4 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
491.00<br />
‐<br />
147.00 37.86 11.40 4.93 2004<br />
63 Dayang Pertama Desb Marine Services Sdn Bhd 3,387.00 ‐ 1,016.00 69.36 20.00 6.50 2004<br />
64 Gulf Fleet No 63 Tidewater Offshore Sdn Bhd 738.00 2004<br />
65 Inlet Amble strategy Sdn Bhd 1,241.00 2004<br />
66 Mutiara Lestari Marine Sdn Bhd 1,512.00 2004<br />
67 Palmas Service Jasa Merin (malaysia) Sdn Bhd 722.00 2004<br />
68 Permint Aman Jasa Merin (malaysia) Sdn Bhd 1,210.00 3,703.00 216.00 51.61 12.19 4.27 2004<br />
69 Ajang Ikhtiar Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 803.00 0.00 241.00 42.04 12.60 5.30 2005<br />
70 Ajang Indah Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 496.00 0.00 149.00 37.95 11.40 4.95 2005<br />
71 M.V Tanjung Huma Tanjung Offshore Servies Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,601.00 0.00 480.00 56.39 16.00 5.50 2005<br />
72 MVSetia Fajar Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 1,470.00 0.00 441.00 54.12 14.60 5.50 2005<br />
73 MV Setia Indah Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 1365.00 2005<br />
74 MV Setia Lestari Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 1470.00 0.00 441.00 58.70 14.60 5.50 2005<br />
75 MV Setia Mega Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 496.00 0.00 149.00 37.81 11.40 4.95 2005<br />
76 MV Setia Nurani Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 1523.00 0.00 441.00 54.11 14.60 5.50 2005<br />
77 Permint damai Jasa Merin (Malaysia) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1212.00 0.00 363.00 55.58 13.80 5.50 2005<br />
78 Sealink Maju 21 Sealink Sdn Bhd 499.00 0.00 149.00 35.01 11.80 4.80 2005<br />
79 Sealink Maju<br />
4/Sealink Maju 5<br />
Sealink Sdn Bhd 248.00 0.00 76.00 28.03 8.60 4.11 2005<br />
80 Armada Tuah 23 Bumi armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1,333.00<br />
‐<br />
399.00 55.54 15.00 5.50 2005<br />
81 Bima Lima Sribima (M) Shipping Sdn Bhd 243.00 ‐ 72.00 36.00 8.00 3.30 2005<br />
82 M.V. Tanjung Manis Tanjung Offshore Services<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
915.00<br />
‐<br />
274.00 41.36 12.60 5.20 2005<br />
83 MV Setia Kasturi Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Bhd 1,443.00 ‐ 431.00 54.92 13.30 6.00 2005<br />
84 Sealink Vanessa 4 Sealink Sdn Bhd 496.00 ‐ 149.00 45.31 11.00 3.50 2005<br />
85 Armada Tuah 23 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1333.00<br />
0.00<br />
399.00 55.54 15.00 5.50 2006<br />
86 Armada Tuah 24 Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1333.00<br />
0.00<br />
399.00 55.54 15.00 5.50 2006<br />
87 Madindra Langkawi Viva Omega Sdn Bhd 1,356.00 2006<br />
88 MV Setia Padu Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 1470.00 1361.71 441.00 54.12 14.60 5.50 2006<br />
89 MV Setia Rentas Alam Maritim (M) Sdn Vhd 1470.00 0.00 460.00 54.12 14.60 5.50 2006<br />
90 Ajang Hikmah Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 3,351.00 ‐ 1,005.00 68.16 20.00 6.50 2006<br />
91 Dayang Seri Viva Omega Sdn Bhd 780.00 2006<br />
92 Permint Murni Jasa Merin (malaysia) Sdn Bhd 1,210.00 2006<br />
93 JMM Hadhari Jasa Merin (Malaysia) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1212.00<br />
0.00<br />
363.00 52.30 13.80 5.50 2007<br />
94 JMM Seri Besut Jasa Merin (Malaysia) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
1212.00<br />
2007<br />
95 Redang Dickson Marine Co Sdn Bhd 441.00<br />
21,032.64<br />
‐ 128.00 32.59 10.00 4.90 2007<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
51
Table 7 : LNG Registered in Malaysia (1996‐2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Puteri Zamrud MISC Bhd 86205 73519 25861 263 43 22 1996<br />
2 Aman Sendai MISC Bhd 16336 9201 4901 125 26 13 1997<br />
3 Puteri Firus MISC Bhd 86205 73519 25861 263 43 22 1997<br />
4 Aman Hakata MISC Bhd 16336 9201 4901 125 25 13 1998<br />
5 Armada Puteri Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn Bhd 2856 2000<br />
6 Puteri Delima Satu MISC Bhd 94430 76190 28329 266 43 21 2002<br />
7 Puteri Intan Satu MISC Bhd 94430 76190 28329 266 43 21 2002<br />
8 Puteri Nilam Satu MISC Bhd 94446 76197 28333 268 43 26 2003<br />
9 Puteri Firus Satu MISC Bhd 94446 76197 28333 268 43 26 2004<br />
10 Puteri Zamrud Satu MISC Bhd 94446 76197 28333 268 43 26 2004<br />
11 Puteri Mutiara Satu MISC Bhd 94446 76197 28333 268 43 26 2005<br />
12 Seri Alam MISC Bhd 95729 83483 28718 272 43 21 2005<br />
13 Seri Amanah MISC Bhd 95729 83483 28718 272 43 21 2005<br />
14 Seri Anggun MISC Bhd 95729 83483 28718 272 43 21 2006<br />
15 Seri Angkasa MISC Bhd 83483<br />
1145252.000<br />
83483 28718 272 43 21 2006<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
52
Table 8 : Tankers Registered in Malaysia(1996‐2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Eagle 8<br />
Sempurna Bunkering<br />
Services(M) Sdn Bhd<br />
49.00<br />
1996<br />
2 Eagle Baltimore MISC Bhd 57456.00 1996<br />
3 Eagle Beaumont MISC Bhd 57456.00 1996<br />
4 Eagle Bos<strong>to</strong>n MISC Bhd 57456.00 1996<br />
5 Kah Soon Baru 95 Lau Ngee Leong 5500.00 0.00 30.00 28.69 4.60 1.98 1996<br />
6 Million Line 1 Kau Siong Sdn Bhd 61.00 0.00 29.00 27.90 4.81 2.17 1996<br />
7 MMM Jackson<br />
Pan Malaysian Marine<br />
Services Sdn Bhd<br />
4409.00<br />
1996<br />
8 Nepline Delima Nepline Berhad 4,629,00 1996<br />
9 Nis Hin 96 Nishin shipping Sdn Bhd 57.00 0.00 33.00 28.97 4.53 2.10 1996<br />
10 Petro Ranger Enerfrate Sdn Bhd 6,718,00 1996<br />
11 Seng Seng No 1<br />
Patroleum Master Seng Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
92.00<br />
1996<br />
12 Suhaila Synergy Point Sdn Bhd 659.00 1996<br />
13 Tung Shing Master Petrobiz Sdn Bhd 49.00 0.00 21.00 24.02 4.92 1.53 1996<br />
14 Armada Perkasa<br />
Bumi Armada Navigation<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
32665.00<br />
1997<br />
15 Bunga Kelana Dua MISC Bhd 57017.00 105400.00 32719.00 235.81 42.00 21.00 1997<br />
16 Bunga Kelana Satu MISC Bhd 57017.00 105400.00 32719.00 235.81 42.00 21.00 1997<br />
17 Bunga Melati Dua MISC Bhd 22254.00 32126.00 8766.00 168.98 30.00 15.20 1997<br />
18 Bunga Melati Satu MISC Bhd 22254.00 32126.00 8766.00 168.98 30.00 15.20 1997<br />
19 Catherine Kamakura Sdn Bhd 140.00 0.00 75.00 34.55 6.09 2.25 1997<br />
20 Domino SS Shipping Sdn Bhd 672.00 0.00 313.00 57.00 9.20 4.00 1997<br />
21 Eagle Birmingham MISC Bhd 57456.00 1997<br />
22 Eagle Charlotte MISC Bhd 57949.00 1997<br />
23 Eagle Colombus MISC Bhd 57949.00 1997<br />
24 Geruda Satu Geruda Shipping Sdn Bhd 210.00 0.00 101.00 38.75 7.93 2.44 1997<br />
25 Gloryang Kaikura Services Sdn Bhd 270.00 0.00 156.00 40.89 7.93 2.89 1997<br />
26 Mandat Bersama Mandat Bersama Sdn Bhd 4242.00 1997<br />
27 Metro One Metro Sedia Transport Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
217.00 0.00 111.00 34.99 7.96 2.86 1997<br />
28 Mewah Jaya Eusolid Sdn Bhd 158.00 0.00 81.00 33.75 6.80 2.30 1997<br />
29 MMM Hous<strong>to</strong>n<br />
Malaysian Ocean Line Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
4509.00<br />
1997<br />
30 Princess Amelia SMT Transport Sdn Bhd 187.00 0.00 81.00 36.07 7.30 2.44 1997<br />
31 Ramai Dua Chen Yii Shipping Sdn Bhd 214.00 0.00 116.00 34.91 7.92 2.58 1997<br />
32 Selendang Mutiara Wawasan Shipping Sdn Bhd 29,965,00 46000.00 12354.00 176.37 32.26 18.90 1997<br />
33 Selendang<br />
Permata<br />
Wawasan Shipping Sdn Bhd 29,965,00 46000.00 12354.00 176.37 32.26 18.90 1997<br />
34 Venice Rejang Venice Sdn Bhd 367.00 0.00 176.00 41.40 8.54 3.66 1997<br />
35 Bunga Kelana 3 MISC Bhd 57017.00 105400.00 32719.00 235.81 42.00 21.00 1998<br />
36 Eagle Albany MISC Bhd 57929.00 1998<br />
37 Eagle Austin MISC Bhd 58156.00 1998<br />
38 Eagle Pneonix MISC Bhd 65346.00 1998<br />
39 Hoe Hup 99 Harvesville Sdn Bhd 323.00 520.00 153.00 44.00 7.00 3.00 1998<br />
40 Hoe Hup No 5<br />
Sri Similaju Corporation Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
206.00<br />
1998<br />
41 Laju Jaya No 1 Bantumaju Sdn Bhd 382.00 1998<br />
42 M T Sun Diamond Sun Up Shipping Co Sdn Bhd 5340.00 1998<br />
43 Mesra 128 Perkapalan Mesra Sdn Bhd 2688.00 0.00 807.00 87.12 14.40 6.50 1998<br />
44 Miri Cheery Semua Shipping Sdn Bhd 1358.00 1998<br />
45 Nova Nova Adiwarna Sdn Bhd 459.00 1998<br />
46 Selendang Gemala Wawasan Shipping Sdn Bhd 29,965,00 46000.00 12272.00 176.37 32.26 18.90 1998<br />
47 Selendang<br />
Kencana<br />
Wawasan Shipping Sdn Bhd 29,965,00 46000.00 12354.00 176.37 32.26 18.90 1998<br />
48 Selendang Ratna Wawasan Shipping Sdn Bhd 29,965,00 45363.00 11997.00 176.37 32.26 18.90 1998<br />
49 Selendang Sari Wawasan Shipping Sdn Bhd 29,965,00 45363.00 11997.00 176.37 32.26 18.90 1998<br />
50 Selendang Tiara Tiara Navigation Sdn Bhd 39,755,00 1998<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
53
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
51 Semua Bersatu Semua Shipping Sdn Bhd 3,878,00 5810.00 1741.00 97.47 16.50 8.50 1998<br />
52 Sun Diamond Sun Up Shipping Sdn Bhd 5,340,00 1998<br />
53 Alam Bitara Bitara Shipping Sdn Bhd 28932.00 45513.00 11802.00 173.10 32.20 18.80 1999<br />
54 Bunga Kelana 4 MISC Bhd 57017.00 105400.00 32719.00 235.81 42.00 21.00 1999<br />
55 Bunga Kelana 5 MISC Bhd 57017.00 105400.00 32719.00 235.81 42.00 21.00 1999<br />
56 Bunga Kelana 6 MISC Bhd 57017.00 105400.00 32719.00 235.81 42.00 21.00 1999<br />
57 Bunga Melati 3 MISC Bhd 22116.00 31983.00 8678.00 168.98 30.00 15.20 1999<br />
58 Bunga Melati 4 MISC Bhd 22116.00 31983.00 8678.00 168.98 30.00 15.20 1999<br />
59 Bunga Melati 5 MISC Bhd 22116.00 31983.00 8678.00 168.98 30.00 15.20 1999<br />
60 Eagle Anaheim MISC Bhd 57929.00 1999<br />
61 Eagle Atlanta MISC Bhd 57929.00 1999<br />
62 Eagle Augusta MISC Bhd 58156.00 1999<br />
63 Hoe Hup No 7 Hoe Hup Seven Sdn Bhd 185.00 1999<br />
64 Jasa Maju 1 Semua Shipping Sdn Bhd 3166.00 4998.00 1790.00 93.06 15.40 7.80 1999<br />
65 Laju Jaya No 2 Meroni(buntulu) Sdn Bhd 258.00 1999<br />
66 Linau 45 Shin Yang Shipping Sdn Bhd 115.00 ‐ 71.00 31.62 5.80 2.80 1999<br />
67 Sibu Glory Grolite Shipping Sdn Bhd 673.00 ‐ 380.00 54.37 11.58 3.65 1999<br />
68 Bunga Kenanga MISC Bhd 40037.00 73096.00 20900.00 220.68 32.24 20.20 2000<br />
69 Bunga Melati 6 MISC Bhd 22116.00 31983.00 8678.00 168.98 30.00 15.20 2000<br />
70 Bunga Melati 7 MISC Bhd 22116.00 31983.00 8678.00 168.98 30.00 15.20 2000<br />
71 Central Star 2 Mujur Suria Sdn Bhd 307.00 2000<br />
72 Hoe Hup 18 Holiday Park Sdn Bhd 95.00 110.79 32.00 31.71 5.48 2.37 2000<br />
73 Hoe Hup No 6<br />
Hoe Hup Six Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
174.00<br />
2000<br />
74 Jasa Ketiga Semua Shipping Sdn Bhd 3321.00 4999.00 1858.00 95.01 15.60 7.80 2000<br />
75 Penrider Progresif Cekap Sdn Bhd 740.00 ‐ 341.00 54.78 11.00 4.50 2000<br />
76 Petro Foremost Shipet Maritime Sdn Bhd 7,678,00 12632.61 3852.00 118.91 21.50 11.00 2000<br />
77 Petro Venture Shipet Maritime Sdn Bhd 4,974,00 2000<br />
78 Sejati Mohamad Umar Bin Ahmat 626.00 ‐ 38.82 20.15 4.88 1.83 2000<br />
79 Alam Bistari Bistari Shipping Sdn Bhd 28539.00 47172.00 12385.00 173.10 32.20 19.10 2001<br />
80 Alam Budi Alam Budi Sdn Bhd 28539.00 47065.00 12385.00 173.10 32.20 19.10 2001<br />
81 Cathay Tk1<br />
Oriental Grandeur Marine<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
369.00<br />
2001<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
54
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
82 Domino No3 Meroni(buntulu) Sdn Bhd 482.00 772.00 201.00 42.73 12.20 3.05 2001<br />
83 Metro No 2<br />
Metro Sedia Transport Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
497.00<br />
2001<br />
84 Sutra Dua Sutrajaya Shipping Sdn Bhd 4,521,00 2001<br />
85 Tuba No 5 Marine Teamwork Sdn Bhd 140.00 2001<br />
86 Wec 9 WEC Transport Service Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
927.00<br />
‐<br />
573.00 68.12 11.00 5.00 2001<br />
87 Danum Yayasan Sabah Dua<br />
Shipping Sdn Bhd<br />
4792.00 7959.00 2430.00 103.06 18.20 8.95 2002<br />
88 Eagle Tacoma MISC Bhd 58166.00 2002<br />
89 Eagle Vermont MISC Bhd 161223.00 2002<br />
90 Eagle Virginia MISC Bhd 161233.00 2002<br />
91 Oriental Glory Glow Quest Sdn Bhd 1,824,00 2997.83 730.00 79.60 13.40 6.80 2002<br />
92 Samudra Dua Prosperline Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
276.00<br />
‐<br />
129.00 38.16 9.22 2.60 2002<br />
93 Ajang Medina Ajang Shipping Sdn Bhd 487.00 ‐ 147.00 42.86 10.50 3.20 2003<br />
94 Atlantic Ocean Special Pyramid Sdn Bhd 1992.00 2003<br />
95 Bunga kasturi MISC Bhd 156967.00 299999.00 99493.00 317.69 60.00 29.70 2003<br />
96 Eagle Tampa MISC Bhd 58166.00 2003<br />
97 Eagle Toledo MISC Bhd 58166.00 2003<br />
98 Eagle Tren<strong>to</strong>n MISC Bhd 58166.00 2003<br />
99 Eagle Tucson MISC Bhd 58166.00 2003<br />
100 Jasa Maju 2 Semado Maritim Sdn Bhd 4999.00 2003<br />
101 Kelisa BHL Marine(M) Sdn Bhd 294.00 301.00 90.00 37.70 7.50 3.60 2003<br />
102 Lynn Lau Hue Kuok & Sons Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
204.00<br />
‐<br />
112.00 39.29 7.34 2.76 2003<br />
103 Senawang<br />
Azam Fowarding & Trading<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
3,120,00<br />
2003<br />
104 Sutra Empat Sutrajaya Shipping Sdn Bhd 4,599,00 2003<br />
105 Tuah Sejagat Vic<strong>to</strong>ry Supply Sdn Bhd 198.00 537.95 155.00 41.47 8.00 3.50 2003<br />
106 Bunga Kelana 10 MISC Bhd 58194.00 105173.00 31243.00 234.88 42.00 21.30 2004<br />
107 Bunga Kelana 7 MISC Bhd 58194.00 105173.00 31243.00 234.88 42.00 21.30 2004<br />
108 Bunga Kelana 8 MISC Bhd 58194.00 105173.00 31243.00 234.88 42.00 21.30 2004<br />
109 Bunga Kelana 9 MISC Bhd 58194.00 105173.00 31243.00 234.88 42.00 21.30 2004<br />
110 Eagle Vienna MISC Bhd 161233.00 2004<br />
111 Gagasan Melaka Gagasan Carriers Sdn Bhd 4464.00 7744.27 2450.00 99.00 18.20 8.80 2004<br />
112 Hailam Satu Zengo Marine Sdn Bhd 166.00 2004<br />
113 Maritime Kelly Wawasan Shipping Sdn 29211.00 44488.00 11658.00 173.40 32.20 18.70 2004<br />
Anne<br />
Bhd<br />
114 Maritime Tuntiga Wawasan Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
29211.00 44488.00 11658.00 173.40 32.20 18.70 2004<br />
115 Mewah Sejati Vic<strong>to</strong>ry Supply Sdn Bhd 480.00 1000.00 314.00 57.00 10.00 4.50 2004<br />
116 MMM Ash<strong>to</strong>n<br />
Malaysian Merchant<br />
Marine Bhd<br />
2479.00<br />
2004<br />
117 Tuah Kuatan Vic<strong>to</strong>ry Supply Sdn Bhd 195.00 2004<br />
118 Bunga Kasturi<br />
Dua<br />
MISC Bhd 157098.00 298100.00 99808.00 317.69 60.00 29.70 2005<br />
119 Eagle Valencia MISC Bhd 160046.00 2005<br />
120 Eagle Venice MISC Bhd 160046.00 306997.70 109299.00 318.40 58.00 28.55 2005<br />
121 Maritime North<br />
Wawasan Shipping Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
29174.00<br />
2005<br />
122 Bunga Kasturi<br />
Tiga<br />
MISC Bhd 157300.00 300325.00 99363.00 316.00 60.00 29.70 2006<br />
123 Bunga Kasturi<br />
Empat<br />
MISC Bhd 157300.00 300325.00 99363.00 317.69 60.00 29.70 2006<br />
124 Sealink Pacific<br />
330<br />
Sealink Sdn Bhd 6,638,00<br />
‐<br />
1991.00 96.62 34.00 7.31 2006<br />
125<br />
Sealink Pacific<br />
389<br />
Sealink Sdn Bhd 4,598,00<br />
1281377.00<br />
2006<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
55
Table 9 : Bulk Carrier Registered in Malaysia (1996‐2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Selendang Mayang Mayang Navigation Sdn Bhd 18,507.00 28,260.00 165.92 26.02 14.20 1996<br />
2<br />
Cathay 12<br />
United Orix Leasing Malaysia<br />
Berhad<br />
259.00<br />
1997<br />
3 Eco Champion Ecochamp Shipping Sdn Bhd 12,859.00 1997<br />
4 MMM Diana Ample Remark Sdn Bhd 76,515.00 1997<br />
5 Nerano PNSL Berhad 15,847.00 1997<br />
6 Selendang Intan Intan Navigation Sdn Bhd 28,097.00 47,290.00 181.10 31.00 16.60 1997<br />
7 Selendang Kasa Kasa Navigation Sdn Bhd 18,507.00 28,260.00 165.92 26.00 14.00 1997<br />
8 Selendang Nilam Nilam Navigation Sdn Bhd 28,097.00 1997<br />
9 Selendang Ayu Ayu Navigation Sdn Bhd 39,755.00 1998<br />
10<br />
Seri Ibonda<br />
Palmbase Maritime (M) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
16,311.00 27,272.00 162.77 26.60 13.50 1998<br />
11 Bunga Saga 9 MISC Bhd 38972.00 73127.00 218.70 32.25 19.00 1999<br />
12 Alam Aman II Katella Sdn Bhd 27306.00 47301.00 182.11 31.00 16.70 2001<br />
13 Eco Vigour Vigour Shipping Sdn Bhd 17,265.00 2001<br />
14 Eco Vision Vision Shipping Sdn Bhd 17,264.00 2001<br />
15 Handy Islander MISC Bhd 15,833.00 2002<br />
16 Pacific Selesa MISC Bhd 16,041.00 2002<br />
17 Sea Maestro MISC Bhd 15,888.00 2002<br />
18 Sea Maiden MISC Bhd 15,888.00 2002<br />
19 Gangga Negara MISC Bhd 15,880.00 2003<br />
20 Handy Gunner MISC Bhd 16,041.00 2003<br />
21 Handy Roseland MISC Bhd 16,041.00 2003<br />
22 Marquisa MISC Bhd 16,041.00 2003<br />
23 Pacific Mattsu MISC Bhd 16,041.00 2003<br />
24 Alam Maju MBC Maju Sdn Bhd 27986.00 2004<br />
25 Alam Mutiara MBC Mutiara Sdn Bhd 27986.00<br />
555,227.00<br />
2004<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
56
Table 10: Passenger Ship Registered in Malaysia(1996‐2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Bahagia Baru 96 Trillion Leader Sdn Bhd 68 1996<br />
2 Ban Hock Soon Ling Heng Ang 31 1996<br />
3 Bobo Chiong Wee Kiong 31 1996<br />
4 Campur Campur Sunrise Entity Sdn Bhd 95 36.71 3.95 1.83 1996<br />
5 Duta Pangkor 8 Pangkor‐Lumut Ekspres Feri Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
107 36.78 4.35 2.1 1996<br />
6 Flying Eagle Ling Kong Mou 44 1996<br />
7 Husqvarna Sarawak Hock Ghim Enterprise Sdn Bhd 76 1996<br />
8 King Soon Balleh 96 Hu Moi Ngiok 55 1996<br />
9 Layang Indah Sealink Sdn Bhd 95 24.12 5.94 2.84 1996<br />
10 Pertama Speed Ling Kui Sunn 27 1996<br />
11 Sing Ann Lai 2020 Tan Jiak Kean 59 1996<br />
12 Srijaya Wong Lang Kiew 44 1996<br />
13 Supersonic No 5 Law Yong Keng 59 1996<br />
14 Tinjar No 3 Huong Tuong Siew 31 1996<br />
15 Tu<strong>to</strong> Express No 10 Tu<strong>to</strong> Express Shipping Sdn Bhd 26 1996<br />
16 Tu<strong>to</strong> No 12 Tu<strong>to</strong> Express Shipping Sdn Bhd 27 1996<br />
17 Usahasama Syarikat Feri Usahasama Sdn Bhd 111.69 19.1 9.14 2.35 1996<br />
18 Vision 2005 Miri River Travel Enterprise Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
19 1996<br />
19 Vovo Express Chiong Chung Hong 31 1996<br />
20 Wahwah Speed Swegim Enterprise Sdn Bhd 34 1996<br />
21 Zon 1 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 178.27 53.17 21.96 8.4 2.5 1996<br />
22 Zon 2 Langkawi Saga Travel & Tours<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
178.27 1996<br />
23 Asean 97 Peter Lau Hieng Wung 35 1997<br />
24 Bahagia 2020 Lim Kuok Chuong 60 33.94 3.23 1.74 1997<br />
25 Bahagia No 1 Ekspres Bahagia Sdn Bhd 82 1997<br />
26 Begawan Laju Lau Oi Phen 33 1997<br />
27 Benuong Shorewell Shipping Sdn Bhd 198 20.4 9.8 2.45 1997<br />
28 Beruit No 1 Kong Kim Sien 35 1997<br />
29 Champur Baru Debon Enterprise Sdn Bhd 107 1997<br />
30 Ekspres Bahagia II Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
178 46.58 40.4 5.33 2.17 1997<br />
31 Good Success 818 Thang Nam Hoi 56 1997<br />
32 Hocksoon Wong Lang Kiew 43 1997<br />
33 Hope King 168 Hock Ghim Enterprise Sdn Bhd 61 35.47 3.3 1.71 1997<br />
34 Husqvarna Kita Swegim Enterprise Sdn Bhd 60 36.04 3.21 1.67 1997<br />
35 Impian 2 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 118 28.25 5.5 3.2 1997<br />
36 Impian 3 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 60 18.69 24.05 5.5 2.1 1997<br />
37 Kawan Express No 1 Kawan Laut Sdn Bhd 315 41.7 6.1 1.9 1997<br />
38 Lambaian 1 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 118 30.26 28.25 5.5 3.2 1997<br />
39 Laris Rohana Binti Hujil 41 1997<br />
40 Maju Balleh Ting Chuo Won 42 1997<br />
41 Nurshah Zamboanga Penang Shipbuilding Corporation<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
78 34.5 3.68 2 1997<br />
42 Pan Silver 1 Pan Silver Ferry Sdn Bhd 56 1997<br />
43 Pertama Voyage Ong Bon Chong 42 1997<br />
44 Pioneer 97 Kong Shaw Hock 57 1997<br />
45 Public Express No 11 Law Yong Keng 30 1997<br />
46 Punan Rajah Tukang Ak Pichang 33 1997<br />
47 Rasa Sayang 1 Sanergy Marine Sdn Bhd 142 23.06 8.17 2.15 1997<br />
48 Tinjar No 2 Mrhuong Tuong Kee 29 1997<br />
49 Tung Kiong No 7 Tan Jiak Kean 28 1997<br />
50 Wanlee No 1 Standrich Sdn Bhd 77 37.65 3.68 1.64 1997<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
57
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
51 Bobo 6 Chiong Wee Luk 33 1998<br />
52 Bon Voyage Ling Siew Sung 28 26.09 3.41 1.24 1998<br />
53 Concorde 98 Yong Hie Sieng 45 1998<br />
54 Ekspres Bahagia 5 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
35 1998<br />
55 Hubungan 1 Sun Power Ferry Sdn Bhd 82 21.7 4.8 1.9 1998<br />
56 Kudat Express Wong Leong Kee & Son Sdn Bhd 116 34.5 4.12 1.6 1998<br />
57 Lambaian 3 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 118 1998<br />
58 Leisure World 1 Luxury Solution Sdn Bhd 4,077 1998<br />
59 Pan Silver 2 Pan Silver Ferry Sdn Bhd 60 1998<br />
60 Pan Silver 3 Pan Silver Ferry Sdn Bhd 60 1998<br />
61 Penaga Penang Port Sdn Bhd 279 1998<br />
62 Pertama Rejang Chua Chun Keong 35 1998<br />
63 Pintas Samudra 2 Yong Choo Kui Shipyard Sdn Bhd 136 35.48 4.52 2.1 1998<br />
64 Salbiah Dua Yiing Hee Ing @ Yung Hee Ing 33 1998<br />
65 Seagull Express 3 Sea‐Gull Express &<br />
Accommodation Sdn Bhd<br />
121 29.2 4.87 2.8 1998<br />
66 Tomcat Eksklusif Anggun Sdn Bhd 41 13.56 5.7 1.85 1998<br />
67 Tomcat 2 Eksklusif Anggun Sdn Bhd 48 4.75 15.3 5.7 1.85 1998<br />
68 Yanmarline Express Yanmarline Express Sdn Bhd 73 36.15 3.63 1.9 1998<br />
69 Angel Ekspress Rowvest Sdn Bhd 111 1999<br />
70 Ekspres Bahagia III Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
135 34.04 36.07 4.12 1.45 1999<br />
71 Ekspres Bahagia 6 Fast Ferry Ventures Sdn Bhd 92 1999<br />
72 Ekspres Bahagia 8 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
97 1999<br />
73 Feri Wawasan Belait Shipping Co Sdn Bhd 445 1999<br />
74 Indomal Express 88 Damai Ferry Service Sdn Bhd 90.06 17.22 21.12 4.62 1.95 1999<br />
75 Kenangan 1 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 81 1999<br />
76 Kenangan 2 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 144 28 5.8 1.9 1999<br />
77 Kenangan 3 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 156 24.4 29.7 6.25 1.65 1999<br />
78 Pelican Eksklusif Anggun Sdn Bhd 41.39 1999<br />
79 Weesam Express 5 Sunrise Energy Sdn Bhd 231 37.4 5.5 1.85 1999<br />
80 Alaf Baru 1 Fast Ferry Ventures Sdn Bhd 118.71 21.27 5.3 1.4 2000<br />
81 Alaf Baru 2 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 115 2000<br />
82 Bo Bo No 2 Chiong Wee Yiing 33 2000<br />
83 Ekspres Bahagia 9 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
111 2000<br />
84 Jupiter Superstar Express Sdn Bhd 183 29.7 6.4 2.2 2000<br />
85 Labuan Express Lima Syarikat Lista Sdn Bhd 179 37.72 4.72 2.05 2000<br />
86 Marine Star 3 Sun Power Ferry Sdn Bhd 82 28.71 3.66 1.6 2000<br />
87 Mars Superstar Express Sdn Bhd 183 29.7 6.4 2.2 2000<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
58
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
88 New Frontier Express<br />
No 2<br />
Ling Heng Seek 87 32.97 3.66 1.34 2000<br />
89 Pan Silver 5 Pan Silver Ferry Sdn Bhd 120 36.8 4.95 2.13 2000<br />
90 Plu<strong>to</strong> Superstar Express Sdn Bhd 183 29.7 6.4 2.2 2000<br />
91 Putai Jaya Ting Chuo Won 56 2000<br />
92 Zuhairi Capital Surge Sdn Bhd 119.92 23.4 8.3 2.85 2000<br />
93 Bahagia 2002 Lim Kuok Chuong 51 2001<br />
94 Bo Bo No 5 Chiong Wee Yiing 33 2001<br />
95 Cinta Baru Kong Kim Sien 36 2001<br />
96 Ekspres Bahagia 10 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
91 2001<br />
97 Fortune Express 1 Jferry Services Sdn Bhd 99 33.37 4.12 2.13 2001<br />
98 Fortune Express 2 Jferry Services Sdn Bhd 99 2001<br />
99 Jaya Express Ting Chu Kee 30 2001<br />
100 Kenangan 6 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 170 29.3 6.8 1.43 2001<br />
101 Langkawi Coral 2 Langkawi Saga Travel & Tours<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
175 28.85 6.8 1.65 2001<br />
102 Langkawi Coral 3 Langkawi Saga Travel & Tours<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
53.42 2001<br />
103 New Frontiers No 3 Sunrise Entity Sdn Bhd 99 2001<br />
104 Puteri Jentayu Salang Indah Resorts Sdn Bhd 74 2001<br />
105 RS Express Yong Choo Kui 200 37.26 5 2.04 2001<br />
106 Sejahtera Pertama Jetacorp Sdn Bhd 99 2001<br />
107 Sofu Rasa Sayang Lee In Jee 51.09 2001<br />
108 Soon Hua Hong Soon Hua Hong Enterprise Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
298 2001<br />
109 Tawindo No 1 Osin Mo<strong>to</strong>r Sdn Bhd 94 2001<br />
110 Yieng Hee No 1 Tiong Chiong Ming 29 2001<br />
111 Yieng Hee No 2 Tiong Chiong Ming 26 2001<br />
112 Yieng Lee No 1 Tiong Chiong Ming 29 2001<br />
113 Coral Island 1 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
332 35.1 7.95 3 2002<br />
114 Ekspres Bahagia 7 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
43.82 2002<br />
115 Excel Express 1 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn<br />
Bhd<br />
99 2002<br />
116 Malaysia Express 1 Tunas Rupat Follow Me Express<br />
Sdn Bhd<br />
194 32.5 7 3.5 2002<br />
117 Mas Indera Kayangan Masindra Shipping (M) Sdn Bhd 1,065 2002<br />
118 Mid‐East Express No 1 Mid‐East Transport Sdn Bhd 119 34.8 4.22 1.5 2002<br />
119 New Frontiers No 5 Sunrise Entity Sdn Bhd 99 2002<br />
120 Alaf Baru 3 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 123.25 2003<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
59
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
121 Alaf Baru 6 Langkawi Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 123.25 2003<br />
122 Asian Vision Sri Jaya Shipping Sdn Bhd 42 2003<br />
123 Bahagia 20 Bahagia 2020 Sdn Bhd 56 2003<br />
124 Bahagia No 8 Ekspres Bahagia Sdn Bhd 132 2003<br />
125 Duta Pangkor 1 Pangkor-Lumut Ekspres Feri Sdn Bhd 149 2003<br />
126 Duta Pangkor 2 Pangkor-Lumut Ekspres Feri Sdn Bhd 79 2003<br />
127 Duta Pangkor 3 Pangkor-Lumut Ekspres Feri Sdn Bhd 79 2003<br />
128 Ekspres Nusa Satu Nusantara Ferry Services Sdn Bhd 106 2003<br />
129 Excel Express 2 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn Bhd 132 2003<br />
130 Excel Express 3 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn Bhd 132 2003<br />
131 Kapit Boleh 168 Swegim Enterprise Sdn Bhd 52 2003<br />
132 Labuan Express Enam Double Power Sdn Bhd 144 39 4.2 2.3 2003<br />
133 Labuan Express Tujuh Hwong Lee (M) Sdn Bhd 158 35.8 4.42 1.86 2003<br />
134 Labuan Express Lapan Hwong Lee (M) Sdn Bhd 99 2003<br />
135 Mid-East Express No 2 Mid-East Transport Sdn Bhd 126 2003<br />
136 Nasuha Capital Surge Sdn Bhd 119.92 23.4 8.3 2.85 2003<br />
137 New Frontiers No 6 Sunrise Entity Sdn Bhd 119 2003<br />
138 Pulau Payar Penang Port Sdn Bhd 16.47 2003<br />
139 Pulau Pinang Penang Port Sdn Bhd 16.47 2003<br />
140 Sarawak Boleh 168 Swegim Enterprise Sdn Bhd 87 32.94 3.91 1.85 2003<br />
141 Tawindo No 2 Osin Mo<strong>to</strong>r Sdn Bhd 116 2003<br />
142 Tawindo No 3 Osin Mo<strong>to</strong>r Sdn Bhd 143 2003<br />
143 Weesam Express 6 Yong Choo Kui Shipyard Sdn Bhd 215 2003<br />
144 Achilles 2 Yong Choo Kui Shipyard Sdn Bhd 63 2004<br />
145 Bo Bo Satu Chiong Chung Heng 42 2004<br />
146 Coral Island 3 Ekspres Bahagia (Langkawi) Sdn Bhd 133 36.74 4.28 1.5 2004<br />
147 Duta Pangkor 5 Pangkor-Lumut Ekspres Feri Sdn Bhd 124 2004<br />
148 Khai Kiong Express Sim Meng Hiang 36 2004<br />
149 Lady Yasmin Yasmin Marine Technology Sdn Bhd 21.94 2004<br />
150 Pintas Samudera 8 Inmiss Shipping Sdn Bhd 92 2004<br />
151 Sejahtera 2 Jetacorp Sdn Bhd 187 37.7 4.76 1.5 2004<br />
152 Sejahtera 3 Jetacorp Sdn Bhd 161 2004<br />
153 Wawasan Perdana Labuan Ferry Corporation Sdn Bhd 1,101 2004<br />
154 Sri Labuan Lima Trans-Link Sdn Bhd 137 36.76 4.28 1.5<br />
20706.94<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
60
Table 11: Container Ships Registered in Malaysia (1996‐ 2006)<br />
NO SHIP NAME OWNER/OPERATOR GRT DWT NRT<br />
LENGTH<br />
(L)<br />
BREADTH<br />
(B)<br />
DEPTH<br />
(D)<br />
YEAR OF<br />
REGISTRY<br />
1 Balt Harmoni Balt Orient Lines Sdn Bhd 14,135.00 1996<br />
2 Able Helmsman Tauladan Gigih 4,337.00 6,596.00 98.00 16.50 8.40 1997<br />
3 Budi Aman Budi Sukma Aman Sdn Bhd 11,982.00 1997<br />
4 Budi Teguh Budi Sukma Teguh Sdn Bhd 11,982.00 1997<br />
5 Bunga Mas Lima MISC Bhd 8,957.00 8,775.00 121.26 22.70 10.80 1997<br />
6 Bunga Mas Enam MISC Bhd 8,957.00 1997<br />
7 Bunga Mas Tujuh MISC Bhd 8,957.00 1997<br />
8 Bunga Mas Lapan MISC Bhd 8,957.00 1998<br />
9 Bunga Mas 9 MISC Bhd 9,380.00 12,550.00 134.00 22.00 11.00 1998<br />
10 Bunga mas 10 MISC Bhd 9,380.00 1998<br />
11 Bougainvilla Chatlink Sdn Bhd 4,226.00 5,788.00 99.99 16.00 8.45 1999<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
61
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 4<br />
FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE USAGE OF PALM OIL AS ALTERNATIVE NON<br />
PETROLEUM‐BASED HYDRAULIC FLUID IN MARINE APPLICATION<br />
AZRI HAMIM AB ADZIS*<br />
Department of Advance Science & Advance Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 21 May 2010; Revised: 9 July 2010 ; Accepted: 13 July 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Most hydraulic applications on land or sea utilize petroleum‐based hydraulic fluid as the working fluid. Fluid leakages are<br />
quite common and in marine application fluid are easily leaked in<strong>to</strong> sea water causing pollutions. An alternative hydraulic<br />
fluid with similar properties as petroleum‐based fluids at lower cost is required <strong>to</strong> be used in marine applications <strong>to</strong> mini‐<br />
mize impact on the environment. Water‐based or synthetic fluids such as water‐glycol, phosphate ether and synthetic<br />
esters are expensive and have certain disadvantages compared with petroleum‐based fluid such as relatively low operat‐<br />
ing temperature, viscosity changes with temperature fluctuation and corrosive against rubber seal. An alternative fluid<br />
may inhibit some of the above weaknesses but can be acceptable if the cost is lower. The purpose of this case study is <strong>to</strong><br />
determine the suitability of palm oil mixture as hydraulic fluid with similar capabilities with petroleum based fluid. (Data<br />
on palm oil properties are <strong>to</strong> be obtained from literature research and a comparison with petroleum based fluid will be<br />
made). Suitability will be determined from the fluids’ suitability <strong>to</strong> maintain viscosity at very high pressure and varying<br />
temperature and also its impact on the environment. Further research on palm oil characteristic in high pressure pumps<br />
and hydraulic equipments compatibility is needed.<br />
Keyword: Hydraulics fluid, palm oil, marine, alternative<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Hydraulics always leaks! It may sound like a<br />
catchy commercial but most hydraulic users<br />
will testify on the truthfulness of the state‐<br />
ment. As the most common hydraulic fluid<br />
base is mineral oil or petroleum based oil, any<br />
leakage can be considered as a potential envi‐<br />
ronmental disaster related <strong>to</strong> petroleum<br />
products. These petroleum products and<br />
other additive in the hydraulic fluids can harm<br />
the marine life and wreck havoc <strong>to</strong> the eco‐<br />
system. Experience from past incidents of<br />
petroleum spills shows that irreparable harm<br />
<strong>to</strong> the environment as seen in the Exxon Val‐<br />
dez oil spill w<strong>here</strong> thousands of marine ani‐<br />
mals were killed [1]. While a disaster of such<br />
magnitude may not be a suitable comparison<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909055<br />
Email address: azri@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
with leaks of hydraulics fluids, the fact re‐<br />
mains that petroleum byproducts are harmful<br />
<strong>to</strong> the environment.<br />
The problems with petroleum based hydraulic<br />
fluids are the non‐biodegradability of the fluid<br />
and the harmful effect it has on the environ‐<br />
ments. Any spills can kill of marine life or con‐<br />
taminate the environments making the spillage<br />
site <strong>to</strong> be inhabitable for a long period.<br />
Additionally, the <strong>to</strong>xicity of most hydraulic<br />
fluid additives and the occupational health<br />
and safety issue, lead <strong>to</strong> an environmentally<br />
safer alternative of petroleum based fluids in<br />
environmental sensitive areas.<br />
The New York State Department of Environ‐<br />
mental Conservation, NYSDEC, legally required<br />
the reporting of any petroleum products spill‐<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
62
age and appropriate steps must be taken <strong>to</strong> con‐<br />
tain the spillage from polluting soils or under‐<br />
ground water sources. The seriousness of the<br />
regulation can be demonstrated by a spill incident<br />
at a site own by the Brookhaven National Labora‐<br />
<strong>to</strong>ry (BNL) in New York. A ruptured hydraulic hose<br />
has resulted in the removal of 50 cubic yards of<br />
contaminated soil and disposed as <strong>to</strong>xic material.<br />
This incident has led BNL <strong>to</strong> adopt the usage of<br />
environmentally safer hydraulic fluid based from<br />
canola oil [2].<br />
In order <strong>to</strong> make a hydraulic fluid <strong>to</strong> be safer for<br />
the environment the hydraulic fluid must be read‐<br />
ily biodegradable or in other word the fluid must<br />
be able <strong>to</strong> be completely converted <strong>to</strong> carbon<br />
dioxide and water quickly and naturally by diges‐<br />
tion or consumption process by naturally occur‐<br />
ring organism in water, oil and soil systems [2].<br />
Any spillage can then be cleaned up normally<br />
without the added cost of hazardous material<br />
handlings.<br />
To obtain the biodegradable features, previous<br />
researches has lead <strong>to</strong> the application of synthetic<br />
base fluid such as synthetic esters and polyglycols<br />
(organophosphate and polyalphaolefin). These<br />
synthetics base fluids were developed mainly for<br />
high temperature and/or fire risk operations and<br />
are able <strong>to</strong> biodegrade easily compared <strong>to</strong> petro‐<br />
leum based fluids [3]. The synthetics based fluids<br />
perform better compared <strong>to</strong> petroleum based<br />
fluids in term of viscosity at low and high tem‐<br />
peratures, volatility, pour point, wear protections<br />
and oxidations [3]. However, synthetic esters are<br />
expensive <strong>to</strong> produce and even for their superior<br />
lubrication performance, the high costs limit its<br />
usage. Polyglycols are less costly but can be quite<br />
<strong>to</strong>xic <strong>to</strong> living organisms especially when mixed<br />
with lubricating additives [3,4].<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Thus, a cheaper non <strong>to</strong>xic alternative <strong>to</strong> be used is<br />
vegetable oil as the base oil for hydraulic fluids.<br />
Among vegetable oils which has been researched<br />
and developed as hydraulic fluids are the canola oil,<br />
rapeseed oil, soybean oil and palm oil.<br />
Properties of Hydraulic Fluid<br />
Primary purpose of hydraulic fluids is <strong>to</strong> maintain<br />
lubrication and fluid characteristics while in use<br />
within the system so as <strong>to</strong> maintain appropriate<br />
pressure <strong>to</strong> operate hydraulic actua<strong>to</strong>rs (cylinders<br />
and mo<strong>to</strong>rs) assemblies in machineries on demand.<br />
An ideal hydraulic fluid will have the following char‐<br />
acteristics [3, 5,6]:<br />
Viscosity<br />
1. Constants viscosity at all temperature<br />
range<br />
2. High anti‐wear characteristics<br />
3. Thermal stability<br />
4. Hydrolytic stability<br />
5. Low chemical corrosiveness<br />
6. Low cavitation tendencies<br />
7. Long life<br />
8. Fire resistance<br />
9. Readily biodegradable<br />
10. Low <strong>to</strong>xicity<br />
11. Low cost<br />
For hydraulic fluids, the temperature effect on<br />
viscosity is very important. A good fluid can main‐<br />
tain a minimum required viscosity at high operat‐<br />
ing temperature yet does not become <strong>to</strong>o viscous<br />
at lower temperature. Too much viscosity may<br />
result in difficulty for the fluid <strong>to</strong> transmit hydrau‐<br />
lic power at low temperature especially at system<br />
start.<br />
Anti Wear<br />
The ability of the fluid <strong>to</strong> coat moving metal parts<br />
with a thin protective oil film. The oil film will re‐<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
63
duce wear due <strong>to</strong> metal‐<strong>to</strong>‐metal contact thus<br />
prolonging the life of the equipments. Most hy‐<br />
draulic fluids have anti‐wear additive added <strong>to</strong> it<br />
<strong>to</strong> obtain anti wear properties.<br />
Most common anti wear additive for petroleum<br />
based fluid is the zinc dithiophosphate (ZDP)<br />
which is a highly <strong>to</strong>xic substance. As it is soluble in<br />
water, its introduction <strong>to</strong> marine environment<br />
can be hazardous.<br />
Corrosion<br />
A good hydraulic fluid has good hydrolytic stabil‐<br />
ity i.e. able <strong>to</strong> prevent any water which may enter<br />
the fluid from causing rust <strong>to</strong> metal. Usually, a<br />
rust inhibi<strong>to</strong>r is added <strong>to</strong> the fluid <strong>to</strong> obtain good<br />
rust protection.<br />
Oxidation<br />
The presence of water and oxygen (air) in the<br />
fluid may cause fluids <strong>to</strong> oxidize and further in‐<br />
crease the chance of rust formation. Oxidize fluid<br />
will also cause chemical corrosions due <strong>to</strong> in‐<br />
crease in acidity.<br />
Flammability<br />
A high flash point (the maximum temperature<br />
before ignition) is necessary for hydraulic fluid as<br />
most fluid works at high temperatures. Petro‐<br />
leum based fluid have a relatively high flash<br />
point of around 150 o C. For extreme environ‐<br />
ments, a fire resistant fluid is required <strong>to</strong> prevent<br />
accidental ignitions.<br />
Effect of Mineral Based Fluid on Marine Environ‐<br />
ment<br />
Hydraulic fluids can enter the environment<br />
from spills and leaks in machines and from leaky<br />
s<strong>to</strong>rage tanks. When these fluids spilled on soil,<br />
some of the ingredients in the hydraulic fluids<br />
mixture may stay on the <strong>to</strong>p, while others may<br />
sink in<strong>to</strong> the groundwater. In water, some in‐<br />
gredients of hydraulic fluids will transfer <strong>to</strong> the<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
bot<strong>to</strong>m and stay t<strong>here</strong>. Marine organism that<br />
live near spillage area may ingest some hydrau‐<br />
lic fluid ingredients. Some organism may die<br />
from the poisoning and some will have traces of<br />
the hydraulic fluid in their system causing defor‐<br />
mations or poisoning the upper food chains.<br />
Eventually, the hydraulic fluids will degrade in<br />
the environment, but complete degradation<br />
may take more than a year and continue <strong>to</strong> af‐<br />
fect living organism during the degradation<br />
process [7]. Prolong contact with human can<br />
increase cancer risk especially on skin [8]. The<br />
International Convention for the Prevention of<br />
Pollution From Ships, 1973 (MARPOL 73/78)<br />
forbid the discharge of oily waste <strong>to</strong> the sea<br />
which cover all petroleum products in any<br />
forms [9].<br />
Vegetable‐based Fluid<br />
In order <strong>to</strong> be accepted as a fluid of choice for<br />
hydraulic application, vegetable based fluid must<br />
have similar characteristics as the commonly<br />
used petroleum based hydraulic fluid. As men‐<br />
tioned earlier, the purpose of the hydraulic fluids<br />
is <strong>to</strong> maintain appropriate pressure <strong>to</strong> operate<br />
actua<strong>to</strong>rs and at the same time lubricate and<br />
protect moving mechanical parts from wear and<br />
corrosion. To maintain the pressure, the fluids<br />
are constantly pumped thus creating a built up<br />
of heat, subjecting the fluid <strong>to</strong> temperature<br />
variations and also constant mechanical stresses<br />
[4].<br />
Vegetable oil provides better anti‐wear perform‐<br />
ance and generally exhibit lower friction coeffi‐<br />
cient and are easily biodegradable. These prop‐<br />
erties are due <strong>to</strong> the composition of the oils<br />
which contain unsaturated hydrocarbons and<br />
naturally occurring esters. The problems are that<br />
t<strong>here</strong> are prone <strong>to</strong> oxidize rapidly, changes in<br />
viscosity at the lower and upper temperature<br />
range and low water resistance. Vegetable es‐<br />
ters oils based on polyunsaturated fatty acid<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
64
tends <strong>to</strong> oxidize rapidly, even at a moderately<br />
increased operating temperature. As the tem‐<br />
perature increases, the oils thicken due <strong>to</strong> its<br />
tendency <strong>to</strong> enter in<strong>to</strong> viscosity‐increasing reac‐<br />
tions in the presence of atmospheric oxygen.<br />
Similar reaction occurs when the temperature<br />
drops as the oil will begin <strong>to</strong> solidify. Rapeseed<br />
oil, corn oil, and sunflower oil have a solidifica‐<br />
tion point of ‐16 o C, ‐20 o C and ‐17 o C respectively<br />
[4, 7, 10]. Palm oil is even worst, solidifying at a<br />
relatively high temperature of 34.1 o C [11]. Even<br />
as the temperatures drop and approaching the<br />
solidification temperatures, the oils will experi‐<br />
enced a marked increase in viscosity and may<br />
cause problem in cold weather [8]. These prob‐<br />
lems however can be easily fixed by mixing the<br />
vegetable oil with synthetic esters and/or by<br />
adding additives <strong>to</strong> improve its anti oxidant and<br />
pour point properties [7]. While the cost of syn‐<br />
thetic ester is very high, by mixing it with vegeta‐<br />
ble oil base will bring the <strong>to</strong>tal cost of the base<br />
oil down compared <strong>to</strong> a fully synthetic solution.<br />
New antioxidants that are suitable for vegetable<br />
oil yet harmless <strong>to</strong> the environment are also<br />
needed as current antioxidants are designed for<br />
mineral oils and some are quite <strong>to</strong>xic.<br />
Oxidative stability is dependant on the predomi‐<br />
nant fatty acids present in the vegetable oil. Oils<br />
containing mostly saturated fatty acids will have<br />
good oxidative stability compared <strong>to</strong> a vegetable<br />
oil containing oleic acid or other monounsatu‐<br />
rated fatty acids. Oils that contain mostly poly‐<br />
unsaturated fatty acids exhibit poor oxidative<br />
stability [8]. In other words, the oxidative stabil‐<br />
ity is inversely proportional <strong>to</strong> the degree of un‐<br />
saturation. The three most cultivated vegetable<br />
oils, the palm oil, soybean oil, and the rapeseed<br />
oil consist mainly of monounsaturated and poly‐<br />
unsaturated fatty acids. These lead <strong>to</strong> a general<br />
consensus of vegetable oils poor oxidative stabil‐<br />
ity compared with petroleum based oil and also<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
the fully saturated synthetics such as synthetic<br />
esters, organophosphate and polyalphaolefin<br />
(PAOs) [8]. So as <strong>to</strong> provide for comparable per‐<br />
formance, vegetable oils formulations generally<br />
require higher doses of antioxidants [6]. Due <strong>to</strong><br />
the oxidative instability of these major vegetable<br />
oils, vegetable oils with high saturated acids is <strong>to</strong><br />
be used due <strong>to</strong> the high solidification points.<br />
On the positive side, vegetable oils offer excel‐<br />
lent lubricity and have a high intrinsic viscosity<br />
and extreme‐pressure properties. Well‐<br />
formulated vegetable oil‐based hydraulic fluids<br />
can pass the demanding Vickers 35VQ25 or Deni‐<br />
son T5D‐42 vane pump wear tests. Vegetable oil<br />
can perform satisfac<strong>to</strong>rily for years under mild<br />
climate and operating conditions, provided the<br />
oil are kept free of water contamination [10].<br />
Klein et al suggested that vegetable oil used as<br />
hydraulic fluid base oil can exhibit better low‐<br />
temperature stability without the need for the<br />
addition of pour point depressant or synthetic<br />
esters by adding ethylene oxide and/or propyl‐<br />
ene oxide in<strong>to</strong> the base oil. Among the base oil<br />
tested for this process are the coconut oil, palm<br />
oil, palm kernel oil, peanut oil, cot<strong>to</strong>n oil, soy‐<br />
bean oil, sunflower oil and rapeseed oil. The<br />
resultant mixture produced ethoxylated and/or<br />
propoxylated base oil has been proven <strong>to</strong> have<br />
better pour point characteristic. This develop‐<br />
ment can result in inexpensive base oil for hy‐<br />
draulic fluid as fewer additives are needed <strong>to</strong><br />
make the fluid suitable for hydraulics applica‐<br />
tions [7].<br />
Aside from chemical processes <strong>to</strong> increase the sta‐<br />
bility of the vegetable oils, t<strong>here</strong> is an alternative<br />
method w<strong>here</strong> genetic modifications is employ on<br />
oil producing crops. Recent advances in genetic<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
65
engineering and hybrid breeding technology<br />
have made it possible <strong>to</strong> alter the physical prop‐<br />
erties of vegetable oils by changing their fatty<br />
acid profiles. This has allowed an improvement<br />
of the oxidation stability by increasing the oleic<br />
content of the oil. The resulting high oleic base<br />
s<strong>to</strong>ck oils with additional antioxidants have<br />
been shown <strong>to</strong> be as good as or better than<br />
petroleum oils in oxidation stability trials [10].<br />
Examples of the usage of vegetable oil based<br />
hydraulic fluids are the Sawfish logging robot<br />
deployed by the Tri<strong>to</strong>n Logging, a Canadian<br />
company, in Lois Lake, British Columbia. The<br />
underwater robot harvested submerged trees<br />
using a hydraulic grappling pincer and electric<br />
chain saw. The hydraulic grappler is powered<br />
with vegetable oil instead of petroleum based<br />
or synthetic based hydraulic fluids. The com‐<br />
pany aim is <strong>to</strong> harvest the dead but well pre‐<br />
served submerged forest thus eliminating the<br />
need <strong>to</strong> cut down living trees onshore and at<br />
the same time did not pollute the aquatic envi‐<br />
ronment of the lake [12].<br />
Feasibility of Palm‐Oil Based Fluid<br />
Many research and developments of hydraulic<br />
fluids made from vegetable oils has been done in<br />
Europe and the United States focusing on rape‐<br />
seed, soybean and canola oils by various inde‐<br />
pendence and government sponsored labora<strong>to</strong>‐<br />
ries such as the New York’s Brookhaven National<br />
Labora<strong>to</strong>ry, Albuquerque’s Sandia National Labo‐<br />
ra<strong>to</strong>ry and the University of Iowa as early as<br />
1991 [2,6]. These researches and the subsequent<br />
commercial products show that rapeseed and<br />
soybeans oils are suitable for hydraulic fluids<br />
base oils and with its additives, able <strong>to</strong> perform<br />
almost equally with petroleum based and syn‐<br />
thetic fluids. However, these oils are sources and<br />
processes in Europe or the United States and <strong>to</strong><br />
utilize these environmentally friendly oils in the<br />
South East Asia region will be costly in term of<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
imports and transportation. Further with the<br />
region own petroleum reserves especially in Ma‐<br />
laysia, it is more economic <strong>to</strong> continue using pe‐<br />
troleum based hydraulic fluids rather than im‐<br />
porting the bio fluids from overseas.<br />
As one of the world <strong>to</strong>p vegetable oil, palm oil<br />
can be a possible choice for further development<br />
as a base oil for hydraulic fluids especially since<br />
palm oil can be found in abundance in Malaysia.<br />
Palm oil contains over 40% oleic acid and around<br />
35% palmitic acid. Almost 60% of fatty acids of<br />
the oil are unsaturated while stearic, palmitic<br />
and myristic are saturated [13]. The suitability of<br />
palm oil as hydraulic fluid base oil is compared<br />
with other vegetable oil through the melting<br />
point and iodine values as shown in table 1 be‐<br />
low.<br />
Table 1: Common vegetable oil melting<br />
points and iodine values [11]<br />
The iodine value is a measure of unsaturation of<br />
vegetable oil. The saturated property of the oil<br />
imparts a strong resistance <strong>to</strong> oxidative rancid‐<br />
ity. Thus the thermal and oxidative of the oil can<br />
be improved if the oil has lower iodine value. A<br />
high iodine value indicates that the oil needs <strong>to</strong><br />
be mix with ethylene oxide and/or propylene<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
66
oxide or other anti‐oxidant additives [8]. The<br />
melting point indicates at which temperature<br />
the oil will start <strong>to</strong> solidify thus making it useless<br />
as hydraulic fluid base oil. A high melting point<br />
will require the oil <strong>to</strong> be treated with more addi‐<br />
tives <strong>to</strong> reduce its melting point <strong>to</strong> practical val‐<br />
ues. Table 1 showed that the palm kernel oil and<br />
palm oil have relatively low iodine values com‐<br />
pared <strong>to</strong> other vegetable oils. This indicates that<br />
palm kernel oil and palm oil have better anti‐<br />
oxidant properties compared <strong>to</strong> rapeseed oil and<br />
soybean oil hence require less anti‐oxidant addi‐<br />
tive. The downside is that the melting points are<br />
relatively high at 24 o C for the kernel oil and 35 o C<br />
for the palm oil. More additives are required <strong>to</strong><br />
bring down the melting points of palm oils <strong>to</strong> be<br />
comparable with rapeseed oil and soybean oil.<br />
Researchers from Universiti Malaysia Tereng‐<br />
ganu have experimented crude palm oil mixed<br />
with Irgalube 343 additive for a hydraulic test rig<br />
using the mixed fluid <strong>to</strong> actuate hydraulics linear<br />
and rotary cylinders. It is reported that after<br />
more than 100 hours of continuous testing, the<br />
fluid mixture demonstrate an increased of vis‐<br />
cosity. Obviously, further experiments with<br />
other types of additives are necessary <strong>to</strong> obtain<br />
palm oil mixture which is capable <strong>to</strong> sustain its<br />
viscosity after hours of usage [13].<br />
Another palm oil based hydraulic fluid research<br />
was done by the Malaysian Palm Oil Board<br />
(MPOB) under the Ministry of Plantation Indus‐<br />
tries and Commodities. The result was a success‐<br />
ful production of a hydraulic fluid with viscosity<br />
grade ISO 46 with good viscosity index and mod‐<br />
erately low pour point. The properties of the<br />
palm based hydraulic fluid developed by MPOB<br />
compared with typical petroleum based fluid are<br />
given in table 2 [14] .<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Table 2: Properties of the MPOB Palm Based Hydraulic Fluid,<br />
Hy‐Gard Petroleum Based Fluid and AMSOIL Synthetics [14]<br />
Based from the researches of MPOB, palm oil<br />
based hydraulic fluid is reported feasible espe‐<br />
cially for use in temperate climate i.e. in tropical<br />
countries. Comparing palm oil based hydraulic<br />
fluid with petroleum based hydraulic fluid and<br />
AMSOIL synthetic esters hydraulic fluid for com‐<br />
mon hydraulic applications, palm based fluid<br />
have similar properties except for its low pour<br />
point.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The feasibility of using vegetable oil based hy‐<br />
draulic fluids has already been proven with the<br />
development and commercial availability of<br />
rapeseed oil and soybean oil based hydraulic<br />
fluids in Europe and the United State. Comparing<br />
the properties of raw, unprocessed palm oil with<br />
other major vegetable oil indicates the possibil‐<br />
ity of utilizing palm oil as base oil for hydraulics<br />
fluid for temperate climate due <strong>to</strong> the high melt‐<br />
ing point and pour point of palm oil compared<br />
with other vegetable oils (rapeseed, canola, soy‐<br />
beans etc). Several researches has been done by<br />
Malaysian researchers on the palm based hy‐<br />
draulic fluid and its suitable additive.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
67
The technology <strong>to</strong> produce hydraulic fluid from<br />
palm oil is already available. What is needed is<br />
the capability <strong>to</strong> manufacture the fluid in size‐<br />
able quantities at an acceptable cost <strong>to</strong> pro‐<br />
mote usage especially in the maritime field. Fur‐<br />
ther step <strong>to</strong> be taken is the will of the Malaysian<br />
government <strong>to</strong> regulate the usage of environ‐<br />
mentally unsafe hydraulic fluids in Malaysian<br />
waters. Legislation has played a major role in<br />
Europe in promoting vegetable oil based fluid in<br />
high risk area. Germany for example mandated<br />
the use of environmentally friendly fluid in its<br />
waterways by prohibiting the use of petroleum<br />
based fluid on its inland waters. The legislation<br />
resulted in Germany having 45% market share<br />
of vegetable based fluids and lubricants in<br />
Europe mainly produced from rapeseed oil [10].<br />
If similar legislation can be applied in Malaysia,<br />
more interest can be expected in producing<br />
palm based hydraulic fluids for use in Malaysian<br />
waters.<br />
References:<br />
1. Skinner, Samuel K; Reilly, William K. (May 1989) (PDF).<br />
The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. National Response Team. (online)<br />
http://www.akrrt.org/Archives/Response_Reports/<br />
ExxonValdez_NRT_1989.pdf (Accessed March 9, 2008).<br />
2. Brookhaven National Labora<strong>to</strong>ry. “Biobased Hydraulic<br />
Fluid Use at Brookhaven National Labora<strong>to</strong>ry.” (online)<br />
http://www.bnl.gov/esd/pollutionpreve/docs/P2%<br />
20Award%20Nominations/Biobased%20Hydraulics.pdf<br />
(Accessed March 9, 2008)<br />
3. Honary, Lou A. T. “Soybean Based Hydraulic Fluid.”<br />
United States Patent Number 5,972,855. 26 Oct 1999<br />
4. Isbell, A. T. “Agricultural Research Series: Biodegradable<br />
Plant‐Based Hydraulic Fluid.” USDA News and Event. Nov 1998.<br />
http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/nov98/oil1198.htm<br />
United State Department of Agriculture (1998)<br />
5. Johnson, Glenn. Ed. “Environmentally Safe Hydraulic Oils<br />
Part 1 & 2. Articles posted on Feb 20, 2008. http://<br />
www.processonline.com.au/articles/749‐Environmentally‐safe‐<br />
hydraulic‐oils‐Part‐1<br />
6. Rose, B and Rivera P. “Replacement of Petroleum Based<br />
Hydraulic Fluids with a Soybean Based Alternative.” United<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
State Department of Energy. http://www.er.doe.gov/epic/docs/<br />
soypaper.htm<br />
7. Klein et al. “Triglyceride‐Based Base Oil for Hydraulic Oils.”<br />
United States Patent Number 5,618,779. 8 April 1997<br />
8. Rudnick, R.L. “Synthetics, Mineral Oil, and Bio‐Based Lubri‐<br />
cants: Chemistry and Technology.” CRC Press. 2005<br />
9. IMO (1997). “MARPOL 73/78, Consolidated Edition 1997.”<br />
London. International Maritime Organization.<br />
10. Nelson, J. “Harvesting Lubricants.” The Carbohydrate Econ‐<br />
omy. Vol 3, Issue No. 1. Fall 2000<br />
11. Calais, P. and Clark, A.R. “Waste Vegetable Oil as Diesel<br />
Replacement Fuel.” (2004) Murdoch University and Western<br />
Australia Renweable Fuels Association, Western Australia<br />
12. Tenenbaum, J.D. “Underwater Logging: Submarines Redis‐<br />
covers Lost Woods.” Environmental Health Perspectives. Vol‐<br />
ume 112, Number 15. November 2004.<br />
13. Wan Nik, W.B, Ani F.N., and Masjuki, H.H. “Rheology of<br />
Environmental Friendly Hydraulic Fluid: Effect of Aging Period,<br />
Temperature and Shear.” Proceedings of the 1 st International<br />
Conference on Natural Resources Engineering & Technology<br />
2006 24‐25 th July 2006, Putrajaya, Malaysia.<br />
14. Yeong, S.K; Ooi, TL and Salmiah A. “Palm‐Based Hydraulic<br />
Fluid.” MPOB TT No. 281. MPOB Information Series, June 2005<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
68
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 5<br />
JOINING OF DISSIMILAR MATERIALS BY DIFFUSION BONDING/ DIFFUSION<br />
WELDING FOR SHIP APPLICATION<br />
FAUZUDDIN AYOB*<br />
Department of Marine Design Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 20 September 2010; Revised: 27 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010 ; Accepted: 28 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The diffusion bonding process is normally used <strong>to</strong> fabricate parts that require high quality and strong welds, involving<br />
intricate parts that are costly or impossible <strong>to</strong> manufacture by conventional means or when the materials used are not<br />
suitable in a conventional fabrication process. This specialized welding process has found considerable acceptance in the<br />
manufacturing of aerospace, nuclear and electronics components.<br />
Explosion bonding/ welding is being applied in the mass production of ‘triclad’ of aluminum and steel joining which used<br />
as transition joints for ship of steel hull and aluminum superstructure and other ship applications. Some disadvantages of<br />
this process are it requires high energy explosive materials <strong>to</strong> be used and have <strong>to</strong> be conducted remotely as it produces<br />
incredible noise. Diffusion bonding shall be explored as the alternative process <strong>to</strong> the production of these transition<br />
joints.<br />
Keywords: Diffusion, bonding, welding, explosion bonding<br />
DEFINITION AND PRINCIPLE OF DIFFUSION<br />
BONDING<br />
Referring <strong>to</strong> the “AWS Master Chart of Weld‐<br />
ing Processes” of American Welding Society, a<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909002<br />
Email address: fauzuddin@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
relationship between diffusion bonding/ diffu‐<br />
sion welding with other solid state welding<br />
processes as well as other available welding<br />
processes was derived as in Fig. 1<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
69
Diffusion bonding is a joining process between<br />
materials w<strong>here</strong>in the principal mechanism for<br />
joint formation is solid state diffusion. Coales‐<br />
cence of the faying surface is accomplished<br />
through the application of pressure at evevated<br />
temperature. No melting and only limited macro‐<br />
scopic deformation or relative motion of the parts<br />
occurs during bonding. Microscopic deformation<br />
followed by recrystallization occurs. Near the<br />
bond zone, self diffusion in the same materials<br />
and inter diffusion between the materials takes<br />
place simultaneously. New crystalline forms of the<br />
original elements and inter‐metallic compounds<br />
may grow during the process (Paulonis, “Diffusion<br />
Welding and Brazing”).<br />
Other terms which are sometimes used synony‐<br />
mously with diffusion bonding include diffusion<br />
welding, solid state bonding, pressure bonding,<br />
isostatic bonding , and hot press bonding.<br />
A three‐stage mechanistic model, as de‐<br />
scribed by Paulonis (“Advanced Diffusion Weld‐<br />
ing Process”), shows the weld formation by diffu‐<br />
sion bonding. See Fig. 2<br />
OBJECTIVE<br />
To describe the concept of diffusion bonding/<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
welding on the joining of dissimilar materials<br />
such as aluminum alloy and steel of various car‐<br />
bon contents for ship applications.<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
The expected outcomes of this brief paper are:<br />
The influences of the bonding process parame‐<br />
ters such as bonding pressure, temperatures,<br />
holding time (duration of pressure), vacuuming<br />
and the effect of the post‐bond heat treatment<br />
on the mechanical and metallographic proper‐<br />
ties of aluminum and steel joining would be<br />
able <strong>to</strong> be analyzed, discussed and established.<br />
The effect of various carbon contents in steel and<br />
aluminum alloys on the joints properties will also<br />
be able <strong>to</strong> be analyzed, discussed and established.<br />
Optimum conditions and parameters of diffusion<br />
bonding that would result in ultimate strength and<br />
quality characteristics of diffusion bonded steel <strong>to</strong><br />
aluminum alloy are able <strong>to</strong> be determined.<br />
The above expected outcomes would make possi‐<br />
ble for the industrial production of aluminum and<br />
steel joining by diffusion bonding for ship applica‐<br />
tions<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
70
METHODOLOGY<br />
Description of Apparatus<br />
To achieve the desired outcomes, various<br />
apparatus are required, namely for diffusion<br />
bonding and post‐bond heat treatment.<br />
Apparatus for Diffusion Bonding<br />
The apparatus for diffusion bonding is de‐<br />
signed <strong>to</strong> provide compressive loading (pressing)<br />
and heating in a vacuum at the interface of a<br />
specimen <strong>to</strong> be joined. The configuration of the<br />
working part of the apparatus is shown at Fig. 3.<br />
Apparatus for Post‐Bond Heat Treatment<br />
This apparatus is designed <strong>to</strong> carry out post‐<br />
bond heat treatment for further diffusion<br />
processes <strong>to</strong> takes place in the diffusion cou‐<br />
ples obtained by diffusion bonding. A sche‐<br />
matic drawing of the annealing furnace, vac‐<br />
uum chamber, specimen and its mounting is<br />
shown in Fig. 5.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Materials and Specimen Preparation for Diffu‐<br />
sion Bonding.<br />
Materials used in this study as parent metals<br />
are commercial grade aluminum and steel with<br />
various carbon contents. These materials are<br />
cut in a lathe <strong>to</strong> cylindrical specimen of sizes;<br />
12 mm diameter by 10 mm length, and 14 mm<br />
diameter by 20 mm length for metallographic<br />
observation and tensile test specimens respec‐<br />
tively. This specimen and their assembly are<br />
shown in Fig. 6 and Fig.7 respectively. 4.3<br />
Bonding Procedure<br />
The specimens are positioned in the apparatus<br />
as shown in Fig. 3. The temperature used for the<br />
metallographic specimens is 600°C and for tensile<br />
specimen are 500°C, 550°C and 600°C. The bonding<br />
of these specimens is conducted under a dynamic<br />
vacuum pressure of the order of 10‐2 Torr for 30<br />
minute with bonding pressure of 0.5 kgf/mm.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
71
Heat Treatment Procedure<br />
Specimens for metallographic observations,<br />
after diffusional bonded, are sectioned axially<br />
in<strong>to</strong> two halves and each half is mounted in the<br />
apparatus for post‐bond heat treatment, as<br />
shown in Fig 5.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Metallographic Preparation and Examinations<br />
After diffusion heat treatment, the speci‐<br />
mens are prepared for metallography. Pho<strong>to</strong>‐<br />
graphs of the prepared metallographic speci‐<br />
mens, in the vicinity of diffusion zones, along<br />
the bonding interface are then taken by optical<br />
microscope.<br />
From the micropho<strong>to</strong>‐<br />
graphs the microstructures<br />
of the diffusion zone are<br />
examined and the diffusion<br />
layer thickness measured<br />
directly. Electron probe<br />
analysis (EPMA) is also per‐<br />
formed on some of these<br />
specimens <strong>to</strong> determine<br />
composition.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
72
Preparation and procedure for Mechanical<br />
Properties Testing<br />
Tensile test are carried out at a crosshead<br />
speed of 1.0 mm/min at room temperature. The<br />
ultimate strength and location of fracture are<br />
determined. The fractured surfaces are analyzed<br />
by X‐ray diffrac<strong>to</strong>meter using Cu‐k radiation.<br />
Fractured surfaces are observed by Scanning<br />
Electron Microscope (SEM) and frac<strong>to</strong>graphs ex‐<br />
amined. SEM pho<strong>to</strong>graphs of these interface<br />
fractured specimens are also taken.<br />
The metallographic specimens are also used<br />
for hardness testing. In this test, the microhard‐<br />
ness tester of the Vickers hardness testing ma‐<br />
chine is employed with loads of 5 and 10 grams.<br />
The hardness is measured across the bonding<br />
interface.<br />
BENEFITS OF DIFFUSION BONDING/ WELDING<br />
The diffusion bonding process is normally used<br />
<strong>to</strong> fabricate parts, when highly‐quality and high‐<br />
strength welds are required, w<strong>here</strong> part shapes<br />
are intricate and would be costly or impossible<br />
<strong>to</strong> manufacture by conventional means or when<br />
the materials used possess unique properties<br />
that interfere with, or area difficult <strong>to</strong> maintain<br />
during conventional fabrication processing. This<br />
specialized welding process has found consider‐<br />
able acceptance in the manufacturing of aero‐<br />
space, nuclear and electronics components.<br />
Further research of this concept would be<br />
beneficial at University level as it will focus on<br />
the development and validation of new joining<br />
techniques specifically for the dissimilar materi‐<br />
als such as between steel and aluminum alloy.<br />
The potential success of a possible research will<br />
contribute enormously <strong>to</strong> the development of a<br />
new welding technology and scientific knowl‐<br />
edge <strong>to</strong> the university and as an alternative fab‐<br />
rication and production methods in the marine<br />
and other related industries. Joining of alumin‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
ium superstructure <strong>to</strong> steel deck and aluminium<br />
decks (or even bulkheads) <strong>to</strong> steel hulls and<br />
other ship’s components fabrication, fitting and<br />
mounting are examples of possibility of utilizing<br />
diffusion bonding technique in marine construc‐<br />
tion.<br />
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION<br />
Realizing the important and benefits of the diffu‐<br />
sion bonding/ welding as mentioned above, it is<br />
recommended that further research <strong>to</strong> be con‐<br />
ducted at <strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong> that would benefit the aca‐<br />
demic fraternity in particular and the related indus‐<br />
tries in general.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1.AWS. 1938. “The AWS Master Chart of Welding Process”.<br />
AWS Welding Handbook American Welding Society, Miami,<br />
Florida<br />
2.D.F. Paulonis, “Diffusion Welding and Brazing”, Pratt and<br />
Whitney Aircraft Group, United Technologies, USA.<br />
3. D.F. Paulonis, “Advanced Diffusion Welding Process”, Pratt<br />
and Whitney Aircraft Group, United Technologies, USA.<br />
4.Tadashi Momono, 1990. “Diffusion Bonding of Cast Iron <strong>to</strong><br />
Steel under Atmospheric Pressure”, Casting Science and Tech‐<br />
nology, The Japan Foundrymen Society, Japan.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
73
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 6<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE CARRIAGE OF LIQUIFIED<br />
NATURAL GAS (LNG) WITHIN COASTAL WATER FROM CARRIER ASPECT<br />
(OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE)<br />
ASMAWI BIN ABDUL MALIK*<br />
Department of Marine Construction & Maintenance Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 12 July 2010; Revised: 2 August 2010 ; Accepted: 18 August 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The inevitable LNG evolution in<strong>to</strong> coastal waters had reflected the lack and absence of clear guidelines on legal frame‐<br />
work for governing the carriage of liquefied natural gas (LNG) within coastal water. IMO (Agenda item 21, MSC 83/<br />
INF.3/2007) does not pay much attention <strong>to</strong> sustainable coastal water transport development due <strong>to</strong> the novelty of such<br />
industry and the traditional procedures of UN developmental bodies, that normally needs sufficient time <strong>to</strong> consider new<br />
and emerging phenomenon in their agenda of work. Thus it is a major source of inefficiency and unsafe operation of the<br />
LNG carriage along the coast line. To date, t<strong>here</strong> is no extension for LNG carriage within coastal waters on every estab‐<br />
lished rules and regulation. The main purpose of this study is <strong>to</strong> develop a legal framework model for the LNG transporta‐<br />
tion and carriage by using the IDEF0 structured modeling technique. The modeling process is divided in<strong>to</strong> three phases,<br />
(i) the information gathering, (ii) the model development and (ii) the experts’ evaluation and validation. In the first phase,<br />
information on existing current legal practices were obtained through the literature study from applicable rules, regula‐<br />
tions, conventions, procedures, policies, research papers and accident cases. In the second phase, a process model was<br />
drafted through an iterative process using the IDEF0 and the questionnaire is developed. From the questionnaire pilot<br />
test, each question blocks has shown an acceptable Cronbach’s Alpha value which is above 0.70. In the third phase, the<br />
preliminary of legal framework model is tested through forty five (45) potential respondents from various fields in legal<br />
practices and thirty eight (38) responded. A promising result was obtained w<strong>here</strong> data exhibit normal distribution trend,<br />
even though every group has their own stand on the legal framework. The ANOVA output has generated P‐values of<br />
0.000. If P is less than or equal <strong>to</strong> the a‐level, one or more mean value are significantly different. Through data correla‐<br />
tion test, the correlated element blocks show a range of 0.0 <strong>to</strong> 0.4. A legal framework model for the LNG carriage within<br />
coastal water was constructed in the stand alone mode covering each aspect.<br />
Keywords: Legal framework model, LNG carriage, structured modelling technique definition, Cronbach’s Alpha, ANOVA and Correlation.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In tandem with the increasing Liquefied Natu‐<br />
ral Gas (LNG) production in the emerging mar‐<br />
ket, the LNG is depleting fast and will be re‐<br />
quired on a major scale <strong>to</strong> feed the world’s<br />
biggest gas market. T<strong>here</strong>fore, attention is<br />
needed <strong>to</strong> focus largely on the safety and secu‐<br />
rity of LNG transported by marine transporta‐<br />
tion at commercial facilities near populated<br />
areas. As the nation’s LNG facility become de‐<br />
veloped, t<strong>here</strong> is no special framework for the<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909051<br />
Email address: asmawiam@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
LNG coastal transportation. In response <strong>to</strong> the<br />
overall safety and security environment re‐<br />
quirement, it is wise <strong>to</strong> seek a coastal water<br />
legal framework covering a broader under‐<br />
standing of hazardous chemical marine ship‐<br />
ments and efforts <strong>to</strong> secure them. Recognizing<br />
these fatal fac<strong>to</strong>rs is important in promoting<br />
for a legal framework for LNG transportation in<br />
coastal water.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
74
Objective of the Research<br />
The research on development of legal frame‐<br />
work governing the carriage of LNG within<br />
coastal water is expected <strong>to</strong> derive:<br />
�� relevant element(s) for a legal framework<br />
on the carriage of LNG within coastal water<br />
3.0 Research Statement<br />
In order <strong>to</strong> create relevant legal framework ele‐<br />
ment (s), several situations identified are <strong>to</strong> in‐<br />
fluence fac<strong>to</strong>rs for safe transportation. The<br />
situations are as follows:<br />
�� Liberalization of importers power and gas<br />
market.<br />
�� Number of receiving or discharging<br />
�� Geographical <strong>to</strong>pography that reduces the<br />
ability of LNG transportation.<br />
�� The high cost of pipeline network and de‐<br />
gasification area development and invest‐<br />
ment.<br />
�� As people keep pace with the development,<br />
energy plans faces high resistance of NIMBY<br />
and BANANA which stand for Not In My<br />
Backyard (NIMBY) and Build Absolutely<br />
Nothing Anyw<strong>here</strong> Near Anything<br />
(BANANA), are being highlighted from the<br />
end user perspective w<strong>here</strong> people per‐<br />
ceive the LNG s<strong>to</strong>rage as a time bomb.<br />
�� Imbalance in demand and supply of the LNG.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Methodology<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
75
Background and Problem Statement<br />
The paper (Industries Energy, Utilities & Mining,<br />
2007) has highlighted as the following:<br />
“Many companies are struggling <strong>to</strong> optimize<br />
their LNG portfolio of assets and contracts in<br />
a way that maximizes value. Opportunities<br />
for ‘arbitrage’ profits require ever more<br />
clever valuation and modeling. The companies<br />
that identify, assess and manage the<br />
increasingly complex interdependencies and<br />
uncertainties in the evolving LNG market will<br />
be the ones who take the profits. LNG relies<br />
on two vital ingredients – infrastructure and<br />
gas”<br />
The situation has indirectly rerouted the<br />
existing LNG system in<strong>to</strong> a new market regime<br />
especially on its facilities from onshore <strong>to</strong> the<br />
coastal trend. It has induced the market player<br />
<strong>to</strong> get in<strong>to</strong> this particular regime as it requires<br />
no land requisition. Thus a real ‘new world gas<br />
market’ began <strong>to</strong> emerge. However a ‘world gas<br />
market’ should not be confused with the much<br />
more flexible world oil market (Jensen, 2004).<br />
The Industries Energy, Utilities & Mining (2007)<br />
also highlighted on the regula<strong>to</strong>ry aspects fol‐<br />
lows:<br />
“Taking account of regula<strong>to</strong>ry risk “LNG operations<br />
are spreading <strong>to</strong> many new locations.<br />
The maturity and format of regula<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
frameworks vary considerably. The economic<br />
viability of an LNG chain can be influenced<br />
significantly by national or regional regulation,<br />
particularly on regasification facilities.”<br />
Although several frameworks have<br />
been developed by the LNG players such as Ball<br />
et al, (2006), who proposed a legal framework<br />
for the Taiwanese government it is specifically<br />
for procurement activities in Taiwan. As in Not‐<br />
teboom et al (2004), the only focused area in<br />
Snøhvit project Norway is on LNG port manage‐<br />
ment. T<strong>here</strong> is no formal framework <strong>to</strong> govern<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
the carriage of this particular dangerous goods<br />
carriage. Hence, a special attention on the de‐<br />
velopment of the Legal Framework on the<br />
Coastal Water for LNG transportation and appli‐<br />
cation is required.<br />
The immediate sign of market demand is<br />
the clear indication that LNG transportation will<br />
centre on the downstream activities as compared <strong>to</strong><br />
the upstream. Product distribution which cover the<br />
following aspects:<br />
�Overcoming problems associated with the trans‐<br />
portation of LNG by land.<br />
�Towards cost effective LNG transportation in<br />
downstream market activities.<br />
�Provision of a healthy, safe and secure environ‐<br />
ment of LNG transportation /carriage within<br />
coastal water.<br />
Morimo<strong>to</strong> (2006) estimated the world LNG<br />
consumption exponentially rises from 139 m/<strong>to</strong>ns<br />
<strong>to</strong> 286 m/<strong>to</strong>ns in his JGC Fiscal Interim Result. The<br />
above prediction is supported by Nilsen (2007),<br />
research on LNG Trade Volume, w<strong>here</strong> momen‐<br />
<strong>to</strong>us growth of short‐term trade from 1998 <strong>to</strong><br />
2006 as shown in Figure 2.1. Thus, existing facili‐<br />
ties need <strong>to</strong> be tripled by 2020 by all means and<br />
sizes as in Figure 2.2.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
76
Figure 2.1: LNG Trade Volume 1998, 2002 & 2006<br />
(Nilsen, 2007)<br />
Figure 2.2: Outlook for World LNG Demand (Morimo<strong>to</strong> 2006)<br />
The future LNG export terminals will be<br />
larger as <strong>to</strong> cater the needs and supply, based<br />
in remote locations with no infrastructure and<br />
subjected <strong>to</strong> extreme weather conditions.<br />
T<strong>here</strong>fore, conventional construction ap‐<br />
proaches will no longer be cost and time effec‐<br />
tive. The direction for future development has<br />
been reinforced by the few inventions of sub‐<br />
players of the Oil & Gas Company such as the<br />
following and in Figure 2.3.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
�� Proposed development of smaller scale re‐<br />
gasification terminals.<br />
�� Proposed development of Liquefaction hubs.<br />
�� Alternative source and uses of LNG.<br />
�� Gas s<strong>to</strong>rage for peak sharing.<br />
�� Proposed development of Shipboard regasi‐<br />
fication.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
77
Figure 2.3 Illustration of Future Expansion in Coastal Water<br />
(Kaalstad, 2006).<br />
Traditionally, the regulation of maritime<br />
transport operations by seafaring countries has<br />
been motivated by the desire <strong>to</strong> establish and<br />
maintain:<br />
�� Standards as regards maritime safety and<br />
the protection of the marine environment;<br />
�� Participation of national fleets in the trans‐<br />
port of its trade (although by and large in the<br />
OECD t<strong>here</strong> exists unrestricted market ac‐<br />
cess);<br />
�� Commercial regulations aimed at facilitat‐<br />
ing the orderly conduct of business; and<br />
�� The ability of sea carriers <strong>to</strong> operate tradi‐<br />
tional co‐operative liner services despite<br />
the presence of laws in many countries<br />
aimed at preventing anti‐competitive be‐<br />
haviors.<br />
As mentioned by Luketa, A. et al (2008); such,<br />
the risk mitigation and risk management ap‐<br />
proaches suggested in the 2004 report are still<br />
appropriate for use with the larger capacity<br />
ships. Proactive risk management approaches<br />
can reduce both the potential and the hazards<br />
of such events. The approaches could include:<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
�� Improvements in ship and termi‐<br />
nal safety/security systems,<br />
�� Modifications <strong>to</strong> improve effec‐<br />
tiveness of LNG tanker escorts, vessel<br />
movement control zones, and safety<br />
operations near ports and terminals,<br />
�� Improved surveillance and<br />
searches, and<br />
�� Improved emergency response<br />
coordination and communications<br />
with first responders and public<br />
safety officials.<br />
In this particular project research, the quanti‐<br />
tative survey technique is being applied. The<br />
result from the quantitative input, will be<br />
tested through descriptive statistic and the<br />
interference statistic. The descriptive statistic<br />
will interrogate the sample characteristic and<br />
the interference will drill in<strong>to</strong> sample popula‐<br />
tion.<br />
Results on Carrier Aspect – Operational Proce‐<br />
dure<br />
Table 3.1 shows the analysis on the sur‐<br />
vey data obtained from the block of question‐<br />
naires aimed at confirming ‘Operational Proce‐<br />
dure’ as an element of the legal framework. The<br />
table shows an overall mean of 4.0683 and an<br />
overall standard deviation of 0.3869. Question<br />
1, 2, 8, 9 and 10 return with individual means<br />
above 4.0. Question 10 “LNG ships handling<br />
procedures while in harbour and restricted ba‐<br />
sin are more stringent” scores the highest mean<br />
4.526 with standard deviation of 0.647. The rest<br />
of the questions (question 3, 4, 5, & 7) return<br />
with individual means lower than 4.0. Question<br />
6 “Coastal LNG ships require more crew than<br />
deep sea LNG ships” returns with the lowest<br />
mean of 3.368 and with standard deviation of<br />
1.207.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
78
Mean<br />
Median<br />
Table 3.1: Carrier Aspect – Operational Procedure<br />
3.4<br />
3.8<br />
3.6<br />
3.9<br />
Figure 3.1: B1 Graphical Summary<br />
Figure 3.1 shows the graphic plot of the<br />
analysis on this block of data. It shows p‐value is<br />
0.378. As the level of significance is above 0.05,<br />
the data is in normal distribution. The variance is<br />
0.1497. The skewness is ‐0.499290 indicating<br />
that the distribution is left‐skewed. The confi‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
3.8<br />
4.0<br />
4.0<br />
4.1<br />
4.2<br />
4.2<br />
dence intervals at 95% confident level are:<br />
Summary for B1 Average of Q uestion<br />
9 5 % C o n f id e n c e I n t e r v a ls<br />
4.4<br />
4.3<br />
4.6<br />
4.4<br />
A n d e rs o n -D a rlin g N o rm a lity T e s t<br />
A -S q u a re d<br />
0.36<br />
P -V alue 0.378<br />
M ean 4.0683<br />
S tD ev 0.3869<br />
V ariance 0.1497<br />
S kew ness -0.499290<br />
K ur<strong>to</strong>sis -0.881537<br />
N 1 0<br />
M inimum 3.3684<br />
1st Q uartile 3.7632<br />
M edian 4.1184<br />
3rd Q uartile 4.4268<br />
M aximum 4.5263<br />
9 5 % C o n fid e n ce I n te rv a l fo r M e a n<br />
3.7915<br />
4.3451<br />
9 5 % C o n fid e n ce I n te rv a l fo r M e d ia n<br />
3.7534 4.4294<br />
9 5 % C o n fid e n ce I n te rv a l fo r S tD e v<br />
0.2661 0.7063<br />
�� µ (mean) is between 3.7915 and 4.3451.<br />
�� σ (standard deviation) is between<br />
0.2661 and 0.7063.<br />
�� the median is between 3.7534 and<br />
4.4294.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
79
Percent<br />
99<br />
95<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
5<br />
1<br />
3.0<br />
Discussion on Result<br />
Figure 3.2: Probability Plot of B1 Data<br />
The result discussion will cover on demo‐<br />
graphic of the respondents, data distribution and<br />
ANOVA and also correlation. The raw data is exe‐<br />
cuted by using Minitab Software and SPSS Statis‐<br />
tical Software<br />
Demographic<br />
Probability Plot of B1 Average of Q uestion<br />
Norm al<br />
3.5<br />
Significantly, the majority of the feed‐<br />
back by the respondents are on the ‘positive<br />
mode or positive inclination’ <strong>to</strong>ward the re‐<br />
search hypothesis. The returned status of the<br />
questionnaire is 84.4%. The respondents are<br />
92.1% men which reflect oil and gas industry<br />
practice w<strong>here</strong> they usually prefer male em‐<br />
ployees.<br />
4.0<br />
4.5<br />
B1 A verage of Question<br />
The 81.6% respondents are over 30<br />
years of age, which indicates the respondents<br />
have enough experience <strong>to</strong> be involved in this<br />
survey and all of the respondents have formal<br />
education. It means that they have been<br />
equipped with relevant knowledge on the oil and<br />
gas operation. Above 75% said that they are well<br />
aware of the LNG business development.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Distribution<br />
5.0<br />
Mean 4.068<br />
S tD ev 0.3869<br />
N 10<br />
RJ 0.967<br />
P-Value >0.100<br />
To expand the idea of a drawn up legal<br />
framework, every legal aspect needs <strong>to</strong> be veri‐<br />
fied through the survey. Questionnaires need <strong>to</strong><br />
be developed from the hypothesis legal frame‐<br />
work, then each of it need <strong>to</strong> be correlated. Be‐<br />
fore proceeding in<strong>to</strong> the data collection, the<br />
questionnaires need <strong>to</strong> be subjected through<br />
pilot test so that only effective questionnaires<br />
are sent out. Selective target groups who have<br />
legal knowledge will be taken in<strong>to</strong> considera‐<br />
tion. Based on Kreijie and Morgan,(1970), De‐<br />
termine Sample Size for Research Education<br />
and Physiological Measurement, the author has<br />
selected the 45 number of sample size. Then as<br />
referred <strong>to</strong> Nazila (2007), she quoted Abdul<br />
Ghafar (1999), when samples came from one<br />
population it is categorized as case study sam‐<br />
ple. In relation with current project, selected<br />
group is being considered which have know<br />
how knowledge on the LNG carriage. The data<br />
collection and compilation is needed during the<br />
second phase of project. The data is collected<br />
according <strong>to</strong> requirement of the application<br />
w<strong>here</strong> it is able <strong>to</strong> represent <strong>to</strong> the situation<br />
required.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
80
From the result in Table 3.1, it shows that the<br />
mean value have ‘Relevant’ status. The differ‐<br />
ence between mean and variance is ± 0.3869<br />
which is 9.51%. The result is way above the alpha<br />
value (5%) is mainly due <strong>to</strong> Q3 <strong>to</strong> Q6. These<br />
questions are about ‘Manning’ issue. It is under‐<br />
standable because t<strong>here</strong> are 84.21% not directly<br />
involved on the operation. They may not truly<br />
understand the basic requirement of LNG crew<br />
task. From the highest mean of question 10, it<br />
shows the majority of the respondents agreed<br />
on the coastal LNG operation demands for detail<br />
LNG ship operation procedure and handling.<br />
Closing Remarks<br />
The legal framework on the LNG car‐<br />
riage within coastal water is the extended ver‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
sion of the current legal guide. As it is a new<br />
revolution that LNG carriage will inevitable<br />
come <strong>to</strong> the coastal zones, t<strong>here</strong> is no literature<br />
of what have been done previously. This is high‐<br />
lighting the new miles<strong>to</strong>ne of the legal develop‐<br />
ment. Hence, this study was conducted <strong>to</strong> iden‐<br />
tify the legal framework component as <strong>to</strong> en‐<br />
sure safe and secure coastal water operation.<br />
This study shows that legal framework is re‐<br />
quired in term of carrier aspect as identified at<br />
Figure 8.1. However, from this study we also<br />
know that the most important fac<strong>to</strong>r is safe<br />
handling. The legal framework is expected <strong>to</strong><br />
reduce the implication and impact <strong>to</strong> the sur‐<br />
rounding in the event of mishandling or any<br />
mishaps.<br />
Figure 8.1 Legal Framework for Coastal LNG Carriage<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
81
Recommendations and Suggestions<br />
Based on the finding of the study, <strong>here</strong> are some<br />
recommendation and suggestion in the hope <strong>to</strong><br />
assist future researcher and for the benefit of all<br />
LNG group of people. Based on the intended set‐<br />
ting of the study, it would be fruitful for future<br />
researcher <strong>to</strong> get more elements included in the<br />
framework. It can be done with further research<br />
and conference involvement. Collaboration with<br />
oil and gas companies such as MISC, PETRONAS<br />
and SHELL would bring about greater point of<br />
view. Experience in admiralty cases would pro‐<br />
duce greater impact on the legal framework de‐<br />
velopment. Future researchers have <strong>to</strong> look in<strong>to</strong><br />
the possibility <strong>to</strong> expand the components.<br />
References<br />
1. Industries Energy, Utilities & Mining, (2007), Value and<br />
Growth in the liquefied natural gas market. [Brochure].<br />
Price Water House Coopers<br />
2. Kaalstad, J.,P., (2006), Offshore LNG Terminals Capital Mar‐<br />
kets Day, APL Incorporation<br />
3. Krejcie, R., V., and Morgan, D., W., (1970), Determining<br />
Sample Sizes for Research Activities: Educational and Psy‐<br />
hological Measurement, 30(3): 607 – 610<br />
4. Koji Morita (2003), “LNG: Falling Prices and Increasing<br />
Flexibility of Supply—Risk Redistribution Creates Contract<br />
Diversity,” International Institute of Energy Economics,<br />
Japan.<br />
5. Luketa, A., M., and Michael, H., Steve A., (2008), Breach<br />
and Safety Analysis of Spills Over Water from Large Lique‐<br />
fied Natural Gas Carriers, Sandia Report<br />
6. Maritime Safety Committee, (2007), Formal Safety Assess‐<br />
ment of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Carriers, Interna‐<br />
tional Maritime Organization (IMO)<br />
7. Morimo<strong>to</strong>, S., (2006), Fiscal 2006 Interim Result Briefing,<br />
JGC Corporation<br />
8. Nazila Abdullah (2007), Kajian Terhadap Kaedah Mengajar,<br />
Kefahaman, dan Pandangan Guru Terhadap Konsep Seko‐<br />
lah Bestari di Sebuah Sekolah di Daerah Kulai, Universiti<br />
Teknologi Malaysia<br />
9. Revised Draft EIR (2006), Cabrillo Port Liquefied Natural<br />
Gas Deepwater Port<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
82
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 7<br />
OBSERVATION ON VARIOUS TECHNIQUES OF NETWORK RECONFIGURATION<br />
WARDIAH DAHALAN*<br />
Department of Marine Electric and Electronics Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 27 May 2010; Revised: 2 August 2010 ; Accepted: 12 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The shipboard power system supplies energy <strong>to</strong> sophisticated systems for weapons, communications, navigation, and<br />
operation. After a fault is encountered, reconfiguration of a shipboard power system becomes a critical activity that is<br />
required <strong>to</strong> either res<strong>to</strong>re service <strong>to</strong> a lost load or <strong>to</strong> meet some operational requirements of the ship. Reconfiguration<br />
refers <strong>to</strong> changing the <strong>to</strong>pology of the power system in order <strong>to</strong> isolate system damage and/or optimize certain charac‐<br />
teristics of the system related <strong>to</strong> power efficiency. When finding the optimal state, it is important <strong>to</strong> have a method that<br />
finds the desired state within a short amount of time, in order <strong>to</strong> allow fast response for the system. Since the reconfigu‐<br />
ration problem is highly nonlinear over a domain of discrete variables, various techniques have been proposed by the<br />
researchers. The main tasks of this thesis include reviewing the shipboard power system characteristics, studying and<br />
reviewing shipboard power system integrated protection, shipboard power distribution systems and typical loads of ship‐<br />
board power system. A variety of techniques used in previous works have been explained in methodologies review.<br />
Many criteria and concepts are used as the basis for consideration in order <strong>to</strong> achieve the desired objectives.<br />
Keyword: Reconfiguration, Fault Location, Service res<strong>to</strong>ration, Distribution Power System<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The Navy ship electric power system supplies<br />
energy <strong>to</strong> the weapons, communication sys‐<br />
tems, navigation systems, and operation sys‐<br />
tems. The reliability and survivability of a Ship‐<br />
board Power Systems (SPS) are critical <strong>to</strong> the<br />
mission of a ship, especially under battle condi‐<br />
tions. SPS are geographically spread all along<br />
the ship. They consist of various components<br />
such as genera<strong>to</strong>rs, cables, switchboards, load<br />
centres, circuit breakers, bus transfer switches,<br />
fuse and load.<br />
The genera<strong>to</strong>rs in SPS are connected in ring<br />
configuration through genera<strong>to</strong>r switchboards<br />
[1]. Bus tie circuit breakers interconnect the<br />
genera<strong>to</strong>r switchboards which allow for the<br />
transfer of power from one switchboard <strong>to</strong><br />
another. Load centers and some loads are<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909018<br />
Email address: wardiah@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
supplied from genera<strong>to</strong>r switchboards. Load<br />
centers in turn supply power <strong>to</strong> power panels<br />
<strong>to</strong> which different loads are connected. Feed‐<br />
ers then supply power <strong>to</strong> load centers and<br />
power panels. The distribution of loads is ra‐<br />
dial in nature. For vital loads, two sources of<br />
power (normal and alternate) are provided<br />
from separate sources via au<strong>to</strong>matic bus<br />
transfers (ABTs) or manual bus transfers<br />
(MBTs). Further, vital loads are isolated from<br />
non‐vital loads <strong>to</strong> accommodate load shed‐<br />
ding during an electrical system causality.<br />
Circuit breakers(CBs) and fuses are provided at<br />
different locations in order <strong>to</strong> remove faulted<br />
loads, genera<strong>to</strong>rs or distribution systems from<br />
unfaulted portions of the system. These faults<br />
could be due <strong>to</strong> material causalities of individual<br />
loads or cables or due <strong>to</strong> widespread system<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
83
fault due <strong>to</strong> battle damage. Because of the<br />
faults and after isolating the fault, t<strong>here</strong> are<br />
unfaulted sections which are left without sup‐<br />
ply. It is required <strong>to</strong> quickly res<strong>to</strong>re supply <strong>to</strong><br />
these unfaulted sections of the SPS. This is ac‐<br />
complished by changing the configuration of<br />
the system by opening and/or closing some<br />
switches (CBsMBTs/ABTs) <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re supply <strong>to</strong><br />
maximum load in the unfaulted section of SPS<br />
<strong>to</strong> continue the present mission [28].<br />
Shipboard Power System Characteristics<br />
Today’s SPS generally use three‐phase power<br />
generated and distributed in an ungrounded<br />
configuration. The ungrounded systems can<br />
keep equipment in continued operations in the<br />
event of the single‐phase ground fault. Un‐<br />
grounded systems mean all cabling are insulated<br />
from the ship hull. Thus, it optimizes continuity<br />
of power (increase equipment reliability).<br />
SPS have different characteristics from typical<br />
utility power systems in overall configuration<br />
and load characteristics. Some of the unique<br />
characteristics of the SPSs are as follows: [38]<br />
�� T<strong>here</strong> is very little rotational inertia relative<br />
<strong>to</strong> load in SPS.<br />
�� SPS are geographically smaller than utility<br />
power systems.<br />
�� SPS is an isolated system with no power<br />
supply from outside power system.<br />
�� SPS has a wider frequency range compared<br />
<strong>to</strong> the terrestrial power system.<br />
�� Shipboard prime movers typically have<br />
shorter time constant than prime movers in<br />
�� terrestrial power systems.<br />
�� Due <strong>to</strong> the limited space on shipboard, SPS<br />
does not have a transmission system.<br />
�� The electric power in SPS is transmitted<br />
through short cables. It leads <strong>to</strong> less power<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
loss and voltage drop as copared <strong>to</strong> terrestrial<br />
power systems.<br />
�� T<strong>here</strong> is a large portion of nonlinear loads rela‐<br />
tive <strong>to</strong> the power generation capability.<br />
�� In SPS, a large number of electric components<br />
are tightly coupled in a small space.<br />
�� A fault happens in one part of the SPS may af‐<br />
fect other parts of the SPS.<br />
�� A large number of electronic loads, such as<br />
combat, control and communication<br />
�� sensors, radia<strong>to</strong>rs, and computers are sensitive<br />
<strong>to</strong> power interruptions and power quality.<br />
�� Some electrical components, which affect the<br />
reconfiguration process, are unique <strong>to</strong> SPS such<br />
as Au<strong>to</strong>matic Bus Transfers (ABT), Manual Bus<br />
Transfers (MBT), Low Voltage Protection de‐<br />
vices (LVPs), and Low Voltage Release devices<br />
(LVRs).<br />
Due <strong>to</strong> these unique characteristics of the SPS,<br />
some of the mathematical expediencies used in<br />
terrestrial power system analysis may not be appli‐<br />
cable <strong>to</strong> SPS accordingly. For example, infinite<br />
buses and slack buses do not have manifestations<br />
in SPSs. Constant voltage, constant frequency, and<br />
constant power simplifications are usually invalid in<br />
SPS. Also, the SPSs are tightly coupled both electri‐<br />
cally and mechanically, requiring integrated model‐<br />
ling of both systems [44]. A brief overview of the<br />
loads in the SPS is explained in the following sec‐<br />
tion.<br />
Loads in the SPS<br />
The loads in the SPS provide various services <strong>to</strong><br />
the ship. According <strong>to</strong> the importance of the ser‐<br />
vices being provided, the loads in the SPS can be<br />
classified in<strong>to</strong> non‐vital, semi‐vital, and vital‐loads<br />
in increasing priority order as follows:<br />
Non‐vital (Non‐essential) ‐ Readily sheddable<br />
loads that can be immediately secured without<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
84
adversely affecting ship operations, survivability,<br />
or life. Examples are hotel loads such as heating<br />
and galley; ship, avionics, and ground support<br />
equipment shops; aircraft fueling systems; refrig‐<br />
eration systems; and other loads that can be<br />
shut down for a short time until full electric<br />
power capability is res<strong>to</strong>red.<br />
Semi‐vital (Semi‐essential) ‐ Loads important <strong>to</strong><br />
the ship but that can be shut down or switched<br />
<strong>to</strong> the alternate plant in order <strong>to</strong> prevent <strong>to</strong>tal<br />
loss of ship’s electrical power. Examples include<br />
aircraft and cargo eleva<strong>to</strong>rs, assault systems,<br />
some radar, communications, and seawater ser‐<br />
vice pumps.<br />
Vital (Essential) – Non‐sheddable loads that af‐<br />
fects the survivability of ship or life. Power <strong>to</strong><br />
these loads is not intentionally interrupted as<br />
part of a load shedding scheme. Examples of vi‐<br />
tal loads are genera<strong>to</strong>rs, boilers, and their auxil‐<br />
iaries; close‐in weapon systems; electronic coun‐<br />
termeasures; tactical data system equipments<br />
with volatile memories; medical and dental op‐<br />
erating rooms; and primary air search radar.<br />
The vital loads are required <strong>to</strong> be connected <strong>to</strong><br />
two independent power sources in the SPS. If a<br />
load is classified as vital load at any major mis‐<br />
sion of the ship, such as propulsion system, it has<br />
<strong>to</strong> be connected <strong>to</strong> the SPS through Au<strong>to</strong>matic<br />
Bus Transfer (ABT). ABT is a device that can<br />
sense the loss of power from normal power<br />
source. When normal power is absent, ABT can<br />
au<strong>to</strong>matically disconnect the load from the nor‐<br />
mal power and switch the load’s power flow<br />
from an alternate power source. ABTs are de‐<br />
signed <strong>to</strong> transfer loads very quickly. If a load is<br />
classified as a vital load in some missions and a<br />
non‐vital load in other missions, such as the<br />
lighting system, the load is connected <strong>to</strong> its SPS<br />
through a Manual Bus Transfer (MBT). MBT is a<br />
device, like an ABT, that can connect loads either<br />
<strong>to</strong> a normal power source or <strong>to</strong> an alternate<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
power source. But unlike the ABT, the MBT must<br />
be shifted manually by an opera<strong>to</strong>r when the<br />
opera<strong>to</strong>r notices that the load’s primary source<br />
of power becomes unavailable. Loads that are<br />
classified as non‐vital loads in any missions are<br />
connected <strong>to</strong> only one power source in the SPS.<br />
The electric loads are hard wired <strong>to</strong> their source<br />
(s) at the time of ship construction. How “vital”<br />
they are is determined at that time and does not<br />
change unless the power system hardware is<br />
modified [36]. One of the important aspects in<br />
considering loads in SPS is Protection and inte‐<br />
grated power system is one type of protection in<br />
SPS.<br />
Integrated Power System (IPS)<br />
The IPS design is applied because it is simpler<br />
and cheaper, and better <strong>to</strong> centrally produce a<br />
commodity such as electricity, than <strong>to</strong> locally<br />
produce it with the user of commodity. In the<br />
IPS, the ship service and the propulsion loads are<br />
provided by a common set of genera<strong>to</strong>rs. The<br />
integrated power systems are currently used for<br />
a wide range of ship applications. The primary<br />
advantage of using integrated power systems is<br />
the flexibility <strong>to</strong> shift power between the propul‐<br />
sion and mission‐critical loads as needed. The<br />
integrated power system can also improve the<br />
survivability and reliability of the SPS. It has been<br />
identified as the next generation technology for<br />
SPS platform and an important step <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />
the all‐electric ship initiative [44].<br />
In SPSs, different faults may occur because of<br />
equipment insulation failures, over voltages<br />
caused by switching surges, or battle damage.<br />
Shipboard power protection systems are re‐<br />
quired <strong>to</strong> detect faults and undesirable condi‐<br />
tions and quickly remove the faults from the<br />
power system.<br />
Shipboard power protection systems are also<br />
required <strong>to</strong> maintain power balance for the re‐<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
85
maining part of the power system au<strong>to</strong>matically<br />
and quickly. T<strong>here</strong>fore, an integrated power pro‐<br />
tection system is necessary for SPSs <strong>to</strong> maximize<br />
service continuity and minimize loss‐of‐load<br />
caused by accidental system abnormal behaviour<br />
or hostile damage. Special characteristics of the<br />
shipboard power system, such as short cable<br />
length, high impedance grounding, and multiple<br />
possible system operation configurations, im‐<br />
pose unique challenges on designing the protec‐<br />
tion system for shipboard power systems. A well<br />
‐designed protection system should protect the<br />
overall power system from the effect of system<br />
components that have been faulted and should<br />
adapt <strong>to</strong> the power system reconfiguration prac‐<br />
tices without any human intervention [39].<br />
The integrated power system has two essential<br />
functions: fault detection and post‐fault recon‐<br />
figuration. Currently, t<strong>here</strong> are three available<br />
fault detection schemes including over‐current,<br />
distance, and differential schemes. The over‐<br />
current fault detection scheme is difficult <strong>to</strong> co‐<br />
ordinate for minimizing the fault isolation of<br />
power systems having multiple sources at differ‐<br />
ent locations, such as shipboard power systems.<br />
The distance fault detection scheme is also not<br />
suitable for a shipboard power system with short<br />
transmission and distribution lines. On the other<br />
hand, the differential fault detection scheme is<br />
faster and more reliable for shipboard power<br />
systems with system level measurements. Ship‐<br />
board power system fast fault detection can be<br />
implemented by the dynamic‐zone‐selection<br />
based differential protection scheme, which trips<br />
only the required circuit breakers <strong>to</strong> isolate the<br />
fault. Shipboard power post‐fault reconfigura‐<br />
tion function, also called fast reconfiguration<br />
function, will evaluate the outcome of the fault<br />
and reconfigure the unfaulted part of the power<br />
system <strong>to</strong> minimize the loss‐of‐load.<br />
The main objective of Shipboard power distribu‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
tion systems are designed <strong>to</strong> minimize the size<br />
and weight, save money, and improve the surviv‐<br />
ability of the vessel. Additionally, shipboard<br />
power distribution systems are desired <strong>to</strong> pos‐<br />
sess the ability <strong>to</strong> continually transfer power <strong>to</strong><br />
vital systems during and after fault conditions.<br />
T<strong>here</strong> are two possible types of shipboard power<br />
distribution architecture radial and zonal.<br />
Radial electric Power Distribution<br />
Distribution lines are usually radial and operate<br />
at low‐level voltages in a radial shipboard power<br />
system. Current shipboard radial electric power<br />
distribution systems have multiple genera<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
(typically three or four), which are connected <strong>to</strong><br />
switchboards. The genera<strong>to</strong>rs could be steam<br />
turbine, gas turbines, or diesel engines. The gen‐<br />
era<strong>to</strong>rs are operated either in a split plant or a<br />
parallel configuration. The 450V, 60Hz three<br />
phase ac power is then distributed <strong>to</strong> load cen‐<br />
ters. Each load is classified as being nonessential,<br />
semi‐essential, or essential . If t<strong>here</strong> is any gen‐<br />
eration capacity loss, a load shedding algorithm<br />
will be initiated based on load priority<br />
In a current navy ship power system, three‐<br />
phase step‐down power transformers are nor‐<br />
mally used. Both the transformer primary and<br />
secondary windings are connected in a delta,<br />
resulting in no reliable current path from the<br />
power lines <strong>to</strong> the ship’s hull. T<strong>here</strong>fore, the sys‐<br />
tem has a high impedance ground and will not<br />
be affected by single phase grounded fault.<br />
Zonal electric power distribution<br />
The zonal power distribution system consists of<br />
two main power distribution buses running lon‐<br />
gitudinally along the port and starboard side of<br />
the ship. One main bus would be positioned well<br />
above the waterline while the other would be<br />
located below the waterline, which maximizes<br />
the distance between buses and improves the<br />
survivability [47]. The effects of damage <strong>to</strong> the<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
86
distributed system and other equipment should<br />
not disturb genera<strong>to</strong>rs. The zonal architecture is<br />
flexible and saves the cost for short switchboard<br />
feeder cables and elimination of distribution<br />
transformers. A zonal distribution system also<br />
allows for equipment installation and testing<br />
prior <strong>to</strong> zone assembly [46].<br />
Need for Reconfiguration<br />
Faults in a shipboard power system may occur<br />
due <strong>to</strong> material casualties of individual loads or<br />
widespread fault due <strong>to</strong> battle damage. In addi‐<br />
tion <strong>to</strong> load faults, casualties can happen <strong>to</strong> ca‐<br />
bles, power generating equipment, or power<br />
distribution buses. If the fault is severe, such as a<br />
genera<strong>to</strong>r fault, it may cause a power deficiency<br />
<strong>to</strong> the remaining power system, system load<br />
generation unbalance, and even an entire sys‐<br />
tem collapse. After the fault has occurred, pro‐<br />
tective devices operate <strong>to</strong> isolate the faulted<br />
section. But, this may lead <strong>to</strong> unfaulted sections<br />
that are not getting supplied. T<strong>here</strong>fore, it is re‐<br />
quired <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re supply au<strong>to</strong>matically and<br />
quickly <strong>to</strong> these un‐faulted sections of the ship‐<br />
board power system <strong>to</strong> improve the system sur‐<br />
vivability. This can be achieved by changing the<br />
configuration of the system by opening and/or<br />
closing switches <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re supply <strong>to</strong> maximum<br />
load in the un‐faulted sections of the shipboard<br />
power system. Reconfiguration can be aimed at<br />
supplying power <strong>to</strong> high priority loads and/or<br />
supplying power <strong>to</strong> maximum amount of loads<br />
depending upon the situation. The need recon‐<br />
figuration is also proposed <strong>to</strong> maintain power<br />
balance of the remaining power system parts<br />
after fault detection and isolation. Fast recon‐<br />
figuration is necessary for a shipboard power<br />
system considering the unique shipboard power<br />
system characteristics.<br />
Methodologies Reviews<br />
In recent years, several reconfiguration method‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
ologies have been proposed for power systems.<br />
With the advancement in the power system, the<br />
<strong>to</strong>pology of power systems has become more<br />
complicated. However, in previous reconfigura‐<br />
tion methodologies, no generic methodology was<br />
proposed for the reconfiguration of a power sys‐<br />
tem with a complicated <strong>to</strong>pology. Most of the<br />
previous reconfiguration methodologies are <strong>to</strong>‐<br />
pology dependent. New reconfiguration method‐<br />
ologies need <strong>to</strong> be researched and developed for<br />
power systems with large scale and complicated<br />
<strong>to</strong>pologies [44].<br />
T<strong>here</strong> are slight differences between reconfigu‐<br />
ration of terrestrial power system and shipboard<br />
power system.<br />
Reconfiguration of terrestrial power system<br />
The reconfiguration approach for power system<br />
can be implemented in centralized manner or in<br />
decentralized manner. In centralized approach,<br />
various methods are applied <strong>to</strong> the reconfigura‐<br />
tion approach, such as evolutionary program‐<br />
ming, heuristic method, artificial intelligent<br />
method, etc.<br />
The main advantage of the centralized ap‐<br />
proaches for power system reconfiguration is that<br />
it is easy for the central controller <strong>to</strong> access re‐<br />
quired information for reconfiguration reasoning.<br />
The central controller in a centralized approach<br />
can directly gather data from the sensors<br />
throughout the entire system. When t<strong>here</strong> are<br />
changes in the system, the central controller<br />
can easily update its database for reconfigura‐<br />
tion. The disadvantage of the centralized ap‐<br />
proach for reconfiguration is that it may lead <strong>to</strong><br />
the single point of failure in the system if the<br />
system lacks redundancy.<br />
The main advantage of the decentralized ap‐<br />
proach for power system reconfiguration is the<br />
robustness. The decentralized approach is im‐<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
87
mune <strong>to</strong> the single point of failure because<br />
t<strong>here</strong> is no central controller in the approach.<br />
Also the decentralized approach has more flexi‐<br />
bility and scalability compared <strong>to</strong> the central‐<br />
ized approach. However, the controllers in the<br />
decentralized system have limited access <strong>to</strong> the<br />
information of the system for control decisions.<br />
So, compared <strong>to</strong> the centralized approach, it is<br />
harder for the decentralized system <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />
the global optimal solution based on the limited<br />
information each controller has.<br />
Many of the proposed au<strong>to</strong>matic reconfiguration<br />
methodologies are developed for distribution<br />
system reconfiguration. The distribution system<br />
is usually reconfigured for res<strong>to</strong>ring the loads in<br />
the distribution system, decreasing the power<br />
loss in the distribution system, stabilizing the<br />
distribution system, etc.<br />
Schmidt et al [3] put forward a fast integer pro‐<br />
gramming based reconfiguration methodology<br />
<strong>to</strong> minimize the power loss in a distribution sys‐<br />
tem. The power loss in the distribution system is<br />
the electric power that is consumed by transmis‐<br />
sion equipments, such as transformers, cables,<br />
wires, etc. This methodology is only applicable <strong>to</strong><br />
radial power systems.<br />
Tzeng et al [4] proposed a feeder reconfiguration<br />
methodology for the distribution system. In that<br />
particular research, dynamic programming is<br />
used <strong>to</strong> find the optimal switching actions for<br />
load balancing in a distribution system. In a<br />
power system, the loads get electric power sup‐<br />
ply from load feeders. The load feeders that sup‐<br />
plies more loads need more current injections<br />
than those load feeder supplying lesser loads.<br />
This will cause the imbalanced current distribu‐<br />
tion in the power system. With the same loads<br />
supplied in the power system, the imbalanced<br />
current distribution in the power system leads <strong>to</strong><br />
more power loss than balanced current distribu‐<br />
tion in the power system. The imbalanced cur‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
rent in the power system also leads <strong>to</strong> the over<br />
current problem and stability problem. The load<br />
feeders in the power system need <strong>to</strong> be bal‐<br />
anced by switching the circuit breakers and<br />
other switching devices so that the current dis‐<br />
tribution in the power system can be balanced..<br />
Gomes et al [5] proposed a heuristic reconfigura‐<br />
tion methodology <strong>to</strong> reduce the power loss in a<br />
distribution system. In this work, the optimal<br />
power flow and sensitivity analysis are used <strong>to</strong><br />
find the reconfiguration solution. This reconfigu‐<br />
ration methodology is only applicable <strong>to</strong> radial<br />
power systems.<br />
Hsu et al [6] proposed a reconfiguration method‐<br />
ology for transformer and feeder load balancing<br />
in a distribution system. When the number of<br />
loads that are supplied through a load feeder<br />
increases, the current injection <strong>to</strong> the load<br />
feeder increases. The current that flows through<br />
the transformer is connected <strong>to</strong> the load feeder<br />
increases, <strong>to</strong>o. It may lead <strong>to</strong> the risk of over cur‐<br />
rent on the transformers and the transmission<br />
lines in the system. The proposed reconfigura‐<br />
tion methodology is based on heuristic search.<br />
Another heuristic search based reconfiguration<br />
algorithm was proposed by Wu et al [51]. In the<br />
research, the reconfiguration methodology was<br />
applied <strong>to</strong> the radial power system for service<br />
res<strong>to</strong>ration, load balancing, and maintenance of<br />
the power system. Zhou, et al [7] put forward a<br />
heuristic reconfiguration methodology for distri‐<br />
bution system <strong>to</strong> reduce the operating cost in a<br />
real time operation environment. The operation<br />
cost in the power system is the power loss in the<br />
distribution system. The operation cost reduc‐<br />
tion is based on the long term operation of the<br />
power system.<br />
The knowledge based systems, such as expert<br />
systems, have also been applied <strong>to</strong> the recon‐<br />
figuration of power systems for a long time.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
88
Knowledge based system is a computer system<br />
that is programmed <strong>to</strong> imitate human problem‐<br />
solving by means of artificial intelligence and<br />
reference <strong>to</strong> a database of knowledge on a par‐<br />
ticular subject .Jung et al [8] proposed an artifi‐<br />
cial intelligent based reconfiguration methodol‐<br />
ogy for load balancing in a distribution system.<br />
An expert system was applied <strong>to</strong> the heuristic<br />
search in order <strong>to</strong> reduce the search space and<br />
reduce the computational time for the recon‐<br />
figuration.<br />
Wu et al [9] proposed a Petri net based recon‐<br />
figuration methodology for res<strong>to</strong>ration of the<br />
power system. A <strong>to</strong>ken passing and a backward<br />
search processes are used <strong>to</strong> identify the se‐<br />
quence of res<strong>to</strong>ration actions and their time.<br />
This method can help <strong>to</strong> estimate the time re‐<br />
quired <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re a subsystem and obtain a sys‐<br />
tematical method for identification of the se‐<br />
quence of actions. Y.L.Ke [10] proposed a Petri<br />
net base approach for reconfiguring a distribu‐<br />
tion system <strong>to</strong> enhance the performance of the<br />
power system by considering the daily load char‐<br />
acteristics and the variations among cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />
due <strong>to</strong> the temperature increase in the power<br />
system.<br />
Jiang and Baldick [11] proposed a comprehen‐<br />
sive reconfiguration algorithm for distribution<br />
system reconfiguration. They employed simu‐<br />
lated annealing <strong>to</strong> optimize the switch configura‐<br />
tion of a distribution system. The objective of<br />
the reconfiguration is <strong>to</strong> decrease the power loss<br />
in the distribution system. Ma<strong>to</strong>s and Melo [12]<br />
put forward a simulated annealing based multi<br />
objective reconfiguration for power system for<br />
loss reduction and service res<strong>to</strong>ration. A recon‐<br />
figuration for enhancing the reliability of the<br />
power system was proposed by Brown [13]. A<br />
predictive reliability model is used <strong>to</strong> compute<br />
reliability indices for the distribution system and<br />
a simulated annealing algorithm is used <strong>to</strong> find a<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
reconfiguration solution.<br />
Shu and Sun [14] proposed a reconfiguration<br />
methodology <strong>to</strong> maintain the load and genera‐<br />
tion balance during the res<strong>to</strong>ration of a power<br />
system. An ant colony optimization algorithm<br />
was used <strong>to</strong> search the proper reconfiguration<br />
sequence based on the Petri net model. Daniel<br />
et al [16] proposed an ant colony based recon‐<br />
figuration for a distribution system. The objec‐<br />
tive of the reconfiguration was <strong>to</strong> reduce the<br />
power loss in the power system.<br />
Salazar et al [16] proposed a feeder reconfigura‐<br />
tion methodology for distribution system <strong>to</strong><br />
minimize the power loss. A reconfiguration algo‐<br />
rithm was proposed based on the artificial neu‐<br />
ral network theory. Clustering techniques <strong>to</strong> de‐<br />
termine the best training set for a single neural<br />
network with generalization ability are also pre‐<br />
sented in that work. Hsu and Huang [17] put for‐<br />
ward another artificial neural network based<br />
reconfiguration for a distribution system. The<br />
reconfiguration can achieve service res<strong>to</strong>ration<br />
by using artificial neural network and pattern<br />
recognition method.<br />
Wang and Zhang [18] proposed a particle swarm<br />
optimization algorithm based reconfiguration<br />
methodology for distribution system. A modified<br />
particle swarm algorithm has been presented <strong>to</strong><br />
solve the complex optimization problem. The<br />
objective of the methodology was <strong>to</strong> minimize<br />
the power loss in the power system. Jin et al [19]<br />
introduced a binary particle swam optimization<br />
based reconfiguration methodology for distribu‐<br />
tion system. The objective of the reconfiguration<br />
was load balancing. The reconfiguration method‐<br />
ology proposed in that work can only be applied<br />
in the power system with radial configuration.<br />
Heo and Lee [20] proposed MAS based intelli‐<br />
gent identification system for power plant con‐<br />
trol and fault diagnosis. The proposed methodol‐<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
89
ogy can achieve the online adaptive identifica‐<br />
tion for control in real time power plant opera‐<br />
tion and offline identification for fault diagnosis.<br />
Enacheanu et al [21] proposed a distribution sys‐<br />
tem architecture that can make the reconfigura‐<br />
tion in the power easy <strong>to</strong> achieve. The reconfigu‐<br />
ration in that work is <strong>to</strong> locate and isolate the<br />
faults in the power system. A remote agent is<br />
used in that work as a central controller for the<br />
reconfiguration of power systems.<br />
Nagata et al [22] proposed MAS based res<strong>to</strong>ra‐<br />
tion methodology for power systems. The MAS<br />
proposed was composed of bus agents and a<br />
single facilita<strong>to</strong>r agent. The bus agent decides a<br />
suboptimal target configuration after faults oc‐<br />
cur. A facilita<strong>to</strong>r agent was developed <strong>to</strong> act as a<br />
manager for the decision process. The existence<br />
of the facilita<strong>to</strong>r agents make the methodology<br />
centralized. Liu et al [37] put forward another<br />
res<strong>to</strong>ration method for the power system. How‐<br />
ever, this method is also centralized because the<br />
res<strong>to</strong>ration decision is made with the help of<br />
coordinating agents that have global information<br />
in the MAS.<br />
Nagata et al [50] improved the method proposed<br />
in [22]. In the MAS proposed in [50], the coordi‐<br />
nation functions were distributed <strong>to</strong> several fa‐<br />
cilita<strong>to</strong>r agents instead of one facilita<strong>to</strong>r agent.<br />
The facilita<strong>to</strong>r agents coordinate with each other<br />
au<strong>to</strong>nomously. However, each facilita<strong>to</strong>r agent<br />
works as centralized coordina<strong>to</strong>r in the local<br />
area. So the MAS proposed in that work is not<br />
completely decentralized. The proposed res<strong>to</strong>ra‐<br />
tion can only be applied <strong>to</strong> a radial power sys‐<br />
tem. Also, the reconfiguration method was<br />
tested on a small power system simulated on a<br />
PC. The agents’ performance in the res<strong>to</strong>ration<br />
for a large power system was not provided.<br />
Wang et al [24] proposed a fuzzy logic and evolu‐<br />
tionary programming based reconfiguration<br />
methodology for distribution systems. In this<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
research, a fuzzy mutation controller is imple‐<br />
mented <strong>to</strong> adaptively update the mutation rate<br />
during the evolutionary process. The objective of<br />
the reconfiguration is <strong>to</strong> reduce the power loss<br />
in the distribution system. Zhou et al [25] put<br />
forward another fuzzy logic based reconfigura‐<br />
tion methodology for distribution system. A<br />
fuzzy logic based reconfiguration was developed<br />
for the purpose of res<strong>to</strong>ration and load balanc‐<br />
ing in a real‐time operation environment. Kuo<br />
and Hsu [26] proposed a service res<strong>to</strong>ration<br />
methodology using fuzzy logic approach. In this<br />
research, the fuzzy logic based approach was<br />
estimated the loads in a distribution system and<br />
devised a proper service res<strong>to</strong>ration plan follow‐<br />
ing a fault.<br />
Various methods have been applied <strong>to</strong> the re‐<br />
configuration process of the terrestrial power<br />
system. However, most of the reconfiguration<br />
methodologies are centralized. A central control‐<br />
ler is a requirement <strong>to</strong> gather data from the<br />
power system, make reconfiguration decisions<br />
after calculation and analysis.<br />
Shipboard Power System Reconfiguration<br />
Compared <strong>to</strong> the terrestrial power systems, the<br />
SPS has its unique characteristics. Based on the<br />
unique characteristics of the SPS, some recon‐<br />
figuration methods have been proposed. Some<br />
of the significant literature of the SPS reconfigu‐<br />
ration process of the SPS is reviewed below.<br />
Butler and Sarma [27] propose a heuristics based<br />
general reconfiguration methodology for<br />
AC radial SPSs. The reconfiguration process is<br />
applied <strong>to</strong> the SPS for service res<strong>to</strong>ration. The<br />
reconfiguration process is based on the initial<br />
configuration and desired configuration details<br />
of the system, such as the list of load con‐<br />
nected /disconnected <strong>to</strong> the SPS, list of available<br />
component (cables, circuit breakers, etc) in the<br />
SPS, etc.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
90
Again Butler and Sarma [28] put forward an opti‐<br />
mization method that can be applied <strong>to</strong> the re‐<br />
configuration of SPS. The objective for reconfigu‐<br />
ration is <strong>to</strong> maximize the load res<strong>to</strong>red in the<br />
SPS. A commercial software package is used for<br />
solving the optimization problem in the recon‐<br />
figuration process. Butler and Sarma [29] im‐<br />
prove the reconfiguration methodology pro‐<br />
posed in [28]. The reconfiguration methodology<br />
is similar <strong>to</strong> the reconfiguration methodology<br />
proposed in [28]. However, in this work, more<br />
constraints, such as voltage constraints for buses<br />
in the SPS, are applied <strong>to</strong> the reconfiguration<br />
compared <strong>to</strong> the work in [28]. In [27] and [28],<br />
the reconfiguration methodology is imple‐<br />
mented by using a commercial optimization soft‐<br />
ware, which cannot provide a real time perform‐<br />
ance.<br />
Srivastava and Butler [32] proposed an au<strong>to</strong>‐<br />
matic rule based expert system for the recon‐<br />
figuration process of an SPS. The objective of the<br />
reconfiguration process is <strong>to</strong> supply the de‐<br />
energized loads after battle damage or cascading<br />
faults. In the event of battle damage or cascad‐<br />
ing faults, a failure assessment (FAST) system<br />
detects faults, identifies faulted components in<br />
damaged sections, and determines de‐energized<br />
loads. The reconfiguration method uses the out‐<br />
put of a FAST system, real time data, <strong>to</strong>pology<br />
information and electrical parameters of various<br />
components <strong>to</strong> perform reconfiguration for load<br />
res<strong>to</strong>ration of an SPS.<br />
Again Srivastava and Butler [33] proposed a<br />
probability based pre‐hit reconfiguration<br />
method. In this research, the reconfiguration<br />
actions are determined on the estimation of the<br />
damage that a weapon hit may cause before the<br />
weapon hit happens. The objective of the recon‐<br />
figuration in this work is <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re the service in<br />
SPS and reduce the damage caused by weapon<br />
hit. This probabilistic reconfiguration methodol‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
ogy has two major modules: weapon damage<br />
assessment (WDA) module and pre‐hit recon‐<br />
figuration module. The main goal of the WDA is<br />
<strong>to</strong> compute the expected probability of damage<br />
(EPOD) value for each electrical component in an<br />
SPS. The pre‐hit reconfiguration module takes<br />
the EPOD calculated by WDA as the input, and<br />
determines the reconfiguration actions <strong>to</strong> re‐<br />
duce the damage <strong>to</strong> the SPS that may be caused<br />
by the weapon hit.<br />
Again the same author, Butler and Sarma [34] pro‐<br />
posed au<strong>to</strong>mated self‐healing strategy for recon‐<br />
figuration for service res<strong>to</strong>ration in Naval SPS. A<br />
model of the 3‐D layout of the electrical network of<br />
shipboard power system using a geographical infor‐<br />
mation system was explained. A self‐healing system<br />
is a system that when subjected <strong>to</strong> a contingency<br />
(or threat) is able <strong>to</strong> access the impact of the contin‐<br />
gency, contain it and then au<strong>to</strong>matically perform<br />
corrective action <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re the system <strong>to</strong> the best<br />
possible (normal) state <strong>to</strong> perform its basic func‐<br />
tionality.<br />
In recent years, Multi Agent System (MAS) tech‐<br />
nologies have been applied <strong>to</strong> the reconfigura‐<br />
tion process in SPS. Srivastava et al [30] pro‐<br />
posed MAS based reconfiguration methodology<br />
for au<strong>to</strong>matic service res<strong>to</strong>ration in the SPS. In<br />
this work, the overall function of the MAS is <strong>to</strong><br />
detect and locate the fault(s), determine faulted<br />
equipments, determine de‐energized loads, and<br />
perform an au<strong>to</strong>mated service res<strong>to</strong>ration on<br />
the SPS <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re de‐energized loads. The MAS<br />
also gives an output list of res<strong>to</strong>rable loads and<br />
switching actions required <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re each load.<br />
The res<strong>to</strong>ration methodology proposed in this<br />
research work is not completely decentralized.<br />
Feliachi et al [35] proposed a new scheme for an<br />
energy management system in the form of the<br />
distributed control agents for the reconfigura‐<br />
tion of the SPS. The control agents’ task is <strong>to</strong> en‐<br />
sure supply of the various load demands while<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
91
taking in<strong>to</strong> account of system constraints and<br />
load priorities. A graph theoretic self‐stabilizing<br />
maximum flow algorithm for the implementation<br />
of the agents’ strategies has been developed <strong>to</strong><br />
find a global solution using load information and<br />
a minimum amount of communication. Although<br />
a simulation platform is developed <strong>to</strong> implement<br />
parts of the reconfiguration system, the simula‐<br />
tion platform proposed in [35] is not a real time<br />
solution and cannot provide bandwidth require‐<br />
ment and latency performance of the system.<br />
Solanki et al [34] proposed an MAS reconfigura‐<br />
tion methodology for SPS. In this work the re‐<br />
configuration process can isolate the fault and<br />
res<strong>to</strong>re the power supply quickly and au<strong>to</strong>no‐<br />
mously. Also, this reconfiguration methodology<br />
can be applied only <strong>to</strong> radial SPS. Solanki and<br />
Schulz [36] demonstrated the MAS for the re‐<br />
configuration of the SPS and the implementa‐<br />
tion of the MAS. In the simulation of the recon‐<br />
figuration process in [36] and [34], the MAS and<br />
SPS are implemented on the same PC. The com‐<br />
munication bandwidth of the MAS cannot be<br />
researched by using this simulation platform.<br />
Sun et al [37] put forward a complete reconfigu‐<br />
ration methodology for the reconfiguration of<br />
the SPS. The objective of the reconfiguration is<br />
<strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re the loads in the SPS. The research is<br />
no central controller in the MAS. Each agent<br />
works independently and au<strong>to</strong>nomously. The<br />
reconfiguration methodology proposed in this<br />
research, cannot be applied <strong>to</strong> SPSs with ring<br />
and mesh structure.<br />
E.J. William [48] proposed an Artificial Neural<br />
Network Algorithm (ANN) <strong>to</strong> determine fault<br />
locations on shipboard Electrical Distribution<br />
System (EDS). It traces the location of the fault<br />
on SPS. The EDS is protected when faults are lo‐<br />
cated and isolated as quickly as possible. The<br />
goal is <strong>to</strong> increase the availability of shipboard<br />
EDS by locating and isolating faults by using<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Power system CAD (PSCAD) and ANN analysis.<br />
However the only problem with this is that the<br />
fault path accuracy is unpredictable and require<br />
sensitive current measurement device.<br />
Kai Huang and Srivastava [42] proposed a novel<br />
Algorithm for agent Based Reconfiguration of<br />
Ring‐structured Shipboard Power System. The<br />
goal of this research is <strong>to</strong> avoid the redundant<br />
information accumulation (RIA) problem in a<br />
multi‐agent system during the reconfiguration<br />
process of SPS. The RIA problem is like a posi‐<br />
tive feedbacks loop and makes the information<br />
flow in the system unstable. Thus, the authors<br />
use the spanning tree pro<strong>to</strong>col <strong>to</strong> detect and<br />
break the ring structure in an agent system.<br />
Discussion<br />
The literature review has revealed some impor‐<br />
tant points which most of the reconfiguration<br />
methodologies for terrestrial power system and<br />
SPS are centralized solutions. Also, the simula‐<br />
tion scenarios in these researches are not in real<br />
time and cannot provide the bandwidth require‐<br />
ment latency performance of the system. From<br />
the analysis, the number of the researcher for<br />
terrestrial power system is greater than ship‐<br />
board power system (SPS). T<strong>here</strong> are only a few<br />
numbers of researchers who explore in the area<br />
of shipboard power system. Most of the cases<br />
are studied by the same researchers like Sarma,<br />
Buttler and Sarasvarti. The number of researches<br />
which focus on reconfiguration on fault location<br />
for shipboard power system is very few as com‐<br />
pared <strong>to</strong> the terrestrial power system.<br />
From the literature, several approaches and<br />
methods have been proposed in the reconfigura‐<br />
tion process for SPS. They vary in term of func‐<br />
tions and applications. Many classical techniques<br />
have been employed for the solution of the re‐<br />
configuration problem such as genetic algo‐<br />
rithms (GA)[44,45], simulated annealing [12],<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
92
particle swarm optimization (PSO)[13,18] tabu<br />
search[21], Multi Agent System (MAS) [20‐22]<br />
and etc. Generally, most of the techniques apply<br />
sensitivity analysis and gradient based optimiza‐<br />
tion algorithms by linearizing the objective func‐<br />
tion and the system constraints around an oper‐<br />
ating point [51]. The results reported in the lit‐<br />
erature were promising and encouraging for fur‐<br />
ther research in this direction [51].<br />
More recently, a new evolutionary computation<br />
technique, called Differential Evolutionary (DE)<br />
algorithm has been proposed and introduced [8].<br />
The algorithm is inspired by biological and socio‐<br />
logical motivations and can take care of optimal‐<br />
ity on rough, discontinuous and multi‐modal sur‐<br />
faces. The DE has three main advantages: it can<br />
find near optimal solution regardless the initial<br />
parameter values, its convergence is fast and it<br />
uses few number of control parameter. In addi‐<br />
tion, DE is simple in coding, easy <strong>to</strong> use and it<br />
can handle integer and discrete optimization.<br />
The performance of DE algorithm was compared<br />
<strong>to</strong> that of different heuristic techniques. It is<br />
found that the convergence speed of DE is sig‐<br />
nificantly better than GA[10]. Meanwhile in [12],<br />
the performance of DE was compared <strong>to</strong> PSO.<br />
The comparison was performed on suite of 34<br />
widely used benchmark problems. It was found<br />
that, DE is the best performing algorithm as it<br />
finds the lowest fitness value for most of the<br />
problems considered in that study. Also, DE is<br />
robust: it is able <strong>to</strong> reproduce the same results<br />
consistently over many trials, w<strong>here</strong>as the per‐<br />
formance of PSO is far more dependent on the<br />
randomized initialization of the individuals [12].<br />
In addition, the DE algorithm has been used <strong>to</strong><br />
solve high dimensional function optimization (up<br />
<strong>to</strong> 1000 dimensions) [12]. It is found that, it has<br />
superior performance on a set of widely used<br />
benchmark functions.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the observation of the previous works,<br />
most of the reconfiguration objectives in meth‐<br />
odology are almost similar even the methods<br />
utilized are different. Among the most familiar<br />
objectives are minimizing the fuel cost, maximize<br />
the load res<strong>to</strong>red, improving the voltage profile<br />
and enhancing power system voltage stability in<br />
both normal and contingency conditions. The<br />
results are compared <strong>to</strong> those reported in the<br />
literature. Among the methods proposed, DE<br />
algorithm seems <strong>to</strong> be promising approach for<br />
engineering problem due <strong>to</strong> the great character‐<br />
istics and its advantages. A novel DE‐based ap‐<br />
proach is proposed <strong>to</strong> solve the reconfiguration<br />
for service res<strong>to</strong>ration problem in shipboard<br />
power system in recent year. However, GA algo‐<br />
rithm and MAS algorithm are still applicable in<br />
the system.<br />
Reference:<br />
[1] N.D.R. Sarma, V.C.Prasad, K.S. Prakasa Rao, V. Sankar,<br />
Oct 1994. “A New Network Reconfiguration Technique for<br />
Service Res<strong>to</strong>ration in Distribution Networks”, IEEE Trans.<br />
on Power Delivery, Vol. 9, No. 4.<br />
[2] S. Civanlar, J. J. Grainger, H. Yin, and S. S. H. Lee, Jul.<br />
1998. “Distribution Feeder Reconfiguration for Loss Reduc‐<br />
tion”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 3, no. 3,<br />
pp. 1217‐1223.<br />
[3] H. P. Schmidt, N. Ida, N. Kagan, and J. C. Guaraldo, Aug.<br />
2005. “Fast Reconfiguration of Distribution Systems Con‐<br />
sidering Loss Minimization”, IEEE Transactions on Power<br />
Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1311‐1319.<br />
[4] Y. M. Tzeng, Y. L. Ke, M. S. Kang, Apr. 2006. “Generic<br />
Switching Actions of Distribution System Operation Using<br />
Dynamic Programming Method”, IEEE Industrial and Com‐<br />
mercial Power Systems Technical Conference.<br />
[5] F. V. Gomes, S. Carneiro Jr., J. L. R. Pereira, M. P. Vina‐<br />
gre, 4, Nov. 2006. “A New Distribution System Reconfigu‐<br />
ration Approach Using Optimum Power Flow and Sensitiv‐<br />
ity Analysis for Loss Reduction”, IEEE Transaction on Power<br />
Systems, vol. 21, no. pp. 1616‐1623.<br />
[6] Peponis, G. and Papadopoulos, M., Nov. 1995.<br />
“Reconfiguration of Radial Distribution Networks: Appli‐<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
93
cation of Heuristic Methods on Large‐Scale Networks”,<br />
IEE Proceedings Generation,Transmission and Distribu‐<br />
tion, Vol. 142, No. 6, pp. 631‐637.<br />
[7] Jung, K.‐H.; Kim, H. and Ko, Y., Oct. 1993. “Network<br />
Reconfiguration Algorithm for Au<strong>to</strong>mated Distribution<br />
Systems based on Artificial Intelligence Approach”, IEEE<br />
Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 1933‐<br />
1941.<br />
[8] R.S<strong>to</strong>rn, K. Price, 1995. “Differential evolution – a sim‐<br />
ple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization<br />
over continuous spaces” Technical report TR‐95‐012.ICSI.<br />
[9] Wu, J.S.; Liu, C.C.; Liou, K.L. and Chou, R.F., Feb. 1997.<br />
“A Petri Net Algorithm for Scheduling of Generic Res<strong>to</strong>ra‐<br />
tion Actions”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol.<br />
12, No. 1, pp. 69‐76.<br />
[10] D.Karaboga, S.Okdem, 2004. “A simple and global<br />
optimization algorithm for engineering problems: differ‐<br />
ential evolution algorithm”, Turkish Journal of Electronics<br />
and Engineering.<br />
[11] Jiang, D. and Baldick, R., May 1996. “Optimal Electric<br />
Distribution System Switch Reconfiguration and Capaci<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Control”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No.<br />
2, pp. 890‐897.<br />
[12] Ma<strong>to</strong>s, M.A. and Melo, P., “Multiobjective Recon‐<br />
figuration for Loss Reduction and<br />
Service Res<strong>to</strong>ration using Simulated Annealing”, Interna‐<br />
tional Conference on Electric Power<br />
Engineering, PowerTech Budapest 99, 1999, pp. 213<br />
[13] J.Vesterstrom, R.Thomsen, 2004. “A comparative<br />
study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimiza‐<br />
tion, and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark<br />
problems, IEEE congress on Evolutionary computation, 980<br />
– 987.<br />
[14] H. Shu, X. Sun, 2005. “A Novel Approach <strong>to</strong> Distribu‐<br />
tion Network Reconfiguration Considering the Priority of<br />
Cus<strong>to</strong>mers”, IEEE Transmission and Distribution Confer‐<br />
ence and Exhibition: Asia and Pacific.<br />
[15] L. C. Daniel, I. H. Khan, S. Ravichandran, Dec. 2005.<br />
“Distribution Network Reconfiguration For Loss Reduction<br />
Using Ant Colony System Algorithm”, IEEE INDICON Annual<br />
Conference, pp. 619‐622.<br />
[16] H. Salazar, R. Gallego, R. Romero, July 2006. “Artificial<br />
Neural Networks and Clustering Techniques Applied in the<br />
Reconfiguration of Distribution Systems”, IEEE Transac‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
tions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 3.<br />
[17] Hsu, Y.Y. and Huang, H.M., May 1995. “Distribution<br />
System Service Res<strong>to</strong>ration using the Artificial Neural<br />
Network Approach and Pattern Recognition Method”, IEE<br />
Proceedings of Generation, Transmission and Distribution,<br />
Vol. 142, No. 3, pp. 251‐256<br />
[18] C. R. Wang, Y. E. Zhang, Aug. 2006. “Distribution Net‐<br />
work Reconfiguration Based on Modified Particle Swarm<br />
Optimization Algorithm”, International Conference on Ma‐<br />
chine Learning and Cybernetics, pp. 2076‐2080.<br />
[19] X. Jin, J. Zhao, Y. Sun, K. Li, B. Zhang, Nov. 2004.<br />
“Distribution Network Reconfiguration for Load Balancing<br />
using Binary Particle Swarm Optimization”, International<br />
Conference on Power System Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.<br />
507‐510.<br />
[20] J. S. Heo and K. Y. Lee, Jul. 2006. “A Multi‐Agent System<br />
‐Based Intelligent Identification System for Power Plant<br />
Control and Fault‐Diagnosis”, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary<br />
Computation, pp. 1544‐1551.<br />
[21] M.A.Abido, 2002. “Optimal Power Flow using Tabu<br />
Search Algorithm”, Electric power components & System,<br />
469‐483.<br />
[22]. T. Nagata, H. Watanabe, M. Ohno, H. Sasaki, Dec.<br />
2000. “A multi‐agent approach <strong>to</strong> power system res<strong>to</strong>ra‐<br />
tion”, International Conference on Power System Technol‐<br />
ogy in 2000, vol. 3, pp. 1551‐1556.<br />
[23] K. L. Butler, N. D. R. Sarma, Whitcomb, H. Do Carmo,<br />
and H. Zhang, Apr. 1998. “Shipboard systems deploy au<strong>to</strong>‐<br />
mated protection”, IEEE Computer Applications in Power,<br />
vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 31‐36.<br />
[24] Wang, G.S.; Wang, P.Y.; Song, Y.H. and Johns, A.T.,<br />
1996. “Co‐ordinated System of Fuzzy Logic and Evolution‐<br />
ary Programming based Network Reconfiguration for Loss<br />
Reduction in Distribution Systems”, Proceedings of the<br />
Fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vol.<br />
3, pp. 1838‐1844.<br />
[25] Zhou, Q.; Shirmohammadi, D. and Liu, W.‐H.E., May<br />
1997. “Distribution Feeder Reconfiguration for Service Res‐<br />
<strong>to</strong>ration and Load Balancing”, IEEE Transactions on Power<br />
Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 724‐729<br />
[26] Kuo, H.C. and Hsu, Y.Y., Oct. 1993. “Distribution System<br />
Load Estimation and Service Res<strong>to</strong>ration Using a Fuzzy Set<br />
Approach”, IEEE Transactions on PWRD, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.<br />
1950‐ 1957.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
94
MI<br />
[27] Butler, K. L, Sarma, N.D.R., Jan. 2000. “General Recon‐<br />
figuration Methodology for AC Radial Shipboard Power<br />
Systems”, IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting,<br />
2000, vol. 2, pp.23‐27.<br />
[28] Butler, K. L, Sarma, N.D.R., Apr. 1999. “A New Method<br />
of Network Reconfiguration for Service Res<strong>to</strong>ration in Ship‐<br />
board Power Systems”, IEEE Transmission and Distribution<br />
Conference, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 11‐16.<br />
[29] Butler, K. L, Sarma, N.D.R., Nov. 2001. “Network Recon‐<br />
figuration for Service Res<strong>to</strong>ration in Shipboard Power Sys‐<br />
tem Distribution Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power<br />
Systems, vol. 16, pp. 653‐661.<br />
[30] S. K. Srivastava, H. Xiao, and K. L Butler‐Purry, Nov.<br />
2002. “Multi‐Agent System for Au<strong>to</strong>mated Service Res<strong>to</strong>ra‐<br />
tion of Shipboard Power Systems”, 15th International Con‐<br />
ference on Computer Applications in Industry and Engineer‐<br />
ing (CAINE‐2002), San Diego, CA, 7‐9.<br />
[31] Butler, K. L, Sarma, N.D.R., Jul. 2003. “Intelligent Net‐<br />
work Reconfiguration of Shipboard Power Systems”, IEEE<br />
Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2003, vol. 4, pp.<br />
13‐17.<br />
[32] S. Srivastava, K. L. Butler‐Burry, “Expert System<br />
Method for Au<strong>to</strong>matic Reconfiguration for Res<strong>to</strong>ration of<br />
Shipboard Power Systems”, IEE Proceedings on Generation,<br />
Transmission and Distribution, vol. 153, no.3, May 2006, pp.<br />
253‐260<br />
[34] S. K. Srivastava, K. L. Butler, 2005. “A Pre‐hit Probabilis‐<br />
tic Reconfiguration Methodology for Shipboard Power Sys‐<br />
tems”, IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium, pp. 99‐<br />
104.<br />
[35] J. M. Solanki, N. N. Schulz, W. Gao, Oct. 2005.<br />
“Reconfiguration for Res<strong>to</strong>ration of Power Systems Using a<br />
Multi‐agent System”, Proceedings of the 37th Annual<br />
North American Power Symposium, pp. 390‐395.<br />
[36] A. Feliachi, K. Schoder, S. Ganesh, H. J. Lai, Jun. 2006.<br />
“Distributed Control Agent Approach <strong>to</strong> Energy Manage‐<br />
ment in Electric Shipboard Power System”, IEEE Power Engi‐<br />
neering Society General Meeting.<br />
[37] J. M. Solanki,N. N. Schulz, Nov. 2005. “Using Intelligent<br />
Multi‐agent System for Shipboard Power Systems Recon‐<br />
figuration”, Proceedings of the 13th International Intelligent<br />
Systems Application <strong>to</strong> Power Systems.<br />
[38] L. Sun and D. A. Cartes, 2004. “Reconfiguration of ship‐<br />
board radial power system using intelligent agents,” Pro‐<br />
ceedings. of Electrical Machine Technology Symposium.<br />
[39] Yan Huang, Dec. 2005. “Fast Reconfiguration Algorithm<br />
Development for Shipboard Power System”, Master of Sci‐<br />
ence Thesis, Mississppi State University,<br />
[40] Butler, K. L, Sarma, N.D.R., 2005 “Visualization for ship‐<br />
board Power Systems”, Proceedings of the 36th Hawai<br />
International Conference on system Sciences.<br />
[41] R.Jayabalan and B. Fahimi., 2004. ”Naval Shipboard<br />
Power System”, University of Texas at Arling<strong>to</strong>n 416S.College<br />
St. Arling<strong>to</strong>n, Texas.<br />
[42] Butler, K. L, Sarma, N.D.R., May 2004. “Self‐Healing<br />
Reconfiguration for Res<strong>to</strong>ration of Naval Shipboard Power<br />
Systems”, IEEE Transactions on power systems, vol. 19, pp.<br />
2.<br />
[43] Kai Huang, David A. Cartes, S. K. Srivastava, 2005. “A<br />
Novel Algorithm for Agent Based Reconfiguration of Ring‐<br />
structured Shipboard Power System” IEEE member, Me‐<br />
chanical Engineering Department, Centre of Advance Power<br />
System Florida State University Tallahassee, FL, USA.<br />
[44] Xiuxia Yang, Yi Zhang, 2005. “Intelligent Real‐time Fault<br />
Res<strong>to</strong>ration of the Large Shipboard Power System Based on<br />
Genetic Algorithm”, International Journal of Information<br />
Technology, Vol 11 No. 12.<br />
[45] K. R. Padamati, Dec. 2007. “Reconfiguration of Ship‐<br />
board Power System using a Genetic Algorithm”, Master of<br />
Science Thesis, Mississppi State University.<br />
[46] 2003. “1547 IEEE Standard for Interconnecting Distrib‐<br />
uted Resources with Electric Power Systems”. The Institute<br />
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.<br />
[47] B. R. Gautam, N. N. Schulz and A. K. Srivastava, 2007.<br />
“Development of Survivability Index for Distribution System<br />
Including Islanding”, Proceedings of the IEEE PES North<br />
American Power Symposium, New Mexico, USA.<br />
[48] E.J.William “ANN Relays Used <strong>to</strong> Determine Fault Loca‐<br />
tions on Shipboard Electrical Distribution Systems’. Depart‐<br />
ment of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Univer‐<br />
sity of Idaho, Moscow.<br />
[49] T. Nagata, H. Fujita, H. Sasaki, Nov. 2005.<br />
“Decentralized Approach <strong>to</strong> Normal Operations for Power<br />
System Network”, Proceedings of the 13th International<br />
Conference on Intelligent Systems Application <strong>to</strong> Power<br />
Systems.<br />
[50] Wu, J.S.; Tomsovic, K.L. and Chen, C.S., Oct. 1991. “A<br />
Heuristic Search Approach <strong>to</strong> Feeder Switching Operations<br />
for Overload, Faults, Unbalanced Flow and Maintenance”,<br />
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 1579‐<br />
1586.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
95
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 8<br />
MOVING FORWARD TO BE A HIGH PERFORMANCE CULTURE ORGANIZATION:<br />
A CASE OF UNIVERSITY KUALA LUMPUR<br />
AZIZ ABDULLAH*<br />
Department of Marine Construction and Maintenance Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 6 September 2010; Revised: 28 September 2010; Accepted: 28 September 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
This brief paper seeks <strong>to</strong> expound the move forward undertaken by University Kuala Lumpur (<strong>UniKL</strong>) <strong>to</strong> be a high perform‐<br />
ance culture organization within a significant short period of time since its inception in early 2002. It further explores<br />
organizational sharing of shared core values held by members that help distinguish it from other similar organizations<br />
that offer a wide range of engineering technology courses in the higher education sec<strong>to</strong>r. It seeks <strong>to</strong> show that high per‐<br />
formance culture of <strong>UniKL</strong> is made possible through a strong commitment by all members <strong>to</strong> excel in whatever they aspire<br />
<strong>to</strong> achieve.<br />
Keyword: Core Values, High Performance Culture, Commitment, Integrity, Innovation, Teamwork, Excellence<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
University Kuala Lumpur (<strong>UniKL</strong>) was estab‐<br />
lished in 2002 with the vision <strong>to</strong> make it a<br />
leading technical entrepreneurial university in<br />
Malaysia and the region. To realize this vision<br />
it focuses on the ‘hands on’ that stresses<br />
more on the application of knowledge. Its<br />
mission, thus, is <strong>to</strong> produce enterprising<br />
global technical entrepreneurs in specific<br />
technical areas of specialization namely, Com‐<br />
puter Engineering and Telecommunication,<br />
Aviation, Au<strong>to</strong>motive, Product Design and<br />
Manufacturing, Chemical and Bioengineering<br />
Technology, Medical Sciences and Marine<br />
Engineering Technology.<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong> is wholly owned by MARA under the<br />
Ministry of Rural and Regional Development<br />
and mandated by the government <strong>to</strong> upgrade<br />
the status of technical education in Malaysia.<br />
It has ten (10) branch campuses offering vari‐<br />
ous diplomas, foundation, undergraduate<br />
and postgraduate programmes, that focus on<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909048<br />
Email address: azizabdullah@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
providing strong technological knowledge<br />
and entrepreneurial skills <strong>to</strong> fulfill the de‐<br />
mands of industries. It practices the concept<br />
of ‘One Campus, One Specialization’, eg<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong> (Lumut branch campus) spe‐<br />
cializes in marine engineering technology<br />
with focus on ship design and construction,<br />
while <strong>UniKL</strong> MIAT (Sepang branch campus)<br />
specializes in aviation technology.<br />
In ensuring the knowledge and capabilities of<br />
its graduates meet local industry needs it ac‐<br />
tively collaborates with various ministries and<br />
agencies such as the Ministry of Entrepre‐<br />
neur and Co‐operative Development (MECD);<br />
marine, civil aviation and transport depart‐<br />
ments, as well as other related local and in‐<br />
ternational relevant organizations that deal,<br />
among others, in aviation and maritime ac‐<br />
tivities <strong>to</strong> help ensure standards of gradu‐<br />
ates’ proficiency and skills match the indus‐<br />
try’s specific needs.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
96
Positive transformation from its traditional or‐<br />
ganizational culture <strong>to</strong>wards a performance‐<br />
driven culture helps <strong>UniKL</strong>’s success in remaining<br />
competitive and excelling in the areas of techni‐<br />
cal entrepreneurship. This success was mani‐<br />
fested through the Ministry of Higher Educa‐<br />
tion’s announcement on July 12, 2010 with re‐<br />
spect <strong>to</strong> the rating for Institutions of Higher<br />
Learning (Setara) that ex<strong>to</strong>lled <strong>UniKL</strong> as one of<br />
the <strong>to</strong>p 18 universities of Malaysia <strong>to</strong> attain the<br />
‘Excellent’ rating. This high rating is attributable<br />
<strong>to</strong> its entrepreneurial achievements driven by a<br />
strong organizational performance–driven cul‐<br />
ture. This culture refers <strong>to</strong> an accepted set of<br />
organizational core values that serve as the foun‐<br />
dation for the transformation process.<br />
LITERATURE REVIEW<br />
In transforming <strong>UniKL</strong>’s traditional culture <strong>to</strong>‐<br />
wards a performance ‐ driven culture the need<br />
<strong>to</strong> understand organizational structure and man‐<br />
agement styles across cultures was further ex‐<br />
plored (Dimitrov, 2005). Issues on culture, dif‐<br />
ferences, motivation, and diversity were ex‐<br />
plored in order <strong>to</strong> gain further understanding<br />
with regards <strong>to</strong> similar issues at <strong>UniKL</strong>.<br />
Exploring of culture dimensions (Hofstede,<br />
1980a) that identified dimensions along which<br />
organizational cultures differ, namely individual‐<br />
ism, uncertainty avoidance, power distance and<br />
masculinity help provide a glimpse of how those<br />
dimensions fit in<strong>to</strong> <strong>UniKL</strong>’s culture transforma‐<br />
tional drive. It was observed that the cultural<br />
dimensions as expounded by Hofstede were pre‐<br />
sent within the organizational culture of <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
but they were within a positive context namely,<br />
t<strong>here</strong> is a high degree of collectivism, low uncer‐<br />
tainty avoidance, low power distance and equal<br />
balance of gender responsibility. These observa‐<br />
tions would help inculcate stronger bonding<br />
among organizational members of <strong>UniKL</strong>.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Examining the relationship between organiza‐<br />
tional culture and transformational leadership<br />
(Xenikou and Simosi, 2006) revealed that trans‐<br />
formational leadership of organizational culture<br />
influences organizational performance. The<br />
group further explored the findings <strong>to</strong> help it<br />
rationalize <strong>UniKL</strong>’s transformation from its tradi‐<br />
tional culture <strong>to</strong>wards one that ex<strong>to</strong>ls a perform‐<br />
ance driven organizational culture.<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong>’s organizational culture is uniquely differ‐<br />
ent from other institutions of higher learning<br />
because it focuses more on application of knowl‐<br />
edge (the hands‐on), without reducing the im‐<br />
portance of knowledge acquisition itself. Thus,<br />
further review (Rchildress and Esenn, 2006) on<br />
findings concerning the combination of knowl‐<br />
edge and skill that can be shared along the same<br />
parallels with <strong>UniKL</strong>’s transformation <strong>to</strong>wards a<br />
performance‐driven culture was sought. It re‐<br />
vealed, among other things, a finding that in or‐<br />
der <strong>to</strong> achieve high performance, the secret lies<br />
in developing personal core values and behaviors<br />
that can help unlock the potential power of high‐<br />
performance teams through individuals, which in<br />
turn, can help produce winning organizations.<br />
SIGNIFICANCE OF PAPER<br />
This paper is significantly important be‐<br />
cause it involves, among others, a specific study<br />
on the organizational culture of a local university<br />
that collectively bears part of a crucial common<br />
responsibility with other universities in helping<br />
<strong>to</strong> sustain Malaysia as a competitive nation in<br />
producing qualified and capable professionals<br />
through its training and educational system <strong>to</strong><br />
meet the increasing demands of Malaysia’s busi‐<br />
ness and industrial growth. In exploring further<br />
on how organizational culture may influence <strong>to</strong><br />
help achieve competitive advantage in an educa‐<br />
tional organization that produces qualified and<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
97
capable professionals <strong>to</strong> meet Malaysia’s indus‐<br />
try needs, it has been decided that the focus<br />
should be on a local technical university. Uni‐<br />
versity Kuala Lumpur (<strong>UniKL</strong>), that was founded<br />
through a national agenda <strong>to</strong> upgrade the status<br />
of technical education in Malaysia <strong>to</strong> a level that<br />
can help meet the needs of local industries and<br />
sustain Malaysia’s economic growth <strong>to</strong>wards a<br />
developed‐nation status by year 2020 is consid‐<br />
ered suitable for this study. A study of the or‐<br />
ganizational culture of <strong>UniKL</strong> was chosen be‐<br />
cause it is a good example of an educational or‐<br />
ganization that has managed <strong>to</strong> go through an<br />
organizational culture transformation from a<br />
traditional <strong>to</strong> a performance‐driven culture. It is<br />
t<strong>here</strong>fore most appropriate that lessons learnt<br />
from this transformation be shared for the bene‐<br />
fit of everyone.<br />
UNDERSTANDING OF HIGH PERFORMANCE<br />
CULTURE (HPC)<br />
Organizational Culture, in simple term, is the way<br />
organizational members do things in their or‐<br />
ganization. It is a system of shared meaning held<br />
by members that distinguishes the organization<br />
from other organizations (Robbins and Judge,<br />
2009). Culture drives an organization, its actions<br />
and results. It guides how employees think, act<br />
and feel. It is the "operating system" of the<br />
company, the organizational DNA. A perform‐<br />
ance culture is based on discipline. This disci‐<br />
pline promotes decisiveness and standards of<br />
excellence and ensures direct accountability.<br />
Such discipline is a main reason why commit‐<br />
ments and expectations are always clear. As<br />
such, high performance organization is one that<br />
gives more focus and commitment <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />
better results through a performance ‐ driven<br />
culture.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
MAKING HIGH PERFORMANCE CULTURE WORK<br />
Four basic fac<strong>to</strong>rs that contribute <strong>to</strong>wards making<br />
high performance culture works at <strong>UniKL</strong> have been<br />
identified. Although these fac<strong>to</strong>rs are commonly<br />
found in most organizations, it is appropriate that<br />
they are further elaborated for better understand‐<br />
ing. The fac<strong>to</strong>rs are as follows;<br />
Openness and trust:<br />
When t<strong>here</strong> is openness and trust, frankness<br />
prevails. Frankness is encouraged because it<br />
implies a willingness <strong>to</strong> speak the unspeakable.<br />
An environment of trust reduces defensiveness<br />
when issues are raised. People react more hon‐<br />
estly, ask questions more frequently, and are<br />
more spontaneous with their comments and<br />
ideas. The organization derives greater value<br />
from its talent, and employees get <strong>to</strong> develop<br />
their competence and contribute <strong>to</strong> success.<br />
Managed differences:<br />
Interpersonal differences result in conflicts. Con‐<br />
flicts are addressed and unfulfilled commitments<br />
are exposed. This results in better ability <strong>to</strong><br />
learn from the conflicts and take proactive action<br />
<strong>to</strong> correct potential differences. Alternatives and<br />
options are looked at without a pre‐determined<br />
outcome when people become less presumptu‐<br />
ous. People express real opinions and move be‐<br />
yond the perceived "safe talk." Issues can then<br />
be resolved more effectively.<br />
Simplicity and focus:<br />
Making things simple, less complex and being<br />
more focused ensures precise focus is directed<br />
<strong>to</strong>wards implementation of objectives with clar‐<br />
ity and precision that define what needs <strong>to</strong> be<br />
accomplished and how <strong>to</strong> accomplish it. T<strong>here</strong> is<br />
a commitment at all levels <strong>to</strong> remove, not add,<br />
complexity from the way of doing business. Be‐<br />
ing result‐driven and having fun are not seen as<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
98
mutually exclusive, but rather compatible and<br />
dependent on one another. Changes occur, as do<br />
positive results.<br />
Playing <strong>to</strong> people's strengths:<br />
Leaders know their people and effectively match<br />
talent and task. Matching talent and task helps<br />
reduce wasted talent. Overly talented people<br />
may however complement those less talented <strong>to</strong><br />
help in the smooth running of departments<br />
within <strong>UniKL</strong>. Leaders understand their people's<br />
strengths and how best <strong>to</strong> elicit these strengths<br />
from them. These organizational members focus<br />
more on building synergies, learning and build‐<br />
ing on strengths and opportunities that help re‐<br />
duce internal weaknesses and neutralizing exter‐<br />
nal threats rather than on merely closing gaps<br />
that may only help address current problems,<br />
not potential or future problems.<br />
CORE VALUES AND STANDARDS BEHAVIOR OF<br />
EXCELLENCE (SBE)<br />
Core values are the primary or dominant<br />
values that are accepted throughout the organi‐<br />
zation. In striving for high performance culture,<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong> had chosen a strong culture that has a<br />
greater impact on employee behavior. It is ob‐<br />
served that <strong>UniKL</strong>’s strong culture results in the<br />
organization’s core values being both intensely<br />
held and widely shared by organizational mem‐<br />
bers. Consistently, a strong culture can have a<br />
great influence on the behavior of its members<br />
because its high degree of sharing and intensity<br />
creates an internal climate of high behavioral<br />
control.<br />
The five (5) primary or dominant core values that<br />
are intensely held and widely shared by organ‐<br />
izational members throughout the organization<br />
are identified as commitment, integrity, team‐<br />
work, innovation and excellence. These core val‐<br />
ues form the basis for the performance appraisal<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
of organizational members with respect <strong>to</strong> the<br />
Key Performance Index (KPI) of <strong>UniKL</strong>. Under<br />
each core value <strong>UniKL</strong> further itemizes three (3)<br />
sub‐performance dimensions known as Stan‐<br />
dards Behavior of Excellence (SBE) that provides<br />
a measurement on a Scale of 1 <strong>to</strong> 5. Thus, the<br />
performance of every organizational member of<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong> can be measured and weaknesses cor‐<br />
rected <strong>to</strong> ensure that <strong>UniKL</strong>’s quest for high per‐<br />
formance culture organization can be achieved<br />
and maintained by its organizational members.<br />
The core values and their sub‐performance di‐<br />
mensions are as listed below;<br />
�� Commitment<br />
�� Punctual.<br />
�� Gets things done<br />
�� Delivers results<br />
�� Integrity<br />
�� Honest.<br />
�� Honors promises.<br />
�� Complies with rules and regula‐<br />
tions.<br />
�� Teamwork<br />
�� Cooperative.<br />
�� Provides support.<br />
�� Puts organization first<br />
�� Innovation<br />
�� Competitive.<br />
�� Generates and shares ideas.<br />
�� Makes things better<br />
�� Excellence<br />
�� Passionate.<br />
�� Performs beyond expectation.<br />
�� Strives <strong>to</strong> be the best<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
99
Commitment<br />
Table 1. Measurements for Commitment<br />
This core value refers <strong>to</strong> the willingness <strong>to</strong> do or<br />
act beyond the normal call of duty. Objectives<br />
are pursued until they are achieved. Organiza‐<br />
tional members shall never give up and shall<br />
overcome all obstacles or challenges <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />
the organizational objectives. Nothing less than<br />
success is acceptable. In other words, commit‐<br />
ment is not just the willingness <strong>to</strong> work due <strong>to</strong><br />
some form of motivation but rather the willing‐<br />
ness <strong>to</strong> do something for the love of doing it,<br />
for the joy and fun of doing it. The reward or<br />
satisfaction is when the job is completed with<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
the highest quality. Table 1 shows the meas‐<br />
urements for ‘Commitment’.<br />
Integrity<br />
This is a trait in us which makes us completely trust‐<br />
worthy in all situations, at all times and everyw<strong>here</strong>.<br />
A person with integrity will not succumb <strong>to</strong> tempta‐<br />
tions, carnal desires, self‐gratification or personal<br />
ambition. He values his honour more than anything<br />
else. Integrity is higher than ethics in that one may<br />
be ethical in office or home but not so outside the<br />
office or home. A person of integrity on the other<br />
hand will be ethical all the time, in all situations and<br />
everyw<strong>here</strong>. Table 2 shows the measurements for<br />
‘Integrity’.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
100
Table 2. Measurements for Integrity<br />
Table 3. Measurements for Teamwork<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
101
Teamwork<br />
This trait refers <strong>to</strong> the “I” versus “We”. A team<br />
player is selfless and is always concerned about<br />
the whole team rather than his own self. In‐<br />
deed, others are looked upon as either equals<br />
or even more important than his own self. A<br />
team player is usually more open‐minded,<br />
ready <strong>to</strong> acknowledge his own weaknesses in<br />
order <strong>to</strong> turn them in<strong>to</strong> strengths. One who<br />
cannot admit mistakes are either foolish, igno‐<br />
rant, arrogant or egoistic. Such people cannot<br />
be a team player, unless he or she is prepared<br />
<strong>to</strong> change. Table 3 shows the measurements<br />
for ‘Teamwork’.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Innovation<br />
Innovative spirit refers <strong>to</strong> a readiness <strong>to</strong> look for<br />
better ways of doing things. A better way could<br />
be a faster way or a cheaper way or more effi‐<br />
cient way of doing things. An innovative person<br />
is never satisfied with the status quo. He is not<br />
complacent and will always feel that the room<br />
for improvement is the largest in the world. One<br />
of Matsushita’s engineers <strong>to</strong>ld him that he could<br />
no longer improve the design of the face of the<br />
TV they were producing. Matsushita <strong>to</strong>ld him,<br />
“how come the human face can have billions of<br />
different features on much smaller size than the<br />
face of a TV. I am sure you can create new de‐<br />
signs given that the face of the TV is much bigger<br />
than the face of a human being”. Table 4 below<br />
shows the measurements for ‘Innovation’.<br />
Table 4. Measurements for Innovation<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
102
Table 5. Measurements for Excellence<br />
Excellence<br />
Excellence is the highest or the best quality one<br />
can achieve. According <strong>to</strong> a Hadith, the Holy<br />
Prophet was reported <strong>to</strong> have said, “Whatever<br />
you do, you must do well”. In other words, a<br />
Muslim cannot be doing anything that is not of<br />
high quality. Unfortunately, most often the qual‐<br />
ity of our work is always low. The Qur’an uses<br />
the word “al‐ihsan” <strong>to</strong> mean excellence which is<br />
higher than that required <strong>to</strong> be “just” or “fair”.<br />
Indeed, justice or fairness is the minimum stan‐<br />
dard that is required by the Qur’an. This is be‐<br />
cause Islam does not allow us <strong>to</strong> be unfair or un‐<br />
just. “To excel” means <strong>to</strong> ex<strong>to</strong>l the virtues of “al‐<br />
ihsan” which in one definition “<strong>to</strong> do something<br />
as though you see Allah, and since you cannot<br />
see Allah, know that He sees you”. Table 5 be‐<br />
low shows the measurements for ‘Excellence’.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
SUCCESS FACTOR OF HIGH PERFORMANCE<br />
CULTURE<br />
Success of High Performance Culture is attrib‐<br />
uted <strong>to</strong> the fact that when an organization has<br />
clearly articulated strategic intent and core val‐<br />
ues, along with disciplined people, it needs less<br />
hierarchy. When organizational members have<br />
disciplined thought, they need less bureaucracy.<br />
When they have disciplined action and strong<br />
leadership capability, they need less excessive<br />
controls. This is especially true with a reduced<br />
hierarchy within the organization of <strong>UniKL</strong>. The<br />
<strong>to</strong>p management is easily reachable by all organ‐<br />
izational members, more so in this era of im‐<br />
proved means of communication that brought<br />
about advances in Information and Communica‐<br />
tion technology.<br />
Although the organizational structure of <strong>UniKL</strong> is<br />
far from the flattened or contemporary structure<br />
commonly found in typical dynamic organiza‐<br />
tions, the structure itself creates less bureauc‐<br />
racy that requires less excessive controls. It is<br />
observed that the main fac<strong>to</strong>r contributing <strong>to</strong>‐<br />
wards the success of <strong>UniKL</strong> becoming a high per<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
103
Figure 1. <strong>UniKL</strong> transforming its traditional culture <strong>to</strong> a per‐<br />
formance‐driven culture<br />
formance culture organization is the transforma‐<br />
tion from its traditional culture <strong>to</strong>wards a per‐<br />
formance‐driven culture organization as charac‐<br />
terized by the following Figure 1.<br />
Looking at the attributes of a performance–<br />
driven culture a critical point that can be ob‐<br />
served is the focus on the external. Focusing on<br />
the external includes external stakeholders such<br />
as the cus<strong>to</strong>mers as well as own family mem‐<br />
bers. <strong>UniKL</strong>’s most important cus<strong>to</strong>mer, namely<br />
the students, is the actual drivers who drive or‐<br />
ganizational members <strong>to</strong> become high perform‐<br />
ance workers through the embrace of a positive<br />
work culture.<br />
The role of high‐performance workers would not<br />
be sustainable without balancing work and fam‐<br />
ily lives. Proper balancing of work and family<br />
lives by organizational members that is well sup‐<br />
ported by management helps sustain high per‐<br />
formance‐driven culture in the organization. On<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
the contrary, traditional organizational work cul‐<br />
ture would have focused on the internal, which<br />
is directed more <strong>to</strong>wards own self, while neglect‐<br />
ing important external stakeholders.<br />
Sourcing on issues concerning balancing work<br />
and family (Peter Berg et al., 2003) revealed that<br />
the culture of the workplace can have a signifi‐<br />
cant impact on the ability of workers <strong>to</strong> balance<br />
their work and family lives. The article further<br />
examined the effects of high‐performance work<br />
practices on workers’ views about whether the<br />
company helps them balance work and family.<br />
Based on previous surveys the article managed<br />
<strong>to</strong> show that a high‐commitment work environ‐<br />
ment characterized by high‐performance work<br />
practices and intrinsically rewarding jobs posi‐<br />
tively influences workers’ perceptions that the<br />
organization is helping them achieve this work<br />
and family balance. This finding is in line with<br />
what exists at <strong>UniKL</strong> with regards <strong>to</strong> work life<br />
balance, rewards and recognition.<br />
Like in any other organizational culture, making<br />
it succeed and maintaining its success would<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
104
have become a major issue without manage‐<br />
ment’s commitment with regards <strong>to</strong> rewards<br />
and recognition, and <strong>UniKL</strong> is no exception. Con‐<br />
versely, high performance culture comes with a<br />
conviction that without management’s commit‐<br />
ment with regards <strong>to</strong> rewards and recognition<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong> may not be able <strong>to</strong> sustain its high per‐<br />
formance‐driven culture.<br />
Evaluation of organizational members’ core val‐<br />
ues and overall performance measurements as<br />
translated through the organizational KPI results<br />
in the following rewards and benefits;<br />
�� Annual Increment<br />
�� Promotion<br />
�� Recognition & Awards<br />
�� Merit Increment<br />
�� Merit Performance Reward/Bonus<br />
�� Special Incentives , that include Umrah,<br />
Vacation, Training<br />
�� Retirement Benefits, that include golden<br />
handshake, gratuity, higher employer<br />
contribution of EPF<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
�� The change from <strong>UniKL</strong>’s traditional organ‐<br />
izational culture <strong>to</strong> a performance ‐ driven<br />
culture helps transform the university <strong>to</strong> be‐<br />
come a high performance culture organiza‐<br />
tion within a short period of time since in‐<br />
ception in 2002.<br />
�� Organizational sharing of shared values held<br />
by members helps distinguish it from other<br />
similar organizations that offer a wide range<br />
of engineering technology courses in the<br />
higher education sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />
�� High performance culture of <strong>UniKL</strong> is made<br />
possible by a strong commitment by mem‐<br />
bers <strong>to</strong> excel in whatever they aspire <strong>to</strong><br />
achieve. Strong commitment is reinforced<br />
through effective and transparent evaluation<br />
of organizational members’ core values and<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
overall performance measurements as trans‐<br />
lated through annual organizational KPI that<br />
results in fair rewards and benefits.<br />
�� Within the context of <strong>UniKL</strong>’s organizational<br />
members who ex<strong>to</strong>l the virtues of “al‐ihsan”<br />
which means “<strong>to</strong> do something as though<br />
you see Allah, and since you cannot see Al‐<br />
lah, know that He sees you” it implies that<br />
they are taking their commitment <strong>to</strong>wards<br />
their work <strong>to</strong> a spiritual level beyond nor‐<br />
mal ethical dimensions.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Berg, P., Kalleberg, A., and Appelbaum, E. (2003). Balanc‐<br />
ing Work and Family: The Role of High‐Commitment Envi‐<br />
ronments, Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol 42 Issue 2,<br />
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.<br />
2. Dimitrov, D. (2005). Cultural Differences for Organizational<br />
Learning and Training. International Journal of the Diver‐<br />
sity, Vol 5, No 4, Common Ground Publishing.<br />
3. Hofstede, G (1980a). Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills,<br />
CA: Sage<br />
4. Robbins, S.P and Judge, T.A.(2009). Organizational Behav‐<br />
ior. 13 th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, USA.<br />
5. Rchildress, J and Esenn, D. (2006). Secret of A Wining Cul‐<br />
ture: Building High‐Performance Teams. Prentice Hall,<br />
India.<br />
6. Xenikou, A and Simosi, M, (2006). Organizational Culture<br />
and Transformational Leadership as Predic<strong>to</strong>rs of Business<br />
Unit Performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol<br />
21 Issue 6, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
105
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 9<br />
TIME‐DOMAIN SIMULATION OF PNEUMATIC TRANSMISSION LINE<br />
MOHD YUZRI MOHD YUSOP*<br />
Deputy Dean Academic & Technology<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 28 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010; Revised: 2 November 2010; Accepted: 2 November 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Pneumatic equipment is widely used in industries for transferring energy or signal. Efficient modelling and simulation in<br />
time domain for gas filled transmission line is of great importance that will provide the foundation for complex pneu‐<br />
matic systems. The basic physical relationships in pneumatics are well established. In this paper, the finite difference<br />
model combined with the lumped model is used <strong>to</strong> simulate the dynamics of air filled polyurethane pneumatic transmis‐<br />
sion line in time domain. Compared with the experimental data, the simulation results show certain consistency, espe‐<br />
cially in the response frequency. The radial expansion of the transmission line due <strong>to</strong> high working pressure is also con‐<br />
sidered in the simulation algorithm.<br />
Keywords: Pneumatic, transmission line, time‐domain simulation, finite‐difference, lumped modelling.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In recent decade, t<strong>here</strong> has been great devel‐<br />
opments and interest in utilising pneumatic<br />
system as a transmission medium. Advan‐<br />
tages of pneumatic systems are that pneu‐<br />
matic components are relatively cheap reli‐<br />
able and can be easily and cheaply main‐<br />
tained. It is also much cleaner than hydraulic<br />
systems. However, the elastic nature of the<br />
compressed air will pose difficulties in achiev‐<br />
ing high accuracy control.<br />
T<strong>here</strong> are mature theories on steady state<br />
analysis of pneumatic systems but the dy‐<br />
namic analysis of pneumatic systems still re‐<br />
quires further research. Manning (1968) used<br />
the method of characteristics for pneumatic<br />
line flows. The perfect gas state equation and<br />
the isentropic relations, <strong>to</strong>gether with the<br />
perfect gas relation for sonic velocity are used<br />
<strong>to</strong> replace the density and pressure in the<br />
continuity and momentum equations by using<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909004<br />
Email address: myuzri@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
the velocity terms. For simplicity, the heat<br />
transfer, viscosity, three‐dimensional effects<br />
and local changes in entropy across travelling<br />
pressure waves are neglected. The determi‐<br />
nation of characteristic lines is the key point<br />
of this method. Separating the transmission<br />
line in<strong>to</strong> sections and treating each of them as<br />
a volume in time‐domain simulation has pre‐<br />
viously been investigated by Krus (1999) and<br />
(Xue and Yusop, 2005).<br />
Krus (1999) established the distributed model<br />
according <strong>to</strong> the state principle of thermody‐<br />
namics. (Xue and Yusop, 2005) meanwhile<br />
utilise the equation of flow passing through<br />
an orifice <strong>to</strong> calculate the mass flow rate.<br />
Considering the transmission line as an elec‐<br />
tric circuit, the time domain models were<br />
established by Franco (2004). This paper in‐<br />
vestigates the time domain simulation of a<br />
pneumatic transmission line. The one‐<br />
dimensional Navier‐S<strong>to</strong>kes equations are<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
106
used <strong>to</strong> model the pneumatic transmission line<br />
Tannehill et al. (1997), which combines the<br />
lumped model (Xue and Yusop, 2005) <strong>to</strong> simulate<br />
the air dynamics in the transmission line. The<br />
experiment set‐up is shown in Figure 1.<br />
Figure 1: Experiment Set‐Up<br />
The valve is opened until the transmission line<br />
reaches a steady state. The valve is then closed<br />
and the system is allowed <strong>to</strong> reach a different<br />
steady state. Pressure transducers are used <strong>to</strong><br />
record the pressure during this process. At the<br />
same time a mass flow meter is used <strong>to</strong> record<br />
the steady state mass flow rate. The simulation<br />
is then performed <strong>to</strong> verify the transient proc‐<br />
ess of the fluid in the transmission line after the<br />
valve is fully closed.<br />
The blocked transmission line is considered <strong>to</strong><br />
have N number of segments. Hence N numbers<br />
of pressure transducers are needed <strong>to</strong> capture<br />
the changes in air pressures along a 4m polyure‐<br />
thane pneumatic transmission line which has an<br />
internal diameter of 5.0mm and a thickness of<br />
1.5mm. The change in system temperature is not<br />
considered in this study and the temperature is<br />
assumed <strong>to</strong> be constant at an ambient tempera‐<br />
ture of 20°C. The change in transmission line di‐<br />
ameter due <strong>to</strong> high system pressure is consid‐<br />
ered during the simulation.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
MATHEMATICAL MODEL<br />
For a general three‐dimensional Navier‐S<strong>to</strong>kes<br />
equation, the following assumptions are made:<br />
1. The swirl of the working fluid in each cross sec‐<br />
tion along the transmission line is omitted.<br />
2. The change in fluid properties along the radial<br />
direction is omitted.<br />
3. Perfect gas is considered ‐<br />
The equations are then reduced <strong>to</strong> one‐dimensional<br />
format as follows:<br />
For continuity equation:<br />
��<br />
�<br />
�t<br />
�<br />
�x<br />
��u��0 x<br />
and for momentum equation:<br />
p � � RT<br />
w<strong>here</strong> ρ is the density, ux being the velocity<br />
along the axial direction, p is the pressure, R is<br />
the gas constant, T is the system temperature<br />
and μ is the dynamic viscosity.<br />
(1)<br />
(2)<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
107
In order <strong>to</strong> update the boundary conditions, the<br />
first and the last segments are considered as<br />
two volumes (Xue and Yuzri, 2005).<br />
The equation used <strong>to</strong> calculate the mass flow rate<br />
passing through the orifice is used, which is:<br />
M� � C � C � A � P<br />
d<br />
m<br />
w<strong>here</strong> the mass flow parameter is as shown below<br />
in equation (4).<br />
C<br />
m<br />
�<br />
d<br />
2�<br />
R<br />
���1� M d is the mass flow rate passing the orifice<br />
while Cd is the discharge coefficient. A is the ori‐<br />
fice cross‐sectional area, Pu is the upstream stag‐<br />
nation pressure (absolute), Tu is the upstream<br />
stagnation temperature (absolute), γ is the spe‐<br />
cific heat ratio and Pvc is the static pressure at the<br />
vena contracta or throat.<br />
�<br />
Equation 4 is only valid when<br />
Otherwise the flow is considered <strong>to</strong> be choked and<br />
Cm will be constant at a value of 0.0405. Note that<br />
the ratio of specific heats g for air is 1.4.<br />
EXPERIMENT AND SIMULATION<br />
u<br />
��<br />
P<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
��<br />
� P<br />
vc<br />
u<br />
T<br />
The transmission line diameter is first calibrated<br />
by experiment <strong>to</strong> determine the influence of the<br />
system pressure on<strong>to</strong> changes in its radial dimen‐<br />
sion. Highly incompressible liquid (water) is in‐<br />
jected in<strong>to</strong> a polyurethane transmission line<br />
which is blocked at one end. Different pressures<br />
are then applied <strong>to</strong> the other end. By recording<br />
changes in the liquid height, the transmission line<br />
u<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
2 �<br />
� P<br />
� �<br />
�<br />
� P<br />
��1� (3)<br />
(4)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
P<br />
vc<br />
vc<br />
u<br />
P<br />
s<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
� �<br />
� 0 . 528<br />
�<br />
�<br />
��<br />
diameter changes can then be determined. Ex‐<br />
periment results are listed in Table 1.<br />
Pressure [bar] Liquid Height [mm]<br />
Table 1: Transmission Line Diameter Calibrations<br />
It is assumed that the high pressure applied only ex‐<br />
pands the transmission line along the radial direction<br />
and do not influence the dimension along the axial<br />
direction. The initial volume occupied by the water is<br />
1.<br />
88<br />
�10<br />
m 3 . Based on the assumption above,<br />
the relationship between the applied pressure and<br />
the internal diameter of the transmission line is as<br />
shown in Figure 2.<br />
0 95.82<br />
1 94.46<br />
2 93.72<br />
3 92.32<br />
4 91.59<br />
5 90.85<br />
6 89.27<br />
7 88.37<br />
�6<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
108
Figure 2: Transmission Line Diameter Calibrations<br />
The relationship between the transmission line<br />
di‐ ameter and the<br />
�5 d � 3�10<br />
p � 0.<br />
005 applied pres‐<br />
sure is as shown in equation (5).<br />
(5)<br />
The valve is first opened until the transmission<br />
line reaches a steady state. N pressure trans‐<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
ducers are used <strong>to</strong> record pressures corre‐<br />
sponding <strong>to</strong> the N segments, and a mass flow<br />
meter is used <strong>to</strong> record air mass flow rate under<br />
the steady state condition. All these recorded<br />
values are then used as the system initial condi‐<br />
tions for the simulation. The transient pressure<br />
values recorded by the pressure transducers at<br />
different positions along the transmission line<br />
Figure 3: Experiment Results for Blocked Transmission<br />
Line (PT=Measured Pressure by Pressure Transducer)<br />
when the valve is closed are as shown in Figure<br />
3.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
109
� �<br />
��<br />
The dynamic viscosity in equa‐<br />
tion (2) can be presented as shown below:<br />
(6)<br />
w<strong>here</strong> ν is the kinematic viscosity.<br />
128 M�<br />
�p<br />
�<br />
�d<br />
�p<br />
d<br />
4<br />
l�<br />
Before the simulation is<br />
conducted, the kinematic viscosity needs <strong>to</strong> be<br />
determined and this is done by utilising equation<br />
(7) as shown below:<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
(7)<br />
Note that is the pressure drop along a segment, and<br />
l is the segment length.<br />
By means of measured steady state pressure values,<br />
the calculated kinematic viscosity ν is identified as<br />
0.00011m 2 /s.<br />
For solving the partial differential equations (1) and<br />
(2), the rational numerical discrete method is used.<br />
Here, upwind method is used <strong>to</strong> discretize the<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
110
PDE equations (1) and (2). Comparisons between<br />
simulation and experiment results are as shown in<br />
Figure 4.<br />
Figure 4: Comparisons between Simulation and Experiment<br />
Results (PS=Simulated Pressure)<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The transmission line diameter calibration experi‐<br />
ment shows that the relationship between the di‐<br />
ameter and the exerted pressure is close <strong>to</strong> linear.<br />
This is then applied <strong>to</strong> the simulation algorithm <strong>to</strong><br />
investigate the influence of the working pressure<br />
on the transmission line diameter expansion as<br />
shown in Figure 2.<br />
Figure 3 shows the pressure response in the<br />
transmission line after the valve is closed. When<br />
the valve is fully closed, the air will continue <strong>to</strong><br />
flow downstream of the transmission line due <strong>to</strong><br />
the presence of higher pressure and momentum<br />
at the upstream of the transmission line. T<strong>here</strong>‐<br />
fore the pressure downstream of the transmis‐<br />
sion line will continue <strong>to</strong> increase until it reaches<br />
a peak value at which the velocity downstream is<br />
close <strong>to</strong> zero. The fluid then starts <strong>to</strong> flow in the<br />
opposite direction in the transmission line since<br />
the pressure downstream is larger than the pres‐<br />
sure upstream. When the upstream pressure<br />
reaches new peak value, the fluid flows down‐<br />
stream again. This process repeats itself though<br />
the peak pressure values reached as the time<br />
progresses at different transmission line posi‐<br />
tions will gradually decreases due <strong>to</strong> the viscosity<br />
effect imposed on the travelling air. Finally, the<br />
system reaches a new steady state in which all<br />
the pressures along the transmission line arrived<br />
at a same constant value.<br />
A combined transmission line model is proposed<br />
in this paper. The simulation is based on the com‐<br />
bination of finite difference model McCloy (1980)<br />
and lumped model (Xue and Yusop, 2005). The<br />
lumped model is used <strong>to</strong> update the boundary<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
conditions, which is then applied <strong>to</strong> the first and<br />
the last segments. The parameters for the other<br />
segments are updated by means of finite differ‐<br />
ence model in the simulation algorithm.<br />
Simulation results show good consistency com‐<br />
pared with the experiment data especially in the<br />
pressure frequency response. The simulation re‐<br />
sults also show that the air in the transmission<br />
line <strong>to</strong>ok a longer time <strong>to</strong> reach a new steady<br />
state compared with the experiment results. This<br />
is due <strong>to</strong> the fact that perfect gas is assumed. Per‐<br />
fect gas assumes that the force between the at‐<br />
oms or molecules in the gas is negligible. The oc‐<br />
cupied volume of the a<strong>to</strong>ms or molecules in the<br />
gas is also omitted under perfect gas conditions.<br />
On the other hand, under real gas conditions, due<br />
<strong>to</strong> the existence of the aforementioned fac<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />
the influence of friction on the working fluid is<br />
larger. Furthermore when the a<strong>to</strong>ms or molecules<br />
in the air hit the blocked end of the transmission<br />
line with a certain momentum, some of these at‐<br />
oms or molecules are bounced back from the<br />
blocked end of the transmission line which is in<br />
the opposite direction of the air flow. The direct<br />
influence of this is a reduction in the <strong>to</strong>tal air en‐<br />
ergy and this result in an earlier dissipation of the<br />
pressure wave in the captured data compared <strong>to</strong><br />
the simulated results.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
A time domain model describing the dynamics of air<br />
in a pneumatic transmission line is presented by con‐<br />
sidering changes in air density, pressure and mass<br />
flow rate. The combined models are proposed <strong>to</strong><br />
simulate the dynamics of trapped air in a blocked<br />
transmission line. In order <strong>to</strong> update the boundary<br />
conditions, the first and the last segments are consid‐<br />
ered as two lumped volumes and these are then con‐<br />
nected <strong>to</strong> the transmission line segments using an<br />
orifice model. The transmission line segments are<br />
expressed by means of finite difference model. The<br />
effectiveness of the proposed model is depicted<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
111
through comparisons of simulated pressure re‐<br />
sponses against pressures measured by practical ex‐<br />
periments. The simulated results can be concluded <strong>to</strong><br />
be successful since it does match well with the cap‐<br />
tured experimental data though the simulated results<br />
show longer system transient state.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Franco, W. and Sorli, M. (2004). Time‐domain Models for<br />
Pneumatic Transmission Lines. Power Transmission and<br />
Motion Control (PTMC 2004). 257‐269.<br />
2. Krus, P. (1999). Distributed Modelling for Simulation<br />
of Pneumatic Systems. 4 th JHPS International Sympo‐<br />
sium. 443‐452.<br />
3. Manning, J.R. (1968). Computerized Method of Char‐<br />
acteristics Calculations for Unsteady Pneumatic Line<br />
Flows. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Basic<br />
Engineering. 231‐240.<br />
4. McCloy, D. (1980). Control of Fluid Power: Analysis<br />
and Design. 2 nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons.<br />
5. Tannehill, J.C., Anderson, D.A. and Pletcher, R.H.<br />
(1997). Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat<br />
Transfer. 2 nd Edition. Taylor & Francis.<br />
6. Xue Y. and Yusop M.Y.M. (2005). Time Domain Simula‐<br />
tion of Air Transmission Lines. 8 th International Sympo‐<br />
sium on Fluid Control, Measurement and Visualization<br />
(FLUCOME). Paper 277.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
112
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
Feature Article 10<br />
REQUIREMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAWS IN THE DESIGN AND CON‐<br />
STRUCTION OF A CHEMICAL TANKER<br />
AMINUDDIN MD AROF*, FIRDAUS TASNIM CHE PA, ISMAIL FAHMI JAMHURI, A’DLIN RAJA YAHYA<br />
Department of Marine & Design Technology<br />
BET Naval Architecture & Shipbuilding<br />
Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur<br />
Received: 28 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2010; Revised: 2 November 2010; Accepted: 2 November 2010<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A Chemical tanker is a ship that carries chemical products with a high degree of purity and corrosiveness. These types of<br />
cargoes are different from other cargoes in that they have a lot more potential for danger <strong>to</strong> men and the environment.<br />
Such dangers could include flammability, <strong>to</strong>xicity and corrosive properties of extreme nature. In order <strong>to</strong> reduce the risk<br />
of accident, ad<strong>here</strong>nce <strong>to</strong> safety regulations and practices is extremely important. In ensuring safety of chemical tankers<br />
at sea, ship builders and ship owners need <strong>to</strong> observe all legal requirements through various international conventions<br />
and codes that have been introduced by IMO <strong>to</strong> enable their ships meet the qualification for the award of a Certificate of<br />
Class for Hull and Machinery issued by recognized Classification Societies on behalf of their flag states.<br />
Keywords: IMO, SOLAS, MARPOL<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The industrial use of chemical grew<br />
massively as the wings of globalisation and<br />
trade spread over the past several decades.<br />
Since the sea surface is the only avenue for<br />
transporting goods in bulk quantities across<br />
the oceans, the trade of chemicals via the wa‐<br />
ter‐route is of vital importance for the indus‐<br />
try and global trade. Apart from the different<br />
types of ships, t<strong>here</strong> are ships which special‐<br />
ize in carrying dangerous chemicals and they<br />
are commonly known as chemical tankers. A<br />
Chemical tanker is a ship that carries chemical<br />
products with a high degree of purity and cor‐<br />
rosiveness. It is generally smaller than prod‐<br />
uct carriers and has many compartments<br />
within the cargo tank <strong>to</strong> enable the simulta‐<br />
neous transportation of various chemical<br />
products. Each cargo tank is composed of<br />
separate pipelines <strong>to</strong> prevent pollution of the<br />
cargo. These types of cargoes are different<br />
*Corresponding Author: Tel.: +605‐6909021<br />
Email address: aminuddin@mimet.unikl.edu.my<br />
from other cargoes in that they have a lot<br />
more potential for danger <strong>to</strong> men and the<br />
environment as compared <strong>to</strong> other cargoes.<br />
Such dangers could include flammability, <strong>to</strong>x‐<br />
icity and corrosive properties of extreme na‐<br />
ture. Hence, in order <strong>to</strong> reduce the risk of ac‐<br />
cident, a strict ad<strong>here</strong>nce <strong>to</strong> safety regula‐<br />
tions and practices is extremely important.<br />
Safety is the state or condition of being<br />
protected against physical, social, psychological,<br />
technical, economical or other types of conse‐<br />
quences of failure, damage, error or harm that<br />
may either affect human, things or the environ‐<br />
ment. Excellent safety of the ship, her crew and<br />
the marine environment starts with a good<br />
ship’s structural design. Different ships are sub‐<br />
jected <strong>to</strong> different risks and for a chemical<br />
tanker, the risk is very high.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
113
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRAINTS<br />
In ensuring safety of chemical tankers at<br />
sea, ship builders and ship owners need <strong>to</strong> ob‐<br />
serve all legal requirements imposed through<br />
various conventions and codes by the Interna‐<br />
tional Maritime Organization (IMO). This will en‐<br />
able their ships meet the qualification for the<br />
award of a certificate of Class for Hull and Ma‐<br />
chinery issued by designated classification socie‐<br />
ties. The IMO divides chemical tanker in<strong>to</strong> three<br />
(3) groups namely vessels designed <strong>to</strong> carry the<br />
most hazardous cargo; vessels designed <strong>to</strong> carry<br />
less hazardous cargo than the first; and the ves‐<br />
sels designed <strong>to</strong> carry the least hazardous chemi‐<br />
cals (ICS, 2002). Among IMO’s conventions, the<br />
International Convention for the Prevention of<br />
Pollution from Ships, 1973 (MARPOL) and the<br />
International Convention for the Safety of Life at<br />
Sea, 1974 (SOLAS) are the most important trea‐<br />
ties implemented <strong>to</strong> ensure the safety of chemi‐<br />
cal tankers.<br />
The main criterion for the safety of a<br />
chemical tanker is the ship needs <strong>to</strong> be con‐<br />
structed in double hull. MARPOL was amended<br />
in 1992 <strong>to</strong> make manda<strong>to</strong>ry for tankers of 5,000<br />
dead‐weight‐<strong>to</strong>nnes (DWT) and above <strong>to</strong> be fit‐<br />
ted with a double hull after July 1993. Double<br />
hull is a hull design and construction method<br />
w<strong>here</strong> the bot<strong>to</strong>m and sides of the ship have two<br />
complete layers of watertight hull surface. The<br />
outer layer acts as the normal hull of the ship,<br />
and the inner hull forms a redundant barrier <strong>to</strong><br />
seawater in case the outer hull is damaged.<br />
Figure 1: Different types of Hull<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
The space in between the two hull layers is<br />
often used as s<strong>to</strong>rage tanks for fuel or ballast water.<br />
Double hulls are a more extensive safety measure<br />
than double bot<strong>to</strong>ms, which have two hull layers<br />
only at the bot<strong>to</strong>m of the ship and not the sides. In<br />
low energy casualties, double hulls can prevent<br />
flooding beyond the penetrated compartment.<br />
MARPOL Annex 1 Chapter 4 Regulation 14 had in‐<br />
troduced the requirement <strong>to</strong> have segregated bal‐<br />
last tanks for all tankers. This means that the ballast<br />
tanks which are empty when carrying the cargo and<br />
only loaded with ballast water for the return leg<br />
must be positioned w<strong>here</strong> the impact of collision<br />
likely <strong>to</strong> be the greatest. The ship should also be<br />
included with cofferdam type segregation or bulk‐<br />
head of the sandwich type. The sandwich type bulk‐<br />
head between two adjoining tanks must be at least<br />
760 mm but are usually broader <strong>to</strong> make it practical<br />
for human entry.<br />
Class 1 vessels need <strong>to</strong> be constructed with<br />
the emphasis on the prevention of cargo escaping<br />
as a result of collision or stranding. The construction<br />
specification requires all cargo tanks <strong>to</strong> be shielded<br />
by ballast tank, double bot<strong>to</strong>m and cofferdams. As a<br />
result, actual cargo tank bulkheads are protected by<br />
void spaces or other tanks. Stability is also taken<br />
in<strong>to</strong> account as a result of flooding of one or more<br />
wing tanks or void spaces as a result or standing.<br />
Vessels in Class 2 must be designed along similar<br />
lines, but the criterion is less stringent in some ar‐<br />
eas. Vessels in Class 3 are judged <strong>to</strong> carry cargo<br />
which is less hazardous and are currently not re‐<br />
quired <strong>to</strong> have an inner and outer skin as in Class 1<br />
and 2. The main restriction<br />
appears <strong>to</strong> be the limited<br />
dimensions of any one cargo<br />
tank. New vessels over 5000<br />
DWT are required <strong>to</strong> have<br />
double hulls.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
114
Since chemical products have high pu‐<br />
rity and corrosiveness, corrosion protection and<br />
prevention is very important. The popular types<br />
of chemical tanker plate material is made from<br />
special types of stainless steel with a high resis‐<br />
tant <strong>to</strong> corrosion from acid. Stainless steel used<br />
for bulkheads can be solid stainless steel or mild<br />
steel clad with stainless steel. Rubber is some‐<br />
times used <strong>to</strong> line tanks carrying products<br />
mainly acids, which are unsuitable for use with<br />
stainless steel or coating. Zinc silicate is fre‐<br />
quently used in tanks designed <strong>to</strong> carry alcohol<br />
as well as some types of solvents and other<br />
chemicals. It is necessary <strong>to</strong> inspect zinc coated<br />
bulkhead after they have been dried <strong>to</strong> ensure<br />
the coating has not been softened or otherwise<br />
damaged.<br />
The requirement for coating application<br />
is under MARPOL Annex II (Regulations for the<br />
Control of Pollution by Noxious Liquid Sub‐<br />
stances). Before coating application, the steel<br />
temperature and relative air humidity in the tank<br />
are two basic fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> observe in ensuring the<br />
correct coating application. The application of<br />
coating starts from the bot<strong>to</strong>m of the tank <strong>to</strong> the<br />
ceiling, because during application the evapo‐<br />
rated solvents may flow <strong>to</strong> the bot<strong>to</strong>m of the<br />
tank. Hence, the air in the tank is both renewed<br />
and dehumidified <strong>to</strong> keep clean atmosp<strong>here</strong> and<br />
steady temperature and humidity conditions.<br />
Figure 2: Application of coating<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
The sequence of coating application also plays an<br />
important rule. If we consider a coating system of<br />
two parts (2 coatings), then we should apply the<br />
first coating <strong>to</strong> all tank surfaces for a specific dry<br />
film thickness. At this stage, as we approach the<br />
ceiling we must cover the tank bot<strong>to</strong>m <strong>to</strong> avoid any<br />
overspray.<br />
Figure 3: Coating application sequence<br />
Some cargoes are required <strong>to</strong> be carried at<br />
certain temperatures. For that reason, heating coils<br />
are installed in the cargo tanks <strong>to</strong> keep the cargo at<br />
the required temperature. The heating substance is<br />
oil or water coming from a heat exchanger, so en‐<br />
able the cargo <strong>to</strong> be carried at a desired range of<br />
temperatures (ExxonMobil, 2002). Chemical tankers<br />
must have a system for tank heating in order <strong>to</strong><br />
maintain the viscosity of certain cargoes. Typically<br />
this system consists of a boiler which pumps pres‐<br />
surized steam through so‐called “heating coils”<br />
made from stainless steel pipes in the cargo tanks,<br />
thus transferring heat in<strong>to</strong> the cargo, which circu‐<br />
lates in the tank by convection.<br />
In SOLAS Chapter II‐2, Regulation 4 Para‐<br />
graph 5.5, tankers are also required <strong>to</strong> be fitted with<br />
an inert gas system. With the inert gas system, the<br />
protection against a tank explosion is achieved by<br />
keeping the oxygen content low. It will reduce the<br />
hydrocarbon gas concentration of tank atmosp<strong>here</strong><br />
<strong>to</strong> a safe proportion. The problem is that impurities<br />
such as carbon and moisture are normally present<br />
in flue gases and it is difficult <strong>to</strong> use a conventional<br />
inert gas system with some chemical.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
115
Figure 4 : Typical arrangement of Inert Gas System<br />
Besides that, IMO also introduced emer‐<br />
gency <strong>to</strong>wing arrangement <strong>to</strong> enable vessels <strong>to</strong><br />
be operated and controlled in cases of mechani‐<br />
cal failures. Under SOLAS Chapter II‐1, Regulation<br />
3‐4, as for any other ships, navigational equip‐<br />
ment of tankers needs <strong>to</strong> be duplicated. All new<br />
tankers of 20,000 DWT and above have <strong>to</strong> be<br />
fitted with an emergency <strong>to</strong>wing arrangement<br />
fitted at both end of the ships.<br />
Figure 5: Emergency <strong>to</strong>wing arrangements<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
In ensuring the safety of personnel and<br />
navigation, personal life saving appliances and radio<br />
communication system are very important. Under<br />
SOLAS Chapter 3 Part B, t<strong>here</strong> is a requirement for<br />
at least one lifebuoy on each side of the ship <strong>to</strong> be<br />
fitted with a buoyant lifeline equal in length <strong>to</strong> not<br />
less than twice the height at which it is s<strong>to</strong>wed<br />
above the waterline at any time or 30 meters,<br />
whichever is greater. Not less than half of the life‐<br />
buoys must have self‐igniting<br />
lights, not less than two of which<br />
must be provided with self activat‐<br />
ing smoke signals which must be<br />
capable of quick release from navi‐<br />
gating bridge. Besides that, a suf‐<br />
ficient number of survival craft<br />
shall be carried for persons on‐<br />
board and must be placed at areas<br />
that are readily accessible. En‐<br />
closed lifeboat must be provided<br />
and for all chemical tanker. Life‐<br />
boats must be equipped with self‐<br />
contained air support system (if<br />
the cargo emits <strong>to</strong>xic gases). In addition, these life‐<br />
boats must afford protection against fire for at least<br />
eight minutes (w<strong>here</strong> the cargo is flammable).<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
116
Figure 6: Enclosed life boat with self contained air support<br />
system<br />
For safety of navigation, installation of<br />
radio communication equipment is important.<br />
At least three (3) two‐way VHF radiotelephone<br />
apparatus shall be provided on every cargo ship<br />
of 500 gross <strong>to</strong>nnage and upwards. Furthermore,<br />
ships also need <strong>to</strong> be fitted with a Global Mari‐<br />
time Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) for the<br />
purpose of providing a maritime mobile service<br />
identity. In this case, INMARSAT identity and<br />
ship’s serial number may be transmitted by the<br />
ship’s equipment and used <strong>to</strong> identify the ship in<br />
emergency situation (SOLAS Regulation 2).<br />
Figure 7: Layout cargo pump‐room with carbon dioxide fire‐<br />
extinguishing system<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
A chemical tanker is a vessel that has high<br />
risk of explosion. Chemical tanker Kemal Ka suffered<br />
explosion on board on 13 th June 2010, 13 nautical<br />
miles off Almedina, near Chipiona and on 29 th Feb‐<br />
ruary 2004, a chemical tanker The Bow Mariner<br />
sinks after an explosion off the coast of Virginia. As<br />
a result, under SOLAS Chapter II‐2 Regulation 7, fire<br />
detection and alarm system must be installed in the<br />
tanker especially at places periodically unattended<br />
such as machinery spaces, the main propulsion and<br />
associated machinery. Smoke detec<strong>to</strong>r should be<br />
fitted at all stairways, corridors and escape routes.<br />
Under regulation 10, ships constructed on or after<br />
1 st July 2002, are required <strong>to</strong> be fitted with suitable<br />
fire fighting systems that can be operated from a<br />
readily accessible position outside the pump‐room.<br />
Cargo pump‐rooms shall be provided with a system<br />
suitable for machinery spaces for ships in category<br />
A. In this case, a carbon dioxide (CO2) fire‐<br />
extinguishing system complying with the provisions<br />
of the Fire Safety Systems Code, such as the alarms<br />
giving audible warning of the release of fire extin‐<br />
guishing medium shall be safe for use in a flamma‐<br />
ble cargo vapour/air mixture. A notice shall be ex‐<br />
hibited at the controls stating that, due <strong>to</strong> the elec‐<br />
trostatic ignition hazard, the system is <strong>to</strong> be used<br />
only for fire extinguishing and not for inerting pur‐<br />
poses. The extin‐<br />
guishing method of<br />
CO2 gas is based on<br />
the reduction of the<br />
oxygen level in air <strong>to</strong><br />
a certain level of CO2<br />
concentration. Com‐<br />
bustion cannot be<br />
sustained in an at‐<br />
mosp<strong>here</strong> containing<br />
a minimum of 34% of<br />
CO2.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
117
When transporting a bulk cargo which is<br />
liable <strong>to</strong> emit a <strong>to</strong>xic or flammable gas, or cause<br />
oxygen depletion in the cargo space, an appro‐<br />
priate instrument for measuring the concentra‐<br />
tion of gas or oxygen in the air shall be provided<br />
<strong>to</strong>gether with detailed instructions for its use<br />
(SOLAS Chapter 6, Regulation 3). In Chapter VII of<br />
SOLAS (Carriage of Dangerous Goods) the chemi‐<br />
cal tanker which carries dangerous and hazard‐<br />
ous cargoes are required <strong>to</strong> carry an appropriate<br />
document as evidence of such compliance. The<br />
document of compliance is normally issued by a<br />
classification society at the same time as the<br />
safety equipment certificate is issued.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
In a nutshell, each class of vessel needs<br />
special requirements due <strong>to</strong> its unique opera‐<br />
tion. All safety requirements are very important<br />
in the process of designing any ship. This is <strong>to</strong><br />
ensure the vessels <strong>to</strong> be in seaworthy condition<br />
and safe for navigation as well as <strong>to</strong> avoid any<br />
threat either <strong>to</strong> the crew or goods being carried.<br />
The rules and regulations are made after de‐<br />
tailed examinations on the causes of previous<br />
accidents at sea. However, these conventions<br />
are soft laws and only impose minimum require‐<br />
ments. Flag states, port states, ship classification<br />
societies and other law enforcement bodies will<br />
then enforce their regulations after adopting the<br />
conventions in<strong>to</strong> their own laws or standards.<br />
Shipowners will strive <strong>to</strong> minimize cost and maxi‐<br />
mise profit in the operation of chemical tankers<br />
and other vessels. The various legal require‐<br />
ments imposed by IMO will in<strong>here</strong>ntly result in<br />
higher acquisition and operating costs. Neverthe‐<br />
less, the safety assurance provided by the imple‐<br />
mentation of the various provisions from the<br />
IMO conventions should never be underesti‐<br />
mated.<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Baptist, C. (2000), Tanker Handbook for Deck Officers,<br />
8th Edition, Brown, Son & Ferguson Ltd, Glasgow.<br />
2. ExxonMobil (2002), Marine Environmental & Safety<br />
Criteria for Industry Vessels in Exxonmobil Service,<br />
Exxonmobil.<br />
3. IMO (2004), SOLAS, Consolidated Edition, IMO<br />
Publication, London.<br />
4. IMO (2006), MARPOL, Consolidated Edition,<br />
IMOPublication, London.<br />
5. ICS (2002), Tanker Safety Guide Chemicals, Third<br />
Edition, International Chamber of Shipping, London.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
118
UNIKL <strong>MIMET</strong> AND ALAM SHIP MANAGEMENT SDN BHD (ASMSB)<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
RESEARCH COLLABORATION<br />
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 21 ST JUNE 2010<br />
<strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong> and Alam Ship Management Sdn Bhd (ASMSB) Collaboration lead <strong>to</strong> the first<br />
Steering Committee Meeting that was attended by nine <strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong> representatives and<br />
seven from ASMSB. Two project titles were proposed: Ship Control and Moni<strong>to</strong>ring System<br />
(SCAMS) and Testing and Commissioning (T&C) System. Project Technical Team was<br />
formed and the MOU contents were reviewed during the meeting. Progress follow up was<br />
done through the Project Meeting on the 1 st August 2010 w<strong>here</strong>by <strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong> validated<br />
the SCAMS system and on the 18 th August 2010 <strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong> reviewed the documents<br />
provided by ASMSB.<br />
R & D ACTIVITIES<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
119
PLASTIC TECHNOLOGY CENTER,<br />
SIRIM HEADQUARTERS, S.ALAM<br />
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
INDUSTRIAL VISIT<br />
R & D ACTIVITIES<br />
10 TH AUGUST 2010<br />
Industrial visit <strong>to</strong> Plastic Technology Centre, SIRIM Head Quarters in Shah Alam on the 10 th August<br />
2010 is <strong>to</strong> discuss the possibilities of utilizing Rice Husk Bio‐Composite material as an alternative<br />
<strong>to</strong> natural wood for marine application. <strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong> delegations consist of Deputy Dean, Dr.<br />
Mohd. YuzriMohdYusop, R&D Coordina<strong>to</strong>r, Mrs. NurshahnawalYaacob and three other lecturers,<br />
Mr. Asmawi Abdul Malik, Mr. ZulzamriSalleh and Mrs. SyajaratunnurYaakup given the opportunity<br />
<strong>to</strong> observe the production of the Rice Husk Bio‐Composite material and made a conclusion on ex‐<br />
ploring further of the bio panel (in terms of capability and durability) in marine application espe‐<br />
cially on wooden boat building and composite boat building.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
120
<strong>MIMET</strong> Technical Bulletin Volume 1 (2) 2010<br />
CALL FOR PAPERS<br />
To inculcate the research culture amongst academics, Universiti Kuala Lumpur Malaysian Institute of Marine Engineering<br />
Technology (<strong>UniKL</strong> <strong>MIMET</strong>) is publishing the Marine Frontier@<strong>UniKL</strong> Research Bulletin. For a start, the bulletin will<br />
be published four times a year, in January, April, July and Oc<strong>to</strong>ber. Original research papers, which have not been published<br />
or currently being considered for publication elsew<strong>here</strong>, will be considered.<br />
Accepted Types of Research<br />
The papers accepted for the bulletins must be based on any of the following types of research:<br />
�� Basic research (pure basic research and strategic basic research)<br />
�� Applied research<br />
�� Experimental development<br />
�� Critical review<br />
Pure basic research is experimental and theoretical work undertaken <strong>to</strong> acquire new knowledge without looking for<br />
long-terms benefits other than advancement of knowledge.<br />
Strategic basic research is experimental and theoretical work undertaken <strong>to</strong> acquire new knowledge directed in<strong>to</strong><br />
specified broad areas in the expectation of useful discoveries. It provides the broad base of knowledge necessary for<br />
the solution of recognised practical problems.<br />
Applied research is original work undertaken primarily <strong>to</strong> acquire new knowledge with a specific application in view. It<br />
is undertaken either <strong>to</strong> determine possible use for the findings of basic research or <strong>to</strong> determine new ways of achieving<br />
some specific and predetermined objectives.<br />
Experimental development is systematic work, using existing knowledge gained from research or practical experience<br />
that is directed <strong>to</strong> producing new materials, products or devices, <strong>to</strong> installing new processes, systems and services, or<br />
<strong>to</strong> improving substantially those already produced or installed.<br />
Critical review is a comprehensive preview and critical analysis of existing literature. It must also propose a unique<br />
lens, framework or model that helps understand specific body of knowledge or address specific research issues.<br />
Condition of Acceptance<br />
The edi<strong>to</strong>rial board considers all papers on the condition that:<br />
�� They are original<br />
�� The authors hold the property or copyright of the paper<br />
�� They have not been published already<br />
�� They are not under consideration for publication elsew<strong>here</strong>, nor in press elsew<strong>here</strong><br />
�� They use non-discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry language<br />
�� The use of proper English (except for manuscripts written in Bahasa Melayu-applicable for selective only)<br />
All papers must be typed on A4 size page using Microsoft Words. The complete paper must be approximately 3, 000 <strong>to</strong><br />
7, 000 words long (excluding references and appendixes). The format is described in detail in the next section.<br />
All papers are reviewed by the edi<strong>to</strong>rial board and evaluated according <strong>to</strong>:<br />
�� Originality<br />
�� Significance in contributing new knowledge<br />
�� Technical adequacy<br />
�� Appropriateness for the bulletin<br />
�� Clarity of presentation<br />
All papers will be directed <strong>to</strong> the appropriate team and/or track. The papers will be reviewed by reviewer(s) and/or<br />
edi<strong>to</strong>r. All review comments and suggestions should be addressed in the final submission if the paper is accepted for<br />
publication, copyright is transferred <strong>to</strong> the bulletin.<br />
Please submit your paper directly <strong>to</strong> the Chief Edi<strong>to</strong>r- drmansor@mimet.unikl.edu.my or the Executive Edi<strong>to</strong>r-<br />
myuzri@mimet.unikl.edu.my for publication in the next issue of the Marine Frontier@<strong>UniKL</strong>.<br />
| MARINE FRONTIER @ <strong>UniKL</strong><br />
121